Pineapple Energy Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
|
|
|
UNITED STATES |
||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
||
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORM 10-Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark One) |
|
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period from _______________________________ to _______________________________ |
|
|
|
Commission File Number: |
001-31588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. |
||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
|
|
|
|
MINNESOTA |
41-0957999 |
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of |
(Federal Employer |
|
|
incorporation or organization) |
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10900 Red Circle Drive, Minnetonka, MN |
55343 |
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
|
(952) 996-1674 |
||
Registrants telephone number, including area code |
||
|
||
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO o
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o Smaller Reporting Company x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. YES o NO x
|
|
|
|
|
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS: |
||||
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. |
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
Name of Exchange |
|
Outstanding at August 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value |
|
NASDAQ |
|
8,398,692 |
$.05 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part I. Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS |
|
|
|
2
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,073,784 |
|
$ |
21,293,448 |
|
Investments |
|
|
17,284,937 |
|
|
11,236,940 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $411,000 and $505,000, respectively |
|
|
17,257,528 |
|
|
15,042,411 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
25,736,043 |
|
|
24,598,317 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
337,274 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
602,140 |
|
|
884,555 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,051,981 |
|
|
3,574,501 |
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
77,006,413 |
|
|
76,967,446 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net |
|
|
13,207,104 |
|
|
13,321,825 |
|
OTHER ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
8,652,236 |
|
|
7,538,903 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,560,217 |
|
|
4,560,217 |
|
Prepaid pensions |
|
|
364,617 |
|
|
399,743 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
119,906 |
|
|
125,560 |
|
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
13,696,976 |
|
|
12,624,423 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
103,910,493 |
|
$ |
102,913,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
385,844 |
|
$ |
372,926 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,539,353 |
|
|
4,986,028 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
2,928,151 |
|
|
4,855,899 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,455,836 |
|
|
1,370,105 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
943,749 |
|
|
0 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
1,259,447 |
|
|
1,169,040 |
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
11,512,380 |
|
|
12,753,998 |
|
|
|||||||
LONG TERM LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term compensation plans |
|
|
1,541,187 |
|
|
887,210 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
756,045 |
|
|
723,534 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
285,343 |
|
|
208,111 |
|
Long term debt - mortgage payable |
|
|
2,205,342 |
|
|
2,401,548 |
|
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
|
4,787,917 |
|
|
4,220,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share; 3,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.05 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 8,396,310 and 8,352,883 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
419,815 |
|
|
417,644 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
34,215,438 |
|
|
33,641,510 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
53,324,009 |
|
|
52,007,261 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
(349,066 |
) |
|
(127,122 |
) |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
87,610,196 |
|
|
85,939,293 |
|
|
|||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
103,910,493 |
|
$ |
102,913,694 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales from operations |
|
$ |
30,658,824 |
|
$ |
28,584,399 |
|
$ |
56,540,835 |
|
$ |
55,349,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
17,374,816 |
|
|
17,934,303 |
|
|
32,741,766 |
|
|
34,919,816 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
9,092,085 |
|
|
7,882,388 |
|
|
17,486,881 |
|
|
15,885,197 |
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
26,466,901 |
|
|
25,816,691 |
|
|
50,228,647 |
|
|
50,805,013 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
4,191,923 |
|
|
2,767,708 |
|
|
6,312,188 |
|
|
4,544,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and other income |
|
|
46,802 |
|
|
280,245 |
|
|
85,425 |
|
|
490,782 |
|
(Loss) gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(15,040 |
) |
|
24,041 |
|
|
(8,620 |
) |
|
32,672 |
|
Interest and other expense |
|
|
(55,961 |
) |
|
(57,703 |
) |
|
(108,451 |
) |
|
(116,795 |
) |
Other (loss) income, net |
|
|
(24,199 |
) |
|
246,583 |
|
|
(31,646 |
) |
|
406,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,167,724 |
|
|
3,014,291 |
|
|
6,280,542 |
|
|
4,951,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,752,395 |
|
|
1,265,910 |
|
|
2,534,289 |
|
|
1,979,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
2,415,329 |
|
|
1,748,381 |
|
|
3,746,253 |
|
|
2,971,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability adjustments |
|
|
88,882 |
|
|
(240,238 |
) |
|
(13,580 |
) |
|
(228,278 |
) |
Unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securitie |
|
|
(16,520 |
) |
|
66,775 |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
66,775 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(1,613 |
) |
|
557,799 |
|
|
(209,845 |
) |
|
484,080 |
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
70,749 |
|
|
384,336 |
|
|
(221,944 |
) |
|
322,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive net income |
|
$ |
2,486,078 |
|
$ |
2,132,717 |
|
$ |
3,524,309 |
|
$ |
3,293,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
$ |
.29 |
|
$ |
.21 |
|
$ |
.45 |
|
$ |
.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
$ |
.29 |
|
$ |
.21 |
|
$ |
.45 |
|
$ |
.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Basic Shares Outstanding |
|
|
8,373,799 |
|
|
8,343,262 |
|
|
8,365,382 |
|
|
8,330,093 |
|
Average Dilutive Shares Outstanding |
|
|
8,399,720 |
|
|
8,350,628 |
|
|
8,394,504 |
|
|
8,335,162 |
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
.15 |
|
$ |
.12 |
|
$ |
.29 |
|
$ |
.24 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Cumulative |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
8,352,883 |
|
$ |
417,644 |
|
$ |
33,641,510 |
|
$ |
52,007,261 |
|
$ |
(127,122 |
) |
$ |
85,939,293 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,746,253 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,746,253 |
|
Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
321 |
|
|
76,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,788 |
|
Issuance of common stock to Employee Stock Ownership Plan |
|
|
36,995 |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
458,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
460,218 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,093 |
|
Shareholder dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,429,505 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,429,505 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(221,944 |
) |
$ |
(221,944 |
) |
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2010 |
|
|
8,396,310 |
|
$ |
419,815 |
|
$ |
34,215,438 |
|
$ |
53,324,009 |
|
$ |
(349,066 |
) |
$ |
87,610,196 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,746,253 |
|
$ |
2,971,313 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
978,026 |
|
|
814,454 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
39,093 |
|
|
31,571 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(400,248 |
) |
|
(514,079 |
) |
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
8,620 |
|
|
(32,672 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from stock based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(2,253,333 |
) |
|
416,903 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(1,192,560 |
) |
|
1,736,690 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
337,274 |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
285,577 |
|
|
355,195 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(430,378 |
) |
|
1,865,747 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
(813,553 |
) |
|
495,280 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
88,977 |
|
|
(5,919 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
976,260 |
|
|
633,348 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,370,008 |
|
|
8,767,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(895,485 |
) |
|
(2,318,124 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(14,390,147 |
) |
|
(21,758,065 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets |
|
|
11,883 |
|
|
41,536 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of investments |
|
|
7,230,299 |
|
|
7,229,000 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(8,043,450 |
) |
|
(16,805,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(2,339,098 |
) |
|
(1,995,656 |
) |
Mortgage principal payments |
|
|
(183,288 |
) |
|
(171,221 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
76,788 |
|
|
66,821 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
650 |
|
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(26,125 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,445,598 |
) |
|
(2,125,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
|
|
(100,624 |
) |
|
217,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(9,219,664 |
) |
|
(9,946,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
21,293,448 |
|
|
29,951,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
12,073,784 |
|
$ |
20,004,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
1,619,958 |
|
$ |
1,860,422 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
103,753 |
|
|
115,889 |
|
Dividends declared not paid |
|
|
1,259,447 |
|
|
1,168,154 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of business
Communications
Systems, Inc. (herein collectively called CSI, our or the Company) is a
Minnesota corporation organized in 1969 which operates directly and through its
subsidiaries located in the United States, Costa Rica, the United Kingdom and
China. CSI is principally engaged through its Suttle and Austin Taylor business
units in the manufacture and sale of modular connecting and wiring devices for
voice and data communications, digital subscriber line filters, and structured
wiring systems and through its Transition Networks business unit in the
manufacture of media and rate conversion products for telecommunications
networks. CSI also provides through its JDL Technologies (JDL) business unit
IT solutions including network design, computer infrastructure installations,
IT service management, change management, network security and network
operations services.
Financial statement presentation
The condensed consolidated balance sheets and
consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity as of June 30, 2010
and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 have been prepared by Company management. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring
adjustments except where noted) necessary to present fairly the financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows at June 30, 2010 and 2009 and
for the periods then ended have been made.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. We recommend these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys December 31, 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the periods ended June 30 are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year.
The presentation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The estimates and assumptions used in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are based upon managements evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the time of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Except to the extent updated or described below, the significant accounting policies set forth in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of accounting policies, and are incorporated herein by reference.
7
Cash equivalents and investments
For purposes of the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $12.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. Of this amount, $1.9 million was invested in short-term money market funds that are not considered to be bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or other government agency. These money market funds seek to preserve the value of the investment at $1.00 per share; however, it is possible to lose money investing in these funds.
The remainder of the Companys cash and cash equivalents is deposited at banks. The FDIC insures deposits at banks up to $250,000 per account. The Companys cash and cash equivalent are held at large, well-established financial institutions and the Company believes any risk associated with uninsured balances is remote.
The Company had $25.9 million in investments which consist of certificates of deposit that were purchased in the public markets and are classified as available-for-sale at June 30, 2010. Of the $25.9 million in investments, $17.3 million mature in 12 months or less and are classified as current assets. Available-for-sale investments are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses net of tax excluded from operations and reported as a separate component of stockholders equity (See Comprehensive income below).
Revenue Recognition
The Companys manufacturing operations (Suttle, Transition Networks and Austin Taylor) recognize revenue when the earnings process is complete, evidenced by persuasive evidence of an agreement, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized for domestic and international sales at the shipping point or delivery to customers, based on the related shipping terms. Risk of loss transfers at the point of shipment or delivery to customers, and the Company has no further obligation after this time. Sales are made directly to customers and through distributors. Payment terms for distributors are consistent with the terms of the Companys direct customers. The Company records a provision for sale returns, sales incentives and warranty costs at the time of the sale based on historical experience and current trends.
JDL generally records revenue on hardware, software and related equipment sales and installation contracts when the revenue recognition criteria are met and products are installed and accepted by customer. JDL records revenue on service contracts on a straight-line basis over the contract period, unless evidence suggests the revenue is earned in a different pattern. Each contract is individually reviewed to determine when the earnings process is complete.
Comprehensive income
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
||
Foreign currency translation |
|
$ |
(1,299,605 |
) |
$ |
(1,089,760 |
) |
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale investments |
|
|
35,283 |
|
|
33,802 |
|
Minimum pension liability |
|
|
915,256 |
|
|
928,836 |
|
|
|
$ |
(349,066 |
) |
$ |
(127,122 |
) |
NOTE 2 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Common shares are reserved in connection with the Companys 1992 Stock Plan under which 2,500,000 shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock or deferred stock granted to officers and key employees. Exercise prices of stock options under the Stock Plan cannot be less than fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Rules and conditions governing awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, subject to certain limitations incorporated into the Stock Plan. At June 30, 2010, 1,123,739 shares remained available to be issued under the Stock Plan. All currently outstanding awards under the Stock Plan are vested. The options expire five years from date of grant.
8
Shares of common stock are also reserved for issuance in connection with a nonqualified stock option plan under which up to 200,000 shares may be issued to nonemployee directors (the Director Plan). The Director Plan provides for the automatic grant of nonqualified options for 3,000 shares of common stock annually to each nonemployee director concurrent with the annual shareholders meeting. Exercise price is the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. Options granted under the Director Plan vest when issued and expire 10 years from date of grant. At June 30, 2010, 37,000 shares are available to be issued under the Director Plan.
The Company also has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) for which 500,000 common shares have been reserved. Employees are able to acquire shares under the ESPP Plan at 95% of the price at the end of the current quarterly plan term, which is June 30, 2010. The ESPP Plan is non-compensatory under current rules and does not give rise to compensation cost. At June 30, 2010, 81,396 shares remain available under the Plan for purchase.
Stock compensation expense recognized for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was $39,000 before income taxes and $25,000 after income taxes. Stock compensation expense recognized for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 was $32,000 before income taxes and $20,000 after income taxes. Excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options included in financing cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $0.
The following table summarizes the stock option transactions for the six months ended June 30, 2010. All outstanding stock options are currently exercisable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted average |
|
Weighted average |
|
|||
Outstanding December 31, 2009 |
|
|
189,000 |
|
$ |
9.77 |
|
|
4.75 years |
|
Issued |
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
11.82 |
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
(24,000 |
) |
|
14.13 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding June 30, 2010 |
|
|
183,000 |
|
|
9.40 |
|
|
5.39 years |
|
18,000 director stock options were granted during the six month period ended June 30, 2010. The aggregate intrinsic value of all options (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the last day of the period exceeded the market price of the stock on the date of grant) outstanding at June 30, 2010 was $230,000. The intrinsic value of all options exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $0. Net cash proceeds from the exercise of all stock options were $0 in each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
NOTE 3 - INVENTORIES
Inventories summarized below are priced at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
$ |
17,052,334 |
|
$ |
15,195,132 |
|
Raw and processed materials |
|
|
8,683,709 |
|
|
9,403,185 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,736,043 |
|
$ |
24,598,317 |
|
9
NOTE 4 WARRANTY
We provide reserves for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. We estimate the costs of our warranty obligations based on our warranty policy or applicable contractual warranty, historical experience of known product failure rates, and use of materials and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. Management reviews the estimated warranty liability on a quarterly basis to determine its adequacy. The actual warranty expense could differ from the estimates made by the Company based on product performance.
The following table presents the changes in the Companys warranty liability for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the majority of which relates to a five-year obligation to provide for potential future liabilities for network equipment sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
648,000 |
|
$ |
593,000 |
|
Actual warranty costs paid |
|
|
(117,000 |
) |
|
(184,000 |
) |
Amounts charged to expense |
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
336,000 |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
612,000 |
|
$ |
745,000 |
|
NOTE 5 CONTINGENCIES
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to legal actions and claims and incurs costs to defend against these actions and claims. Company management is not aware of any outstanding or pending legal actions or claims that would materially affect the Companys financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
In the preparation of the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements, management calculates income taxes based upon the estimated effective rate applicable to operating results for the full fiscal year. This includes estimating the current tax liability as well as assessing differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and book accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are recorded on the balance sheet. These assets and liabilities are analyzed regularly and management assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income.
At June 30, 2010 there was $608,000 of net uncertain tax benefit positions that would reduce the effective income tax rate if recognized. The Company records interest and penalties related to income taxes as income tax expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. We do not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to the settlement of audits or the expiration of statutes of limitations within the next twelve months.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The tax years 2006-2008 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and the years 2005-2008 remain open to examination by various state tax departments. The tax years from 2007-2009 remain open in Costa Rica.
10
The Companys effective income tax rate was 40.4% for the first six months of 2010. The effective tax rate differs from the federal tax rate of 35% due to state income taxes, foreign losses not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes, provisions for interest charges and settlement of uncertain income tax positions. Although the foreign operating losses may ultimately be deductible in the countries in which they have occurred, the Company has not recorded a deferred tax asset for these losses due to uncertainty regarding the eventual realization of the benefit. The effect of the foreign operations is an overall rate increase of approximately 3.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. There were no additional uncertain tax positions identified in the second quarter of 2010. The Companys effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was 40%, and differed from the federal tax rate due to state income taxes, foreign losses not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes, and provisions for interest charges.
NOTE 7 SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company classifies its businesses into four segments as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle manufactures and sells U.S. standard modular connecting and wiring devices for voice and data communications, digital subscriber line filters, and structured wiring systems; |
|
|
Transition Networks designs and markets data transmission, computer network and media conversion products; |
|
|
JDL Technologies, Inc. provides IT services including network design, computer infrastructure installations, IT service management, change management, network security and network operations services; |
|
|
Austin Taylor Communications LTD manufactures British-standard telephone equipment and equipment enclosures for the U.K and international markets. |
Our non-allocated corporate general and administrative expenses are categorized as Other in the Companys segment reporting. Management has chosen to organize the enterprise and disclose reportable segments based on our products and services. There are no material inter-segment revenues.
11
Information concerning the Companys continuing operations in the various segments for the six month and three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION - SIX MONTHS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Suttle |
|
Transition |
|
JDL |
|
Austin |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
19,052,260 |
|
$ |
30,872,395 |
|
$ |
4,920,855 |
|
$ |
1,695,325 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
56,540,835 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
13,978,168 |
|
|
14,285,741 |
|
|
2,896,285 |
|
|
1,581,572 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,741,766 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
5,074,092 |
|
|
16,586,654 |
|
|
2,024,570 |
|
|
113,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,799,069 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,633,670 |
|
|
10,319,377 |
|
|
708,348 |
|
|
528,763 |
|
|
2,296,723 |
|
$ |
17,486,881 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,440,422 |
|
$ |
6,267,277 |
|
$ |
1,316,222 |
|
$ |
(415,010 |
) |
$ |
(2,296,723 |
) |
$ |
6,312,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
435,843 |
|
$ |
298,263 |
|
$ |
76,808 |
|
$ |
20,727 |
|
$ |
146,385 |
|
$ |
978,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
504,812 |
|
$ |
279,251 |
|
$ |
16,947 |
|
$ |
14,393 |
|
$ |
80,082 |
|
$ |
895,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
20,814,871 |
|
$ |
28,183,814 |
|
$ |
5,514,242 |
|
$ |
3,690,063 |
|
$ |
45,707,503 |
|
$ |
103,910,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle |
|
Transition |
|
JDL |
|
Austin |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
22,610,556 |
|
$ |
25,807,976 |
|
$ |
5,383,301 |
|
$ |
1,547,524 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
55,349,357 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
17,568,938 |
|
|
12,389,167 |
|
|
3,503,354 |
|
|
1,458,357 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,919,816 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
5,041,618 |
|
|
13,418,809 |
|
|
1,879,947 |
|
|
89,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,429,541 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,137,280 |
|
|
9,794,984 |
|
|
660,565 |
|
|
589,474 |
|
|
1,702,894 |
|
$ |
15,885,197 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,904,338 |
|
$ |
3,623,825 |
|
$ |
1,219,382 |
|
$ |
(500,307 |
) |
$ |
(1,702,894 |
) |
$ |
4,544,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
312,877 |
|
$ |
294,861 |
|
$ |
81,777 |
|
$ |
31,406 |
|
$ |
93,533 |
|
$ |
814,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
2,007,992 |
|
$ |
160,058 |
|
$ |
8,542 |
|
$ |
83,351 |
|
$ |
58,181 |
|
$ |
2,318,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
23,913,846 |
|
$ |
26,390,154 |
|
$ |
5,218,364 |
|
$ |
4,987,839 |
|
$ |
42,503,622 |
|
$ |
103,013,825 |
|
12
SEGMENT INFORMATION - THREE MONTHS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle |
|
Transition |
|
JDL |
|
Austin |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
9,125,155 |
|
$ |
17,119,199 |
|
$ |
3,625,136 |
|
$ |
789,334 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
30,658,824 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
6,701,710 |
|
|
7,954,859 |
|
|
1,961,387 |
|
|
756,860 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,374,816 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
2,423,445 |
|
|
9,164,340 |
|
|
1,663,749 |
|
|
32,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,284,008 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,845,771 |
|
|
5,426,073 |
|
|
321,152 |
|
|
280,209 |
|
|
1,218,880 |
|
$ |
9,092,085 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
577,674 |
|
$ |
3,738,267 |
|
$ |
1,342,597 |
|
$ |
(247,735 |
) |
$ |
(1,218,880 |
) |
$ |
4,191,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
218,806 |
|
$ |
151,238 |
|
$ |
38,889 |
|
$ |
8,525 |
|
$ |
73,875 |
|
$ |
491,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
41,016 |
|
$ |
252,660 |
|
$ |
5,160 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
41,040 |
|
$ |
339,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle |
|
Transition |
|
JDL |
|
Austin |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
10,760,552 |
|
$ |
13,671,193 |
|
$ |
3,302,233 |
|
$ |
850,421 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
28,584,399 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
8,499,083 |
|
|
6,564,333 |
|
|
2,065,941 |
|
|
804,945 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,934,302 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
2,261,469 |
|
|
7,106,860 |
|
|
1,236,292 |
|
|
45,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,650,097 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,571,038 |
|
|
4,871,654 |
|
|
340,013 |
|
|
308,538 |
|
|
791,146 |
|
$ |
7,882,389 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
690,431 |
|
$ |
2,235,206 |
|
$ |
896,279 |
|
$ |
(263,062 |
) |
$ |
(791,146 |
) |
$ |
2,767,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
162,713 |
|
$ |
147,437 |
|
$ |
40,293 |
|
$ |
16,433 |
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
$ |
369,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
1,768,895 |
|
$ |
84,757 |
|
$ |
34,542 |
|
$ |
43,052 |
|
$ |
15,936 |
|
$ |
1,947,182 |
|
NOTE 8 PENSIONS
The Companys U.K. based subsidiary Austin Taylor maintains defined benefit pension plans that cover approximately 8 active employees. The Company does not provide any other post-retirement benefits to its employees. Components of net periodic benefit cost of the pension plans were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months Ended June 30 |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Service cost |
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
|
19,000 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
124,000 |
|
|
139,000 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(107,000 |
) |
|
(135,000 |
) |
|
|
$ |
34,000 |
|
$ |
23,000 |
|
NOTE 9 NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted net income per common share takes into effect the dilutive effect of potential common shares outstanding. The Companys only potential common shares outstanding are stock options, which resulted in a dilutive effect of 25,921 shares and 29,122 shares for the respective three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010. The dilutive effect of stock options for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 was 7,366 shares and 5,069 shares, respectively. The Company calculates the dilutive effect of outstanding options using the treasury stock method. The number of shares not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of common stock during the period was 0 and 170,900 at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
13
NOTE 10 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The accounting guidance establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments and quoted prices in markets that are not active, and inputs that are directly observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, such as treasury securities with pricing interpolated from recent trades of similar securities, or priced with models using highly observable inputs, such as commodity options priced using observable forward prices and volatilities.
Level 3 Significant inputs to pricing have little or no observability as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation, such as the complex and subjective models and forecasts used to determine the fair value of financial instruments.
The Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, include money market funds within cash and cash equivalents of $1,873,000 and $12,972,000 classified as Level 1 within the hierarchy and certificate of deposits within investments of $25,937,000 and $18,776,000 classified as Level 2. The Company does not have any assets or liabilities classified as Level 3 within the hierarchy. There were no transfers between levels during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
NOTE 11 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of this filing. We do not believe there are any material subsequent events that would require further disclosure.
14
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward looking statements
In this report and, from time to time, in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in press releases, and in other communications to shareholders or the investing public, the Company may make forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 concerning possible or anticipated future financial performance, business activities, plans, pending claims, investigations or litigation which are typically preceded by the words believes, expects, anticipates, intends or similar expressions. For these forward-looking statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in federal securities laws. Shareholders and the investing public should understand that these forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance, activities, anticipated results, outcomes or plans to differ significantly from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
lower sales to major telephone companies and other major customers; |
|
|
the introduction of competitive products and technologies; |
|
|
our ability to successfully reduce operating expenses at certain business units; |
|
|
the general health of the telecom sector; |
|
|
successful integration and profitability of acquisitions; |
|
|
delays in new product introductions; |
|
|
higher than expected expense related to new sales and marketing initiatives; |
|
|
unfavorable resolution of claims and litigation; |
|
|
availability of adequate supplies of raw materials and components; |
|
|
fuel prices; |
|
|
government funding of education technology spending; and |
|
|
other factors discussed from time to time in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including risk factors presented under Item 1A of the Companys most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K. |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Consolidated sales increased 7% in 2010 to $30,659,000 compared to $28,584,000 in 2009. Consolidated operating income in 2010 increased to $4,192,000 compared to $2,768,000 in the second quarter of 2009.
Net income in 2010 increased to $2,415,000 compared to $1,748,000 in the second quarter of 2009.
Suttle
Suttle sales decreased 15% in the second quarter of 2010 to $9,125,000 compared to $10,761,000 in the same period of 2009 due to contraction of the housing and building sectors of the economy. Sales by customer groups in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle Sales by Customer Group |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Major telephone companies |
|
$ |
4,225,000 |
|
$ |
6,041,000 |
|
Distributors/OEM |
|
|
3,071,000 |
|
|
2,440,000 |
|
International |
|
|
1,208,000 |
|
|
1,254,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
621,000 |
|
|
1,026,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,125,000 |
|
$ |
10,761,000 |
|
15
Suttles sales by product groups in second quarter of 2010 and 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle Sales by Product Group |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Modular connecting products |
|
$ |
3,595,000 |
|
$ |
3,946,000 |
|
DSL products |
|
|
2,977,000 |
|
|
3,083,000 |
|
Structured cabling products |
|
|
2,352,000 |
|
|
3,588,000 |
|
Other products |
|
|
201,000 |
|
|
144,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,125,000 |
|
$ |
10,761,000 |
|
Sales to the major telephone companies decreased 30% in 2010 due to a decrease in sales of DSL products, an accelerating decline in voice markets and the continued impact of the contraction of the U.S. housing market. Sales to these customers accounted for 46% of Suttles sales in the 2010 second quarter compared to 56% of sales in 2009. Sales to distributors, OEMs, and electrical contractors increased 26% in 2010 due to increased sales of DSL products. This customer segment accounted for 34% and 23% of sales in the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively. International sales decreased 4% and accounted for 13% of Suttles second quarter 2010 sales. Suttles products do not have a large international market due to different product specifications in non-US markets. Sales to other customers decreased 39% to $621,000.
Modular connecting products sales have decreased 9% due to a slowing of the home building business and accelerated decline in the voice market. Sales of DSL products decreased 3% due to the maturation of the U.S. DSL market and the order cycle of major customers. Sales of structured cabling products decreased 34% due to the contraction of the housing market, specifically the multi-dwelling unit space.
Suttles gross margin increased 7% in the second quarter of 2010 to $2,423,000 compared to $2,261,000 in the same period of 2009. Gross margin percentage increased to 27% in 2010 from 21% in 2009 due to product mix changes. Suttle realizes its highest selling margins on modular connecting products. DSL products are the least profitable. Suttle also earns better margins on sales to distributor and OEM customers where pricing is usually based on Company list prices versus major telephone customers where pricing is usually based on negotiated contracts. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $275,000 or 18% in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, due to increased spending in the Companys technology development initiative. Suttles operating income was $578,000 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to operating income of $690,000 in 2009.
Transition Networks
Transition Networks sales increased 25% to $17,119,000 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $13,671,000 in 2009.
Second quarter sales by region are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition Networks Sales by Region |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
North America |
|
$ |
14,429,000 |
|
$ |
11,407,000 |
|
Europe, Middle East, Asia (EMEA) |
|
|
995,000 |
|
|
879,000 |
|
Rest of world |
|
|
1,695,000 |
|
|
1,385,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,119,000 |
|
$ |
13,671,000 |
|
16
Sales in North America increased 27% or $3,023,000 due to an improving economic situation in the United States and Canada and increased activity in target vertical market segments. International sales increased $426,000, or 19% primarily due to improved economic activity in Asia and Latin America. The economy in the EMEA region continues to be sluggish but sales still had a 13% increase over the same period in the prior year.
The following table summarizes Transition Networks 2010 and 2009 second quarter sales by its major product groups:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition Networks Sales by Product Group |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Media converters |
|
$ |
12,777,000 |
|
$ |
9,806,000 |
|
Ethernet switches |
|
|
1,026,000 |
|
|
913,000 |
|
Ethernet adapters |
|
|
1,720,000 |
|
|
2,231,000 |
|
Other products |
|
|
1,596,000 |
|
|
721,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
17,119,000 |
|
$ |
13,671,000 |
|
Gross margin on second quarter Transition Networks sales increased 29% to $9,164,000 in 2010 from $7,107,000 in 2009. Gross margin as a percentage of sales was 54% in 2010, compared to 52% in the 2009 period. The increase is due to the mix of products with an increase in some higher margin conversion products and lower operating expenses for the indirect costs related to gross margin. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 11% to $5,426,000 in 2010 compared to $4,872,000 in 2009 due to the hiring of new employees and an increase in selling expenses. Operating income increased to $3,738,000 in 2010 compared to $2,235,000 in 2009.
JDL Technologies, Inc.
JDL Technologies, Inc. reported 2010 second quarter sales of $3,625,000 compared to $3,302,000 in 2009.
JDLs revenues by customer group were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JDL Revenue by Customer Group |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Broward County FL schools |
|
$ |
3,587,000 |
|
$ |
3,289,000 |
|
All other |
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,625,000 |
|
$ |
3,302,000 |
|
17
Revenues earned in Broward County FL increased $298,000 or 9% in the second quarter 2010. The increase was the result of higher funding for LAN/WAN/Wire work in 2010 than in 2009.
JDL gross margin increased 35% to $1,664,000 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $1,236,000 in the same period in 2009. Gross margin as a percentage of sales increased to 46% in 2010 from 37% in 2009 due to purchasing discounts and rebates the Company was able to take advantage of during the quarter. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in 2010 to $321,000 compared to $340,000 in 2009 due to a reduction in compensation expenses. JDL reported operating income of $1,343,000 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $896,000 in the same period of 2009.
Austin Taylor
Austin Taylors revenues decreased 7% to $789,000 for the second quarter of 2010, compared to $850,000 in 2009. This decrease is due to the impact of project suspensions and an overall decrease in demand within the markets served by Austin Taylor. Gross margin decreased 29% to $32,000 in 2010 from $45,000 in 2009. Gross margin as a percentage of sales was 4% in 2010 compared to 5% in 2009. This decrease is a result of the cost of transferring manufacturing equipment and establishing continuity of supply from alternative suppliers. Austin Taylor reported an operating loss in 2010 of $248,000 compared to $263,000 in 2009.
Other
Net investment income decreased to a loss of $24,000 in 2010 as compared to income of $247,000 in 2009. This decrease is due to unrealized foreign exchange losses due to the decline in the Euro. Income before income taxes increased to $4,168,000 in 2010 compared to $3,014,000 in 2009. The Companys effective income tax rate was 42% in both 2010 and 2009. This effective rate was higher than the standard rate of 35% due to state income taxes, foreign losses not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes, provisions for interest charges and settlement of uncertain income tax positions.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Consolidated sales increased 2% in 2010 to $56,541,000 compared to $55,349,000 in 2009. Consolidated operating income in 2010 increased to $6,312,000 compared to $4,544,000 in the first six months of 2009.
Net income in 2010 increased to $3,746,000 compared to $2,971,000 in the first six months of 2009.
Suttle
Suttle sales decreased 16% in the first six months of 2010 to $19,052,000 compared to $22,611,000 in the same period of 2009. Sales by customer groups in the first six months of 2010 and 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle Sales by Customer Group |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Major telephone companies |
|
$ |
8,740,000 |
|
$ |
12,997,000 |
|
Distributors/OEMs |
|
|
6,326,000 |
|
|
5,028,000 |
|
International |
|
|
2,639,000 |
|
|
2,512,000 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,347,000 |
|
|
2,074,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
19,052,000 |
|
$ |
22,611,000 |
|
18
Suttles sales by product groups in first six months of 2010 and 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suttle Sales by Product Group |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Modular connecting products |
|
$ |
7,808,000 |
|
$ |
8,503,000 |
|
DSL products |
|
|
6,048,000 |
|
|
6,716,000 |
|
Structured cabling products |
|
|
4,841,000 |
|
|
7,079,000 |
|
Other products |
|
|
355,000 |
|
|
313,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
19,052,000 |
|
$ |
22,611,000 |
|
Sales to the major telephone companies decreased 33% in 2010 due to decreased DSL deployment and continued contraction of the domestic housing market. Sales to these customers accounted for 46% of Suttles sales in the first six months of 2010 compared to 57% of sales in the same period in 2009. Sales to distributors, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and electrical contractors increased 26% in 2010 primarily due to the increase of DSL sales to these customers. Overall, DSL sales are lower in 2010 but have increased in this customer segment due to increased broadband deployment. This customer segment accounted for 33% and 22% of sales in the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. International sales increased 5% and accounted for 14% of Suttles first six months 2010 sales. Suttles products do not have a large international market due to different product specifications in non-US markets. Sales to other customers decreased 35% to $1,347,000.
Modular connecting products sales have decreased 8% due to a slowing of the home building business and continued decline in the voice market. Sales of DSL products decreased 10% due to the maturation of the U.S. DSL market. Sales of structured cabling products decreased 32% due to the contraction of the housing market, specifically the multi-dwelling unit space.
Suttles gross margin increased 1% in the first six months of 2010 to $5,074,000 compared to $5,042,000 in the same period of 2009. Gross margin percentage increased to 27% in 2010 from 22% in 2009 due to product mix changes. Suttle realizes its highest selling margins on modular connecting products. DSL products are the least profitable. Suttle also earns better margins on sales to distributor and OEM customers, where pricing is usually based on Company list prices, than from sales to major telephone customers where pricing is usually based on negotiated contracts. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $496,000 or 16% in the first six months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, due to increases in technological development spending. Suttles operating income was $1,440,000 in the first six months of 2010 compared to operating income of $1,904,000 in 2009.
19
Transition Networks
Transition Networks sales increased 20% to $30,872,000 in the first six months of 2010 compared to $25,808,000 in 2009.
First six months sales by region are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition Networks Sales by Region |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
North America |
|
$ |
25,524,000 |
|
$ |
21,194,000 |
|
Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA) |
|
|
2,075,000 |
|
|
2,069,000 |
|
Rest of world |
|
|
3,273,000 |
|
|
2,545,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
30,872,000 |
|
$ |
25,808,000 |
|
Sales in North America increased $4,330,000 or 20% due to an improving economic situation in the United States and Canada and increased activity in target vertical market segments and product groups. International sales increased $734,000, or 16% primarily due to improved economic activity in Asia and Latin America. The EMEA region continues to be sluggish in its economic recovery and sales remain essentially flat in that region.
The following table summarizes Transition Networks 2010 and 2009 first six months sales by its major product groups:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition Networks Sales by Product Group |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Media converters |
|
$ |
23,203,000 |
|
$ |
19,422,000 |
|
Ethernet switches |
|
|
1,896,000 |
|
|
1,460,000 |
|
Ethernet adapters |
|
|
3,322,000 |
|
|
3,548,000 |
|
Other products |
|
|
2,451,000 |
|
|
1,378,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
30,872,000 |
|
$ |
25,808,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin on the first six months of Transition Networks sales increased to $16,587,000 in 2010 from $13,419,000 in 2009. Gross margin as a percentage of sales was 54% in 2010, compared to 52% in the 2009 period, due to the mix of products with an increase in some higher margin conversion products and lower operating expenses for the indirect costs related to gross margin. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 5% to $10,319,000 in 2010 compared to $9,795,000 in 2009 due to the hiring of new employees and an increase in selling expenses. Operating income increased to $6,267,000 in 2010 compared to $3,624,000 in 2009.
JDL Technologies, Inc.
JDL Technologies, Inc. reported 2010 first six months sales of $4,921,000 compared to $5,383,000 in 2009.
JDLs revenues by customer group were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JDL Revenue by Customer Group |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Broward County FL schools |
|
$ |
4,787,000 |
|
$ |
5,301,000 |
|
All other |
|
|
134,000 |
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,921,000 |
|
$ |
5,383,000 |
|
20
Revenues earned in Broward County FL decreased $514,000 or 10% in 2010. The decrease was the result of Broward County receiving contract funding approval six months later than the usual announcement timeframe, which resulted in lower revenue in the first half of 2010 specifically the first quarter.
JDL gross margin increased 8% to $2,025,000 in the first six months of 2010 compared to $1,880,000 in the same period in 2009. Gross margin as a percentage of sales increased to 41% in 2010 from 35% in 2009 due to purchasing discounts and rebates the Company was able to take advantage of during the first half of the year. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 7% in 2010 to $708,000 compared to $661,000 in 2009 due to increased travel and relocation costs due to a change in management in the first quarter 2010. JDL reported operating income of $1,316,000 in the first six months of 2010 compared to $1,219,000 in the same period of 2009.
Austin Taylor
Austin Taylors revenues increased 9% to $1,695,000 for the first six months of 2010, compared to $1,548,000 in 2009. This increase is due to broader product sales into the OEM market and deeper sales penetration into the UK and Ireland distribution network. Gross margin increased 28% to $114,000 in 2010 from $89,000 in 2009. Gross margin as a percentage of sales was 7% in 2010 compared to 6% in 2009. This increase was due to a gain in manufacturing efficiency resulting from a recently implemented cost reduction and process improvement program. Austin Taylor reported an operating loss in 2010 of $415,000 compared to $500,000 in 2009.
Other
Net investment income decreased 108% to a loss of $32,000 in 2010 as compared to income of $407,000 in 2009. This decrease is due to unrealized foreign exchange losses due to the decline in the Euro. Income before income taxes increased to $6,281,000 in 2010 compared to $4,951,000 in 2009. The Companys effective income tax rate was 40% in both 2010 and 2009. This effective rate was higher than the standard rate of 35% due to state income taxes, foreign losses not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes, and provisions for interest charges as explained in Note 6 above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2010, the Company had approximately $38,011,000 of cash equivalents and investments compared to $40,069,000 of cash equivalents and investments at December 31, 2009. The Company had current assets of approximately $77,006,000 and current liabilities of $11,512,000 at June 30, 2010 compared to current assets of $76,967,000 and current liabilities of $12,754,000 at December 31, 2009.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,370,000 in the first six months of 2010 compared to $8,767,000 in the same period in 2009. Significant working capital changes from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010 included decreased accrued compensation and benefits of $814,000 due to the payment of the Companys long term bonuses in the first quarter of 2010, an increase in inventory balances due to purchases at JDL for installations during the third quarter and an increase in accounts receivable of $2,253,000 due to an overall increase in sales in the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2009.
Net cash used in investing activities was $8,043,000 in the first six months in 2010 compared to cash used of $16,806,000 in the same period in 2009. During the first six months of 2010, the Company continued to purchase certificates of deposit with maturities of greater than 90 days during the quarter and increased its investments from $18.8 million at December 31, 2009 to $25.9 million at June 30, 2010.
21
Net cash used in financing activities was $2,446,000 and $2,126,000 in the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash dividends paid in the first six months of 2010 were $2,339,000 ($.28 per common share) compared to $1,996,000 ($.24 per common share) in the same period in 2009. Proceeds from common stock issuances, principally issued under the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan, totaled approximately $77,000 in the first six months of 2010 and $67,000 in the same period in 2009. In the first six months of 2010, the Company did not purchase any of its outstanding common shares. At June 30, 2010, 481,938 additional shares could be repurchased under outstanding Board authorizations. The Company has a $10,000,000 line of credit from U.S. Bank. Interest on borrowings on the credit line is at the LIBOR rate plus 1.5% (2.0% at June 30, 2010). There were no borrowings on the line of credit during the first six months of 2010 or 2009. The credit agreement expires September 30, 2010 and is secured by assets of the Company. As part of the acquisition of the new Minnetonka headquarters building in July 2007, the Company assumed an outstanding mortgage of $4,380,000. The mortgage is payable in monthly installments and carries an interest rate of 6.83%. The mortgage matures on March 1, 2016. Mortgage payments on principal totaled $92,000 during the second quarter of 2010. The outstanding balance on the mortgage was $2,591,000 at June 30, 2010.
In the opinion of management, based on the Companys current financial and operating position and projected future expenditures, sufficient funds are available to meet the Companys anticipated operating and capital expenditure needs.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies, including the assumptions and judgments underlying them, are discussed in our 2009 Form 10-K in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. There were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
The Companys accounting policies have been consistently applied in all material respects and disclose such matters as allowance for doubtful accounts, sales returns, inventory valuation, warranty expense, income taxes, revenue recognition, asset and goodwill impairment recognition and foreign currency translation. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the result of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Results may differ from these estimates due to actual outcomes being different from those on which we based our assumptions. Management reviews these estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
We do not believe there are any recently issued accounting standards that have not yet been adopted that will have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
22
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
The Company has no freestanding or embedded derivatives. The Companys policy is to not use freestanding derivatives and to not enter into contracts with terms that cannot be designated as normal purchases or sales.
The vast majority of our transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars; as such, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have historically not been material to the Company. At June 30, 2010 our bank line of credit carried a variable interest rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) plus 1.5%. The Companys investments are either money market type of investments that earn interest at prevailing market rates or certificates of deposits insured through the FDIC and as such do not have material risk exposure.
Based on the Companys operations, in the opinion of management, no material future losses or exposure exist relative to market risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Operating Effectiveness of Accounting and Control Procedures. We concluded that, in the aggregate, no material weakness existed as of June 30, 2010 related to documentation and review of significant accounting judgments and estimates, balance sheet account reconciliations, financial closing processes and financial reporting processes at period ends.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the period covered by this Report there was no additional change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Not
Applicable.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Not
Applicable.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not
applicable.
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not
Applicable.
23
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]
Item 5. Other Information
Not Applicable
Item 6 Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
The following exhibits are included herein: |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
Certification |
|
31.2 |
Certification |
|
32. |
Certifications pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350). |
24
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Jeffrey K. Berg |
|
|
|
Jeffrey K. Berg |
|
Date: August 10, 2010 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David T. McGraw |
|
|
|
David T. McGraw |
|
Date: August 10, 2010 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
25