-
Annual Statements
-
»
Companies
-
»
PRA GROUP INC
-
»
Annual Report: 2010 (Form 10-K)
PRA GROUP INC - Annual Report: 2010 (Form 10-K)
e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-50058
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
75-3078675 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
120 Corporate Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia
|
|
23502 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (888) 772-7326
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
(Title of Class)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES þ NO
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment of this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o. |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant
as of June 30, 2010 was $1,109,804,772 based on the $66.78 closing price as reported on the NASDAQ
Global Stock Market.
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding as of February 18, 2011 was
17,104,930.
Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the Proxy Statement to be filed by
approximately April 20, 2011 for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by
reference into Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Form 10-K.
Cautionary Statements Pursuant to Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995:
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities
laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that, if they
materialize or not, or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of
historical fact, are forward-looking statements, including statements regarding overall trends,
operating cost trends, liquidity and capital needs and other statements of expectations, beliefs,
future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends, and similar expressions concerning
matters that are not historical facts. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above
may include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
deterioration in the economic or inflationary environment in the United States,
including the interest rate environment, that may have an adverse effect on our
collections, results of operations, revenue and stock price or on the stability of the
financial system as a whole; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to purchase defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate prices and to replace our defaulted consumer receivables with additional receivables portfolios; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain account documents relating to accounts that we acquire and the possibility that account documents that we obtain could contain errors; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully acquire receivables of new asset types or implement a new pricing structure; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the business practices of credit originators in terms of selling defaulted
consumer receivables; |
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations that affect our ability to collect sufficient amounts
on our defaulted consumer receivables; |
|
|
|
|
changes in or interpretation of tax laws or adverse results of tax audits; |
|
|
|
|
changes in bankruptcy or collection laws that could negatively affect our business, including by causing an increase in certain types of bankruptcy filings involving liquidations, which may cause our collections to decrease; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to employ and retain qualified employees, especially collection personnel,
and our senior management team; |
|
|
|
|
our work force could become unionized in the future, which could adversely affect the
stability of our production and increase our costs; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the credit or capital markets, which affect our ability to borrow money or
raise capital; |
|
|
|
|
the degree and nature of our competition; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain existing clients and obtain new clients for our fee-for-service
businesses; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain necessary account documents from sellers of defaulted consumer
receivables, which could negatively impact our collections; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to comply with regulations of the collection industry; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully operate and/or integrate new business acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain, renegotiate or replace our credit facility; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to satisfy the restrictive covenants contained in our debt agreements; |
|
|
|
|
the imposition of additional taxes on us; |
|
|
|
|
the possibility that we could incur significant valuation allowance charges; |
3
|
|
|
our ability to manage growth successfully; |
|
|
|
|
the possibility that we could incur business or technology disruptions, or not adapt to
technological advances; |
|
|
|
|
the possibility that we or our industry could experience negative publicity or
reputational attacks; |
|
|
|
|
the sufficiency of our funds generated from operations, existing cash and available
borrowings to finance our current operations; and |
|
|
|
|
the risk factors listed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). |
You should assume that the information appearing in this annual report is accurate only as of
the date it was issued. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may
have changed since that date.
For a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could affect our future
events, developments or results, you should carefully review the Risk Factors section beginning
on page 18, as well as Business section beginning on page 4 and the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section beginning on page 32.
Our forward-looking statements could be wrong in light of these and other risks, uncertainties
and assumptions. The future events, developments or results described in this report could turn out
to be materially different. We have no obligation to publicly update or revise our forward-looking
statements after the date of this annual report and you should not expect us to do so.
Investors should also be aware that while we do, from time to time, communicate with
securities analysts and others, we do not, by policy, selectively disclose to them any material
nonpublic information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, stockholders
should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any analyst regardless of
the content of the statement or report. We do not, by policy, confirm forecasts or projections
issued by others. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any
projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not our responsibility.
PART I
General
Our business focuses upon the detection, collection, and processing of both unpaid and
normal-course accounts receivable originally owed to credit grantors, governments, retailers and
others. Our primary business is the purchase, collection and management of portfolios of defaulted
consumer receivables. These are the unpaid obligations of individuals to credit originators, which
include banks, credit unions, consumer and auto finance companies and retail merchants. We also
provide fee-based services, including collateral-location services for credit originators via PRA
Location Services, LLC (IGS), revenue administration, audit and debt discovery/recovery services
for government entities through both PRA Government Services, LLC (RDS) and MuniServices, LLC
(MuniServices) and class action claims recovery service and related payment processing via Claims
Compensation Bureau, LLC (CCB). We believe that the strengths of our business are our
sophisticated approach to portfolio pricing, segmentation and servicing, our emphasis on developing
and retaining our collection personnel, our sophisticated processing systems and procedures and our
relationships with many of the largest consumer lenders in the United States.
4
We use the following terminology throughout our reports:
|
|
|
Amortization refers to cash collections applied to principal on finance receivables. |
|
|
|
|
Amortization Rate refers to cash collections applied to principal on finance
receivables as a percentage of total cash collections. |
|
|
|
|
Buybacks refers to purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of
non-compliant accounts. |
|
|
|
|
Cash Collections refers to collections on our owned portfolios only, exclusive of fee
income. |
|
|
|
|
Cash Receipts refers to collections on our owned portfolios together with fee income. |
|
|
|
|
Core accounts or portfolios refer to accounts or portfolios that that are defaulted
consumer receivables and are not in a bankrupt status upon purchase. These accounts are
aggregated separately from purchased bankruptcy accounts. |
|
|
|
|
Income Recognized on Finance Receivable, Net refers to income derived from our owned debt
portfolios and is shown net of valuation allowance charges.
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Income refers to revenues generated from our fee-for-service subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased bankruptcy accounts or portfolios refer to accounts or portfolios that are
in bankruptcy when we purchase them and as such are purchased as a pool of bankrupt
accounts. |
Our debt purchase business specializes in receivables that have been charged-off by the credit
originator. Because the credit originator and/or other debt servicing companies have unsuccessfully
attempted to collect these receivables, we are able to purchase them at a substantial discount to
their face value. From our 1996 inception through December 31, 2010, we acquired 2,002 portfolios,
representing more than 24 million customer accounts, with a face value of $54.8 billion for a total
purchase price of $1.7 billion. The success of our business depends on our ability to purchase
portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate valuations and to collect on those
receivables effectively and efficiently. We have one reportable segment, receivables management,
based on similarities among the operating units including homogeneity of services, service delivery
methods and use of technology.
We have achieved strong financial results over the past ten years, with cash collections
growing from $30.7 million in 2000 to $529.3 million in 2010. Total revenue has grown from $19.6
million in 2000 to $372.7 million in 2010, a compound annual growth rate of 34%. Similarly, pro
forma net income has grown from $1.6 million in 2000 to net income of $73.9 million in 2010.
We were initially formed as Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C., a Delaware limited
liability company, on March 20, 1996. In connection with our 2002 initial public offering (our
IPO), all of the membership units of Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. were exchanged,
simultaneously with the effectiveness of our registration statement, for a single class of the
common stock of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., a new Delaware corporation formed on August 7,
2002. Accordingly, the members of Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. became the common
stockholders of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., which became the parent company of Portfolio
Recovery Associates, L.L.C. and its subsidiaries.
The Company maintains an Internet website at the following address: www.portfoliorecovery.com.
We make available on or through our website certain reports that we file with or furnish to
the SEC in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These include our annual reports on
Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to
those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. We make this information available on our website free of charge as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with or furnish it to the SEC.
The information that is filed with the SEC may be read or copied at the SECs Public Reference Room
at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. In addition, information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet
site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC at: www.sec.gov.
5
Reports filed with or furnished to the SEC are also available free of charge upon request by
contacting our corporate office at:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Attn: Investor Relations
120 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 100
Norfolk, Virginia 23502
Competitive Strengths
We Offer a Compelling Alternative to Debt Owners and Governmental Entities
We offer debt owners the ability to immediately realize value for their charged-off
receivables throughout the post charge-off collection cycle, from receivables that have only been
processed internally by the debt owner to receivables that have been subject to multiple internal
and external collection efforts, whether or not subject to bankruptcy proceedings.
This flexibility helps us to meet the needs of debt owners and allows
us to become a trusted resource. Also, through our government services business, we have the
ability to service state and local governments receivables in various ways. This includes such
services as processing tax payments on behalf of the client and extends to more complicated tax
audit and discovery work, as well as additional services that fill the needs of our clients.
Disciplined and Proprietary Underwriting Process
One of the key components of our growth has been our ability to price portfolio acquisitions
at levels that have generated profitable returns on investment. Since inception, we have been able
to collect more than our purchase price for defaulted consumer receivables portfolios, which has
enabled us to generate increasing profits and operational cash flow. In order to price core portfolios
and forecast the targeted collection results for a portfolio, we use two separate internally
developed statistical models and one externally developed model, which we may supplement with
on-site due diligence and data obtained from the debt owners collection process and loan files.
One model analyzes the portfolio as one unit based on demographic and account characteristic
comparisons, while the second and external models analyze each account in a portfolio using
variables in a regression analysis. As we collect on our portfolios, the results are input back
into the models in an ongoing process which we believe increases their accuracy. Additionally, we
have not sold any accounts since 2002, and the accounts we sold were primarily in Chapter 13
bankruptcy proceedings. We stopped selling these accounts as we began the effort to build our own
bankruptcy portfolio buying group which started purchasing bankrupt accounts in 2004. By holding
and collecting the accounts over the long-term, we create batch tracking history that we believe is
unique among our peers.
Ability to Hire, Develop and Retain Productive Collectors
We place considerable focus on our ability to hire, develop, motivate and retain effective
collectors who are key to our continued growth and profitability. Several large military bases and
numerous telemarketing, customer service and reservation phone centers are located near our
headquarters and regional offices in Virginia, providing access to a large pool of eligible
personnel. The Hutchinson, Kansas, Las Vegas, Nevada, Birmingham, Alabama, Jackson, Tennessee,
Houston, Texas and Fresno, California areas, where we maintain offices, also provide a sufficient
potential workforce of eligible personnel. We have found that tenure is a primary driver of our
collector effectiveness. We offer our collectors a competitive wage with the opportunity to receive
incentive compensation based on performance, as well as an attractive benefits package, a
comfortable working environment and the ability to work on a flexible schedule. We have a
comprehensive training program for new owned portfolio collectors and provide continuing advanced
training classes which are conducted in our five training centers. Recognizing the demands of the
job, our management team has endeavored to create a professional and supportive environment for all
of our employees.
Established Systems and Infrastructure
We have devoted significant effort to developing our systems, including statistical models,
databases and reporting packages, to optimize our portfolio purchases and collection efforts. In
addition, we believe that our
6
technology infrastructure is flexible, secure, reliable and redundant, to ensure the
protection of our sensitive data and to mitigate exposure to systems failure or unauthorized
access. We take data security and collection compliance very seriously. We employ a staff of
Quality Control and Compliance employees whose role it is to monitor calls and observe collection
system entries in real time. They additionally monitor and research daily exception reports that
track significant account status movements and account changes. We also employ sophisticated call
and work action recording systems which allow us to better monitor compliance and quality of our
customer contacts. We believe that our systems and infrastructure give us meaningful advantages
over our competitors. We have developed financial models and systems for pricing portfolio
acquisitions, managing the collections process and monitoring operating results. We perform a
static pool analysis monthly on each of our portfolios, inputting actual results back into our
acquisition models, to enhance their accuracy. We monitor collection results continuously, seeking
to identify and resolve negative trends immediately. In addition, we do not sell our purchased
defaulted consumer receivables. Instead, we work them over the long-term enhancing our knowledge
of a pools long-term performance. Our comprehensive management reporting package is designed to
fully inform our management team so that they may make timely operating decisions. This
combination of hardware, software and proprietary modeling and systems has been developed by our
management team through years of experience in this industry and we believe provides us with an
important competitive advantage from the acquisition process all the way through collection
operations.
Strong Relationships with Major Credit Originators
We have done business with most of the top consumer lenders in the United States. We maintain
an extensive marketing effort and our senior management team is in contact on a regular basis with
known and prospective credit originators. We believe that we have earned a reputation as a
reliable and compliant purchaser of defaulted consumer receivables portfolios and as responsible
collectors. Furthermore, from the perspective of the selling credit originator, the failure to
close on a negotiated sale of a portfolio consumes valuable time and expense and can have an
adverse effect on pricing when the portfolio is re-marketed. Similarly, if a credit originator
sells a portfolio to a debt buyer who has a reputation for violating industry standard collecting
practices, the reputation of the credit originator can be damaged. We consistently attempt to
negotiate reasonable and mutually acceptable contract terms, resulting in a confident and
expeditious closing process for both parties. We go to great lengths to collect from consumers in a
responsible, professional and legally compliant manner. We believe our strong relationships with
major credit originators provide us with access to quality opportunities for portfolio purchases.
Experienced Management Team
We have an experienced management team with considerable expertise in the accounts receivable
management industry. Prior to our formation, our founders played key roles in the development and
management of a consumer receivables acquisition and divestiture operation of Household Recovery
Services, a subsidiary of Household International, now owned by HSBC. As we have grown, the
original management team has been expanded substantially to include a group of experienced,
seasoned executives, many coming from the largest, most sophisticated lenders in the country.
Portfolio Acquisitions
Our portfolio of defaulted consumer receivables includes a diverse set of accounts that can be
categorized by asset type, age and size of account, level of previous collection efforts and
geography. To identify attractive buying opportunities, we maintain an extensive marketing effort
with our senior officers contacting known and prospective sellers of defaulted consumer
receivables. We have acquired receivables of Visa®, MasterCard® and other
credit cards, private label credit cards, installment loans, lines of credit, bankrupt accounts,
deficiency balances of various types, legal judgments, and trade payables, all from a variety of
debt owners. These debt owners include major banks, credit unions, consumer finance companies,
telecommunication providers, retailers, utilities, insurance companies, medical groups/hospitals,
auto finance companies and other debt buyers. In addition, we make periodic visits to the
operating sites of debt sellers and attend numerous industry events in an effort to develop account
purchase opportunities. We also maintain active relationships with brokers of defaulted consumer
receivables.
7
The following chart categorizes our life to date owned portfolios as of December 31, 2010 into
the major asset types represented (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life to Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Purchase |
|
|
|
|
Asset Type |
|
No. of Accounts |
|
|
% |
|
|
Value(1) |
|
|
% |
|
|
Price(2) |
|
|
% |
|
|
Major Credit Cards |
|
|
14,414 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
$ |
38,953,302 |
|
|
|
71 |
% |
|
$ |
1,376,140 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
Consumer Finance |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
6,353,854 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
117,555 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Private Label Credit Cards |
|
|
3,994 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
5,573,155 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
191,308 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Auto Deficiency |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3,955,414 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
43,291 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
24,296 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
54,835,725 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,728,294 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Life to Date Purchased Face Value represents the original
face amount purchased from sellers and has not been reduced by
any adjustments including payments and buybacks. |
|
(2) |
|
The Original Purchase Price represents the cash paid to sellers to acquire portfolios of
defaulted consumer receivables. |
We have done business with most of the largest consumer lenders in the United States. Since
our formation, we have purchased accounts from approximately 150 debt owners.
We have acquired portfolios at various price levels, depending on the age of the portfolio,
its geographic distribution, our historical experience with a certain asset type or credit
originator and similar factors. A typical defaulted consumer receivables portfolio that we acquire
ranges from $1 million to $150 million in face value and contains defaulted consumer receivables
from diverse geographic locations with average initial individual account balances of $400 to
$7,000.
The age of a defaulted consumer receivables portfolio (the time since an account has been
charged-off) is an important factor in determining the price at which we will purchase the
portfolio. Generally, there is an inverse relationship between the age of a portfolio and the price
at which we will purchase the portfolio. This relationship is due to the fact that older
receivables typically liquidate at lower rates. The accounts receivables management industry
places receivables into categories depending on the number of collection agencies that have
previously attempted to collect on the receivables. Fresh accounts are typically past due 120 to
270 days, charged-off by the credit originator and are either being sold prior to any
post-charge-off collection activity or are placed with a third-party for the first time. These
accounts typically sell for the highest purchase price. Primary accounts are typically 360 to 450
days past due and charged-off, have been previously placed with one contingent fee servicer and
receive a lower purchase price. Secondary and tertiary accounts are typically more than 660 days
past due and charged-off, have been placed with two or three contingent fee servicers and receive
even lower purchase prices. We also purchase accounts previously worked by four or more agencies
and these are typically two to three years or more past due and receive an even lower price. In
addition, we purchase accounts that are included in consumer bankruptcies. These bankrupt accounts
are typically filed under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and have an associated payment
plan that can range from 3 to 5 years in duration. We purchase bankrupt accounts in both forward
flow and spot transactions and, consequently, they can be at any age in the bankruptcy plan life
cycle.
As shown in the following chart, as of December 31, 2010, we purchase accounts at various
points in the delinquency cycle (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life to Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Purchase |
|
|
|
|
Account Type |
|
No. of Accounts |
|
|
% |
|
|
Value(1) |
|
|
% |
|
|
Price(2) |
|
|
% |
|
|
Fresh |
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
4,369,125 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
385,238 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Primary |
|
|
3,761 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
6,458,767 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
310,830 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Secondary |
|
|
3,867 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
6,181,804 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
212,838 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Tertiary |
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
5,249,031 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
72,609 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
BK Trustees |
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15,686,301 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
637,837 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Other |
|
|
7,710 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
16,890,697 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
108,942 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
24,296 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
54,835,725 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,728,294 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Life to Date Purchased Face Value represents the original face amount purchased
from sellers and has not been reduced by any adjustments including payments and buybacks. |
|
(2) |
|
The Original Purchase Price represents the cash paid to sellers to acquire portfolios of
defaulted consumer
receivables. |
We also review the geographic distribution of accounts within a portfolio because we have
found that state specific laws and rules can have an effect on the collectability of accounts
located there. In addition, economic factors and bankruptcy trends vary regionally and are
factored into our maximum purchase price equation.
The following chart sets forth our overall life to date portfolio of defaulted consumer
receivables geographically as of December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life to Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Purchase |
|
|
|
|
Geographic Distribution |
|
No. of Accounts |
|
|
% |
|
|
Value(1) |
|
|
% |
|
|
Price(2) |
|
|
% |
|
|
California |
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
7,046,011 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
210,721 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Texas |
|
|
3,820 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
6,331,198 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
159,988 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
5,268,681 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
155,024 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
New York |
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
3,368,356 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
98,474 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2,059,659 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
66,681 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
North Carolina |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
1,944,480 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
59,122 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Illinois |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
1,920,035 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
65,789 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Ohio |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1,902,952 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
71,749 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Georgia |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1,791,183 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
68,417 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
New Jersey |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1,548,719 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
49,798 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Michigan |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1,477,883 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
53,281 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Virginia |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1,177,839 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
41,297 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Tennessee |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1,144,523 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
42,836 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Arizona |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1,134,406 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
33,946 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Massachusetts |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1,045,218 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
32,289 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
South Carolina |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
974,174 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
28,451 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Other (3) |
|
|
6,704 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
14,700,408 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
490,431 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
24,296 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
54,835,725 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,728,294 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Life to Date Purchased Face Value represents the original face amount purchased
from sellers and has not been reduced by any adjustments including payments and buybacks. |
|
(2) |
|
The Original Purchase Price represents the cash paid to sellers to acquire portfolios of
defaulted consumer receivables. |
|
(3) |
|
Each state included in Other represents less than 2% of the face value of total defaulted
consumer receivables. |
Purchasing Process
We acquire portfolios from debt owners through auctions and negotiated sales. In an auction
process, the seller will assemble a portfolio of receivables and will either broadly offer the
portfolio to the market or seek purchase prices from specifically invited potential purchasers. In
a privately negotiated sale process, the debt owner will contact known purchasers directly, take
bids and negotiate the terms of sale. We also acquire accounts in forward flow contracts. Under a
forward flow contract we agree to purchase defaulted consumer receivables from a debt owner on a
periodic basis, at a set percentage of face value of the receivables over a specified time period,
generally from three to twelve months. These agreements typically have a provision requiring that
the attributes of the receivables to be sold will not significantly change each month and that the
debt owner efforts to collect these receivables will not change. If this provision is not adhered
to, the contract will typically allow for the early termination of the forward flow contract by the
purchaser or call for a price renegotiation. Forward flow contracts are a consistent source of
defaulted consumer receivables for accounts receivables management providers and provide the debt
owner with a reliable source of revenue and a professional resolution of defaulted consumer
receivables.
In a typical sale transaction, a debt owner initially distributes a computer data file
containing ten to fifteen essential data fields on each receivables account in the portfolio
offered for sale. Such fields typically include but are not limited to the customers name,
address, outstanding balance, date of charge-off, date of last payment and the date the account was
opened. We perform our initial due diligence on the portfolio by electronically cross-checking the
data fields on the computer disk or data tape against the accounts in our owned portfolios and
9
against national demographic and credit databases. We compile a variety of portfolio level reports
examining all demographic data available. When valuing pools of bankrupt consumer receivables, we
seek to access information on the status of each accounts bankruptcy case.
In order to determine a purchase price for a core portfolio, we use two separate internally
developed computer models and one externally developed model, which we may supplement with on-site
due diligence of the sellers collection operation and/or a review of their loan origination files,
collection notes and work processes. We analyze the portfolio using our proprietary multiple
regression model, which analyzes each account of the portfolio using variables in the regression
model. In addition, we analyze the portfolio as a whole using an adjustment model, which uses an
appropriate cash flow model depending upon whether it is a purchase of fresh, primary, secondary or
tertiary accounts. Then, adjustments can be made to the cash flow model to compensate for
demographic attributes supported by a detailed analysis of demographic data. Finally, we use a
model that creates statistically similar portfolios from our existing accounts and develops
collection curves for them that are used in our price modeling. From these models we derive our
quantitative purchasing analysis which is used to help price transactions. The multiple regression
model is also used to prioritize collection work efforts subsequent to purchase. With respect to
prospective forward flow contracts and other long-term relationships, we obtain a representative
file that we use to determine the price of the forward flow agreement. On a go-forward basis, we
receive the actual file to be funded, process it through our models, and compare it to the representative file noted above to determine if the delivered file meets the expectations of the initial
pricing file. This process allows us to confirm that the accounts we are purchasing are materially consistent
with the accounts we agreed to purchase under the forward flow arrangement. In addition, when
purchasing bankrupt consumer receivables, we utilize a completely separate, specifically designed
pricing model.
Our due diligence and portfolio review results in a comprehensive analysis of the proposed
portfolio. This analysis compares defaulted consumer receivables in the prospective portfolio with
our collection history in similar portfolios. We then use our multiple regression model to value
each account. Finally, we use the statistically similar portfolio analysis model to refine our
curves. Using these three valuation approaches, we determine cash collections over the life of the
portfolio. We then summarize all anticipated cash collections and associated direct expenses and
project a collectability value expressed both in dollars and liquidation percentage and a detailed
expense projection over the portfolios estimated economic life. We use the total projected
collectability value and expenses to determine an appropriate purchase price.
We maintain a detailed static pool analysis on each portfolio that we have acquired, capturing
all demographic data and revenue and expense items for further analysis. We use the static pool
analysis to refine the underwriting models that we use to price future portfolio purchases. The
results of the static pool analysis are input back into our models, increasing the accuracy of the
models as the data set increases with every portfolio purchase and each days collection efforts.
In addition, we do not sell our purchased defaulted consumer receivables. Instead, we work them
over the long-term enhancing our knowledge of a pools long-term performance.
The quantitative and qualitative data derived in our due diligence is evaluated together with
our knowledge of the current defaulted consumer receivables market and any subjective factors about
the portfolio or the debt owner of which management may be aware. A portfolio acquisition approval
memorandum is prepared for each prospective portfolio before a purchase price is submitted to the
debt owner. This approval memorandum, which outlines the portfolios anticipated collectability
and purchase structure, is distributed to members of our Investment Committee. The approval by the
Committee sets a maximum purchase price for the portfolio.
Once a portfolio purchase has been approved by our Investment Committee and the terms of the
sale have been agreed to with the debt owner, the acquisition is documented in an agreement that
contains customary terms and conditions. Provisions are typically incorporated for bankrupt,
disputed, fraudulent or deceased accounts and typically, the debt owner either agrees to repurchase
these accounts or replace them with acceptable replacement accounts within certain time frames.
10
Owned Portfolio Collection Operations
Call Center Operations
Our work flow management system places, recalls and prioritizes accounts in collectors work
queues, based on our analyses of our accounts and other demographic, credit and customer behavior
attributes and prior collection work activities. We use this process to focus our work effort on
those customers most likely to pay on their accounts and to rotate to other collectors the
non-paying but most likely to pay accounts from which other collectors have been unsuccessful in
receiving payment. The majority of our collections occur as a result of telephone contact with
customers; however, letters and legal activity also generate meaningful levels of cash collections.
The collectability forecast for a newly acquired portfolio will help determine our initial
collection strategy. Accounts that are determined to have the highest predicted collection
probability may be sent immediately to collectors work queues. Less collectible accounts may be
set aside as house accounts to be collected using a predictive dialer or another passive, low cost
method. After owning an account for a month we begin reassessing the collectability on a daily
basis based on a set of observed account characteristics and behaviors. Some accounts may be
worked using a letter and/or settlement strategy. We may obtain credit reports for various
accounts after the collection process begins.
Our computer system allows each collector to view the scanned documents relating to the
account which have been received from the seller, which can include the original account
application and payment checks, customer correspondence and other documents. A typical collector
work queue may include 300 to 600 accounts or more. The work queue is depleted and replenished
automatically by our computerized work flow system.
On the initial contact call, a customer is given a standardized presentation regarding the
benefits of resolving his or her account with us. Emphasis is placed on determining the reason for
the customers default in order to better assess the customers situation and create a plan for
repayment. The collector is incentivized to have the customer pay the full balance of the account
although this occurs very infrequently. If the collector cannot obtain payment of the full
balance, the collector will suggest a repayment plan which generally includes an approximate 20%
down payment with the balance to be repaid over an agreed upon period. At times, when determined to
be appropriate, and in many cases with management approval, a reduced lump-sum settlement may be
agreed upon. If the customer elects to utilize an installment plan, we have developed a system
which enables us to make withdrawals from a customers bank account, in accordance with the
directions of the customer.
If a collector is unable to establish contact with a customer based on information received,
the collector must undertake skip tracing procedures to develop important account information.
Skip tracing is the process of developing new phone, address, job or asset information on a
customer, or verifying the accuracy of such information. Each collector does his or her own skip
tracing using a number of computer applications available at his or her workstation, a process
which is significantly supplemented by a series of automated skip tracing procedures implemented by
us on a regular basis.
Legal Recovery
An important component of our collections effort involves our legal recovery department and
the judicial collection of accounts of customers who have the ability, but not the willingness, to
resolve their obligations. Accounts for which the customer is not cooperative and for which we can
establish garnishable wages or attachable assets are reviewed for legal action. Additionally, we
review accounts using a proprietary scoring model and select those accounts reflecting a high
propensity to pay in a legal environment. Depending on the balance of the defaulted consumer
receivable and the applicable state collection laws, we determine whether to commence legal action
to judicially collect on the receivable. The legal process can take an extended period of time,
but it also generates cash collections that likely would not have been realized otherwise.
11
We use a combination of internal staff (attorney and support), as well as external attorneys,
to pursue legal collections under certain circumstances. Over the past several years we have
focused on developing our internal legal collection capability. We anticipate that, over time,
collections from our internal legal team will surpass those of our external collection fee
collection attorneys. We have the capability in all 50 states to initiate lawsuits
in amounts up to the jurisdictional limits of the respective courts. Our legal recovery
department, using external vendors, also collects claims against estates in cases involving
deceased debtors having assets at the time of death. Our legal recovery department oversees our
internal legal collections and coordinates a nationwide collections attorney network which is
responsible for the preparation and filing of judicial collection proceedings in multiple
jurisdictions, determining the suit criteria, and instituting wage garnishments to satisfy
judgments. This network consists of approximately 65 law firms who work on a contingent fee basis.
Legal cash collections generated by both our in house attorneys and outside independent contingent
fee attorneys constituted approximately 24% of our total cash collections in 2010. As our
portfolio matures, a larger number of accounts will be directed to our legal recovery department
for judicial collection; consequently, we anticipate that legal cash collections will grow
commensurately and comprise a larger percentage of our total cash collections.
Bankruptcy Operations
Our bankruptcy department manages customer filings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on debtor
accounts derived from three sources; 1) the companys purchased pools of charged off accounts and accounts
that have filed for bankruptcy protection after being acquired by us, 2) our purchased pools of
bankrupt accounts, and 3) our third party servicing client relationships. On company owned
accounts, we file proofs of claim (POCs) or claim transfers and actively manage these accounts
through the entire life cycle of the bankruptcy proceeding in order to substantiate our claims and
ensure that we participate in any distributions to creditors. On accounts managed under a third
party relationship, we work on either a full service contingency fee basis or a menu style fee for
service basis.
We developed our proprietary Bankruptcy Management System (BMS) as a secure and highly
automated platform for providing bankruptcy notification services, filing POCs and claim transfers,
managing documents, administering our case load, posting and reconciling payments and providing
customized reports. BMS is a robust system designed to manage claims processing and case
management in a high volume environment. The system is highly flexible and its capacity is easily
expanded. Daily processing volumes are managed to meet individual bar dates associated with each
bankruptcy case and specific client turnaround times. BMS and its underlying business rules were
developed with emphasis first on minimizing risks through strict compliance to the bankruptcy code,
then on maximizing recoveries from automated claim filing and case administration.
Each of our bankruptcy department employees goes through an entry level training program to
familiarize them with BMS and the bankruptcy process, including a general overview of how we
interact with the courts, debtors attorneys and trustees. We also use a tiered process of cross
training designed to familiarize advancing employees with a variety of operational assignments and
analytical tasks. For example, we utilize specially trained employees to perform advanced data
matching and analytics for clients, while others are tasked with resolving objections directly with
attorneys and trustees. In rare circumstances, resolution of these objections may need to be
effected by working through our network of local counsel.
Fee-for-Service Businesses
Through our subsidiaries, we provide fee-based services, including collateral location
services for credit originators via our IGS subsidiary; revenue administration, audit, and debt
discovery/recovery services for government entities through our government services business; and
class action claims recovery services and related payment processing through our CCB subsidiary.
We previously offered third party contingent fee collections services through our Anchor
Receivables Management subsidiary, which ceased operations during the second quarter of 2008.
IGS performs national skip tracing, asset location and collateral recovery services,
principally for auto finance companies, for a fee. The amount of fee earned is generally dependent
on several different outcomes: whether the debtor was found and a resolution on the account
occurred, if the collateral was repossessed or if payment was made by the debtor to the debt owner.
12
The primary source of income for RDS and MuniServices, which together comprise our government
services business, is derived from servicing taxing authorities in several different ways:
processing their tax payments and tax forms, collecting delinquent taxes, identifying taxes that
are not being paid and auditing tax payments. The processing and collection pieces are standard
commission based billings or fee for service transactions. When audits are conducted, there are two
components. The first is a charge for the hours incurred on conducting the audit, based on a
contractual billing rate. The gross billing amount based on the aforementioned billing rate is a
component of the line item Fee income while the salary expense is included in the line item
Compensation and employee services. The second item is for expenses incurred while conducting
the audit. Most jurisdictions will reimburse us for direct expenses incurred for the audit
including such items as travel and meals. The billed
amounts are included in the line item Fee income and the expense component is included in
its appropriate expense category, generally, Other operating expenses.
On March 15, 2010, we acquired 62% of the membership units of CCB. CCB was founded in 1996
and is a leading provider of class action claims settlement recovery services and related payment
processing to corporate clients. CCBs process allows clients to maximize settlement recoveries,
in many cases participating in settlements they would otherwise not know existed. The company
charges fees for its services and works with clients to identify, prepare and submit claims to
class action administrators charged with disbursing class action settlement funds.
Competition
We face competition in both of the markets we serve owned portfolio and fee-for-service
receivables management from new and existing providers of outsourced receivables management
services, including other purchasers of defaulted consumer receivables portfolios, third-party
contingent fee collection agencies and debt owners that manage their own defaulted consumer
receivables rather than outsourcing them. The receivables management industry (owned portfolio and
contingent fee) remains highly fragmented and competitive. There are few significant barriers for
entry to new providers of contingent fee receivables management services and, consequently, the
number of agencies serving the contingent fee market may continue to grow. Constrained investment
capital and the need for portfolio evaluation expertise sufficient to price portfolios effectively
constitute significant barriers for entry to new purchased portfolio receivables companies.
We face bidding competition in our acquisition of defaulted consumer receivables and in
obtaining placement of fee-for-service receivables. We also compete on the basis of reputation,
industry experience and performance. Among the positive factors which we believe influence our
ability to compete effectively in this market are our ability to bid on portfolios at appropriate
prices, our reputation from previous transactions regarding our ability to close transactions in a
timely fashion, our relationships with originators of defaulted consumer receivables, our team of
well-trained collectors who provide quality customer service and compliance with applicable
collections laws and our ability to efficiently and effectively collect on various asset types.
Current or new competitors that have substantially greater financial, personnel and other
resources, greater adaptability to changing market needs, longer operating histories, or more
established relationships in our industry than we currently have, could influence our ability to
compete effectively.
Information Technology
Technology Operating Systems and Server Platform
The architecture and design of our systems provides us with a technology system that is
flexible, secure, reliable and redundant to provide for the protection of our sensitive data. We
utilize Intel-based servers running Microsoft Windows 2000/2003 operating systems. Our desktop PCs
run the Windows XP operating system. In addition, we utilize a blend of purchased and proprietary
software systems tailored to the needs of our business. These systems are designed to eliminate
inefficiencies in our collections and continue to meet business objectives in a changing
environment. Our proprietary software systems are being leveraged to manage location information
and operational applications for government services, IGS and CCB.
13
Network Technology
To provide delivery of our applications, we utilize Intel-based workstations across our entire
business operation. The environment is configured to provide speeds of 100 megabytes to the
desktops of our collections and administration staff. Our one gigabyte server network architecture
supports high-speed data transport. Our network system is designed to be scalable and meet
expansion and inter-building bandwidth and quality of service demands.
Database and Software Systems
The ability to access and utilize data is essential to us being able to operate in a
cost-effective manner. Our centralized computer-based information systems support the core
processing functions of our business under a set of integrated databases and are designed to be
both replicable and scalable to accommodate our internal growth. This integrated approach helps to
assure that data sources are processed efficiently. We use these systems for portfolio and client
management, skip tracing, check taking, financial and management accounting, reporting, and
planning and analysis. The systems also support our customers, including on-line access to account
information, account status and payment entry. We use a combination of Microsoft and Oracle
database software to manage
our portfolios and financial, customer and sales data. Government Services, IGS and CCB all
maintain unique, proprietary software systems that manage the movement of data, accounts and
information throughout these business units.
Redundancy, System Backup, Security and Disaster Recovery
Our data centers provide the infrastructure for collection services and uninterrupted support
of data, applications and hardware for all of our business units. We believe our facilities and
operations include sufficient redundancy, file back-up and security to ensure minimal exposure to
systems failure or unauthorized access. The preparations in this area include the use of call
centers in Virginia, Kansas, Alabama and Tennessee in order to help provide redundancy for data
and processes should one site be completely disabled. We have a disaster recovery plan covering
our business that is tested on a periodic basis. The combination of our locally distributed call
control systems provides enterprise-wide call and data distribution between our call centers for
efficient portfolio collection and business operations. In addition to data replication between
the sites, incremental backups of both software and databases are performed on a daily basis and a
full system backup is performed weekly. Backup data tapes are stored at an offsite location along
with copies of schedules and production control procedures, procedures for recovery using an
off-site data center, and documentation and other critical information necessary for recovery and
continued operation. Our Virginia headquarters has two separate telecommunications feeds,
uninterruptible power supplies and natural gas and diesel-generators, all of which provide a level
of redundancy should a power outage or interruption occur. We also have generators installed at
each of our call centers, as well as our subsidiary locations in Alabama, California and Nevada.
We also employ rigorous physical and electronic security to protect our data. Our call centers
have restricted card key access and appropriate additional physical security measures. Electronic
protections include data encryption, firewalls and multi-level access controls.
Predictive Dialer Technology
The Avaya Proactive Contact Dialer enables our collection staff to focus on certain defaulted
consumer receivables according to our specifications. Its predictive technology takes into account
all collection campaign and dialing parameters and is able to automatically adjust its dialing pace
to match changes in campaign conditions and provide the lowest possible wait times and abandon
rates, with the highest volume of outbound calls.
Display Screens for Real Time Data Utilization
We utilize multiple plasma displays at most of our collection facilities to aid in recovery of
portfolios. The displays provide real-time business-critical information to our collection
personnel for efficient collection efforts such as telephone, production, employee status, goal
trending, training and corporate information.
14
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we employed 2,473 persons on a full-time basis, including the
following number of front line operations employees by business: 1,779 working on our owned
portfolios and 342 working in our fee for service subsidiaries. None of our employees are
represented by a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our
relations with our employees are good.
Collection Personnel
We recognize that our collectors are critical to the success of our business as a majority of
our collection efforts occur as a result of telephone contact with customers. We have found that
the tenure and productivity of our collectors are directly related. Therefore, attracting, hiring,
training, retaining and motivating our collection personnel is a major focus for us. We pay our
collectors competitive wages and offer employees a full benefits program which includes
comprehensive medical coverage, short and long term disability, life insurance, dental and vision
coverage, pre-paid legal plan, an employee assistance program, supplemental indemnity, cancer,
hospitalization and accident insurance, a flexible spending account for child care and a matching
401(k) program. In addition to a base wage, we provide collectors with the opportunity to receive
unlimited compensation through an incentive compensation program that pays bonuses above a set
monthly base, based upon each collectors collection results. This program is designed to provide
that employees are paid based not only on performance, but also on consistency and compliance.
A large number of telemarketing, customer-service and reservation phone centers are located
near our Norfolk, Virginia headquarters. We believe that we offer a competitive and, in many
cases, a higher base wage than many local employers and therefore have access to a large number of
eligible personnel. In addition, there are several military bases in the area which provide us
with an excellent source of employees. As a result, we employ numerous military spouses and
retirees. We have also found the Las Vegas, Nevada, Hutchinson, Kansas, Birmingham, Alabama,
Jackson, Tennessee, Houston, Texas and Fresno, California areas to provide a large potential
workforce of eligible personnel.
Training
We provide a comprehensive multi-week training program for all new owned portfolio collectors.
Our training program begins with lectures on collection techniques, local, state and federal
collection laws, systems, negotiation skills, skip tracing and telephone use. These sessions are
then followed by additional weeks of practical instruction, including conducting live calls with
additional managerial supervision in order to provide employees with confidence and guidance while
still contributing to our profitability. Each trainee must successfully pass a comprehensive
examination before being assigned to the collection floor, as well as once a year thereafter. In
addition, we conduct continuing advanced classes in our five training centers. Our technology and
systems allow us to monitor and record individual employees and then offer additional training in
areas of deficiency to increase productivity and ensure compliance.
Office of General Counsel
Our Office of General Counsel manages general corporate governance; litigation; insurance;
corporate transactions; intellectual property; contract and document preparation and review,
including real estate purchase and lease agreements and portfolio purchase documents; compliance
with federal securities laws and other regulations and statutes; obtaining and maintaining
insurance coverage; and dispute and complaint resolution. As a part of its compliance functions,
our Office of General Counsel works with our Director of Internal Audit in the implementation of
our Code of Ethics. In that connection, we have implemented companywide ethics training and
mandatory ethics quizzes and have established a confidential telephone hotline to report suspected
policy violations, fraud, embezzlement, deception in record keeping and reporting, accounting,
auditing matters and other acts which are inappropriate, criminal and/or unethical. Our Code of
Ethics is available at the Investor Relations page of our website. Our Office of General Counsel
also works closely with and provides guidance to our Quality Control and Compliance department and
assists with advising our staff in relevant areas including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
and other relevant laws and regulations. Our Office of General Counsel distributes guidelines and
procedures for collection personnel to follow when communicating with customers, customers agents,
attorneys and other parties during our recovery efforts. This includes approving all written
15
communications to account debtors. In addition, our Office of General Counsel regularly
researches, and provides collections personnel and our training department with summaries and
updates of changes in federal and state statutes and relevant case law so that they are aware of
and in compliance with changing laws and judicial decisions when skip-tracing or collecting
accounts.
Regulation
Federal and state statutes establish specific guidelines and procedures which debt collectors
must follow when collecting customer accounts. It is our policy to comply with the provisions of
all applicable federal laws and corresponding state statutes in all of our recovery activities. Our
failure to comply with these laws could have a material adverse effect on us in the event and to
the extent that they apply to some or all of our recovery activities. Federal and state consumer
protection, privacy and related laws and regulations extensively regulate the relationship between
debt collectors and debtors, and the relationship between customers and credit card issuers.
Significant federal laws and regulations applicable to our business as a debt collector include the
following:
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. This act imposes certain obligations and restrictions
on the practices of debt collectors, including specific restrictions regarding communications with
customers, including the time, place and manner of the communications. This act also gives
consumers certain rights, including the right to dispute the validity of their obligations and a
right to sue debt collectors who fail to comply with its provisions, including the right to recover
their attorney fees.
Fair Credit Reporting Act. This act places certain requirements on credit information
providers regarding the verification of the accuracy of information provided to credit reporting
agencies and investigating consumer disputes concerning the accuracy of such information. We
provide information concerning our accounts to the
three major credit reporting agencies, and it is our practice to correctly report this
information and to investigate credit reporting disputes. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act to include additional duties applicable to data
furnishers with respect to information in the consumers credit file that the consumer identifies
as resulting from identity theft, and requires that data furnishers have procedures in place to
prevent such information from being furnished to credit reporting agencies.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. This act requires that certain financial institutions, including
collection agencies, develop policies to protect the privacy of consumers private financial
information and provide notices to consumers advising them of their privacy policies. This act also
requires that if private personal information concerning a consumer is shared with another
unrelated institution, the consumer must be given an opportunity to opt out of having such
information shared. Since we do not share consumer information with non-related entities, except as
required by law, or except as needed to collect on the receivables, our consumers are not entitled
to any opt-out rights under this act. This act is enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which
has retained exclusive jurisdiction over its enforcement, and does not afford a private cause of
action to consumers who may wish to pursue legal action against a financial institution for
violations of this act.
Electronic Funds Transfer Act. This act regulates the use of the Automated Clearing House
(ACH) system to make electronic funds transfers. All ACH transactions must comply with the rules
of the National Automated Check Clearing House Association (NACHA) and Uniform Commercial Code §
3-402. This act, the NACHA regulations and the Uniform Commercial Code give the consumer, among
other things, certain privacy rights with respect to electronic fund transfer transactions, the
right to stop payments on a pre-approved fund transfer, and the right to receive certain
documentation of the transaction. This act also gives consumers a right to sue institutions which
cause financial damages as a result of their failure to comply with its provisions.
Telephone Consumer Protection Act. In the process of collecting accounts, we use automated
predictive dialers and pre-recorded messages to communicate with our consumers. This act and
similar state laws place certain restrictions on telemarketers and users of automated dialing
equipment and pre-recorded messages who place telephone calls to consumers.
16
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act of 1940
was amended in December 2003 as the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA). The SCRA gives U.S.
military service personnel relief from credit obligations they may have incurred prior to entering
military service, and may also apply in certain circumstances to obligations and liabilities
incurred by a servicemember while serving on active duty. The SCRA prohibits creditors from taking
specified actions to collect the defaulted accounts of servicemembers. The SCRA impacts many
different types of credit obligations, including installment contracts and court proceedings, and
tolls the statute of limitations during the time that the servicemember is engaged in active
military service. The SCRA also places a cap on interest bearing obligations of servicemembers to
an amount not greater than 6% per year, inclusive of all related charges and fees.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) provides standards to protect the confidentiality of patients
personal healthcare and financial information. Pursuant to HIPAA, business associates of health
care providers, such as agencies which collect healthcare receivables, must comply with certain
privacy and security standards established by HIPAA to ensure that the information provided will be
safeguarded from misuse. This act is enforced by the Department of Health and Human Services and
does not afford a private cause of action to consumers who may wish to pursue legal action against
an institution for violations of this act.
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In order to prevent any collection activity with bankrupt debtors by
creditors and collection agencies, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code provides for an automatic stay, which
prohibits certain contacts with consumers after the filing of bankruptcy petitions. The U.S.
Bankruptcy Code also dictates what types of claims will or will not be allowed in a bankruptcy
proceeding and how such claims may be discharged.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. On July 21, 2010 the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) became law. The Dodd-Frank Act
restructures the regulation and supervision of the financial services industry. Many of the
provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have extended implementation periods and delayed effective dates
and will require extensive rulemaking by regulatory authorities. As a result, the ultimate impact of the act on
our business cannot be determined at this time.
Additionally, there are some state statutes and regulations comparable to the above federal
laws, and specific licensing requirements which affect our operations. State laws may also limit
credit account interest rates and the fees, as well as limit the time frame in which judicial and
non-judicial actions may be initiated to collect consumer accounts.
Although we are not a credit originator, some of the following laws, which apply principally
to credit originators, may occasionally affect our operations because our receivables were
originated through credit transactions:
Truth in Lending Act;
Fair Credit Billing Act; and
Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Federal laws which regulate credit originators require, among other things, that credit card
issuers disclose to consumers the interest rates, fees, grace periods and balance calculation
methods associated with their credit card accounts. Consumers are entitled under current laws to
have payments and credits applied to their accounts promptly, to receive prescribed notices and to
require billing errors to be resolved promptly. Some laws prohibit discriminatory practices in
connection with the extension of credit. Federal statutes further provide that, in some cases,
consumers cannot be held liable for, or their liability is limited with respect to, charges to the
credit card account that were a result of an unauthorized use of the credit card. These laws, among
others, may give consumers a legal cause of action against us, or may limit our ability to recover
amounts owing with respect to the receivables, whether or not we committed any wrongful act or
omission in connection with the account. If the credit originator fails to comply with applicable
statutes, rules and regulations, it could create claims and rights for consumers that could reduce
or eliminate their obligations to repay the account and have a possible material adverse effect on
us.
17
Accordingly, when we acquire defaulted consumer receivables, typically we contractually
require credit originators to indemnify us against any losses caused by their failure to comply
with applicable statutes, rules and regulations relating to the receivables before they are sold to
us.
The U.S. Congress and several states have enacted legislation concerning identity theft.
Additional consumer protection and privacy protection laws may be enacted that would impose
additional requirements on the enforcement of and recovery on consumer credit card or installment
accounts. Any new laws, rules or regulations that may be adopted, as well as existing consumer
protection and privacy protection laws, may adversely affect our ability to recover the
receivables. In addition, our failure to comply with these requirements could adversely affect our
ability to enforce the receivables.
We cannot assure you that some of our receivables were not established as a result of identity
theft or unauthorized use of a credit card. In the event that a receivable was established as a
result of identity theft or unauthorized use, we could not recover the amount of the defaulted
consumer receivables. As a purchaser of defaulted consumer receivables, we may acquire receivables
subject to legitimate defenses on the part of the consumer. Typically our account purchase
contracts allow us to return to the debt owners certain defaulted consumer receivables that may not
be collectible, due to these and other circumstances. Upon return, the debt owners are required to
replace the receivables with similar receivables or repurchase the receivables. These provisions
limit to some extent our losses on such accounts.
In addition to our obligation to comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and
regulations, we are also obligated to comply with judicial decisions reached in court cases
involving legislation passed by any such governmental bodies.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The following are risks related to our business.
A deterioration in the economic or inflationary environment in the United States may have an
adverse effect on our collections, results of operations, revenue and stock price.
Our performance may be affected by economic or inflationary conditions in the United States.
If the United States economy deteriorates or if there is a significant rise in inflation, personal
bankruptcy filings may increase, and the ability of consumers to pay their debts could be adversely
affected. This may in turn adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, revenue
and stock price. Deteriorating economic conditions could also adversely impact businesses and
governmental entities to which we provide fee-based services, which could reduce our fee income and
cash flow and thereby adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, revenue and
stock price. Other factors associated with the economy that could influence our performance
include the financial stability of the lenders on our line of credit, our access to credit, and
financial factors affecting consumers.
The financial turmoil which affected the banking system and financial markets in recent years
has resulted in a tightening in credit markets. There could be a number of follow-on effects from
the financial turmoil on our business, including a decrease in the value of our financial
investments, the insolvency of lending institutions, including the lenders on our line of credit,
resulting in our inability to obtain credit. These and other economic factors could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to purchase defaulted consumer receivables at appropriate prices, and a decrease
in our ability to purchase portfolios of receivables could adversely affect our ability to generate
revenue.
If we are unable to purchase defaulted receivables from debt owners at appropriate prices, or
one or more debt owners stop selling defaulted receivables to us, we could lose a potential source
of income and our business may be harmed. The availability of receivables portfolios at prices
which generate an appropriate return on our investment depends on a number of factors both within
and outside of our control, including the following:
the continuation of high levels of consumer debt obligations;
sales of defaulted receivables portfolios by debt owners; and
competitive factors affecting potential purchasers and credit originators of receivables.
18
Moreover, there can be no assurance that our existing or potential clients will continue to
outsource their defaulted consumer receivables at recent levels or at all, or that we will be able
to continue to offer competitive bids for defaulted consumer receivables portfolios. If we are
unable to develop and expand our business or adapt to changing market needs as well as our current
or future competitors are able to do, we may experience reduced access to defaulted consumer
receivables portfolios at appropriate prices and reduced profitability.
Because of the length of time involved in collecting defaulted consumer receivables on
acquired portfolios and the volatility in the timing of our collections, we may not be able to
identify trends and make changes in our purchasing strategies in a timely manner.
We may not be able to continually replace our defaulted consumer receivables with additional
receivables portfolios sufficient to operate efficiently and profitably.
To operate profitably, we must acquire and service a sufficient amount of defaulted consumer
receivables to generate revenue that exceeds our expenses. Fixed costs such as salaries and lease
or other facility costs constitute a significant portion of our overhead and, if we do not replace
the defaulted consumer receivables portfolios we service with additional portfolios, we may have to
reduce the number of our collection personnel. We would then have to rehire collection staff as we
obtain additional defaulted consumer receivables portfolios. These practices could lead to:
low employee morale;
fewer experienced employees;
higher training costs;
disruptions in our operations;
loss of efficiency; and
excess costs associated with unused space in our facilities.
Furthermore, heightened regulation of the credit card and consumer lending industry or
changing credit origination strategies may result in decreased availability of credit to consumers,
potentially leading to a future reduction in defaulted consumer receivables available for purchase
from debt owners. We cannot predict how our ability to identify and purchase receivables and the
quality of those receivables would be affected if there would be a shift in consumer lending
practices, whether caused by changes in the regulations or accounting practices applicable to debt
owners, a sustained economic downturn or otherwise.
When documents are required to collect on an account, we rely on the seller to fulfill its
contractual obligation, if applicable, to provide them in an accurate and timely fashion. For some
of the accounts that we purchase, we may be unable to obtain these account documents, or the
accounts documents that we obtain may contain errors. Our inability to obtain these documents from
the seller may negatively impact the liquidation rate on such accounts that are subject to judicial
collections, or that are located in states in which, by law, no collection activity may proceed
without account documents.
When we collect accounts judicially, courts in certain jurisdictions require that a copy of
the account statements or applications be attached to the pleadings in order to obtain a judgment
against the account debtors. If we are unable to produce accurate and authentic account documents,
these courts will deny our claims. Additionally, our ability to collect non-judicially may be
impacted by state laws which require that certain types of account documentation be in our
possession prior to the institution of any collection activities.
19
We may not be able to collect sufficient amounts on our defaulted consumer receivables to fund our
operations.
Our business primarily consists of acquiring and liquidating receivables that consumers have
failed to pay and that the credit originator has deemed uncollectible and has charged-off. The
debt owners have typically made numerous attempts to recover on their defaulted consumer
receivables, often using a combination of in-house recovery efforts and third-party collection
agencies. These defaulted consumer receivables are difficult to collect and we may not collect a
sufficient amount to cover our investment associated with purchasing the defaulted consumer
receivables and the costs of running our business.
We may not be successful at acquiring receivables of new asset types or in implementing a new
pricing structure.
We may pursue the acquisition of receivables portfolios of asset types in which we have little
current experience. We may not be successful in completing any acquisitions of receivables of
these asset types and our limited experience in these asset types may impair our ability to collect
on these receivables. This may cause us to pay too much for these receivables and consequently, we
may not generate a profit from these receivables portfolio acquisitions.
Our collections may decrease if certain types of bankruptcy filings involving liquidations
increase.
Various economic trends and potential changes to existing legislation may contribute to an
increase in the amount of personal bankruptcy filings. Under certain bankruptcy filings a debtors
assets may be sold to repay creditors, but since the defaulted consumer receivables we service are
generally unsecured we often would not be able to collect on those receivables. We cannot ensure
that our collection experience would not decline with an increase in personal bankruptcy filings or
a change in bankruptcy regulations or practices. If our actual collection experience with respect
to a defaulted bankrupt consumer receivables portfolio is significantly lower than we projected
when we purchased the portfolio, our financial condition and results of operations could
deteriorate.
Our ability to recover on portfolios of bankrupt consumer receivables may be impacted by changes in
federal laws or changes in the administrative practices of the various bankruptcy courts.
We recover on consumer receivables that have filed for bankruptcy protection under available
U.S. bankruptcy laws. We recover on consumer receivables that have filed for bankruptcy protection
after we acquired them, and we also purchase accounts that are currently in bankruptcy proceedings.
Our ability to recover on portfolios of bankruptcy consumer receivables may be impacted by changes
in federal laws or changes in administrative practices of the various bankruptcy courts.
Our ability to recover and enforce our finance receivables may be limited under federal and state
laws.
The businesses conducted by the Companys operating subsidiaries are subject to licensing and
regulation by governmental and regulatory bodies in the many jurisdictions in which the Company
operates and conducts its business. Federal and state laws may limit our ability to recover and
enforce our defaulted consumer receivables regardless of any act or omission on our part. Some
laws and regulations applicable to credit issuers may preclude us from collecting on defaulted
consumer receivables we purchase if the credit issuer previously failed to comply with applicable
laws in generating or servicing those receivables. Collection laws and regulations also directly
apply to our business. Such laws and regulations are extensive and subject to change. Additional
consumer protection and privacy protection laws may be enacted that would impose additional
requirements on the enforcement of and collection on consumer credit receivables. Any new laws,
rules or regulations that may be adopted, as well as existing consumer protection and privacy
protection laws, may adversely affect our ability to collect on our defaulted consumer receivables
and may harm our business. In addition, federal and state governmental bodies are considering, and
may consider in the future, legislative proposals that would regulate the collection of our
defaulted consumer receivables. Further, certain tax laws such as Internal Revenue Code Section
6050P (requiring 1099-C returns to be filed on discharge of indebtedness in excess of $600) could
negatively impact our ability to collect or cause us to incur additional expenses. Although we
cannot predict if or how any future legislation would impact our business, our failure to comply
with any current or future laws or
20
regulations applicable to us could limit our ability to collect
on our defaulted consumer receivables, which could reduce our profitability and harm our business.
Failure to comply with government regulation of the collections industry could result in penalties,
litigation, damage to our reputation or the suspension or termination of our ability to conduct our
business.
The collections industry is governed by various U.S. federal and state laws and regulations.
Many states require us to be a licensed debt collector. The Federal Trade Commission has the
authority to investigate consumer complaints against debt collection companies and to recommend
enforcement actions and seek monetary penalties. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and
regulations, such failure could result in the suspension, or termination of our ability to conduct
collections which would materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition
and stock price. In addition, new federal and state laws or regulations or changes in the ways
these rules or laws are interpreted or enforced could limit our activities in the future or
significantly increase the cost of compliance.
Changes in governmental laws and regulations could increase our costs and liabilities or impact our
operations.
Changes in laws and regulations or
the manner in which they are interpreted or applied may
alter our business environment. This could affect our results of operations or increase our
liabilities. These negative impacts could result from changes in collection laws, laws related to
credit reporting, consumer bankruptcy, accounting standards, taxation requirements, employment laws
and communications laws, among others. For example, we know that both federal and state governments are currently reviewing existing
law related to debt collection, in order to determine if any changes are needed. If we become subject to additional costs or
liabilities in the future resulting from changes in laws and regulations, that could adversely effect on our results of operations
and financial condition.
We may make acquisitions that prove unsuccessful or strain or divert our resources.
We intend to consider acquisitions of other companies that could complement our business,
including the acquisition of entities offering greater access and expertise in other asset types
and markets that are related but that we do not currently serve. If we do acquire other
businesses, we may not be able to successfully operate the acquired entity and/or integrate these
businesses with our own and we may be unable to maintain our standards, controls and policies.
Further, acquisitions may place additional constraints on our resources by diverting the attention
of our management from other business concerns. Through acquisitions, we may enter markets in
which we have no or limited experience. Moreover, any acquisition may result in a potentially
dilutive issuance of equity securities or may result in the incurrence of additional debt and
amortization expenses of related intangible assets, which could reduce our profitability and harm
our business.
The loss of IGS, RDS, MuniServices or CCB customers could negatively affect our operations.
With respect to the acquisitions of IGS, RDS, MuniServices and CCB, a significant portion of
the valuation was attributed to existing client and customer relationships. Our customers, in
general, may terminate their relationship with us on 30-90 days prior notice. In the event a
customer or customers terminate or significantly cut back any relationship with us, it could reduce
our profitability and harm our business and could potentially give rise to an impairment charge
related to an intangible asset specifically ascribed to existing client and customer relationships.
Our senior management team is important to our continued success and the loss of one or more
members of senior management could negatively affect our operations.
The loss of the services of one or more of our key executive officers or key employees could
disrupt our operations. We have employment agreements with Steve Fredrickson, our president, chief
executive officer and chairman of our board of directors, Kevin Stevenson, our executive vice
president and chief financial and administrative officer, and most of our other senior executives.
The current agreements contain non-compete provisions that survive termination of employment.
However, these agreements do not and will not assure the continued services of these officers and
we cannot ensure that the non-compete provisions will be enforceable.
21
Our success depends on the continued service and performance of our key executive officers, and we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to retain those individuals.
Our work force could become unionized in the future, which could adversely affect the stability of
our operations and increase our costs.
Currently, none of our employees are represented by unions. However, our employees have the
right at any time under the National Labor Relations Act to form or affiliate with a union. If
some or all of our workforce were to become unionized and the terms of the collective bargaining
agreement were significantly different from our current compensation arrangements, it could
adversely affect the stability of our work force and increase our costs.
We experience high employee turnover rates and we may not be able to hire and retain enough
sufficiently trained employees to support our operations.
The receivables management industry is very labor intensive and, similar to other companies in
our industry, we typically experience a high rate of employee turnover. Our annual turnover rate
in our collector workforce, excluding those employees that do not complete our multi-week training
program was 39% in 2010. We compete for qualified personnel with companies in our industry and in
other industries. Our growth requires that we continually hire and train new collectors. A higher
turnover rate among our collectors will increase our recruiting and training costs and limit the
number of experienced collection personnel available to service our defaulted consumer receivables.
If this were to occur, we would not be able to service our defaulted consumer receivables
effectively and this would reduce our ability to continue our growth and operate profitability.
We may not be able to retain, renegotiate or replace our existing credit facility.
Our credit facility includes an aggregate principal amount available of $407.5 million which
consists of a $50 million fixed rate loan that matures on May 4, 2012, and a $357.5 million
revolving facility that matures on December 20, 2014. The revolving facility will be automatically
increased by $50 million upon maturity and repayment of the fixed rate loan. If we are unable to
retain, renegotiate or replace such facility, our growth could be adversely affected, which could
negatively impact our business operations and the price of our common stock.
We may not be able to continue to satisfy the restrictive covenants in our debt agreements.
All of our receivable portfolios are pledged to secure amounts owed to our lenders. Our debt
agreements impose a number of restrictive covenants on how we operate our business. Failure to
satisfy any one of these covenants could result in all or any of the following consequences, each
of which could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to conduct business:
acceleration of outstanding indebtedness;
our inability to continue to purchase receivables needed to operate our business; or
our inability to secure alternative financing on favorable terms, if at all.
Changes in interest rates could increase our interest expense and reduce our net income. Our
future hedging strategies may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with changes in
interest rates and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, as
could our failure to comply with hedge accounting principles and interpretations.
Our revolving credit facility bears interest at a variable rate as of December 31, 2010.
Increases in interest rates could increase our interest expense which would, in turn, lower our
earnings. From time to time, we may enter into hedging transactions to mitigate our interest rate
risk on a portion of our credit facility. Our hedging strategies rely on assumptions and
projections. If these assumptions and projections prove to be incorrect or our hedges do not
adequately mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates, we may experience volatility in our
earnings that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We had no
interest rate hedge contracts at December 31, 2010.
In addition, hedge accounting in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815 Derivatives and Hedging
requires the application of significant subjective judgments to a body of accounting concepts that
is complex and for which the interpretations have continued to evolve within the accounting
profession and among the standard-setting bodies. Our failure to comply with hedge accounting
principles and interpretations in the future could result in the loss of the applicability of hedge
accounting which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Additional taxes levied on us could harm our financial results.
Our tax filings are subject to audit by tax authorities in most jurisdictions in
which we do business. These audits may result in assessments of additional taxes, adjustments to
the timing of taxable income or deductions or allocations of income among tax jurisdictions. If any such challenges are made and are not
resolved in our favor, they could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
22
We file income tax returns using the cost recovery method for tax revenue recognition as it
relates to our debt purchasing business. We were notified on June 21, 2007 that we were being
examined by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2005 calendar year. The IRS has concluded its
audit and on March 19, 2009 issued Form 4549-A, Income Tax Examination Changes, for tax years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The IRS has asserted that cost recovery for tax revenue
recognition does not clearly reflect taxable income and that unused line fees paid on credit
facilities should be capitalized and amortized rather than taken as a current deduction. On April
22, 2009, we filed a formal protest of the findings contained in the examination report prepared by
the IRS. We believe we have sufficient support for the technical merits of our positions and that it is more-likely-than-not that these positions will ultimately be sustained;
therefore, a reserve for uncertain tax positions is not necessary for these tax positions. If we
are unsuccessful in our appeal, we may be required to further our efforts in United States Tax
Court. Additionally if judicial appeals prove unsuccessful, we may ultimately be required to pay
the related deferred taxes and any potential interest, possibly requiring additional financing from
other sources.
We utilize the interest method of revenue recognition for determining our income recognized on
finance receivables, which is based on an analysis of projected cash flows that may prove to be
less than anticipated and could lead to reductions in future revenues or the incurrence of
valuation allowance charges.
We utilize the interest method to determine income recognized on finance receivables under the
guidance of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 310-30, Loans
and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (ASC 310-30). Under this method,
static pools of receivables we acquire are modeled upon their projected cash flows. A yield is
then established which, when applied to the unamortized purchase price of the receivables, results
in the recognition of income at a constant yield relative to the remaining balance in the pool.
Each static pool is analyzed monthly to assess the actual performance compared to that expected by
the model. Significant increases in actual or projected future cash flows are recognized
prospectively, through an upward adjustment of the yield, over a pools estimated remaining life.
Any increase to the yield then becomes the new benchmark for future impairment testing for the
pool. Under ASC 310-30, rather than lowering the estimated yield for significant decreases in
actual or projected future cash flows, a valuation allowance charge is recorded to reduce the
carrying value of a pool to maintain the then current yield and is shown as a reduction in revenues
in the consolidated income statements with a corresponding valuation allowance offsetting finance
receivables, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. As a result, if the accuracy of the modeling
process deteriorates or there is a significant decline in anticipated future cash flows, we could
incur reductions in future revenues resulting from additional valuation allowance charges, which
could reduce our profitability in a given period and negatively impact our stock price.
Our operations could suffer from telecommunications or technology downtime or increased costs.
Our success depends in large part on sophisticated telecommunications and computer systems.
The temporary or permanent loss of our computer and telecommunications equipment and software
systems, through casualty or operating malfunction, could disrupt our operations. In the normal
course of our business, we must record and process significant amounts of data quickly and
accurately to access, maintain and expand the databases we use for our collection activities. Any
failure of our information systems or software and our backup systems would interrupt our business
operations and harm our business. Our headquarters are located in a region that is susceptible to
hurricane damage, which may increase the risk of disruption of information systems and telephone
service for sustained periods.
Further, our business depends heavily on services provided by various local and long distance
telephone companies. A significant increase in telephone service costs or any significant
interruption in telephone services could reduce our profitability or disrupt our operations and
harm our business.
We may not be able to successfully anticipate, manage or adopt technological advances within our
industry.
Our business relies on computer and telecommunications technologies and our ability to
integrate these technologies into our business is essential to our competitive position and our
success. Computer and telecommunications technologies are evolving rapidly and are characterized
by short product life cycles. We
23
may not be successful in anticipating, managing or adopting technological changes on a timely
basis, which could reduce our profitability or disrupt our operations and harm our business.
While we believe that our existing information systems are sufficient to meet our current
demands and continued expansion, our future growth may require additional investment in these
systems. We depend on having the capital resources necessary to invest in new technologies to
acquire and service defaulted consumer receivables. We cannot ensure that adequate capital
resources will be available to us at the appropriate time.
We rely on our systems and employees, and certain failures or disruptions could adversely affect
the continuity of our business operations.
We may be subject to disruptions of our operating systems arising from events that are not
entirely within our control. Those events may include, for example, terrorist attacks, war and the
outcome of war and threats of attacks; computer viruses; electrical or telecommunications outages;
natural disasters; computer hacking attacks; malicious employee acts; other intentional destructive
human acts; and disease pandemics. Any or all of these occurrences could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition and stock price.
We serve markets that are highly competitive, and we may be unable to compete with businesses that
may have greater resources than we have.
We face competition in the markets we serve from new and existing providers of outsourced
receivables management services, including other purchasers of defaulted consumer receivables
portfolios, third-party contingent fee collection agencies and debt owners that manage their own
defaulted consumer receivables rather than outsourcing them. The receivables management industry is
highly fragmented and competitive, consisting of thousands of consumer and commercial agencies,
most of which compete in the contingent fee business.
We face bidding competition in our acquisition of defaulted consumer receivables and in our
placement of fee based receivables, and we also compete on the basis of reputation, industry
experience and performance. Some of our current competitors and possible new competitors may have
substantially greater financial, personnel and other resources, greater adaptability to changing
market needs, longer operating histories and more established relationships in our industry than we
currently have. In the future, we may not have the resources or ability to compete successfully.
As there are few significant barriers for entry to new providers of fee based receivables
management services, there can be no assurance that additional competitors with greater resources
than ours will not enter the market.
We may not be able to manage our growth effectively.
We have expanded significantly since our formation and we intend to maintain our focus on
growth. However, our growth will place additional demands on our resources and we cannot ensure
that we will be able to manage our growth effectively. In order to successfully manage our growth,
we may need to:
expand and enhance our administrative infrastructure;
continue to improve our management, financial and information systems and controls; and
recruit, train, manage and retain our employees effectively.
Continued growth could place a strain on our management, operations and financial resources.
We cannot ensure that our infrastructure, facilities and personnel will be adequate to support our
future operations or to effectively adapt to future growth. If we cannot manage our growth
effectively, our results of operations may be adversely affected.
The market price of our shares of common stock could fluctuate significantly.
Wide fluctuations in the trading price or volume of our shares of common stock could be caused
by many factors, including factors relating to our company or to investor perception of our company
(including changes in
24
financial estimates and recommendations by research analysts), but also factors relating to (or relating to investor perception of) the receivables management industry or
the economy in general.
Negative publicity or reputational attacks could damage our reputation.
From time to time there are negative news stories about our industry or company, especially
with respect to alleged conduct in collecting debt from customers. Negative public opinion about our alleged
or actual debt collection practices or about the debt collection industry, especially that
expressed via social media such as blogs, various websites or newsletters, generally could
adversely impact our stock price and our ability to retain and attract customers and employees.
Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and Delaware law contain provisions that may prevent or
delay a change of control or that may otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws contain provisions that may make it more
difficult, expensive or otherwise discourage a tender offer or a change in control or takeover
attempt by a third-party, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to our stockholders. The
existence of these provisions may have a negative impact on the price of our common stock by
discouraging third-party investors from purchasing our common stock. In particular, our certificate
of incorporation and by-laws include provisions that:
|
|
|
classify our board of directors into three groups, each of which will serve for staggered
three-year terms; |
|
|
|
|
permit a majority of the stockholders to remove our directors only for cause; |
|
|
|
|
permit our directors, and not our stockholders, to fill vacancies on our board of directors; |
|
|
|
|
require stockholders to give us advance notice to nominate candidates for election to our
board of directors or to make stockholder proposals at a stockholders meeting; |
|
|
|
|
permit a special meeting of our stockholders to be called only by approval of a majority of
the directors, the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer, the
president or the written request of holders owning at least 30% of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
permit our board of directors to issue, without approval of our stockholders, preferred
stock with such terms as our board of directors may determine; |
|
|
|
|
permit the authorized number of directors to be changed only by a resolution of the board
of directors; and |
|
|
|
|
require the vote of the holders of a majority of our voting shares for stockholder
amendments to our by-laws. |
In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which
provides certain restrictions on business combinations between us and any party acquiring a 15% or
greater interest in our voting stock other than in a transaction approved by our board of directors
and, in certain cases, by our stockholders. These provisions of our certificate of incorporation,
our by-laws and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control, even if our stockholders
support such proposals. Moreover, these provisions could diminish the opportunities for
stockholders to participate in certain tender offers, including tender offers at prices above the
then-current market value of our common stock, and may also inhibit increases in the trading price
of our common stock that could result from takeover attempts or speculation.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
25
Item 2. Properties.
Our principal executive offices and primary operations facility are located in
approximately 110,000 square feet of leased space in three adjacent buildings in Norfolk, Virginia.
One of our call centers is also located within this space. This site can currently accommodate
approximately 1,000 employees. We own a two-acre parcel of land across from our headquarters which
we developed into a parking lot for use by our employees.
We own an approximately 22,000 square foot facility in Hutchinson, Kansas, comprised of two
buildings, and contiguous parcels of land which are used primarily for employee parking. The
Hutchinson site can currently accommodate approximately 250 employees. This facility contains one
of our call centers.
We lease a call center facility located in approximately 32,000 square feet of space in
Hampton, Virginia which can accommodate approximately 430 employees.
We lease a property located in Las Vegas, Nevada which houses the employees of our IGS
subsidiary as well as certain owned portfolio call center operations. The leased space is
approximately 30,000 square feet and can accommodate approximately 310 employees.
We lease two facilities in Birmingham, Alabama totaling approximately 18,000 square-feet which
can accommodate approximately 170 employees. The Birmingham facility houses the employees of our
RDS subsidiary as well as PRA call center employees.
We lease a 34,000 square foot building and a nine-acre parcel of land in Jackson, Tennessee,
which the Company originally purchased in 2006 and subsequently conveyed to the Industrial
Development Board of the City of Jackson. We lease back the property from the Industrial Board
under a long term Master Industrial Lease Agreement and have the option to re-purchase the property
at any time during the term of the lease. This facility can accommodate approximately 430
employees. This facility contains one of our call centers.
For our MuniServices subsidiary, we lease approximately 26,000 square feet of office space in
several offices around the country, the majority of which are located in Fresno, California. These
offices can accommodate approximately 140 employees.
We lease a facility located in approximately 6,000 square feet of space in Houston, Texas
which can accommodate approximately 30 employees. Certain employees of our government services
business are located in this facility.
We lease approximately 10,000 square feet of space in Rosemont, Illinois which can accommodate
approximately 30 employees. Certain of our Information Technology Department employees are
located in this facility.
We lease approximately 2,500 square feet of space in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania which can
accommodate approximately 20 employees. This facility houses the employees of our CCB subsidiary.
We do not consider any specific leased or owned facility to be material to our operations. We
believe that equally suitable alternative facilities are available in all areas where we currently
do business.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are from time to time subject to routine legal claims and proceedings, most of which
are incidental to the ordinary course of our business. We initiate lawsuits against customers and
are occasionally countersued by them in such actions. Also, customers, either individually, as
members of a class action, or through a governmental entity on behalf of customers, may initiate
litigation against us, in which they allege that we have violated a state or federal law in the
process of collecting on an account. From time to time, other types of lawsuits are brought
against us. While it is not expected that these or any other legal proceedings or claims in which
we are involved will, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on
our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition, it is possible that, due to unexpected
future developments, an unfavorable resolution of a legal proceeding or claim could occur which may
be material to our results of
26
operations for a particular period. The matter described below falls outside of the normal
parameters of our routine legal proceedings.
The Attorney General for the State of Missouri filed a purported enforcement action against
the Company in 2009 that seeks relief for Missouri customers that have allegedly been injured as a
result of certain of our collection practices. We have vehemently denied any wrongdoing herein and
in 2010, the complaint was dismissed with prejudice. The matter is currently on appeal, and so it
is not possible at this time to estimate the possible loss, if any.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities.
Price Range of Common Stock
Our common stock (Common Stock) began trading on the NASDAQ Global Stock Market under the
symbol PRAA on November 8, 2002. Prior to that time there was no public trading market for our
common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sales price for the Common Stock, as
reported by the NASDAQ Global Stock Market, for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$ |
34.89 |
|
|
$ |
19.41 |
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
$ |
39.52 |
|
|
$ |
26.11 |
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
$ |
49.01 |
|
|
$ |
37.13 |
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
$ |
50.50 |
|
|
$ |
40.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$ |
58.12 |
|
|
$ |
41.50 |
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2010
|
|
$ |
72.80 |
|
|
$ |
54.34 |
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
$ |
71.98 |
|
|
$ |
58.82 |
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$ |
78.00 |
|
|
$ |
62.31 |
|
As of February 3, 2011, there were 26 holders of record of the Common Stock. Based on
information provided by our transfer agent and registrar, we believe that there are 21,943
beneficial owners of the Common Stock.
Stock Performance
The following graph compares from December 31, 2005, to December 31, 2010, the cumulative
stockholder returns assuming an initial investment of $100 on January 1, 2006 in the Companys
Common Stock, the stocks comprising the NASDAQ Global Market Composite Index, the NASDAQ Market
Index (U.S.) and the stocks comprising a peer group index consisting of six peers which includes
Encore Capital Group, Inc., Asset Acceptance Capital Corp., Asta Funding, Inc., Compucredit
Holdings Corporation, FTI Consulting Inc. and EPIQ Systems Inc. Any dividends paid during the
five year period are assumed to be reinvested.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
12/31/2005 |
|
|
12/31/2006 |
|
|
12/31/2007 |
|
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
|
PRAA |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
NASDAQ Global Market Composite Index |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
NASDAQ Market Index (U.S.) |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
Peer Group Index |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
The comparisons of stock performance shown above are not intended to forecast or be indicative
of possible future performance of the Companys common stock. The Company does not make or endorse
any predictions as to its future stock performance.
Dividend Policy
Our board of directors sets our dividend policy. We do not currently pay regular dividends on
our Common Stock and did not pay dividends in 2010 or 2009; however, our board of directors may
determine in the future to declare or pay dividends on our Common Stock. Under the terms of our
credit facility, cash dividends may not exceed $20 million in any fiscal year. Any future
determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our board
of directors and will depend on then existing conditions, including our financial condition,
results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other
factors that our board of directors may consider relevant.
28
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
Selected Financial Data. |
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income recognized on finance receivables, net |
|
$ |
309,680 |
|
|
$ |
215,612 |
|
|
$ |
206,486 |
|
|
$ |
184,705 |
|
|
$ |
163,357 |
|
Fee income |
|
|
63,026 |
|
|
|
65,479 |
|
|
|
56,789 |
|
|
|
36,043 |
|
|
|
24,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
372,706 |
|
|
|
281,091 |
|
|
|
263,275 |
|
|
|
220,748 |
|
|
|
188,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee services |
|
|
124,077 |
|
|
|
106,388 |
|
|
|
88,073 |
|
|
|
69,022 |
|
|
|
58,142 |
|
Legal and agency fees and costs |
|
|
60,941 |
|
|
|
46,978 |
|
|
|
52,869 |
|
|
|
40,187 |
|
|
|
33,318 |
|
Outside fees and services |
|
|
12,554 |
|
|
|
9,570 |
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
7,287 |
|
|
|
6,821 |
|
Communications |
|
|
17,226 |
|
|
|
14,773 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
|
|
8,531 |
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
Rent and occupancy |
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,437 |
|
|
|
9,213 |
|
|
|
7,424 |
|
|
|
5,517 |
|
|
|
5,131 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
10,296 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
6,977 |
|
|
|
5,915 |
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
242,844 |
|
|
|
200,482 |
|
|
|
178,438 |
|
|
|
139,564 |
|
|
|
116,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
129,862 |
|
|
|
80,609 |
|
|
|
84,837 |
|
|
|
81,184 |
|
|
|
72,000 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,052 |
) |
|
|
(7,909 |
) |
|
|
(11,151 |
) |
|
|
(3,704 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
120,875 |
|
|
|
72,703 |
|
|
|
73,746 |
|
|
|
77,899 |
|
|
|
72,206 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
47,004 |
|
|
|
28,397 |
|
|
|
28,384 |
|
|
|
29,658 |
|
|
|
27,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
73,871 |
|
|
$ |
44,306 |
|
|
$ |
45,362 |
|
|
$ |
48,241 |
|
|
$ |
44,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. |
|
$ |
73,454 |
|
|
$ |
44,306 |
|
|
$ |
45,362 |
|
|
$ |
48,241 |
|
|
$ |
44,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
4.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
$ |
3.08 |
|
|
$ |
2.80 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
$ |
2.77 |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
16,820 |
|
|
|
15,420 |
|
|
|
15,229 |
|
|
|
15,646 |
|
|
|
15,911 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
16,885 |
|
|
|
15,455 |
|
|
|
15,292 |
|
|
|
15,779 |
|
|
|
16,082 |
|
OPERATING AND OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collections and fee income (1) |
|
$ |
592,367 |
|
|
$ |
433,482 |
|
|
$ |
383,488 |
|
|
$ |
298,209 |
|
|
$ |
261,357 |
|
Operating expenses to cash collections and fee income |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
Return on equity (2) |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Acquisitions of finance receivables, at cost (3) |
|
$ |
367,443 |
|
|
$ |
288,889 |
|
|
$ |
280,336 |
|
|
$ |
263,809 |
|
|
$ |
112,406 |
|
Acquisitions of finance receivables, at face value |
|
$ |
6,804,952 |
|
|
$ |
8,109,694 |
|
|
$ |
4,588,234 |
|
|
$ |
11,113,830 |
|
|
$ |
7,788,158 |
|
Employees at period end: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employees |
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
Ratio of collection personnel to total employees (4) |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes both cash collected on finance receivables and fee income earned during the
relevant period. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated by dividing net income for each year by average monthly stockholders equity for
the same year. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents cash paid for finance receivables. It does not include certain capitalized costs
or buybacks. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes all collectors and all first-line collection supervisors at December 31. |
Below are listed certain key balance sheet data for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
As of December 31, |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
41,094 |
|
|
$ |
20,265 |
|
|
$ |
13,901 |
|
|
$ |
16,730 |
|
|
$ |
25,101 |
|
Finance receivables, net |
|
|
831,330 |
|
|
|
693,462 |
|
|
|
563,830 |
|
|
|
410,297 |
|
|
|
226,447 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
995,908 |
|
|
|
794,433 |
|
|
|
657,840 |
|
|
|
476,307 |
|
|
|
293,378 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
690 |
|
Total debt, including obligations under capital lease and line of credit |
|
|
302,396 |
|
|
|
320,799 |
|
|
|
268,305 |
|
|
|
168,103 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
490,516 |
|
|
|
335,480 |
|
|
|
283,863 |
|
|
|
235,280 |
|
|
|
247,278 |
|
29
Below are listed the quarterly consolidated income statements for the years ended December 31,
2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income recognized on finance receivables, net |
|
$ |
84,783 |
|
|
$ |
80,026 |
|
|
$ |
76,920 |
|
|
$ |
67,951 |
|
|
$ |
55,962 |
|
|
$ |
54,336 |
|
|
$ |
54,038 |
|
|
$ |
51,276 |
|
Fee income |
|
|
15,972 |
|
|
|
15,518 |
|
|
|
16,109 |
|
|
|
15,427 |
|
|
|
17,254 |
|
|
|
14,229 |
|
|
|
17,069 |
|
|
|
16,927 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100,755 |
|
|
|
95,544 |
|
|
|
93,029 |
|
|
|
83,378 |
|
|
|
73,216 |
|
|
|
68,565 |
|
|
|
71,107 |
|
|
|
68,203 |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee services |
|
|
32,350 |
|
|
|
31,213 |
|
|
|
30,872 |
|
|
|
29,642 |
|
|
|
26,447 |
|
|
|
26,844 |
|
|
|
26,434 |
|
|
|
26,663 |
|
Legal and agency fees and costs |
|
|
17,367 |
|
|
|
16,748 |
|
|
|
13,488 |
|
|
|
13,338 |
|
|
|
12,518 |
|
|
|
11,296 |
|
|
|
11,047 |
|
|
|
12,118 |
|
Outside fees and services |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
2,459 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
Communications |
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,102 |
|
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
|
3,616 |
|
|
|
3,472 |
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
|
|
3,472 |
|
Rent and occupancy |
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,387 |
|
|
|
3,294 |
|
|
|
3,206 |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
2,275 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
2,234 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
64,480 |
|
|
|
62,721 |
|
|
|
58,700 |
|
|
|
56,943 |
|
|
|
51,115 |
|
|
|
49,776 |
|
|
|
49,882 |
|
|
|
49,709 |
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
36,275 |
|
|
|
32,823 |
|
|
|
34,329 |
|
|
|
26,435 |
|
|
|
22,101 |
|
|
|
18,789 |
|
|
|
21,225 |
|
|
|
18,494 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,517 |
) |
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
|
|
(2,180 |
) |
|
|
(2,018 |
) |
|
|
(1,964 |
) |
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
|
|
(1,978 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
33,787 |
|
|
|
30,645 |
|
|
|
32,152 |
|
|
|
24,291 |
|
|
|
20,083 |
|
|
|
16,825 |
|
|
|
19,276 |
|
|
|
16,519 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
13,156 |
|
|
|
11,888 |
|
|
|
12,474 |
|
|
|
9,486 |
|
|
|
7,667 |
|
|
|
6,729 |
|
|
|
7,554 |
|
|
|
6,447 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
20,631 |
|
|
$ |
18,757 |
|
|
$ |
19,678 |
|
|
$ |
14,805 |
|
|
$ |
12,416 |
|
|
$ |
10,096 |
|
|
$ |
11,722 |
|
|
$ |
10,072 |
|
Less net income/(loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. |
|
$ |
20,645 |
|
|
$ |
18,481 |
|
|
$ |
19,528 |
|
|
$ |
14,800 |
|
|
$ |
12,416 |
|
|
$ |
10,096 |
|
|
$ |
11,722 |
|
|
$ |
10,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
17,063 |
|
|
|
17,058 |
|
|
|
16,970 |
|
|
|
16,191 |
|
|
|
15,505 |
|
|
|
15,466 |
|
|
|
15,377 |
|
|
|
15,334 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
17,165 |
|
|
|
17,093 |
|
|
|
17,080 |
|
|
|
16,203 |
|
|
|
15,531 |
|
|
|
15,502 |
|
|
|
15,415 |
|
|
|
15,367 |
|
Below are listed the quarterly consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31,
2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
41,094 |
|
|
$ |
20,297 |
|
|
$ |
18,250 |
|
|
$ |
23,006 |
|
|
$ |
20,265 |
|
|
$ |
19,874 |
|
|
$ |
15,661 |
|
|
$ |
16,549 |
|
Finance receivables, net |
|
|
831,330 |
|
|
|
807,239 |
|
|
|
775,606 |
|
|
|
742,484 |
|
|
|
693,462 |
|
|
|
660,879 |
|
|
|
624,592 |
|
|
|
576,600 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
8,932 |
|
|
|
7,789 |
|
|
|
8,159 |
|
|
|
8,752 |
|
|
|
9,169 |
|
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
|
|
8,617 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
|
|
5,893 |
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
|
|
3,289 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
24,270 |
|
|
|
22,794 |
|
|
|
23,230 |
|
|
|
21,925 |
|
|
|
21,864 |
|
|
|
22,093 |
|
|
|
22,112 |
|
|
|
23,106 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
61,678 |
|
|
|
61,665 |
|
|
|
61,665 |
|
|
|
49,053 |
|
|
|
29,299 |
|
|
|
29,299 |
|
|
|
28,815 |
|
|
|
27,646 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
18,466 |
|
|
|
19,945 |
|
|
|
21,425 |
|
|
|
30,018 |
|
|
|
10,756 |
|
|
|
11,425 |
|
|
|
12,093 |
|
|
|
12,761 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,775 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
4,809 |
|
|
|
5,773 |
|
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
995,908 |
|
|
$ |
947,737 |
|
|
$ |
915,021 |
|
|
$ |
882,450 |
|
|
$ |
794,433 |
|
|
$ |
759,682 |
|
|
$ |
718,838 |
|
|
$ |
672,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,227 |
|
|
$ |
5,739 |
|
|
$ |
5,445 |
|
|
$ |
5,079 |
|
|
$ |
4,108 |
|
|
$ |
3,957 |
|
|
$ |
3,281 |
|
|
$ |
3,622 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
6,922 |
|
|
|
6,227 |
|
|
|
6,264 |
|
|
|
4,506 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
Accrued payroll and bonuses |
|
|
15,445 |
|
|
|
10,447 |
|
|
|
9,124 |
|
|
|
8,298 |
|
|
|
11,633 |
|
|
|
11,294 |
|
|
|
7,783 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
164,971 |
|
|
|
151,638 |
|
|
|
139,111 |
|
|
|
126,234 |
|
|
|
117,206 |
|
|
|
110,333 |
|
|
|
102,001 |
|
|
|
94,118 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
288,500 |
|
|
|
289,500 |
|
|
|
296,300 |
|
|
|
319,300 |
|
|
|
306,300 |
|
|
|
289,800 |
|
|
|
266,300 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
Derivative instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
490,943 |
|
|
|
464,781 |
|
|
|
451,214 |
|
|
|
444,318 |
|
|
|
458,953 |
|
|
|
437,576 |
|
|
|
409,701 |
|
|
|
376,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
14,449 |
|
|
|
14,531 |
|
|
|
15,080 |
|
|
|
15,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
163,538 |
|
|
|
162,418 |
|
|
|
161,267 |
|
|
|
154,975 |
|
|
|
82,400 |
|
|
|
81,358 |
|
|
|
78,274 |
|
|
|
76,647 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
326,807 |
|
|
|
306,164 |
|
|
|
287,681 |
|
|
|
268,153 |
|
|
|
253,353 |
|
|
|
240,939 |
|
|
|
230,841 |
|
|
|
219,119 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss), net
of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
490,516 |
|
|
|
468,425 |
|
|
|
448,727 |
|
|
|
422,804 |
|
|
|
335,480 |
|
|
|
322,106 |
|
|
|
309,137 |
|
|
|
295,698 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
995,908 |
|
|
$ |
947,737 |
|
|
$ |
915,021 |
|
|
$ |
882,450 |
|
|
$ |
794,433 |
|
|
$ |
759,682 |
|
|
$ |
718,838 |
|
|
$ |
672,323 |
|
|
|
|
30
Below are certain key financial data and ratios for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
EARNINGS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income recognized on finance receivables, net |
|
$ |
309,680 |
|
|
$ |
215,612 |
|
|
$ |
206,486 |
|
Fee income |
|
|
63,026 |
|
|
|
65,479 |
|
|
|
56,789 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
372,706 |
|
|
|
281,091 |
|
|
|
263,275 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
242,844 |
|
|
|
200,482 |
|
|
|
178,438 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
129,862 |
|
|
|
80,609 |
|
|
|
84,837 |
|
Net interest expense |
|
|
8,987 |
|
|
|
7,906 |
|
|
|
11,091 |
|
Net income |
|
|
73,871 |
|
|
|
44,306 |
|
|
|
45,362 |
|
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. |
|
|
73,454 |
|
|
|
44,306 |
|
|
|
45,362 |
|
|
PERIOD-END BALANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
41,094 |
|
|
$ |
20,265 |
|
|
$ |
13,901 |
|
Finance receivables, net |
|
|
831,330 |
|
|
|
693,462 |
|
|
|
563,830 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
|
|
80,144 |
|
|
|
40,055 |
|
|
|
40,975 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
995,908 |
|
|
|
794,433 |
|
|
|
657,840 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
319,300 |
|
|
|
268,300 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
490,943 |
|
|
|
458,953 |
|
|
|
373,977 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
490,516 |
|
|
|
335,480 |
|
|
|
283,863 |
|
|
FINANCE RECEIVABLE COLLECTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collections |
|
$ |
529,342 |
|
|
$ |
368,003 |
|
|
$ |
326,699 |
|
Principal amortization without allowance charges |
|
|
194,509 |
|
|
|
124,756 |
|
|
|
100,823 |
|
Principal amortization with allowance charges |
|
|
219,662 |
|
|
|
152,391 |
|
|
|
120,213 |
|
Principal amortization w/ allowance charges as % of cash collections: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including fully amortized pools |
|
|
41.5 |
% |
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
|
36.8 |
% |
Excluding fully amortized pools |
|
|
44.8 |
% |
|
|
44.7 |
% |
|
|
39.4 |
% |
Estimated remaining collections core |
|
$ |
974,108 |
|
|
$ |
893,716 |
|
|
$ |
848,601 |
|
Estimated remaining collections bankruptcy |
|
|
749,410 |
|
|
|
521,730 |
|
|
|
266,964 |
|
Estimated remaining collections total |
|
|
1,723,518 |
|
|
|
1,415,446 |
|
|
|
1,115,565 |
|
|
ALLOWANCE FOR FINANCE RECEIVABLES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at period-end |
|
$ |
76,407 |
|
|
$ |
51,255 |
|
|
$ |
23,620 |
|
Balance at period-end to net finance receivables |
|
|
9.19 |
% |
|
|
7.39 |
% |
|
|
4.19 |
% |
Allowance charge |
|
$ |
25,152 |
|
|
$ |
27,635 |
|
|
$ |
19,390 |
|
Allowance charge to finance receivable income |
|
|
7.51 |
% |
|
|
11.36 |
% |
|
|
8.58 |
% |
Allowance charge to cash collections |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
7.51 |
% |
|
|
5.94 |
% |
|
PURCHASES OF FINANCE RECEIVABLES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price core |
|
$ |
149,998 |
|
|
$ |
126,334 |
|
|
|
167,318 |
|
Face value core |
|
|
3,424,313 |
|
|
|
4,435,068 |
|
|
|
3,467,949 |
|
Purchase price bankruptcy |
|
|
217,445 |
|
|
|
162,470 |
|
|
|
113,018 |
|
Face value bankruptcy |
|
|
3,380,639 |
|
|
|
3,674,626 |
|
|
|
1,120,285 |
|
Purchase price total |
|
|
367,442 |
|
|
|
288,804 |
|
|
|
280,336 |
|
Face value total |
|
|
6,804,952 |
|
|
|
8,109,694 |
|
|
|
4,588,234 |
|
Number of portfolios total |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
PER SHARE DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
16,885 |
|
|
|
15,454 |
|
|
|
15,292 |
|
Closing market price |
|
$ |
75.20 |
|
|
$ |
44.85 |
|
|
$ |
33.84 |
|
|
RATIOS AND OTHER DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity (1) |
|
|
16.56 |
% |
|
|
14.16 |
% |
|
|
17.27 |
% |
Return on revenue (2) |
|
|
19.82 |
% |
|
|
15.76 |
% |
|
|
17.23 |
% |
Operating margin (3) |
|
|
34.84 |
% |
|
|
28.68 |
% |
|
|
32.22 |
% |
Operating expense to cash receipts (4) |
|
|
41.00 |
% |
|
|
46.25 |
% |
|
|
46.53 |
% |
Debt to equity (5) |
|
|
61.65 |
% |
|
|
95.62 |
% |
|
|
94.52 |
% |
Cash collections per collector hour paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
Excluding bankruptcy collections |
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
Excluding bankruptcy and external legal collections |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
Number of collectors |
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
Number of employees |
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
Cash receipts (4) |
|
$ |
592,367 |
|
|
$ |
433,483 |
|
|
$ |
383,488 |
|
Line of credit unused portion at period end |
|
|
107,500 |
|
|
|
45,700 |
|
|
|
96,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as annualized net income divided by average equity for the period |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as net income divided by total revenues |
|
(3) |
|
Calculated as income from operations divided by total revenues |
|
(4) |
|
Cash receipts is defined as cash collections plus fee income |
|
(5) |
|
For purposes of this ratio, debt equals the line of credit balance plus long-term debt |
31
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Overview
Portfolio Recovery Associates is a diversified financial and business services company. We
are a leading company in the business of purchasing and collecting defaulted consumer receivables.
Those finance receivables fall into two general categories: purchased bankruptcy portfolios and
core portfolios. Revenue for this part of our business consists of cash collections received less
amounts applied to principal on the Companys owned debt portfolios.
Through our subsidiaries, we provide a broad range of fee-based business services. Those
services include collateral location services to credit originators through our IGS subsidiary;
revenue administration, discovery, and compliance services to governmental entities through RDS and
MuniServices, our government services subsidiaries; and class action claims recovery services
through our CCB subsidiary.
Portfolio Recovery Associates is headquartered in Norfolk, Virginia, and employs approximately
2,500 team members. The shares of Portfolio Recovery Associates are traded on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market under the symbol PRAA.
Earnings Summary
For the year ended December 31, 2010, net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery
Associates, Inc. was $73.5 million, or $4.35 per diluted share, compared with $44.3 million, or
$2.87 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2009. Total revenue was $372.7 for the
year ended December, 31, 2010, up 32.6% from the same year ago period. Revenue during the year
ended December 31, 2010 consisted of $309.7 million in income recognized on finance receivables,
net of allowance charges, and $63.0 million in fee income. Income recognized on finance
receivables, net of allowance charges, increased $94.1 million, or 43.6%, over the same period in
2009, primarily as a result of a significant increase in cash collections. Cash collections were
$529.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, up 43.8% over $368.0 million in the same
year ago period. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded $25.2 million in
net allowance charges, compared with $27.6 million in the comparable year ago period. The
Companys performance has been positively impacted by significant increases in portfolio
acquisitions and by operational efficiencies surrounding the cash collections process, including
the continued refinement of automated dialer technology and account scoring analytics.
Additionally, the Company has continued to develop its internal legal collection staff resources,
which enables us to place accounts into that channel that otherwise would have been prohibitively
expensive for legal action.
Fee income decreased from $65.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $63.0 million
in the same period of 2010, mainly as a result of lower revenues generated from our existing fee
for service businesses due primarily to the adverse impact of the economic slowdown on general
business growth and governmental tax revenues. This was offset by an increase in revenue generated
as a result of the acquisition of a majority interest of CCB in March 2010.
Operating expenses were $242.8 million for the year ended December, 31, 2010, up 21.1% over
the same period in 2009, due primarily to increased compensation expense and legal costs.
Compensation expense increased primarily as a result of larger staff sizes. Legal and agency fees
and costs increased from $47.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $60.9 million for
the year ended December, 31, 2010. This increase was the result of several factors, including
growth in the size of our owned debt portfolios, expansion of our internal legal collection
resources, and refinement of our internal scoring methodology that expanded our account selections
for legal action.
Results of Operations
Our business revolves around the detection, collection and processing of both unpaid and
normal-course receivables originally owed to credit grantors, governments, retailers and others.
The results of operations include the financial results of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and
all of our subsidiaries, all of which are in
32
the receivables management business. Under the
guidance of the FASB ASC Topic 280 Segment Reporting (ASC 280), we have determined that we have
several operating segments that meet the aggregation criteria of ASC 280, and therefore, we have
one reportable segment, receivables management, based on similarities among the operating units
including homogeneity of services, service delivery methods and use of technology.
The following table sets forth certain operating data in dollars and as a percentage of total
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income recognized on finance receivables, net |
|
$ |
309,680 |
|
|
|
83.1 |
% |
|
$ |
215,612 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
% |
|
$ |
206,486 |
|
|
|
78.4 |
% |
Fee income |
|
|
63,026 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
65,479 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
56,789 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
372,706 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
281,091 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
263,275 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee services |
|
|
124,077 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
106,388 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
88,073 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
Legal and agency fees and costs |
|
|
60,941 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
46,978 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
52,869 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Outside fees and services |
|
|
12,554 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
9,570 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Communications |
|
|
17,226 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
14,773 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Rent and occupancy |
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,437 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
9,213 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
7,424 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
10,296 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
6,977 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
242,844 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
200,482 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
178,438 |
|
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
129,862 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
80,609 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
84,837 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,052 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(7,909 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(11,151 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
120,875 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
72,703 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
73,746 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
47,004 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
28,397 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
28,384 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
73,871 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
$ |
44,306 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
$ |
45,362 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. |
|
$ |
73,454 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
$ |
44,306 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
$ |
45,362 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
Revenues
Total revenues were $372.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $91.6
million or 32.6% compared to total revenues of $281.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, net
Income recognized on finance receivables, net was $309.7 million for the year ended December
31, 2010, an increase of $94.1 million or 43.6% compared to income recognized on finance
receivables, net of $215.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was
primarily due to an increase in our cash collections on our owned finance receivables to $529.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $368.0 million for the year ended December
31, 2009, an increase of $161.3 million or 43.8%. Our finance receivables amortization rate,
including allowance charges, was 41.5% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 41.4% for
the year ended December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we acquired finance
receivables portfolios with an aggregate face value amount of $6.8 billion at a cost of $367.4
million. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we acquired finance receivable portfolios with
an aggregate face value of $8.1 billion at a cost of $288.9 million. In any period, we acquire
defaulted consumer receivables that can vary dramatically in their age, type and ultimate
collectability. We may pay significantly different purchase rates for purchased receivables within
any period as a result of this quality fluctuation. In addition, market forces can drive
pricing rates up or down in any period, irrespective of other quality fluctuations. As a
result, the average purchase rate paid for any given period can fluctuate dramatically based on our
particular buying activity in that period. However, regardless of the average purchase price and
for similar time frames, we intend to target a similar internal rate of return, after direct
expenses, in pricing our portfolio acquisitions; therefore, the absolute rate paid is not relevant
to estimated profitability of a periods buying.
Income recognized on finance receivables, net is shown net of changes in valuation allowances
recognized under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit
Quality (ASC
33
310-30), which requires that a valuation allowance be recorded for significant
decreases in expected cash flows or change in timing of cash flows which would otherwise require a
reduction in the stated yield on a pool of accounts. As such, allowance charges are netted against
income recognized on finance receivables in the Consolidated Income Statements and are included in
collections applied to principal on finance receivables in the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded net allowance charges of $25.2 million,
the majority of which related to non-bankruptcy portfolios acquired in 2005 through 2007. For the
year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded net allowance charges of $27.6 million, the majority of
which related to non-bankruptcy portfolios acquired in 2005 through 2008. In any given period, we
may be required to record valuation allowances due to pools of receivables underperforming our
expectations. Factors that may contribute to the recording of valuation allowances may include
both internal as well as external factors. External factors which may have an impact on the
collectability, and subsequently to the overall profitability of purchased pools of defaulted
consumer receivables include: overall market pricing for pools of consumer receivables (which is
driven by both supply and demand), new laws or regulations relating to collections, new
interpretations of existing laws or regulations, and the overall condition of the economy.
Internal factors which may have an impact on the collectability, and subsequently the overall
profitability of purchased pools of defaulted consumer receivables would include: necessary
revisions to initial and post-acquisition scoring and modeling estimates, non-optimal operational
activities (which relates to the collection and movement of accounts on both our collection floor
and external channels), as well as decreases in productivity related to turnover and tenure of our
collection staff. Due to the extraordinary deterioration of the U.S. economy beginning in the
fourth quarter of 2008, our collection efforts continued to be more challenging in the year ended
December 31, 2010, which exacerbated the typical effects of these external and internal factors for
that period. These combined factors have contributed to the valuation allowances that we recorded
during the year ended December 31, 2010.
Fee Income
Fee income was $63.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $2.5 million
or 3.8% compared to fee income of $65.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Fee income
declined as a result of a decrease in revenue generated by our MuniServices government processing
and collection business and our IGS fee-for-service business, partially offset by an increase in
revenue generated by our RDS government processing and collection business as well as revenue
generated through the acquisition of a 62% controlling interest in CCB on March 15, 2010. IGS
revenues were negatively affected by reduced levels of automotive financings. MuniServices
revenues were negatively impacted by declines in sales and use tax volumes in California and by
reductions in municipal budgets.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $242.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase
of $42.3 million or 21.1% compared to total operating expenses of $200.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Total operating expenses were 41.0% of cash receipts for the year ended
December 31, 2010 compared with 46.3% for the same period in 2009.
Compensation and Employee Services
Compensation and employee services expenses were $124.1 million for the year ended December
31, 2010, an increase of $17.7 million or 16.6% compared to compensation and employee services
expenses of $106.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase is mainly due to an
overall increase in our owned portfolio collection staff. Compensation and employee services
expenses increased as total employees grew 11.7% to 2,473 as of December 31, 2010 from 2,213 as of
December 31, 2009. Additionally, existing employees received normal salary increases.
Compensation and employee services expenses as a percentage of cash receipts decreased to 21.0% for
the year ended December 31, 2010 from 24.5% of cash receipts for the same period in 2009.
Legal and Agency Fees and Costs
Legal and agency fees and costs were $60.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an
increase of
$13.9 million or 29.6% compared to legal and agency fees and costs of $47.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009. Of the $13.9 million increase, $17.6 million was attributable to an
increase in legal fees and costs incurred resulting from accounts referred to both our in house
attorneys and outside independent contingent
34
fee attorneys. This increase was largely due to the
refinement of our internal scoring methodology that expanded our account selections for legal
action. Growth in the size of our owned debt portfolios and expansion of our internal legal
collection resources were also contributing factors. The increase in legal fees and costs was
partially offset by a $3.7 million decline in agency fees due primarily to reduced business
activity associated with IGS. Total legal fees paid to independent contingent fee attorneys for the
year ended December 31, 2010 were 22.3% of external legal cash collections compared to 23.0% for
the year ended December 31, 2009. These legal fees represent the contingent fees for the cash
collections generated by our independent third party attorney network. Total legal costs
paid to bring suit on our legal accounts totaled $31.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
up from $11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. As a percentage of total legal
collections, these legal costs were 24.9% and 18.1% for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Outside Fees and Services
Outside fees and services expenses were $12.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an
increase of $3.0 million or 31.3% compared to outside legal and other fees and services expenses of
$9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Of the $3.0 million increase, $1.3 million was
attributable to an increase in our corporate legal expenses while the remaining $1.7 million
increase was due to increases in other outside fees and services and accounting fees.
Communications
Communications expenses were $17.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase
of $2.4 million or 16.2% compared to communications expenses of $14.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase was mainly due to a growth in mailings due to an increase in
special letter campaigns. The remaining increase was attributable to higher telephone expenses
driven by a greater number of finance receivables to work, as well as a significant expansion of
our dialer capacity and related calls that are generated by the dialer. Mailings were responsible
for 87.5% or $2.1 million of this increase, while the remaining 12.5% or $0.3 million was
attributable to increased call volumes.
Rent and Occupancy
Rent and occupancy expenses were $5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an
increase of $0.5 million or 10.4% compared to rent and occupancy expenses of $4.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was due to the expansion of our Hampton, Virginia call
center, the additional space resulting from our acquisition of a 62% controlling interest in CCB on
March 15, 2010, the relocation of our IGS business to another location during 2009 and other
renewals and expansions, as well as increased utility charges.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses were $12.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2010, an increase of $3.2 million or 34.8% compared to depreciation and amortization expenses of
$9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase is mainly due to additional
expenses incurred related to the depreciation and amortization of the tangible and intangible
assets acquired in the acquisition of a 62% controlling interest in CCB on March 15, 2010.
Additional increases are the result of continued capital expenditures on equipment, software and
computers related to our growth and systems upgrades.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses were $10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase
of $1.5 million or 17.0% compared to other operating expenses of $8.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase was mainly due to increases in various expenses related to general
growth of the Company. No individual item represents a significant portion of the overall
increase.
Interest Income
Interest income was $65,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $61,000
compared to interest income of $3,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase is the
result of interest earned and a refund received on the overpayment of federal and state income
taxes.
35
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $1.2
million or 15.2% compared to interest expense of $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The increase was mainly due to an increase in our average borrowings for the year ended December
31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, and the termination of our interest rate swap during
the fourth quarter of 2010, both of which were partially offset by a decrease in our weighted
average variable interest rate which decreased to 2.46% for the year ended December 31, 2010 as
compared to 2.62% for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $47.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of
$18.6 million or 65.5% compared to income tax expense of $28.4 million for the year ended December
31, 2009. The increase is mainly due to an increase of 66.3% in income before taxes for the year
ended December 31, 2010 when compared to the same period in 2009. This was offset by a slight
decrease in the effective tax rate of 38.9% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 39.1%
for the same period in 2009.
Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
Revenues
Total revenues were $281.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $17.8
million or 6.8% compared to total revenues of $263.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Income Recognized on Finance Receivables, net
Income recognized on finance receivables, net was $215.6 million for the year ended December
31, 2009, an increase of $9.1 million or 4.4% compared to income recognized on finance receivables,
net of $206.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to an
increase in cash collections on our owned finance receivables to $368.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to $326.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of
$41.3 million or 12.6%. This was partially offset by an increase in our finance receivables
amortization rate, including the allowance charge, to 41.4% for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to 36.8% for the year ended December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2009,
we acquired finance receivables portfolios with an aggregate face value amount of $8.1 billion at a
cost of $288.9 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we acquired finance receivable
portfolios with an aggregate face value of $4.6 billion at a cost of $280.3 million. In any
period, we acquire finance receivables that can vary dramatically in their age, type and ultimate
collectibility. We may pay significantly different purchase rates for purchased receivables within
any period as a result of this quality fluctuation. In addition, market forces can drive pricing
rates up or down in any period, irrespective of other quality fluctuations. As a result, the
average purchase rate paid for any given period can fluctuate dramatically based on our particular
buying activity in that period. However, regardless of the average purchase price and for similar
time frames, we intend to target a similar internal rate of return, after direct expenses, in
pricing our portfolio acquisitions; therefore, the absolute rate paid is not relevant to estimated
profitability of a periods buying.
Income recognized on finance receivables, net is shown net of changes in valuation allowances
recognized under ASC 310-30, which requires that a valuation allowance be recorded for significant
decreases in expected cash flows or change in timing of cash flows which would otherwise require a
reduction in the stated yield on a pool of accounts. As such, allowance charges are netted against
income recognized on finance receivables in the Consolidated Income Statements and are included in
collections applied to principal on finance receivables in the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded net allowance charges of $27,635,000.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded net allowance charges of $19,390,000. In any
given period, we may be required to record valuation allowances due to pools of receivables
underperforming our expectations. Factors that may contribute to the recording of valuation
allowances may include both internal as well as external factors. External factors which may have
an impact on the collectability, and subsequently to the overall profitability of purchased pools
of defaulted consumer receivables would include:
36
overall market pricing for pools of consumer
receivables (which is driven by both supply and demand), new laws or regulations relating to
collections, new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, and the overall condition of the
economy. Internal factors which may have an impact on the collectability, and subsequently the
overall profitability of purchased pools of defaulted consumer receivables would include:
necessary revisions to initial and post-acquisition scoring and modeling estimates, non-optimal
operational activities (which relates to the collection and movement of accounts on both our
collection floor and external channels), as well as decreases in productivity related to turnover
and tenure of our collection staff. Due to the extraordinary deterioration of the
U.S. economy beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, our collection efforts became more
challenging in the year ended December 31, 2009, which exacerbated the typical effects of these
external and internal factors for that period. These combined factors have contributed to the
valuation allowances that we recorded during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Fee Income
Fee income was $65.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $8.7 million
or 15.3% compared to fee income of $56.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Fee income
grew as a result of the acquisitions of MuniServices on July 1, 2008 and Broussard Partners and
Associates, Inc. on August 1, 2008, as well as an increase in revenue generated by our RDS
government processing and collection business, partially offset by a decrease in revenue generated
by our IGS fee-for-service business and our Anchor contingent fee business, which ceased operations
in the second quarter of 2008.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $200.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase
of $22.1 million or 12.4% compared to total operating expenses of $178.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Total operating expenses were 46.3% of cash receipts for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared with 46.5% for the same period in 2008.
Compensation and Employee Services
Compensation and employee services expenses were $106.4 million for the year ended December
31, 2009, an increase of $18.3 million or 20.8% compared to compensation and employee services
expenses of $88.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase is mainly due to the
acquisition of MuniServices on July 1, 2008, as well as an overall increase in our owned portfolio
collection staff. In addition, in conjunction with the renewal of their employment agreements, our
Named Executive Officers and other senior executives were awarded nonvested shares which vested on
January 1, 2009. As a result of the vesting of these shares, we recorded stock-based compensation
expense in connection with these shares, in the amount of approximately $1.4 million during the
first quarter of 2009. Also, we reversed $1.2 million of estimated share-based compensation costs
in the third quarter of 2008, that had been accrued in 2007 and 2008 relating to the 2007 Long Term
Incentive Program. Compensation and employee services expenses increased as total employees grew
8.9% to 2,213 as of December 31, 2009 from 2,032 as of December 31, 2008. Additionally, existing
employees received normal salary increases. Compensation and employee services expenses as a
percentage of cash receipts increased to 24.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 23.0% of
cash receipts for the same period in 2008.
Legal and Agency Fees and Costs
Legal and agency fees and costs expenses were $47.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2009, a decrease of $5.9 million or 11.2% compared to legal and agency fees and costs of $52.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Of the $5.9 million decrease, $5.5 million was
attributable to a decrease in legal fees and costs incurred resulting from accounts referred to
both our in house attorneys and outside third-party contingent fee attorneys. The remaining $0.4
million decrease was attributable to a decrease in agency fees mainly incurred by our IGS
subsidiary. Total outside legal expenses paid to third-party contingent fee attorneys for the year
ended December 31, 2009 were 42.3% of legal cash collections generated by contingent fee attorneys
compared to 39.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008. Outside legal fees and costs paid to
independent contingent fee attorneys decreased from $33.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2008 to $27.6 million, a decrease of $5.7 million or 17.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Additionally, as disclosed previously, we also effectuate legal collections using our own in-house
attorneys. Total legal expenses
37
incurred by our in-house attorneys for the year ended December 31,
2009 were 17.5% of legal cash collections generated by our in-house attorneys compared to 41.4% for
the year ended December 31, 2008. Legal fees and costs incurred by our in-house attorneys
increased from $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $3.8 million, an increase of
$0.3 million or 8.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Outside Fees and Services
Outside fees and services expenses were $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an
increase of $0.7 million or 7.9% compared to outside legal and other fees and services expenses of
$8.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The $0.7 million increase was attributable to an
increase in other outside fees and services and corporate legal and accounting.
Communications
Communications expenses were $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase
of $4.5 million or 43.7% compared to communications expenses of $10.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The increase was mainly due to a growth in mailings due to an increase in
special letter campaigns which increased by $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 when
compared to the year ago period. The remaining increase was attributable to higher telephone
expenses driven by a greater number of finance receivables to work, as well as a significant
expansion of our dialer capacity and related calls that are generated by the dialer. Mailings were
responsible for 95.6% or $4.3 million of this increase, while the remaining 4.4% or $0.2 million
was attributable to increased call volumes.
Rent and Occupancy
Rent and occupancy expenses were $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an
increase of $0.9 million or 23.1% compared to rent and occupancy expenses of $3.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of MuniServices on
July 1, 2008 and the relocation of our IGS business to another location during 2009, as well as
increased utility charges.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses were $9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
an increase of $1.8 million or 24.3% compared to depreciation and amortization expenses of $7.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase is mainly due to additional expenses
incurred related to the depreciation and amortization of the tangible and intangible assets
acquired in the acquisition of MuniServices and the acquisition of the assets of BPA on August 1,
2008. Additional increases are the result of continued capital expenditures on equipment, software
and computers related to our growth and systems upgrades.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses were $8.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase
of $1.8 million or 25.7% compared to other operating expenses of $7.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The increase was due to increases in various expenses mainly as a result of the
addition of MuniServices and BPA. No individual item represents a significant portion of the
overall increase.
Interest Income
Interest income was $3,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $57,000 or
95.0% compared to interest income of $60,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. This decrease is
mainly due to lower average invested cash and cash equivalents balances during the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $3.3
million compared to interest expense of $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
decrease was mainly due to a decrease in our weighted average variable interest rate which
decreased to 2.62% for the year ended
38
December 31, 2009 as compared to 4.60% for the year ended
December 31, 2008, partially offset by an increase in our average borrowings for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $28.4 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Pre-tax income for the year ending December 31, 2009 decreased by $1.0 million as compared to the
year ending December 31, 2008; however, income tax expense remained the same due to the impact of
permanent items, state tax credits and prior year true-up which resulted in a lower effective tax
rate for the year ending December 31, 2008 when compared to the same period in 2009.
Supplemental Performance Data
Owned Portfolio Performance:
The following tables show certain data related to our owned portfolio. These tables describe
the purchase price, cash collections and related multiples. Further, these tables disclose our
entire portfolio, as well as its subsets; the portfolio of purchased bankrupt accounts and our core
portfolio. The accounts represented in the purchased bankruptcy tables are those portfolios of
accounts that were bankrupt at the time of purchase. This contrasts with accounts that file
bankruptcy after we purchase them, which continue to be tracked in their corresponding core
portfolio.
The purchase price multiples for 2005 through 2010 described in the table below are lower than
historical multiples in previous years. This trend is primarily, but not entirely related to
pricing competition. When competition increases, and or supply decreases so that pricing becomes
negatively impacted on a relative basis (total lifetime collections in relation to purchase price),
yields tend to trend lower.
Additionally, however, the way we initially book newly acquired pools of accounts and how we
forecast future estimated collections for any given portfolio of accounts has evolved over the
years due to a number of factors including the current economic situation. Since our revenue
recognition under ASC 310-30 is driven by both the ultimate magnitude of estimated lifetime
collections as well as the timing of those collections, we have progressed towards booking new
portfolio purchases using a higher confidence level for both estimated collection amounts and pace.
Subsequent to the initial booking, as we gain collection experience and comfort with a pool of
accounts, we continuously update ERC. Since our inception, these processes have tended to cause
the ratio of collections, including ERC, to purchase price for any given year of buying to
gradually increase over time. As a result, our estimate of lifetime collections to purchase price
has shown relatively steady increases as pools have aged. Thus, all factors being equal in terms
of pricing, one would naturally tend to see a higher collection to purchase price ratio from a pool
of accounts that were six years from purchase than say a pool that was just two years from
purchase.
To the extent that lower purchase price multiples are the ultimate result of more competitive
pricing and lower yields, this will generally lead to higher amortization rates (payments applied
to principal as a percentage of cash collections), lower operating margins and ultimately lower
profitability. As portfolio pricing becomes more favorable on a relative basis, our profitability
will tend to increase. It is important to consider, however, that to the extent we can improve our
collection operations by collecting additional cash from a discreet quantity and quality of
accounts, and/or by collecting cash at a lower cost structure, we can positively impact the
collection to purchase price ratio and operating margins. During 2008 and continuing through 2010,
we made significant enhancements in our analytical abilities, management personnel and automated
dialing capabilities, all with the intent to collect more cash at lower cost.
39
Information about our owned portfolios as of December 31, 2010 is as follows:
Entire Portfolio ($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Percentage of Reserve |
|
Actual Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life to Date |
|
Reserve |
|
Allowance to Unamortized |
|
Collections |
|
Estimated |
|
Total Estimated |
Purchase |
|
Purchase |
|
Total Estimated |
|
Net Finance |
|
Reserve |
|
Allowance to |
|
Purchase Price and |
|
Including Cash |
|
Remaining |
|
Collections to |
Period |
|
Price (1) |
|
Collections (2) |
|
Receivable Balance (3) |
|
Allowance (4) |
|
Purchase Price (5) |
|
Reserve Allowance (6) |
|
Sales |
|
Collections (7) |
|
Purchase Price (8) |
|
1996 |
|
$ |
3,080 |
|
|
$ |
10,143 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
10,043 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
329 |
% |
1997 |
|
$ |
7,685 |
|
|
$ |
25,395 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
25,122 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
|
330 |
% |
1998 |
|
$ |
11,089 |
|
|
$ |
37,002 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
36,607 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
|
334 |
% |
1999 |
|
$ |
18,898 |
|
|
$ |
68,445 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
67,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
|
|
362 |
% |
2000 |
|
$ |
25,020 |
|
|
$ |
114,019 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
110,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,184 |
|
|
|
456 |
% |
2001 |
|
$ |
33,481 |
|
|
$ |
171,214 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
166,673 |
|
|
$ |
4,541 |
|
|
|
511 |
% |
2002 |
|
$ |
42,325 |
|
|
$ |
190,351 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
184,432 |
|
|
$ |
5,919 |
|
|
|
450 |
% |
2003 |
|
$ |
61,448 |
|
|
$ |
253,276 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
243,452 |
|
|
$ |
9,824 |
|
|
|
412 |
% |
2004 |
|
$ |
59,177 |
|
|
$ |
188,291 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
178,628 |
|
|
$ |
9,663 |
|
|
|
318 |
% |
2005 |
|
$ |
143,171 |
|
|
$ |
310,837 |
|
|
$ |
20,756 |
|
|
$ |
16,817 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
270,650 |
|
|
$ |
40,187 |
|
|
|
217 |
% |
2006 |
|
$ |
107,713 |
|
|
$ |
217,381 |
|
|
$ |
25,880 |
|
|
$ |
19,415 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
$ |
168,966 |
|
|
$ |
48,415 |
|
|
|
202 |
% |
2007 |
|
$ |
258,397 |
|
|
$ |
505,826 |
|
|
$ |
100,180 |
|
|
$ |
18,315 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
335,138 |
|
|
$ |
170,688 |
|
|
|
196 |
% |
2008 |
|
$ |
275,145 |
|
|
$ |
538,136 |
|
|
$ |
155,587 |
|
|
$ |
20,645 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
269,588 |
|
|
$ |
268,548 |
|
|
|
196 |
% |
2009 |
|
$ |
281,583 |
|
|
$ |
720,932 |
|
|
$ |
198,715 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
234,745 |
|
|
$ |
486,187 |
|
|
|
256 |
% |
2010 |
|
$ |
361,843 |
|
|
$ |
760,876 |
|
|
$ |
330,055 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
86,562 |
|
|
$ |
674,314 |
|
|
|
210 |
% |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,690,055 |
|
|
$ |
4,112,124 |
|
|
$ |
831,330 |
|
|
$ |
76,407 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
2,388,606 |
|
|
$ |
1,723,518 |
|
|
|
243 |
% |
|
|
Purchased Bankruptcy Portfolio ($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Percentage of Reserve |
|
Actual Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life to Date |
|
Reserve |
|
Allowance to Unamortized |
|
Collections |
|
Estimated |
|
Total Estimated |
Purchase |
|
Purchase |
|
Total Estimated |
|
Net Finance |
|
Reserve |
|
Allowance to |
|
Purchase Price and |
|
Including Cash |
|
Remaining |
|
Collections to |
Period |
|
Price (1) |
|
Collections (2) |
|
Receivable Balance (3) |
|
Allowance (4) |
|
Purchase Price (5) |
|
Reserve Allowance (6) |
|
Sales |
|
Collections (7) |
|
Purchase Price (8) |
|
1996- 2003 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
2004 |
|
$ |
7,468 |
|
|
$ |
14,176 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
$ |
14,145 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
190 |
% |
2005 |
|
$ |
29,301 |
|
|
$ |
43,059 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
42,756 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
|
147 |
% |
2006 |
|
$ |
17,648 |
|
|
$ |
30,973 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
2,380 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
28,955 |
|
|
$ |
2,018 |
|
|
|
176 |
% |
2007 |
|
$ |
78,557 |
|
|
$ |
111,742 |
|
|
$ |
26,584 |
|
|
$ |
1,910 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
79,281 |
|
|
$ |
32,461 |
|
|
|
142 |
% |
2008 |
|
$ |
108,615 |
|
|
$ |
183,857 |
|
|
$ |
67,637 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
87,892 |
|
|
$ |
95,965 |
|
|
|
169 |
% |
2009 |
|
$ |
156,064 |
|
|
$ |
366,721 |
|
|
$ |
125,270 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
98,415 |
|
|
$ |
268,306 |
|
|
|
235 |
% |
2010 |
|
$ |
211,880 |
|
|
$ |
389,812 |
|
|
$ |
199,960 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
39,486 |
|
|
$ |
350,326 |
|
|
|
184 |
% |
|
Total |
|
$ |
609,533 |
|
|
$ |
1,140,340 |
|
|
$ |
419,893 |
|
|
$ |
6,377 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
390,930 |
|
|
$ |
749,410 |
|
|
|
187 |
% |
|
|
Core Portfolio ($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Percentage of Reserve |
|
Actual Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life to Date |
|
Reserve |
|
Allowance to Unamortized |
|
Collections |
|
Estimated |
|
Total Estimated |
Purchase |
|
Purchase |
|
Total Estimated |
|
Net Finance |
|
Reserve |
|
Allowance to |
|
Purchase Price and |
|
Including Cash |
|
Remaining |
|
Collections to |
Period |
|
Price (1) |
|
Collections (2) |
|
Receivable Balance (3) |
|
Allowance (4) |
|
Purchase Price (5) |
|
Reserve Allowance (6) |
|
Sales |
|
Collections (7) |
|
Purchase Price (8) |
|
1996 |
|
$ |
3,080 |
|
|
$ |
10,143 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
10,043 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
329 |
% |
1997 |
|
$ |
7,685 |
|
|
$ |
25,395 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
25,122 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
|
330 |
% |
1998 |
|
$ |
11,089 |
|
|
$ |
37,002 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
36,607 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
|
334 |
% |
1999 |
|
$ |
18,898 |
|
|
$ |
68,445 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
67,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
|
|
362 |
% |
2000 |
|
$ |
25,020 |
|
|
$ |
114,019 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
110,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,184 |
|
|
|
456 |
% |
2001 |
|
$ |
33,481 |
|
|
$ |
171,214 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
166,673 |
|
|
$ |
4,541 |
|
|
|
511 |
% |
2002 |
|
$ |
42,325 |
|
|
$ |
190,351 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
184,432 |
|
|
$ |
5,919 |
|
|
|
450 |
% |
2003 |
|
$ |
61,448 |
|
|
$ |
253,276 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
243,452 |
|
|
$ |
9,824 |
|
|
|
412 |
% |
2004 |
|
$ |
51,709 |
|
|
$ |
174,115 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
164,483 |
|
|
$ |
9,632 |
|
|
|
337 |
% |
2005 |
|
$ |
113,870 |
|
|
$ |
267,778 |
|
|
$ |
20,534 |
|
|
$ |
15,945 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
227,894 |
|
|
$ |
39,884 |
|
|
|
235 |
% |
2006 |
|
$ |
90,065 |
|
|
$ |
186,408 |
|
|
$ |
25,662 |
|
|
$ |
17,035 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
$ |
140,011 |
|
|
$ |
46,397 |
|
|
|
207 |
% |
2007 |
|
$ |
179,840 |
|
|
$ |
394,084 |
|
|
$ |
73,596 |
|
|
$ |
16,405 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
255,857 |
|
|
$ |
138,227 |
|
|
|
219 |
% |
2008 |
|
$ |
166,530 |
|
|
$ |
354,279 |
|
|
$ |
87,950 |
|
|
$ |
20,645 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
181,696 |
|
|
$ |
172,583 |
|
|
|
213 |
% |
2009 |
|
$ |
125,519 |
|
|
$ |
354,211 |
|
|
$ |
73,445 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
136,330 |
|
|
$ |
217,881 |
|
|
|
282 |
% |
2010 |
|
$ |
149,963 |
|
|
$ |
371,064 |
|
|
$ |
130,095 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
47,076 |
|
|
$ |
323,988 |
|
|
|
247 |
% |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,080,522 |
|
|
$ |
2,971,784 |
|
|
$ |
411,437 |
|
|
$ |
70,030 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,997,676 |
|
|
$ |
974,108 |
|
|
|
275 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Purchase price refers to the cash paid to a seller to acquire defaulted consumer
receivables, plus certain capitalized costs, less buybacks. |
|
(2) |
|
Total estimated collections refers to actual cash collections, including cash sales,
plus estimated remaining collections. |
|
(3) |
|
Net finance receivable balance refers to the purchase price less amortization over the
life of the portfolio. |
40
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Life to date reserve allowance refers to the total amount of allowance charges incurred
on our owned portfolios net of any reversals. |
|
(5) |
|
Percentage of reserve allowance to purchase price refers to the total amount of
allowance charges incurred on our owned portfolios net of any reversals, divided by the
purchase price. |
|
(6) |
|
Percentage of reserve allowance to unamortized purchase price and reserve allowance
refers to the total amount of allowance charges incurred on our owned portfolios net of any
reversals, divided by the sum of the unamortized purchase price and the life to date
reserve allowance. |
|
(7) |
|
Estimated remaining collections refers to the sum of all future projected cash
collections on our owned portfolios |
|
(8) |
|
Total estimated collections to purchase price refers to the total estimated collections
divided by the purchase price. |
The following tables show our net valuation allowances recorded against our investment in
finance receivables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
Entire Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge as |
Allowance Period(1) |
|
1996-2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009-2010 |
|
Total |
|
% of NFR(2) |
|
Q1 05 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q2 05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q3 05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q4 05 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q1 06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q2 06 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q3 06 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q4 06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Q1 07 |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q2 07 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q3 07 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Q4 07 |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Q1 08 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Q2 08 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Q3 08 |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,780 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Q4 08 |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,865 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Q1 09 |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,220 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Q2 09 |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Q3 09 |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,010 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Q4 09 |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Q1 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,870 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Q2 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,320 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Q3 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,520 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Q4 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,442 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
|
$ |
16,817 |
|
|
$ |
19,415 |
|
|
$ |
18,315 |
|
|
$ |
20,645 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
76,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Purchases, net |
|
$ |
203,026 |
|
|
$ |
59,177 |
|
|
$ |
143,171 |
|
|
$ |
107,713 |
|
|
$ |
258,397 |
|
|
$ |
275,145 |
|
|
$ |
643,426 |
|
|
$ |
1,690,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Allowance period represents the quarter in which we recorded valuation allowances, net
of any (reversals). |
|
(2) |
|
NFR refers to total net finance receivables as of the end of the allowance period
presented. |
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
Purchased BK Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge as |
Allowance Period (1) |
|
1996-2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009-2010 |
|
Total |
|
% of NFR(2) |
|
Q1 05 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q2 05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q3 05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q4 05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q1 06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q2 06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q3 06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q4 06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q1 07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q2 07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q3 07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Q4 07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Q1 08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Q2 08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Q3 08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q4 08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Q1 09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q2 09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q3 09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q4 09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q1 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Q2 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q3 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q4 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
|
$ |
2,860 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Purchases, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,468 |
|
|
$ |
29,301 |
|
|
$ |
17,648 |
|
|
$ |
78,557 |
|
|
$ |
108,615 |
|
|
$ |
367,944 |
|
|
$ |
609,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
Core Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge as |
Allowance Period (1) |
|
1996-2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009-2010 |
|
Total |
|
% of NFR(2) |
|
Q1 05 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q2 05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q3 05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q4 05 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q1 06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q2 06 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Q3 06 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Q4 06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Q1 07 |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Q2 07 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Q3 07 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Q4 07 |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Q1 08 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Q2 08 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Q3 08 |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Q4 08 |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,115 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Q1 09 |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,060 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Q2 09 |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Q3 09 |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,920 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Q4 09 |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,205 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Q1 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,525 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Q2 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,325 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Q3 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,050 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Q4 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,915 |
|
|
$ |
18,015 |
|
|
$ |
15,455 |
|
|
$ |
20,645 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Purchases, net |
|
$ |
203,026 |
|
|
$ |
51,709 |
|
|
$ |
113,870 |
|
|
$ |
90,065 |
|
|
$ |
179,840 |
|
|
$ |
166,530 |
|
|
$ |
275,482 |
|
|
$ |
1,080,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Allowance period represents the quarter in which we recorded valuation allowances, net
of any (reversals). |
|
(2) |
|
NFR refers to total net finance receivables as of the end of the allowance period
presented. |
42
The following graph shows the purchase price of our owned portfolios by year. The purchase
price number represents the cash paid to the seller, plus certain capitalized costs, less buybacks.
As shown in the above chart, the composition of our purchased portfolios has shifted in favor
of bankrupt accounts in recent years. We began buying bankrupt accounts during 2004 and slowly
increased the volume of accounts we acquired through 2006 as we tested our models, refined our
processes and proved out our operating assumptions. After observing a high level of modeling
confidence in our early purchases, we began increasing our level of purchases more dramatically
during the period from 2007 through 2010.
Our ability to profitably purchase and liquidate pools of bankrupt accounts provides diversity
to our distressed asset acquisition business. Although we generally buy bankrupt assets from many
of the same consumer lenders from whom we acquire Core customer accounts, the volumes and pricing
characteristics as well as the competitors are different. Based upon market dynamics, the
profitability of pools purchased in the bankrupt and Core markets may differ over time. We have
found periods when bankrupt accounts were more profitable and other times when Core accounts were
more profitable. From 2004 through 2008, our bankruptcy buying fluctuated between 13% and 39% of
our total portfolio purchasing in those years. In 2009, for the first time in our history,
bankruptcy purchasing exceeded that of our Core buying, finishing at 55% of total portfolio
purchasing for the year and during 2010 this percentage increased to 59%. This occurred as severe
dislocations in the financial markets, coupled with legislative uncertainty, caused pricing in the
bankruptcy market to decline substantially thereby driving our strategy to make advantageous
bankruptcy portfolio acquisitions during this period.
In order to collect our Core portfolios, we generally need to employ relatively higher amounts
of labor and incur additional collection costs to generate each dollar of cash collections as
compared with bankruptcy portfolios. In order to achieve acceptable levels of net return on
investment (after direct expenses), we are generally targeting a total cash collections to purchase
price multiple in the 2.5-3.0x range. On the other hand, bankrupt accounts generate the majority
of cash collections through the efforts of the U.S. bankruptcy courts. In this process, cash is
remitted to our Company with no corresponding cost other than the cost of filing claims at the time
of purchase and general administrative costs for monitoring the progress of each account through
the bankruptcy process. As a result, overall collection costs are much lower for us when
liquidating a pool of bankrupt accounts as compared to a pool of Core accounts, but conversely the
price we pay for bankrupt accounts is generally higher than Core accounts. We generally target
similar returns on investment (measured after direct expenses) for bankrupt and Core portfolios at
any given point in the market cycles. However, because of the lower related collection costs, we can pay more for bankrupt portfolios, which causes the
estimated total cash collections to purchase price multiples of bankrupt pools to be in the
1.4-2.0x range generally. In summary, compared to a pool of Core accounts, to the extent both
pools had identical targeted
43
returns on investment (measured after direct expenses), the bankrupt pool would be
expected to generate less revenue, a lower yield, less direct expenses, similar operating income,
and a higher operating margin.
In addition, collections on younger, newly filed bankrupt accounts tend to be of a lower
magnitude in the earlier months when compared to Core charge-off accounts. This lower level of
early period collections is due to the fact that 1) we purchase primarily accounts that represent
unsecured claims in bankruptcy, and 2) these unsecured claims are scheduled to begin paying out
after payment of the secured and priority claims. As a result of the administrative processes
regarding payout priorities within the court-administered bankruptcy plans, unsecured creditors do
not generally begin receiving meaningful collections on unsecured claims until 12 to 18 months
after the bankruptcy filing date. Therefore, to the extent that we purchase portfolios with more
recent bankruptcy filing dates, as we did to a significant extent in 2009 and 2010, we would expect
to experience a delay in cash collections compared with Core charged-off accounts.
We utilize a long-term approach to collecting our owned portfolios of receivables. This
approach has historically caused us to realize significant cash collections and revenues from
purchased portfolios of finance receivables years after they are originally acquired. As a result,
we have in the past been able to temporarily reduce our level of current period acquisitions
without a corresponding negative current period impact on cash collections and revenue.
The following tables, which exclude any proceeds from cash sales of finance receivables,
demonstrates our ability to realize significant multi-year cash collection streams on our owned
portfolios.
Cash Collections By Year, By Year of Purchase Entire Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
Purchase |
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Collection Period |
|
Period |
|
Price |
|
|
1996-2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
1996 |
|
$ |
3,080 |
|
|
$ |
7,295 |
|
|
$ |
730 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
9,982 |
|
1997 |
|
|
7,685 |
|
|
|
15,138 |
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
24,614 |
|
1998 |
|
|
11,089 |
|
|
|
16,981 |
|
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
36,581 |
|
1999 |
|
|
18,898 |
|
|
|
18,207 |
|
|
|
12,090 |
|
|
|
9,598 |
|
|
|
7,336 |
|
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
|
4,352 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
66,473 |
|
2000 |
|
|
25,020 |
|
|
|
6,894 |
|
|
|
19,498 |
|
|
|
19,478 |
|
|
|
16,628 |
|
|
|
14,098 |
|
|
|
10,924 |
|
|
|
8,067 |
|
|
|
5,202 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
2,782 |
|
|
|
110,373 |
|
2001 |
|
|
33,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,048 |
|
|
|
28,831 |
|
|
|
28,003 |
|
|
|
26,717 |
|
|
|
22,639 |
|
|
|
16,048 |
|
|
|
10,011 |
|
|
|
6,164 |
|
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
161,182 |
|
2002 |
|
|
42,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,073 |
|
|
|
36,258 |
|
|
|
35,742 |
|
|
|
32,497 |
|
|
|
24,729 |
|
|
|
16,527 |
|
|
|
9,772 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
6,375 |
|
|
|
184,417 |
|
2003 |
|
|
61,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,308 |
|
|
|
49,706 |
|
|
|
52,640 |
|
|
|
43,728 |
|
|
|
30,695 |
|
|
|
18,818 |
|
|
|
13,135 |
|
|
|
10,422 |
|
|
|
243,452 |
|
2004 |
|
|
59,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,019 |
|
|
|
46,475 |
|
|
|
40,424 |
|
|
|
30,750 |
|
|
|
19,339 |
|
|
|
13,677 |
|
|
|
9,944 |
|
|
|
178,628 |
|
2005 |
|
|
143,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,968 |
|
|
|
75,145 |
|
|
|
69,862 |
|
|
|
49,576 |
|
|
|
33,366 |
|
|
|
23,733 |
|
|
|
270,650 |
|
2006 |
|
|
107,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,971 |
|
|
|
53,192 |
|
|
|
40,560 |
|
|
|
29,749 |
|
|
|
22,494 |
|
|
|
168,966 |
|
2007 |
|
|
258,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,263 |
|
|
|
115,011 |
|
|
|
94,805 |
|
|
|
83,059 |
|
|
|
335,138 |
|
2008 |
|
|
275,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,277 |
|
|
|
107,974 |
|
|
|
100,337 |
|
|
|
269,588 |
|
2009 |
|
|
281,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,338 |
|
|
|
177,407 |
|
|
|
234,745 |
|
2010 |
|
|
361,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,562 |
|
|
|
86,562 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,690,055 |
|
|
$ |
64,515 |
|
|
$ |
53,148 |
|
|
$ |
79,253 |
|
|
$ |
117,052 |
|
|
$ |
153,404 |
|
|
$ |
191,376 |
|
|
$ |
236,393 |
|
|
$ |
262,166 |
|
|
$ |
326,699 |
|
|
$ |
368,003 |
|
|
$ |
529,342 |
|
|
$ |
2,381,351 |
|
|
|
Cash Collections By Year, By Year of Purchase Purchased Bankruptcy Portfolio
|
($ in thousands) |
Purchase |
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Collection Period |
|
Period |
|
Price |
|
|
1996-2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
7,468 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
4,554 |
|
|
$ |
3,956 |
|
|
$ |
2,777 |
|
|
$ |
1,455 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
14,145 |
|
2005 |
|
|
29,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
11,934 |
|
|
|
6,845 |
|
|
|
3,318 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
42,756 |
|
2006 |
|
|
17,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,608 |
|
|
|
9,455 |
|
|
|
6,522 |
|
|
|
4,398 |
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
28,955 |
|
2007 |
|
|
78,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
27,972 |
|
|
|
25,630 |
|
|
|
22,829 |
|
|
|
79,281 |
|
2008 |
|
|
108,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,024 |
|
|
|
35,894 |
|
|
|
37,974 |
|
|
|
87,892 |
|
2009 |
|
|
156,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,635 |
|
|
|
81,780 |
|
|
|
98,415 |
|
2010 |
|
|
211,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,486 |
|
|
|
39,486 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
609,533 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
8,331 |
|
|
$ |
25,064 |
|
|
$ |
27,016 |
|
|
$ |
56,818 |
|
|
$ |
86,371 |
|
|
$ |
186,587 |
|
|
$ |
390,930 |
|
|
|
Cash Collections By Year, By Year of Purchase Core Portfolio
|
($ in thousands) |
Purchase |
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Collection Period |
|
Period |
|
Price |
|
|
1996-2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
1996 |
|
$ |
3,080 |
|
|
$ |
7,295 |
|
|
$ |
730 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
9,982 |
|
1997 |
|
|
7,685 |
|
|
|
15,138 |
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
24,614 |
|
1998 |
|
|
11,089 |
|
|
|
16,981 |
|
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
36,581 |
|
1999 |
|
|
18,898 |
|
|
|
18,207 |
|
|
|
12,090 |
|
|
|
9,598 |
|
|
|
7,336 |
|
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
|
4,352 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
66,473 |
|
2000 |
|
|
25,020 |
|
|
|
6,894 |
|
|
|
19,498 |
|
|
|
19,478 |
|
|
|
16,628 |
|
|
|
14,098 |
|
|
|
10,924 |
|
|
|
8,067 |
|
|
|
5,202 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
2,782 |
|
|
|
110,373 |
|
2001 |
|
|
33,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,048 |
|
|
|
28,831 |
|
|
|
28,003 |
|
|
|
26,717 |
|
|
|
22,639 |
|
|
|
16,048 |
|
|
|
10,011 |
|
|
|
6,164 |
|
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
161,182 |
|
2002 |
|
|
42,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,073 |
|
|
|
36,258 |
|
|
|
35,742 |
|
|
|
32,497 |
|
|
|
24,729 |
|
|
|
16,527 |
|
|
|
9,772 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
6,375 |
|
|
|
184,417 |
|
2003 |
|
|
61,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,308 |
|
|
|
49,706 |
|
|
|
52,640 |
|
|
|
43,728 |
|
|
|
30,695 |
|
|
|
18,818 |
|
|
|
13,135 |
|
|
|
10,422 |
|
|
|
243,452 |
|
2004 |
|
|
51,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,276 |
|
|
|
41,921 |
|
|
|
36,468 |
|
|
|
27,973 |
|
|
|
17,884 |
|
|
|
13,181 |
|
|
|
9,780 |
|
|
|
164,483 |
|
2005 |
|
|
113,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,191 |
|
|
|
59,645 |
|
|
|
57,928 |
|
|
|
42,731 |
|
|
|
30,048 |
|
|
|
22,351 |
|
|
|
227,894 |
|
2006 |
|
|
90,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,363 |
|
|
|
43,737 |
|
|
|
34,038 |
|
|
|
25,351 |
|
|
|
19,522 |
|
|
|
140,011 |
|
2007 |
|
|
179,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,413 |
|
|
|
87,039 |
|
|
|
69,175 |
|
|
|
60,230 |
|
|
|
255,857 |
|
2008 |
|
|
166,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,253 |
|
|
|
72,080 |
|
|
|
62,363 |
|
|
|
181,696 |
|
2009 |
|
|
125,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,703 |
|
|
|
95,627 |
|
|
|
136,330 |
|
2010 |
|
|
149,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,076 |
|
|
|
47,076 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,080,522 |
|
|
$ |
64,515 |
|
|
$ |
53,148 |
|
|
$ |
79,253 |
|
|
$ |
117,052 |
|
|
$ |
152,661 |
|
|
$ |
183,045 |
|
|
$ |
211,329 |
|
|
$ |
235,150 |
|
|
$ |
269,881 |
|
|
$ |
281,632 |
|
|
$ |
342,755 |
|
|
$ |
1,990,421 |
|
|
44
When we acquire a new pool of finance receivables, our estimates typically result in an
72 96 month projection of cash collections. The following chart shows our historical cash
collections (including cash sales of finance receivables) in relation to the aggregate of the total
estimated collection projections made at the time of each respective pool purchase, adjusted for
buybacks, for the period 2001 through 2010.
Primarily as a result of the downturn in the economy, the decline in the availability of
consumer credit, our efforts to help customers establish reasonable payment plans, and improvements
in our collections capabilities which have allowed us to profitably collect on accounts with lower
balances or lower quality, our average payment size has decreased over the past several years.
However, due to improved scoring and segmentation, together with enhanced productivity, we have
been able to generate increased amounts of cash collections by generating enough incremental
payments to overcome the decrease in payment size.
Owned Portfolio Personnel Performance:
We measure the productivity of each collector each month, breaking results into groups of
similarly tenured collectors. The following tables display various productivity measures that we
track.
Number of Collectors by Tenure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year +(1) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
Q2
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
Q3
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
Q4
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year(2) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
Q2
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
Q3
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
Q4
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(2) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
Q2
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
Q3
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
Q4
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated based on actual employees (collectors) with one year of service or more. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated using total hours worked by all collectors, including those in training to
produce a full time equivalent FTE. |
The tables below contain our most recent six years of collector productivity metrics as
defined by calendar quarter.
Cash Collections per Hour Paid (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash collections |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
Q2
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
Q3
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
Q4
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-legal cash collections(2) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
Q2
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
Q3
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
Q4
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-bankruptcy cash collections(3) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
Q2
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
Q3
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
Q4
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-legal/non-bankruptcy cash collections(4) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
Q2
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
Q3
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
Q4
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash collections (assigned and unassigned) divided by total hours paid (including
holiday, vacation and sick time) to collectors (including those in training). |
|
(2) |
|
Represents total cash collections less external legal cash collections. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents total cash collections less purchased bankruptcy cash collections from
trustee-administered accounts. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents total cash collections less external legal cash collections and less
purchased bankruptcy cash collections from trustee-administered accounts. |
46
Cash collections have substantially exceeded revenue in each quarter since our formation. The
following chart illustrates the consistent excess of our cash collections on our owned portfolios
over income recognized on finance receivables on a quarterly basis. The difference between cash
collections and income recognized on finance receivables is referred to as payments applied to
principal. It is also referred to as amortization of purchase price. This amortization is the
portion of cash collections that is used to recover the cost of the portfolio investment
represented on the balance sheet.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes cash collections on finance receivables only and excludes cash proceeds from
sales of defaulted consumer receivables. |
Seasonality
Collections tend to be higher in the first and second quarters of the year and lower in the
third and fourth quarters of the year, due to customer payment patterns in connection with seasonal
employment trends, income tax refunds and holiday spending habits. Historically, our growth has
partially masked the impact of this seasonality.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes cash collections on finance receivables only and excludes cash proceeds from
sales of defaulted consumer receivables. |
47
The following table displays our quarterly cash collections by source, for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Collection Source ($ in thousands) |
|
Q42010 |
|
|
Q32010 |
|
|
Q22010 |
|
|
Q12010 |
|
|
Q42009 |
|
|
Q32009 |
|
|
Q22009 |
|
|
Q12009 |
|
|
Call Center & Other Collections |
|
$ |
53,775 |
|
|
$ |
51,711 |
|
|
$ |
54,477 |
|
|
$ |
56,987 |
|
|
$ |
45,365 |
|
|
$ |
48,590 |
|
|
$ |
50,052 |
|
|
$ |
50,914 |
|
External Legal Collections |
|
|
21,446 |
|
|
|
20,217 |
|
|
|
18,819 |
|
|
|
18,276 |
|
|
|
15,496 |
|
|
|
15,330 |
|
|
|
16,527 |
|
|
|
17,790 |
|
Internal Legal Collections |
|
|
12,841 |
|
|
|
12,130 |
|
|
|
11,362 |
|
|
|
10,714 |
|
|
|
7,570 |
|
|
|
6,196 |
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
|
|
3,539 |
|
Purchased Bankruptcy Collections |
|
|
56,301 |
|
|
|
53,319 |
|
|
|
43,748 |
|
|
|
33,219 |
|
|
|
26,855 |
|
|
|
22,251 |
|
|
|
19,637 |
|
|
|
17,628 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
144,363 |
|
|
$ |
137,377 |
|
|
$ |
128,406 |
|
|
$ |
119,196 |
|
|
$ |
95,286 |
|
|
$ |
92,367 |
|
|
$ |
90,479 |
|
|
$ |
89,871 |
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the changes in finance receivables, including the amounts paid to
acquire new portfolios, for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
693,462 |
|
|
$ |
563,830 |
|
|
$ |
410,297 |
|
Acquisitions of finance receivables (1) |
|
|
357,530 |
|
|
|
282,023 |
|
|
|
273,746 |
|
Cash collections applied to principal on finance receivables (2) |
|
|
(219,662 |
) |
|
|
(152,391 |
) |
|
|
(120,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
831,330 |
|
|
$ |
693,462 |
|
|
$ |
563,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Remaining Collections (ERC)(3) |
|
$ |
1,723,518 |
|
|
$ |
1,415,446 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Acquisitions of finance receivables is net of buybacks and includes certain capitalized
acquisition related costs. |
|
(2) |
|
Cash collections applied to principal (also referred to as amortization) on finance
receivables consists of cash collections less income recognized on finance receivables, net of
allowance charges. |
|
(3) |
|
Estimated Remaining Collections refers to the sum of all future projected cash collections on
our owned portfolios. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, our primary sources of cash have been cash flows from operations, bank
borrowings and equity offerings. Cash has been used for acquisitions of finance receivables,
corporate acquisitions, repurchase of our common stock, payment of cash dividends, repayments of
bank borrowings, purchases of property and equipment and working capital to support our growth.
As of December 31, 2010, cash and cash equivalents totaled $41.1 million, as compared to $20.3
million at December 31, 2009. Total debt outstanding on our $407.5 million line of credit was
$300.0 million as of December 31, 2010, which represents availability of $107.5 million.
We have in place forward flow commitments for the purchase of defaulted consumer receivables
over the
next 12 months of approximately $234.4 million as of December 31, 2010. Additionally we may
enter into new or renewed flow commitments in the next twelve months and close on spot transactions
in addition to the aforementioned flow agreements. We believe that funds generated from operations
and from cash collections on finance receivables, together with existing cash and available
borrowings under our credit agreement would be sufficient to finance our operations, planned
capital expenditures, the aforementioned forward flow commitments, and a material amount of
additional portfolio purchasing in excess of the currently committed flow amounts during the next
twelve months.
We are cognizant of the market fundamentals in the debt purchase and company acquisition
market which, because of significant supply and tight capital availability, could cause increased
buying opportunities to arise. Accordingly, we filed a $150 million shelf registration during the
third quarter of 2009. We issued $75.5 million of equity securities under that registration
statement during February of 2010 in order to take advantage of market opportunities while
retaining the ability to issue up to an additional $74.5 million of equity or debt securities under
the shelf registration statement in the future. The outcome of any future transaction is subject to
market conditions. In addition, due to these opportunities, we closed on a new and expanded
syndicated loan during the fourth quarter of 2010. The new credit agreement increased our possible
availability to $407.5
48
million. Refer to the Borrowings section below for additional information on the line
of credit.
With the acquisition of a controlling interest in CCB on March 15, 2010, we have the right to
call the noncontrolling interest through February 2015. In addition, the noncontrolling interest
has the right to put the remainder of the shares to us beginning in March 2012 and ending February
2018. The total maximum amount we would have to pay for the non-controlling interest in CCB in any
scenario is $22.8 million.
We file income taxes using the cost recovery method for tax revenue recognition. We were
notified on June 21, 2007 that we were being examined by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2005
calendar year. The IRS has concluded its audit and on March 19, 2009 issued Form 4549-A, Income
Tax Examination Changes for tax years ending December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The IRS has
asserted that cost recovery for tax revenue recognition does not clearly reflect taxable income and
that unused line fees paid on credit facilities should be capitalized and amortized rather than
taken as a current deduction. On April 22, 2009, we filed a formal protest of the findings
contained in the examination report prepared by the IRS. We believe we have sufficient support for
the technical merits of our positions and that it is more-likely-than-not that these positions will
ultimately be sustained; therefore, a reserve for uncertain tax positions is not necessary for
these tax positions. If we are unsuccessful in our appeal, we may further our efforts in United States Tax Court. Additionally, if judicial appeals prove unsuccessful we may ultimately be required to pay
the related deferred taxes and any potential interest, possibly requiring additional financing from
other sources.
In forming our tax positions, we consider inputs based on industry practice, tax advice from
professionals and drawing similarities of our facts and circumstances to those in established case
law (most notably as it relates to revenue recognition, Underhill and Liftin). These tax positions
deal not only with revenue recognition, but also with general tax compliance including sales and
use, franchise, gross receipts, payroll, property and income tax issues, including our tax base and
apportionment factors.
A diverse group of companies
participate in our industry including distressed debt purchasers, Wall Street hedge funds, small
private collection companies and other such investment firms. These participants are
diverse in their structure, processes, and profitability. We base our primary tax revenue
recognition policy on the nature of the assets that we acquire. We, therefore, file income tax
returns using the cost recovery method for tax revenue recognition as it relates to our debt
purchasing business.
Cash generated from operations is dependent upon our ability to collect on our finance
receivables. Many factors, including the economy and our ability to hire and retain qualified
collectors and managers, are essential to our ability to generate cash flows. Fluctuations in
these factors that cause a negative impact on our business could have a material impact on our
future cash flows.
Our operating activities provided cash of $143.6 million, $85.3 million and $81.7 million for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In these periods, cash from
operations was generated primarily from net income earned through cash collections and fee income
received for the period. The increase was due mainly to an increase in net income to $73.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2010, from $44.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
$45.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as well as an increase in deferred tax expense
to $47.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, from $28.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and $30.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The remaining changes
were due to net changes in other accounts related to our operating activities.
Our investing activities used cash of $170.5 million, $134.3 million and $185.7 million for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Cash provided by investing
activities is primarily driven by cash collections applied to principal on finance receivables.
Cash used in investing activities is primarily driven by acquisitions of finance receivables,
purchases of property and equipment and company acquisitions. The majority of the increase was due
to net cash payments for corporate acquisitions totaling $23.1 million for the year ended December
31, 2010 compared to $100,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $26.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008 as well as an increase in acquisitions of finance receivables which
increased to $357.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $282.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 and $273.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was
offset by an increase in collections applied to principal on finance receivables to $219.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $152.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
$120.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
49
Our financing activities provided cash of $47.8 million, $55.3 million and $101.2 million for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Cash used in financing activities
is primarily driven by payments on our line of credit and principal payments on long-term debt.
Cash is provided primarily by draws on our line of credit and proceeds from stock offerings. The
majority of the change was due to a decrease in the net borrowings on our line of credit. We had
net repayments on our line of credit of $19.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, as
compared to net draws of $51.0 million and $100.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The decrease in the net borrowings on our line of credit was offset
by the cash proceeds received from our $75.5 million equity offering during the year ended December
30, 2010 as compared to $0 for both of the prior year periods.
Cash paid for interest was $9.4 million, $8.0 million and $11.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The majority of interest was paid on our lines of
credit, capital lease obligations and other long-term debt. The increase from the year ended
December 31, 2009 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 was mainly due to an increase in
our average borrowings which increased to $244.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from
$234.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, and the cost to terminate our interest rate
swap, partially offset by an decrease in our weighted average interest rate from 2.46% for the year
ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2.62% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease from
the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 was mainly due to
a decrease in our weighted average interest rate which decreased to 2.62% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 from 4.60% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Borrowings
On December 20, 2010, we entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders named therein (the Credit Agreement). Under the
terms of the Credit Agreement, the credit facility includes an aggregate principal amount available
of $407.5 million which consists of a $50 million fixed rate loan that matures on May 4, 2012,
which was transferred from our existing credit agreement, and a $357.5 million revolving credit
facility that matures on December 20, 2014. The revolving credit facility will be automatically
increased by $50 million upon the maturity and repayment of the fixed rate loan. The fixed rate
loan bears interest at a rate of 6.8% per annum, payable monthly in arrears. The revolving loans
accrue interest, at our option, at either the base rate plus 1.75% per annum or the Eurodollar rate
(as defined) for the applicable term plus 2.75% per annum. The base rate is the highest of (a) the
Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (b) Bank of Americas prime rate, and (c) the Eurodollar rate plus
1.00%. Interest is payable on base rate loans quarterly in arrears and on Eurodollar loans in
arrears on the last day of each interest period or if such interest period exceeds three months,
every three months. Our revolving credit facility includes a $20 million swingline loan sublimit
and a $20 million letter of credit sublimit. It also contains an accordion loan feature that
allows us to request an increase of up to $142.5 million in the amount available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility, whether from existing or new lenders, subject to the
terms of the Credit Agreement. No existing lender is obligated to increase its commitment. The
Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of our assets. The
Credit Agreement contains restrictive covenants and events of default include the following:
|
|
|
borrowings may not exceed 30% of the ERC of all its eligible asset pools plus 75% of its
eligible accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
the consolidated leverage ratio (as defined) cannot exceed 2.0 to 1.0 as of the end of
any fiscal quarter; |
|
|
|
|
consolidated Tangible Net Worth (as defined) must equal or exceed $309,452,000 plus 50%
of positive consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter beginning December 31, 2010,
plus 50% of the net proceeds of any equity offering; |
|
|
|
|
capital expenditures during any fiscal year cannot exceed $20 million; |
|
|
|
|
cash dividends and distributions during any fiscal year cannot exceed $20 million; |
|
|
|
|
stock repurchases during the term of the agreement cannot exceed $100 million; |
|
|
|
|
permitted acquisitions (as defined) during any fiscal year cannot exceed $100 million; |
|
|
|
|
we must maintain positive consolidated income from operations during any fiscal quarter;
and
|
50
|
|
|
restrictions on changes in control. |
The revolving credit facility also bears an unused commitment fee of 0.375% per annum, payable
quarterly in arrears.
All of our borrowings at December 31, 2010 under our revolving credit facility consisted of
30-day Eurodollar rate loans, with an annual interest rate as of December 31, 2010 equal to 3.01%.
Our previous credit facility included an aggregate principal amount available of $365.0
million as of December 31, 2009, which consisted of a $50 million fixed rate loan and a $315
million revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bore interest at
a floating rate equal to the one month LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.40%, which equated to 1.63%
at December 31, 2009. We also paid an unused line fee for our previous credit facility equal to
0.30% on any unused portion of the facility. The credit facility was collateralized by
substantially all of our assets and contained certain restrictive covenants.
We had $300.0 million and $319.3 million of borrowings outstanding on our credit facilities as
of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, of which $50 million was part of the
non-revolving fixed rate loan at both dates.
We were in compliance with all covenants of our credit facilities as of December 31, 2010 and
2009.
Stockholders Equity
Stockholders equity was $490.5 at December 31, 2010 and $335.5 million at December 31, 2009.
The increase was attributable primarily to $71.7 in net proceeds from a stock offering and $73.5
million in net income.
Contractual Obligations
The following summarizes our contractual obligations that exist as of December 31, 2010
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than 1 |
|
|
1 - 3 |
|
|
4 - 5 |
|
|
than 5 |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Operating Leases |
|
$ |
19,372 |
|
|
$ |
4,323 |
|
|
$ |
8,191 |
|
|
$ |
4,908 |
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
Line of Credit (1) |
|
|
361,153 |
|
|
|
12,004 |
|
|
|
29,681 |
|
|
|
319,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Commitments (2) (3) |
|
|
261,968 |
|
|
|
239,038 |
|
|
|
15,330 |
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreements |
|
|
11,890 |
|
|
|
10,114 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
656,894 |
|
|
$ |
266,762 |
|
|
$ |
55,670 |
|
|
$ |
332,512 |
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
To the extent that a balance is outstanding on our lines of credit, the revolving portion
($250 million) would be due in December, 2014 and the non-revolving fixed rate sub-limit portion
($50 million) would be due in May 2012. This amount also includes estimated interest and unused
line fees due on the line of credit for both the
fixed rate and variable rate components. This estimate also assumes that the balance on the line
of credit remains constant from the December 31, 2010 balance of $300.0 million and the balance is
paid in full at its maturity. |
|
(2) |
|
This amount includes the maximum remaining amount to be purchased under forward flow contracts
for the purchase of charged-off consumer debt in the amount of approximately $234.4 million. |
|
(3) |
|
This amount includes the maximum remaining purchase price of $22.8 million to be paid to
acquire the noncontrolling interest of CCB. |
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2010 as defined by Item
303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
51
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets to
improve the reporting for the transfer of financial assets. The guidance must be applied as of the
beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15,
2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual
reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. We adopted this guidance during
the first quarter of 2010, which had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance on consolidation of variable interest entities to
improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide
more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. The guidance is effective
as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009 for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim
and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. We adopted this
guidance during the first quarter of 2010, which had no material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06), which clarifies
and expands disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. Disclosures are required
for significant transfers between levels in the fair value hierarchy. Activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements is to be presented on a gross, rather than net, basis. The update clarifies how
the appropriate level of disaggregation should be determined and emphasizes that information
sufficient to permit reconciliation between fair value measurements and line items on the financial
statements should be provided. The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the expanded disclosures related to activity in Level
3 fair value measurements which are effective one year later. We adopted ASU 2010-06 during the
first quarter of 2010, which had no material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan
Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool that is Accounted for as a Single Asset (ASU
2010-18), which clarifies the accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of a deterioration
in credit quality since origination (referred to as Subtopic 310-30 Loans). Under ASU 2010-18,
an entity may not apply troubled debt restructuring (TDR) accounting guidance to individual
Subtopic 310-30 loans that are part of a pool, even if the modification of those loans would
otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. Once a pool is established, individual
loans should not be removed from the pool unless the entity sells, forecloses, or writes off the
loan. Entities would continue to consider whether the pool of loans is impaired if expected cash
flows for the pool change. Subtopic 310-30 loans that are accounted for individually would
continue to be subject to TDR accounting guidance. A one-time election to terminate accounting
for loans as a pool, which may be made on a pool-by-pool basis, is provided upon adoption of ASU
2010-18. ASU 2010-18 is effective for interim or annual periods ending on or after July 15, 2010.
We adopted ASU 2010-18 during the third quarter of 2010, which had no material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
In July, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310) Disclosures about
the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20),
which requires significant new disclosures about the allowance for credit losses and the credit
quality of financing receivables. The requirements are intended to enhance transparency regarding
credit losses and the credit quality of loan and lease receivables. Under this statement,
allowance for credit losses and fair value are to be disclosed by portfolio segment, while credit
quality information, impaired financing receivables and nonaccrual status are to be presented by
class of financing receivable. Disclosure of the nature and extent, the financial impact and
segment information of troubled debt restructurings will also be required. The disclosures are to
be presented at the level of disaggregation that management uses when assessing and monitoring the
portfolios risk and performance. ASU 2010-20 is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. We adopted ASU 2010-20 on December 15, 2010, and
have included the required disclosures in the notes to our consolidated financial statements (see
Note 3).
52
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles and our discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations require our management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that
affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We
base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates and
such differences may be material.
Management believes our critical accounting policies and estimates are those related to
revenue recognition, valuation of acquired intangibles and goodwill and income taxes. Management
believes these policies to be critical because they are both important to the portrayal of our
financial condition and results, and they require management to make judgments and estimates about
matters that are inherently uncertain. Our senior management has reviewed these critical accounting
policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Revenue Recognition
We acquire accounts that have experienced deterioration of credit quality between origination
and our acquisition of the accounts. The amount paid for an account reflects our determination
that it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the accounts
contractual terms. At acquisition, we review each account to determine whether there is evidence of
deterioration of credit quality since origination and if it is probable that we will be unable to
collect all amounts due according to the accounts contractual terms. If both conditions exist, we
determine whether each such account is to be accounted for individually or whether such accounts
will be assembled into pools based on common risk characteristics. We consider expected prepayments
and estimate the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash
flows for each acquired portfolio and subsequently aggregated pools of accounts. We determine the
excess of the pools scheduled contractual principal and contractual interest payments over all
cash flows expected at acquisition as an amount that should not be accreted (nonaccretable
difference) based on our proprietary acquisition models. The remaining amount, representing the
excess of the accounts cash flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, is accreted into
income recognized on finance receivables over the remaining estimated life of the account or pool
(accretable yield).
We account for our investment in finance receivables under the guidance of ASC Topic 310-30,
Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (ASC 310-30). Under ASC
310-30 static pools of accounts may be established. These pools are aggregated based on certain
common risk criteria. Each static pool is recorded at cost, which includes certain direct costs
of acquisition paid to third parties, and is accounted for as a single unit for the recognition of
income, payments applied to principal and loss provision. Once a static pool is established for a
calendar quarter, individual receivable accounts are not added to the pool (unless replaced by the
seller) or removed from the pool (unless sold or returned to the seller). ASC 310-30 requires that
the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows, based on our estimates
derived from our proprietary collection models, not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue or
expense or on the balance sheet. ASC 310-30, utilizing the interest method, initially freezes the
yield, estimated when the accounts are purchased as the basis for subsequent impairment testing.
Significant increases in expected future cash flows may be recognized prospectively, through an
upward adjustment of the yield, over a portfolios remaining life. Any increase to the yield then
becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing. Under ASC 310-30, rather than lowering the
estimated yield if the collection estimates are not received or projected to be received, the
carrying value of a pool would be written down to maintain the then current yield and is shown as a
reduction in revenue in the consolidated income statements with a corresponding valuation allowance
offsetting finance receivables, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. Income on finance
receivables is accrued quarterly based on each static pools effective yield. Quarterly cash flows
greater than the interest accrual will reduce the carrying value of the
static pool. This reduction in carrying value is defined as payments applied to principal
(also referred to as finance receivable amortization). Likewise, cash flows that are less than the
interest accrual will accrete the
53
carrying balance. Generally, we do not record accretion in the first six to twelve months of
the estimated life of the pool; accordingly, we utilize either the cost recovery method or cash
method when necessary to prevent accretion as permitted by ASC 310-30. The yield is estimated and
periodically recalculated based on the timing and amount of anticipated cash flows using our
proprietary collection models. A pool can become fully amortized (zero carrying balance on the
balance sheet) while still generating cash collections. In this case, all cash collections are
recognized as revenue when received. Under the cash method, revenue is recognized as it would be
under the interest method up to the amount of cash collections. Additionally, we use the cost
recovery method when collections on a particular pool of accounts cannot be reasonably predicted.
These cost recovery pools are not aggregated with other portfolios. Under the cost recovery
method, no revenue is recognized until we have fully collected the cost of the portfolio, or until
such time that we consider the collections to be probable and estimable and begin to recognize
income based on the interest method as described above.
We establish valuation allowances for all acquired accounts subject to ASC 310-30 to reflect
only those losses incurred after acquisition (that is, the present value of cash flows initially
expected at acquisition that are no longer expected to be collected). Valuation allowances are
established only subsequent to acquisition of the accounts. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had
a valuation allowance of $76.4 million and $51.3 million, respectively, on our finance receivables.
We implement the accounting for income recognized on finance receivables under ASC 310-30 as
follows. We create each accounting pool using our projections of estimated cash flows and expected
economic life. We then compute the effective yield that fully amortizes the pool to the end of its
expected economic life based on the current projections of estimated cash flows. As actual cash
flow results are recorded, we balance those results to the data contained in our proprietary models
to ensure accuracy, then review each accounting pool watching for trends, actual performance versus
projections and curve shape, sometimes re-forecasting future cash flows utilizing our statistical
models. The review process is primarily performed by our finance staff; however, our operational
and statistical staffs may also be involved depending upon actual cash flow results achieved. To
the extent there is overperformance, we will either increase the yield or release the allowance and
consider increasing future cash projections, if persuasive evidence indicates that the
overperformance is considered to be a significant betterment. If the overperformance is considered
more of an acceleration of cash flows (a timing difference), the Company will adjust estimated
future cash flows downward which effectively extends the amortization period, or take no action at
all if the amortization period is reasonable and falls within the pools expected economic life.
In either case, yield may or may not be increased due to the time value of money (accelerated cash
collections). To the extent there is underperformance, we will record an allowance if the
underperformance is significant and will also consider revising estimated future cash flows based
on current period information, or take no action if the pools amortization period is reasonable
and falls within the currently projected economic life.
We utilize the provisions ASC Topic 605-45, Principal Agent Considerations (ASC 605-45),
to account for revenues from our fee for service subsidiaries. ASC 605-45 requires an analysis to
be completed to determine if certain revenues should be reported gross or reported net of their
related operating expense. This analysis includes an assessment of who retains inventory/credit
risk, who controls vendor selection, who establishes pricing and who remains the primary obligor on
the transaction. Each of these factors was considered to determine the correct method of
recognizing revenue from our subsidiaries.
Our skip tracing subsidiary utilizes both gross and net reporting under ASC 605-45. We
generate revenue by working an account and successfully locating a customer for our client. An
investigative fee is received for these services. In addition, we incur agent expenses where
we hire a third-party collector to effectuate repossession. In many cases we have an arrangement
with our client which allows us to bill the client for these fees. We have determined these fees
to be gross revenue based on the criteria in ASC 605-45 and they are recorded as such in the line
item Fee income, primarily because we are primarily liable to the third party collector. There is
a corresponding expense in Legal and agency fees and costs for these pass-through items. We
also incur fees to release liens on the repossessed collateral. These lien-release fees are netted
in the line Legal and agency fees and costs.
Our government processing and collection business primary source of income is derived from
servicing taxing authorities in several different ways: processing all of their tax payments and
tax forms, collecting delinquent taxes, identifying taxes that are not being paid and auditing tax
payments. The processing and collection pieces are standard commission based billings or fee for
service transactions. When we conduct an
54
audit, there are two components. The first component is a billing for the hours incurred on
conducting the audit. This billing is marked up from the actual costs incurred. The gross billing
is a component of the line item Fee income and the expense is included in the line item
Compensation and employee services. The second component is expenses incurred while conducting
the audit. Most jurisdictions will reimburse us for direct expenses incurred for the audit
including such items as travel and meals. The billed amounts are included in the line item Fee
income and the expense component is included in its appropriate expense category, generally,
Other operating expenses.
Our claims administration and payment processing business utilizes net reporting under ASC
605-45. We generate revenue by filing claims with the class action claims administrator on behalf
of our clients and receive the related settlement payment. Under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
104, (SAB 104), we have determined our fee is not earned until we have received the settlement
funds. When a payment is received from the claims administrator for settlement of a lawsuit, we
record our fee on a net basis as revenue and include it in the line item Fee income. The
balance of the received amounts is recorded as a liability and included in the line item
Accounts payable.
Valuation of Acquired Intangibles and Goodwill
In accordance with ASC Topic 350 IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (ASC 350) we are required
to perform a review of goodwill for impairment annually or earlier if indicators of potential
impairment exist. The review of goodwill for potential impairment is highly subjective and requires
that: (1) goodwill is allocated to various reporting units of our business to which it relates; and
(2) we estimate the fair value of those reporting units to which the goodwill relates and then
determine the book value of those reporting units. If the estimated fair value of reporting units
with allocated goodwill is determined to be less than their book value, we are required to estimate
the fair value of all identifiable assets and liabilities of those reporting units in a manner
similar to a purchase price allocation for an acquired business. This requires independent
valuation of certain unrecognized assets. Once this process is complete, the amount of goodwill
impairment, if any, can be determined.
We believe that, at December 31, 2010, there was no impairment of goodwill or other intangible
assets. However, changes in various circumstances including changes in our market capitalization,
changes in our forecasts and changes in our internal business structure could cause one of our
reporting units to be valued differently thereby causing an impairment of goodwill. Additionally,
in response to changes in our industry and changes in global or regional economic conditions, we
may strategically realign our resources and consider restructuring, disposing or otherwise exiting
businesses, which could result in an impairment of some or all of our identifiable intangibles or
goodwill. There were no such plans in place at December 31, 2010.
Income Taxes
We follow the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 740 Income Taxes (ASC 740) as it relates to the
provision for income taxes and uncertainty in income taxes. Accordingly, we record a tax provision
for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. In accordance with ASC
740 the provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of
temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and
for operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years
in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. The guidance also prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods
and disclosure. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with the guidance is a two-step
process. The first step is recognition: the enterprise determines whether it is
more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution
of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In
evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the
enterprise should presume that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority
that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step is measurement: a tax
position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the
amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured as the
largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. Tax
55
positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be
recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met.
Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition
threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that
threshold is no longer met.
Effective with our 2002 tax filings, we adopted the cost recovery method of income recognition
for tax purposes. We believe cost recovery to be an acceptable method for companies in the bad debt
purchasing industry and results in the reduction of current taxable income as, for tax purposes,
collections on finance receivables are applied first to principal to reduce the finance receivables
to zero before any income is recognized.
We believe it is more likely than not that forecasted income, including income that may be
generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies, together with the tax effects of the
deferred tax liabilities, will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets.
In the event that all or part of the deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the
future, a valuation allowance would be established and charged to earnings in the period such
determination is made. Similarly, if we subsequently realize deferred tax assets that were
previously determined to be unrealizable, the respective valuation allowance would be reversed,
resulting in a positive adjustment to earnings or a decrease in goodwill in the period such
determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant
judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws.
Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with our expectations could have a
material impact on our results of operations and financial position.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.
Our exposure to market risk relates primarily to interest rate risk with our variable
rate credit line. The average borrowings on our variable rate credit line were $244.2 million and
$234.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Assuming a 200 basis
point increase in interest rates, interest expense would have increased by $5.0 million and $4.8
million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and
2008, we had $250.0 million and $269.3 million, respectively, of variable rate debt outstanding on
our credit lines. We do not have any other variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
Significant increases in future interest rates on the variable rate credit line could lead to a
material decrease in future earnings assuming all other factors remained constant.
56
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
See Item 6 for quarterly consolidated financial statements for 2010 and 2009.
Index to Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
63-86 |
|
57
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
income statements, and statements of changes in stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),
and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting.
Norfolk, Virginia
February 25, 2011
58
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2010 and 2009
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
41,094 |
|
|
$ |
20,265 |
|
Finance receivables, net |
|
|
831,330 |
|
|
|
693,462 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
8,932 |
|
|
|
9,169 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
24,270 |
|
|
|
21,864 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
61,678 |
|
|
|
29,299 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
18,466 |
|
|
|
10,756 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,775 |
|
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
995,908 |
|
|
$ |
794,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3,227 |
|
|
$ |
4,108 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
4,506 |
|
Accrued payroll and bonuses |
|
|
15,445 |
|
|
|
11,633 |
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
|
164,971 |
|
|
|
117,206 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
319,300 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
Derivative instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
490,943 |
|
|
|
458,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
14,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01, authorized shares, 2,000,
issued and outstanding shares - 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01, authorized shares, 30,000,
17,064 issued and outstanding shares at December 31, 2010, and
15,596 issued and 15,514 outstanding shares at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
163,538 |
|
|
|
82,400 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
326,807 |
|
|
|
253,353 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
490,516 |
|
|
|
335,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
995,908 |
|
|
$ |
794,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
59
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Income Statements
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(Amounts in thousands, except per shares amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income recognized on finance receivables, net |
|
$ |
309,680 |
|
|
$ |
215,612 |
|
|
$ |
206,486 |
|
Fee income |
|
|
63,026 |
|
|
|
65,479 |
|
|
|
56,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
372,706 |
|
|
|
281,091 |
|
|
|
263,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee services |
|
|
124,077 |
|
|
|
106,388 |
|
|
|
88,073 |
|
Legal and agency fees and costs |
|
|
60,941 |
|
|
|
46,978 |
|
|
|
52,869 |
|
Outside fees and services |
|
|
12,554 |
|
|
|
9,570 |
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
Communications |
|
|
17,226 |
|
|
|
14,773 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
Rent and occupancy |
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,437 |
|
|
|
9,213 |
|
|
|
7,424 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
10,296 |
|
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
6,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
242,844 |
|
|
|
200,482 |
|
|
|
178,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
129,862 |
|
|
|
80,609 |
|
|
|
84,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,052 |
) |
|
|
(7,909 |
) |
|
|
(11,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
120,875 |
|
|
|
72,703 |
|
|
|
73,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
47,004 |
|
|
|
28,397 |
|
|
|
28,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
73,871 |
|
|
$ |
44,306 |
|
|
$ |
45,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. |
|
$ |
73,454 |
|
|
$ |
44,306 |
|
|
$ |
45,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
4.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
16,820 |
|
|
|
15,420 |
|
|
|
15,229 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
16,885 |
|
|
|
15,454 |
|
|
|
15,292 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
60
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(Loss), Net of Taxes |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
15,159 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
71,443 |
|
|
$ |
163,685 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
235,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,362 |
|
Net unrealized change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and vesting of nonvested shares |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607 |
|
Issuance of common stock for acquisition |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
Amortization of share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
Income tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
Reversal of FIN 48 reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
15,286 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
74,574 |
|
|
$ |
209,047 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
283,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,306 |
|
Net unrealized change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap derivative, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and vesting of nonvested shares |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
Issuance of common stock for acquisition |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
Amortization of share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,820 |
|
Income tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
15,514 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
82,400 |
|
|
$ |
253,353 |
|
|
$ |
(428 |
) |
|
$ |
335,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,454 |
|
Net unrealized change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap derivative, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and vesting of nonvested shares |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
Proceeds from stock offering, net of offering costs |
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
71,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,688 |
|
Amortization of share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,203 |
|
Income tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
Issuance of common stock for acquisition |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
17,064 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
163,538 |
|
|
$ |
326,807 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
490,516 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
61
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
73,871 |
|
|
$ |
44,306 |
|
|
$ |
45,362 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of share-based compensation |
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
3,820 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,437 |
|
|
|
9,213 |
|
|
|
7,424 |
|
Deferred tax expense |
|
|
47,493 |
|
|
|
28,927 |
|
|
|
30,854 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
(1,862 |
) |
|
|
(555 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
(1,663 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
(1,167 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
(873 |
) |
|
|
(385 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(413 |
) |
Accrued payroll and bonuses |
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
143,581 |
|
|
|
85,285 |
|
|
|
81,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(9,546 |
) |
|
|
(4,521 |
) |
|
|
(6,139 |
) |
Acquisition of finance receivables, net of buybacks |
|
|
(357,530 |
) |
|
|
(282,023 |
) |
|
|
(273,746 |
) |
Collections applied to principal on finance receivables |
|
|
219,662 |
|
|
|
152,391 |
|
|
|
120,213 |
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(23,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,041 |
) |
Contingent payment made for business acquisition |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(170,531 |
) |
|
|
(134,253 |
) |
|
|
(185,713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of options |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
Income tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Payment of liability-classified contingent consideration |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from line of credit |
|
|
177,500 |
|
|
|
123,500 |
|
|
|
171,300 |
|
Principal payments on line of credit |
|
|
(196,800 |
) |
|
|
(72,500 |
) |
|
|
(71,000 |
) |
Payments of line of credit origination costs and fees |
|
|
(3,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock offering, net of offering costs |
|
|
71,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
2,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
47,779 |
|
|
|
55,332 |
|
|
|
101,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
20,829 |
|
|
|
6,364 |
|
|
|
(2,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
20,265 |
|
|
|
13,901 |
|
|
|
16,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
41,094 |
|
|
$ |
20,265 |
|
|
$ |
13,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
9,398 |
|
|
$ |
8,004 |
|
|
$ |
11,322 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquisition |
|
$ |
4,950 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
$ |
1,847 |
|
Net unrealized change in fair value of derivative instrument |
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
$ |
(790 |
) |
|
$ |
89 |
|
Distributions payable relating to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
1,291 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
62
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization and Business:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (PRA) was formed on March 20, 1996. Portfolio Recovery
Associates, Inc. (PRA Inc) was formed in August 2002. On November 8, 2002, PRA Inc completed its
initial public offering (IPO) of common stock. As a result, all of the membership units and
warrants of PRA were exchanged on a one to one basis for warrants and shares of a single class of
common stock of PRA Inc. PRA Inc owns all outstanding membership units of PRA, PRA Holding I, LLC,
PRA Holding II, LLC, PRA Holding III, LLC (PRA Holding III), PRA Receivables Management, LLC
(formerly d/b/a Anchor Receivables Management), PRA Location Services, LLC (d/b/a IGS Nevada), PRA
Government Services, LLC (d/b/a RDS) and MuniServices, LLC. On March 15, 2010, PRA Inc acquired
62% of the membership units of Claims Compensation Bureau, LLC (CCB). The business of PRA Inc,
a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) revolves around the
detection, collection, and processing of both unpaid and normal-course receivables originally owed
to credit grantors, governments, retailers and others. The Companys primary business is the
purchase, collection and management of portfolios of defaulted consumer receivables. These accounts
are purchased from sellers of finance receivables and collected by a highly skilled staff whose
purpose is to locate and contact customers and arrange payment or resolution of their debts. The
Company, through its Litigation Department, collects accounts judicially, either by using its own
attorneys or by contracting with independent attorneys throughout the country through whom the
Company takes legal action to satisfy customer debts. The Company also provides services for
clients on either a commission or transaction-fee basis. Clients include entities in the financial
services, auto, retail, utility, health care and government sectors. Services provided to these
clients include obtaining location information for clients in support of their collection
activities (known as skip tracing), and the management of both delinquent and non-delinquent
receivables for government entities. In addition, through its newly acquired CCB subsidiary, the
Company provides class action claims settlement recovery services and related payment processing to
its corporate clients.
On December 28, 1999, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA Holding I, LLC (PRA Holding
I), and is the sole member. The purpose of PRA Holding I is to enter into leases of office space
and hold the Companys real property (see Note 10) in Hutchinson, Kansas, Norfolk, Virginia and
other real and personal property.
On June 1, 2000, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA Receivables Management, LLC (d/b/a
Anchor Receivables Management) (Anchor) and was the sole initial member. Anchor was organized as
a contingent collection agency and contracted with holders of finance receivables to attempt
collection efforts on a contingent basis for a stated period of time. Anchor became fully
operational during April 2001. The Company purchased the equity interest in Anchor from PRA
immediately after the IPO. The Company ceased its Anchor contingent fee operation during the
second quarter of 2008, but PRA Receivables Management, LLC continues to serve as the operational
entity for the Companys bankruptcy department.
On October 1, 2004, the Company acquired the assets of IGS Nevada, Inc., a privately held
company specializing in asset-location and debt resolution services (the resulting business is
referred to herein as IGS). On September 10, 2004, the Company created a wholly owned
subsidiary, PRA Location Services, LLC d/b/a IGS to operate IGS.
On July 29, 2005, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and liabilities of
Alatax, Inc., a provider of outsourced business revenue administration, audit and debt
discovery/recovery services for local governments (the resulting business is referred to herein as
RDS). Although most of its clients are located in Alabama, RDS, through PRA Government
Services, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary formed by the Company on June 23, 2005, is expanding into
surrounding states.
On October 13, 2006, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA Holding II, LLC (PRA Holding
II), and is its sole member. The purpose of PRA Holding II is to hold the Companys real property
in Jackson, Tennessee and other real and personal property. PRA Holding II originally purchased
the real property in 2006 and subsequently conveyed it to the Industrial Development Board of the
City of Jackson. The Company leases back the property from the Industrial Board under a long term
Master Industrial Lease Agreement, and has the option to re-purchase the property at any time during
the term of the lease.
On July 1, 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interests of MuniServices, LLC
(the resulting business is referred to herein as MuniServices). MuniServices was founded in 1978
and is a provider of revenue
63
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
enhancement and related services to state and local governments. The consolidated income
statements include the results of operations of MuniServices for the period from July 1, 2008
through December 31, 2010.
On August 1, 2008, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Broussard Partners
and Associates, Inc. (BPA), which is operating as a part of RDS. BPA, founded in 1995, is a
provider of audit services to parishes in Louisiana. The consolidated income statements include
the results of operations of BPA for the period from August 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010.
On October 9, 2009, PRA formed a wholly owned subsidiary, PRA Holding III, LLC (PRA Holding
III) d/b/a PRA Cafe. The purpose of PRA Holding III is to own and operate the Companys employee
café located at the Companys headquarters on Norfolk, Virginia.
On March 15, 2010, the Company acquired 62% of the membership units of Claims Compensation
Bureau, LLC (CCB). CCB is a leading provider of class action claims settlement recovery services
and related payment processing to corporate clients. The consolidated income statements include
the results of operations of CCB for the period from March 15, 2010 through December 31, 2010.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Principles of accounting and consolidation: The consolidated financial statements of the
Company are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include
the accounts of PRA Inc, PRA, PRA Holding I, PRA Holding II, PRA Holding III, IGS, RDS,
MuniServices and CCB. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Under the guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 280 Segment Reporting (ASC 280), the Company has determined that it
has several operating segments that meet the aggregation criteria of ASC 280, and therefore, it has
one reportable segment, accounts receivable management, based on similarities among the operating
units including homogeneity of services, service delivery methods and use of technology.
Cash and cash equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a
maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Included in cash and cash
equivalents are funds held on the behalf of others arising from the collection of accounts placed
with the Company. The balance of the funds held on behalf of others was $1,457,807 and $1,709,673
at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. There is an offsetting liability that is included in
Accounts payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Other assets: Other assets consist mainly of prepaid expenses and deposits, line of credit
origination costs and fees and capitalizable internal use software development costs on projects
that are in the development stage.
Concentrations of credit risk: Financial instruments, which potentially expose the Company to
concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and investments. The
Company places its cash and cash equivalents and investments with high quality financial
institutions. At times, cash balances may be in excess of the amounts insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Derivative instruments and hedging activities: The Company accounts for derivatives and
hedging activities in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815 Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815),
which requires entities to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in
the balance sheet at their respective fair values. For derivatives designated in hedging
relationships, changes in the fair value are either offset through earnings against the change in
fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged or recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive income or loss until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.
The Company only enters into derivative contracts that it intends to designate as a hedge of a
forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a
recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge). For all hedging relationships, the Company
formally documents the hedging relationship and its risk-management objective and strategy for
undertaking the hedge, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being
hedged, how the hedging instruments effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed
prospectively and retrospectively, and a description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness.
The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedges inception and on an ongoing basis, whether
the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting cash flows
of hedged items. For derivative
64
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash-flow hedge, the effective portion of the
gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and
reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction
affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or
hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.
The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it determines that the derivative
is no longer effective in offsetting cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is
sold, terminated, or exercised, the derivative is dedesignated as a hedging instrument because it
is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur, or management determines that designation of
the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.
In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative is retained,
the Company continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet and recognizes
any subsequent changes in its fair value in earnings. When it is probable that a forecasted
transaction will not occur, the Company discontinues hedge accounting and recognizes immediately in
earnings gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income.
Finance receivables and income recognition: The Companys principal business consists of the
acquisition and collection of pools of accounts that have experienced deterioration of credit
quality between origination and the Companys acquisition of the accounts. The amount paid for any
pool reflects the Companys determination that it is probable the Company will be unable to collect
all amounts due according to an accounts contractual terms. At acquisition, the Company reviews
the portfolio both by account and aggregate pool to determine whether there is evidence of
deterioration of credit quality since origination and if it is probable that the Company will be
unable to collect all amounts due according to the accounts contractual terms. If both conditions
exist, the Company determines whether each such account is to be accounted for individually or
whether such accounts will be assembled into pools based on common risk characteristics. The
Company considers expected prepayments and estimates the amount and timing of undiscounted expected
principal, interest and other cash flows for each acquired portfolio and subsequently aggregates
pools of accounts. The Company determines the excess of the pools scheduled contractual principal
and contractual interest payments over all cash flows expected at acquisition as an amount that
should not be accreted (nonaccretable difference) based on the Companys proprietary acquisition
models. The remaining amount, representing the excess of the pools cash flows expected to be
collected over the amount paid, is accreted into income recognized on finance receivables over the
remaining estimated life of the pool (accretable yield).
The Company accounts for its investment in finance receivables under the guidance of FASB ASC
Topic 310-30 Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (ASC 310-30).
Under ASC 310-30, static pools of accounts may be established. These pools are aggregated based on
certain common risk criteria. Each static pool is recorded at cost, which includes certain direct
costs of acquisition paid to third parties, and is accounted for as a single unit for the
recognition of income, payments applied to principal, and loss provision. Once a static pool is
established for a calendar quarter, individual receivable accounts are not added to the pool
(unless replaced by the seller) or removed from the pool (unless sold or returned to the seller).
ASC 310-30 requires that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows, based
on the Companys estimates derived from its proprietary collection models, not be recognized as an
adjustment of revenue or expense or on the balance sheet. ASC 310-30, utilizing the interest
method, initially freezes the yield estimated when the accounts are purchased as the basis for
subsequent impairment testing. Significant increases in actual, or expected future cash flows may
be recognized prospectively, through an upward adjustment of the yield, over a portfolios
remaining life. Any increase to the yield then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing.
Under ASC 310-30, rather than lowering the estimated yield if the collection estimates are not
received or projected to be received, the carrying value of a pool would be written down to
maintain the then current yield and is shown as a reduction in revenue in the consolidated income
statements with a corresponding valuation allowance offsetting finance receivables, net, on the
consolidated balance sheets. Income on finance receivables is accrued quarterly based on each
static pools effective yield. Quarterly cash flows greater than the interest accrual will reduce
the carrying value of the static pool. This reduction in carrying value is defined as payments
applied to principal (also referred to as finance receivable amortization). Likewise, cash flows
that are less than the interest accrual will increase, or accrete, the carrying balance. The
Company generally does not record accretion in the first six to twelve months of the estimated life
of the pool; accordingly, the Company utilizes either the cost recovery method or cash method when
necessary, as permitted by ASC 310-30, to prevent accretion. The yield is estimated and
periodically recalculated
65
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
based on the timing and
amount of anticipated cash flows using the Companys proprietary collection models. A pool
can become fully amortized (zero carrying balance on the balance sheet) while still
generating cash collections. In this case, all cash collections are recognized as revenue when
received. Under the cash method, revenue is recognized as it would be under the interest method up
to the amount of cash collections. Additionally, the Company uses the cost recovery method when
collections on a particular pool of accounts cannot be reasonably predicted. These cost recovery
pools are not aggregated with other portfolios. Under the cost recovery method, no revenue is
recognized until the Company has fully collected the cost of the portfolio, or until such time that
the Company considers the collections to be probable and estimable and begins to recognize income
based on the interest method as described above. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had
net finance receivables balances in pools accounted for under the cost recovery method of $1.6
million and $2.9 million, respectively.
The Company establishes valuation allowances, if necessary, for acquired accounts subject to
ASC 310-30 to reflect only those losses incurred after acquisition (that is, the present value of
cash flows initially expected at acquisition that are no longer expected to be collected).
Valuation allowances are established only subsequent to acquisition of the accounts. At December
31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had an allowance against its finance receivables of $76,407,000 and
$51,255,000, respectively.
The Company implements the accounting for income recognized on finance receivables under ASC
310-30 as follows. The Company creates each accounting pool using its projections of estimated
cash flows and expected economic life. The Company then computes the effective yield that fully
amortizes the pool to the end of its expected economic life based on the current projections of
estimated cash flows using the interest method. As actual cash flow results are recorded, the
Company balances those results to the data contained in its proprietary models to ensure accuracy,
then reviews each accounting pool watching for trends, actual performance versus projections and
curve shape (a graphical depiction of the timing of cash flows), sometimes re-forecasting future
cash flows utilizing the Companys statistical models. The review process is primarily performed
by the Companys finance staff; additionally, the Companys operational and statistical staffs may
also be involved. To the extent there is overperformance, the Company will either increase the
yield or release the allowance and consider increasing future cash projections, if persuasive
evidence indicates that the overperformance is considered to be a significant betterment. If the
overperformance is considered more of an acceleration of cash flows (a timing difference), the
Company will adjust estimated future cash flows downward which effectively extends the amortization
period, or take no action at all if the amortization period is reasonable and falls within the
pools expected economic life. In either case, the yield may or may not be increased due to the
time value of money (accelerated cash collections). To the extent there is underperformance, the
Company will record an allowance if the underperformance is significant and will also consider
revising estimated future cash flows based on current period information, or take no action if the
pools amortization period is reasonable and falls within the currently projected economic life.
The Company capitalizes certain fees paid to third parties related to the direct acquisition
of a portfolio of accounts. These fees are added to the acquisition cost of the portfolio and
accordingly are amortized over the life of the portfolio using the interest method. The balance of
the unamortized capitalized fees at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $3,295,515, $3,231,926 and
$3,078,560, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 the Company
capitalized $1,073,769, $969,927 and $1,250,940, respectively, of these direct acquisition fees.
During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 the Company amortized $1,010,180, $816,561
and $607,296, respectively, of these direct acquisition fees.
The agreements to purchase the aforementioned receivables include general representations and
warranties from the sellers covering account holder death or bankruptcy and accounts settled or
disputed prior to sale. The representation and warranty period permitting the return of these
accounts from the Company to the seller is typically 90 to 180 days. Any funds received from the
seller of finance receivables as a return of purchase price are referred to as buybacks. Buyback
funds are applied against the finance receivable balance received and are not included in the
Companys cash collections from operations. In some cases, the seller will replace the returned
accounts with new accounts in lieu of returning the purchase price. In that case, the old account
is removed from the pool and the new account is added.
Fee income: The Company utilizes the provisions ASC Topic 605-45 Principal Agent
Considerations (ASC 605-45) to account for fee income revenue from its contingent fee,
skip-tracing and government processing and collection subsidiaries. ASC 605-45 requires an
analysis to be completed to determine if certain revenues
66
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
should be reported gross or reported net
of their related operating expense. This analysis includes an assessment of who retains
inventory/credit risk, which controls vendor selection, who establishes pricing and who
remains the primary obligor on the transaction. The Company considers each of these factors to
determine the correct method of recognizing revenue from its subsidiaries.
For the Companys contingent fee subsidiary, the portfolios which are placed for servicing are
owned by its clients and are placed under a contingent fee commission arrangement. The Companys
subsidiary is paid to collect funds from the clients debtors and earns a commission generally
expressed as a percentage of the gross collection amount. The Fee income line of the income
statement reflects the contingent fee amount earned, and not the gross collection amount. The
Company ceased its Anchor contingent fee operation during the second quarter of 2008.
The Companys skip tracing subsidiary utilizes both gross and net reporting under ASC 605-45.
IGS generates revenue by working an account and successfully locating a customer for its client.
An investigative fee is received for these services. In addition, the Company incurs agent
expenses where it hires a third-party collector to effectuate repossession. In many cases the
Company has an arrangement with its client which allows it to bill the client for these fees. The
Company has determined these fees to be gross revenue based on the criteria in ASC 605-45 and they
are recorded as such in the line item Fee income, primarily because the Company is primarily
liable to the third party collector. There is a corresponding expense in Legal and agency fees and
costs for these pass-through items. IGS also incurs fees to release liens on the repossessed
collateral. These lien-release fees are netted in the line Legal and agency fees and costs.
The Companys government processing and collection businesss primary source of income is
derived from servicing taxing authorities in several different ways: processing all of their tax
payments and tax forms, collecting delinquent taxes, identifying taxes that are not being paid and
auditing tax payments. The processing and collection pieces are standard commission based billings
or fee for service transactions. When audits are conducted, there are two components. The first
is a billing for the hours incurred on conducting the audit. This billing is marked up from the
actual costs incurred. The gross billing is a component of the line item Fee income and the
expense is included in the line item Compensation and employee services. The second item is for
expenses incurred while conducting the audit. Most jurisdictions will reimburse the Company for
direct expenses incurred for the audit including such items as travel and meals. The billed
amounts are included in the line item Fee income and the expense component is included in its
appropriate expense category, generally, Other operating expenses.
The Companys claims administration and payment processing business utilizes net reporting
under ASC 605-45. CCB generates revenue by filing claims with the class action claims
administrator on behalf of its clients and receives the related settlement payment. Under SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, (SAB 104), the Company has determined its fee is not earned until
it has received the settlement funds. When a payment is received from the claims administrator for
settlement of a lawsuit, the Company records its fee on a net basis as revenue and includes it in
the line item Fee income. The balance of the received amounts is recorded as a liability and
included in the line item Accounts payable.
Property and equipment: Property and equipment, including improvements that significantly add
to the productive capacity or extend useful life, are recorded at cost, while maintenance and
repairs are expensed currently. Property and equipment are depreciated over their useful lives
using the straight-line method of depreciation. Software and computer equipment are amortized or
depreciated over three to five years. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over five years.
Equipment is depreciated over five to seven years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the
lesser of the useful life, which ranges from three to ten years, or the remaining term of the
leased property. Building improvements are depreciated over ten to thirty-nine years. When
property is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the
balance sheet and any gain or loss is included in the income statement.
Intangible assets: In connection with the Companys business acquisitions, the Company
recorded certain tangible and intangible assets. Intangible assets recorded include client and
customer relationships, non-compete agreements, trademarks and goodwill. In accordance FASB ASC
Topic 350 Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (ASC 350), the Company amortizes intangible assets
over their estimated useful lives. In addition, Goodwill, pursuant to ASC 350, is not amortized
but rather is reviewed at least annually for impairment. See Note 8 for additional disclosure.
67
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Income taxes: The Company records a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the
reported results of operations. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740 Income Taxes (ASC 740),
the provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of
temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and
for operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years
in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. The Company recognizes the effect
of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not to be sustained.
Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely
of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the
change in judgment occurs. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits as a component of income tax expense.
Effective with the Companys 2002 tax filings, the Company adopted the cost recovery method of
income recognition for tax purposes. The Company believes cost recovery to be an acceptable tax
revenue recognition method for companies in the bad debt purchasing industry and results in the
reduction of current taxable income as, for tax purposes, collections on finance receivables are
applied first to principal to reduce the finance receivables to zero before any income is
recognized.
The Company believes that it is more likely than not that forecasted income, including income
that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies, together with the tax effects
of the deferred tax liabilities, will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets. In
the event that all or part of the deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the
future, a valuation allowance would be established and charged to earnings in the period such
determination is made. Similarly, if the Company subsequently realizes deferred tax assets that
were previously determined to be unrealizable, the respective valuation allowance would be
reversed, resulting in a positive adjustment to earnings in the period such determination is made.
In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the
impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties
in a manner inconsistent with managements expectations could have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations and financial position.
Advertising costs: Advertising costs are expensed when incurred.
Operating leases: General abatements or prepaid leasing costs are recognized on a
straight-line basis over the life of the lease. In addition, future minimum lease payments
(including the impact of rent escalations) are expensed on a straight-lined basis over the life of
the lease. Material leasehold improvements are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining life
of the lease.
Capital leases: Leases are analyzed to determine if they meet the definition of a capital
lease as defined in FASB ASC Topic 840 Leases (ASC 840). Those lease arrangements that meet
one of the four criteria are considered capital leases. As such, the leased asset is capitalized
and amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful
life of the asset. The lease is recorded as a liability with each payment amortizing the principal
balance and a portion classified as interest expense.
Share-based compensation: The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance
with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 Compensation-Stock Compensation (ASC 718). ASC 718
requires that compensation expense associated with stock options and nonvested share awards be
recognized in the income statement. Based on historical experience, the Company assumes a
forfeiture rate for most option and nonvested share grants. Most options and nonvested share
awards generally vest between one and five years from the grant date and are expensed on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period. See Note 15 for additional disclosure.
Use of estimates: The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
68
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Significant estimates have been made by management with respect to the timing and amount of
future cash collections of the Companys finance receivables portfolios. Actual results could
differ from these estimates making
it reasonably possible that a change in these estimates could occur within one year. On a
quarterly basis, management reviews the estimates of future cash collections, and whether it is
reasonably possible that its assessments of collectibility may change based on actual results and
other factors.
Estimated fair value of financial instruments: The Company applies the provision of FASB ASC
Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value as the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also requires the
consideration of differing levels of inputs in the determination of fair values. Based upon the
fact there are no quoted prices in active markets or other observable market data, the Company used
unobservable inputs for computation of the fair value of finance receivables, net. Disclosure of
the estimated fair values of financial instruments often requires the use of estimates. See Note
14 for additional disclosure.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance on accounting for
transfers of financial assets to improve the reporting for the transfer of financial assets. The
guidance must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting
period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited.
The Company adopted the guidance during the first quarter of 2010, which had no material impact on
its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance on consolidation of variable interest entities to
improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide
more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. The guidance is effective
as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim
and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company adopted
the guidance during the first quarter of 2010, which had no material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements
(ASU 2010-06), which clarifies and expands disclosure requirements related to fair value
measurements. Disclosures are required for significant transfers between levels in the fair value
hierarchy. Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements is to be presented on a gross, rather than
net, basis. The update clarifies how the appropriate level of disaggregation should be determined
and emphasizes that information sufficient to permit reconciliation between fair value measurements
and line items on the financial statements should be provided. The update is effective for interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the expanded disclosures
related to activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective one year later. The
Company adopted ASU 2010-06 during the first quarter of 2010, which had no material effect on its
consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan
Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool that is Accounted for as a Single Asset (ASU
2010-18), which clarifies the accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of a deterioration
in credit quality since origination (referred to as Subtopic 310-30 Loans). Under ASU 2010-18,
an entity may not apply troubled debt restructuring (TDR) accounting guidance to individual
Subtopic 310-30 loans that are part of a pool, even if the modification of those loans would
otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. Once a pool is established, individual
loans should not be removed from the pool unless the entity sells, forecloses, or writes off the
loan. Entities would continue to consider whether the pool of loans is impaired if expected cash
flows for the pool change. Subtopic 310-30 loans that are accounted for individually would
continue to be subject to TDR accounting guidance. A one-time election to terminate accounting
for loans as a pool, which may be made on a pool-by-pool basis, is provided upon adoption of ASU
2010-18. ASU 2010-18 is effective for interim or annual periods ending on or after July 15, 2010.
The Company adopted ASU 2010-18 during the third quarter of 2010, which had no material effect on
its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310) Disclosures about
the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20),
which requires
69
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
significant new disclosures about the allowance for credit losses and the credit
quality of financing receivables. The requirements are intended to enhance transparency regarding
credit losses and the credit quality of loan and lease receivables. Under this statement,
allowance for credit losses and fair value are to be disclosed by portfolio segment,
while credit quality information, impaired financing receivables and nonaccrual status are to
be presented by class of financing receivable. Disclosure of the nature and extent, the financial
impact and segment information of troubled debt restructurings will also be required. The
disclosures are to be presented at the level of disaggregation that management uses when assessing
and monitoring the portfolios risk and performance. ASU 2010-20 is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted ASU 2010-20 on
December 15, 2010, and has included the required disclosures in the notes to its consolidated
financial statements (see Note 3).
3. Finance Receivables, net:
Changes in finance receivables, net for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, were as
follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
693,462 |
|
|
$ |
563,830 |
|
Acquisitions of finance receivables, net of buybacks |
|
|
357,530 |
|
|
|
282,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collections |
|
|
(529,342 |
) |
|
|
(368,003 |
) |
Income recognized on finance receivables, net |
|
|
309,680 |
|
|
|
215,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash collections applied to principal |
|
|
(219,662 |
) |
|
|
(152,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
831,330 |
|
|
$ |
693,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the time of acquisition, the life of each pool is generally estimated to be between 72 to
96 months based on projected amounts and timing of future cash collections using the proprietary
models of the Company. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had $831.3 million in finance
receivables, net included in the consolidated balance sheet. Based upon current projections, cash
collections applied to principal are estimated to be as follows for the following years ending
December 31, (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
221,841 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
|
219,962 |
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
212,298 |
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
137,253 |
|
December 31, 2015 |
|
|
37,040 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
|
2,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
831,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company purchased $6.8 billion of face value of
finance receivables. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company purchased $8.1 billion
of face value of finance receivables. At December 31, 2010, the estimated remaining collections on
the receivables purchased during 2010 and 2009 were $674.3 million and $486.2 million,
respectively. There were no sales of finance receivables during the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009.
Accretable yield represents the amount of income recognized on finance receivables the Company
can expect to generate over the remaining life of its existing portfolios based on estimated future
cash flows as of the balance sheet date. Additions represent the original expected accretable
yield to be earned by the Company based on its proprietary buying models. Reclassifications from
nonaccretable difference to accretable yield primarily result from the Companys increase in its
estimate of future cash flows. Reclassifications to nonaccretable difference from accretable yield
result from the Companys decrease in its estimates of future cash flows and allowance charges that
70
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
exceed the Companys increase in its estimate of future cash flows. Changes in accretable yield
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
721,984 |
|
|
$ |
551,735 |
|
Income recognized on finance receivables, net |
|
|
(309,680 |
) |
|
|
(215,612 |
) |
Additions |
|
|
403,252 |
|
|
|
408,935 |
|
Reclassifications from/(to) nonaccretable difference |
|
|
76,632 |
|
|
|
(23,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
892,188 |
|
|
$ |
721,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASC 310-30 requires that a valuation allowance be recorded for significant decreases
in expected cash flows or change in timing of cash flows which would otherwise require a reduction
in the stated yield on a pool of accounts. In any given period, the Company may be required to
record valuation allowances due to pools of receivables underperforming expectations. Factors that
may contribute to the recording of valuation allowances may include both internal as well as
external factors. External factors which may have an impact on the collectability, and
subsequently to the overall profitability of purchased pools of defaulted consumer receivables
would include: overall market pricing for pools of consumer receivables (which is driven by both
supply and demand), new laws or regulations relating to collections, new interpretations of
existing laws or regulations, and the overall condition of the economy. Internal factors which may
have an impact on the collectability, and subsequently the overall profitability of purchased pools
of defaulted consumer receivables would include: necessary revisions to initial and
post-acquisition scoring and modeling estimates, non-optimal operational activities (which relates
to the collection and movement of accounts on both the collection floor of the Company and external
channels), as well as decreases in productivity related to turnover and tenure of the Companys
collection staff. The following is a summary of activity within the Companys valuation allowance
account for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Portfolio |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Total |
|
Valuation allowance finanace receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginnning balance |
|
$ |
47,580 |
|
|
$ |
3,675 |
|
|
$ |
51,255 |
|
Allowance charges |
|
|
23,350 |
|
|
|
2,975 |
|
|
|
26,325 |
|
Reversal of previous recorded allowance charges |
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(1,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net allowance charge |
|
|
22,450 |
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
25,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: loans acquired with
deteriorated credit quality |
|
$ |
70,030 |
|
|
$ |
6,377 |
|
|
$ |
76,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables, net: |
|
$ |
411,437 |
|
|
$ |
419,893 |
|
|
$ |
831,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Portfolio |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Total |
|
Valuation allowance finanace receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginnning balance |
|
$ |
20,485 |
|
|
$ |
3,135 |
|
|
$ |
23,620 |
|
Allowance charges |
|
|
28,145 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
28,765 |
|
Reversal of previous recorded allowance charges |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net allowance charge |
|
|
27,095 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
27,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: loans acquired with
deteriorated credit quality |
|
$ |
47,580 |
|
|
$ |
3,675 |
|
|
$ |
51,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables, net: |
|
$ |
403,432 |
|
|
$ |
290,030 |
|
|
$ |
693,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Portfolio |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Total |
|
Valuation allowance finanace receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginnning balance |
|
$ |
3,450 |
|
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
$ |
4,230 |
|
Allowance charges |
|
|
18,030 |
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
20,405 |
|
Reversal of previous recorded allowance charges |
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net allowance charge |
|
|
17,035 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
19,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: loans acquired with
deteriorated credit quality |
|
$ |
20,485 |
|
|
$ |
3,135 |
|
|
$ |
23,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables, net: |
|
$ |
389,736 |
|
|
$ |
174,094 |
|
|
$ |
563,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Accounts Receivable, net:
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Amounts
collected on accounts receivable are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the
consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses inherent in its accounts receivable portfolio. In establishing the required
allowance, management considers historical losses adjusted to take into account current market
conditions and its customers financial condition, the amount of receivables in dispute, and the
current receivables aging and current payment patterns. The Company reviews its allowance for
doubtful accounts monthly. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means
of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The balance
of the allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $2.5 million and $2.9
million, respectively. The Company does not have any off balance sheet credit exposure related to
its customers.
5. Operating Leases:
The Company leases office space and equipment under operating leases. Rental expense was
$4,299,513, $3,755,478 and $3,060,710 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Future minimum lease payments for operating leases at December 31, 2010, are as follows
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
4,323 |
|
2012 |
|
|
4,121 |
|
2013 |
|
|
4,070 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,611 |
|
2015 |
|
|
2,297 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
19,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Business Acquisitions:
On March 15, 2010, the Company acquired 62% of the membership units of Claims Compensation
Bureau, LLC (CCB). The remaining 38% of the membership units were acquired by Claims
Compensation Bureau, Inc., CCBs predecessor. Claims Compensation Bureau, Inc. was founded in 1996
and is a leading provider of class action claims settlement recovery services and related payment
processing to corporate clients. CCBs process allows clients to maximize settlement recoveries,
in many cases participating in settlements they would otherwise not know existed. The company
charges fees for its services and works with clients to identify, prepare and submit claims to
class action administrators charged with dispersing class action settlement funds. In connection
with the acquisition, the president and founder of CCB, as well as another member of its senior
management, entered into
72
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
long-term employment agreements with the Company. The consolidated income
statement for the year ended December 31, 2010 includes the results of operations of CCB from March
15, 2010 through December 31, 2010.
The Companys initial investment for the 62% ownership of CCB was paid for with $23.0 million
in cash plus $2.0 million in deferred payments which were paid during 2010. As part of the
agreement, the Company has the right through February 28, 2015 to purchase the remaining 38% of CCB
at certain multiples of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization).
In addition, beginning March 1, 2012 and ending February 28, 2018, the noncontrolling interest can
require the Company to purchase its units at pre-defined multiples of EBITDA, as defined (see Note
7). Any future acquisitions by the Company of the noncontrolling interest will be accounted for as
an equity transaction.
The Company accounted for this purchase in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business
Combinations. Under this guidance, an entity is required to recognize the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and the consideration given at
their fair value on the acquisition date. The following tables summarize the fair value of the
consideration given for CCB, as well as the fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed,
and the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree as of the March 15, 2010 acquisition date (amounts
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price consideration given: |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
23,000 |
|
Contingent consideration arrangement |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of total consideration given |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual relationships |
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
Tradenames |
|
|
400 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
500 |
|
Cash |
|
|
500 |
|
Software |
|
|
67 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable net assets acquired |
|
|
13,469 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
26,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value of acquired business |
|
|
40,323 |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in CCB |
|
|
15,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price consideration given |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of the noncontrolling interest in CCB was determined as the
percentage of the noncontrolling interest multiplied by the fair value of all assets which were
derived from the acquisition of CCB on March 15, 2010.
On June 11, 2010, the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, RDS, acquired substantially all the
assets of Tax Return, Inc. for $500,000. The purchase price was allocated to a non-competition
agreement, fixed assets and goodwill, all of which are included as assets of RDS. There is no
contingent consideration associated with this acquisition.
The acquisition of CCB levers the Companys competency in payment and administrative
processing, while broadening its scope of services. The acquisition of Tax Return, Inc. further
expands the audit expertise and capacity of the Companys government services business.
73
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest:
In accordance with ASC 810, the Company has consolidated all financial statement accounts of
CCB in its consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and its consolidated income statement
for the year ended December 31, 2010. The redeemable noncontrolling interest amount is separately
stated on the consolidated balance sheet and represents the 38% interest in CCB not owned by the
Company. In addition, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest is stated separately
in the consolidated income statement.
The Company has the right through February 28, 2015 to purchase the remaining 38% of CCB at
certain multiples of EBITDA. In addition, beginning March 1, 2012 and ending February 28, 2018,
the noncontrolling interest can require the Company to purchase its units at pre-defined multiples
of EBITDA.
The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 480-10-S99 Distinguishing Liabilities
from Equity (ASC 480-10-S99) which provides guidance on the accounting for equity securities
that are subject to mandatory redemption requirements or whose redemption is outside the control of
the issuer. The noncontrolling interest put arrangement is accounted for under ASC 480-10-S99,
as redemption under the put arrangement is outside the control of the Company. As such, the
redeemable noncontrolling interest is recorded outside of permanent equity. Although the
noncontrolling interest was redeemable by the Company as of the reporting date, it was not yet
redeemable by the holder of the put option. The Company measures the redeemable noncontrolling
interest at the greater of its ASC 480-10-S99 measurement amount (estimated redemption value of the
put option embedded in the noncontrolling interest) or its measurement amount under the guidance
of ASC 810. The ASC 810 measurement amount includes adjustments for the noncontrolling interests
pro-rata share of earnings, losses and distributions, pursuant to the limited liability company
agreement. Adjustments to the measurement amount are recorded to stockholders equity. The
Company used a present value calculation to estimate the redemption value of the put option as of
the reporting date. If material, the Company adjusts the numerator of earnings per share
calculations for the current period change in the excess of the noncontrolling interests ASC
480-10-S99 measurement amount over the greater of its ASC 810 measurement amount or the estimated
fair value of the noncontrolling interest. The estimated redemption value of the noncontrolling interest, as if it were currently redeemable
by the holder of the put option under the terms of the put arrangement, was $22.8 million at
December 31, 2010.
The following table represents the changes in the redeemable noncontrolling interest for the
period from March 15, 2010 to December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition date fair value of redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
15,323 |
|
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
417 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
14,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net:
Intangible assets consist of the following at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Client and customer relationships |
|
$ |
29,823 |
|
|
$ |
17,823 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(16,910 |
) |
|
|
(11,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
18,466 |
|
|
$ |
10,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In accordance with ASC 350, the Company is amortizing the following intangible assets over the
estimated useful lives as indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Date |
|
Customer Relationships |
|
|
Non-Compete Agreements |
|
|
Trademarks |
|
IGS |
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
7 years |
|
3 years (1) |
|
|
|
|
RDS (2) |
|
July 29, 2005 |
|
10 years |
|
3 years (1) |
|
|
|
|
The Palmer Group (2) |
|
July 25, 2007 |
|
2.4 years (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MuniServices (2) |
|
July 1, 2008 |
|
11 years |
|
3 years |
|
14 years |
BPA (2) |
|
August 1, 2008 |
|
10 years |
|
2.4 years |
|
|
|
|
CCB |
|
March 15, 2010 |
|
4-7 years |
|
3 years |
|
14 years |
Tax Return, Inc. (2) |
|
June 11, 2010 |
|
|
|
3.5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These intangible assets are fully amortized with no expense recognized during 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Operates as part of the Companys government services group. |
The combined original weighted average amortization period is 8.1 years. The Company reviews
these relationships at least annually for impairment. Total amortization expense for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $5,215,679, $2,673,108 and $2,140,942, respectively.
Amortization expense relating to the non-compete agreements is calculated on a straight-line
method (which approximates the pattern of economic benefit concept) for the IGS, MuniServices, BPA
and CCB non-compete agreements and a pattern of economic benefit concept for the RDS non-compete
agreements. Amortization expense relating to the client and customer relationships is calculated
using a pattern of economic benefit concept for the IGS, RDS, MuniServices and CCB acquisitions,
straight-line over the length of the contract for The Palmer Group acquisition and straight-line
over their estimated useful lives of ten years for the BPA acquisition. Amortization expense
relating to the trademarks is calculated using a pattern of economic benefit concept for the
MuniServices and CCB acquisitions. The pattern of economic benefit concept relies on expected net
cash flows from all existing clients. The rate of amortization of the client relationships will
fluctuate annually to match these original expected cash flows.
The future amortization of these intangible assets is estimated to be as follows as of
December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
4,813 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,690 |
|
2013 |
|
|
3,021 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,267 |
|
2015 |
|
|
1,797 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, Goodwill, pursuant to ASC 350, is not amortized but rather is reviewed at least
annually for impairment. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company underwent its annual
review of goodwill. Based upon the results of this review, which was conducted as of October 1,
2010, no impairment charges to goodwill or the other intangible assets were necessary as of the
date of this review. The Company believes that nothing has occurred since the review was performed
through December 31, 2010, that would indicate a triggering event and thereby necessitate an
impairment charge to goodwill or the other intangible assets. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the
carrying value of goodwill was $61.7 million and $29.3 million, respectively. The $32.4 million
increase in the carrying value of goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2010 mainly relates
to the purchase of CCB on March 15, 2010 (see Note 6) and additional contingent purchase price of
$5.0 million paid in stock relating to the achievement of the earn-out provisions of the
MuniServices acquisition. The $1.8 million increase in the carrying
75
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
value of goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2009 relates to additional purchase price consideration paid for the acquisitions of MuniServices and BPA.
9. 401(k) Retirement Plan:
The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan. Under the plan, all employees over
twenty-one years of age are eligible to make voluntary contributions to the plan up to 100% of
their compensation, subject to Internal Revenue Service limitations, after completing six months of
service, as defined in the plan. The Company makes matching contributions of up to 4% of an
employees salary. Total compensation expense related to these contributions was $1,302,510,
$1,141,785 and $959,902 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
10. Line of Credit:
On December 20, 2010, the Company entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America,
N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders named therein (the Credit Agreement).
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the credit facility includes an aggregate principal amount
available of $407.5 million which consists of a $50 million fixed rate loan that matures on May 4,
2012, which was transferred from the Companys existing credit agreement, and a $357.5 million
revolving credit facility that matures on December 20, 2014. The revolving credit facility will be
automatically increased by $50 million upon the maturity and repayment of the fixed rate loan. The
fixed rate loan bears interest at a rate of 6.8% per annum, payable monthly in arrears. The
revolving loans accrue interest, at the option of the Company, at either the base rate plus 1.75%
per annum or the Eurodollar rate (as defined) for the applicable term plus 2.75% per annum. The
base rate is the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (b) Bank of Americas prime
rate, and (c) the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%. Interest is payable on base rate loans quarterly in
arrears and on Eurodollar loans in arrears on the last day of each interest period or if such
interest period exceeds three months, every three months. The Companys revolving credit facility
includes a $20 million swingline loan sublimit and a $20 million letter of credit sublimit. It
also contains an accordion loan feature that allows the Company to request an increase of up to $142.5
million in the amount available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility, whether from existing or new lenders, subject to terms of the Credit Agreement. No existing lender
is obligated to increase its commitment. The Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority lien
on substantially all of the Companys assets. The Credit Agreement contains restrictive covenants
and events of default include the following:
|
|
|
borrowings may not exceed 30% of the ERC of all its eligible asset pools plus 75% of its
eligible accounts receivable; |
|
|
|
|
the consolidated leverage ratio (as defined) cannot exceed 2.0 to 1.0 as of the end of
any fiscal quarter; |
|
|
|
|
consolidated Tangible Net Worth (as defined) must equal or exceed $309,452,000 plus 50%
of positive consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter beginning December 31, 2010,
plus 50% of the net proceeds of any equity offering; |
|
|
|
|
capital expenditures during any fiscal year cannot exceed $20 million; |
|
|
|
|
cash dividends and distributions during any fiscal year cannot exceed $20 million; |
|
|
|
|
stock repurchases during the term of the agreement cannot exceed $100 million; |
|
|
|
|
permitted acquisitions (as defined) during any fiscal year cannot exceed $100 million; |
|
|
|
|
the Company must maintain positive consolidated income from operations (as defined)
during any fiscal quarter; and |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on changes in control. |
The revolving credit facility also bears an unused commitment fee of 0.375% per annum, payable
quarterly in arrears.
76
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
All of the Companys borrowings at December 31, 2010 under its revolving credit facility
consisted of 30-day Eurodollar rate loans, with an annual interest rate as of December 31, 2010
equal to 3.01%.
The Companys previous credit facility included an aggregate principal amount available of
$365.0 million as of December 31, 2009, which consisted of a $50 million fixed rate loan and a $315
million revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bore interest at
a floating rate equal to the one month LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 1.40%, which equated to 1.63%
at December 31, 2009. The Company also paid an unused line fee for its previous credit facility
equal to 0.30% on any unused portion of the facility. The credit facility was collateralized by
substantially all of the Companys assets and contained certain restrictive covenants.
The Company had $300.0 million and $319.3 million of borrowings outstanding on its credit
facilities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, of which $50 million was part of the
non-revolving fixed rate loan at both dates.
The Company was in compliance with all covenants of its credit facilities as of December 31,
2010 and 2009.
11. Derivative Instruments:
The Company may periodically enter into derivative financial instruments, typically
interest rate swap agreements, to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on
variable-rate debt and their impact on earnings and cash flows. The Company does not utilize
derivative financial instruments with a level of complexity or with a risk greater than the
exposure to be managed nor does it enter into or hold derivatives for trading or speculative
purposes. The Company periodically reviews the creditworthiness of the swap counterparty to assess
the counterpartys ability to honor its obligation. Counterparty default would expose the Company
to fluctuations in variable interest rates. Based on the guidance of ASC 815, the Company records
derivative financial instruments at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets.
On December 16, 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate forward rate swap transaction
(the Swap) with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, National Association (JP Morgan) pursuant to an ISDA
Master Agreement which contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. The Swap had
an effective date of January 1, 2010, with a notional amount of $50.0 million. Under the Swap, the
Company received a floating interest rate based on one-month LIBOR Market Index Rate and paid a
fixed interest rate of 1.89%. The Swap was scheduled to mature on May 1, 2011. On November 10,
2010, the Company terminated its interest rate swap agreement. As a result of the termination, the
Company and JP Morgan released each other from all obligations under the Swap, including, without
limitation, the obligation to make periodic payments thereunder, and the Swap was canceled and
terminated. The Company paid a $416,000 termination payment to JP Morgan on November 15, 2010,
representing the approximate present value of the expected remaining monthly settlement payments
that otherwise were to have been due to JP Morgan thereafter.
The Companys financial derivative instrument was designated and qualified as a cash flow
hedge, and the effective portion of the gain or loss on such hedge was reported as a component of
other comprehensive income/(loss) in the consolidated financial statements of the Company. To the
extent that the hedging relationship was not effective, the ineffective portion of the change in
fair value of the derivative would have been recorded in other income (expense). The hedge was
considered effective for the period from December 16, 2008 through the termination of the Swap on
November 10, 2010. Therefore, no amount has been recorded in the consolidated income statements
related to the hedges ineffectiveness during 2008, 2009 or 2010. Hedges that receive designated
hedge accounting treatment are evaluated for effectiveness at the time that they are designated, as
well as throughout the hedging period.
The following table sets forth the fair value amounts of derivative instruments held by the
Company as of the dates indicated (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Derivative designated as a hedging instrument under ASC 815: |
|
Asset Derivative |
|
|
Liability Derivative |
|
|
Asset Derivative |
|
|
Liability Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contract |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Liability derivatives are recorded in the liability section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The following table sets forth the (loss) recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss (AOCL), net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, for derivatives held by
the Company as well as any (loss) reclassified from AOCL into expense (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Other |
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
|
on Derivative |
|
|
AOCL into Expense |
|
|
AOCL into Expense |
|
Derivative
designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815: |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Interest rate swap contract |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
interest expense |
|
$ |
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Other |
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
|
on Derivative |
|
|
AOCL into Expense |
|
|
AOCL into Expense |
|
Derivative
designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815: |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Interest rate swap contract |
|
$ |
(517 |
) |
|
interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative |
|
$ |
(517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss are reclassified into earnings under certain
situations, for example, if the occurrence of the transaction is no longer probable or no longer
qualifies for hedge accounting. Due to the termination of the Swap on November 10, 2010, the
Company paid a $416,000 termination payment which represented the then current amount included in
accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, which was reclassed into interest expense in
the consolidated income statement for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company has no further
obligation under the Swap.
12. Property and equipment, net:
Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Software |
|
$ |
21,014 |
|
|
$ |
16,542 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
10,697 |
|
|
|
8,869 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
|
5,624 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
7,498 |
|
|
|
6,040 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
3,277 |
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
6,045 |
|
|
|
6,045 |
|
Land |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(32,697 |
) |
|
|
(25,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
24,270 |
|
|
$ |
21,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense, relating to property and equipment, for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $7,221,355, $6,539,823 and $5,283,058, respectively.
78
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Beginning in July 2006 upon initiation of certain internally developed software projects, in
accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 350-40 Internal-Use Software (ASC 350-40), the
Company began capitalizing qualifying computer software costs incurred during the application
development stage and amortizing them over their estimated useful life of three to seven years on a
straight-line basis beginning when the project is completed. Costs associated with preliminary
project stage activities, training, maintenance and all other post implementation stage activities
are expensed as incurred. The Companys policy provides for the capitalization of certain direct
payroll costs for employees who are directly associated with internal use computer software
projects, as well as external direct costs of services associated with developing or obtaining
internal use software. Capitalizable personnel costs are limited to the time directly spent on
such projects. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company has incurred and capitalized
$4,188,160 and $2,774,444, respectively, of these direct payroll costs related to software
developed for internal use. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, $1,314,667 and $1,514,489,
respectively, of these costs are for projects that are in the development stage and therefore are a
component of Other assets. Once the projects are completed the costs will be transferred to
Software and amortized over their estimated useful life of three to seven years. Amortization
expense and remaining unamortized costs relating to this internally developed software as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $435,201 and $2,199,673, respectively. Amortization
expense and remaining unamortized costs relating to this internally developed software as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $128,622 and $1,021,336, respectively.
13. Long-Term Debt:
On February 6, 2009, the Company entered into a commercial loan agreement to finance computer
software and equipment purchases in the amount of $2,036,114. The loan is collateralized by the
related computer software and equipment. The loan is a three year loan with a fixed rate of 4.78%
with monthly installments, including interest, of $60,823 beginning on March 31, 2009, and it
matures on February 28, 2012.
On December 15, 2010, the Company entered into a commercial loan agreement to finance computer
software and equipment purchases in the amount of $1,569,016. The loan is collateralized by the
related computer software and equipment. The loan is a three year loan with a fixed rate of 3.69%
with monthly installments, including interest, of $46,108 beginning on January 15, 2011, and it
matures on December 15, 2013.
14. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures:
(a) Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
In accordance with the disclosure requirements of FASB ASC Topic 825, Financial
Instruments (ASC 825), the table below summarizes fair value estimates for the Companys
financial instruments. The total of the fair value calculations presented does not represent, and
should not be construed to represent, the underlying value of the Company. The carrying amounts in
the table are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets under the indicated captions as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
41,094 |
|
|
$ |
41,094 |
|
|
$ |
20,265 |
|
|
$ |
20,265 |
|
Finance receivables, net |
|
|
831,330 |
|
|
|
1,126,340 |
|
|
|
693,462 |
|
|
|
839,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
319,300 |
|
|
$ |
319,300 |
|
Long-tern debt |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
Derivative instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments often requires the use of
estimates. The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of
financial instruments:
79
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Finance receivables, net: The Company records purchased receivables at cost, which represents
a significant discount from the contractual receivable balances due. The Company computed the
estimated fair value of these receivables using proprietary pricing models that the Company
utilizes to make portfolio purchase decisions.
Line of credit: The carrying amount approximates fair value, as the interest rates
approximate the rate currently offered to the Company for similar debt instruments of comparable
maturities by the Companys bankers.
Long-term debt: The carrying amount approximates fair value, as the interest rates
approximate the rate currently offered to the Company for similar debt instruments of comparable
maturities by the Companys bankers.
Derivative instrument: The interest rate swap was recorded at estimated fair value, which was
determined using pricing models developed based on the LIBOR swap rate and other observable market
data, adjusted for non-performance risk of both the counterparty and the Company.
(b) Fair Value Hierarchy:
The Company recorded its derivative instrument at estimated fair value on a recurring basis.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include estimated fair value information
regarding its derivative instrument as of December 31, 2009, as required by FASB ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). There were no derivative instruments at
December 31, 2010. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. ASC 820 also requires the consideration of differing levels of inputs in the
determination of fair values. Those levels of input are summarized as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 quote prices, such as quoted prices
for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in
markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant
assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity.
Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using
pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques as well as instruments
for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its entirety
falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
entirety.
The placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Companys interest rate swap derivative
instrument as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is Level 2 based on the Level 2 inputs
described in section (a) above. Refer to Note 11 for further information regarding the terminated
derivative instrument.
15. Share-Based Compensation:
The Company has a stock option and nonvested share plan. The Company created the 2002 Stock
Option Plan (the Plan) on November 7, 2002. The Plan was amended in 2004 (the Amended Plan) to
enable the Company to issue nonvested shares of stock to its employees and directors. The Amended
Plan was approved by the Companys shareholders at its Annual Meeting on May 12, 2004. On March
19, 2010, the Company adopted a 2010 Stock Plan, which was approved by its shareholders at the 2010
Annual Meeting. The 2010 Stock Plan is a further amendment to the Amended Plan, and contains,
among other things, specific performance metrics with respect to performance-
based stock awards. Up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock may be issued under the 2010 Stock
Plan. The 2010 Stock Plan expires November 7, 2012.
The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of ASC
718. As of December 31, 2010, total future compensation costs related to nonvested awards of
nonvested shares (not including nonvested shares granted under the Long-Term Incentive Program) is
estimated to be $3.0 million with a weighted
80
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
average remaining life of 2.4 years (not including
nonvested shares granted under the Long-Term Incentive Programs). As of December 31, 2010, there
is no future compensation cost related to stock options and the remaining vested stock options have
a weighted average remaining life of 0.1 years. Based upon historical data, the Company used an
annual forfeiture rate of 14% for stock options and 15-40% for nonvested shares for most of the
employee grants. Grants made to key employee hires and directors of the Company were assumed to
have no forfeiture rates associated with them due to the historically low turnover among this
group.
Total share-based compensation expense was $4,203,154, $3,819,915 and $140,590 for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company, in conjunction with the renewal
of employment agreements with its Named Executive Officers and other senior executives, awarded
nonvested shares which vested on January 1, 2009. As a result of the vesting of these shares, the
Company recorded stock-based compensation expense in connection with these shares, in the amount of
approximately $1.4 million during the first quarter of 2009. Tax benefits resulting from
tax deductions in excess of share-based compensation expense recognized under the fair value
recognition provisions of ASC 718 (windfall tax benefits) are credited to additional
paid-in capital in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized tax shortfalls are first
offset against the cumulative balance of windfall tax benefits, if any, and then charged directly
to income tax expense. The total tax benefit realized from share-based compensation expense was
approximately $0.9 million, $2.2 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
Stock Options
All options issued under the Amended Plan vest ratably over five years. Granted options
expire seven years from grant date. The remaining outstanding stock options expire on January 16,
2011. Options granted to a single person cannot exceed 200,000 in a single year. As of December
31, 2010, 895,000 options have been granted under the Amended Plan, of which 118,955 have been
cancelled and are eligible for regrant. All expenses for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are included in
earnings as a component of compensation and employee services expense.
The following summarizes all option related transactions from December 31, 2007 through
December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price Per |
|
|
Fair Value Per |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Share |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
163 |
|
|
$ |
16.97 |
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
15.87 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
21.50 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
17.24 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
16.51 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
29.41 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
28.45 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
$ |
2.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the stock options were issued to employees of the Company except for 40,000 that
were issued to non-employee directors. Non-employee directors were granted 20,000 stock
options in 2004. No stock options were granted in 2010, 2009 or 2008. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, was
approximately $0.1 million, $2.7 million, and $0.9 million, respectively.
The following information is as of December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Number |
|
|
Average Remaining |
|
|
Exercise Price Per |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Price |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price Per Share |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
|
$29.79 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
|
|
Total as of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
29.79 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
|
|
81
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the value
of the stock options when granted. This model was developed to estimate the fair value of traded
options, which have different characteristics than employee stock options. In addition, changes to
the subjective input assumptions can result in materially different fair market value estimates.
Therefore, the Black-Scholes model may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the
fair value of employee stock options.
Nonvested Shares
With the exception of the awards made pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Program and a few
employee and director grants, the terms of the nonvested share awards are similar to those of the
stock option awards, wherein the nonvested shares vest ratably over three to five years and are
expensed over their vesting period. In addition, in conjunction with the renewal of their
employment agreements, the Companys Named Executive Officers and other senior executives were
awarded nonvested shares which vested on January 1, 2009. As a result of the vesting of these
shares, the Company recorded share-based compensation expense in connection with these shares, in
the amount of approximately $1.4 million during the first quarter of 2009.
The following summarizes all nonvested share transactions, excluding those related to the
Long-Term Incentive Program, from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Shares |
|
|
Weighted-Average Price |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
at Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
$ |
41.72 |
|
Granted |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
37.47 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
39.55 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
40.05 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
41.60 |
|
Granted |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
34.22 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
36.62 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
42.20 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
40.24 |
|
Granted |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
53.06 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
41.46 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
39.61 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
$ |
47.89 |
|
|
|
|
The total grant date fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, was $1,514,036, $3,014,339 and $1,446,897, respectively.
Long-Term Incentive Programs
Pursuant to the Amended Plan, on March 30, 2007, January 4, 2008, January 20, 2009 and January
14, 2010, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of 96,550, 80,000, 108,720 and 53,656
performance-based nonvested shares, respectively. All shares granted under the LTI Programs were
granted to key employees of the Company. For both the 2007 and 2008 grants, no estimated
compensation costs have been accrued or recognized because the achievements of the performance
targets of the programs were not met. The 2009 grant is performance and market based and cliff
vests after the requisite service period of two to three years if certain financial and market
related goals are met. The goals are based upon diluted earnings per share (EPS) totals for
2009, the return on owners equity for the three year period beginning on January 1, 2009 and
ending December 31, 2011, and the relative total shareholder return as compared to a peer group for
the same three year period. The number of shares vested can double if the financial goals are
exceeded and no shares will vest if the financial goals are not met. The Company is expensing the
nonvested share grant over the requisite service period of two to three years beginning on January
1, 2009. If the Company believes that the number of shares granted will be more or less than
originally projected, an adjustment to the expense will be made at that time based on the probable
outcome. The EPS component of the
82
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2009 plan was not achieved and therefore no compensation
expense was recognized during 2009 or 2010 related to the 2009 grants. The 2010 grant is
performance and market based and cliff vests after the requisite service period of two to three
years if certain financial and market related goals are met. The goals are based upon diluted EPS
totals for 2010, the return on owners equity for the three year period beginning on January 1,
2010 and ending December 31, 2012, and the relative total shareholder return as compared to a peer
group for the same three year period. The number of shares that will be ultimately vest are based
on a sliding scale and can double if the financial goals are exceeded or no shares will vest if the
financial goals are not met. The Company is expensing the nonvested share grant over the requisite
service period of two to three years beginning on January 1, 2010. If the Company believes that
the number of shares granted will be more or less than originally projected, an adjustment to the
expense will be made at that time based on the probable outcome. At December 31, 2010, total
future compensation costs related to nonvested share awards granted under the 2009 and 2010 LTI
Programs are estimated to be approximately $3.3 million. The Company assumed a 7.5% forfeiture
rate for these grants and the remaining shares have a weighted average life of 1.42 years at
December 31, 2010.
16. Earnings per Share:
Basic EPS are computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by weighted average
common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS are computed using the same components as basic EPS with
the denominator adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options and nonvested share awards.
Share-based awards that are contingent upon the attainment of performance goals are not included in
the computation of diluted EPS until the performance goals have been attained. The dilutive effect
of stock options and nonvested shares is computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes
any proceeds that could be obtained upon the exercise of stock options and vesting of nonvested
shares would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price for the period. The
assumed proceeds include the windfall tax benefit that would be received upon assumed exercise. The
following table provides a reconciliation between the computation of basic EPS and diluted EPS for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
73,454 |
|
|
|
16,820 |
|
|
$ |
4.37 |
|
|
$ |
44,306 |
|
|
|
15,420 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
45,362 |
|
|
|
15,229 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options
and nonvested share awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
73,454 |
|
|
|
16,885 |
|
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
$ |
44,306 |
|
|
|
15,454 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$ |
45,362 |
|
|
|
15,292 |
|
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, there were no antidilutive options outstanding.
17. Stockholders Equity:
Stock Offering:
On February 22, 2010, the Company closed on a public stock offering filed under a shelf
registration statement that was filed during the third quarter of 2009. As a result of the filing,
the Company sold a total of 1,437,500 shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $52.50
per share. The Company received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $71.7 million,
after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. The Company used
the net proceeds of the offering primarily to repay a portion of the debt outstanding under its
then existing $365 million revolving credit facility.
18. Income Taxes:
The Company records an income tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the
reported results of operations. In accordance with ASC 740, the provision for income taxes is
computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit
carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates
83
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets and
liabilities are expected to be realized or settled.
The guidance of ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in
a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The evaluation of a tax position in
accordance with the guidance is a two-step process. The first step is recognition: the enterprise
determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon
examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the
technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the enterprise should presume that the position will be
examined by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant
information. The second step is measurement: a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial
statements. The tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50
percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to
meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent
financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions
that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the
first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The Company was notified on June 21, 2007 that it was being examined by the Internal
Revenue Service for the 2005 calendar year. The IRS has concluded its audit and on March 19, 2009
issued Form 4549-A, Income Tax Examination Changes for tax years ending December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005. The IRS has proposed that cost recovery for tax revenue recognition does not clearly reflect
taxable income and that unused line fees paid on credit facilities should be capitalized and
amortized rather than taken as a current deduction. On April 22, 2009, the Company filed a formal
protest of the findings contained in the examination report prepared by the IRS. The Company
believes it has sufficient support for the technical merits of its positions and that it is
more-likely-than-not these positions will ultimately be sustained; therefore, a reserve for
uncertain tax positions is not necessary. If the Company is unsuccessful in its appeal, it might
ultimately be required to pay the related deferred taxes and any potential interest, possibly
requiring additional financing from other sources.
As of December 31, 2010, the tax years subject to examination by the major taxing
jurisdictions, including the Internal Revenue Service, are 2003, 2005 and subsequent years. The
2003 tax year remains open to examination because of a net operating loss that originated in that
year but was not fully utilized until the 2005 tax year. The 2005, 2006, and 2007 tax years are
extended through December 31, 2011.
ASC 740 requires the recognition of interest, if the tax law would require interest to be paid
on the underpayment of taxes, and recognition of penalties, if a tax position does not meet the
minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties. No interest or penalties were accrued
in 2010 or 2009.
The income tax expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is
comprised of the following (amounts in thousands):
84
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
Federal |
|
|
State |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Current tax benefit |
|
$ |
(481 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(489 |
) |
Deferred tax expense |
|
|
40,163 |
|
|
|
7,330 |
|
|
|
47,493 |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
39,682 |
|
|
$ |
7,322 |
|
|
$ |
47,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
Federal |
|
|
State |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Current tax (benefit)/expense |
|
$ |
(707 |
) |
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
(530 |
) |
Deferred tax expense |
|
|
24,645 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
28,927 |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
23,938 |
|
|
$ |
4,459 |
|
|
$ |
28,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
Federal |
|
|
State |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Current tax benefit |
|
$ |
(2,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,470 |
) |
Deferred tax expense |
|
|
26,414 |
|
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
|
30,854 |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
24,306 |
|
|
$ |
4,078 |
|
|
$ |
28,384 |
|
|
|
|
The Company has recognized a net deferred tax liability of $164,971,005 and $117,206,100 as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The components of the net deferred tax liability are as
follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation |
|
$ |
1,794 |
|
|
$ |
749 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Federal and state tax credit carryforward |
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
Federal and state net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
Guaranteed payments |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets and goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
Section 467 leases |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
Other |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
7,888 |
|
|
|
4,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
Intangible assets and goodwill |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
Cost recovery |
|
|
169,654 |
|
|
|
120,154 |
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liability |
|
|
172,859 |
|
|
|
121,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
164,971 |
|
|
$ |
117,206 |
|
|
|
|
A valuation allowance has not been provided at December 31, 2010 or 2009 since management
believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. In the event
that all or part of the deferred tax assets are determined not to be realizable in the future, an
adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination
is made. Similarly, if the Company subsequently realizes deferred tax assets that were previously
determined to be unrealizable, the respective valuation allowance would be reversed, resulting in a
positive adjustment to earnings in the period such determination is made. In addition, the
calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of
uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner
inconsistent with managements expectations could have a material impact on the Companys results
of operations and financial position. At December 31, 2010, the Company
85
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
had state income tax
credit carryforwards of approximately $1.1 million which will begin to expire starting in the year
ending December 31, 2021. The Company also incurred state net operating loss carryforwards in
2010, 2009 and 2008 of approximately $2.5 million, $2.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, of
which approximately $161,000 will begin to expire starting in the year ending December 31, 2013 and
the remainder starting in the year ending December 31, 2018.
The Company believes cost recovery to be an acceptable tax revenue recognition method for
companies in the bad debt purchasing industry and results in the reduction of current taxable
income as, for tax purposes, collections on finance receivables are applied first to principal to
reduce the finance receivables to zero before any taxable income is recognized. The temporary
difference from the use of cost recovery for income tax purposes resulted in a deferred tax
liability at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
A reconciliation of the Companys expected tax expense at statutory tax rates to actual tax
expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 consists of the following components
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
Federal tax at statutory rates |
|
$ |
42,306 |
|
|
$ |
25,446 |
|
|
$ |
25,811 |
|
State tax expense, net of federal benefit |
|
|
4,759 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
Other |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
47,004 |
|
|
$ |
28,397 |
|
|
$ |
28,384 |
|
|
|
|
19. Commitments and Contingencies:
Employment Agreements:
The Company has employment agreements with all of its executive officers and with several
members of its senior management group, most of which expire on December 31, 2011. Such agreements
provide for base salary payments as well as bonuses which are based on the attainment of specific
management goals. Future compensation under these agreements is approximately $11.9 million. The
agreements also contain confidentiality and non-compete provisions.
Litigation:
The Company is from time to time subject to routine legal claims and proceedings, most of
which are incidental to the ordinary course of its business. The Company initiates lawsuits
against customers and are occasionally countersued by them in such actions. Also, customers,
either individually, as members of a class action, or through a governmental entity on behalf of
customers, may initiate litigation against the Company, in which they allege that the Company has
violated a state or federal law in the process of collecting on an account. From time to time,
other types of lawsuits are brought against the Company. While it is not expected that these or
any other legal proceedings or claims in which the Company is involved will, either individually or
in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on the Companys results of operations, liquidity
or financial condition, it is possible that, due to unexpected future developments, an unfavorable
resolution of a legal proceeding or claim could occur which may be material to the Companys
results of operations for a particular period. The matter described below falls outside of the
normal parameters of the Companys routine legal proceedings.
The Attorney General for the State of Missouri filed a purported enforcement action against
PRA in 2009 that seeks relief for Missouri customers that have allegedly been injured as a result
of certain collection practices of PRA. PRA has vehemently denied any wrongdoing herein and in
2010, the complaint was dismissed with prejudice. The matter is currently on appeal, and so it is
not possible at this time to estimate the possible loss, if any.
Forward Flow Agreements:
The Company is party to several forward flow agreements that allow for the purchase of
defaulted consumer receivables at pre-established prices. The maximum remaining amount to be
purchased under forward flow agreements at December 31, 2010 is approximately $234.4 million.
86
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management
recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily
was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject
to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the
principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of December 31,
2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. We are responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Internal control
over financial reporting is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) as a process
designed by, or under the supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial
officers and effected by the companys board of directors, management and other personnel, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the
Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment, management has determined that, as of December 31,
2010, its internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the criteria
set forth in the COSO framework. The Companys independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG
LLP, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, which is included herein.
The scope of managements assessment of internal controls over financial reporting did not include
our recently acquired subsidiary, CCB, which was excluded from our evaluation. This business
represents less than 5% of total assets and total revenues reflected in our consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010.
87
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.:
We have audited Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Portfolio
Recovery Associates, Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting (Item 9A). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Portfolio Recovery
Associates, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO).
88
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. acquired a controlling interest in Claims Compensation Bureau,
LLC (CCB) during 2010, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2010, CCBs internal control over financial reporting associated with less than 5% of the total
assets and total revenues reflected in the consolidated financial statements of Portfolio Recovery
Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our audit of
internal control over financial reporting of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. also excluded an
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of CCB.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated income statements, and
statements of changes in stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and our report dated February 25, 2011
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Norfolk, Virginia
February 25, 2011
89
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections
labeled Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, Board of Directors,
Executive Officers, Corporate Governance, Committees of the Board and Audit Committee Report in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement in
connection with the Companys 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to (a) the
section labeled Compensation Discussion and Analysis in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement
in connection with the Companys 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and (b) the section labeled
Compensation Committee Report in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the
Companys 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which section (and the report contained therein)
shall be deemed to be furnished in this report and shall not be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a result of such
furnishing in this Item 11.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management And Related
Stockholder Matters.
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the section
labeled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in the Companys
definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Companys 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections
labeled Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions and Director Independence in the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement in connection with the Companys 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the section
labeled Principal Accountant Fees and Services in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement in
connection with the Companys 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
90
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) |
|
Financial Statements. |
The following financial statements of the Company are included in Item 8 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
58 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
63-86 |
(b) Exhibits.
|
2.1 |
|
Equity Exchange Agreement between Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. and
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the
Registration Statement on Form S-1). |
|
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Portfolio Recovery
Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1). |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Second Amended and Restated By-Laws of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009). |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
the Registration Statement on Form S-1). |
|
|
4.2 |
|
Form of Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registration
Statement on Form S-1). |
|
|
10.1 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated November 14, 2008, by and between Steven D.
Fredrickson and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K dated November 20, 2008). |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated November 14, 2008, by and between Kevin P.
Stevenson and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of the Form 8-K dated November 20, 2008). |
|
|
10.3 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated November 14, 2008, by and between Craig A. Grube
and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
the Form 8-K dated November 20, 2008). |
|
|
10.4 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated November 14, 2008, by and between Judith S. Scott
and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of
the Form 8-K dated November 20, 2008). |
|
|
10.5 |
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, by and between
Steven D. Fredrickson and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009). |
|
|
10.6 |
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, by and between
Kevin P. Stevenson and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.6 of the Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009). |
|
|
10.7 |
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 30, 2008, by and between
Craig A. Grube and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 of the Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009). |
|
|
10.8 |
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, by and between
Judith S. Scott and Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 of the Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009). |
91
|
10.9 |
|
Portfolio Recovery Associates 2010 Stock Plan (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 of the Form 8-K filed June 9, 2010). |
|
|
10.10 |
|
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc., Annual Bonus Plan (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Form 8-K filed June 9, 2010). |
|
|
10.11 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2010, by and among Portfolio
Recovery Associates, Inc., Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, PRA Holding I, LLC, PRA
Location Services, LLC, PRA Government Services, LLC, PRA Receivables Management, LLC,
PRA Holding II, LLC, PRA Holding III, LLC, MuniServices, LLC, Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, SunTrust Bank, as
documentation agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo
Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, and the lenders party
thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K filed December 22,
2010). |
|
|
21.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. |
|
|
23.1 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
|
|
24.1 |
|
Powers of Attorney (included on signature page). |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Section 302 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Section 302 Certifications of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 906 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
92
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Steven D. Fredrickson
|
|
|
|
Steven D. Fredrickson |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and
Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Kevin P. Stevenson
|
|
|
|
Kevin P. Stevenson |
|
|
|
Chief Financial and Administrative Officer,
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Steven D. Fredrickson and Kevin P. Stevenson, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him and on his behalf,
and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to execute and sign any and all
amendments or post-effective amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact or any of them
or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof and
the registrant hereby confers like authority on its behalf.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Steven D. Fredrickson
|
|
|
|
Steven D. Fredrickson |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Kevin P. Stevenson
|
|
|
|
Kevin P. Stevenson |
|
|
|
Chief Financial and Administrative Officer,
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ John H. Fain
|
|
|
|
John H. Fain |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ John E. Fuller
|
|
|
|
John E. Fuller |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Penelope W. Kyle
|
|
|
|
Penelope W. Kyle |
|
|
|
Director |
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ David N. Roberts
|
|
|
|
David N. Roberts |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Scott M. Tabakin
|
|
|
|
Scott M. Tabakin |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: February 25, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ James M. Voss
|
|
|
|
James M. Voss |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
94