PRECIGEN, INC. - Quarter Report: 2014 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     .

Commission File Number: 001-36042

INTREXON CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(301) 556-9900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report date)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of August 8, 2014, 100,477,548 shares of common stock, no par value per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

INTREXON CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RheoSwitch Therapeutic System^® is our registered trademark in the United States and LEAP™ and mAbLogix™ are our common law trademarks in the United States. Other trademarks, trade names and service marks appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners.

2

Table of Contents

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding our strategy, future events, future operations, future financial position, future revenue, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives of management and expected market growth are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements about:

Forward-looking statements may also concern our expectations relating to AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. and Trans Ova Genetics, L.C. We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important factors in the cautionary statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, particularly in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments that we may make.

You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the documents that we reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

3

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

Intrexon Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

Intrexon Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

Intrexon Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Intrexon Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ and Total Equity

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

7

Table of Contents

Intrexon Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

8

Table of Contents

Intrexon Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

9

Table of Contents

Intrexon Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Intrexon Corporation (the “Company” or “Intrexon”) is a Virginia corporation focused on forming collaborations to create biologically based products and processes using synthetic biology. At June 30, 2014, the Company owned approximately 60% of AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. (“AquaBounty”), a biotechnology company focused on improving productivity in commercial aquaculture (Note 4), and 51% of Biological & Popular Culture, Inc. (“BioPop”) (Note 4). The Company has operations in California, Florida, Maryland, Virginia, and Budapest, Hungary. There have been no commercialized products derived from the Company’s collaborations to date.

Effective July 26, 2013, the Company’s board of directors and shareholders approved a reverse stock split of 1-for-1.75 of the Company’s shares of common stock. Shareholders entitled to fractional shares as a result of the reverse stock split received a cash payment in lieu of receiving fractional shares. Shares of common stock underlying outstanding stock options and warrants were proportionately reduced and the respective exercise prices were proportionately increased in accordance with the terms of the agreements governing such securities. All share and per share data of the Company’s common stock, including shares of common stock underlying stock options and warrants, have been retroactively adjusted in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to reflect the reverse stock split.

On August 13, 2013, the Company completed its initial public offering (“IPO”), whereby the Company sold 11,499,998 shares of common stock, inclusive of 1,499,999 shares of common stock sold by the Company pursuant to the full exercise of an overallotment option granted to the underwriters in connection with the IPO, at a price of $16.00 per share. The shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on August 8, 2013. The aggregate proceeds from the IPO were approximately $168,300, net of underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately $12,900 and offering expenses paid by the Company of approximately $2,800 (of which $2,300 were capitalized). Upon the closing of the IPO, all shares of the Company’s redeemable convertible preferred stock, including accrued but unpaid dividends thereon, converted into 79,705,130 shares of common stock. Additionally, in connection with the closing of the IPO, the Company amended and restated its articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to 200,000,000 and decrease the number of authorized shares of undesignated preferred stock to 25,000,000.

These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars and are prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Unaudited Financial Information

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. These interim consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary for fair statement of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2014 and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. These interim financial results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014, or for any other future annual or interim period. The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

10

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenue through contractual agreements with collaborators (known as exclusive channel collaborations, “ECC” or “ECCs”) whereby the collaborators obtain exclusive access to the Company’s proprietary technologies for use in the research, development and commercialization of products and/or treatments in a contractually specified field of use. Generally, the terms of these collaborative agreements provide that the Company receives some or all of the following: (i) upfront payments upon consummation of the agreement, (ii) reimbursements for costs incurred by the Company for research and development and/or manufacturing efforts related to specific applications provided for in the agreement, (iii) milestone payments upon the achievement of specified development, regulatory and commercial activities, and (iv) royalties on sales of products arising from the collaboration.

The Company’s collaboration agreements typically contain multiple elements, or deliverables, including technology licenses, research and development services, and in certain cases manufacturing services. The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (“ASU 2009-13”). In accordance with the provisions of ASU 2009-13, the Company identifies the deliverables within the agreements and evaluates which deliverables represent separate units of accounting. Analyzing the agreements to identify deliverables requires the use of judgment. A deliverable is considered a separate unit of accounting when the deliverable has value to the collaborative partner on a standalone basis based on the consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances for each agreement.

Consideration received is allocated at the inception of the agreement to all identified units of accounting based on their relative selling price. When available, the relative selling price for each deliverable is determined using vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the selling price or third-party evidence of the selling price, if VSOE does not exist. If neither VSOE nor third-party evidence of the selling price exists, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price (“BESP”) for the deliverable. The amount of allocable consideration is limited to amounts that are fixed or determinable. The consideration received is allocated among the separate units of accounting, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are applied to each of the separate units. The Company recognizes the revenue allocated to each unit of accounting as the Company delivers the related goods or services. If the Company determines that certain deliverables should be treated as a single unit of accounting, then the revenue is recognized using either a proportional performance or straight-line method, depending on whether the Company can reasonably estimate the level of effort required to complete its performance obligations under an arrangement and whether such performance obligations are provided on a best-efforts basis. As the Company cannot reasonably estimate its performance obligations related to its collaborators, the Company recognizes revenue on a straight-line basis over the period it expects to complete its performance obligations.

The terms of the Company’s agreements may provide for milestone payments upon achievement of certain defined events. The Company applies ASU No. 2010-17, Revenue Recognition — Milestone Method (“ASU 2010-17” or “Milestone Method”). Under the Milestone Method, the Company recognizes consideration that is contingent upon the achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is substantive in its entirety. A milestone is considered substantive when it meets all of the following criteria:

In the event that a milestone is not considered substantive, the Company recognizes the milestone consideration as revenue using the same method applied to upfront payments.

11

Table of Contents

Research and development services are a deliverable satisfied by the Company in accordance with the terms of the collaboration agreements and the Company considers these services to be inseparable from the license to the core technology; therefore, reimbursements of services performed are recognized as revenue. Because reimbursement (i) is contingent upon performance of the services by the Company, (ii) does not include a profit component, and (iii) does not relate to any future deliverable, the revenue is recognized during the period in which the related services are performed and collection of such amounts is reasonably assured. Payments received for manufacturing services will be recognized when the earnings process related to the manufactured materials has been completed. Royalties to be received under the agreements will be recognized as earned.

Research and Development

The Company considers that regulatory and other uncertainties inherent in the research and development of new products preclude it from capitalizing such costs. Research and development expenses include salaries and related costs of research and development personnel, and the costs of consultants, facilities, materials and supplies associated with research and development projects as well as various laboratory studies. Indirect research and development costs include depreciation, amortization and other indirect overhead expenses.

The Company has research and development arrangements with third parties that include upfront and milestone payments. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had research and development commitments with third parties totaling $2,647 and $2,445, respectively, of which $1,049 and $957, respectively, had not yet been incurred. The commitments are generally cancellable by the Company at any time upon written notice.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash balances at a limited number of banks may periodically exceed insurable amounts. The Company believes that it mitigates its risk by investing in or through major financial institutions with high quality credit ratings. Recoverability of investments is dependent upon the performance of the issuer. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had cash equivalent investments in highly liquid money market accounts at major financial institutions of $67,792 and $43,733, respectively.

Short-term and Long-term Investments

Short-term and long-term investments include U.S. government debt securities, commercial paper and certificates of deposit. The Company determines the appropriate classification as short-term or long-term at the time of purchase based on original maturities and management’s reasonable expectation of sales and redemption. The Company reevaluates such classification at each balance sheet date. The Company’s written investment policy requires investments to be explicitly rated by two of the three following rating services: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and/or Fitch and to have a minimum rating of A1, P1 and/or F-1, respectively, from those agencies. In addition, the investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.

Equity Securities

The Company holds equity securities received and/or purchased from certain collaborators. Other than investments accounted for using the equity method, the Company elected the fair value option to account for its equity securities held in these collaborators. These equity securities are recorded at fair value at each reporting date and are subject to market price volatility. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from fair value adjustments are reported in the consolidated statement of operations. The fair value of these equity securities is subject to fluctuation in the future due to the volatility of the stock market, changes in general economic conditions and changes in the financial conditions of these collaborators. These equity securities are classified as noncurrent in the consolidated balance sheet since the Company does not intend to sell these equity securities within one year. The Company has not sold any of these equity securities to date.

12

Table of Contents

The Company records the fair value of securities received on the date the collaboration is consummated or the milestone is achieved using the closing, quoted price of the collaborator’s security on that date, assuming the transfer of consideration is considered perfunctory. If the transfer of the consideration is not considered perfunctory, the Company considers the specific facts and circumstances to determine the appropriate date on which to evaluate fair value. The Company also evaluates whether any discounts for trading restrictions or other basis for lack of marketability should be applied to the fair value of the securities at inception of the collaboration. In the event the Company concludes that a discount should be applied, the fair value of the securities is adjusted at inception of the collaboration and re-evaluated at each reporting period thereafter.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset and liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in its fair value measurements. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Concentrations of Risk

Due to the Company’s mix of fixed and variable rate securities holdings, the Company’s investment portfolio is susceptible to changes in interest rates. As of June 30, 2014, gross unrealized losses on the Company’s investments were not material. From time to time, the Company may liquidate some or all of its investments to fund operational needs or other activities, such as capital expenditures or business acquisitions. Depending on which investments the Company liquidates to fund these activities, the Company could recognize a portion, or all, of the gross unrealized losses.

Equity Method Investments

Through March 15, 2013, the Company accounted for its investment in AquaBounty using the equity method of accounting since the Company had the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating activities of AquaBounty. The excess of the investment over the Company’s pro-rata share of AquaBounty’s net assets represented identifiable intangible assets and equity-method goodwill. On March 15, 2013, the Company acquired additional ownership interests in AquaBounty which resulted in the Company gaining control over AquaBounty, thereby requiring consolidation effective on that date (Note 4).

The Company has entered into three strategic joint ventures (Note 5). The Company accounts for its investments in these joint ventures using the equity method of accounting since the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating activities of these entities.

13

Table of Contents

The Company determined that it has significant influence over two of its collaborators, Ziopharm Oncology, Inc. (“Ziopharm”) and Oragenics, Inc. (“Oragenics”), as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, based on its ownership interests, representation on the board of directors of the collaborators and other qualitative factors. The Company accounts for its investments in Ziopharm and Oragenics using the fair value option. The fair value of the Company’s equity securities of Ziopharm was $66,053 and $71,134 as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and is included as equity securities in the respective consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s ownership percentage of Ziopharm is 16.3% and 16.4% at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in the fair value of the Company’s equity securities held in Ziopharm was $(9,015) and $3,789 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $(5,081) and $(27,743) for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Summarized unaudited financial information for Ziopharm for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:

In September 2013, the Company increased its investment in Oragenics, upon which the Company concluded it had significant influence over the operations of Oragenics. The fair value of the Company’s equity securities of Oragenics was $15,758 and $22,161 as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and is included as equity securities in the respective consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s ownership interest in Oragenics was 24.4% and 24.6% at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in the fair value of the Company’s equity securities held in Oragenics was $(7,113) and $(865) for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $(6,403) and $2,028 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Summarized unaudited financial information for Oragenics for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:

Variable Interest Entities

The Company identifies entities that (1) do not have sufficient equity investment at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (2) in which the equity investors lack an essential characteristic of a controlling financial interest as variable interest entities (“VIE” or “VIEs”). The Company performs an initial and on-going evaluation of the entities with which the Company has variable interests to determine if any of these entities are a VIE. If an entity is identified as a VIE, the Company performs an assessment to determine whether the Company has both (1) the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) have the obligation to absorb losses from or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If both of these criteria are satisfied, the Company is identified as the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

As of June 30, 2014, the Company determined that Genopaver, LLC (“Genopaver”) and Intrexon Energy Partners, LLC (“Intrexon Energy Partners”) were VIEs. The Company was not the primary beneficiary for these entities since it did not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs. As of December 31, 2013, the Company determined that Genopaver was a VIE. The Company was not the primary beneficiary for this entity since it did not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE.

14

Table of Contents

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major additions or betterments are capitalized and repairs and maintenance are generally expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of these assets are as follows:

Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the applicable lease term, generally one to four years.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized (Notes 3 and 10). Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount prior to performing the two-step goodwill impairment test. If this is the case, the two-step goodwill impairment test is required. If it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than the carrying amount, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required.

If the two-step goodwill impairment test is required, first, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying amount (including goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit and the entity must perform step two of the impairment test. Under step two, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation and the residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. Fair value of the reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, step two does not need to be performed.

The Company performs its annual impairment review of goodwill in the fourth quarter, or sooner if a triggering event occurs prior to the annual impairment review.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of patents and related technologies acquired as a result of mergers and acquisitions (Note 3). These intangible assets are subject to amortization, were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition and are stated net of accumulated amortization. Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of in-process research and development acquired in mergers and acquisitions (Notes 3 and 4) and was recorded at fair value at the dates of the respective acquisitions.

The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 350, Intangibles, Goodwill and Other, which requires the amortization of long-lived intangible assets to reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are expected to be realized. The intangible assets are amortized over their remaining estimated useful lives, ranging from seven to fourteen years for the patents and related technologies.

15

Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets to be held and used, including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or a significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is not recoverable.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets, including in-process research and development, are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances between annual tests indicate that the asset may be impaired. Impairment losses on indefinite-lived intangible assets are recognized based solely on a comparison of their fair value to carrying value, without consideration of any recoverability test. The Company monitors the progression of its in-process research and development, as the likelihood of success is contingent upon commercial development or regulatory approval.

Foreign Currency Translation

The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, where the local currency is the functional currency, are translated from their respective functional currencies into United States dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, with resulting foreign currency translation adjustments recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. Revenue and expense amounts are translated at average rates during the period.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to both differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of the change. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company identifies any uncertain income tax positions and recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company records interest, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of interest expense. Penalties, if any, are recorded in general and administrative expenses.

Net Loss per Share

Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period, without consideration of common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share is calculated by adjusting weighted average shares outstanding for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents outstanding for the period, using the treasury-stock method. For purposes of the diluted net loss per share calculation, preferred stock, stock options and warrants are considered to be common stock equivalents but are excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive and, therefore, basic and diluted net loss per share were the same for all periods presented.

16

Table of Contents

Segment Information

The Company has determined that it operates as one segment. The Company uses synthetic biology for the creation of distinct products developed in collaboration with third parties. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, substantially all of the Company’s revenues are derived in the United States of America. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, substantially all of the Company’s assets are located in the United States of America. As of June 30, 2014, the Company has $1,390 of property and equipment in Hungary.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP. The standard outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes the most current revenue recognition guidance. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016, which is effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the implementation of this standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASU 2014-10”). The provisions of ASU 2014-10 related to Topic 915 will not have a significant impact to the Company. ASU 2014-10 removes an exception provided to development-stage entities in Consolidation (Topic 810) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. The revisions to Consolidation (Topic 810) are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, which are effective for the Company for the year ending December 31, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the implementation of this standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain insignificant reclassifications have been made to the prior interim period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current interim period presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

3. Mergers and Acquisitions

Medistem Acquisition

On March 6, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock and securities convertible into common stock of California-based Medistem, Inc. (“Medistem”), a pioneer in the development of Endometrial Regenerative Cells (“ERCs”), for a combination of cash and Company common stock. The acquisition allows the Company to employ its synthetic biology platforms to engineer a diverse array of cell-based therapeutic candidates using Medistem’s multipotent ERCs. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Medistem equity holders received 714,144 shares of the Company’s common stock and $4,920 in cash in exchange for the outstanding Medistem common stock and securities convertible into common stock. Additionally, Medistem had issued the Company two promissory notes in the amount of $707, including accrued interest, which were settled upon closing of the merger. Certain members of Medistem’s management surrendered a total of 17,695 shares of their merger consideration to reimburse the Company for required payroll tax withholdings. The results of Medistem’s operations subsequent to March 6, 2014 have been included in the consolidated financial statements.

17

Table of Contents

The fair value of the total consideration transferred was $24,995. The acquisition date fair value of each class of consideration transferred was as follows:

The fair value of the shares of the Company’s common stock issued was based on the quoted closing price of the Company’s common stock on March 6, 2014. The preliminary estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date is shown below:

The fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date are considered preliminary and is subject to revision when the valuation of intangible assets is finalized upon receipt of the final valuation report from a third party valuation expert. The preliminary fair value of acquired intangible assets was determined using the cost approach, which establishes value based on the cost of reproducing or replacing the asset. The acquired intangible assets consist of in-process research and development, which is an indefinite-lived intangible asset. The goodwill consists of buyer-specific synergies between the Company’s and Medistem’s technologies present. The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

As of June 30, 2014, the Company has incurred $680 of acquisition related costs, of which $20 and $310 is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

The results of operations of Medistem are included in the consolidated statement of operations beginning on the day after the acquisition date. The following unaudited condensed pro forma financial information for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 is presented as if the acquisition had been consummated on January 1, 2013:

18

Table of Contents

4. Consolidated Majority-Owned Subsidiaries

AquaBounty

On November 16, 2012, the Company acquired 48,631,444 shares of AquaBounty common stock, representing 47.56% of the then outstanding shares of AquaBounty, for $6,000 through a definitive purchase agreement with an existing AquaBounty shareholder and its affiliate. On November 29, 2012, the Company executed a promissory note purchase agreement (“promissory note”) with AquaBounty. The promissory note allowed for the Company to loan up to $500 to AquaBounty. Draws on the promissory note by AquaBounty accrued annual interest of 3% and matured no later than May 28, 2013. Between December 2012 and February 2013, AquaBounty drew $500 on the promissory note. On March 15, 2013, AquaBounty repaid the $500 promissory note plus accrued interest.

On March 15, 2013, the Company acquired 18,714,814 shares of AquaBounty for $4,907 in a private subscription offering, thereby increasing the Company’s ownership in AquaBounty to 53.82%, resulting in the Company consolidating AquaBounty pursuant to the step acquisition guidance in ASC 805. The Company recognized a gain of $7,415 to account for the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the previously held 47.56% equity interest. The fair value of the consideration transferred included:

The Company used the private subscription price to measure fair value of the Company’s previously held investment and noncontrolling interest. The estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date is shown in the table below along with subsequent adjustments during the measurement period to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The adjustments were due to the completed valuation of intangible assets and long-term debt.

The fair value of acquired intangible assets was determined using the multi-period excess earnings method, a variation of the income approach that estimates the value of an intangible asset equal to the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the intangible asset. The acquired intangible assets consist of in-process research and development until regulatory approval is obtained, at which point the intangible assets will be

19

Table of Contents

accounted for as definite lived intangible assets and amortized over the expected useful life of fifteen years. The goodwill represents future revenue opportunities and the potential for expansion of AquaBounty products and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The results of operations of AquaBounty are included in the consolidated statement of operations beginning on the acquisition date. The following unaudited condensed pro forma financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is presented as if the acquisition had been consummated on January 1, 2012:

The pro forma net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 excludes the $7,415 non-recurring gain on remeasurement of the Company’s previously held investment in AquaBounty.

On March 20, 2014, the Company acquired 19,040,366 additional shares of AquaBounty common stock for $10,000 in a private subscription offering, thereby increasing the Company’s aggregate ownership in AquaBounty to 59.85% upon closing.

See Note 6 for a discussion of the Company’s ECC with AquaBounty.

BioPop

On October 1, 2013, the Company paid $1,300 to acquire 51% of the outstanding common stock of BioPop, and effective on that date, the Company began consolidating BioPop in its consolidated results of operations and financial position pursuant to ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). In connection with the transaction, the Company recorded goodwill of $822 and intangible assets of $430. The intangible assets consist of acquired technology and are being amortized over the expected useful life of four years.

5. Investments in Joint Ventures

Intrexon Energy Partners

On March 26, 2014, the Company and certain investors (the “Investors”), including an affiliate of Third Security, LLC (“Third Security”), entered into a Limited Liability Company Agreement which governs the affairs and conduct of business of Intrexon Energy Partners, a joint venture formed to optimize and scale-up the Company’s gas-to-liquid bioconversion platform for the production of certain fuels and lubricants. The Company contributed technology for a 50% membership interest in Intrexon Energy Partners. The Investors made initial capital contributions, totaling $25,000 in the aggregate, in exchange for pro rata membership interests in Intrexon Energy Partners totaling 50%. In addition, Intrexon has committed to make additional capital contributions of up to $25,000, and the Investors, as a group and pro rata in accordance with their respective membership interests in Intrexon Energy Partners, have committed to make additional capital contributions of up to $25,000, at the request of Intrexon Energy Partners’ Board of Managers (the “IEP Board”) and subject to certain limitations. The Company and the Investors have the right, but not the obligation, to make additional capital contributions above these limits when and if solicited by the IEP Board.

20

Table of Contents

Intrexon Energy Partners is governed by the IEP Board which has five members. Two members of the IEP Board are designated by the Company and three members of the IEP Board are designated by a majority of the Investors.

Intrexon Energy Partners incurred a net loss of $1,210 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 for research and development services provided by the Company. It is expected that the Company and the Investors will make additional capital contributions to Intrexon Energy Partners during the third quarter of 2014.

See discussion of the Company’s ECC with Intrexon Energy Partners at Note 6. See discussion of a concurrent private placement securities purchase made by the Investors at Note 12.

OvaXon

On December 18, 2013, the Company and OvaScience, Inc. (“OvaScience”) entered into a Limited Liability Company Agreement (“OvaXon LLC Agreement”) which governs the affairs and conduct of business of OvaXon, LLC (“OvaXon”), a joint venture to create new applications for improving human and animal health. OvaXon leverages experience and technology from both the Company and OvaScience. Both the Company and OvaScience made an initial capital contribution of $1,500 in January 2014 for a 50% membership interest in OvaXon. In cases in which the board of managers of OvaXon (“OvaXon Board”) determines that additional capital contributions are necessary in order for OvaXon to conduct business and comply with its obligations under the ECC (Note 6), each of the Company and OvaScience have the right, but not the obligation, to make additional capital contributions to OvaXon subject to the OvaXon LLC Agreement.

OvaXon is governed by the OvaXon Board which has four members. The Company, as well as OvaScience, has the initial right to appoint two members to the OvaXon Board. For so long as OvaScience and/or any of its affiliates is a member of OvaXon and holds at least 25% interest in OvaXon, OvaScience will have the sole authority to select and appoint on behalf of OvaXon each of the representatives of OvaXon on the ECC committees, and one such appointee will be an “Executive Officer” of OvaXon under the terms of the ECC with final authority to resolve certain ECC committee disputes.

As of June 30, 2014 OvaXon had net assets of $2,216. OvaXon incurred a net loss of $590 and $784 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The Company’s investment in OvaXon was $1,108 as of June 30, 2014.

S & I Ophthalmic

On September 30, 2013, the Company and an indirect subsidiary (“Sun Pharmaceutical Subsidiary”) of Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (“Sun Pharmaceutical”) entered into a Limited Liability Company Agreement (“Sun LLC Agreement”) which governs the affairs and the conduct of business of S & I Ophthalmic, LLC (“S & I Ophthalmic”), a joint venture to develop therapies for the treatment of ocular diseases. S & I Ophthalmic leverages experience and technology from both the Company and Sun Pharmaceutical. Both the Company and Sun Pharmaceutical Subsidiary made an initial capital contribution of $5,000 in October 2013 for a 50% membership interest in S & I Ophthalmic. In cases in which the board of managers of S & I Ophthalmic (“S & I Board”) determines that additional capital contributions are necessary in order for S & I Ophthalmic to conduct business and comply with its obligations under the ECC (Note 6), each of the Company and Sun Pharmaceutical Subsidiary have committed to making additional capital contributions to S&I Ophthalmic subject to certain limits defined in the agreement. Each has the right, but not the obligation, to make additional capital contributions above the defined limits when and if solicited by the S & I Board.

Beginning on the seventh anniversary of the effective date of the Sun LLC Agreement, and upon the second anniversary thereafter, the Company, as well as Sun Pharmaceutical Subsidiary, may make a cash offer to purchase all of the other party’s interest in S & I Ophthalmic. Upon receipt of such an offer, the other party must either agree to tender its interests at the offered price or submit a counteroffer at a price higher than the original offer. Such offer and counteroffer may continue until one party agrees to the other’s price.

21

Table of Contents

S & I Ophthalmic is governed by the S & I Board which has four members. The Company, as well as Sun Pharmaceutical Subsidiary, has the initial right to appoint two members to the S & I Board. For so long as Sun Pharmaceutical Subsidiary and/or any of its affiliates is a member of S & I Ophthalmic and holds a percentage interest in S & I Ophthalmic that is at least equal to the percentage held by the Company and/or its affiliates, Sun Pharmaceutical Subsidiary will have the sole authority to select and appoint on behalf of S & I Ophthalmic each of the representatives of the S & I Ophthalmic on the ECC committees, and one such appointee will be an “Empowered Representative” of the S & I Ophthalmic under the terms of the ECC with final authority to resolve certain ECC committee disputes.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, S & I Ophthalmic had net assets of $7,779 and $9,567, respectively. S & I Ophthalmic incurred a net loss of $910 and $1,788 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The Company’s investment in S & I Ophthalmic was $3,889 and $4,784 as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

6. Collaboration Revenue

The Company’s collaborations provide for multiple deliverables to be delivered by the Company and typically include a license to the Company’s technology platforms, participation in collaboration committees, performance of certain research and development services and may include obligations for certain manufacturing services. The Company groups these deliverables into two units of accounting based on the nature of the deliverables and the separation criteria. The first deliverable (“Unit of Accounting 1”) includes the license to the Company’s technology platform, the Company’s participation on the collaboration committees and any research and development services associated with its technology platforms. The deliverables for Unit of Accounting 1 are combined because they cannot be individually separated. The second deliverable (“Unit of Accounting 2”) includes manufacturing services to be provided for any Company materials in an approved product. These services have standalone value and are contingent due to uncertainties on whether an approved product will ever be developed thereby requiring manufacture by the Company at that time. As VSOE and third party evidence of selling price is not available or practical, the BESP for each unit of accounting is determined using a historical cost approach due to the early stage of development of the Company’s technology. In establishing BESP for Unit of Accounting 1, the Company uses the accumulated costs incurred as of the collaboration by the Company on its technology platform licensed to the collaborator to approximate the cost to recreate the deliverables included in this unit of accounting. All upfront consideration is allocated to Unit of Accounting 1. Unit of Accounting 2 is determined to be a contingent deliverable at the inception of the collaboration due to the uncertainties surrounding whether an approved product will ever be developed and require manufacturing by the Company. The upfront consideration allocated to Unit of Accounting 1 is recognized over the expected life of the Company’s technology platform using a straight-line approach.

The Company recognizes the reimbursement payments received for research and development services in the period when the services are performed and collection is reasonably assured. At the inception of each collaboration, the Company determines whether any milestone payments are substantive and can be recognized when earned in accordance with ASU 2010-17. The milestone payments are typically not considered substantive. Royalties related to product sales will be recognized when earned since payments relate directly to products that have been fully developed and for which the Company has satisfied all of its obligations.

22

Table of Contents

The Company determines whether collaborations are individually “significant” for disclosure based on a number of factors, including total revenue recorded by the Company pursuant to the collaboration, collaborators either consolidated or accounted for using the equity method, or other qualitative factors. The following table summarizes the amounts recorded in the consolidated statements of operations for each significant collaboration for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

23

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the terms of the Company’s significant collaborations.

Ziopharm Collaboration

Effective January 6, 2011, the Company entered into a worldwide ECC with Ziopharm. Pursuant to the ECC, Ziopharm received a license to the Company’s technology platform within the field of oncology as defined more specifically in the agreement. Upon execution of the ECC, the Company received 3,636,926 shares of Ziopharm’s common stock valued at $17,457 as upfront consideration. In addition to the deliverables discussed above, the Company transferred two clinical product candidates to Ziopharm that resulted in a separate unit of accounting for which $1,115 of the upfront consideration was allocated and recognized as collaboration revenue in 2011. The remaining $16,342 of upfront consideration was allocated to Unit of Accounting 1 discussed above. The Company is entitled to additional shares of common stock representing the lesser of (i) the original shares received or (ii) the number of shares representing 7.495% of Ziopharm’s outstanding shares at the date of the dosing of the first patient in a Phase II clinical trial of a product candidate created, produced or developed by Ziopharm using the Company’s technology (“Ziopharm Milestone”). On October 24, 2012, the Ziopharm Milestone was achieved and the Company received 3,636,926 shares of Ziopharm’s common stock valued at $18,330 as milestone consideration. Since the Ziopharm Milestone was not substantive, the Company allocated the Ziopharm Milestone to the applicable units of accounting and is being recognized in a manner similar to these units of accounting. The Company receives reimbursement payments for research and development services provided and manufacturing services for Company materials provided to Ziopharm during the ECC. Subject to certain expense allocations, Ziopharm will pay the Company 50% of the quarterly net profits derived from the sale of products developed from the ECC. Ziopharm is responsible for conducting preclinical and clinical development of product candidates, as well as for other aspects of commercialization or manufacturing of product candidates. The term of the ECC commenced on January 6, 2011 and continues until terminated pursuant to the ECC agreement. The ECC may be terminated by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and may be terminated voluntarily by Ziopharm upon 90 days written notice to the Company.

See Note 15 for further discussion related to Ziopharm.

Synthetic Biologics, Inc. Collaborations

Effective November 18, 2011, the Company entered into a worldwide ECC with Synthetic Biologics, Inc. (“Synthetic Biologics”), a publicly traded company focused on the development of innovative disease-modifying medicines for serious illnesses. Pursuant to the ECC, at the transaction effective date, Synthetic Biologics received a license to the Company’s technology platform within a designated field (“Field One”). Upon execution of the ECC, the Company received 3,123,558 shares of Synthetic Biologics’ common stock valued at $1,687 as upfront consideration. The Company is entitled to additional shares of common stock representing the lesser of (i) the original shares received or (ii) the number of shares representing 9.995% of Synthetic Biologics’ outstanding shares at the date of the dosing of the first patient in a Phase II clinical trial of a product candidate created, produced or developed by Synthetic Biologics using the Company’s technology. The Company will receive reimbursement payments for research and development services provided pursuant to the agreement and manufacturing services for

24

Table of Contents

Company materials provided to Synthetic Biologics during the ECC. Subject to certain expense allocations, Synthetic Biologics will pay the Company 50% of the quarterly net profits derived from the sale of products developed from the ECC. Synthetic Biologics is responsible for conducting preclinical and clinical development of product candidates, as well as for other aspects of commercialization or manufacturing of the product candidates. The term of the ECC commenced on November 18, 2011 and continues until terminated pursuant to the ECC agreement. The ECC may be terminated by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and may be terminated voluntarily by Synthetic Biologics upon 90 days written notice to the Company. On April 16, 2013, the Company terminated its ECC with Synthetic Biologics in Field One. As a result of this termination, all licenses granted by the Company under the ECC for use in Field One reverted back to the Company and the Company recognized the balance of deferred revenue associated with the upfront consideration as collaboration revenue in April 2013.

On August 6, 2012, the Company entered into its second worldwide ECC with Synthetic Biologics. Pursuant to this ECC, at the transaction effective date, Synthetic Biologics received a license to the Company’s technology platform within a second designated field (“Field Two”). Upon Synthetic Biologics’ shareholders’ approval on October 5, 2012, the Company received a technology access fee of 3,552,210 shares of Synthetic Biologics common stock valued at $7,815 as upfront consideration. Upon the filing by Synthetic Biologics of an investigational new drug application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“U.S. FDA”), the Company will receive cash or common stock at the option of Synthetic Biologics valued at $2,000. Upon the first to occur of either the first commercial sale of a product developed under the ECC or the granting of regulatory approval of a product developed under the ECC, the Company will receive cash or common stock at the option of Synthetic Biologics valued at $3,000. The ECC initially targets three infectious diseases and Synthetic Biologics may elect to target up to five more infectious diseases by paying the Company a field expansion fee of $2,000 in either cash or common stock for each additional infectious disease selected. The Company receives reimbursement payments for research and development services provided pursuant to the agreement and manufacturing services for preclinical Company materials provided to Synthetic Biologics during the ECC. The Company has the option to propose, and Synthetic Biologics can select, the Company to be the bulk manufacturer of products developed from the ECC. On a quarterly basis, Synthetic Biologics will pay the Company royalties with percentages ranging from upper-single digits to lower double digits of net sales of products developed from the ECC. Synthetic Biologics is responsible for conducting preclinical and clinical development of product candidates, as well as for other aspects of commercialization and manufacturing of the product candidates. The term of the ECC commenced on August 6, 2012 and continues until terminated pursuant to the ECC agreement. The ECC may be terminated by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and may be terminated voluntarily by Synthetic Biologics upon 90 days written notice to the Company.

On December 17, 2012, the Company received $2,500 from Synthetic Biologics as a prepayment of research and development services to be provided in conjunction with either of the two ECCs. The Company recorded this amount as deferred revenue and recognizes collaboration revenue as services are performed. Any remaining balance of this prepayment is refundable to Synthetic Biologics in the event both ECCs are terminated.

See Note 15 for further discussion related to Synthetic Biologics.

Oragenics Collaborations

Effective June 5, 2012, the Company entered into a worldwide ECC with Oragenics, a publicly traded company focused on becoming the world leader in novel antibiotics against infectious disease and probiotics for oral health for humans and pets. Pursuant to the ECC, at the transaction effective date, Oragenics received a license to the Company’s technology platform within the field of lantibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases in humans and companion animals as defined more specifically in the agreement. Upon execution of the ECC, the Company received a technology access fee of 4,392,425 shares of Oragenics’ common stock valued at $6,588 as upfront consideration. The Company is entitled to receive additional shares of common stock, or at Oragenics’ option, receive a cash payment based upon the fair market value of the shares, upon the separate achievement of certain regulatory milestones of the first product candidate developed from the ECC (“Oragenics ECC 1 Milestones”). The Oragenics ECC 1 Milestones include: (i) 1% of Oragenics’ outstanding shares as defined in the ECC agreement at the date of the filing of the first Investigative New Drug Application with the U.S. FDA for a product candidate created, produced or developed using the Company’s technology (“Oragenics ECC 1 Product”); (ii) 1.5% of

25

Table of Contents

Oragenics’ outstanding shares as defined in the ECC agreement at the date of the dosing of the first patient in the first Phase II clinical trial of an Oragenics ECC 1 Product; (iii) 2% of Oragenics’ outstanding shares as defined in the ECC agreement at the date of the dosing of the first patient in the first Phase III clinical trial of an Oragenics ECC 1 Product; (iv) 2.5% of Oragenics’ outstanding shares as defined in the ECC agreement at the date of the first New Drug Application or Biologics License Application with the U.S. FDA for an Oragenics ECC 1 Product, or alternatively the first equivalent regulatory filing with a foreign agency; and (v) 3% of Oragenics’ outstanding shares as defined in the ECC agreement at the date of the granting of the first regulatory approval of an Oragenics ECC 1 Product. The Company receives reimbursement payments for research and development services provided pursuant to the agreement during the ECC and manufacturing services for Company materials provided to Oragenics during the ECC. Oragenics will pay the Company 25% of the quarterly profits derived from the sale of products developed from the ECC.

Oragenics is responsible for funding the further development of lantibiotics toward the goal of commercialization, conducting preclinical and clinical development of product candidates, as well as for other aspects of commercialization or manufacturing of the product candidates. The term of the ECC commenced on June 5, 2012 and continues until terminated pursuant to the ECC agreement. The ECC may be terminated by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and may be terminated voluntarily by Oragenics upon 90 days written notice to the Company.

Effective September 30, 2013, the Company entered into its second worldwide ECC with Oragenics (“ECC 2”). Pursuant to ECC 2, at the transaction effective date, Oragenics received a license to the Company’s technology platform to develop and commercialize probiotics, specifically the direct administration to humans of genetically modified probiotics for the treatment of diseases of the oral cavity, throat, sinus and esophagus as defined more specifically in the agreement. Upon execution of ECC 2, the Company received a technology access fee of 1,348,000 shares of Oragenics’ common stock valued at $3,503 and a $1,956 convertible promissory note maturing on or before December 31, 2013 as upfront consideration. Prior to the maturity date, Oragenics had the right to convert the promissory note into shares of Oragenics’ common stock subject to its shareholders’ approval. The conversion price is equal to the closing price of Oragenics’ common stock on the last trading day immediately prior to the date of conversion. On December 18, 2013, Oragenics converted the promissory note into 698,241 shares of Oragenics’ common stock. The Company is entitled to receive additional shares of common stock, or at Oragenics’ option, receive a cash payment based upon the fair market value of the shares, upon the first instance of attainment of certain commercialization milestones of a product candidate developed from ECC 2 (“Oragenics ECC 2 Milestones”). The Oragenics ECC 2 Milestones include: (i) $2,000 within thirty days of the first instance of the achievement of the first dosing of a patient in a phase II clinical trial for an Oragenics product developed from ECC 2 (“Oragenics ECC 2 Product”); (ii) $5,000 within thirty days of the first instance of the achievement of the meeting of the primary endpoint in a phase III clinical trial for an Oragenics ECC 2 Product; and (iii) $10,000 within thirty days of the first instance of the achievement of the first to occur of (a) the first commercial sale of an Oragenics ECC 2 Product anywhere in the world, or (b) the regulatory approval for an Oragenics ECC 2 Product. The Company receives reimbursement payments for research and development services provided pursuant to the agreement during the ECC and manufacturing services for Company materials provided to Oragenics during ECC 2. Oragenics will pay the Company 10% of the net sales derived from the sale of products developed from ECC 2.

Oragenics is responsible for funding the further development of probiotics toward the goal of commercialization, conducting preclinical and clinical development of product candidates, as well as for other aspects of commercialization or manufacturing of the product candidates. The term of ECC 2 commenced on September 30, 2013 and continues until terminated pursuant to ECC 2. ECC 2 may be terminated by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and following full payment of the technology access fee may be terminated voluntarily by Oragenics upon 90 days written notice to the Company.

See Note 15 for further discussion related to Oragenics.

Fibrocell Science, Inc. Collaboration

Effective October 5, 2012, the Company entered into an ECC with Fibrocell Science, Inc. (“Fibrocell”), a publicly traded, autologous cellular therapeutic company focused on the development of innovative products for aesthetic, medical and scientific applications. Pursuant to the ECC, at the transaction effective date, Fibrocell

26

Table of Contents

received a license to the Company’s technology platform to develop and commercialize genetically modified and non-genetically modified autologous fibroblasts and autologous dermal cells in the United States of America. Upon execution of the ECC, the Company received a technology access fee of 1,317,520 shares of Fibrocell’s common stock valued at $7,576 as upfront consideration. The number of shares received reflects a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of Fibrocell’s common stock effective April 30, 2013. The Company receives reimbursement payments for research and development services provided pursuant to the agreement during the ECC and manufacturing services for Company materials provided to Fibrocell during the ECC. On a quarterly basis, Fibrocell will pay the Company royalties of 7% of net sales up to $25,000 and 14% of net sales above $25,000 on each product developed from the ECC. If Fibrocell uses the Company’s technology platform to improve the production of a current or new Fibrocell product not developed from the ECC, Fibrocell will pay the Company a quarterly royalty equal to 33% of the cost of goods sold savings generated by the improvement. Fibrocell is responsible for conducting preclinical and clinical development of product candidates, as well as for other aspects of commercialization and manufacturing of the product candidates. The term of the ECC commenced on October 5, 2012 and continues until terminated pursuant to the ECC agreement. The ECC may be terminated by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and may be terminated voluntarily by Fibrocell upon 90 days written notice to the Company.

Effective June 28, 2013, the Company entered into an amendment to the ECC with Fibrocell. The amendment expands the field of use defined in the ECC agreement. Under the terms of the amendment to the ECC, the Company received 1,243,781 shares of Fibrocell’s common stock valued at $7,612 as a supplemental technology access fee. The Company allocated this additional consideration to the appropriate unit of accounting and is recognizing it consistent with the unit of accounting.

Effective January 10, 2014, the Company entered into a second amendment to the ECC with Fibrocell. The second amendment further expanded the field of use defined in the ECC agreement. Under the terms of the second amendment to the ECC, the Company received 1,024,590 shares of Fibrocell’s common stock valued at $5,225 as a technology access fee. The Company allocated this additional consideration to the appropriate unit of accounting and is recognizing it consistent with the unit of accounting.

See Note 15 for further discussion related to Fibrocell.

Genopaver Collaboration

Effective March 29, 2013, the Company entered into a worldwide ECC with Genopaver, a limited liability company formed by affiliates of Third Security (Note 15). Genopaver was formed for the purpose of entering into the ECC and developing and commercializing products in the field of the fermentative production of alkaloids through genetically modified cell-lines and substrate feeds for use as active pharmaceutical ingredients or as commercially sold intermediates in the manufacture of active pharmaceutical ingredients. Upon execution of the ECC, the Company received a technology access fee of $3,000 as upfront consideration. The Company receives reimbursement payments for research and development services provided pursuant to the agreement during the ECC. Genopaver will pay the Company a royalty as a percentage in the lower-double digits on the quarterly gross profits of product sales from products developed under the ECC. Genopaver is responsible for the development and commercialization of the product candidates. The term of the ECC commenced on March 29, 2013 and continues until terminated pursuant to the ECC agreement. The ECC may be terminated by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and may be terminated voluntarily by Genopaver upon 90 days written notice to the Company.

AquaBounty Collaboration

On February 14, 2013, the Company entered into an ECC with AquaBounty. The Company will be reimbursed for research and development services as provided for in the ECC agreement. In the event of product sales from a product developed from the ECC, the Company will receive 16.66% of quarterly gross profits for each product. All revenues and expenses related to this ECC are eliminated in consolidation (Note 4).

27

Table of Contents

S & I Ophthalmic Collaboration

On September 30, 2013, the Company entered into a worldwide ECC with S & I Ophthalmic, a joint venture between the Company and Sun Pharmaceutical Subsidiary, an indirect subsidiary of Sun Pharmaceutical, an international specialty pharmaceutical company focused on chronic diseases (Note 5). The ECC grants S & I Ophthalmic an exclusive worldwide license to the Company’s technology platform to develop and commercialize therapies in humans for the treatment of ocular diseases defined more specifically in the agreement. The Company will be reimbursed for research and development services pursuant to the agreement and manufacturing services for Company materials provided to S & I Ophthalmic during the ECC. Subject to certain expense allocations, S & I Ophthalmic will pay the Company royalties with percentages ranging from mid-single digits and above of the net sales derived from the sale of products developed under the ECC. The term of the ECC commenced on September 30, 2013 and continues until terminated by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and may be terminated voluntarily by S & I Ophthalmic upon 90 days written notice to the Company.

BioPop Collaboration

On October 1, 2013, the Company entered into a worldwide ECC with BioPop. The ECC grants BioPop an exclusive, worldwide license to the Company’s technology platform to develop and commercialize artwork, children’s toys and novelty goods that are derived from living organisms or are enabled by synthetic biology. The Company will be reimbursed for research and development services and manufacturing services as provided for in the ECC agreement. The Company is entitled to royalties in the mid-single digits as a percentage of the net product sales of a product developed under the ECC. All revenues and expenses related to this ECC are eliminated in consolidation (Note 4).

OvaXon Collaboration

On December 18, 2013, the Company entered into a worldwide ECC with OvaXon, a joint venture between the Company and OvaScience, a life sciences company focused on infertility treatments (Note 5). The ECC grants OvaXon an exclusive, worldwide license to the Company’s technology platform to create new applications for improving human and animal health. OvaScience also licensed certain technology to OvaXon pursuant to a separate license agreement. The Company will be reimbursed for research and development services and manufacturing services as provided for in the ECC agreement. The term of the ECC commenced on December 18, 2013 and continues until terminated by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and may be terminated voluntarily by OvaXon upon 90 days written notice to the Company.

Intrexon Energy Partners Collaboration

On March 26, 2014, the Company entered into a worldwide ECC with Intrexon Energy Partners, a joint venture between the Company and certain investors, including an affiliate of Third Security (Note 5). The ECC grants Intrexon Energy Partners an exclusive, worldwide license to the Company’s technology platform to optimize and scale-up the Company’s gas-to-liquid bioconversion platform for the production of certain fuels and lubricants. Upon execution of the ECC, the Company received a technology access fee of $25,000 as upfront consideration. The Company will be reimbursed for research and development services as provided for in the ECC agreement. The term of the ECC commenced on March 26, 2014 and continues until March 26, 2034 unless terminated prior to that date by either party in the event of certain material breaches defined in the agreement and may be terminated voluntarily by Intrexon Energy Partners upon 90 days written notice to the Company.

Deferred Revenue

Deferred revenue primarily consists of consideration received for upfront and milestone payments in connection with the Company’s collaborations and prepayments for research and development services performed for collaborators pursuant to the terms of the collaborations. Deferred revenue consists of the following:

28

Table of Contents

7. Short-term and Long-term Investments

The Company’s investments are classified as available-for-sale. The following table summarizes the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of available-for-sale investments as of June 30, 2014:

The following table summarizes the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of available-for-sale investments as of December 31, 2013:

For more information on our method for determining the fair value of our assets, see Note 2 – “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”.

The estimated fair value of available-for-sale investments classified by their contractual maturities as of June 30, 2014 was as follows:

Changes in market interest rates and bond yields cause certain investments to fall below their cost basis, resulting in unrealized losses on investments. The unrealized losses of the Company’s investments were primarily a result of unfavorable changes in interest rates subsequent to the initial purchase of these investments and have been in a loss position for less than 12 months.

As of June 30, 2014, the Company did not consider any of its investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired. When evaluating its investments for other-than-temporary impairment, the Company reviews factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below its cost basis, the financial condition of the issuer, the Company’s ability and intent to hold the security and whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the investment before recovery of its cost basis.

29

Table of Contents

8. Fair Value Measurements

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued compensation and benefits, other accrued liabilities, and related party payables approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including the items for which the fair value option has been elected, at June 30, 2014:

The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including the items for which the fair value option has been elected, at December 31, 2013:

Financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis were not significant at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

The method used to estimate the fair value of the Level 1 assets in the tables above is based on observable market data as these equity securities are publicly-traded. The method used to estimate the fair value of the Level 2 short-term and long-term investments in the tables above is based on professional pricing sources for identical or comparable instruments, rather than direct observations of quote prices in active markets. The method used to estimate the fair value of the Level 2 equity securities in the tables above is based on the quoted market price of the publicly-traded security, adjusted for a discount for lack of marketability.

There were no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy in the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

30

Table of Contents

9. Property, Plant and Equipment, net

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:

Depreciation expense was $1,281 and $1,114 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $2,399 and $2,260 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively

10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2014 are as follows:

No goodwill or accumulated impairment losses existed as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Intangible assets consist of the following at June 30, 2014: