PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS CO - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
Commission file number: 0-31164
Preformed Line Products Company
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Ohio | 34-0676895 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
660 Beta Drive | ||
Mayfield Village, Ohio | 44143 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Office) | (Zip Code) |
(440) 461-5200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (S232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of common shares outstanding as of August 1, 2010: 5,253,534.
Table of Contents
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
June 30 | December 31 | |||||||
Thousands of dollars, except share and per share data | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 22,110 | $ | 24,097 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $1,157 ($995 in 2009) |
51,894 | 49,245 | ||||||
Inventories net |
57,131 | 56,036 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
3,452 | 3,256 | ||||||
Prepaids |
3,705 | 3,214 | ||||||
Prepaid taxes |
3,759 | 1,049 | ||||||
Other current assets |
1,241 | 2,062 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
143,292 | 138,959 | ||||||
Property and equipment net |
68,304 | 67,766 | ||||||
Patents and other intangibles net |
7,501 | 8,087 | ||||||
Goodwill |
6,654 | 6,925 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
5,038 | 4,358 | ||||||
Other assets |
9,287 | 9,277 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 240,076 | $ | 235,372 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Notes payable to banks |
$ | 3,268 | $ | 3,181 | ||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
1,080 | 1,330 | ||||||
Trade accounts payable |
20,405 | 18,764 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and amounts withheld from employees |
11,167 | 8,345 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
7,490 | 8,375 | ||||||
Accrued profit-sharing and other benefits |
2,652 | 3,890 | ||||||
Dividends payable |
1,091 | 1,076 | ||||||
Income taxes payable and deferred income taxes |
1,522 | 1,379 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
48,675 | 46,340 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
3,704 | 3,099 | ||||||
Unfunded pension obligation |
9,202 | 8,678 | ||||||
Income taxes payable, noncurrent |
1,722 | 1,898 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
852 | 1,515 | ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
2,924 | 3,021 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
PLPC Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock $2 par value per share, 15,000,000 shares authorized,
5,253,306 and 5,248,298
issued and outstanding, net of 553,747 and 554,059 treasury shares at par, respectively |
10,507 | 10,497 | ||||||
Paid in capital |
7,301 | 5,885 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
171,048 | 165,953 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(15,591 | ) | (11,369 | ) | ||||
TOTAL PLPC SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
173,265 | 170,966 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
(268 | ) | (145 | ) | ||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
172,997 | 170,821 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 240,076 | $ | 235,372 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
3
Table of Contents
PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
Three month periods ended June 30 | Six month periods ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(Thousands of dollars, except share and per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 82,137 | $ | 59,568 | $ | 151,045 | $ | 118,262 | ||||||||
Cost of products sold |
54,682 | 39,718 | 103,565 | 79,834 | ||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
27,455 | 19,850 | 47,480 | 38,428 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Selling |
7,038 | 5,526 | 13,540 | 10,890 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
9,666 | 7,371 | 19,144 | 14,423 | ||||||||||||
Research and engineering |
2,700 | 2,159 | 5,559 | 4,220 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expense (income) |
1,135 | (311 | ) | 990 | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
20,539 | 14,745 | 39,233 | 29,511 | |||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME |
6,916 | 5,105 | 8,247 | 8,917 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
94 | 87 | 177 | 212 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(126 | ) | (107 | ) | (296 | ) | (216 | ) | ||||||||
Other income |
409 | 178 | 760 | 657 | ||||||||||||
377 | 158 | 641 | 653 | |||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
7,293 | 5,263 | 8,888 | 9,570 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
1,197 | 1,721 | 1,758 | 3,311 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME |
6,096 | 3,542 | 7,130 | 6,259 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax |
| (42 | ) | (98 | ) | (47 | ) | |||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PLPC |
$ | 6,096 | $ | 3,584 | $ | 7,228 | $ | 6,306 | ||||||||
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to PLPC common shareholders |
$ | 1.16 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 1.38 | $ | 1.21 | ||||||||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to PLPC common shareholders |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.19 | ||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.40 | ||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding basic |
5,253 | 5,231 | 5,253 | 5,228 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding diluted |
5,402 | 5,311 | 5,401 | 5,306 | ||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
4
Table of Contents
PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Six month periods ended June 30 | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Thousands of dollars) | ||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,130 | $ | 6,259 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,042 | 3,404 | ||||||
Provision for accounts receivable allowances |
277 | 345 | ||||||
Provision for inventory reserves |
737 | 1,548 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(1,164 | ) | 95 | |||||
Share-based compensation expense |
1,383 | 669 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards |
| (75 | ) | |||||
Net investment in life insurance |
(26 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||
Unrealized foreign currency gain on hedge contract |
(451 | ) | | |||||
Other net |
(5 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(3,586 | ) | (4,947 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(2,113 | ) | 431 | |||||
Trade accounts payables and accrued liabilities |
4,446 | 3,154 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
(627 | ) | 517 | |||||
Other net |
(3,331 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
6,712 | 11,214 | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(6,606 | ) | (4,198 | ) | ||||
Business acquisitions |
| (433 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations |
| 750 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
225 | 89 | ||||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(6,381 | ) | (3,792 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Increase (decrease) in notes payable to banks |
(3 | ) | 818 | |||||
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt |
11,946 | 706 | ||||||
Payments of long-term debt |
(11,471 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(2,167 | ) | (2,125 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards |
| 75 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
84 | 188 | ||||||
Purchase of common shares for treasury |
(21 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(1,632 | ) | (645 | ) | ||||
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(686 | ) | 1,055 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,987 | ) | 7,832 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
24,097 | 19,869 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 22,110 | $ | 27,701 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
5
Table of Contents
PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
In thousands, except share and per share data, unless specifically noted
NOTE A
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Preformed Line Products Company and
subsidiaries (the Company or PLPC) have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying
notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. However, in the opinion of management,
these consolidated financial statements contain all estimates and adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring accruals, required to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, and
cash flows for the interim periods. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2010.
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements, but does not include all of the information and notes required by U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further
information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial
statements included in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2010 with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
NOTE B OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION
Inventories
net
June 30 | December 31 | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Finished products |
$ | 27,404 | $ | 26,161 | ||||
Work-in-process |
4,365 | 3,473 | ||||||
Raw materials |
33,644 | 34,788 | ||||||
65,413 | 64,422 | |||||||
Excess of current cost over LIFO cost |
(5,108 | ) | (4,463 | ) | ||||
Noncurrent portion of inventory |
(3,174 | ) | (3,923 | ) | ||||
$ | 57,131 | $ | 56,036 | |||||
Noncurrent inventory is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and is
principally comprised of raw materials.
6
Table of Contents
Property and equipment net
Major classes of property and equipment are stated at cost and were as follows:
June 30 | December 31 | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Land and improvements |
$ | 7,009 | $ | 7,188 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
51,772 | 51,297 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
106,566 | 104,179 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
5,734 | 6,068 | ||||||
171,081 | 168,732 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
102,777 | 100,966 | ||||||
$ | 68,304 | $ | 67,766 | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six month periods ended June 30 are
as follows:
PLPC | Noncontrolling interest | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three month period | Three month period | Three month period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ended June 30 | ended June 30 | ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,096 | $ | 3,584 | $ | | $ | (42 | ) | $ | 6,096 | $ | 3,542 | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains on
available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
| 88 | | | | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(4,140 | ) | 9,172 | 41 | 9 | (4,099 | ) | 9,181 | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss, net of tax |
30 | 84 | | | 30 | 84 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
(4,110 | ) | 9,344 | 41 | 9 | (4,069 | ) | 9,353 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 1,986 | $ | 12,928 | $ | 41 | $ | (33 | ) | $ | 2,027 | $ | 12,895 | |||||||||||
PLPC | Noncontrolling interest | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Six month period | Six month period | Six month period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ended June 30 | ended June 30 | ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 7,228 | $ | 6,306 | $ | (98 | ) | $ | (47 | ) | $ | 7,130 | $ | 6,259 | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(4,310 | ) | 5,923 | 25 | 6 | (4,285 | ) | 5,929 | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss, net of tax |
88 | 167 | | | 88 | 167 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
(4,222 | ) | 6,090 | 25 | 6 | (4,197 | ) | 6,096 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 3,006 | $ | 12,396 | $ | (73 | ) | $ | (41 | ) | $ | 2,933 | $ | 12,355 | ||||||||||
Legal proceedings
From time to time, the Company may be subject to litigation incidental to its business. The
Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings that the Company believes would,
individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition,
results of operations, or cash flows.
7
Table of Contents
NOTE C PENSION PLANS
PLP-USA hourly employees of the Company who meet specific requirements as to age and service are
covered by a defined benefit pension plan. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for
this plan. Net periodic benefit cost for this plan included the following components:
Three month period ended June 30 | Six month period ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 185 | $ | 216 | $ | 407 | $ | 431 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
276 | 292 | 598 | 584 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan
assets |
(240 | ) | (183 | ) | (480 | ) | (366 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
49 | 132 | 140 | 264 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 269 | $ | 457 | $ | 665 | $ | 913 | ||||||||
During the six month period ended June 30, 2010, no contributions have been made to the plan. The
Company presently anticipates making no contributions to fund the plan in 2010.
NOTE D COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share were computed by dividing net income attributable to PLPC common
shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for each respective
period. Diluted earnings per share were calculated by dividing net income attributable to PLPC
common shareholders by the weighted-average of all potentially dilutive common shares that were
outstanding during the periods presented.
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
For the three month period ended June 30 | For the six month period ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Numerator |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to PLPC |
$ | 6,096 | $ | 3,584 | $ | 7,228 | $ | 6,306 | ||||||||
Denominator |
||||||||||||||||
Determination of shares |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
5,253 | 5,231 | 5,253 | 5,228 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect share-based awards |
149 | 80 | 148 | 78 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
5,402 | 5,311 | 5,401 | 5,306 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per common share attributable to PLPC shareholders |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.16 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 1.38 | $ | 1.21 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.19 | ||||||||
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, 41,500 and 32,500 stock options were
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share due to the average market price being
lower than the exercise price, and as such the stock options are anti-dilutive. For the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2009, 43,450 and 13,000 stock options
were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share due to the average market price
being lower than the exercise price, and as such the stock options are anti-dilutive.
8
Table of Contents
NOTE E GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
The Companys finite and indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of the following:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying | Accumulated | Gross Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Finite-lived intangible assets |
||||||||||||||||
Patents |
$ | 4,826 | $ | (3,370 | ) | $ | 4,827 | $ | (3,213 | ) | ||||||
Land use rights |
1,227 | (62 | ) | 1,365 | (55 | ) | ||||||||||
Trademark |
313 | (43 | ) | 311 | | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
5,359 | (749 | ) | 5,372 | (520 | ) | ||||||||||
$ | 11,725 | $ | (4,224 | ) | $ | 11,875 | $ | (3,788 | ) | |||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets |
||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 6,654 | $ | 6,925 | ||||||||||||
The Company performs its annual impairment test for goodwill utilizing a discounted cash flow
methodology, market comparables, and an overall market capitalization reasonableness test in
computing fair value by reporting unit. The Company then compares the fair value of the reporting
unit with its carrying value to assess if goodwill has been impaired. Based on the assumptions as
to growth, discount rates and the weighting used for each respective valuation methodology, results
of the valuations could be significantly changed. However, the Company believes that the
methodologies and weightings used are reasonable and result in appropriate fair values of the
reporting units.
The Company performed its annual impairment test for goodwill as of January 1, 2010, and determined
that no adjustment to the carrying value was required. The aggregate amortization expense for
other intangibles with finite lives for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 was $.2
million and $.4 million. The aggregate amortization expense for other intangibles with finite
lives for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 was $.1 million and $.2 million.
Amortization expense is estimated to be $.9 million for 2010, $.7 million for 2011, $.8 million for
2012 and 2013 and $.7 million for 2014.
The Companys only intangible asset with an indefinite life is goodwill. The changes in the
carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, are as
follows:
Australia | South Africa | Poland | All Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
$ | 2,243 | $ | 52 | $ | 1,161 | $ | 3,469 | $ | 6,925 | ||||||||||
Currency translation |
(92 | ) | (2 | ) | (178 | ) | 1 | (271 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ | 2,151 | $ | 50 | $ | 983 | $ | 3,470 | $ | 6,654 | ||||||||||
NOTE F SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The 1999 Stock Option Plan
The 1999 Stock Option Plan (the Plan) permits the grant of 300,000 options to buy common shares of
the Company to certain employees at not less than fair market value of the shares on the date of
grant. At June 30, 2010 there were no shares remaining to be issued under the Plan. Options
issued to date under the Plan vest 50% after one year following the
date of the grant, 75% after two years, and 100% after three years and expire from five to ten
years from the date of grant. Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises will be funded
with the issuance of new shares.
There were no options granted during the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
9
Table of Contents
Activity in the Plan for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise Price | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Shares | per Share | Term (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
85,502 | $ | 33.29 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
| $ | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(4,696 | ) | $ | 15.13 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited |
| $ | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding (vested and expected
to vest) at June 30, 2010 |
80,806 | $ | 34.34 | 5.8 | $ | 226 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
69,056 | $ | 32.94 | 5.1 | $ | 226 | ||||||||||
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six month periods ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 was $.1 million and $.4 million. Cash received for the exercise of stock options
during 2010 was $.1 million. There were no excess tax benefits from stock based awards for the six
month period ended June 30, 2010.
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded compensation expense
related to the stock options currently vesting, reducing income before taxes and net income by less
than $.1 million for both periods. The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet
recognized at June 30, 2010 is expected to be a combined total of $.2 million over a weighted
average period of 1.9 years.
Long Term Incentive Plan of 2008
Under the Preformed Line Products Company Long Term Incentive Plan of 2008 (the LTIP Plan),
certain employees, officers, and directors will be eligible to receive awards of options and
restricted shares. The purpose of this LTIP Plan is to give the Company and its subsidiaries a
competitive advantage in attracting, retaining, and motivating officers, employees, and directors
and to provide an incentive to those individuals to increase shareholder value through long-term
incentives directly linked to the Companys performance. The total number of Company common shares
reserved for awards under the LTIP Plan is 400,000. Of the 400,000 common shares, 300,000 common
shares have been reserved for restricted share awards and 100,000 common shares have been reserved
for share options. The LTIP Plan expires on April 17, 2018.
Restricted Share Awards
For all of the participants except the CEO, a portion of the restricted share award is subject to
time-based cliff vesting and a portion is subject to vesting based upon the Companys performance
over a three year period. All of the CEOs restricted shares are subject to vesting based upon the
Companys performance over a three year period.
The restricted shares are offered at no cost to the employees; however, the participant must remain
employed with the
Company until the restrictions on the restricted shares lapse. The fair value of a restricted
share award is based on the market price of a common share on the grant date. The Company
currently estimates that no awards will be forfeited. Dividends declared in 2009 and thereafter
will be accrued in cash dividends. In 2008, dividends were reinvested in additional restricted
shares, and held subject to the same vesting requirements as the underlying restricted shares.
10
Table of Contents
A summary of the restricted share awards for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 is as
follows:
Restricted Share Awards | ||||||||||||||||
Performance | Total | Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||
and Service | Service | Restricted | Grant-Date | |||||||||||||
Required | Required | Awards | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Nonvested as of January 1, 2010 |
115,346 | 12,475 | 127,821 | $ | 38.28 | |||||||||||
Granted |
66,973 | 7,303 | 74,276 | 35.75 | ||||||||||||
Vested |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Forfeited |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Nonvested as of June 30, 2010 |
182,319 | 19,778 | 202,097 | $ | 37.35 | |||||||||||
For time-based restricted shares the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award in General and administrative
expense in the accompanying statement of consolidated income. Compensation expense related to the
time-based restricted shares for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $.1
million. As of June 30, 2010, there was $.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to time-based restricted share awards that is expected to be recognized over the
weighted-average remaining period of approximately 1.4 years.
For the performance-based awards, the number of restricted shares in which the participants will
vest depends on the Companys level of performance measured by growth in pretax income and sales
over a requisite performance period. Depending on the extent to which the performance criterions
are satisfied under the LTIP Plan, the participants are eligible to earn common shares over the
vesting period. Performance-based compensation expense for the six month periods ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 was $1.1 million and $.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the remaining
performance-based restricted share awards compensation expense of $3.8 million is expected to be
recognized over a period of approximately 1.1 years.
In the event of a Change in Control, vesting of the restricted shares will be accelerated and all
restrictions will lapse. Unvested performance-based awards are based on a maximum potential payout.
Actual shares awarded at the end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential
payout level depending on achievement of performance-based award objectives.
To satisfy the vesting of its restricted share awards, the Company has reserved new shares from its
authorized but unissued shares. Any additional granted awards will also be issued from the
Companys authorized but unissued shares. Under the LTIP Plan, there are 97,903 common shares
currently available for additional restricted share grants.
Share Option Awards
The LTIP plan permits the grant of 100,000 share options to buy common shares of the Company to
certain employees at not less than fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. At June
30, 2010 there were 89,000 shares remaining available for issuance under the LTIP Plan. Options
issued to date under the Plan vest 50% after one year following the date of the grant, 75% after
two years, and 100% after three years and expire from five to ten years from the date of grant.
Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises will be funded with the issuance of new shares.
The Company has elected to use the simplified method of calculating the expected term of the stock
options and historical volatility to compute fair value under the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. The risk free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the
U.S. zero coupon Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant. Forfeitures have been estimated to
be zero.
There were no options granted for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
11
Table of Contents
Activity in the Companys plan for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Exercise Price | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Shares | per Share | Term (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
11,000 | $ | 38.76 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
| $ | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
| $ | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited |
| $ | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding (vested and expected
to vest) at June 30, 2010 |
11,000 | $ | 38.76 | 9.5 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
There were no stock options exercised under the LTIP Plan during the six month period ended June
30, 2010. There were no excess tax benefits from stock based awards for the six month period ended
June 31, 2010.
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded compensation expense
related to the stock options currently vesting, reducing income before taxes and net income by less
than $.1 million and zero, respectively. The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards
not yet recognized at June 30, 2010 is expected to be a combined total of $.1 million over a
weighted average period of approximately 2.3 years.
NOTE G FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The carrying value of the Companys current financial instruments, which include cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, and short-term debt,
approximates its fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. At June 30,
2010, the fair value of the Companys long-term debt was estimated using discounted cash flows
analysis, based on the Companys current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing
arrangements which are considered to be level two inputs. There have been no transfers in or out of
level two for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Based on the analysis performed, the fair
value and the carrying value of the Companys long-term debt are as follows:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | |||||||||||||
Long-term debt and
related current
maturities |
$ | 4,724 | $ | 4,784 | $ | 4,617 | $ | 4,429 | ||||||||
As a result of being a global company, the Companys earnings, cash flows and financial position
are exposed to foreign currency risk. The Companys primary objective for holding derivative
financial instruments is to manage foreign currency risks. The Company accounts for derivative
instruments and hedging activities as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheet and carry these instruments at fair value. The Company does not enter into any trading or
speculative positions with regard to derivative instruments.
During June 2010, the Company entered into a forward foreign exchange contract to reduce its
exposure to foreign currency rate changes related to the purchase price of Electropar which closed
on July 30, 2010. This contract was effective as a hedge from an economic perspective, but was not
designated as a hedge for accounting purposes under ASC 815. The Company entered into this
contract with a global financial institution that the Company believes to be creditworthy.
Foreign currency derivative instruments outstanding are not designated as hedges for accounting
purposes, the gains and losses related to mark-to-market adjustments were recognized as other
income and expense on the statement of consolidated income during the period in which the
derivative instruments were outstanding.
12
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had a forward foreign currency contract with an exercise value of
$12.9 million which matured on July 28, 2010 at a forward rate of NZD $1.00=$.6632 USD. The
unrealized gain recognized into earnings as a result of revaluing the instrument to fair value on
June 30, 2010 was $.5 million which was included in other income (expense) in the statement of
consolidated income and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Fair value of
$13.3 million was determined using the market approach by references to quoted prices in active
markets for similar assets, which is Level 2 as defined in the fair value hierarchy.
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments recorded in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2010 and 2009:
Asset Derivative | ||||||||||
Fair Value at June 30, | ||||||||||
Derivative Not Designated as Hedging Instrument | Balance Sheet Classification | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
Other current assets | $ | 451.0 | $ | |
The following table shows the effects of the Companys derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Income:
Amount of Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||
Location of Gain or (loss) | Recognized in Earnings | |||||||||
Recognized in Income on | On Derivative at June 30, | |||||||||
Derivative not Desigated as Hedging Instruments | Derivative | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
Other income (expense) | $ | 451.0 | $ | |
NOTE H RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB updated guidance included in FASB ASC 810-10, related to the consolidation
of variable interest entities. This guidance will require ongoing reassessments of whether an
enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. In addition, this updated
guidance amends the quantitative approach for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity. ASC 810-10 amends certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a
variable interest entity and adds additional reconsideration events for determining whether an
entity is a variable interest entity. Further, this guidance requires enhanced disclosures that
will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprises
involvement in a variable interest entity. This updated guidance is effective as of the beginning
of the first annual reporting period and interim reporting periods that begin after November 15,
2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Companys financial statements
or disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820).
This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to require
disclosure of the transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and a schedule for Level 3 that separately
identifies purchases, sales, issuances and settlements and requires more detailed disclosures
regarding valuation techniques and inputs. The Company adopted this new standard effective
January 1, 2010 and it had no impact on the Companys financial statements or disclosures.
NOTE I RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition
(Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues
Task Force (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for sales arrangements that include
multiple products or services by revising the criteria for when deliverables may be accounted for
separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically, this guidance establishes a selling price
hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is necessary to separately
account for each product or service. This hierarchy provides more options for establishing selling
price than existing guidance. ASU 2009-13 is required to be applied prospectively to new or
materially modified revenue arrangements in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of ASU 2009-13
will have on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and related disclosures;
however no effect is expected.
13
Table of Contents
ASU No. 2009-05 (ASC Topic 820), which amends Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Overall,
ASU No. 2009-13 (ASC Topic 605), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, ASU No. 2009-14 (ASC
Topic 985), Certain Revenue Arrangements that include Software Elements, and various other ASUs
No. 2009-2 through ASU No. 2010-19 which contain technical corrections to existing guidance or
affect guidance to specialized industries or entities, were recently issued. These updates have no
current applicability to the Company or their effect on the financial statements would not have
been significant.
NOTE J SEGMENT INFORMATION
The following tables present a summary of the Companys reportable segments for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Financial results for the PLP-USA segment include the
elimination of all segments intercompany profit in inventory.
Three month period ended June 30 | Six month period ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 30,666 | $ | 26,028 | $ | 57,147 | $ | 54,699 | ||||||||
Australia |
13,287 | 6,260 | 24,178 | 11,942 | ||||||||||||
Brazil |
7,637 | 5,690 | 16,264 | 10,882 | ||||||||||||
South Africa |
2,969 | 2,293 | 5,780 | 4,147 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
3,026 | 3,200 | 5,614 | 5,555 | ||||||||||||
Poland |
4,090 | 2,737 | 7,403 | 5,695 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
20,462 | 13,360 | 34,659 | 25,342 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 82,137 | $ | 59,568 | $ | 151,045 | $ | 118,262 | ||||||||
Intersegment sales |
||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 2,205 | $ | 1,545 | $ | 3,327 | $ | 3,075 | ||||||||
Australia |
157 | 19 | 208 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Brazil |
212 | 230 | 1,082 | 970 | ||||||||||||
South Africa |
122 | 192 | 230 | 204 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
224 | 80 | 394 | 116 | ||||||||||||
Poland |
137 | 306 | 311 | 744 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
6,662 | 2,771 | 11,109 | 5,230 | ||||||||||||
Total intersegment sales |
$ | 9,719 | $ | 5,143 | $ | 16,661 | $ | 10,373 | ||||||||
14
Table of Contents
Three month period ended June 30 | Six month period ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) |
||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | (40 | ) | $ | 1,218 | $ | (468 | ) | $ | 2,139 | ||||||
Australia |
342 | 21 | 597 | 49 | ||||||||||||
Brazil |
(323 | ) | 31 | (75 | ) | 89 | ||||||||||
South Africa |
250 | 116 | 438 | 236 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
219 | 277 | 370 | 422 | ||||||||||||
Poland |
111 | 32 | 149 | 138 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
638 | 26 | 747 | 238 | ||||||||||||
Total income taxes |
$ | 1,197 | $ | 1,721 | $ | 1,758 | $ | 3,311 | ||||||||
Net income |
||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 1,834 | $ | 1,094 | $ | 805 | $ | 2,250 | ||||||||
Australia |
560 | 62 | 1,018 | 112 | ||||||||||||
Brazil |
702 | 51 | 1,167 | 145 | ||||||||||||
South Africa |
642 | 304 | 1,125 | 611 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
489 | 616 | 825 | 938 | ||||||||||||
Poland |
424 | 123 | 556 | 548 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
1,445 | 1,292 | 1,634 | 1,655 | ||||||||||||
Total net income |
6,096 | 3,542 | 7,130 | 6,259 | ||||||||||||
Loss attributable to noncontrolling
interest, net of tax |
| (42 | ) | (98 | ) | (47 | ) | |||||||||
Net income attributable to PLPC |
$ | 6,096 | $ | 3,584 | $ | 7,228 | $ | 6,306 | ||||||||
June 30 | December 31 | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 69,250 | $ | 65,266 | ||||
Australia |
34,353 | 31,269 | ||||||
Brazil |
24,608 | 25,194 | ||||||
South Africa |
8,567 | 7,081 | ||||||
Canada |
9,661 | 9,006 | ||||||
Poland |
12,914 | 14,777 | ||||||
All Other |
80,354 | 82,330 | ||||||
239,707 | 234,923 | |||||||
Corporate assets |
369 | 449 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 240,076 | $ | 235,372 | ||||
NOTE K INCOME TAXES
The Companys effective tax rate was 16% and 33% for the three month periods ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively, and 20% and 35% for six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The lower effective tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010
is primarily due to the favorable benefit from foreign earnings in jurisdictions with lower tax
rates, a favorable tax incentive for technological innovation, and the decrease of unrecognized
tax benefits effectively settled through audits.
The Company provides valuation allowances against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than
not that some portion, or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had gross unrecognized tax positions of approximately $1.1
million. Under the provisions of ASC 740 Income Taxes, the Company may decrease its unrecognized
tax benefits by $.1 million within the next twelve months due to the expiration of statues of
limitations. The Company recognized less than $.2 million of a decrease in unrecognized tax
benefit for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to settlement of unrecognized
tax benefits.
NOTE L SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 30, 2010, the Company completed the business combination acquiring all of the outstanding
equity of Electropar Limited (Electropar) for NZ$20.5 million or $13.3 million USD in cash and the
assumption of certain liabilities, subject to a customary post-closing working capital adjustment.
Electropar designs, manufacturers and markets pole line and substation hardware for the global
electrical utility industry. Electropar is based out of New Zealand with a subsidiary operation in
Australia. The acquisition of Electropar will strengthen the Companys position in the power
distribution, transmission and substation hardware markets and will expand its presence in the
Asia-Pacific region.
15
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Preformed Line Products Company (the Company, PLPC, we, us, or our) was incorporated in
Ohio in 1947. We are an international designer and manufacturer of products and systems employed
in the construction and maintenance of overhead and underground networks for the energy,
telecommunication, cable operators, information (data communication), and other similar industries.
Our primary products support, protect, connect, terminate, and secure cables and wires. We also
provide solar hardware systems and mounting hardware for a variety of solar power applications. Our
goal is to continue to achieve profitable growth as a leader in the innovation, development,
manufacture, and marketing of technically advanced products and services related to energy,
communications, and cable systems and to take advantage of this leadership position to sell
additional quality products in familiar markets.
The reportable segments are PLP-USA, Australia, Brazil, South Africa, Canada, Poland, and All
Other. Our PLP-USA segment is comprised of our U.S. operations primarily supporting our domestic
energy and telecommunications products. The Australia segment is comprised of all of our operations
in Australia supporting energy, telecommunications, data communications and solar products. Our
South Africa and Brazil segments are comprised of the manufacturing and sales operations from those
locations which meet at least one of the criteria of a reportable segment. Our final two segments
are Poland and Canada, which are comprised of a manufacturing and sales operation, and have been
included as segments to comply with reporting segments for 75% of consolidated sales. Our remaining
operations are included in the All Other segment as none of these operations meet, or the future
estimated results are not expected to meet the criteria for a reportable segment.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On May 15, 2010, we entered into a definitive agreement with Tony Lachlan Wallace, Grant Lachlan
Wallace and Helen Amelia Wallace each of Auckland, New Zealand as trustees of the Wallace Family
Trust, Grant Lachlan Wallace, Tony Lachlan Wallace and Alison Kay Wallace each of Auckland, NZ, as
trustees of the T&A Wallace Family Trust, and Cameron Wallace Trust (collectively, Sellers) for
the Sale and Purchase of Shares in Electropar Limited, a New Zealand corporation. Electropar
Limited (Electropar) designs, manufactures and markets pole line and substation hardware for the
global electrical utility industry. Electropar is based out of New Zealand with a subsidiary
operation in Australia. The acquisition of Electropar will strengthen our position in the power
distribution, transmission and substation hardware markets and will expand our presence in the
Asia-Pacific region.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, PLPC acquired all of the outstanding equity of Electropar for
NZ$20.5 million or $13.3 million USD subject to a customary post-closing working capital
adjustment. In addition, we may be required to make an additional earn-out consideration payment to
the Sellers up to NZ$2 million based on Electropar achieving a financial performance target
(Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) for the 12 month period following
closing. In addition, the Purchase Agreement includes customary representations, warranties,
covenants and indemnification provisions. The acquisition of Electropar closed on July 30, 2010.
On December 18, 2009, PLPC and Tyco Electronics Group S.A. (Tyco Electronics) completed a Stock and
Asset Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which, PLPC acquired from Tyco Electronics its Dulmison
business for $16 million and the assumption of certain liabilities. The acquisition of Dulmison
strengthened our position in the power distribution and transmission hardware market and expanded
our presence in the Asia-Pacific region. As a result of the acquisition, we added operations in
Indonesia and Malaysia and strengthened our existing positions in Australia, Thailand, Mexico and
the United States.
16
Table of Contents
Preface
Our net sales for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 increased $22.6 million, or 38%, and
gross profit increased $7.6 million, or 38%, compared to the three month period ended June 30,
2009. Our net sales increase was caused by a 49% increase in foreign net sales in addition to a
25% increase in U.S. net sales. Our financial results are subject to fluctuation results in the
exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. Of the 38% increase in net
sales, 6% was from the favorable effect on the change in the translation rate of local currencies
as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar to certain weaker foreign currencies compared
to 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, sales and gross profit increased 32%
compared to 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, costs and expenses increased $5.1
million, or 34%, as foreign costs and expenses increased $2.5 million and U.S. costs and expenses
increased $2.6 million. As a result of the preceding, excluding the effect of currency
translation, net income increased $2.3 million compared to 2009.
Our net sales for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 increased $32.8 million, or 28%, and
gross profit increased $9.1 million, or 24%, compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
Our net sales increase was caused by a 64% increase in total foreign net sales coupled with a 9%
increase in U.S. net sales. Our financial results are subject to fluctuations in the exchange
rates of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. Of the 28% increase in net sales, 9%
was from the favorable effect on the change in the translation rate of local currencies as a result
of the U.S. dollar to certain weaker foreign currencies compared to 2009. Excluding the effect of
currency translation, gross profit increased 14% compared to 2009. Excluding the effect of
currency translation, cost and expenses increased $7.6 million, or 26%, as U.S. and foreign costs
and expenses both increased $3.8 million. As a result of the preceding, excluding the effect of
currency translation, net income increased $.3 million compared to 2009.
Despite the recent global economic downturn, we are seeing an improvement in our global marketplace
and our financial condition continues to remain strong. We continue to generate cash flows from
operations, have proactively managed working capital and have controlled capital spending. We
currently have a debt to equity ratio of 5% and can borrow needed funds at an attractive interest
rate under our credit facility. While current worldwide conditions necessitate that we concentrate
our efforts on maintaining our financial strengths, we believe there are many available
opportunities for growth. We are pursuing these opportunities as appropriate in the current
environment in order to position ourselves for when the economic recovery ultimately happens.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP) Our discussions of the financial results include non-GAAP
measures (primarily the impact of foreign currency) to provide additional information concerning
our financial results and provide information that is useful to the assessment of our performance
and operating trends.
17
Table of Contents
THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 COMPARED TO THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
The following table sets forth a summary of the Companys consolidated income statements for the
three month period ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009. The Companys past operating results are
not necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Three month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||
Thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 82,137 | $ | 59,568 | $ | 22,569 | 38 | % | ||||||||
Cost of products sold |
54,682 | 39,718 | 14,964 | 38 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
27,455 | 19,850 | 7,605 | 38 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit as percentage of net sales |
33 | % | 33 | % | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
20,539 | 14,745 | 5,794 | 39 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses as percentage of net sales |
25 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
6,916 | 5,105 | 1,811 | 35 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
377 | 158 | 219 | 139 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
7,293 | 5,263 | 2,030 | 39 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes as percentage of net sales |
9 | % | 9 | % | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
1,197 | 1,721 | (524 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,096 | $ | 3,542 | $ | 2,554 | 72 | % | ||||||||
Net Sales. For the three month period ended June 30, 2010, net sales were $82.1 million, an
increase of $22.6 million, or 38%, from the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the
effect of currency translation, net sales increased 32% as summarized in the following table:
Three month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
due to | excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
currency | currency | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | translation | tranlation | change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 30,666 | $ | 26,028 | $ | 4,638 | $ | | $ | 4,638 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||
Australia |
13,287 | 6,260 | 7,027 | 1,933 | 5,094 | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brazil |
7,637 | 5,690 | 1,947 | 1,043 | 904 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||
South Africa |
2,969 | 2,293 | 676 | 329 | 347 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
3,026 | 3,200 | (174 | ) | 363 | (537 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Poland |
4,090 | 2,737 | 1,353 | 201 | 1,152 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
20,462 | 13,360 | 7,102 | (208 | ) | 7,310 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 82,137 | $ | 59,568 | $ | 22,569 | $ | 3,661 | $ | 18,908 | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
The increase in PLP-USA net sales of $4.6 million, or 18%, was primarily due to sales volume
increases of $2.8 million, sales mix increases of $2.3 million partially offset by lower average
sales prices when compared to 2009. International net sales for the three month period ended June
30, 2010, were favorably affected by $3.7 million when converted to U.S. dollars, as a result of
the U.S. dollar compared to certain weaker foreign currencies. The following discussions of
international net sales exclude the effect of currency translation. Australia net sales increased
$5.1 million, or 81%, as a result of higher sales volume of $4 million primarily related to the
Dulmison acquisition in December 2009 coupled with a $.6 million increase in sales related to
BlueSky, and higher energy sales volume. Brazil net sales increased $.9 million, or 16%, primarily
as a result of higher sales volume. South Africa net sales increased $.3 million, or 15%, as a
result of increased energy sales. Canada net sales decreased $.5 million, or 17%, due to lower
sales volume in their domestic markets primarily due to a one-time sales project in 2009. Poland
net sales increased $1.2 million, or 42%, due primarily to an increase in sales volume as a result
of an improvement in Polands overall economy. All Other net sales increased $7.3 million, or 55%,
due to an overall increase in sales volume coupled with an estimated $3.7 million in net sales
realized through the acquisition entered into in December 2009 reported in All Other.
18
Table of Contents
Gross profit. Gross profit of $27.5 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2010
increased $7.6 million, or 38%, compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding
the effect of currency translation, gross profit increased 32% as summarized in the following
table:
Three month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
due to | excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
currency | currency | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | translation | translation | change | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 9,729 | $ | 8,808 | $ | 921 | $ | | $ | 921 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||
Australia |
4,416 | 1,694 | 2,722 | 661 | 2,061 | 122 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brazil |
2,048 | 1,302 | 746 | 269 | 477 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||
South Africa |
1,461 | 901 | 560 | 162 | 398 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
1,357 | 1,435 | (78 | ) | 161 | (239 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Poland |
1,304 | 800 | 504 | 58 | 446 | 56 | ||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
7,140 | 4,910 | 2,230 | (38 | ) | 2,268 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 27,455 | $ | 19,850 | $ | 7,605 | $ | 1,273 | $ | 6,332 | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
PLP-USA gross profit of $9.7 million increased $.9 million compared to 2009. PLP-USA gross profit
increased $1.6 million due to higher sales partially offset by an increase in material costs.
International gross profit for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 was favorably impacted by
$1.3 million when local currencies were translated to U.S. dollars compared to 2009. The following
discussion of international gross profit excludes the effect of currency translation. The
Australia gross profit increase of $2.1 million was the result of $1.4 million from higher net
sales and a $.8 million improvement in manufacturing efficiencies partially offset by higher
material costs. Brazils gross profit increase of $.5 million was primarily the result of an
increase in sales volume of $.2 million coupled with an improvement in product margins. The South
Africa gross profit increase of $.4 million was a result of an increase in overall product margins
of $.3 million due primarily to better product mix compared to 2009, coupled with $.1 million from
higher net sales. Canadas gross profit decrease of $.2 million was a result of $.3 million from
lower sales volume partially offset by an improvement in product margins. Polands gross profit
increase of $.4 million was a result of $.5 million from higher sales volume coupled with an
improvement in manufacturing efficiencies of $.6 million partially offset by an increase in
material costs of $.7 million. The increase in All Other gross profit of $2.3 million was the
result of our legacy subsidiaries located in our All Other reportable segment contributed 60% of
the gross profit increase and our new locations acquired as part of the Dulmison acquisition in
December 2009 contributed the other 40% of the improvement in gross profit. The $1.3 million
improvement related in gross profit to our legacy subsidiaries located in our All Other reportable
segment increased $1.8 million due to higher net sales coupled with an improvement in manufacturing
efficiencies of $.1 million partially offset by an increase in material costs of $.6 million.
19
Table of Contents
Costs and expenses. Costs and expenses for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 increased
$5.8 million, or 39%, compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect
of currency translation, costs and expenses increased 34% as summarized in the following table:
Three month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
due to | excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
currency | currency | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | translation | translation | change | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 10,149 | $ | 7,753 | $ | 2,396 | $ | | $ | 2,396 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||
Australia |
2,525 | 1,293 | 1,232 | 392 | 840 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brazil |
1,604 | 1,217 | 387 | 216 | 171 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
South Africa |
481 | 417 | 64 | 51 | 13 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
505 | 388 | 117 | 60 | 57 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Poland |
745 | 650 | 95 | 26 | 69 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
4,530 | 3,027 | 1,503 | (9 | ) | 1,512 | 50 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 20,539 | $ | 14,745 | $ | 5,794 | $ | 736 | $ | 5,058 | 34 | % | ||||||||||||
PLP-USA costs and expenses increased $2.4 million due primarily to an increase in employee related
costs of $.6 million, acquisition related costs of $.4 million, an unfavorable change in the cash
surrender value of life insurance policies of $.3 million, a loss on foreign currency translations
of $.6 million, consulting costs of $.2 million, commissions of $.1 million and repairs and
maintenance of $.1 million. International costs and expenses for the three month period ended June
30, 2010 were unfavorably impacted by $.7 million when local currencies were translated to U.S.
dollars compared to 2009. The following discussions of international costs and expenses exclude
the effect of currency translation. Australia costs and expenses increased $.8 million primarily
due to an increase in personnel related costs and the addition of new employees related to the
December 2009 Dulmison acquisition coupled with higher consulting expenses. Brazil costs and
expenses increase of $.2 million related to an increase in personnel related costs due to the
addition of new employees and a new labor contract coupled with an increase in sales commissions,
advertising expenses and lower bad debt expense in 2009 due to the collection on customer accounts
previously considered questionable partially offset by lower research and engineering expenses.
South Africa costs and expenses remained relatively unchanged compared to 2009. Canada and Poland
costs and expenses both increased less than $.1 million primarily due to an increase in personnel
related costs. All Other costs and expenses increased $1.5 million primarily due to a $.8 million
loss on currency translation when converting balances from foreign currencies into U.S. dollars
coupled with additional costs and expenses related to the locations acquired in December 2009
located in the All Other category. The costs and expenses of our legacy locations located in the
All Other category remained relatively unchanged.
Other income. Other income for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 of $.4 million was $.2
million higher compared to 2009. Other income primarily increased $.5 million due to an unrealized
gain recognized as a result of revaluing our forward foreign exchange contract to fair value at
June 30, 2010. This forward foreign exchanged contract was entered into on June 7, 2010 to reduce
our exposure to foreign currency rate changes related to the purchase price of Electropar, which
closed on July 30, 2010. Also contributing to the increase in Other income was a $.1 million
increase related to our natural gas well located at our corporate headquarters property in Mayfield
Village, Ohio. Our increase in other income was offset by $.3 million due to an increase in
non-operational expenses related to our foreign jurisdictions.
Income taxes. Income taxes for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 of $1.2 million were $.5
million lower than 2009. The effective tax rate for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 was
16% compared to 33% in 2009. The effective tax rate for three month period ended June 30, 2010 is
lower than the statutory federal rate of 34% primarily due to increased foreign earnings in
jurisdictions with lower tax rates, a favorable tax incentive for technological innovation, and the
decrease of unrecognized tax benefits primarily due to settlement of audits.
20
Table of Contents
Net income. As a result of the preceding items, net income for the three month period ended June
30, 2010 was $6.1 million, compared to $3.5 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2009.
Excluding the effect of currency translation, net income increased $2.3 million as summarized in
the following table:
Three month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
due to | excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
currency | currency | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | translation | translation | change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 1,834 | $ | 1,094 | $ | 740 | $ | | $ | 740 | 68 | % | ||||||||||||
Australia |
560 | 62 | 498 | 69 | 429 | 692 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brazil |
702 | 51 | 651 | 68 | 583 | 1,143 | ||||||||||||||||||
South Africa |
642 | 304 | 338 | 71 | 267 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
489 | 616 | (127 | ) | 58 | (185 | ) | (30 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Poland |
424 | 123 | 301 | 24 | 277 | 225 | ||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
1,445 | 1,292 | 153 | (45 | ) | 198 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 6,096 | $ | 3,542 | $ | 2,554 | $ | 245 | $ | 2,309 | 65 | % | ||||||||||||
PLP-USA net income increased $.7 million as a result of an increase in other income of $.5 million
coupled with a decrease in income taxes of $1.3 million partially offset by a decrease in operating
income of $1 million. The following discussion of international net income excludes the effect of
currency translation. Australia net income increased $.4 million due primarily to the increase in
operating income of $.9 million partially offset by an increase in other income of $.3 million and
an increase in income taxes. Brazil net income increased $.6 million primarily as a result of the
increase in operating income of $.3 million coupled with a decrease in income taxes due to certain
technological tax incentives received. South Africa net income increased $.3 million primarily as
a result of the increase in operating income of $.4 million partially offset by an increase in
income taxes. Canada net income decreased $.2 million primarily as a result of the decrease in
operating income of $.3 million partially offset by a decrease in income taxes. Poland net income
increased $.3 million as a result of a $.4 million increase in operating income partially offset by
an increase in income taxes. All Other net income increased $.2 million primarily as a result of
the $.8 million increase in operating income offset by an increase in income taxes.
SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 COMPARED TO SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
The following table sets forth a summary of the Companys consolidated income statements for the
six month period ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009. The Companys past operating results are
not necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Six month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||
Thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | % Change | ||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 151,045 | $ | 118,262 | $ | 32,783 | 28 | % | ||||||||
Cost of products sold |
103,565 | 79,834 | 23,731 | 30 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
47,480 | 38,428 | 9,052 | 24 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit as percentage of net sales |
31 | % | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
39,233 | 29,511 | 9,722 | 33 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses as percentage of net sales |
26 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
8,247 | 8,917 | (670 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income |
641 | 653 | (12 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
8,888 | 9,570 | (682 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes as percentage of net sales |
6 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
1,758 | 3,311 | (1,553 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,130 | $ | 6,259 | $ | 871 | 14 | % | ||||||||
21
Table of Contents
Net Sales. For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, net sales were $151 million, an increase
of $32.8 million, or 28%, compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the
effect of currency translation, net sales increased 19% as summarized in the following table:
Six month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
due to | excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
currency | currency | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | translation | tranlation | change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 57,147 | $ | 54,699 | $ | 2,448 | $ | | $ | 2,448 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
Australia |
24,178 | 11,942 | 12,236 | 4,828 | 7,408 | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brazil |
16,264 | 10,882 | 5,382 | 2,944 | 2,438 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
South Africa |
5,780 | 4,147 | 1,633 | 1,007 | 626 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
5,614 | 5,555 | 59 | 782 | (723 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Poland |
7,403 | 5,695 | 1,708 | 750 | 958 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
34,659 | 25,342 | 9,317 | 286 | 9,031 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 151,045 | $ | 118,262 | $ | 32,783 | $ | 10,597 | $ | 22,186 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
The increase in PLP-USA net sales of $2.5 million, or 4%, was primarily due to sales volume
increases of $1.6 million, sales mix increases of $2.4 million primarily offset by lower average
sales prices compared to 2009. International net sales for the six month period ended June 30,
2010 were favorably affected by $10.6 million when converted to U.S. dollars, as a result of the
U.S. dollar compared to certain weaker foreign currencies. The following discussions of
international net sales exclude the effect of currency translation. Australia net sales increased
$7.4 million, or 62%, as a result of higher sales volume of which $6.6 million related to the
Dulmison acquisition in December 2009 coupled with an increase in sales related to BlueSky Energy
Ltd. Brazil net sales increased $2.4 million, or 22%, as a result of higher energy sales volume in
their markets. South Africa net sales increased $.6 million, or 15%, primarily as a result of
increased volume in energy sales. Canada net sales decreased $.7 million, or 13%, due to lower
sales volume in their markets coupled with a one-time sales project which was recognized in the
second quarter 2009. Poland net sales increased $1 million, or 17%, due primarily to an increase
in sales volume in the second quarter 2010 in their domestic markets due to an improvement in
Polands economy. All other net sales increased $9 million, or 36%, due to an increase in sales
volume coupled with an estimated $4.8 million in net sales realized through the acquisition entered
into in December 2009 reported in All Other.
Gross profit. Gross profit of $47.5 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 increased
$9.1 million, or 24%, compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect
of currency translation, gross profit increased 14% as summarized in the following table:
Six month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
due to | excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
currency | currency | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | translation | translation | change | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 16,321 | $ | 18,128 | $ | (1,807 | ) | $ | | $ | (1,807 | ) | (10 | )% | ||||||||||
Australia |
8,093 | 3,247 | 4,846 | 1,642 | 3,204 | 99 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brazil |
4,453 | 2,739 | 1,714 | 789 | 925 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||
South Africa |
2,745 | 1,644 | 1,101 | 471 | 630 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
2,441 | 2,402 | 39 | 340 | (301 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Poland |
2,214 | 1,741 | 473 | 211 | 262 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
11,213 | 8,527 | 2,686 | 128 | 2,558 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 47,480 | $ | 38,428 | $ | 9,052 | $ | 3,581 | $ | 5,471 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
22
Table of Contents
PLP-USA gross profit of $16.3 million decreased $1.8 million compared to 2009. PLP-USA gross
profit decreased primarily due to higher material costs. International gross profit for the six
month period ended June 30, 2010 were favorably impacted by $3.6 million when local currencies were
translated to U.S. dollars compared to 2009. The following discussion of international gross
profit excludes the effect of currency translation. The Australia gross profit increase of $3.2
million was the result of $2 million from higher net sales coupled with lower manufacturing labor
costs of $1.5 million, partially offset by an increase in material costs. Brazils gross profit
increase of $.9 million was primarily the result of $.6 million from higher net sales coupled with
an improvement in product margins. The South Africa gross profit increase of $.6 million was a
result of $.2 million from higher sales volume coupled with an improvement in product margins.
Canadas gross profit decrease of $.3 million was due to a decrease in sales volume. Polands
gross profit increase of $.3 million was a result of $.3 million from higher sales volume coupled
an improvement in manufacturing efficiencies partially offset by a $.2 million increase in material
costs. All Other gross profit improved $2.6 million compared to 2009. Approximately half of the
improvement in gross profit related to our new locations acquired in December 2009 as part of the
Dulmison acquisition. The rest of the improvement in All Other gross profit was due to higher
sales volume related to our other operations that are included in All Other.
Costs and expenses. Cost and expenses for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 increased $9
million, or 33%, compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the effect of
currency translation, costs and expenses increased 26% as summarized in the following table:
Six month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
due to | excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
currency | currency | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | translation | translation | change | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 19,768 | $ | 16,385 | $ | 3,383 | $ | | $ | 3,383 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||
Australia |
4,875 | 2,526 | 2,349 | 975 | 1,374 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brazil |
3,228 | 2,453 | 775 | 611 | 164 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
South Africa |
997 | 691 | 306 | 150 | 156 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
977 | 781 | 196 | 137 | 59 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Poland |
1,470 | 1,061 | 409 | 144 | 265 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
7,918 | 5,614 | 2,304 | 151 | 2,153 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 39,233 | $ | 29,511 | $ | 9,722 | $ | 2,168 | $ | 7,554 | 26 | % | ||||||||||||
PLP-USA costs and expenses increased $3.4 million primarily due to an increase in employee related
costs of $1.1 million, business acquisition/integration costs of $.9 million, a foreign currency
translation loss of $.5 million, repairs and maintenance of $.3 million, travel expenses of $.1
million, consulting costs of $.1 million, and $.1 million due to less bad debt recoveries.
International costs and expenses for the six month period ended June 20, 2010 were unfavorably
impacted by $2.2 million when local currencies were translated to U.S. dollars compared to 2009.
The following discussions of international costs and expenses exclude the effect of currency
translation. Australia costs and expenses increased $1.4 million primarily due to an increase in
personnel related costs, the addition of new employees related to the December 2009 Dulmison
acquisition and higher IT and consulting expenses. Brazil cost and expenses increased $.2 million
primarily due to higher personnel related costs related to additional employees and a new labor
contract coupled with an increase in advertising and travel expenses. South Africa cost and
expenses increased $.2 million primarily due to higher personnel related costs and administrative
expenses due to an increase in bad debt expense coupled with higher building maintenance costs.
Canada cost and expenses increased less than $.1 million due to higher personnel related costs
coupled with an increase in depreciation expense. Poland cost and expenses increased $.3 million
primarily due to higher personnel related costs coupled with higher commission expense. The
increase in All Other costs and expenses increased $2.2 million primarily due to the additional new
employees from our new locations acquired in December 2009.
23
Table of Contents
Other income. Other income for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 of $.8 million increased
$.2 million compared to 2009. As previously noted, Other income increased primarily due to an
unrealized gain recognized as a result of revaluing our forward foreign exchange contract to fair
value. This forward foreign exchanged contract was entered into on June 7, 2010 to reduce our
exposure to foreign currency rate changes related to the purchase price of Electropar, which closed
on July 30, 2010. The increase in Other income was partially offset by an increase in interest
expense at several of our foreign and domestic locations coupled with a $.3 million increase in
non-operational expenses related to our foreign jurisdictions.
Income taxes. Income taxes for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 of $1.8 million was $1.5
million lower than the same period in 2009. The effective tax rate for the six month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 was 20% and 35% respectively. The effective tax rate for the six month
period ended June 30, 2010 is lower than the statutory federal rate of 34% and the prior periods
rate of 35% primarily due to increased foreign earnings in jurisdictions with lower tax rates, a
favorable tax incentive for technological innovation, and the decrease of unrecognized tax benefits
primarily due to settlement of audits.
Net income. As a result of the preceding items, net income for the six month period ended June 30,
2010 was $7.1 million, compared to net income of $6.3 million for the six month period ended June
30, 2009. Excluding the effect of currency translation, net income increased $.3 million as
summarized in the following table:
Six month period ended June 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
due to | excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||
currency | currency | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | translation | translation | change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLP-USA |
$ | 805 | $ | 2,250 | $ | (1,445 | ) | $ | | $ | (1,445 | ) | (64 | )% | ||||||||||
Australia |
1,018 | 112 | 906 | 260 | 646 | 577 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brazil |
1,167 | 145 | 1,022 | 126 | 896 | 618 | ||||||||||||||||||
South Africa |
1,125 | 611 | 514 | 184 | 330 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
825 | 938 | (113 | ) | 114 | (227 | ) | (24 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Poland |
556 | 548 | 8 | 50 | (42 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
All Other |
1,634 | 1,655 | (21 | ) | (135 | ) | 114 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 7,130 | $ | 6,259 | $ | 871 | $ | 599 | $ | 272 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
PLP-USA net income decreased $1.4 million as a result of a $4.4 million decrease in operating
income partially offset by a decrease in income taxes of $2.6 million and an increase in other
income. The following discussion of international net income excludes the effect of currency
translation. Australia net income increased $.6 million due primarily to the increase in operating
income of $1.3 million partially offset by increases in other income (expense) of $.3 million and
income taxes of $.4 million. Brazil net income increased $.9 million primarily as a result of the
increase in operating income of $.7 million coupled with a decrease in income taxes of $.2 million.
South Africa net income increased $.3 million primarily as a result of the increase in operating
income of $.5 million partially offset by an increase in income taxes. Canada net income decreased
$.2 million primarily as a result of the decrease in operating income of $.3 million partially
offset by a decrease in income taxes. Poland net income remained relatively unchanged compared to
2009. All Other net income increased $.1 million primarily as a result of the $.6 million increase
in operating income partially offset by an increase in income taxes.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our critical accounting policies are consistent with the information set forth in Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in
our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and are, therefore, not presented herein.
24
Table of Contents
WORKING CAPITAL, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash decreased $2 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Net cash provided by
operating activities was $6.7 million primarily because of net income, non-cash adjustments, and an
increase in trade payables partially offset by an increase in accounts receivables, inventories,
income taxes payable and all other current assets/liabilities. The major investing and financing
uses of cash were $6.6 million in capital expenditures, $2.2 million in dividend payments and
payment of long term debt of $11.5 million offset by cash proceeds of $.2 million related to the
sale of property, plant and equipment and proceeds from debt borrowings of $11.9 million.
Net cash used in investing activities of $6.4 million represents an increase of $2.6 million when
compared to the cash used by investing activities in the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
During 2009, we received the remaining $.8 million from escrow related to the May 30, 2008 sale of
the SMP operations and paid an earnout of $.4 million to the sellers of Direct Power and Water
Company, originally purchased in March 2007. Capital expenditures increased $2.4 million in the
six month period ended June 30, 2010 when compared to 2009 due mostly to our facilities expansion
in Mexico, investment in solar panels at our Canadian operation and a software system
implementation at our Spanish operation.
Cash used in financing activities of $1.6 million represents an increase of $1 million when
compared to the cash used by financing activities in the six month period ended June 30, 2009. This
increase was primarily a result of $.5 million in net debt borrowings in 2010 compared to $1.3
million in net debt borrowings in 2009.
Our current ratio was 2.9 to 1 at June 30, 2010 and 3 to 1 at December 31, 2009. At June 30, 2010,
our unused balance under our main credit facility was $28.1 million and our bank debt to equity
percentage was 5%. Our main revolving credit agreement contains, among other provisions,
requirements for maintaining levels of working capital, net worth, and profitability. At June 30,
2010, we were in compliance with these covenants. We believe our future operating cash flows will
be more than sufficient to cover debt repayments, other contractual obligations, capital
expenditures and dividends. In addition, we believe our existing cash of $22.1 million, together
with our untapped borrowing capacity, provides substantial financial resources. If we were to
incur significant additional indebtedness, we expect to be able to meet liquidity needs under our
credit facilities. We do not believe we would increase our debt to a level that would have a
material adverse impact upon results of operations or financial condition.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB updated guidance included in FASB ASC 810-10, related to the consolidation
of variable interest entities. This guidance will require ongoing reassessments of whether an
enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. In addition, this updated
guidance amends the quantitative approach for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity. ASC 810-10 amends certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a
variable interest entity and adds additional reconsideration events for determining whether an
entity is a variable interest entity. Further, this guidance requires enhanced disclosures that
will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprises
involvement in a variable interest entity. This updated guidance is effective as of the beginning
of the first annual reporting period and interim reporting periods that begin after November 15,
2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial
statements or disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820).
This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to require
disclosure of the transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and a schedule for Level 3 that separately
identifies purchases, sales, issuances and settlements and requires more detailed disclosures
regarding valuation techniques and inputs. We adopted this new standard effective January 1, 2010
and it had no impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition
(Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues
Task Force (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for sales arrangements that include
multiple products or services by revising the criteria for when deliverables may be accounted for
separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically, this guidance establishes a selling price
hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is necessary to separately
account for each product or service. This hierarchy provides more options for establishing selling
price than existing guidance. ASU 2009-13 is required to be applied prospectively to new or
materially modified revenue arrangements in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect the adoption of ASU 2009-13 will have
on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and related disclosures; however no
effect is expected.
25
Table of Contents
ASU No. 2009-05 (ASC Topic 820), which amends Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Overall,
ASU No. 2009-13 (ASC Topic 605), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, ASU No. 2009-14 (ASC
Topic 985), Certain Revenue Arrangements that include Software Elements, and various other ASUs
No. 2009-2 through ASU No. 2010-19 which contain technical corrections to existing guidance or
affect guidance to specialized industries or entities were recently issued. These updates have no
current applicability to us or effect on the financial statements would not have been significant.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company operates manufacturing facilities and offices around the world and uses fixed and
floating rate debt to finance the Companys global operations. As a result, the Company is subject
to business risks inherent in non-U.S. activities, including political and economic uncertainty,
import and export limitations and market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. The Company believes the political and economic risks related to the
Companys international operations are mitigated due to the stability of the countries in which the
Companys largest international operations are located.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had a forward foreign currency contract with an exercise value of
$12.9 million maturing July 28, 2010 at a forward rate of
NZD $1.00=$.6632 USD. The Company
entered into this forward foreign exchange contract to reduce its exposure to foreign currency rate
changes related to the purchase price of Electropar which closed on July 30, 2010. The Company
does not hold derivatives for trading purposes.
The Company is exposed to market risk, including changes in interest rates. The Company is subject
to interest rate risk on its variable rate revolving credit facilities and term notes, which
consisted of borrowings of $8.1 million at June 30, 2010. A 100 basis point increase in the
interest rate would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $.1 million
for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
The Companys primary currency rate exposures are related to foreign denominated debt, intercompany
debt, forward exchange contracts, foreign denominated receivables and cash and short-term
investments. A hypothetical 10% change in currency rates would have a favorable/unfavorable impact
on fair values on such instruments of $3.5 million and on income before tax of $.1 million.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, were effective as of June 30, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management, the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these
actions will not materially affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
26
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There were no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 15, 2010.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On February 15, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized a plan to repurchase up to 200,000 shares
of Preformed Line Products Company. The repurchase plan does not have an expiration date. The
following table includes repurchases for the three month period ended June 30, 2010.
Total Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Shares Purchased as | Maximum Number of | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Part of Publicly | Shares that may yet be | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Announced Plans or | Purchased under the | |||||||||||||
Period (2010) | Purchased | per Share | Programs | Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
April |
| | 188,748 | 11,252 | ||||||||||||
May |
| | 188,748 | 11,252 | ||||||||||||
June |
| | 188,748 | 11,252 | ||||||||||||
Total |
|
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. (Removed and Reserved)
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
31.1 | Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer, Robert G. Ruhlman, pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|||
31.2 | Certifications of the Principal Financial Officer, Eric R. Graef, pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|||
32.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, Robert G. Ruhlman, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished. |
|||
32.2 | Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer, Eric R. Graef, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished. |
27
Table of Contents
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Cautionary Statement for Safe harbor Purposes Under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995
This Form 10-Q and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
contain forward-looking statements regarding the Companys and managements beliefs and
expectations. As a general matter, forward-looking statements are those focused upon future plans,
objectives or performance (as opposed to historical items) and include statements of anticipated
events or trends and expectations and beliefs relating to matters not historical in nature. Such
forward-looking statements are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to the Companys
operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are
beyond the Companys control. Such uncertainties and factors could cause the Companys actual
results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by such forward-looking
statements.
The following factors, among others, could affect the Companys future performance and cause
the Companys actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
forward-looking statements made in this report:
| The overall demand for cable anchoring and control hardware for electrical transmission
and distribution lines on a worldwide basis, which has a slow growth rate in mature markets
such as the United States (U.S.), Canada, and Western Europe; |
| The ability of our customers to raise funds needed to build the facilities their
customers require; |
| Technological developments that affect longer-term trends for communication lines such
as wireless communication; |
| The decreasing demands for product supporting copper-based infrastructure due to the
introduction of products using new technologies or adoption of new industry standards; |
| The Companys success at continuing to develop proprietary technology to meet or exceed
new industry performance standards and individual customer expectations; |
| The Companys success in strengthening and retaining relationships with the Companys
customers, growing sales at targeted accounts and expanding geographically; |
| The extent to which the Company is successful in expanding the Companys product line
into new areas; |
| The Companys ability to identify, complete and integrate acquisitions for profitable
growth; |
| The potential impact of consolidation, deregulation and bankruptcy among the Companys
suppliers, competitors and customers; |
| The relative degree of competitive and customer price pressure on the Companys
products; |
| The cost, availability and quality of raw materials required for the manufacture of
products; |
28
Table of Contents
| The effects of fluctuation in currency exchange rates upon the Companys reported
results from international operations, together with non-currency risks of investing in and
conducting significant operations in foreign countries, including those relating to
political, social, economic and regulatory factors; |
| Changes in significant government regulations affecting environmental compliances; |
| The telecommunication markets continued deployment of Fiber-to-the-Premises; |
| The Companys ability to obtain funding for future acquisitions; |
| The potential impact of the depressed housing market on the Companys ongoing
profitability and future growth opportunities; |
| The continued support by Federal, State, Local and Foreign Governments in incentive
programs for promoting renewable energy deployment; |
| Those factors described under the heading Risk Factors on page 13 of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 15, 2010. |
29
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
August 5, 2010 | /s/ Robert G. Ruhlman | |||
Robert G. Ruhlman | ||||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
August 5, 2010 | /s/ Eric R. Graef | |||
Eric R. Graef | ||||
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Finance (Principal Accounting Officer) |
30
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
31.1 | Certifications of the Principal Executive Officer, Robert G. Ruhlman, pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|||
31.2 | Certifications of the Principal Financial Officer, Eric R. Graef, pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|||
32.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, Robert G. Ruhlman, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished. |
|||
32.2 | Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer, Eric R. Graef, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished. |
31