PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS CO - Quarter Report: 2014 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

Commission file number: 0-31164

Preformed Line Products Company

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(440) 461-5200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of common shares outstanding as of August 1, 2014: 5,390,092.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

3

Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

4

Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

5

Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

6

Table of Contents

PREFORMED LINE PRODUCTS COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

In thousands, except share and per share data, unless specifically noted

NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Preformed Line Products Company and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “PLPC”) have been prepared in accordance with United States of America (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. However, in the opinion of management, these consolidated financial statements contain all estimates and adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, required to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2014.

The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2013 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 14, 2014 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

NOTE B – OTHER FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION

Inventories – net

Cost of inventories for certain material is determined using the last-in-first-out (LIFO) method and totaled approximately $25.9 million at June 30, 2014 and $25.1 million at December 31, 2013. An actual valuation of inventories under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of the year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must be based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these estimates are subject to change and may be different than the actual inventory levels and costs at the end of the year, interim results are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. During the three and six month period ended June 30, 2014, the net change in LIFO inventories resulted in a $.1 million benefit to Income before income taxes for each period. During the three and six month period ended June 30, 2013, the net change in LIFO inventories resulted in a $.2 million charge to Income before income taxes for each period.

Noncurrent inventory is included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

7

Table of Contents

Property, plant and equipment - net

Major classes of property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and were as follows:

Legal proceedings

From time to time, the Company may be subject to litigation incidental to its business. The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings that the Company believes would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

NOTE C – PENSION PLANS

The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the Plan. Net periodic benefit cost for this plan included the following components:

During the six month period ended June 30, 2014, $.4 million of contributions were made to the Plan. The Company presently anticipates contributing an additional $.2 million to fund the Plan in 2014.

8

Table of Contents

NOTE D – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (“AOCI”)

The following tables set forth the total changes in AOCI by component, net of tax:

NOTE E – COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share were computed by dividing Net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for each respective period. Diluted earnings per share were calculated by dividing Net income by the weighted-average of all potentially dilutive common stock that was outstanding during the periods presented.

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, 23,500 and 18,500 stock options, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per shares as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, no stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per shares as there were no stock options where the effect of the exercise would have been anti-dilutive.

9

Table of Contents

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, 59,739 and 12,066 restricted shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per shares as the effect of the exercise would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, 5,614 and 3,846 restricted shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per shares as the effect of the exercise would have been anti-dilutive.

NOTE F – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

The Company’s finite and indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of the following:

The aggregate amortization expense for other intangibles with finite lives for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 was $.4 million and $.8 million, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense for other intangibles with finite lives for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 was $.4 million and $.7 million, respectively. Amortization expense is estimated to be $.8 million for the remaining period of 2014, $1.3 million for 2015, $1.2 million for 2016, $1.2 million for 2017 and $1.1 million for 2018. The weighted-average remaining amortization period by intangible asset class is as follows: patents, 2 years; land use rights, 62.7 years; trademark, 11.1 years; technology, 17.3 years and customer relationships, 15.6 years.

The Company’s measurement date for its annual impairment test for goodwill is October 1st of each year. There were no indications of impairment during the six month period ended June 30, 2014. The Company performs its annual impairment test for goodwill utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology, market comparables, and an overall market capitalization reasonableness test in computing fair value by reporting unit. The Company then compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value to assess if goodwill has been impaired. Based on the assumptions as to growth, discount rates and the weighting used for each respective valuation methodology, results of the valuations could be significantly different. However, the Company believes that the methodologies and weightings used are reasonable and result in appropriate fair values of the reporting units.

The Company’s only intangible asset with an indefinite life is goodwill. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by segment, for the six month period ended June 30, 2014, are as follows:

The additions to goodwill relate to the acquisition of Helix Uniformed Limited on January 31, 2014.

10

Table of Contents

NOTE G – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The 1999 Stock Option Plan

Activity in the Company’s 1999 Stock Option Plan for the six month period ended June 30, 2014 was as follows:

There were 900 and 10,900 stock options exercised during the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was less than $.1 million and $.3 million, respectively. Cash received for the exercise of stock options during the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was less than $.1 million and $.5 million, respectively. Excess tax benefits from share-based awards for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $0 and $.1 million, respectively.

For the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded no compensation expense related to stock options for either period as all options are fully vested.

Long Term Incentive Plan of 2008

Under the Preformed Line Products Company Long Term Incentive Plan of 2008 (the “LTIP”), certain employees, officers, and directors are eligible to receive awards of options, restricted shares and restricted share units. The purpose of this LTIP is to give the Company a competitive advantage in attracting, retaining, and motivating officers, employees and directors and to provide an incentive to those individuals to increase shareholder value through long-term incentives directly linked to the Company’s performance. The total number of Company common shares reserved for awards under the LTIP is 900,000. Of the 900,000 common shares, 800,000 common shares have been reserved for restricted share units and 100,000 common shares have been reserved for stock options. The LTIP expires on April 17, 2018.

Restricted Share Units

For all of the participants except the CEO, a portion of the restricted share units (RSUs) is subject to time-based cliff vesting and a portion is subject to vesting based upon the Company’s performance over a three year period. All of the CEO’s RSUs are subject to vesting based upon the Company’s performance over a three year period.

The RSUs are offered at no cost to the employees; however, the participant must remain employed with the Company until the restrictions on the RSUs lapse. The fair value of RSUs is based on the market price of a common share on the grant date. The Company currently estimates that no RSUs will be forfeited. Dividends declared are accrued in cash.

11

Table of Contents

A summary of the RSUs for the six month period ended June 30, 2014 is as follows:

For time-based RSUs, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award in General and administrative expense in the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Income. Compensation expense related to the time-based RSUs for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 was $.1 million and $.2 million, respectively. Compensation expense related to the time-based RSUs for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 was $.1 million for each period. As of June 30, 2014, there was $.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to time-based RSUs that is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining period of approximately 1.9 years.

For the performance-based RSUs, the number of RSUs in which the participants will vest depends on the Company’s level of performance measured by growth in pretax income and sales growth over a requisite performance period. Depending on the extent to which the performance criterions are probable of being satisfied under the LTIP, the participants are eligible to earn common shares over the vesting period. Performance-based compensation expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2014 was income of $.1 million. The performance-based compensation expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2014 was $.4 million. During the three month period ended June 30, 2014, a $.9 million reduction in performance-based compensation expense was recorded related to the 2013 performance-based RSU grant, due to changes in estimates for growth in pretax income. Performance-based compensation expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 was $.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, the remaining performance-based RSUs compensation expense of $3.5 million is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately 2 years.

The excess tax benefits from RSUs for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $.2 million and $0, respectively.

In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the LTIP), vesting of the RSUs will be accelerated and all restrictions will lapse. Unvested performance-based awards are based on a maximum potential payout. Actual shares awarded at the end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential payout level depending on achievement of performance-based award objectives.

To satisfy the vesting of its RSU awards, the Company has issued new shares from its authorized but unissued shares. Any additional granted awards will also be issued from the Company’s authorized but unissued shares. Under the LTIP, there are 384,398 common shares currently available for additional RSU grants.

Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company maintains a trust, commonly referred to as a rabbi trust, in connection with the Company’s deferred compensation plan. This plan allows for two deferrals. First, Directors make elective deferrals of Director fees payable and held in the rabbi trust. The deferred compensation plan allows the Directors to elect to receive Director fees in common shares of the Company at a later date instead of fees paid each quarter in cash. Second, this plan allows certain Company employees to defer LTIP restricted shares or RSUs for future distribution in the form of common shares. Assets of the rabbi trust are consolidated, and the value of the Company’s stock held in the rabbi trust is classified in Shareholders’ equity and generally accounted for in a manner similar to treasury stock. The Company recognizes the original amount of the deferred compensation (fair value of the deferred stock award at the date of grant) as the basis for recognition in common shares issued to the rabbi trust. Changes in the fair value of amounts owed to certain employees or Directors are not recognized as the Company’s deferred compensation plan does not permit diversification and must be settled by the delivery of a fixed number of the Company’s common shares. As of June 30, 2014, 249,557 shares have been deferred and are being held by the rabbi trust.

12

Table of Contents

Share Option Awards

The LTIP plan permits the grant of 100,000 options to buy common shares of the Company to certain employees at not less than fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. At June 30, 2014 there were 40,000 shares remaining available for issuance under the LTIP. Options issued to date under the Plan vest 50% after one year following the date of the grant, 75% after two years, and 100% after three years and expire from five to ten years from the date of grant. Shares issued as a result of stock option exercises will be funded with the issuance of new shares.

The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating fair values of options. The Black-Scholes model requires assumptions regarding the volatility of the Company’s stock, the expected life of the stock award and the Company’s dividend yield. The Company utilizes historical data in determining these assumptions. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. zero coupon Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant. Forfeitures have been estimated to be zero.

There were 17,000 and 0 options granted for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

The fair value for the stock options granted in 2014 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Activity in the Company’s LTIP plan for the six month period ended June 30, 2014 was as follows:

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2014 was $25.79. There were 1,250 and 9,250 stock options exercised during the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was less than $.1 million and $.3 million, respectively. Cash received for the exercise of stock options during the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $.1 million and $.4 million, respectively.

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded compensation expense related to the stock options currently vesting of $.1 million and $.2 million, respectively. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded compensation expense related to the stock options currently vesting of less than $.1 million for each period. The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized at June 30, 2014 is expected to be a combined total of $.4 million over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.2 years.

13

Table of Contents

NOTE H – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The carrying value of the Company’s current financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, and short-term debt, approximates its fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. At June 30, 2014, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated using discounted cash flows analysis, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements which are considered to be level two inputs. There have been no transfers in or out of level two for the six month period ended June 30, 2014. Based on the analysis performed, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates its’ carrying value as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

NOTE I – RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In March 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-05, “Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity.” ASU 2013-05 clarifies the applicable guidance for the release of the cumulative translation adjustment under current U.S. GAAP by emphasizing that the accounting for the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income for sales or transfers of a controlling financial interest within a foreign entity is the same irrespective of whether the sale or transfer is of a subsidiary or a group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or business. When a reporting entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity, the parent is required to apply the guidance in Subtopic 830-30 to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. The amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years (and interim reporting periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company adopted the guidance in the first quarter of 2014 and it did not have an effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.

NOTE J – NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS TO BE ADOPTED

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity”, or ASU 2014-08. ASU 2014-08 changes the criteria for reporting a discontinued operation. Under the new pronouncement, a disposal of a part of an organization that has a major effect on its operations and financial results is a discontinued operation. The Company is required to adopt ASU 2014-08 prospectively for all disposals or components of the business classified as held for sale during fiscal period beginning after December 15, 2014 and is currently evaluating what impact, if any, its adoption will have to the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” or ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue in a matter that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, the amendment provides five steps that an entity should apply when recognizing revenue. The amendment also specifies the accounting of some costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and expands the disclosure requirements around contracts with customers. An entity can either adopt this amendment retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with cumulative effect of initially applying the update recognized at the date of initial application. The amendment is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating what impact, if any, its adoption will have to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

14

Table of Contents

NOTE K – SEGMENT INFORMATION

The following tables present a summary of the Company’s reportable segments for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Financial results for the PLP-USA segment include the elimination of all segments’ intercompany profit in inventory.

NOTE L – INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate was 33% and 40% for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively and 33% and 36% for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three month period ended June 30, 2014 is lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to increased earnings in jurisdictions with lower tax rates than the U.S. federal statutory rate where such earnings are permanently reinvested. The lower effective tax rate for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 compared with the same periods for 2013 was primarily related to the Company’s decision in 2013 not to recognize the tax benefit attributable to operating losses in certain foreign jurisdictions.

The Company provides valuation allowances against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. No significant changes to the valuation allowance were reflected for the period ended June 30, 2014.

15

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2014, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $.6 million with no significant changes during the period ended June 30, 2014. The Company does not anticipate any material changes to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

NOTE M – PRODUCT WARRANTY RESERVE

The Company records an accrual for estimated warranty costs to Costs of products sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income. These amounts are recorded in Accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company records and accounts for its warranty reserve based on specific claim incidents. Should the Company become aware of a specific potential warranty claim for which liability is probable and reasonably estimable, a specific charge is recorded and accounted for accordingly. Adjustments are made quarterly to the accruals as claim information changes.

The following is a rollforward of the product warranty reserve:

NOTE N – BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

On January 31, 2014, the Company acquired Helix Uniformed Limited (Helix), located in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. From an accounting perspective, the acquisition is not considered material. The acquisition of Helix will diversify the Company’s business in Canada, expand its manufacturing footprint and enhance its engineering capabilities locally. The results of Helix are included in The Americas reportable segment. The values related to the acquisition are preliminary and subject to final opening balance sheet adjustments.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to help the readers of our financial statements better understand our results of operations, financial condition and present business environment. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

The MD&A is organized as follows:

16

Table of Contents

OVERVIEW

Preformed Line Products Company (the “Company”, “PLPC”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) was incorporated in Ohio in 1947. We are an international designer and manufacturer of products and systems employed in the construction and maintenance of overhead and underground networks for the energy, telecommunication, cable operators, information (data communication), and other similar industries. Our primary products support, protect, connect, terminate, and secure cables and wires. We also provide solar hardware systems and mounting hardware for a variety of solar power applications. Our goal is to continue to achieve profitable growth as a leader in the innovation, development, manufacture, and marketing of technically advanced products and services related to energy, communications, and cable systems and to take advantage of this leadership position to sell additional quality products in familiar markets. We have 19 sales and manufacturing operations in 15 different countries.

We report our segments in four geographic regions: PLP-USA (including Corporate), The Americas (includes operations in North and South America without PLP-USA), EMEA (Europe, Middle East & Africa) and Asia-Pacific in accordance with accounting standards codified in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 280, Segment Reporting. Each segment distributes a full range of our primary products. Our PLP-USA segment is comprised of our U.S. operations manufacturing our traditional products primarily supporting our domestic energy and telecommunications products. Our other three segments, The Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific, support our energy, telecommunications, data communication, and solar products in each respective geographical region.

The segment managers responsible for each region report directly to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, who is the chief operating decision maker, and are accountable for the financial results and performance of the entire segment for which they are responsible. The business components within each segment are managed to maximize the results of the entire company rather than the results of any individual business component of the segment.

We evaluate segment performance and allocate resources based on several factors primarily based on sales and net income.

PREFACE

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Our discussions of the financial results include non-GAAP measures (e.g., foreign currency impact) to provide additional information concerning our financial results and provide information that we believe is useful to the readers of our financial statements in the assessment of our performance and operating trends.

Our financial statements are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. As foreign currencies weaken against the U.S. dollar, our revenues and costs decrease as the foreign currency-denominated financial statements translate into fewer dollars. On average, foreign currencies weakened against the U.S. dollar in the first half of 2014. The most significant currencies that contributed to this movement were the South African rand, the Brazilian real and the Australian dollar. On a reportable segment basis, the unfavorable impact of foreign currency on net sales and net income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, was as follows:

For the three month period ended June 30, 2014, net sales of $100 million decreased $11.7 million, or 11%, compared to 2013. Excluding the effect of currency translation, net sales decreased 9%. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit decreased from 33.6% of net sales to 31.1% of net sales. Excluding the effect of currency translation, gross profit of $31.2 million decreased $5.9 million, or 16%, compared to 2013. Costs and expenses of $23.6 million decreased $3.5 million. Excluding the effect of translation, costs and expenses decreased $3.1 million compared to 2013. Operating income for the three month period ended June 30, 2014 was $7.6 million, a decrease of $2.9 million compared to 2013. The unfavorable effect of currency translation of the preceding factors had a negligible effect on operating income compared to 2013. Net income for the three month period ended June 30, 2014 of $5.1 million decreased $1.3 million compared to 2013.

17

Table of Contents

For the six month period ended June 30, 2014, net sales of $189.9 million decreased $20.5 million, or 10%, compared to 2013. The fluctuations of foreign currencies during the six month period ended June 30, 2014 had an unfavorable impact on net sales of $6.2 million as compared to 2013. Excluding the impact of currency translation of $6.2 million, sales decreased 7% compared to 2013. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit was 30.8% and 32.7% for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Excluding the unfavorable effect of currency translation of $1.6 million, gross profit of $58.6 million decreased $8.6 million. Costs and expenses of $46.8 million decreased $4.7 million. Excluding the effect of translation, costs and expenses decreased $3.3 million. Operating income for the six month period ended June 30, 2014 of $11.8 million decreased $5.5 million compared to 2013. The effect of currency translation was negligible on operating income. Net income for the six month period ended June 30, 2014 of $7.8 million decreased $3.5 million compared to 2013. The effect of currency translation was negligible on net income.

The global political and economic conditions continue to impact the building of new transmission lines throughout the world but our financial condition continues to remain strong despite the continued uncertainties in Europe and reduced growth in areas of the Asia-Pacific segment. Despite the current global economy, we believe our business fundamentals are sound and that we are strategically well-positioned as we remain focused on managing costs, increasing sales volumes and delivering value to our customers. We have continued to invest in the business to improve efficiency, develop new products, increase our capacity and become an even stronger supplier to our customers. We currently have a bank debt to equity ratio of 13.3% and can borrow needed funds at an attractive interest rate under our credit facility.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 COMPARED TO THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s Statement of Consolidated Income and the percentage of net sales for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The Company’s past operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.