PREMIER BIOMEDICAL INC - Quarter Report: 2014 September (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________.

Commission File Number: 000-54563

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (814) 786-8849

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Applicable only to issuers involved in bankruptcy proceedings during the preceding five years:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ¨ No ¨

Applicable only to corporate issuers:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of November 14, 2014, there were 21,757,175 shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value, issued and outstanding.

PREMIER BIOMEDICAL, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

This Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions, and on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations set forth under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements also include statements in which words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “consider” or similar expressions are used.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our future results and shareholder values may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1. Financial Statements.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business

Premier Biomedical, Inc. (“the Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 10, 2010 (“Inception”). The Company was formed to develop and market medications and procedures that address a significant number of the most highly visible health issues currently affecting mankind. The Company will market these medications and procedures to leading worldwide pharmaceutical firms via publication in medical journals and by direct contact.

These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein.

Development Stage Company

The Company is currently considered a development stage company as defined by FASB ASC 915-10-05. As a development stage enterprise, the Company discloses the deficit accumulated during the development stage and the cumulative statements of operations and cash flows from inception to the current balance sheet date. An entity remains in the development stage until such time as, among other factors, revenues have been realized. To date, the development stage of the Company’s operations consists of developing the business model and marketing concepts.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents 

The Company maintains cash balances in non-interest-bearing accounts, which do not currently exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Patent Rights and Applications

Patent rights and applications costs include the acquisition costs and costs incurred for the filing of patents. Patent rights and applications are amortized on a straight-line basis over the legal life of the patent rights beginning at the time the patents are approved. Patent costs for unsuccessful patent applications are expensed when the application is terminated.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments 

Under FASB ASC 820-10-05, the Financial Accounting Standards Board establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement reaffirms that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements as reflected herein. The carrying amounts of cash, prepaid expenses and accrued expenses reported on the balance sheet are estimated by management to approximate fair value primarily due to the short term nature of the instruments.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share 

The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss adjusted on an “as if converted” basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities. For the periods presented, potential dilutive securities had an anti-dilutive effect and were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Stock-Based Compensation

Under FASB ASC 718-10-30-2, all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recognized $312,830 of stock based compensation expense, consisting of $49,751 related to common stock warrants issued for services, and $263,079 of compensation expense related to common stock and common stock subscriptions payable issued for services. During the comparative nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recognized $3,520,854 of stock based compensation expense, consisting of $262,904 related to common stock warrants issued for services, and $3,257,950 of compensation expense related to common stock issued for services, including $2,965,000 attributed to the fair value of stock sold to related parties in excess of the proceeds received.

Revenue Recognition

Sales on fixed price contracts are recorded when services are earned, the earnings process is complete or substantially complete, and the revenue is measurable and collectability is reasonably assured. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The Company defers any revenue from sales in which payment has been received, but the earnings process has not occurred. Sales have not yet commenced.

Advertising and Promotion

All costs associated with advertising and promoting products are expensed as incurred. These expenses were $150,821 and $5,482 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for significant deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not, that such asset will not be recovered through future operations.

Uncertain Tax Positions

In accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), the Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be capable of withstanding examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. These standards prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. These standards also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

Various taxing authorities periodically audit the Company’s income tax returns. These audits include questions regarding the Company’s tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income to various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposures connected with these various tax filing positions, including state and local taxes, the Company records allowances for probable exposures. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which an allowance has been established, is audited and fully resolved. The Company has not yet undergone an examination by any taxing authorities.

The assessment of the Company’s tax position relies on the judgment of management to estimate the exposures associated with the Company’s various filing positions.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation, to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11: Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.The new guidance requires that unrecognized tax benefits be presented on a net basis with the deferred tax assets for such carryforwards. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not expect the adoption of the new provisions to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 2 – Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has no revenues and incurred net losses from operations, resulting in an accumulated deficit of $7,549,289 as of September 30, 2014. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management is actively pursuing new ventures to increase revenues. In addition, the Company is currently seeking additional sources of capital to fund short term operations. The Company, however, is dependent upon its ability to secure equity and/or debt financing and there are no assurances that the Company will be successful; therefore, without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of any uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements also do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 – Related Parties

Accounts Payable

The Company owed $4,479 and $37,690 as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, to an entity owned by the Chairman of the Board of Directors. The amounts are related to patent costs paid by the Chairman on behalf of the Company.

The Company owed $467 and $2,182 as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, to the Company’s CEO for reimbursable expenses.

The Company owed $13,765 and $-0- as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, to one of the Company’s Board of Directors for reimbursable expenses.

Notes Payable

From time to time, the Company has received short term loans from officers and directors as disclosed in Note 6 below.

Common Stock

On September 25, 2013, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to a director in exchange for proceeds of $50,000. Board of director compensation expense of $650,000 was recognized due to the fair value of the shares in excess of the $0.05 per share purchase price.

On February 27, 2013, the Company sold 500,000 shares of its common stock to the Chairman of the Board of Directors in exchange for proceeds of $25,000. Board of director compensation expense of $365,000 was recognized due to the fair value of the shares in excess of the $0.05 per share purchase price.

On February 20, 2013, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to a director in exchange for proceeds of $50,000. Board of director compensation expense of $780,000 was recognized due to the fair value of the shares in excess of the $0.05 per share purchase price.

On February 20, 2013, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of its common stock to a director in exchange for proceeds of $75,000. Board of director compensation expense of $1,170,000 was recognized due to the fair value of the shares in excess of the $0.05 per share purchase price.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On June 8, 2012, the Company sold 6,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $2,100 to one of the Company’s directors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On January 20, 2011, the Company sold 500,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share in exchange for proceeds of $5 to a newly appointed director. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, May 10, 2010, through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The shares issued carried a total fair value of $160, or $0.00032 per share using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

On June 21, 2010, the Company sold 3,000,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share, at a fair value of $960, or $0.00032 per share, along with warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance and warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 to the Company’s CEO. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, May 10, 2010, through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The fair value of the common stock issuance to the founder using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

The total fair value of the warrant issuances to the founder using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is as follows:

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On June 21, 2010, the Company sold 3,000,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share, and an intrinsic value of $960, or $0.00032 per share, along with warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance and warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 to the Company’s Chairman of the Board. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, May 10, 2010, through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The fair value of the common stock issuance to the founder using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

The total fair value of the warrant issuances to the founder using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is as follows:

On June 21, 2010, the Company sold a total of 4,000,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share in exchange for total proceeds of $40 to four of the Company’s directors. The shares issued carried a total fair value of $1,280, or $0.00032 per share using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, May 10, 2010, through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The fair value of the common stock issuances to the founders using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

Common Stock Warrants

On October 1, 2012, the Company granted 1,000,000 common stock warrants to each of two directors to purchase a total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for services provided above and beyond their services as directors. The warrants are fully vested, and are exercisable over seven (7) years from the date of grant. The total fair value of the 2,000,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $1,321,496, or $0.6608 per share, based on a volatility rate of 100%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.39% and an expected term of 3.5 years, and was expensed as professional fee expense during the year ended December 31, 2012.

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted common stock warrants to the Company’s CEO pursuant to the commencement of an employment agreement to purchase a total of 105,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for his services as an officer. In December 2012, the Company and our CEO agreed to terminate his employment agreement, effective as of its date of inception. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vested on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. The fair value of the 105,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $74,798, or $0.7315 per share, based on a 76% discount using a 24% probability that the triggering event would be satisfied, a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. The Company recognized $11,644 and $6,773 of amortization recorded to professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully amortized by December 31, 2013.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted common stock warrants to the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors pursuant to the commencement of an employment agreement to purchase a total of 105,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for his services as the Chairman of the Board. In December 2012, the Company and Dr. Felder agreed to terminate his employment agreement, effective as of its date of inception. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vested on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. The fair value of the 105,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $74,798, or $0.7315 per share, based on a 76% discount using a 24% probability that the triggering event would be satisfied, a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. The Company recognized $11,644 and $6,773 of amortization recorded to professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully amortized by December 31, 2013.

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted 50,000 common stock warrants to each of nine directors to purchase a total of 450,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share over a seven year period from the grant date for their services as directors. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vested on June 15, 2013. The total fair value of the 450,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $320,564, or $0.7315 per share, based on a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. The Company recognized a total of $202,675 and $117,889 of amortization recorded to professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully amortized by December 31, 2013.

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted 70,000 common stock warrants to each of three directors to purchase a total of 210,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for services provided above and beyond their services as directors. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vested on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 505-50, non-employee stock based compensation awards are re-measured at each period. The total fair value of the 210,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $133,788, or $0.6371 per share as of December 31, 2012, based on a 76% discount using a 24% probability that the triggering event would be satisfied, a volatility rate of 88%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.18% and an expected term of 7 years. The Company recognized a total of $25,317 and $11,811 of professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully expensed by December 31, 2013.

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted common stock warrants to one of the directors to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for services provided above and beyond their service as a director. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013 and the remaining 50% vested on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. The total fair value of the 70,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $49,865, or $0.7315 per share, based on a 76% discount using a 24% probability that the triggering event would be satisfied, a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. The Company recognized $7,764 and $4,515 of professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully amortized by December 31, 2013.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 4 – Patent Rights and Applications

The Company amortizes its patent rights and applications on a straight line basis over the expected useful technological or economic life of the patents, which is typically 17 years from the legal approval of the patent applications. As of January 1, 2013, the Company has elected to expense all of their patent rights and application costs due to difficulties associated with having to prove the value of their future economic benefits. All patent applications are currently pending and the Company has no patents that have yet been approved. It is the Company’s policy that it performs reviews of the carrying value of its patent rights and applications on an annual basis. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company performed reviews of the carrying value of its patent rights and applications and, as a result, the Company wrote off a total book value of $31,774 and $14,817, respectively, in patent rights and applications related to discontinued pursuit of international patents, and due to the uncertainty of deriving a future economic benefit from our patents.

Note 5 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10 upon inception at May 10, 2010. Under FASB ASC 820-10-5, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The standard outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures. Under GAAP, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, and FASB ASC 820-10-50 details the disclosures that are required for items measured at fair value.

The Company has certain financial instruments that must be measured under the new fair value standard. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following schedule summarizes the valuation of financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheets as of September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013:

The fair values of our related party debts are deemed to approximate book value, and are considered Level 2 inputs as defined by ASC Topic 820-10-35.

There were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputs for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, or the year ended December 31, 2013.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 6 – Notes Payable, Related Parties

Notes payable, related parties consist of the following at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively:

The Company recorded interest expense in the amount of $29,321 and $279 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and imputed interest expense in the amount of $134 and $660 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively related to notes payable, related parties.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies

On May 9, 2012, the Company entered into a Collaborative Agreement with the University of Texas at El Paso. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company will work jointly with the University to develop a series of research and development programs around its sequential-dialysis technology in the areas of Alzheimer's Disease, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Chronic Pain Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Multiple Sclerosis, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig's disease), Blood Sepsis, Cancer, Heart Attacks and Strokes. The programs will utilize the facilities at one or more of the University of Texas’ campuses. The Company will pay the University’s actual overhead for the projects, plus a negotiated facility and administration overhead expense, and 10% of all gross revenues associated with the sale, license and/or royalties of all products and treatment procedures directly affiliated with programs. Intellectual property jointly invented and developed as a result of the projects will be owned jointly by the University and the Company. The agreement has an initial term of five (5) years, and is renewable upon mutual agreement of the parties.

Note 8 – Equity Line of Credit

On January 17, 2014, the Company’s registration statement became effective whereby it registered 15 million shares of common stock that it would sell to Kodiak Capital Group, LLC (“Kodiak”) over time pursuant to an Investment Agreement entered into on December 5, 2013 wherein Kodiak agreed to invest up to five million dollars ($5,000,000). The offering was to terminate on the earlier of (i) when all 15 million shares are sold, (ii) when the maximum offering amount of $5,000,000 has been achieved, or (iii) on January 17, 2016, unless the Company terminated it earlier. The investment Agreement included a termination date of July 17, 2014, but on July 9, 2014 it was extended to run through July 17, 2015. On October 16, 2014, we exercised our right to terminate the contract upon written notice to Kodiak.

The Company could not submit a new put notice until after the closing of the previous notice. The purchase price for the shares pursuant to the put notice was to be equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the lowest closing best bid price of the common stock during the five consecutive trading days immediately following the date of our notice to Kodiak (“Put Notice”) of our election to put shares pursuant to the Investment Agreement, subject to a limitation, whereby Kodiak’s holdings could not exceed 9.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock. The shares had to be paid for and share certificates delivered within the “pricing period,” which was five (5) trading days from the date the put notice is delivered (“Put Date”).

On October 15, 2013, the Company paid to Kodiak an initial fee of $10,000 and issued 391,398 shares of common stock following execution of the Agreement, along with the issuance of another 167,742 shares to Manners, Inc. as commitment fees. In addition, the Company agreed to pay a consulting firm, Cambridge Partners Atlanta Group, LLC (“Cambridge”), an introduction fee payable as follows: (i) ten percent (10%) of the first $1,000,000 in total draws, (ii) seven percent (7%) on the draws from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000; and (iii) five percent (5%) on all draws in excess of $1,500,000. Cambridge was entitled to these introduction fees on all proceeds received from Kodiak until the termination date of the consulting agreement, which was September 26, 2015 until we exercised our right to terminate the contract on October 16, 2014.

The Company used the proceeds from the sale of common stock pursuant to the agreement to pay down debt, research and development activities, general corporate and working capital purposes, and for other purposes that the board of directors deems to be in the best interest of the Company.

As of the date of this report, the Company had sold a total of 2,022,894 shares of common stock in exchange for total proceeds of $700,000 pursuant to the investment agreement, in addition to the initial issuance of 559,140 common shares as a commitment fee.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9 – Stockholders’ Equity

Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A

The Company has 10,000,000 authorized shares of Preferred Stock, of which 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) have been designated. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time after the issuance of such share into one (1) fully paid and non-assessable share of Common Stock. Each outstanding share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to one hundred (100) votes per share on all matters to which the shareholders of the Corporation are entitled or required to vote. The Company shall reserve and keep available out of its authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock such number of shares sufficient to effect the conversions. No shares of Series A Preferred Stock have been granted to date.

Common Stock

The Company has 300,000,000 authorized shares of $0.00001 par value Common Stock.

Common Stock (2014)

On September 13, 2014, the Company granted 15,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $2,250 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On August 12, 2014, the Company granted 75,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $12,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On June 19, 2014, the Company granted 100,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $42,400 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On May 8, 2014, we sold 588,235 shares of our common stock to Kodiak in exchange for proceeds of $100,000 pursuant to our fifth Put Notice under our equity line of credit as delivered on April 30, 2014.

On April 10, 2014, we sold 211,641 shares of our common stock to Kodiak in exchange for proceeds of $100,000 pursuant to our fourth Put Notice under our equity line of credit as delivered on April 2, 2014.

On April 3, 2014, the Company granted 50,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $40,500 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On March 19, 2014, the Company granted 100,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $70,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The shares were subsequently issued on April 17, 2014.

On March 14, 2014, we sold 181,819 shares of our common stock to Kodiak in exchange for proceeds of $100,000 pursuant to our third Put Notice under our equity line of credit as delivered on March 6, 2014.

On March 7, 2014, the Company granted 15,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $15,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On February 24, 2014, we sold 374,532 shares of our common stock to Kodiak in exchange for proceeds of $250,000 pursuant to our second Put Notice under our equity line of credit as delivered on February 12, 2014.

On February 20, 2014, a warrant holder elected to exercise warrants consisting of 10,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to a unit offering previously sold on March 11, 2013 in exchange for proceeds of $7,500.

On February 12, 2014, a warrant holder elected to exercise warrants consisting of 5,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to a unit offering previously sold on February 20, 2013 in exchange for proceeds of $3,750.

On February 10, 2014, the Company granted 18,462 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $12,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On February 3, 2014, we sold 666,667 shares of our common stock to Kodiak in exchange for proceeds of $150,000 pursuant to our first Put Notice under our equity line of credit as delivered on January 25, 2014.

Common Stock (2013)

On December 19, 2013, the Company granted 200,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $140,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On December 17, 2013, the Company granted 150,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $100,500 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On October 31, 2013, the Company granted 10,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $7,400 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On October 31, 2013, the Company granted 25,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $18,500 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On October 17, 2013, the Company granted 200,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $140,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On October 15, 2013, the Company granted 391,398 shares of common stock to Kodiak Capital Group, LLC as a commitment fee for a potential future financing. The total fair value of the common stock was $246,581 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On October 15, 2013, the Company granted 167,742 shares of common stock to Manners, Inc. as a commitment fee for a potential future financing by Kodiak Capital Group, LLC. The total fair value of the common stock was $105,678 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On September 25, 2013, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to a director in exchange for proceeds of $50,000. Board of director compensation expense of $650,000 was recognized due to the fair value of the shares in excess of the $0.05 per share purchase price.

On September 25, 2013, the Company granted 300,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $210,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On July 19, 2013, the Company issued a total of 20,000 shares of its common stock that were sold on June 27, 2013 pursuant to warrant exercises amongst seven investors in exchange for total proceeds of $2,000.

On July 15, 2013, the Company granted 50,000 shares of common for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $46,500 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On various dates between July 2, 2013 and July 25, 2013, the Company issued a total of 61,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to warrant exercises at $0.50 per share amongst eight investors in exchange for total proceeds of $30,500.

On various dates between July 6, 2013 and July 25, 2013, the Company issued a total of 161,200 shares of its common stock pursuant to warrant exercises at $0.10 per share amongst twenty one investors in exchange for total proceeds of $16,120.

On July 3, 2013, the Company issued a total of 35,000 shares of its common stock that were sold on June 21, 2013 pursuant to warrant exercises amongst seven investors in exchange for total proceeds of $3,500.

On June 27, 2013, two warrant holders elected to exercise warrants consisting of a total of 20,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to unit offerings previously sold on February 28, 2011, in exchange for total proceeds of $2,000. The shares were subsequently issued on July 19, 2013.

On June 21, 2013, a total of seven warrant holders elected to exercise warrants consisting of a total of 35,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to unit offerings previously sold on February 28, 2011, in exchange for total proceeds of $3,500. The shares were subsequently issued on July 3, 2013.

On March 11, 2013, a warrant holder elected to exercise warrants consisting of a 10,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to a unit offering previously sold on February 28, 2011, in exchange for proceeds of $1,000.

On March 11, 2013, the Company sold 10,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.75 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $5,000. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On March 2, 2013, the Company granted 50,000 shares of common for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $36,450 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On February 27, 2013, the Company sold 500,000 shares of its common stock to the Chairman of the Board of Directors in exchange for proceeds of $25,000. Board of director compensation expense of $365,000 was recognized due to the fair value of the shares in excess of the $0.05 per share purchase price.

On February 20, 2013, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to a director in exchange for proceeds of $50,000. Board of director compensation expense of $780,000 was recognized due to the fair value of the shares in excess of the $0.05 per share purchase price.

On February 20, 2013, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of its common stock to a director in exchange for proceeds of $75,000. Board of director compensation expense of $1,170,000 was recognized due to the fair value of the shares in excess of the $0.05 per share purchase price.

On February 17, 2013, the Company sold 5,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.75 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $2,500. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On February 10, 2013, the Company sold 20,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.75 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $10,000. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On January 30, 2013, the Company sold 60,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.75 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $30,000. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On January 22, 2013, the Company sold 15,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.75 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $7,500. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On January 9, 2013, the Company issued 40,000 shares of its common stock that were sold on December 31, 2012, pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $20,000 that were presented as a subscriptions payable at December 31, 2012.

Common Stock (2012)

On December 31, 2012, the Company sold 40,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.75 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $20,000. The shares were subsequently issued on January 9, 2013, as such, the proceeds were presented as a subscriptions payable at December 31, 2012.

On October 24, 2012, a warrant holder elected to exercise warrants consisting of a 10,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to a unit offering previously sold on February 28, 2011, in exchange for proceeds of $1,000.

On September 21, 2012, four warrant holders elected to exercise warrants consisting of a total of 40,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to unit offerings previously sold on February 28, 2011, in exchange for total proceeds of $4,000.

On various dates from August 9, 2012, through September 18, 2012, the Company issued a total of 420,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share amongst a total of forty four warrant holders, in exchange for total proceeds of $42,000 pursuant to warrant exercise notices from unit offerings previously sold on February 28, 2011.

On August 15, 2012, the Company sold 3,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $1,050. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On August 9, 2012, the Company sold 10,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $3,500. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On August 9, 2012, the Company sold 10,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $3,500. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On July 16, 2012, the Company sold 14,285 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $5,000. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On July 2, 2012, a warrant holder elected to exercise 250,000 cashless warrants of a total of 2,500,000 held, exercisable at $0.00001 per share. As a result, the Company issued an aggregate of 249,990 shares of common stock. The issuance was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, and the investor was accredited, had the opportunity to meet with and ask questions of management, and there was no solicitation in connection with the offering.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On June 11, 2012, the Company sold a total of 160,004 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for total proceeds of $56,000. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On June 8, 2012, the Company sold 6,000 shares of its common stock and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.50 per share over a one year term pursuant to a unit offering in exchange for proceeds of $2,100 to one of the Company’s directors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

Common Stock (2011)

On various dates from April 1, 2011, through June 3, 2011, the Company sold a total of 228,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share, in exchange for total proceeds of $57,000 to a total of eighteen independent investors. The Company was able to increase its offering price from its February 28, 2011, offerings due to developments with regard to an anticipated Cooperative Research and Development Agreement, or CRADA, involving clinical tests on patients which it anticipates will be conducted in conjunction with the Department of Defense, along with the increased enterprise value generated from the capital previously received.

On February 28, 2011, the Company sold a total of 723,200 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.10 per share, along with warrants to purchase a total of 723,200 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share over a one year period beginning from the date the Company began trading on a public stock exchange, which was August 1, 2012, in exchange for total proceeds of $72,320 to a total of eighty five independent investors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the 723,200 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $1,121, or $0.00155 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.27% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $506. The Company was able to increase its offering price as it advanced in the development of its business, along with the progression of events that will enable it to bring the Company to a public trading platform and increase the implied value attributed to the potential liquidity to third party investors.

On January 20, 2011, the Company sold 500,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share in exchange for proceeds of $5 to a newly appointed director. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, May 10, 2010, through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The shares issued carried a total fair value of $160, or $0.00032 per share using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Common Stock (2010)

On June 21, 2010, the Company sold 3,000,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share, at a fair value of $960, or $0.00032 per share, along with warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance and warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 to the Company’s CEO. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, May 10, 2010, through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The fair value of the common stock issuance to the founder using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

The total fair value of the warrant issuances to the founder using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is as follows:

On June 21, 2010, the Company sold 3,000,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share, and an intrinsic value of $960, or $0.00032 per share, along with warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance and warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 to the Company’s Chairman of the Board. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, May 10, 2010, through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The fair value of the common stock issuance to the founder using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

The total fair value of the warrant issuances to the founder using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is as follows:

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On June 21, 2010, the Company sold a total of 4,000,000 founder’s shares at the par value of $0.00001 per share in exchange for total proceeds of $40 to four of the Company’s directors. The shares issued carried a total fair value of $1,280, or $0.00032 per share using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method. The sale of these units was simply to establish the internal ownership, which occurred prior to the commencement of any operational activities, or offerings to the public or friends and family members. The Company was essentially dormant from the date of formation, May 10, 2010, through the date when the unit sales occurred as part of the Company’s formation. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the shares and the cash received was not recorded as compensation expense. The fair value of the common stock issuances to the founders using the Option-pricing Method to Allocation – Option Value by Capital Structure method is as follows:

Beneficial Conversion Feature

On August 13, 2013, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with LG Capital Funding, LLC. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price that was $0.3737 below the market price of $0.80 on the August 13, 2013, origination date resulted in a debt discount value of $23,236 that was recognized as additional paid in capital and was amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the loan, which was accelerated upon the repayment prior to maturity on November 6, 2013.

Subscriptions Payable

On September 19, 2014, the Company granted 70,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $7,959 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The shares were subsequently issued on October 6, 2014, as such, the stock award was presented as a subscriptions payable at September 30, 2014.

On September 19, 2014, the Company granted 100,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $11,370 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The shares were subsequently issued on October 15, 2014, as such, the stock award was presented as a subscriptions payable at September 30, 2014.

On September 6, 2014, the Company granted 120,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $19,200 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The shares were subsequently issued on November 3, 2014, as such, the stock award was presented as a subscriptions payable at September 30, 2014.

On September 6, 2014, the Company granted another 120,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $19,200 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The shares were subsequently issued on November 3, 2014, as such, the stock award was presented as a subscriptions payable at September 30, 2014.

On September 6, 2014, the Company granted 70,000 shares of common stock for services performed. The total fair value of the common stock was $11,200 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The shares were subsequently issued on November 3, 2014, as such, the stock award was presented as a subscriptions payable at September 30, 2014.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 10 – Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants Granted

On June 21, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000,000 shares of founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s CEO. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $890, or $0.00089 per share, using the stated term, or ten years, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $390.

On June 21, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at $0.001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000,000 shares of founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s Chairman of the Board. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $890, or $0.00089 per share, using the stated term, or ten years, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $390.

Series A Preferred Stock Warrants Cancelled

No series A preferred stock warrants were cancelled during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

Series A Preferred Stock Warrants Expired

No series A preferred stock warrants were expired during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

Series A Preferred Stock Warrants Exercised

No series A preferred stock warrants were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

The following is a summary of information about the Series A Preferred Stock Warrants outstanding at September 30, 2014.

The fair value of each warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s series A preferred stock warrants have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its series A preferred stock warrants. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, there were no warrants granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.

There were no series A preferred stock warrants granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, or the year ended December 31, 2013.

The following is a summary of activity of outstanding series A preferred stock warrants:

Note 11 – Common Stock Warrants

Common Stock Warrants Granted (2014)

No warrants were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Amendment of Common Stock Warrants (2013)

On June 28, 2013, the Company extended a total of 190,289 previously granted common stock warrants issued amongst a total of ten former investors, with an exercise price of $0.50 for approximately an additional 25 days from their expiration. All other terms remained the same as originally issued. These modified warrants are fully vested and expired on July 23, 2013. The total estimated value using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model, based on a volatility rate of 32% and a call option value of $0.4200, was $79,923. The value immediately preceding the modification was $-0- due to their expiration. As a result, the entire $79,923 was recognized as a deemed dividend on June 28, 2013.

Common Stock Warrants Granted (2013)

On December 12, 2013, the Company granted common stock warrants to an independent contractor to purchase a total of 50,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for consulting services. The warrants are exercisable over two (2) years from December 12, 2013. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 505-50, non-employee stock based compensation awards are re-measured at each period. The fair value of the 50,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $21,736, or $0.4347 per share as of December 31, 2013, based on a volatility rate of 104%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.34% and an expected term of 2 years, and was expensed as professional fee expense during the year ended December 31, 2013.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On September 25, 2013, the Company granted common stock warrants to an independent contractor to purchase a total of 300,000 shares of common stock at $0.96 per share for consulting services. The warrants vest monthly in 50,000 increments over six months commencing on October 1, 2013. The warrants are exercisable over three (3) years from October 1, 2013. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 505-50, non-employee stock based compensation awards are re-measured at each period. The fair value of the 300,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $134,709, or $0.4490 per share as of December 31, 2013, based on a volatility rate of 105%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.75% and an expected term of 3 years. A total of $49,751 and $74,314 was expensed as professional fee expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively.

On March 11, 2013, the Company sold warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $5,000 in conjunction with the sale of 10,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On February 20, 2013, the Company sold warrants to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $2,500 in conjunction with the sale of 5,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On February 20, 2013, the Company sold warrants to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $10,000 in conjunction with the sale of 20,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On February 14, 2013, the Company sold warrants to purchase 60,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $30,000 in conjunction with the sale of 60,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On January 30, 2013, the Company sold warrants to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $7,500 in conjunction with the sale of 15,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

Common Stock Warrants Granted (2012)

On December 31, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $20,000 in conjunction with the sale of 40,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On October 1, 2012, the Company granted 1,000,000 common stock warrants to each of two Directors to purchase a total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for services provided above and beyond their services as Directors. The warrants are fully vested, and are exercisable over seven (7) years from the date of grant. The total fair value of the 2,000,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $1,321,496, or $0.6608 per share based on a volatility rate of 100%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.39% and an expected term of 3.5 years, and was expensed as professional fee expense during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted common stock warrants to the Company’s CEO pursuant to the commencement of an employment agreement to purchase a total of 105,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for his services as an Officer. In December 2012, the Company and our CEO agreed to terminate his employment agreement, effective as of its date of inception. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013, and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. The fair value of the 105,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $74,798, or $0.7315 per share, based on a 76% discount using a 24% probability that the triggering event would be satisfied, a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. The Company recognized $11,644 and $6,773 of amortization recorded to professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully amortized by December 31, 2013.

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted common stock warrants to the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors pursuant to the commencement of an employment agreement to purchase a total of 105,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for his services as the Chairman of the Board. In December 2012, the Company and Dr. Felder agreed to terminate his employment agreement, effective as of its date of inception. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013, and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. The fair value of the 105,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $74,798, or $0.7315 per share, based on a 76% discount using a 24% probability that the triggering event would be satisfied, a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. The Company recognized $11,644 and $6,773 of amortization recorded to professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully amortized by December 31, 2013.

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted 50,000 common stock warrants to each of nine Directors to purchase a total of 450,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share over a seven year period from the grant date for their services as Directors. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013, and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The total fair value of the 450,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $320,564, or $0.7315 per share, based on a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. The Company recognized a total of $202,675 and $117,889 of amortization recorded to professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully amortized by December 31, 2013.

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted 70,000 common stock warrants to each of three Directors to purchase a total of 210,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for services provided above and beyond their services as Directors. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013, and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 505-50, non-employee stock based compensation awards are re-measured at each period. The total fair value of the 210,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $133,788, or $0.6371 per share as of December 31, 2012, based on a 76% discount using a 24% probability that the triggering event would be satisfied, a volatility rate of 88%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.18% and an expected term of 7 years. The Company recognized a total of $25,317 and $11,811 of professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully expensed by December 31, 2013.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On September 28, 2012, the Company granted common stock warrants to one of the Directors to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock at $1.45 per share for services provided above and beyond their services as Directors. The warrants carry a vesting period of 50% on January 15, 2013, and the remaining 50% vest on June 15, 2013. The option to exercise this warrant shall only be available if the Company’s common stock reaches a bid price of three dollars ($3.00) per share and remains at or above three dollars ($3.00) per share for thirty (30) consecutive trading days on any and all markets or exchanges which the Company’s common stock is traded (triggering event). The warrants are exercisable over seven (7) years after the triggering event. The total fair value of the 70,000 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $49,865, or $0.7315 per share, based on a 76% discount using a 24% probability that the triggering event would be satisfied, a volatility rate of 108%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.49% and an expected term of 3.76 years, and is being amortized over the implied service term, or vesting period, of the warrants. The Company recognized $7,764 and $4,515 of professional fee expense during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The warrants were fully amortized by December 31, 2013.

On August 15, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase 3,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $1,050 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On August 9, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $3,500 in conjunction with the sale of 10,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On August 9, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase another 10,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $3,500 in conjunction with the sale of 10,000 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On July 16, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase 14,285 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $5,000 in conjunction with the sale of 14,285 shares of common stock. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On June 11, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase a total of 160,004 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for total proceeds of $56,000 in conjunction with the sale of 160,004 shares of common stock to a total of seven independent investors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

On June 8, 2012, the Company sold warrants to purchase 6,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share over a one year period from the date of sale, in exchange for proceeds of $2,100 in conjunction with the sale of 6,000 shares of common stock to an independent investor. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Common Stock Warrants Granted (2011)

On February 28, 2011, the Company granted warrants to purchase a total of 723,200 shares of common stock at $0.10 per share over a two year period beginning one year from the date the Company begins trading on a public stock exchange, in exchange for total proceeds of $72,320 in conjunction with the sale of 723,200 shares of common stock to a total of eighty five independent investors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the 723,200 common stock warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $1,121, or $0.00155 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.27% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $506.

Common Stock Warrants Granted (2010)

On June 21, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000,000 founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s CEO. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $3,910, or $0.00023 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $1,530.

On June 21, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 17,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance, in exchange for proceeds of $30 in conjunction with the sale of 3,000,000 founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s Chairman of the Board. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $3,910, or $0.00023 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $1,530.

On June 21, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of common stock at $0.00001 per share over a ten year period from the date of issuance to the Company’s securities attorney, as an offering cost for the sale of a total of 10,000,000 founder’s shares of common stock to the Company’s Officers and Directors. The proceeds received were allocated between the common stock and warrants on a relative fair value basis. The total fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is $575, or $0.00023 per share, based on a 105% volatility, risk-free interest rate of 3.26% and a 25% discount due to lack of marketability. The intrinsic value of the warrants was $225.

Common Stock Warrants Cancelled

No warrants were cancelled during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

Common Stock Warrants Expired

A total of 110,000 and -0- warrants expired during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Common Stock Warrants Exercised

On February 20, 2014, a warrant holder elected to exercise warrants consisting of a total of 10,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to a unit offering previously sold on March 11, 2013, in exchange for total proceeds of $7,500.

On February 12, 2014, a warrant holder elected to exercise warrants consisting of a total of 5,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to a unit offering previously sold on February 20, 2013 in exchange for total proceeds of $3,750.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On various dates between July 2, 2013, and July 25, 2013, the Company issued a total of 61,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to warrant exercises at $0.50 per share amongst eight investors in exchange for total proceeds of $30,500.

On various dates between July 6, 2013, and July 25, 2013, the Company issued a total of 161,200 shares of its common stock pursuant to warrant exercises at $0.10 per share amongst twenty one investors in exchange for total proceeds of $16,120.

On June 27, 2013, two warrant holders elected to exercise warrants consisting of a total of 20,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to unit offerings previously sold on February 28, 2011, in exchange for total proceeds of $2,000. The shares were subsequently issued on July 19, 2013, as such, the proceeds were presented as a subscriptions payable at June 30, 2013.

On June 21, 2013, a total of seven warrant holders elected to exercise warrants consisting of a total of 35,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to unit offerings previously sold on February 28, 2011, in exchange for total proceeds of $3,500. The shares were subsequently issued on July 3, 2013, as such, the proceeds were presented as a subscriptions payable at June 30, 2013.

On March 11, 2013, there were 10,000 common stock warrants exercised in exchange for proceeds of $1,000.

A total of 710,000 common stock warrants were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2012. The exercises resulted in the issuance of a total of 709,990 shares of common stock, including 40,000 shares that were subsequently issued on October 16, 2012, and total proceeds of $46,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012.

The following is a summary of information about the Common Stock Warrants outstanding at September 30, 2014.

The fair value of each warrant grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:

The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s common stock warrants have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its common stock warrants. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, there were no warrants granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.

The weighted average fair value of warrants granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock was approximately $0.75 per warrant granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. No warrants were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited) 

The following is a summary of activity of outstanding common stock warrants:

Note 12 – Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10, which requires use of the liability method. FASB ASC 740-10-25 provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, referred to as temporary differences.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company incurred a net operating loss and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $1,730,720 and $1,245,131 of federal net operating losses, respectively. The net operating loss carry forwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2031.

The components of the Company’s deferred tax asset are as follows:

Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company’s history of losses, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Premier Biomedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited) 

A reconciliation between the amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and state statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:

In accordance with FASB ASC 740, the Company has evaluated its tax positions and determined there are no uncertain tax positions.

Note 13 – Subsequent Events

Common Stock Sales

On October 2, 2014, the Company sold 500,000 shares of common stock in exchange for total proceeds of $50,000.

On October 2, 2014, the Company sold 10,000 shares of common stock in exchange for total proceeds of $1,000.

Common Stock Issuances in Settlement of Subscriptions Payable

On October 6, 2014, the Company issued 70,000 shares of common stock in settlement of a subscriptions payable outstanding on September 30, 2014 in the amount of $7,959.

On October 15, 2014, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock in settlement of a subscriptions payable outstanding on September 30, 2014 in the amount of $11,370.

On November 3, 2014, the Company issued 120,000 shares of common stock in settlement of a subscriptions payable outstanding on September 30, 2014 in the amount of $19,200.

On November 3, 2014, the Company issued another 120,000 shares of common stock in settlement of a subscriptions payable outstanding on September 30, 2014 in the amount of $19,200.

On November 3, 2014, the Company issued 70,000 shares of common stock in settlement of a subscriptions payable outstanding on September 30, 2014 in the amount of $11,200. 

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains not only statements that are historical facts, but also statements that are forward-looking (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Forward-looking statements are, by their very nature, uncertain and risky. These risks and uncertainties include international, national and local general economic and market conditions; demographic changes; our ability to sustain, manage, or forecast growth; our ability to successfully make and integrate acquisitions; raw material costs and availability; new product development and introduction; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect technology; and other risks that might be detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Although the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Statement reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by them. Consequently, and because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, the actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports as we attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and prospects.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of the Company is based upon, and should be read in conjunction with, its unaudited financial statements and related notes elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Summary Overview

We are a research-based company that intends to discover and develop medical treatments for humans, specifically targeting the treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Fibromyalgia, Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS/Lou Gehrig’s Disease), Blood Sepsis and Viremia, and Cancer.

We have exclusive licenses to two US granted patents, one covering our basic technology to “Physically remove the pathophysiological basis of the disease TM” and a patent covering our pain-relieving medication aimed at the fibromyalgia and neuralgia market. Our plans are to work toward FDA approval of our drug candidate, Feldetrex. Although we have been considering the William Beaumont Army Medical Center as a possible clinical trial testing venue, after consultation with our expert consultant on FDA regulations we are now leaning toward selecting a venue which will expedite our corporate goal of obtaining FDA approval. We are seeking to raise the necessary funds required carry out the costly clinical trials.

UTEP Collaborative Agreement

On May 9, 2012, we entered into a Collaborative Agreement with the University of Texas at El Paso. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, we will work jointly with the University to develop a series of research and development programs around our sequential-dialysis technology in the areas of Alzheimer's Disease, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Chronic Pain Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Multiple Sclerosis, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig's disease), Blood Sepsis, Cancer, Heart Attacks and Strokes. The programs will utilize the facilities at one or more of the University of Texas’ campuses. We will pay the University’s actual overhead for the projects, a negotiated facility and administration overhead expense, and 10% of all gross revenues associated with the sale, license and/or royalties of all products and treatment procedures directly affiliated with the programs. Intellectual property jointly invented and developed as a result of the projects will be owned jointly by the University and us. The agreement has an initial term of five (5) years, and is renewable upon mutual agreement of the parties.

U.S. Army CRADA

On June 7, 2013, we entered into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (the “CRADA”) with the Clinical Investigation Regulatory Office U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command (“CIRO”) for performing medical research, development, testing and evaluation.

The purpose of the CRADA is to outline the terms upon which we will collaborate with the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command at the William Beaumont Army Medical Center (“WBAMC”) on the “Clearance of Specific Immunomodulators from Cerebrospinal Fluid via Selective Dialysis”, and more specifically targeting the prevention of suicidal ideation and clinical depression, and to assist in the creation of antibodies in order to obtain a decrease in the neuropathologic findings in traumatic brain injury.

Our obligation under the CRADA, in addition to providing the basis for the study, is to cover approximately $10,000 in costs, while the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command will provide equipment, material and services. The CRADA can be terminated by either party pursuant to thirty (30) days’ notice, or work will cease upon completion of the study, exhaustion of funds, termination, or July 31, 2016, whichever occurs first. We have the initial authorization to file patent applications on all inventions jointly developed during the term of the CRADA.

We have not generated any revenue to date, and we do not currently have a product ready for market.

Going Concern

As a result of our financial condition, we have received a report from our independent registered public accounting firm for our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, which includes an explanatory paragraph describing the uncertainty as to our ability to continue as a going concern. In order to continue as a going concern we must effectively balance many factors and begin to generate revenue so that we can fund our operations from our sales and revenues. If we are not able to do this we may not be able to continue as an operating company. At our current revenue and burn rate, our cash on hand will last less than a month, and thus we must raise capital through the sale of our stock. However, there is no assurance that our existing cash flow will be adequate to satisfy our existing operating expenses and capital requirements.

Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:

Introduction

We had no revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. Our operating expenses were $247,042 and $734,722 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $1,025,266 and $3,870,882 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $778,224 and $3,136,160, or 76% and 81%, respectively. Our operating expenses consisted mostly of professional fees, research and development costs, and general and administrative expenses as we continued to incur research and development costs in connection with our U.S. Army CRADA and UTEP Collaborative Agreements.

Revenues and Net Operating Loss

Our revenue, operating expenses, net operating loss, and net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, were as follows:

Revenues

The Company was established on May 10, 2010, and is in the development stage and had no revenues for the period from May 10, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2014.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses were $25,588 and $80,550 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $58,473 and $180,213 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $32,885, or 56%, and a decrease of $99,663, or 55%, respectively. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, was primarily due to the correction of a short-term delay of payments owed by us for research and development done through our partners, specifically the University of Texas at El Paso and the U.S. Army, that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014, followed by a subsequent acceleration of those payments in the three months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was a result of diminished costs incurred from UTEP and fewer patent application costs. We also had no expenses related to the development of our patented technologies during the time periods presented.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses were $113,769 and $201,883 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $666,936 and $2,994,164 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $553,167, or 83%, and a decrease of $2,792,281, or 93%, respectively. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, was primarily a result of decreased board of director compensation expense of $650,000 that was recognized due to the excess fair value of 1,000,000 shares of common stock sold at $0.05 per share during the three months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was primarily due to the elimination of compensation related to stock issuances to Directors incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2013, that was not incurred during 2014. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, general and administrative expenses consisted primarily of public relations, travel and administrative expenses.

Professional Fees

Professional fee expenses totaled $107,685 and $452,289 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $299,857 and $696,505 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $192,172, or 64%, and $244,216, or 35%, respectively. Amounts for both periods include non-cash stock based compensation. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, professional fees consisted of $14,250 of stock based compensation related to the issuance of a total of 90,000 shares of common stock to independent contractors, $68,929 related to subscriptions payable for the subsequent issuance of 480,000 shares of common stock and approximately $24,506 of professional fees paid, or owed in cash. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, professional fees consisted of $194,150 of stock based compensation related to the issuance of a total of 373,462 shares of common stock, $68,929 related to subscriptions payable for the subsequent issuance of 480,000 shares of common stock and $49,751 of amortized warrant expenses to independent contractors and approximately $139,459 of professional fees paid, or owed in cash.

Net Operating Loss

Net operating loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, was $247,042, or ($0.01) per share, and $734,722, or $(0.04) per share, respectively, compared to $1,025,266, or $(0.06) per share, and $3,870,882, or ($0.26) per share, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in net operating loss was $778,224, or 76%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, and $3,136,160, or 81%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, the decrease was a result of the decrease in professional fees, research and development costs, and general and administrative expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the decrease was a result primarily of a decrease in compensation related to stock issuances to Directors, plus a decrease in research and development costs, professional fees, and general and administrative expenses.

Other Expense

Other expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $-0- and $29,455, respectively, as compared to $8,044 and $8,524 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Other expense consisted of $-0- and $29,455 of interest and finance charges on debt and equity financing, consisting of interest on Officer and Director loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $180 and $660 of imputed interest on non-interest bearing debts owed to our Officers and Directors during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Net Loss

Net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, was $247,042, or ($0.01) per share, and $764,177, or $(0.04) per share, respectively, compared to $1,033,310, or $(0.06) per share, and $3,879,406, or ($0.26) per share, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in net loss was $786,268, or 76%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, and $3,115,229, or 80%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, the decrease was a result of the decrease in research and development costs, professional fees, and general and administrative expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the decrease was a result primarily of a decrease in compensation related to stock issuances to Directors, plus a decrease in research and development costs, general and administrative expenses, as well as professional fees.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash, current assets, total assets, current liabilities, and total liabilities as of September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively, are as follows: