Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. - Quarter Report: 2005 December (Form 10-Q)
U.
S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
[
X ] QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the quarterly period ended December
31, 2005
PRESTIGE
BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
Delaware
|
20-1297589
|
001-32433
|
(State
of Incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
(Commission
File Number)
|
PRESTIGE
BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Delaware
|
20-0941337
|
333-11715218-18
|
(State
of Incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
(Commission
File Number)
|
(Exact
name of Registrants as specified in their charters)
90
North Broadway
Irvington,
New York 10533
|
(914)
524-6810
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Registrants’
telephone number, including area
code)
|
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined quarterly report being filed
separately by Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. and Prestige Brands International
LLC, both registrants. Prestige Brands International, LLC, an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. is the indirect parent
company of Prestige Brands, Inc., the issuer of our 9¼% senior subordinated
notes due 2012, and the parent guarantor of such notes. As the indirect holding
company of Prestige Brands International, LLC, Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.
does not conduct ongoing business operations. As a result, the financial
information for Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. and Prestige Brands
International, LLC is identical for the purposes of the discussion of operating
results in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.” Unless otherwise indicated, we have presented
information throughout this Form 10-Q for Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. and
its
consolidated subsidiaries, including Prestige Brands International, LLC. The
information contained herein relating to each individual registrant is filed
by
such registrant on its own behalf. Neither registrant makes any representation
as to information relating to the other registrant. Prestige Brands
International, LLC meets the conditions set forth in general instructions
(H)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with
the
reduced disclosure format.
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrants (1) have filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrants were
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrants are accelerated filers (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes
o
No
x
As
of
February 8, 2005, Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. had 50,040,890 shares of common
stock outstanding. As of such date, Prestige International Holdings, LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc., owned 100% of the
uncertificated ownership interests of Prestige Brands International,
LLC.
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc.
Form
10-Q
Index
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets - December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2005
(unaudited)
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations - three months ended December 31, 2005
and 2004
and nine months
ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income -
nine months ended
December
31, 2005 (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows - nine months ended December 31, 2005
and 2004
(unaudited)
|
5
|
|
Notes
to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Prestige
Brands International, LLC
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets - December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2005
(unaudited)
|
22
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations - three months ended December 31, 2005
and 2004
and nine months
ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)
|
23
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Members’ Equity - nine months ended December 31,
2005 (unaudited)
|
24
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows - nine months ended December 31, 2005
and 2004
(unaudited)
|
25
|
|
Notes
to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
26
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation
|
40
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
|
52
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
53
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
54
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
55
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
55
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
55
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
55
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
55
|
Signatures
|
56
|
1
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
December
31, 2005
|
March
31, 2005
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets
|
|||||||
Cash
|
$
|
9,646
|
$
|
5,334
|
|||
Accounts
receivable
|
36,011
|
35,918
|
|||||
Inventories
|
33,682
|
24,833
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax assets
|
7,195
|
5,699
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
3,049
|
3,152
|
|||||
Funds
in escrow
|
3,000
|
--
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
92,583
|
74,936
|
|||||
Property
and equipment
|
1,453
|
2,324
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
298,273
|
294,731
|
|||||
Intangible
assets
|
647,021
|
608,613
|
|||||
Other
long-term assets
|
14,502
|
15,996
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
1,053,832
|
$
|
996,600
|
|||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
20,553
|
$
|
21,705
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
11,715
|
11,589
|
|||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
3,730
|
3,730
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
35,998
|
37,024
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
513,833
|
491,630
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax liabilities
|
98,872
|
85,899
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
648,703
|
614,553
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies - Note 13
|
|||||||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock - $0.01 par value
|
|||||||
Authorized
- 5,000 shares
|
|||||||
Issued
and outstanding - None
|
--
|
--
|
|||||
Common
stock - $0.01 par value
|
|||||||
Authorized
- 250,000 shares
|
|||||||
Issued
and outstanding - 50,056 shares at December 31, 2005 and 50,000 March
31,
2005
|
501
|
500
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
378,417
|
378,251
|
|||||
Treasury
stock, at cost - 15 shares at December 31, 2005 and 2 shares at March
31,
2005
|
(25
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
608
|
320
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
25,628
|
2,980
|
|||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
405,129
|
382,047
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
$
|
1,053,832
|
$
|
996,600
|
See
accompanying notes.
2
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three
Months
Ended
December 31
|
Nine
Months
Ended
December 31
|
||||||||||||
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
79,829
|
$
|
73,018
|
$
|
216,577
|
$
|
211,630
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
27
|
25
|
77
|
126
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
79,856
|
73,043
|
216,654
|
211,756
|
|||||||||
Cost
of Sales
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
38,726
|
33,241
|
103,224
|
104,320
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
41,130
|
39,802
|
113,430
|
107,436
|
|||||||||
Operating
Expenses
|
|||||||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
7,385
|
5,168
|
26,307
|
24,402
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
6,159
|
5,690
|
15,182
|
15,113
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
|
520
|
457
|
1,495
|
1,395
|
|||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
2,314
|
2,148
|
6,610
|
5,753
|
|||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
16,378
|
13,463
|
49,594
|
46,663
|
|||||||||
Operating
income
|
24,752
|
26,339
|
63,836
|
60,773
|
|||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
144
|
48
|
451
|
135
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(9,670
|
)
|
(12,042
|
)
|
(27,158
|
)
|
(34,012
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
(7,567
|
)
|
||||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
(9,526
|
)
|
(11,994
|
)
|
(26,707
|
)
|
(41,444
|
)
|
|||||
Income
before provision for
income
taxes
|
15,226
|
14,345
|
37,129
|
19,329
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
5,881
|
5,218
|
14,481
|
7,392
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
9,345
|
9,127
|
22,648
|
11,937
|
|||||||||
Cumulative
preferred dividends on Senior Preferred
and
Class B Preferred Units
|
--
|
(3,895
|
)
|
--
|
(11,341
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
income available to members and common stockholders
|
$
|
9,345
|
$
|
5,232
|
$
|
22,648
|
$
|
596
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.19
|
$
|
0.21
|
$
|
0.46
|
$
|
0.02
|
|||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.19
|
$
|
0.20
|
$
|
0.45
|
$
|
0.02
|
|||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
Basic
|
48,929
|
24,725
|
48,874
|
24,617
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
50,010
|
26,613
|
50,007
|
26,543
|
See
accompanying notes.
3
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
and
Comprehensive Income
Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
Common
Stock
Par
Shares Value
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Treasury
Stock
Shares Amount
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Totals
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances
- March 31, 2005
|
50,000
|
$
|
500
|
$
|
378,251
|
2
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
$
|
320
|
$
|
2,980
|
$
|
382,047
|
||||||||||
Additional
costs associated with initial public offering
|
(63
|
)
|
(63
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock and options to officers, directors and
employees
|
56
|
1
|
229
|
230
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase
of common stock
|
13
|
(21
|
)
|
(21
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Components
of comprehensive income
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
22,648
|
22,648
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on interest rate cap, net of income tax benefit of
$134
|
288
|
288
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
22,936
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances
- December 31, 2005
|
50,056
|
$
|
501
|
$
|
378,417
|
15
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
$
|
608
|
$
|
25,628
|
$
|
405,129
|
See
accompanying notes.
4
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
|
Nine
Months Ended December 31
|
||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Operating
Activities
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
22,648
|
$
|
11,937
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
8,105
|
7,148
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
11,543
|
12,749
|
|||||
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
1,727
|
2,290
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
230
|
--
|
|||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
--
|
7,567
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of purchases
of
businesses
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
2,681
|
520
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(6,997
|
)
|
4,470
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
271
|
(914
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
(3,549
|
)
|
1,160
|
||||
Account
payable - related parties
|
--
|
1,000
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
(823
|
)
|
(7,989
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
35,836
|
39,938
|
|||||
Investing
Activities
|
|||||||
Purchases
of equipment
|
(452
|
)
|
(198
|
)
|
|||
Purchases
of intangibles
|
(22,623
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Purchases
of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
(30,555
|
)
|
(425,479
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(53,630
|
)
|
(425,677
|
)
|
|||
Financing
Activities
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of notes
|
30,000
|
698,512
|
|||||
Payment
of deferred financing costs
|
(13
|
)
|
(23,529
|
)
|
|||
Repayment
of notes
|
(7,797
|
)
|
(344,605
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from the issuance of equity securities
|
--
|
58,722
|
|||||
Purchase
of shares for treasury
|
(21
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Additional
costs associated with initial public offering
|
(63
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
22,106
|
389,100
|
|||||
Increase
in cash
|
4,312
|
3,361
|
|||||
Cash
- beginning of period
|
5,334
|
3,393
|
|||||
Cash
- end of period
|
$
|
9,646
|
$
|
6,754
|
|||
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
|||||||
Fair
value of assets acquired, net of cash acquired
|
$
|
33,909
|
$
|
655,537
|
|||
Fair
value of liabilities assumed
|
(3,354
|
)
|
(229,966
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
price funded with non-cash contributions
|
--
|
(92
|
)
|
||||
Cash
paid to purchase businesses
|
$
|
30,555
|
$
|
425,479
|
|||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
28,206
|
$
|
24,359
|
|||
Income
taxes paid
|
$
|
1,335
|
$
|
2,427
|
See
accompanying notes.
5
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
Business
and Basis of Presentation
|
Nature of Business
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc. (“the Company”) and its subsidiaries are engaged in the
marketing, sales and distribution of over-the-counter drug, personal care and
household cleaning brands to mass merchandisers, drug stores, supermarkets
and
club stores primarily in the United States. In February 2005, the Company
completed an initial public offering.
Basis of Presentation
The
unaudited consolidated financial statements presented herein have been prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements
include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that
are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods.
Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2005
are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year
ending March 31, 2006. This financial information should be read in conjunction
with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in Amendment
No. 2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31,
2005.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on
the
Company’s knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may undertake
in the future, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all short-term deposits and investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Substantially all
of
the Company’s cash is held by one bank located in Wyoming. The Company does not
believe that, as a result of this concentration, it is subject to any unusual
financial risk beyond the normal risk associated with commercial banking
relationships.
Accounts
Receivable
The
Company extends non-interest bearing trade credit to its customers in the
ordinary course of business. To minimize credit risk, ongoing evaluations of
customers’ financial condition are performed; however, collateral is not
required. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based on
its
historical collections experience, as well as its evaluation of current and
expected conditions and trends affecting its customers.
Sales
Returns
The
Company must make estimates of potential future product returns related to
current period sales. In order to do this, the Company analyzes historical
returns, current economic trends, changes in customer demand and acceptance
of
the Company’s products when evaluating the adequacy of the Company’s allowance
for returns in any accounting period. If actual returns are greater than those
estimated by management, the Company’s financial statements in future periods
may be adversely affected.
6
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or fair value, where cost is determined by
using
the first-in, first-out method. The Company provides an allowance for slow
moving and obsolete inventory.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line
method based on the following estimated useful lives:
Years
|
||
Machinery
|
5
|
|
Computer
equipment
|
3
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
7
|
Expenditures
for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When an asset
is
sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and associated accumulated depreciation
are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized
in
the consolidated statement of operations.
Property
and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds its fair value.
Goodwill
The
excess of the purchase price over the fair market value of assets acquired
and
liabilities assumed in acquisition transactions is classified as goodwill.
In
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“Statement”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets,” the Company does not amortize goodwill, but performs
impairment tests of the carrying value at least annually.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. For intangible assets
with finite lives, amortization is computed on the straight-line method over
estimated useful lives ranging from five to 30 years.
Indefinite
lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually, while
intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets
may
not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount
of
the asset exceeds its fair value.
Deferred
Financing Costs
The
Company has incurred debt issuance costs in connection with its long-term debt.
These costs are capitalized as deferred financing costs and amortized using
the
effective interest method over the term of the related debt.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues
are recognized when the following revenue recognition criteria are met: (1)
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) there is a fixed or
determinable price; (3) the product has been shipped and the customer takes
ownership and assumes risk of loss; and (4) collectibility of the resulting
receivable is reasonably assured. The Company has determined that the transfer
of risk of loss generally occurs when product is received by the customer and,
accordingly, recognizes revenue at that time. Provision is made for estimated
customer discounts and returns at the time of sale based on the Company’s
historical experience.
The
Company frequently participates in the promotional programs of its customers,
as
is customary in this industry. The ultimate cost of these promotional programs
varies based on the actual number of units sold during a finite period of time.
These programs may include coupons, scan downs, temporary price
7
reductions
or other price guarantee vehicles. The Company estimates the cost of such
promotional programs at their inception based on historical experience and
current market conditions and reduces sales by such estimates. At the completion
of the promotional program, the estimated amounts are adjusted to actual
results.
Costs
of Sales
Costs
of
sales include product costs, warehousing costs, inbound and outbound shipping
costs, and handling and storage costs. Shipping, warehousing and handling costs
were $7.3 million and $5.7 million for the three month periods ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $19.1 million and $16.9 million for the
nine month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Advertising
and Promotion Costs
Advertising
and promotion costs are expensed as incurred. Slotting fees associated with
products are recognized as a reduction of sales. Under slotting arrangements,
the retailers allow the Company’s products to be placed on the stores’ shelves
in exchange for such fees. Direct reimbursements of advertising costs are
reflected as a reduction of advertising costs in the period earned.
Stock-based
Compensation
During
the three month period ended September 30, 2005, the Company adopted FASB,
Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“Statement No. 123(R)”) with the
initial grants of restricted stock and options to purchase common stock to
employees and directors in accordance with the provisions of the Company’s
Long-Term
Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). Statement No. 123(R) requires the Company to
measure the cost of services to be rendered based on the grant-date fair value
of the equity award. Compensation expense is to be recognized over the period
which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award,
generally referred to as the requisite service period. The Company recorded
non-cash compensation charges of $0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three
month and nine month periods ended December 31, 2005, respectively, for such
grants.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are recorded in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No.
109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement No. 109”). Pursuant to Statement No.
109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences
between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using
the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences
are
expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to
reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.
Derivative
Instruments
FASB
Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” (“Statement No. 133”), requires companies to recognize derivative
instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value.
The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends
on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging
relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those
derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments,
a
company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being
hedged, as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment
in a foreign operation.
The
Company has designated its derivative financial instruments as cash flow hedges
because they hedge exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that
are attributable to interest rate risk. For these hedges, the effective portion
of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component
of
other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same
line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or
periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instruments is recorded in results
of operations immediately.
8
Earnings
Per Share
Basic
and
diluted earnings per share are calculated based on income available to member
and common shareholders and the weighted-average number of shares outstanding
during the reported period. For the period ended December 31, 2004, the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding includes the Company’s common units
as if the common units had been converted to common stock using the February
2005 initial public offering conversion ratio of one common unit to 0.4589
shares of common stock.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In
March
2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional
Asset Retirement Obligations” (“FIN 47”) which clarifies guidance provided by
Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 is
effective for the Company no later than March 31, 2006. The adoption of FIN
47
is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
May
2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154,
“Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (“Statement No. 154”) which replaces
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” (“APB Opinion
No. 20”) and FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements.” Statement No. 154 requires that voluntary changes in
accounting principle be applied retrospectively to the balances of assets and
liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective
application is practicable and that a corresponding adjustments be made to
the
opening balance of retained earnings. APB Opinion No. 20 had required that
most
voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net
income the cumulative effect of changing to the new principle. Statement No.
154
is effective for all accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005.
2.
Acquisition
of Dental Concepts, LLC
On
November 8, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of the ownership
interests of Dental Concepts, LLC (“Dental Concepts”), a marketer of therapeutic
oral care products sold under “The Doctor’s®” brand. The Company expects that
The Doctor’s® product line will benefit from its business model of outsourcing
manufacturing and increasing awareness through targeted marketing and
advertising. Additionally, the Company anticipates benefits associated with
its
ability to leverage certain economies of scale and the elimination of redundant
operations. The results from operations of The Doctor’s® brand since the
acquisition date are included within the Company’s financial statements as a
component of the over-the-counter segment.
The
purchase price of the ownership interests was approximately $30.5 million (net
of cash acquired of $0.3 million), including fees and expenses of the
acquisition of $0.5 million. The Company financed the acquisition price through
the utilization of its senior revolving credit facility and with cash resources
of $30.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
The
following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired
and
the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The Company has obtained
independent valuations of certain tangible and intangible assets; however,
the
final purchase price will not be determined until all valuations have been
completed and all contingencies have been resolved. Consequently, the allocation
of the purchase price is subject to refinement. At December 31, 2005, $3.0
million is being held in escrow pending the resolution of the aforementioned
contingencies. Future disbursements from escrow will increase the amount
recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as goodwill.
9
The
fair
values assigned to the net assets acquired consist of the
following:
(In
thousands)
|
||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$
|
2,774
|
||
Inventory
|
1,852
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
172
|
|||
Property
and equipment
|
174
|
|||
Intangible
assets
|
22,395
|
|||
Goodwill
|
3,542
|
|||
Funds
in escrow
|
3,000
|
|||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(3,354
|
)
|
||
$
|
30,555
|
The
allocation to intangible assets of $22.4 million relates solely to “The Doctor’s
®” brand trademark which the Company estimates to have a useful life of 20
years. At December 31, 2005, goodwill resulting from this transaction was $3.5
million. As discussed above, this recorded amount is subject to change as
additional information becomes available; however, it is estimated that such
amount will be fully deductible for income tax purposes.
The
following table sets forth the unaudited results of the Company’s operations on
a pro forma basis as if the acquisition of Dental Concepts had been completed
on
April 1, 2004. It also includes the pro forma results from operations of
Vetco, Inc., which was acquired in October 2004, as if the acquisition of Vetco,
Inc. had been completed on April 1, 2004. The pro forma financial
information is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that the
combined entities would have achieved had the acquisition been consummated
on
April 1, 2004, nor is it necessarily indicative of the operating results that
may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2006.
Three
Months
Ended
December 31
|
Nine
Months
Ended
December 31
|
||||||||||||
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
81,475
|
$
|
76,275
|
$
|
224,697
|
$
|
227,274
|
|||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
$
|
15,057
|
$
|
14,188
|
$
|
36,343
|
$
|
21,393
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
9,242
|
$
|
9,031
|
$
|
22,168
|
$
|
13,203
|
|||||
Cumulative
preferred dividends on Senior Preferred
and
Class B
Preferred Units
|
--
|
(3,895
|
)
|
--
|
(11,341
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
income available to members and common shareholders
|
$
|
9,242
|
$
|
5,136
|
$
|
22,168
|
$
|
1,862
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.19
|
$
|
0.21
|
$
|
0.45
|
$
|
0.08
|
|||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.18
|
$
|
0.19
|
$
|
0.44
|
$
|
0.07
|
|||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
Basic
|
48,929
|
24,725
|
48,874
|
24,617
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
50,010
|
26,613
|
50,007
|
26,543
|
10
The
components of accounts receivable consist of the following (in
thousands):
December
31, 2005
|
March
31,
2005
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$
|
37,752
|
$
|
36,985
|
|||
Other
receivables
|
1,163
|
835
|
|||||
38,915
|
37,820
|
||||||
Less
allowances for discounts, returns and
uncollectible
accounts
|
(2,904
|
)
|
(1,902
|
)
|
|||
$
|
36,011
|
$
|
35,918
|
Inventories
consist of the following (in thousands):
December
31, 2005
|
March
31,
2005
|
||||||
Packaging
and raw materials
|
$
|
3,970
|
$
|
3,587
|
|||
Finished
goods
|
29,712
|
21,246
|
|||||
$
|
33,682
|
$
|
24,833
|
Inventories
are shown net of allowances for obsolete and slow moving inventory of $1.6
million and $1.5 million at December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2005,
respectively.
Property
and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
December
31, 2005
|
March
31,
2005
|
||||||
Machinery
|
$
|
3,338
|
$
|
3,099
|
|||
Computer
equipment
|
928
|
771
|
|||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
303
|
244
|
|||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
340
|
173
|
|||||
4,909
|
4,287
|
||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(3,456
|
)
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|||
$
|
1,453
|
$
|
2,324
|
11
6. Goodwill
As
discussed in Note 2, the Company purchased the ownership interests of Dental
Concepts in November 2005. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value
of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed has been recorded as
goodwill.
A
reconciliation of the activity affecting the carrying value of goodwill is
as
follows:
Balance
- March 31, 2005
|
$
|
294,731
|
||
Goodwill
acquired in connection with the
acquisition
of Dental Concepts, LLC
|
3,542
|
|||
Balance
- December 31, 2005
|
$
|
298,273
|
12
7. Intangible
Assets
On
October 28, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of the “Chore Boy®”
brand of cleaning pads and sponges. The purchase price of the Chore Boy® brand
of $22.6 million, including direct costs of $0.4 million, has been allocated
to
indefinite lived intangible assets and a covenant not-to-compete of $22.6
million and $0.04 million, respectively.
Intangible
assets consist of the following (in thousands):
December
31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
|
Accumulated
|
Net
|
|||||||||||
Amount
|
Additions
|
Amortization
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
Indefinite
lived trademarks
|
$
|
522,346
|
$
|
22,585
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
544,931
|
|||||
Amortizable
intangible assets
|
|||||||||||||
Trademarks
|
94,900
|
22,395
|
(15,359
|
)
|
101,936
|
||||||||
Non-compete
agreement
|
158
|
38
|
(42
|
)
|
154
|
||||||||
95,058
|
22,433
|
(15,401
|
)
|
102,090
|
|||||||||
$
|
617,404
|
$
|
45,018
|
$
|
(15,401
|
)
|
$
|
647,021
|
March
31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
|
Accumulated
|
Net
|
|||||||||||
Amount
|
Additions
|
Amortization
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
Indefinite
lived trademarks
|
$
|
522,346
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
522,346
|
|||||
Amortizable
intangible assets
|
|||||||||||||
Trademarks
|
94,900
|
(8,775
|
)
|
86,125
|
|||||||||
Non-compete
agreement
|
158
|
(16
|
)
|
142
|
|||||||||
95,058
|
--
|
(8,791
|
)
|
86,267
|
|||||||||
$
|
617,404
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(8,791
|
)
|
$
|
608,613
|
At
December 31, 2005, intangible assets are expected to be amortized over a period
of five to 30 years as follows (in thousands):
Twelve
Months Ending December 31
|
||||
2006
|
$
|
10,061
|
||
2007
|
10,061
|
|||
2008
|
10,061
|
|||
2009
|
9,013
|
|||
2010
|
8,665
|
|||
Thereafter
|
54,229
|
|||
$
|
102,090
|
13
8. Long-Term
Debt
Long-term
debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
December
31,
2005
|
March
31,
2005
|
|||||
Senior
revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), which expires on
April 6, 2009, is available for maximum borrowings of up to $60.0
million.
The Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at the Company’s option at
either the prime rate plus a variable margin or LIBOR plus a variable
margin. The variable margin ranges from 0.75% to 2.50% and at December
31,
2005, the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility was 8.75%
per
annum. The Company is also required to pay a variable commitment
fee on
the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility. At December
31, 2005,
the commitment fee was 0.50% of the unused line. The Revolving Credit
Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s
assets.
|
$
|
25,000
|
$
|
--
|
|||
Senior
secured term loan facility, (“Tranche B Term Loan Facility”) that bears
interest at the Company’s option at either the prime rate or LIBOR plus a
variable margin of 2.25%. At December
31,
2005, the weighted average applicable interest rate on the Tranche
B Term
Loan Facility was 6.34%. Principal payments of $933 and interest
are
payable quarterly. In February 2005, the Tranche B Term Loan Facility
was
amended to increase the amount available thereunder by $200.0 million,
all
of which is available at December
31,
2005. Current amounts outstanding under the Tranche B Term Loan Facility
mature on April 6, 2011, while amounts borrowed pursuant to the amendment
will mature on October 6, 2011. The
Tranche B Term Loan Facility is collateralized by substantially all
of the
Company’s assets.
|
366,563
|
369,360
|
|||||
Senior
Subordinated Notes (“Senior Notes”) that bear interest at 9.25% which is
payable on April 15th
and October 15th
of
each year. The Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2012; however, the
Company
may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes on or prior to April 15,
2008
at a redemption price equal to 100%, plus a make-whole premium, and
on or
after April 15, 2008 at redemption prices set forth in the indenture
governing the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are unconditionally
guaranteed by Prestige Brands International, LLC (“Prestige
International”), a wholly owned subsidiary, and Prestige International’s
wholly owned subsidiaries (other than the issuer). Each of these
guarantees is joint and several. There are no significant restrictions
on
the ability of any of the guarantors to obtain funds from their
subsidiaries.
|
126,000
|
126,000
|
|||||
517,563
|
495,360
|
||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
(3,730
|
)
|
(3,730
|
)
|
|||
$
|
513,833
|
$
|
491,630
|
14
The
Revolving Credit Facility and the Tranche B Term Loan Facility (together the
“Senior Credit Facility”) contain various financial covenants, including
provisions that require the Company to maintain certain leverage ratios,
interest coverage ratios and fixed charge coverage ratios. Additionally, the
Senior Credit Facility contains provisions that restrict the Company from
undertaking specified corporate actions, such as asset dispositions,
acquisitions, dividend payments, changes of control, incurrence of indebtedness,
creation of liens and transactions with affiliates. The Company was in
compliance with its financial and restrictive covenants under the Senior Credit
Facility at December 31, 2005.
Future
principal payments required in accordance with the terms of the Senior Credit
Facility and the Senior Notes are as follows (in thousands):
Twelve
Months Ending December 31
|
||||
2006
|
$
|
3,730
|
||
2007
|
3,730
|
|||
2008
|
3,730
|
|||
2009
|
28,730
|
|||
2010
|
3,730
|
|||
Thereafter
|
473,913
|
|||
$
|
517,563
|
The
Company entered into a 5% interest rate cap agreement with a financial
institution to mitigate the impact of changing interest rates. The agreement
provides for a notional amount of $20.0 million and terminates in June 2006.
The
Company also entered into interest rate cap agreements with another financial
institution that became effective on August 30, 2005, with a total notional
amount of $180.0 million and cap rates ranging from 3.25% to 3.75%. The
agreements terminate on May 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008 as to $50.0 million, $80.0
million and $50.0 million, respectively. The Company is accounting for the
interest rate cap agreements as cash flow hedges. The fair value of the interest
rate cap agreements, which is included in other long-term assets, was $2.9
million at December
31,
2005.
9. Shareholders’
Equity
In
connection with the Company’s IPO, the Board of Directors adopted the 2005
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan provides for grants of
stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units
and other equity-based awards. Directors, officers and other employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries, as well as others performing services for the
Company, are eligible for grants under the Plan. At December 31, 2005, there
were 4.7 million shares available for issuance under the Plan.
Pursuant
to the provisions of the Plan, on July 29, 2005, each of the Company’s four
independent members of the Board of Directors received an award of 6.2 thousand
shares of common stock in connection with Company’s directors’ compensation
arrangements. Of such amount, 1.8 thousand shares represent a one-time grant
of
unrestricted shares, while the remaining 4.4 thousand shares represent
restricted shares that vest over a two year period.
On
August
4, 2005, Frank Palantoni joined the Company as President and Chief Operating
Officer. In connection therewith, the Board of Directors granted Mr. Palantoni
30.9 thousand shares of restricted common stock and options to purchase an
additional 61.8 thousand shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.95
per share. The options vest over a period of five years while the restricted
shares will vest contingent upon the attainment of certain revenue and earnings
per share targets.
15
In
September 2005, the Company repurchased 13.0 thousand shares of restricted
common stock from former employees pursuant to the provisions of the various
employee stock purchase agreements. The average purchase price of the shares
was
$1.70 per share.
In
October 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the grant of 156.0
thousand shares of restricted stock with a fair market value of $12.32 per
share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on September 30, 2005, to
employees. The issuance of such shares is contingent upon the Company’s
attainment of certain revenue and earnings per share targets. Additionally,
in
the event that an employee terminates his or her employment with the Company
prior to October 1, 2008, the vesting date, the shares will be
forfeited.
10. Earnings
Per Share
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
December
31
|
Nine
Months Ended
December
31
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||||
Numerator
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) available to members and common shareholders
|
$
|
9,345
|
$
|
5,232
|
$
|
22,648
|
$
|
596
|
|||||
Denominator
|
|||||||||||||
Denominator
for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares
|
48,929
|
24,725
|
48,874
|
24,617
|
|||||||||
Dilutive
effect of unvested restricted common stock issued to employee and
directors
|
1,081
|
1,888
|
1,133
|
1,926
|
|||||||||
Denominator
for diluted earnings per share
|
50,010
|
26,613
|
50,007
|
26,543
|
|||||||||
Earnings
per Common Share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.19
|
$
|
0.21
|
$
|
0.46
|
$
|
0.02
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.19
|
$
|
0.20
|
$
|
0.45
|
$
|
0.02
|
Outstanding
employee stock options to purchase an aggregate of 61.8 thousand shares of
common stock at December 31, 2005 were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because their exercise price was greater than the
average market price of the common stock, and therefore, their inclusion would
be antidilutive. At December 31, 2005, 1.0 million restricted shares issued
to
management and employees are unvested; however, such shares (with the exception
of 31 thousand chares with vesting subject to contingencies) are included
in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Additionally, the grant of
156.0 thousand shares of restricted stock to employees has been excluded from
the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per share since such shares
are subject to contingencies.
11. Related
Party Transactions
The
Company had entered in an agreement with an affiliate of GTCR Golder Rauner
II,
LLC (“GTCR”), a private equity firm and an investor in the Company, whereby the
GTCR affiliate was to provide management and advisory services to the Company
for an aggregate annual compensation of $4.0 million.
16
The
agreement was terminated in February 2005. During the three month and nine
month
periods ended December 31, 2004, the Company paid the affiliate of GTCR a
management fee of $1.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively.
12. Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are recorded in the Company’s quarterly financial statements based on the
Company’s estimated annual effective income tax rate. The effective rates used
in the calculation of income taxes were 38.6% and 36.4% for the three month
periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the nine month
periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the effective tax rates were 39.0%
and
38.2%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate for the three month
period ended December 31, 2005 results from the increase in the Company’s
graduated federal income tax rate from 34% to 35%, due to the formation of
the
Company in February 2005 and the election to file a consolidated federal income
tax return. The difference in the effective tax rates for the nine month periods
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 results primarily from the computation of
taxes
on a separate company basis during the nine month period ended December 31,
2004.
In
June
2003, Dr. Jason Theodosakis filed a lawsuit, Theodosakis v. Walgreens, et al.,
in Federal District Court in Arizona, alleging that two of the Company’s
subsidiaries, Medtech Products and Pecos Pharmaceutical, as well as other
unrelated parties, infringed the trade dress of two of his published books.
Specifically, Dr. Theodosakis published “The Arthritis Cure” and “Maximizing the
Arthritis Cure” regarding the use of dietary supplements to treat arthritis
patients. Dr. Theodosakis alleged that his books have a distinctive trade dress,
or cover layout, design, color and typeface, and those products that the
defendants sold under the ARTHx trademarks infringed the books’ trade dress and
constituted unfair competition and false designation of origin. Additionally,
Dr. Theodosakis alleged that the defendants made false endorsements of the
products by referencing his books on the product packaging and that the use
of
his name, books and trade dress invaded his right to publicity. The Company
sold
the ARTHx trademarks, goodwill and inventory to a third party, Contract
Pharmacal Corporation, in March 2003. On January 12, 2005, the court granted
the
Company’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed all claims against Pecos and
Medtech. The plaintiff has filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals which
is
pending.
On
January 3, 2005, the Company was served with process by its former lead counsel
in the Theodosakis litigation seeking $679,000 plus interest. The case was
filed
in the Supreme Court of New York and is styled as Dickstein Shapiro et al v.
Medtech Products, Inc. In February 2005, the plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint naming the Pecos Pharmaceutical Company as defendant. The Company
has
answered and filed a counterclaim against Dickstein and also filed a third
party
complaint against the Lexington Insurance Company, the Company’s product
liability carrier. The Company believes that if there is any obligation to
the
Dickstein firm relating to this matter, it is an obligation of Lexington and
not
the Company.
The
Company and certain of its officers and directors are defendants in a
consolidated putative securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Consolidated
Action”). The first of the six consolidated cases was filed on August 3, 2005.
Plaintiffs purport to represent a class of shareholders of the Company who
purchased shares between February 9, 2005 through November 15, 2005. Plaintiffs
also name as defendants the underwriters in the Company’s initial public
offering and a private equity fund that was a selling shareholder in the
offering. The district court has appointed a Lead Plaintiff. On December 23,
2005, the Lead Plaintiff filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint, which
asserts claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of
1933
and Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The
Lead Plaintiff generally alleges that the Company issued a series of materially
false and misleading statements in
17
connection
with its initial public offering and thereafter in regard to the following
areas: the accounting issues described in the Company’s press release issued on
or about November 15, 2005; and the alleged failure to disclose that demand
for
certain of the Company’s products was declining and that the Company was
planning to withdraw several products from the market. Plaintiffs seek an
unspecified amount of damages. The Company intends to file a motion to dismiss
the Consolidated Class Action Complaint on or about February 21, 2006. The
Company’s management believes the allegations to be unfounded, will vigorously
pursue its defenses, and cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of
loss,
if any.
On
September 6, 2005, another putative securities class action lawsuit
substantially similar to the initially-filed complaints in the Consolidated
Action described above was filed against the same defendants in the Circuit
Court of Cook County, Illinois (the “Chicago Action”). In light of the
first-filed Consolidated Action, proceedings in the Chicago Action have been
stayed until a ruling on defendants’ anticipated motions to dismiss the
consolidated complaint in the Consolidated Action. The Company’s management
believes the allegations to be unfounded, will vigorously pursue its defenses,
and cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any.
The
Company is also involved from time to time in routine legal matters and other
claims incidental to its business. When it appears probable in management’s
judgment that the Company will incur monetary damages or other costs in
connection with such claims and proceedings, and such costs can be reasonably
estimated, liabilities are recorded in the financial statements and charges
are
recorded against earnings. The Company believes the resolution of such routine
matters and other incidental claims, taking into account reserves and insurance,
will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results
of
operation.
The
Company’s sales are concentrated in the areas of over-the-counter pharmaceutical
products, personal care products and household cleaning products. The Company
sells its products to mass merchandisers, food and drug accounts, and dollar
and
club stores. During the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2005,
approximately 59.8% and 62.1%, respectively, of the Company’s total sales were
derived from its four major brands, while during the three and nine month
periods ended December 31, 2004, approximately 64.7% and 64.6%, respectively,
of
the Company’s total sales were derived from these four brands. During the three
and nine month periods ended December 31, 2005, approximately 20.0% and 22.4%,
respectively, of the Company’s net sales were made to one customer, while during
the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2004, 27.7% and 28.1% of
net
sales were to this customer. At December 31, 2005, approximately 19.6% of
accounts receivable were owed by this customer.
The
Company manages product distribution in the continental United States through
a
main distribution center in St. Louis, Missouri. A serious disruption, such
as a
flood or fire, to the main distribution center could damage the Company’s
inventories and could materially impair the Company’s ability to distribute its
products to customers in a timely manner or at a reasonable cost. The Company
could incur significantly higher costs and experience longer lead times
associated with the distribution of its products to its customers during the
time that it takes the Company to reopen or replace its distribution center.
As
a result, any such disruption could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s sales and profitability.
15. Business
Segments
Segment
information has been prepared in accordance with FASB Statement No. 131,
“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” The
Company’s operating segments are based on its product lines and consist of (i)
Over-the-Counter Drugs, (ii) Personal Care and (iii) Household
18
Cleaning.
Accordingly, within each reportable segment are operations that have similar
economic characteristics, including the nature of their products, production
process, type of customer and method of distribution.
There
were no inter-segment sales or transfers during the periods ended December
31,
2005 and 2004. The Company evaluates the performance of its product lines and
allocates resources to them based primarily on contribution margin. The table
below summarizes information about reportable segments (in
thousands).
Quarter
Ended December 31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter
|
Personal
|
Household
|
|||||||||||
Drug
|
Care
|
Cleaning
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
42,051
|
$
|
7,007
|
$
|
30,771
|
$
|
79,829
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
--
|
--
|
27
|
27
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
42,051
|
7,007
|
30,798
|
79,856
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
15,821
|
3,954
|
18,951
|
38,726
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
26,230
|
3,053
|
11,847
|
41,130
|
|||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
4,926
|
724
|
1,735
|
7,385
|
|||||||||
Contribution
margin
|
$
|
21,304
|
$
|
2,329
|
$
|
10,112
|
33,745
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
8,993
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
24,752
|
||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(9,526
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(5,881
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
9,345
|
19
Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter
|
Personal
|
Household
|
|||||||||||
Drug
|
Care
|
Cleaning
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
116,199
|
$
|
21,595
|
$
|
78,783
|
$
|
216,577
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
--
|
--
|
77
|
77
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
116,199
|
21,595
|
78,860
|
216,654
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
43,044
|
12,307
|
47,873
|
103,224
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
73,155
|
9,288
|
30,987
|
113,430
|
|||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
18,192
|
2,870
|
5,245
|
26,307
|
|||||||||
Contribution
margin
|
$
|
54,963
|
$
|
6,418
|
$
|
25,742
|
87,123
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
23,287
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
63,836
|
||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(26,707
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(14,481
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
22,648
|
Quarter
Ended December 31, 2004
|
|||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter
|
Personal
|
Household
|
|||||||||||
Drug
|
Care
|
Cleaning
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
40,964
|
$
|
7,612
|
$
|
24,442
|
$
|
73,018
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
--
|
--
|
25
|
25
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
40,964
|
7,612
|
24,467
|
73,043
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
14,545
|
3,681
|
15,015
|
33,241
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
26,419
|
3,931
|
9,452
|
39,802
|
|||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
3,357
|
797
|
1,014
|
5,168
|
|||||||||
Contribution
margin
|
$
|
23,062
|
$
|
3,134
|
$
|
8,438
|
34,634
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
8,295
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
26,339
|
||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(11,994
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(5,218
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
9,127
|
20
Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2004
|
|||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter
|
Personal
|
Household
|
|||||||||||
Drug
|
Care
|
Cleaning
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
113,067
|
$
|
24,593
|
$
|
73,970
|
$
|
211,630
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
--
|
--
|
126
|
126
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
113,067
|
24,593
|
74,096
|
211,756
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
44,075
|
12,800
|
47,445
|
104,320
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
68,992
|
11,793
|
26,651
|
107,436
|
|||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
15,709
|
4,213
|
4,480
|
24,402
|
|||||||||
Contribution
margin
|
$
|
53,283
|
$
|
7,580
|
$
|
22,171
|
83,034
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
22,261
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
60,773
|
||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(41,444
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(7,392
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
11,937
|
During
the nine month periods ended December 2005 and 2004, 97.9% and 97.7%,
respectively, of sales were made to customers in the United States and Canada.
Other than the United States, no individual geographical area accounted for
more
than 10% of net sales in any of the periods presented. At December 31, 2005
and
2004, all of the Company’s long-term assets were located in the United States of
America and have not been allocated between segments.
21
Prestige
Brands International, LLC
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
December
31, 2005
|
March
31, 2005
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets
|
|||||||
Cash
|
$
|
9,646
|
$
|
5,334
|
|||
Accounts
receivable
|
36,011
|
35,918
|
|||||
Inventories
|
33,682
|
24,833
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax assets
|
7,195
|
5,699
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
3,049
|
3,152
|
|||||
Funds
in escrow
|
3,000
|
--
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
92,583
|
74,936
|
|||||
Property
and equipment
|
1,453
|
2,324
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
298,273
|
294,731
|
|||||
Intangible
assets
|
647,021
|
608,613
|
|||||
Other
long-term assets
|
14,502
|
15,996
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
1,053,832
|
$
|
996,600
|
|||
Liabilities
and Members’ Equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
20,553
|
$
|
21,705
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
11,715
|
11,589
|
|||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
3,730
|
3,730
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
35,998
|
37,024
|
|||||
Long-term
debt
|
513,833
|
491,630
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax liabilities
|
98,872
|
85,899
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
648,703
|
614,553
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies - Note 12
|
|||||||
Members’
Equity
|
|||||||
Contributed
capital - Prestige Holdings
|
370,423
|
370,277
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
608
|
320
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
34,098
|
11,450
|
|||||
Total
members’ equity
|
405,129
|
382,047
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and members’ equity
|
$
|
1,053,832
|
$
|
996,600
|
See
accompanying notes.
22
Prestige
Brands International, LLC
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three
Months
Ended
December 31
|
Nine
Months
Ended
December 31
|
||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
79,829
|
$
|
73,018
|
$
|
216,577
|
$
|
211,630
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
27
|
25
|
77
|
126
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
79,856
|
73,043
|
216,654
|
211,756
|
|||||||||
Cost
of Sales
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
38,726
|
33,241
|
103,224
|
104,320
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
41,130
|
39,802
|
113,430
|
107,436
|
|||||||||
Operating
Expenses
|
|||||||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
7,385
|
5,168
|
26,307
|
24,402
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
6,159
|
5,690
|
15,182
|
15,113
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
|
520
|
457
|
1,495
|
1,395
|
|||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
2,314
|
2,148
|
6,610
|
5,753
|
|||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
16,378
|
13,463
|
49,594
|
46,663
|
|||||||||
Operating
income
|
24,752
|
26,339
|
63,836
|
60,773
|
|||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
144
|
48
|
451
|
135
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(9,670
|
)
|
(12,042
|
)
|
(27,158
|
)
|
(34,012
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
(7,567
|
)
|
||||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
(9,526
|
)
|
(11,994
|
)
|
(26,707
|
)
|
(41,444
|
)
|
|||||
Income
before provision for
income
taxes
|
15,226
|
14,345
|
37,129
|
19,329
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
5,881
|
5,218
|
14,481
|
7,392
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
9,345
|
$
|
9,127
|
$
|
22,648
|
$
|
11,937
|
See
accompanying notes.
23
Prestige
Brands International, LLC
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Members’ Equity
and
Comprehensive Income
Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
Contributed
Capital
Prestige
Holdings
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Totals
|
||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Balances
- March 31, 2005
|
$
|
370,277
|
$
|
320
|
$
|
11,450
|
$
|
382,047
|
|||||
Additional
costs associated with capital contributions
from
Prestige Brands
Holdings
|
(63
|
)
|
(63
|
)
|
|||||||||
Capital
contributions from Prestige Brands Holdings in connection with
compensation of officers and directors
|
230
|
230
|
|||||||||||
Repurchase
of equity units
|
(21
|
)
|
(21
|
)
|
|||||||||
Components
of comprehensive income
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income for the period
|
22,648
|
22,648
|
|||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on interest rate cap, net of tax benefit of $116
|
288
|
288
|
|||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
22,936
|
||||||||||||
Balances
- December 31, 2005
|
$
|
370,423
|
$
|
608
|
$
|
34,098
|
$
|
405,129
|
See
accompanying notes.
24
Prestige
Brands International, LLC
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
|
Nine
Months Ended December 31
|
||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Operating
Activities
|
|
||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
22,648
|
$
|
11,937
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
8,105
|
7,148
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
11,543
|
12,749
|
|||||
Amortization
of deferred financing costs
|
1,727
|
2,290
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
230
|
--
|
|||||
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
--
|
7,567
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of purchases
of
businesses
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
2,681
|
520
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(6,997
|
)
|
4,470
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
271
|
(914
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
(3,549
|
)
|
1,160
|
||||
Account
payable - related parties
|
--
|
1,000
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(823
|
)
|
(7,989
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
35,836
|
39,938
|
|||||
Investing
Activities
|
|||||||
Purchases
of equipment
|
(452
|
)
|
(198
|
)
|
|||
Purchases
of intangibles
|
(22,623
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Purchases
of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
(30,555
|
)
|
(425,479
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(53,630
|
)
|
(425,677
|
)
|
|||
Financing
Activities
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of notes
|
30,000
|
698,512
|
|||||
Payment
of deferred financing costs
|
(13
|
)
|
(23,529
|
)
|
|||
Repayment
of notes
|
(7,797
|
)
|
(344,605
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from the issuance of equity securities
|
--
|
58,722
|
|||||
Purchase
of shares for treasury
|
(21
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Additional
costs associated with initial public offering
|
(63
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
22,106
|
389,100
|
|||||
Increase
in cash
|
4,312
|
3,361
|
|||||
Cash
- beginning of period
|
5,334
|
3,393
|
|||||
Cash
- end of period
|
$
|
9,646
|
$
|
6,754
|
|||
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
|||||||
Fair
value of assets acquired, net of cash acquired
|
$
|
33,909
|
$
|
655,537
|
|||
Fair
value of liabilities assumed
|
(3,354
|
)
|
(229,966
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
price funded with non-cash contributions
|
--
|
(92
|
)
|
||||
Cash
paid to purchase businesses
|
$
|
30,555
|
$
|
425,479
|
|||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
28,206
|
$
|
24,359
|
|||
Income
taxes paid
|
$
|
1,335
|
$
|
2,427
|
See
accompanying notes.
25
Prestige
Brands International, LLC
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
Business
and Basis of Presentation
|
Nature of Business
Prestige
Brands International, LLC, (“Prestige International” or the “Company”) is an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. (“Prestige
Holdings”) and the indirect parent company of Prestige Brands, Inc., the issuer
of the 9.25% senior subordinated notes due 2012 (“Senior Notes”) and the
borrower under the senior credit facility consisting of a Revolving Credit
Facility, Tranche B Term Loan Facility and a Tranche C Term Loan Facility
(together the “Senior Credit Facility”). Prestige International is a holding
company with no assets or operations and is also the parent guarantor of the
Senior Notes and Senior Credit Facility. Prestige Holdings and its subsidiaries
are engaged in the marketing, sales and distribution of over-the-counter drug,
personal care and household cleaning brands to mass merchandisers, drug stores,
supermarkets and club stores primarily in the United States.
Basis of Presentation
The
unaudited consolidated financial statements presented herein have been prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial reporting and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements
include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that
are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods.
Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2005
are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year
ending March 31, 2006. This financial information should be read in conjunction
with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in Amendment
No. 2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31,
2005.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on
the
Company’s knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may undertake
in the future, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all short-term deposits and investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Substantially all
of
the Company’s cash is held by one bank located in Wyoming. The Company does not
believe that, as a result of this concentration, it is subject to any unusual
financial risk beyond the normal risk associated with commercial banking
relationships.
Accounts
Receivable
The
Company extends non-interest bearing trade credit to its customers in the
ordinary course of business. To minimize credit risk, ongoing evaluations of
customers’ financial condition are performed; however, collateral is not
required. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based on
its
historical collections experience, as well as its evaluation of current and
expected conditions and trends affecting its customers.
26
Sales
Returns
The
Company must make estimates of potential future product returns related to
current period sales. In order to do this, the Company analyzes historical
returns, current economic trends, changes in customer demand and acceptance
of
the Company’s products when evaluating the adequacy of the Company’s allowance
for returns in any accounting period. If actual returns are greater than those
estimated by management, the Company’s financial statements in future periods
may be adversely affected.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or fair value, where cost is determined by
using
the first-in, first-out method. The Company provides an allowance for slow
moving and obsolete inventory.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line
method based on the following estimated useful lives:
Years
|
||
Machinery
|
5
|
|
Computer
equipment
|
3
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
7
|
Expenditures
for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When an asset
is
sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and associated accumulated depreciation
are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized
in
the consolidated statement of operations.
Property
and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds its fair value.
Goodwill
The
excess of the purchase price over the fair market value of assets acquired
and
liabilities assumed in acquisition transactions is classified as goodwill.
In
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“Statement”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets,” the Company does not amortize goodwill, but performs
impairment tests of the carrying value at least annually.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. For intangible
assets with finite lives, amortization is computed on the straight-line method
over estimated useful lives ranging from five to 30 years.
Indefinite
lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually, while
intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets
may
not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount
of
the asset exceeds its fair value.
Deferred
Financing Costs
The
Company has incurred debt issuance costs in connection with its long-term debt.
These costs are capitalized as deferred financing costs and amortized using
the
effective interest method over the term of the related debt.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues
are recognized when the following revenue recognition criteria are met: (1)
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) there is a fixed or
determinable price; (3) the product has been shipped and the customer takes
ownership and assumes risk of loss; and (4) collectibility of the resulting
receivable is reasonably assured. The Company has determined that the transfer
of risk of loss generally occurs when product is received by the customer
and, accordingly, recognizes revenue at that time. Provision is made
for
27
estimated
customer discounts and returns at the time of sale based on the Company’s
historical experience.
The
Company frequently participates in the promotional programs of its customers,
as
is customary in this industry. The ultimate cost of these promotional programs
varies based on the actual number of units sold during a finite period of time.
These programs may include coupons, scan downs, temporary price reductions
or
other price guarantee vehicles. The Company estimates the cost of such
promotional programs at their inception based on historical experience and
current market conditions and reduces sales by such estimates. At the completion
of the promotional program, the estimated amounts are adjusted to actual
results.
Costs
of Sales
Costs
of
sales include product costs, warehousing costs, inbound and outbound shipping
costs, and handling and storage costs. Shipping, warehousing and handling costs
were $7.3 million and $5.7 million for the three month periods ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $19.1 million and $16.9 million for the
nine month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Advertising
and Promotion Costs
Advertising
and promotion costs are expensed as incurred. Slotting fees associated with
products are recognized as a reduction of sales. Under slotting arrangements,
the retailers allow the Company’s products to be placed on the stores’ shelves
in exchange for such fees. Direct reimbursements of advertising costs are
reflected as a reduction of advertising costs in the period earned.
Stock-based
Compensation
During
the three month period ended September 30, 2005, the Company adopted FASB,
Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“Statement No. 123(R)”) with the
initial grants of Prestige Brands Holdings’ restricted stock and options to
purchase common stock to employees and directors in accordance with the
provisions of Prestige Brands Holdings’ Long-Term
Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). Statement No. 123(R) requires the Company to
measure the cost of services to be rendered based on the grant-date fair value
of the equity award. Compensation expense is to be recognized over the period
which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award,
generally referred to as the requisite service period. The Company recorded
non-cash compensation charges of $0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three
month and nine month periods ended December 31, 2005, respectively, for such
grants.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are recorded in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No.
109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement No. 109”). Pursuant to Statement No.
109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences
between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using
the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences
are
expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to
reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.
Derivative
Instruments
FASB
Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” (“Statement No. 133”), requires companies to recognize derivative
instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value.
The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends
on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging
relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those
derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments,
a
company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being
hedged, as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment
in a foreign operation.
The
Company has designated its derivative financial instruments as cash flow hedges
because they hedge exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that
are attributable to interest rate risk. For these hedges, the effective portion
of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component
of
28
other
comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same line
item
associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during
which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the
gain or loss on the derivative instruments is recorded in results of operations
immediately.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In
March
2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional
Asset Retirement Obligations” (“FIN 47”) which clarifies guidance provided by
Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 is
effective for the Company no later than March 31, 2006. The adoption of FIN
47
is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
May
2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154,
“Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (“Statement No. 154”) which replaces
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” (“APB Opinion
No. 20”) and FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements.” Statement No. 154 requires that voluntary changes in
accounting principle be applied retrospectively to the balances of assets and
liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective
application is practicable and that a corresponding adjustments be made to
the
opening balance of retained earnings. APB Opinion No. 20 had required that
most
voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net
income the cumulative effect of changing to the new principle. Statement No.
154
is effective for all accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005.
2.
Acquisition
of Dental Concepts, LLC
On
November 8, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of the ownership
interests of Dental Concepts, LLC (“Dental Concepts”), a marketer of therapeutic
oral care products sold under “The Doctor’s®” brand. The Company expects that
The Doctor’s® product line will benefit from its business model of outsourcing
manufacturing and increasing awareness though targeted marketing and
advertising. Additionally, the Company anticipates benefits associated with
its
ability to leverage certain economies of scale and the elimination of redundant
operations. The results from operations of The Doctor’s® brand since the
acquisition date are included within the Company’s financial statements as a
component of the over-the-counter segment.
The
purchase price of the ownership interests was approximately $30.5 million (net
of cash acquired of $0.3), including fees and expenses of the acquisition of
$0.5 million. The Company financed the acquisition price through the utilization
of its senior revolving credit facility and with cash resources of $30.0 million
and $0.5 million, respectively.
The
following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired
and
the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The Company has obtained
independent valuations of certain tangible and intangible assets; however,
the
final purchase price will not be determined until all valuations have been
completed and all contingencies have been resolved. Consequently, the allocation
of the purchase price is subject to refinement. At December 31, 2005, $3.0
million is being held in escrow pending the resolution of the aforementioned
contingencies. Future disbursements from escrow will increase the amount
recorded in the Company’s balance sheet as goodwill.
29
The
fair
values assigned to the net assets acquired consist of the
following:
(In
thousands)
|
||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$ 2,774
|
|||
Inventory
|
1,852
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
172
|
|||
Property
and equipment
|
174
|
|||
Intangible
assets
|
22,395
|
|||
Goodwill
|
3,542
|
|||
Funds
in escrow
|
3,000
|
|||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(3,354
|
)
|
||
$
|
30,555
|
The
allocation to intangible assets of $22.4 million relates solely to “The Doctor’s
®” brand trademark which the Company estimates to have a useful life of 20
years. At December 31, 2005, goodwill resulting from this transaction was $3.5
million. As discussed above, this recorded amount is subject to change as
additional information becomes available; however, it is estimated that such
amount will be fully deductible for income tax purposes.
The
following table sets forth the unaudited results of the Company’s operations on
a pro forma basis as if the acquisition of Dental Concepts had been completed
on
April 1, 2004. It also includes the pro forma results from operations of
Vetco, Inc., which was acquired in October 2004, as if the acquisition of Vetco,
Inc. had been completed on April 1, 2004. The pro forma financial
information is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that the
combined entities would have achieved had the acquisition been consummated
on
April 1, 2004, nor is it necessarily indicative of the operating results that
may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2006.
Three
Months
Ended
December 31
|
Nine
Months
Ended
December 31
|
||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2005
|
2004
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
81,475
|
$
|
76,275
|
$
|
224,697
|
$
|
227,274
|
|||||
Income
before provision for
income
taxes
|
$
|
15,057
|
$
|
14,188
|
$
|
36,343
|
$
|
21,393
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
9,242
|
$
|
9,031
|
$
|
22,168
|
$
|
13,203
|
3. Accounts
Receivable
The
components of accounts receivable consist of the following (in
thousands):
December
31, 2005
|
March
31,
2005
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$ |
37,752
|
$
|
36,985
|
|||
Other
receivables
|
1,163
|
835
|
|||||
38,915
|
37,820
|
||||||
Less
allowances for discounts, returns and
uncollectible
accounts
|
(2,904
|
)
|
(1,902
|
)
|
|||
$
|
36,011
|
$
|
35,918
|
30
4. Inventories
Inventories
consist of the following (in thousands):
December
31, 2005
|
March
31,
2005
|
||||||
Packaging
and raw materials
|
$
|
3,970
|
$
|
3,587
|
|||
Finished
goods
|
29,712
|
21,246
|
|||||
$
|
33,682
|
$
|
24,833
|
Inventories
are shown net of allowances for obsolete and slow moving inventory of $1.6
million and $1.5 million at December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2005,
respectively.
5. Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
December
31, 2005
|
March
31,
2005
|
||||||
Machinery
|
$
|
3,338
|
$
|
3,099
|
|||
Computer
equipment
|
928
|
771
|
|||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
303
|
244
|
|||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
340
|
173
|
|||||
4,909
|
4,287
|
||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(3,456
|
)
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|||
$
|
1,453
|
$
|
2,324
|
6. Goodwill
As
discussed in Note 2 , the Company purchased the ownership interests of Dental
Concepts in November 2005. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value
of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed has been recorded as
goodwill.
A
reconciliation of the activity affecting the carrying value of goodwill is
as
follows:
Balance
- March 31, 2005
|
$
|
294,731
|
||
Goodwill
acquired in connection with the
acquisition
of Dental Concepts, LLC
|
3,542
|
|||
Balance
- December 31, 2005
|
$
|
298,273
|
31
7. Intangible
Assets
On
October 28, 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of the “Chore Boy®”
brand of cleaning pads and sponges. The purchase price of the Chore Boy® brand
of $22.6 million, including direct costs of $0.4 million, has been allocated
to
indefinite lived intangible assets and a covenant not-to-compete of $22.6
million and $0.04 million, respectively.
Intangible
assets consist of the following (in thousands):
December
31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
|
Accumulated
|
Net
|
|||||||||||
Amount
|
Additions
|
Amortization
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
Indefinite
lived trademarks
|
$
|
522,346
|
$
|
22,585
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
544,931
|
|||||
Amortizable
intangible assets
|
|||||||||||||
Trademarks
|
94,900
|
22,395
|
(15,359
|
)
|
101,936
|
||||||||
Non-compete
agreement
|
158
|
38
|
(42
|
)
|
154
|
||||||||
95,058
|
22,433
|
(15,401
|
)
|
102,090
|
|||||||||
$
|
617,404
|
$
|
45,018
|
$
|
(15,401
|
)
|
$
|
647,021
|
March
31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
|
Accumulated
|
Net
|
|||||||||||
Amount
|
Additions
|
Amortization
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
Indefinite
lived trademarks
|
$
|
522,346
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
522,346
|
|||||
Amortizable
intangible assets
|
|||||||||||||
Trademarks
|
94,900
|
(8,775
|
)
|
86,125
|
|||||||||
Non-compete
agreement
|
158
|
(16
|
)
|
142
|
|||||||||
95,058
|
--
|
(8,791
|
)
|
86,267
|
|||||||||
$
|
617,404
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
(8,791
|
)
|
$
|
608,613
|
At
December 31, 2005, intangible assets are expected to be amortized over a period
of five to 30 years as follows (in thousands):
Twelve
Months Ending December 31
|
||||
2006
|
$
|
10,061
|
||
2007
|
10,061
|
|||
2008
|
10,061
|
|||
2009
|
9,013
|
|||
2010
|
8,665
|
|||
Thereafter
|
54,229
|
|||
$
|
102,090
|
32
8. Long-Term
Debt
Long-term
debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
December
31,
2005
|
March
31,
2005
|
|||||
Senior
revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), which expires on
April 6, 2009, is available for maximum borrowings of up to $60.0
million.
The Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at the Company’s option at
either the prime rate plus a variable margin or LIBOR plus a variable
margin. The variable margin ranges from 0.75% to 2.50% and at December
31,
2005, the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility was 8.75%
per
annum. The Company is also required to pay a variable commitment
fee on
the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility. At December
31, 2005,
the commitment fee was 0.50% of the unused line. The Revolving Credit
Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s
assets.
|
$
|
25,000
|
$
|
--
|
|||
Senior
secured term loan facility, (“Tranche B Term Loan Facility”) that bears
interest at the Company’s option at either the prime rate or LIBOR plus a
variable margin of 2.25%. At December
31,
2005, the weighted average applicable interest rate on the Tranche
B Term
Loan Facility was 6.34%. Principal payments of $933 and interest
are
payable quarterly. In February 2005, the Tranche B Term Loan Facility
was
amended to increase the amount available thereunder by $200.0 million,
all
of which is available at December
31,
2005. Current amounts outstanding under the Tranche B Term Loan Facility
mature on April 6, 2011, while amounts borrowed pursuant to the amendment
will mature on October 6, 2011. The
Tranche B Term Loan Facility is collateralized by substantially all
of the
Company’s assets.
|
366,563
|
369,360
|
|||||
Senior
Subordinated Notes (“Senior Notes”) that bear interest at 9.25% which is
payable on April 15th
and October 15th
of
each year. The Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2012; however, the
Company
may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes on or prior to April 15,
2008
at a redemption price equal to 100%, plus a make-whole premium, and
on or
after April 15, 2008 at redemption prices set forth in the indenture
governing the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes are unconditionally
guaranteed by Prestige International and its wholly owned subsidiaries
(other than the issuer). Each of these guarantees is joint and several.
There are no significant restrictions on the ability of any of the
guarantors to obtain funds from their subsidiaries.
|
126,000
|
126,000
|
|||||
517,563
|
495,360
|
||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
(3,730
|
)
|
(3,730
|
)
|
|||
$
|
513,833
|
$
|
491,630
|
33
The
Revolving Credit Facility and the Tranche B Term Loan Facility (together the
“Senior Credit Facility”) contain various financial covenants, including
provisions that require the Company to maintain certain leverage ratios,
interest coverage ratios and fixed charge coverage ratios. Additionally, the
Senior Credit Facility contains provisions that restrict the Company from
undertaking specified corporate actions, such as asset dispositions,
acquisitions, dividend payments, changes of control, incurrence of indebtedness,
creation of liens and transactions with affiliates. The Company was in
compliance with its financial and restrictive covenants under the Senior Credit
Facility at December 31, 2005.
Future
principal payments required in accordance with the terms of the Senior Credit
Facility and the Senior Notes are as follows (in thousands):
Twelve
Months Ending December 31
|
||||
2006
|
$
|
3,730
|
||
2007
|
3,730
|
|||
2008
|
3,730
|
|||
2009
|
28,730
|
|||
2010
|
3,730
|
|||
Thereafter
|
473,913
|
|||
$
|
517,563
|
The
Company entered into a 5% interest rate cap agreement with a financial
institution to mitigate the impact of changing interest rates. The agreement
provides for a notional amount of $20.0 million and terminates in June 2006.
The
Company also entered into interest rate cap agreements with another financial
institution that became effective on August 30, 2005, with a total notional
amount of $180.0 million and cap rates ranging from 3.25% to 3.75%. The
agreements terminate on May 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008 as to $50.0 million, $80.0
million and $50.0 million, respectively. The Company is accounting for the
interest rate cap agreements as cash flow hedges. The fair value of the interest
rate cap agreements was $2.9 million at December
31,
2005.
9. Members’
Equity
In
connection with the Prestige
Brands Holdings’
IPO, the
Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (“the
Plan”). The Plan provides for grants of stock options, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, deferred stock units and other equity-based awards.
Directors, officers and other employees of the Company and its subsidiaries,
as
well as others performing services for the Company, are eligible for grants
under the Plan. At December 31, 2005, there were 4.7 million shares available
for issuance under the Plan.
Pursuant
to the provisions of the Plan, on July 29, 2005, each of the Company’s four
independent members of the Board of Directors received an award of 6.2 thousand
shares of Prestige Brands Holdings’ common stock in connection with Company’s
directors’ compensation arrangements. Of such amount, 1.8 thousand shares
represent a one-time grant of unrestricted shares, while the remaining 4.4
thousand shares represent restricted shares that vest over a two year period.
The benefits, as well as the costs associated with these relationships were
contributed to the Company.
On
August
4, 2005, Frank Palantoni joined the Company as President and Chief Operating
Officer. In connection therewith, the Board of Directors granted Mr. Palantoni
30.9 thousand shares of Prestige Brands Holdings’ restricted common stock and
options to purchase an additional 61.8 thousand shares of Prestige Brands
Holdings’ common stock at an exercise price of $12.95 per share. The options
vest over a period of five years while the restricted shares will vest
contingent upon the attainment of certain performance-based benchmarks. The
benefits, as well as the costs associated with these relationships were
contributed to the Company.
34
In
September 2005, the Company repurchased 13.0 thousand shares of Prestige Brands
Holdings’ restricted common stock from former employees pursuant to the
provisions of the various employee stock purchase agreements. The average
purchase price of the shares was $1.70 per share. The benefits associated with
these transactions were contributed to the Company.
In
October 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the grant of 156.0
thousand shares of Prestige Brands Holdings’ restricted stock with a fair market
value of $12.32 per share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on
September 30, 2005, to employees. The issuance of such shares is contingent
upon
the Company’s attainment of certain revenue and earnings per share targets.
Additionally, in the event that an employee terminates his or her employment
with the Company prior to October 1, 2008, the vesting date, the shares will
be
forfeited. The benefits, as well as the costs associated with these
relationships were contributed to the Company.
10. Related
Party Transactions
The
Company had entered in an agreement with an affiliate of GTCR Golder Rauner
II,
LLC (“GTCR”), a private equity firm and an investor in the Company, whereby the
GTCR affiliate was to provide management and advisory services to the Company
for an aggregate annual compensation of $4.0 million. The agreement was
terminated in February 2005. During the three month and nine month periods
ended
December 31, 2004, the Company paid the affiliate of GTCR a management fee
of
$1.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively.
11. Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are recorded in the Company’s quarterly financial statements based on the
Company’s estimated annual effective income tax rate. The effective rates used
in the calculation of income taxes were 38.6% and 36.4% for the three month
periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the nine month
periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the effective tax rates were 39.0%
and
38.2%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate for the three month
period ended December 31, 2005 results from the increase in the Company’s
graduated federal income tax rate from 34% to 35%, due to the formation of
the
Company in February 2005 and the election to file a consolidated federal income
tax return. The difference in the effective tax rates for the nine month periods
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 results primarily from the computation of
taxes
on a separate company basis during the nine month period ended December 31,
2004.
12. Commitments
and Contingencies
In
June
2003, Dr. Jason Theodosakis filed a lawsuit, Theodosakis v. Walgreens, et al.,
in Federal District Court in Arizona, alleging that two of the Company’s
subsidiaries, Medtech Products and Pecos Pharmaceutical, as well as other
unrelated parties, infringed the trade dress of two of his published books.
Specifically, Dr. Theodosakis published “The Arthritis Cure” and “Maximizing the
Arthritis Cure” regarding the use of dietary supplements to treat arthritis
patients. Dr. Theodosakis alleged that his books have a distinctive trade dress,
or cover layout, design, color and typeface, and those products that the
defendants sold under the ARTHx trademarks infringed the books’ trade dress and
constituted unfair competition and false designation of origin. Additionally,
Dr. Theodosakis alleged that the defendants made false endorsements of the
products by referencing his books on the product packaging and that the use
of
his name, books and trade dress invaded his right to publicity. The Company
sold
the ARTHx trademarks, goodwill and inventory to a third party, Contract
Pharmacal Corporation, in March 2003. On January 12, 2005, the court granted
the
Company’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed all claims against Pecos and
Medtech. The plaintiff has filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals which
is
pending.
35
On
January 3, 2005, the Company was served with process by its former lead counsel
in the Theodosakis litigation seeking $679,000 plus interest. The case was
filed
in the Supreme Court of New York and is styled as Dickstein Shapiro et al v.
Medtech Products, Inc. In February 2005, the plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint naming the Pecos Pharmaceutical Company as defendant. The Company
has
answered and filed a counterclaim against Dickstein and also filed a third
party
complaint against the Lexington Insurance Company, the Company’s product
liability carrier. The Company believes that if there is any obligation to
the
Dickstein firm relating to this matter, it is an obligation of Lexington and
not
the Company.
The
Company and certain of its officers and directors are defendants in a
consolidated putative securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Consolidated
Action”). The first of the six consolidated cases was filed on August 3, 2005.
Plaintiffs purport to represent a class of shareholders of the Company who
purchased shares between February 9, 2005 through November 15, 2005. Plaintiffs
also name as defendants the underwriters in the Company’s initial public
offering and a private equity fund that was a selling shareholder in the
offering. The district court has appointed a Lead Plaintiff. On December 23,
2005, the Lead Plaintiff filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint, which
asserts claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of
1933
and Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The
Lead Plaintiff generally alleges that the Company issued a series of materially
false and misleading statements in connection with its initial public offering
and thereafter in regard to the following areas: the accounting issues described
in the Company’s press release issued on or about November 15, 2005; and the
alleged failure to disclose that demand for certain of the Company’s products
was declining and that the Company was planning to withdraw several products
from the market. Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages. The Company
intends to file a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint
on
or about February 21, 2006. The Company’s management believes the allegations to
be unfounded, will vigorously pursue its defenses, and cannot reasonably
estimate the potential range of loss, if any.
On
September 6, 2005, another putative securities class action lawsuit
substantially similar to the initially-filed complaints in the Consolidated
Action described above was filed against the same defendants in the Circuit
Court of Cook County, Illinois (the “Chicago Action”). In light of the
first-filed Consolidated Action, proceedings in the Chicago Action have been
stayed until a ruling on defendants’ anticipated motions to dismiss the
consolidated complaint in the Consolidated Action. The Company’s management
believes the allegations to be unfounded, will vigorously pursue its defenses,
and cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any.
The
Company is also involved from time to time in routine legal matters and other
claims incidental to its business. When it appears probable in management’s
judgment that the Company will incur monetary damages or other costs in
connection with such claims and proceedings, and such costs can be reasonably
estimated, liabilities are recorded in the financial statements and charges
are
recorded against earnings. The Company believes the resolution of such routine
matters and other incidental claims, taking into account reserves and insurance,
will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results
of
operation.
13. Concentrations
of Risk
The
Company’s sales are concentrated in the areas of over-the-counter pharmaceutical
products, personal care products and household cleaning products. The Company
sells its products to mass merchandisers, food and drug accounts, and dollar
and
club stores. During the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2005,
approximately 59.8% and 62.1%, respectively, of the Company’s total sales were
derived from its four major brands while during the three and nine month periods
ended December 31, 2004, approximately 64.7% and 64.6%, respectively, of the
Company’s total sales were derived from these four brands. During the three and
nine month periods ended December 31, 2005, approximately
36
20.0%
and
22.4%, respectively, of the Company’s net sales were made to one customer, while
during the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2004, 27.7% and
28.1%
of net sales were to this customer. At December 31, 2005, approximately 19.6%
of
accounts receivable were owed by one customer.
The
Company manages product distribution in the continental United States through
a
main distribution center in St. Louis, Missouri. A serious disruption, such
as a
flood or fire, to the main distribution center could damage the Company’s
inventories and could materially impair the Company’s ability to distribute its
products to customers in a timely manner or at a reasonable cost. The Company
could incur significantly higher costs and experience longer lead times
associated with the distribution of its products to its customers during the
time that it takes the Company to reopen or replace its distribution center.
As
a result, any such disruption could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s sales and profitability.
14. Business
Segments
Segment
information has been prepared in accordance with FASB Statement No. 131,
“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” The
Company’s operating segments are based on its product lines and consist of (i)
Over-the-Counter Drugs, (ii) Personal Care and (iii) Household Cleaning.
Accordingly, within each reportable segment are operations that have similar
economic characteristics, including the nature of their products, production
process, type of customer and method of distribution.
There
were no inter-segment sales or transfers during the periods ended December
31,
2005 and 2004. The Company evaluates the performance of its product lines and
allocates resources to them based primarily on contribution margin. The table
below summarizes information about reportable segments (in
thousands).
Quarter
Ended December 31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter
|
Personal
|
Household
|
|||||||||||
Drug
|
Care
|
Cleaning
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
42,051
|
$
|
7,007
|
$
|
30,771
|
$
|
79,829
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
--
|
--
|
27
|
27
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
42,051
|
7,007
|
30,798
|
79,856
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
15,821
|
3,954
|
18,951
|
38,726
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
26,230
|
3,053
|
11,847
|
41,130
|
|||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
4,926
|
724
|
1,735
|
7,385
|
|||||||||
Contribution
margin
|
$
|
21,304
|
$
|
2,329
|
$
|
10,112
|
33,745
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
8,993
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
24,752
|
||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(9,526
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(5,881
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
9,345
|
37
Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter
|
Personal
|
Household
|
|||||||||||
Drug
|
Care
|
Cleaning
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
116,199
|
$
|
21,595
|
$
|
78,783
|
$
|
216,577
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
--
|
--
|
77
|
77
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
116,199
|
21,595
|
78,860
|
216,654
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
43,044
|
12,307
|
47,873
|
103,224
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
73,155
|
9,288
|
30,987
|
113,430
|
|||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
18,192
|
2,870
|
5,245
|
26,307
|
|||||||||
Contribution
margin
|
$
|
54,963
|
$
|
6,418
|
$
|
25,742
|
87,123
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
23,287
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
63,836
|
||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(26,707
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(14,481
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
22,648
|
Quarter
Ended December 31, 2004
|
|||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter
|
Personal
|
Household
|
|||||||||||
Drug
|
Care
|
Cleaning
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ 40,964
|
|
$ 7,612
|
|
$
24,442
|
|
$
73,018
|
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
--
|
--
|
25
|
25
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
40,964
|
7,612
|
24,467
|
73,043
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
14,545
|
3,681
|
15,015
|
33,241
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
26,419
|
3,931
|
9,452
|
39,802
|
|||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
3,357
|
797
|
1,014
|
5,168
|
|||||||||
Contribution
margin
|
$
|
23,062
|
$
|
3,134
|
$
|
8,438
|
34,634
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
8,295
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
26,339
|
||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(11,994
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(5,218
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
9,127
|
38
Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2004
|
|||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter
|
Personal
|
Household
|
|||||||||||
Drug
|
Care
|
Cleaning
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
113,067
|
$
|
24,593
|
$
|
73,970
|
$
|
211,630
|
|||||
Other
revenues
|
--
|
--
|
126
|
126
|
|||||||||
Total
revenues
|
113,067
|
24,593
|
74,096
|
211,756
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
44,075
|
12,800
|
47,445
|
104,320
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
68,992
|
11,793
|
26,651
|
107,436
|
|||||||||
Advertising
and promotion
|
15,709
|
4,213
|
4,480
|
24,402
|
|||||||||
Contribution
margin
|
$
|
53,283
|
$
|
7,580
|
$
|
22,171
|
83,034
|
||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
22,261
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
60,773
|
||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(41,444
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(7,392
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
11,937
|
During
the nine month periods ended December 2005 and 2004, 97.9% and 97.7%,
respectively, of sales were made to customers in the United States and Canada.
No individual geographical area accounted for more than 10% of net sales in
any
of the periods presented. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, all of the Company’s
long-term assets were located in the United States of America and have not
been
allocated between segments.
39
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc. (“the Company”), as the indirect holding company of
Prestige Brands International, LLC (“Prestige International”) does not conduct
ongoing business operations. As a result, the financial information for the
Company and Prestige International is identical for the purposes of the
discussion of operating results in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Prestige International is an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and the parent company of
Prestige Brands, Inc., the issuer of our 9.25% senior subordinated notes due
2012 (“Senior Notes”) and the borrower under the senior credit facility,
consisting of a Revolving Credit Facility, Tranche B Term Loan Facility and
a
Tranche C Term Loan Facility (together the “Senior Credit Facility”). Prestige
International is also the parent guarantor of the obligations.
General
We
sell
well-recognized, brand name over-the-counter drug, household cleaning and
personal care products. We operate in niche segments of these categories where
we can use the strength of our brands, our established retail distribution
network, a low-cost operating model and our experienced management team as
a
competitive advantage to grow our presence in these categories and, as a result,
grow our sales and profits.
We
have
grown our brand portfolio by acquiring strong and well-recognized brands from
larger consumer products and pharmaceutical companies, as well as other brands
from smaller private companies. While the brands we have purchased from larger
consumer products and pharmaceutical companies have long histories of support
and brand development, we believe that at the time we acquired them they were
considered “non-core” by their previous owners and did not benefit from the
focus of senior level management or strong marketing support. We believe that
the brands we have purchased from smaller private companies have been
constrained by the limited resources of their prior owners. After acquiring
a
brand, we seek to increase its sales, market share and distribution in both
existing and new channels. We pursue this growth through increased spending
on
advertising and promotion, new marketing strategies, improved packaging and
formulations and innovative new products.
In
February 2005, we raised $448.0 million through an initial public offering
of
28.0 million shares of common stock. The net proceeds of the offering were
$416.8 million after deducting $28.0 million of underwriters’ discounts and
commissions and $3.2 million of offering expenses. The net proceeds of $416.8
million plus $3.0 million from our revolving credit facility and $8.8 million
of
cash on hand went to repay $100.0 million of our existing senior indebtedness
(plus a repayment premium of $3.0 million and accrued interest of $0.5 million
as of February 15, 2005), to redeem $84.0 million in aggregate principal amount
of our existing 9.25% senior subordinated notes (plus a redemption premium
of
$7.8 million and accrued interest of $3.3 million as of March 18, 2005), to
repurchase an aggregate of 4,397,950 shares of our common stock held by the
GTCR
funds and the TCW/Crescent funds for $30.2 million, and to contribute $199.8
million to Prestige International Holdings, LLC, which was used to redeem all
of
its outstanding senior preferred units and class B preferred units. We did
not
receive any of the proceeds from the sale of 4.2 million shares by the selling
stockholders as a result of the underwriters exercising their over-allotment
options.
On
October 28, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the “Chore Boy®” brand of
cleaning pads and sponges. The purchase price of the Chore Boy® brand of $22.6
million, including direct costs of $0.4 million, has been allocated to
indefinite lived intangible assets and a covenant not-to-compete of $22.6
million and $0.04 million, respectively. We purchased the Chore Boy brand with
funds generated from operations.
40
On
November 8, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the ownership interests of
Dental Concepts, LLC, a marketer of therapeutic oral care products sold under
“The Doctor’s®” brand. The purchase price of the ownership interests was
approximately $30.5 million, including fees and expenses of the acquisition
of
$0.5 million. We financed the acquisition price through the utilization of
our
senior revolving credit facility and with cash resources of $30.0 million and
$0.5 million, respectively.
We
expect
that both the Chore Boy and The Doctor’s® product lines will benefit from our
business model of outsourcing manufacturing and increasing awareness though
targeted marketing and advertising. Additionally, we anticipate benefits
associated with our ability to leverage certain economies of scale and the
elimination of redundant operations.
Quarterly
Period Ended December 31, 2005 compared to the Quarterly
Period
Ended December 31, 2004
Net
Sales
Net
sales
for the period ended December 31, 2005 were $79.9 million compared to $73.0
million for the comparable period of 2004. This represented an increase of
$6.9
million, or 9.3%, from the prior period. The Over-the-Counter Drug segment
had
net sales of $42.1 million for the period ended December 31, 2005, an increase
of $1.1 million, or 2.7%, above net sales of $41.0 million for the period ended
December 31, 2004. The Household Cleaning segment had net sales of $30.8 million
for the period ended December 31, 2005, an increase of $6.3 million, or 25.9%,
above net sales of $24.5 million for the period ended December 31, 2004. The
Personal Care segment had net sales of $7.0 million for the period ended
December 31, 2005, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 7.9%, below net sales of
$7.6
million for the period ended December 31, 2004.
Over-the-Counter
Drug Segment
Net
sales
in the Over-the-Counter Drug segment were $42.1 million for the period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $41.0 million for the comparable period of 2004. This
represented an increase of $1.1 million, or 2.7%, from the prior period. The
sales increase is primarily attributed to “The Doctor’s®” brand which was
acquired with the Dental Concepts acquisition in November 2005. Excluding sales
related to The Doctor’s brand, net sales for this segment were down 1.6%. Strong
sales gains for Little Remedies versus same period last year were offset by
declines in the Chloraseptic, Clear eyes and Compound W brands. The gain in
Little Remedies is attributed to increased consumer and professional
advertising, expanded distribution and new items. The decline in Chloraseptic
was a result of temporary supply issues with the relief strips product line.
The
Clear eyes sales decline is primarily a result of our having fulfilled
backorders of the smaller size item during the period ending December 31, 2004.
Retail movement for Clear eyes during the period ending December 31, 2004 was
up
due to the new items and media support. Compound W factory shipments during
the
2005 period were down versus the same period last year, but on an improving
trend from the two previous periods.
Personal
Care Segment
Net
sales
of the Personal Care segment were $7.0 million for the period ended December
31,
2005 versus $7.6 million for the comparable period of 2004. This represented
a
decrease of $0.6 million, or 7.9%, from the prior period. The sales decrease
is
a result Denorex brand’s continued decline in consumer consumption.
Household
Cleaning Segment
Net
sales
of the Household Cleaning segment were $30.8 million for the period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $24.5 million for the comparable period of 2004. This
represented an increase of $6.3 million, or 25.9%, from the prior period. The
sales increase is a result the acquisition of the Chore Boy line of scrubbers
and strong factory shipments of Comet and Spic and Span brands. The Chore Boy
brand, which was acquired in October 2005, contributed $2.3 million of sales
during the period. The increase in Comet sales is attributed to strong retail
consumption of powder and sprays and expanded distribution of Comet Cream.
The
Spic and Span sales increase is a result of expanded
distribution.
41
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit for the period ended December 31, 2005 was $41.1 million compared to
$39.8 million for the comparable period of 2004. This represented an increase
of
$1.3 million, or 3.3%, from the prior period. The increase in gross profit
is
primarily a result of the increased sales activity. Gross profit as a percent
of
sales was 51.5% for the period ended December 31, 2005 versus 54.5% for the
comparable period of 2004. The decrease in gross profit percentage is a result
of higher petroleum costs and changes in product mix. The Household Cleaning
segment’s sales, which have the lowest gross margin as a percent of sales of all
the segments, represented 38.6% of the Company’s overall sales during the period
versus 33.5% in the same period last year.
Over-the-Counter
Drug Segment
Gross
profit of the Over-the-Counter segment was $26.2 million for the period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $26.4 million for the comparable period of 2004. This
represented a decrease of $0.2 million, or 0.7%, from the prior period. Gross
profit as a percent of sales was 62.4% for the period ended December 31, 2005
versus 64.5% for the comparable period of 2004. The decrease in gross profit
percentage is a result of higher petroleum costs and changes in the sales mix.
Personal
Care Segment
Gross
profit of the personal care segment was $3.1 million for the period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $4.0 million for the comparable period of 2004. This
represented a decrease of $0.9 million, or 22.3%, from the prior period. Gross
profit as a percent of sales was 43.6% for the period ended December 31, 2005
versus 51.6% for the comparable period of 2004. The gross profit decrease is
due
to the sales shortfall, increased costs of goods and higher transportation
costs. The increased cost of goods is primarily a result of higher petroleum
prices related to the Cutex product line, as well as higher costs associated
with the increased “value” size for Denorex which was introduced last fall.
Household
Cleaning Segment
Gross
profit of the Household Cleaning segment was $11.8 million for the period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $9.5 million for the comparable period of 2004. This
represented an increase of $2.3 million, or 25.3%, from the prior period. The
increase in gross profit is primarily a result of the increased sales activity.
Gross profit as a percent of sales was 38.5% for the period ended December
31,
2005 versus 38.6% for the comparable period of 2004 as a result of increased
transportation costs partially offset by changes in the product
mix.
Contribution
Margin
Contribution
margin was $33.7 million for the period ended December 31, 2005 versus $34.6
million for the comparable period of 2004. This represented a decrease of $0.9
million, or 2.6%, from the prior period. The contribution margin decrease is
a
result of increased sales and gross margin as discussed above offset by a $2.2
million increase in advertising and promotion spending in the period ended
December 31, 2005.
Over-the-Counter
Drug Segment
Contribution
margin of the Over-the-Counter drug segment was $21.3 million for the period
ended December 31, 2005 versus $23.1 million for the comparable period of 2004.
The contribution margin decrease is a result of the gross profit decline as
discussed above plus a $1.6 million increase in advertising and promotion
spending in the period ended December 31, 2005. Dental Concepts contributed
$0.4
million to the increased advertising and promotion expenditures while the
balance is a result of increased spending on Chloraseptic, Clear Eyes and Little
Remedies during the period ended December 31, 2005.
42
Personal
Care Segment
Contribution
margin of the personal care segment was $2.3 million for the period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $3.1 million for the comparable period of 2004. This
represented a decrease of $0.8 million, or 25.7%, from the prior period. The
contribution margin decrease is primarily the result of the gross profit decline
discussed above, partially offset by a $0.1 million reduction in advertising
and
promotion spending in the period ended December 31, 2005.
Household
Cleaning Segment
Contribution
margin of the Household Cleaning segment was $10.1 million for the period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $8.4 million for the comparable period of 2004. This
represented an increase of $1.7 million, or 19.8%, from the prior period. The
contribution margin increase is a result of the previously discussed gross
profit increase, partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in advertising
and
promotion spending in the period ended December 31, 2005 related primarily
to
Comet media spending.
General
and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses were $6.2 million for the period ended December
31,
2005 versus $5.7 million for the comparable period of 2004. The increase is
primarily due to accounting and legal fees associated with the special
investigation conducted by the Board of Directors and the related restatement
of
the Company's historical financial results.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation
and amortization expense was $2.8 million for the period ended December 31,
2005
versus $2.6 million for the comparable period of 2004. The increase was
primarily due to amortization of intangible assets related to the Dental
Concepts acquisition.
Interest
Expense, net
Net
interest expense was $9.5 million for the period ended December 31, 2005 versus
$12.0 million for the comparable period of 2004. This represented a decrease
of
$2.5 million, or 20.6%, from the prior period. The decrease in interest expense
is due to the reduction of indebtedness outstanding, offset by higher interest
rates on the remaining indebtedness.
Income
Taxes
The
income tax provision for the period ended December 31, 2005 was $5.9 million,
with an effective rate of 38.6%, compared to $5.2 million, with an effective
rate of 36.4% for period ended December 31, 2004. The increase in effective
tax
rate is primarily the result of an increase in the graduated federal income
tax
rate from 34% to 35%, effective March 31, 2005, due to the formation of the
Company in February 2005 and the election to file a consolidated federal income
tax return.
Nine
Month Period Ended December 31, 2005 compared to the Nine Month
Period
Ended December 31, 2004
Net
Sales
Net
sales
for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005 were $216.7 million compared
to $211.8 million for the comparable period of 2004. This represented an
increase of $4.9 million, or 2.3%, from the prior period. The Over-the-Counter
Drug segment had net sales of $116.2 million for the nine month period ended
December 31, 2005, an increase of $3.1 million, or 2.8%, above net sales of
$113.1 million for the nine month period ended December 31, 2004. The Household
Cleaning segment had net sales of $78.9 million for the nine month period ended
December 31, 2005, an increase of $4.8 million, or 6.4%, greater than net sales
of $74.1 million for the nine month period ended December 31, 2004. The Personal
Care segment had net sales of $21.6 million for the nine month period ended
December 31, 2005, a decrease of $3.0 million, or 12.2%, below net sales of
$24.6 million for the nine month period ended December 31, 2004.
43
Over-the-Counter
Drug Segment
Net
sales
in the Over-the-Counter Drug segment were $116.2 million for the nine month
period ended December 31, 2005 versus $113.1 million for the comparable period
of 2004. This represented an increase of $3.1 million, or 2.8%, over the prior
period. The sales increase resulted from year-over-year sales gains for the
Chloraseptic and Clear Eyes brands, the acquisition of Dental Concepts in
November 2005, the inclusion of Little Remedies for the entire 2005 fiscal
period (Little Remedies was acquired in October 2004; therefore only two
months of operations were included in the nine month period ended December
31,
2004.), partially offset by a decline in sales of Compound W, New Skin and
Murine. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, net sales for the segment were
down 4.9% for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005, versus the same
period last year. The Chloraseptic and Clear Eyes gains are a result of
continued strong retail consumer consumption during the period. The decline
in
Compound W is primarily a result of softness in the retail wart remover
category. The decline in New Skin is a result of the drop in sales in the retail
liquid bandage category. The decline in Murine is a result of decreased consumer
consumption and lost distribution.
Personal
Care Segment
Net
sales
of the Personal Care segment were $21.6 million for the nine month period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $24.6 million for the comparable period of 2004. This
represented a decrease of $3.0 million, or 12.2%, from the prior period. The
sales decrease is primarily attributable to the Denorex brand’s continued
decline in consumer consumption and lower Cutex sales due to softness in the
nail polish remover category.
Household
Cleaning Segment
Net
sales
of the Household Cleaning segment were $78.9 million for the nine month period
ended December 31, 2005 versus $74.1 million for the comparable period of 2004.
This represented an increase of $4.8 million, or 6.4%, over the prior period.
The sales increase was the result of increased shipments of Comet and Spic
and
Span and the acquisition of the Chore Boy brand in October 2005, which
contributed $2.3 million of the net sales increase. The increase in Comet sales
is a result of improved consumer consumption of the powder, price increases
on
the powder items at the beginning of the fiscal year and increased distribution
of Comet Cream. These gains were partially offset by the discontinuance of
the
Clean & Flush toilet bowl product. The Spic and Span sales increase is
primarily due to distribution gains.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005 was $113.4 million
compared to $107.4 million for the comparable period of 2004. This represented
an increase of $6.0 million, or 5.6%, over the prior period. The nine month
period ended December 31, 2004 included inventory step-up costs associated
with
the acquisitions of businesses of approximately $5.3 million versus $0.1 million
for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005. Excluding costs associated
with the inventory step-up in the period ended December 31, 2004, gross profit
increased by $0.7, million or 0.7%, for the nine month period ended December
31,
2005. Gross profit as a percent of sales was 52.4% for the nine month period
ended December 31, 2005 versus 50.7% for the comparable period of 2004.
Excluding the inventory step-up charge, gross profit in the period ended
December 31, 2004 was 53.3%. The decrease in gross profit as a percent of sales,
excluding inventory step-up charge, is primarily a result of higher petroleum
costs and changes in product mix.
Over-the-Counter
Drug Segment
Gross
profit for the Over-the-Counter segment was $73.2 million for the nine month
period ended December 31, 2005 versus $69.0 million for the comparable period
of
2004. This represented an increase of $4.2 million, or 6.0%, from the prior
period. Excluding $2.7 million and $0.1 million of costs associated with the
inventory step-ups in the nine month period ended December 31, 2004 and 2005,
respectively, gross profit increased by $1.6 million, or 2.0%, for the nine
month period ended December 31, 2005. Gross profit as a percent of sales was
63.0% for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005 versus 61.0% for the
comparable period of 2004. Excluding the inventory step up charge for
the
44
nine
month period ended December 31, 2004, gross profit in the prior period was
63.4%. The decrease in gross profit percentage is a result of higher petroleum
costs.
Personal
Care Segment
Gross
profit of the personal care segment was $9.3 million for the nine month period
ended December 31, 2005 versus $11.8 million for the comparable period of 2004.
This represented a decrease of $2.5 million, or 21.2%, from the prior period.
Excluding $0.2 million of costs associated with the inventory step-up in the
nine month period ended December 31, 2004, gross profit decreased by $2.7
million, or 22.5%, for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005. Gross
profit as a percent of sales was 43.0% for the nine month period ended December
31, 2005 versus 48.0% for the comparable period of 2004. Excluding the inventory
step-up charge, gross profit in the period ended December 31, 2004 was 48.8%.
The gross profit decrease is due to the sales shortfall, increased costs of
goods and higher transportation costs. The increased cost of goods is primarily
a result of higher petroleum prices related to the Cutex product line and the
higher costs associated with the new Denorex “value size” which was introduced
last fall.
Household
Cleaning Segment
Gross
profit of the Household Cleaning segment was $31.0 million for the nine month
period ended December 31, 2005 versus $26.7 million for the comparable period
of
2004. This represented an increase of $4.3 million, or 16.3%, from the prior
period. Excluding $2.4 million of costs associated with the inventory step-up
in
the nine month period ended December 31, 2004, gross profit increased by $1.9
million, or 6.6%, for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005. The
increase in gross profit is a result of the sales increase and a slight
improvement in the gross profit as a percent of sales. Gross profit as a percent
of sales was 39.3% for the period ended December 31, 2005 versus 36.0% for
the
comparable period of 2004. Excluding the inventory step-up charge, gross profit
in the period ended December 31, 2004 was 39.2%. The gross profit percentage
improvement is a result of discontinuance of the lower margin Clean & Flush
toilet bowl product and sales of certain obsolete Spic and Span inventory in
the
nine month period ended December 31, 2004, partially offset by increased
distribution costs related to rising fuel costs.
Contribution
Margin
Contribution
margin was $87.1 million for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005
versus $83.0 million for the comparable period of 2004. This represented an
increase of $4.1 million, or 4.9%, from the prior period. The contribution
margin increase is a result of higher sales and gross margin as discussed above,
partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in advertising and promotion
spending in the nine month period ended December 31, 2005. Excluding costs
associated with the inventory step-up mentioned above, contribution margin
decreased by $1.1 million or 1.2% for the nine month period ended December
31,
2005 versus the comparable period of 2004.
Over-the-Counter
Drug Segment
Contribution
margin for the Over-the-Counter drug segment was $55.0 million for the nine
month period ended December 31, 2005 versus $53.3 million for the comparable
period of 2004. Excluding costs associated with the inventory step-up mentioned
above, contribution margin decreased by $0.9 million, or 1.6%, for the nine
month period ended December 31, 2005 versus the comparable period of 2004.
The
contribution margin decrease is a result of the increase in sales and gross
profit discussed above, offset by $2.5 million increase in advertising and
promotion spending in the nine month period ended December 31, 2005. Advertising
and promotion increased during the period as a result of the acquisitions of
Little Remedies and The Doctor’s brands, as well as increased spending on Clear
Eyes and Compound W.
Personal
Care Segment
Contribution
margin for the personal care segment was $6.4 million for the nine month period
ended December 31, 2005 versus $7.6 million for the comparable period of 2004.
This represented a decrease of $1.2 million, or 15.3%, from the prior period.
Excluding costs associated with the inventory step-up mentioned above,
contribution margin decreased by $1.4 million. The contribution margin decrease
is a result of lower sales and gross margin as discussed above, partially offset
by a $1.3 million reduction in
45
advertising
and promotion spending in the nine month period ended December 31, 2005. The
reduction in advertising and promotion was primarily a result of a shift in
Cutex advertising from television to print media and reduced spending behind
Denorex.
Household
Cleaning Segment
Contribution
margin of the Household Cleaning segment was $25.7 million for the nine month
period ended December 31, 2005 versus $22.2 million for the comparable period
of
2004. This represented an increase of $3.5 million, or 16.1%, from the prior
period. Excluding costs associated with the inventory step-up mentioned above,
contribution margin increased by $1.1 million or 4.7% for the nine month period
ended December 31, 2005 versus the comparable period of 2004. The contribution
margin increase is a result of increased sales and gross margin as discussed
above, partially offset by increased advertising and promotion spending of
$0.8
million, or 17%, during the nine month period ended December 31, 2005. The
increased advertising and promotion is primarily related to Comet media
spending.
General
and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses were $15.2 million for the nine month period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $15.1 million for the comparable period of 2004.
Synergies achieved with the integration of the Medtech, Bonita Bay and Spic
and
Span acquisitions were offset by an increase in costs associated with being
a
public company, including, Sarbanes-Oxley reporting compliance, regulatory
filings and legal fees. Additionally, during the period ended December 31,
2005,
the Company incurred legal and accounting fees associated with the special
investigation conducted by the Board of Directors and the related restatement
of
the Company’s historical financial results. The nine month period ended December
31, 2005 includes additional expenses associated with the integration of Little
Remedies acquired in the October 2004 Vetco acquisition, and The Doctor’s brand
acquired with the Dental Concepts acquisition completed in November
2005.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation
and amortization expense was $8.1 million for the nine month period ended
December 31, 2005 versus $7.1 million for the comparable period of 2004. The
increase was due to amortization of intangible assets related to the Vetco
and
Dental Concepts acquisitions.
Interest
Expense, net
Net
interest expense was $26.7 million for the nine month period ended December
31,
2005 versus $33.9 million for the comparable period of 2004. This represented
a
decrease of $7.2 million or 21.2% from the prior period. The decrease in
interest expense is due to the reduction of indebtedness outstanding, offset
by
higher interest rates on the remaining indebtedness.
Loss
on Extinguishment of Debt
Loss
on
extinguishment of debt was $0 for the nine month period ended December 31,
2005
versus $7.6 million for the comparable period of 2004. The $7.6 million for
the
nine month period ended December 31, 2004 is related to the write-off of
deferred financing costs and debt discounts associated with the borrowings
retired in connection with the Bonita Bay acquisition.
Income
Taxes
The
income tax provision for the nine month period ended December 31, 2005 was
$14.5
million, with an effective rate of 39.0%, compared to $7.4 million, with an
effective rate of 38.2% for the nine month period ended December 31,
2004.
46
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We
have
historically financed our operations with a combination of internally generated
funds and borrowings. In February 2005, we completed an initial public offering
that provided the Company with net proceeds of $416.8 million which were used
to
repay $184.0 million of indebtedness, to repurchase common stock held by the
GTCR funds and the TCW/Crescent funds, and to redeem all of the outstanding
senior preferred units and class B preferred units held by previous investors.
Our principal uses of cash are for operating expenses, debt service,
acquisitions, working capital, and capital expenditures.
Net
cash
provided by operating activities was $35.8 million for period ended December
31,
2005 compared to $39.9 million for comparable period of 2004. The $4.1 million
decrease was primarily due to an increase in the aggregate of net income and
non-cash items, offset by an increase in the components of working capital
during the nine month period ended December 31, 2005. Net income of $22.6
million, adjusted for non-cash items of $21.6 million in 2005, compares to
net
income of $11.9 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $29.8 million for the
period ended December 31, 2004. Non-cash items in 2004 included a $7.6 million
loss on debt extinguishment. Working capital increased by $8.4 million for
period ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to an increase in inventories
of
$7.0 million as a result higher than normal inventory levels of Compound W,
an
increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $4.4 million, partially
offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of $2.7 million and prepaid expenses
of $0.3 million.
Net
cash
used in investing activities was $53.6 million for period ended December 31,
2005 compared to net cash used of $425.7 million for the comparable period
of
2004. The net cash used in investing activities for the December 31, 2005 period
was primarily a result of the acquisitions of both Dental Concepts and the
Chore
Boy brand during the period. The net cash used in investing activities for
the
period ended December 31, 2004 was primarily for the acquisitions of Bonita
Bay
in April 2004 and Vetco in October 2004.
Net
cash
provided by financing activities was $22.1 million for the period ended December
31, 2005 compared to $389.1 million for the period ended December 31, 2004.
Net
cash provided by financing activities for December 31, 2005 was due to increased
indebtedness as a result of $30.0 million of borrowings under the revolving
credit facility to fund the Dental Concepts acquisition. The Company paid down
$5.0 million of the outstanding revolving credit facility and $2.8 million
of
mandatory scheduled payments on the senior secured term loan facility during
the
nine months ended December 31, 2005. In the period ended December 31, 2004,
to
finance the acquisitions of Bonita Bay and Vetco, the Company borrowed $698.5
million and issued preferred units and common units of $58.7 million. The
increase in debt was partially offset by the payment of deferred financing
costs
of $23.5 million, repayment of the debt incurred in February 2004 at the time
of
the Medtech/Denorex acquisition, the pay down of the revolving credit facility
and scheduled payments on current debt which totaled $344.6
million.
Capital
Resources
On
February 15, 2005, the Company completed an initial public offering of common
stock which resulted in net proceeds of $416.8 million. The proceeds were used
to repay the $100.0 million outstanding under the Tranche C Term Loan Facility
(plus a repayment premium of $3.0 million and accrued interest of $0.5 million
as of February 15, 2005), and to redeem $84.0 million in aggregate principal
amount of our existing 9.25% Senior Notes (plus a redemption premium of $7.8
million and accrued interest of $3.3 million as of March 18, 2005). Effective
upon the completion of the initial public offering, we entered into an amendment
to the credit agreement that, among other things, allows us to increase the
indebtedness under our Tranche B Term Loan Facility by $200.0 million and allows
for an increase in our Revolving Credit Facility up to a maximum of $60.0
million.
As
of
December 31, 2005, we had an aggregate of $517.6 million of outstanding
indebtedness, which consisted of (i) an aggregate of $366.6 million of
borrowings under the Tranche B Term Loan Facility, (ii) $126.0 million of 9.25%
Senior Notes due 2012, and (iii) $25.0 million under the revolving
credit
47
facility.
We had $35.0 million of borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility
available at such time.
All
loans
under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest at floating rates, which can
be
either (i) based on the prime rate, or (ii) LIBOR rate, plus an applicable
margin. As of December 31, 2005, an aggregate of $366.6 million was outstanding
under the term loans at a weighted average interest rate of 6.3%.
On
June
30, 2004, we paid $52 thousand for a 5% interest rate cap agreement with a
notional amount of $20.0 million. The interest rate cap terminates in June
2006.
On March 7, 2005, we paid $2.3 million for interest rate cap agreements that
became effective August 30, 2005, with a total notional amount of $180.0 million
and LIBOR cap rates ranging from 3.25% to 3.75%. The interest rate cap
agreements terminate on May 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008
as to
$50.0 million, $80.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively.
The
fair value of the interest rate cap agreements was $2.9 million at December
31,
2005.
The
Tranche B Term Loan Facility matures in April 2011. We must make quarterly
amortization payments on the term loan facility equal to 0.25% of the initial
principal amount of the term loan. The Revolving Credit Facility matures and
the
commitments relating to the Revolving Credit Facility terminate in April 2009.
The obligations under the Senior Credit Facility are guaranteed on a senior
basis by Prestige International and all of its domestic subsidiaries, other
than
the issuer (Prestige Brands, Inc.), and are collateralized by substantially
all
of our assets.
The
Senior Credit Facility contains various financial covenants, including financial
covenants that require us to maintain certain leverage ratios, interest coverage
ratios and fixed charge coverage ratios, as well as covenants restricting us
from undertaking specified corporate actions, including asset dispositions,
acquisitions, payment of dividends and other specified payments, changes of
control, incurrence of indebtedness, creation of liens, making loans and
investments and transactions with affiliates. Our Senior Notes require that
adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the indenture governing such notes) be used
as
the basis for calculating our leverage and interest coverage ratios. We were
in
compliance with our financial and restrictive covenants under the credit
facility at December 31, 2005.
Our
principal sources of funds are anticipated to be cash flows from operating
activities and available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and
Tranche B Term Loan Facility. We believe that these funds will provide us with
sufficient liquidity and capital resources for us to meet our current and future
financial obligations, as well as to provide funds for working capital, capital
expenditures and other needs for at least the next 12 months. We regularly
review acquisition opportunities and other potential strategic transactions,
which may require additional debt or equity financing.
48
Commitments
As
of
December 31, 2005, we had ongoing commitments under various contractual and
commercial obligations as follows:
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than
1
Year
|
2 to
3
Years
|
4
to 5
Years
|
After
5 Years
|
|||||||||||
(in
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
$
|
517.6
|
$
|
3.7
|
$
|
7.5
|
$
|
32.5
|
$
|
473.9
|
||||||
Interest
on long-term debt (1)
|
243.7
|
36.3
|
69.7
|
68.8
|
68.9
|
|||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
1.4
|
0.5
|
0.8
|
0.1
|
--
|
|||||||||||
Total
Contractual Obligations
|
$
|
762.7
|
$
|
40.5
|
$
|
78.0
|
$
|
101.4
|
$
|
542.8
|
(1) |
Represents
the estimated interest obligations on the outstanding balances of
the
Revolving Credit Facility, Tranche B Term Loan Facility and Senior
Notes,
together, assuming scheduled principal payments (based on the terms
of the
loan agreements) were made and assuming a weighted average interest
rate
of 7.16%. Estimated interest obligations would be different under
different assumptions regarding interest rates or timing of principal
payments. If interest rates on borrowings with variable rates increased
by
1%, interest expense would increase approximately $3.9 million, in
the
first year. However, given the protection afforded by the
interest rate cap agreements, the impact of a one percentage point
increase would be limited to $2.0 million.
|
49
The
significant accounting policies are described in the notes of the unaudited
financial statements included elsewhere in this document. While all significant
accounting policies are important to our consolidated financial statements,
some
of these policies may be viewed as being critical. Such policies are those
that
are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and require
our most difficult, subjective and complex estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and the related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates are based
upon
our historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe
to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The most critical
accounting policies are as follows:
Allowance
for doubtful accounts and the allowance for obsolete and damaged
inventory
In
the
ordinary course of business, we grant non-interest bearing trade credit to
our
customers on normal credit terms. To reduce our credit risk, we perform ongoing
credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition. In addition, we
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based upon our historical
collection experience and expected collectibility of our accounts receivable.
If
uncollectible account balances exceed our estimates, our financial statements
would be adversely affected.
We
write
down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or damage equal to the difference
between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon
assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market
conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional
inventory write-downs may be required.
Valuation
of long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill
Pursuant
to FASB Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“Statement No. 141”) and
Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“Statement No. 142”)
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are no longer amortized, but
must be tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with finite
lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives. We are
required to make judgments regarding the value assigned to acquired intangible
assets and their respective useful lives. Our determination of the values and
lives was based on our analysis of the requirements of Statements No. 141 and
No. 142, as well as an independent evaluation of such assets. We have determined
that a significant portion of our trademarks have indefinite lives. If we
determine that any of these assets has a finite life, we would amortize the
value of that asset over the remainder of such finite life. Intangible assets
with finite lives and other long-lived assets must also be evaluated for
impairment when management believes that the carrying value of the asset will
not be recovered. Adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results
could result in a future impairment charge. There were no impairments of
goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets or other long-lived assets during
the period ended December 31, 2005. Goodwill and other intangible assets
amounted to $945.3 million at December 31, 2005.
Revenue
Recognition
We
comply
with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting
Bulletin 104 “Revenue Recognition,” which states that revenue should be
recognized when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of
an
arrangement exists; (2) the product has been shipped and the customer takes
ownership and assumes the risk of loss; (3) the selling price is fixed or
determinable; and (4) collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably
assured. The Company has determined that the transfer of risk of loss
generally occurs when product is received by the customer and, accordingly,
recognizes revenue at that time.
We
must
make estimates of potential future product returns related to current period
sales. In order to do this, we analyze historical returns, current economic
trends and changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products when
evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for returns in any accounting period.
If actual returns are greater than those estimated by management, our financial
statements in future periods would be adversely affected.
50
The
Company frequently participates in the promotional programs of its customers,
as
is customary in this industry. The ultimate cost of these promotional programs
varies based on the actual number of units sold during a finite period of time.
These programs may include coupons, scan downs, temporary price reductions
or
other price guarantee vehicles. The Company estimates the cost of such
promotional programs at their inception based on historical experience and
current market conditions and reduces sales by such estimates. At the completion
of the promotional program, the estimated amounts are adjusted to actual
results.
In
March
2005, the FASB issued FIN 47 which clarifies guidance provided by Statement
No.
143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 is effective for the
Company no later than March 31, 2006. The adoption of FIN 47 is not expected
to
have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations
or
cash flows.
In
May
2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154 which replaces APB Opinion No. 20 and
FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial
Statements.” Statement No. 154 requires that voluntary changes in accounting
principle be applied retrospectively to the balances of assets and liabilities
as of the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application
is practicable and that a corresponding adjustment be made to the opening
balance of retained earnings. APB Opinion No. 20 had required that most
voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net
income the cumulative effect of changing to the new principle. Statement No.
154
is effective for all accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005.
We
do not
have any off-balance sheet arrangements or financing activities with
special-purpose entities.
Inflationary
factors such as increases in the costs of raw materials, packaging materials,
purchased product and overhead may adversely affect our operating results.
Although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations for the periods referred to above,
a
high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on us and our
operating results. The recent increase in crude oil prices has had an adverse
impact on transportation costs, as well as, certain petroleum based raw
materials and packaging material. Although the Company takes efforts to minimize
the impact of inflationary factors, including raising prices to our customers,
a
high rate of pricing volatility associated with crude oil supplies may continue
to have an adverse effect on our operating results.
The
first
quarter of our fiscal year typically has the lowest level of revenue due to
the
seasonal nature of certain of our brands relative to the summer and winter
months. In addition, the first quarter is the least profitable quarter due
the
increased advertising and promotional spending to support those brands with
a
summer selling season, such as Compound W, Cutex and New Skin. The Company’s
advertising and promotional campaign in the third quarter influence sales in
the
fourth quarter winter months. Additionally, the fourth quarter has the lowest
level of advertising and promotional spending as a percent of
revenue.
This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”),
including information within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. The following cautionary statements are
being made pursuant to the provisions of the Act and with the intention to
obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Act. Although we
believe that our expectations are based
51
on
reasonable assumptions, actual results may differ materially from those in
the
forward looking statement.
These
forward-looking statements may or may not contain the words “believe,”
“anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will
likely result,” or other similar words and phrases. Forward-looking statements
and our plans and expectations are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated, including, but not limited to the following:
·
|
general
economic conditions affecting our products and their respective
markets,
|
·
|
the
high level of competition in our industry and
markets,
|
·
|
our
dependence on a limited number of customers for a large portion of
our
sales,
|
·
|
disruptions
in our distribution center,
|
·
|
acquisitions
or other strategic transactions diverting managerial resources, or
incurrence of additional liabilities or integration problems associated
with such transactions,
|
·
|
changing
consumer trends, pricing pressures which may cause us to lower our
prices,
|
·
|
increases
in supplier prices,
|
·
|
changes
in our senior management team,
|
·
|
our
ability to protect our intellectual property
rights,
|
·
|
our
dependency on the reputation of our brand
names,
|
·
|
shortages
of supply of sourced goods or interruptions in the manufacturing
of our
products,
|
·
|
our
level of debt, and ability to service our
debt,
|
·
|
our
ability to obtain additional financing,
and
|
·
|
the
restrictions imposed by our senior credit facility and the indenture
on
our operations.
|
Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Except as required under federal securities laws and the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we do not have any intention to
update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising
after the date of this Form 10-Q, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. As a result of these risks and uncertainties, readers
are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements included
in
this Form 10-Q or that may be made elsewhere from time to time by, or on behalf
of, us. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly
qualified by these cautionary statements.
We
are
exposed to changes in interest rates because our senior credit facility is
variable rate debt. Interest rate changes, therefore, generally do not affect
the market value of such debt, but do impact the amount of our interest payments
and, therefore, our future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors
are
held constant. At December 31, 2005, we had variable rate debt of approximately
$366.6 million related to our Tranche B Term Loan and $25.0 million related
to
our Revolving Credit Facility. Holding other variables constant, including
levels of indebtedness, a one percentage point increase in interest rates on
our
variable debt would have an adverse impact on pre-tax earnings and cash flows
for the next year of approximately $3.9 million.
However,
on June 30, 2004, we paid $52 thousand for a 5% interest rate cap agreement
with
a notional amount of $20.0 million that terminates in June 2006. Additionally,
on March 7, 2005 we paid $2.3 million for
52
interest
rate cap agreements that became effective August 30, 2005, with a total notional
amount of $180.0 million and LIBOR cap rates ranging from 3.25% to 3.75%. These
interest rate cap agreements terminate on May 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008
as
to
$50.0 million, $80.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively.
Given
the protection afforded by the interest rate cap agreements, the impact on
pre-tax earnings and cash flows during the next year of a one percentage point
increase in interest rates would be limited to $2.0 million. The fair value
of
the interest rate cap agreements was $2.9 million at December 31,
2005.
The
Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries
required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic filings under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported in a timely manner in accordance with the requirements
of the Exchange Act, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer
and
the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of
these disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of December 31, 2005. Based on this evaluation, the
Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer each concluded that the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31,
2005.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2005, the Company implemented controls to
remediate the material weaknesses in its internal control over financial
reporting that arose from the
Company’s inappropriate application of the requirements of SAB No. 104 with
respect to revenue recognition, its failure classify promotions and allowances
in accordance with the requirements of EITF 01-09, its failure to ensure that
adjustments to deferred income taxes for increases in graduated federal income
tax rates were timely recognized in the Company’s financial statements and its
inaccurate computation of earnings per share, all of which were reported
in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2005, filed with the SEC on November 29, 2005. More specifically
the Company:
· |
Appointed
a Corporate Controller who reports to the Company’s Chief Financial
Officer.
|
· |
Engaged
an independent tax consultant, who reports directly to the Corporate
Controller, to provide guidance with regard to the determination
of
corporate tax obligations.
|
· |
Implemented
procedures and controls (including ongoing training) to ensure that
assumptions and guidelines relative to shipments to customers are
properly
monitored and analyzed, and to ensure that revenue is recorded after
risk
of loss has passed to the customer in accordance with the requirements
of
SAB No. 104.
|
· |
Implemented
procedures and controls (including ongoing training) to ensure that
the
pricing component of promotions and allowances is properly identified,
analyzed and recorded as a reduction of revenues in accordance with
the
requirements of EITF 01-09.
|
Management
is not required to report on the assessment of its internal control over
financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
until it files its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2006. Although it expects its internal control over financial
reporting
53
to
be
effective at that time, if it fails to remediate any condition constituting
a
material weakness on or before March 31, 2006, the presence of a material
weakness at that time would cause management to conclude that its internal
controls over financial reporting are ineffective and would cause its external
auditors to issue an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of such internal
controls.
There
have been no other changes in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company's third fiscal quarter that have
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
ITEM
1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In
June
2003, Dr. Jason Theodosakis filed a lawsuit, Theodosakis v. Walgreens, et al.,
in Federal District Court in Arizona, alleging that two of the Company’s
subsidiaries, Medtech Products and Pecos Pharmaceutical, as well as other
unrelated parties, infringed the trade dress of two of his published books.
Specifically, Dr. Theodosakis published “The Arthritis Cure” and “Maximizing the
Arthritis Cure” regarding the use of dietary supplements to treat arthritis
patients. Dr. Theodosakis alleged that his books have a distinctive trade dress,
or cover layout, design, color and typeface, and those products that the
defendants sold under the ARTHx trademarks infringed the books’ trade dress and
constituted unfair competition and false designation of origin. Additionally,
Dr. Theodosakis alleged that the defendants made false endorsements of the
products by referencing his books on the product packaging and that the use
of
his name, books and trade dress invaded his right to publicity. The Company
sold
the ARTHx trademarks, goodwill and inventory to a third party, Contract
Pharmacal Corporation, in March 2003. On January 12, 2005, the court granted
the
Company’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed all claims against Pecos and
Medtech. The plaintiff has filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals which
is
pending.
On
January 3, 2005, the Company was served with process by its former lead counsel
in the Theodosakis litigation seeking $679,000 plus interest. The case was
filed
in the Supreme Court of New York and is styled as Dickstein Shapiro et al v.
Medtech Products, Inc. In February 2005, the plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint naming the Pecos Pharmaceutical Company as defendant. The Company
has
answered and filed a counterclaim against Dickstein and also filed a third
party
complaint against the Lexington Insurance Company, the Company’s product
liability carrier. The Company believes that if there is any obligation to
the
Dickstein firm relating to this matter, it is an obligation of Lexington and
not
the Company.
The
Company and certain of its officers and directors are defendants in a
consolidated putative securities class action lawsuit filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Consolidated
Action”). The first of the six consolidated cases was filed on August 3, 2005.
Plaintiffs purport to represent a class of shareholders of the Company who
purchased shares between February 9, 2005 through November 15, 2005. Plaintiffs
also name as defendants the underwriters in the Company’s initial public
offering and a private equity fund that was a selling shareholder in the
offering. The district court has appointed a Lead Plaintiff. On December 23,
2005, the Lead Plaintiff filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint, which
asserts claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of
1933
and Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The
Lead Plaintiff generally alleges that the Company issued a series of materially
false and misleading statements in connection with its initial public offering
and thereafter in regard to the following areas: the accounting issues described
in the Company’s press release issued on or about November 15, 2005; and the
alleged failure to disclose that demand for certain of the Company’s products
was declining and that the Company was planning to withdraw several products
from the market. Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages. The Company
intends to file a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint
on
or about February 21, 2006. The Company’s management believes the allegations to
be
54
unfounded,
will vigorously pursue its defenses, and cannot reasonably estimate the
potential range of loss, if any.
On
September 6, 2005, another putative securities class action lawsuit
substantially similar to the initially-filed complaints in the Consolidated
Action described above was filed against the same defendants in the Circuit
Court of Cook County, Illinois (the “Chicago Action”). In light of the
first-filed Consolidated Action, proceedings in the Chicago Action have been
stayed until a ruling on defendants’ anticipated motions to dismiss the
consolidated complaint in the Consolidated Action. The Company’s management
believes the allegations to be unfounded, will vigorously pursue its defenses,
and cannot reasonably estimate the potential range of loss, if any.
ITEM
2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
There
were no equity securities sold by the Company during the period covered by
this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that were not registered under the Securities
Act
of 1933, as amended.
ITEM
3.
|
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
None
ITEM
4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
None
ITEM
5.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
See
Exhibit Index immediately following signature page.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrants
have
duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
Dated:
February 14, 2006
|
PRESTIGE
BRANDS HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
Registrant
|
||
By:
|
/s/
PETER J. ANDERSON
|
|
Name:
|
Peter
J. Anderson
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Dated:
February 14, 2006
|
PRESTIGE
BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
|
|
Registrant
|
||
By:
|
/s/
PETER J. ANDERSON
|
|
Name:
|
Peter
J. Anderson
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
56
Exhibit
Index
10.1
|
Unit
Purchase Agreement among Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. and Dental
Concepts, LLC, Richard Gaccione, Combined Consultants DBPT Gordon
Wade,
Douglas A.P. Hamilton, Islandia L.P., George O’Neill, Abby O’Neill,
Michael Porter, Marc Cole and Michael Lesser, dated November 9,
2005
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification, executed by Peter C. Mann, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Prestige Brands Holdings,
Inc.
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification, executed by Peter J. Anderson,
Chief
Financial Officer of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
31.3
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification, executed by Peter C. Mann, Manager,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Prestige Brands International,
LLC.
|
31.4
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification, executed by Peter J. Anderson,
Chief
Financial Officer of Prestige Brands International,
LLC.
|
32.1
|
Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of
Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 302 (18 U.S.C. 1350), executed
by
Peter C. Mann, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Prestige
Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
32.2
|
Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of
Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 302 (18 U.S.C. 1350) executed
by
Peter J. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of Prestige Brands Holdings,
Inc.
|
32.3
|
Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of
Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 302 (18 U.S.C. 1350), executed
by
Peter C. Mann, Manager, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Prestige
Brands International, LLC.
|
32.4
|
Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of
Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code 302 (18 U.S.C. 1350) executed
by
Peter J. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of Prestige Brands
International, LLC.
|