Primo Water Corp /CN/ - Quarter Report: 2014 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended: June 28, 2014

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-31410

COTT CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (905) 672-1900 and (813) 313-1800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Cott Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts)

Unaudited

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

Cott Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

Unaudited

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

Cott Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except share amounts)

Unaudited

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

Cott Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

Unaudited

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Cott Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Equity

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except share amounts)

Unaudited

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7

Table of Contents

Cott Corporation

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Unaudited

Note 1— Business and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Description of Business

Cott Corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (“Cott,” “the Company,” “our Company,” “Cott Corporation,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), is one of the world’s largest producers of beverages on behalf of retailers, brand owners and distributors. Our product lines include carbonated soft drinks (“CSDs”), 100% shelf stable juice and juice-based products, clear, still and sparkling flavored waters, energy drinks and shots, sports products, new age beverages, ready-to-drink teas, beverage concentrates, liquid enhancers, freezables and ready-to-drink alcoholic beverages, as well as hot chocolate, coffee, malt drinks, creamers/whiteners and cereals.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all information and notes presented in the annual consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement of our results of operations for the interim periods reported and of our financial condition as of the date of the interim balance sheet have been included. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the annual audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013. The accounting policies used in these interim consolidated financial statements are consistent with those used in the annual consolidated financial statements.

The presentation of these interim consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

During the six months ended June 28, 2014, we recorded out-of-period adjustments which decreased net income by approximately $0.7 million, which related to 2013 and were primarily associated with fixed assets and accrued liabilities. We evaluated the total out-of-period adjustments in relation to the current period, which is when the adjustments were recorded, as well as the period in which they originated and concluded these adjustments are not material to either the consolidated quarterly or annual financial statements for all impacted periods.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Update ASU 2013-11—Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its guidance regarding the information provided in relation to the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We have adopted this guidance and incorporated it into the presentation of our consolidated financial statements.

Update ASU 2014-09—Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)

In May 2014, the FASB amended its guidance regarding revenue recognition and created a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The objectives for creating Topic 606 were to remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue recognition, provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, provide more useful information to users of the financial statements through improved disclosure requirements, simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer, and improve comparability of revenue recognition

8

Table of Contents

practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions and capital markets. The core principal of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve the core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: 1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3) determine the transaction price; 4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and 5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. For public entities, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The amendments may be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendment recognized at the date of initial application. We are currently assessing the impact of adoption of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.

Update ASU 2014-12—Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period

In June 2014, the FASB amended its guidance regarding accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. The stated vesting period (which includes the period in which the performance target could be achieved) may differ from the requisite service period. For public entities, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period. The amendments may be applied prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. We believe that the adoption of these amendments will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2—Acquisitions

Aimia Acquisition

On May 30, 2014 (the “Acquisition Date”), our United Kingdom (“U.K.”) reporting segment acquired 100 percent of the share capital of Aimia Foods (Holdings) Limited (the “Aimia Acquisition”), which includes its operating subsidiary company, Aimia Foods Limited (together referred as “Aimia”) pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement dated May 30, 2014. Aimia produces and distributes hot chocolate, coffee and cold cereal products primarily through food service, vending and retail channels. The aggregate purchase price for the Aimia Acquisition was £52.1 million ($87.6 million) payable in cash, which included a payment for estimated closing balance sheet working capital, £19.9 million ($33.5 million) in deferred consideration to be paid by September 30, 2014, and aggregate contingent consideration of up to £16.0 million ($26.9 million), which is payable upon the achievement of certain performance measures during the twelve months ending July 1, 2016 (the “Earn Out Period”).

The total consideration paid by us for the Aimia Acquisition, subject to final working capital adjustments, is summarized below:

9

Table of Contents

Our primary reasons for the Aimia Acquisition were to diversify Cott’s product portfolio, packaging formats and channel mix, and enhance our customer offering and growth prospects.

The Aimia Acquisition is being accounted for as a business combination which, among other things, requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be measured at their acquisition date fair values. Identified intangible assets, goodwill and property, plant and equipment are recorded at their estimated fair values per preliminary valuations and may change based on the final valuations. The results of operations of Aimia have been included in our operating results beginning as of the Acquisition Date. We allocated the total purchase price exchanged for Aimia to tangible assets, liabilities and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values was recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired was based on estimates and assumptions made by management. Intangible assets are amortized using a method that reflects the pattern in which economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed using a straight-line amortization method.

The sellers are entitled to contingent consideration of up to a maximum of £16.0 million ($26.9 million), based on the exchange rate on the Acquisition Date, which will be due by us if Aimia meets certain targets relating to net income plus interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for the twelve months ending July 1, 2016. We estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration based on financial projections of the acquired business and estimated probabilities of achievement of the EBITDA targets. We believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, but there is significant judgment involved. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities subsequent to the acquisition will be recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined to be £10.6 million ($17.9 million) using a present valued probability-weighted income approach. Key assumptions include probability-adjusted EBITDA amounts with discount rates consistent with the level of risk of achievement.

The following table summarizes the estimated allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the Aimia Acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price is based on a preliminary valuation that is expected to be completed by the end of 2014. Any adjustment may affect the total purchase price and amount of goodwill.

The Company recognized $1.8 million of acquisition related costs associated with the Aimia Acquisition that were expensed during the three and six month period ended June 28, 2014. These costs are included in the selling, general, and administrative expenses of our Consolidated Statements of Operations in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations.”

10

Table of Contents

Intangible Assets

In our preliminary determination of the fair value of the intangible assets, we considered, among other factors, the best use of acquired assets, analysis of historical financial performance and estimates of future performance of Aimia’s products. The estimated fair values of identified intangible assets were calculated considering market participant expectations and using an income approach and estimates and assumptions provided by Aimia’s and our management. The following table sets forth the components of identified intangible assets associated with the Aimia Acquisition and their estimated weighted average useful lives:

Customer relationships represent future projected revenue that will be derived from sales to existing customers of Aimia.

Trademarks and trade names represent the future projected cost savings associated with the premium and brand image obtained as a result of owning the trademark or trade name as opposed to obtaining the benefit of the trademark or trade name through a royalty or rental fee.

In conjunction with the closing of the Aimia Acquisition, certain key employees of Aimia executed non-competition agreements, which prevent those employees from competing with us in the specified restricted territories for a period of time from the Acquisition Date. The value of the Aimia business could be materially diminished without these noncompetition agreements.

Goodwill

The principal factor that resulted in recognition of goodwill was that the purchase price for the Aimia Acquisition was based in part on cash flow projections assuming the reduction of administration costs and the integration of acquired customers and products into our operations, which is of greater value than on a standalone basis. The goodwill recognized as part of the Aimia Acquisition was allocated to the U.K. reporting segment, none of which is expected to be tax deductible.

Selected Financial Data (unaudited)

The following unaudited financial information from the Acquisition Date through June 28, 2014 represents the activity of Aimia that has been combined with our operations as of the Acquisition Date.

Calypso Acquisition

In June 2013, our U.K. reporting segment acquired 100 percent of the share capital of Cooke Bros. Holdings Limited (the “Calypso Acquisition”), which includes its subsidiary companies Calypso Soft Drinks Limited and Mr. Freeze (Europe) Limited (together, “Calypso”). Calypso produces fruit juices, juice drinks, soft drinks, and freeze products in the United Kingdom. The aggregate purchase price for the acquisition of Calypso was $12.1 million, which includes approximately $7.0 million paid at closing, a deferred payment of approximately $2.3 million paid on the first anniversary of the closing date, and a deferred payment of approximately $3.0 million to be paid on the second anniversary of the closing date. In connection with the Calypso Acquisition, we paid $18.5 million of outstanding debt of the acquired companies. The closing payment and the first deferred payment were funded from available cash.

The total consideration paid by us in the Calypso Acquisition is summarized below:

11

Table of Contents

Our primary reasons for the Calypso Acquisition were to expand Cott’s product portfolio and enhance our customer offering and growth prospects.

Supplemental Pro Forma Data (unaudited)

The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the three and six months ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013 represent the combined results of our operations as if the Aimia Acquisition and the Calypso Acquisition had occurred on December 30, 2012. The unaudited pro forma results reflect certain adjustments related to these acquisitions such as increased amortization expense on acquired intangible assets resulting from the preliminary fair valuation of assets acquired. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have occurred had we operated as a single entity during such periods.

Cliffstar Acquisition

On August 17, 2010, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Cliffstar Corporation (“Cliffstar”) and its affiliated companies (the “Cliffstar Acquisition”) for approximately $503.0 million in cash, $14.0 million in deferred consideration payable in equal installments over three years and contingent consideration of up to $55.0 million. Contingent consideration of $34.9 million was ultimately paid to the seller of Cliffstar, and all claims for contingent consideration have been resolved as of December 28, 2013.

12

Table of Contents

Note 3—Restructuring and Asset Impairments

We implement restructuring programs from time to time that are designed to improve operating effectiveness and lower costs. When we implement these programs, we incur various charges, including severance, asset impairments, and other employment related costs. During the first quarter of 2014, we implemented one such program, which involved the closure of two of our smaller plants, one located in North America and another one located in the United Kingdom (the “2014 Restructuring Plan”). The plant closures are expected to be completed by the end of our 2014 fiscal year and will result in cash charges associated with employee redundancy costs and relocation of assets, and non-cash charges related to asset impairments and accelerated depreciation on property, plant and equipment. In connection with the 2014 Restructuring Plan, we expect to incur total charges of approximately $5.0 million to $6.0 million. We also implemented a plan in June 2013, which consisted primarily of headcount reductions.

The following table summarizes restructuring charges for the three and six months ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, respectively:

There were no asset impairment charges for the three and six months ended June 29, 2013. The following table summarizes asset impairment charges for the three and six months ended June 28, 2014:

The following tables summarize our restructuring liability as of June 28, 2014, along with charges to costs and expenses and cash payments:

2014 Restructuring Plan:

13

Table of Contents

Note 4—Share-Based Compensation

The table below summarizes the share-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 28, 2014 and June 29, 2013, respectively. This share-based compensation expense was recorded in selling, general, and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. As used below: (i) “Performance-based RSUs” mean restricted share units with performance-based vesting granted under the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Equity Incentive Plan”) or Amended and Restated Equity Plan (as defined below), as the case may be, (ii) “Time-based RSUs” mean restricted share units with time-based vesting granted under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan or Amended and Restated Equity Plan, as the case may be, and (iii) “Stock options” mean non-qualified stock options granted under the Amended and Restated Equity Plan, the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, or the Restated 1986 Common Share Option Plan, as amended (the “Option Plan”), as the case may be, and (iv) “Director share awards” mean common shares issued in consideration of the annual board retainer fee to non-management members of our board of directors under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan or Amended and Restated Equity Plan, as the case may be.

As of June 28, 2014, the unrecognized share-based compensation expense and years we expect to recognize it as compensation expense were as follows:

Stock option activity for the six months ended June 28, 2014 was as follows:

14

Table of Contents

During the six months ended June 28, 2014, Performance-based RSU and Time-based RSU activity was as follows:

On February 14, 2013, our board of directors adopted an amendment and restatement of the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Amended and Restated Equity Plan”), pursuant to which the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan was amended and restated to, among other things, increase the number of shares that may be issued under the plan to 12,000,000 shares and to provide that the number of shares available for issuance will be reduced 2.0 shares for each share issued pursuant to a “full-value” award (i.e., an award other than an option or stock appreciation right) after the effective date of the amendment and restatement. The Amended and Restated Equity Plan was approved by Cott’s shareowners on April 30, 2013. Awards made in 2011 and 2012 prior to the amendment and restatement are generally governed by the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan without giving effect to these restrictions.

Certain outstanding stock options were granted under the Option Plan. Our board of directors terminated the Option Plan as of February 23, 2011, and no further awards will be granted under it. In connection with the termination of the Option Plan, outstanding options will continue in accordance with the terms of the Option Plan until exercised, forfeited or terminated, as applicable.

Note 5—Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $1.6 million on pre-tax loss of $5.5 million for the six months ended June 28, 2014, as compared to an income tax expense of $2.2 million on pre-tax income of $21.3 million for the six months ended June 29, 2013. This is the result of pre-tax income in certain jurisdictions that is not offset by pre-tax losses in other jurisdictions that have valuation allowances.

Note 6—Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share

Basic net (loss) income per common share is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted to include the effect, if dilutive, of the exercise of in-the-money stock options, Performance-based RSUs and Time-based RSUs. Diluted net loss per common share is equivalent to basic net loss per common share.

A reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted net income per common share computations is as follows:

At June 28, 2014, we excluded 832,951 (June 29, 2013—442,131) stock options from the computation of diluted net (loss) income per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

15

Table of Contents

In addition, we excluded the impact of the remaining stock options, Performance-based RSU’s and Time-based RSUs from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the three and six months ended June 28, 2014 as they were considered anti-dilutive for purposes of calculating loss per share.

Note 7—Segment Reporting

Our product lines include CSDs, 100% shelf stable juice and juice-based products, clear, still and sparkling flavored waters, energy drinks and shots, sports products, new age beverages, ready-to-drink teas, beverage concentrates, liquid enhancers, freezables and ready-to-drink alcoholic beverages, as well as hot chocolate, coffee, malt drinks, creamers/whiteners and cereal. Our business operates through three reporting segments—North America (which includes our U.S. operating segment and Canada operating segment), U.K. (which includes our United Kingdom operating segment and our Continental European operating segment), and All Other (which includes our Mexico operating segment, our Royal Crown International (“RCI”) operating segment and other Miscellaneous Expenses). Our corporate oversight function (“Corporate”) is not treated as a segment; it includes certain general and administrative costs that are not allocated to any of the reporting segments. The primary measures used in evaluating our reporting segments are revenues, operating income (loss), and additions to property, plant and equipment, which have been included as part of our segment disclosures listed below. During the fourth quarter of 2013, management reviewed our reporting segments and subsequently combined our Mexico and RCI reporting segments with the segment previously classified as All Other into one segment classified as All Other. Prior year information has been updated to reflect the change in our reporting segments.