Primoris Services Corp - Quarter Report: 2017 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017
OR
☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 0001-34145
Primoris Services Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
20-4743916 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500 |
|
|
Dallas, Texas |
|
75201 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (214) 740-5600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☒ |
|
Accelerated filer ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ |
|
Smaller reporting company ☐ |
Do not check if a smaller reporting company. |
|
|
Emerging growth company ☐ |
||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
At November 6, 2017, 51,448,753 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were outstanding.
PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION
2
PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents ($67,034 and $7,045 related to VIEs. See Note 11) |
|
$ |
143,235 |
|
$ |
135,823 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
19,304 |
|
|
— |
|
Customer retention deposits |
|
|
926 |
|
|
481 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
356,851 |
|
|
388,000 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings |
|
|
177,662 |
|
|
138,618 |
|
Inventory and uninstalled contract materials |
|
|
39,617 |
|
|
49,201 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
14,529 |
|
|
19,258 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
752,124 |
|
|
731,381 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
305,046 |
|
|
277,346 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
48,655 |
|
|
32,841 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
151,118 |
|
|
127,226 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
4,749 |
|
|
2,004 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,261,692 |
|
$ |
1,170,798 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
153,677 |
|
$ |
168,110 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
|
159,120 |
|
|
112,606 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
125,626 |
|
|
108,006 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
2,839 |
|
Current portion of capital leases |
|
|
214 |
|
|
188 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
62,697 |
|
|
58,189 |
|
Current portion of contingent earnout liabilities |
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
— |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
505,415 |
|
|
449,938 |
|
Long-term capital leases, net of current portion |
|
|
245 |
|
|
15 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
191,948 |
|
|
203,381 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
9,830 |
|
|
9,830 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
13,007 |
|
|
9,064 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
720,445 |
|
|
672,228 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock—$.0001 par value; 90,000,000 shares authorized; 51,448,753 and 51,576,442 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
160,277 |
|
|
162,128 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
376,537 |
|
|
335,218 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
4,428 |
|
|
1,219 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
|
541,247 |
|
|
498,570 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
$ |
1,261,692 |
|
$ |
1,170,798 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||
Revenue |
|
$ |
608,311 |
|
$ |
507,828 |
|
$ |
1,800,978 |
|
$ |
1,395,085 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
537,890 |
|
|
457,699 |
|
|
1,591,021 |
|
|
1,262,394 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
70,421 |
|
|
50,129 |
|
|
209,957 |
|
|
132,691 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
42,559 |
|
|
35,994 |
|
|
128,390 |
|
|
101,150 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,716 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
27,862 |
|
|
11,419 |
|
|
81,567 |
|
|
28,825 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
— |
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
— |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
(92) |
|
|
299 |
|
|
288 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(39) |
|
|
(278) |
|
|
(52) |
|
|
(278) |
|
Interest income |
|
|
228 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
411 |
|
|
122 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,198) |
|
|
(2,246) |
|
|
(6,605) |
|
|
(6,754) |
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
32,086 |
|
|
8,834 |
|
|
81,686 |
|
|
22,203 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(9,952) |
|
|
(4,078) |
|
|
(28,644) |
|
|
(9,244) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,134 |
|
$ |
4,756 |
|
$ |
53,042 |
|
$ |
12,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(1,537) |
|
|
(252) |
|
$ |
(3,209) |
|
$ |
(706) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Primoris |
|
$ |
20,597 |
|
$ |
4,504 |
|
$ |
49,833 |
|
$ |
12,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.055 |
|
$ |
0.055 |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
51,441 |
|
|
51,780 |
|
|
51,491 |
|
|
51,759 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
51,707 |
|
|
52,034 |
|
|
51,751 |
|
|
51,978 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,042 |
|
$ |
12,959 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
43,064 |
|
|
46,430 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
6,184 |
|
|
5,015 |
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment |
|
|
477 |
|
|
2,716 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
911 |
|
|
1,169 |
|
Unrealized gain on short-term investments |
|
|
(5,980) |
|
|
— |
|
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
(3,880) |
|
|
(3,361) |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer retention deposits |
|
|
(445) |
|
|
(451) |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
41,870 |
|
|
27,093 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings |
|
|
(38,464) |
|
|
(39,936) |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
17,210 |
|
|
13,865 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
(2,745) |
|
|
(1,963) |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(17,813) |
|
|
10,036 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
|
46,067 |
|
|
(41,584) |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
17,858 |
|
|
18,580 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
49 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
161,432 |
|
|
50,617 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(57,346) |
|
|
(52,137) |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
7,027 |
|
|
7,763 |
|
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
(13,588) |
|
|
— |
|
Sale of short-term investments |
|
|
350 |
|
|
— |
|
Cash paid for acquisitions |
|
|
(66,205) |
|
|
(4,108) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(129,762) |
|
|
(48,482) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
Repayment of capital leases |
|
|
(191) |
|
|
(626) |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(41,088) |
|
|
(36,867) |
|
Payment of debt issuance costs for amended and restated credit agreement |
|
|
(631) |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock purchased under a long-term incentive plan |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
1,439 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(4,999) |
|
|
— |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(8,497) |
|
|
(8,536) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(24,258) |
|
|
(14,590) |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,412 |
|
|
(12,455) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
135,823 |
|
|
161,122 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
143,235 |
|
$ |
148,667 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||
Cash paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
6,236 |
|
$ |
6,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes, net of refunds received |
|
$ |
25,618 |
|
$ |
2,079 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||
Obligations incurred for the acquisition of property |
|
$ |
4,163 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and not yet paid |
|
$ |
2,829 |
|
$ |
2,848 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
Note 1—Nature of Business
Organization and operations — Primoris Services Corporation is a holding company of various construction and product engineering subsidiaries. The Company’s underground and directional drilling operations install, replace and repair natural gas, petroleum, telecommunications and water pipeline systems, including large diameter pipeline systems. The Company’s industrial, civil and engineering operations build and provide maintenance services to industrial facilities including power plants, petrochemical facilities, and other processing plants; construct multi-level parking structures; and engage in the construction of highways, bridges and other environmental construction activities. The Company is incorporated in the State of Delaware, and its corporate headquarters is located at 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75201.
Reportable Segments — Through the end of the year 2016, the Company segregated its business into three reportable segments: the Energy segment, the East Construction Services segment and the West Construction Services segment. In the first quarter 2017, the Company changed its reportable segments in connection with a realignment of the Company’s internal organization and management structure. The segment changes during the quarter reflect the focus of our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) on the range of services we provide to our end user markets. Our CODM regularly reviews the Company’s operating and financial performance based on these segments.
The current reportable segments include the Power, Industrial and Engineering (“Power”) segment, the Pipeline and Underground (“Pipeline”) segment, the Utilities and Distribution (“Utilities”) segment and the Civil segment. Segment information for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new segment presentation. See Note 18 – “Reportable Segments” for a brief description of the reportable segments and their operations.
The classification of revenues and gross profit for segment reporting purposes can at times require judgment on the part of management. Our segments may perform services across industries or perform joint services for customers in multiple industries. To determine reportable segment gross profit, certain allocations, including allocations of shared and indirect costs, such as facility costs, equipment costs and indirect operating expenses were made.
7
The following table lists the Company’s primary business units and their reportable segment:
Business Unit |
|
Reportable Segment |
|
Prior Reportable Segment |
|
ARB Industrial (a division of ARB, Inc.) |
|
Power |
|
West |
|
ARB Structures |
|
Power |
|
West |
|
Primoris Power (formerly PES Saxon division) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Renewable Energy (a division of Primoris AV) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Industrial Constructors (formerly PES Industrial Division) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Fabrication (a division of PES) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Mechanical Contractors (a combination of a division of PES and Cardinal Contractors) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
OnQuest |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
OnQuest Canada |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Design and Construction (“PD&C”); created 2017 |
|
Power |
|
NA |
|
Rockford Corporation (“Rockford”) |
|
Pipeline |
|
West |
|
Vadnais Trenchless Services (“Vadnais Trenchless”) |
|
Pipeline |
|
West |
|
Primoris Field Services (a division of PES Primoris Pipeline) |
|
Pipeline |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Pipeline (a division of PES Primoris Pipeline) |
|
Pipeline |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Coastal Field Services; created 2017 |
|
Pipeline |
|
NA |
|
ARB Underground (a division of ARB, Inc.) |
|
Utilities |
|
West |
|
Q3 Contracting (“Q3C”) |
|
Utilities |
|
West |
|
Primoris AV |
|
Utilities |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Distribution Services ("PDS"); created 2017 |
|
Utilities |
|
NA |
|
Primoris Heavy Civil (formerly JCG Heavy Civil Division) |
|
Civil |
|
East |
|
Primoris I&M (formerly JCG Infrastructure & Maintenance Division) |
|
Civil |
|
East |
|
BW Primoris |
|
Civil |
|
East |
|
The Company owns a 50% interest in two separate joint ventures, both formed in 2015. The Carlsbad Power Constructors joint venture (“Carlsbad”) is engineering and constructing a gas-fired power generation facility, and the “ARB Inc. & B&M Engineering Co.” joint venture (“Wilmington”) is also engineering and constructing a gas-fired power generation facility. Both projects are located in Southern California. The joint venture operations are included as part of the Power segment. As a result of determining that the Company is the primary beneficiary of the two variable interest entities (“VIEs”), the results of the Carlsbad and Wilmington joint ventures are consolidated in the Company’s financial statements. Both projects are expected to be completed in 2018. Financial information for the joint ventures is presented in Note 11 – “Noncontrolling Interests”.
On January 29, 2016, the Company acquired the net assets of Mueller Concrete Construction Company (“Mueller”) for $4.1 million, and on November 18, 2016, the Company acquired the net assets of Northern Energy & Power (“Northern”) for $6.8 million. On May 26, 2017, the Company acquired the net assets of Florida Gas Contractors (“FGC”) for $37.7 million; on May 30, 2017, the Company acquired certain engineering assets for approximately $2.3 million; and on June 16, 2017, the Company acquired the net assets of Coastal Field Services (“Coastal”) for $27.5 million. Both Mueller and FGC operations are included in the Utilities segment, Northern operations are included in the Power segment, and Coastal operations are included in the Pipeline segment. See Note 7— “Business Combinations”.
Unless specifically noted otherwise, as used throughout these consolidated financial statements, “Primoris”, “the Company”, “we”, “our”, “us” or “its” refers to the business, operations and financial results of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Note 2—Basis of Presentation
Interim consolidated financial statements — The interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As such, certain disclosures, which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 28, 2017, which contains the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, have been omitted.
8
This Third Quarter 2017 Report should be read in concert with the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. The interim financial information is unaudited. In the opinion of management, the interim information includes all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the interim financial information.
Short-term investments — The Company classifies as short-term investments all securities or other assets acquired which have ready marketability and can be liquidated, if necessary, within the current operating cycle and which have readily determinable fair values. Short-term investments are classified as trading and are recorded at fair value using the first-in, first-out method. The Company’s short-term investments are generally short-term dollar-denominated bank deposits, U.S. Treasury Bills and marketable equity securities.
Revenue recognition
Fixed-price contracts — Historically, a substantial portion of the Company’s revenue has been generated under fixed-price contracts. For fixed-price contracts, the Company recognizes revenues primarily using the percentage-of-completion method, which may result in uneven and irregular results. In the percentage-of-completion method, estimated contract values, estimated cost at completion and total costs incurred to date are used to calculate revenues earned. Unforeseen events and circumstances can alter the estimate of the costs and potential profit associated with a particular contract. Total estimated costs, and thus contract revenues and income, can be impacted by changes in productivity, scheduling, the unit cost of labor, subcontracts, materials and equipment. Additionally, external factors such as weather, client needs, client delays in providing permits and approvals, labor availability, governmental regulation and politics may affect the progress of a project’s completion and thus the timing of revenue recognition. To the extent that original cost estimates are modified, estimated costs to complete increase, delivery schedules are delayed, or progress under a contract is otherwise impeded, cash flow, revenue recognition and profitability from a particular contract may be adversely affected.
Other contract forms — The Company also uses unit price, time and material, and cost reimbursable plus fee contracts. For these jobs, revenue is recognized primarily based on contractual terms. Generally, time and material and cost reimbursement contract revenues are recognized on an input basis, based on labor hours incurred and on purchases made. Unit price contracts generally recognize revenue on an output based measurement such as the completion of specific units at a specified unit price.
The Company considers unapproved change orders to be contract variations for which customers have not agreed to both scope and price. Costs associated with unapproved change orders are included in the estimated cost to complete and are treated as project costs as incurred. The Company will recognize revenue if we believe it is probable that the contract price will be adjusted and can be reliably estimated. Unapproved change orders involve the use of estimates, and it is reasonably possible that revisions to the estimated costs and recoverable amounts may be required in future reporting periods to reflect changes in estimates or final agreements with customers.
The Company considers claims to be amounts it seeks, or will seek, to collect from customers or others for customer-caused changes in contract specifications or design, or other customer-related causes of unanticipated additional contract costs on which there is no agreement with customers. Claims can also be caused by non-customer-caused changes, such as weather delays or rain. Costs associated with claims are included in the estimated costs to complete the contracts and are treated as project costs when incurred. Claims are included in revenue to the extent we have a reasonable legal basis, the related costs have been incurred, realization is probable, and amounts can be reliably estimated. Revenue in excess of contract costs from claims is recognized when an agreement is reached with customers as to the value of the claims, which in some instances may not occur until after completion of work under the contract.
At September 30, 2017, we had unapproved change orders and claims included in contract value that totalled approximately $87.6 million, which were in the process of being negotiated in the normal course of business. Approximately $74.2 million of unapproved change orders and claims had been recognized as revenue on a cumulative percentage-of-completion basis through September 30, 2017.
For all contracts, if an estimate of total contract cost and estimated total revenue indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss is recognized in full at that time and recognized as an “accrued loss provision” which is included in the accrued expenses and other current liabilities amount on the balance sheet. For fixed price contracts, as the percentage-
9
of-completion method is used to calculate revenues, the accrued loss provision is changed so that the gross profit for the contract remains zero in future periods.
Changes in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability, including those arising from final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income. These revisions are recognized as changes in accounting estimates in the period in which the revisions are identified.
In all forms of contracts, the Company estimates its collectability of contract amounts at the same time that it estimates project costs. If the Company anticipates that there may be issues associated with the collectability of the full amount calculated as revenues, the Company may reduce the amount recognized as revenue to reflect the uncertainty associated with realization of the eventual cash collection. For example, when a cost reimbursable project exceeds the client’s expected budget amount, the client frequently requests an adjustment to the final amount. Similarly, some utility clients reserve the right to audit costs for significant periods after performance of the work. In these situations, the Company may choose to defer recognition of a portion of the revenue until the client pays for the services.
The caption “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets represents unbilled receivables which arise when revenues have been recorded but the amount will not be billed until a later date. Balances represent: (a) unbilled amounts arising from the use of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting which may not be billed under the terms of the contract until a later date or project milestone; (b) incurred costs to be billed under cost reimbursement type contracts; (c) amounts arising from routine lags in billing; or (d) the revenue associated with unapproved change orders or claims when realization is probable and amounts can be reliably determined. For those contracts in which billings exceed contract revenues recognized to date, the excess amounts are included in the caption “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings”.
In accordance with applicable terms of certain construction contracts, retainage amounts may be withheld by customers until completion and acceptance of the project. Some payments of the retainage may not be received for a significant period after completion of our portion of a project. In some jurisdictions, retainage amounts are deposited into an escrow account.
Significant revisions in contract estimates — Revenue recognition is based on the percentage-of-completion method for fixed-price contracts. Under this method, the costs incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated costs are used to calculate revenue. Total estimated costs, and thus contract revenues and margin, are impacted by many factors, which can cause significant changes in estimates during the life cycle of a project.
For projects that were in process at the end of the prior year or a prior quarter, there can be a difference in revenues and profits that would have been recognized in the prior year or prior quarter had current estimates of costs to complete been used at the end of the prior year or prior quarter.
Customer concentration — The Company operates in multiple industry segments encompassing the engineering and construction of commercial, industrial and public works infrastructure assets primarily throughout the United States. Typically, the top ten customers in any one calendar year generate revenues in excess of 50% of total revenues; however, the group that comprises the top ten customers varies from year to year.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, revenues generated by the top ten customers were approximately $317.2 million and $1,058.5 million, respectively, which represented 52.2% and 58.8%, respectively, of total revenues during the period. During the periods, a California utility project represented 10.6% and 8.8% of total revenues, respectively and Texas Department of Transportation (“TXDOT”) represented 8.4% and 9.8% of total revenues, respectively.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, revenues generated by the top ten customers were $272.0 million and $805.0 million, respectively, which represented 53.5% and 57.7%, respectively, of total revenues during the period. During the periods, a Louisiana petrochemical project represented 10.3% and 11.6% of total revenues, respectively and TXDOT represented 7.9% and 10.4% of total revenues, respectively.
At September 30, 2017, approximately 10.8% of the Company’s accounts receivable were due from one customer, and that customer provided 7.9% of the Company’s revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
10
In addition, of total accounts receivable, approximately 11.2% are from one customer with whom the Company is currently in dispute resolution. See Note 17 – “Commitments and Contingencies”.
At September 30, 2016, approximately 15.4% of the Company’s accounts receivable were due from one customer, and that customer provided 11.6% of the Company’s revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. In addition, approximately 11.2% of total accounts receivable at September 30, 2016 were in dispute resolution.
Multiemployer plans — Various subsidiaries are signatories to collective bargaining agreements. These agreements require that the Company participate in and contribute to a number of multiemployer benefit plans for its union employees at rates determined by the agreements. The trustees for each multiemployer plan determine the eligibility and allocations of contributions and benefit amounts, determine the types of benefits, and administer the plan. Federal law requires that if the Company were to withdraw from an agreement, it would incur a withdrawal obligation. The potential withdrawal obligation may be significant. In accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), any withdrawal liability would be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably estimated.
Inventory and uninstalled contract materials — Inventory consists of expendable construction materials and small tools that will be used in construction projects and is valued at the lower of cost, using first-in, first-out method, or net realizable value. Uninstalled contract materials are certain job specific materials not yet installed, for highway construction projects, which are valued using the specific identification method relating the cost incurred to a specific project. In most cases, the Company is able to invoice a state agency for the materials, but title will not pass to the state agency until the materials are installed.
Note 3—Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, with several clarifying updates issued during 2016 and 2017. The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard will supersede all current revenue recognition standards and guidance. Revenue recognition will occur when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The mandatory adoption will require new qualitative and quantitative disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments, information about contract balances and performance obligations, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The standard permits the “modified retrospective method”, which requires prospective application of the new standard as a cumulative-effect adjustment. The Company expects to adopt this new standard using the modified retrospective method that will result in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the date of adoption. The adoption will only apply to customer contracts that are not substantially complete as of January 1, 2018.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the standard on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows and related disclosures. While we are still in our evaluation process, we do not expect Topic 606 to have a material impact on our financial statements, though internal documentation and record keeping may be significantly impacted. The impact to our results is not believed to be material because Topic 606 generally supports the recognition of revenue over time under the cost-to-cost method for the majority of our contracts, which is consistent with our current percentage of completion revenue recognition model. In most of our fixed price contracts, the customer typically controls the work in process as evidenced either by contractual termination clauses or by our rights to payment for work performed to date to deliver services that do not have an alternative use to us.
The Company does not expect the new standard to materially affect the total revenue that can be recognized over the life of a construction project; however, the revenue recognized on a quarterly basis during the construction period may change. We believe that Topic 606 is likely to be more impactful to certain of our lump sum projects as a result of the following potential changes from our current practices:
§ |
Performance obligations – Topic 606 requires a review of contracts and contract modifications to determine whether there are multiple performance obligations. Each separate performance obligation must be accounted for as a distinct project, which could impact the timing of revenue recognition. There is a potential that some of our contracts may have multiple performance obligations which may affect the timing of revenue recognition. |
11
§ |
Variable consideration – In accordance with Topic 606, revenue recognition must account for variable consideration, including potential liquidated damages and customer discounts. Currently, we assess the impact of liquidated damages as an estimated cost of the project. The adoption of the new standard may affect the timing of the recognition of revenue for both liquidated damages and discounts. |
§ |
Mobilization costs – Mobilization costs typically include costs to provide labor, equipment and facilities to a project site and they are recorded currently as project costs as incurred. Topic 606 requires these costs to be capitalized as an asset and amortized over the duration of the project. |
§ |
Significant components – For some projects, we may purchase equipment from a third party, such as micro–LNG equipment, and install the equipment at the project site. Under today’s standard, the Company recognizes the associated revenue and profit for the equipment. Depending on the terms of the contract, under the new standard, revenue may be recognized without profit. |
We expect significant expanded disclosures relating to revenue recognized during each period. We do not expect Topic 606 to have a material impact on our consolidated balance sheet.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)”. The ASU will require recognition of operating leases with lease terms of more than twelve months on the balance sheet as both assets for the rights and liabilities for the obligations created by the leases. The ASU will require disclosures that provide qualitative and quantitative information for the lease assets and liabilities recorded in the financial statements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is reviewing the impact of the ASU and will establish procedures to adopt the ASU.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718) — Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The ASU modifies the accounting for excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies associated with share-based payments by requiring that excess tax benefits or deficiencies be included in the income statement rather than in equity. Additionally, the tax benefits for dividends on share-based payment awards will also be reflected in the income statement. As a result of these modifications, the ASU requires that the tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments will be shown on the cash flow statement as operating activities rather than as financing activities. The Company adopted the ASU as of January 1, 2017, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business" which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. ASU 2017-01 requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-01 to have an impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, "Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment". ASU 2017-04 removes the second step of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and will be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-04 to have an impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718) — Scope of Modification Accounting”. The ASU amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. The amendments in the ASU provide guidance on types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation”. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-09 to have an impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
12
Note 4—Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and requires certain disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 addresses fair value GAAP for financial assets and financial liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period and for non-financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs use quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are “unobservable data points” for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.
The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels identified under ASC Topic 820, the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|||
|
|
Recorded |
|
in Active Markets |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|||
|
|
on Balance |
|
for Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|||
|
|
Sheet |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
|||
Assets as of September 30, 2017: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
143,235 |
|
$ |
143,235 |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
19,304 |
|
|
19,304 |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Liabilities as of September 30, 2017: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration |
|
$ |
1,252 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets as of December 31, 2016: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
135,823 |
|
$ |
135,823 |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Liabilities as of December 31, 2016: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial instruments of the Company not listed in the table consist of accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities. These financial instruments generally approximate fair value based on their short-term nature. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value based on comparison with current prevailing market rates for loans of similar risks and maturities.
The following table provides changes to the Company’s contingent consideration liability Level 3 fair value measurements during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs |
|
||||
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
||||
Contingent Consideration Liability |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Beginning balance, January 1, |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
Additions to contingent consideration liability: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida Gas Contractors acquisition |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
— |
|
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability during year |
|
|
52 |
|
|
— |
|
Ending balance, September 30, |
|
$ |
1,252 |
|
$ |
— |
|
On a quarterly basis, the Company assesses the estimated fair value of the contractual obligation to pay the contingent consideration and any changes in estimated fair value are recorded in Other expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Fluctuations in the fair value of contingent consideration are impacted by two unobservable inputs, management’s estimate of the probability of the acquired company meeting the contractual operating performance target and the estimated discount rate (a rate that approximates the Company’s cost of capital). Significant changes in either of those inputs in isolation would result in a different fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption of the probability of meeting the performance target is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the fair value of contingent consideration liability, whereas a change in assumption used of the estimated discount rate is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the fair value of contingent consideration liability.
13
Note 5—Accounts Receivable
The following is a summary of the Company’s accounts receivable:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Contracts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $480 at September 30, 2017 and $1,030 at December 31, 2016, respectively |
|
$ |
292,281 |
|
$ |
340,871 |
|
Retention receivable |
|
|
59,388 |
|
|
46,394 |
|
|
|
|
351,669 |
|
|
387,265 |
|
Other accounts receivable |
|
|
5,182 |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
$ |
356,851 |
|
$ |
388,000 |
|
Note 6—Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts consist of the following:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts |
|
$ |
5,475,483 |
|
$ |
5,391,124 |
Gross profit recognized |
|
|
458,018 |
|
|
456,871 |
|
|
|
5,933,501 |
|
|
5,847,995 |
Less: billings to date |
|
|
(5,914,959) |
|
|
(5,821,983) |
|
|
$ |
18,542 |
|
$ |
26,012 |
This amount is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets under the following captions:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings |
|
$ |
177,662 |
|
$ |
138,618 |
Billings in excess of cost and estimated earnings |
|
|
(159,120) |
|
|
(112,606) |
|
|
$ |
18,542 |
|
$ |
26,012 |
Note 7 — Business Combinations
On January 29, 2016, the Company’s subsidiary, Primoris AV, acquired certain assets and liabilities of Mueller Concrete Construction Company for $4.1 million. The purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. During the second quarter of 2016, the Company finalized its estimate of fair value of the acquired assets of Mueller, which included $2.0 million of fixed assets, $2.0 million of goodwill and $0.1 million of inventory. Mueller operates as a division of Primoris AV, within the Utilities segment. Goodwill largely consists of expected benefits from providing foundation expertise for Primoris AV’s construction efforts in underground line work, substations and telecom/fiber. Goodwill also includes the value of the assembled workforce that the Mueller acquisition provides to the Primoris AV business. Based on the current tax treatment, goodwill will be deductible for income tax purposes over a fifteen-year period.
On June 24, 2016, the Company’s subsidiary, Vadnais Trenchless, purchased property, plant and equipment from Pipe Jacking Unlimited, Inc., consisting of specialty directional drilling and tunneling equipment for $13.4 million in cash. The Company determined this purchase did not meet the definition of a business as defined under ASC 805. The estimated fair value of the equipment was equal to the purchase price. The Company believes the purchase of the equipment will aid in the Company’s pipeline construction projects and enhance the work provided to our utility clients.
On November 18, 2016, the Company’s subsidiary, Primoris AV, acquired certain assets and liabilities of Northern Energy & Power for $6.8 million. The acquired business unit name was changed to Primoris Renewable Energy (“PRE”). PRE operates in the Power segment and serves the renewable energy sector with a specific focus on solar photovoltaic installations in the United States. The purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method of
14
accounting. During the second quarter of 2017, the Company finalized its estimated fair value of the acquired assets of PRE, which resulted in a $0.1 million reduction in goodwill compared to amounts previously recorded. The allocation of the total purchase price included fixed assets of $0.1 million; intangible assets of $3.0 million; and goodwill of $3.7 million. Intangible assets consist of customer relationships. Goodwill largely consists of synergies expected from expanded operations as well as the value of the assembled workforce that PRE provides. Based on the current tax treatment, goodwill will be deductible for income tax purposes over a fifteen-year period.
On May 26, 2017, the Company’s subsidiary, PDS, acquired certain assets of Florida Gas Contractors, a utility contractor specializing in underground natural gas infrastructure, for approximately $33.0 million in cash. In addition, the sellers could receive a contingent earnout amount of up to $1.5 million over a one-year period ending May 26, 2018, based on the achievement of certain operating targets. The estimated fair value of the potential contingent consideration on the acquisition date was $1.2 million. FGC operates in the Utilities segment and expands the Company’s presence in the Florida and Southeast markets. The purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The preliminary allocation of the total purchase price consisted of $4.8 million of fixed assets; $4.2 million of working capital; $10.5 million of intangible assets; and $14.7 million of goodwill. The Company continues to assess the final cutoff data and expects to finalize its estimate of fair value of the acquired assets of FGC during the fourth quarter of 2017. In connection with the FGC acquisition, the Company also paid $3.5 million to acquire certain land and buildings. Intangible assets primarily consist of customer relationships. Goodwill associated with the FGC acquisition principally consists of expected benefits from providing expertise for the Company’s construction efforts in the underground utility business as well as the expansion of the Company’s geographic presence. Goodwill also includes the value of the assembled workforce that the FGC acquisition provides to the Company. Based on the current tax treatment, goodwill will be deductible for income tax purposes over a fifteen-year period.
On May 30, 2017, the Company’s subsidiary, PD&C, acquired certain engineering assets for approximately $2.3 million in cash. PD&C operates in the Power segment and the acquisition futher enhances its ability to provide quality service for engineering and design projects. The purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The preliminary allocation of the total purchase price consisted of $0.2 million of fixed assets and $2.1 million of intangible assets. Intangible assets primarily consist of customer relationships.
On June 16, 2017, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of Coastal Field Services for approximately $27.5 million in cash. Coastal provides pipeline construction and maintenance, pipe and vessel coating and insulation, and integrity support services for companies in the oil and gas industry. Coastal operates in the Pipeline segment and increases the Company’s market share in the Gulf Coast energy market. The purchase was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The preliminary allocation of the total purchase price consisted of $4.0 million of fixed assets; $4.6 million of working capital; $9.9 million of intangible assets; $9.3 million of goodwill; and $0.3 million of long-term capital leases. The Company continues to assess the final cutoff data and expects to finalize its estimate of fair value of the acquired assets of Coastal during the fourth quarter of 2017. Intangible assets primarily consist of customer relationships and tradename. Goodwill associated with the Coastal acquisition principally consists of expected benefits from providing expertise for the Company’s expansion of services in the pipeline construction and maintenance business. Goodwill also includes the value of the assembled workforce that the Coastal acquisition provides to the Company. Based on the current tax treatment, goodwill will be deductible for income tax purposes over a fifteen-year period.
Supplemental Unaudited Pro Forma Information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
The following pro forma information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 presents the results of operations of the Company as if these acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of 2016. The supplemental pro forma information has been adjusted to include:
· |
the pro forma impact of amortization of intangible assets and depreciation of property, plant and equipment, based on the purchase price allocations; and |
· |
the pro forma tax effect of both the income before income taxes and the pro forma adjustments, calculated using a tax rate of 36.5% and 44.2% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. |
15
The pro forma results are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of, or intended to represent, the results that would have been achieved had the various acquisitions been completed on January 1, 2016. For example, the pro forma results do not reflect any operating efficiencies and associated cost savings that the Company might have achieved with respect to the acquisitions.
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
608,311 |
|
$ |
533,609 |
|
$ |
1,827,045 |
|
$ |
1,441,319 |
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
32,086 |
|
$ |
12,977 |
|
$ |
83,458 |
|
$ |
24,752 |
|
Net income attributable to Primoris |
|
$ |
20,597 |
|
$ |
6,816 |
|
$ |
52,068 |
|
$ |
13,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
51,441 |
|
|
51,780 |
|
|
51,491 |
|
|
51,759 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
51,707 |
|
|
52,034 |
|
|
51,751 |
|
|
51,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Note 8—Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill by segment was recorded as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Reporting Segment |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Power |
|
$ |
24,391 |
|
$ |
24,512 |
|
Pipeline |
|
|
51,521 |
|
|
42,252 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
35,056 |
|
|
20,312 |
|
Civil |
|
|
40,150 |
|
|
40,150 |
|
Total Goodwill |
|
$ |
151,118 |
|
$ |
127,226 |
|
At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, intangible assets other than goodwill totaled $48.7 million and $32.8 million, respectively, net of amortization. The table below summarizes the intangible asset categories, amounts and the average amortization periods, which are on a straight-line basis:
|
|
Amortization |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
Period |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Tradename |
|
3 to 10 years |
|
$ |
10,918 |
|
$ |
11,754 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
3 to 15 years |
|
|
36,306 |
|
|
20,136 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
2 to 5 years |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
951 |
|
Other |
|
3 years |
|
|
245 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,655 |
|
$ |
32,841 |
|
16
Amortization expense of intangible assets was $2.6 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $6.2 million and $5.0 million, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
For the Years Ending |
|
Amortization |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Expense |
|
|
2017 (remaining three months) |
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
2018 |
|
|
9,741 |
|
2019 |
|
|
9,393 |
|
2020 |
|
|
6,650 |
|
2021 |
|
|
5,413 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
14,953 |
|
|
|
$ |
48,655 |
|
Note 9—Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, accounts payable were $153.7 million and $168.1 million, respectively. These balances included retention amounts for the same periods of approximately $11.8 million and $10.6 million, respectively. The retention amounts are due to subcontractors and have been retained pending contract completion and customer acceptance of jobs.
The following is a summary of accrued expenses and other current liabilities:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
Payroll and related employee benefits |
|
$ |
52,755 |
|
$ |
43,768 |
Insurance, including self-insurance reserves |
|
|
46,835 |
|
|
42,546 |
Reserve for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
12,562 |
|
|
12,801 |
Corporate income taxes and other taxes |
|
|
8,553 |
|
|
3,368 |
Accrued administrative cost |
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
2,741 |
Other |
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
2,782 |
|
|
$ |
125,626 |
|
$ |
108,006 |
Note 10—Credit Arrangements
Long-term debt and credit facilities consist of the following:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Commercial equipment notes |
|
$ |
153,987 |
|
$ |
161,148 |
|
Mortgage notes |
|
|
11,372 |
|
|
7,564 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Senior secured notes |
|
|
89,286 |
|
|
92,858 |
|
|
|
$ |
254,645 |
|
$ |
261,570 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(62,697) |
|
|
(58,189) |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
$ |
191,948 |
|
$ |
203,381 |
|
Commercial Notes Payable and Mortgage Notes Payable
From time to time, the Company enters into commercial equipment notes payable with various equipment finance companies and banks. At September 30, 2017, interest rates ranged from 1.78% to 3.51% per annum and maturity dates range from June 15, 2018 to August 22, 2022. The notes are secured by certain construction equipment of the Company.
17
The Company also entered into two secured mortgage notes payable to a bank in December 2015 totaling $8.0 million, with interest rates of 4.3% per annum and maturity dates of January 1, 2031. The mortgage notes are secured by two buildings.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company acquired three properties from a related party and assumed mortgage notes secured by the properties totaling $4.2 million, with interest rates of 5.0% per annum and maturity dates of October 1, 2038.
Revolving Credit Facility
On September 29, 2017, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with CIBC Bank USA, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”) and co-lead arranger, The Bank of the West, as co-lead arranger, and Branch Banking and Trust Company, IBERIABANK, Bank of America, and Simmons Bank (the “Lenders”), which increased its borrowing capacity from $125.0 million to $200.0 million. The Credit Agreement consists of a $200.0 million revolving credit facility whereby the Lenders agreed to make loans on a revolving basis from time to time and to issue letters of credit for up to the $200.0 million committed amount. The termination date of the Credit Agreement is September 29, 2022. The Company capitalized $0.6 million of debt issuance costs during the third quarter of 2017 that is being amortized as interest expense over the life of the Credit Agreement.
The principal amount of any loans under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at either: (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin as specified in the Credit Agreement (based on the Company’s senior debt to EBITDA ratio as defined in the Credit Agreement), or (ii) the Base Rate (which is the greater of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (b) the prime rate as announced by the Administrative Agent). Quarterly non-use fees, letter of credit fees and administrative agent fees are payable at rates specified in the Credit Agreement.
The principal amount of any loan drawn under the Credit Agreement may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time, with a minimum prepayment of $5.0 million.
The Credit Agreement includes customary restrictive covenants for facilities of this type, as discussed below.
Commercial letters of credit outstanding were $19.5 million at September 30, 2017 and $16.2 million at December 31, 2016. Other than commercial letters of credit, there were no borrowings under the Credit Agreement or the previous credit agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and available borrowing capacity at September 30, 2017 was $180.5 million.
Senior Secured Notes and Shelf Agreement
On December 28, 2012, the Company entered into a $50.0 million Senior Secured Notes purchase agreement (“Senior Notes”) and a $25.0 million private shelf agreement (the “Notes Agreement”) by and among the Company, The Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and certain Prudential affiliates (the “Noteholders”). On June 3, 2015, the Notes Agreement was amended to provide for the issuance of additional notes of up to $75.0 million over the three year period ending June 3, 2018 ("Additional Senior Notes").
The Senior Notes amount was funded on December 28, 2012. The Senior Notes are due December 28, 2022 and bear interest at an annual rate of 3.65%, paid quarterly in arrears. Annual principal payments of $7.1 million are required from December 28, 2016 through December 28, 2021 with a final payment due on December 28, 2022. The principal amount may be prepaid, with a minimum prepayment of $5.0 million, at any time, subject to make-whole provisions.
On July 25, 2013, the Company drew $25.0 million available under the Notes Agreement. The notes are due July 25, 2023 and bear interest at an annual rate of 3.85%, paid quarterly in arrears. Seven annual principal payments of $3.6 million are required from July 25, 2017 with a final payment due on July 25, 2023.
On November 9, 2015, the Company drew $25.0 million available under the Additional Senior Notes Agreement. The notes are due November 9, 2025 and bear interest at an annual rate of 4.6%, paid quarterly in arrears. Seven annual principal payments of $3.6 million are required from November 9, 2019, with a final payment due on November 9, 2025.
18
Loans made under both the Credit Agreement and the Notes Agreement are secured by our assets, including, among others, our cash, inventory, goods, equipment (excluding equipment subject to permitted liens) and accounts receivable. All of our domestic subsidiaries have issued joint and several guaranties in favor of the Lenders and Noteholders for all amounts under the Credit Agreement and Notes Agreement.
Both the Credit Agreement and the Notes Agreement contain various restrictive and financial covenants including, among others, senior debt/EBITDA ratio and debt service coverage requirements. In addition, the agreements include restrictions on investments, change of control provisions and provisions in the event the Company disposes more than 20% of its total assets.
The Company was in compliance with the covenants for the Credit Agreement and Notes Agreement at September 30, 2017.
Canadian Credit Facility
The Company has a demand credit facility for $8.0 million in Canadian dollars with a Canadian bank for purposes of issuing commercial letters of credit in Canada. The credit facility has an annual renewal and provides for the issuance of commercial letters of credit for a term of up to five years. The facility provides for an annual fee of 1.0% for any issued and outstanding commercial letters of credit. Letters of credit can be denominated in either Canadian or U.S. dollars. At December 31, 2016, there were no letters of credit outstanding. Letters of credit outstanding was $0.5 million in Canadian dollars at September 30, 2017, and the available borrowing capacity was $7.5 million in Canadian dollars. The credit facility contains a working capital restrictive covenant for OnQuest Canada, ULC. At September 30, 2017, OnQuest Canada, ULC was in compliance with the covenant.
Note 11 — Noncontrolling Interests
The Company is currently participating in two joint ventures, each of which has been determined to be a variable interest entity (“VIE”), with the Company as the primary beneficiary as a result of its significant influence over the joint venture operations.
Each joint venture is a partnership, and consequently, no tax effect has been recognized for the income. The net assets of the joint ventures are restricted for use by the specific project and are not available for general operations of the Company.
Carlsbad Joint Venture
The Carlsbad joint venture operating activities began in 2015 and are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
28,722 |
|
$ |
608 |
|
$ |
65,725 |
|
$ |
7,276 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
550 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
930 |
|
|
327 |
|
The Carlsbad joint venture made no distributions to the partners, and the Company made no capital contributions to the Carlsbad joint venture during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The project is expected to be completed in 2018.
19
The carrying value of the assets and liabilities associated with the operations of the Carlsbad joint venture are included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets as follows:
jjjjjj |
|||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
51,869 |
|
$ |
4,630 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
10,832 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
124 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
$ |
42,964 |
|
$ |
3,426 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
16,882 |
|
$ |
286 |
|
Due to Primoris |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
46 |
|
Wilmington Joint Venture
The Wilmington joint venture operating activities began in October 2015 and are included in the Company's consolidated statements of income as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
5,143 |
|
$ |
6,140 |
|
$ |
29,742 |
|
$ |
11,057 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
987 |
|
|
211 |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
379 |
|
The Wilmington joint venture made no distributions to the partners, and the Company made no capital contributions to the Wilmington joint venture during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The project is expected to be completed in 2018.
The carrying value of the assets and liabilities associated with the operations of the Wilmington joint venture are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
15,165 |
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
239 |
|
$ |
4,242 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
$ |
1,822 |
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,766 |
|
$ |
602 |
|
Due to Primoris |
|
$ |
4,809 |
|
$ |
2,035 |
|
Summary – Joint Venture Balance Sheets
The following table summarizes the total balance sheet amounts for the two joint ventures, which are included in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
Joint Venture |
|
Consolidated |
|
||
At September 30, 2017 |
|
Amounts |
|
Amounts |
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
67,034 |
|
$ |
143,235 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
11,071 |
|
$ |
356,851 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
177,662 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
19,648 |
|
$ |
153,677 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
$ |
44,786 |
|
$ |
159,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
7,045 |
|
$ |
135,823 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
4,242 |
|
$ |
388,000 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
138,618 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
888 |
|
$ |
168,110 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
$ |
5,998 |
|
$ |
112,606 |
|
20
Note 12—Related Party Transactions
Prior to March 2017, Primoris leased three properties in California from Stockdale Investment Group, Inc. (“SIGI”). Our Chairman of the Board of Directors, who is our largest stockholder, and his family hold a majority interest of SIGI. In March 2017, the Company exercised a right of first refusal and purchased the SIGI properties. The purchase was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors for $12.8 million. The Company assumed three mortgage notes totaling $4.2 million with the remainder paid in cash.
During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company paid $0 and $0.2 million, respectively, in lease payments to SIGI for the use of these properties. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company paid $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in lease payments to SIGI for the use of these properties.
Primoris leases properties from other individuals that are current employees. The amounts leased are not material and each arrangement was approved by the Board of Directors.
Note 13—Stock-Based Compensation
In July 2008, the shareholders approved and the Company adopted the Primoris Services Corporation 2008 Long-term Incentive Equity Plan, which was replaced by the Primoris Services Corporation 2013 Long-term Incentive Equity Plan (“Equity Plan”), after approval by the shareholders and adoption by the Company on May 3, 2013.
The Company’s Board of Directors has granted 259,065 Restricted Stock Units (“Units”) to executives under the Equity Plan. The grants were documented in RSU Award Agreements, which provide for a vesting schedule and require continuing employment of the executive. The Units are subject to earlier acceleration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture as provided in the underlying RSU Award Agreement. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued 10,000 Units and 100,553 Units, respectively
At September 30, 2017, a total of 173,650 Units were vested. The vesting schedule for the remaining Units are as follows:
|
|
Number of Units |
For the Years Ending December 31, |
|
to Vest |
2017 (remaining three months) |
|
— |
2018 |
|
28,471 |
2019 |
|
51,552 |
2020 |
|
5,392 |
|
|
85,415 |
Under guidance of ASC Topic 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation”, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and is recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award).
The fair value of the Units was based on the closing market price of our common stock on the day prior to the date of the grant. Stock compensation expense for the Units is being amortized using the straight-line method over the service period. The Company recognized $0.2 million and $0.5 million in compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $0.9 million and $1.2 million in compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At September 30, 2017, approximately $1.4 million of unrecognized compensation expense remained for the Units, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
Vested Units accrue “Dividend Equivalent Units” (as defined in the Equity Plan), which will be accrued as additional Units. At September 30, 2017, a total of 2,707 Dividend Equivalent Units were accrued.
21
Note 14—Income Taxes
The Company determines its best current estimate of the annual effective tax rate using expected pre-tax earnings, statutory tax rates, and available tax planning opportunities. Certain significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rate from quarter to quarter. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as an income tax expense.
The effective tax rate on income including noncontrolling interests for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was 35.1% and 42.1%, respectively. The effective tax rate on income attributable to Primoris (excluding noncontrolling interests) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was 36.5% and 43.0%, respectively. Our tax rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to the impact of state income taxes and nondeductible components of per diem expenses, partially offset by benefits recorded to the third quarter rate for prior year provision-to-return adjustments, including the 2017 impact of tax credits to be claimed in all open years.
The Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns are generally no longer subject to examination for tax years before 2014. The statutes of limitation of state and foreign jurisdictions generally vary between 3 to 5 years. Accordingly, the tax years 2012 through 2016 remain open to examination by the other taxing jurisdictions in which the Company operates.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effects of remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from changes in tax rates are recognized in income in the period of enactment.
Note 15—Dividends and Earnings Per Share
The Company has paid or declared cash dividends during 2016 and 2017 as follows:
Declaration Date |
|
Record Date |
|
Payable Date |
|
Amount Per Share |
|
February 22, 2016 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
|
April 15, 2016 |
|
$ |
0.055 |
May 2, 2016 |
|
June 30, 2016 |
|
July 15, 2016 |
|
$ |
0.055 |
August 3, 2016 |
|
September 30, 2016 |
|
October 14, 2016 |
|
$ |
0.055 |
November 2, 2016 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
January 16, 2017 |
|
$ |
0.055 |
March 21, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
April 15, 2017 |
|
$ |
0.055 |
May 5, 2017 |
|
June 30, 2017 |
|
July 14, 2017 |
|
$ |
0.055 |
August 2, 2017 |
|
September 29, 2017 |
|
October 14, 2017 |
|
$ |
0.055 |
November 2, 2017 |
|
December 29, 2017 |
|
January 15, 2018 |
|
$ |
0.060 |
The payment of future dividends is contingent upon our revenues and earnings, capital requirements and general financial condition of the Company, as well as contractual restrictions and other considerations deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.
22
The table below presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Primoris |
|
$ |
20,597 |
|
$ |
4,504 |
|
$ |
49,833 |
|
$ |
12,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator (shares in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares for computation of basic earnings per share |
|
|
51,441 |
|
|
51,780 |
|
|
51,491 |
|
|
51,759 |
Dilutive effect of shares issued to independent directors |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
Dilutive effect of restricted stock units (1) |
|
|
262 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
256 |
|
|
215 |
Weighted average shares for computation of diluted earnings per share |
|
|
51,707 |
|
|
52,034 |
|
|
51,751 |
|
|
51,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to Primoris: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
(1) |
Represents the dilutive effect of a grant of 259,065 Units and 2,707 vested Dividend Equivalent Units. |
Note 16—Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock —The Company issued 65,429 shares of common stock in February 2017 and 85,907 shares of common stock in February 2016 under the Company’s long-term retention plan (“LTR Plan”). The shares were purchased by the participants in the LTR Plan with payment made to the Company of $1.1 million in February 2017 and $1.4 million in February 2016. The Company’s LTR Plan for managers and executives allows participants to use a portion of their annual bonus amount to purchase Company common stock at a discount from the market price. The shares purchased in February 2017 were for bonus amounts earned in 2016, and the number of shares was calculated at 75% of the average closing market price of January 2017.
In February 2017 and 2016, the Company issued 11,784 shares and 10,450 shares of common stock, respectively, as part of the quarterly compensation of the non-employee members of the Board of Directors. In August 2017 and 2016, the Company issued 11,448 shares and 11,745 shares of common stock, respectively, as part of the quarterly compensation of the non-employee members of the Board of Directors.
As discussed in Note 13 — “Stock–Based Compensation”, as of September 30, 2017, the Board of Directors has granted a total of 259,065 shares of Units under the Equity Plan and these Units have accrued 2,707 Dividend Equivalent Units.
Share repurchase plan —In February 2017, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a $5.0 million share repurchase program under which the Company could, depending on market conditions, share price and other factors, acquire shares of its common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. During the period from March 23, 2017 through March 28, 2017, the Company purchased and cancelled 216,350 shares of stock for $5.0 million at an average cost of $23.10 per share.
Note 17—Commitments and Contingencies
Leases — The Company leases certain property and equipment under non-cancellable operating leases which expire at various dates through 2023. The leases require the Company to pay all taxes, insurance, maintenance and utilities and are classified as operating leases in accordance with ASC Topic 840 “Leases”.
Total lease expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $6.8 million and $18.8 million, respectively, compared to $5.7 million and $16.5 million, respectively for the same periods in 2016. The
23
amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 included lease payments made to related parties of $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively compared to $0.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2016.
Letters of credit — At September 30, 2017, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $19.8 million, and at December 31, 2016, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $16.2 million. The outstanding amounts include the U.S. dollar equivalents for letters of credit issued in Canadian dollars.
Bonding — At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had bid and completion bonds issued and outstanding totaling approximately $2.03 billion and $1.53 billion, respectively.
NTTA settlement — On February 7, 2012, the Company was sued in an action entitled North Texas Tollway Authority (“NTTA”), Plaintiff v. James Construction Group, LLC, and KBR, Inc., Defendants, v. Reinforced Earth Company, Third-Party Defendant (the “Lawsuit”). On February 25, 2015 the Lawsuit was settled and the Company recorded a liability for $17.0 million. A second defendant agreed to provide up to $5.4 million to pay for the total expected remediation cost of approximately $22.4 million. The Company will use its settlement obligation to pay for a third-party contractor approved by the NTTA. At September 30, 2017, the remaining accrual balance was $15.4 million. In the event that the total remediation costs exceed the $22.4 million, the second defendant would pay 20% of the excess amount and the Company would pay for 80% of the excess amount.
Legal proceedings —The Company has been engaged in dispute resolution to collect money it believes it is owed for one construction project completed in 2014. Because of uncertainties associated with the project, including uncertainty of the amounts that would be collected, the Company used a zero profit margin approach to recording revenues during the construction period for the project.
For the project, a cost reimbursable contract, the Company recorded a receivable of $32.9 million with a reserve of approximately $17.8 million included in “billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings”. At this time, the Company cannot predict the amount that it will collect nor the timing of any collection. The dispute resolution for the receivable initially required international arbitration; however, in the first half of 2016, the owner sought bankruptcy protection in U.S. bankruptcy court. The Company has initiated litigation against the sureties who have provided lien and stop payment release bonds for the total amount owed. A trial date has been tentatively set for the first quarter of 2018.
The Company had been engaged in dispute resolution to collect money it believed was owed for another construction project completed in 2014. During the third quarter 2016, the Company settled the dispute with an exchange of general releases and receipt of $38.0 million in cash. The Company changed its zero estimate of profit and accounted for the settlement as a change in accounting estimate which resulted in recognizing revenues of approximately $27.5 million and gross profit of approximately $26.7 million in the third quarter of 2016.
The Company is subject to other claims and legal proceedings arising out of its business. The Company provides for costs related to contingencies when a loss from such claims is probable and the amount is reasonably determinable. In determining whether it is possible to provide an estimate of loss, or range of possible loss, the Company reviews and evaluates its litigation and regulatory matters on a quarterly basis in light of potentially relevant factual and legal developments. If we determine an unfavorable outcome is not probable or reasonably estimable, we do not accrue for a potential litigation loss. Management is unable to ascertain the ultimate outcome of other claims and legal proceedings; however, after review and consultation with counsel and taking into consideration relevant insurance coverage and related deductibles/self-insurance retention, management believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims and believes that the reasonably possible outcome of such claims will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a materially adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows of the Company.
SEC Inquiry — The Company has been cooperating with an inquiry by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which appears to be focused on certain percentage-of-completion contract revenue recognition practices of the Company during the time period 2013 and 2014. The Company is continuing to respond to the staff’s inquiries in connection with this matter. At this stage, the Company is unable to predict when the staff’s inquiry will conclude or the outcome.
Withdrawal liability for multiemployer pension plan — In November 2011, members of the Pipe Line Contractors Association (“PLCA”), including ARB, Rockford and Q3C (prior to the Company’s acquisition in 2012),
24
withdrew from the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund multiemployer pension plan (“Plan”) in order to mitigate additional liability in connection with the significantly underfunded Plan. During the first quarter of 2016, the Company received a final payment schedule for its withdrawal liability. Based on this schedule, the liability recorded at September 30, 2017 was $4.9 million. The Company has no plans to withdraw from any other agreements.
Note 18—Reportable Segments
Through the end of the year 2016, the Company segregated its business into three reportable segments: the Energy segment, the East Construction Services segment and the West Construction Services segment. In the first quarter 2017, the Company changed its reportable segments in connection with a realignment of the Company’s internal organization and management structure. The segment changes during the quarter reflect the focus of our CODM on the range of services we provide to our end user markets. Our CODM regularly reviews the Company’s operating and financial performance based on these segments.
The current reportable segments include the Power segment, the Pipeline segment, the Utilities segment, and the Civil segment. Segment information for prior periods have been restated to conform to the new segment presentation.
Driving the new end-user focused segments are differences in the nature of the services provided; the type or class of customer using the segment’s services; the method used by the segment to provide the services; and the regulatory environment of its customers.
Each of the Company’s reportable segments are comprised of similar business units that specialize in services unique to the segment. The reportable segments are managed separately because each serves different types of customers, use different methods to obtain services, and the nature of the regulatory environment are different for each reportable segment.
The classification of revenues and gross profit for segment reporting purposes can at times require judgment on the part of management. Our segments may perform services across industries or perform joint services for customers in multiple industries. To determine reportable segment gross profit, certain allocations, including allocations of shared and indirect costs, such as facility costs, equipment costs and indirect operating expenses were made.
The following is a brief description of the reportable segments:
The Power segment operates throughout the United States and specializes in a range of services that include full EPC project delivery, turnkey construction, retrofits, upgrades, repairs, outages, and maintenance for entities in the petroleum, petrochemical, water, and other industries.
The Pipeline segment operates throughout the United States and specializes in a range of services, including pipeline construction, pipeline maintenance, pipeline facility work, compressor stations, pump stations, metering facilities, and other pipeline related services for entities in the petroleum and petrochemical industries.
The Utilities segment operates primarily in California and the Midwest and Southeast regions of the United States and specializes in a range of services, including utility line installation and maintenance, gas and electric distribution, streetlight construction, substation work, and fiber optic cable installation.
The Civil segment operates primarily in the Southeastern and Gulf Coast regions of the United States and specializes in highway and bridge construction, airport runway and taxiway construction, demolition, heavy earthwork, soil stabilization, mass excavation, and drainage projects.
All intersegment revenues and gross profit, which were immaterial, have been eliminated in the following tables.
25
Segment Revenues
Revenue by segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Segment |
|
Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Power |
|
$ |
154,178 |
|
25.3% |
|
$ |
101,811 |
|
20.0% |
|
Pipeline |
|
|
84,357 |
|
13.9% |
|
|
106,042 |
|
20.9% |
|
Utilities |
|
|
246,524 |
|
40.5% |
|
|
186,985 |
|
36.8% |
|
Civil |
|
|
123,252 |
|
20.3% |
|
|
112,990 |
|
22.3% |
|
Total |
|
$ |
608,311 |
|
100.0% |
|
$ |
507,828 |
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Segment |
|
Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Power |
|
$ |
443,191 |
|
24.6% |
|
$ |
367,025 |
|
26.3% |
|
Pipeline |
|
|
402,425 |
|
22.4% |
|
|
217,182 |
|
15.6% |
|
Utilities |
|
|
576,446 |
|
32.0% |
|
|
447,858 |
|
32.1% |
|
Civil |
|
|
378,916 |
|
21.0% |
|
|
363,020 |
|
26.0% |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,800,978 |
|
100.0% |
|
$ |
1,395,085 |
|
100.0% |
|
Segment Gross Profit
Gross profit by segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Gross Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
Gross Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Power |
|
$ |
18,842 |
|
12.2% |
|
$ |
10,893 |
|
10.7% |
|
Pipeline |
|
|
12,084 |
|
14.3% |
|
|
32,402 |
|
30.6% |
|
Utilities |
|
|
36,081 |
|
14.6% |
|
|
33,925 |
|
18.1% |
|
Civil |
|
|
3,414 |
|
2.8% |
|
|
(27,091) |
|
(24.0%) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
70,421 |
|
11.6% |
|
$ |
50,129 |
|
9.9% |
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Gross Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
Gross Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Power |
|
$ |
52,498 |
|
11.8% |
|
$ |
36,570 |
|
10.0% |
|
Pipeline |
|
|
79,575 |
|
19.8% |
|
|
43,870 |
|
20.2% |
|
Utilities |
|
|
76,701 |
|
13.3% |
|
|
68,651 |
|
15.3% |
|
Civil |
|
|
1,183 |
|
0.3% |
|
|
(16,400) |
|
(4.5%) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
209,957 |
|
11.7% |
|
$ |
132,691 |
|
9.5% |
|
26
Segment Goodwill
The amount of goodwill recorded by segment at September 30, 2017 and at December 31, 2016 is presented in Note 8 – “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”.
Geographic Region — Revenues and Total Assets
The Company’s revenues are derived from customers primarily in the United States, with less than 1.0% generated from sources outside of the United States. At September 30, 2017, approximately 1.0% of total assets were located outside of the United States.
Note 19—Subsequent Events
Cash Dividend – On November 2, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.06 per common share for stockholders of record as of December 29, 2017, payable on or about January 15, 2018.
27
PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017 (“Third Quarter 2017 Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities, the effects of regulation and the economy, generally. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as “anticipates”, “believes”, “could”, “estimates”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “plans”, “potential”, “predicts”, “projects”, “should”, “will”, “would” or similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks in detail in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). You should read this Third Quarter 2017 Report, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and our other filings with the SEC completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.
Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this Third Quarter 2017 Report. We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and the accompanying notes included in Part 1, Item 1 of this Third Quarter 2017 Report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Introduction
Primoris is a holding company of various subsidiaries, which form one of the larger publicly traded specialty contractors and infrastructure companies in the United States. Serving diverse end-markets, we provide a wide range of construction, fabrication, maintenance, replacement, water and wastewater, and engineering services to major public utilities, petrochemical companies, energy companies, municipalities, state departments of transportation and other customers. We install, replace, repair and rehabilitate natural gas, refined product, water and wastewater pipeline systems; large diameter gas and liquid pipeline facilities; and heavy civil projects, earthwork and site development. We also construct mechanical facilities and other structures, including power plants, petrochemical facilities, refineries, water and wastewater treatment facilities and parking structures. Finally, we provide specialized process and product engineering services.
We have longstanding customer relationships with major utility, refining, petrochemical, power and engineering companies. We have completed major underground and industrial projects for a number of large natural gas transmission and petrochemical companies in the United States, as well as significant projects for our engineering customers. We enter into a large number of contracts each year, and the projects can vary in length from several weeks to as long as 48 months for completion on larger projects. Although we have not been dependent upon any one customer in any year, a small number of customers tend to constitute a substantial portion of our total revenues.
We recognize revenues and profitability on our contracts depending on the type of contract. For our fixed price, or lump sum, contracts, we record revenue as the work progresses on a percentage-of-completion basis, which means that we recognize revenue based on the percentage of costs incurred to date in proportion to the total estimated costs
28
expected to complete the contract. Fixed price contracts may include retainage provisions under which customers withhold a percentage of the contract price until the project is complete. For our unit price, time and material, and cost-plus contracts, we recognize revenue as units are completed or services are performed.
Through the end of the year 2016, the Company segregated its business into three reportable segments: the Energy segment, the East Construction Services segment and the West Construction Services segment. In the first quarter 2017, the Company changed its reportable segments in connection with a realignment of the Company’s internal organization and management structure. The segment changes during the quarter reflect the focus of our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) on the range of services we provide to our end user markets. Our CODM regularly reviews the Company’s operating and financial performance based on these segments.
The current reportable segments include the Power, Industrial, and Engineering (“Power”) segment, the Pipeline and Underground (“Pipeline”) segment, the Utilities and Distribution (“Utilities”) segment, and the Civil segment. See Note 18 – “Reportable Segments” for a brief description of the reportable segments and their operations.
The classification of revenues and gross profit for segment reporting purposes can at times require judgment on the part of management. Our segments may perform services across industries or perform joint services for customers in multiple industries. To determine reportable segment gross profit, certain allocations, including allocations of shared and indirect costs, such as facility costs, equipment costs and indirect operating expenses were made.
The following table lists the Company’s primary business units and their reportable segment:
Business Unit |
|
Reportable Segment |
|
Prior Reportable Segment |
|
ARB Industrial (a division of ARB, Inc.) |
|
Power |
|
West |
|
ARB Structures |
|
Power |
|
West |
|
Primoris Power (formerly PES Saxon division) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Renewable Energy (a division of Primoris AV) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Industrial Constructors (formerly PES Industrial Division) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Fabrication (a division of PES) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Mechanical Contractors (a combination of a division of PES and Cardinal Contractors) |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
OnQuest |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
OnQuest Canada |
|
Power |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Design and Construction (“PD&C”); created 2017 |
|
Power |
|
NA |
|
Rockford Corporation (“Rockford”) |
|
Pipeline |
|
West |
|
Vadnais Trenchless Services (“Vadnais Trenchless”) |
|
Pipeline |
|
West |
|
Primoris Field Services (a division of PES Primoris Pipeline) |
|
Pipeline |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Pipeline (a division of PES Primoris Pipeline) |
|
Pipeline |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Coastal Field Services; created 2017 |
|
Pipeline |
|
NA |
|
ARB Underground (a division of ARB, Inc.) |
|
Utilities |
|
West |
|
Q3 Contracting (“Q3C”) |
|
Utilities |
|
West |
|
Primoris AV |
|
Utilities |
|
Energy |
|
Primoris Distribution Services ("PDS"); created 2017 |
|
Utilities |
|
NA |
|
Primoris Heavy Civil (formerly JCG Heavy Civil Division) |
|
Civil |
|
East |
|
Primoris I&M (formerly JCG Infrastructure & Maintenance Division) |
|
Civil |
|
East |
|
BW Primoris |
|
Civil |
|
East |
|
The Company owns a 50% interest in two separate joint ventures, both formed in 2015. The Carlsbad Power Constructors joint venture (“Carlsbad”) is engineering and constructing a gas-fired power generation facility, and the “ARB Inc. & B&M Engineering Co.” joint venture (“Wilmington”) is also engineering and constructing a gas-fired power generation facility. Both projects are located in Southern California. The joint venture operations are included as part of the Power segment. As a result of determining that the Company is the primary beneficiary of the two variable interest entities (“VIEs”), the results of the Carlsbad and Wilmington joint ventures are consolidated in the Company’s financial statements. Both projects are expected to be completed in 2018.
29
On January 29, 2016, the Company acquired the net assets of Mueller Concrete Construction Company (“Mueller”) for $4.1 million, and on November 18, 2016, the Company acquired the net assets of Northern Energy & Power (“Northern”) for $6.8 million. On May 26, 2017, the Company acquired the net assets of Florida Gas Contractors (“FGC”) for $37.7 million; on May 30, 2017, the Company acquired certain engineering assets for approximately $2.3 million; and on June 16, 2017, the Company acquired the net assets of Coastal Field Services (“Coastal”) for $27.5 million. Both Mueller and FGC operations are included in the Utilities segment, Northern operations are included in the Power segment, and Coastal operations are included in the Pipeline segment.
In August 2017, the Company announced it is investing approximately $22.0 million to build, own, and operate a portfolio of solar projects in a California School District acquired from the developers, Spear Point Energy, LLC, and PFMG Solar, LLC. This investment amount includes the estimated cost of EPC work on the projects, which is projected to be completed in 2018. The solar projects are expected to generate a 25-year recurring revenue stream from the District's signed power purchase agreement. As an investment in a renewable energy project, the solar assets should provide Primoris with investment tax credits valued at over $5.0 million. The Company’s initial investment for the solar projects was $3.1 million.
Material trends and uncertainties
We generate our revenue from both large and small construction and engineering projects. The award of these contracts is dependent on many factors, most of which are not within our control. We depend in part on spending by companies in the energy and oil and gas industries, the gas utility industry, as well as municipal water and wastewater customers. Over the past several years, each segment has benefited from demand for more efficient and more environmentally friendly energy and power facilities, local highway and bridge needs and from the activity level in the oil and gas industry. However, periodically, each of these industries and government agencies are adversely affected by macroeconomic conditions. Economic factors outside of our control may affect the amount and size of contracts we are awarded in any particular period.
We closely monitor our customers to assess the effect that changes in economic, market and regulatory conditions may have on them. We have experienced reduced spending by some of our customers over the last several years, which we attribute to negative economic and market conditions, and we anticipate that these negative conditions may continue to affect demand for our services in the near-term. Fluctuations in market prices of oil, gas and other fuel sources have affected demand for our services. The current price of oil, gas and liquid natural gas has created uncertainty with respect to demand for our oil and gas pipeline services in the near term, with additional uncertainty resulting over the length of time that prices will remain at current levels. We believe that our upstream operations, such as the construction of gathering lines within the oil shale formations, will remain at lower levels for an extended period. While there was some stability in the price of oil in the first nine months of 2017, that stability has not resulted in a significant change in the contracting activities of our customers. We believe that over time, the need for pipeline infrastructure for mid-stream and gas utility companies will result in a continuing need for our services, but the impact of the low oil prices and the bankruptcy of some smaller oil and gas producers may delay midstream pipeline opportunities. The continuing changes in the regulatory environment also affect the demand for our services, either by increasing our work or delaying projects. For example, the regulatory environment in California may result in delays for the construction of gas-fired power plants while regulators continue to search for significant renewable resources, but renewable resources may also create a demand for our construction services. Finally, we believe that regulated utility customers will continue to invest in our maintenance and replacement services.
Seasonality, cyclicality and variability
Our results of operations are subject to quarterly variations. Some of the variation is the result of weather, particularly rain, ice and snow, which can impact our ability to perform construction services. While the majority of the Company’s work is in the southern half of the United States, these seasonal impacts affect revenues and profitability since gas and other utilities defer routine replacement and repair during their period of peak demand. Any quarter can be affected either negatively or positively by atypical weather patterns in any part of the country. In addition, demand for new projects tends to be lower during the early part of the year due to clients’ internal budget cycles. As a result, the Company generally experiences higher revenues and earnings in the third and fourth quarters of the year as compared to the first two quarters.
The Company is also dependent on large construction projects which tend not to be seasonal, but can fluctuate from year to year based on general economic conditions. Our business may be affected by declines or delays in new
30
projects or by client project schedules. Because of the seasonal and cyclical nature of our business, the financial results for any period may fluctuate from prior periods, and the Company’s financial condition and operating results may vary from quarter-to-quarter. Results from one quarter may not be indicative of its financial condition or operating results for any other quarter or for an entire year.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and that affect the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for each period. These estimates and assumptions must be made because certain information that is used in the preparation of our financial statements cannot be calculated with a high degree of precision from data available, is dependent on future events, or is not capable of being readily calculated based on generally accepted methodologies. Often, these estimates are particularly difficult to determine, and we must exercise significant judgment. We use estimates in our assessments of revenue recognition under percentage-of-completion accounting with estimated future job profitability, estimation of any loss provision, the allowance for doubtful accounts, useful lives of property and equipment, fair value assumptions in analyzing goodwill and long-lived asset impairments, self-insured claims liabilities and deferred income taxes. Actual results could differ significantly from our estimates, and our estimates could change if they were made under different assumptions or conditions.
As described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, our critical accounting policies relate primarily to revenue recognition for fixed and unit price contracts, income taxes, goodwill, long-lived assets, reserves for uninsured risks and contingencies. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies since December 31, 2016.
Results of Operations
Consolidated Results
The following discussion compares the results of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.
Revenue
Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $608.3 million, an increase of $100.5 million, or 19.8%, compared to the same period in 2016. Projects from our major utility clients in California and the Midwest increased revenues by $52.1 million, and our Southern California joint venture power plant projects and our Mid-Atlantic power plant project increased revenues by $40.4 million. In addition, acquisitions completed subsequent to the third quarter of 2016 increased revenues by $20.6 million, and increased volume for Texas DOT projects increased revenue by $14.7 million. The increases were partially offset by $27.5 million of revenue recognized in the third quarter of 2016 from the collection of a disputed receivable.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, revenue increased by $405.9 million, or 29.1%, compared to the same period in 2016. Three major pipeline jobs increased revenues by $213.7 million, and our major utility clients in California and the Midwest increased revenue by $110.0 million. In addition, our Southern California joint venture power plant projects and our Mid-Atlantic power plant project increased revenues by $106.0 million, and our Texas DOT projects and Louisiana methanol plant project increased revenues by $66.1 million. The increases were partially offset by decreases of $78.5 million from projects substantially completed in 2017 and $27.5 million of revenue recognized in the third quarter of 2016 from the collection of a disputed receivable.
31
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $70.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, an increase of $20.3 million, or 40.5%, compared to the same period in 2016. Gross profit increased by $37.3 million from the third quarter 2016 write-down of the Belton area jobs and by $5.1 million from our Southern California joint venture power plant projects and our Mid-Atlantic power plant project. In addition, acquisitions completed subsequent to the third quarter of 2016 increased gross profit by $3.8 million. The increases were partially offset by $26.7 million of gross profit recognized in the third quarter of 2016 from the collection of a disputed receivable.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, gross profit increased by $77.3 million, or 58.2%, compared to the same period in 2016. Smaller write-downs on the Belton area jobs and two large pipeline projects in Florida increased gross profit by $52.2 million and $50.6 million, respectively. In addition, our Southern California joint venture power plant projects and our Mid-Atlantic power plant project increased gross profit by $11.0 million. The increases were partially offset by $26.7 million of gross profit recognized in the third quarter of 2016 from the collection of a disputed receivable and a $25.9 million decrease due to increased costs on DOT projects.
As discussed in Note 2 — “Basis of Presentation”, we had unapproved change orders and claims included in contract value that totalled approximately $87.6 million at September 30, 2017. Of this amount, approximately $50.1 million was claims related to the Belton area projects, and $22.2 million was from two completed jobs that are currently in legal dispute.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses of $42.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017, increased by $6.6 million, or 18.2%, compared to the third quarter of 2016. Approximately $4.5 million of the increase in SG&A is related to businesses acquired subsequent to the third quarter of 2016. The primary reason for the remaining increase was a $2.2 million increase in compensation related expenses, including incentive compensation accruals. SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue decreased slightly to 7.0% compared to 7.1% for the corresponding period in 2016 due primarily to the increase in revenue.
SG&A expense of $128.4 million increased $27.2 million, or 26.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. Approximately $8.0 million of the increase in SG&A is related to businesses acquired subsequent to the third quarter of 2016. The remaining increase was primarily due to a $13.1 million increase in compensation related expenses, including incentive compensation accruals; a $1.2 million increase in advisory fees for acquisitions; a $1.0 million benefit in the prior year from an adjustment to the pension withdrawal liability; and a $0.8 million increase in legal costs. SG&A as a percentage of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased slightly to 7.1% compared to 7.3% for the corresponding period in 2016, as a result of the increase in revenue.
Planned JCG Texas Heavy Civil division divestiture and impairment of goodwill
In October 2016, the Company announced that it planned to divest its Texas heavy civil business unit, which operates as a division of JCG. The Company planned to continue to operate the business unit until completion of a sale. The Company engaged a financial advisor to assist in the sale and marketed the business unit. In April 2017, the Board of Directors determined that based on the information available, the Company would attain the best long-term value by withdrawing from the sales process and continuing to operate the business unit. Primoris will aggressively pursue claims that will be made for five Texas Department of Transportation projects that resulted in significant losses recorded in 2016. However, there can be no assurance as to the final amounts collected.
Under the provisions of ASC 350, the planned divestiture triggered an analysis of the goodwill amount recorded on the balance sheet of JCG. The analysis resulted in the Company recording a pretax, non-cash goodwill impairment charge of approximately $2.7 million in the third quarter of 2016.
32
Other income and expense
Non-operating income and expense items for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||||||
Investment income |
|
$ |
6,066 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
6,066 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
(92) |
|
|
299 |
|
|
288 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(39) |
|
|
(278) |
|
|
(52) |
|
|
(278) |
|
Interest income |
|
|
228 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
411 |
|
|
122 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,198) |
|
|
(2,246) |
|
|
(6,605) |
|
|
(6,754) |
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
$ |
4,224 |
|
$ |
(2,585) |
|
$ |
119 |
|
$ |
(6,622) |
|
Investment income in the three months ended September 30, 2017 is related to a $6.0 million unrealized gain from a short-term investment in marketable equity securities.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, foreign exchange gains reflect currency exchange fluctuations of the United States dollar compared to the Canadian dollar. Most of our Canadian subsidiary’s contracts are sold based on United States dollars, but a portion of the work is paid for with Canadian dollars creating a positive currency exchange difference when the value of the Canadian dollar is less than the US dollar.
Interest income is derived from interest earned on excess cash invested primarily in short-term U.S. Treasury bills, which are backed by the federal government, and other investments that may not be backed by the federal government.
Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 remain relatively unchanged compared to the same periods in 2016 due to relatively similar levels of long-term debt for the periods.
Provision for income taxes
The Company determines its best current estimate of the annual effective tax rate at each interim period using expected annual pre-tax earnings, statutory tax rates, and available tax planning opportunities. Certain significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rate from quarter to quarter.
The Company recorded income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 of $10.0 million compared to $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The $5.9 million increase was primarily driven by a $22.0 million increase in pre-tax income (excluding noncontrolling interests); partially offset by a 14.9% decrease in effective tax rate from 47.5% to 32.6%. The decrease in the effective tax rate was driven by favorable prior year provision-to-return adjustments, including the 2017 impact of tax credits to be claimed in all open years.
The Company recorded income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 of $28.6 million compared to $9.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The $19.4 million increase was primarily driven by a $57.0 million increase in pre tax income (excluding noncontrolling interests); partially offset by a 6.5% decrease in effective tax rate from 43.0% to 36.5%. The decrease in effective tax rate was primarily due to favorable prior year provision-to-return adjustments, including the 2017 impact of tax credits to be claimed in all open years.
33
Segment results
Power, Industrial and Engineering Segment
Revenue and gross profit for the Power segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Power Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
154,178 |
|
|
|
$ |
101,811 |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
18,842 |
|
12.2% |
|
$ |
10,893 |
|
10.7% |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Power Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
443,191 |
|
|
|
$ |
367,025 |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
52,498 |
|
11.8% |
|
$ |
36,570 |
|
10.0% |
|
Revenue increased by $52.4 million, or 51.4%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $27.1 million increase from our joint venture power plant projects in Southern California and a $13.3 million increase from a power plant construction project in the Mid-Atlantic region that began late in the third quarter of 2016. In addition, acquisitions completed subsequent to the third quarter of 2016 contributed $6.8 million to the increase.
Revenue increased by $76.2 million, or 20.8%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $77.1 million increase from our joint venture power plant projects in Southern California, a $28.8 million increase from a power plant construction project in the Mid-Atlantic region that began late in the third quarter of 2016, and a $16.8 million increase from a project at a methane plant in Texas that began in 2017. These increases are partially offset by a $26.0 million reduction from the substantial completion of a large petrochemical plant in Louisiana in the second quarter of 2017 and a $24.8 million decrease due to the completion of two large parking structures in 2016.
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2017, increased by $7.9 million, or 73.0%, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $5.0 million increase from the additional revenue provided by the joint venture projects in Southern California and the power plant project in the Mid-Atlantic and a $1.1 million increase from the acquisitions completed subsequent to the third quarter of 2016. These are partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease from the substantial completion of the petrochemical plant in the second quarter of 2017. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2016, higher costs on a project in Texas resulted in a $4.0 million reduction in gross profit.
Gross profit increased by $15.9 million, or 43.6%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $11.0 million increase from the additional revenue provided by the joint venture projects in Southern California and the power plant project in the Mid-Atlantic and a $1.1 million increase from acquisitions completed subsequent to the third quarter of 2016. In addition, we had higher costs on a project in Texas during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 that resulted in a $4.5 million write down. These increases are partially offset by a $4.2 million decrease from the substantial completion of the petrochemical plant in the second quarter of 2017.
Gross profit as a percent of revenues increased to 12.2% and 11.8% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, from 10.7% and 10.0% in the same periods in 2016, primarily as a result of the higher costs on a project in Texas during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.
34
Pipeline and Underground Segment
Revenue and gross profit for the Pipeline segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Pipeline Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
84,357 |
|
|
|
$ |
106,042 |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
12,084 |
|
14.3% |
|
$ |
32,402 |
|
30.6% |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Pipeline Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
402,425 |
|
|
|
$ |
217,182 |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
79,575 |
|
19.8% |
|
$ |
43,870 |
|
20.2% |
|
In the third quarter of 2016, we collected a disputed receivable (the “Collection”) related to a major pipeline project completed in 2014, which resulted in recognizing revenue of approximately $27.5 million and gross profit of approximately $26.7 million. The following discussion excludes the impact of the Collection, which was a one-time item.
Revenue increased by $5.8 million, or 7.4%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $46.6 million increase from pipeline projects in Texas and Pennsylvania that began in 2017, partially offset by a $42.3 million decrease from the substantial completion of pipeline jobs in Florida and North Carolina during the first half of 2017.
Revenue increased by $212.7 million, or 112.2%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $181.7 million increase from two large pipeline jobs in Florida, which began in the third quarter of 2016, and a $32.0 million increase from a pipeline project in Pennsylvania that began in 2017.
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $6.4 million, or 111.9%, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily attributable to a $4.2 million increase from pipeline projects in Texas and Pennsylvania that began in 2017, and a $1.2 million increase from the Coastal acquisition that was completed in the second quarter of 2017.
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $62.4 million compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily attributable to a $50.6 million increase from the two pipeline jobs in in Florida, which experienced good weather conditions resulting in no weather delays and high productivity.
Gross profit as a percent of revenues increased to 14.3% and 19.8% during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively from 7.3% and 9.1% in the same periods in 2016 for the reasons noted above.
35
Utilities and Distribution Segment
Revenue and gross profit for the Utilities segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Utilities Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
246,524 |
|
|
|
$ |
186,985 |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
36,081 |
|
14.6% |
|
$ |
33,925 |
|
18.1% |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Utilities Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
576,446 |
|
|
|
$ |
447,858 |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
76,701 |
|
13.3% |
|
$ |
68,651 |
|
15.3% |
|
Revenue increased by $59.5 million, or 31.8%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $32.0 million increase in work for two major utility customers in California and a $12.9 million increase for two major utility customers in the Midwest. In addition, revenue increased by $7.2 million from a collaboration Master Service Agreement (“MSA”) arrangement for a major utility customer in California, and the acquisition of FGC in the second quarter of 2017 increased revenue by $6.1 million.
Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $128.6 million, or 28.7%, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $50.3 million increase in work for two major utility customers in California and a $23.5 million increase for two major utility customers in the Midwest. In addition, revenue increased by $36.2 million from a collaboration MSA arrangement for a major utility customer in California, and the acquisition of FGC in the second quarter of 2017 increased revenue by $8.3 million.
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $2.2 million, or 6.4%, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to the acquisition of FGC in the second quarter of 2017 and the growth in revenue, partially offset by lower gross margins on the collaboration MSA work.
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased $8.1 million, or 11.7%, compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to the acquisition of FGC in the second quarter of 2017 and the growth in revenue, partially offset by lower gross margin on the collaboration MSA work.
Gross profit as a percent of revenues decreased to 14.6% and 13.3% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, from 18.1% and 15.3% in the same periods in 2016. The decrease is driven primarily by lower margins on the collaboration MSA work.
36
Civil Segment
Revenue and gross profit for the Civil segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Civil Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
123,252 |
|
|
|
$ |
112,990 |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
3,414 |
|
2.8% |
|
$ |
(27,091) |
|
(24.0%) |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
(Thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
||
Civil Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
378,916 |
|
|
|
$ |
363,020 |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
0.3% |
|
$ |
(16,400) |
|
(4.5%) |
|
In the third quarter of 2016, the Company recorded a $37.3 million write-down related to the Belton area projects. The following discussion excludes the impact of the write-down.
Revenue increased by $10.3 million, or 9.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $14.7 million increase in Texas DOT projects and a $6.6 million increase from a methanol plant project in Louisiana that began in 2017. These increases are partially offset by a $6.7 million decrease from three projects that were substantially completed prior to the third quarter of 2017.
Revenue increased by $15.9 million, or 4.4%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $34.8 million increase in Texas DOT projects, a $31.3 million increase from a methanol plant project in Louisiana that began in 2017, and a $12.8 million increase in Arkansas DOT projects. These increases are partially offset by a $27.7 million decrease from four projects that were substantially completed prior to the third quarter of 2017, a $16.7 million decrease in Louisiana DOTD projects, and a $9.5 million decrease in Florida mine work.
Gross profit decreased by $6.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to a $5.2 million decrease as a result of increased costs on Arkansas DOT, Louisiana DOTD, and other Texas DOT projects, partially offset by a $2.3 million increase from the methanol plant project in Louisiana that began in 2017.
Gross profit decreased by $19.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a $25.9 million decrease as a result of higher costs on Arkansas DOT, Louisiana DOTD, and other Texas DOT projects and a $6.2 million decrease from the substantial completion of a large petrochemical plant in Louisiana in the second quarter of 2017. The decrease was partially offset by a $14.9 million increase from lower write downs on the Belton area projects, which experienced higher costs in the first nine months of 2016.
Gross profit as a percent of revenue decreased to 2.8% and 0.3% during the three and nine months months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, from 9.0% and 5.8% in the same periods in 2016 for the reasons noted above.
Revenue at the Belton area projects was $34.4 million and $114.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectivily, representing 27.9% and 30.1% of total Civil revenue. Revenue for which no margin was recognized was $37.5 million and $98.1 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, of which $21.1 million and $62.8 million was from the Belton area projects. The Belton area jobs in a loss position contributed $2.5 million gross profit, and the remaining Belton area job contributed ($0.2) million gross profit during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017. At September 30, 2017, the accrued loss provision for the Belton area projects was $6.6 million and estimated remaining revenue for the four jobs in a loss position was $63.7 million.
37
Completion of the jobs is scheduled for the latter half of 2018. At September 30, 2017, estimated revenue for the remaining Belton area job was $101.7 million, with completion of the job scheduled for 2019.
Geographic area financial information
The majority of the Company’s revenues are derived from customers in the United States with approximately 1% generated from sources outside of the United States.
Backlog
For companies in the construction industry, backlog can be an indicator of future revenue streams. We define backlog as a combination of: (1) anticipated revenue from the uncompleted portions of existing contracts for which we have known revenue amounts for fixed and unit price contracts (“Fixed Backlog”), and (2) the estimated revenues on MSA work for the next four quarters (“MSA Backlog”). We normally do not include time-and-equipment, time-and-materials and cost reimbursable plus fee contracts in the calculation of backlog, since their final revenue amount is difficult to estimate in advance. However, we will include these types of contracts in backlog if the customer specifies an anticipated revenue amount.
The two components of backlog, Fixed Backlog and MSA Backlog, are detailed below.
Fixed Backlog
Fixed Backlog by reportable segment as of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2017 and the changes in Fixed Backlog for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 (in millions) are as follows:
|
|
Beginning Fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Fixed |
|
Revenue |
|
Total Revenue |
|
||||
|
|
Backlog at |
|
Contract |
|
Revenue |
|
Backlog |
|
Recognized from |
|
for Nine Months |
|
||||||
|
|
December 31, |
|
Additions to |
|
Recognized from |
|
at September 30, |
|
Non-Fixed Backlog |
|
ended September 30, |
|
||||||
Reportable Segment |
|
2016 |
|
Fixed Backlog |
|
Fixed Backlog |
|
2017 |
|
Projects |
|
2017 |
|
||||||
Power |
|
$ |
469.6 |
|
$ |
352.3 |
|
$ |
403.4 |
|
$ |
418.5 |
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
$ |
443.2 |
|
Pipeline |
|
|
1,019.4 |
|
|
169.3 |
|
|
381.0 |
|
|
807.7 |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
402.4 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
187.8 |
|
|
153.5 |
|
|
65.8 |
|
|
423.0 |
|
|
576.5 |
|
Civil |
|
|
605.9 |
|
|
449.4 |
|
|
371.9 |
|
|
683.4 |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
378.9 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,126.4 |
|
$ |
1,158.8 |
|
$ |
1,309.8 |
|
$ |
1,975.4 |
|
$ |
491.2 |
|
$ |
1,801.0 |
|
Revenues recognized from non-Fixed Backlog projects shown above are generated by MSA projects and projects completed under time-and-equipment, time-and-materials and cost-reimbursable-plus-fee contracts or are revenue from the sale of construction materials, such as rock or asphalt, to outside third parties or sales of water services by BW Primoris.
At September 30, 2017, our total Fixed Backlog was $1.98 billion, representing a decrease of $151.0 million, or 3.3%, compared to $2.13 billion as of December 31, 2016.
MSA Backlog
The following table outlines historical MSA revenues for the past seven quarters ($ in millions):
|
|
Quarterly MSA Revenues |
||
|
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
First Quarter |
|
105.2 |
|
105.5 |
Second Quarter |
|
142.2 |
|
181.0 |
Third Quarter |
|
160.2 |
|
197.9 |
Fourth Quarter |
|
168.6 |
|
|
MSA Backlog includes anticipated MSA revenues for the next twelve months. We estimate MSA revenues based on historical trends, anticipated seasonal impacts and estimates of customer demand based on information from our customers.
38
The following table shows our estimated MSA Backlog at September 30, 2017 by reportable segment (in millions):
|
MSA Backlog |
|
|
|
at September 30, |
|
|
Reportable Segment: |
2017 |
|
|
Power |
$ |
40.6 |
|
Pipeline |
|
42.8 |
|
Utilities |
|
557.2 |
|
Civil |
|
— |
|
Total |
$ |
640.6 |
|
Total Backlog
The following table shows total backlog (Fixed Backlog plus MSA Backlog), by reportable segment as of the quarter-end dates shown below (in millions):
Reportable Segment: |
|
September 30, 2016 |
|
December 31, 2016 |
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
June 30, 2017 |
|
September 30, 2017 |
|
|||||
Power |
|
$ |
533.6 |
|
$ |
511.9 |
|
$ |
577.4 |
|
$ |
491.3 |
|
$ |
459.1 |
|
Pipeline |
|
|
1,030.3 |
|
|
1,052.6 |
|
|
917.1 |
|
|
927.5 |
|
|
850.5 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
519.0 |
|
|
606.5 |
|
|
672.3 |
|
|
664.1 |
|
|
623.0 |
|
Civil |
|
|
612.1 |
|
|
626.9 |
|
|
631.7 |
|
|
667.5 |
|
|
683.4 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,695.0 |
|
$ |
2,797.9 |
|
$ |
2,798.5 |
|
$ |
2,750.4 |
|
$ |
2,616.0 |
|
We expect that during the next four quarters, we will recognize as revenue approximately 71% of the total backlog at September 30, 2017, comprised of backlog of approximately: 78% of the Power segment; 55% of the Pipeline segment; 100% of the Utilities segment; and 61% of the Civil segment.
Backlog should not be considered a comprehensive indicator of future revenues, as a percentage of our revenues are derived from projects that are not part of a backlog calculation. The backlog estimates include amounts from estimated MSA revenues, but our customers are not contractually obligated to purchase an amount of services from us under the MSAs. Any of our contracts, MSA, fixed price or fixed unit price, may be terminated by our customers on relatively short notice. In the event of a project cancellation, we may be reimbursed for certain costs, but typically we have no contractual right to the total revenues reflected in backlog. Projects may remain in backlog for extended periods of time as a result of customer delays, regulatory requirements or project specific issues. Future revenues from projects completed under time-and-equipment, time-and-materials and cost-reimbursable-plus-fee contracts may not be included in our estimated backlog amount.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Needs
Liquidity represents our ability to pay our liabilities when they become due, fund business operations and meet our contractual obligations and execute our business plan. Our primary sources of liquidity are our cash balances at the beginning of each period and our net cash flow. If needed, we have availability under our lines of credit to augment liquidity needs. In order to maintain sufficient liquidity, we evaluate our working capital requirements on a regular basis. We may elect to raise additional capital by issuing common stock, convertible notes, term debt or increasing our credit facility, as necessary, to fund our operations or to fund the acquisition of new businesses.
Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $143.2 million at September 30, 2017 compared to $135.8 million at December 31, 2016. We anticipate that our cash and investments on hand, existing borrowing capacity under our credit facility and our future cash flows from operations will provide sufficient funds to enable us to meet our operating needs, our planned capital expenditures and our ability to grow for at least the next twelve months. In evaluating our liquidity needs, we consider cash and cash equivalents held by our consolidated VIEs. These amounts, which totaled $67.0 million and $7.0 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, were not available for general corporate purposes.
The construction industry is capital intensive, and we expect to continue to make capital expenditures to meet anticipated needs for our services. Historically, we have invested an amount that approximated the sum of depreciation
39
and amortization expenses plus proceeds from equipment sales. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, capital expenditures were approximately $57.3 million. In addition, the companies acquired during the period added $12.4 million to property, plant and equipment, and we assumed $4.2 million of mortgage debt during the period. For the first nine months of 2017, total construction equipment purchases were $38.2 million, while the amount of depreciation, amortization and equipment sales proceeds were approximately $56.3 million. Capital expenditures for the remaining three months of 2017 are expected to total between $5.0 million and $10.0 million.
Cash Flows
Cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are summarized as follows:
|
|
Nine months ended |
|||||
|
|
September 30, |
|||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
(Thousands) |
|
||
Change in cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
161,432 |
|
$ |
50,617 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(129,762) |
|
|
(48,482) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(24,258) |
|
|
(14,590) |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7,412 |
|
$ |
(12,455) |
|
Operating Activities
The source of our cash flows from operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
Change |
|
|||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
|
|
|||||
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
81,567 |
|
$ |
28,825 |
|
$ |
52,742 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
49,248 |
|
|
51,445 |
|
|
(2,197) |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
911 |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
(258) |
|
Unrealized gain on short-term investments |
|
|
(5,980) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(5,980) |
|
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
(3,880) |
|
|
(3,361) |
|
|
(519) |
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment |
|
|
477 |
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
(2,239) |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
67,614 |
|
|
(14,311) |
|
|
81,925 |
|
Net other income (expense) and tax provision |
|
|
(28,525) |
|
|
(15,866) |
|
|
(12,659) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
161,432 |
|
$ |
50,617 |
|
$ |
110,815 |
|
The net change in assets and liabilities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 resulted in cash provided by the net change of $67.6 million, compared to a net use of cash of $14.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, an improvement in cash flows of $81.9 million. The primary reason for the improvement of $81.9 million was an increase of $87.7 million in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings and an improvement of $14.8 million in accounts receivable for the current year, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $27.8 million.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the $67.6 million of cash provided by the changes in assets and liabilities are outlined as follows:
· |
Accounts receivable decreased by $41.9 million from December 31, 2016, reflecting successful collection efforts during the first nine months of 2017. For non-disputed receivables (excluding retainage), our days sales outstanding declined from 47 days at December 31, 2016 to 38 days at September 30, 2017. In addition to maintaining an excellent collection history, we have certain lien rights that can provide additional security for collections. At September 30, 2017, accounts receivable represented 28.3% of our total assets compared to 33.1% at the end of 2016; |
40
· |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings increased by $46.1 million compared to December 31, 2016, primarily due to a $39.5 million increase from our Carlsbad joint venture project; |
· |
Uninstalled inventory decreased by $9.6 million during the first nine months of 2017; |
· |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased by $7.3 million compared to December 31, 2016; |
· |
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings (“CIE”) increased by $38.5 million compared to December 31, 2016. CIE results primarily from either time lags between revenue recognition and contractual billing terms or the billing lag at the end of each month; and |
· |
Accounts payable decreased by $17.8 million and accrued expenses and other current liabilities increased by $17.8 million during the first nine months of 2017. |
Investing activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we purchased property and equipment for $57.3 million in cash (which is net of assumed mortgage notes of $4.2 million) compared to $52.1 million during the same period in the prior year. We believe that ownership of equipment is generally preferable to renting equipment on a project-by-project basis, as ownership helps to ensure the equipment is available for our projects when needed. In the past, ownership has resulted in lower overall equipment costs.
We paid $13.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 for a short-term investment in marketable equity securities. We did not have any purchases of investments during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we used $66.2 million for acquisitions, primarily related to FGC and Coastal.
Financing activities
Financing activities used cash of $24.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, which was the net of several transactions, including:
· |
$30.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of debt secured by our equipment; |
· |
$41.3 million in repayment of long-term debt and capital leases; |
· |
Dividend payments of $8.5 million to our stockholders; |
· |
Repurchase of $5.0 million of common stock; and |
· |
$1.1 million in proceeds from the issuance of 65,429 shares of common stock purchased by the participants in the Primoris Long-term Retention Plan. |
Financing activities used cash of $14.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which was the net of several transactions, including:
· |
$30.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of debt secured by our equipment; |
· |
$37.5 million in repayment of long-term debt and capital leases; |
· |
Dividend payments of $8.5 million to our stockholders; |
· |
$1.4 million in proceeds from the issuance of 85,907 shares of common stock purchased by the participants in the Primoris Long-term Retention Plan. |
41
Credit Agreements
For a description of our credit agreements, see Note 10 — “Credit Arrangements” in Item 1, Financial Statements of this Third Quarter 2017 Report.
Related party transactions
For a discussion of related party transactions, please see Note 12 — “Related Party Transactions” in Item 1, Financial Statements of this Third Quarter 2017 Report.
Common stock
For a discussion of items affecting our common stock, please see Note 16 — “Stockholders’ Equity” in Item 1, Financial Statements of this Third Quarter 2017 Report.
Contractual Obligations
As of September 30, 2017, we had $255.1 million of outstanding long-term debt and capital lease obligations, and there were no short-term borrowings.
A summary of contractual obligations as of September 30, 2017 was as follows:
|
|
Total |
|
1 Year |
|
2 - 3 Years |
|
4 - 5 Years |
|
After 5 Years |
|
|||||
|
|
(In Millions) |
|
|||||||||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
255.1 |
|
$ |
62.9 |
|
$ |
106.6 |
|
$ |
52.2 |
|
$ |
33.4 |
|
Interest on long-term debt (1) |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
Pension plan withdrawal liability |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
— |
|
Equipment operating leases |
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
— |
|
Contingent consideration obligations |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Real property leases |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Real property leases—related parties |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
$ |
329.8 |
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
$ |
139.8 |
|
$ |
64.3 |
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
(1) |
The interest amount represents interest payments for our fixed rate debt assuming that principal payments are made as originally scheduled. |
The table does not include obligations under multi-employer pension plans in which some of our employees participate. Our multi-employer pension plan contribution rates are generally specified in our collective bargaining agreements, and contributions are made to the plans based on employee payrolls. Our obligations for future periods cannot be determined because we cannot predict the number of employees that we will employ at any given time nor the plans in which they may participate.
We may also be required to make additional contributions to multi-employer pension plans if they become underfunded, and these contributions would be determined based on our union payroll. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 added special funding and operational rules for multi-employer plans that are classified as “endangered”, “seriously endangered”, or “critical” status. Plans in these classifications must adopt measures to improve their funded status through a funding improvement or rehabilitation plan, which may require additional contributions from employers. The amount of additional funds that we may be obligated to contribute cannot be reasonably estimated and is not included in the table above.
In November 2011, members of the Pipe Line Contractors Association “PLCA”, including ARB, Rockford and Q3C (prior to the Company’s acquisition in 2012), withdrew from the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund multiemployer pension plan (“Plan”) in order to mitigate additional liability in connection with the significantly underfunded Plan. During the first quarter of 2016, the Company received a final payment schedule for its withdrawal liability. Based on this schedule, the liability recorded at September 30, 2017 was $4.9 million. The Company has no plans to withdraw from any other agreements.
42
Off-balance sheet transactions
As is common in our industry, we enter into certain off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business that result in risks not directly reflected on our balance sheet. We have no off-balance sheet financing arrangement with variable interest entities. The following represents transactions, obligations or relationships that could be considered material off-balance sheet arrangements.
· |
At September 30, 2017, we had letters of credit outstanding of $19.8 million under the terms of our credit agreements. These letters of credit are used by our insurance carriers to ensure reimbursement for amounts that they are disbursing on our behalf, such as beneficiaries under our self-funded insurance program. In addition, from time to time, certain customers require us to post a letter of credit to ensure payments to our subcontractors or guarantee performance under our contracts. Letters of credit reduce our borrowing availability under our Credit Agreement and Canadian Credit Facility. If these letters of credit were drawn on by the beneficiary, we would be required to reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit, and we may be required to record a charge to earnings for the reimbursement. As of the date of this Third Quarter 2017 Report, we do not believe that it is likely that any material claims will be made under a letter of credit; |
· |
We enter into non-cancellable operating leases for some of our facilities, equipment and vehicles, including leases with related parties. At September 30, 2017, equipment operating lease commitments were $30.9 million, and facility rental commitments were $13.3 million. Accounting treatment of operating leases will change in accordance with ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)”, effective January 1, 2019; |
· |
In the ordinary course of our business, we may be required by our customers to post surety bid or completion bonds in connection with services that we provide. At September 30, 2017, we had $2.03 billion in outstanding bonds. As of the date of this Third Quarter 2017 Report, we do not anticipate that we would have to fund material claims under our surety arrangements; |
· |
Certain of our subsidiaries are parties to collective bargaining agreements with unions which may create future obligations not recorded on our balance sheet; |
· |
Other guarantees that we make from time to time, such as guaranteeing the obligations of our subsidiaries; and |
· |
Employment agreements with executive officers or with executives from acquired companies may create obligations at a future date. |
Receivable Collection Actions
As do all construction contractors, we negotiate payments with our customers from time to time, and we may encounter delays in receiving payments from our customers. The Company has been engaged in dispute resolution to collect money it believes it is owed for one construction project completed in 2014. Because of uncertainties associated with the project, including uncertainty of the amounts that would be collected, the Company used a zero profit margin approach to recording revenues during the construction period for the project.
For the project, a cost reimbursable contract, the Company recorded a receivable of $32.9 million with a reserve of approximately $17.8 million included in “billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings”. At this time, the Company cannot predict the amount that it will collect nor the timing of any collection. The dispute resolution for the receivable initially required international arbitration; however, in the first half of 2016, the owner sought bankruptcy protection in U.S. bankruptcy court. The Company has initiated litigation against the sureties who have provided lien and stop payment release bonds for the total amount owed. A trial date has been tentatively set for the first quarter of 2018.
Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices
Our operations are affected by increases in prices, whether caused by inflation or other economic factors. We attempt to recover anticipated increases in the cost of labor, equipment, fuel and materials through price escalation provisions in certain major contracts or by considering the estimated effect of such increases when bidding or pricing new work or by entering into back-to-back contracts with suppliers and subcontractors.
43
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to risks related to market conditions. These risks primarily include fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. We may seek to manage these risks through the use of financial derivative instruments. These instruments may include foreign currency exchange contracts and interest rate swaps.
We do not execute transactions or use financial derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We enter into transactions with counter parties that are generally financial institutions in a matter to limit significant exposure with any one party.
At September 30, 2017, we had no derivative financial instruments.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, short-term debt, accounts payable and accrued liabilities shown in the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, due to the generally short maturities of these items.
At September 30, 2017, all of our long-term debt was subject to fixed interest rates.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of September 30, 2017, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures”, as such term is defined under Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e).
Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, at September 30, 2017, the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their stated objectives. We anticipate continuing enhancement of our controls, especially as we complete the process of integrating our financial and operations information systems onto a common platform.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, there were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting practices or processes that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
44
The information required for this item is provided in Note 17 — “Commitments and Contingencies”, included in the unaudited notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included under Part I of this Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.
In addition to the information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which to our knowledge have not materially changed. Those risks, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results, are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
On September 29, 2017, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with CIBC Bank USA, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”) and co-lead arranger, The Bank of the West, as co-lead arranger, and Branch Banking and Trust Company, IBERIABANK, Bank of America, and Simmons Bank (the “Lenders”), which increased its borrowing capacity from $125.0 million to $200.0 million. The Credit Agreement consists of a $200.0 million revolving credit facility whereby the Lenders agreed to make loans on a revolving basis from time to time and to issue letters of credit for up to the $200.0 million committed amount. The termination date of the Credit Agreement is September 29, 2022.
The principal amount of any loans under the Credit Agreement will bear interest at either: (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin as specified in the Credit Agreement (based on the Company’s senior debt to EBITDA ratio as defined in the Credit Agreement), or (ii) the Base Rate (which is the greater of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% or (b) the prime rate as announced by the Administrative Agent). Quarterly non-use fees, letter of credit fees and administrative agent fees are payable at rates specified in the Credit Agreement
The principal amount of any loan drawn under the Credit Agreement may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time, with a minimum prepayment of $5.0 million.
The Credit Agreement includes various restrictive and financial covenants including, among others, senior debt/EBITDA ratio and debt service coverage requirements. In addition, the Credit Agreement include restrictions on investments, change of control provisions and provisions in the event the Company disposes more than 20% of its total assets.
The Credit Agreement is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the description of the agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full and complete terms of the agreement.
45
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Exhibit |
|
Description |
10.1 |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer (*) |
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer (*) |
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification by the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer (*) |
32.2 |
|
Section 1350 Certification by the Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer (*) |
101 INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document (*) |
101 SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (*) |
101 CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (*) |
101 LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (*) |
101 PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (*) |
101 DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (*) |
(*)Filed herewith
46
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION |
|
|
Date: November 6, 2017 |
/s/ PETER J. MOERBEEK |
|
Peter J. Moerbeek |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
47