ProtoKinetix, Inc. - Annual Report: 2006 (Form 10-K)
U.
S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-KSB
(Mark
One)
|
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
fiscal year ended December
31, 2006
|
[
]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the
transition period from ___________ to _____________
Commission
File Number: 0-32917
PROTOKINETIX,
INC.
Formerly
known as RJV Networks, Inc.
(Name
of
small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
94-3355026
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
Suite
1500-885 West Georgia Street
Vancouver,
British Columbia Canada V6C 3E8
________________________________________________________________________
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip
code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (604)
687-9887
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: $.001
par value common stock
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes X
No
___
Check
if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not
contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment
to
this Form 10-KSB. [ ]
The
issuer’s revenues for the most recent fiscal year were USD $0
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $12,002,713 based upon the
closing price of our common stock which was $0.33 on April 13, 2007. Shares
of
common stock held by each officer and director and by each person or group
who
owns 10% or more of them outstanding common stock amounting to 8,218,780 shares
have been excluded in that such persons or groups may be deemed to be
affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a
conclusive determination for other purposes.
As
of
April 16, 2007, there were 44,590,639shares of our common stock were issued
and
outstanding.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference: None.
Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format: No.
INTRODUCTION
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial
statements and notes thereto. Because we desire to take advantage of, the "safe
harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,
we
caution readers regarding certain forward looking statements in the following
discussion and elsewhere in this report and in any other statement made by,
or
on our behalf, whether or not in future filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Forward looking statements are statements not based on historical
information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results
or other developments. Forward looking statements are necessarily based upon
estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business,
economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are
beyond our control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions,
are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual
results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in any forward looking statements made by, or our behalf. We disclaim any
obligation to update forward looking statements.
Forward
looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance,
or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of
activity, performance, or achievement expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "intend,"
"expects," "plan," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts,"
"potential," or "continue" or the negative of such terms or other comparable
terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results,
levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor
any
other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such
statements.
WE
ARE A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE BUSINESS AND AN INVESTMENT IN OUR COMPANY IS EXTREMELY
RISKY.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
FORM
10-KSB ANNUAL REPORT
_________________________
PROTOKINETIX,
INC.
Section
|
Heading
|
Page
|
Part
I
|
||
Item
1
|
Description
of Business
|
4
|
Item
2
|
Description
of Property
|
11
|
Item
3
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
11
|
Item
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
12
|
Part
II
|
||
Item
5
|
Market
for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters
|
12
|
Item
6
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
or Plan of Operation
|
16
|
Item
6A
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
18
|
Item
7
|
Financial
Statements
|
18
|
Item
8
|
Changes
in and Disagreements on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
18
|
Item
8A
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
18
|
Item
8B
|
Other
Information
|
19
|
Part
III
|
||
Item
9
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons, Compliance with
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act
|
19
|
Item
10
|
Executive
Compensation
|
20
|
Item
11
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
21
|
Item
12
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
22
|
Part
IV
|
||
Item
13
|
Exhibits
and Reports on Form 8-K
|
22
|
Item
14
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
23
|
Certifications
and Signatures
|
23
|
PART
I
ITEM
1. DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
Important
Disclosures and Disclaimers.
Please
note that ProtoKinetix, Inc. (the "Company") is a development stage company
that
has not yet sold or marketed any products. The Company had $0 in revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2006.
It
is
important to understand that although the Company (as is discussed below) is
focused on various promising scientific efforts, to date, Protokinetix Inc.
has
not yet marketed a product.The research on the two amoino acid and the three
amino acid AAGP™ molecules has demonstrated that they hold significant promise
in the field of medicine in preserving cells, tissue and organs. The antiaging
properties and the protective effect of AAGP™ also is of significant interest to
the cosmetic and skin care industries. Research has confirmed that the AAGP™
molecules improve the harvest of cells from cryopreservation by greater than
30%. There is a market for AAGP™ to preserve cells, but we will not be marketing
these until we have completed our scale up manufacturing of the
molecule.
Overview
We
are a
biotechnical company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia that owns
the
world-wide rights to a family of synthetic anti-freeze glycoproteins
(trademarked by us as AAGP™). We are dedicated to the commercial development of
AAGP™ for use in human and veterinary medicine, food additives and supplements,
and the biotechnology and cosmetic industry. We are making meaningful progress
in this domain by coordinating a team of world recognized intellectual talent
in
a networked environment. As of December 31, 2006 research has been conducted
at
three Universities in Europe as well as three universities in North America.
There is also work being conducted by one European and three American
corporations as well as by one research institute in Australia. Discussions
are
underway with additional universities and research facilities to conduct
research.
Our
business plan is based primarily on the furtherance of certain intellectual
property rights obtained by way of "sub-licenses" of technology from other
companies. At present, we have engaged the patent law firm of Cabinet-Moutard
of
Versaille, France, and have filed a number of international patent applications.
These patent applications include:
WO
2004/014928 A2 (19 February 2004)
PCT
Int.
Appl. (2006), 87 pp. WO2006059227 A1 20060608 AN 2006:538719
Patent
application: Fr 03 May 2006, 06 03952
Consistent
with our agreements with the licensors of various technologies we license,
we
have developed two finished commercial products which improve the preservation
of cells. The products for the preservation of cells do not require regulatory
approval. We are continuing to conduct research to develop additional products.
The chemical process by which the AAGP™ is manufactured is covered by a world
wide patent that is issued to INSA. We have purchased the exclusive rights
to
use this process to manufacture AAGP™. Final patents have not been issued for
AAGP(TN), but we are protected by PCT Int. Appl.(2006),87 pp. WO2006059227
A1
20060608 AN 2006:538719 and the patent application Fr. 03 May 2006, 06 03952.
There have been no final patents awarded to cover the AAGP™ molecules as of this
date, nor have we achieved regulatory approval for any product. We are focused
on the research and development of one primary compound known as AFGP, which
we
have filed a trademark application for.
The
Company operates with a skeletal management team headed by John Todd, M.D.
In
addition to Dr. Todd, the Company receives advice and counsel from its
Scientific Advisory Board. A short biography of Dr. Todd may be found within
this Form 10-KSB, and the biographies of other members of the ProtoKinetix
Scientific Advisory Board may be found within the "About Us" section of the
Company's website located at www.protokinetix.com.
The
company employs one secretary, two full time Ph.D. researchers as well as two
contract researchers and two laboratory technicians.
AFGP
Project Overview
We
currently focus on the research, development and testing of the synthetic
glycoproteins (AFGP) which have been trademarked, AAGP™. We have entered into
agreements which give us the exclusive right to develop products derived from
patent pending technologies related to synthetic AFGPs. Our intellectual
property rights were developed by Dr. Geraldine Castelot-Deliencourt. As of
the
date of this report, the Company's development agents, including the parties
the
Company has licensed AFGP technologies from, have received world wide patents
on
the process by which the synthetic AFGP is manufactured, and we have patents
pending on the 3 to 5 amino acid AAGP molecules. The 2 amino acid molecule
AAGP
has a patent application which was filed on May 03, 2006.
AFGP
Compound
One
of
the many accomplishments from pioneering research of the U.S. Antarctic Program
was the discovery, in the early sixties, that fish living year-long in subzero
temperature are extremely resistant to freezing. The substances that prevent
these fish from freezing were isolated, characterized and designated as
antifreeze glycoproteins or AFGP. Various kinds of AFGP were isolated from
many
species of fishes, and in some amphibians, plants and insects. All of the AFGPs
share a common characteristic that prevents ice crystals from growing and
connecting to each other. Research has also confirmed a membrane stabilizing
characteristics of native AFGP.
A
review
of the scientific literature will confirm that there has been a great deal
of
interest around the world in these natural antifreeze glycoproteins which are
able to protect a great many creatures subjected to freezing temperatures.
A
further review will also confirm that the natural antifreeze is able to preserve
mammalian cells tissue and organs. The metabolic rate in living cells is reduced
as the temperature is lowered. Keeping cells and tissue at a low temperature
enables their preservation for a longer time than cells can be preserved for
at
a higher temperature. Yet, when cells are exposed to sub zero temperatures,
they
are destroyed by the formation of ice crystals which disrupts the cell membrane
(this effect is not seen with AAGP™.)
Scientists
have conducted many experiments in which they extracted naturally occurring
AFGP
from a variety of fish and then used these naturally occurring antifreeze
glycoproteins to reduce the temperature at which ice crystals are formed. It
has
been determined in experiments by many scientists that mammalian cells in a
solution containing natural AFGP could be successfully preserved at temperatures
several degrees below zero Celsius. At this temperature the metabolic rate
of
the cells is very low, and these cells can be preserved for a longer period
of
time at sub zero temperatures as long as the cells are not destroyed by the
formation of ice crystals. However, until today, applications of AFGP were
limited since researchers were unable to produce sufficient quantities or stable
enough copies of these antifreeze glycoproteins for commercial applications,
and
the use of naturally occurring compounds extracted from fish is too labor and
cost-intensive to be practical.
The
native antifreeze glycoproteins are very large molecules that are often made
up
of a repeating series of smaller molecules, glycoproteins. Glycoproteins are
often very biologically active, but they are inherently quite unstable. The
oxygen-glycosidic link is readily cleaved by glycosidases, resulting in a low
bio-availability of these glycoconjugate based molecules. Dr. Geraldine
Castelot-Deliencourt, along with Dr. Jean-Charles Quirion at the Research
Institute of Organic Chemistry in Rouen, France, developed a patented process
to
stabilize the oxygen-glycosidic bond in these sugar based molecules. This
patented process replaces the weaker oxygen bond with a C-F2 mimetic. The
resultant molecules are biologically active and stable over a pH range of 2
to
13. They are not broken down by glycosidases. It is by using this patented
process that the active repeating segment of native antifreeze glycoproteins
has
been synthesized to produce the synthetic antifreeze glycoprotein molecules
(AAGP™). Protokinetix Inc. has produced and tested a variety of the molecules
from the family of AAGP™ molecules. The experimental work which we have
conducted confirms the following:
· |
The
molecules are stable over a pH of 1.8 to
13
|
· |
Toxicity
trials have been conducted by 3 separate researchers. There is no
toxicity
until a concentration of 50 milligrams per milliliter of the AAGP™. This
is a concentration ten times the dose that we anticipate using for
medical
applications and for cell preservation.
|
· |
There
is excellent preservative effect upon cells, protecting them from
harsh
environmental stimuli. This was confirmed using Ultraviolet C radiation
and 1 molar solution of Hydrogen
Peroxide
|
· |
There
is no interference with cell growth
rate
|
· |
Cells
appear morphologically normal in the presence of
AAGP™
|
· |
Cells
function normally in the presence of
AAGP™
|
· |
There
is a reduced COX-2 induction following an inflammatory stimulus
(Interleukin 1-B). The IL1-B/COX2 pathway is a well known pathway
involved
in many pathologies.
|
· |
There
is strong evidence to show that AAGP™ is involved in cellular repair at
the molecular level
|
· |
AAGP™
has been shown to enhance cell viability during
cryopreservation
|
· |
Cells
live significantly longer in the presence of AAGP™ over a temperature
range of minus 3 degrees C to plus 37 degrees
C
|
· |
AAGP
enables the preservation of Platelets at minus 3 degrees
C
|
· |
The
AAGP™ has no thermal hysteresis activity. This is expected given its small
size.
|
We
are
continuing our research to determine additional characteristics of AAGP™ as well
as the mechanism of action of this very interesting and valuable family of
molecules. The work is being conducted not only through our contracted
researchers but also through a number of universities and research facilities.
The results of our work to date suggest that AAGP™ may have a very large market
in the following areas:
1. |
Skin
Care
|
a. |
Anti-aging
|
b. |
Reparative
|
c. |
Protective
|
d. |
Solar
Block
|
2. |
Cell
culture protection
|
a. |
Short
term preservation
|
b. |
Cryopreservation
|
3. |
Organ
Preservation for Transplantation
|
a. |
Cells
- Islet cell transplantation
|
b. |
Solid
organ
|
4. |
Tissue
preservation
|
a. |
Cardioplegic
solution additive
|
b. |
Tissue
damage reduction following CVA and
MI
|
c. |
Tissue
protection following trauma and ischemia secondary to
edema
|
5. |
Blood
and blood product preservation
|
a. |
Platelet
storage
|
b. Long term storage of packed red cells
6. An anti-inflammatory agent
Intellectual
Property
As
of the
date of this Report, our development agents, including the parties we have
licensed AFGP technologies from, have applied to receive patents for
technologies we have licensed and continue to primarily base our research
efforts on. At present, we have engaged the patent law firm of Cabinet-Moutard
of Versaille, France, and have filed a number of international patent
applications. These patent applications include:
WO
2004/014928 A2 (19 February 2004)
PCT
Int.
Appl. (2006), 87 pp. WO2006059227 A1 20060608 AN 2006:538719
Patent
application: Fr 03 May 2006, 06 03952
Consistent
with our agreements with the licensors of various technologies we license,
we
have no finished commercial product or products, and have received no final
patents awards or FDA approvals for any product or diagnostic procedures. We
are
focused on the research and development of one primary compound known as AAGP™,
which we have filed a trademark application for.
Subject
to our available financial resources, our intellectual property strategy is:
(1)
to pursue licenses, trade secrets, and know-how within our primary research
areas, and (2) to develop and acquire proprietary positions to reagents and
new
platforms for the development of products related to these technologies.
Trade
Secrets and Know-How
We
believe that even if our intellectual property position is ultimately diminished
as a result of our development agents and licensors receiving patent protection
for the licenses ProtoKinetix has contracted to access, we have developed a
substantial body of trade secrets and know-how relating to the development
of
AAGP™, including but not limited to the optimization of materials for efforts,
and how to maximize sensitivity, speed-to-result, specificity, stability and
reproducibility.
Competition
The
markets that we are attempted to enter are multi-billion dollar international
industries. They are intensely competitive. Many of our competitors (from every
perspective) are substantially larger and have greater financial, research,
manufacturing, and marketing resources.
Industry
competition in general is based on the following:
· |
Scientific
and technological capability;
|
· |
Proprietary
know-how;
|
· |
The
ability to develop and market products and
processes;
|
· |
The
ability to obtain FDA or other required regulatory
approvals;
|
· |
The
ability to manufacture products that meet applicable FDA requirements,
(i.e. FDA’s Quality System Regulations) see Governmental Regulation
section;
|
· |
Access
to adequate capital;
|
· |
The
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
and
|
· |
The
availability of patent protection.
|
We
believe our scientific and technological capabilities are significant. Some
of
the results of our research are available at our website located at
www.protokinetix.com.
Our
ability to develop our research is in large measure dependent on our having
additional resources and/or collaborative relationships, particularly where
we
can have our product development efforts funded on a project or milestone basis.
We believe that our know-how with our AFGP project, in spite of not yet
receiving any patent protected rights, has been instrumental in our obtaining
the collaborations we have developed.
Although
there is no such immediate need to make any regulatory filing in the United
States or abroad, one should know that we have limited experience with regard
to
obtaining FDA or other required regulatory approvals, and no experience with
obtaining pre-marketing approval of a biologic product. (See "Governmental
Regulation" for definition of pre-marketing approval.) For this reason, should
our research efforts continue to show promise, we will need to hire consultants
to assist the Company with such governmental regulations.
Our
access to capital is more challenging, relative to most of our competitors.
This
is a competitive disadvantage. We believe however that our access to capital
may
increase as we get closer to the development of a commercially viable
product.
To
date,
we believe our research has enabled us to attract and retain qualified
consultants. Because of the greater financial resources of many of our
competitors, we may not be able to complete effectively for the same individuals
to the extent that a competitor uses its substantial resources to attract any
such individuals.
As
is
discussed above, with respect to the availability of patent protection, we
do
not have our own portfolio of patents or the financial resources to develop
and/or acquire a portfolio of patents similar to those of our larger
competitors. We have been able to obtain access to patent-pending technology
by
entering into licensing arrangements. However, there can be no certainty that
any of the patent-pending technologies we have licensed will ever receive final
approval by any patent office.
Super
Antibody and Catalytic Antibody Platform Technologies
The
Company continues to own the rights to both the Super Antibody and the catalytic
antibody platform technologies. The Company will continue to search for a
patentable receptor site that exists only on cancer cells.
Governmental
Regulation
As
was
discussed above, the Company has developed a commercially viable product which
does not require any government regulatory approval.. This is the use of AAGP™
to improve the cell yield during cryopreservation. (See web site www.protokinetix.com
and look
under the Research Data section to view the scientific reports.)
The
Company continues to conduct an active research program to confirm the medical
application of AAGP™. We are also conducting work in the fields of Veterinary
medicine, and skin care applications. As we confirm the commercial application
of AAGP™ in each of these fields we will then take the necessary steps to obtain
regulatory approval for these applications.
The
following discussion relates to factors that may come into play when
and if
the
Company has a commercially viable product in an area which requires regulatory
approval. These products may be regulated by the European regulatory agencies,
FDA, U.S. Department of Agriculture, certain state and local agencies, and/or
comparable regulatory bodies in other countries (collectively, these agencies
shall be referred to as the "Agencies"). Government regulation affects almost
all aspects of development, production, and marketing, including product
testing, authorizations to market, labeling, promotion, manufacturing, and
record keeping. The FDA and U.S. Department of Agriculture regulated products
require some form of action by that agency before they can be marketed in the
United States, and, after approval or clearance, the products must continue
to
comply with other FDA requirements applicable to marketed products. Both before
and after approval or clearance, failure to comply with the FDA’s requirements
can lead to significant penalties. The Company's proposed AAGP™ products will
require government regulatory approval as a biologic agent. Such regulatory
approval will be granted only after the appropriate preclinical and clinical
studies are conducted to confirm efficacy and safety.
The
Company's proposed
AAGP™
products may be considered by FDA to be biologic and will therefore be submitted
to the biologics division of the FDA, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research.
Every
company that manufactures biologic products or medical devices distributed
in
the United States must comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulations. These
regulations govern the manufacturing process, including design, manufacture,
testing, release, packaging, distribution, documentation, and purchasing.
Compliance with the Quality System Regulations is required before the FDA will
approve an application. These requirements also apply to marketed products.
Companies are also subject to other post-market and general requirements,
including compliance with restrictions imposed on marketed products, compliance
with promotional standards, record keeping, and reporting of certain adverse
reactions or events. The FDA regularly inspects companies to determine
compliance with the Quality System Regulations and other post-approval
requirements. Failure to comply with statutory requirements and the FDA’s
regulations can lead to substantial penalties, including monetary penalties,
injunctions, product recalls, seizure of products, and criminal
prosecution.
The
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1988 prohibits laboratories from
performing in vitro tests for the purpose of providing information for the
diagnosis, prevention or treatment of any disease or impairment of, or the
assessment of, the health of human beings unless there is in effect for such
laboratories a certificate issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services applicable to the category of examination or procedure performed.
Although a certificate is not required for ProtoKinetix, ProtoKinetix considers
the applicability of the requirements of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Act
in the potential design and development of its products.
In
addition, the FDA regulates the export of medical devices that have not been
approved for marketing in the United States. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
Act contains general requirements for any medical device that may not be sold
in
the United States and is intended for export. Specifically, a medical device
intended for export is not deemed to be adulterated or misbranded if the
product: (1) accords to the specifications of the foreign purchaser; (2) is
not
in conflict with the laws of the county to which it is intended for export;
(3)
is labeled on the outside of the shipping package that it is intended for
export; and (4) is not sold or offered for sale in the United States. Some
medical devices face additional statutory requirements before they can be
exported. If an unapproved device does not comply with an applicable performance
standard or premarket approval requirement, is exempt from either such
requirement because it is an investigational device, or is a banned device,
the
device may be deemed to be adulterated or misbranded unless the FDA has
determined that exportation of the device is not contrary to the public health
and safety and has the approval of the country to which it is intended for
export. However, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act does permit the export
of devices to any country in the world, if the device complies with the laws
of
the importing country and has valid marketing authorization in one of several
"listed" countries under the theory that these listed countries have
sophisticated mechanisms for the review of medical devices for safety and
effectiveness.
ProtoKinetix
is also subject to regulations in foreign countries governing products, human
clinical trials and marketing, and may need to obtain approval or evaluations
by
international public health agencies, such as the World Health Organization,
in
order to sell products in certain countries. Approval processes vary from
country to country, and the length of time required for approval or to obtain
other clearances may in some cases be longer than that required for U.S.
governmental approvals. The extent of potentially adverse governmental
regulation affecting ProtoKinetix that might arise from future legislative
or
administrative action cannot be predicted.
Environmental
Laws
To
date,
we have not encountered any costs relating to compliance with any environmental
laws.
ITEM
2. DESCRIPTION
OF PROPERTY
The
Company does not own any real property. The Company is currently paying a rental
fee where it is located.
ITEM
3. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
There
are
currently no legal matters pending.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
A
shareholder meeting was not held during fiscal year 2006.
PART
II
ITEM
5. MARKET
FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Trades
of
our common stock are subject to Rule 15g-9 of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, known as the Penny Stock Rule. This rule imposes requirements on
broker/dealers who sell securities subject to the rule to persons other than
established customers and accredited investors. For transactions covered by
the
rule, brokers/dealers must make a special suitability determination for
purchasers of the securities and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to
the transaction prior to sale. The Securities and Exchange Commission also
has
rules that regulate broker/dealer practices in connection with transactions
in
"penny stocks." Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of
less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities
exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume
information with respect to transactions in that security is provided by the
exchange or system). The Penny Stock Rules requires a broker/ dealer, prior
to a
transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver
a
standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission that provides
information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny
stock market. The broker/dealer also must provide the customer with current
bid
and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker/dealer
and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing
the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and
offer quotations, and the broker/dealer and salesperson compensation
information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to
effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before
or
with the customer’s confirmation. These disclosure requirements have the effect
of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for our common
stock. As a result of these rules, investors may find it difficult to sell
their
shares.
The
Company's Common Stock is quoted on the over-the-counter market and quoted
on
the National Association of Securities Dealers Electronic Bulletin Board ("OTC
Bulletin Board") under the symbol "PKTX". The high and low bid prices for the
Common Stock, as reported by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc., are indicated
for the periods described below. Such prices are inter-dealer prices without
retail markups, markdowns or commissions, and may not necessarily represent
actual transactions.
2005
|
Low
|
High
|
As
of March 31, 2005
|
$.45
|
$.55
|
As
of June 30, 2005
|
.87
|
.94
|
As
of September 30, 2005
|
.52
|
.58
|
As
of December 31, 2005
|
.60
|
.63
|
2006
|
Low
|
High
|
As
of March 31, 2006
|
$.65
|
$.68
|
As
of June 30, 2006
|
.62
|
.65
|
As
of September 30, 2006
|
.51
|
.57
|
As
of December 31, 2006
|
.40
|
.46
|
Dividends
We
have
never paid cash dividends and have no plans to do so in the foreseeable future.
Our future dividend policy will be determined by our board of directors and
will
depend upon a number of factors, including our financial condition and
performance, our cash needs and expansion plans, income tax consequences, and
the restrictions that applicable laws, our current preferred stock instruments,
and our future credit arrangements may then impose.
Currently
under Nevada law, a dividend may not be made by a corporation if, after giving
it effect:
· |
the
corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due
in the
usual course of business; or
|
· |
except
as otherwise specifically allowed by the corporation’s articles of
incorporation, the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum
of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if
the
corporation were to be dissolved at the time of distribution, to
satisfy
the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose
preferential rights are superior to those receiving the
distribution.
|
Holders
As
of
April 16, 2007, there were approximately 59 shareholders of record of the
company's Common Stock. As of April 16, 2007, the Company had 44,590,639 shares
issued and outstanding. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company
issued 4,895,956 new common shares. From January 1, 2006 through April 16,
2007
the Company issued 323,486 common shares.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds From Registered
Securities
Below
is
a table showing the number of newly issued shares by quarter:
Period
|
Number
of Newly Issued Common Shares
|
First
Quarter
|
166,359
|
Second
Quarter
|
2,722,613
|
Third
Quarter
|
1,669,984
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
107,000
|
Total
|
4,665,956
|
There
have been no sales of unregistered securities during calendar 2006 which would
be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 701 of Regulation S-B, except
for
the following:
On
March
17, 2006 we issued a total of 166,359 common shares pursuant to three consulting
agreements. These issuances were made in lieu of cash payments for services
rendered and were considered exempt transactions under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On
May
10, 2006 we issued a total of 529,279 common shares to Thunderbird Global
Corporation in consideration of the conversion of $158,783.60 of the outstanding
debentures Thunderbird Global Corporation held. These issuances were considered
exempt transactions under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.
On
May
25, 2006 we issued a total of 1,266,278 common shares pursuant to seven
consulting agreements. These issuances were made in lieu of cash payments for
services rendered and were considered exempt transactions under Section 4(2)
of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On
June
5, 2006 we issued a total of 27,056 common shares pursuant to a consulting
agreement. These issuances were made in lieu of cash payments for services
rendered and were considered exempt transactions under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On
June
15, 2006 we issued a total of 900,000 common shares for cash. These issuances
were considered exempt transactions under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of
1933, as amended.
On
July
27, 2006, we issued 1,200,000 common shares to consultants of the Company in
connection with consulting agreements. These issuances were made in lieu of
cash
payments for services rendered and were considered exempt transactions under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On
August
11, 2006, we issued 100,000 common shares to an outside consultant in connection
with a consulting agreement. These issuances were made in lieu of cash payments
for services rendered and were considered exempt transactions under Section
4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On
September 8, 2006, we issued 69,231 common shares to outside consultant in
connection with consulting agreements. These issuances were made in lieu of
cash
payments for services rendered and were considered exempt transactions under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On
September 21, 2006, we issued 186,406 common shares to three consultants in
connection with consulting agreements. These issuances were made in lieu of
cash
payments for services rendered and were considered exempt transactions under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On
September 22, 2006, we issued 114,347 common shares to two consultants in
connection with consulting agreements. These issuances were made in lieu of
cash
payments for services rendered and were considered exempt transactions under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On
November 15, 2006, we issued 100,000 common shares to consultants in connection
with consulting agreements. These issuances were made in lieu of cash payments
for services rendered and were considered exempt transactions under Section
4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On
December 8, 2006, we issued 7,000 common shares to a consultant in connection
with a consulting agreement. These issuances were made in lieu of cash payments
for services rendered and were considered exempt transactions under Section
4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Warrants
During
2006, in lieu of payment for advisory services rendered to the Company, the
Company issued the following parties warrants to purchase common shares of
the
Company's stock:
No.
of shares
|
Exercise
Price
|
Date
Exercised
|
Date
Expired
|
|||||
563929
Alberta Ltd.
|
100,000
|
0.50
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
8/1/07
|
||||
Centrum
Bank AG
Fbo
Asset Protection Fund
|
100,000
|
0.50
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
8/1/07
|
||||
Dr.
S. Jane Goundrey
|
100,000
|
0.50
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
8/1/07
|
||||
Jem
Resources
|
50,000
|
0.50
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
8/1/07
|
||||
Malita
Investments
|
100,000
|
0.50
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
8/1/07
|
||||
Simon
Shah
|
50,000
|
0.60
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
12/1/06
|
||||
Simon
Shah
|
50,000
|
0.58
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
3/1/07
|
||||
Simon
Shah
|
50,000
|
0.67
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
6/1/06
|
||||
Simon
Shah
|
50,000
|
0.62
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
9/1/07
|
||||
Chardan
Capital Markets, LLC
|
50,000
|
0.60
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
12/1/06
|
||||
Chardan
Capital Markets, LLC
|
50,000
|
0.58
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
3/1/07
|
||||
Chardan
Capital Markets, LLC
|
50,000
|
0.67
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
6/1/06
|
||||
Chardan
Capital Markets, LLC
|
50,000
|
0.62
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
9/1/07
|
||||
Ravi
Chiruvola
|
100,000
|
0.50
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
3/1/07
|
||||
Ravi
Chiruvola
|
100,000
|
0.67
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
6/1/07
|
||||
Ravi
Chiruvola
|
100,000
|
0.62
|
Not
Exercised(1)
|
9/1/07
|
||||
Total
|
1,150,000
|
(1) As
of
April 16, 2007 these warrants have not been exercised.
Disclosure
Related to Form S-8 Issuances
Prior
to
issuing any common shares under Form S-8, the Company requests and receives
an
executed verification from all issuees stating that the issuee is a natural
person and that: (a) the shares being issued are not being provided to create
or
sustain a market for the Company's securities, and (b) that the shares are
not
being issued as a part of a capital raising transaction. All consultants to
the
Company are required to provide work product as a part of and condition to
their
relationship with the Company. Consultant work product is delivered in
accordance with the terms and conditions of each respective Consultant’s
agreement.
ITEM
6. MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. Our discussion and analysis
of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of any contingent liabilities at the financial statement date and
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an
on-going basis we review our estimates and assumptions. Our estimates were
based
on our historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results are likely to differ from
those estimates under different assumptions or conditions, but we do not believe
such differences will materially affect our financial position or results of
operations. Our critical accounting policies, the policies we believe are most
important to the presentation of our financial statements and require the most
difficult, subjective and complex judgments, are outlined below in "Critical
Accounting Policies," and have not changed significantly.
In
addition, certain statements made in this report may constitute "forward-looking
statements." These forward-looking statements involve known or unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance,
or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. Specifically, 1) our ability to obtain necessary regulatory
approvals for our products; and 2) our ability to increase revenues and
operating income, is dependent upon our ability to develop and sell our
products, general economic conditions, and other factors. You can identify
forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should,"
"expects," "intends," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates,"
"predicts," "potential," "continues" or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected-in
the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
critical and significant accounting policies, including the assumptions and
judgments underlying them, are disclosed in the Notes to the Financial
Statements. These policies have been consistently applied in all material
respects and address such matters as revenue recognition and depreciation
methods. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically
dictated by accounting principles, generally accepted in the United States
of
America, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. There are
also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any viable alternative
would not produce a materially different result. See our audited financial
statements and notes thereto which contain accounting policies and other
disclosures required by accounting principles, generally accepted in the United
States of America.
Expenses
Our
expenses in 2006 were $1,967,633which consisted of $386,095 in professional
legal and accounting expenses. We operate the company by hiring outside
consultants to assist us with management, strategic planning, organization
and
daily operations. These professional consulting fees amounted to $1,196,124.
These professional consulting services related to marketing, product and market
research and development and investment banking services including financing,
capitalization and merger opportunities.
Plan
of Operation
Our
current operations are centered around the Company's relationships with various
research and development consultants who are conducting research on behalf
of
the company at discrete and established laboratories in various parts of the
world. The Company intends to continue these efforts throughout
2007.
Sales
and Marketing
The
Company is currently not selling or marketing any products.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
December 31, 2006, we had $166,115 in cash and $612,506 in total current assets.
As of the date of this report, we require additional capital investments or
borrowed funds to meet cash flow projections and carry forward our business
objectives. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise capital
from
outside sources in sufficient amounts to fund our new business.
The
failure to secure adequate outside funding would have an adverse affect on
our
plan of operation and results therefrom and a corresponding negative impact
on
shareholder liquidity.
Inflation
Although
management expects that our operations will be influenced by general economic
conditions, we do not believe that inflation had a material effect on our
results of operations during the year ending December 31, 2006.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of
the
Company as a going concern. The history of losses and the inability for the
Company to make a profit from selling a good or service has raised substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
In
spite
of the fact that the current cash obligations of the Company are relatively
minimal, given the cash position of the Company, we have very little cash to
operate.
We
intend
to fund the Company and attempt to meet corporate obligations by selling common
stock. However the Company's common stock is at a low price and is not actively
traded.
Results
of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2006.
We
had $0
in net revenues.
We
had a
$1,967,633 net loss from operations for 2006.
Operating
expenses were $1,967,633 in 2006. These expenses were primarily incurred for
professional fees, consulting services related to the operations of the
Company's business, specifically, research and development related expenses,
and
other general and administrative expenses.
ITEM
6A QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We
face
exposure to fluctuations in the price of our common stock due to the very
limited cash resources we have. For example, the Company has very limited
resources to pay legal and accounting professionals. If we are unable to pay
a
legal or accounting professional in order to perform various professional
services for the company, it may be difficult, if not impossible, for the
Company to maintain its reporting status under the '34 Exchange Act. If the
Company felt that it was likely that it would not be able to maintain its
reporting status, it would make a disclosure by filing a Form 8-K with the
SEC.
In any case, if the Company was not able to maintain its reporting status,
it
would become "delisted" and this would potentially cause an investor or an
existing shareholder to lose all or part of his investment.
ITEM
7. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The
Consolidated Financial Statements and schedules that constitute Item 7 are
attached at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB on the "F"
pages.
ITEM
8. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not
applicable.
ITEM
8A. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Under
the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this annual report, and based on their evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to
material information relating to the Company required to be included in the
Company’s periodic SEC filings. There were no significant changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that could significantly affect this
control since our last fiscal quarter.
Disclosure
controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we
file
or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange
Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
ITEM
8B. OTHER
INFORMATION
Not
applicable.
PART
III
ITEM
9. DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL
PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE
EXCHANGE ACT
As
of
April 16, 2007, the Company's current officers and directors consist of the
following persons:
Name
|
Age
|
Office
|
Since
|
Dr.
John Todd
|
61
|
Chairman
of the Board, President, CEO and CFO
|
Inception
|
Mr.
C. Fred Whittaker
|
63
|
Director
|
2005
|
Dr.
John Todd
Dr.
John
Todd has held the position of Chairman and President of ProtoKinetix, Inc since
July 2003. From 1999 to 2003 Dr. Todd is a practicing general surgeon in White
Rock, British Columbia. He went into a part time practice in July of 2005,
sharing a practice with another general surgeon so that he can spend more time
conducting the work on Protokinetix, Inc. Dr. Todd received his Doctor of
Medicine Degree from the University of Calgary in 1974.
C.
Fred Whittaker
Mr.
C.
Fred Whittaker was elected to our Board of Directors in 2005. Mr. Whittaker
has
been in the accounting profession for over 40 years. Mr. Whittaker received
his
Chartered Accounting designation in 1967, and has worked for various accounting
firms, including KPMG, as well as for himself at different times in the past.
For the last 15 years, he has worked exclusively for Whittaker & Associates,
a regional accounting firm which he founded located in Vancouver, British
Columbia. Currently, Mr. Whittaker is a senior partner at the accounting firm
of
Whittaker & Associates and has been for the past 30 years.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliances
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"),
requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and holders of more than
10% of the Company’s common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership
of
common stock and other equity securities of the Company. The Company believes
that during the year ended December 31, 2006, its officers, directors and
holders of more than 10% of the Company’s common stock complied with all Section
16(a) filing requirements.
Code
of Ethics
Effective
March 31, 2006, our board of directors adopted the ProtoKinetix, Inc. Code
of
Business Conduct and Ethics. The board of directors believes that our Code
of
Business Conduct and Ethics provides standards that are reasonably designed
to
deter wrongdoing and to promote the following: (1)
honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent
conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
(2)
full,
fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents
that we file with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission;
(3)
compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
the
prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics to an appropriate person or persons; and (4)
accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Identification
of Audit Committee; Audit Committee Financial Expert
The
Company currently does not have an audit committee and has not made a
determination of whether there is a financial expert. The Company plans to
establish an audit committee during the third quarter of the current fiscal
year.
ITEM
10. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The
following table summarizes the annual compensation paid to ProtoKinetix’s named
executive officers for the two years ended December 31, 2006, and
2005:
Annual
Compensation
|
Long-Term
Compensation
|
|||||||||||||
Common
Shares
|
||||||||||||||
Underlying
|
All
|
|||||||||||||
Restricted
|
Options
|
Other
|
||||||||||||
Other
Annual
|
Stock
|
Granted
|
Compen
|
|||||||||||
Name
and Position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Compensation
|
Awards
($)
|
(#
Shares)
|
-sation
|
|||||||
Dr.
John Todd
|
2006
|
$0
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
------
|
-0-
|
|||||||
President,
Chief
|
2005
|
0
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
------
|
-0-
|
|||||||
Executive
Officer
|
||||||||||||||
and
Director
|
||||||||||||||
Mr.
C. Fred Whittaker
|
2006
|
$0
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
------
|
-0-
|
|||||||
Director
|
2005
|
0
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
------
|
-0-
|
|||||||
And
Director
|
||||||||||||||
Options/SAR
Grants in the Last Fiscal Year
N/A
Employment
Agreements
None
Chief
Executives Officer’s compensation
During
fiscal year 2006, Dr. John Todd did not draw a salary nor did the Company accrue
a salary for any obligation.
Compensation
of Directors
Directors
receive no remuneration for their services as directors at this time. The
Company has adopted no retirement, pension, profit sharing or other similar
programs.
ITEM
11. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of the Company’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2006 based on
information available to the Company by (i) each person who is known by the
Company to own more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock based upon reports
filed by such persons within the Securities and Exchange Commission; (ii) each
of the Company’s directors; (iii) each of the Named Executive Officers; and (iv)
all officers and directors of the Company as a group.
Name
and Address
|
Shares
Beneficially Owned
|
Percent
of Class
|
Dr.
John Todd (1)
|
3,130,000(4)
|
7
%
|
Mr.
C. Fred Whittaker (2)
|
120,000
|
Less
than 1%
|
Centrum
Bank AG (3)
|
4,868,780
|
10.9%
|
TOTAL
|
8,118,780
|
18.2%
|
(1) The
address is 1500-885 Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8 Canada
(2) The
address is 1500-885 Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8 Canada
(3) The
address is Kirchstrasse 3, 9490 Vaduz Liechtenstein
(4) This
amount includes 400,000 shares beneficially owned J.D. Todd Medical
Inc
A
person
is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by
such
person within 60 days from the date of the registration statement upon the
exercise of options or warrants. Each beneficial owner's percentage ownership
is
determined by assuming that options or warrants that are held by such person
and
which are exercisable within 60 days of the date of this registration statement
have been exercised. Unless otherwise indicated, the company believes that
all
persons named in the table have voting and investment power with respect to
all
shares of common stock beneficially owned by them.
ITEM
12. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
N/A
ITEM
13. EXHIBITS
AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a)
Exhibits.
Exhibit
#
|
Description
|
|
3.1(i)
|
Certificate
of Incorporation filed as an exhibit to the Company's registration
statement on Form 10-SB/A filed on July 24, 2001 and incorporated
herein
by reference.
|
|
3.1(ii)
|
By-Laws
filed as an exhibit to the Company's registration statement on Form
10-SB/A filed on July 24, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
10.1
|
February
1, 2006 Consulting Agreement between Jansa Overseas, Inc. and
Protokinetix, Inc.
|
|
10.2
|
February
1, 2006 Consulting Agreement between Amirem, Inc. and Protokinetix,
Inc.
|
|
14.1
|
ProtoKinetix,
Inc. Code of Ethics filed as an exhibit to the Company's Form 10-KSB
filed
on April 13, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
23.1
|
Consent
of Experts
|
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-12(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
|
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification attached.
|
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit
Fees
For
the
years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Peterson Sullivan PLLC,
the
Company’s principal accountants, billed the Company $40,000 and $30,292,
respectively, for fees for the audit of the Company’s annual financial
statements and review of financial statements included in the Company’s Forms
10-QSB.
Audit-Related
Fees
For
the
years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Peterson Sullivan PLLC
did
not provide the Company with any assurances or related services reasonably
related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial
statements and are not reported above under "Audit Fees."
Tax
Fees
For
the
years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Peterson Sullivan PLLC
did
not bill for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax
planning.
All
Other Fees
For
the
years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Peterson Sullivan PLLC
did
not bill the Company for fees associated with the preparation and filing of
the
Company’s registration statements, the creation of pro forma financial
statements and other related matters.
Audit
Committee Pre-Approval Policies
The
Company currently does not have an audit committee. The Company’ Board of
Directors currently approves in advance all audit and non-audit related services
performed by the Company’s principal accountants.
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly
authorized.
|
|
PROTOKINETIX,
INC.
|
||
Date: April
17, 2007
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Dr. John Todd
|
|
Dr.
John Todd
|
||||
|
|
President,
CEO and CFO
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signatures
|
Title
|
Date
|
/s/Dr.
John Todd
Dr.
John Todd
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
Of The
Board
|
April
17, 2007
|
PROTOKINETIX,
INCORPORATED
(A
Development Stage Company)
FINANCIAL
REPORT
DECEMBER
31, 2006
|
C
O N T E N T S
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
BALANCE
SHEET
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENTS
OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES
TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the
Board of Directors and Shareholders
ProtoKinetix,
Incorporated
We
have
audited the accompanying balance sheet of ProtoKinetix, Incorporated (a
development stage company) as of December 31, 2006, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the period from December 23, 1999
(date of inception) through December 31, 2006. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company has determined that
it
is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration
of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose
of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of ProtoKinetix, Incorporated (a
development stage company) as of December 31, 2006, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005, and for the period from December 23, 1999 (date of inception) through
December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will
continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements,
the Company has not generated revenues or positive cash flows from operations
and has an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2006. These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plan regarding those matters is also described in Note 1. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
the
outcome of this uncertainty.
/S/
PETERSON SULLIVAN PLLC
Seattle,
Washington
April
12,
2007
1
PROTOKINETIX,
INCORPORATED
(A
Development Stage Company)
BALANCE
SHEET
December
31, 2006
ASSETS
|
||||||
Current
Assets
|
|
|
||||
|
Cash
|
|
|
$
166,115
|
||
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
6,391
|
|||
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
440,000
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
612,506
|
Computer
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,944
|
|
1,444
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
613,950
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
||||
|
Due
to outside management consultants
|
|
$
306,892
|
|||
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
107,809
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
414,701
|
Stockholders'
Equity
|
|
|
||||
|
Common
stock, $.0000053 par value; 100,000,000 common
|
|
||||
|
|
shares
authorized; 44,267,153 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
240
|
||
|
Common
stock issuable; 400,000 shares
|
|
5
|
|||
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
17,055,767
|
|||
|
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
|
(16,856,763)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
613,950
|
PROTOKINETIX,
INCORPORATED
(A
Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
For
the
Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the
Period
from December 23, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31,
2006
Cumulative
|
|||||||||
During
the
|
|||||||||
Development
|
|||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
Stage
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$
-
|
|
$
2,000
|
|
$
2,000
|
||||
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Licenses
|
|
|
|
|
3,379,756
|
|||
|
Professional
fees
|
386,095
|
|
333,186
|
|
2,812,788
|
|||
|
Consulting
fees
|
1,196,124
|
|
3,915,676
|
|
9,233,803
|
|||
|
Research
and development
|
180,709
|
|
410,650
|
|
800,891
|
|||
|
General
and administrative
|
192,836
|
|
155,835
|
|
539,897
|
|||
|
Interest
|
11,869
|
|
13,193
|
|
48,162
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
1,967,633
|
|
4,828,540
|
|
(16,813,297)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(1,967,633)
|
|
(4,826,540)
|
|
(16,813,297)
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Loss
from operations of the discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
segment
|
|
|
|
|
(43,466)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$
(1,967,633)
|
|
$(4,826,540)
|
|
$(16,856,763)
|
Net
Loss per Common Share (basic and
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
fully
diluted)
|
$
(0.05)
|
|
$
(0.13)
|
|
|
|||
Weighted
average number of common
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
shares
outstanding
|
43,233,617
|
|
38,598,215
|
|
|
|||
PROTOKINETIX,
INCORPORATED
(A
Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS
OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For
the
Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the
Period
from December 23, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2006
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Stock
|
During
the
|
|||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Issuable
|
Paid-in
|
Subscriptions
|
Development
|
||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Receivable
|
Stage
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock, December 1999
|
9,375,000
|
|
$
50
|
|
-
|
|
$
-
|
|
$
4,950
|
|
$
-
|
|
$
-
|
|
$
5,000
|
|||||
Net
loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35)
|
|
(35)
|
|||||
Balance,
December 31, 2000
|
9,375,000
|
|
50
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
4,950
|
|
|
|
(35)
|
|
4,965
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock, April 2001
|
5,718,750
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,250
|
|||||
Net
loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,902)
|
|
(16,902)
|
|||||
Balance,
December 31, 2001
|
15,093,750
|
|
80
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
20,170
|
|
|
|
(16,937)
|
|
3,313
|
|||||
Net
loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,878)
|
|
(14,878)
|
|||||
Balance,
December 31, 2002
|
15,093,750
|
|
80
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
20,170
|
|
|
|
(31,815)
|
|
(11,565)
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock for services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
July
2003
|
2,125,000
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
||||
|
August
2003
|
300,000
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
||||
|
September
2003
|
1,000,000
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
||||
|
October
2003
|
1,550,000
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
619,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,000
|
||||
Issuance
of common stock for licensing rights
|
14,000,000
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,099,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,100,000
|
|||||
Common
stock issuable for licensing rights
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
11
|
|
299,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|||||
Shares
cancelled on September 30, 2003
|
(9,325,000)
|
|
(49)
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|||||
Net
loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,662,745)
|
|
(3,662,745)
|
|||||
Balance,
December 31, 2003
|
24,743,750
|
|
131
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
11
|
|
3,530,108
|
|
-
|
|
(3,694,560)
|
|
(164,310)
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock for services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
March
2004
|
1,652,300
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
991,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
991,380
|
||||
|
May
2004
|
500,000
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
514,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
515,000
|
||||
|
July
2004
|
159,756
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,695
|
||||
|
August
2004
|
100,000
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,000
|
||||
|
October
2004
|
732,400
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
479,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
480,000
|
||||
|
November
2004
|
650,000
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
454,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,000
|
||||
|
December
2004
|
255,000
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,426
|
||||
Common
stock issuable for AFGP license
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
5
|
|
709,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
710,000
|
|||||
Common
stock issuable for Recaf license
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
2
|
|
223,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,000
|
|||||
Warrants
granted (for 3,450,000 shares) for services,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
October
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,253
|
||||
Options
granted (for 400,000 shares) for services,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
October
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,734
|
|||||
Stock
subscriptions receivable
|
|
|
|
|
1,800,000
|
|
10
|
|
329,990
|
|
(330,000)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|||||
Warrants
exercised:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|||||
|
August
2004
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
||||
|
October
2004
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
3
|
|
134,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
||||
|
December
2004
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
5
|
|
224,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
||||
Options
exercised, December 2004
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
1
|
|
29,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|||||
Net
loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(6,368,030)
|
|
(6,368,030)
|
|||||
Balance,
December 31, 2004
|
28,793,206
|
|
$
154
|
|
6,950,000
|
|
$
37
|
|
$
9,924,547
|
|
$
(330,000)
|
|
$(10,062,590)
|
|
$
(467,852)
|
PROTOKINETIX,
INCORPORATED
(A
Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS
OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Continued)
For
the
Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the
Period
from December 23, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2006
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Stock
|
During
the
|
|||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Issuable
|
Paid-in
|
Subscriptions
|
Development
|
||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Receivable
|
Stage
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2004
|
28,793,206
|
|
$
154
|
|
6,950,000
|
|
$
37
|
|
$
9,924,547
|
|
$
(330,000)
|
|
$
(10,062,590)
|
|
$
(467,852)
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock for stock subscriptions received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
||||||
Issuance
of common stock for common stock issuable
|
2,000,000
|
|
11
|
|
(2,000,000)
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock for common stock issuable
|
2,050,000
|
|
10
|
|
(2,050,000)
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|||||
Options
exercised,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|||||
|
February
2005
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
1
|
|
10,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
||||
|
May
2005
|
200,000
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
||||
Issuance
of common stock for note payable conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
February
2005
|
285,832
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,750
|
||||
|
May
2005
|
353,090
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,927
|
||||
Issuance
of common stock for common stock issuable
|
2,535,000
|
|
13
|
|
(2,535,000)
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock for services and common stock issuable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
April
2005
|
30,000
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
||||
|
May
2005
|
3,075,000
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,320,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,321,000
|
||||
|
June
2005
|
50,000
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,500
|
||||
|
August
2005
|
111,111
|
|
1
|
|
(92,593)
|
|
(1)
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
||||
|
October
2005
|
36,233
|
|
1
|
|
(36,233)
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
||||
|
November
2005
|
311,725
|
|
2
|
|
(245,000)
|
|
(1)
|
|
36,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,250
|
||||
|
December
2005
|
1,220,000
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
756,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
756,400
|
||||
Common
stock canceled; August 2005
|
(250,000)
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257,499)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257,500)
|
|||||
Common
stock issuable for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
June
2005
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
1
|
|
149,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
||||
|
August
2005
|
|
|
|
|
36,233
|
|
1
|
|
21,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,740
|
||||
|
September
2005
|
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
1
|
|
74,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
||||
|
September
2005 (Proteocell)
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
1
|
|
57,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,000
|
||||
|
December
2005
|
|
|
|
|
120,968
|
|
1
|
|
74,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
||||
Net
loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,826,540)
|
|
(4,826,540)
|
|||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
40,801,197
|
|
$
220
|
|
608,375
|
|
$
6
|
|
$
14,503,079
|
|
$
-
|
|
$
(14,889,130)
|
|
$
(385,825)
|
PROTOKINETIX,
INCORPORATED
(A
Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS
OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Continued)
For
the
Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the
Period
from December 23, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2006
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Stock
|
During
the
|
|||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Issuable
|
Paid-in
|
Subscriptions
|
Development
|
||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Receivable
|
Stage
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
40,801,197
|
|
$
220
|
|
608,375
|
|
$
6
|
|
$
14,503,079
|
|
$
-
|
|
$
(14,889,130)
|
|
$
(385,825)
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock and warrants for $450,000 in cash (June
2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Common
stock
|
900,000
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
352,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
352,147
|
||||
|
Warrants
granted (for 450,000 shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,853
|
||||
Issuance
of common stock for note payable conversion including
accumulated
interest (June 2006)
|
529,279
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,783
|
|||||
Issuance
of common stock and common stock issuable for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
February
2006
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
1
|
|
10,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,500
|
||||
|
March
2006
|
166,359
|
|
1
|
|
(108,375)
|
|
(1)
|
|
36,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,750
|
||||
|
May
2006
|
1,266,278
|
|
7
|
|
(70,000)
|
|
(1)
|
|
792,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
792,756
|
||||
|
June
2006
|
27,056
|
|
1
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
5
|
|
718,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
718,250
|
||||
|
July
2006
|
1,200,000
|
|
6
|
|
(1,200,000)
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
||||
|
August
2006
|
100,000
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
||||
|
September
2006
|
369,984
|
|
1
|
|
(50,000)
|
|
1
|
|
209,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
||||
|
November
2006
|
100,000
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,000
|
||||
|
December
2006
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,010
|
||||
Warrants
issued (for 700,000 shares) for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,658
|
|||||
Cancellation
of shares, April 2006
|
(1,200,000)
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|||||
Net
loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,967,633)
|
|
(1,967,633)
|
|||||
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
44,267,153
|
|
$
240
|
|
400,000
|
|
$
5
|
|
$
17,055,767
|
|
$
-
|
|
$
(16,856,763)
|
|
$
199,249
|
PROTOKINETIX,
INCORPORATED
(A
Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
For
the
Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for the
Period
from December 23, 1999 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2006
Cumulative
|
|||||||||
During
the
|
|||||||||
Development
|
|||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
Stage
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
|
|||||||||
Net
loss for the period
|
$
(1,967,633)
|
|
$
(4,826,540)
|
|
$
(16,856,763)
|
||||
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
used
in operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Depreciation
expense
|
1,017
|
|
674
|
|
1,944
|
||
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
and
expenses
|
1,885,266
|
|
4,316,390
|
|
13,442,157
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued for consulting services
|
58,658
|
|
|
|
1,774,911
|
||
|
|
Stock
options issued for consulting services
|
|
|
|
|
212,734
|
||
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
148
|
|
(6,539)
|
|
(6,391)
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
(433,800)
|
|
(6,200)
|
|
(440,000)
|
|
|
|
|
Due
to outside management consultants
|
|
|
(86,958)
|
|
306,892
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
75,888
|
|
10,199
|
|
106,975
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
interest payable
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
36,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(380,456)
|
|
(585,780)
|
|
(1,421,247)
|
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Purchase
of computer equipment
|
|
|
(1,705)
|
|
(3,388)
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,705)
|
|
(3,388)
|
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Warrants
exercised
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
705,000
|
|||
|
Stock
options exercised
|
|
|
70,500
|
|
100,500
|
|||
|
Issuance
of common stock and warrants for cash
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
470,250
|
|||
|
Proceeds
from convertible note
|
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Net
cash flows provided by financing activities
|
450,000
|
|
400,500
|
|
1,590,750
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash
|
69,544
|
|
(186,985)
|
|
166,115
|
Cash,
beginning of year
|
96,571
|
|
283,556
|
|
|
||||
Cash,
end of year
|
$
166,115
|
|
$
96,571
|
|
$
166,115
|
||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
-
|
|
$
-
|
|
$
-
|
||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$
-
|
|
$
-
|
|
$
-
|
||||
Supplementary
Information - Non-cash Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Stock
subscriptions received
|
$
-
|
|
$
330,000
|
|
$
330,000
|
|||
|
Note
payable converted to common stock
|
158,783
|
|
191,677
|
|
350,460
|
|||
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
1. The Company and Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
ProtoKinetix,
Incorporated (the "Company"), a development stage company, was incorporated
under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 23, 1999. The Company is
a
medical research company whose mission is the advancement of human health care.
In
2003,
the Company entered into an assignment of license agreement (the "Agreement")
with BioKinetix, Inc., an Alberta, Canada, corporation. The Agreement provided
the Company with an exclusive assignment of all of the rights (the "Rights")
that BioKinetix possessed relating to proprietary technologies that are being
developed for the creation and commercialization of "superantibodies," an
enhancement of antibody technology that makes ordinary antibodies much more
lethal. In consideration, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the
Company to issue 16,000,000 shares of its common stock to the shareholders
of
BioKinetix.
The
Company is also currently researching the benefits and feasibility of
proprietary synthesized Antifreeze Glycoproteins ("AFGP"). In preliminary
studies, AFGP has demonstrated an ability to protect and preserve human cells
at
temperatures below freezing.
Going
Concern
The
Company's financial statements are prepared consistent with accounting
principles generally accepted in the Unites States applicable to a going
concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of
liabilities in the normal course of business.
As
shown
in the financial statements, the Company has not developed a commercially viable
product, has not generated any significant revenue to date, and has incurred
losses since inception, resulting in a net accumulated deficit at December
31,
2006. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern and may result in discontinuance of
operations.
The
Company anticipates that its existing capital resources will not enable it
to
continue operations through December 31, 2007, if the Company does not
raise additional capital through various financing options; however, the Company
does not have any financing commitments at this date. There can be no assurance
that financing will be available on favorable terms or at all. If the Company
raises additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt
securities, the issuance of such securities may result in dilution to existing
stockholders.
The
financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification
of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company have to curtail
operations or be unable to continue in existence.
Cash
Cash
consists of funds held in checking accounts. Cash balances may exceed federally
insured limits from time to time.
Accounts
Receivable
Receivables
consist of cost advances and an amount due from a veterinary center that
purchased the Company's AFGP product for research.
Prepaid
Expenses
Prepaid
expenses consist of shares issued for services yet to be performed.
Computer
Equipment
Computer
equipment is stated at cost and is depreciated using straight-line methods
over
the estimated useful lives.
Due
to Outside Management Consultants
The
Company's offices are currently provided by outside management consultants
and
costs are allocated to the Company on a month-to-month basis. The amounts due
are unsecured, bear no interest and are due on demand.
Convertible
Note Payable
On
February 1, 2004, the Company executed a subscription agreement under which
the Company issued to a corporation an 8% secured convertible note in exchange
for $315,000. The note was due February 1, 2006, and was convertible into
shares of the Company's common stock at the lower of $.30 per share or 70%
of
the average of the three lowest trading prices for the 30 days prior to the
conversion date. No beneficial conversion feature was applicable to this
convertible note.
In
April
2005, 285,832 common shares, in May 2005, 353,090 common shares and in May
2006,
529,279 common shares were issued in accordance with the note terms of
conversion in lieu of payment on this note and accumulated unpaid interest.
The
May 2006 conversion into common stock repaid the balance owing on the note
and
all related interest. All conversions were exercised at a $0.30 per share
conversion price.
Warrants
The
Company estimates the value of warrants using a Black-Scholes pricing model
based on management's assumptions regarding the warrant lives, expected
volatility, and risk free interest rates.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Financial
instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, due to outside management
consultants, and accounts payable. The fair value of these financial instruments
approximates the carrying amounts due to the short-term nature.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue when a sale is made, the fee is fixed or
determinable, collectibility is probable and no significant Company obligations
remain.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach that
requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected
future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company's
financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences,
the
Company generally considers all expected future events other than enactments
of
changes in the tax laws or rates.
Research
and Development Costs
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Earnings
per Share and Potentially Dilutive Securities
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in
the
period. Diluted loss per share takes into consideration common shares
outstanding (computed under basic earnings per share) and any potentially
dilutive securities. The effect of debt convertible into common shares and
outstanding warrants were not included in the computation of diluted earnings
per share for all periods presented because they were anti-dilutive due to
the
Company's losses. No convertible debt remained outstanding as of
December 31, 2006. Common stock issuable
is
considered outstanding as of the original approval date for purposes of earnings
per share computations.
Share-Based
Compensation
The
Company has a stock-based equity incentive plan, which is described more fully
in Note 4. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company had accounted for the plan
under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations as
permitted by SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." No
stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in the net loss when options
granted under the plan have an exercise price equal to or greater than the
market value of the underlining common stock on the date of grant. No options
have been granted to employees under the plan; therefore, no reconciliation
is
provided of the effects on net loss in applying the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS
No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment" using the modified-prospective transition
method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized for the
year
ended December 31, 2006, would include compensation cost for all
share-based payments made subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the
grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No.
123(R). Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not have any effect on the financial
statements because no share-based payments were made to employees in
2006.
Commitments
The
Company leases office space on a month-to-month basis. Rent expense incurred
was
$32,484 for 2006, $30,106 for 2005, and $108,092 for the cumulative period
during the development stage.
Estimates
The
preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
these financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the period. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainties in Income Taxes,
("FIN
48"). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be
taken in a tax return. FIN
48 is
effective for financial statements as of January 1, 2007. The Company has not
yet determined the impact of applying FIN 48.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
157, Fair
Value Measurements ("FAS
157"). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements but does not require
any new fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. The Company has not yet determined the impact of
applying FAS 157.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
158, Employers'
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans,
("FAS
158"). FAS 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded
status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer
plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to
recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur
through comprehensive income. FAS 158 is effective for financial statements
as
of December 31, 2006. The Company does not expect any material impact from
applying FAS 158.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities,
("FAS
159"). FAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial
reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility
in
reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently
without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. FAS 159 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company has not yet determined the impact of adopting
FAS
159 on the Company's financial position.
Note
2. Income Taxes
The
Company is liable for taxes in the United States. As of December 31, 2006,
the Company did not have any income for tax purposes and therefore, no tax
liability or expense has been recorded in these financial
statements.
The
Company has tax losses of approximately $16,800,000 available to reduce future
taxable income. The tax loss expires in years between 2022 and
2024.
The
deferred tax asset associated with the tax loss carry forward is approximately
$5,728,000. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance against the
deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance increased by $574,000 and $1,731,000
for 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Note
3. Discontinued Operations
In
2003,
the Company signed the licensing agreement described in Note 1. This agreement
changed the Company's business plan to that of a medical research company.
Accordingly, the operating results related to the internet-based real estate
listing segment have been presented as discontinued operations in these
financial statements for all periods presented. There were no revenues for
the
years presented in losses from discontinued operations.
Note
4. Share-Based Compensation
In
2003,
the Company adopted its 2003 and 2004 Stock Incentive Plans. Each plan provides
for the issuance of incentive and non-qualified shares of the Company's stock
to
officers, directors, employees and non-employees. The Board of Directors
determines the terms of the shares or options to be granted, including the
number of shares or options, the exercise price, and the vesting schedule,
if
applicable. In 2006 and 2005, the Company issued common shares from both plans
to non-employee consultants for services rendered as follows:
2006
|
Number
of
Shares
|
Value
per
Share
|
||
February
|
20,000
|
$0.53
|
||
March
|
57,984
|
0.61
|
||
May
|
1,196,278
|
0.66
|
||
June
|
27,056
|
0.59
|
||
August
|
100,000
|
0.65
|
||
September
|
319,984
|
0.66
|
||
November
|
100,000
|
0.49
|
||
December
|
7,000
|
0.43
|
||
Total
2006
|
1,828,302
|
2005
|
Number
of
Shares
|
Value
per
Share
|
||
April
|
30,000
|
$0.50
|
||
May
|
3,075,000
|
1.08
|
||
June
|
50,000
|
1.01
|
||
August
|
18,518
|
0.81
|
||
November
|
66,725
|
0.54
|
||
December
|
1,220,000
|
0.62
|
||
Total
2005
|
4,460,243
|
A
summary
of the Company's outstanding stock options is as follows:
Number
of
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2004
|
300,000
|
$0.30
|
||
Granted
|
-
|
|||
Exercised
|
(235,000)
|
0.30
|
||
Forfeited
|
(65,000)
|
0.30
|
||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2005 and 2006
|
-
|
|||
Options
exercisable at December 31, 2005 and 2006
|
-
|
Note
5. Equity
In
June
2006, the Company issued (for $450,000) 900,000 shares of common stock which
included warrants to purchase an additional 450,000 shares of common stock.
Proceeds from the issuance were allocated to the shares and warrants based
on
their relative fair values. The fair value of the warrants was determined using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected
volatility of 74%, risk-free interest rate of 5%, 1-year expected life, and
a 0%
dividend yield.
In
November 2006, the Company issued warrants to purchase 700,000 shares for
services, the cost of which has been expensed in 2006 as compensation. The
warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option model with the following
assumptions: expected volatility of 64%, risk-free interest rate of 8.25%,
weighted average expected lives of 7 months, and a 0% dividend
yield.
Note
6. Subsequent Event
In
2007,
the Company extended the exercise period by six months to August 1, 2007 for
the
450,000 outstanding warrants which were issued in connection with 900,000 shares
in June 2006 (see Note 5).