PROVECTUS BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2013 September (Form 10-Q)

PROVECTUS BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2013 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 000-09410

PROVECTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada		90-0031917
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7327 Oak Ridge Highway, Suite A, Knoxville, Tennessee		37931
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

866-594-5999

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨ Yes x No

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.001 per share, as of September 30, 2013, was 139,974,331. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s 8% convertible preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, as of September 30, 2013, was 746,666. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Series A 8% convertible preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, as of September 30, 2013, was 2,958,334.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements			1
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets			2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations			3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity			4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow			8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			15
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			17
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			17

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings			18
Item 1A. Risk Factors			18
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			18
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			19
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			19
Item 5. Other Information			19
Item 6. Exhibits			20

SIGNATURES			21

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” as defined under U.S. federal securities laws. These statements reflect management’s current knowledge, assumptions, beliefs, estimates, and expectations and express management’s current views of future performance, results, and trends and may be identified by their use of terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “will,” and other similar terms. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to materially differ from those described in the forward-looking statements. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Such statements are made as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to update such statements after this date.

Risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to materially differ from those described in forward-looking statements include those discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including those described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q), and the following:

•

our ability to license our dermatology drug product candidate, PH-10, on the basis of our Phase 2 atopic dermatitis and psoriasis results, which are in the process of being further developed;

•

our determination, based on guidance of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), whether to proceed with or without a partner with a Phase 3 trial of PV-10 to treat recurrent melanoma and the costs associated with such a trial, unless the path to approval of PV-10 is accelerated, and whether Breakthrough Therapy Designation acceptance is viable and enables an accelerated path;

•

our determination whether to license PV-10, our recurrent melanoma drug product candidate, and other solid tumors such as liver cancer and cancers metastatic to the liver, if such licensure is appropriate considering the timing and structure of such a license, or to commercialize PV-10 on our own to treat recurrent and metastatic melanoma and other solid tumors such as liver cancer and cancers metastatic to the liver; and

•

our ability to raise additional capital if we determine to commercialize PH-10 and/or PV-10 on our own, although our expectation is to be acquired by a prospective pharmaceutical or biotech concern prior to commercialization.

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

PROVECTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(A Development-Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2012
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,253,591		$	1,221,701
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		45,284			—

Total Current Assets		8,298,875			1,221,701
Equipment and furnishings, less accumulated depreciation of $427,615 and $422,965		31,829			29,829
Patents, net of amortization of $7,292,837 and $6,789,497, respectively		4,422,608			4,925,948
Other assets		27,000			27,000

	$	12,780,312		$	6,204,478

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable — trade	$	202,464		$	243,435
Accrued compensation and payroll taxes		98,720			—
Accrued consulting expense		61,282			61,283
Other accrued expenses		180,001			206,706

Total Current Liabilities		542,467			511,424
Long-Term Liability
Warrant liability		3,514,622			1,299,570

Total Liabilities		4,057,089			1,810,994

Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock; par value $.001 per share; 25,000,000 shares authorized including; 8% convertible preferred stock, 746,666 and 2,478,185 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, liquidation preference $0.75 (in aggregate $570,585 and $1,896,117, respectively); Series A 8% convertible preferred stock, 2,958,334 shares issued and outstanding in 2013, liquidation preference $0.75 (in aggregate $2,246,855)		3,705			2,478
Common stock; par value $.001 per share; 250,000,000 authorized; 139,974,331 and 118,427,925 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		139,974			118,428
Paid-in capital		138,032,870			122,625,654
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(129,453,326	)		(118,353,076	)

Total Stockholders’ Equity		8,723,223			4,393,484

	$	12,780,312		$	6,204,478

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROVECTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(A Development-Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013			Three Months Ended September 30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012			Cumulative Amounts from January 17, 2002 (Inception) Through September 30, 2013
Revenues
OTC product revenue	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	25,648
Medical device revenue		—			—			—			—			14,109

Total revenues		—			—			—			—			39,757
Cost of sales		—			—			—			—			15,216

Gross profit		—			—			—			—			24,541
Operating expenses
Research and development		1,296,654			1,129,921			2,815,519			4,352,940			45,914,372
General and administrative		2,185,756			2,296,637			6,864,865			7,228,225			73,050,754
Amortization		167,780			167,780			503,340			503,340			7,292,837

Total operating loss		(3,650,190	)		(3,594,338	)		(10,183,724	)		(12,084,505	)		(126,233,422	)
Gain on sale of fixed assets		—			—			—			—			55,075
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			—			—			—			(825,867	)
Investment income		293			310			576			1,325			653,793
(Loss) gain on change in fair value of warrant liability		(902,798	)		1,246,917			(917,102	)		1,435,898			4,995,099
Net interest expense		—			—			—			—			(8,098,004	)

Net loss		(4,552,695	)		(2,347,111	)		(11,100,250	)		(10,647,282	)		(129,453,326	)
Dividends on preferred stock		(38,690	)		(43,884	)		(1,188,648	)		(145,709	)		(12,026,710	)

Net loss applicable to common shareholders	$	(4,591,385	)	$	(2,390,995	)	$	(12,288,898	)	$	(10,792,991	)	$	(141,480,036	)

Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.10	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted		131,573,656			113,166,988			126,503,388			112,073,836

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROVECTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(A Development-Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)


	Preferred Stock				Common Stock						Paid in capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
	Number of Shares		Par Value		Number of Shares			Par Value			Paid in capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
Balance, at January 17, 2002		—	$	—		—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Issuance to founding shareholders		—		—		6,000,000			6,000			(6,000	)		—			—
Sale of stock		—		—		50,000			50			24,950			—			25,000
Issuance of stock to employees		—		—		510,000			510			931,490			—			932,000
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		120,000			120			359,880			—			360,000
Net loss for the period from January 17, 2002 (inception) to April 23, 2002 (date of reverse merger)		—		—		—			—			—			(1,316,198	)		(1,316,198	)

Balance, at April 23, 2002		—	$	—		6,680,000		$	6,680		$	1,310,320		$	(1,316,198	)	$	802
Shares issued in reverse merger		—		—		265,763			266			(3,911	)		—			(3,645	)
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		1,900,000			1,900			5,142,100			—			5,144,000
Purchase and retirement of stock		—		—		(400,000	)		(400	)		(47,600	)		—			(48,000	)
Stock issued for acquisition of Valley Pharmaceuticals		—		—		500,007			500			12,225,820			—			12,226,320
Exercise of warrants		—		—		452,919			453			—			—			453
Warrants issued in connection with convertible debt		—		—		—			—			126,587			—			126,587
Stock and warrants issued for acquisition of Pure-ific		—		—		25,000			25			26,975			—			27,000
Net loss for the period from April 23, 2002 (date of reverse merger) to December 31, 2002		—		—		—			—			—			(5,749,937	)		(5,749,937	)

Balance, at December 31, 2002		—	$	—		9,423,689		$	9,424		$	18,780,291		$	(7,066,135	)	$	11,723,580
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		764,000			764			239,036			—			239,800
Issuance of warrants for services		—		—		—			—			145,479			—			145,479
Stock to be issued for services		—		—		—			—			281,500			—			281,500
Employee compensation from stock options		—		—		—			—			34,659			—			34,659
Issuance of stock pursuant to Regulation S		—		—		679,820			680			379,667			—			380,347
Beneficial conversion related to convertible debt		—		—		—			—			601,000			—			601,000
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003		—		—		—			—			—			(3,155,313	)		(3,155,313	)

Balance, at December 31, 2003		—	$	—		10,867,509		$	10,868		$	20,461,632		$	(10,221,448	)	$	10,251,052
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		733,872			734			449,190			—			449,923
Issuance of warrants for services		—		—		—			—			495,480			—			495,480
Exercise of warrants		—		—		132,608			133			4,867			—			5,000
Employee compensation from stock options		—		—		—			—			15,612			—			15,612
Issuance of stock pursuant to Regulation S		—		—		2,469,723			2,469			790,668			—			793,137
Issuance of stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		—		—		1,930,164			1,930			1,286,930			—			1,288,861
Beneficial conversion related to convertible debt		—		—		—			—			360,256			—			360,256


	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Paid in capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
	Number of Shares		Par Value		Number of Shares		Par Value		Paid in capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
Issuance of convertible debt with warrants		—		—		—		—		105,250			—			105,250
Repurchase of beneficial conversion feature		—		—		—		—		(258,345	)		—			(258,345	)
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2004		—		—		—		—		—			(4,344,525	)		(4,344,525	)

Balance, at December 31, 2004		—	$	—		16,133,876	$	16,134	$	23,711,540		$	(14,565,973	)	$	9,161,701
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		226,733		227		152,058			—			152,285
Issuance of stock for interest payable		—		—		263,721		264		195,767			—			196,031
Issuance of warrants for services		—		—		—		—		1,534,405			—			1,534,405
Issuance of warrants for contractual obligations		—		—		—		—		985,010			—			985,010
Exercise of warrants and stock options		—		—		1,571,849		1,572		1,438,223			—			1,439,795
Employee compensation from stock options		—		—		—		—		15,752			—			15,752
Issuance of stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		—		—		6,221,257		6,221		6,506,955			—			6,513,176
Debt conversion to common stock		—		—		3,405,541		3,405		3,045,957			—			3,049,362
Issuance of warrants with convertible debt		—		—		—		—		1,574,900			—			1,574,900
Beneficial conversion related to convertible debt		—		—		—		—		1,633,176			—			1,633,176
Beneficial conversion related to interest expense		—		—		—		—		39,529			—			39,529
Repurchase of beneficial conversion feature		—		—		—		—		(144,128	)		—			(144,128	)
Net loss for the year ended 2005		—		—		—		—		—			(11,763,853	)		(11,763,853	)


	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Paid in capital		Accumulated Deficit			Total
	Number of Shares		Par Value		Number of Shares		Par Value		Paid in capital		Accumulated Deficit			Total
Balance, at December 31, 2005		—	$	—		27,822,977	$	27,823	$	40,689,144	$	(26,329,826	)	$	14,387,141
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		719,246		719		676,024		—			676,743
Issuance of stock for interest payable		—		—		194,327		195		183,401		—			183,596
Issuance of warrants for services		—		—		—		—		370,023		—			370,023
Exercise of warrants and stock options		—		—		1,245,809		1,246		1,188,570		—			1,189,816
Employee compensation from stock options		—		—		—		—		1,862,456		—			1,862,456
Issuance of stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		—		—		10,092,495		10,092		4,120,329		—			4,130,421
Debt conversion to common stock		—		—		2,377,512		2,377		1,573,959		—			1,576,336
Beneficial conversion related to interest expense		—		—		—		—		16,447		—			16,447
Net loss for the year ended 2006		—		—		—		—		—		(8,870,579	)		(8,870,579	)

Balance, at December 31, 2006		—	$	—		42,452,366	$	42,452	$	50,680,353	$	(35,200,405	)	$	15,522,400
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		150,000		150		298,800		—			298,950
Issuance of stock for interest payable		—		—		1,141		1		1,257		—			1,258
Issuance of warrants for services		—		—		—		—		472,635		—			472,635
Exercise of warrants and stock options		—		—		3,928,957		3,929		3,981,712		—			3,985,641
Employee compensation from stock options		—		—		—		—		2,340,619		—			2,340,619
Issuance of stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		—		—		2,376,817		2,377		1,845,761		—			1,848,138
Debt conversion to common stock		—		—		490,000		490		367,010		—			367,500
Net loss for the year ended 2007		—		—		—		—		—		(10,005,631	)		(10,005,631	)

Balance, at December 31, 2007		—	$	—		49,399,281	$	49,399	$	59,988,147	$	(45,206,036	)	$	14,831,510
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		350,000		350		389,650		—			390,000
Issuance of warrants for services		—		—		—		—		517,820		—			517,820
Exercise of warrants and stock options		—		—		3,267,795		3,268		2,636,443		—			2,639,711
Employee compensation from stock options		—		—		—		—		1,946,066		—			1,946,066
Net loss for the year ended 2008		—		—		—		—		—		(10,269,571	)		(10,269,571	)

Balance, at December 31, 2008		—	$	—		53,017,076	$	53,017	$	65,478,126	$	(55,475,607	)	$	10,055,536
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		796,012		796		694,204		—			695,000
Issuance of warrants for services		—		—		—		—		1,064,210		—			1,064,210
Exercise of warrants and stock options		—		—		3,480,485		3,480		2,520,973		—			2,524,453
Employee compensation from stock options		—		—		—		—		870,937		—			870,937
Issuance of stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D						10,116,653		10,117		6,508,571		—			6,518,688
Net loss for the year ended 2009		—		—		—		—		—		(12,322,314	)		(12,322,314	)

Balance, at December 31, 2009		—	$	—		67,410,226	$	67,410	$	77,137,021	$	(67,797,921	)	$	9,406,510
Issuance of stock for services		—		—		776,250		776		855,837		—			856,613
Issuance of warrants for services		—		—		—		—		1,141,593		—			1,141,593
Exercise of warrants and stock options		—		—		3,491,014		3,491		3,100,189		—			3,103,680
Issuance of common stock pursuant to Regulation S		—		—		559,000		559		418,691		—			419,250
Issuance of common stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		—		—		11,168,067		11,169		6,335,820		—			6,346,989


	Preferred Stock						Common Stock				Paid in capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
	Number of Shares			Par Value			Number of Shares		Par Value		Paid in capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
Issuance of preferred stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		13,283,324			13,283			—		—		4,204,107			—			4,217,390
Preferred stock conversions into common stock		(7,893,326	)		(7,893	)		7,893,326		7,893		—			—			—
Employee compensation from stock options		—			—			—		—		3,759,650			—			3,759,650
Net loss for the year ended 2010		—			—			—		—		—			(18,552,102	)		(18,552,102	)

Balance, at December 31, 2010		5,389,998		$	5,390			91,297,883	$	91,298	$	96,952,908		$	(86,350,023	)	$	10,699,573
Issuance of stock for services		—			—			350,000		350		332,400			—			332,750
Issuance of warrants for services		—			—			—		—		945,116			—			945,116
Exercise of warrants and stock options		—			—			7,185,522		7,185		6,616,126			—			6,623,311
Issuance of common stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		—			—			9,905,062		9,905		7,031,334			—			7,041,239
Sale of non-controlling interest in Pure-ific Corporation and warrants		—			—			—		—		443,500			—			443,500
Preferred stock conversions into common stock		(1,858,333	)		(1,859	)		1,858,331		1,859		—			—			—
Employee compensation from stock options		—			—			—		—		3,368,950			—			3,368,950
Net loss for the year ended 2011		—			—			—		—		—			(19,434,699	)		(19,434,699	)

Balance, at December 31, 2011		3,531,665		$	3,531			110,596,798	$	110,597	$	115,690,334		$	(105,784,722	)	$	10,019,740
Issuance of stock for services		—			—			550,000		550		455,950			—			456,500
Issuance of warrants for services		—			—			—		—		1,512,026			—			1,512,026
Issuance of common stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		—			—			6,227,647		6,228		4,784,316			—			4,790,544
Preferred stock conversions into common stock		(1,053,480	)		(1,053	)		1,053,480		1,053		—			—			—
Employee compensation from stock options		—			—			—		—		183,028			—			183,028
Net loss for the year ended 2012		—			—			—		—		—			(12,568,354	)		(12,568,354	)

Balance, at December 31, 2012		2,478,185		$	2,478			118,427,925	$	118,428	$	122,625,654		$	(118,353,076	)	$	4,393,484
Issuance of stock for services		—			—			475,000		475		311,525			—			312,000
Issuance of warrants for services		—			—			—		—		1,527,518			—			1,527,518
Exercise of warrants and stock options		—			—			43,750		44		20,956			—			21,000
Issuance of common stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		—			—			18,854,470		18,854		12,185,320			—			12,204,174
Issuance of preferred stock and warrants pursuant to Regulation D		3,400,001			3,400			—		—		1,248,650			—			1,252,050
Preferred stock conversions into common stock		(2,173,186	)		(2,173	)		2,173,186		2,173		—			—			—
Dividends on preferred stock		—			—			—		—		(29,063	)		—			(29,063	)
Employee compensation from stock options		—			—			—		—		142,310			—			142,310
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2013		—			—			—		—		—			(11,100,250	)		(11,100,250	)

Balance, at September 30, 2013		3,705,000		$	3,705			139,974,331	$	139,974	$	138,032,870		$	(129,453,326	)	$	8,723,223

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROVECTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(A Development-Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012			Cumulative Amounts from January 17, 2002 (Inception) through September 30, 2013
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(11,100,250	)	$	(10,647,282	)	$	(129,453,326	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation		4,650			4,579			450,616
Amortization of patents		503,340			503,340			7,292,837
Amortization of original issue discount		—			—			3,845,721
Amortization of commitment fee		—			—			310,866
Amortization of prepaid consultant expense		—			—			1,295,226
Amortization of deferred loan costs		—			—			2,261,584
Accretion of United States Treasury Bills		—			—			(373,295	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			—			825,867
Loss on exercise of warrants		—			—			236,146
Beneficial conversion of convertible interest		—			—			55,976
Convertible interest		—			—			389,950
Compensation through issuance of stock options		142,310			183,028			14,540,039
Compensation through issuance of stock		—			—			932,000
Issuance of stock for services		312,000			409,250			9,365,511
Issuance of warrants for services		1,527,518			1,381,329			7,724,087
Issuance of warrants for contractual obligations		—			—			985,010
Gain on sale of equipment		—			—			(55,075	)
Loss (gain) on change in fair value of warrant liability		917,102			(1,435,898	)		(4,995,099	)
Change in assets and liabilities
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(45,284	)		(16,284	)		(45,284	)
Accounts payable		(40,971	)		179,513			198,819
Accrued expenses		72,014			1,512,859			489,633

Net cash used in operating activities		(7,707,571	)		(7,925,566	)		(83,722,191	)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets		—			—			180,075
Capital expenditures		(6,650	)		(15,885	)		(96,570	)
Proceeds from sales of investments		—			—			37,010,481
Purchases of investments		—			—			(36,637,186	)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(6,650	)		(15,885	)		456,800

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net proceeds from loans from stockholder		—			—			174,000
Proceeds from convertible debt		—			—			6,706,795
Net proceeds from sales of preferred stock and warrants		2,550,000			—			11,458,131
Net proceeds from sales of common stock and warrants		12,204,174			2,077,796			55,018,695
Proceeds from exercises of warrants and stock options		21,000			—			21,099,014
Cash paid for preferred dividends		(29,063	)		—			(29,063	)
Cash paid to retire convertible debt		—			—			(2,385,959	)
Cash paid for deferred loan costs		—			—			(747,612	)
Premium paid on extinguishments of debt		—			—			(170,519	)
Purchase and retirement of common stock		—			—			(48,000	)
Net proceeds from sale of non-controlling interest in Pure-ific Corporation		—			—			443,500

Net cash provided by financing activities		14,746,111			2,077,796			91,518,982

Net change in cash and cash equivalents	$	7,031,890		$	(5,863,655	)	$	8,253,591
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period		1,221,701			7,705,773			—

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	8,253,591		$	1,842,118		$	8,253,591

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information pursuant to Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the condensed consolidated financial statements were issued.

2. Recapitalization and Merger

Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., formerly known as “Provectus Pharmaceutical, Inc.” and “SPM Group, Inc.,” was incorporated under Colorado law on May 1, 1978. SPM Group ceased operations in 1991, and became a development-stage company effective January 1, 1992, with the new corporate purpose of seeking out acquisitions of properties, businesses, or merger candidates, without limitation as to the nature of the business operations or geographic location of the acquisition candidate.

On April 1, 2002, SPM Group changed its name to “Provectus Pharmaceutical, Inc.” and reincorporated in Nevada in preparation for a transaction with Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a privately-held Tennessee corporation (“PPI”). On April 23, 2002, an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Provectus Pharmaceutical and PPI was approved by the written consent of a majority of the outstanding shares of Provectus Pharmaceutical. As a result, Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. issued 6,680,000 shares of common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of PPI. As part of the acquisition, Provectus Pharmaceutical changed its name to “Provectus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.” and PPI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Provectus. This transaction was recorded as a recapitalization of PPI.

On November 19, 2002, the Company acquired Valley Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a privately-held Tennessee corporation formerly known as Photogen, Inc., by merging PPI with and into Valley and naming the surviving corporation “Xantech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.” Photogen, Inc. was separated from Photogen Technologies, Inc. in a non-pro-rata split-off to some of its shareholders. The assets of Photogen, Inc. consisted primarily of the equipment and intangibles related to its therapeutic activity and were recorded at their fair value. The majority shareholders of Valley were also the majority shareholders of Provectus. Valley had no revenues prior to the transaction with the Company. By acquiring Valley, the Company acquired its intellectual property, including issued U.S. patents and patentable inventions.

3. Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share

Basic and diluted loss per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Loss per share excludes the impact of outstanding options and warrants and convertible preferred stock as they are antidilutive. Potential common shares excluded from the calculation at September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, relate to 66,238,507 and 26,042,116 from warrants, 15,322,206 and 15,140,956 from options, and 3,705,000 and 2,941,665 from convertible preferred shares.

4. Equity Transactions

(a) During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $48,750. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company issued 175,000 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $160,000.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $49,500. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $64,500.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $51,250. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued 225,000 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $184,750.

As the fair market value of these services was not readily determinable, these services were valued based on the fair market value, determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

(b) During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued 1,924,973 warrants to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $409,640. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, 859,833 warrants were forfeited. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company issued 1,003,000 warrants to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $475,668. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, 1,500 warrants were forfeited.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 2,605,000 warrants to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $931,655. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, 1,051,500 warrants were forfeited. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company issued 454,500 warrants to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $183,908. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, 4,368,644 warrants were forfeited.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 442,000 warrants to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $186,223. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, 136,500 warrants were forfeited. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued 1,732,135 warrants to consultants in exchange for services. Consulting costs charged to operations were $721,753. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, 122,833 warrants were forfeited.

As the fair market value of these services was not readily determinable, these services were valued based on the fair market value, determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

(c) The Company determined that warrants issued January 13, 2011 and referred to as Series A Warrants and Series C Warrants should be classified as liabilities in accordance with ASC 815 because the warrants in question contain exercise price reset features that require the exercise price of the warrants be adjusted if the Company issues certain other equity related instruments at a lower price per share. The value of the warrant liability was determined based on the Monte-Carlo Simulation model at the date the warrants were issued. The warrant liability is then revalued at each subsequent quarter. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, there was a loss recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $311,062 and $148,364, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, there was a gain recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $221,149 and $222,546, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 there was a loss recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $337,244. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, there was a gain recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $429,818.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013 the Company completed a private offering of common stock and warrants to accredited investors for gross proceeds of $4,045,510. The Company accepted subscriptions, in the aggregate, for 5,394,013 shares of common stock and five year warrants to purchase 7,277,264 shares of common stock. Investors received five year fully vested warrants to purchase up to 100% to 150% of the number of shares purchased by the investors in the offering. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The purchase price for each share of common stock together with the warrants was $0.75. The Company used the proceeds for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc. served as placement agent for the offering. In connection with the offering, the Company paid $522,640 and issued five year fully vested warrants to purchase 539,401 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.00 to Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc., which represents 10% of the total number of shares of common stock sold to investors solicited by Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013 the Company completed a private offering of common stock and warrants to accredited investors for gross proceeds of $2,641,501. The Company accepted subscriptions, in the aggregate, for 3,522,001 shares of common stock and five year warrants to purchase 5,283,003 shares of common stock. Investors received five year fully vested warrants to purchase up to 150% of the number of shares purchased by the investors in the offering. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The purchase price for each share of common stock together with the warrants was $0.75. The Company used the proceeds for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc. served as placement agent for the offering. In connection with the offering, the Company paid $314,173, accrued $32,500 at June 30, 2013 which was paid in July 2013 and issued five year fully vested warrants to purchase 352,200 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.00 to Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc., which represents 10% of the total number of shares of common stock sold to investors solicited by Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013 the Company completed a private offering of common stock and warrants to accredited investors for gross proceeds of $4,613,037. The Company accepted subscriptions, in the aggregate, for 6,150,718 shares of common stock and five year warrants to purchase 9,226,077 shares of common stock. Investors received five year fully vested warrants to purchase up to 150% of the number of shares purchased by the investors in the offering. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The purchase price for each share of common stock together with the warrants was $0.75. The Company used the proceeds for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc. served as placement agent for the offering. In connection with the offering, the Company paid $564,686 and issued five year fully vested warrants to purchase 615,072 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.00 to Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc., which represents 10% of the total number of shares of common stock sold to investors solicited by Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013 the Company completed a private offering of common stock and warrants to accredited investors for gross proceeds of $2,687,500. The Company accepted subscriptions, in the aggregate, for 3,583,333 shares of common stock and five year warrants to purchase 5,375,000 shares of common stock. Investors received five year fully vested warrants to purchase up to 150% of the number of shares purchased by the investors in the offering. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The purchase price for each share of common stock together with the warrants was $0.75. The Company used the proceeds for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Maxim Group LLC served as placement agent for the offering. In connection with the offering, the Company paid $349,375 and issued five year fully vested warrants to purchase 358,333 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.00 to Maxim Group LLC, which represents 10% of the total number of shares of common stock sold to investors solicited by Maxim Group LLC.

(d) In March and April 2010, the Company had an issuance of 8% Convertible Preferred Stock with warrants. The Company determined that warrants issued with the 8% convertible preferred stock should be classified as liabilities in accordance with ASC 815 because the warrants in question contain exercise price reset features that require the exercise price of the warrants be adjusted if the Company issues certain other equity related instruments at a lower price per share. The value of the warrant liability was determined based on the Monte-Carlo Simulation model at the date the warrants were issued. The warrant liability is then revalued at each subsequent quarter. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, there was a loss recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $446,698 and $114,800, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, there was a gain recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $399,057 and $229,599, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 there was a loss recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $275,279. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, there was a gain recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $817,099.

Dividends on the 8% Convertible Preferred Stock accrue at an annual rate of 8% of the original issue price and are payable in either cash or common stock. If the dividend is paid in common stock, the number of shares of common stock will equal the quotient of the amount of cash dividends divided by the market price of the stock on the dividend payment date. The dividends are payable quarterly on the 15th day after the quarter-end. The Company anticipates paying the dividends in common stock. The Company has a deficit and, as a result, the dividends are recorded against additional paid-in capital. In January 2013, the Company issued 61,022 shares of common stock in dividends on preferred stock in lieu of cash dividends due as of January 15, 2013. At March 31, 2013, the Company recognized dividends of $21,921 which are included in dividends on preferred stock on the consolidated statement of operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2013 there were 593,000 shares of the Company’s redeemable preferred stock that converted into 593,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In April 2013, the Company issued 29,384 shares of common stock in dividends on preferred stock in lieu of cash dividends due as of April 15, 2013. At June 30, 2013, the Company recognized dividends of $22,164 which are included in dividends on preferred stock on the consolidated statement of operations. During the three months ended June 30, 2013 there were 403,520 shares of the Company’s redeemable preferred stock that converted into 403,520 shares of the Company’s common stock. In July 2013, the Company issued 34,598 shares of common stock in dividends on preferred stock in lieu of cash dividends due as of July 15, 2013. At September 30, 2013, the Company recognized dividends of $10,586 which are included in dividends on preferred stock on the consolidated statement of operations. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 there were 734,999 shares of the Company’s redeemable preferred stock that converted into 734,999 shares of the Company’s common stock.

(e) On February 22, 2013, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain accredited investors for the issuance and sale in a private placement of an aggregate of $2,550,000 of Units at a purchase price of $0.75 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one share of Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share, and a warrant to purchase one and one-quarter shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.001 per share (subject to adjustment) at an exercise price of $1.00 per whole share (subject to adjustment). The total Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock issued was 3,400,001 shares, and the total warrants were 4,250,000. The Company used the net proceeds of the private placement for working capital, FDA trials, securing licensing partnerships, and general corporate purposes.

The Company determined that warrants issued in February, 2013 with the Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock should be classified as liabilities in accordance with ASC 815 because the warrants in question contain exercise price reset features that require the exercise price of the warrants be adjusted if the Company issues certain other equity related instruments at a lower price per share. The preferred stock was determined to have characteristics more akin to equity than debt. As a result, the conversion option was determined to be clearly and closely related to the preferred stock and therefore does not need to be bifurcated and classified as a liability. The proceeds received from the issuance of the preferred stock were first allocated to the fair value of the warrants with the remainder allocated to the preferred stock. The fair value of the preferred stock if converted on the date of issuance was greater than the value allocated to the preferred stock. As a result, a beneficial conversion amount was recorded upon issuance. The fair value of the warrants recorded from the February 2013 issuance was $1,297,950 resulting in a beneficial conversion amount of $1,025,950. The beneficial conversion has been recorded as a deemed dividend as of March 31, 2013 and is included in dividends on preferred

stock on the consolidated statements of operations. The value of the warrant liability was determined based on the Monte-Carlo Simulation model at the date the warrants were issued. The warrant liability is then revalued at each subsequent quarter. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 there was a loss recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $165,750. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 there was a gain recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $289,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 there was a loss recognized from the revaluation of the warrant liability of $290,275.

Dividends on the Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock accrue at an annual rate of 8% of the original issue price and are payable in either cash or common stock. If the dividend is paid in common stock, the number of shares of common stock will equal the quotient of the amount of cash dividends divided by the market price of the stock on the dividend payment date. The dividends are payable quarterly on the 15th day after the quarter-end. The Company anticipates paying the dividends in common stock although was required to pay the initial dividends due in cash. The Company has a deficit and, as a result, the dividends are recorded against additional paid-in capital. At March 31, 2013, the Company recognized dividends of $29,063 which are included in dividends on preferred stock on the consolidated statement of operations and were paid in April 2013. At June 30, 2013, the Company recognized dividends of $50,860 which are included in dividends on preferred stock on the consolidated statement of operations. In July 2013, the Company issued 79,401 shares of common stock in dividends on preferred stock in lieu of cash dividends due as of July 15, 2013. At September 30, 2013, the Company recognized dividends of $28,104 which are included in dividends on preferred stock on the consolidated statement of operations. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 there were 441,667 shares of the Company’s Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock that converted into 441,667 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On June 23, 2013, our agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC expired. On July 22, 2013 the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt pursuant to which the Company may, in the Company’s sole discretion, direct the purchase up to $30,000,000 of the Company’s common stock over the 30-month term of the Purchase Agreement. From time to time during the term of the Purchase Agreement, the Company may, in its sole discretion direct the purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a per share purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the lowest sale price of the Company’s common stock reported on the OTCQB on the purchase date and (ii) the arithmetic average of the three lowest closing sale prices for the Company’s common stock during the 12 consecutive business days ending on the business day immediately preceding the purchase date. The Company may, under certain circumstances, at its discretion, increase the amount of common stock that it sells on each purchase date. The committed obligation under any single regular purchase shall not exceed $250,000, unless the parties mutually agree to increase the dollar amount of any regular purchase. In no event may Alpha Capital Anstalt purchase shares of the Company’s common stock for less than $0.75 per share. In consideration of entering into the Purchase Agreement and making the commitment to purchase the Purchase Shares, the Company issued 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Alpha Capital Anstalt. Costs charged to operations for this commitment fee were $162,500. The Purchase Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time, at its discretion, without cost to the Company.

5. Stock-Based Compensation

One employee of the Company exercised 18,750 options at an exercise price of $0.32 per share of common stock for $6,000 and 25,000 options at an exercise price of $0.60 per share of common stock for $15,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2013. One former non-employee member of the board forfeited 25,000 stock options on May 29, 2013. On August 19, 2013, the Company issued 250,000 stock options to its re-elected members of the board. All of the stock options issued in 2013 vest on the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to the fair market price on the date of issuance. On May 14, 2012, the Company issued 50,000 stock options to a newly appointed member of the board. On June 28, 2012, the Company issued 200,000 stock options to its re-elected members of the board. All of the stock options issued in 2012 vest on the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to the fair market price on the date of issuance.

The compensation cost relating to stock options issued in 2013 is measured based on the fair value of the stock options issued. For purposes of estimating the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant, the Company utilized the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected volatility factor of the market price of the Company’s common stock (as determined by reviewing its historical public market closing prices). Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee and board member stock options. Included in the results of operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 is $142,310 of stock-based compensation expense which relates to the fair value of stock options. Included in the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 is $0 and $183,028, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense which relates to the fair value of stock options.

The following is a summary of nonvested stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:


	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2012		—		$	—
Granted		250,000		$	0.57
Vested		(250,000	)	$	0.57
Canceled		—			—

Nonvested at September 30, 2013		—		$	—

As of September 30, 2013, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan.

6. Related Party Transaction

The Company paid one non-employee member of the board $48,000 for consulting services performed as of September 30, 2013. The Company paid another non-employee member of the board $75,000 for consulting services performed as of September 30, 2013. The Company paid a third non-employee member of the board $75,000 for consulting services performed as of September 30, 2013.

7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This guidance enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Under this guidance, assets and liabilities carried at fair value must be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis. At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs are classified as Level 3. The fair value of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including Cash and cash equivalents and Accounts payable, approximates the carrying value due to the relatively short maturity of such instruments. The fair value of derivative instruments is determined by management with the assistance of an independent third party valuation specialist. The warrant liability is a derivative instrument and is classified as Level 3. The Company used the Monte-Carlo Simulation model to estimate the fair value of the warrants. Significant assumptions used at March 31, 2013 for the 2010 warrants include a weighted average term of 2.0 years, a 5% probability that the warrant exercise price would be reset, volatility range of 58.0% to 59.1% and a risk free interest rate of 0.25%. Significant assumptions used at June 30, 2013 for the 2010 warrants include a weighted average term of 1.7 years, a 5% probability that the warrant exercise price would be reset, volatility range of 55.7% to 56.5% and a risk free interest rate of 0.36%. Significant assumptions used at September 30, 2013 for the 2010 warrants include a weighted average term of 1.5 years, a 5% probability that the warrant exercise price would be reset, volatility range of 59.0% to 59.4% and a risk free interest rate of 0.33%. Significant assumptions used at March 31, 2013 for the 2011 warrants include a weighted average term of 2.8 years, a 5% probability that the warrant exercise price would be reset, volatility range of 58.0% to 59.1% and a risk free interest rate of 0.25%. Significant assumptions used at June 30, 2013 for the 2011 warrants include a weighted average term of 2.5 years, a 5% probability that the warrant exercise price would be reset, volatility of 59.1% and a risk free interest rate of 0.66%. Significant assumptions used at September 30, 2013 for the 2011 warrants include a weighted average term of 2.3 years, a 5% probability that the warrant exercise price would be reset, volatility of 58.6% and a risk free interest rate range of 0.33% to 0.63%. Significant assumptions used at March 31, 2013 for the 2013 warrants include a weighted average term of 4.9 years, a 5% probability that the warrant exercise price would be reset, volatility range of 58.0% to 66.7% and a risk free interest rate range of 0.25% to 0.77%. Significant assumptions used at June 30, 2013 for the 2013 warrants include a weighted average term of 4.7 years, a 5% probability that the warrant exercise price would be reset, volatility of 64.6% and a risk free interest rate of 1.41%. Significant assumptions used at September 30, 2013 for the 2013 warrants include a weighted average term of 4.4 years, a 5% probability that the warrant exercise price would be reset, volatility of 64.3% and a risk free interest rate of 1.39%.

The warrant liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis is as follows:


	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Derivative instruments:
Warrant liability at September 30, 2013	$	3,514,622	$	—	$	—	$	3,514,622
Warrant liability at December 31, 2012	$	1,299,570	$	—	$	—	$	1,299,570

A reconciliation of the warranty liability measured at fair value on a recurring basis with the use of significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) from January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013 follows:


Balance at January 1, 2013	$	1,299,570
Issuance of warrants		1,297,950
Net loss included in earnings		917,102
Exercise of warrants		—

Balance at September 30, 2013	$	3,514,622

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion is intended to assist in the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our results of operations and our financial condition together with our consolidated subsidiaries. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited financial statements, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (“2012 Form 10-K”), which includes additional information about our critical accounting policies and practices and risk factors, and Item 1A of Part II of this report, which updates those risk factors. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the statement of operations, including trends which might appear, are not necessarily indicative of future operations.

Plan of Operation

We have implemented our integrated business plan, including execution of the current and next phases in clinical development of our pharmaceutical products and continued execution of research programs for new research initiatives.

Our current plans include continuing to operate with our four employees during the immediate future, as well as four primary consultants and various vendor relationships, and anticipate adding additional personnel if necessary in the next 12 months. Our current plans also include minimal purchases of new property, plant and equipment, and increased research and development for additional clinical trials.

We believe that our prescription drug candidates PV-10 and PH-10 provide us with two products in multiple indications, which have been shown in clinical trials to be safe to treat serious cancers and diseases of the skin, and important immunologic data has been corroborated and characterized by institutions such as Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida and another leading research facility. We continue to develop clinical trials for these products to show their safety and efficacy, which we believe will continue to be shown based on data in previous studies, and which will result in one or more license transactions with pharmaceutical and or biotech partners. Together with our non-core technologies, which we intend to sell or license in the future, we believe this combination represents the foundation for maximizing shareholder value this year and beyond.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012

Revenues

We had no revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Research and Development

Research and development costs of $1,296,654 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 included payroll of $411,119, consulting and contract labor of $451,024, legal of $93,515, insurance of $61,049, lab supplies and pharmaceutical preparations of $258,756, rent and utilities of $19,641, and depreciation expense of $1,550. Research and development costs of $1,129,921 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 included payroll of $302,064, consulting and contract labor of $670,449, legal of $62,568, insurance of $60,228, lab supplies and pharmaceutical preparations of $13,122, rent and utilities of $19,864, and depreciation expense of $1,626. The decrease in consulting and contract labor is due to decreased costs of current preclinical and clinical trial activity. The increase in lab supplies and pharmaceutical preparations is the result of securing drug substance and drug product for pivotal clinical studies with the newly patented synthesis of Rose Bengal.

Research and development costs of $2,815,519 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 included payroll of $1,135,095, consulting and contract labor of $1,006,049, legal of $174,539, insurance of $148,549, lab supplies and pharmaceutical preparations of $290,921, rent and utilities of $55,716, and depreciation expense of $4,650. Research and development costs of $4,352,940 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included payroll of $2,258,622, consulting and contract labor of $1,737,376, legal of $178,236, insurance of $85,228, lab supplies and pharmaceutical preparations of $32,564, rent and utilities of $56,335, and depreciation expense of $4,579. The decrease in payroll is the result of no bonuses being paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in consulting and contract labor is due to decreased costs of current preclinical and clinical trial activity. The increase in lab supplies and pharmaceutical preparations is the result of securing drug substance and drug product for pivotal clinical studies with the newly patented synthesis of Rose Bengal.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased by $110,881 in the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $2,185,756 from $2,296,637 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. General and administrative expenses were very similar for both periods, although investor relations expense decreased slightly in the three months ended September 30, 2013.

General and administrative expenses decreased by $363,360 in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $6,864,865 from $7,228,225 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. General and administrative expenses were very similar for both periods, although payroll expense was lower for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as a result of no bonuses being paid during 2013.

Investment Income

Investment income was insignificant in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Loss on change in fair value of warrant liability

Loss on change in fair value of warrant liability increased by $2,149,715 in the three months ended September 30, 2013 to a loss of $902,798 from a gain of $1,246,917 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. This activity results from accounting for the warrant liability described in Footnotes 4(c), 4(d), 4(e) and Footnote 7 to the financial statements.

Loss on change in fair value of warrant liability increased by $2,353,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to a loss of $917,102 from a gain of $1,435,898 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This activity results from accounting for the warrant liability described in Footnotes 4(c), 4(d), 4(e) and Footnote 7 to the financial statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash and cash equivalents were $8,253,591 at September 30, 2013, compared with $1,221,701 at December 31, 2012. The increase of approximately $7 million was due primarily to sales of common stock, preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock in the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

By managing variable cash expenses due to minimal fixed costs, we believe our cash and cash equivalents on hand at September 30, 2013, together with approximately $6 million received in the three months ending December 31, 2013 due to sales of common stock and warrants, will be sufficient to meet our current and planned operating needs until 2015 without consideration being given to additional cash inflows that might occur from the exercise of existing warrants or future sales of equity securities, although we may, in our sole discretion, direct Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Investor”) to purchase up to $30,000,000 of our common stock per an existing agreement with Investor.

We are seeking to improve our cash flow through both the licensure of PH-10 on the basis of our Phase 2 atopic dermatitis and psoriasis results, and primarily the geographic licensure of PV-10 on the basis of our Phase 2 metastatic melanoma and Phase 1 liver results in certain areas of the world, as well as pursuing a strategic investment strategy, including equity sales to potential pharmaceutical and/or biotech partners. In addition, the data now available and forthcoming from Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida has been and is expected to be particularly helpful in supporting our development plans with both the FDA and prospective partners. The geographic areas of interest for PV-10 principally include China, India, Japan and Middle East and North Africa (MENA). We are encouraged by the interest in both PV-10 and PH-10 on a geographic basis and are continuing discussions with potential partners.

We are also considering the global licensure of PV-10 as well since it has come to our attention that this is of interest to potential partners. We have provided data on a confidential basis to both potential global and geographic partners for both PV-10 and PH-10 via a secure electronic data room that is monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week and houses formal data submissions to the FDA as well as various corporate governance related documents.

We also expect to continue with the majority stake asset sale and licensure of our non-core assets. However, the primary objective of the Company is to strategically monetize the core value of PV-10 and PH-10 through various transactions, leveraging value creation up to and including an appropriate merger and acquisition transaction that includes upfront cash and acquirer stock in exchange for Company ownership as well as a contingency value right to facilitate potential upside post-acquisition. We believe regulatory clarity is determined by specifying the expected approval pathways of both PV-10 and PH-10. This may include the potential for breakthrough therapy designation for PV-10 to treat metastatic melanoma and an accelerated approval path for PV-10 to treat refractory recurrent melanoma. Such clarity will help facilitate transactions with potential partners. Additionally, the existing and forthcoming mechanism of action related clinical and nonclinical data for both PV-10 and PH-10 will further aid in both regulatory clarity and transactions with potential partners.

However, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in either licensing of PH-10 or PV-10, any equity transaction, or selling a majority stake of the OTC and other non-core assets via a spin-out transaction and licensing our existing non-core products. Moreover, even if we are successful in improving our current cash flow position, we nonetheless plan to seek additional funds to meet our long-term requirements in 2014 and beyond. We anticipate that these funds will otherwise come from the proceeds of private placements, the exercise of existing warrants outstanding, or public offerings of debt or equity securities. While we believe that we have a reasonable basis for our expectation that we will be able to raise additional funds, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete additional financing in a timely manner. In addition, any such financing may result in significant dilution to shareholders.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe there have been no material changes to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our 2012 Form 10-K.

New Accounting Pronouncements

None.

Contractual Obligations — Leases

We lease office and laboratory space in Knoxville, Tennessee, on an annual basis, renewable for one year at our option. We have no lease commitments as of September 30, 2013. We are currently leasing on a month-to-month basis.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We had no holdings of financial or commodity instruments as of September 30, 2013, other than cash and cash equivalents, short-term deposits, money market funds, and interest bearing investments in U.S. governmental debt securities. We have accounted for certain warrants issued in March and April 2010, January 2011 and February 2013 as liabilities at their fair value upon issuance, which are remeasured at each period end with the change in fair value recorded in the statement of operations. See notes 4 and 7 of interim financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

All of our business is transacted in U.S. dollars and, accordingly, foreign exchange rate fluctuations have not had a significant impact on us, and they are not expected to have a significant impact on us in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of September 30, 2013, the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

Except as described below, we are not involved in any legal proceedings nor are we party to any pending claims that we believe could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

On January 2, 2013, Glenn Kleba, derivatively on behalf of the Company as a nominal defendant (the “Plaintiff”), filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the Circuit Court for the State of Tennessee, Knox County, against H. Craig Dees, Timothy C. Scott, Eric A. Wachter, Stuart Fuchs, Kelly M. McMasters, Alfred E. Smith, IV and Peter R. Culpepper, and against the Company as a nominal defendant (the “Shareholder Derivative Complaint”). The Shareholder Derivative Complaint alleges (i) breach of fiduciary duties, (ii) waste of corporate assets, and (iii) unjust enrichment, all three claims based on the Plaintiff’s allegations that the defendants authorized and/or accepted stock option awards in violation of the terms of the Company’s 2002 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) by issuing stock options in excess of the amounts authorized under the Plan and delegated to defendant H. Craig Dees the sole authority to grant himself and other executive officers of the Company cash bonuses that the Plaintiff alleges to be excessive.

In April 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors established a special litigation committee to investigate the allegations of the Shareholder Derivative Complaint and make a determination as to how the matter should be resolved. The special litigation committee has begun its investigation and proceedings in the case have been stayed pending the conclusion of the committee’s investigation. In view of the inherent uncertainties of litigation and the early stage of this litigation, the outcome of this case cannot be predicted at this time. Likewise, the amount of any potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors listed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Such risk factors should be considered carefully with the information provided elsewhere in this report.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for services. On July 22, 2013 the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt. In consideration of entering into the Purchase Agreement and making the commitment to purchase the Purchase Shares, the Company issued 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Alpha Capital Anstalt.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 442,000 warrants to consultants in exchange for services.

The issuances of the securities were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) and Regulation D thereunder as transactions not involving a public offering.

The Company has used and intends to use the net proceeds of these issuances for working capital, FDA trials, securing licensing partnerships, and general corporate purposes.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 Certification).

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 Certification).

32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 Certification).

101		Interactive Data Files.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	PROVECTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

November 11, 2013	By:	/s/ Peter R. Culpepper
		Peter R. Culpepper
		On behalf of the registrant and as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 Certification).

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 Certification).

32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 Certification).

101		Interactive Data Files.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company