Annual Statements Open main menu

QSAM Biosciences, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 December (Form 10-Q)

anpathgroup10q123109.htm


 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


 
FORM 10-Q
 

 
 
   
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
For the quarterly period ended: DECEMBER 31, 2009
 
or
   
r
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

ANPATH GROUP, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
DELAWARE
333-123365
20-1602779
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

224 Rolling Hill Road Suite 2A Mooresville, NC 28117
 (Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

(704) 658-3350
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x  Yes   r  No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
   
Large accelerated filer  r
   
Accelerated filer                        r
   
Non-accelerated filer    r
   
Smaller reporting company      x
   
   
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  r  Yes     x  No
 
   
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  
 
 Class
 
Outstanding at February 15, 2010
Common Stock, $.0001 par value
 
16,803,654
 
 
 
 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
     
PAGE
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   
       
Item 1
 
  3
   
  3
   
  4
   
 5
   
 6
       
Item 2.
 
 18
Item 3.
 
  26
Item 4T.
 
  27
       
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
   
       
Item 1A.
 
27
Item 6.
 
  27
       
 
  28
 
 
 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ANPATH GROUP, INC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
   
Nine Months Ended
 
Year Ended
 
   
December 31, 2009
 
March 31, 2009
 
   
(unaudited)
   
(audited)
 
ASSETS
           
CURRENT ASSETS
           
Cash
 
$
134,713
   
$
11,231
 
Accounts receivable, net
   
4,228
     
10,241
 
Prepaid expenses
   
50,507
     
4,817
 
Inventory
   
     
22,354
 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
   
189,448
     
48,643
 
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
               
Furniture & fixtures
   
205,694
     
205,694
 
Machinery & equipment
   
195,137
     
195,137
 
Capitalized software
   
3,210
     
3,210
 
Less accumulated depreciation
   
(254,332
)
   
(205,676
)
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS
   
149,709
     
198,365
 
OTHER ASSETS
               
Trade secrets
   
1,026,000
     
1,026,000
 
Deposits
   
183,488
     
198,082
 
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS
   
1,209,489
     
1,224,082
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
1,548,646
   
$
1,471,090
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
               
CURRENT LIABILITIES
               
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
$
283,890
   
$
395,525
 
Accrued interest payable
   
277,439
     
135,570
 
Wages payable
   
153,340
     
188,840
 
Current maturities of long-term debt, net of discount
   
2,822,156
     
1,484,357
 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
   
3,536,825
     
2,204,292
 
LONG TERM LIABILITIES
               
Notes payable, net of discount
   
     
 
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES
   
     
 
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
   
3,536,825
     
2,204,292
 
                 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
   
-
     
-
 
                 
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
               
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized,
               
no shares issued and outstanding
   
-
     
-
 
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
               
16,803,654 and 16,203,654 shares issued and outstanding
   
1,680
     
1,620
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
29,957,783
     
28,863,063
 
Accumulated deficit
   
(31,947,642
)
   
(29,597,885
)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
   
(1,988,179
   
(733,2020
)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
               
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
$
1,548,646
   
$
1,471,090
 
 
See accompanying condensed notes to interim consolidated financial statements.
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
2009
 
2008
 
2009
   
2008
 
REVENUES
$
66,988
 
$
28,176
 
$
321,558
   
$
73,680
 
COST OF SALES
 
45,195
   
22,534
   
220,766
     
68,173
 
Gross Profit
 
21,793
   
5,642
   
100,792
     
5,507
 
EXPENSES
                         
Sales
 
60,725
   
78,889
   
187,213
     
266,425
 
Product development
 
66,825
   
91,858
   
205,690
     
301,982
 
Corporate
 
124,566
   
225,690
   
425,099
     
     592,870
 
Finance and administrative
 
85,427
   
82,886
   
319,862
     
317,148
 
Consultants
 
25,000
   
143,000
   
294,000
     
199,875
 
Compensation cost for re-pricing warrants
 
-
   
623,548
   
265,383
     
623,548
 
Financing expense
 
149,779
   
378,606
   
610,350
     
974,202
 
Total Expenses
 
512,322
   
1,624,487
   
2,307,597
     
3,276,050
 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
 
(490,529
)
 
(1,618,845
)
 
(2,206,805
)
   
(3,270,543
)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
                         
Interest expense
 
(54,265
)
 
(27,423
)
 
(142,952
)
   
(82,141
)
Other income
 
-
   
-
   
-
     
-
 
Interest income
 
-
   
-
   
-
     
6
 
Impairment of long lived assets
 
-
   
-
   
-
     
-
 
Total Other Income and Expense
 
(54,265
)
 
(27,423
)
 
(142,952
)
   
(82,141
)
LOSS BEFORE TAXES
 
(544,794
)
 
(1,646,268
)
 
(2,349,757
)
   
(3,352,678
)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
 
-
   
-
   
-
     
-
 
NET LOSS
$
(544,794
)
$
(1,646,268
)
$
(2,349,757
)
 
$
(3,352,678
)
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE
$
(0.03
)
$
(0.11
)
$
(0.14
)
 
$
(0.23
)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING,
                         
BASIC AND DILUTED
 
16,803,654
   
14,558,905
   
16,570,927
     
14,392,525
 

See accompanying condensed notes to interim consolidated financial statements.
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
 
             
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2009
   
2008
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
           
Net loss
 
$
(2,349,757
)
 
$
(3,352,678
)
Depreciation and amortization
   
48,656
     
50,241
 
Stock issued for services
   
221,000
     
143,000
 
Stock options granted and warrants issued
   
118,301
     
408,211
 
Stock options re-priced for services
   
265,384
     
408,211
 
Discount on note payable
   
469,348
     
623,549
 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operations:
               
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
   
6,013
     
(4,633
)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses
   
(45,690
)
   
79,766
 
Decrease (increase) in inventory
   
22,354
     
22,997
 
Decrease in trade secrets
   
-
     
-
 
Decrease (increase) in deposits
   
14,594
     
(17,365
)
Increase (decrease)  in accounts payable & accrued expenses
   
(111,635
)
   
461,229
 
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
   
141,869
         
Increase (decrease) in wages payable
   
(35,501
)
   
-
 
Increase (decrease) in discount on notes payable
   
-
     
-
 
Net cash used by operating activities
   
(1,235,064
)
   
(856,231
)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Net cash provided (used) in investing activities
   
-
     
-
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Proceeds from notes payable
   
1,464,334
     
319,700
 
Payment of notes payable
   
(105,788
)
   
(135,000
)
Proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrants
   
-
     
235,000
 
Proceeds from the re-pricing of warrants
   
-
     
88,560
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
   
1,358,546
     
508,260
 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
   
123,482
     
(347,971
)
CASH - Beginning of period
   
11,231
     
351,627
 
CASH - End of period
 
$
134,713
   
$
3,656
 
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
               
Interest expense
 
$
1,083
   
$
-
 
Income taxes
 
$
-
   
$
-
 

See accompanying condensed notes to interim consolidated financial statements.
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
Anpath Group, Inc. (hereinafter the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on August 26, 2004.  The principal business of the Company is a holding company. The Company’s sole subsidiary is EnviroSystems, Inc. (hereinafter “ESI”) The Company’s name was changed to Anpath Group, Inc on January 8, 2008 at a special meeting of the shareholders’ of the Company. The Company’s former name was Telecomm Sales Network, Inc. The Company’s headquarters is located in Mooresville, North Carolina. The Company’s year end is March 31.

ESI provides infection control products on an international basis through both direct sales and channels of distribution.  ESI products are currently sold to transportation, military and industrial/institutional markets. ESI products are manufactured utilizing chemical-emulsion technology, designed to make the products effective against a broad spectrum of harmful organisms while safe to people, equipment and habitat.
 
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The foregoing unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim consolidated financial information and with the instructions to Regulation S-K as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements of the Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K which was filed with the SEC on July 10, 2009. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and disclosures necessary for a fair presentation of these interim statements have been included.  All such adjustments are, in the opinion of management, of a normal recurring nature.

Operating results for the nine month period ending December 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2010.
 
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the Company's financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company's management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.
 
The following are summarized accounting policies considered to be significant by the Company's management:
 
Accounting Method
 
The Company's financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
 
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company considers all unrestricted cash, short-term deposits, and other investments with original maturities of no more than ninety days when acquired to be cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the statement of cash flows
 
Accounts Receivable
 
Accounts receivable are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within thirty days from the invoice date or as specified by the invoice and are stated at the amount billed to the customer. Customer account balances with invoices dated over ninety days or ninety days past the due date are considered delinquent.

The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reduced by a valuation allowance that reflects management's best estimate of the amount that will not be collected. Management reviews all accounts receivable balances that are considered delinquent and, based on an assessment of current credit worthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected. In addition, management periodically evaluates the adequacy of the allowance based on the Company's past experience. Allowance for doubtful accounts amounted to $-0- and $1,036 at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
 
Earnings Per Share
 
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 128 "Earnings per Share" ("SFAS 128"), which provides for calculation of "basic" and "diluted" earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings per share. Although there were common stock equivalents outstanding at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, they were not included in the calculation of earnings per share because their inclusion would have been considered anti-dilutive.
 
Provision for Taxes
 
Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS 109"). Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the "more likely than not" standard imposed by SFAS 109 to allow recognition of such an asset.
 
At December 31, 2009, the Company had net deferred tax assets calculated at an expected rate of 34% of approximately $10,862,000 (March 31, 2009 - $10,063,000) principally arising from net operating loss carry forwards and stock compensation. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the net deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset was recorded at December 31, 2009.
 
The significant components of the deferred tax asset at December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 were as follows:
 
   
December 31,
   
March 31,
 
   
2009
   
2008
 
Estimated net operating loss carry forward
 
$
31,947,000
   
$
29,598,000
 
                 
Deferred tax asset
 
$
10,862,000
   
$
10,063,000
 
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
   
(10,862,000
)
   
(10,063,000
)
Net deferred tax asset
 
$
-
   
$
-
 
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
At December 31, 2009, the Company has net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $31,947,000 ($29,598,000 in March 31, 2009), which expire in the years 2023 through 2027. The change in the allowance account from March 31, 2009 to December 31, 2009 was $799,000.
 
Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in our tax provisions. Ultimately, the actual tax benefits to be realized will be based upon future taxable earnings levels, which are very difficult to predict.

Fair Value Measurements

SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS 157"), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  On April 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 related to its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).
 
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by SFAS No. 157 are as follows:
 
Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
 
Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
 
Level 3 – Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally unobservable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management's best estimate of fair value. Level 3 instruments include those that may be more structured or otherwise tailored to the Company's needs.
 
On April 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157. We had no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Therefore, the initial adoption of SFAS 157 had no impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. On December 14, 2008 the FASB issued a proposed FASB staff position ("FSP") that would amend SFAS 157 to delay its effective date for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, that is, at least annually. For items within the scope of the proposed FSP the effective date of SFAS 157 would be delayed to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 (fiscal 2010 for the Company) and interim periods within those fiscal years. During February 2008, the FASB confirmed and made effective the FSP. The Company has chosen not to implement SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities at this time.
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
Fixed Assets

Equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the respective assets, typically 3-7 years. Major additions and betterments are capitalized. Upon retirement or disposal, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in operations.

The following table summarizes the Company's fixed assets:

   
December 31,
   
March 31,
 
   
2009
   
2009
 
Office Equipment
 
$
51,347
   
$
51,347
 
Furniture & Fixtures
   
11,825
     
11,825
 
Marketing/Trade Show Equipment
   
2,659
     
2,659
 
Manufacturing Equipment
   
195,138
     
195,138
 
Laboratory Equipment
   
139,862
     
139,138
 
Capitalized Software
   
3,210
     
3,210
 
     
404,041
     
382,230
 
Allowance for Depreciation and amortization
   
(254,332
)
   
(205,676
)
Fixed Assets, net
 
$
149,709
   
$
198,365
 

Depreciation expense for the nine month periods ending December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $48,656 and $50,241 respectively.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, depreciation expense in the amount of $-0- and $17,044 was recorded for manufacturing equipment that sat idle and is included as part of Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
 
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.

As shown in the financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and has an accumulated deficit of $31,947,642 since the inception of the Company. These factors indicate that the Company may be unable to continue in existence. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue existence. The Company anticipates its projected business plan will require a minimum of $1,000,000 to continue operations for the next twelve months.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

The Company assesses potential impairment of its long lived assets, which include its property and equipment and its identifiable intangibles such as its trade secrets under the guidance of Statement of Financial Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets.” On an annual basis, or as events and circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired, the Company assesses potential impairment of its long lived assets. The Company determines impairment by measuring the undisclosed future cash flows generated by the assets, comparing the results to the assets' carrying value and adjusting the assets to the lower of the carrying value to fair value and charging current operations for any measured impairment.

Concentration Risk

Sales to a metropolitan mass transit authority, international distributors and an airline distributor represented approximately 91.9% of our sales for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and sales to a metropolitan mass transit authority and a distributor represented approximately 72.4% of our sales for the nine months ended December 31, 2008.

The Company relied upon a single supplier to provide it with PCMX, which is the biocide used in our chemical emulsion disinfectant products. Although there are other suppliers of this material, a change in suppliers would cause a delay in the production process, which could ultimately affect operating results.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. References herein to the Company include the Company and its subsidiary, unless the context otherwise requires.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts have been reclassified from the prior financial statements for comparative purposes.
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
Revenue Recognition

Revenue is generally recognized and earned when all of the following criteria are satisfied: a) persuasive evidence of sales arrangements exists; b) delivery has occurred; c) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and d) collectability is reasonably assured.

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via a purchase order from our customers. Delivery occurs when title and all risks of ownership are transferred to the purchaser which generally occurs when the products are shipped to the customer. No right of return exists on sales of product except for defective or damaged products. The sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of purchase order. To assure that collectability is reasonably assured, credit evaluations are performed on all customers.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company measures compensation cost for its stock based compensation plans under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Accounting for Stock Based Compensations.” This statement supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and its related implementation guidance. This statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", requires companies to include expenses in net income (loss) and earnings (loss) for each issuance of options and warrants. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to value its issuance of options and warrants. 

Use of Estimates

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

 
NOTE 3 - INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of raw materials that the Company had manufactured prior to outsourcing manufacturing to our current contract manufacturer. In the nine months ended December 31, 2009, the prior raw materials were converted to finished goods in the manufacturing process and sold. At December 31, 2009 we had no inventories on hand. Inventories consist of the following:
 
   
December 31,
   
March 31,
 
   
2009
   
2009
 
Raw material
 
$
-
   
$
22,354
 
Finished goods
   
-
     
-
 
Allowance for obsolescence
   
-
     
-
 
Inventory, net
 
$
-
   
$
22,354
 
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
NOTE 4 - NOTES, LOANS AND CONVERTIBLE DEBT

Notes payable consists of the following:

       
   
December 31, 2009
   
March 31, 2009
 
7% note due July 8, 2010 payable to ANPG Lending, LLC
 
$
1,500,000
   
$
1,500,000
 
8% notes due from April 7, 2010 through December 24, 2010 payable to unrelated individuals
   
1,410,000
     
-
 
6% notes due on or before May 10, 2009 payable to our CEO
   
93,700
     
102,210
 
6% notes due on or before February 24, 2009 payable to Arthur Douglas & Associates
   
85,000
     
85,000
 
5.95% note due in 10 installments of $5,583 payable to FlatIron Capital
   
22,056
     
-
 
6% notes due December 29, 2008 payable to our CFO
   
6,000
     
6,000
 
10% note due April 8, 2009 payable to an unrelated individual
   
-
     
25,000
 
10% note due September 10, 2009 payable to an unrelated individual
   
-
     
20,000
 
10% note due September 24, 2009 payable to an unrelated individual
   
-
     
20,000
 
Discount on notes payable
   
(294,600
)
   
(273,853
)
   
$
2,822,156
   
$
1,484,357
 

Current Year Financing
During the nine months ended December 31, 2009 the Company borrowed from various parties the aggregate amount of $1,410,000. These loans mature from April 7, 2010 through December 24, 2010 and have a mandatory conversion into common stock of the Company from April 7, 2010 through December 24, 2010. These loans bear interest of 8% payable at maturity. Each note is convertible into common stock of the Company at an initial conversion rate $.50 per share. The actual conversion rate will be based on the previous 20 trading day average price of our common stock. The conversion rate cannot be more than $0.50 or less than $0.20. The loans are initially convertible into 2,820,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Detachable warrants were also issued with each note giving the holder the right to purchase an aggregate 2,820,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise rice of $.75 per share.

In accordance with EITF 00-27, the Company recognized the beneficial conversion feature associated with the notes convertibility into shares and warrants. The total value of warrants was determined using the Black Scholes Option Price Calculation. In employing this model, the following assumptions were used the actual three month T-Bill rate on the advance dates for the risk-free rate. The actual share price on advance dates; expected volatility of 67.36%, no dividends and a five year horizon in all Black Scholes Option Price calculations. The total value of warrants was $490,097 and the total value of shares was $-0-.

Following the guidance provided by EITF 00-27 the Company allocated proceeds first to the warrants issuable upon conversion of the note. The value of the warrants was recorded on the balance sheet as debt discounts and increases to shareholder’s equity. The debt discounts are being amortized over the remaining life of the convertible note.
 
March 31, 2009 Financing
During the year ended March 31, 2009 the Company borrowed from various parties the aggregate amount of $393,210. These loans are due on demand after 90 days and bear interest of 6% to 10% payable at maturity. Each note is convertible into common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $.20 to $.88 per share. The loans are initially convertible into 697,966 shares of the Company’s common stock. Detachable warrants were also issued with each note giving the holder the right to purchase an aggregate 512,966 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise rice of $.20 to $.88 per share. During the year ended March 31, 2009, $135,000 of these loans were converted into 675,000 shares of common stock. During the nine months ended December 31, 2009, $73,510 of these loans were retired.
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
In accordance with EITF 00-27, the Company recognized the beneficial conversion feature associated with the notes convertibility into shares and warrants. The total value of warrants was determined using the Black Scholes Option Price Calculation. In employing this model, the following assumptions were used the actual three month T-Bill rate on the advance dates for the risk-free rate. The actual share price on advance dates; expected volatility of 67.36%, no dividends and a five year horizon in all Black Scholes Option Price calculations. The total value of warrants was $122,173 and the total value of shares was $73,142.

Following the guidance provided by EITF 00-27 the Company allocated proceeds first to the warrants issuable upon conversion of the note. The value of the warrants was recorded on the balance sheet as debt discounts and increases to shareholder’s equity. The debt discounts are being amortized over the remaining life of the convertible note.

ANPG Lending, LLC
On January 8, 2008, the Company completed a financing transaction with ANPG Lending, LLC, (the “LLC”) pursuant to the terms of a Loan and Security Agreement by and between the Company and the LLC.  Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company issued to the LLC convertible promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000. The Loan Agreement also provides that the LLC may make up to an additional $500,000 in advances to the Company in the discretion of the LLC.  In addition to the Notes, the Company issued to the LLC warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The Warrants have terms of 5 years and are exercisable at an initial exercise price $0.87 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.  

Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company granted to the LLC a security interest in the Company’s assets and properties to secure the Company’s obligations under the Notes to the LLC.  

As a condition to obtaining the Financing, the Company entered into a Securities Repurchase Agreement by and between the Company, the LLC and the Singer Children’s Management Trust (the “Trust”) pursuant to which the Company repurchased from the Trust 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $625,000.  The Company used $625,000 from the LLC to pay the purchase price for the Securities and used $30,000 to pay the lenders legal expenses of the transaction. Pursuant to the Repurchase Agreement, the Company issued to the LLC three additional Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 750,000 shares of our common stock. The Warrants have terms of 5 years and are exercisable at an initial exercise price $0.87 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.  The warrants can be exercised using a cashless exercise exchange and will automatically be exercised at the termination of the term if the price of the Company’s common stock on such date is above $0.87 per share, subject to certain adjustments.

As a result of the foregoing transactions, the Company was able to obtain net proceeds of approximately $845,000 to be used for general working capital purposes.  

The Notes are due and payable on July 8, 2009.  The Notes bear interest at a rate of 7% per annum and interest accrues and is payable on the maturity date of the Notes.  The Notes are convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at an initial conversion price of $0.87.  The conversion price is subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.  
 
In accordance with EITF 00-27, the Company recognized the beneficial conversion feature associated with the notes convertibility into shares and warrants. The total value of warrants was determined using the Black Scholes Option Price Calculation. In employing this model, the following assumptions were used the actual three month T-Bill rate on the advance dates for the risk-free rate; the actual share price on advance dates; expected volatility of 63%, no dividends and a five year horizon in all Black Scholes Option Price calculations. The total value of warrants was $778,500 and the total value of shares was $721,500.

Following the guidance provided by EITF 00-27 the Company allocated proceeds first to the warrants issuable upon conversion of the note. The value of the warrants was recorded on the balance sheet as debt discounts and increases to shareholder’s equity. The debt discounts are being amortized over the remaining life of the convertible note. The value of warrants in excess of the actual debt advance amounts were expensed as financing fees.

 Forbearance Agreement with ANPG Lending, LLC
On September 26, 2009 the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of the 1,500,000 warrants outstanding to ANPG Lending LLC to $0.20 in exchange for ANPG Lending LLC agreeing to extend the maturity date of the loans aggregating $1,500,000 from July 8, 2009 to September 8, 2009. A subsequent forbearance agreement was signed extending the maturity date of the loans to March 31, 2010.

 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
NOTE 5 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases
 
The Company has formal operating leases for all of its office and laboratory space. The Company has entered into a new three year office lease agreement to begin October 1, 2009 for an office/warehouse combination in Mooresville, NC. Lease payments under the new office lease will be $2,695 per month for the first year and increases 3% for each subsequent year.

Rent expense relating to operating spaces leased was approximately $43,433 and $64,328 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 
   
Payments Due by Period
 Contractual Obligations
 
Total
   
Less than 1 year
   
1-3 years
   
4-5 years
 
After 5 years
Office Lease
 
$
89,180
   
$
32,664
   
$
56,516
   
$
-
 
$
-
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
 
$
89,180
   
$
32,664
   
$
56,516
   
$
-
 
$
-
 
NOTE 6 - PREFERRED STOCK AND COMMON STOCK

Preferred Stock
 
As of December 31, 2009, no preferred stock has been issued by the Company.

Common Stock
 
On October 1, 2008, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Arthur Douglas and Associates, Inc for investment relations services. The Company agreed to pay compensation to Arthur Douglas and Associates, Inc of 100,000 shares of restricted common stock per month for a period of 12 months. During the nine months ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 600,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $221,000 to Arthur Douglas and Associates.

 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
NOTE 7 - STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS

The following is a summary of all common stock warrant activity during the year ended March 31, 2009 and the nine months ended December 31, 2009:

   
Number of
Shares Under Warrants
   
Exercise Price
Per Share
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Warrants issued and exercisable at: March 31, 2008
   
7,940,342
   
$
.87-5.00
   
$
2.25
 
Warrants issued
   
626,600
     
0.20-0.88
     
1.97
 
Warrants expired
   
(248,928
)
   
5.00
     
5.00
 
Warrants exercised
   
(675,000
)
   
0.20
     
0.20
 
Warrants issued and exercisable at: March 31, 2009
   
7,643,014
   
$
0.20-5.00
   
$
2.25
 
Warrants issued
   
3,288,500
     
0.75
     
0.75
 
Warrants expired
   
(3,914
)
   
5.00
     
5.00
 
Warrants exercised
   
-
     
-
     
-
 
Warrants issued and exercisable at: December 31, 2009
   
10,927,600
   
$
0.20-5.00
   
$
1.22
 

The following represents additional information related to common stock warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2009:

     
Outstanding and Exercisable
 
Range of Exercise Price
   
Number of
Shares Under
Warrants
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contract Life in
Years
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
$
0.20 – 2.50
     
2,762,500
 
0.22
 
$
1.24
 
$
       2.70
     
2,500,000
 
2.52
   
2.70
 
$
0.20 – 0.88
     
2,226,930
 
3.16
   
0.30
 
$
0.20 - 0.88
     
3,438,170
 
4.46
   
.73
 
Total
     
10,927,600
 
2.68
   
1.22
 

The Company used the Black-Scholes option price calculation to value the warrants issued during the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and the year ending March 31, 2009 using the following assumptions: risk-free rate of 0.25-4.50%; volatility of 63% to 67; zero dividend yield; the actual exercise term of the warrants issued and the exercise price of warrants issued.

 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
NOTE 8 - EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

The Company has two stock option plans: (a) the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and (b) the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan which both have been approved by both the Board of Directors and the shareholders. An aggregate amount of common stock that may be awarded and purchased under the Plans is 3,700,000 shares of the Company's common stock.

The exercise price for incentive stock options granted under the 2006 and 2004 Plans may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted, except for options granted to 10% stockholders which must have an exercise price of not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. The exercise price for non-statutory options is determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Incentive stock options granted under the plans have a maximum term of ten years, except for grants to 10% stockholders which are subject to a maximum term of five years. The term of non-statutory stock options is determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Options granted under the plans are not transferable, except by will and the laws of descent and distribution.

Under the Plans during the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company granted 1,390,000 and 42,000 stock options to employees and directors. The options were granted with an exercise prices $0.63-0.24 and will fully vest from one to four years of service. The options were valued using the fair value method as prescribed by SFAS No. 123 (R), resulting in a total value associated with these options for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and the year ended March 31, 2009 of $187,655 and $15,000. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R), this amount will be accrued to compensation expense over the expected service term as vested. The accrued compensation expense related to these options for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is $118,302 and $148,095 and has been expensed in the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively pursuant to the application of SFAS No. 123(R), and credited to additional paid-in capital.

As of December 31, 2009 there were 920,000 remaining options available to be issued in the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan.

The following is a summary of all common stock option activity during the year ended March 31, 2009 and the nine months ended December 31, 2009:
 
   
Shares Under
Options
Outstanding
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Options outstanding at March 31, 2008
   
2,676,455
   
$
2.73
 
Options granted
   
42,000
     
0.63
 
Options expired
   
(1,169,903
)
   
3.01
 
Options exercised
   
-
     
-
 
Options outstanding at March 31, 2009
   
1,548,552
     
2.49
 
Options granted
   
1,390,000
     
0.24
 
Options expired
   
-
     
-
 
Options exercised
   
-
     
-
 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009
   
2,938,552
   
$
1.42
 
 
   
Options
Exercisable
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
 
Options exercisable at March 31, 2009
   
1,548,552
   
$
2.49
 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2009
   
1,496,052
   
$
2.50
 
 
 
ANPATH GROUP, INC
CONDENSED NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009
 
The following represents additional information related to common stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2009:

Range
of
Exercise
Price
   
Number
Outstanding at
December 31,
2009
   
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
Years
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
(Total
Shares)
   
Number
Exercisable
At
December 31,
2009
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
(Exercisable
Shares)
 
$
3.40
     
63,854
     
4.84
   
$
3.40
     
63,854
   
$
3.40
 
$
5.00
     
72,333
     
0.88
   
$
5.00
     
72,333
   
$
5.00
 
$
1.61 - 2.95
     
22,365
     
6.45
   
$
2.06
     
22,365
   
$
2.06
 
$
2.00 - 2.85
     
1,390,000
     
3.55
   
$
2.32
     
1,337,500
   
$
2.32
 
$
0.24
     
1,390,000
     
9.33
   
$
0.24
     
-
   
$
-
 
$
0.63 - 5.00
     
2,938,552
     
6.27
   
$
1.42
     
1,496,052
   
$
2.50
 

Total compensation cost related to non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 was $247,455 and $263,362, respectively.

Weighted average period of non-vested stock options was 9.24 years as of December 31, 2009.

The Company used the Black-Scholes option price calculation to value the options granted in the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and the year ended March 31, 2009 using the following assumptions: risk-free rate of 1% to 4.5%; volatility of 63% to 67%; zero dividend yield; half the actual term and exercise price of options granted.
 
NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Our CFO, and a member of our Board of Directors, is a 5% owner and CFO of Mastodon Ventures, Inc. Mastodon provides office space and incidentals for our CFO at no cost to the Company. On April 20, 2009 the Company paid Mastodon $30,000 for consulting services in connection with advising the Company in financing matters.
 
 
During the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company’s CEO, made loans to the Company in the amount of $102,210.  The loans are due on demand after 90 days and bear interest at 6%. In addition, the Company issued to the CEO five year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 116,146 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. During the nine months ended December 31, 2009, the Company paid $8,510 to the CEO in repayment of these loans and $150 in accrued interest. At December 31, 2009 the balance owed to the CEO on these loans was $93,700 plus accrued interest of $7,086.

On December 31, 2008, the Company’s CFO, made a loan to the Company in the amounts of $6,000.  The loan is due on demand after 90 days and bear interest at 6%. In addition, the Company issued to the CFO a five year warrant to purchase up to an aggregate of 6,818 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. At December 31, 2009 the balance owed to the CFO on this loan was $6,000 plus accrued interest of $457.

At December 31, 2009 the CEO and CFO have deferred their salaries in the amount $87,083 and $52,506, respectively.



CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report contains certain financial information and statements regarding our operations and financial prospects of a forward-looking nature. Although these statements accurately reflect management’s current understanding and beliefs, we caution you that certain important factors may affect our actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements which may be deemed to be made in this Report. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Report which are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “may”, “intend”, “expect”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “could”, “estimate”, “plan”, or “continue” or the negative variations of these words or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance of any kind that such forward-looking information and statements in any way reflect our actual future operations and/or financial results, and any of such information and statements should not be relied upon either in whole or in part in any decision to invest in the shares. Many of the factors, which could cause actual results to differ from forward looking statements, are outside our control. These factors include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General
 
Anpath Group, Inc. (“Anpath”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”) through our wholly-owned subsidiary EnviroSystems, Inc. (“ESI”), produces disinfecting, sanitizing and cleaning products designed to help prevent the spread of infectious microorganisms, while minimizing the harmful effects to people, application surfaces and the environment.  We believe that the ability to destroy a wide-range of disease-causing microorganisms combined with a favorable profile for health and environmental effects makes our products ideal for use in a wide range of applications/markets that are in need of disinfection/cleaning products that are safe to use and non-toxic.
 
We are directed by our mission to “Provide a healthier today and a safer tomorrow through knowledgeable people and innovative infection prevention, decontamination, and health science technologies, products, and services.”  We intend to utilize our technology and resources to develop products that reduce biological risks without introducing the attendant chemical risks that are so prevalent today.
 
It is this focus on developing safe infection prevention technologies that we believe will position us in the forefront of the industry at a time when there is rapidly growing awareness of the critical need to prevent biological risks — both natural and man-made.
 
Our headquarters is located at 1224 Rolling Hill Road, Suite 2A, Mooresville, North Carolina 28117. Our telephone number is (704) 658-3350.
 
Primary Technology Platform

We have developed and have trade secret rights to what we believe to be a unique and proprietary Parachlorometaxylenol (more commonly known as PCMX) based chemical emulsion biocide technology platform.  PCMX has been widely used as an antimicrobial in surgical hand and skin scrubs.  Based on this technology, we have developed a portfolio of efficacious disinfectants/sanitizers/cleaners that achieve bio-decontamination without using toxic & corrosive chemicals.  Our PCMX chemical emulsion biocides have the following characteristics:
 
 
·
They kill a wide range of infectious microorganism, including MRSA;
 
 
·
They minimize harmful effects to people (EnviroTru®/EnviroTru® 1453  meet Environmental Protection Agency requirements for Toxicity Category IV) and do not cause skin, eye, pulmonary, oral or dermal irritation;
 
 
·
They are non-corrosive (EnviroTru®/EnviroTru® 1453 are included in the Boeing Qualified Products List (QPL) and conform with AMS-1452A, 1453 & D6-7127 Aircraft Corrosion Specifications); and
 
In addition to the foregoing benefits, we also believe that our proprietary PCMX chemical emulsion biocide technology will act as a barrier to competition.
 
 
Product Categories
 
We believe that the concept of an easy-to-use and effective line of decontaminants that fits with a favorable environmental profile offers us a unique opportunity to differentiate our products in multiple infection prevention markets. It is our intention to use the unique characteristics of our chemical emulsion technology to build acceptance of our decontaminants as an alternative which is significantly different from other biocidal products that currently dominate the marketplace.  We are exploiting our technology platform to establish a broad product portfolio in the following categories:
 
·  
Surface care products - disinfectants, sanitizers and cleaners (including wipes);
 
·  
Geo Biocides – biocides for use in the oil and gas industry.

·  
Animal care products - skin and hoof care treatment and animal shampoo;
 
·  
Personal care products – antimicrobial hand soaps, hand sanitizers and facial scrubs (including wipes); and
 
 
Surface Care Products
 
We believe that convenience, safety, the effect on air quality and environmental responsibility are increasingly playing a greater role in the buying decision for surface cleaners/disinfectants. We believe that consumers in general have become more health conscious and at the same time have grown more concerned about the effect that traditional cleaners/disinfectants have on internal and external environments.  Often consumers are required to settle for a trade-off between effectiveness and environmental friendliness.  We believe that our surface care products will provide consumers with products that are both efficacious and safe for the environment.
 
Our surface care products include the following.
 
·  
EnviroTru® Disinfectant & Cleaner Deodorizer, which is a multi-purpose, ready-to-use disinfectant, sanitizer and deodorizing cleaner for use on hard surfaces. EnviroTru® is effective against numerous organisms without causing any adverse effects to surfaces, humans or the environment. EnviroTru® is registered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and meets EPA requirements for Toxicity Category IV (minimal effects noted, no precautionary or first aid statements required; no harmful dermal, ocular, inhalation or ingestion effects). EnviroTru® also conforms to AMS 1452A, AMS 1453 and Boeing D6-7127 specifications for non-corrosion and materials compatibility. EnviroTru® has no special handling requirements, does not require protective clothing, gloves or special ventilation and is non-flammable.
 
 
EnviroTru® is also effective for use in animal housing facilities, including veterinary clinics, farms, equine farms, kennels, livestock houses, swine houses, poultry houses and laboratories.  When used as directed, EnviroTru® will clean, deodorize and disinfect veterinary feeding and watering equipment, utensils, instruments, cages, kennels, stables, catteries, etc.
 
·  
EnviroTru® 1453 Disinfectant & Cleaner Deodorizer, which is a multi-purpose, ready-to-use disinfectant, sanitizer and deodorizing cleaner for use on aircraft hard surfaces, including exterior and interior surfaces such as cabins, toilets, sinks, faucets, counter tops and luggage compartments. EnviroTru®1453 conforms to AMS 1452A, AMS 1453 and Boeing D6-7127 specifications for non-corrosion and materials compatibility. EnviroTru®1453 is registered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and meets EPA requirements for Toxicity Category IV (minimal effects noted, no precautionary or first aid statements required; no harmful dermal, ocular, inhalation or ingestion effects).  EnviroTru®1453 has no special handling requirements, does not require protective clothing, gloves or special ventilation and is non-flammable.
 
·  
SurfaceTru Deodorizing Cleaner, which is a powerful, multi-purpose cleaner and deodorizer that’s safe for use on a variety of surfaces.  SurfaceTru™ is effective for removing dirt and grime and is gentle to application surfaces, safe for the user and friendly to the environment. It has no special handling requirements, does not require protective clothing, gloves or special ventilation and is non-flammable.
 
·  
SurfaceTru Cleaning & Deodorizing Wipes, which are powerful cleaning and deodorizing wipes that are packaged in their own individual foil wrappers for easy portability. Each wipe opens to a large, 9” x 8” durable cloth with a smooth finish that can be conveniently used on a variety of surfaces. SurfaceTru™ Wipes can be carried with you for use when an immediate need for an effective, yet gentle cleaner arises.
 
·  
Electrostatic Sprayers.   In addition to the foregoing products, we also market electrostatic sprayers produced by Electrostatic Spraying Systems, Inc. (“ESS”) which may be used to apply our liquid surface care products to the target surfaces. Electrostatic sprayers provide superior spray coverage by more effectively dispensing solutions compared to conventional sprayers; tests have demonstrated 4-10 times better coverage. Electrostatic sprayers operate by producing highly charged spray droplets using a unique embedded induction electrode design. This induction charging results in spray droplets that have a force of attraction that is 75 times that of gravity. This means droplets will reverse direction and move upwards, against gravity, to coat hidden surfaces, and wrap around objects resulting in complete, even coverage of the target. When using an electrostatic sprayer it is possible to deliver ESI’s liquid disinfectants and cleaners to difficult to reach locations that may harbor disease-causing microorganisms.
 
 
In October 2008, we announced that ESI entered into a prime distributor agreement with ESS.  Using ESS electrostatic sprayers in conjunction with our EnviroTru® Disinfectant Cleaner creates an electrostatically charged decontamination system which provides an efficient system to quickly administer EnviroTru® Disinfectant Cleaner to large areas, difficult to reach spaces, or to high-traffic areas that require frequent treatment. This system substantially improves the bio-availability of EnviroTru®.  The result is reduced manpower costs and simultaneously improved coverage, reducing the threat of disease-causing microorganisms.  In summary, the system offers an extremely efficient, cost-effective way to realize the advantages of EnviroTru®.
 
Future Surface Care Products
 
We are conducting research and development and are planning to reintroduce a hospital grade disinfectant product to replace one of our earlier products called EcoTru®.  The reformulated disinfectant is expected to demonstrate through testing that it will effectively kill numerous bacteria, fungi, and viruses, including MRSA, Hepatitis B and C, HIV, herpes and influenza. Likewise, in addition to being highly effective as a disinfectant, our reformulated hospital grade product is expected to occupy a unique position in the market place, combining this microbial effectiveness in a disinfectant product which will also have a favorable profile for health and environmental effects.
 
Geo Biocides
 
In response to requests from members of the oil & gas industry for a non-toxic but effective disinfectant to replace toxic biocides used in hydraulic fracturing, we developed GeoTru™ Concentrate Biocide designed to be used as a “down-hole” biocide in the oil & gas industry.  GeoTru™ Concentrate is a surfactant-based anionic chemistry with extended shelf life that is effective when used under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.  It is active over a wide pH range and is non-oxidizing and nonreactive with other down-hole chemistries and designed to be used particularly in hydraulic fracturing. In February 2010 we received our first commercial order for our GeoTru™ Concentrate Biocide.

Animal Care Products
 
We believe that the microorganism killing properties of our products, combined with their safety profile, make them ideally suited for use as a topical treatment for skin ailments caused by microorganisms.  We have worked to develop products for use on animals and have focused initially on the equine market with the introduction of EquineTru® Skin and Hoof Treatment.  EquineTru® Skin & Hoof Treatment is an antiseptic that may be used to rapidly, safely and effectively treat common skin and hoof conditions caused by microorganisms without irritating a horse’s skin or drying out its hoofs.  The active ingredient used in EquineTru® Skin and Hoof Treatment, PCMX, has been widely used as an antimicrobial in surgical hand and skin scrubs and it is successfully used as a topical antiseptic for skin and mucous membranes.  It is also used as a fungicide in a variety of applications.  EquineTru® Skin and Hoof Treatment has been reviewed and cleared for market by the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), a division of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Its use is permitted for United States Equestrian Federation (USEF) and Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) regulated competitions.
 
Future Animal Care Product Considerations
 
We are working on developing several variations of EquineTru® Skin and Hoof Treatment for specific application, an animal shampoo and skin treatments for household pets.
 
Personal Care Products
 
Personal care products such as antimicrobial hand soaps and hand sanitizers have traditionally been purchased by hospitals and health clinics.  However, due to an increased awareness of germs and transmission of disease, individual consumers as well as institutional buyers such as health clubs, schools, restaurants and grocery stores are increasingly purchasing these products.  These consumers, however, appear to have little understanding of the benefits and/or adverse consequences of the products they choose.
 
In response to what we believe will be an increasing market for these products, we are developing our KeraTru Personal Care line of products which will include hand sanitizers and antimicrobial soaps.  Our KeraTru personal care line of products are safe and include several alcohol free products and we believe that they are more than or as effective as the leading brands.
 
 
Results of Operations

Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2008

Revenues.  Our revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $66,988 and $28,176, respectively.  This is an increase of $38,812. This increase is directly attributive to repeat orders from our distributors, orders from new distributors and from increased market demand. Our products initially become available for sale in September 2008.

Revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were composed of the following:
 
   
Three Months Ended December 31,
 
Products
 
2009
   
2008
 
Electro-Static Sprayer
   
11.2
%
   
42.6
%
SurfaceTru® Cleaning & Deodorizing Wipes
   
0.5
%
   
19.1
%
EnviroTru® and EnviroTru 1453®
   
97.5
%
   
35.7
%
EquineTru®
   
0.8
%
   
2.6
%

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $45,195 and $22,534, respectively.  As a percentage of revenues, for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, cost of sales represented 67.47% and 79.98% of revenues, respectively.  Cost of sales on revenues from sales of the Electro-Static Sprayers is a higher percentage of revenues than our other products.

Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $512,322 and $2,307,597, respectively, a decrease of $1,795,275 or 78%.  Individual components of the change in operating expenses are as follows:

·  
Sales expense decrease of $18,164 or 23.02% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Product development expense decrease of $25,033 or 27.25% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Corporate expense decrease of $101,124 or 44.81% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Finance and administrative expense increase of $2,541 or 3.07% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Consultant expense decrease of $118,000 or 82.52% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Compensation cost for re-pricing warrants decrease of $623,548 or 100% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Financing expense decrease of $228,827 or 60.44% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

Sales. The decrease in sales expense for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008 is attributed to a decrease of one employee and associated benefits of $9,689 and a reduction of office lease cost of $6,155. Various other cost had a net decrease of $2,320 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008.

Product Developement. The decrease in product development expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008 is attributed to a decrease of one employee and associated benefits of $17,762 and a reduction of product testing cost of $3,395 and a decrease in compensation cost of options awards of $5,316. Various other cost had a net increase of $1,440 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008.

Corporate. The decrease in corporate expense for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008 is attributed to a decrease in legal fees of $97,871, and a decrease in idle process depreciation of machinery of $8,522. Various other cost had a net increase of $5,269 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008.
 
 
Finance and Administrative. The were no significant increases or decreases in finance and administrative expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008.  Various cost had a net increase of $2,541 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008.

Consulting. Consultants are usually compensated through the issuance of restricted stock or the issuance of common stock warrants. Consulting cost decreased to $25,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $143,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $118,000.  Cash was paid for consulting services for the three months ended December 31, 2009 in the amount of $25,000. Restricted stock was issued in the three months ended December 31, 2008 in the amounts of $143,000.

Compensation Cost for Re-Pricing Warrants. Warrants were re-priced in the three months ended December 31, 2008 at a cost of $623,548. No warrants were re-priced in the three months ended December 31, 2009.

Financing Expense. Financing cost decreased to $149,779 from $378,606 for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, a decrease of $228,827. The decrease is attributed to a reduced amount of financing with convertible debt and detachable warrants.

Nine Months Ended December 31, 2009 compared to Six Months Ended December 31, 2008

Revenues.  Our revenues for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $321,558 and $73,680, respectively.  This is an increase of $247,878. This increase is directly attributive to repeat orders from our distributors, orders from new distributors and increased market demand. Our products initially become available for sale in September 2008.

Revenues for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were composed of the following:
 
   
Six Months Ended December 31,
 
Products
 
2009
   
2008
 
Electro-Static Sprayer
   
9.6
%
   
21.8
%
SurfaceTru® Cleaning & Deodorizing Wipes
   
0.3
%
   
32.3
%
EnviroTru® and EnviroTru 1453®
   
89.6
%
   
42.9
%
EquineTru®
   
0.5
%
   
3.00
%

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $220,766 and $68,173, respectively.  As a percentage of revenues, for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, cost of sales represented 68.66% and 92.53% of revenues, respectively.  Cost of sales for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 includes an additional $22,354 and $22,997 in raw materials that the Company provided to our contract manufacture. This additional cost included in cost of sales material was produced prior to our current contract manufacturing contract. Under our current contract our manufacturer is to provide all raw materials cost. Cost of sales adjusted for these additional amounts for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 would be $153,217 and $26,927 and would represent 61.70% and 61.31% of revenues, respectively. At December 31, 2009 the Company did not have any further raw materials on hand.

Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $2,307,597 and $3,276,050, respectively, a decrease of $968,453 or 29.6%.  Individual components of the change in operating expenses are as follows:

·  
Sales expense decrease of $79,212 or 29.73% for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Product development expense decrease of $96,292 or 30.96% for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Corporate expense decrease of $167,771 or 28.30% for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Finance and administrative expense increase of $2,714 or 0.09% for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Consultant expense increase of $94,125 or 47.09% for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Compensation cost for re-pricing warrants decrease of $358,165 or 57.44% for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
·  
Financing expense decrease of $363,852 or 37.35% for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
 

 
Sales. The decrease in sales expense for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008 is attributed to a decrease of one employee and associated benefits of $24,635, a reduction of office lease cost of $15,220, and an effort to reduce and control travel, trade show and advertising expenses by the department of $24,201. Various other cost had a net decrease of $15,156 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008.

Product Developement. The decrease in product development expenses for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008 is attributed to a decrease of one employee and associated benefits of $63,384 and a reduction of product testing cost of $14,525 and a decrease in compensation cost of options awards of $15,948. Various other cost had a net decrease of $2,435 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008.

Corporate. The decrease in corporate expense for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008 is attributed to a decrease in legal fees of $113,112, a decrease in annual meeting cost of $8,570, a decrease in idle process depreciation of machinery of $25,566, an increase in travel and entertainment expenses of $11,992 and a decrease in office lease cost of $14,933. Various other cost had a net increase of $17,582 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared to 2008.

Consulting. Consultants are usually compensated through the issuance of restricted stock or the issuance of common stock warrants. Consulting cost increased to $294,000 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $199,875 for the nine months ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $94,125.  Restricted stock was issued in the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 in the amounts of $269,000 and $199,875. A portion of the increase is attributed to the intrinsic cost of issuing Stock warrants which are calculated using the Black-Scholes Option pricing model. Expenses related to the Black-Scholes valuation method in the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $269,000 and $199,875, respectively.  In the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 we paid cash compensation of $25,000 and $-0-, respectively.

Compensation Cost for Re-Pricing Warrants. Compensation Cost for Re-Pricing Warrants decreased to $265,383 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $623,548 for nine months ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $358,165.

Financing Expense. Financing cost decreased to $610,350 from $974,202 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, a decrease of $363,852. The decrease is attributed to a reduced amount of financing with convertible debt and detachable warrants.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the nine months ended December 31, 2009, we used net cash of $1,235,064 in operating activities, compared with $856,231 of net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2008, in comparison to the same period in the prior year, this is an increase in net cash used in operating activities of $378,833 from the prior.

We had net cash provided by financing activities of $1,358,546 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared with $508,260 provided by financing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2008. Cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2009, includes $1,464,334 from the issuance of note payables and the payment of notes payables of $105,788. Cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 includes $323,560 from the exercise of warrants and issuance of common stock as well as $319,700 from the issuance of note payables.

At December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents available in the amounts of $134,713 and $11,231, an increase of $11,231.

Subsequent to December 31, 2009 we are actively seeking to raise up to $4,000,000 in a private placement of our common stock.
 

 
Contractual Obligations

We have entered into a lease agreement for an office lease beginning October 1, 2009. The office lease requires us to pay $99,960 over a three year period beginning. We have an option to extend this lease for an additional year. The office is located in Mooresville, NC.

Effective August 1, 2006, EnviroSystems, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, which we refer to as ESI, entered into a manufacturing agreement with Minntech Corporation, a Minnesota corporation pursuant to which Minntech has agreed to be the exclusive U.S. manufacturer of EnviroSystems' liquid products.

The Manufacturing Agreement provides the terms and conditions pursuant to which Minntech will manufacture and supply to ESI all of ESI's requirements for its products.  Manufacturing of our products commenced in September 2008. The Manufacturing Agreement has a term of three years commencing after the first shipment of commercial quantities of the Product by Minntech to ESI, provides for automatic one year renewals if not terminated by one of the parties. The Manufacturing Agreement may be terminated by either party upon 90 days prior written notice.

 
   
Payments Due by Period
 Contractual Obligations
 
Total
   
Less than 1 year
   
1-3 years
   
4-5 years
 
After 5 years
Office Lease
 
$
89,180
   
$
32,664
   
$
56,516
   
$
-
 
$
-
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
 
$
89,180
   
$
32,664
   
$
56,516
   
$
-
 
$
-
 
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements. These statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of estimates in preparation of financial statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, based on historical experience, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following critical accounting policies rely upon assumptions, judgments and estimates and were used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

Trade Secret

The recorded value of the Company’s trade secret relating to the formula/formulation of ESI’s products at the time acquired by the Company was based upon the valuation of an independent appraiser. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company has determined that its trade secret has an indefinite life. Accordingly, it is not subject to amortization, but is subject to the Company’s annual assessment of prospective impairment. As of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009 no impairment of this trade secret was deemed necessary.
 
 
Impairment of Long Lived Assets

We assess potential impairment of our long lived assets, which include our property and equipment and our identifiable intangibles such as our trade secrets under the guidance of Statement of Financial Standards No. 144  Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets.   Once annually, or as events and circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired, we assess potential impairment of our long lived assets. We determine impairment by measuring the undisclosed future cash flows generated by the assets, comparing the results to the assets' carrying value and adjusting the assets to the lower of the carrying value to fair value and charging currant operations for any measured impairment.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is generally recognized and earned when all of the following criteria are satisfied: a) persuasive evidence of sales arrangements exists; b) delivery has occurred; c) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and d) collectability is reasonably assured.

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via a purchase order from our customers. Delivery occurs when title and all risks of ownership are transferred to the purchaser which generally occurs when the products are shipped to the customer. No right of return exists on sales of product except for defective or damaged products. The sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of purchase order. To assure that collectability is reasonably assured we perform ongoing credit evaluations of all of our customers.
 
Contingent Liability

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 14, we may have certain contingent liabilities with respect to material existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. We accrue liabilities when it is probable that future cost will be incurred and such cost can be measured.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information required by this Item.
 
 
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

In connection with the preparation of this Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by the Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)).  Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.  Based on such evaluation, and in light of the previously identified material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, as of March 31, 2009, relating to the lack of appropriate accounting policies and related procedures described in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective. 

(b) Changes to Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors described in Part I, Item 1A-Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.

Item 6. Exhibits
 
 
Exhibit 31.1
 
     
Exhibit 31.2
 
     
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 
 
 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
 
 
Anpath Group, Inc.
   
February 16, 2010
By: /s/ J. Lloyd Breedlove                 
 
J. Lloyd Breedlove
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 



EXHIBIT INDEX

 
Exhibit 31.1
 
Certification of the CEO Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
Exhibit 31.2
 
Certificate of the CFO Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
Exhibit 32
 
Certification of the CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.