QSAM Biosciences, Inc. - Annual Report: 2010 (Form 10-K)

anpath10k033110.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10K

ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: March 31, 2010

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

ANPATH GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	333-123365	20-1602779
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(Commission File Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

224 Rolling Hill Dr, Suite 2A, Mooresville, North Carolina 28117

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

704-658-3350

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes ý No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. ¨ Yes ý No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý Yes ¨ No

Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10K or any amendment to this Form 10K. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes ý No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on September 30, 2009 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), by reference to the price at which the voting stock was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such voting stock, was $7,228,250.

On July 13, 2010, the registrant had 17,466,295 shares of common outstanding.

Documents incorporated by reference: None.

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC.

FORM 10K

INDEX

		PAGE
PART I
Item 1.	Business.	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	14
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.	21
Item 2.	Properties.	21
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.	22
Item 4.	Reserved.	22

PART II
Item 5.	Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.	22
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.	23
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	23
Item 8.	Financial Statements.	30
Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.	30
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.	30
Item 9B.	Other Information.	32

PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.	32
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.	36
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.	40
Item 13.	Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence.	41
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services.	42

PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules	42
Signatures

Table of Contents

PART I

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10K (including the Exhibits hereto) contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business operations. Such statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical fact. Accordingly, statements that are based on management's projections, estimates, assumptions and judgments are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "plan," "estimate," "approximately," "intend," and other similar words and expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as "should," "would," "could," and "may." In addition, we may from time to time make such written or oral "forward-looking statements" in future filings (including exhibits thereto) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission" or "SEC"), in our reports to stockholders, and in other communications made by or with our approval. These forward-looking statements are based largely on our current expectations, assumptions, plans, estimates, judgments and projections about our business and our industry, and they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable estimates and assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will in fact occur or that our estimates or assumptions will be correct, and we caution that actual results may differ materially and adversely from those in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors that could cause our or our industry's actual results, level of activity, performance or achievement to differ materially from those discussed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of us and could cause our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows to be materially adversely effected. Accordingly, investors and all others are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. In evaluating these statements, some of the factors that you should consider include those described below under “Item 1A Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10K.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

COMPANY OVERVIEW

General

Anpath Group, Inc. (“Anpath”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”) through our wholly-owned subsidiary EnviroSystems, Inc. (“ESI”), produces disinfecting, sanitizing and cleaning products designed to help prevent the spread of infectious microorganisms, while minimizing the harmful effects to people, application surfaces and the environment. We believe that the ability to destroy a wide-range of disease-causing microorganisms combined with a favorable profile for health and environmental effects makes our products ideal for use in a wide range of applications/markets that are in need of disinfection/cleaning products that are safe to use and non-toxic.

We are directed by our mission to “Provide a healthier today and a safer tomorrow through knowledgeable people and innovative infection prevention, decontamination, and health science technologies, products, and services.” We intend to utilize our technology and resources to develop products that reduce biological risks without introducing the attendant chemical risks that are so prevalent today. It is this focus on developing safe infection prevention technologies that we believe will position us in the forefront of the industry at a time when there is rapidly growing awareness of the critical need to prevent biological risks — both natural and man-made.

Our headquarters is located at 224 Rolling Hill Road, Suite 2A, Mooresville, North Carolina 28117. Our telephone number is (704) 658-3350.

Recent Developments

On May 20, 2010 Anpath filed petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.

Table of Contents

The Need for Chapter 11 Restructuring

The Company was in default or approaching default on its Secured Loan Agreements and Secured Notes totaling approximately $3,380,700 as of May 10, 2010. In the fiscal years ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, the Company reported net losses of $4,948,301 and $4,023,929. While smaller, less experienced, and lacking the resources of its major competitors, Anpath’s operating subsidiary has established strong positions in several major markets, including a letter of intent with a major supplier of oil and gas industry chemicals and a distribution contract with a national franchise cleaning service.

The Company’s lack of revenue and profit made it impossible for it to continue to satisfy its senior creditors. In this regard, pursuant to a loan agreement originally dated January 8, 2008, ANPG Lending LLC (“ANPG Lending”) purchased certain secured convertible promissory notes from Anpath (the “Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000 (the “Principal Amount”). Pursuant to the terms of the Notes, the Principal Amount, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon (collectively, with the Principal Amount, the “Outstanding Amount”), was originally due and payable in full on July 8, 2009. ANPG Lending agreed to extend the original maturity date of the Outstanding Amount and, on September 8, 2009, November 8, 2009, and March 31, 2010, respectively, entered into certain forbearance agreements with Anpath. Per the terms of the November 8, 2009 forbearance agreement, the Outstanding Amount was rescheduled to be due and payable on March 31, 2010 (the “New Maturity Date”).

When Anpath was unable to repay the Notes on the New Maturity Date, Anpath Lending, working with Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. (“Laidlaw”), agreed to lend the Company additional funds for use as working capital (the “Additional Funding”) in order to provide the Company an opportunity to complete a plan of action that would address its short and long term capital needs.

Faced with declining liquidity, upcoming interest payments, over $2,910,000 in 2010 debt maturities, and the inability to access the capital markets to restructure its balance sheet, the Company pursued various strategic alternatives in late 2009 and early 2010, including seeking to extend the maturities on its debt due in 2010, seeking to implement debt exchanges, seeking to issue new debt for cash and/or in exchange for debt, and pursuing asset sales. Ultimately, the efforts to restructure outside of Chapter 11 were unsuccessful and Anpath commenced negotiations with its secured lender and certain noteholders. Those negotiations led to the formation of the consensual Plan to restructure the Company’s debt obligations, and the Company filed Chapter 11 to implement its restructuring.

The Chapter 11 Petition

On May 20, 2010 (the “Filing Date”), with no other tenable alternative available to it, Anpath filed petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware pursuant to which it proposed a plan of reorganization (the “Plan”).

The Additional Funding amount that was agreed to between Anpath and its principal creditors is $700,000. Of this amount, prior to the Filing Date $100,000 was advanced by Anpath Lending and $186,000 by investors introduced by Laidlaw (collectively, the “Interim Notes”). The $414,000 balance (hereinafter referred to as the “DIP Facility”) is intended to be provided through the issuance of additional notes (the “Post-Petition DIP Notes”), $250,000 of which are to be purchased by Anpath Lending and $164,000 by investors to be introduced by Laidlaw. The Interim Notes were issued with a 7% per annum rate of interest, as will the Post-Petition DIP Notes to be issued under the DIP Facility.

The Plan proposes a restructuring of the debt and other claims against the Company vis-à-vis the interests of its current shareholders. The Plan must be voted on by the holders of claims against and interests in the Company and, in connection therewith, the Plan must meet various standards to be approved (and confirmed) by the Bankruptcy Court. A condition of confirmation of the Plan by the Bankruptcy Court is that the Offering be completed, at least in the Minimum Offering Amount, in order that the Company can emerge from bankruptcy with working capital projected to be sufficient to sustain operations for at least one year.

Table of Contents

Status of Required Plan Approvals

Before it was filed, the Company sought the support of its principle creditors for the Plan that was being proposed. In connection with this initiative:

·	a super-majority of the Senior Secured Class of creditors, including Anpath Lending, signed the Plan Support Agreement; and

·	a super-majority of the investors holding more than 50% of the Convertible Notes all signed the Plan Support Agreement.

As more fully explained in the Bankruptcy Petition Disclosure Statement, Management and the Board of Directors of the Company urged that the Plan be filed in the Bankruptcy Court on a consensual basis because, in the alternative:

·	the Company would not have had access to the Interim Note and DIP Facility financing that has and continues to provide the working capital necessary to maintain operations while it completes the bankruptcy petition process; and

the Company would have been forced into a liquidation pursuant to which Anpath Lending and the holders of the Interim Notes, who hold a lien on the Company’s assets, would have most likely received 100% of any net liquation proceeds that would have resulted from such liquidation, the result of which would have been that:

o	the unsecured creditors who are owed approximately $100,000 would have received no consideration;

o	the investors who hold approximately $1.6 million in convertible notes would have received no consideration; and

o	the holders of the common stock in the Company would have been completely wiped out with no prospect for recovery

Post-Petition Outlook for the Company

Incorporated in the Plan is a Post-Petition Budget that indicates that, with its obligations eliminated and the Company enjoying a debt-free capitalization, if the Offering is completed for at least the Minimum Offering Amount, the Company should have the working capital needed to support operations that focus on those priorities needed to produce near-term revenue that we believe will allow the Company to sustain itself without the need for any further deficit funding requirements.

Business Overview

Through its wholly-owned subsidiary EnviroSystems, Inc. (“ESI”), Anpath produces disinfecting, sanitizing and cleaning products designed to help prevent the spread of infectious microorganisms, while minimizing the harmful effects to people, application surfaces and the environment. We believe that the ability to destroy a wide-range of disease-causing microorganisms combined with a favorable profile for health and environmental effects makes our products ideal for use in a wide range of applications/markets that are in need of disinfection/cleaning products that are safe to use and non-toxic.

Table of Contents

Primary Technology Platform

We have developed and have trade secret rights to what we believe to be a unique and proprietary Parachlorometaxylenol (more commonly known as PCMX) based chemical emulsion biocide technology platform. PCMX has been widely used as an antimicrobial in surgical hand and skin scrubs. Based on this technology, we have developed a portfolio of efficacious disinfectants/sanitizers/cleaners that achieve bio-decontamination without using toxic and corrosive chemicals. Our PCMX chemical emulsion biocides have the following characteristics:

●	They kill a wide range of infectious microorganism, including MRSA;

●	They minimize harmful effects to people (EnviroTru® /EnviroTru® 1453 meet Environmental Protection Agency requirements for Toxicity Category IV) and do not cause skin, eye, pulmonary, oral or dermal irritation;

●	They are safe for animals (the EquineTru® formulation safely prevents and eliminates persistent skin and hoof conditions caused by micro-organisms); and

●	They are non-corrosive (EnviroTru /EnviroTru 1453 are included in the Boeing Qualified Products List (QPL) and conform to AMS-1452A, 1453 & D6-7127 Aircraft Corrosion Specifications).

Product Categories

We believe that the concept of an easy-to-use and effective line of decontaminants that fits with a favorable environmental profile offers us a unique opportunity to differentiate our products in multiple infection prevention markets. It is our intention to use the unique characteristics of our chemical emulsion technology to build acceptance of our decontaminants as an alternative which is significantly different from other biocidal products that currently dominate the marketplace.

We are exploiting our technology platform to establish a broad product portfolio in the following categories:

●	Surface Care products - disinfectants, sanitizers and cleaners (including wipes);

●	GeoBiocides – biocides for use in the oil and gas industry.

●	Animal Care products - skin and hoof care treatment and animal shampoo; and

●	Personal Care products – antimicrobial hand soaps, hand sanitizers and facial scrubs (including wipes).

Current Products

As more fully explained in the information incorporated by reference herein, we are currently generating modest revenue from the following products:

Surface Care Products: We presently sell a number of different surface disinfectant liquids, sprays and wipes that are purchased primarily for use in industrial markets.

Animal Care Products: We currently have one product that is accepted by veterinary regulators which addresses skin and hoof disease in horses.

Future Products

As more fully explained in the information incorporated by reference herein, the real value-creation opportunity for the Company lies in the near-term prospects in two particular product areas (the “Near Term Product Opportunities”):

Table of Contents

Hospital Grade Product

We are planning to reintroduce a hospital grade disinfectant product to replace one of our earlier products called EcoTru®. The reformulated disinfectant is expected to demonstrate that it will effectively kill numerous bacteria, fungi, and viruses, including MRSA, Hepatitis B and C, HIV, herpes and influenza. Likewise, in addition to being highly effective as a disinfectant, our reformulated hospital grade product is expected to occupy a unique position in the market place, combining this microbial effectiveness in a disinfectant product which will also have a favorable profile for health and environmental effects. This product is currently in the final EPA submission l process. The Company is working with a 3rd party EPA consultant group and an independent, EPA registered lab in the development of the EPA submission. It is anticipated that based on recent efficacy testing we will be able to bridge the majority of the claims from our previous product, EcoTru, thereby reducing testing cost and time. The EPA may require testing of one organism in each class to validate each class. It is anticipated that final federal EPA registration will occur prior to the end of 2010. A serious delay or failure to achieve EPA registration for the revised EcoTru would result in a delay in the primary product offering. The long-term success of our Surface Care product line is dependent upon registration of a broad-spectrum product.

Oil & Gas Industry

In response to requests from members of the oil and gas industry for a non-toxic but effective disinfectant to replace toxic biocides used in oil and gas well stimulation, we developed GeoTru™ Concentrated GeoBiocide designed to be used as a “down-hole” biocide in the oil and gas drilling industry. GeoTru is a surfactant-based chemistry for the control of microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and algae, effective when used under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. It is safe to handle and transport, non-flammable, and with no explosion hazard. GeoTru has an extended shelf life and it is active over a wide pH range and is non-oxidizing and nonreactive with other down-hole chemistries. It has been designed to be used particularly in hydraulic fracturing.The Company has worked with two different industry participants in the vetting of GeoTru and the product is currently in the final process of EPA registration. We expect to have federal EPA registration for GeoTru early in the 4th quarter of 2010. Simultaneously, the Company, in concert with two industry partners, is finalizing a series of advanced toxicology and environment tests designed to further differentiate GeoTru from the current products on the market. Delay or failure to achieve EPA registration for GeoTru will seriously affect the Company’s ability to sustain itself in the short-run and would undoubtedly require the company to raise more capital.

The Company is going to concentrate its budget resources and manpower on completing the regulatory certification for these two products and, if approved, it will seek to consummate a manufacturing, marketing and licensing agreement in order to try and best gain commercial traction for the products more quickly than one could expect if Anpath were to try and build an in-house direct sales force and sell these products directly in their respective marketplaces.

The information incorporated herein speaks of many other products and product areas, the development of and support for which is not sustainable based on the Company’s current access to capital. As a result, most if not all these activities will be put on hold pending the results that the Company generates from its Near-Term Product Opportunities.

Therefore, while it is true that the Company’s core underlying Product Technology Platform could logically be used to exploit consumer-facing cleaning and personal care products, this is an area that would require more capital and product expertise than Anpath currently can command.

Micro Chemical Emulsion Technology

Our disinfectant products are manufactured using our micro-emulsion technology. Through the use of micro-emulsion technology, we are able to create a highly efficient delivery mechanism for parachlorometaxylenol, which is the antimicrobial ingredient used in our chemical emulsion formulations. We believe that our micro-emulsion technology allows our products to specifically target infectious microorganisms without harming higher life forms or the environment.

Table of Contents

Parachlorometaxylenol (“PCMX”)

PCMX is the active antimicrobial ingredient in our EcoTru®, EnviroTru®, EnviroTru® 1453, EquineTru®, GeoTru™, and SurfaceTru™ products. PCMX has been used as an effective antimicrobial disinfectant ingredient for over five decades, both in the United States and in Europe. PCMX has been demonstrated to be effective against bacteria, virus, and fungal species. In other formulations using PCMX, its biocide activity has been limited due to the inability of such formulations to deliver PCMX because a water barrier exists between PCMX and microorganism membranes, which are both oily. Our chemical emulsion technology efficiently enables the delivery of PCMX across this barrier to the cell membranes.

In addition to its broad spectrum of activity, PCMX has a very low instance of allergic response (it has been used by the cosmetics industry for many years as a preservative) and it is degraded in the environment in both the presence and the absence of oxygen.

Micro-particle Anatomy

Observing the ESI chemical emulsions under a very high degree of magnification, one would see a suspension of micro-particles moving very rapidly in de-ionized water. Many of these particles are about 1/200th the width of a human hair. The center of the particles is oily or lipophilic, as is the target microbial membrane.

Incorporated into these micro-particles is PCMX biocide. The surface of each particle has a negative surface charge that is crucial to the targeting mechanism. There is an electrostatic attraction between these particles and the microbes. The selective targeting of the microbes by these micro-particles is the basis for the efficacy of our chemical emulsion products.

Micro-Emulsion Mechanism

The use of PCMX in an emulsion is the basis for our products efficacy. We believe that the physical/chemical properties of the emulsion particles and the electrostatic charge on the surface allows the particles to successfully target pathogenic microorganisms and deliver the biocide directly to the microorganisms' cell membrane, thereby improving efficacy.

By delivering the PCMX directly to the cell membrane, we have been able to reduce the concentration of the biocide PCMX to 0.2% and yet achieve disinfectant efficacy not seen at 15 to 25 fold higher concentrations.

In addition, we believe by targeting the microorganism membrane, it is not necessary to use an oxidizing biocide to kill the organism. Oxidizing biocides, such as bleach and hydrogen peroxide, are effective biocides but are indiscriminate, can be corrosive and require direct access to the microorganism. Also, a difference in cell surface architecture, which is the key to cellular identity, provides the mechanism by which our disinfectants micro-particles discriminate between microorganisms and provides the foundation and focal point for the antimicrobial effect of ESI disinfectants.

Table of Contents

Manufacturing

Our liquid products are manufactured by Minntech Corporation, an EPA and FDA listed manufacturer. Effective August 2006, ESI entered into an agreement with Minntech, pursuant to which Minntech agreed to establish a dedicated manufacturing line at its manufacturing facility for our products. The agreement with Minntech has a term of three years, commencing after the date of the first shipment of commercial quantities of our product and provides for one year renewals. Our first shipment of commercial quantities occurred in September 2007. The agreement may be terminated by either of the parties upon ninety days notice.

Our agreement with Minntech also includes dedicated warehousing facilities and distribution services for our products. Additionally, we may elect to utilize other customer and technical services offered by Minntech and we have the ability to expand our relationship with Minntech to take advantage of Minntech’s international manufacturing capabilities.

We believe that Minntech has the capabilities to continue to meet our volume requirements and specifications through the next several years and until we are ready to conduct our own in-house manufacturing and/or identify another contract manufacturer. All lots of product produced are subject to quality assurance standards established by EnviroSystems and Minntech provides a Certificate of Analysis with each lot produced, certifying inspection results and quality standards compliance. Additionally, we monitor vendor testing of raw materials and review production records to ensure EnviroSystems' procedures and specifications are followed throughout production.

Future Possible Self Manufacture Capability

Upon achieving sufficient levels of sales and revenues, we may pursue the development of in-house manufacturing capabilities which we believe might reduce our cost of goods sold and improve our control over our trade secrets. We believe that such a facility would cost approximately $2 million to develop and require approximately 20,000 to 80,000 square feet. Any such facility that we developed would also include quality assurance and research and development facilities in addition to manufacturing facilities adequate to produce our products.

Research and Development

During our most recent fiscal year and the prior fiscal year, we have devoted approximately $295,123 and $433,556 to research and development activities, much of which have been focused on returning our hospital grade product to the market and in developing a GeoBiocide product. While the return of the hospital grade product and the development of a viable GeoBiocide is our clear priority, we have ongoing development programs focused on expanding our chemical emulsion product platform. We remain opportunistic regarding synergistic product line extensions and we are pursuing next generation disinfectants as well as a line of soaps, cleansers and hand sanitizers including products based on essential oils

Table of Contents

Government Regulation

Products that make biocide claims are regulated by either the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) or the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). Generally the line of demarcation is the intended use of the biocide; those used on inanimate objects are regulated by the EPA and those intended for use on living beings are regulated by the FDA. Disinfectant products such as ours are classified as “pesticides” and are subject to regulation by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996. FIFRA generally requires that before any person can sell or distribute any pesticide in the United States, they must obtain a registration from the EPA. After completing the registration process and submission of all required data, an applicant's proposed product label is stamped when accepted by EPA and returned to the registrant for use upon the registered product package. Anyone who sells/distributes a pesticide (including antimicrobial products) also must register that product in every state in which they intend to sell/distribute the product.

Facilities at which a pesticide is produced also must be listed with the EPA. Upon registration, an establishment number is assigned. Annual pesticide production reports are required to be submitted to the EPA and other books and records must be maintained indicating the amount produced, repackaged/relabeled for the past year, amount sold/distributed for the past year within and outside of the U.S., and the amount to be produced/repackaged/ relabeled for the current year. Pesticide maintenance fees are required for registered products. Failure to pay registration and annual maintenance fees or provide necessary test data when requested by the EPA could result in the cancellation of an EPA registration.

EPA regulations also require registrants to report to the EPA new information concerning adverse effects associated with their products.

Three (3) of our products are registered with the United States Environmental Protection Agency and have EPA registered labels and have been assigned EPA Registration Nos. 70791-1 and 70791-2. They are EcoTru®, EnviroTru®, and EnviroTru® 1453. In addition, EnviroTru® and EnviroTru® 1453 are registered in all of the 50 States in the United States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.

The FDA is an agency of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and is responsible for the safety regulation of most types of foods, dietary supplements, drugs, vaccines, biological medical products, blood products, medical devices, radiation-emitting devices, veterinary products, and cosmetics.

We have one current product cleared by the FDA, EquineTru® Skin & Hoof Treatment. EquineTru® was reviewed and cleared for market use by the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM); the branch of the FDA which regulates food, food additives, and drugs that are given to animals, including food animals and pets.

Like the EPA, facilities that produce drugs must be listed with the FDA and are open to inspection. FDA regulations also require producers to report information concerning adverse effects associated with their products.

Foreign Regulation

Although to date we have not had substantial international sales of our products, when we do sell products in foreign jurisdictions, we will be subject to foreign regulations. We expect that we will have to register our products in other foreign jurisdictions before we can realize substantial sales in such jurisdictions. Compliance with foreign requirements could require substantial expenditures and effort.

Table of Contents

Competition

The market for products such as ours is highly competitive and we face competition from a number of companies, most of which have substantially greater brand name recognition and financial, research and development, production and other resources than we do.

Consumer, Institutional, Hospitality and Military

In the consumer and institutional markets our primary competitors include Johnson & Johnson, Ecolab, Inc., Clorox, Sensible Life Products, and Proctor & Gamble, and others all of which have products with recognized national brands that include Clorox, Lysol, Pine Sol, and industry specific products. Products used in the consumer markets and certain institutional markets like the hospitality industry generally compete based upon price. To date, relatively higher per unit costs of our product as compared to our competitors has limited our ability to compete in these markets. We believe an increased awareness of the need for safer biocides with environmentally correct profiles will aid our principal competitive advantages; comparatively favorable toxicity profile, efficacy, and environmental profile.

Oil and Gas

There are 34 dominant major oilfield chemical suppliers, led by the likes of Dow Chemical, BASF and Rhodia, with a remaining fragmented set of smaller competitors. Current competitive products are conventional biocides: Glutaraldehydes, Sodium hypochlorite (bleach) and chlorine dioxide. All are toxic and not eco-friendly. Electrochemically activated salt water has been used and is available; a green technology, but expensive. The relevant trend is toward a reduction in the use of toxic biocides as increased environmental regulations make biocide applications more and more costly, and the potential for regulation requiring “greener” biocides a real possibility.

Animal Care

Our EquineTru® Skin & Hoof Treatment product competes in a market occupied by a wide range of large and small companies. Products in this market are largely sold through catalogs and by way of endorsements and word-of-mouth. To compete in this market, we must establish ourselves as a known entity and gain credibility, a process that we expect to be slow. However, we believe that because of our product’s toxicity profile we have the advantage of offering one product for both skin and hoof conditions. Many hoof care products are too toxic to use on the skin.

Healthcare

Our competitors in the Healthcare market include Johnson & Johnson, Clorox, STERIS Corporation, Caltech Industries, Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc., Reckitt Benkiser, Sensible Life Products, and Ecolab, Inc.

We believe that few competitive products have the same low-toxicity classifications assigned by the EPA to proprietary EcoTru® formulation, as well as the efficacy against a broad range of microorganisms and virulent pathogens that EcoTru®'s reissued labeling is expected to reflect.

Table of Contents

Personal Care

Smaller companies typically account for less than 15% of sales in the liquid soap category while the consumer hand sanitizer category is dominated by the Purell (Pfizer) brand and Dial. Private label products represent a third of sales. Purell (GoJo) currently owns the institutional side of the market.

ESI’s planned KeraTru™ line is expected to compete against current products based on greater effectiveness, a lack of reactions and increased safety for kids. Alcohol-based products lose their effectiveness within seconds of being applied to the skin; it is intended that KeraTru™ hand products remain active well after being applied and leaves the skin feeling soft. KeraTru™ hand products are planned to also be antiseptic and hypoallergenic, benefits not included with alcohol-based products. Finally, an alcohol-free, rinse free, and fragrance free KeraTru™ hand sanitizer will be non-toxic and not dangerous for kids or adults (when properly applied). Once immediate priorities are addressed, the Company will seek potential partners to co-develop and market the KeraTru line.

Competitive Advantage.

Though there are many disinfectant products that are EPA-registered, when used as directed, the majority of these products incorporate chemicals that can be toxic, corrosive and potentially damaging to the environment. ESI eliminates the effectiveness-safety trade-off faced by consumers in the current market place.

Through a proprietary formulation method using parachlorometaxylenol (PCMX), the company offers effective disinfecting solutions with active ingredient concentration levels at one-to-two orders of magnitude lower than those of other disinfectants, eliminating any toxic or corrosive effects.

Unlike many competing products, ESI’s PCMX based chemical emulsion products do not require special handling or precautions, including no precautions for skin, eye, pulmonary, oral or dermal irritation. Additionally, products are nonflammable and environmentally responsible.

Intellectual Property

We have not applied for patent protection for our proprietary PCMX formulation or for our micro-emulsion technology and instead rely upon trade secret protection for protection of our formula, formulation, micro-emulsion technology and manufacturing process. We continue to review our intellectual property protection policy and have evaluated the use of patent versus trade secret protection for our intellectual property. While we chose not to apply for patents on our formulation or micro-emulsion technology, in the future we may seek other available patent protection. In addition, based upon our review of industry practice, we determined that it is more common to rely upon trade secret protection, rather than patents to protect intellectual property, particularly when such intellectual property involves processes such as ours. We have instituted strict internal procedures to protect the trade secrets and have confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements in place with our current contract manufacturers as well as our potential new manufacturing partner.

We will continue to evaluate our current trade secret protection and may decide in the future, if available, to submit use or design patents in certain areas that will not require us to disclose the trade secrets that give our chemical emulsion products or future potentially patentable derivative products a competitive advantage. For example, we have several pending patent application for new product formulas that are produced through more traditional processes than our chemical emulsion technology. In addition, we submitted both the early and the current versions of EcoTru® to a major U.S. de-formulation laboratory to see if they could reverse engineer our products. Despite their best efforts to reverse engineer our product, they were not able to provide us with an accurate report of the micro-emulsion ingredients or manufacturing process. As new products are brought to market, we intend to carefully analyze each for the methodology to be employed in protection of the intellectual property.

Table of Contents

Pursuant to an Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement, effective as of July 30, 1996, between EnviroSystems, American Children's Foundation, Richard M. Othus, Andrew D.B. Lambie and Cascade Chemical Corporation, each of American Children’s Foundation, Mr. Othus, Mr. Lambie and Cascade Chemical Corporation irrevocably assigned to us all of their rights to the chemical formula which we use in the manufacture of our product. In consideration thereof, we agreed to pay to each of Messrs. Othus and Lambie a royalty equal to 0.25% of gross revenues received by us from sales of our products throughout the world, less credits and returns, for as long as we sell products which embody the assigned formula.

Our products are sold under a variety of trademarks and trade names. We own all of the trademarks and trade names we believe to be material to the operation of our business. EcoTru® is currently registered in the United States, Japan, and Taiwan. We expect to file additional registrations in the European Union countries and Canada. Likewise we have filed to register EnviroTru®, EquineTru®, SurfaceTru™ KeraTru™, GeoTru™ and Anpath.

Except for the trademarks referred to above, we do not believe any single trademark is material to the operations of our business as a whole.

Employees

As of March 31, 2010, we had a total of 5 full time employees. None of our employees are represented by a trade union. We anticipate hiring additional full time employees within the next twelve months.

Customers

We have traditionally sold the majority of our products to customers in the healthcare industry, including hospitals, dental offices, physicians' offices, reference laboratories, long term care facilities and veterinary offices. In addition, we also have also sold our products to the aviation industry, janitorial industry, local and federal government, education and customers in the hospitality industry. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, sales to our top ten customers represented approximately 96.96%.

Sales, Marketing, Distribution

Our strategy has been to market and sell our products primarily through third party distributors and to a lesser extent through direct sales. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2010, sales through distributors accounted for approximately 64.40% of our sales. We have entered into distribution agreements with distributors that service the industry segments that we have targeted for sales of our products. In the transportation industry, we have entered into a distribution agreement with Andpak, a distributor to the aviation industry which markets our EnviroTru™ 1453 and SurfaceTru™ cleaning wipes to the same industry.

We have also entered into distribution agreements with distributors to market our products outside of the United States. Recent sales to both the Korean and Japanese markets are encouraging.

We recently also entered into a National Account Agreement with Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. (JPI) (Jan-Pro), a nationwide commercial cleaning franchisor. The exclusive Agreement is to supply ESI’s EnviroTru® Disinfectant & Deodorizing Cleaner and electrostatic sprayer systems to JPI and its US franchises. Based on mutually agreed upon projected revenue goals between ESI and JPI, the Company estimates the value of the 3-year agreement to be approximately $3 million in revenue assuming purchases by the JPI franchises meet the targeted goals, although the Company can provide no assurance that it will achieve the projected revenue targets.

Our products are shipped to customers from our contract manufacturers’ facility in Minneapolis, MN. We use third party carriers to deliver our products. From time to time, we will arrange for shipments directly from our contract manufacturer.

Table of Contents

Insurance Matters

We maintain a general business liability policy and other coverage specific to our industry and operations. We also maintain general products liability coverage and directors and officers liability coverage. We believe that our insurance program provides adequate coverage for all reasonable risks associated with operating our business.

Corporate History

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in August 2004, and prior to January 10, 2006, we had no material assets and/or operations. Effective January 10, 2006, we acquired EnviroSystems, Inc. in a reverse merger transaction. In connection therewith, we issued to the preferred stockholders of EnviroSystems 6,400,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding preferred stock of EnviroSystems. See “Description of the Merger” below. Effective as of January 10, 2006 our business became that of EnviroSystems. On January 12, 2007, we amended our certificate of incorporation to change our name from Telecomm Communications, Inc. to Anpath Group, Inc. to more closely align our name with our business.

EnviroSystems was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1996 and historically its business has been the development, marketing and distribution of cleaning and disinfecting products intended to reduce the spread of infectious disease without adverse effects to people, equipment or the environment. EnviroSystems' products were sold into the healthcare, aviation, government and marine industry segments.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

You should carefully consider the following risk factors and the other information included herein before investing in our common stock. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Company

Certain Business Considerations: A number of factors could affect the business of Anpath and/or its operating subsidiary, ESI. Any factor which could adversely affect the business of ESI could, by extension, have a negative effect on the Company’s own financial performance. Among these potential factors are the following:

The continuing global economic crisis could adversely affect the Company’s business.

The current global economic crisis and turbulent financial markets could adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. Lower consumer spending worldwide could lead to a decline in demand for ESI’s products and services. If the global credit markets do not improve, the Company could have difficulty in the future refinancing of debt and raising capital for operations.

ESI’s products will continue to be subject to periodic random inspection and testing by the EPA and ESI cannot be certain that such tests will not result in further EPA letters of inquiry or other actions.

ESI’s products will continue to be subject to periodic inspection and testing by the EPA and other authorities, where applicable, and must comply at all times with the EPA and state regulations. If ESI fails an EPA inspection and/or test, or otherwise fail to comply with statutory and regulatory requirements, ESI could be subject to possible legal or regulatory action, such as suspension of sales, suspension of manufacturing, and seizure of products or voluntary recall of products. Further, such a failure could result in the imposition of market restrictions through labeling changes or in product removal. If compliance with regulatory requirements is not maintained or if problems concerning safety or effectiveness of ESI’s products occur following reauthorization by the EPA, ESI’s ability to market its products may be withdrawn. Further, if products selected for random testing by the EPA have not been properly stored, then the EPA tests may result in a finding that ESI’s products do not meet the efficacy standards on the labels. If EPA testing results in findings that its products do not meet EPA standards, it could have a material adverse effect on ESI’s business, reputation and results of operation and, by extension, the Company.

Table of Contents

ESI has not applied for patents on proprietary technology and instead relies upon trade secret protection to protect its intellectual property; it may be difficult and costly to protect its proprietary rights and ESI may not be able to ensure their protection.

ESI has not applied for patent protection for its proprietary formulas and micro-emulsion technology and has decided instead to rely upon trade secret protection to protect such intellectual property. Trade secrets are difficult to protect and while ESI uses reasonable efforts to protect its trade secrets, it cannot assure that its employees, consultants, contractors or scientific advisors will not, unintentionally or willfully, disclose its trade secrets to competitors or other third parties. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets. Moreover, ESI’s competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how. If ESI is unable to defend its trade secrets from illegal use, or if ESI’s competitors develop equivalent knowledge, it could have a material adverse effect on ESI’s business.

Any infringement of ESI’s proprietary rights could result in significant litigation costs, and any failure to adequately protect its proprietary rights could result in ESI’s competitors’ offering similar products, potentially resulting in loss of a competitive advantage and decreased revenue. Existing patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws afford only limited protection. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect ESI’s proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Therefore, ESI may not be able to protect its proprietary rights against unauthorized third party use. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and is using ESI’s trade secrets could be expensive and time consuming, and the outcome of such a claim is unpredictable. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce its intellectual property rights, to protect ESI’s trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. This litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could materially adversely affect the future operating results of ESI – thereby negatively affecting the financial performance of the Company as well.

Potential claims alleging infringement of third party's intellectual property by ESI could harm ESI’s ability to compete and result in significant expense to ESI and loss of significant rights.

From time to time, third parties may assert patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to ESI’s business. Any claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, divert the efforts of ESI’s technical and management personnel, cause product shipment delays, disrupt ESI’s relationships with ESI’s customers or require ESI to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, any of which could have a material adverse effect upon the ESI’s operating results and thus the Company’s financial performance. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to ESI. If a claim against ESI is successful and ESI cannot obtain a license to the relevant technology on acceptable terms, license a substitute technology or redesign ESI’s products to avoid infringement, business, financial condition and results of operations of both ESI and the Company would be materially adversely affected.

To date Anpath and ESI have had significant operating losses, an accumulated deficit and have had limited revenues and they do not expect to be profitable for at least the foreseeable future, and Anpath and ESI cannot predict when they might become profitable, if ever.

Anpath and ESI have been operating at a loss each year since the Company’s and ESI’s inception, and the Company and ESI expects to continue to incur losses for the next twelve to eighteen months. As of March 31, 2009, the Company and ESI had a combined accumulated deficit of approximately $28,921,873. ESI also has had limited revenues. Revenues for the twelve months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, were $85,969 and $115,284, respectively. Further, ESI may not be able to generate significant revenues in the future. In addition, the Company expects to incur substantial operating transfers in order to fund the expansion of ESI’s business. As a result, the Company expects to continue to experience substantial negative cash flow for at least twelve to eighteen months and cannot predict when, or even if, the Company might become profitable. ESI will need to generate significant revenues in order to achieve and maintain profitability. ESI may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to pay the advances made by the Company or achieve profitability in the future. Even if the Company and ESI do achieve profitability, the Company and ESI may not be able to sustain or increase profitability. If ESI is not able to generate revenues sufficient to fund ESI’s operations through product sales or if the Company is not able to raise sufficient funds through investments by third parties, it could result in the Company’s and ESI’s inability to continue as a going concern and, as a result, the Company’s investors could lose their entire investment.

Table of Contents

ESI operates in a highly regulated industry, which may delay the introduction of new products, cause withdrawal of products from the market, and have other adverse consequences.

Pursuant to applicable environmental and safety laws and regulations, ESI is required to obtain and maintain certain governmental permits and approvals for ESI’s products. Permits and approvals may be subject to revocation, modification or denial under certain circumstances. While ESI believes it is in compliance in all material respects with such environmental and safety laws, there can be no assurance that ESI’s operations or activities will not result in administrative or private actions, revocation of required permits or licenses, or fines, penalties or damages, which could have an adverse effect on ESI. In addition, the Company cannot predict the extent to which any legislation or regulation may affect the market for ESI’s products or its cost of doing business.

The Company has relied almost entirely on external financing to fund operations and acquisitions to date.

Because the Company has never generated meaningful revenue and currently operates at a loss, the Company is completely dependent on the continued availability of financing in order to continue its business. There can be no assurance that financing sufficient to enable the Company and its subsidiaries to continue their operations will be available to the Company. The Company’s failure to obtain financing or to produce levels of revenue to meet its financial needs could result in its inability to continue as a going concern and, as a result, the Company’s investors could lose their entire investment.

The Company may need to raise capital to fund operations, and its failure to obtain funding when needed may force the Company to delay, reduce or eliminate product development efforts.

If, in the future, the Company is not capable of generating sufficient revenues from operations and its capital resources are insufficient to meet future requirements, the Company may have to raise funds to permit ESI to continue the commercialization, marketing and sale of its products. The Company cannot be certain that funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. To the extent that the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity securities, its stockholders may experience significant dilution. Any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that impact its ability to conduct business. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital if required or on acceptable terms, ESI may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development and/or commercialization of one or more of its products, restrict its operations or obtain funds by entering into agreements on unattractive terms.

ESI relies upon third party manufacturers to produce its products, making it vulnerable to supply disruptions which could harm its business.

ESI relies upon third party manufacturers to produce its products. If ESI’s third party manufacturers are unable to manufacture product in quantities ESI requires or that meets its specifications, or if they raise their prices, it could have a material adverse effect on ESI’s sales and results of operation. In addition, in the event of any of the foregoing, ESI could be required to seek new manufacturers. In such event, ESI cannot be certain that it will find alternative third party manufacturers who will manufacture product on similar economic terms. ESI’s costs of goods sold could increase, with an adverse effect on ESI’s sales and results of operations.

ESI relies upon a single supplier for parachlorometaxylenol (“PCMX”), the active ingredient in the Company’s products.

ESI relies upon a single supplier, Clariant Corporation, to provide ESI with PCMX, which is the biocide used in ESI’s products. Clariant Corporation is one of the largest suppliers of PCMX in the United States. If Clariant Corporation is unable to supply ESI with PCMX in the quantities and on the economic terms that ESI requires, it could have a material adverse effect on ESI’s business.

Table of Contents

ESI lacks significant sales, marketing and distribution capabilities and depends on third parties to market and distribute its product both in the United States and Internationally.

ESI does not have an internal sales organization dedicated solely to sales and marketing of ESI’s product and therefore ESI must rely upon third party distributors to market and sell its product. These third parties may not be able to market ESI’s product successfully or may not devote the time and resources to marketing ESI’s product that ESI requires. ESI also relies upon third party carriers to distribute and deliver ESI’s product. As such, deliveries are to a certain extent out of the ESI’s control. If ESI chooses to develop its own sales, marketing or distribution capabilities, it will need to build a marketing and sales force with technical expertise and with supporting distribution capabilities, which will require a substantial amount of management and financial resources that may not be available. If ESI or a third party is not able to adequately sell and distribute its product, ESI’s business will be materially harmed.

Substantially all of the Company’s operations are conducted at a single location. Any disruption at the Company’s facility could adversely affect its operations and increase its expenses.

Substantially all of the Company’s operations are currently conducted at a single location in Mooresville, North Carolina. The Company takes precautions to safeguard its facility, including insurance, health and safety protocols. However, a natural disaster, such as a fire, flood or earthquake, could cause substantial delays in the Company’s operations, damage or destroy the Company’s books and records, computer systems, or inventory, and cause the Company to incur additional expenses. The insurance the Company maintains against fires, floods, earthquakes and other natural disasters may not be adequate to cover the Company’s losses in any particular case.

ESI faces competition in its markets from a number of large and small companies, some of which have greater financial, research and development, production and other resources than the Company has.

ESI’s products face competition from products which may be used as an alternative or substitute therefore. In addition, the Company competes with several large companies in the disinfectant business. To the extent these companies, or new entrants into the market, offer comparable disinfectant products at lower prices, ESI’s business could be adversely affected. ESI’s competitive position is based principally on its micro-emulsion technology, product quality and product safety. ESI’s competitors can be expected to continue to improve the design and performance of their products and to introduce new products with competitive performance characteristics. There can be no assurance that ESI will have sufficient resources to maintain its current competitive position.

The Company may not be able to manage its growth effectively, which could adversely affect its operations and financial performance.

The ability to manage and operate its business as the Company executes its development and growth strategy will require effective planning. Significant growth could strain the Company’s internal resources and could adversely affect its financial performance. The Company expects that its efforts to grow will place a significant strain on its personnel, management systems, infrastructure and other resources. The Company’s ability to manage future growth effectively will also require it to successfully attract, train, motivate, retain and manage new employees and continue to update and improve its operational, financial and management controls and procedures. If the Company does not manage its growth effectively, its operations could be adversely affected, resulting in slower growth and a failure to achieve or sustain profitability.

The Company’s future success depends on retaining its existing key employees and hiring and assimilating new key employees. The loss of key employees or the inability to attract new key employees could limit its ability to execute its growth strategy, resulting in lost sales and a slower rate of growth.

The Company’s success depends in part on its ability to retain key employees including its executive officers. The Company has only entered into an employment agreement with one of its executives. Also, it does not currently carry “key man” insurance on its executives but intends to obtain it in the near future. It would be difficult for the Company to replace any one of these individuals. In addition, as the Company grows, it may need to hire additional key personnel. The Company may not be able to identify and attract high quality employees or successfully assimilate new employees into its existing management structure.

Table of Contents

ESI cannot predict the impact of its proposed marketing efforts. If these efforts are unsuccessful, ESI may not earn enough revenue to become profitable.

ESI’s success will depend on investing in marketing resources and successfully implementing its marketing plan. ESI’s proposed business plan includes hiring marketing personnel and a dedicated sales force and developing a comprehensive marketing plan for its product. Such a marketing plan may include attending trade shows and making private demonstrations, advertising and promotional materials, advertising campaigns in both print and broadcast media, and advertising/promotion-related operations. ESI cannot give any assurance that these marketing efforts will be successful. If they are not, revenues may be insufficient to cover its fixed costs and ESI may not become profitable.

ESI’s business may be affected by factors outside of the Company’s control.

ESI’s ability to increase sales, and to profitably distribute and sell its products, is subject to a number of risks, including changes in its business relationships with its principal distributors, competitive risks such as the entrance of additional competitors into ESI’s markets, pricing and technological competition, risks associated with the development and marketing of new products in order to remain competitive and risks associated with changes in demand for disinfectants which can be affected by economic conditions, health care reform and government regulation.

We have experienced losses and will incur losses in the future.

We are an early stage company with a limited operating history. As of March 31, 2010, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $32,500,000 million and we expect to continue to incur operating losses, in the aggregate and on a per share basis. In addition, there is no assurance that we will ever be able to achieve or sustain positive cash flows or profitability, the consequence of which is that we could continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future. If we are not able to achieve or sustain positive cash flows or profitability, our stock price may decline and our ability to remain in business will be impaired. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition in our most recent Form 10-Q which is incorporated herein by reference.

Because we have a limited operating history, it is difficult to evaluate our business and prospects.

Anpath Holdings, Inc. was formed in October 2005 as Bonds Financial, Inc. and beta-trading on our electronic trading platform began in April 2007, with the commercial launch of the platform in December 2007. As a result, we have only a limited operating history from which you can evaluate our business and our prospects. We expect to encounter risks and difficulties frequently experienced by early-stage companies in rapidly evolving industries, such as the electronic financial services industry. These risks and difficulties that are specific to our business or the electronic financial services industry are described throughout the Risk Factors in our Form 10-K which is incorporated herein by reference.

Certain Bankruptcy Considerations

Non-Confirmation or Delay of Confirmation of the Plan

The Bankruptcy Court, which sits as a court of equity, may exercise substantial discretion. Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code sets forth the requirements for confirmation and requires, among other things, that the confirmation of the Plan not be followed by a need for further financial reorganization and that the value of distributions to dissenting creditors and shareholders not be less than the value of distributions such creditors and shareholders would receive if the Company were liquidated under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Although the Company believes that the Plan will meet such tests, there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will reach the same conclusion.

Table of Contents

Non-Consensual Confirmation

In the event any impaired Class of Claims does not accept a plan, a bankruptcy court may nevertheless confirm such plan at the proponent’s request if at least one impaired class of claims has accepted the plan (with such acceptances being determined without including the vote of any “insider” in such class), and, as to each impaired class that has not accepted the plan, the bankruptcy court determines that the plan of reorganization “does not discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable” with respect to the dissenting impaired classes. The Company believes that the Plan satisfies these requirements.

Risk of Non-Occurrence of the Effective Date

Although the Company believes that the Effective Date will occur reasonably soon after the Confirmation Date, there can be no assurance as to such timing or as to whether it will occur.

General Effect

The filing of a bankruptcy petition by the Company, and the publicity attendant thereto, may adversely affect the Company’s business. The Company believes that any such adverse effects may worsen during the pendency of a protracted bankruptcy case if the Plan is not confirmed as expected or if it were necessary for operating subsidiaries to file bankruptcy petitions.

Classification and Treatment of Claims and Equity Interests

Section 1122 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the Plan classify Claims against, and Interests in, the Company. The Bankruptcy Code also provides that the Plan may place a Claim or Interest in a particular Class only if such Claim or Interest is substantially similar to the other Claims or Interests of such Class. The Company believes that all Claims and Interests have been appropriately classified in the Plan.

To the extent that the Bankruptcy Court finds that a different classification is required for the Plan to be confirmed, the Company presently anticipates that it would seek (i) to modify the Plan to provide for whatever classification might be required for confirmation and (ii) to use the acceptances received from any creditor pursuant to this solicitation for the purpose of obtaining the approval of the Class or Classes of which such creditor ultimately is deemed to be a member. Any such reclassification of creditors, although subject to the notice and hearing requirements of the Bankruptcy Code, could adversely affect the Class in which such creditor was initially a member, or any other Class under the Plan, by changing the composition of such Class and the vote required for approval of the Plan. There can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court, after finding that a classification was inappropriate and requiring a reclassification, would approve the Plan based upon such reclassification. Except to the extent that modification of classification in the Plan requires re-solicitation, the Company will, in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules, seek a determination by the Bankruptcy Court that acceptance of the Plan of any Holder of Claims pursuant to this solicitation will constitute a consent to the Plan’s treatment of such Holder regardless of the Class as to which such Holder is ultimately deemed to be a member. The Company believes that under the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure the Company would be required to re-solicit votes for or against the Plan only when a modification adversely affects the treatment of the claim of any creditor or equity holder.

The Bankruptcy Code also requires that the Plan provide the same treatment for each Claim or Interest of a particular Class unless the Holder of a particular Claim or Interest agrees to a less favorable treatment of its Claim or Interest. The Company believes that it has complied with this requirement. To the extent that the Bankruptcy Court finds that the Plan does not satisfy such requirement, the Bankruptcy Court could deny confirmation of the Plan.

Issues or disputes relating to classification and/or treatment could result in a delay in the Confirmation and Consummation of the Plan and could increase the risk that the Plan will not be consummated.

If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks or in executing our business strategy, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

Table of Contents

Risks Related To Our Common Stock

If we fail to remain current in our reporting requirements, our common stock could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of our stockholders to sell their common stock in the secondary market.

In order for an issuer to have its securities quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, it must be required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Thereafter, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board, issuers are required to file complete annual and quarterly reports in a timely fashion. An issuer whose securities are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board that fails to file a complete annual or quarterly by the applicable due date for such report three times within a two year period, will have its securities removed from the OTC Bulletin Board and will be ineligible to have their securities quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board for a one year period. If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements for the next two years, we will be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, which could lead to losses for stockholders.

The securities of public companies can experience extreme price and volume fluctuations, which can be unrelated or out of proportion to the operating performance of such companies. We expect our common stock price will be subject to similar volatility. Any negative change in the public's perception of the prospects of our company or companies in our market could also depress our common stock price, regardless of our actual results. Factors affecting the trading price of our common stock may include:

	·	regulatory actions;
	·	variations in our operating results;

	·	announcements of technological innovations, new products or product enhancements, strategic alliances or significant agreements by us or by our competitors;
	·	recruitment or departure of key personnel;

	·	litigation, legislation, regulation or technological developments that adversely affect our business;
	·	changes in the estimates of our operating results or changes in recommendations by any securities analysts that elect to follow our common stock; and

market conditions in our industry, the industries of our customers and the economy as a whole.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they downgrade our stock, the price of our stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock may be affected by research and reports that industry or financial analysts may in the future publish about us or our business, over which we will have no control. There are many large, well-established publicly traded companies active in our industry and market, which means it will unlikely that we will receive widespread, if any, analyst coverage. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who in the future elect to cover us, downgrade our stock, our stock price would likely decline rapidly.

We have no intention to pay dividends on our common stock.

For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance our operations and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends with respect to our common stock. As a result, investors should not expect to receive dividends on any of the shares of our common stock purchased by them, for a long period of time, if ever.

Table of Contents

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and there may be a limited trading market for our common stock.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. There is extremely limited and sporadic trading of our common stock and no assurance can be given, when, if ever, an active trading market will develop or, if developed, that it will be sustained. As a result, investors in our common stock may be unable to sell their shares.

Future issuances of shares of our common stock pursuant to the exercise of options and warrants and conversion of convertible securities may decrease the market price of our common stock.

As of March 31, 2010, we had 17,466,295 shares of common stock outstanding. We also have 10,048,347 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. Further, we have up to an additional 3,700,000 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2004 Equity Compensation Plan and our 2006 Incentive Stock Plan. If any of our stockholders either individually or in the aggregate cause a large number of securities to be sold in the public market, or if the market perceives that these holders intend to sell a large number of securities, such sales or anticipated sales could result in a substantial reduction in the trading price of shares of our common stock and could also impede our ability to raise future capital.

The application of the “penny stock” rules could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and increase your transaction costs to sell those shares.

As long as the trading price of our common stock is below $5.00 per share, the open-market trading of our common stock will be subject to the “penny stock” rules. The penny stock rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1 million or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouses). For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of securities and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction before the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the broker-dealer must deliver, before the transaction, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information on the limited market in penny stocks. These additional burdens imposed on broker-dealers may restrict the ability or decrease the willingness of broker-dealers to sell our common stock, and may result in decreased liquidity of our common stock and increased transaction costs for sales and purchases of our common stock as compared to other securities.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Facilities

Our principal executive offices are located at 224 Rolling Hill Road, Suite 2A, Mooresville, North Carolina 28117. We entered into a three year lease for this space beginning October 1, 2009 for an office/warehouse combination in Mooresville, NC. Lease payments under the new office lease will be $2,695 per month for the first year and increases 3% for each subsequent year.

In June 2006 we entered into a lease for a laboratory facility in Mentor, Ohio. The space is approximately 1,440 square feet. The lease has a two year term, commencing on August 1, 2006 and ending in June 2008 and the rent is $900 per month. We have continued this lease on a month to month basis.

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings other than the Bankruptcy proceedings filed May 20, 2010.

On May 20, 2010 Anpath filed petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. We anticipate emerging from Bankruptcy in August 2010. See ITEM 1. BUSINESS

ITEM 4. RESERVED

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Since March 6, 2007, our common stock has traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the stock symbol “ANPG.” Prior thereto, our common stock had traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the stock symbol “TNSW.” The first day on which our shares were traded was September 1, 2005. The following table shows the reported high and low closing bid prices per share for our common stock based on information provided by the OTC Bulletin Board. The over-the-counter market quotations set forth for our common stock reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

	High		Low
Period from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2010	$	0.48	$	0.19
Period from October 1, 2009 to December 21, 2009	$	0.47	$	0.25
Period from July 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009	$	0.45	$	0.30
Period from April 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009	$	0.35	$	0.19
Period from January 1, 2009 to March 31, 2009	$	0.30	$	0.15
Period from October 1, 2008 to December 21, 2008	$	0.73	$	0.24
Period from July 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008	$	0.84	$	0.50
Period from April 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008	$	0.90	$	0.50

Number of Stockholders

As of March 31, 2010, there were approximately 400 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

Historically, we have not paid any dividends to the holders of our common stock and we do not expect to pay any such dividends in the foreseeable future as we expect to retain our future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 we sold 82,500 shares of restricted common stock to individuals exercising warrants at $0.20 per warrant for aggregate consideration of $16,500.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

This item is not applicable because we are a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in this report. Those statements in the following discussion that are not historical in nature should be considered to be forward-looking statements that are inherently uncertain. See “Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

From our inception in August 2004, until our acquisition of EnviroSystems in a reverse merger transaction in January 2006, we had no material assets and/or business operations. As a result of the merger, EnviroSystems became our wholly owned subsidiary and our business became that of EnviroSystems. EnviroSystems was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1996.

Through our wholly-owned subsidiary EnviroSystems, Inc., we produce cleaning and disinfecting products that we believe will help prevent the spread of infectious microorganisms while minimizing the harmful effects to people, equipment or the environment.

Products. Our infection prevention products will target a United States market for infection prevention products and services estimated at $11.8 billion in 2009. It is further estimated that consumables/disposables constitute 91% of this market. The total global demand is believed to be approximately 3-3.5 times that of the U.S. The demand for disinfectants in the U.S. is estimated to be $2.2 billion to $2.5 billion in the same period.

Primary Technology Platform

●	They kill a wide range of infectious microorganism, including MRSA;

●	They minimize harmful effects to people (EnviroTru® /EnviroTru® 1453 meet Environmental Protection Agency requirements for Toxicity Category IV) and do not cause skin, eye, pulmonary, oral or dermal irritation;

●	They are safe for animals (the EquineTru® formulation safely prevents and eliminates persistent skin and hoof conditions caused by micro-organisms); and

●	They are non-corrosive (EnviroTru /EnviroTru 1453 are included in the Boeing Qualified Products List (QPL) and conform to AMS-1452A, 1453 & D6-7127 Aircraft Corrosion Specifications).

Product Categories

We are exploiting our technology platform to establish a broad product portfolio in the following categories:

●	Surface Care products - disinfectants, sanitizers and cleaners (including wipes);

●	GeoBiocides – biocides for use in the oil and gas industry.

●	Animal Care products - skin and hoof care treatment and animal shampoo; and

●	Personal Care products – antimicrobial hand soaps, hand sanitizers and facial scrubs (including wipes).

Current Products

As more fully explained in the information incorporated by reference herein, we are currently generating modest revenue from the following products:

Surface Care Products: We presently sell a number of different surface disinfectant liquids, sprays and wipes that are purchased primarily for use in industrial markets.

Animal Care Products: We currently have one product that is accepted by veterinary regulators which addresses skin and hoof disease in horses.

Opportunities”):

Table of Contents

Future Products

Hospital Grade Product

Oil & Gas Industry

Micro Chemical Emulsion Technology

Table of Contents

Parachlorometaxylenol (“PCMX”)

Micro-particle Anatomy

Micro-Emulsion Mechanism

Table of Contents

Through EnviroSystems, we produce disinfecting, sanitizing and cleaning products designed to help prevent the spread of infectious microorganisms, while minimizing the harmful effects to people, application surfaces and the environment. We have developed and have trade secret rights to what we believe to be a unique and proprietary Parachlorometaxylenol (more commonly known as PCMX).

We are exploiting our technology platform to establish a broad product portfolio in the following categories:

·	Surface care products - disinfectants, sanitizers and cleaners (including wipes);

·	Animal care products - skin and hoof care treatment and animal shampoo;

·	Personal care products – antimicrobial hand soaps, hand sanitizers and facial scrubs (including wipes); and

·	Geo-Biocides – biocides for use in the oil and gas industry.

Among our near-term priorities, we intend to continue to work to reintroduce a hospital grade disinfectant product to replace the product called EcoTru®. This product had historically been EnviroSystems’ primary product and accounted for a majority of its revenue, but was removed from the market in 2006. The reformulated EcoTru® is expected to demonstrate through testing that it will effectively kill numerous bacteria, fungi, and viruses, including Hepatitis B and C, HIV, herpes and influenza. Likewise, in addition to being highly effective as a disinfectant, our reformulated EcoTru® is expected to occupy a unique position in the market place in that it will combine this microbial effectiveness in a disinfectant product which also will have a favorable profile for health and environmental effects.

Results of Operations

Year Ended March 31, 2010 compared to Year Ended March 31, 2009

Revenues. Our revenues for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $428,861 and $85,969, respectively. This is an increase of $342,892 over the prior year. This increase is directly attributive to repeat orders from our distributors, orders from new distributors and increased market demand.

Revenues for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were composed of the following:

	Years Ended March 31,
Products	2010			2009
Electro-Static Sprayer		12.48	%		19.54	%
EnviroTru® and EnviroTru 1453®		87.14	%		46.30	%
Other		.38	%		34.16	%

Table of Contents

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $292,963 and $77,613, respectively, an increase of $215,350. As a percentage of revenues, for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, cost of sales represented 68.31% and 90.28% of revenues, respectively. Cost of sales for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 includes $4,079 and $5,019 for disposal cost of material that scrapped and $22,354 and $27,045 of raw material cost from inventory we produced prior to our inventory production contract with Minntech. Under the production contract with Minntech, they are responsible for the procurement of raw materials. Cost of sales adjusted for these additional amounts for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 would be $270,609 and $50,568 and would represent 63.10% and 58.82% of revenues, respectively. At March 31, 2010 the Company did not have any further raw materials on hand.

During the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, depreciation expense in the amount of $-0- and $34,371 was recorded for manufacturing equipment that sat idle and is included as part of Operating Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $2,832,136 and $3,920,599, respectively, a decrease of $1,088,463 or 27.76%. Individual components of the change in operating expenses are as follows:

·	Sales expense decrease of $88,904 or 26.17% in the current year end of March 31, 2010 when compared to the prior year end of March 31, 2009.
·	Product development expense decrease of $138,433 or 31.93% for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

·	Corporate expense decrease of $160,642 or 22.03% in the current year end of March 31, 2010 when compared to the prior year end of March 31, 2009.
·	Finance and administrative expense increase of $8,651 or 0.02% in the current year end of March 31, 2010 when compared to the prior year end of March 31, 2009.

·	Consultant expense increase of $47,625 or 18.22% in the current year end of March 31, 2010 when compared to the prior year end of March 31, 2009.
·	Compensation cost for re-pricing warrants decrease of $316,673 or 54.41% in the current year end of March 31, 2010 when compared to the prior year end of March 31, 2009.

·	Financing expense decrease of $440,087 or 37.57% in the current year end of March 31, 2010 when compared to the prior year end of March 31, 2009.

Sales. The decrease in sales expense for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009 is attributed to a decrease of one employee and associated benefits of $24,183, a reduction of office lease cost of $21,375; an effort to reduce and control travel, trade show and advertising expenses by the department of $25,299 and a reduction in sales consultants of $12,000. Various other cost had a net decrease of $6,047 for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009.

Product Developement. The decrease in product development expenses for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009 is attributed to a decrease of one employee and associated benefits of $74,359; a reduction of product testing cost of $43,965 and a decrease in compensation cost of options awards of $21,264. Various other cost had a net increase of $1,155 for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009.

Corporate. The decrease in corporate expense for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009 is attributed to a decrease in legal fees of $119,521, a decrease in annual meeting cost of $8,570, a decrease in idle process depreciation of machinery of $34,371, an increase in travel and entertainment expenses of $13,509 and a decrease in office lease cost of $19,198. Various other cost had a net increase of $7,509 for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009.

Table of Contents

Consulting. Consultants are usually compensated through the issuance of restricted stock or the issuance of common stock warrants. Consulting cost increased to $309,000 from $261,375 for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009, an increase of $47,625. Restricted stock was issued in year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 in the amounts of $221,000 and $204,500. Expenses related to the Black-Scholes valuation method in the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $-0- and $56,875, respectively. In the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 we paid cash compensation of $88,000 and $-0-, respectively.

Compensation Cost for Re-Pricing Warrants. Compensation Cost for Re-Pricing Warrants decreased to $265,383 from $582,056 for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009, a decrease of $316,673. The decrease is attributed to a reduced amount of re-pricing of warrants in the current year.

Financing Expense. Financing cost decreased to $731,276 from $1,171,363 for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2009, a decrease of $440,087. The decrease is attributed to a reduced amount of financing with convertible debt and detachable warrants.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the year ended March 31, 2010, we used $1,386,277 in operating activities, compared with $922,166 used in operating activities for the year ended March 31, 2009, an increase of $464,111 or 50.33%.

We had net cash provided by financing activities of $1,375,046 for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared with $581,770 provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2009. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended March 31, 2010, includes $16,500 in proceeds from the exercise warrants, and net proceeds of $1,355,546 from notes payable.

At March 31, 2010 and 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents available in the amounts of $-0- and $11,231, a decrease of $11,231.

Contractual Obligations

Operating Leases

We have entered into a lease agreement for an office lease beginning October 1, 2009. The office lease requires us to pay $99,960 over a three year period beginning. We have an option to extend this lease for an additional year. The office is located in Mooresville, NC.

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		4-5 years		After 5 years
Office Lease	$	89,180	$	32,664	$	56,516	$	-	$	-
Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	89,180	$	32,664	$	56,516	$	-	$	-

Executive Employment Contracts

The Company does not have any executive employment contracts in place at the present time.

Table of Contents

Manufacturing Contract

Effective August 1, 2006, EnviroSystems, Inc., the wholly owned subsidiary of Anpath Group, Inc. entered into a manufacturing agreement with Minntech Corporation, a Minnesota corporation pursuant to which Minntech has agreed to be the exclusive U.S. manufacturer of EnviroSystems' disinfectant product.

The Manufacturing Agreement provides the terms and conditions pursuant to which Minntech will manufacture and supply to ESI all of ESI's requirements for the Product. Manufacturing of the Product commenced in September 2007. The Manufacturing Agreement has a term of three years commencing after the first shipment of commercial quantities of the Product by Minntech to ESI, provides for automatic one year renewals if not terminated by one of the parties. The Manufacturing Agreement may be terminated by either party upon 90 days prior written notice.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements. These statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of estimates in preparation of financial statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, based on historical experience, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following critical accounting policies rely upon assumptions, judgments and estimates and were used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

Trade Secret

The trade secret of the formula/formulation of EnviroSystems' product, at the time acquired by us was based upon the valuation of an independent appraiser.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

We assess potential impairment of our long lived assets, which include our property and equipment and our identifiable intangibles such as our trade secrets under the guidance of Statement of Financial Standards No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets. Once annually, or as events and circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired, we assess potential impairment of our long lived assets. We determine impairment by measuring the undisclosed future cash flows generated by the assets, comparing the results to the assets' carrying value and adjusting the assets to the lower of the carrying value to fair value and charging currant operations for any measured impairment.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is generally recognized and earned when all of the following criteria are satisfied: a) persuasive evidence of sales arrangements exists; b) delivery has occurred; c) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and d) collectability is reasonably assured.

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via a purchase order from our customers. Delivery occurs when title and all risks of ownership are transferred to the purchaser which generally occurs when the products are shipped to the customer. No right of return exists on sales of product except for defective or damaged products. The sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of purchase order. To assure that collectability is reasonably assured we perform ongoing credit evaluations of all of our customers.

Table of Contents

Contingent Liability

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 14, we may have certain contingent liabilities with respect to material existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. We accrue liabilities when it is probable that future cost will be incurred and such cost can be measured.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The full text of our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 begins on page F-1 of this Annual Report.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A. ACONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In connection with the preparation of this annual report on Form 10K, Anpath’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

During the evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2010, management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, which management considers an integral component of disclosure controls and procedures. The material weakness identified relates to a lack of appropriate accounting policies and related procedures. As a result of the material weakness identified, management concluded that Anpath’s disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective.

Notwithstanding the existence of this material weakness, Anpath believes that the consolidated financial statements in this annual report on Form 10K fairly present, in all material respects, Anpath’s financial condition as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of Anpath is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Anpath’s internal control over financial reporting is a process, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the Board of Directors; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Anpath’s management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). As a result of this assessment, management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The material weakness identified is disclosed below:

Lack of Appropriate Accounting Policies and Related Procedures.

·	We do not have adequate personnel and other resources to assure that significant and complex transactions are timely analyzed and reviewed.
·	We have limited personnel and financial resources available to plan, develop, and implement disclosure and procedure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
·	Our limited financial resources restrict our employment of adequate personnel needed and desirable to separate the various receiving, recording, reviewing and oversight functions for the exercise effective control over financial reporting.
·	Our limited resources restrict our ability to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described above, Anpath management has concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, Anpath’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.

Table of Contents

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. We were not required to have, nor have we, engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform an audit of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

The Company intends, as capital resources allow, remedying its material weaknesses by identifying steps that can be taken in the process of documenting and evaluating the applicable accounting treatment for non-routine or complex transactions as they may arise. Despite the Company’s intention to remedy its material weaknesses in the manner described, the actions required to accomplish these objectives may require the Company to engage additional personnel which actions may not be possible in the near term due to our limited financial resources and operations.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

As of the end of the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Anpath internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Directors and Executive Officers

Set forth below are the names, ages, and positions of each of our and EnviroSystems' executive officers and directors, together with such person's business experience during the past five (5) years.

Name	Age	Position(s)
J. Lloyd Breedlove	62	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Stephen Hoelscher	51	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Director
Paul S. Malchesky	64	Chief Science Officer, EnviroSystems
Jeff Savino	56	Vice President, Marketing and Sales, EnviroSystems

Table of Contents

J. Lloyd Breedlove

J. Lloyd Breedlove has been our and EnviroSystems' President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors since January 10, 2006 and since 2004, he has served as a member of the board of directors of EnviroSystems. From June 2003 to 2006, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Imalux Corporation a corporation in the medical imaging equipment industry. Prior thereto, from December 2000 to May 2003 he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of KIVALO, Inc. a healthcare technology company with emphasis on disease management. From 1991to 1999, Mr. Breedlove served as the Executive Vice President and Group President of STERIS Corporation, a developer and manufacturer of infection and contamination control products. From 1989 to 1991, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Catheter Research Inc. (CRI), a developer of a vascular surgery products and prior thereto he was the Director of Sales and held other sales and management positions at Mallinckrodt, Inc., a diverse company focusing on supplying products to the healthcare industry. Mr. Breedlove has a wide range of experience working with companies in various stages of development from start-ups to companies with global operations. During Mr. Breedlove's tenure at STERIS, annual sales increased from $13 million to greater than $820 million. He has served on numerous advisory and corporate boards, with an emphasis on establishing healthcare businesses. Mr. Breedlove received an MBA from Western Carolina University. Serving in Viet Nam, he was awarded the Bronze Star, Bronze Star with Oak Leaf Cluster, Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry, Air Medal and Purple Heart.

Stephen Hoelscher

Mr. Hoelscher has been our and EnviroSystems' Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and a member of our board of directors since January 10, 2006. Mr. Hoelscher is a Certified Public Accountant and has 30 years of accounting and auditing experience. Mr. Hoelscher is a 5% owner of, and also the CFO for, Mastodon Ventures, Inc., a financial consulting business in Austin, Texas, a position that he has held since 2000. Mastodon Ventures, Inc. is an affiliate of MV Nanotech Corp. which previously made loans to us in the aggregate amount of $850,000, which amount (plus accrued but unpaid interest) was repaid out of the net proceeds of our private offering completed in January 2006. Since May, 2004, Mr. Hoelscher has also served as the Chief Financial Officer of EnXnet, Inc, a Tulsa, Oklahoma based publicly traded technology company, and he has provided accounting consulting services to EnXnet since January 2001. Mr. Hoelscher will continue to provide limited consultation to Mastodon and will continue to consult with EnXnet but will devote such time as necessary to the performance of his duties to us. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Hoelscher was the Controller for Aperian, Inc. an Austin, Texas based publicly traded company. Prior to joining Aperian, he was the controller for Protos Software Company in Georgetown, Texas from 1996 to 1997. Mr. Hoelscher was Audit Manager with Brown, Graham and Company, P.C. from 1989 to 1996. Mr. Hoelscher received a Bachelor of Business Administration from West Texas A&M University (formerly West Texas State University) in Canyon, Texas in 1981.

Dr. William Jay Robbins, M.D., F.A.C.P., A.A.H.I.V.S., Director

Dr. Robbins background includes a history of active involvement with infectious disease care, specifically with HIV treatment and immunology. Currently he is a member of the National Board of Directors at the American Academy of HIV Medicine. In 2000, he founded his current practice, Infectious Disease of Central Florida in Orlando, Florida. Dr. Robbins is a member of the National Medical Advisory Board of Aguron Corporation, and is the Florida Chapter President at the American Academy of HIV Medicine.

Dr. Robbins is a Principal Investigator for a wide range of clinical research studies with numerous pharmaceutical and biotech companies. He has two decades of clinical trial participation and engages as an expert speaker for Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Roche, and Bohringer-Ingelheim. In additional he has held positions as Clinical Instructor at both NOVA Southeastern University School of Osteopathic Medicine and the Orlando Regional Medical Center.

From 1986-1999, Dr. Robbins founded and was senior physician at Central Florida Infectious Disease, P.A., Prior to that he held Chief of Medicine position at A.M.I. Medical Center in Orlando, Florida. Dr. Robbins has participated in numerous community service organizations specifically focused on HIV/AIDS. He has received many awards and honors including the AMI Medical Center Orlando Physician of the Year - 1989 and Glebeigh Hospital, Orlando, Florida Distinguished Faculty Award Recognition for AIDS victims, and has published numerous scientific papers focused on HIV Medicine.

Dr. Robbins earned his Bachelor of Science degree in biology from Lehigh University (1973) and a Doctor of Medicine degree from the University of the State of New York, Albany, New York (1985) He received residency training from the department of internal medicine at the Lutheran Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York (1981-1983) and completed fellowship training in infectious diseases at the University of the State of New York - Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York (1983-1985).

Paul S. Malchesky

Paul S. Malchesky, D. Eng. has served as the Chief Science Officer of our subsidiary, EnviroSystems, since January, 2006. Dr. Malchesky is a former Vice President of Operations and Discovery and Development for NanoScale Materials, Inc. in Manhattan, KS. Previously, he served as Vice President of Investigational Research at STERIS Corporation, Mentor, OH, and Staff Member at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in Artificial Organs in Cleveland, OH. As an academician, Dr. Malchesky is Associate Professor of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and Adjunct Staff in Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Adjunct Professor in Chemical Engineering at Kansas State University. He is also President of the International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation (ICAOT). Dr. Malchesky is also the Editor-in-Chief of Artificial Organs and Managing Editor of Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis. He holds a Doctorate in Engineering from Cleveland State University, M.S. degrees in Chemistry from Case Western Reserve University and in Chemical Engineering from Cleveland State University and a B.S. Degree in Chemistry from St. Francis College (PA).

Jeff Savino

Jeff Savino has served as the Vice President of Marketing & Sales of our subsidiary, EnviroSystems, since January, 2006. Mr. Savino has nearly thirty years of proven experience in medical marketing and sales, spanning from small to large corporations. His background includes new product introductions, operations experience, and international commerce and business Most recently he built and managed a national distribution network at Boehringer Labs. Previously, Mr. Savino held a number of responsible positions in his ten years of service with STERIS Corporation, including Vice President, International Health Care, and Latin American Operations. His marketing and sales career began with Baxter. Mr. Savino holds a B.S. Degree in Biology from City University of New York.

Election of Directors and Officers

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one (1) vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of directors. Cumulative voting with respect to the election of directors is not permitted by our certificate of incorporation.

The board of directors shall be elected at the annual meeting of the stockholders or at a special meeting called for that purpose. Each director shall hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until the director's successor is elected and qualified. If a vacancy occurs on the board of directors, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors, then the stockholders may fill the vacancy at the next annual meeting or at a special meeting called for the purpose, or the board of directors may fill such vacancy.

Table of Contents

Compensation of Directors

It is intended that each member of our board of directors who is not also an employee (a “non-employee director”) will receive an annual retainer in shares of our common stock as determined by our board of directors and all directors will be reimbursed for costs and expenses related to attending meetings of the board of directors or committees of the board of directors on which they serve.

Our employee directors will not receive any additional compensation for serving on our board of directors or any committee of our board of directors, and our non-employee directors will not receive any compensation from us for their roles as directors other than the stock option grants described above.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors does not have any committees. We do not have a nominating committee because the board has determined that since the board consists of two members it was not necessary to have a nominating committee. Our board of directors, which consists of Mr. Breedlove and Mr. Hoelscher, participates in the consideration of director nominees.

Our board of directors does not have a separately-designated standing audit committee and our entire board serves as the audit committee. We have not adopted an audit committee charter or made a determination as to whether any of our directors would qualify as an audit committee financial expert.

Code of Ethics.

The Company has not yet adopted a code of ethics applicable to its chief executive officer and chief accounting officer, or persons performing those functions, because of the small number of persons involved in management of the Company.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our officers or directors.

Legal Proceedings

Based on our inquiries of all of our officers and directors, we are not aware of any pending or threatened legal proceedings involving any of our officers or directors that would be material to an evaluation of our management.

Table of Contents

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning all cash and non-cash compensation awarded to each named executive officer for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

														Nonqualified
												Non-Equity		Deferred		All
							Stock		Option			Incentive Plan		Compensation		Other
Name and Principal		Salary			Bonus		Awards		Awards			Compensation		Earnings		Compensation		Total
Position	Year	($)			($)		($)		($)			($)		($)		($)		($)
									(A)
J. Lloyd Breedlove,	2010	$	259,000	(1)	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	(2)	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	259,000
Pres., CEO and	2009	$	260,041	(1)	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	(2)	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	260,041
Director (1)

Stephen Hoelscher,	2010	$	140,016	(3)	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	62,885	(4)	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	202,901
CFO, Secretary and Director	2009	$	140,016	(3)	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	62,885	(4)	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	202,901

(A) The Company used the Black-Scholes option price calculation to value the options issued to the officers using the following assumptions: risk-free rate of 4.50%; volatility of 63%; zero dividend yield; the actual exercise term of the options issued and the exercise price of options issued.

(1) The company was unable to pay Mr. Breedlove his full salary and all unpaid salary has been accrued. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, Mr. Breedlove’s accrued unpaid executive compensation was $119,084 and $97,500.

(2) An option for the purchase of 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share was granted to Mr. Breedlove on January 10, 2006. This option became fully vested and exercisable on January 9, 2008. This option has a termination date of January 9, 2011.

An option for the purchase of 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.24 per share was granted to Mr. Breedlove on May 1, 2009. This option becomes vested over a four year vesting schedule; 25% at May 1, 2010 and the remainder vesting in 36 equal monthly amounts through May 1, 2013. This option has a termination date of May 1, 2019.

(3) The company was unable to pay Mr. Hoelscher his full salary and all unpaid salary has been accrued. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, Mr. Hoelscher’s accrued unpaid executive compensation was $70,008 and $58,340.

(4) An option for the purchase of 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.20 per share was granted to Mr. Hoelscher on December 18, 2006. This option becomes vested over a four year vesting schedule; 25% at the January 17, 2007and the remainder vesting in 36 equal monthly amounts through December 17, 2010. This option has a termination date of December 17, 2016.

An option for the purchase of 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.24 per share was granted to Mr. Hoelscher on May 1, 2009. This option becomes vested over a four year vesting schedule; 25% at May 1, 2010 and the remainder vesting in 36 equal monthly amounts through May 1, 2013. This option has a termination date of May 1, 2019.

Table of Contents

Employment Agreements

We currently do not have an employment contract with our executive officers.

Other Compensation

We pay Mr. Breedlove $259,000 per year in consideration for Mr. Breedlove serving as our Chief Executive Officer, President and as a member of the Board of Directors. Mr. Hoelscher is compensated $140,000 per year in consideration for Mr. Hoelscher serving as our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and as a member of the Board of Directors.

We may also issue to our officers and directors stock options on terms and conditions to be determined by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors.

Stock Option Plans

2004 Equity Compensation Plan

We adopted our 2004 Equity Compensation Plan on September 1, 2004. The plan provides for the grant of options intended to qualify as “incentive stock options”, options that are not intended to so qualify or “nonstatutory stock options” and restricted stock. The total number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plan is 1,300,000 shares, subject to adjustment in the event of stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or similar capital change. No grants have been made under the plan.

The plan is administered by our board of directors, which selects the eligible persons to whom options or stock awards shall be granted, determines the number of shares subject to each option or stock award, the exercise price therefore and the periods during which options are exercisable, interprets the provisions of the plan and, subject to certain limitations, may amend the plan. Each option or stock award granted under the plan shall be evidenced by a written agreement between us and the optionee.

Grants may be made to our employees (including officers) and directors and to certain consultants and advisors.

The exercise price for incentive stock options granted under the plan may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted, except for options granted to 10% stockholders which must have an exercise price of not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. The exercise price for nonstatutory options is determined by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. Incentive stock options granted under the plan have a maximum term of ten years, except for grants to 10% stockholders which are subject to a maximum term of five years. The term of nonstatutory stock options is determined by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. Options granted under the plan are not transferable, except by will and the laws of descent and distribution.

Table of Contents

2006 Stock Incentive Plan

In connection with the merger, our board of directors adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan was approved by our stockholders of record as November 15, 2006 at our special meeting of stockholders which occurred on January 8, 2007. The 2006 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights. The number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2006 Plan is 2,400,000 shares.

The 2006 Plan is administered by our board of directors, which will select the eligible persons to whom options or stock awards shall be granted, determine the number of shares subject to each option or stock award, the exercise price therefore and the periods during which options are exercisable, interpret the provisions of the plan and, subject to certain limitations, may amend the plan. Each option or stock award granted under the plan shall be evidenced by a written agreement between us and the optionee.

Grants may be made to our employees (including officers) and directors and to certain consultants and advisors.

The exercise price for incentive stock options granted under the 2006 Plan may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted, except for options granted to 10% stockholders which must have an exercise price of not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. The exercise price for nonstatutory options will be determined by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. Incentive stock options granted under the 2006 Plan will have a maximum term of ten years, except for grants to 10% stockholders which are subject to a maximum term of five years. The term of nonstatutory stock options will be determined by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors. Options granted under the plan are not transferable, except by will and the laws of descent and distribution.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END

OPTION AWARDS

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)

Name	Exercisable (Vested)			Unexercisable (Unvested)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date
J. Lloyd Breedlove		750,000	(1)		750,000	$	2.50	01/10/2011
J. Lloyd Breedlove		-0-	(2)		-0-		0.24	05/01/2019
Stephen Hoelscher		200,000	(3)		-0-		2.50	12/17/2016
Stephen Hoelscher		-0-	(4)		200,000	$	0.24	05/01/2019

(1) An option for the purchase of 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share was granted to Mr. Breedlove on January 10, 2006. This option became fully vested and exercisable on January 9, 2008. This option has a termination date of January 9, 2011.

(2) An option for the purchase of 750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.24 per share was granted to Mr. Breedlove on May 1, 2009. This option becomes vested over a four year vesting schedule; 25% at May 1, 2010 and the remainder vesting in 36 equal monthly amounts through May 1, 2013. This option has a termination date of May 1, 2019.

(3) An option for the purchase of 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.20 per share was granted to Mr. Hoelscher on December 18, 2006. This option becomes vested over a four year vesting schedule; 25% at the January 17, 2007and the remainder vesting in 36 equal monthly amounts through December 17, 2010. This option has a termination date of December 17, 2016.

(4) An option for the purchase of 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.24 per share was granted to Mr. Hoelscher on May 1, 2009. This option becomes vested over a four year vesting schedule; 25% at May 1, 2010 and the remainder vesting in 36 equal monthly amounts through May 1, 2013. This option has a termination date of May 1, 2019.

Table of Contents

OPTIONS EXERCISED and STOCK VESTED

No named executive officer exercised options in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 or March 31, 2009. Options held by the following named executive officers vested during the years ended:

	March 31,		March 31,
Name	2010		2009
J. Lloyd Breedlove		-0-		-0-
Stephen Hoelscher		50,000		50,000

Compensation of Directors

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Name

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

($)

Stock Awards

($)

Option Awards

($)

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

($)

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

($)

All Other Compensation

($)

Total

($)

J. Lloyd Breedlove (1)

—

Stephen Hoelscher (1)

—

Stephen A. Schneider (2)

—

Paul A. Boyer (2)

—

David V. Gilroy (2)

—

Dr William Robbins (3)

—

(1) Board members who are also officers are not individually compensated for being on the Board of Directors.

(2) Mr. Schneider, Mr. Boyer, and Mr. Gilroy resigned from the Board of Directors on March 5, 2009.

(3) Mr. Robbins was appointed to the Board on September 2, 2009.

Table of Contents

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table shows information about securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of March 31, 2010:

Plan Category	Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options (a)		Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding (b)		Number of Securities remaining for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		2,780,000	$	2.34		920,000	*
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—
Total		2,780,000	$	2.34		920,000

* Represents remaining shares issuable under the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan and the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth certain information as of June 29, 2010 regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each person who, to our knowledge, beneficially owns more than 5% of our Common Stock; (ii) each of our directors and named executive officers; and (iii) all of our named executive officers and directors as a group:

Name and address of Beneficial Owner	Amount (1)		Percent of Class
Directors and Named Executive Officers (2):
J. Lloyd Breedlove (3)		1,129,526		6.1	%
Stephen Hoelscher (4)		331,980		1.9	%

All directors and named executive officers as a group (two persons)		1,461,506		7.8	%

Other 5% or Greater Beneficial Owners
The Ferguson Living Trust UDT 8/13/74 (5) 2100 Gold Street San Jose, CA 95164		2,915,562		14.3	%
ANPG Lending LLC (6) c/o Romulus Holdings 2200 Fletcher Avenue Fort Lee, NJ 07024		10,182,708		4.9	%

(1)

Beneficial ownership is calculated based on 17,466,295 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of June 29, 2010. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The number of shares beneficially owned by a person includes shares of common stock subject to options or warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days following the date hereof. The shares issuable pursuant to those options or warrants are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding these options and warrants but are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite the stockholder's name, subject to community property laws, where applicable.

(2)	The address for the directors and named executive officers is c/o Anpath Group, Inc., 224 Rolling Hill Road, Suite 2A, Mooresville, North Carolina 28117.

Table of Contents

(3)

Includes 200,775 common stock shares, 750,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of $2.50 per share and 116,127 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. Also includes 62,624 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options to purchase shares of EnviroSystems preferred stock, using a conversion ratio of 1.956994 shares of our common stock for each share of EnviroSystems preferred stock issuable upon exercise. Mr. Breedlove holds options to purchase 32,000 shares of EnviroSystems preferred stock which are exercisable to purchase up to 62,624 shares of our common stock based on the conversion ratio. Such number of shares was determined assuming the exercise of all options and warrants to purchase EnviroSystems preferred stock. In the event such options and/or warrants expire without being exercised, then any shares of common stock issuable upon exercise shall be distributed pro-rata among the EnviroSystems preferred stockholders. In the event of such a pro-rata distribution, Mr. Breedlove would be eligible to receive additional shares of common stock. This amount does not include 750,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of $0.24 per share which have not vested.

(4)

Includes 124,540 common stock shares, 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of $2.20 per share and 7,440 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. This amount does not include 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of $0.24 per share which have not vested.

(5)	Includes 2,500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants to purchase common stock. Also includes 415,562 shares of common stock issued in exchange for shares of EnviroSystems preferred stock.

(6)

Such shares include 856,000 shares of common stock out of a total of approximately 8,682,708 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) and 1,500,000 issuable upon the exercise of warrants (the “Warrants”). The Notes have an aggregate principal balance of $1,500,000 and are convertible into shares of common stock at a price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment pursuant to anti-dilution provisions in the Notes. The Warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 per share, subject to adjustment pursuant to anti-dilution provisions in the Warrants. The Notes and Warrants have limits on exercise and conversion. According to the terms of the Notes and the Warrants held by ANPG Lending LLC, it is prohibited from converting the Notes or exercising its Warrants if after such exercise or conversion, ANPG Lending LLC’s percentage ownership of common stock would exceed 4.9%. If there were no such restrictions in the Notes and Warrants, and ANPG Lending LLC had the right to exercise such Notes and Warrants for all 10,182,708 shares, ANPG Limited LLC would be deemed to own approximately 36.8% of our common stock.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

Other than the compensation and employment arrangements described above, we have not entered into any transactions with any of our directors or executive officers or their immediate family members during the fiscal ended March 31, 2010.

Director Independence

The Company’s board of directors reviewed the independence of the directors using the criteria established by the American Stock Exchange. As of March 31, 2010, the Board determined that one of its three directors are independent based upon such criteria.

Table of Contents

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

BehlerMick P.S. (formerly Williams & Webster, P.S. (Behler) was our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. Pattillo, Brown & Hill, L.L.P. (PB&H) was our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ended March 31, 2010. Set forth below are the fees and expenses for W&W and PB&H for each of the last two years for the following services provided to us:

	2010		2009
Audit Fees-Behler	$	42,644	$	65,130
Audit Fees-PB&H		14,060		—
Audit Related Fees		—		—
Tax Fees		—		—
All Other Fees		—		—

Except as described above, we have not been billed for any services by Behler or PB&H. Our Board of Directors acts as our audit committee. Our Board of Directors has not authorized Behler or PB&H to provide any other services for us.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)

(1)

Financial Statements.

The financial statements listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing on page F-1 of this Form 10K are filed as a part of this report.

(2)	Financial Statement Schedules

There is no financial statement schedules included in this annual report.

(3)	The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this annual report.

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description
3.1	Composite Certificate of Incorporation (11)
3.2	By-Laws (1)
4.1	Specimen Certificate of Common Stock (1)
4.2	Form of Warrant (5)
4.3	Warrant, dated July 6, 2007 (8)
4.4	Form of Note (10)
4.5	Form of Warrant (10)
10.1	2004 Equity Compensation Plan (1)
10.2	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2005 between MV Nanotech Corp. and Telecomm Sales Network, Inc. (2)
10.3	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 11, 2005 by and between Telecomm, TSN Acquisition Corporation and EnviroSystems, Inc. (Nonmaterial schedules and exhibits identified in the Agreement and Plan of Merger have been omitted pursuant to Item 601b.2 of Regulation S-K. Telecomm Sales Network, Inc. agrees to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request by the Commission a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.) (3)

Table of Contents

10.4	Escrow and Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of November 11, 2005 by and between Telecomm, Daniel Ferguson, as shareholder agent, EnviroSystems and Jerold K. Levien, Esq. as escrow agent.(4)
10.5	Form of Registration Rights Agreement between Telecomm Sales Network, Inc. and the other signatories thereto. (5)
10.6	Commercial Lease Agreement dated June 6, 2006 by and between Morlake Executive Suites and EnviroSystems, Inc. (5)
10.7	Telecomm Sales Network, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (5)+
10.8	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (5)+
10.9	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (5)+
10.10	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (5)+
10.11	Employment Agreement made as of January 19, 2006 between Telecomm Sales Network, Inc. and J. Lloyd Breedlove(4)
10.12	Manufacturing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2006 between EnviroSystems, Inc. and Minntech Corporation (6) *
10.13	Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement between EnviroSystems, Inc. American Children’s Foundation, Richard H. Othus, Andrew D.B. Lambie and Cascade Chemical Corporation.(9)
10.14	Consent Agreement and Final Order with United States Environmental Protection Agency (6)
10.15	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 7, 2007 between MV Nanotech Corp., the Singer Children’s Management Trust and, solely with respect to sections 4 and 8, Anpath Group, Inc.
10.16	Settlement Agreement dated as of July 6, 2007 by and among Anpath Group, Inc., MV Nanotech Corp. and The Ferguson Living Trust UTD 8/13/74 and Daniel Ferguson in his capacity as Shareholder Agent (8)
10.17	Lock-Up Agreement made and entered into as of July 6, 2007 (8)
10.18	Loan and Security Agreement dated as of January 8, 2008 by and between Anpath Group, Inc. and ANPG Lending LLC (without exhibits or schedules).(10)
10.19	Securities Repurchase Agreement dated as of January 8, 2008 by and between Anpath Group, Inc, ANPG Lending LLC and the Singer Children’s Management Trust (without exhibits or schedules) (10).
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant (12)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (12)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (12)
32.1	Certification of the CEO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (12)

(1)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on March 16, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(2)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 17, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 12, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Transition Report on Form 10KSB filed on June 29, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
(6)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed on November 15, 2006.
(7)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 17, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(8)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(9)	Filed as an exhibit to Amendment 2 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on April 16, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
(10)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference
(11)	Filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s Transition Report on Form 10K filed on July 9, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
(12)	Filed herein

+ Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

* Pursuant to a request for confidential treatment which has been granted by the SEC, certain confidential portions of this document have been omitted and furnished separately to the SEC in accordance with Rule 406(b).

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

July 14, 2010	ANPATH GROUP, INC.

	By: /s/ J. Lloyd Breedlove
	J. Lloyd Breedlove
	President and CEO

In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

	ANPATH GROUP, INC.

July 14, 2010	/s/ J. Lloyd Breedlove
	J. Lloyd Breedlove
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Principal Executive Officer

	ANPATH GROUP, INC.

July 14, 2010	/s/ Stephen Hoelscher
	Stephen Hoelscher
	Chief Financial Officer and Director, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

Table of Contents

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Anpath Group, Inc.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Anpath Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The financial statements of Anpath Group, Inc. as of March 31, 2009, were audited by other auditors whose report dated July 10, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on these statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audit and report of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Anpath Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses and has an accumulated deficit at March 31, 2010. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Pattillo, Brown & Hill L.L.P.

Certified Public Accountants

Waco, Texas

July 13, 2010

F-1

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	Years Ended
	March 31,
	2010			2009
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	-		$	11,231
Accounts receivable, net		6,864			10,241
Prepaid expenses		31,207			4,817
Inventory		-			22,354
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		38,071			48,643
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Furniture & fixtures		205,694			205,694
Machinery & equipment		195,137			195,137
Capitalized software		3,210			3,210
Less accumulated depreciation		(270,171	)		(205,676	)
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS		133,871			198,365
OTHER ASSETS
Trade secrets		1,026,000			1,026,000
Deposits		177,795			198,082
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS		1,203,795			1,224,082
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,375,737		$	1,471,090
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	368,483		$	395,525
Accrued interest payable		334,660			135,570
Wages payable		230,541			188,840
Current maturities of long-term debt, net of discount		2,920,951			1,484,357
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		3,854,635			2,204,292
LONG TERM LIABILITIES
Notes payable, net of discount		-			-
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES		-			-
TOTAL LIABILITIES		3,854,635			2,204,292
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		-			-
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 17,020,462 and 16,203,654 shares issued and outstanding		1,702			1,620
Additional paid-in capital		30,013,696			28,863,063
Accumulated deficit		(32,494,296	)		(29,597,885	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		(2,478,898	)		(733,202	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,375,737		$	1,471,090

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	For the Fiscal Years Ended
	March 31,
	2010			2009
REVENUES	$	428,861		$	85,969
COST OF SALES		292,963			77,613
Gross Profit		135,898			8,357
EXPENSES:
Sales		250,793			339,697
Product development		295,123			433,556
Corporate		568,626			729,268
Finance and administrative		411,935			403,284
Consultants		309,000			261,375
Compensation cost for re-pricing warrants		265,383			582,056
Financing expense		731,276			1,171,363
Total Expenses		2,832,136			3,920,599
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(2,696,238	)		(3,912,242	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense		(200,173	)		(111,693	)
Interest income		-			6
Total Other Income and Expense		(200,173	)		(111,687	)
LOSS BEFORE TAXES		(2,896,411	)		(4,023,929	)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		-			-
NET LOSS	$	(2,896,411	)	$	(4,023,929	)
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.28	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING,
BASIC AND DILUTED		16,650,242			14,650,443

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity

For fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009

											Total
	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in			Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital			(Deficit)			Equity
Balance, March 31, 2008		14,249,889	$	1,425	$	27,226,561		$	(25,573,956	)	$	1,654,030
Common stock issued at a price of $.20 per share in the exercise of warrants		675,000		68		134,932			-			135,000
Common stock issued for services		1,165,129		116		325,886			-			326,002
Common stock and warrants issued at a price of $.88 per share for cash		113,636		11		99,989			-			100,000
Stock options granted and warrants issued		-		-		405,079			-			405,079
Warrants re-priced for cash at $.20 per warrant		-		-		88,560			-			88,560
Warrants re-priced in exchange for services rendered		-		-		582,056			-			582,056
Net loss for the year ended March 31, 2009		-		-		-			(4,023,929	)		(4,023,929
Balance, March 31, 2009		16,203,654		1,620		28,863,063			(29,597,885	)		(733,202
Common stock issued at a price of $.20 per share in the exercise of warrants		82,500		8		16,492			-			16,500
Common stock issued for services		600,000		60		220,940			-			221,000
Common stock issued in the cashless exercise of warrants		134,308		14		(14	)		-			-
Stock options granted and warrants issued		-		-		647,832			-			647,832
Warrants re-priced for cash at $.20 per warrant		-		-		265,383			-			265,383
Net loss for the year ended March 31, 2009		-		-		-			(2,896,411	)		(2,896,411
Balance, March 31, 2010		17,020,462	$	1,702	$	30,013,696		$	(32,494,296	)	$	(2,478,898

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

	For the Fiscal Years Ended
	March 31,
	2010			2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(2,896,411	)	$	(4,023,929
Depreciation and amortization		64,494			66,964
Stock issued for services		221,000			326,002
Stock options granted and warrants issued		647,832			363,587
Stock options re-priced for services		265,384			623,548
Discount on note payable		100,104			1,171,363
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operations:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable		3,377			6639
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses		(26,388	)		91,244
Decrease (increase) in inventory		22,354			27,045
Decrease in trade secrets		-			-
Decrease (increase) in deposits		20,287			46,256
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable & accrued expenses		(27,042	)		273,798
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable		199,090			111,693
Increase (decrease) in wages payable		41,701			188,840
Increase (decrease) in discount on notes payable		-			(195,216
Net cash used by operating activities		(1,364,218	)		(922,166
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided (used) in investing activities		-			-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from notes payable		1,410,000			393,210
Payment of notes payable		(73,513	)		(135,000
Proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrants		16,500			235,000
Proceeds from the re-pricing of warrants		-			88,560
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,352,987			581,770
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(11,231	)		(340,396
CASH - Beginning of period		11,231			351,627
CASH - End of period	$	-		$	11,231
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
Interest expense	$	1,083		$	-
Income taxes	$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Anpath Group, Inc. (hereinafter “the Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on August 26, 2004. The principal business of the Company is a holding company. The Company’s sole subsidiary is EnviroSystems, Inc. (hereinafter “ESI”) The Company’s name was changed to Anpath Group, Inc on January 8, 2007. Formerly name was Telecomm Sales Network, Inc. The Company’s headquarters is located in Mooresville, North Carolina and its year end is March 31.

ESI provides infection control products on an international basis through both direct sales and channels of distribution. While ESI’s current focus is on the health care market, products are also sold to transportation, military and industrial/institutional markets. ESI products are manufactured utilizing chemical-emulsion technology, designed to make the products effective against a broad spectrum of harmful organisms while safe to people, equipment and habitat.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Accounting Method

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all unrestricted cash, short-term deposits, and other investments with original maturities of no more than ninety days when acquired to be cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the statement of cash flows

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within thirty days from the invoice date or as specified by the invoice and are stated at the amount billed to the customer. Customer account balances with invoices dated over ninety days or ninety days past the due date are considered delinquent.

The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reduced by a valuation allowance that reflects management's best estimate of the amount that will not be collected. Management reviews all accounts receivable balances that are considered delinquent and, based on an assessment of current credit worthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected. In addition, management periodically evaluates the adequacy of the allowance based on the Company's past experience. Allowance for doubtful accounts amounted to $-0- and $-0- at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred and are included as part of Sales expense. For the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 the Company incurred $-0- and $13,902, respectively in advertising cost.

F-6

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

Loss per share was computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. At March 31, 2010 and 2009, basic and diluted net loss per share are the same, as for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, potentially dilutive securities have not been included in the diluted loss per common share calculation as they would have been anti-dilutive. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had stock equivalents of 12,986,899 and 9,051,465 outstanding.

Compensated Absences

Employees earn personal leave time based on hours worked and longevity. These benefits are vested when earned but cannot be carried over from calendar year to calendar year. Benefits are accrued as they are earned and are reflected in the financial statements. Accrued compensated absences at March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $43,846 and $31,636, respectively.

Contingent Liability

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 14, the Company may have certain contingent liabilities with respect to material existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. The Company accrues liabilities when it is probable that future cost will be incurred and such cost can be measured.

Derivative Instruments

We periodically assess our financial and equity instruments to determine if they require derivative accounting. Instruments which may potentially require derivative accounting are conversion features of debt and common stock equivalents in excess of available authorized common shares.

If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change. The Company has not entered into derivatives contracts to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes as of March 31, 2010 and 2009.

F-7

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company's financial instruments as defined by ASC 825, Financial Instruments may include cash, receivables, and advances, accounts payable and accrued expenses. All such instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at March 31, 2010 and 2009.

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (ASC 820), define fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. The Company has no Level 1 assets or liabilities; and

Level 2. Inputs from other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly. The Company has no Level 2 assets or liabilities; and

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little of no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The Company has no Level 3 assets or liabilities.

Fixed Assets

Equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the respective assets, typically 3-7 years. Major additions and betterments are capitalized. Upon retirement or disposal, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in operations.

The following table summarizes the Company's fixed assets:

	March 31,
	2010			2009
Office Equipment	$	51,347		$	51,347
Furniture & Fixtures		11,825			11,825
Marketing/Trade Shows		2,659			2,659
Manufacturing Equipment		195,138			195,138
Laboratory Equipment		139,863			118,051
Capitalized Software		3,210			3,210
		404,042			382,230
Allowance for Depreciation		( 270,171	)		(205,676	)
Fixed Assets, net	$	133,871		$	198,365

Depreciation expense for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $64,494 and $66,964, respectively.

F-8

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

Depreciation expense on manufacturing equipment is included as a part of Cost of Sales on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the year ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, depreciation expense on manufacturing equipment was $37,075 and $2,733.

Depreciation expense in the amount of $-0- and $34,371 for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was recorded for manufacturing equipment that sat idle and is included as part of Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Depreciation expense on all other equipment is included as part of Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.

As shown in the financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and has an accumulated deficit since the inception of the Company. These factors indicate that the Company may be unable to continue in existence. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue existence. The Company anticipates its projected business plan will require a minimum of approximately $1,500,000 to continue operations for the next eighteen months.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

The Company assesses potential impairment of its long lived assets, which include its property and equipment and its identifiable intangibles such as its trade secrets on an annual basis, or as events and circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired, the Company assesses potential impairment of its long lived assets. The Company determines impairment by measuring the undisclosed future cash flows generated by the assets, comparing the results to the assets’ carrying value and adjusting the assets to the lower of the carrying value to fair value and charging current operations for any measured impairment. The Company determined that the Trade Secrets were impaired by $374,000 in previous years. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009 no further impairment of this trade secret was deemed necessary.

Concentration Risk

Sales to our top ten customers represented approximately 96.96% and 98.58% of our sales for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

Suppliers

We rely upon a single supplier to provide us with PCMX, which is the biocide used in our chemical emulsion disinfectant products. Although there are other suppliers of this material, a change in suppliers would cause a delay in the production process, which could ultimately affect operating results.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. References herein to the Company include the Company and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.

F-9

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) recognized the complexity of its standard-setting process and embarked on a revised process in 2004 that culminated in the release on July 1, 2009, of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, sometimes referred to as the Codification or ASC. In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the sole source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles. Pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC 105, the Company has updated references to GAAP in its financial statements issued for the period ended February 28, 2010. The adoption of FASB ASC 105 did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

The FASB has issued ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events” (“ASC Topic 855”). ASC Topic 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, ASC Topic 855 provides:

·	The period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements;

·	The circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and

·	The disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date.

ASC Topic 855 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The Company has adopted and will follow the guidance in ASC Topic 855 for all prospective subsequent event transactions and disclosures.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts have been reclassified from the prior financial statements for comparative purposes.

Revenue Recognition

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via a purchase order from our customers. Delivery occurs when title and all risks of ownership are transferred to the purchaser which generally occurs when the products are shipped to the customer. No right of return exists on sales of product except for defective or damaged products. The sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of purchase order. To assure that collectability is reasonably assured, credit evaluations are performed on all customers.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.

F-10

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 addresses all forms of share-based payment (“SBP”) awards including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. Under ASC 718 awards result in a cost that is measured at fair value on the awards’ grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest and will result in a charge to operations.

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505, Share Based Payments to Non-Employees, and ASC 718 which requires that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of stock-based compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges are being amortized over their respective contractual vesting periods.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to value its issuance of options and warrants. The Company recorded compensation expense of $913,215 and $949,550 for years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Trade Secret

The recorded value of the Company’s trade secret relating to the formula/formulation of ESI’s products at the time acquired by the Company was based upon the valuation of an independent appraiser. The Company has determined that its trade secret has an indefinite life. Accordingly, it is not subject to amortization, but is subject to the Company’s annual assessment of prospective impairment. The Company determined that the Trade Secrets were impaired by $374,000 in previous years. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009 no further impairment of this trade secret was deemed necessary.

Use of Estimates

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

NOTE 3 - CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with what management believes to be high credit quality financial institutions. At times such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company maintains cash balances at several financial institutions. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. At March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s did not have any uninsured risk.

F-11

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 4 - INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market (first-in, first out basis) and include purchased raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods and consist of the following:

	March 31,
	2010		2009
Raw material	$	—	$	22,354
Work-in-progress		—		—
Finished goods		—		—
Inventory, net	$	—	$	22,354

NOTE 5 - INCOME TAXES

Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the "more likely than not" standard imposed by ASC 740 to allow recognition of such an asset.

At March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had deferred tax assets calculated at an expected rate of 34% of approximately $11,048,000 and $8,695,000, principally arising from net operating loss carry forwards and stock compensation. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been recorded.

The significant components of the deferred tax assets at March 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

	March 31,
	2010			2009
Net operating loss carry forward:	$	32,494,000		$	29,598,000
Deferred tax asset	$	11,048,000		$	10,063,000
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		(11,048,000	)		(10,063,000	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—

At March 31, 2010 and 2009 the Company has net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $32,494,000 and $29,598,000, respectively, which begin to expire in the year 2014 through 2029. The change in valuation allowance from March 31, 2009 from March 31, 2008 is $985,000.

Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in our tax provisions. Ultimately, the actual tax benefits to be realized will be based upon future taxable earnings levels, which are very difficult to predict.

F-12

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 6 - NOTES, LOANS AND CONVERTIBLE DEBT

Notes payable consists of the following:

	March 31,
	2010			2009
7% note due July 8, 2010 payable to ANPG Lending, LLC	$	1,500,000		$	1,500,000
6% notes due on or before May 10, 2009 payable to our CEO		93,700			102,210
6% notes due on demand payable to Arthur Douglas & Associates		85,000			85,000
6% notes due on demand payable to our CFO		6,000			6,000
10% note due April 8, 2009 payable to an unrelated individual		-			25,000
10% note due June 10, 2009 payable to an unrelated individual		-			20,000
10% note due June 24, 2009 payable to an unrelated individual		-			20,000
8% notes due April 8, 2010 payable to unrelated individuals		537,500			-
8% notes due July 1, 2010 payable to unrelated individuals		357,500			-
8% notes due from August 25, 2010 through December 24, 2010 payable to unrelated individuals		515,000			-
Total Notes Payable		3,094,700			1,758,210
Discount on notes payable		(173,749	)		(273,853	)
Notes Payable, net of discount	$	2,920,951		$	1,484,357

During the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 the Company borrowed from various parties the aggregate amount of $1,410,000 and $393,210. These loans are due on demand after 90 days and bear interest of 6% to 10% payable at maturity. Each note is convertible into common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $.20 to $.88 per share. The loans are initially convertible into 2,820,000 and 697,966 shares of the Company’s common stock. Detachable warrants were also issued with each note giving the holder the right to purchase an aggregate 2,820,000 and 512,966 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise rice of $.20 to $.88 per share.

In accordance with ASC 470, the Company recognized the beneficial conversion feature associated with the notes convertibility into shares and warrants. The total value of warrants was determined using the Black Scholes Option Price Calculation. In employing this model, the following assumptions were used the actual three month T-Bill rate on the advance dates for the risk-free rate. The actual share price on advance dates; expected volatility of 67.36%, no dividends and a five year horizon in all Black Scholes Option Price calculations. For the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 the total value of warrants was $416,074 and $122,173 and the total value of shares was $74,024 and $73,142.

Following the guidance provided by ASC 470, the Company allocated proceeds first to the warrants issuable upon conversion of the note. The value of the warrants was recorded on the balance sheet as debt discounts and increases to shareholder’s equity. The debt discounts are being amortized over the remaining life of the convertible note.

F-13

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 7 - COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

The Company has formal operating leases for all of its office and laboratory space. Rent expense relating to operating space leased was approximately $54,811 and $84,166 for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		4-5 years		After 5 years
Office Lease	$	81,095	$	32,907	$	48,188		—		—
Laboratory Lease (1)		—		—		—		—		—
Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	81,095	$	32,907	$	48,188		—		—

(1) The laboratory lease has expired and the Company continues leasing these premises on a month to month basis

Executive Employment Contracts

The Company does not have any executive employment contracts with its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

NOTE 8 - PREFERRED STOCK AND COMMON STOCK

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value preferred stock, which may be issued in one or more series at the sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors. The board of directors is also authorized to determine the rights, preferences, and privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon any series of preferred stock. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, no preferred stock has been issued by the Company.

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common stock. All shares have equal voting rights, are non-assessable and have one vote per share. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors of the Company.

Common Stock and Warrants issued for Cash

On June 26, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with The OGP Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“OGP”) pursuant to which the Company sold to OGP 113,636 shares of restricted common stock of the Company at a price of $0.88 per Share. In addition, the Company issued to OGP a five year warrant to purchase up to an aggregate of 113,636 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. (See Note 11 Related Party Transactions)

F-14

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

Common Stock Issued for Services

On March 31, 2009 the Company issued 565,129 shares to four officers in lieu of salaries of $121,502 for the months of February and March 2009.

On October 1, 2008, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Arthur Douglas and Associates, Inc for investment relations services. The Company agreed to pay compensation to Arthur Douglas and Associates, Inc of 100,000 shares of restricted common stock per month for a period of 12 months. During the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company issued 600,000 and 600,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $221,000 and $204,500 to Arthur Douglas and Associates.

Conversion of Note Payable for Common Stock

On December 17, 2008, MV Nanotech Corporation called its notes payable in the amount of $135,000 in exchange for the exercise of 675,000 common stock warrants. The Company issued 675,000 shares of restricted common stock in this transaction.

Warrant Exercise

In January 2010, the Company issued 82,500 shares of common stock for cash of $16,500 in the exercise of warrants at $0.20 per warrant.

On March 23, 2010, the Company issued 134,308 shares of common stock in the cashless exercise of warrants.

NOTE 9 - STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS

On November 20, 2008, the Board of Directors approved the re-pricing of outstanding stock purchase warrants held by MV Nanotech Corporation and Arthur Douglas and Associates in connection with their assistance in raising capital funds for the Company. A total of 2,147,655 stock purchase warrants originally priced from $2.50 to $1.25 were re-priced to $.20 per stock purchase warrant. The Company valued the re-priced stock purchase warrants using the Black-Scholes option price calculation method. The Company recorded a charge of $582,056 for re-pricing these stock purchase warrants.

On November 26, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the re-pricing of all outstanding stock purchase warrants as a means for raising additional capital. During December 2008, the Company received proceeds of $88,560 to re-price 442,801 stock purchase warrants to a new price of $.20 per stock purchase warrant. The original price of these stock purchase warrants ranged from $1.25 to $2.50 per stock purchase warrant.

On June 26, 2009 the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of the 1,500,000 warrants outstanding to ANPG Lending LLC to $0.20 in exchange for ANPG Lending LLC agreeing to extend the maturity date of the loans aggregating $1,500,000 from July 8, 2009 to September 8, 2009. The Company recorded a charge of $265,383 for re-pricing these stock purchase warrants.

F-15

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

The following is a summary of all common stock warrant activity during the two years ended March 31, 2010:

	Number of Shares Under Warrants			Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Warrants issued and exercisable at: March 31, 2008		7,940,342		$	.87-5.00	$	2.25
Warrants issued		626,600			0.20-0.88		1.97
Warrants expired		(248,928	)		5.00		5.00
Warrants exercised		(675,000	)		0.20		0.20
Warrants issued and exercisable at: March 31, 2009		7,643,014		$	0.20-5.00	$	2.25
Warrants issued		3,288,500			0.75		0.75
Warrants expired		(134,308	)		5.00		1.67
Warrants exercised		(748,859	)		.20		.20
Warrants issued and exercisable at: March 31, 2010		10,048,347		$	0.20-5.00	$	1.18

The following represents additional information related to common stock warrants outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2010:

		Outstanding and Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price		Number of Shares Under Warrants		Weighted Average Remaining Contract Life in Years	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	0.20 – 2.50		1,936,656	0.27	$	1.32
$	2.70		2,500,000	2.52		2.70
$	0.20 – 0.88		2,173,521	3.15		0.30
$	0.20 - 0.88		3,438,170	4.52		.73
Total			10,048,347	2.91		1.18

The Company used the Black-Scholes option price calculation to value the warrants issued during the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 using the following assumptions: risk-free rate of 0.25-4.50%; volatility of 63% to 67; zero dividend yield; the actual exercise term of the warrants issued and the exercise price of warrants issued.

F-16

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 10 - EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

The Company has two stock option plans: (a) the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and (b) the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan which both have been approved by both the Board of Directors and the shareholders. An aggregate amount of common stock that may be awarded and purchased under the Plans is 3,700,000 shares of the Company's common stock.

The exercise price for incentive stock options granted under the 2006 and 2004 Plans may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted, except for options granted to 10% stockholders which must have an exercise price of not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. The exercise price for non-statutory options is determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Incentive stock options granted under the plans have a maximum term of ten years, except for grants to 10% stockholders which are subject to a maximum term of five years. The term of non-statutory stock options is determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Options granted under the plans are not transferable, except by will and the laws of descent and distribution.

Under the Plans during the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted 1,390,000 and 42,000 stock options to employees and directors. The options were granted with an exercise prices $0.63-0.24 and will fully vest from one to four years of service. The options were valued using the fair value method as prescribed by ASC 718 Compensation-Stock Compensation, resulting in a total value associated with these options for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 of $187,655 and $15,000. This amount will be accrued to compensation expense over the expected service term as vested. The accrued compensation expense related to these options for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is $157,734 and $210,861 and has been expensed in the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and credited to additional paid-in capital.

As of March 31, 2010 there were 920,000 remaining options available to be issued in the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan.

The following is a summary of all common stock option activity during the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:

	Shares Under Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding at March 31, 2008		2,676,455		$	2.73
Options granted		42,000			0.63
Options expired		(1,169,903	)		3.01
Options exercised		-			-
Options outstanding at March 31, 2009		1,548,552			2.49
Options granted		1,390,000			0.24
Options expired		-			-
Options exercised		-			-
Options outstanding at March 31, 2010		2,938,552		$	1.42

	Options Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share
Options exercisable at March 31, 2009		1,548,552	$	2.49
Options exercisable at March 31, 2010		1,536,052	$	2.49

F-17

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

The following represents additional information related to common stock options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2010:

Range of Exercise Price		Number Outstanding at March 31, 2010		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life Years		Weighted Average Exercise Price (Total Shares)		Number Exercisable at March 31, 2010		Weighted Average Exercise Price (Exercisable Shares)
$	3.40		63,854		4.59	$	3.40		63,854	$	3.40
$	5.00		72,333		0.64	$	5.00		72,333	$	5.00
$	1.61 - 2.95		22,365		6.21	$	2.06		22,365	$	2.06
$	2.00 - 2.85		1,390,000		3.30	$	2.32		1,377,500	$	2.32
$	0.24		1,390,000		9.09	$	0.24		-	$	-
$	0.63 - 5.00		2,938,552		6.02	$	1.42		1,536,052	$	2.49

Total compensation cost related to non-vested stock options as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $208,022 and $263,362, respectively.

Weighted average period of non-vested stock options was 9.06 years as of March 31, 2010.

The Company used the Black-Scholes option price calculation to value the options granted in the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 using the following assumptions: risk-free rate of 1% to 4.5%; volatility of 63% to 67%; zero dividend yield; half the actual term and exercise price of options granted.

NOTE 12 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company’s CFO, and member of the Board of Directors, is a 5% owner and CFO of Mastodon Ventures, Inc. Mastodon provides office space and incidentals for the CFO at no cost to the Company. On June 26, 2008 Mastodon advanced the Company $35,000 in a short-term advance. On June 30, 2008, the Company returned to Mastodon $35,000 in repayment of the June 26, 2008 advance and on that date had no balances outstanding with Mastodon.

On July 29, and August 12, 2008, MV Nanotech Corporation, a subsidiary of Mastodon made loans to the Company in the amounts of $75,000 and $60,000, respectively. The loans are due on demand after 90 days and bear interest at 6%. In addition, the Company issued to Mastodon five year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 153,409 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. MV Nanotech transferred 100,000 of these warrants to a non-affiliated individual. On November 20, 2008, the Board of Directors re-priced all outstanding warrants held by MV Nanotech to $.20 per warrant. On December 17, 2008, MV Nanotech Corporation called its notes payable in the amount of $135,000 in exchange for the exercise of 675,000 common stock warrants. The Company issued 675,000 shares of restricted common stock in this transaction. At March 31, 2009, the Company does not owe MV Nanotech Corporation any amounts.

F-18

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

During the year ended March 31, 2009, the Company’s CEO, made loans to the Company in the amount of $102,210. The loans are due on demand after 90 days and bear interest at 6%. In addition, the Company issued to the CEO five year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 116,146 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. During the year ended March 31, 2010, the Company paid $8,510 to the CEO in repayment of these loans and $150 in accrued interest. At March 31, 2010 the balance owed to the CEO on these loans was $93,700 plus accrued interest of $8,492.

On December 31, 2008, the Company’s CFO, made a loan to the Company in the amounts of $6,000. The loan is due on demand after 90 days and bear interest at 6%. In addition, the Company issued to the CFO a five year warrant to purchase up to an aggregate of 6,818 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. At March 31, 2010 the balance owed to the CFO on this loan was $6,000 plus accrued interest of $547.

At March 31, 2010 the CEO and CFO have deferred their salaries in the amount $119,084 and $70,008, respectively.

On June 26, 2008, The OGP Group LLC, purchased 113,636 shares of restricted common stock of the Company at a price of $0.88 per Share. In addition, the Company issued to OGP a five year warrant to purchase up to an aggregate of 113,636 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.88 per share. In a separate agreement between OGP and MV Nanotech Corporation, a subsidiary of Mastodon Ventures, Inc in which our CFO is a 5% owner and CFO, MV Nanotech has agreed to sell to OGP 50,000 shares of our Company common stock that MV Nanotech owns for $100. In addition after September 24, 2008, OGP has the right to present to MV Nanotech up to 113,636 shares of our common stock for purchase at a price of $1.00 per share.

NOTE 13 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 20, 2010 Anpath filed petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.

The Need for Chapter 11 Restructuring

F-19

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

The Chapter 11 Petition

F-20

Table of Contents

ANPATH GROUP, INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

Status of Required Plan Approvals

Before it was filed, the Company sought the support of its principle creditors for the Plan that was being proposed. In connection with this initiative:

·	a super-majority of the Senior Secured Class of creditors, including Anpath Lending, signed the Plan Support Agreement; and

·	a super-majority of the investors holding more than 50% of the Convertible Notes all signed the Plan Support Agreement.

·	the Company would not have had access to the Interim Note and DIP Facility financing that has and continues to provide the working capital necessary to maintain operations while it completes the bankruptcy petition process; and

o	the unsecured creditors who are owed approximately $100,000 would have received no consideration;

o	the investors who hold approximately $1.6 million in convertible notes would have received no consideration; and

o	the holders of the common stock in the Company would have been completely wiped out with no prospect for recovery

Post-Petition Outlook for the Company

The Plan calls for the following:

·	DIP lenders will advance $414,000 during the bankruptcy

·	Accounts payable class will receive 50% cash at emergence from the Bankruptcy

·	Before the private placement, 10,000,000 shares of the new company will be split between the Classes:

o	Senior Secured Class will receive 61% of the reorganized company

o	Unsecured Note Holder Class will receive 34% of the reorganized company

o	Common stock class will receive 5% of the reorganized company

o	All current options, warrant and convertible equity eliminated in the reorganization

A Private Placement Offering in the minimum amount of $1,250,000 up to a maximum amount of $1,500,000 will be completed as a condition of emerging from bankruptcy. The Private placement Offering will be sold at $.40 per share for a minimum of 3,125,000 and a maximum of 3,750,000 common stock shares.

·	A new Board will be installed at emergence from bankruptcy.

F-21

Table of Contents