QUALSTAR CORP - Annual Report: 2005 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-30083
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CALIFORNIA | 95-3927330 | |
(STATE OF INCORPORATION) | (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.) |
3990-B HERITAGE OAK COURT, SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063
(805) 583-7744
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
COMMON STOCK
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of December 31, 2004, the aggregate market value of the
common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
approximately $32,071,000.
The total shares of common stock without par value outstanding
at September 16, 2005 is 12,253,117.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this
Form 10-K are incorporated by reference from the
registrants definitive proxy statement for its annual
meeting of shareholders, which will be filed with the Commission
on or before October 28, 2005.
Qualstar Corporation
FORM 10-K
For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2005
INDEX
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements inherently are
subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which we cannot
predict or quantify. Our actual results may differ materially
from the results projected in the forward-looking statements.
Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not
limited to, those discussed in ITEM 1
Business, including the section therein entitled
Risk Factors, and in ITEM 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations. You generally can identify
forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as believes, may,
will, expects, intends,
estimates, anticipates,
plans, seeks, or continues,
or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar
terminology. Forward looking statements also include the
assumptions underlying or relating to any such statements.
Forward looking statements contained within this document
represent a good-faith assessment of Qualstars future
performance for which management believes there is a reasonable
basis. Qualstar disclaims any obligation to update the forward
looking statements contained herein, except as may be required
by law.
PART I
Item 1. | Business |
Introduction
We design, develop, manufacture and sell automated magnetic tape
libraries used to store, retrieve and manage electronic data
primarily in network computing environments. Tape libraries
consist of cartridge tape drives, tape cartridges and robotics
to move the cartridges from their storage locations to the tape
drives under software control. Our tape libraries provide data
storage solutions for organizations requiring backup, recovery
and archival storage of critical data. Our products are
compatible with commonly used operating systems, including UNIX,
Windows, and Linux. Our tape libraries are also compatible with
a wide range of storage management software packages, such as
those supplied by Computer Associates, EMC/ Legato, Tivoli,
Symantec/ Veritas, CommVault and BakBone Software. We offer tape
libraries for multiple tape drive technologies, including LTO,
AIT, Super AIT, and SuperDLT.
We sell our tape libraries worldwide, primarily to value added
resellers, system integrators and original equipment
manufacturers. These customers typically integrate our tape
libraries with software from third party vendors and related
hardware such as servers and network components to provide
storage solutions, which are then sold to end users. We
configure our libraries based on each customers individual
requirements, with a normal delivery time of one to three
working days. This rapid fulfillment of customer orders allows
our resellers to minimize their inventory levels and allows us
to compete effectively with distribution channels used by our
competitors.
Qualstar was incorporated in California in 1984. Our initial
products were IBM compatible 9-track reel-to-reel tape drives.
In 1995, we entered the tape automation market with a series of
tape libraries incorporating 8mm tape drives. Since that time,
we have introduced a succession of tape library models designed
to work with the leading automation-capable tape drive
technologies. Automated tape libraries and related products,
such as tape drives and tape media, represented approximately
75.1% of revenues for fiscal 2005, approximately 81.4% of
revenues for fiscal 2004, and approximately 79.8% of revenues
for fiscal 2003. Sales of power supplies, services and other
products accounted for the balance of our revenues.
In July 2002, we purchased the assets of N2Power, Incorporated,
a supplier of ultra small high efficiency open-frame switching
power supplies. Power supplies provided by N2Power are utilized
within our tape library products as well as sold to original
equipment manufacturers for incorporation into their products.
N2Power products are sold under the N2Power brand name as well
as under a private label brand name through independent sales
representatives and distributors. Revenues from N2Power products
totaled 5.0% of total revenues for fiscal 2005 and 1.8% of total
revenues for fiscal 2004.
1
Table of Contents
Industry Background
Storing, managing and protecting data has become critical to the
operation of many enterprises and governments as the world
economy becomes increasingly information dependent. The data
storage industry is growing in response to the increase in the
amount of data that is generated and that must be preserved. The
amount of data has been increasing due to the growth in the
number of computers, the number, size and complexity of computer
networks and software applications, and the emergence of new
applications such as image processing, e-commerce, internet
services, medical image storage, video and motion picture image
storage, and other multi-media applications. In addition,
businesses continue to generate increasing amounts of
traditional business information with respect to their products,
customers and financial data. This increase in the amount of
data that is generated stimulates increases in the demand for
data storage and the management of this data.
Factors Driving Growth in Data Storage |
| Increased demand from Internet and e-commerce businesses. The growth in the Internet and e-commerce has created businesses that depend on the creation, access to and archival storage of data. We believe this demand will continue to grow as individuals and businesses increase their reliance on the Internet for communications, commerce and data retrieval. | |
| Growth in new types of data. New types of data are also fueling the growth in data storage. For example, graphics, audio and MP3, video, medical and security images, and multi-media uses such as video on demand, require far greater storage capacity than text and financial data. | |
| Recognition of the critical importance of data. Corporate databases contain useful information about customer records, order patterns and other factors that can be analyzed and transformed into a valuable asset and a competitive advantage. The ability to efficiently store, manage and protect this information is important to the value and success of many businesses. The usefulness of past and present data is further enhanced by new sophisticated data mining software applications that can access and analyze large databases. | |
| Growing awareness of the need for disaster protection. Companies are recognizing that without their data they may not survive. Natural disasters, as well as overt and covert actions targeted at individual companies, classes of users or whole countries, can destroy data and entire data centers, threatening a companys very existence. Systematic replication and secure off-site storage of corporate data is recognized as the best defense against catastrophic data loss. Tape libraries are a key technology in most corporate data disaster protection plans. | |
| Compliance with new regulatory requirements for records retention. Many businesses now have to deal with new regulatory requirements from various governmental agencies that require businesses to retain data for longer periods of time. The regulations that have received the most visibility include HIPAA requirements covering medical records; Sarbanes-Oxley, which addresses corporate governance; and Rule 17a under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, regarding recordkeeping requirements for the securities industry. These regulations and others are projected to increase demand for long-term storage capacity over the next few years. | |
| Growth in network computing applications and data. The use of computer networks has shifted critical information and applications to network servers to allow more people to gain access to stored data as well as to create new data. As the speed of network computing has increased, numerous new applications have become feasible such as computer fax and e-mail, all of which generate progressively more data. Organizations are increasingly aware of the need to protect this data, as networks become a mission-critical element of many operations. | |
| Decrease in the costs of storing data. The costs of data storage have decreased with advances in technology and improved manufacturing processes. We expect these costs to continue to decrease. The decrease in the cost of data storage encourages the storage of more data and makes it more cost effective to add storage capacity than to remove old data, which in the past may have been purged periodically. |
2
Table of Contents
Advances in Storage Management Technologies |
The growth in data is contributing to an evolution in
traditional storage solutions. New technologies are designed to
provide high-speed connectivity for data-intensive applications
across multiple operating systems, including UNIX, Windows, and
Linux. These new methods of storage and data management
technologies include the following:
| Fibre Channel. Fibre Channel is an interface technology based on industry standards for the connection of storage devices to networks. Interface is the term used to describe the electronics, cabling and software used to facilitate communications between devices. With Fibre Channel, users are better able to share stored information with other storage devices and servers over longer distances, with data transfer speeds significantly faster than the most common interface technology in use today, thereby increasing the importance of storage area networks. | |
| Storage Area Networks. Storage Area Network, or SAN, architecture applies the inherent benefits of a networked approach to data storage applications, which allows data to move efficiently and reliably between multiple storage devices and servers. The benefits of SAN architecture also include increasing the expandability of existing storage solutions and providing a higher level of connectivity than exists with traditional technologies. Additionally, SANs are able to provide these benefits across multiple operating systems. | |
| Advanced storage management software. This software automatically migrates infrequently accessed data to the lower cost storage medium such as a tape library. A users request for this data at some later date will recall the data automatically from the tape library. This process reduces the overall storage cost by using the least expensive storage medium to store data that is not expected to be needed on a frequent basis. Advances in storage management software have increased the ability of businesses to more cost-effectively store, manage and retrieve data, which in turn allows businesses to operate more efficiently. | |
| Network Attached Storage. Current storage devices are dependent on a file server for all commands and control. Network attached storage devices give storage devices file server functionality, which allow users to plug a storage device directly into a network without requiring a separate file server. This allows users to maintain, or even enhance, system performance while saving on both time and cost. |
Types of Data Storage |
Current non-volatile storage solutions are based primarily on
two technologies: magnetic disk and magnetic tape. These
technologies represent a compromise among a variety of competing
factors including capacity, cost, speed, portability and data
reliability. Magnetic tapes are removable, which allows them to
be transported easily to an off-site location for security or
protection from physical harm. Magnetic disks provide quicker
access to stored data and generally are used when speed is
important. Less frequently used data is often migrated from
magnetic disks to tape storage. Tape libraries provide a
near-online solution, where less frequently used data files are
stored on tape at substantially lower cost compared to disk
while still providing automated access.
Tape Libraries and Applications |
Tape libraries automate the tape loading process, eliminate
errors induced by human operators, and enhance security compared
to tapes that must be retrieved and loaded manually. Tape
libraries can also be operated from remote locations around the
clock, thus, eliminating the need for an operator. Automated
tape libraries are a key component in a companys overall
storage solution and data protection strategy.
Tape drives and tape media are two key components of tape
libraries. The costs of tape drives and tape media have declined
with advances in technology, and we expect this trend to
continue. As prices decline, new applications for automated
storage become justified, further increasing the number of
applications that can benefit from the use of tape libraries. We
believe that continued technological improvements in tape drives
and tape media will further reduce overall storage costs in the
future.
3
Table of Contents
Current and emerging applications for tape libraries include:
| Automated backup. Backup is the creation of a duplicate copy of current data for the purpose of recovering the data in the event the original is lost or damaged. An automated tape library, in conjunction with storage management software, can backup network data at any time without human intervention. A library with multiple tape drives can backup data using all of its drives simultaneously, thus significantly speeding up the recording process. Backup tapes can be removed from the library and stored in an off-site location for protection against a loss of the primary site. | |
| Archiving. Archiving is the storage of data for historical purposes. When information is stored on tape, automated tape libraries, under application control, can catalog tapes for future retrieval and prevent unauthorized removal or corruption of data by using password or key lock protection. Archival tapes provide a historic record for use in fraud detection, audit, legal and other processes. Tape libraries are also used for archiving due to benefits offered by the tape medium, such as long-term data integrity, resistance to environmental contamination, ease of relocation, low cost, and the availability of Write Once Read Many or WORM tapes. | |
| Digital video. Digital recording of camera images for surveillance and security purposes is an alternative to traditional analog VHS recording in installations such as airports, retail stores, government facilities and gaming operations. This is an important market opportunity because tape libraries eliminate the need for operators to load, unload, store and retrieve the large number of tapes created in these facilities. Library based systems index, store and play back the video images on demand, significantly reducing the retrieval time and cost of operation when compared to VHS recording and playback devices. Digital recording technology provides higher resolution than analog VHS recording technology. | |
| Image management. Storage-intensive applications such as satellite mapping and medical image management systems are turning to tape libraries because of the cost advantage over traditional storage methods. X-ray images or MRI results, for instance, must frequently be kept on file for years. Storing a digitized image in a tape library costs considerably less than storing a film copy, and can be retrieved years later with the click of a mouse. |
Distribution of Tape Library Products |
The requirements for storage solutions vary depending on the
size of an enterprise, the type of data generated and the amount
of data to be stored. With the increased dependence on stored
data, most organizations, regardless of their size, have a
heightened need for storage solutions that integrate devices
such as tape drives, tape libraries and storage management
software. Those organizations with sufficient in-house
information technology resources can rely on their internal
infrastructure and expertise to design, purchase and implement
their own storage solutions. These organizations may elect to
purchase equipment from distributors or directly from the
original equipment manufacturers. Many organizations, however,
do not have sufficient in-house resources but have the same need
for data storage solutions. These organizations often look to
value added resellers to design, supply and install their
storage solutions.
Value added resellers develop and install storage solutions for
enterprises that face complex storage needs but lack the
in-house capability of designing and implementing the proper
solution or have chosen to outsource these functions. Typically,
the value added reseller will select among a variety of
different hardware technologies and software options, as well as
provide installation and other services, to deliver a complete
storage solution for the end user. Value added resellers require
rapid turnaround of orders, custom configuration of tape
libraries, drop shipment to their customers site,
compatibility with multiple tape formats and software, and
marketing and technical support.
Original equipment manufacturers generally resell products made
by others under their own brand name and typically assume
responsibility for product sales, service and support. Original
equipment manufacturers enable manufacturers, such as Qualstar,
to reach end users not served by other channels and to serve
select vertical markets where specific original equipment
manufacturers have exceptional strength. Original
4
Table of Contents
equipment manufacturers require special services such as product
configuration control, extensive qualification testing, custom
colors and private labeling.
Our Solutions
We offer storage solutions that respond to the growing data
management challenges facing businesses today, while addressing
the unique needs of value added resellers and original equipment
manufacturers.
We believe that high reliability is important to the end users
of our products due to the critical nature of the data that is
being stored, shorter time periods available for the back-up
operations, and the operation of backup systems during hours
when personnel may not be available to respond to problems. To
address these concerns, we emphasize quality and reliability in
the design, manufacturing and testing of our products which
reduces the potential for product failures and results in
products that require little maintenance.
The technology utilized in automated tape libraries is
continuously evolving due to advances in data recording methods,
component cost reductions, advances in semiconductor and
microprocessor technologies, and a general trend toward
miniaturization in the electronics industry. This changing
technology requires that we continuously develop and market new
products to prevent our product lines from becoming obsolete.
Our tape libraries are compatible with over forty-five(45)
third-party storage management software packages, including
those supplied by Computer Associates, EMC/ Legato, Tivoli,
Symantec/ Veritas, CommVault and BakBone Software. Storage
management software enables network administrators to allocate
the use of storage technologies among user groups or tasks, to
manage data from a central location, and to retrieve, transfer
and backup data between multiple workstations. We believe that
storage management software is a crucial component of any
automated storage installation, and lack of compatibility is a
significant barrier to entry for new tape library competitors.
To ensure compatibility, our engineers work with independent
software vendors during the product development cycles. We do
not have contracts with any independent software vendors, nor do
we need access to their software code to design our products. We
maintain relationships with them by supplying tape libraries so
they can qualify their software to work with our tape libraries
and by evaluating their software for compatibility with our tape
libraries. We also support our relationships with them by
keeping them informed about current and anticipated changes to
our products and by referring business to them when value added
resellers or end users inquire about storage management software
sources.
Strategy
Our goals are to enhance our position as a supplier of automated
tape libraries and to maintain or increase our market share in
each of the tape formats in which we compete. To achieve these
goals, we intend to:
| Offer libraries for multiple tape drive technologies. We offer tape libraries for a range of tape drive technologies, including LTO, AIT, Super AIT, and SuperDLT. By offering products based on multiple tape drive technologies, we reduce our dependence on the success of any single technology and can offer products that target the specific preferences of resellers and original equipment manufacturers and their end user customers. | |
| Focus on value added reseller channels. We sell our products primarily through selected value added resellers who have a strong market presence, have demonstrated the ability to work directly with end users, and who maintain relationships with major vendors of storage management software. Because we market our products primarily through this channel, we have implemented a variety of programs to support and enhance our relationships with our reseller partners. These programs are designed to benefit the reseller and increase the likelihood of selling our products. We intend to maintain our marketing presence in support of this channel. We conduct business with our value added resellers on an individual purchase order basis and no long-term purchase commitments are involved. | |
| Maintain and strengthen original equipment manufacturer relationships. We sell our products to several companies under private label or original equipment manufacturer relationships. Original equipment manufacturer sales enable us to reach some end users not served by our value added |
5
Table of Contents
resellers. The same product characteristics that make our tape libraries attractive to value added resellers also are important to original equipment manufacturers. We conduct business with our original equipment manufacturer customers on an individual purchase order basis and no long-term purchase commitments are involved. | ||
| Develop libraries for new tape technologies. The tape drive industry is continuously advancing the state of technology. We will continue to design new libraries for those technologies that appear promising and that meet our standards for capacity, quality and reliability. | |
| Maintain our rate of innovation. We plan to maintain our high level of investment in research and development to exploit emerging technologies and product opportunities. We intend to continue the expansion of our product lines to incorporate higher capacities and new technologies. |
We believe that our experience, efficiency and strict control
over the development and manufacture of new products are key
factors in the successful execution of our strategy. We design
our tape libraries with a high percentage of common parts, use
quality components and minimize the number of moving parts. We
utilize proprietary techniques in the design, production and
testing of our libraries in order to simplify the manufacturing
process and reduce our costs. We manufacture all of our products
at a single facility and we control our inventory closely to
provide rapid delivery to our customers. These steps allow us to
design and bring to market new products rapidly in response to
changing technology.
Products
Tape Libraries |
We offer a number of tape library families, each capable of
incorporating one or more tape drive technologies, as summarized
in the following table:
Tape Drive | Range of Tape | Maximum Capacity | ||||||||||
Product Family | Technology | Cartridges | in Terabytes(1) | |||||||||
TLS-4000
|
Sony AIT | 12 to 600 | 120.0 | |||||||||
TLS-5000
|
Sony SAIT | 33 to 264 | 132.0 | |||||||||
TLS-6000
|
Quantum SDLT | 10 to 240 | 72.0 | |||||||||
TLS-8000
|
LTO | 11 to 264 | 105.6 | |||||||||
RLS-4000
|
Sony AIT | 22 to 70 | 14.0 | |||||||||
RLS-5000
|
Sony SAIT | 16 to 44 | 22.0 | |||||||||
RLS-6000
|
Quantum SDLT | 27 | 8.1 | |||||||||
RLS-8000
|
LTO | 12 to 44 | 17.6 |
(1) | A Terabyte is one million megabytes, or one thousand gigabytes. The table shows native capacity and excludes gains from data compression, which can increase capacity by more than 100%. |
Our tape library families include a number of models that differ
in storage capacity, price and features. Our libraries are
installed in network computing environments ranging from small
departmental networks to enterprise-wide networks supporting
hundreds of users. We believe that selling products for multiple
tape drive technologies insulates us somewhat from the dynamics
of the marketplace as various tape standards compete for market
share. This helps our products appeal to the broadest possible
range of end user market segments. This wide range of products
makes us a one-stop supplier for our value added reseller and
original equipment manufacturer customers, enabling them to meet
most end user requirements for a specific tape format. Our wide
range of products for competing tape drive technologies also
helps to insulate us from the occasional supply shortages from
tape drive or tape media manufacturers.
Tape libraries generally contain two or more tape drives and
from several to thousands of tapes. We concentrate our product
offerings in the mid-range of 10 to 600 tapes. We design our
tape libraries for continuous, unattended operation. Multiple
tape drives allow simultaneous access to different data files by
different users on the network, and increase the rate at which
data can move on to, out of, or within the
6
Table of Contents
network. A library with multiple tape drives can back up data
using all drives simultaneously, significantly speeding up the
recording process. In some of our libraries, tape cartridges are
stored in removable magazines, allowing for easy bulk removal of
the tapes. Our libraries also offer features such as barcode
readers to scan cartridge labels and an input/output port for
importing and exporting tapes under system control. Several of
our library models are expandable in the field by increasing the
number of tape storage positions. This feature provides the end
user with the ability to increase data capacity as storage needs
grow.
We continue to develop and release new libraries to expand our
product offerings to meet the changing demands of the
marketplace. In addition, we continue to enhance and improve our
existing products to maintain our competitive position.
Some of our tape libraries incorporate a number of specialized
features that we believe improve reliability, serviceability and
performance, including:
| Rapid tape drive replacement. We design our libraries so that a tape drive can be replaced quickly without special tools. This feature minimizes the off-line time required when a tape drive must be replaced, and frequently avoids the high cost and delays of a service call. | |
| Fibre Channel connectivity. We offer a Fibre Channel option on many of our models for connection to Storage Area Networks and other high performance applications. | |
| Closed-loop servo control. Our tape libraries use digital closed-loop servo control for robotic motion to provide precise tape handling. This yields motion that is smooth, repeatable and highly reliable. | |
| Brushless motors. Motors are a key component in any robotic system. We use only brushless electric motors in our tape libraries. Brushless motors provide longer life and less electrical noise compared to conventional brush-type motors. We build many of our own motors in order to obtain optimum performance and reliability. | |
| Variable Input/ Output Port. Our VIOP feature allows users to select the number of cartridge slots to be dedicated to bulk import or export of media to or from the library. | |
| Remote management. Many larger companies with global back-up solutions or disaster management programs require tape libraries that can be put off-site in various regions, but that must be administered from a single location. With Q-Link, our remote library manager, customers can put libraries anywhere in the world and manage them from a single administrative hub using a standard web browser. |
Our flagship product line, the TLS Series, is specifically
designed to be placed on the floor or on a tabletop, without the
need for a special equipment rack. If requested, we provide our
customers with an adapter kit for rack mounting some models.
Other manufacturers design libraries primarily for rack
mounting, and supply an adapter for tabletop use.
Our RLS Series of tape libraries are designed to fit efficiently
in equipment racks and provide back-up capacity in only five
standard units, or a total of 8.75 inches of rack space. In
addition, some models in the RLS series were designed to support
dual-redundant power supplies and hot-swappable tape drives.
Other Products |
In addition to our tape libraries, we sell ancillary products
such as tape media, tape magazines, cables, bar code labels and
adapters for rack mounting.
In July 2002, we purchased the assets and intellectual property
of N2Power, Incorporated, a privately held company located in
Newbury Park, California. Our N2Power division designs,
manufactures, and sells ultra small high-efficiency open-frame
switching power supplies based on its patented technology.
N2Power products are used in our tape libraries as well as sold
to original equipment manufacturers and a private label
distributor.
7
Table of Contents
Sales and Marketing
Sales |
We sell our tape library products primarily through value added
resellers. Our sales force will initiate contact with value
added resellers who are candidates to sell our tape libraries.
We strive to develop relationships with resellers who have
expertise in storage management applications, established
relationships with end users and the experience to understand
and satisfy their customers needs.
We believe that by selling directly to value added resellers, we
have an advantage over competitors who will often sell directly
to end users, thereby competing with their resellers. Some of
the advantages of our strategy include the following:
| Higher profit margins. Focusing on this channel, we achieve economies that result in higher profit margins to be shared by both the reseller and us. | |
| Custom configurations. We offer custom configurations of our products, such as special paint, private branding and non-standard options, on very short notice. | |
| Channel conflicts avoided. We refer substantially all end user inquiries to our reseller partners. Frequently, our sales force will make end user visits with resellers to help close a pending sale. | |
| Credit. We extend credit terms to resellers who meet our credit requirements. | |
| Rapid delivery. We generally ship a product within one to three working days of confirming an order, rivaling the delivery time of many distributors. |
Although we sell our tape libraries primarily to value added
resellers, we believe that original equipment manufacturers are
an important element of our business. The sales cycle for
original equipment manufacturers generally encompasses six
months to one year and may involve extensive product and system
qualification testing, evaluation, integration and verification.
Original equipment manufacturers typically assume responsibility
for product sales, service and support.
Our international sales are currently directed from our
corporate offices in Simi Valley, California. European sales are
coordinated through our European sales office in the United
Kingdom. All of our international sales are denominated in
U.S. dollars. Revenues from customers outside of North
America were approximately $6.9 million, or 27.3% of
revenues in fiscal 2005, approximately $10.2 million or
32.4% of revenues in fiscal 2004, and approximately
$9.9 million or 29.4% of revenues in fiscal 2003.
Our sales are spread across a broad customer base. For the year
ended June 30, 2005, no single customer accounted for more
than 10% of our revenue.
Marketing |
We support our sales efforts with a broad array of marketing
programs designed to generate brand awareness, attract and
retain qualified value added resellers and inform end users
about the advantages of our products. We provide our resellers
with a full range of marketing materials, including product
specifications, sales literature, software connectivity
information and product application notes.
We train our resellers to sell our products and to answer
customers questions. We advertise in key publications and
participate in trade shows. We display our products under the
Qualstar brand name at some trade shows and participate in other
trade shows in partnership with our principal suppliers and
resellers. We support our marketing and customer support with a
website that features comprehensive marketing and product
information.
We conduct sales and technical training classes for our
resellers. We also conduct various promotional activities for
resellers and end users, including product-specific rebates and
co-operative advertising.
8
Table of Contents
Customer Service and Technical Support
We believe that strong customer service and technical support is
an essential aspect of our business. Our customer service and
technical support efforts consist of the following components:
| Technical support. Our technical support personnel are available twenty-four hours per day, Monday through Friday. Technical support personnel are available to all customers at no charge by telephone, facsimile and e-mail to answer questions and solve problems relating to our products. Our technical support personnel are trained in all aspects of our products. Our support staff is located at our headquarters in Simi Valley, California. We sell service contracts for on-site service of our tape libraries installed within the United States and Canada, which are fulfilled by IBM Corporation and on-site service contracts sold in Europe are fulfilled by Eastman Kodak S.A. Commercial Imaging Group. | |
| Sales engineering. Our engineers provide both pre-and post-sales support to our resellers. Engineers typically become involved in more complex problem-solving situations involving interactions between our products, third-party software, network server hardware and the network operating systems. Engineers work with resellers and end users over the telephone and at an end user site as required. | |
| Training. We offer a product maintenance training program for end users, value added resellers, original equipment manufacturers, customer service and technical support personnel. We conduct training classes at our headquarters and on-site as appropriate. | |
| Warranty. The warranty period on our tape libraries is three years. Some TLS and all RLS models have three year advance replacement warranty coverage that provides for replacement of components or, if necessary, complete libraries. All other TLS models have a one year advance replacement warranty with the second and third year being return-to-factory for service at no charge. Customers may purchase extended advance replacement service coverage and on-site service if they are located in the United States, Canada and some countries within Europe. |
Manufacturing and Suppliers
We manufacture all of our tape libraries at our facility in Simi
Valley, California. We currently operate five assembly lines
during one daily eight-hour shift. As needs require, we have the
ability to add a second or third shift to increase our capacity.
To respond rapidly to orders, we build our tape libraries to a
semi-finished state, perform full testing and then place the
tape libraries in a holding area until an order is received.
Once an order is confirmed, we remove the unit from the holding
area, install tape drives and configure the unit to meet the
specific requirements of the order, retest and then ship.
The manufacturing cycle to bring the libraries to a
semi-finished state is approximately five working days. We
believe that this process represents an effective way to control
our inventory levels while maintaining the ability to fill
specific orders in short lead times. We coordinate inventory
planning and management with suppliers and customers to match
our production to market demand. Once we confirm an order, we
generally ship the product within one to three working days. We
believe this response time is among the fastest in the industry
and gives us a competitive edge. Because we fill the majority of
our orders as they are received, our backlog generally is small
and is not indicative of future revenues.
We carefully select our suppliers based on their ability to
provide quality parts that meet our specifications and volume
requirements. Inventory planning and management is coordinated
closely with suppliers to match our production needs. Many of
the components assembled into our libraries are off-the-shelf
parts, which reduces the risk of part shortages and allows us to
maintain inventory of these parts at a minimum. A number of our
component parts are not available off the shelf, but are
designed to our specifications for integration into our products.
Tape drives and tape media are available only from a limited
number of suppliers, some of which are sole-source providers.
Some of our suppliers compete with us by selling their own tape
libraries. The risk of
9
Table of Contents
allocation is greater upon the introduction of a new tape drive
technology. Any disruption in supplies of tape drives or tape
media could delay shipments of our products.
Competition
The market for automated tape libraries is intensely competitive
and characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving
standards. Because we offer a broad range of libraries for
different tape drive technologies, we tend to have a large
number of competitors that differ depending on the particular
format and performance level. We compete in a segment of the
overall tape library market that focuses on small to mid- range
network computing environments. Our principal competitors in
this market segment include Sun/ StorageTek, Quantum
Corporation, Advanced Digital Information Corporation, Overland
Storage, Inc., and Spectra Logic Corporation.
Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial and
other resources, better name recognition, larger research and
development staffs, and more capabilities in manufacturing,
marketing and distributing products than we do. Our competitors
may develop new technologies and products that are more
effective than our products. We are not ISO-9000 certified,
unlike some of our competitors, which may limit some
customers ability to purchase our products.
As competitors introduce products in a particular tape drive
technology, the increased competition normally results in price
erosion and a reduction in gross margins for all competitors. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully
against either current or potential competitors or that
competition will not cause a reduction in our revenues or profit
margins. We believe that our ability to compete depends on a
number of factors, including the success and timing of new
product developments by us and by our competitors, compatibility
of our products with a broad range of computing systems, product
performance, reliability, price, marketing and sales execution
and customer support. Specifically, we believe that the
principal competitive factors in the selection of a tape library
include:
| reliability of the robotic assembly that handles the tape cartridges; | |
| initial purchase price; | |
| storage capacity; | |
| speed of data transfer; | |
| compatibility with existing operating systems and storage management software; | |
| after-sale expandability of a tape library to meet increasing storage requirements; | |
| expected product life, cost of maintenance and total cost of ownership; and | |
| physical configuration and power requirements of the library. |
We believe our tape libraries compete favorably overall with
respect to many of these factors.
Research and Development
Our research and development group of 21 people consists of
engineers and technicians who have data storage and related
industry experience. We have developed over 40 separate tape
library models for eleven different tape formats over the last
ten years.
Our research and development efforts rely on the integration of
multiple engineering disciplines to generate products that meet
market needs in a competitive and timely fashion. Successful
development of automated tape libraries requires the integration
of mechanical design, electronic design packaging, software
design, and firmware design into a single product. Product
success also relies on the engineering groups thorough
knowledge of each of the different tape drive technologies.
We frequently develop new products in response to the
availability of a new tape drive technology. As tape drive
manufacturers compete in the marketplace, they continually
invest in research and development to
10
Table of Contents
gain performance leadership either by offering increasingly
enhanced versions of their current tape drive products or by
introducing an entirely new tape drive technology. We benefit
from these industry developments by utilizing the new technology
in our products. Our engineers work closely with the tape drive
manufacturers through the drive development cycle to assure that
reliable tape library and tape drive combinations are brought to
market.
The design architecture of our tape libraries makes use of
common parts across most product families, allowing us to
develop and introduce new products quickly. If a new tape drive
is an advanced version of one already incorporated in one or
more of our products, our time and dollar investment to
incorporate the new drive can be relatively small, with the
primary focus being on verification testing. When the form
factors differ, the time and investment requirements can grow
substantially, and may require development of a new product
family altogether.
We also develop new products as we identify emerging market
needs. Our sales, marketing, product development and engineering
groups identify products to fulfill customer and marketplace
needs. Our research and development group concentrates on
leveraging previous engineering investments into new products.
For example, our firmware is based on successive generations of
the operating system developed for our first library. We also
use common parts in our different library series and leverage
our electro-mechanical and electronic hardware technology from
previous products into next generation designs. In some cases,
entire subassemblies are transferable, leveraging not only
engineering time but also materials purchasing, inventory
stocking and manufacturing efforts.
Our research and development expenses were approximately
$3.8 million in fiscal 2005, approximately
$4.3 million in fiscal 2004, and approximately
$4.0 million in fiscal 2003. We anticipate research and
development costs to be slightly lower in fiscal 2006.
Intellectual Property
We rely on copyright protection of our firmware, as well as
patent protection for some of our designs and products. We also
rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret and other
intellectual property laws to protect our proprietary rights.
However, we do not believe our intellectual property provides
significant protection from competition. We believe that,
because of the rapid pace of technological change in the tape
storage industry, patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret
protection are less significant than factors such as the
knowledge, ability and experience of our personnel and timely
new product introductions.
We enter into Employee Proprietary Information and Inventions
Agreements with our engineers along with all employees and
consultants to protect our technology and designs. However, we
do not believe that such protection can preclude competitors
from developing substantially equivalent products.
Employees
As of September 26, 2005, we had 95 full-time
employees, including 35 in operations and manufacturing, 22 in
research and development, 6 in customer service and technical
support, 17 in sales and marketing, and 15 in administration and
finance. We also employ a small number of temporary employees
and consultants as needed. We are not a party to any collective
bargaining agreement or other similar agreement. We believe that
we have a good relationship with our employees.
11
Table of Contents
RISK FACTORS
Our principal competitors devote greater financial resources to developing, marketing and selling automated tape libraries. Consequently, we may be unable to maintain or increase our market share. |
We face significant competition in developing and selling
automated tape libraries. Rapid and ongoing changes in
technology and product standards could quickly render our
products less competitive, or even obsolete. We have
significantly fewer financial, technical, manufacturing,
marketing and other resources than many of our competitors and
these limited resources may harm our business in many ways. For
example, in the past several years our competitors have:
| acquired other tape library companies; | |
| increased the geographic scope of their market; | |
| offered a wider range of tape library products; and | |
| developed and acquired proprietary software and disk based products that operate in conjunction with their products and the products of their competitors. |
In the future, our competitors may leverage their greater
resources to:
| develop, manufacture and market products that are less expensive or technologically superior to our products; | |
| attend more trade shows and spend more on advertising and marketing; | |
| reach a wider array of potential customers through a broader range of distribution channels; | |
| respond more quickly to new or changing technologies, customer requirements and standards; or | |
| reduce prices in order to preserve or gain market share. |
We believe competitive pressures are likely to continue. We
cannot guarantee that our resources will be sufficient to
address this competition or that we will manage costs and adopt
strategies capable of effectively utilizing our resources. If we
are unable to respond to competitive pressures successfully, our
prices and profit margins may fall and our market share may
decrease.
We have a limited number of executives. The loss of any single executive or the failure to hire and integrate capable new executives could harm our business. |
The success of our business is tied closely to the managerial,
engineering and business acumen of our existing executives.
William J. Gervais, our President, has been largely responsible
for the development of most of our tape libraries, has overseen
our operations and growth, and established and maintained our
strategic relationships. We expect that he will continue these
efforts for the foreseeable future. Our future success will also
depend on our ability to attract, retain and motivate key
executives and other key personnel, many of whom have been
instrumental in developing new technologies and strategic plans.
We may not be able to retain our existing personnel or attract
additional qualified personnel in the future. However, our
current dependence on a limited number of executives and other
key personnel, for whom replacements may be difficult to find,
entails a risk that we may not be able to supervise and manage
our ongoing operations.
Our suppliers could reduce shipments of tape drives and tape media. If this occurs, we would be forced to curtail production, our revenues could fall and our market share could decline. |
Automated tape libraries and related products, such as tape
drives and tape media, represented approximately 75.1% of our
revenues for fiscal 2005, approximately 81.4% of our revenues
for fiscal 2004, and approximately 79.8% of our revenues for
fiscal 2003. We depend on a limited number of third-party
manufacturers to supply us with the tape drives and tape media
that we incorporate into our automated tape libraries. Some tape
drive manufacturers, including Sony Corporation and Quantum
Corporation, compete
12
Table of Contents
with us by also manufacturing tape libraries. There can be no
assurance that other tape drive manufacturers will not also
begin to manufacture libraries.
Historically, some of these suppliers have been unable to meet
demand for their products and have allocated their limited
supply among customers. If suppliers limit our supply of tape
drives or tape media, we may be forced to delay or cancel
shipments of our tape libraries. The major supplier risks we
face include the following:
| Sony Electronics, Inc. is our sole-source supplier of AIT and Super AIT drives and media. In the past, Sony has allocated some of their products and may allocate them again in the future. In fiscal 2005 we derived approximately $12.0 million or 47.8% of our revenues, in fiscal 2004 we derived approximately $16.1 million, or 51.1%, of our revenues, and in fiscal 2003 we derived approximately $18.9 million, or 56.2% of revenues from the sale of libraries, tape drives and tape media based on Sony AIT and Super AIT technologies. If Sony reduces its sales to us or raises its prices, we could lose revenues and our margins could decline. | |
| Quantum Corporation is our sole-source supplier of SuperDLT tape drives and competes with us as a manufacturer of automated tape libraries. In the past, Quantum has allocated quantities of tape drives among its customers. It is possible that Quantum will allocate again, and as a result, may be unable to meet our future SuperDLT tape drive requirements. | |
| The LTO standard was developed by an industry consortium consisting of IBM, Hewlett Packard and Quantum/ Certance. LTO competes with AIT and other half-inch tape drives and media. All three drive suppliers also sell automated tape libraries that utilize LTO tape drives and compete with our products. Therefore, even if we receive adequate allocation, it may be at a price that renders our products uncompetitive. |
Our other suppliers have in the past been, and may in the future
be, unable to meet our demand, including our needs for timely
delivery, adequate quantity and high quality. We do not have
long-term supply contracts with any of our significant
suppliers. The partial or complete loss of any of our suppliers
could result in lost revenue, added costs and production delays
or could otherwise harm our business and customer relationships.
Our revenues could decline if we fail to execute our distribution strategy successfully. |
We distribute and sell our automated tape libraries primarily
through value added resellers and original equipment
manufacturers, and intend to continue this strategy for the
foreseeable future. Value added resellers integrate our tape
libraries with products of other manufacturers and sell the
combined products to their own customers. Original equipment
manufacturers combine our tape libraries with their own products
and sell the combined product under their own brand. We
currently devote, and intend to continue to devote, significant
resources to develop these relationships. A failure to initiate,
manage and expand our relationships with value added resellers
or original equipment manufacturers could limit our ability to
grow or sustain our current level of revenues.
Our focus on the distribution of our products through value
added resellers poses the following risks:
| we may reach fewer customers because we depend on value added resellers to market to end users and these value added resellers may fail to market effectively or fail to devote sufficient or effective sales, marketing and technical support to the sales of our products; | |
| we may lose sales because many of our value added resellers sell products that compete with our products. These value added resellers may reduce their marketing efforts for our products in favor of products manufactured by our competitors; | |
| our costs may increase as value added resellers generally require a higher level of customer support than do original equipment manufacturers; and | |
| as the market for tape libraries matures, we expect that tape libraries designed for small and medium size businesses will not require the level of sales, marketing and technical support traditionally provided |
13
Table of Contents
by value added resellers and, consequently, tape libraries for these customers will be increasingly sold through distribution channels rather than through value added resellers. |
We depend upon our original equipment manufacturer
customers ability to develop new products, applications
and product enhancements that incorporate our products in a
timely, cost-effective and customer-friendly manner. We cannot
guarantee that our original equipment manufacturer customers
will meet these challenges effectively. Original equipment
manufacturers typically conduct substantial and lengthy
evaluation programs before certifying a new product for
inclusion in their product line. We may be required to devote
significant financial and human resources to these evaluation
programs with no assurance that our products will ever be
selected. In addition, even if selected by the original
equipment manufacturer, there generally is no requirement that
the original equipment manufacturer purchase any particular
amount of product from us or that it refrain from purchasing
competing products.
We do not have any exclusive agreements with our value added
resellers or original equipment manufacturers, who purchase our
products on an individual purchase order basis. If we lose
important value added resellers or original equipment
manufacturer customers, if they reduce their focus on our
products or if we are unable to obtain additional value added
reseller or original equipment manufacturer customers, our
business could suffer.
We rely on tape technology for substantially all of our revenues. Our business will be harmed if demand for storage solutions using tape technology declines or fails to develop as we expect. |
We derive substantially all of our revenues from products that
incorporate some form of tape technology. We expect to derive
substantially all of our revenues from these products for the
foreseeable future. As a result, we will continue to be subject
to the risk of a decrease in revenues if demand for these
products declines or if rising prices make it more difficult to
obtain them. If products incorporating other technologies gain
comparable or superior market acceptance and competitive price
advantage, our business, financial condition and operating
results could be adversely and materially affected unless we
successfully develop and market products incorporating the new
technology.
We depend upon the AIT and Super AIT tape formats supplied by Sony Electronics Inc. for a significant portion of our revenues. Should Sony abandon or fail to advance this tape format, future revenues or operating results could suffer. |
Sony Electronics Inc. is our sole supplier of AIT and Super AIT
tape drives and tape media. If Sony should discontinue
manufacturing these products or fail to advance the technology
to keep pace with the industry trend of increasing tape
capacity, our revenues or operating results could be
significantly impacted.
Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate unexpectedly from quarter to quarter, which may cause our stock price to decline. |
Our quarterly revenues and operating results have fluctuated in
the past, and are likely to vary significantly in the future due
to several factors, including:
| general economic conditions affecting spending for information technology; | |
| increased competition and pricing pressures; | |
| reductions in the size, delays in the timing, or cancellation of significant customer orders; | |
| shifts in product or distribution channel mix; | |
| the timing of the introduction or enhancement of products by us, our original equipment manufacturer customers or our competitors; | |
| expansions or reductions in our relationships with value added reseller and original equipment manufacturer customers; |
14
Table of Contents
| financial difficulties affecting our value added reseller or original equipment manufacturer customers that render them unable to pay amounts owed to us; | |
| increased number and diversity of available data back-up and archive storage alternatives resulting in delays to customer decision-making cycles; | |
| market acceptance of new and enhanced versions of our products; | |
| new product developments by storage device manufacturers, including cost and performance of disk drive products; | |
| the rate of growth in the data storage market and the various segments within it; | |
| timing and levels of our operating expenses; and | |
| availability of tape media and key components and performance of key suppliers. |
We believe that period to period comparisons of our operating
results may not necessarily be reliable indicators of our future
performance. It is likely that in some future period our
operating results will not meet your expectations or those of
public market analysts.
Any unanticipated change in revenues or operating results is
likely to cause our stock price to fluctuate since such changes
reflect new information available to investors and analysts. New
information may cause investors and analysts to revalue our
stock and this, in the aggregate, may cause fluctuations in our
stock price.
Our lack of significant order backlog makes it difficult to forecast future revenues and operating results. |
We normally ship products within a few days after orders are
received. Consequently, we do not have significant order backlog
and a large portion of our revenues in each quarter results from
orders placed during that quarter. Because backlog can be an
important indicator of future revenues, our lack of backlog
makes it more difficult to forecast our future revenues. Since
our operating expenses are relatively fixed in the short term,
unexpected fluctuations in revenues could negatively impact our
quarterly operating results.
If we fail to develop and introduce new products on a timely and cost-effective basis, or if our products do not contain the features required by the marketplace, we will eventually lose market share and sales to more innovative competitors. |
The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing
technology and evolving industry standards. The future success
of Qualstar will depend on our ability to anticipate changes in
technology, to develop new and enhanced products on a timely and
cost-effective basis, and to introduce, manufacture and achieve
market acceptance of these new and enhanced products. In
particular, our success will depend on the market acceptance of
our soon to be introduced XLS family of automated tape
libraries, our next generation of automated tape
libraries designed for the enterprise marketplace. Our RLS
and TLS families of tape libraries are facing increasing
competition from products manufactured by our competitors and
may face competition from other types of storage devices that
may be developed in the future.
Development schedules for high technology products are
inherently subject to uncertainty and there can be no assurance
we will be able to meet our product development schedules or
that our development costs will be within budgeted amounts. If
the products or product enhancements developed are not
deliverable due to technical problems, quality issues or
component shortages, or if such products or product enhancements
are not accepted by the marketplace or are unreliable, then our
business, financial condition and results of operations may be
materially adversely affected.
The introduction of new storage technologies or the adoption of
an industry standard different than our current product
standards could render our existing products obsolete.
15
Table of Contents
Our increased research and development spending may not yield results that justify the costs incurred. |
In recent fiscal years we have substantially increased our
research and development spending over that of prior periods.
Our products and markets are technologically advanced and
rapidly evolving, and we cannot be assured that these efforts
will successfully provide us with new or upgraded products that
will be competitive. If these programs are not successful, our
increased investment in research and development will not yield
corresponding benefits to us.
We depend upon independent software vendors to provide management software that makes our tape libraries functional. |
The utility of an automated tape library depends partly upon the
storage management software, which supports the library and
integrates it into the users computing environment to
provide a complete storage solution. We do not develop and have
no control over the development of this storage management
software. Instead we rely on third party independent software
vendors to develop and support this software. Accordingly, the
continued development and future growth of the market for our
products will depend partly upon the success of software vendors
to meet the overall data storage and management needs of tape
library purchasers and our ability to maintain relationships
with these firms. Although we do not have contracts with any
third party independent software vendors, we maintain
relationships with them by:
| supplying tape libraries so they can qualify their software to work with our tape libraries; | |
| evaluating their software for compatibility with our tape libraries; | |
| keeping them informed as to current and contemplated changes to our products; and | |
| referring business to them when value added resellers or end users inquire about software sources. |
Our customers have the right to return our products in certain circumstances. An excessive number of returns may reduce our revenues. |
Our customers have 30 days from the date of purchase to
return products that do not conform to an end users
requirements. We may otherwise allow product returns if we think
that doing so maximizes the effectiveness of our sales channels
and promotes our reputation for quality and service.
Although we estimate and reserve for potential returns in our
reported financial results, actual returns could exceed our
estimates. If the number of returns exceeds our estimates, our
financial results could be adversely impacted for the periods
during which returns are made.
We may spend money pursuing sales that do not occur when anticipated or at all. |
Original equipment manufacturer customers typically conduct
significant evaluation, testing, implementation and acceptance
procedures before they begin to market and sell new models of
tape libraries. This evaluation process is lengthy and may range
from six months to one year or more. This process is complex and
may require significant sales, marketing, engineering and
management resources on our part. The process becomes more
complex as we simultaneously qualify our products with multiple
customers or pursue large orders with a single customer. As a
result, we may expend resources to develop customer
relationships before we recognize any revenue from these
relationships, if at all.
We sell a significant portion of our products to customers located outside the United States. Currency fluctuations and increased costs associated with international sales could make our products unaffordable in foreign markets, which would reduce our revenue or profitability. |
Revenues from shipments to customers outside of North America
accounted for approximately 27.3% of revenues in fiscal 2005,
approximately 32.4% of revenues in fiscal 2004, and
approximately 29.4% of revenues
16
Table of Contents
in fiscal 2003. We believe that international sales will
continue to represent a significant portion of our revenues. Our
international sales subject us to a number of risks, including:
| political and economic instability may reduce demand for our products or our ability to market our products in foreign countries; | |
| although we denominate our international sales in U.S. dollars, currency fluctuations could make our products unaffordable to foreign purchasers or more expensive compared to those of foreign manufacturers; | |
| restrictions on the export or import of technology may reduce or eliminate our ability to sell in certain markets; | |
| the need to comply with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations; | |
| greater difficulty of administering business overseas may increase the costs of foreign sales and support; | |
| foreign governments may impose tariffs, quotas and taxes on our products; | |
| longer payment cycles typically associated with international sales and potential difficulties in collecting accounts receivable may reduce the profitability of foreign sales; and | |
| our current determination not to seek ISO-9000 certification, a widely accepted method of establishing and certifying the quality of a manufacturers operations, may reduce sales. |
These risks may increase our costs of doing business
internationally and reduce our revenues or profitability.
We may have to expend significant amounts of time and money defending or settling product liability claims arising from failures of our tape libraries. |
Because our tape library customers use our products to store and
backup their important data, we face potential liability if our
products fail to perform. Although we maintain general liability
insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this
type or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability
that may be imposed. Any imposition of liability that is not
covered by insurance or that exceeds our insurance coverage
could reduce our profitability or cause us to discontinue
operations.
A failure to develop and maintain proprietary technology may negatively affect our business. |
We rely on copyright protection of electronic circuits and our
firmware, as well as patent protection for some of our designs
and products. We also rely on a combination of trademark, trade
secret, and other intellectual property laws and various
contract rights to protect our proprietary rights. However, we
do not believe our intellectual property rights provide
significant protection from competition. As a consequence, these
rights may not preclude competitors from developing products
that are substantially equivalent or superior to our products.
In addition, many aspects of our products are not subject to
intellectual property protection and therefore can be reproduced
by our competitors.
Intellectual property infringement claims brought against us could be time consuming and expensive to defend. |
In recent years, there has been an increasing amount of
litigation in the United States involving patents and other
intellectual property rights. Qualstar is not currently directly
involved in any intellectual property litigation or proceedings.
However, in April 2004 we settled litigation that Raytheon
Company had filed alleging that Qualstar and eight other named
defendants infringed on a patent owned by Raytheon Company
entitled Mass Data Storage Library. In the future,
we may become subject to other claims or inquiries
17
Table of Contents
regarding our alleged unauthorized use of a third partys
intellectual property. An adverse outcome in litigation could
force us to do one or more of the following:
| stop selling, incorporating or using our products or services that use the challenged intellectual property; | |
| subject us to significant liabilities to third parties; | |
| obtain from the owners of the infringed intellectual property right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all; or | |
| redesign those products or services that use the infringed technology, which redesign may be either economically or technologically infeasible. |
Whether or not an intellectual property litigation claim is
valid, the cost of responding to it, in terms of legal fees and
expenses and the diversion of management resources, could harm
our business.
Undetected software or hardware flaws could increase our costs, reduce our revenues and divert resources from our core business needs. |
Our tape libraries are complex. Despite our efforts to revise
and update our manufacturing and test processes to address
engineering and component changes, we may not be able to control
and eliminate manufacturing flaws adequately. These flaws may
include undetected software or hardware defects associated with:
| a newly introduced product; | |
| a new version of an existing product; or | |
| a product that has been integrated into a network storage solution with the products of other vendors. |
The variety of contexts in which errors may arise may make it
difficult to identify the source of a problem. These problems
may:
| cause us to incur significant warranty, repair and replacement costs; | |
| divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts; | |
| cause significant customer relations problems; or | |
| damage our reputation. |
To address these risks, we frequently revise and update
manufacturing and test procedures to address engineering and
component changes to our products. If we fail to adequately
monitor, develop and implement appropriate test and
manufacturing processes we could experience a rate of product
failure that results in substantial shipment delays, repair or
replacement costs or damage to our reputation. Product flaws may
also consume our limited engineering resources and interrupt our
development efforts. Significant product failures would increase
our costs and result in the loss of future sales and be harmful
to our business.
Our warranty reserves may not adequately cover our warranty obligations. |
We have established reserves for the estimated liability
associated with our product warranties. However, we could
experience unforeseen circumstances where these or future
reserves may not adequately cover our warranty obligations.
Our officers and directors could implement corporate actions that are not in the best interests of our shareholders as a whole. |
Our executive officers and directors own beneficially, in the
aggregate, approximately 45% of our outstanding common stock as
of June 30, 2005. As a result, these shareholders will be
able to exercise significant control over all matters requiring
shareholder approval, including the election of directors and
18
Table of Contents
approval of significant corporate transactions, which could
delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us. The
interests of our officers and directors, when acting in their
capacity as shareholders, may lead them to:
| vote for the election of directors who agree with the incumbent officers or directors preferred corporate policy; or | |
| oppose or support significant corporate transactions when these transactions further their interests as incumbent officers or directors, even if these interests diverge from their interests as shareholders per se and thus from the interests of other shareholders. |
Some provisions of our charter documents may make takeover attempts difficult, which could depress the price of our stock and inhibit your ability to receive a premium price for your shares. |
Our board of directors has the authority, without any action by
the shareholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock and to fix the rights and preferences of such
shares. In addition, our articles of incorporation and bylaws
contain provisions that eliminate cumulative voting in the
election of directors and require shareholders to give advance
notice if they wish to nominate directors or submit proposals
for shareholder approval. These provisions may have the effect
of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, may
discourage bids for our common stock at a premium over its
market price and may adversely affect the market price, and the
voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.
We do not currently intend to pay dividends and therefore you will only be able to recover your investment in our common stock, if at all, by selling the shares of the stock that you own. |
We historically have pursued a policy of reinvesting our
earnings in research and development, expanding our value added
reseller and original equipment manufacturer relationships, and
expanding our manufacturing capabilities. Consequently, we have
never paid dividends on our shares of capital stock. We
currently intend to continue this policy for the foreseeable
future to strengthen our financial and competitive position in
the tape library market.
Trading in our stock has been limited and our stock price has been volatile. Consequently, it may be difficult to sell your shares. |
There has been very little trading in shares of our stock and
some days it does not trade at all. This, as well as the factors
listed below, has caused the price of our stock to be very
volatile. Consequently, it may be difficult to sell your shares
of our stock at the price you paid for them or at a price equal
to that quoted in the Nasdaq National Market. Factors that may
cause our stock price to fluctuate in the future include:
| quarterly variations in operating results, especially if they differ from our previously announced forecasts or forecasts made by analysts; | |
| our announcements of anticipated future revenues or operating results; | |
| announcements concerning us, our competitors, our customers, or our industry; | |
| the introduction of new technology or products by us or our competitors; | |
| comments regarding us and the data storage market made by industry analysts or on Internet bulletin boards; | |
| changes in earnings estimates by analysts or changes in accounting policies; | |
| changes in product pricing policies by us or our competitors; and | |
| changes in general economic conditions. |
In addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price and
volume volatility in recent years. This volatility has had a
substantial effect on the market prices of securities of many
smaller public companies for reasons frequently unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of the specific
companies. These market fluctuations may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
19
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Executive Officers
Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the board
of directors. The executive officers of Qualstar as of
September 26, 2005 are:
Name | Age | Position | ||||
William J. Gervais
|
62 | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | ||||
Richard A. Nelson
|
62 | Vice President of Engineering, Secretary and Director | ||||
Frederic T. Boyer
|
61 | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
David L. Griffith
|
49 | Vice President of Operations | ||||
Robert K. Covey
|
58 | Vice President of Marketing | ||||
Robert C. King
|
61 | Vice President of Sales |
Background
William J. Gervais is a founder of Qualstar and has been
our President and a director since our inception in 1984, and
was elected Chief Executive Officer in January 2000. From 1984
until January 2000, Mr. Gervais also served as our Chief
Financial Officer. From 1981 until 1984, Mr. Gervais was
President of Northridge Design Associates, Inc., an engineering
consulting firm. Mr. Gervais was a co-founder, and served
as Engineering Manager from 1976 until 1981, of Micropolis
Corporation. Mr. Gervais earned a B.S. degree in Mechanical
Engineering from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
in 1967.
Richard A. Nelson is a founder of Qualstar and has been
our Vice President of Engineering, Secretary and a director
since our inception in 1984. From 1974 to 1984, Mr. Nelson
was self employed as an engineering consultant specializing in
microprocessor technology. Mr. Nelson earned a B.S. in
Electronic Engineering from California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona in 1966.
Frederic T. Boyer has been our Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer since October, 2002. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Boyer was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Accelerated Networks from 1998 to 2001. From May 1997 to October
1998, Mr. Boyer was the Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Software Dynamics.
From January 1996 to May 1997, Mr. Boyer was a consultant
to several technology companies. From March 1990 to January
1996, Mr. Boyer was Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Fibermux Corporation, a networking company later
acquired by ADC Telecommunications. Mr. Boyer holds an
M.B.A. from Loyola University, a B.S. in Accounting from
California State University, Los Angeles, and a B.S. in
Economics from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.
David L. Griffith, currently our Vice President of
Operations, joined the company in October of 2001. From 1999 to
2001, Mr. Griffith served as the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Stardrive Solutions Inc., a software
solutions provider for the broadcast automation industry. From
1998 to 1999, Mr. Griffith was the Corporate Vice President
of Business Development at Tandberg Data ASA where he was
responsible for the development of worldwide business plans and
corporate expansion activities. From 1994 to 1998,
Mr. Griffith was the President and Chief Executive Officer
of Tandberg Data, Inc. located in Simi Valley, California. From
1990 to 1994, Mr. Griffith was the Vice President of Sales
and Marketing for Tandberg Data, Inc. From 1987 to 1990,
Mr. Griffith acted as Marketing Manager and Program Manager
for the Memory Products Group of Siemens Information Systems.
Mr. Griffith received a degree in Mechanical Engineering
from California State Polytechnic University in 1980.
Robert K. Covey has been our Vice President of Marketing
since 1994. From 1986 to 1993 Mr. Covey was regional
manager of ATG Cygnet, an optical disk library firm. From 1982
to 1985, Mr. Covey served as national sales manager at
Micropolis Corporation, a former disk drive manufacturer.
Mr. Covey attended Butler University and Bentley College
from 1965 to 1968.
Robert C. King was appointed our Vice President of Sales
in June 2005. From 1999 until it was acquired by JDS Uniphase in
2004, Mr. King was Vice President, Sales for E2O
Communications, a manufacturer of optical transceivers. From
1995 to 1998 Mr. King was Vice President, Sales and
Marketing for Advanced
20
Table of Contents
Photonix. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. King served as Vice
President, Sales and Marketing for Performance Materials
Corporation. From 1989 to 1992, Mr. King served as Vice
President, Market and Business Development for PCO, a subsidiary
of Corning Incorporated. Mr. King holds a B.S.M.E. degree
from Ohio University in Athens, Ohio.
Item 2. | Properties |
Our headquarters, located in Simi Valley, California, consists
of a single building containing approximately 57,000 square feet
housing our manufacturing, sales and marketing, finance and
administration and approximately half of our engineering. Our
lease on this facility expires in February 2011, with an early
termination option becoming available in February of 2007. Rent
on this facility is $39,000 per month, with step-ups
ranging from $2,400 to $2,800 per month every two years.
We also lease approximately 4,300 square feet of office
space in Boulder, Colorado, that houses our Advanced Development
Group. The lease of the Boulder, Colorado facility expires in
2007. Additionally, we have a sales office in Surrey,
United Kingdom.
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings |
We are from time to time involved in various lawsuits and legal
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. At
this time, we are not aware of any pending or threatened
litigation against us that we expect will have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity
or operating results. Legal claims are inherently uncertain,
however. We cannot assure you that we will not be adversely
affected in the future by legal proceedings.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Shareholders |
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005.
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Qualstars common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Stock
Markets National Market (NASDAQ Symbol QBAK).
The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale
prices of our common stock as reported by NASDAQ, during the
periods indicated:
Period | Date Range | High | Low | ||||||||||
Fiscal 2005:
|
|||||||||||||
First Quarter
|
July 1 September, 30, 2004 | $ | 6.44 | $ | 5.00 | ||||||||
Second Quarter
|
October 1 December 31, 2004 | $ | 6.94 | $ | 4.33 | ||||||||
Third Quarter
|
January 1 March 31, 2005 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 4.00 | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter
|
April 1 June 30, 2005 | $ | 4.55 | $ | 3.53 | ||||||||
Fiscal 2004:
|
|||||||||||||
First Quarter
|
July 1 September, 30, 2003 | $ | 6.23 | $ | 4.75 | ||||||||
Second Quarter
|
October 1 December 31, 2003 | $ | 5.40 | $ | 4.25 | ||||||||
Third Quarter
|
January 1 March 31, 2004 | $ | 6.10 | $ | 4.56 | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter
|
April 1 June 30, 2004 | $ | 6.88 | $ | 5.25 |
There were approximately 49 owners of record of Qualstars
common stock as of September 16, 2005.
Qualstar has declared no cash dividends during the periods
reported. Qualstar does not currently anticipate paying cash
dividends in the foreseeable future, but intends to retain any
future earnings for reinvestment in its business. Any future
determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of
our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon
Qualstars financial condition, results of operations,
capital requirements, terms of any debt instruments then in
effect and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem
relevant at the time.
21
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
The following selected financial data is qualified in its
entirety by and should be read in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in
this 10-K. Our historical financial results are not
necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future
period.
Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, expect per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Income Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
$ | 25,144 | $ | 31,530 | $ | 33,557 | $ | 37,631 | $ | 51,572 | ||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
16,529 | 19,575 | 21,171 | 23,753 | 33,216 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
8,615 | 11,955 | 12,386 | 13,878 | 18,356 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development
|
3,750 | 4,268 | 3,994 | 2,136 | 1,279 | |||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing
|
3,350 | 3,607 | 3,834 | 3,048 | 3,399 | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
3,955 | 5,420 | 4,428 | 5,222 | 3,301 | |||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
11,055 | 13,295 | 12,256 | 10,406 | 7,979 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations
|
(2,440 | ) | (1,340 | ) | 130 | 3,472 | 10,377 | |||||||||||||||
Investment income
|
858 | 624 | 693 | 1,133 | 1,225 | |||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss for other-than-temporary decline in investments
|
| (160 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment of investment
|
| | | | (1,050 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
(1,582 | ) | (876 | ) | 823 | 4,605 | 10,552 | |||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
65 | (145 | ) | 274 | 1,845 | 3,824 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (1,647 | ) | $ | (731 | ) | $ | 549 | $ | 2,760 | $ | 6,728 | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.54 | ||||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.53 | ||||||||||
Shares used to compute earnings (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
12,398 | 12,577 | 12,579 | 12,475 | 12,372 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
12,398 | 12,577 | 12,666 | 12,664 | 12,668 | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 12,210 | $ | 6,401 | $ | 6,236 | $ | 4,859 | $ | 11,509 | ||||||||||
Marketable securities
|
21,854 | 29,376 | 29,857 | 25,987 | 15,578 | |||||||||||||||
Working capital
|
43,275 | 46,534 | 47,191 | 46,507 | 43,382 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
47,223 | 51,647 | 52,096 | 50,758 | 47,878 | |||||||||||||||
Total debt
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
44,653 | 48,064 | 48,868 | 47,973 | 44,689 |
22
Table of Contents
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto.
Overview
We design, develop, manufacture and sell automated magnetic tape
libraries used to store, retrieve and manage electronic data
primarily in network computing environments. We offer tape
libraries for multiple tape drive technologies, including LTO,
AIT, Super AIT, and SuperDLT tape drives and media.
Many enterprises now routinely manage very large databases, in
addition to storing information on local desktop computers.
This, coupled with the growth in the amount of data from new
sources and applications, is increasing the need for managing
and storing data efficiently. Anticipating the increased demand
for tape libraries, we have developed tape libraries spanning a
broad range of tape formats, prices, capacity and performance.
We expect our products to continue to evolve in the future in
response to emerging tape technologies and changing customer
preferences.
We have developed a network of value added resellers who
specialize in delivering complete storage solutions to end
users. End users of our products range from small businesses
requiring simple automated backup solutions to large
organizations needing complex storage management solutions. We
also sell our products to original equipment manufacturers who
bundle our products with their own and sell them as part of a
complete system or solution. We assist our customers with
marketing, sales and technical support.
Our international sales efforts are currently directed from our
corporate offices in Simi Valley, California. European sales are
coordinated through our European sales office in the United
Kingdom. All of our international sales are denominated in
U.S. dollars. Revenues from sales outside North America
were approximately $6.9 million, or 27.3% of revenues in
fiscal 2005, approximately $10.2 million, or 32.4% of
revenues in fiscal 2004, and approximately $9.9 million, or
29.4% of revenues in fiscal 2003.
We also design, develop, manufacture and sell ultra small
high-efficiency open-frame switching power supplies for original
equipment manufacturers of telecommunications equipment,
servers, routers, switches, RAIDs, and other equipment. Our
power supplies are sold under the N2Power brand name through
independent sales representatives and a private distributor. The
primary customers are original equipment manufacturers and
contract manufacturers.
Net revenues include revenues from the sale of tape libraries,
library tape drives, tape cartridges, and ancillary products.
Ancillary revenues include service, repair, on-site service
agreements net of the cost of any third party service contracts,
and power supplies. Automated tape libraries and related
products, such as tape drives and tape media, represented
approximately 75.1% of revenues in fiscal 2005, approximately
81.4% of revenues in fiscal 2004, and approximately 79.8% of
revenues in fiscal 2003. Sales of ancillary products and
services accounted for the balance of our revenues.
Gross margins depend on several factors, including the cost of
manufacturing, product mix, customer demand and the level of
competition. Larger tape libraries provide higher gross margins
than do smaller tape libraries primarily because the competition
is less intense in this market segment.
Research and development activities include the design and
development of new products, as well as enhancements to existing
products. Our engineering group is developing our next
generation of automated tape libraries, currently in transition
from the development phase to the pilot production phase, with
manufacturing lines planned for our Simi Valley facility. We
expect research and development expenses to decrease slightly in
absolute dollars in the next fiscal year.
We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in
fiscal 2006 due to expensing stock options under
SFAS 123(R). We expect sales and marketing expenses to
increase in fiscal 2006 due to additional expenses associated
with bringing our next generation tape libraries to market.
23
Table of Contents
We recorded deferred compensation of approximately
$1.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2000,
representing the difference between the exercise price of stock
options and restricted stock granted to employees and directors
during fiscal 2000 and the deemed fair value for accounting
purposes of our common stock on the grant dates. Amortization of
deferred compensation, which was recorded as general and
administrative expense in the statement of operations, was $0 in
fiscal 2005, approximately $140,000 during fiscal 2004, and
approximately $301,000 in fiscal 2003. The deferred compensation
related to these stock options and restricted stock was fully
amortized as of June 30, 2004.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principals generally accepted in the United States. The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going
basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to
customer promotional offers, sales returns, bad debts,
inventories, warranty costs, investments, and income taxes. We
base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation
of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition |
Revenue is recognized upon shipment of product to our customers.
Title and risk of loss transfer to the customer when the product
leaves our dock in Simi Valley, California, or another shipping
location designated by us. In general, these customers are
allowed to return the product, free of penalty, within thirty
days of shipment, if the product does not meet the end
users requirements. Revenues from technical support
services and other services are recognized at the time services
are performed.
We record an allowance for estimated sales returns based on past
experience and current knowledge of our customer base. Our
experience has been such that only a very small percentage of
libraries are returned. Should our experience change, however,
we may require additional allowances for sales returns.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts based on an
assessment of the collectibility of specific accounts and the
overall condition of accounts receivable. In evaluating the
adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, we analyze
specific trade receivables, historical bad debts, customer
credits, customer credit-worthiness and changes in
customers payment terms and patterns. If the financial
condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make additional payments, then we
may need to make additional allowances. Likewise, if we
determine that we could realize more of our receivables in the
future than previously estimated, we would adjust the allowance
to increase income in the period we made this determination.
Inventory Valuation |
We record inventories at the lower of cost or market value. We
assess the value of our inventories periodically based upon
numerous factors including expected product or material demand,
current market conditions, technological obsolescence, current
cost and net realizable value. If necessary, we write down our
inventory for estimated obsolescence, potential shrinkage, or
unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost
of inventory and the estimated market value based upon
assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If
technology changes more rapidly than expected, or market
conditions become less favorable than those projected by
management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
24
Table of Contents
Warranty Obligations |
We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the
time revenue is recognized. We engage in extensive product
quality programs and processes, including active monitoring and
evaluation of product failure rates, material usage and
estimation of service delivery costs incurred in correcting a
product failure. However, should actual product failure rates,
material usage, or service delivery costs differ from our
estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would
be required. Historically our warranty costs have not been
significant.
Accounting for Income Taxes |
We estimate our tax liability based on current tax laws in the
statutory jurisdictions in which we operate. These estimates
include judgments about deferred tax assets and liabilities
resulting from temporary differences between assets and
liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such
amounts recognized for tax purposes, as well as about the
realization of deferred tax assets.
We maintain a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax
assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of
realizing the benefits of net deferred tax assets in future
years. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing
prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the
need for such a valuation allowance. In the event we were to
determine that we would be able to realize all or part of our
net deferred tax asset in the future, the valuation allowance
would be decreased accordingly.
We may periodically undergo examinations by the federal and
state regulatory authorities and the Internal Revenue Service.
We may be assessed additional taxes and or penalties contingent
on the outcome of these examinations. Our previous examinations
have not resulted in any unfavorable or significant assessments.
The Company had fiscal 2002 under audit by the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) for which the IRS issued a no change
opinion in the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
Results of Operations
The following table reflects, as a percentage of net revenues,
statements of operations data for the periods indicated:
Years Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Net revenues
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
65.7 | 62.1 | 63.1 | ||||||||||
Gross margin
|
34.3 | 37.9 | 36.9 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Research and development
|
14.9 | 13.5 | 11.9 | ||||||||||
Sales and marketing
|
13.4 | 11.4 | 11.4 | ||||||||||
General and administrative
|
15.7 | 17.2 | 13.2 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations
|
(9.7 | ) | (4.2 | ) | 0.4 | ||||||||
Investment income
|
3.4 | 2.0 | 2.0 | ||||||||||
Impairment loss for other-than-temporary decline in investments
|
| (0.6 | ) | | |||||||||
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
(6.3 | ) | (2.8 | ) | 2.4 | ||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
0.3 | (0.5 | ) | 0.8 | |||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
(6.6 | )% | (2.3 | )% | 1.6 | % | |||||||
25
Table of Contents
Revenues are recognized upon shipment of the product to the
customer, less estimated returns, for which provision is made at
the time of sale. The following table summarizes our revenue by
major product line:
Years Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Tape Library revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
TLS
|
51.7 | % | 56.4 | % | 67.7 | % | |||||||
RLS
|
13.1 | 15.5 | 4.0 | ||||||||||
64.8 | 71.9 | 71.7 | |||||||||||
Other revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
Service
|
10.5 | 7.6 | 6.2 | ||||||||||
Media
|
10.3 | 9.5 | 8.1 | ||||||||||
Power Supplies
|
5.1 | 1.8 | 0.6 | ||||||||||
Upgrades, Spares, 9 Track
|
9.3 | 9.2 | 13.4 | ||||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Fiscal 2005 Compared to Fiscal 2004
Net Revenues. Revenues are recognized upon shipment of
the product to the customer, less estimated returns, for which
provision is made at the time of the sale. Revenues for the year
ended June 30, 2005 were $25.1 million, a decrease of
20.3% compared to net revenues of $31.5 million for the
year ended June 30, 2004.
The decrease in revenues was due primarily to a decline in the
demand for our tape libraries using 8mm AIT tape technology and
to a lesser extent, half inch tape technology. Revenues from
libraries incorporating AIT tape technology were lower due to
customer preferences shifting to the higher capacity half inch
technology tape drives, caused, in part, by the delayed
availability of AIT4 tape drives. Moreover, when AIT4 tape
drives did become available, they were not backward read-write
compatible with earlier generations of AIT tape drives. Both of
these factors negatively impacted our upgrade business in our
large AIT customer base. Revenues incorporating half inch
technology exceeded revenues incorporating 8mm technology in
absolute dollars in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2004, by comparison,
revenues were divided about evenly between 8mm and half inch
tape technologies in absolute dollars. However, revenues from
libraries incorporating half inch technology decreased from
fiscal 2004 as the second and third quarters of fiscal 2004
benefited from a large non-recurring library order of
approximately $2.5 million.
Revenues from tape libraries and drives decreased to
$16.3 million, or 64.8% of revenues, in the year ended
June 30, 2005 from $22.7 million, or 71.9% of
revenues, in the year ended June 30, 2004. Although selling
prices of our libraries dropped during fiscal 2005, average
selling prices of libraries increased during fiscal 2005 due to
a change in product mix.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was $8.6 million, or
34.3% of revenues, for the year ended June 30, 2005,
compared to $12.0 million, or 37.9% of revenues, for fiscal
2004. Cost of goods sold consists primarily of direct labor,
purchased parts, depreciation of plant and equipment, rent,
utilities, and packaging costs. The decrease in gross margin as
a percentage of revenues was attributed to lower manufacturing
overhead absorption due to lower revenues as well as to lower
selling prices due to greater competitive pricing pressures.
Research and Development. Research and development
expenses consist of engineering salaries, benefits, outside
consultant fees, purchased parts, and supplies used in
development activities. Research and development expenses for
the year ended June 30, 2005 decreased to $3.8 million
or 14.9% of revenues as compared to $4.3 million or 13.5%
of revenues for the year ended June 30, 2004. This decrease
in absolute dollars was due primarily to lower prototype
material costs and salaries, partly offset by higher consulting
costs, as the next generation of tape libraries transitions from
the development phase to the pilot production phase.
26
Table of Contents
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist
primarily of employee salaries, benefits, sales commissions,
trade show costs, advertising and travel related expenses. Sales
and marketing expenses decreased to $3.4 million, or 13.3%
of revenues for the year ended June 30, 2005, as compared
to $3.6 million, or 11.4% of revenues, for the year ended
June 30, 2004. The decrease in absolute dollars can be
attributed primarily to a reduction in advertising and outside
commission expenses.
General and Administrative. General and administrative
expenses include employee salaries and benefits, deferred
compensation related to stock options and restricted stock,
provision for doubtful accounts, and professional service fees.
General and administrative expenses decreased to
$4.0 million, or 15.7% of revenues for the year ended
June 30, 2005 as compared to $5.4 million, or 17.2% of
revenues for the year ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in
general and administrative expenses was due to lower legal
expenses attributed to the settlement of the Raytheon lawsuit in
April 2004, lower bad debt expense and the absence of deferred
stock compensation.
Investment Income and Impairment Loss for
Other-than-Temporary Decline in Investments. Investment
income increased to $858,000 for the year ended June 30,
2005 as compared to net investment income of $464,000 in fiscal
2004. The increase is attributed to lowering the average
duration of our portfolio to capture the higher short-term
yields available in the current higher interest rate
environment. In addition, an impairment loss for
other-than-temporary decline in investments of $160,000 was
recognized in fiscal 2004 earnings due to the adoption of
Emerging Issues Task Force No. 03-1.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income
taxes was $65,000, or 4.1% of pre-tax loss, for fiscal
2005 compared to a benefit of $145,000, or 16.6% of pre-tax
loss, for fiscal 2004. The provision for income taxes in fiscal
2005 can be primarily attributed to establishing full valuation
allowances against net deferred tax assets based on our
assessment regarding the realizability of these benefits in
future years offset by the recognition of research and
development credits to be received. In fiscal 2004, the low
effective tax benefit rate was primarily attributed to
establishing valuation allowances for capital losses realized on
a tax basis in fiscal 2004 and net operating loss carryforwards.
Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003
Net Revenues. Revenues for the year ended June 30,
2004 were $31.5 million, a decrease of 6.0% compared to net
revenues of $33.6 million for the year ended June 30,
2003.
The decrease in revenues was due primarily to a decline in the
demand for our tape libraries using 8mm AIT tape technology.
This decrease was substantially offset by an increase in
revenues from our libraries using half inch technology, such as
LTO-2 and Super AIT. The most recent AIT tape technology has
only half the native storage capacity of the most recent LTO-2
and other half inch tape technologies. We have been successful
at incorporating half inch tape drives into our TLS libraries as
well as the newer rack-mountable RLS libraries and shifting
customer preferences to the half inch tape format. This resulted
in revenues being divided about evenly between 8mm and half inch
tape technologies in absolute dollars in fiscal 2004. In fiscal
2003, by comparison, revenues attributed to AIT tape technology
in absolute dollars exceeded half inch technology by 44%.
Revenues from tape libraries and drives decreased to
$22.7 million, or 71.9% of revenues, in the year ended
June 30, 2004 from $24.1 million, or 71.7% of
revenues, in the year ended June 30, 2003. Selling prices
of our libraries remained relatively stable during fiscal 2004.
Average selling prices of library tape drives increased during
fiscal 2004 due to a change in product mix.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was $12.0 million, or
37.9% of revenues, for the year ended June 30, 2004,
compared to $12.4 million, or 36.9% of revenues, for fiscal
2003. The increase in gross margin as a percentage of revenues
was attributed to efficiencies achieved in material management;
a more favorable product mix caused by the discontinuation of
several lower margin libraries; and sales of media with higher
than normal margins.
Research and Development. Research and development
expenses for the year ended June 30, 2004 increased 6.9% to
$4.3 million or 13.5% of revenues as compared to
$4.0 million or 11.9% of revenues for the
27
Table of Contents
year ended June 30, 2003. This increase was due primarily
to costs incurred in the continuing operating activities of our
Advanced Development Group in Boulder, Colorado, established in
late fiscal 2002 to design and develop our next generation of
tape libraries.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses
decreased by 5.9% to $3.6 million, or 11.4% of revenues for
the year ended June 30, 2004, as compared to
$3.8 million, or 11.4% of revenues, for the year ended
June 30, 2003. Although the percent decrease is consistent
with the decrease in revenues, in absolute dollars, the decrease
can be attributed to a reduction in advertising costs due to a
shift to the lower cost electronic advertising versus print
advertising and lower co-operative advertising as well as a
reduction in travel related expenditures.
General and Administrative. General and administrative
expenses increased to $5.4 million for fiscal 2004 as
compared to $4.4 million for fiscal 2003. As a percentage
of revenues, general and administrative expenses increased to
17.2% for the year ended June 30, 2004 as compared to 13.2%
for the year ended June 30, 2003. The increase in general
and administrative expenses was due primarily to legal fees and
settlement costs associated with our defense of the Raytheon
lawsuit.
Investment Income and Impairment Loss for
Other-than-Temporary Decline in Investments. Investment
income, net of an impairment loss for other-than-temporary
decline in investments of $160,000, decreased to $464,000 in the
year ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $693,000 in the
year ended June 30, 2003. This decrease was due primarily
to the adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 03-1,
which resulted in recognizing an impairment loss for
other-than-temporary decline in investments of $160,000 in
earnings. In addition, the economy continues to experience low
interest rates, which has had a negative impact on our
portfolios overall performance.
Provision for Income Taxes. The benefit for income taxes
was $145,000, or 16.6% of pre-tax loss, for fiscal 2004 compared
to a provision of $274,000, or 33.3% of pre-tax income, for
fiscal 2003. The low effective tax benefit rate in fiscal 2004
can be primarily attributed to valuation allowances established
for capital losses realized on a tax basis in fiscal 2004 and
net operating loss carryforwards based on our assessment
regarding the realizability of these benefits in future years.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, we have funded our capital requirements with cash
provided by operations. Cash provided by operating activities
was $.2 million in fiscal 2005, $.3 million in fiscal
2004, and $6.0 million in fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2005,
operating cash was primarily provided by refunds of fiscal 2002
federal and state income taxes paid and a decrease in accounts
receivable, offset partially by decreases in accounts payable
and other accrued liabilities. In fiscal 2004, operating cash
was primarily provided by a refund of fiscal 2003 income taxes
paid and increases in accounts payable and other accrued
liabilities, offset partially by increases in accounts
receivable and inventories. In fiscal 2003, operating cash was
primarily provided by reductions in accounts receivable and
inventory.
Cash provided by investing activities was $7.3 million in
fiscal 2005, and cash used in investing activities was $15,000
in fiscal 2004, and $4.7 million in fiscal 2003. Cash
provided by investing activities in fiscal 2005 related
primarily to sales of marketable securities partially offset by
purchases of equipment. Cash used in investing activities for
fiscal 2004 and 2003 related primarily to purchases of
marketable securities as well as equipment and leasehold
improvements.
Cash used in financing activities was $1.7 million in
fiscal 2005, $.1 million in fiscal 2004 and cash provided
by financing activities was $.05 million in fiscal 2003.
Cash used in financing activities for fiscal 2005 and 2004,
related primarily to repurchasing shares of the Companys
common stock. Cash provided by financing activities in fiscal
2003 related primarily to principal and interest payments on
directors notes and proceeds from the exercise of stock
options, partially offset by the repurchase of the
Companys common stock.
As of June 30, 2005, we had $12.2 million in cash and
cash equivalents and $21.9 million in marketable
securities. We believe that our existing cash and cash
equivalents and funds available from the sale of our
28
Table of Contents
marketable securities, will be sufficient to fund our working
capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next
12 months. We may utilize cash to invest in businesses,
products or technologies that we believe are strategic. We
regularly evaluate other companies and technologies for possible
investment by us. In addition, we have made and may in the
future make investments in companies with whom we have
identified potential synergies. However, we have no present
commitments or agreements with respect to any material
acquisition of other businesses or technologies.
Summary of Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following is a summary of our future payments due under
contractual obligations as of June 30, 2005:
Operating | Purchase | |||||||||||
Year Ended June 30 | Leases | Obligations | Total | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
2006
|
$ | 581 | $ | 2,035 | $ | 2,616 | ||||||
2007
|
592 | | 592 | |||||||||
2008
|
554 | | 554 | |||||||||
2009
|
570 | | 570 | |||||||||
Thereafter
|
895 | | 895 | |||||||||
$ | 3,192 | $ | 2,035 | $ | 5,227 | |||||||
Purchase obligations in the table above represent the value of
open purchase orders as of June 30, 2005. We believe that
some of these obligations could be canceled for payment of a
nominal penalty or no penalty; however, the amount of open
purchase orders that could be canceled under such terms is
difficult to quantify.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 7A. | Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We develop products in the United States and sell them
worldwide. As a result, our financial results could be affected
by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or
weak economic conditions in foreign markets. As all sales are
currently made in U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the
dollar could make our products less competitive in foreign
markets. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the
general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly since
the majority of our investments are in shorter duration
securities. We have no outstanding debt nor do we utilize
derivative financial instruments. Therefore, no quantitative
tabular disclosures are required.
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Page | |||||
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|||||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
30 | ||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
31 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
32 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
|
33 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
34 | ||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
35 | ||||
(2) Supplemental Schedule:
|
|||||
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts;
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
47 |
29
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Qualstar Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Qualstar Corporation as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended June 30, 2005. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Qualstar Corporation at June 30, 2005
and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
June 30, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedules, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
Woodland Hills, California
August 10, 2005
30
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
June 30, | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||
Current assets:
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 12,210 | $ | 6,401 | ||||||
Marketable securities
|
21,854 | 29,376 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $248 at June 30,
2005 and $217 at June 30, 2004
|
3,532 | 4,628 | ||||||||
Inventories
|
7,157 | 7,418 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
452 | 470 | ||||||||
Prepaid income taxes
|
640 | 1,072 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
| 594 | ||||||||
Total current assets
|
45,845 | 49,959 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
1,188 | 1,439 | ||||||||
Other assets
|
190 | 249 | ||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 47,223 | $ | 51,647 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 763 | $ | 1,171 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and related liabilities
|
496 | 500 | ||||||||
Other accrued liabilities
|
1,311 | 1,754 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities
|
2,570 | 3,425 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
| 158 | ||||||||
Shareholders equity:
|
||||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; 5,000 shares authorized; no
shares issued
|
| | ||||||||
Common stock, no par value; 50,000 shares authorized,
12,253 and 12,596 shares issued and outstanding as of
June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively
|
18,370 | 20,121 | ||||||||
Notes from directors
|
| (45 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(159 | ) | (101 | ) | ||||||
Retained earnings
|
26,442 | 28,089 | ||||||||
Total shareholders equity
|
44,653 | 48,064 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 47,223 | $ | 51,647 | ||||||
See accompanying notes
31
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
$ | 25,144 | $ | 31,530 | $ | 33,557 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold
|
16,529 | 19,575 | 21,171 | |||||||||||
Gross profit
|
8,615 | 11,955 | 12,386 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||
Research and development
|
3,750 | 4,268 | 3,994 | |||||||||||
Sales and marketing
|
3,350 | 3,607 | 3,834 | |||||||||||
General and administrative
|
3,955 | 5,420 | 4,428 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
11,055 | 13,295 | 12,256 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations
|
(2,440 | ) | (1,340 | ) | 130 | |||||||||
Investment income
|
858 | 624 | 693 | |||||||||||
Impairment loss for other-than-temporary decline in investments
|
| (160 | ) | | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
(1,582 | ) | (876 | ) | 823 | |||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
65 | (145 | ) | 274 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (1,647 | ) | $ | (731 | ) | $ | 549 | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
Shares used to compute earnings (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
12,398 | 12,577 | 12,579 | |||||||||||
Diluted
|
12,398 | 12,577 | 12,666 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes
32
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Notes | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred | from | Income | Retained | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Compensation | Directors | (Loss) | Earnings | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at July 1, 2002
|
12,656 | 20,751 | (631 | ) | (387 | ) | (31 | ) | 28,271 | 47,973 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options
|
60 | 149 | | | | | 149 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of unvested stock options
|
| (190 | ) | 190 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of shares pursuant to stock repurchase
|
(76 | ) | (344 | ) | | | | | (344 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
| | 301 | | | | 301 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest on directors notes
|
| | | (17 | ) | | | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments on directors notes
|
| | | 248 | | | 248 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
| | | | | 549 | 549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments
|
| | | | 9 | | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
558 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2003
|
12,640 | $ | 20,366 | $ | (140 | ) | $ | (156 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 28,820 | $ | 48,868 | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options
|
19 | 69 | | | | | 69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of shares pursuant to stock repurchase
|
(63 | ) | (314 | ) | | | | | (314 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
| | 140 | | | | 140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest on directors notes
|
| | | (6 | ) | | | (6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Principal and interest payments on directors notes
|
| | | 117 | | | 117 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss
|
| | | | | (731 | ) | (731 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments
|
| | | | (239 | ) | | (239 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment loss for other-than-temporary decline in investments
|
| | | | 160 | | 160 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss
|
(810 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2004
|
12,596 | $ | 20,121 | $ | | $ | (45 | ) | $ | (101 | ) | $ | 28,089 | $ | 48,064 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options
|
16 | 76 | | | | | 76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of shares pursuant to stock repurchase
|
(359 | ) | (1,827 | ) | | | | | (1,827 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Principal and interest payments on directors notes
|
| | | 45 | | | 45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss
|
| | | | | (1,647 | ) | (1,647 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments
|
| | | | (58 | ) | | (58 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss
|
(1,705 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2005
|
12,253 | $ | 18,370 | $ | | $ | | $ | (159 | ) | $ | 26,442 | $ | 44,653 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes
33
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Years Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (1,647 | ) | $ | (731 | ) | $ | 549 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
463 | 423 | 380 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
436 | 312 | 657 | ||||||||||||
Provision for (recovery of) bad debts and returns
|
38 | 186 | (53 | ) | |||||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
| 140 | 301 | ||||||||||||
Impairment loss for other-than-temporary decline in investments
|
| 160 | | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest on directors notes
|
| (6 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of securities
|
(11 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
1,058 | (279 | ) | 2,213 | |||||||||||
Inventories
|
261 | (327 | ) | 2,609 | |||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
29 | (222 | ) | 236 | |||||||||||
Prepaid income taxes and income taxes payable
|
432 | 264 | (1,167 | ) | |||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
(408 | ) | 35 | (454 | ) | ||||||||||
Accrued payroll and related liabilities
|
(4 | ) | 68 | 124 | |||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities
|
(443 | ) | 285 | 657 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
204 | 308 | 6,035 | ||||||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||||||
Purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements
|
(164 | ) | (257 | ) | (561 | ) | |||||||||
Purchases of marketable securities
|
(22,277 | ) | (41,123 | ) | (34,375 | ) | |||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities
|
29,752 | 41,365 | 30,513 | ||||||||||||
Purchase of assets of N2Power, Incorporated
|
| | (288 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
7,311 | (15 | ) | (4,711 | ) | ||||||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||||||||||
Principal and interest payments on directors notes
|
45 | 117 | 248 | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
76 | 69 | 149 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock
|
(1,827 | ) | (314 | ) | (344 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(1,706 | ) | (128 | ) | 53 | ||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
5,809 | 165 | 1,377 | ||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
6,401 | 6,236 | 4,859 | ||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 12,210 | $ | 6,401 | $ | 6,236 | |||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
|
|||||||||||||||
Income taxes paid
|
$ | 5 | $ | 12 | $ | 904 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes
34
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Business |
Qualstar Corporation (Qualstar) was incorporated in
California in 1984 to develop and manufacture IBM compatible
9-track reel-to-reel tape drives for the personal computer and
workstation marketplaces. Since 1995, Qualstar has focused its
efforts on designing, developing, manufacturing and selling
automated magnetic tape libraries used to store, retrieve and
manage electronic data primarily in the network computing
environment. Tape libraries consist of cartridge tape drives,
tape cartridges and robotics to move the tape cartridges from
their storage locations to the tape drives under software
control. Qualstars libraries provide storage solutions for
organizations requiring backup, recovery, and archival storage
of critical electronic information. Qualstars tape
libraries are compatible with commonly used operating systems,
including UNIX, Windows and Linux and a wide range of storage
management software. Qualstar offers tape libraries for multiple
tape drive technologies, including those using LTO, AIT, Super
AIT, and SuperDLT.
In July 2002, Qualstar purchased the assets of N2Power,
Incorporated, a supplier of ultra small high efficiency open
frame switching power supplies. Power supplies are sold with the
N2Power brand name as well as under a private label brand name
to original equipment manufacturers. In addition, they are
utilized in Qualstars tape library products.
Principles in Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and
operations of Qualstar and its wholly owned subsidiary. All
significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Qualstar classifies as cash equivalents only cash and those
investments that are short term, highly liquid, readily
convertible to cash, and so near their maturity that they
present an insignificant risk of change in value due to changes
in interest rates.
Concentration of Credit Risk, Other Risks and Significant Customers |
Qualstar sells its products primarily through a variety of
market channels including original equipment manufacturers
(OEM) and value added resellers (VAR) located
worldwide. Ongoing credit evaluations of customers
financial condition are performed by Qualstar, and generally,
collateral is not required. Potential uncollectible accounts
have been provided for in the financial statements.
Sales outside of North America represented approximately 27.3%
of net revenues in fiscal 2005, approximately 32.4% of net
revenues in fiscal 2004 and approximately 29.4% of net revenues
in fiscal 2003. Revenues from Qualstars two largest
customers combined were approximately 13.9%, 14.6%, and 15.4%
for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively. At June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the two
largest customers accounts receivable, net of specific
allowances, totaled approximately 18.7%, 22.4% and 30.1% of net
accounts receivable, respectively.
Marketable Securities |
Marketable securities consist primarily of high-quality
U.S. corporate securities and U.S. federal government
and state government debt securities. These securities are
classified in one of three categories: trading,
available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity. Trading securities are
bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in
the near term. Held-to-maturity securities are those securities
which Qualstar has the ability and intent to hold until
maturity. All other securities not included in trading or
held-to-maturity are
35
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
classified as available-for-sale. All of Qualstars
marketable securities were classified as available-for-sale at
June 30, 2005 and 2004.
Available-for-sale securities are recorded at market value.
Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related income
tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from
earnings and are reported as a separate component of
shareholders equity until realized. Dividend and interest
income are recognized when earned.
Realized gains and losses for securities classified as
available-for-sale are included in earnings when the underlying
securities are sold and are derived using the specific
identification method for determining the cost of securities
sold.
On March 31, 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-1,
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments, (EIFT 03-1)
effective for annual financial statements with fiscal years
ending after June 15, 2004. EITF 03-1 provides
guidance for determining when an investment is
other-than-temporarily impaired, and states that an investment
is considered other-than-temporarily impaired when its fair
value is less than its amortized cost basis and is deemed other
than temporary. The application of EITF 03-1 to the
Companys marketable securities portfolio resulted in the
identification of an other-than-temporarily impaired investment
as of June 30, 2004. In accordance with EITF 03-1, the
Company recognized an impairment loss for other-than-temporary
decline in investments of $160,000 in earnings equal to the
difference between the amortized cost basis and its fair value
as of June 30, 2004.
Inventories |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out
basis) or market.
Suppliers |
Sales and costs of goods sold related to products purchased from
one supplier totaled approximately 47.8% and 41.0%,
respectively, of total sales and cost of goods sold for the year
ended June 30, 2005. Sales and costs of goods sold related
to products purchased from one large supplier totaled
approximately 51.1% and 41.3%, respectively, of total sales and
cost of goods sold for the year ended June 30, 2004. Sales
and costs of goods sold related to products purchased from one
supplier totaled approximately 56.2% and 57.3%, respectively, of
total sales and cost of goods sold for the year ended
June 30, 2003.
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives (3 to 7 years) of
the individual assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over
the estimated useful lives, or the term of the related leases,
whichever is shorter, using the straight-line method.
Long-Lived Assets |
Qualstar reviews for the impairment of long-lived assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of any asset may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss would be recognized when the estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use
of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than the
carrying amount. If an impairment is indicated, the amount of
the loss to be recorded is based upon an estimate of the
difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the
asset. Fair value is based upon discounted cash flows expected
to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition
and other valuation methods. There were no impairment losses of
long-lived assets recognized during the periods presented.
36
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Recognition |
Revenues are recognized upon shipment of the product to the
customer and when collectibility is reasonably assured, less
estimated returns for which provisions are made at the time of
sale. The provision for estimated returns is made based on known
claims and estimates of additional returns based on historical
data. Revenues from technical support services and other
services are recognized at the time the services are performed.
Shipping and Handling Costs |
Qualstar generally records all charges for outbound shipping and
handling as revenue. All inbound shipping and fulfillment costs
are classified as costs of goods sold.
Warranty Obligations |
Qualstar provides a three year warranty period on its tape
libraries. Some TLS and all RLS models have three year advance
replacement warranty coverage that provides for replacement of
components, or if necessary, complete libraries. All other TLS
models have a one year advance replacement warranty with the
second and third year being return-to-factory for service at no
charge. Customers may purchase extended advance replacement
service coverage and on-site service if they are located in the
United States, Canada and most countries within Europe. A
provision for costs related to warranty expense is recorded when
revenue is recognized, which is estimated based on historical
warranty costs incurred.
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45),
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of the
Indebtedness of Others, which clarifies the requirements
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, relating to a guarantors accounting
for and disclosures for certain guarantees. FIN 45 requires
enhanced disclosures, among other things, for certain
guarantees, including warranty accruals. Qualstar does not issue
third party guarantees, as defined, and therefore only the
disclosure provisions of FIN 45 apply. Qualstar adopted
FIN 45 for the year ended June 30, 2003, and the
adoption has had no impact on Qualstars financial position
or results of operations. Additional disclosures have not been
provided as the Companys warranty accrual and warranty
expense is not material in any of the periods presented.
Research and Development |
All research and development costs are charged to expense as
incurred. These costs consist primarily of engineering salaries,
benefits, outside consultant fees, and purchased parts and
supplies of personnel directly involved in the design and
development of new products.
Advertising |
Qualstar expenses all costs of advertising and promotion as
incurred. Advertising and promotion expenses for the years ended
June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were approximately $520,000,
$601,000, and $984,000, respectively.
Accounting for Stock Based Compensation |
Employee stock options are accounted for under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, as amended and interpreted, which
requires the recognition of expense when the option price is
less than the fair value of the stock at the date of grant.
Qualstar generally awards options for a fixed number of shares
at an option price equal to the fair value at the date of grant.
37
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Qualstar has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123).
If Qualstar recognized employee stock option-related
compensation expense in accordance with SFAS 123 and used
the minimum value method for grants prior to the Companys
initial public offering and the Black-Scholes method model
afterward for determining the weighted average fair value of
options granted, the Companys net income (loss) and
earnings (loss) per share would have been reduced to the pro
forma amounts indicated below:
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) as reported
|
$ | (1,647 | ) | $ | (731 | ) | $ | 549 | |||||
Stock-based employee compensation cost included in reported net
income
|
| 140 | 301 | ||||||||||
Pro forma stock-based employee compensation cost under
SFAS 123
|
(118 | ) | (505 | ) | (591 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net income (loss)
|
$ | (1,765 | ) | $ | (1,096 | ) | $ | 259 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic as reported
|
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||||
Basic pro forma
|
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||||
Diluted as reported
|
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||||
Diluted pro forma
|
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||||
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value
of the options is amortized over the options vesting
periods. The pro forma effect on net income or loss for 2005,
2004 and 2003 is not representative of the pro forma effect on
net income or loss in future years because compensation expense
in future years may reflect the amortization of a larger number
of stock options granted in several succeeding years.
In computing the pro forma compensation expense under
SFAS 123, a weighted-average fair value of $1.27 for 2005,
$3.59 for 2004, and $4.29 for 2003 stock option grants was
estimated at the date of grant using the minimum value option
pricing model before Qualstars initial public offering and
the Black Scholes model afterward with the following assumptions:
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Expected dividend yield
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate
|
3.8 | % | 2.9 | % | 2.7 | % | ||||||
Expected life of options
|
4 years | 4 years | 5 years | |||||||||
Volatility
|
36.9 | % | 100.8 | % | 54.0 | % |
Income Taxes |
Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method in
accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and
assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences
of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax
bases of assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax
benefit to be derived from tax credits and loss carryforwards.
Current income tax expense or benefit represents the amount of
income taxes expected to be payable or
38
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
refundable for the current year. A valuation allowance is
established when, in the opinion of management, it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive income (loss) is accounted for according to
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income (SFAS 130). Comprehensive income (loss)
includes unrealized gains and losses on debt and equity
securities classified as available-for-sale and included as a
component of shareholders equity.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
Qualstar calculates earnings (loss) per share in accordance with
SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Basic
earnings per share has been computed by dividing net income
(loss) by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has been computed
by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average common
shares outstanding plus dilutive securities or other contracts
to issue common stock as if these securities were exercised or
converted to common stock.
The following table sets forth the calculation for basic and
diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Earnings:
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (1,647 | ) | $ | (731 | ) | $ | 549 | |||||
Shares:
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted average shares for basic earnings (loss) per share
|
12,398 | 12,577 | 12,579 | ||||||||||
Stock options
|
| | 87 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
12,398 | 12,577 | 12,666 | ||||||||||
Shares issuable under stock options of 455,000, 511,000 and
152,000 for the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings (loss) per share because the effect would be
antidilutive.
Segment Information |
Based on the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information and the manner in which the Chief Operating
Decision Maker analyzes the business, Qualstar has determined
that it does not have separately reportable operating segments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximate their fair values due to the short term nature of
these financial instruments.
Estimates and Assumptions |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from
those estimates. Management believes that the estimates are
reasonable.
39
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reclassification |
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation.
2. | Marketable Securities |
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair
value of the Companys investments with unrealized losses
that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, at June 30, 2005.
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Loss | Value | Loss | Value | Loss | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
US Treasury obligations and direct obligations of
U.S. Government agencies
|
$ | 3,973 | $ | (27 | ) | $ | 8,645 | $ | (58 | ) | $ | 12,618 | $ | (85 | ) | |||||||||
Government Sponsored Enterprise collateralized mortgage
obligations
|
934 | (3 | ) | 1,538 | (17 | ) | 2,472 | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds
|
4,054 | (41 | ) | 1,708 | (13 | ) | 5,762 | (54 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 8,961 | $ | (71 | ) | $ | 11,891 | $ | (88 | ) | $ | 20,852 | $ | (159 | ) | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations. The unrealized losses on
the Companys investments in U.S. Treasury obligations
and direct obligations of U.S. Government agencies were
caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of
these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the
securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the
investment. Because the Company has the ability and intent to
hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may
be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to
be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2005.
Government Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) Collateralized
Mortgage Obligations. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are
identified as GSEs. The unrealized losses on the Companys
investment in GSE collateralized mortgage obligations were
caused by interest rate increases. The cash flows of these
investments are guaranteed by the GSE. Because the decline in
market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and
not credit quality and because the Company has the ability and
intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value,
which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these
investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
June 30, 2005.
Corporate Bonds. The unrealized losses on the
Companys investments in corporate bonds were caused by
interest rate increases. The contractual terms of these
investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at
a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because
the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments
until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the
Company does not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2005.
40
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
3. | Inventories |
Inventories consist of the following:
June 30, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials
|
$ | 6,196 | $ | 6,370 | ||||
Finished goods
|
961 | 1,048 | ||||||
$ | 7,157 | $ | 7,418 | |||||
4. | Property and Equipment |
The components of property and equipment are as follows:
June 30, | |||||||||
2005 | 2004 | ||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||
Leasehold improvements
|
$ | 546 | $ | 546 | |||||
Furniture and fixtures
|
994 | 970 | |||||||
Machinery and equipment
|
2,320 | 2,340 | |||||||
3,860 | 3,856 | ||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(2,672 | ) | (2,417 | ) | |||||
$ | 1,188 | $ | 1,439 | ||||||
5. | Income Taxes |
The provision (benefit) for income taxes is comprised of the
following:
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Current:
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
|
$ | (156 | ) | $ | (451 | ) | $ | (332 | ) | ||||
State
|
(215 | ) | (6 | ) | (51 | ) | |||||||
(371 | ) | (457 | ) | (383 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred:
|
|||||||||||||
Federal
|
342 | 257 | 579 | ||||||||||
State
|
94 | 55 | 78 | ||||||||||
436 | 312 | 657 | |||||||||||
$ | 65 | $ | (145 | ) | $ | 274 | |||||||
41
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal
income tax rate to Qualstars effective income tax rate:
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Statutory federal income tax expense (benefit)
|
(34.0 | )% | (34.0 | )% | 34.0 | % | ||||||
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
(3.7 | ) | (4.2 | ) | 2.6 | |||||||
Non-taxable investment income
|
(3.4 | ) | (16.0 | ) | (16.6 | ) | ||||||
Research and development credits
|
(15.5 | ) | (22.8 | ) | | |||||||
Valuation allowance
|
60.9 | 55.2 | | |||||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation
|
0.0 | 5.4 | 12.5 | |||||||||
Other
|
(0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 0.8 | |||||||
4.1 | % | (16.6 | )% | 33.3 | % | |||||||
The tax effect of temporary differences resulted in deferred
income tax assets (liabilities) as follows:
June 30, | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
$ | 610 | $ | 26 | ||||||
Capital loss and other credit carryforwards
|
501 | 513 | ||||||||
Research and development credit carryforwards
|
471 | 503 | ||||||||
Allowance for bad debts and returns
|
102 | 89 | ||||||||
Inventory reserves
|
167 | 146 | ||||||||
Capitalized inventory costs
|
40 | 33 | ||||||||
Other accruals
|
331 | 326 | ||||||||
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
2,222 | 1,636 | ||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation and other
|
(215 | ) | (158 | ) | ||||||
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
(215 | ) | (158 | ) | ||||||
Valuation allowance
|
(2,007 | ) | (1,042 | ) | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets
|
$ | | $ | 436 | ||||||
The Company placed a valuation allowance on net deferred tax
assets during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 based on
the Companys assessment regarding the realizability of
such assets in future years. The Company has net operating
losses, capital losses, research and development credit and
other carryforwards for tax purposes of $1,582 at June 30,
2005 expiring between fiscal years 2009 and 2025, except for the
state research and development credit, which has no limit on the
carryforward period.
The Company had fiscal 2002 under audit by the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) for which the IRS issued a no change
opinion in the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
6. | Preferred Stock |
Qualstars capital structure allows for the Board of
Directors to authorize 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock.
The Board of Directors has authority to fix the rights,
preferences, privileges and restrictions, including
42
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
voting rights, of these shares of preferred stock without any
future vote or action by the shareholders. At June 30, 2005
and 2004, there were no outstanding shares of preferred stock.
7. | Stock Option Plans |
Qualstar adopted a stock option plan (1998 Stock Incentive Plan)
under which incentive and nonqualified stock options could be
granted for an aggregate of no more than 1,215,000 shares
of common stock. Under the terms of the plan, options could be
issued at an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair
market value of common stock as determined by the board of
directors (or board appointed administrator) on the date of
grant. If an incentive stock option is granted to an individual
owning more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all
stock, the exercise price of the option may not be less than
110% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the
date of grant. Options are exercisable in annual installments
and terminate as specified in each option agreement, but
terminate no later than ten years after the date of grant.
The following table summarizes all stock option activity:
Weighted | |||||||||||||
Stock | Exercise Price | Average | |||||||||||
Options | per Share | Exercise Price | |||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2003
|
480 | $ | 2.78 - $9.38 | $ | 5.27 | ||||||||
Granted
|
104 | 5.10 | 5.10 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
(19 | ) | 2.78 - 5.25 | 3.54 | |||||||||
Cancelled
|
(54 | ) | 4.89 - 9.38 | 5.90 | |||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2004
|
511 | $ | 4.23 - $9.38 | $ | 5.24 | ||||||||
Granted
|
90 | 3.71 | 3.71 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
(16 | ) | 4.23 - 5.25 | 4.74 | |||||||||
Cancelled
|
(130 | ) | 4.23 - 9.38 | 5.79 | |||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2005
|
455 | $ | 3.71 - $9.38 | $ | 4.80 | ||||||||
Options Exercisable at | ||||||||||||||||||||
Options Outstanding at June 30, 2005 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Weighted Average | Average | Number of | Average | ||||||||||||||||
Shares | Remaining | Exercise | Shares | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||
Exercise Price Range | Outstanding | Contractual Life | Price | Exercisable | Price | |||||||||||||||
$3.71
|
90 | 10.0 | $ | 3.71 | | $ | | |||||||||||||
$4.23 - 5.94
|
333 | 7.2 | $ | 4.65 | 181 | $ | 4.63 | |||||||||||||
$9.38
|
32 | 5.1 | $ | 9.38 | 32 | $ | 9.38 |
On January 14, 2000, each of Qualstars four
non-employee directors were granted and purchased
54,000 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the 1998
Stock Incentive Plan at a price of $2.78 per share. Each
director paid for the shares with a promissory note in the
amount of $150,000 secured by the purchased shares. Interest on
the notes accrued at the rate of 6.21% and was payable annually.
Payments of principal on the notes were due in four equal annual
installments beginning in January 2002. Qualstar, solely at its
discretion, had the right to repurchase each directors
restricted shares at the original purchase price upon
termination of service for any reason. Qualstars
repurchase right lapsed and the shares vested ratably over four
years based upon each year of service as a director. All of
these shares were fully vested as of January 14, 2004.
Upon issuance of the restricted stock and granting of stock
options in January 2000, Qualstar recorded a deferred
compensation charge of $1.7 million related to both stock
options and restricted stock for the difference between the
exercise price and the deemed fair market value for accounting
purposes on the date of
43
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the grant. The deferred compensation recorded was amortized over
a four-year vesting period, which resulted in compensation
expense of $140,000 in fiscal 2004, $301,000 in fiscal 2003, and
$430,000 in fiscal 2002. During the year ended June 30,
2003, approximately 52,000 of unvested stock options related to
these grants were forfeited. The forfeitures resulted in a
decrease in common stock paid-in-capital and deferred
compensation of $190,000 during the year ended June 30,
2003.
8. | Purchase of N2Power |
On July 11, 2002, Qualstar acquired the assets and
intellectual properties of N2Power, Incorporated, a privately
held company which designed and produced small and efficient
open-frame switching power supplies. The consideration for this
acquisition amounted to $250,000 plus acquisition expenses of
$38,000. The purchase price was primarily allocated to a patent,
in the amount of $240,000, which is being amortized over
5 years. At June 30, 2005, accumulated amortization of
the patent was $144,000. Amortization expense for the years
ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $48,000 in each
year. Amortization expense is estimated to be $48,000 in each of
the fiscal years 2006 and 2007.
9. | Commitments |
Qualstars lease agreement for its facility located in Simi
Valley, California, expires in February of 2011, with an early
termination option becoming available in February of 2007. The
annual rent for the lease is $468,000, with step-ups ranging
from $28,000 to $34,000 every two years.
Qualstars lease agreement for its facility located in
Boulder, Colorado, expires in May of 2007. The annual rent for
the lease is $55,000, with a nominal step-up of approximately 2%
annually.
Future minimum lease payments under these leases are as follows:
Minimum | ||||
Year Ending | Lease Payment | |||
2006
|
$ | 581,000 | ||
2007
|
592,000 | |||
2008
|
554,000 | |||
2009
|
570,000 | |||
Thereafter
|
895,000 | |||
$ | 3,192,000 | |||
Rent expense (including equipment rental) for the years ended
June 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003, was $671,000, $679,000, and
$589,000, respectively.
10. | Legal Proceedings |
On January 10, 2003, Raytheon Company
(Raytheon) filed a complaint in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that
Qualstar and eight other named defendants infringed on a patent
owned by Raytheon entitled Mass Data Storage
Library. Raytheon filed an amended complaint on or about
February 6, 2003, which included an allegation that
Qualstars tape libraries infringe Raytheons patent.
On April 2, 2004, Raytheon and Qualstar entered into a
written settlement agreement pursuant to which all claims
between the parties alleged in the litigation were dismissed
with prejudice. The costs to settle this dispute have been
included in our results of operations in general and
administrative expenses in the year ended June 30, 2004 and
have not had a material adverse effect on our financial position.
We are from time to time involved in various lawsuits and legal
proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. At
this time, we are not aware of any pending or threatened
litigation against us that we
44
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
expect will have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, liquidity or operating results. Legal
claims are inherently uncertain, however. We cannot assure you
that we will not be adversely affected in the future by legal
proceedings.
11. | Geographic Information |
Information regarding revenues attributable to the
Qualstars primary geographic operating regions is as
follows:
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
North America
|
$ | 18,281 | $ | 21,312 | $ | 23,678 | |||||||
Europe
|
4,933 | 4,842 | 7,349 | ||||||||||
Asia
|
1,264 | 4,279 | 1,837 | ||||||||||
Other
|
666 | 1,097 | 693 | ||||||||||
$ | 25,144 | $ | 31,530 | $ | 33,557 | ||||||||
The geographic classification of revenues is based upon the
location to which the product is shipped. Qualstar does not have
any significant long-lived assets outside of the United States.
12. | Benefit Plans |
Qualstar has a voluntary deferred compensation plan (the Plan)
qualifying for treatment under Internal Revenue Code
Section 401(k). All employees are eligible to participate
in the Plan following three months of service of employment and
may contribute up to 100% of their compensation on a pre-tax
basis, not to exceed the annual IRS maximum. Qualstar, at the
discretion of management, may make matching contributions in an
amount equal to 25% of the first 6% of compensation contributed
by eligible participants. Qualstars contributions under
the Plan totaled $67,000, $76,000, and $58,000 for the years
ended June 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003 respectively.
13. | Related Party Transactions |
Qualstars outside counsel is a member of its board of
directors. During the years ended June 30, 2005, 2004, and
2003 Qualstar paid $105,000, $131,000, and $149,000,
respectively to the law firm in which the director is a
shareholder for general business purposes.
14. | Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R), which is a revision of FASB Statement
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
SFAS 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB Statement
No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in
SFAS 123(R) is similar to the approach described in
Statement 123. However, SFAS 123(R) requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee
stock options, be recognized in the income statement based on
their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an
alternative.
SFAS 123(R) must be adopted as of the first interim or
annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. We
will adopt SFAS 123(R) on July 1, 2005.
SFAS 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its
requirements using one of two methods. The first method is a
modified prospective transition method whereby a company would
recognize share-based
45
Table of Contents
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
employee costs from the beginning of the fiscal period in which
the recognition provisions are first applied as if the
fair-value-based accounting method had been used to account for
all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after the
effective date and to any awards that were not fully vested as
of the effective date. Measurement and attribution of
compensation cost for awards that are nonvested as of the
effective date of SFAS 123(R) would be based on the same
estimate of the grant-date fair value and the same attribution
method used previously under SFAS 123. For those awards
that are granted, modified, or settled after
Statement 123(R) is adopted, compensation cost will be
measured and recognized in the financial statements in
accordance with the provisions of Statement 123(R). Prior
periods would not be restated.
The second adoption method is a modified retrospective
transition method whereby a company would recognize employee
compensation cost for periods presented prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123(R) in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS 123; that is, an entity would recognize employee
compensation cost in the amounts reported in the pro forma
disclosures provided in accordance with SFAS 123. A company
would not be permitted to make any changes to those amounts upon
adoption of SFAS 123(R) unless those changes represent a
correction of an error. For periods after the date of adoption
of SFAS 123(R), the modified prospective transition method
described above would be applied.
The Company currently expects to adopt SFAS 123(R) using
the modified prospective transition method, and expects the
adoption to have an effect on Qualstars results of
operations similar to the amounts reported historically in the
Companys footnotes under the pro forma disclosure
provisions of SFAS 123.
15. | Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) |
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, | March 31, | December 31, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2005:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 6,706 | $ | 5,742 | $ | 6,392 | $ | 6,305 | |||||||||
Gross profit
|
2,110 | 1,861 | 2,311 | 2,333 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
(429 | ) | (635 | ) | (347 | ) | (236 | ) | |||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | |||||
Diluted
|
(0.04 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||
Fiscal 2004:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 7,696 | $ | 8,302 | $ | 9,556 | $ | 5,976 | |||||||||
Gross profit
|
3,114 | 3,007 | 3,594 | 2,240 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
(16 | ) | (346 | ) | 207 | (576 | ) | ||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||||
Diluted
|
0.00 | (0.03 | ) | 0.02 | (0.05 | ) |
46
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE II
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended June 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003
Column A | Column B | Column C | Column D | Column E | ||||||||||||||||
Charged | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | to Costs | Charged | Balance at | |||||||||||||||||
Beginning of | and | to Other | End of | |||||||||||||||||
Description | Period | Expenses | Accounts | Deductions(1) | Period | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended June 30, 2005
|
$ | 217,000 | $ | 172,000 | $ | | $ | 141,000 | $ | 248,000 | ||||||||||
Year Ended June 30, 2004
|
$ | 260,000 | $ | 208,000 | $ | | $ | 251,000 | $ | 217,000 | ||||||||||
Year Ended June 30, 2003
|
$ | 2,100,000 | $ | (53,000 | ) | $ | | $ | 1,787,000 | $ | 260,000 |
(1) | Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. |
47
Table of Contents
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of Qualstars disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2005, pursuant to
Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules
and forms, and to ensure that the information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
We did not make any changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. | Other Information |
None.
PART III
The information called for by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and
14 of Part III of Form 10-K (except information as to
Qualstars executive officers, which is included under
Part I, Item 1 of this Report) will be included in
Qualstars Proxy Statement which management intends to file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days
after the close of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, and
is hereby incorporated by reference to such Proxy Statement.
Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
A list of our executive officers and biographical information
appears in Part I, Item 1 of this report. Information
about our Directors may be found under the caption
Election of Directors of our Proxy Statement (the
Proxy Statement). That information is incorporated
herein by reference.
The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the
caption Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the
captions Executive Compensation and
Information Regarding the Board and its Committees
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the
caption Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information set forth under the captions Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions of the Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
48
Table of Contents
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services
appears in the Proxy Statement Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm and is incorporated herein by
reference.
PART IV
Item 15. | Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits |
(a) | The financial statements and supplemental schedules are set forth under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. |
(b) Exhibits:
Exhibit | ||||
No. | Description | |||
3 | .1(1) | Restated Articles of Incorporation. | ||
3 | .2(1) | Amended and Restated Bylaws. | ||
10 | .1(1)* | 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. | ||
10 | .2(1) | Form of Indemnification Agreement. | ||
10 | .3(2) | Lease agreement between Strategic Performance Fund-II, Inc. and Qualstar Corporation, dated September 20, 2000. | ||
10 | .4* | Base salaries payable to executive officers during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006. | ||
10 | .5* | Cash bonus plan for executive officers for fiscal year ending June 30, 2006. | ||
14 | .1(3) | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | ||
21 | .1 | Subsidiaries of Qualstar Corporation | ||
23 | .1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | ||
31 | .1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
31 | .2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32 | .1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32 | .2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibits to Qualstars registration statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-96009), declared effective by the Commission on June 22, 2000. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to Qualstars Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to Qualstars Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 |
* | Each of these exhibits constitutes a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report. |
49
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
Qualstar Corporation |
By: | /s/ William J. Gervais |
|
|
William J. Gervais, | |
Chief Executive Officer and President |
Date: September 26, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||||
/s/ William J. Gervais |
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (principal executive officer) |
September 26, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Richard A. Nelson |
Vice President, Engineering Secretary and Director | September 26, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Frederic T. Boyer |
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) | September 26, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Carl W. Gromada |
Director | September 26, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Jose M. Miyar |
Director | September 26, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Robert E. Rich |
Director | September 26, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Robert T. Webber |
Director | September 26, 2005 |
50
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
No. | Description | |||
3 | .1(1) | Restated Articles of Incorporation. | ||
3 | .2(1) | Amended and Restated Bylaws. | ||
10 | .1(1)* | 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. | ||
10 | .2(1) | Form of Indemnification Agreement. | ||
10 | .3(2) | Lease agreement between Strategic Performance Fund-II, Inc. and Qualstar Corporation, dated September 20, 2000. | ||
10 | .4* | Base salaries payable to executive officers during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006. | ||
10 | .5* | Cash bonus plan for executive officers for fiscal year ending June 30, 2006. | ||
14 | .1(3) | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | ||
21 | .1 | Subsidiaries of Qualstar Corporation | ||
23 | .1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | ||
31 | .1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
31 | .2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32 | .1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32 | .2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibits to Qualstars registration statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-96009), declared effective by the Commission on June 22, 2000. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to Qualstars Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to Qualstars Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 |
* | Each of these exhibits constitutes a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report. |
51