QWEST CORP - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

or

For the transition period from                      to                    

Commission File No. 001-03040

QWEST CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(303) 992-1400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

THE REGISTRANT, A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC., MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS H(1) (a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  ¨     Non-accelerated filer  x    Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ¨    No  x

On August 5, 2008, one share of Qwest Corporation common stock was outstanding.

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Our industry uses many terms and acronyms that may not be familiar to you. To assist you in reading this document and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have provided below definitions of some of these terms.

ii

Table of Contents

iii

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

QWEST CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “QC” refer to Qwest Corporation, references to “Qwest,” “we,” “us,” the “Company” and “our” refer to Qwest Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, references to “QSC” refer to our direct parent company, Qwest Services Corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, and references to “QCII” refer to our ultimate parent company, Qwest Communications International Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, which was derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q. In compliance with those instructions, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. We believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.

In the opinion of management, these statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present our condensed consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows as of June 30, 2008 and for all periods presented. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as updated by our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 4, 2008 (our “April 4, 2008 Form 8-K”).

The condensed consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results or cash flows expected for the full year or of the results we would have incurred had we operated as a stand-alone entity during the periods presented.

Business Combinations

In light of regulatory changes in 2007 and consistent with QCII’s continuing strategy to simplify its and our corporate structure and gain operational efficiencies, in the first quarter of 2008 QCII moved to us most of the administrative and other functions of QSC and merged into us two of QSC’s other wholly owned subsidiaries that previously charged the majority of their costs to us:

4

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

These reorganization activities combined businesses that were already controlled by QCII, therefore we accounted for these activities in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. These activities had the following effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and as of December 31, 2007:

In addition, to aid the understanding of these and future financial statements, we recast prior year financial information in our April 4, 2008 Form 8-K.

QCII continues to evaluate other ways to better organize the legal organization and operations of its subsidiaries and may make additional changes to the legal organization and operations of its subsidiaries, including us, in the future. In connection with these past or future reorganization activities, we do not believe we have consummated, and we do not expect to consummate in the future, any business combinations or other transactions that will adversely affect our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Reclassifications

During the first quarter of 2008, we changed the definitions we use to classify expenses as cost of sales, selling expenses or general, administrative and other operating expenses. Operating expenses are now reported as follows:

5

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

We believe these changes allow users of our financial statements to better understand our cost structure and the way we manage our business. These expense classifications may not be comparable to those of other companies. These changes had no impact on total operating expenses or net income for any period. To reflect the impact these changes would have had if they had been implemented in prior periods, we have reclassified certain financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 that is presented in these condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition, to aid the understanding of these and future financial statements, we reclassified certain prior year financial information in our April 4, 2008 Form 8-K.

We have also reclassified certain other prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentations.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We sometimes use derivative financial instruments, specifically interest rate swap contracts, to manage interest rate risks. We execute these instruments with creditworthy banks and monitor our counterparty exposure. An interest rate hedge is generally designated as either a cash flow hedge or a fair value hedge. In a cash flow hedge, a borrower of variable interest debt agrees with another party to make fixed payments equivalent to paying fixed rate interest on debt in exchange for receiving payments from the other party equivalent to receiving variable rate interest on debt; the effect of which is to eliminate some portion of the variability in the borrower’s overall cash flows. In a fair value hedge, a borrower of fixed rate debt agrees with another party to make variable payments equivalent to paying variable rate interest on the debt in exchange for receiving fixed payments from the other party equivalent to receiving fixed rate interest on debt; the effect of which is to eliminate some portion of the variability in the fair value of the borrower’s overall debt portfolio.

We recognize all derivatives on our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value. On the date the derivative instrument is entered into, we generally designate the derivative as either a cash flow hedge or a fair value hedge.

For a derivative that is designated as and meets all of the required criteria for a cash flow hedge, we record in accumulated other comprehensive income on our condensed consolidated balance sheets any changes in the fair value of the derivative. We then reclassify these amounts into earnings as the underlying hedged item affects earnings. In addition, if there are any changes in the fair value of the derivative arising from ineffectiveness of the cash flow hedging relationship, we record those amounts immediately in other expense (income)—net in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. For a derivative that is designated as and meets all of the required criteria for a fair value hedge, we record in other expense (income)—net in our condensed consolidated statements of operations the changes in fair value of the derivative and the underlying hedged item.

We assess quarterly whether each derivative is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. If we determine that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge, or if a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting with respect to that derivative prospectively. We record immediately in earnings changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not designated as hedges.

6

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

Use of Estimates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions made when accounting for items and matters such as, but not limited to, long-term contracts, customer retention patterns, allowance for doubtful accounts, depreciation, amortization, asset valuations, internal labor capitalization rates, affiliate transactions, recoverability of assets (including deferred tax assets), impairment assessments, employee benefits, taxes, reserves and other provisions and contingencies are reasonable, based on information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the condensed consolidated balance sheets, as well as the reported amounts of revenue, expenses and components of cash flows during the periods presented in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. We also make estimates in our assessments of potential losses in relation to threatened or pending legal and tax matters. See Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies for additional information.

For all of these and other matters, actual results could differ from our estimates.

USF, Gross Receipts Taxes and Other Surcharges

Our revenue and general, administrative and other operating expenses include taxes and surcharges that we recognize on a gross basis of $51 million and $100 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and $54 million and $104 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

Depreciation and Amortization

Property, plant and equipment is shown net of accumulated depreciation on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Accumulated depreciation was $32.426 billion and $31.976 billion as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

Capitalized software is shown net of accumulated amortization on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Accumulated amortization was $1.376 billion and $1.311 billion as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

7

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which provides a definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements for future transactions. We carry on our condensed consolidated balance sheets financial instruments whose value cannot be determined by reference to an observable market—including those described in more detail in Note 2—Investments. We continue to estimate the value of these instruments using judgmentally determined inputs, some of which are observable and some of which are not observable. We have not changed the methods used to value these financial instruments as a result of our adoption of this standard. Our condensed consolidated balance sheets also indirectly reflect the value of financial instruments held by the QCII employee benefit plans in which our employees and retirees participate. However, we only adjust our balance sheet annually at December 31 to reflect market changes in the value of QCII employee benefit plan assets. QCII continues to assess whether the methods previously used to determine the fair value of employee benefit plan assets are appropriate within the SFAS No. 157 framework for measuring fair value, but we do not anticipate that any changes in valuation methods will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Effective January 1, 2008, we also adopted SFAS No. 159, “Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”). Under SFAS No. 159, entities may choose to measure at fair value many financial instruments and certain other items that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 159 also establishes recognition, presentation, and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. Although we have adopted this standard, we have not yet elected the fair value option for any assets or liabilities and, therefore, the adoption of this standard has not had any impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Note 2: Investments

QSC manages all cash and investments for us and our affiliates. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our investments included $64 million and $31 million, respectively, of auction rate securities, which are classified as non-current, available-for-sale investments and are included in other non-current assets at estimated fair value on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Auction rate securities are generally long-term debt instruments that provide liquidity through a Dutch auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined calendar intervals, generally every 28 days. This mechanism generally allows existing investors to rollover their holdings and continue to own their respective securities or liquidate their holdings by selling their securities at par value. QSC generally invests in these securities for short periods of time as part of its cash management program. However, the uncertainties in the credit markets have prevented QSC and other investors from liquidating their holdings of auction rate securities in recent auctions for these securities because the amount of securities submitted for sale has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. These investments were collateralized by bonds rated AA- at June 30, 2008 and AA as of December 31, 2007 and were insured against loss of principal and interest by bond insurers with AA and BB credit ratings at June 30, 2008 and AAA credit ratings at December 31, 2007. These securities were valued using a discounted cash flow model that takes into consideration the following: an assumption that the issuer will decide to call or convert the securities or that an active market will develop for these investments in four years; and a risk premium determined by the financial conditions of the issuer and the bond insurers as well as the value of the collateral. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded immaterial unrealized gains and losses due to changes in the fair value

8

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

of these investments. The net unrealized loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income because we believe the value of these investments will recover. However, if the credit ratings of the issuer, the bond insurers or the collateral deteriorate, we may further adjust the carrying value of these investments. An increase of one percentage point in the risk premium used in our valuation model would result in an immaterial decrease in the estimated fair value of these investments. Because we are uncertain as to when the liquidity issues relating to these investments will improve, we continue to classify these securities as non-current as of June 30, 2008.

During the fourth quarter of 2007, an investment fund we historically treated as a cash equivalent began liquidating its holdings and restricting distributions. As a result, we reclassified our holdings in the fund from cash and cash equivalents to investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We valued this investment considering the asset values of the securities underlying the fund. As of December 31, 2007, $20 million of our remaining investment in the fund was included in other current assets and $3 million was included in other non-current assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of June 30, 2008, $21 million of our remaining investment in the fund was included in other current assets and $6 million was included in other non-current assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded immaterial unrealized gains and losses for the change in the fair value of the fund, which were recorded in other expense (income)—net in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Because we record our portion of the entire portfolio of cash and investments managed by QSC and because our portion varies from period to period, our proportionate ownership of any investments—including illiquid investments—can change. These changes are reflected on a net basis in cash flows from investing activities on our consolidated statements of cash flows.

Note 3: Borrowings

We were in compliance with all provisions and covenants of our borrowings as of June 30, 2008.

During the first quarter of 2008, we entered into the interest rate hedges described below as part of our long- and short-term debt strategies. One objective of our short-term debt strategy is to take advantage of favorable interest rates by swapping floating rate debt to fixed rate debt using cash flow hedges. And one objective of our long-term debt strategy is to achieve a more balanced ratio of fixed rate to floating rate debt by swapping a portion of our fixed interest rate debt to floating rate debt through fair value hedges. This decreases our exposure to changes in the fair value of our fixed interest rate debt due to changes in interest rates.

In March 2008, we entered into interest rate hedges on $500 million of the outstanding $750 million aggregate principal amount of our Floating Rate Notes due 2013. The notes bear interest at a rate per year equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.25%. These hedges had the economic effect of swapping our floating interest rate to fixed interest rates of approximately 6.0% for a term of approximately two years. We designated these swaps as cash flow hedges. The value of our cash flow hedges of approximately $6 million is recorded in other non-current assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008, with a corresponding increase, net of deferred taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income. We did not recognize any gain or loss in earnings for hedge ineffectiveness during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.

9

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

In March 2008, we also entered into interest rate hedges on the outstanding $500 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.5% Notes due 2017. These hedges had the economic effect of swapping our fixed interest rate to a floating interest rate until these notes mature in 2017. We designated these swaps as fair value hedges. The value of our fair value hedges of approximately $19 million is recorded in other non-current liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008, with a related reduction in the carrying value of long-term debt of $22 million. A net immaterial gain for hedge ineffectiveness is recorded in other expense (income)—net in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The cash flow and fair value hedges are valued using projected future cash flows, discounted at mid-market implied forward LIBOR rates. The debt underlying the fair value hedges is valued using projected future cash flows, discounted at mid-market implied forward LIBOR rates, plus a constant spread above LIBOR determined at the inception of the hedging relationship. These valuations are determined excluding accrued interest.

Note 4: Severance

For each of the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we accrued severance costs of $6 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we accrued severance costs of $57 million and $9 million, respectively. A portion of our severance charges is included in each of cost of sales, selling expenses and general, administrative and other operating expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our severance liability was $21 million and $23 million, respectively.

Note 5: Tax Matters

During the second quarter of 2008, we recorded a state property tax receivable of $40 million as the result of a property tax settlement on assessments we challenged for tax years 2002-2007. In addition, the settlement provides for a reduction in our property tax valuations in that state for tax years 2008 and 2009.

We are included in consolidated federal income tax returns of QCII. As a result, QCII’s federal tax audits may affect us.

On April 15, 2008, QCII received from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) the Revenue Agent’s Report for tax years 2004 and 2005. The report contains proposed adjustments on several issues, including issues that may affect us. Based on QCII’s, and our, evaluation of the IRS’s positions reflected in the proposed adjustments, we have not recorded a material adjustment to our unrecognized tax benefits or our uncertain tax position liability. However, there can be no assurance that QCII and the IRS will reach settlements on any of these issues or that, if QCII does reach settlements, the terms will be favorable to us.

Note 6: Product Revenue

We generate the majority of our revenue by providing services using our telecommunications network. We also generate revenue from services we provide to our affiliates. These services are further described below.

10

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

We also generate other revenue from USF surcharges and the subleasing of space in our office buildings, warehouses and other properties.

Revenue from our products and services for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is summarized in the following table:

One of our affiliates currently offers wireless services under a service arrangement with a nationwide wireless service provider. Under this existing arrangement, our affiliate sells wireless products and services under the Qwest brand name. This arrangement will expire in February 2009. In April 2008, we signed a five-year agreement with a different nationwide wireless service provider to market its wireless products and services under its brand name beginning in 2008. Revenue from services provided under this arrangement will be recorded on a net basis in our consolidated financial statements.

Note 7: Commitments and Contingencies

QCII is involved in several legal proceedings to which we are not a party that, if resolved against QCII, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. We have included below a discussion of these matters, together with a discussion of those matters to which we are a party. Only those matters to which we are a party (primarily the third matter described under the heading “Other Matters” relating to litigation brought by several owners of payphones) represent contingencies for which we have recorded, or could reasonably anticipate recording, an accrual if appropriate to do so.

Throughout this note, when we refer to a class action as “putative” it is because a class has been alleged, but not certified in that matter. Until and unless a class has been certified by the court, it has not been established that the named plaintiffs represent the class of plaintiffs they purport to represent. Settlement classes have been

11

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

certified in connection with the settlements of certain of the putative class actions described below where the courts held that the named plaintiffs represented the settlement class they purported to represent.

The terms and conditions of applicable bylaws, certificates or articles of incorporation, agreements or applicable law may obligate QCII to indemnify its former directors, officers and employees with respect to certain of the matters described below, and QCII has been advancing legal fees and costs to many former directors, officers and employees in connection with certain matters described below.

Settlement of Consolidated Securities Action

Twelve putative class actions purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of QCII’s publicly traded securities between May 24, 1999 and February 14, 2002 were consolidated into a consolidated securities action pending in federal district court in Colorado against QCII and various other defendants. The first of these actions was filed on July 27, 2001. Plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that defendants issued false and misleading financial results and made false statements about QCII’s business and investments, including materially false statements in certain of QCII’s registration statements. The most recent complaint in this matter sought unspecified compensatory damages and other relief. However, counsel for plaintiffs indicated that the putative class would seek damages in the tens of billions of dollars.

In November 2005, QCII, certain other defendants, and the putative class representatives entered into, and filed with the federal district court in Colorado, a Stipulation of Partial Settlement that, if implemented, will settle the consolidated securities action against QCII and certain other defendants (the “QCII settlement”). No parties admit any wrongdoing as part of the QCII settlement. Pursuant to the QCII settlement, QCII has deposited approximately $400 million in cash into a settlement fund. In connection with the QCII settlement, QCII received $10 million from Arthur Andersen LLP. As part of the QCII settlement, the class representatives and the settlement class they represent are also releasing Arthur Andersen. If the QCII settlement is not implemented, QCII will be repaid the $400 million plus interest, less certain expenses, and QCII will repay the $10 million to Arthur Andersen.

If implemented, the QCII settlement will resolve and release the individual claims of the class representatives and the claims of the settlement class they represent against QCII and all defendants except Joseph Nacchio, our former chief executive officer, and Robert Woodruff, our former chief financial officer. In September 2006, the federal district court in Colorado issued an order approving the proposed QCII settlement on behalf of purchasers of QCII’s publicly traded securities between May 24, 1999 and July 28, 2002, over the objections of Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff. Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff then appealed that order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. In addressing that appeal, the Tenth Circuit held that the federal district court order overruling Nacchio and Woodruff’s objections to the QCII settlement was not sufficiently specific, and it remanded the case to the district court with instructions to consider certain issues and to provide a more detailed explanation for its earlier decision overruling those objections. Subsequent to the remand, a proposed settlement was reached involving the claims of the putative class against Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff as described below that, if implemented, will also result in the implementation of the QCII settlement.

On August 4, 2008, QCII, Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff, and the putative class representatives entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Nacchio/Woodruff settlement”) that, if implemented, will, among other things, (i) settle the individual claims of the putative class representatives and the class they purport to represent

12

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

against Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff, and (ii) result in the withdrawal by Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff of their objections to the QCII settlement and the resolution of their indemnification dispute with QCII arising from the QCII settlement. Under the proposed Nacchio/Woodruff settlement, QCII would contribute $40 million, and Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff would contribute a total of $5 million of insurance proceeds. The Nacchio/Woodruff settlement is subject to a number of conditions and future contingencies, including that it (i) requires both preliminary and final court approval, and (ii) provides QCII with the right to terminate the settlement if class members representing more than a specified amount of alleged securities losses elect to opt out of the settlement. No parties admit any wrongdoing as a part of the Nacchio/Woodruff settlement.

KPNQwest Litigation/Investigation

On June 25, 2004, the trustees in the Dutch bankruptcy proceeding for KPNQwest, N.V. (of which QCII was a major shareholder) filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of New Jersey alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and breach of fiduciary duty and mismanagement under Dutch law. QCII is a defendant in this lawsuit along with Joseph Nacchio, Robert S. Woodruff and John McMaster. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that defendants’ actions were a cause of the bankruptcy of KPNQwest and they seek damages for the bankruptcy deficit of KPNQwest of approximately $2.4 billion. Plaintiffs also seek treble damages as well as an award of plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs. On October 17, 2006, the court issued an order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit, concluding that the dispute should be adjudicated in the Netherlands rather than New Jersey. Plaintiffs appealed this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which affirmed the dismissal.

On September 13, 2006, Cargill Financial Markets, Plc and Citibank, N.A. filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Amsterdam, located in the Netherlands, against QCII, KPN Telecom B.V., KPN, Joseph Nacchio, John McMaster, and other former employees or supervisory board members of QCII, KPNQwest, or KPN. The lawsuit alleges that defendants misrepresented KPNQwest’s financial and business condition in connection with the origination of a credit facility and wrongfully allowed KPNQwest to borrow funds under that facility. Plaintiffs allege damages of approximately €219 million (or approximately $346 million based on the exchange rate on June 30, 2008).

In 2006, QCII and the other defendants reached settlements of a putative class action filed against QCII and others in the federal district court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of certain purchasers of publicly traded securities of KPNQwest. The plaintiffs had alleged that, among other things, defendants engaged in a fraudulent scheme and deceptive course of business in order to inflate KPNQwest’s revenue and the value of KPNQwest securities. In 2007, the court approved the settlements, which were then implemented. Certain individuals and entities were excluded from the settlement class at their request. As a result, their claims were not released by the court order approving the settlement. Some of these individuals and entities filed actions against QCII. QCII expects that at least some of the other persons who were excluded from the settlement class will also pursue actions against QCII if QCII is unable to resolve their claims amicably. In the aggregate, those who were excluded from the settlement class contended that they incurred losses of at least $76 million resulting from their investments in KPNQwest securities during the settlement class period, which does not include any claims for punitive damages or interest. QCII has settled most of these loss claims, and QCII is vigorously defending the claims of others, as described below, who were excluded from the settlement class.

On October 31, 2002, Richard and Marcia Grand, co-trustees of the R.M. Grand Revocable Living Trust, dated January 25, 1991, filed a lawsuit in Arizona Superior Court. As amended and following the appeal of a

13

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

partial summary judgment against plaintiffs which was affirmed in part and reversed in part, plaintiffs allege, among other things, that defendants violated state securities laws in connection with plaintiffs’ investments in KPNQwest securities. QCII is a defendant in this lawsuit along with Qwest B.V. (one of QCII’s subsidiaries), Joseph Nacchio and John McMaster, the former President and Chief Executive Officer of KPNQwest. Plaintiffs claim to have lost approximately $10 million in their investments in KPNQwest.

On August 23, 2005, the Dutch Shareholders Association (Vereniging van Effectenbezitters, or VEB) filed a petition for inquiry with the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court of Appeals, located in the Netherlands, with regard to KPNQwest. VEB sought an inquiry into the policies and course of business at KPNQwest that are alleged to have caused the bankruptcy of KPNQwest in May 2002, and an investigation into alleged mismanagement of KPNQwest by its executive management, supervisory board members, joint venture entities (QCII and KPN), and KPNQwest’s outside auditors and accountants. On December 28, 2006, the Enterprise Chamber ordered an inquiry into the management and conduct of affairs of KPNQwest for the period January 1 through May 23, 2002. QCII and others have appealed that order to the Netherlands Supreme Court.

Purporting to speak for an unspecified number of shareholders, VEB also sought exclusion from the settlement class in the settlements of the KPNQwest putative securities class action described above. The information that VEB provided in support of its request for exclusion did not indicate the losses claimed to have been sustained by VEB or the unspecified shareholders that VEB purports to represent, and thus those claims are not included in the approximately $76 million of losses claimed by those who requested exclusion from the settlement class, as described above. In view of these and other deficiencies in VEB’s request for exclusion, VEB was not excluded from the settlement class. QCII can provide no assurance, however, that its settlement will be enforced against VEB or the shareholders it purports to represent if VEB or such shareholders were to bring claims against QCII in the Netherlands.

QCII will continue to defend against the pending KPNQwest litigation matters vigorously.

Other Matters

Several putative class actions relating to the installation of fiber optic cable in certain rights-of-way were filed against QCII on behalf of landowners on various dates and in various courts in California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. For the most part, the complaints challenge QCII’s right to install its fiber optic cable in railroad rights-of-way. Complaints in Colorado, Illinois and Texas, also challenge QCII’s right to install fiber optic cable in utility and pipeline rights-of-way. The complaints allege that the railroads, utilities and pipeline companies own the right-of-way as an easement that did not include the right to permit QCII to install its fiber optic cable in the right-of-way without the plaintiffs’ consent. Most actions (California, Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas) purport to be brought on behalf of state-wide classes in the named plaintiffs’ respective states. The Massachusetts action purports to be on behalf of state-wide classes in all states in which QCII has fiber optic cable in railroad rights-of-way (other than Louisiana and Tennessee), and also on behalf of two classes of landowners whose properties adjoin railroad rights-of-way originally derived from federal land grants. Several actions purport to be brought on behalf of multi-state classes. The Illinois state court action purports to be on behalf of landowners in Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio and Wisconsin. The Illinois federal court action purports to be on behalf of landowners in Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, Montana and Oregon. The Indiana action purports to be on behalf of a national class of landowners adjacent to railroad

14

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

rights-of-way over which QCII’s network passes. The complaints seek damages on theories of trespass and unjust enrichment, as well as punitive damages. On July 18, 2008, the Massachusetts court entered an order preliminarily approving a settlement of all of the actions described above, except the action pending in Tennessee. The court also set a hearing for November 17, 2008 to consider final approval of the proposed settlement.

Qwest Communications Corporation (“QCC”), one of QCII’s other subsidiaries, is a defendant in litigation filed by several billing agents for the owners of payphones seeking compensation for coinless calls made from payphones. The matter is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Generally, the payphone owners claim that QCC underpaid the amount of compensation due to them under Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) regulations for coinless calls placed from their phones onto QCC’s network. The claim seeks compensation for calls, as well as interest and attorneys’ fees. QCC will vigorously defend against this action.

We are a defendant in litigation brought by several owners of payphones relating to the rates we charged them for the lines to their payphones between 1997 and 2003. Generally, the payphone owners claim that we charged more for payphone access lines than we were permitted to charge under the applicable FCC rules. Two lawsuits are pending, one filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, the other in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The Washington lawsuit resulted in reversal of the district court’s dismissal order by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and is currently stayed pending resolution of related proceedings before the FCC. The Utah lawsuit resulted in reversal of the district court’s dismissal order by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, and is currently stayed pending resolution of related proceedings before the FCC. A proceeding against us is also pending before the Oregon Public Utility Commission. Several related proceedings are underway at the FCC involving us, other telecommunications companies, and payphone owners. In all of these proceedings, the payphone owners seek damages for amounts paid allegedly exceeding the amounts that were permitted under the applicable FCC rules. We will vigorously defend against these actions.

A putative class action filed on behalf of certain of QCII’s retirees was brought against QCII, the Qwest Life Insurance Plan and other related entities in federal district court in Colorado in connection with QCII’s decision to reduce the life insurance benefit for these retirees to a $10,000 benefit. The action was filed on March 30, 2007. The plaintiffs allege, among other things, that QCII and other defendants were obligated to continue their life insurance benefit at the levels in place before QCII decided to reduce them. Plaintiffs seek restoration of the life insurance benefit to previous levels and certain equitable relief. The district court ruled in QCII’s favor on the central issue of whether QCII properly reserved its right to reduce the life insurance benefit under applicable law and plan documents. The retirees have amended their complaint to assert additional claims. QCII believes the remaining claims are without merit, and QCII will continue to vigorously defend against this matter.

Flood Damage

During June 2008, floods in the Midwest, particularly Iowa, caused damage to our network and other assets. We are still in the process of assessing the full extent of the damage. However, based on our current assessment, we estimate that expenditures required for the restoration of our network and physical plant may range from $50 million to $60 million, including repairs and equipment replacement. Our damage estimate is subject to many uncertainties and may change materially as we complete physical surveys. We carry commercial property insurance that covers certain property damage and business interruption, subject to approximately a $5 million

15

Table of Contents

QWEST CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

(Unaudited)

deductible for buildings and approximately a $25 million deductible for buried outside plant. We are working with our insurance carriers to determine the extent to which insurance proceeds will offset these expenditures.

The floods did not have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, as the majority of the capital and repair expenditures will be recorded in future periods as we incur the costs.

Note 8: Labor Union Contracts

We are a party to collective bargaining agreements with our labor unions, the Communications Workers of America and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. Our three-year labor agreements with the unions expire on August 16, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, employees covered under these collective bargaining agreements totaled 18,608 or 58% of all our employees. We are currently in negotiations regarding new collective bargaining agreements with our labor unions and their representatives.

Note 9: Dividends

We declared dividends to QSC of $600 million and $1.6 billion and paid dividends of $300 million and $1 billion during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. On July 18, 2008, we paid a dividend of $200 million.

Note 10: Subsequent Event

On July 21, 2008, the IRS approved a settlement with QCII relating to its audit of QCII’s tax years 1998 through 2001. Net cash payments related to this settlement will be approximately $120 million. QCII estimates its final settlement of tax years 1998 through 2001 combined with its proposed settlement of its tax years 2002 and 2003 will result in an increase to net income of approximately $15 million; however, QCII is unsure when its proposed settlement of tax years 2002 and 2003 will be concluded. QCII has not completed its determination of the amount it will record in the third quarter of 2008 related to the 1998 through 2001 settlement separately and discretely from its proposed settlement of tax years 2002 and 2003.

16

Table of Contents

Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “QC” refer to Qwest Corporation, references to “Qwest,” “we,” “us,” the “Company” and “our” refer to Qwest Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, references to “QSC” refer to our direct parent company, Qwest Services Corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, and references to “QCII” refer to our ultimate parent company, Qwest Communications International Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Certain statements set forth below under this caption constitute forward-looking statements. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the end of this Item 2 for additional factors relating to such statements, and see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this report for a discussion of certain risk factors applicable to our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Business Overview and Presentation

We provide voice, data, Internet and satellite video services. We generate revenue from services provided in the 14-state region of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. We refer to this region as our local service area.

Our operations are included in the consolidated operations of our ultimate parent, QCII, and generally account for the majority of QCII’s consolidated revenue. In addition to our operations, QCII maintains a national telecommunications network. Through its fiber optic network, QCII provides the following products and services that we do not provide:

QCII also maintains a wireless business as described below under the heading “Business Trends—Wireless Services.” We will begin reselling wireless services in the future.

For certain products and services we provide, and for a variety of internal communications functions, we use parts of QCII’s telecommunications network to transport voice and data traffic. Through its network, QCII also provides nationally and globally some data and Internet access services that are similar to services we provide within our local service area. These services include private line, ATM and frame relay.

Our analysis presented below is organized to provide the information we believe will be useful for understanding the relevant trends going forward. However, this discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in Item 1 of Part I of this report.

In light of regulatory changes in 2007 and consistent with QCII’s continuing strategy to simplify its and our corporate structure and gain operational efficiencies, in the first quarter of 2008 QCII moved to us most of the

17

Table of Contents

administrative and other functions of QSC and merged into us two of QSC’s other wholly owned subsidiaries that previously charged the majority of their costs to us:

These reorganization activities combined businesses that were already controlled by QCII, therefore we accounted for these activities in a manner similar to a pooling of interests. These activities had the following effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and as of December 31, 2007:

In addition, to aid the understanding of these and future financial statements, we recast prior year financial information in our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 4, 2008 (our “April 4, 2008 Form 8-K”).

QCII continues to evaluate other ways to better organize the legal organization and operations of its subsidiaries and may make additional changes to the legal organization and operations of its subsidiaries, including us, in the future. In connection with these past or future reorganization activities, we do not believe we have consummated, and we do not expect to consummate in the future, any business combinations or other transactions that will adversely affect our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

During the first quarter of 2008, we also changed the definitions we use to classify expenses as cost of sales, selling expenses or general, administrative and other operating expenses. Operating expenses are now reported as follows:

18

Table of Contents

We believe these reclassification changes allow users of our financial statements to better understand our cost structure and the way we manage our business. These expense classifications may not be comparable to those of other companies. These changes had no impact on total operating expenses or net income for any period.

To reflect the impact that the reorganization activities and expense reclassifications described above would have had if they had been implemented in prior periods, we have recast and reclassified certain financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 that is presented in this Item 2 and in our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report. In addition, to aid the understanding of this filing and future filings, we recast and reclassified certain prior year financial information in our April 4, 2008 Form 8-K.

We have also reclassified certain other prior year revenue, expenses and access line amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

Business Trends

Our financial results continue to be impacted by several significant trends, which are described below:

We also continue to focus on improving penetration of broadband services, and broadband subscribers continue to grow as customers migrate to higher speed Internet connections. We reached 2.6 million broadband subscribers as of June 30, 2008 compared to 2.3 million as of the same date in 2007. We believe the ability to continually increase connection speeds is competitively important. As a result, we continue to invest in increasing our available connection speeds to meet customer demand. We expect broadband subscriber growth to continue, even though we expect to face ongoing competition for these subscribers.

19

Table of Contents

While these trends are important to understanding and evaluating our financial results, the other transactions, events and trends discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this report may also materially impact our business operations and financial results.

Results of Operations

Overview

We generate the majority of our revenue by providing services using our telecommunications network. We also generate revenue from services we provide to our affiliates. Depending on the products or services purchased, a customer may pay a service activation fee, a monthly service fee, a usage charge or a combination of these. Our services are further described below.

We also generate other revenue from USF surcharges and the subleasing of space in our office buildings, warehouses and other properties.

20

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the number of employees as of June 30, 2008 and 2007:

Operating Revenue

The following table compares our total operating revenue by products and services for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:

Voice Services Revenue

Voice services revenue decreased primarily due to lower local voice services revenue as a result of access line losses of 8% as of June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007. We had 12.189 million and 13.272 million access lines as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We continue to experience access line losses as a result of the competitive pressures and more recently the economic decline, as described in “Business Trends.” Voice services revenue also declined as a result of lower rates, but to a lesser extent.

Data, Internet and Video Services Revenue

Data, Internet and video services revenue increased primarily due to a 14% increase in broadband subscribers and, to a lesser extent, a 35% increase in satellite video subscribers as of June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007. The growth in broadband services revenue resulted from continuing increases in penetration and, to a lesser extent, increased rates as customers upgraded to higher speed services. Private line services revenue also increased as a result of higher volumes. These revenue increases were partially offset by a decline in frame relay services revenue due to lower volumes.

21

Table of Contents

Affiliate Services Revenue

Affiliate services revenue decreased primarily due to a change in the way we determine sales support services billed to our affiliates. We implemented this change in the fourth quarter of 2007. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in private line services we provided to support an affiliate’s data and Internet businesses.

We estimate that the profit from these affiliate services was approximately $100 million, before income taxes, in each of the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and $210 million and $190 million, before income taxes, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Operating Expenses

The following table provides further detail regarding our total operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:

Cost of Sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)

Cost of sales are costs incurred in providing products and services to our customers. These include: employee-related costs directly attributable to operating and maintaining our network (such as salaries, wages and certain benefits); and other cost of sales directly related to our network operations (such as professional fees, materials and supplies, equipment sales costs and outsourced services).

22

Table of Contents

Employee-related costs decreased primarily due to employee reductions in our network operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, this decrease was partially offset by a severance charge of $40 million in the first quarter related to network operations.

Other cost of sales increased primarily due to higher equipment sales costs and professional fees for operating and maintaining our network.

As discussed in Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report, during June 2008 floods in the Midwest, particularly Iowa, caused damage to our network. We anticipate that we will incur additional repair costs during the remainder of 2008 for the restoration of our network and physical plant. The floods did not have a significant impact on our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, as the majority of the repair expenditures will be recorded in future periods as we incur the costs.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses are costs incurred in selling products and services to our customers. These include: employee-related costs directly attributable to selling products or services (such as salaries, wages, internal commissions and certain benefits); marketing, advertising and external commissions and other selling costs (such as bad debt expense, professional fees and outsourced services).

Employee-related costs increased for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to higher commission costs as a result of changes in our commission structure. This increase was partially offset by a decline in the amortization of customer acquisition costs associated with the activation of access lines. Certain customer acquisition costs are deferred and amortized over the expected life of the customer relationship, and have been declining in amount as a result of access line losses and promotional waivers of activation fees.

Marketing, advertising and external commissions decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to higher costs in the same period of 2007 for customer retention and broadband promotions, as well as increased online media advertising. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 these costs were essentially flat compared to the prior year.

Other selling costs increased due to higher professional fees related to systems and process improvements to support selling and billing functions, as well as higher postage and shipping costs.

General, Administrative and Other Operating Expenses

General, administrative and other operating expenses are corporate overhead and other operating costs. These include: employee-related costs for administrative functions (such as salaries, wages and certain benefits); taxes and fees (such as property and other taxes and USF charges); real estate and occupancy costs (such as rents, utilities and fleet costs); and other general, administrative and other operating costs (such as professional fees, outsourced services, litigation related charges and general computer systems support services). These expenses also include our pension and post-retirement benefits costs for all employees and retirees.

Employee-related costs decreased primarily due to lower pension costs, certain health care costs and payroll taxes, partially offset by increased post-retirement costs.

Taxes and fees decreased primarily due to a $40 million favorable property tax settlement and other favorable adjustments in the second quarter of 2008.

Affiliate Expenses

Affiliate expenses include charges for our use of long-distance services, wholesale Internet access, insurance and certain retiree benefits.

23

Table of Contents

Affiliate expenses increased primarily due to a general liability insurance credit adjustment in 2007 and increased charges for long-distance services as we continued to transition our employees’ use of these services to an affiliate. These increases were partially offset by net credits for retiree benefits.

Depreciation and Amortization

The following table provides detail regarding depreciation and amortization expense:

Depreciation expense decreased due to lower capital expenditures and the changing mix of our investment in property, plant and equipment since 2002. If our capital investment program remains approximately the same and we do not significantly shorten our estimates of the useful lives of our assets, we expect that our depreciation expense will continue to decrease.

Other Consolidated Results

The following table provides detail regarding other expense (income)—net and income tax expense:

Other—net includes, among other things, interest income, other interest expense, such as interest on income taxes, and gains or losses related to fair value interest rate hedges. The changes in other—net were primarily due to an $18 million loss on early retirement of debt in the second quarter of 2007.

The effective income tax rate is the provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before income taxes. Our effective income tax rate was 38.0% and 38.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 38.0% and 38.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are a wholly owned subsidiary of QSC, which is wholly owned by QCII. As such, factors relating to, or affecting, QCII’s liquidity and capital resources could have material impacts on us, including changes in the

24

Table of Contents

market’s perception of us and impacts on our credit ratings and on our access to capital markets. QCII and its consolidated subsidiaries had total borrowings of $14.2 billion at June 30, 2008 and $14.3 billion at December 31, 2007.

QCII has cash management arrangements between certain of its subsidiaries that include lines of credit, affiliate obligations, capital contributions and dividends. As part of these cash management arrangements, affiliates provide lines of credit to certain other affiliates. Amounts outstanding under these lines of credit and inter-company obligations vary from time to time and are classified as short-term borrowings.

Near-Term View

We had $393 million in cash and cash equivalents available at June 30, 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, our cash was provided by operating activities. For the next 12 months, we expect to use our available excess cash primarily to pay dividends and income taxes to QSC and to make additional investments in our network. We expect our 2008 capital expenditures to be higher than our 2007 level. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we declared a dividend of $1.6 billion to QSC and paid dividends of $1.0 billion to QSC.

Our working capital deficit, or the amount by which our current liabilities exceed our current assets, was $1.386 billion as of June 30, 2008 and $904 million as of December 31, 2007. Our working capital deficit increased by $482 million primarily due to dividends declared to QSC and capital expenditures, partially offset by earnings before depreciation, amortization and income taxes.

Our working capital deficit is primarily caused by dividends that we pay to QSC. The timing of cash payments for declared dividends to QSC is at our discretion in consultation with QSC. We continue to produce significant cash from operating activities, and we believe that our cash on hand and our cash flows from operations should be sufficient to meet our cash needs through the next 12 months. We have approximately $320 million of debt maturing in the next 12 months, and we may elect to refinance some or all of that debt.

Due to recent turmoil in the credit markets, we may not be able to refinance maturing debt at terms that are as favorable as those from which we previously benefited or at terms that are acceptable to us.

To the extent that QCII’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA (as defined in QCII’s debt covenants), is reduced by cash judgments, settlements and/or tax payments, its debt to consolidated EBITDA ratios under certain debt agreements will be adversely affected. This could reduce QCII’s liquidity and flexibility due to potential restrictions on drawing on its line of credit and potential restrictions on incurring additional debt under certain provisions of its debt agreements. As a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII, our business operations and financial condition could be similarly affected, potentially impacting our credit ratings and access to capital markets.

On March 27, 2008, in connection with the addition of a new lender to its revolving credit facility (referred to as the Credit Facility), QCII increased the amount available to it under the Credit Facility from $850 million to $910 million. The Credit Facility is currently undrawn and expires in October 2010. The Credit Facility contains various limitations, including a restriction on using any proceeds from the facility to pay settlements or judgments relating to securities-related actions discussed in Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report. Any amounts drawn on the Credit Facility are guaranteed by QSC and are secured by a senior lien on our stock.

On July 17, 2008, QCII’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share totaling approximately $138 million, payable on August 29, 2008 to shareholders of record as of August 8, 2008. It is the expectation of QCII’s Board of Directors to pay a quarterly dividend going forward.

On October 4, 2006, QCII’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for up to $2 billion of QCII’s common stock over two years. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, QCII repurchased

25

Table of Contents

18 million and 49 million shares, respectively, of its common stock under this program at a weighted average price per share of $4.58 and $5.21, respectively. As of June 30, 2008, QCII had repurchased a total of $1.636 billion of common stock under this program; thus $364 million remained available for stock repurchases. It is QCII’s intention to fully achieve this plan in 2008, while reviewing, on a regular basis, opportunities to enhance shareholder returns.

Long-Term View

We have historically operated with a working capital deficit due to our practice of declaring and paying regular cash dividends to QSC and it is likely that we will operate with a working capital deficit in the future. As discussed below, we continue to generate substantial cash from operations. We believe that cash provided by operations, combined with our current cash position and continued access to capital markets to refinance our debt as it matures, should allow us to meet our cash requirements for the foreseeable future. Due to recent turmoil in the credit markets, we may not be able to refinance maturing debt at terms that are as favorable as those from which we previously benefited or at terms that are acceptable to us.

We may periodically need to obtain financing in order to meet our debt obligations as they come due. We may also need to obtain additional financing or investigate other methods to generate cash (such as further cost reductions or the sale of assets) if revenue and cash provided by operations decline, if economic conditions weaken, if competitive pressures increase or if we or QCII become subject to significant judgments or settlements in one or more of the matters discussed in Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report. In the event of an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters, we or QCII could be required to make significant payments that may cause us to draw down significantly on our cash balances. The magnitude of any settlements or judgments resulting from these matters could materially and adversely affect QCII’s financial condition and ability to meet its debt obligations, potentially impacting its credit ratings, its ability to access capital markets and its compliance with debt covenants. As a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII, our business operations and financial condition could be similarly affected, potentially impacting our credit ratings and access to capital markets.

The Credit Facility makes available to QCII $910 million of additional credit subject to certain restrictions as described below and is currently undrawn. This facility has a cross payment default provision, and this facility and certain other debt issues of QCII and its other subsidiaries also have cross acceleration provisions. When present, such provisions could have a wider impact on liquidity than might otherwise arise from a default or acceleration of a single debt instrument. These provisions generally provide that a cross default under these debt instruments could occur if:

Upon such a cross default, the creditors of a material amount of QCII’s debt may elect to declare that a default has occurred under their debt instruments and to accelerate the principal amounts due such creditors. Cross acceleration provisions are similar to cross default provisions, but permit a default in a second debt instrument to be declared only if in addition to a default occurring under the first debt instrument, the indebtedness due under the first debt instrument is actually accelerated. As a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII, in the event of such a cross-default or cross-acceleration, our business operations and financial condition could be affected, potentially impacting our credit ratings and access to the capital markets. In addition, the Credit Facility contains various limitations, including a restriction on using any proceeds from the facility to pay settlements or judgments relating to the securities-related actions discussed in Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report.

26

Table of Contents

Historical View

The following table summarizes cash flow activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities decreased primarily due to a revenue decline that exceeded a net decrease in operating expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization), partially offset by a net increase in cash flows associated with affiliate transactions. This included a decrease in tax payments to QSC year over year of $343 million as a result of utilization of acquired net operating losses, partially offset by $306 million in cash outflows as a result of lower receipts and increased payments under affiliate receivables and payables.

Investing Activities

Cash used for investing activities increased primarily due to higher capital expenditures to support anticipated growth in our data and Internet services.

Financing Activities

Cash used for financing activities decreased primarily due to an equity infusion from QSC of $231 million in connection with the transfer to us of most of QSC’s administrative and other functions and related assets and liabilities.

We paid cash dividends of $1.0 billion and $1.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We may declare and pay dividends to QSC in excess of our earnings to the extent permitted by applicable law. Our debt covenants do not limit the amount of dividends we can pay to QSC.

We were in compliance with all provisions and covenants of our borrowings as of June 30, 2008.

Letters of Credit

As of June 30, 2008, we had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $56 million.

Risk Management

We are exposed to market risks arising from changes in interest rates. The objective of our interest rate risk management program is to manage the level and volatility of our interest expense. We may employ derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risk exposure.

As of June 30, 2008, we had $750 million of floating-rate debt outstanding, of which $250 million is currently exposed to changes in interest rates. This exposure is linked to the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR. We have entered into interest rate hedges related to the other $500 million that have the economic effect of swapping the floating interest rates to fixed interest rates until March 2010. A hypothetical increase of 100

27

Table of Contents

basis points in LIBOR relative to the $750 million of floating-rate debt would not have had a material effect on earnings. As of June 30, 2008, we had approximately $320 million of long-term fixed rate debt obligations maturing in the subsequent 12 months. We are exposed to changes in interest rates at any time that we choose to refinance this debt. A hypothetical increase of 100 basis points in the interest rate on any refinancing of the current portion of long-term debt would not have a material effect on our earnings.

During the first quarter of 2008, we entered into interest rate hedges as part of our long- and short-term debt strategies. One objective of our long-term debt strategy is to achieve a more balanced ratio of fixed rate to floating rate debt by swapping a portion of our fixed interest rate debt to floating rate debt through fair value hedges. This decreases our exposure to changes in the fair value of our fixed interest rate debt due to changes in interest rates, but increases the exposure of our interest expense to changes in interest rates. This exposure is partially offset by the improvements in other income that also arise from the fair value hedges. Therefore, a hypothetical increase of 100 basis points in LIBOR would not have a material effect on our earnings due to these fair value hedges.

As of June 30, 2008, our cash and investments managed by QSC included $390 million of highly liquid instruments, $64 million of auction rate securities and $27 million in an investment fund. As interest rates change, so will the interest income derived from these instruments. Assuming that these investment balances were to remain constant, a hypothetical decrease of 100 basis points in interest rates would not have a material effect on our earnings.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There were no substantial changes to our off-balance sheet arrangements or contractual commitments in the six months ended June 30, 2008, when compared to the disclosures provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains or incorporates by reference forward-looking statements about our financial condition, results of operations and business. These statements include, among others:

These statements may be made expressly in this document or may be incorporated by reference to other documents we have filed or will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “plan,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” or similar expressions used in this document or in documents incorporated by reference in this document.

These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by us in those statements. Some of these risks are described in Item 1A of Part II of this report.

These risk factors should be considered in connection with any written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons acting on our behalf may issue. Given these uncertainties, we caution investors not to unduly rely on our forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to review or confirm analysts’ expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events

28

Table of Contents

or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Further, the information about our intentions contained in this document is a statement of our intentions as of the date of this document and is based upon, among other things, the existing regulatory environment, industry conditions, market conditions and prices, the economy in general and our assumptions as of such date. We may change our intentions, at any time and without notice, based upon any changes in such factors, in our assumptions or otherwise.

The information under the heading “Risk Management” in Item 2 of Part I of this report is incorporated herein by reference.

The effectiveness of our or any system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to certain limitations, including the exercise of judgment in designing, implementing and evaluating the controls and procedures, the assumptions used in identifying the likelihood of future events and the inability to eliminate misconduct completely. As a result, there can be no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures will detect all errors or fraud. By their nature, our or any system of disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the “Exchange Act”) as of June 30, 2008. On the basis of this review, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed, and are effective, to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the second quarter of 2008 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

29

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

The information contained in Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report is incorporated herein by reference.

Risks Affecting Our Business

Increasing competition, including product substitution, continues to cause access line losses, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial performance.

We compete in a rapidly evolving and highly competitive market, and we expect competition to continue to intensify. We are facing greater competition in providing wireline services from cable companies, wireless providers (including us and one of our affiliates), facilities-based providers using their own networks as well as those leasing parts of our network, and resellers. In addition, regulatory developments over the past several years have generally increased competitive pressures on our business. Due to some of these and other factors, we continue to lose access lines.

We are continually evaluating our responses to these competitive pressures. Some of our more recent responses are product bundling and packaging and QCII’s and our continuing focus on customer service. However, we may not be successful in these efforts. We may not be able to distinguish our service levels from those of our competitors, and we may not be successful in integrating our product offerings, especially products for which we act as a reseller, such as wireless services and satellite video services. If these initiatives are unsuccessful or insufficient and our revenue declines significantly without corresponding cost reductions, this will cause a significant deterioration to our results of operations and financial condition and adversely affect our ability to service debt and pay other obligations.

Consolidation among participants in the telecommunications industry may allow our competitors to compete more effectively against us, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial performance.

The telecommunications industry has experienced some consolidation, and several of our competitors have consolidated with other telecommunications providers. This consolidation results in competitors that are larger and better financed and affords our competitors increased resources and greater geographical reach, thereby enabling those competitors to compete more effectively against us. We have begun to experience and expect further increased pressures as a result of this consolidation and in turn have been and may continue to be forced to respond with lower profit margin product offerings and pricing plans in an effort to retain and attract customers. These pressures could adversely affect our operating results and financial performance.

Rapid changes in technology and markets could require substantial expenditure of financial and other resources in excess of contemplated levels, and any inability to respond to those changes could reduce our market share.

The telecommunications industry is experiencing significant technological changes, and our ability to execute our business plans and compete depends upon our and our affiliates’ ability to develop and deploy new products and services, such as broadband data, wireless, video and VoIP services. The development and deployment of new products and services could also require substantial expenditure of financial and other resources in excess of contemplated levels. If we and our affiliates are not able to develop new products and services to keep pace with technological advances, or if those products and services are not widely accepted by customers, our ability to compete could be adversely affected and our market share could decline. Any inability to keep up with changes in technology and markets could also adversely affect the trading price of our debt securities.

30

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Legal and Regulatory Matters

Any adverse outcome of the securities-related matters pending against QCII, including the KPNQwest litigation, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and operating results, on the trading price of our debt securities and on our ability to access the capital markets.

As described in Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report, the securities-related matters, including the KPNQwest matters, present material and significant risks to QCII and us. In the aggregate, the plaintiffs in the KPNQwest matters seek billions of dollars in damages. In addition, the outcome of one or more of these matters could have a negative impact on the outcomes of the other matters. QCII continues to defend against these matters vigorously and is currently unable to provide any estimate as to the timing of their resolution. In addition, the ultimate outcome of the appeal by Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff of the decision approving the QCII settlement of the consolidated securities action is uncertain and could result in the payment of additional monies by QCII in connection with indemnification claims by Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff if the proposed settlement of the claims of the putative class against Messrs. Nacchio and Woodruff is not implemented.

We can give no assurance as to the impacts on QCII’s and our financial results or financial condition that may ultimately result from these matters. The ultimate outcomes of these matters are still uncertain, and substantial settlements or judgments in these matters could have a significant impact on QCII and us. The magnitude of such settlements or judgments resulting from these matters could materially and adversely affect QCII’s financial condition and ability to meet its debt obligations, potentially impacting its credit ratings, its ability to access capital markets and its compliance with debt covenants. In addition, the magnitude of any such settlements or judgments may cause QCII to draw down significantly on its cash balances, which might force it to obtain additional financing or explore other methods to generate cash. Such methods could include issuing additional securities or selling assets. As a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII, our business operations and financial condition could be similarly affected.

Further, there are other material proceedings pending against QCII and us as described in Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report that, depending on their outcome, may have a material adverse effect on QCII’s and our financial position. Thus, we can give no assurances as to the impacts on QCII’s and our financial results or financial condition as a result of these matters.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and are therefore exposed to restrictions on our manner of doing business and a variety of claims relating to such regulation.

We are subject to significant state and federal regulation. Interstate communications (including international communications that originate or terminate in the U.S.) are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and other laws. Intrastate communications are regulated by state utilities commissions pursuant to state utility laws. Generally, we must obtain and maintain certificates of authority from the FCC and regulatory bodies in most states where we offer regulated services and must obtain prior regulatory approval of rates, terms and conditions for regulated services, where required. We are subject to numerous, and often quite detailed, requirements under federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. Accordingly, we cannot ensure that we are always in compliance with all these requirements at any single point in time. The agencies responsible for the enforcement of these laws, rules and regulations may initiate inquiries or actions based on customer complaints or on their own initiative.

Regulation of the telecommunications industry is changing rapidly, and the regulatory environment varies substantially from state to state. A number of state legislatures and state utility commissions have adopted reduced or modified forms of regulation for retail services. These changes also generally allow more flexibility for rate changes and for new product introduction, and they enhance our ability to respond to competition. At the

31

Table of Contents

same time, some of the changes at both the state and federal level may have the potential effect of reducing some regulatory protections, including having FCC-approved tariffs that include rates, terms and conditions. Despite these regulatory changes, a substantial portion of our local voice services revenue remains subject to FCC and state utility commission pricing regulation, which could expose us to unanticipated price declines. There can be no assurance that future regulatory, judicial or legislative activities will not have a material adverse effect on our operations, or that regulators or third parties will not raise material issues with regard to our compliance or noncompliance with applicable regulations.

All of our operations are also subject to a variety of environmental, safety, health and other governmental regulations. We monitor our compliance with federal, state and local regulations governing the discharge and disposal of hazardous and environmentally sensitive materials, including the emission of electromagnetic radiation. Although we believe that we are in compliance with such regulations, any such discharge, disposal or emission might expose us to claims or actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Risks Affecting Our Liquidity

QCII’s high debt levels pose risks to our viability and may make us more vulnerable to adverse economic and competitive conditions, as well as other adverse developments.

Our ultimate parent, QCII, continues to carry significant debt. As of June 30, 2008, our consolidated debt was approximately $7.9 billion, which was included in QCII’s consolidated debt of $14.2 billion. Approximately $4.9 billion of QCII’s debt, which includes approximately $820 million of our debt obligations, comes due over the next three years. The $4.9 billion amount also includes $1.265 billion of QCII’s 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2025 (the “3.50% Convertible Senior Notes”), which QCII may elect to redeem, and holders may elect to convert, in November 2010. In addition, holders of these 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes may also elect to convert the principal of their notes into cash during periods when specified, market-based conversion requirements are met. While we currently believe QCII and we will have the financial resources to meet our obligations when they come due, we cannot anticipate what QCII’s and our future condition will be. We may have unexpected costs and liabilities and we may have limited access to financing. In addition, it is QCII’s intention to fully achieve by the end of 2008 the remaining $364 million of stock repurchases available under its previously disclosed stock repurchase program. Also, QCII began paying a quarterly dividend in the first quarter of 2008, and it is the expectation of QCII’s Board of Directors to pay a quarterly dividend going forward. Cash used by QCII to purchase its common stock or to pay dividends will not be available for other purposes, including the repayment of debt.

We may periodically need to obtain financing in order to meet our debt obligations as they come due. Due to recent turmoil in the credit markets, we may not be able to refinance maturing debt at terms that are as favorable as those from which we previously benefited or at terms that are acceptable to us. We may also need to obtain additional financing or investigate other methods to generate cash (such as further cost reductions or the sale of assets) if revenue and cash provided by operations decline, if economic conditions weaken, if competitive pressures increase or if QCII or we become subject to significant judgments or settlements in one or more of the matters discussed in Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report. We can give no assurance that this additional financing will be available on terms that are acceptable. Also, we may be impacted by factors relating to or affecting our liquidity and capital resources due to perception in the market, impacts on our credit ratings or provisions in our financing agreements that may restrict our flexibility under certain conditions.

QCII’s $910 million revolving credit facility (referred to as the Credit Facility), which is currently undrawn, has a cross payment default provision, and the Credit Facility and certain other debt issues of QCII and its other subsidiaries have cross acceleration provisions. When present, these provisions could have a wider impact on liquidity than might otherwise arise from a default or acceleration of a single debt instrument. As a subsidiary of QCII, any such event could adversely affect our ability to conduct business or access the capital markets and

32

Table of Contents

could adversely impact our credit ratings. In addition, the Credit Facility contains various limitations, including a restriction on using any proceeds from the facility to pay settlements or judgments relating to the securities-related actions discussed in Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this report.

The degree to which we, together with QCII, are leveraged may have other important limiting consequences, including the following:

We may be unable to significantly reduce the substantial capital requirements or operating expenses necessary to continue to operate our business, which may in turn affect our operating results.

The industry in which we operate is capital intensive, and we anticipate that our capital requirements will continue to be significant in the coming years. Although we have reduced our operating expenses over the past few years, we may be unable to further significantly reduce these costs, even if revenue in some areas of our business is decreasing. While we believe that our planned level of capital expenditures will meet both our maintenance and our core growth requirements going forward, this may not be the case if circumstances underlying our expectations change.

Adverse changes in the value of assets or obligations associated with QCII’s employee benefit plans could negatively impact QCII’s stockholders’ equity balance, which may in turn affect our business and liquidity.

Our employees participate in employee benefit plans sponsored by QCII.

QCII maintains a qualified pension plan, a nonqualified pension plan and post-retirement benefit plans. QCII’s condensed consolidated balance sheets indirectly reflect the value of all plan assets and benefit obligations under these plans. The accounting for employee benefit plans is complex, as is the process of calculating the benefit obligations under the plans. Adverse changes in interest rates or market conditions, among other assumptions and factors, could cause a significant increase in QCII’s benefit obligations or a significant decrease of the asset values without necessarily impacting QCII’s net income in the short term. In addition, QCII’s benefit obligations could increase significantly if it needs to unfavorably revise the assumptions it used to calculate the obligations. Because the combined value of plan assets and the combined benefit obligations are each approximately 20 times larger than QCII’s stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2007, these adverse changes could have a significant negative impact on its stockholders’ equity. Stockholders’ equity is one of several measures used by certain customers and vendors, among others, to evaluate a company’s financial condition. As such, a significant negative impact on QCII’s stockholders’ equity could adversely impact QCII’s and our competitiveness in obtaining favorable purchase arrangements and make it more challenging for QCII and us to compete for certain sales contracts, among other things.

In addition, with respect to QCII’s qualified pension plan, adverse changes could require QCII to contribute a material amount of cash to the plan or could accelerate the timing of any required payments. However, based on current actuarial analyses and forecasts, QCII does not expect to be required to make any such contributions in the near term.

Because we are a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII, these events could adversely affect our ability to conduct business or to access the capital markets.

33

Table of Contents

The cash needs of our affiliated companies consume a significant amount of the cash we generate.

We regularly declare and pay dividends to our direct parent, QSC. We may declare and pay dividends in excess of our earnings to the extent permitted by applicable law, which may consume a significant amount of the cash we generate. Our debt covenants do not limit the amount of dividends we can pay to our parent.

Our debt agreements and the debt agreements of QCII allow us and QCII to incur significantly more debt, which could exacerbate the other risks described in this report.

The terms of QCII’s and our debt instruments permit both QCII and us to incur additional indebtedness. Additional debt may be necessary for many reasons, including to adequately respond to competition, to comply with regulatory requirements related to our service obligations or for financial reasons alone. Incremental borrowings or borrowings at maturity on terms that impose additional financial risks to our various efforts to improve our financial condition and results of operations could exacerbate the other risks described in this report.

Other Risks Relating to Qwest

If conditions or assumptions differ from the judgments, assumptions or estimates used in our critical accounting policies, the accuracy of our financial statements and related disclosures could be affected.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our critical accounting policies, which are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, describe those significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements that are considered “critical” because they require judgments, assumptions and estimates that materially impact our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. As a result, if future events or assumptions differ significantly from the judgments, assumptions and estimates in our critical accounting policies, these events or assumptions could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Taxing authorities may determine we owe additional taxes relating to various matters, which could adversely affect our financial results.

We are included in the consolidated federal income tax return of QCII. As such, we could be severally liable for tax examinations and adjustments attributed to other members of the QCII affiliated group. As a significant taxpayer, QCII is subject to frequent and regular audits by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, as well as state and local tax authorities. These audits could subject us to tax liabilities if adverse positions are taken by these tax authorities. In June 2006, QCII received notices of proposed adjustments on several significant issues for the 2002 through 2003 audit cycle, including a proposed adjustment disallowing a loss recognized by QCII relating to the sale of its DEX directory publishing business. QCII has reached a tentative settlement with the IRS on several of these issues, including the DEX sale. These settlements are subject to formal review and approval by the IRS, and there is no assurance that these settlements will ultimately be effected in accordance with QCII’s expectations.

In April 2008, QCII received from the IRS proposed adjustments on several issues for the 2004 and 2005 audit cycle. Based on QCII’s and our evaluation of the IRS’s positions reflected in the proposed adjustments, we have not recorded a material adjustment of our unrecognized tax benefits. However there can be no assurance that QCII and the IRS will reach settlements on any of these issues or that, if QCII does reach settlements, the terms will be favorable to us.

Because prior to 1999 we were a member of affiliated groups filing consolidated U.S. federal income tax returns, we could be severally liable for tax examinations and adjustments not directly applicable to us or to

34

Table of Contents

current members of the QCII affiliated group. Tax sharing agreements have been executed between QCII and previous affiliates, and QCII believes the liabilities, if any, arising from adjustments to previously filed returns would be borne by the affiliated group member determined to have a deficiency under the terms and conditions of such agreements and applicable tax law. We have not generally provided for liabilities attributable to current or former affiliated companies or for claims they have asserted or may assert against us.

We believe that we have adequately provided for tax contingencies. However, our tax audits and examinations may result in tax liabilities that differ materially from those that we have recorded in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Because the ultimate outcomes of all of these matters are uncertain, we can give no assurance as to whether an adverse result from one or more of them will have a material effect on our financial results.

If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements with our labor unions as they expire from time to time, or if our unionized employees were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, our business and operating results could be materially harmed.

We are a party to collective bargaining agreements with our labor unions, which represent a significant number of our employees. Our current three-year agreements with the CWA and the IBEW will expire on August 16, 2008. We are currently in negotiations regarding new collective bargaining agreements with our labor unions and their representatives. Although we believe that our relations with our employees are satisfactory, no assurance can be given that we will be able to successfully extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements as they expire from time to time. The impact of future negotiations, including changes in wages and benefit levels, could have a material impact on our financial results. Also, if we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements, if disputes with our unions arise, or if our unionized workers engage in a strike or other work stoppage, we could incur higher ongoing labor costs or experience a significant disruption of operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

As a result of recent regulatory developments or other business needs, QCII is reorganizing the legal structure of its subsidiaries, which could adversely affect the trading price of our debt securities and our credit ratings.

In February 2007, the FCC issued an order that freed us from some regulatory obligations under the Telecommunications Act. Among other things, the order gives us more flexibility to integrate our local operations with the long-distance operations of QCII and gives QCII more flexibility to integrate the operations of its subsidiaries that provide shared services to us and QCII’s other subsidiaries. In light of this order and consistent with QCII’s continuing strategy to simplify its and our corporate structure and gain operational efficiencies, QCII has made changes to the legal organization of some of its subsidiaries and has moved some of its operations among its subsidiaries. QCII continues to evaluate other ways to better organize its legal organization and operations of its subsidiaries and may make additional changes in the future. In connection with these activities, we do not expect that QCII will consummate any business combinations or other transactions that will adversely affect our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. However, if we continue to be involved in any of these activities and are unable to successfully integrate the affected operations, the trading price of our debt securities and credit ratings could be adversely affected. Additionally, these reorganization activities will impact the entities that are consolidated into our financial statements and, as a result, our future financial statements will be different from the financial statements we have historically presented. Therefore, our historical financial performance might not be indicative of future financial performance.

35

Table of Contents

Exhibits identified in parentheses below are on file with the SEC and are incorporated herein by reference. All other exhibits are provided as part of this electronic submission.

36

Table of Contents

In accordance with Item 601(b) (4) (iii) (A) of Regulation S-K, copies of certain instruments defining the rights of holders of certain of our long-term debt are not filed herewith. Pursuant to this regulation, we hereby agree to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.

37

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

August 6, 2008

38