QWEST CORP - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

or

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File No. 001-03040

QWEST CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(303) 992-1400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

THE REGISTRANT, A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC., MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS I(1) (a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-K AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION I(2).

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

On February 12, 2010, one share of Qwest Corporation common stock was outstanding. None of Qwest Corporation’s common stock is held by non-affiliates.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Our industry uses many terms and acronyms that may not be familiar to you. To assist you in reading this document and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have provided below definitions of some of these terms.

ii

Table of Contents

iii

Table of Contents

Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “QC” refer to Qwest Corporation, references to “Qwest,” “we,” “us,” the “Company” and “our” refer to Qwest Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, references to “QSC” refer to our direct parent company, Qwest Services Corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, and references to “QCII” refer to our ultimate parent company, Qwest Communications International Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

We offer data, Internet, video and voice services within the 14-state region of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. We refer to this region as our local service area.

We are wholly owned by QSC, which is wholly owned by QCII. Our operations are included in the consolidated operations of QCII and generally account for the majority of QCII’s consolidated revenue. In addition to our operations, QCII maintains a national telecommunications network. Through its fiber-optic network, QCII provides the following products and services that we do not provide:

For certain products and services we provide, and for a variety of internal communications functions, we use parts of QCII’s telecommunications network to transport data and voice traffic. Through its network, QCII also provides nationally and globally some data and Internet access services that are similar to services we provide within our local service area. These services include private line and our traditional wide area network, or WAN, services, which consist of asynchronous transfer mode, or ATM, and frame relay.

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Colorado in 1911. Our principal executive offices are located at 1801 California Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, and our telephone number is (303) 992-1400.

For a discussion of certain risks applicable to our business, financial condition and results of operations, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. The financial information in this section should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Item 8 and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this report.

1

Table of Contents

Financial and Operational Highlights

The table below provides a summary of some of our financial highlights.

The table below presents some of our operational metrics.

Operations

Our operations are integrated into and are part of the segments of QCII. Our business contributes to all three of QCII’s segments: business markets, mass markets and wholesale markets. We group our products and services among three major categories, including:

2

Table of Contents

Additional information about our contribution to QCII’s segments is provided in Note 15—Contribution to QCII Segments to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this report. For more information about QCII’s reporting segments, see QCII’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Substantially all of our revenue comes from customers located in the United States, and substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the United States.

Products, Services and Customers

Our products and services include a variety of data, Internet and voice services. Through our strategic partnerships with DIRECTV and Verizon Wireless, we also offer satellite digital television and wireless services to customers in our local service area. As noted above, our business contributes to all three of QCII’s segments: business markets, mass markets and wholesale markets. We group our products and services among three major categories: strategic services, legacy services and affiliate and other services. Revenue from our strategic services represented 30% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009, and these services are our fastest growing source of revenue.

We offer our customers the ability to bundle together several products and services. In addition, through joint marketing relationships with our affiliates, we are also able to bundle our services with additional services offered by our affiliates. For example, we offer our mass markets customers integrated and unlimited local and long-distance services. These customers can also bundle two or more services such as broadband, video, voice and Verizon Wireless services. We believe these customers value the convenience of, and price discounts associated with, receiving multiple services through a single company.

Most of our products and services are provided using our telecommunications network, which consists of voice and data switches, copper cables, fiber-optic broadband cables and other equipment. Our network serves approximately 10.3 million access lines and forms a portion of the public switched telephone network, or PSTN.

We offer our products and services through three main customer channels, which are made up of our business markets, mass markets and wholesale markets customers. Our business markets customers include enterprise and government customers. Enterprise customers consist of local, national and global businesses. We sell our products and services to business markets customers through direct sales, partnership relationships and arrangements with third-party sales agents. Our mass markets customers include consumers and small businesses. We sell our products and services to mass markets customers using a variety of channels, including our sales and call centers, our website, telemarketing and retail stores and kiosks. Our wholesale markets customers are other carriers and resellers that purchase our products and services in large quantities to sell to their customers or that purchase our access services that allow them to connect their customers and their networks to our network. We sell our products and services to wholesale customers through direct sales, partnership relationships and arrangements with third-party sales agents.

Described below are our key products and services.

Strategic Services

Our business markets customers use our strategic services to access the Internet and Internet-based services, as well as to connect to private networks and to conduct internal and external data transmissions such as transferring files from one location to another. Our mass markets customers generally use our strategic services to access the Internet, Internet-based services and digital television. Our wholesale customers use our facilities for colocation and use our private line services to connect their customers and their networks to our network. Our marketing and sales efforts increasingly focus on these growth services.

3

Table of Contents

Private line. Private line is a direct circuit or channel specifically dedicated for the purpose of directly connecting two or more sites. Private line offers a high-speed, secure solution for frequent transmission of large amounts of data between sites. Our business markets customers use these services to connect to private networks and to conduct internal and external data transmissions such as transferring files from one location to another. Our wholesale markets customers use these services to connect their customers and their networks to our network.

Broadband. Our broadband services allow customers to connect to the Internet through their existing telephone lines and fiber-optic cables at higher speeds than dial-up access. Our business markets and mass markets customers use these services to access the Internet and Internet-based services.

Video. Our video services include primarily satellite digital television offered to our mass markets customers. These services are offered under an arrangement with DIRECTV that allows us to market, sell and bill for its services under its brand name.

Verizon Wireless services. Our wireless services are offered under an arrangement with Verizon Wireless that allows us to market, sell, and bill for its services under its brand name, primarily to mass markets customers who buy these services as part of a bundle with one or more of our other products and services. We began selling these services in the third quarter of 2008 under a five-year agreement entered into in April 2008.

Legacy Services

Our legacy services include local, access, ISDN and traditional WAN services. We originate, transport and terminate local services. For our business and mass markets customers, local services consist of primarily basic local exchange and switching services. We also provide enhanced features with our local exchange services, such as caller ID, call waiting, call return, 3-way calling, call forwarding and voice mail. For our wholesale customers, local services include primarily unbundled network elements, or UNEs, which allow these customers to use our network or a combination of our network and their own networks to provide voice and data services to their customers. Our local services also include network transport, billing services and access to our network by other telecommunications providers and wireless carriers. These services allow other telecommunications companies to provide telecommunications services that originate or terminate on our network.

We also provide access services to our wholesale customers. Access services include fees that we charge to other telecommunications providers to connect their customers and their networks to our network so that they can provide long-distance, transport, data, wireless and Internet services.

Affiliate and Other Services

We provide to our affiliates data services, local services and billing and collections services that we also provide to external customers. In addition, we provide to our affiliates: marketing, sales and advertising; computer system development and support services; network support and technical services; and other support services, such as legal, regulatory, finance and accounting, tax, human resources and executive support.

We also generate other operating revenue from USF surcharges and the leasing and subleasing of space in our office buildings, warehouses and other properties.

Importance, Duration and Effect of Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights

Either directly or through our affiliates, we own or have licenses to various patents, trademarks, trade names, copyrights and other intellectual property necessary to conduct our business. We believe it is unlikely that we could lose any intellectual property rights that are material to our business.

4

Table of Contents

Competition

We compete in a rapidly evolving and highly competitive market, and we expect intense competition to continue. Regulatory developments and technological advances have increased opportunities for alternative communications service providers, which in turn have increased competitive pressures on our business. These alternate providers often face fewer regulations and have lower cost structures than we do. In addition, the telecommunications industry has experienced some consolidation and several of our competitors have consolidated with other telecommunications providers. The resulting consolidated companies are generally larger, have more financial and business resources and have greater geographical reach than we do.

As discussed below, competition for many of our services is based in part on bundled offerings. We believe customers value the convenience of, and price discounts associated with, receiving multiple services through a single company. As such, we continue to focus on expanding and improving our bundled offerings.

Strategic Services

In providing strategic services to our business markets customers, we compete with national telecommunications providers, smaller regional providers and wireless providers, as well as large integrators that provide customers with data services thereby taking traffic off of our network. Competition for business markets strategic services is driven by price and bundled offerings. Private line services also compete on network reach and reliability, while broadband services also compete on bandwidth and quality.

In providing strategic services to our mass markets customers, we compete primarily with cable companies and other broadband service providers. Competition for broadband services is based on price, bandwidth, network reach, service, promotions and bundled offerings. In reselling DIRECTV video services, we compete primarily with cable companies. Competition is based on price, content, quality, promotions and bundled offerings. Many of our competitors for these strategic services are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as we are, and therefore they are able to avoid significant regulatory costs and obligations. The market for wireless services is highly competitive. In reselling Verizon Wireless services, we compete with national and regional carriers, as well as other sales agents and resellers. We market and sell wireless services to customers who are buying these services as part of a bundle with one or more of our other services. Competition is based on coverage area, price, services, features, handsets, technical quality and customer service.

In providing private line services to our wholesale markets customers, we compete primarily with national telecommunications providers, such as AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. Additionally we are experiencing increased competition for private line services from cable companies. Competition for private line services is based primarily on price, as well as network reach, bandwidth, quality, reliability and customer service. Although we are experiencing intense competition in this market, we believe we are favorably positioned due to our strong presence in our local service area.

Legacy Services

Although our status as an incumbent local exchange carrier, or ILEC, continues to provide us some advantages in providing local services to our business and mass markets customers, we continue to face significant competition in this market. Many consumers are substituting cable and wireless for traditional voice telecommunications services, which has increased the number and type of competitors within our industry and has decreased our market share. As a result of this product substitution, we face greater competition in providing local services from wireless providers, resellers and sales agents (including ourselves) and from broadband service providers, including cable companies. We also continue to compete with traditional telecommunications providers, such as national carriers, smaller regional providers, competitive local exchange carriers and independent telephone companies.

Competition for business and mass markets customers is based primarily on pricing, packaging of services and features, quality of service and meeting customer care needs. We believe these customers value the

5

Table of Contents

convenience of, and price discounts associated with, receiving multiple services through a single company. Within the telecommunications industry, these services may include telephone, wireless, video and Internet access. Accordingly, we and our competitors continue to develop and deploy more innovative product bundling, enhanced features and combined billing options in an effort to retain and gain customers. While we rely on reseller or sales agency arrangements to provide some of our bundled services, some of our competitors are able to provide all of their bundled services directly, which may provide them a competitive advantage.

Some of our competitors for business and mass markets customers are subject to fewer regulations than we are, which affords them competitive advantages against us. Under federal regulations, telecommunication providers are able to interconnect their networks with ours, resell our services or lease separate parts of our network in order to provide competitive services. Generally, we have been required to provide these functions and services at wholesale rates, which allows our competitors to sell their services at lower prices. However, these rules have been and continue to be reviewed by state and federal regulators. For additional discussion of regulations affecting our business, see “Regulation” below. In addition, wireless and broadband service providers generally are subject to less or no regulation, which may allow them to operate with lower costs than we are able to operate.

The market for wholesale local services is highly competitive. Our UNE customers are experiencing the same competition with competitive local exchange carriers, or CLECs, for local services customers as we are, as discussed above. We also compete with some of our own wholesale markets customers that are deploying their own networks to provide customers with local services. By doing so, these competitors take traffic off of our network.

We face significant competition for access services from CLECs, cable companies, resellers and wireless service providers. Our access service customers face competitive pressures in their businesses that are similar to those we face with respect to strategic and legacy services. To the extent that these competitive pressures result in decreased demand for their services, demand for our access services also declines.

Regulation

We are subject to significant regulation by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, which regulates interstate communications, and state utility commissions, which regulate intrastate communications. These agencies issue rules to protect consumers and promote competition; they set the rates that telecommunication companies charge each other for exchanging traffic; and they have established funds (called universal service funds) to support provision of services to high-cost areas. In most states, local voice service, switched and special access services, and interconnection services are subject to price regulation, although the extent of regulation varies by type of service and geographic region. In addition, we are required to maintain licenses with the FCC and with utility commissions in most states. Laws and regulations in many states restrict the manner in which a licensed entity can interact with affiliates, transfer assets, issue debt and engage in other business activities, and many mergers and acquisitions require approval by the FCC and some state commissions.

In this section, we describe potentially significant regulatory changes that we face, including: state commission review of the rates we charge for local telephone service and FCC proposals to reform universal service funds, change the rates carriers charge each other for exchanging traffic, and change the rates we can charge for special access services.

Interconnection

In our local service area, we are required by law to interconnect with other telecommunications providers and to allow competing local exchange carriers to resell our services and use our facilities as unbundled network elements. State commissions periodically conduct proceedings to change the rates we are allowed to charge for these services, and those proceedings can result in changes to our revenue from wholesale customers. The FCC and state commissions are also considering designating additional geographic areas where we would be allowed to charge higher, market-based rates for these services.

6

Table of Contents

Intercarrier Compensation and Access Pricing

The FCC has initiated a number of proceedings that could affect the rates and charges for services that we sell to or purchase from other carriers and for traffic that we exchange with other carriers. The FCC has been considering comprehensive reform of these charges, known as “intercarrier compensation,” in a proceeding that could result in fundamental changes in the charges we or our affiliates collect from and pay to other carriers. This proceeding may not be completed for some time. State commissions also periodically open proceedings to change the rates that we or other local carriers charge to terminate and originate intrastate calls. The FCC, state commissions and federal courts are also reviewing intercarrier compensation issues relating to IP services, including whether we should pay intercarrier compensation to carriers for traffic bound for Internet service providers that cross local exchange boundaries (known as “VNXX traffic”) and whether VoIP providers must pay carrier access charges. In 2009, we received approximately $400 million in switched access revenue (which includes a significant amount of related services not subject to these proceedings), and our affiliates’ paid a greater amount to other carriers for switched access.

The FCC also has an open proceeding to examine whether rates should be reduced for high-capacity facilities that local exchange carriers, like Qwest, sell to other companies. Some parties have proposed changes to the FCC’s rules that would significantly reduce our revenues from these facilities. This proceeding remains pending before the FCC. In 2009, we received approximately $1.4 billion for interstate special access services (excluding digital subscriber line), but not all of that revenue is at issue in the FCC’s special access proceeding. Most proposals submitted in the proceeding would impact only lower-capacity services and not higher-capacity fiber-based services, and many proposals would impact services only in geographic areas where the FCC has granted us pricing flexibility. If the FCC does mandate lower prices, our affiliates’ will benefit from lower prices for the special access services they purchase from other carriers, which totaled $558 million in 2009.

Universal Service

The FCC maintains a number of universal service programs that are intended to ensure affordable telephone service for all Americans, including low-income consumers and those living in rural areas that are costly to serve, and ensure access to advanced telecommunications services for schools, libraries and rural health care providers. These programs, which totaled over $7 billion annually in recent years, are funded through contributions by interstate telecommunications carriers, which are generally passed through to their end-users. The FCC is actively considering a new contribution methodology, which, if adopted, could significantly increase our universal service contributions. While we would have the right to pass these charges on to our customers, the additional charges could affect the demand for certain telecommunications services.

In 2009, we received approximately $66 million in federal universal service high-cost subsidies. The FCC is actively considering changes in the structure and distribution methodology of its universal service programs. Additionally, in 2005, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the FCC’s universal service high cost rules for failure to comply with federal law, and the FCC has an open proceeding to consider how to comply with the order. The FCC is also considering whether to reconfigure its universal service funds to support broadband services. The resolution of these proceedings ultimately could affect the amount of universal service support we receive.

In 2009, we received approximately $87 million in state universal service high-cost subsidies. State commissions and legislatures may review and alter their respective state universal service programs, and, as a result, our distributions may be affected.

Network Neutrality

In October 2009, the FCC initiated a proceeding to consider adopting network neutrality rules applicable to providers of broadband Internet access services. In general, network neutrality refers to government policies

7

Table of Contents

designed to safeguard and promote an open Internet. Among other things, network neutrality rules could affect our ability to charge for enhanced or prioritized broadband Internet access services. This proceeding remains pending before the FCC.

Employees

Our occupational employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with the Communications Workers of America, or CWA, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, or IBEW. Our current four-year agreements with the CWA and IBEW expire on October 6, 2012. See the discussion of risks relating to our labor relations in “Risk Factors—Other Risks Relating to Qwest” in Item 1A of this report.

Website Access and Important Investor Information

Our website address is www.qwest.com, and we routinely post important investor information in the “Investor Relations” section of our website at investor.qwest.com. The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website is not part of this annual report. You may obtain free electronic copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports in the “Investor Relations” section of our website under the heading “SEC Filings.” These reports are available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

QCII has adopted written codes of conduct that serve as the code of ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer and senior financial officers, in accordance with Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules of the SEC promulgated thereunder and the New York Stock Exchange rules. In the event that QCII makes any changes to, or provides any waivers from, the provisions of its code of conduct applicable to its and our principal executive officer and senior financial officers, QCII intends to disclose these events on QCII’s and our website or in a report on Form 8-K within four business days of such event.

These codes of conduct, as well as copies of QCII’s guidelines on significant governance issues and the charters of QCII’s audit committee, compensation and human resources committee and nominating and governance committee, are available in the “Corporate Governance” section of QCII’s and our website at investor.qwest.com/corporate-governance or in print to any stockholder who requests them by sending a written request to QCII’s Corporate Secretary at Qwest Communications International Inc., 1801 California Street, Denver, Colorado 80202.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-K contains or incorporates by reference forward-looking statements about our financial condition, operating results and business. These statements include, among others:

8

Table of Contents

These statements may be made expressly in this document or may be incorporated by reference to other documents we have filed or will file with the SEC. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “plan,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” or similar expressions used in this document or in documents incorporated by reference in this document.

These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by us in those statements. Some of these risks are described in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report.

These risk factors should be considered in connection with any written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons acting on our behalf may issue. Given these uncertainties, we caution investors not to unduly rely on our forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to review or confirm analysts’ expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Further, the information about our intentions contained in this document is a statement of our intentions as of the date of this document and is based upon, among other things, the existing regulatory environment, industry conditions, market conditions and prices, the economy in general and our assumptions as of such date. We may change our intentions, at any time and without notice, based upon any changes in such factors, in our assumptions or otherwise.

9

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risks Affecting Our Business

Increasing competition, including product substitution, continues to cause access line losses, which has adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We compete in a rapidly evolving and highly competitive market, and we expect competition to continue to intensify. We are facing greater competition from cable companies, wireless providers, resellers and sales agents (including ourselves) and facilities-based providers using their own networks as well as those leasing parts of our network. In addition, regulatory developments over the past several years have generally increased competitive pressures on our business. Due to some of these and other factors, we continue to lose access lines.

We are continually evaluating our responses to these competitive pressures. Some of our more recent responses are expanded broadband capabilities and strategic partnerships. We also remain focused on customer service and providing customers with simple and integrated solutions, including, among other things, product bundles and packages. However, we may not be successful in these efforts. We may not be able to distinguish our offerings and service levels from those of our competitors, and we may not be successful in integrating our product offerings, especially products for which we act as a reseller or sales agent such as wireless and video services. If these initiatives are unsuccessful or insufficient, we are otherwise unable to sufficiently stem or offset our continuing access line losses and our revenue declines significantly without corresponding cost reductions, this would adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to service debt and pay other obligations.

Unfavorable general economic conditions in the United States could negatively impact our operating results and financial condition.

Unfavorable general economic conditions, including the unstable economy and the current credit market environment, could negatively affect our business. While it is often difficult for us to predict the impact of general economic conditions on our business, these conditions could adversely affect the affordability of and consumer demand for some of our products and services and could cause customers to shift to lower priced products and services or to delay or forgo purchases of our products and services. One or more of these circumstances could cause our revenue to decline. Also, our customers may not be able to obtain adequate access to credit, which could affect their ability to make timely payments to us. If that were to occur, we could be required to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts, and the number of days outstanding for our accounts receivable could increase. In addition, as discussed below under the heading “Risks Affecting our Liquidity,” due to the unstable economy and the current credit market environment, we may not be able to refinance maturing debt at terms that are as favorable as those from which we previously benefited, at terms that are acceptable to us or at all. For these reasons, among others, if the current economic conditions persist or decline, this could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to service debt and pay other obligations.

Consolidation among participants in the telecommunications industry may allow our competitors to compete more effectively against us, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

The telecommunications industry has experienced some consolidation, and several of our competitors have consolidated with other telecommunications providers. This consolidation results in competitors that are larger and better financed and affords our competitors increased resources and greater geographical reach, thereby enabling those competitors to compete more effectively against us. We have experienced and expect further increased pressures as a result of this consolidation and in turn have been and may continue to be forced to respond with lower profit margin product offerings and pricing plans in an effort to retain and attract customers. These pressures could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to service debt and pay other obligations.

10

Table of Contents

Rapid changes in technology and markets could require substantial expenditure of financial and other resources in excess of contemplated levels, and any inability to respond to those changes could reduce our market share and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

The telecommunications industry is experiencing significant technological changes, and our ability to execute our business plans and compete depends upon our and our affiliates’ ability to develop and deploy new products and services. The development and deployment of new products and services could also require substantial expenditure of financial and other resources in excess of contemplated levels. If we are not able to develop new products and services to keep pace with technological advances, or if those products and services are not widely accepted by customers, our ability to compete could be adversely affected and our market share could decline. Any inability to keep up with changes in technology and markets could also adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to service debt and pay other obligations.

Our reseller and sales agency arrangements expose us to a number of risks, one or more of which may adversely affect our business and operating results.

We rely on reseller and sales agency arrangements with other companies to provide some of the services that we sell to our customers, including video services and wireless products and services. If we fail to extend or renegotiate these arrangements as they expire from time to time or if these other companies fail to fulfill their contractual obligations to us or our customers, we may have difficulty finding alternative arrangements and our customers may experience disruptions to their services. In addition, as a reseller or sales agent, we do not control the availability, retail price, design, function, quality, reliability, customer service or branding of these products and services, nor do we directly control all of the marketing and promotion of these products and services. To the extent that these other companies make decisions that negatively impact our ability to market and sell their products and services, our business plans and goals and our reputation could be negatively impacted. If these reseller and sales agency arrangements are unsuccessful due to one or more of these risks, our business and operating results may be adversely affected.

Third parties may claim we infringe upon their intellectual property rights, and defending against these claims could adversely affect our profit margins and our ability to conduct business.

From time to time, we receive notices from third parties or are named in lawsuits filed by third parties claiming we have infringed or are infringing upon their intellectual property rights. We may receive similar notices or be involved in similar lawsuits in the future. Responding to these claims may require us to expend significant time and money defending our use of affected technology, may require us to enter into licensing agreements requiring royalty payments that we would not otherwise have to pay or may require us to pay damages. If we are required to take one or more of these actions, our profit margins may decline. In addition, in responding to these claims, we may be required to stop selling or redesign one or more of our products or services, which could significantly and adversely affect the way we conduct business.

Risks Relating to Legal and Regulatory Matters

Any adverse outcome of the KPNQwest litigation could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and operating results, on the trading price of our debt securities and on our ability to access the capital markets.

As described in “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 of this report, the KPNQwest matters present material and significant risks to QCII and us. In the aggregate, the plaintiffs in the KPNQwest matters seek billions of dollars in damages. In addition, the outcome of one or more of these matters could have a negative impact on the outcomes of the other matters. QCII continues to defend against these matters vigorously and is currently unable to provide any estimate as to the timing of their resolution.

We can give no assurance as to the impacts on QCII’s and our financial results or financial condition that may ultimately result from these matters. The ultimate outcomes of these matters are still uncertain, and

11

Table of Contents

substantial settlements or judgments in these matters could have a significant impact on QCII and us. The magnitude of such settlements or judgments resulting from these matters could materially and adversely affect QCII’s financial condition and ability to meet its debt obligations, potentially impacting its credit ratings, its ability to access capital markets and its compliance with debt covenants. In addition, the magnitude of any such settlements or judgments may cause QCII to draw down significantly on its cash balances, which might force it to obtain additional financing or explore other methods to generate cash. Such methods could include issuing additional securities or selling assets. As a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII, our business operations and financial condition could be similarly affected.

Further, there are other material proceedings pending against QCII as described in “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 of this report that, depending on their outcome, may have a material adverse effect on QCII’s and our financial position. Thus, we can give no assurances as to the impacts on QCII’s and our operating results or financial condition as a result of these matters.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and are therefore exposed to restrictions on our manner of doing business and a variety of claims relating to such regulation.

We are subject to significant regulation by the FCC, which regulates interstate communications, and state utility commissions, which regulate intrastate communications. Generally, we must obtain and maintain certificates of authority from the FCC and regulatory bodies in most states where we offer regulated services, and we are subject to numerous, and often quite detailed, requirements under federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. Accordingly, we cannot ensure that we are always in compliance with all these requirements at any single point in time. The agencies responsible for the enforcement of these laws, rules and regulations may initiate inquiries or actions based on customer complaints or on their own initiative. See additional information about regulations affecting our business in “Business—Regulation” in Item 1 of this report.

Regulation of the telecommunications industry is changing rapidly, and the regulatory environment varies substantially from state to state. A number of state legislatures and state utility commissions have adopted reduced or modified forms of regulation for retail services. These changes also generally allow more flexibility for rate changes and for new product introduction, and they enhance our ability to respond to competition. Despite these regulatory changes, a substantial portion of our local voice services revenue remains subject to FCC and state utility commission pricing regulation, which could expose us to unanticipated price declines. For instance, in 2010 the state utility commission in Arizona may consider a price cap plan that will govern the rates that we charge in that state. The FCC is also considering changing the rates that carriers can charge each other for originating, carrying and terminating traffic and for local access facilities. Also under review by the FCC and state commissions are the intercarrier compensation issues arising from the delivery of traffic destined for entities that offer conference and chat line services for free (known in the industry as “access stimulation,” or “traffic pumping”), and of traffic bound for Internet service providers that cross local exchange boundaries (known as “VNXX traffic”). The FCC and state commissions are also considering changes to funds they have established to subsidize service to high-cost areas. Changes to how those funds are distributed could result in us receiving less in universal service funding, and changes to how the funds are collected could make some of our services less competitive. There can be no assurance that future regulatory, judicial or legislative activities will not have a material adverse effect on our operations, or that regulators or third parties will not raise material issues with regard to our compliance or noncompliance with applicable regulations.

All of our operations are also subject to a variety of environmental, safety, health and other governmental regulations. We monitor our compliance with federal, state and local regulations governing the management, discharge and disposal of hazardous and environmentally sensitive materials. Although we believe that we are in compliance with these regulations, our management, discharge or disposal of hazardous and environmentally sensitive materials might expose us to claims or actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

12

Table of Contents

Risks Affecting Our Liquidity

QCII’s high debt levels pose risks to our viability and may make us more vulnerable to adverse economic and competitive conditions, as well as other adverse developments.

Our ultimate parent, QCII, continues to carry significant debt. As of December 31, 2009, our consolidated debt was approximately $8.4 billion, which was included in QCII’s consolidated debt of approximately $14.2 billion as of that date. Approximately $5.8 billion of QCII’s debt, which includes approximately $2.8 billion of our debt obligations, comes due over the next three years. The $5.8 billion amount also includes $1.265 billion of QCII’s 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2025 (referred to as the 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes), which QCII may elect to redeem at any time on or after November 20, 2010 and holders may require QCII to repurchase for cash on November 15, 2010. In addition, holders of these 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes may also elect to convert the principal of their notes into cash during periods when specified, market-based conversion requirements are met. While we currently believe QCII and we will have the financial resources to meet our obligations when they come due, we cannot fully anticipate our future condition or that of QCII, the credit markets or the economy generally. We may have unexpected costs and liabilities, and we may have limited access to financing. In addition, QCII has $193 million of potential stock repurchases remaining under its previously disclosed stock repurchase program, and it is the current expectation of QCII’s Board of Directors that QCII will continue to pay a quarterly cash dividend. Cash used by QCII to purchase its common stock or to pay dividends will not be available for other purposes, including the repayment of debt.

We may periodically need to obtain financing in order to meet our debt obligations as they come due. Due to the unstable economy and the current credit market environment, we may not be able to refinance maturing debt at terms that are as favorable as those from which we previously benefited, at terms that are acceptable to us or at all. We may also need to obtain additional financing or investigate other methods to generate cash (such as further cost reductions or the sale of assets) if revenue and cash provided by operations decline, if economic conditions weaken, if competitive pressures increase, if holders of the 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes elect to convert their notes because market-based conversion provisions are met or require QCII to repurchase their notes for cash on November 15, 2010, if QCII or we are required to contribute a material amount of cash to QCII’s pension plan, if QCII or we are required to begin to pay other post-retirement benefits significantly earlier than is anticipated, or if QCII becomes subject to significant judgments or settlements in one or more of the matters discussed in “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 of this report. We can give no assurance that this additional financing will be available on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. Also, we may be impacted by factors relating to or affecting our liquidity and capital resources due to perception in the market, impacts on our credit ratings or provisions in our financing agreements that may restrict our flexibility under certain conditions.

QCII’s $1.035 billion revolving credit facility (referred to as the Credit Facility), which is currently undrawn, has a cross payment default provision, and the Credit Facility and certain other debt issues of QCII and its other subsidiaries have cross acceleration provisions. When present, these provisions could have a wider impact on liquidity than might otherwise arise from a default or acceleration of a single debt instrument. As a subsidiary of QCII, any such event could adversely affect our ability to conduct business or access the capital markets and could adversely impact our credit ratings. In addition, the Credit Facility contains various limitations, including a restriction on using any proceeds from the facility to pay settlements or judgments relating to the legal matters discussed in “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 of this report.

The degree to which we, together with QCII, are leveraged may have other important limiting consequences, including the following:

13

Table of Contents

We may be unable to significantly reduce the substantial capital requirements or operating expenses necessary to continue to operate our business, which may in turn affect our operating results.

The industry in which we operate is capital intensive, and we anticipate that our capital requirements will continue to be significant in the coming years. Although we have reduced our operating expenses over the past few years, we may be unable to further significantly reduce these costs, even if revenue in some areas of our business is decreasing. While we believe that our planned level of capital expenditures will meet both our maintenance and our core growth requirements going forward, this may not be the case if circumstances underlying our expectations change.

Adverse changes in the value of assets or obligations associated with QCII’s employee benefit plans could negatively impact QCII’s liquidity, which may in turn affect our business and liquidity.

Our employees participate in employee benefit plans sponsored by QCII.

QCII maintains a qualified pension plan, a non-qualified pension plan and post-retirement benefit plans. The funded status of these plans is the difference between the value of all plan assets and benefit obligations. The accounting unfunded status of QCII’s pension plan was $790 million at December 31, 2009. The process of calculating benefit obligations is complex. Adverse changes in interest rates or market conditions, among other assumptions and factors, could cause a significant increase in QCII’s benefit obligations or a significant decrease in the value of plan assets. With respect to QCII’s qualified pension plan, adverse changes could require QCII to contribute a material amount of cash to the plan or could accelerate the timing of any required cash payments. The amounts contributed by us through QCII are not segregated or restricted and may be used to provide benefits to employees of QCII’s other subsidiaries. QCII determines our cash contribution and, historically, has only required us to pay our portion of its required pension contribution. QCII will not be required to make a cash contribution to the plan in 2010. Based on currently available information, QCII’s projected required contribution in 2011 is $0 to $120 million. The information necessary to finalize QCII’s 2011 contribution calculations will not be available until later in 2010. It is also very likely, based on current funding laws and regulations, that significantly higher contributions will be required in 2012 and beyond. The amount of any required contributions in 2012 and beyond will depend on earnings on investments, discount rates, changes in the plan and funding laws and regulations. Any future material cash contributions in 2011 and beyond could have a negative impact on QCII’s liquidity by reducing its cash flows, which in turn could affect our liquidity.

Because we are a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII, these events could adversely affect our liquidity or our ability to conduct our business or access the capital markets.

The cash needs of our affiliated companies consume a significant amount of the cash we generate.

We regularly declare and pay dividends to our direct parent, QSC. We may declare and pay dividends in excess of our earnings to the extent permitted by applicable law, which may consume a significant amount of the cash we generate. Our debt covenants do not limit the amount of dividends we can pay to our parent.

Our debt agreements and the debt agreements of QCII allow us and QCII to incur significantly more debt, which could exacerbate the other risks described in this report.

The terms of QCII’s and our debt instruments permit both QCII and us to incur additional indebtedness. Additional debt may be necessary for many reasons, including to adequately respond to competition, to comply with regulatory requirements related to our service obligations or for financial reasons alone. Incremental borrowings or borrowings at maturity on terms that impose additional financial risks to our various efforts to improve our operating results and financial condition could exacerbate the other risks described in this report.

14

Table of Contents

Other Risks Relating to Qwest

If conditions or assumptions differ from the judgments, assumptions or estimates used in our critical accounting policies, the accuracy of our financial statements and related disclosures could be affected.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our critical accounting policies, which are discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Item 7 of this report, describe those significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements that are considered “critical” because they require judgments, assumptions and estimates that materially impact our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. As a result, if future events or assumptions differ significantly from the judgments, assumptions and estimates in our critical accounting policies, these events or assumptions could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Taxing authorities may determine we owe additional taxes relating to various matters, which could adversely affect our financial results.

We are included in the consolidated federal income tax return of QCII. As such, we could be severally liable for tax examinations and adjustments attributed to other members of the QCII affiliated group. As a significant taxpayer, QCII is subject to frequent and regular audits by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, as well as state and local tax authorities. These audits could subject us to tax liabilities if adverse positions are taken by these tax authorities.

Tax sharing agreements have been executed between QCII and previous affiliates, and QCII believes the liabilities, if any, arising from adjustments to previously filed returns would be borne by the affiliated group member determined to have a deficiency under the terms and conditions of such agreements and applicable tax law. We have not generally provided for liabilities attributable to current or former affiliated companies or for claims they have asserted or may assert against us.

We believe that we have adequately provided for tax contingencies. However, QCII’s tax audits and examinations may result in tax liabilities that differ materially from those that we have recorded in our consolidated financial statements. Because the ultimate outcomes of all of these matters are uncertain, we can give no assurance as to whether an adverse result from one or more of them will have a material effect on our financial results.

If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements with our labor unions as they expire from time to time, or if our unionized employees were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, our business and operating results could be materially harmed.

We are a party to collective bargaining agreements with our labor unions, which represent a significant number of our employees. Our current four-year agreements with the CWA and the IBEW expire on October 6, 2012. Although we believe that our relations with our employees and unions are satisfactory, no assurance can be given that we will be able to successfully extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements as they expire from time to time. The impact of future negotiations, including changes in wages and benefit levels, could have a material impact on our financial results. Also, if we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements, if significant disputes with our unions arise, or if our unionized workers engage in a strike or other work stoppage, we could incur higher ongoing labor costs or experience a significant disruption of operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

15

Table of Contents

Health care reform in the United States could increase the costs of maintaining our post-retirement health benefit programs.

The U.S. Congress is considering legislation addressing health care reform. If enacted, this legislation could have a significant ongoing impact on our tax liabilities and the costs of maintaining our employee health and post-retirement benefit programs, which would significantly impact our annual net income and cash flows. Any enacted legislation could also have a significant non-recurring impact on our net income in the period of enactment. For example, current reform proposals would disallow federal income tax deductions for retiree prescription drug benefits to the extent we receive reimbursements for those benefits under the Medicare Part D program. This change would increase the cost to us of this employee benefit program, resulting in a non-recurring increase in our income tax expense and an associated reduction in our net income of approximately $54 million to $70 million in the period in which the law is enacted. We cannot predict whether any law relating to health care reform will ultimately be enacted, the terms or timing of any such law, or whether we would make any changes to our benefit programs as a result of any such law.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our principal properties do not lend themselves to simple description by character and location. The components of our gross investment in property, plant and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:

Land and buildings consists of land, land improvements, central office and certain administrative office buildings. Communications equipment consists primarily of switches, routers and transmission electronics. Other network equipment includes primarily conduit and cable. General-purpose computers and other consists principally of computers, office equipment, vehicles and other general support equipment. We own substantially all of our telecommunications equipment required for our business. However, we lease certain facilities and equipment under various capital lease arrangements when the leasing arrangements are more favorable to us than purchasing the assets. Due to favorable economics, we have increasingly turned to financing our assets through capital leases. Total gross investment in property, plant and equipment was approximately $43.7 billion and $43.9 billion as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, before deducting accumulated depreciation.

We own and lease administrative offices in major metropolitan locations primarily within our local service area. Substantially all of our communications equipment and other network equipment is located in buildings that we own or on land within our local service area.

For additional information, see Note 6—Property, Plant and Equipment to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this report.

16

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

QCII is involved in several legal proceedings to which we are not a party that, if resolved against QCII, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. We have included below a discussion of these matters. Only those matters to which we are a party represent contingencies for which we have accrued, or could reasonably anticipate accruing, liabilities if appropriate to do so. We are not a party to any of the matters discussed below and therefore have not accrued any liabilities for these matters.

In this section, when we refer to a class action as “putative” it is because a class has been alleged, but not certified in that matter. Until and unless a class has been certified by the court, it has not been established that the named plaintiffs represent the class of plaintiffs they purport to represent.

The terms and conditions of applicable bylaws, certificates or articles of incorporation, agreements or applicable law may obligate QCII to indemnify its former directors, officers or employees with respect to certain of the matters described below, and QCII has been advancing legal fees and costs to certain former directors, officers or employees in connection with certain matters described below.

KPNQwest Litigation/Investigation

On January 27, 2009, the trustees in the Dutch bankruptcy proceeding for KPNQwest, N.V. (of which QCII was a major shareholder) filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Colorado alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and breach of duty and mismanagement under Dutch law. QCII is a defendant in this lawsuit along with Joseph P. Nacchio, QCII’s former chief executive officer, Robert S. Woodruff, QCII’s former chief financial officer, and John McMaster, the former president and chief executive officer of KPNQwest. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that defendants’ actions were a cause of the bankruptcy of KPNQwest, and they seek damages for the bankruptcy deficit of KPNQwest of approximately $2.4 billion. Plaintiffs also seek treble and punitive damages as well as an award of plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs. A lawsuit asserting the same claims that was previously filed in the federal district court for the District of New Jersey was dismissed without prejudice, and that dismissal was affirmed on appeal.

On September 13, 2006, Cargill Financial Markets, Plc and Citibank, N.A. filed a lawsuit in the District Court of Amsterdam, located in the Netherlands, against QCII, KPN Telecom B.V., Koninklijke KPN N.V. (referred to as KPN), Mr. Nacchio, Mr. McMaster, and other former employees or supervisory board members of QCII, KPNQwest or KPN. The lawsuit alleges that defendants misrepresented KPNQwest’s financial and business condition in connection with the origination of a credit facility and wrongfully allowed KPNQwest to borrow funds under that facility. Plaintiffs allege damages of approximately €219 million (or approximately $314 million based on the exchange rate on December 31, 2009).

On October 31, 2002, Richard and Marcia Grand, co-trustees of the R.M. Grand Revocable Living Trust, dated January 25, 1991, filed a lawsuit in Arizona Superior Court. As amended and following the appeal of a partial summary judgment against plaintiffs which was affirmed in part and reversed in part, plaintiffs allege, among other things, that defendants violated state securities laws in connection with plaintiffs’ investments in KPNQwest securities. QCII is a defendant in this lawsuit along with Qwest B.V. (one of QCII’s subsidiaries), Mr. Nacchio and Mr. McMaster. The Arizona Superior Court dismissed most of plaintiffs’ claims, and plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the remainder of their claims. Plaintiffs appealed the court’s decision to the Arizona Court of Appeals, which affirmed the Arizona Superior Court’s decision. Plaintiffs claim to have lost approximately $9 million in their investments in KPNQwest, and are also seeking interest and attorneys’ fees.

On August 23, 2005, the Dutch Shareholders Association (Vereniging van Effectenbezitters, or VEB) filed a petition for inquiry with the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court of Appeals, located in the Netherlands, with regard to KPNQwest. VEB sought an inquiry into the policies and course of business at KPNQwest that are alleged to have caused the bankruptcy of KPNQwest in May 2002, and an investigation into alleged mismanagement of KPNQwest by its executive management, supervisory board members, joint venture entities (QCII and KPN), and

17

Table of Contents

KPNQwest’s outside auditors and accountants. On December 28, 2006, the Enterprise Chamber ordered an inquiry into the management and conduct of affairs of KPNQwest for the period January 1 through May 23, 2002. On December 5, 2008, the Enterprise Chamber appointed investigators to conduct the inquiry.

QCII will continue to defend against the pending KPNQwest litigation matters vigorously.

Other Matters

Several putative class actions relating to the installation of fiber-optic cable in certain rights-of-way were filed against QCII on behalf of landowners on various dates and in various courts in California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. For the most part, the complaints challenge QCII’s right to install its fiber-optic cable in railroad rights-of-way. Complaints in Colorado, Illinois and Texas, also challenge QCII’s right to install fiber-optic cable in utility and pipeline rights-of-way. The complaints allege that the railroads, utilities and pipeline companies own the right-of-way as an easement that did not include the right to permit QCII to install its fiber-optic cable in the right-of-way without the plaintiffs’ consent. Most actions (California, Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas) purport to be brought on behalf of state-wide classes in the named plaintiffs’ respective states. The Massachusetts action purports to be on behalf of state-wide classes in all states in which QCII has fiber-optic cable in railroad rights-of-way (other than Louisiana and Tennessee), and also on behalf of two classes of landowners whose properties adjoin railroad rights-of-way originally derived from federal land grants. Several actions purport to be brought on behalf of multi-state classes. The Illinois state court action purports to be on behalf of landowners in Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio and Wisconsin. The Illinois federal court action purports to be on behalf of landowners in Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, Montana and Oregon. The Indiana action purports to be on behalf of a national class of landowners adjacent to railroad rights-of-way over which QCII’s network passes. The complaints seek damages on theories of trespass and unjust enrichment, as well as punitive damages. On July 18, 2008, a federal district court in Massachusetts entered an order preliminarily approving a settlement of all of the actions described above, except the action pending in Tennessee. On September 10, 2009, the court denied final approval of the settlement on grounds that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. On December 9, 2009, the court issued a revised ruling that, among other things, denied a motion for approval as moot and dismissed the matter for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Qwest Communications Company, LLC, or QCC, is a defendant in litigation filed by several billing agents for the owners of payphones seeking compensation for coinless calls made from payphones. The matter is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Generally, the payphone owners claim that QCC underpaid the amount of compensation due to them under FCC regulations for coinless calls placed from their phones onto QCC’s network. The claim seeks compensation for calls, as well as interest and attorneys’ fees. QCC will vigorously defend against this action.

A putative class action filed on behalf of certain of QCII’s retirees was brought against QCII, the Qwest Group Life Insurance Plan and other related entities in federal district court in Colorado in connection with QCII’s decision to reduce the life insurance benefit for these retirees to a $10,000 benefit. The action was filed on March 30, 2007. The plaintiffs allege, among other things, that QCII and other defendants were obligated to continue their life insurance benefit at the levels in place before QCII decided to reduce them. Plaintiffs seek restoration of the life insurance benefit to previous levels and certain equitable relief. The district court ruled in QCII’s favor on the central issue of whether QCII properly reserved our right to reduce the life insurance benefit under applicable law and plan documents. The plaintiffs subsequently amended their complaint to assert additional claims. The court has since dismissed or granted summary judgment to QCII on all of the plaintiffs’ claims. Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration is pending before the court.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

We have omitted this information pursuant to General Instruction I(2).

18

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Not Applicable.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified by reference to, the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Item 8 of this report and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this report. The comparability of the following selected financial data is significantly impacted by various changes in accounting principles including:

19

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Certain statements in this report constitute forward-looking statements. See “Business—Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 1 of this report for additional factors relating to these statements, and see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report for a discussion of certain risk factors applicable to our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Business Overview and Presentation

We offer data, Internet, video and voice services within the 14-state region of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. We refer to this region as our local service area.

Our operations are included in the consolidated operations of our ultimate parent, QCII, and generally account for the majority of QCII’s consolidated revenue. In addition to our operations, QCII maintains a national telecommunications network. Through its fiber-optic network, QCII provides some long-distance, data and Internet services that we do not provide. You can find additional information about these services that we do not provide in “Business” in Item 1 of this report.

For certain products and services we provide, and for a variety of internal communications functions, we use parts of QCII’s telecommunications network to transport voice and data traffic. Through its network, QCII also provides nationally and globally some data and Internet access services that are similar to services we provide within our local service area. These services include private line, and our traditional wide area network, or WAN, services, which consist of asynchronous transfer mode, or ATM, and frame relay.

Our operations are integrated into and are part of the segments of QCII and contribute to all three of QCII’s segments: business markets, mass markets and wholesale markets. We have the same Chief Operating Decision Maker, or CODM, as QCII. QCII’s CODM reviews our financial information only in connection with our quarterly and annual reports that we file with the SEC. Consequently, we do not provide our discrete financial information to the CODM on a regular basis. Additional information on our contributions to QCII’s segments is provided in Note 15—Contribution to QCII Segments to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this report.

We group our products and services among major categories of products and services. During the third quarter of 2009, we changed these categories and began using the following three categories:

We have reclassified certain prior year revenue and expense amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

Our analysis presented below is organized to provide the information we believe will be useful for understanding the relevant trends affecting our business. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in Item 8 of this report.

20

Table of Contents

Business Trends

Our financial results were impacted by several significant trends, which are described below. We expect that these trends will continue to affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

21

Table of Contents

QCII will not be required to make a cash contribution to the qualified pension plan in 2010. Based on currently available information, QCII’s projected required contribution in 2011 is $0 to $120 million. The information necessary to finalize QCII’s 2011 contribution calculations will not be available until later in 2010. It is also very likely, based on current funding laws and regulations, that significantly higher contributions will be required in 2012 and beyond. The amount of any required contributions in 2012 and beyond will depend on earnings on investments, discount rates, changes in the plan and funding laws and regulations. The amounts contributed by us through QCII are not segregated or restricted and may be used to provide benefits to employees of QCII’s other subsidiaries. Historically, QCII has only required us to pay our portion of its required pension contribution.

While these trends are important to understanding and evaluating our financial results, the other transactions, events and trends discussed in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report may also materially impact our business operations and financial results.

22

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Overview

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the number of employees as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

2009 COMPARED TO 2008

Operating Revenue

Operating revenue decreased primarily due to lower legacy services revenue as a result lower local services revenue due to continued access line losses, lower access services revenue and declining revenue from our traditional WAN services. Operating revenue also decreased due to lower revenue from affiliate and other services driven by reduced support associated with an affiliate’s winding down of its wireless business. These decreases in overall operating revenue were partially offset by increased strategic services revenue as a result of increased broadband and video subscribers and our transition to selling Verizon Wireless services. We believe that declining general economic conditions negatively impacted our revenue in 2009.

The following table compares our operating revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:

23

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our total broadband and video subscribers and access lines by customer channel as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:

Strategic Services

Strategic services revenue increased primarily due to an increase in broadband subscribers, partially offset by rate discounts. Strategic services revenue also increased due to selling Verizon Wireless services. An increase in video subscribers as of December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 also contributed to the increase in strategic services revenue.

Legacy Services

Legacy services revenue decreased primarily due to a decline in local and access services revenue due to access line loss and a declining demand for UNEs for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Legacy services revenue also decreased due to lower revenue from our traditional WAN services, driven by customer migration to more advanced technology services.

Affiliate and Other Services Revenue

Affiliate services revenue decreased primarily due to reduced support provided to an affiliate associated with the affiliate’s winding down of its wireless business as we transitioned to selling Verizon Wireless services. In addition, we had reduced support associated with an affiliate’s winding down of its video and data products and related services. These decreases in affiliate services were partially offset by an increase in services we provided to support an affiliate’s growth in strategic service offerings. We estimate that the profit from affiliate services was approximately $300 million and $380 million before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

24

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

The following table provides further detail regarding our operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:

Cost of Sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)

Cost of sales are costs incurred in providing products and services to our customers. These include: employee-related costs directly attributable to operating and maintaining our network (such as salaries, wages and certain benefits); and other cost of sales directly related to our network operations (such as professional fees, materials and supplies and outsourced services).

Employee-related costs decreased primarily due to lower salaries, wages and benefits related to employee reductions in our network operations, as we continued to manage workforce to workload. In addition, severance expense decreased because we terminated fewer employees in 2009 as compared to 2008.

Other cost of sales decreased primarily due to lower professional fees and network expenses due to our continued focus on managing costs associated with our network, along with decreased volumes.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses are costs incurred in selling products and services to our customers. These include: employee-related costs directly attributable to selling products or services (such as salaries, wages, internal commissions and certain benefits); marketing, advertising and external commissions; and other selling costs (such as bad debt expense, professional fees and outsourced services).

Employee-related costs decreased due to lower salaries, wages and benefits related to employee reductions, along with decreased commissions driven by lower sales headcount and lower attainment of sales targets. These decreases were partially offset by increases in severance expenses.

25

Table of Contents

Marketing, advertising and external commissions decreased primarily due to reduced spending associated with direct mail and media, along with improved consumer call center costs and a change to using internal sales call centers.

Other selling costs decreased primarily due to lower professional fees as a result of a favorable rate change in credit processing fees and other cost savings initiatives.

General, Administrative and Other Operating Expenses

General, administrative and other operating expenses are corporate overhead and other operating costs. These include: employee-related costs for administrative functions (such as salaries, wages and certain benefits); taxes and fees (such as property and other taxes and USF charges); real estate and occupancy costs (such as rents, utility and fleet costs); and other general, administrative and other operating costs (such as professional fees, outsourced services, litigation related charges and general computer systems support services). General, administrative and other operating expenses also include our allocated share of QCII’s combined net periodic pension and post-retirement expense for all eligible employees and retirees.

Employee-related costs increased primarily due to increased pension and post-retirement benefits expenses. These benefits expenses are based on several assumptions, including discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets, that are set at the beginning of each year. In 2008 we recognized combined net periodic benefits income, as pension income exceeded post-retirement benefit expense for the year. However, during 2008 QCII experienced significant losses on its pension and post-retirement benefit plan assets, which significantly impacted the pension and post-retirement benefits expenses we recorded in 2009. This increase in pension and post-retirement benefits expenses was partially offset by decreased severance expense and by lower expenses due to workforce reductions as we continue to manage our workforce to our workload.

QCII allocates the expense or income of its benefit plans to us based upon demographics of our employees compared to all the remaining participants. The expense is a function of the amount of benefits earned, interest on benefit obligations, expected return on plan assets, amortization of costs and credits from prior benefit changes and amortization of actuarial gains and losses. We recorded combined net periodic expense of $193 million and net periodic income of $13 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The 2009 expense is net of a $12 million gain allocated to us as a result of QCII’s decision to no longer provide pension benefit accruals for active management employees under the qualified and non-qualified pension plans on or after January 1, 2010. The shift from recording combined net periodic income to recording combined net periodic expense was primarily due to a decrease in expected return on plan assets as a result of lower plan asset values and an increase in net actuarial losses. Actuarial gains or losses reflect the differences between earlier actuarial assumptions and what actually occurred. We expect to record combined net periodic expense of approximately $127 million in 2010. The expected decrease in combined net periodic expense in 2010 is primarily due to QCII’s decision to no longer provide pension benefit accruals for active management employees under the qualified and non-qualified pension plans, the elimination of the qualified and non-qualified pension plan death benefits for certain eligible retirees and reduced interest cost, offset by an increase in actuarial losses.

Taxes and fees increased as a result of a $40 million favorable property tax settlement and other favorable adjustments in the second quarter of 2008. These increases were partially offset by lower USF charges resulting from continued access line erosion and a decrease in current year property taxes.

Real estate and occupancy costs decreased primarily due to lower fuel costs, resulting from fewer miles driven and lower fuel prices. Real estate and occupancy costs also decreased because we had fewer operating leases in 2009 as compared to 2008.

Other expenses decreased primarily due to lower professional fees, the 2008 impairments of certain assets related to QCII’s transition to selling Verizon Wireless services and decreased supplies expense due to cost cutting measures.

26

Table of Contents

Affiliate Expenses

Affiliate expenses include charges for our use of long-distance services, wholesale Internet access, insurance, occupancy charges and certain retiree benefits.

Affiliate expenses decreased primarily due to reduced insurance costs driven by decreases in our workforce, and reduced support charges from our wireless affiliate partially offset by increases in wholesale Internet access in support of our broadband services.

2008 COMPARED TO 2007

Operating Revenue

Operating revenue decreased primarily due to lower legacy services revenue driven in part by access line losses as a result of competitive pressures. Operating revenue also decreased due to a decrease in affiliate and other services due to a change in the way we determine sales support services billed to our affiliates, partially offset by an increase in services we provided to support an affiliate’s strategic service offerings. These decreases in overall operating revenue were partially offset by increased revenue in our strategic services as a result of increased broadband subscribers and private line services.

The following table compares our operating revenue for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:

The following table summarizes our access lines by customer channel as of December 31, 2008 and 2007:

In addition to the specific items discussed below, we believe declining general economic conditions negatively impacted our revenue in 2008.

27

Table of Contents

Strategic Services

Strategic services revenue increased primarily due to an increase in broadband subscribers and, to a lesser extent, an increase in video subscribers as of December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007. Private line services revenue also increased as a result of higher volumes partially offset by rate compression.

Legacy Services

Legacy services revenue decreased as a result of lower local services revenue and lower access services revenue, which were both driven by access line losses resulting from competitive pressure. Legacy services revenue also decreased due to a decrease in our traditional WAN services revenue, such as frame relay and ATM services, due to lower volumes. Local services revenue was impacted by competitive pressures as customers disconnected primary and additional lines resulting in declining revenue, and a declining demand for unbundled network elements.

Affiliate and Other Services Revenue

Affiliate services revenue decreased primarily due to a change in the way we determine sales support services billed to our affiliates. We implemented this change in the fourth quarter of 2007. This revenue decrease was partially offset by an increase in services we provided to support an affiliate’s growth in strategic service offerings. We estimate that the profit from affiliate services was approximately $380 million and $410 million before income taxes, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Operating Expenses

The following table provides further detail regarding our operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:

28

Table of Contents

Cost of Sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)

Employee-related costs decreased primarily due to lower salaries, wages and benefit costs as a result of employee reductions in our network operations and lower overtime costs, partially offset by severance charges of approximately $78 million in 2008.

Other cost of sales increased primarily due to higher cost of equipment sales and higher professional fees and other costs for operating and maintaining our network. In addition, during June 2008, floods in the Midwest, particularly Iowa, caused damage to our network. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred flood-related repair expenditures of $13 million, which contributed to the increase in other cost of sales over prior year.

Selling Expenses

Employee-related costs increased primarily due to an increase in commissions related to higher attainment of sales targets. Increased severance charges, along with increased benefits and taxes also contributed to the increase in employee-related costs. These increases were partially offset by a decline in the amortization of deferred costs associated with the activation of access lines. Certain customer acquisition costs are deferred up to the amount of any up-front fee and amortized over the expected life of the customer relationship and have been declining in amount as a result of access line losses and promotional waivers of up-front fees.

Marketing, advertising and external commissions decreased primarily due to lower costs for media advertising in 2008.

Other selling costs increased due to a refund associated with a regulatory matter in 2007, higher costs for postage and shipping, higher professional fees, and other costs including expenses associated with sponsoring the Democratic and Republican National Conventions, which took place in our 14-state region in 2008.

General, Administrative and Other Operating Expenses

Employee-related costs decreased primarily due to lower pension expense partially offset by severance charges of $32 million in 2008, increased salaries and wages and an increase in post-retirement benefit expenses. QCII allocates the expense of its benefit plans to us based upon demographics of our employees compared to all the remaining participants. The expense is a function of the amount of benefits earned, interest on benefit obligations, expected return on plan assets, amortization of costs and credits from prior benefit changes and amortization of actuarial gains and losses. For the year ended December 31, 2008, QCII allocated to us combined pension and post-retirement benefit income of $13 million compared to a combined pension and post-retirement benefit expense of $39 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The shift from recording combined net periodic expense to recording combined net periodic income was primarily due to a decrease in net actuarial losses. Actuarial gains or losses reflect the differences between earlier actuarial assumptions and what actually occurred.

Taxes and fees decreased primarily due to a $40 million favorable property tax settlement recognized in 2008. Excluding this settlement, taxes and fees decreased due to other favorable property tax adjustments.

Other expenses increased due to increased professional fees, increased marketing and advertising expense, and the impairment of certain assets related to real estate properties and QCII’s wireless business partially offset by a decrease in legal expenses resulting from charges recorded in 2007 for a litigation matter.

Affiliate Expenses

Affiliate expenses include charges for our use of long-distance services, wholesale Internet access, insurance, occupancy charges and certain retiree benefits.

Affiliate expenses increased primarily due to increases in Internet access and voice mail services, occupancy charges and a general liability insurance credit received in 2007.

29

Table of Contents

Depreciation and Amortization

The following table provides detail regarding depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

If we do not significantly shorten our estimates of the useful lives of our assets, we expect that our depreciation expense will continue to decrease for the foreseeable future. Amortization expense increased due to an increase in internally developed capitalized software. Lower capital expenditures and the changing mix of our investment in property, plant and equipment since 2002 have decreased our depreciation expense.

Effective January 1, 2009, we changed our estimates of the economic lives of certain copper cable and telecommunications equipment assets. These changes resulted in additional depreciation expense of approximately $36 million and reduced net income, net of deferred taxes, by $22 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. These assets were fully depreciated as of December 31, 2009.

Other Consolidated Results

The following table provides detail regarding other expense (income)—net and income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

nm—Percentages greater than 200% and comparisons between positive and negative values or to/from zero values are considered not meaningful.

Other Expense (Income)—Net

Other expense (income)—net includes: interest expense on long-term borrowings; investment write-downs; gains and losses on the sales of investments and fixed assets; gains and losses on early retirement of debt; interest income; and interest expense not related to borrowings, such as interest on income taxes.

30

Table of Contents

Interest expense on long-term borrowings—net increased in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily due to the issuance of $811 million of new debt in the second quarter of 2009, partially offset by decreased interest as a result of maturities, and decreasing interest rates on floating rate debt. Interest expense on long-term borrowings—net decreased in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to lower interest rates from refinancing activities.

Loss on early retirement of debt—net for 2007 was primarily due to the redemption of $250 million aggregate principal amount of 8 ⁷/ 8% Debentures due June 1, 2031. The redemption resulted in a loss on early retirement of debt of $18 million.

Other—net includes, among other things, interest income, income tax penalties, other interest expense (such as interest on income taxes) and gains or losses related to fair value interest rate hedges.

Income Tax Expense

The decrease in income tax expense was due to the decrease in income before income taxes. The effective income tax rate is the provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before income taxes. Our effective income tax rate for 2009, 2008 and 2007 was 38%, 37% and 37%, respectively.

The U.S. Congress is considering legislation addressing health care reform. Current reform proposals would disallow federal income tax deductions for retiree prescription drug benefits to the extent we receive reimbursements for those benefits under the Medicare Part D program. This change would increase the cost to us of this employee benefit program, resulting in a non-recurring increase in our income tax expense and an associated reduction in our net income of approximately $54 million to $70 million in the period in which the law is enacted.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are a wholly owned subsidiary of QSC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII. As such, factors relating to, or affecting, QCII’s liquidity and capital resources could have material impacts on us, including impacts on our credit ratings, our access to capital markets and changes in the financial market’s perception of us. QCII and its consolidated subsidiaries had total borrowings of $14.200 billion and $13.555 billion as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

QCII has cash management arrangements between certain of its subsidiaries that include lines of credit, affiliate obligations, capital contributions and dividends. As part of these cash management arrangements, affiliates provide lines of credit to certain other affiliates. Amounts outstanding under these lines of credit and intercompany obligations vary from time to time and are classified as short-term borrowings.

Near-Term View

We expect that our cash on hand and expected net cash generated by operating activities will exceed our cash needs over the next 12 months. At December 31, 2009, we held cash and cash equivalents totaling $1.014 billion, QCII had $1.035 billion available under its currently undrawn revolving credit facility (referred to as the Credit Facility) and QCII had an additional $1.392 billion in cash and cash equivalents.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, our net cash generated by operating activities totaled $3.167 billion. Although our revenue decreased in 2009 compared to 2008, for 2010 we believe that we will begin to stabilize revenue and continue to control costs to keep them aligned with revenue. As such, we expect that we will continue to generate cash from operating activities sufficient to fund our financing and investing activities. For the coming 12 months, our expected financing and investing cash needs include capital expenditures (anticipated to be $1.4 billion or less in 2010), $500 million of debt maturing in June 2010 and dividends to QSC.

31

Table of Contents

We have significant discretion in how we use our cash to pay for capital expenditures and for other costs of our business, as only a minority portion of our capital expenditures is dedicated to preservation activities or government mandates. We evaluate capital expenditure projects based on expected strategic impacts (such as forecasted revenue growth or productivity, expense and service impacts) and our expected return on investment. If we are not successful in maintaining or increasing our net cash generated by operating activities in the near term, we may use this discretion to decrease our capital expenditures, which may impact future years’ operating results and cash flows. For example, we also lease certain facilities and equipment under various capital lease arrangements when the leasing arrangements are more favorable to us than purchasing the assets. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we entered into capital leases of approximately $61 million, which allowed us to reduce our initial cash outlays, and we may use lease financing in 2010 for some portion of our capital spending.

At December 31, 2009, our current liabilities exceeded our current assets by $474 million. This working capital deficit improved $367 million as compared to our working capital deficit at December 31, 2008. This improvement was primarily due to earnings before depreciation and amortization, and net proceeds from our long term debt issuance, partially offset by dividends declared to QSC, capital expenditures and the reclassification of non-current debt to current.

In general, we intend to refinance our debt as it matures. However, we do not anticipate issuing new debt to refinance the $500 million of debt maturing in June 2010, as that maturity was factored into our 2009 borrowing decisions. We expect that at any time we deem conditions favorable we will also attempt to improve our liquidity position by accessing debt markets in a manner designed to create positive economic value. Although we were able to access the credit markets in April 2009, the unstable economy may impair our ability to refinance maturing debt at terms that are as favorable as those from which we previously benefited or at terms that are acceptable to us.

Long-Term View

We have historically operated with a working capital deficit due to our practice of declaring and paying regular cash dividends to QSC, and it is likely that we will operate with a working capital deficit in the future. As discussed below, we continue to generate substantial cash from operations. We believe that these cash flows, combined with continued access to the capital markets to refinance debt as it comes due, will provide sufficient liquidity to continue our planned investing and financing activities.

Debt

We have a significant amount of debt maturing in the next several years, including $500 million maturing in 2010, $825 million maturing in 2011, $1.500 billion maturing in 2012 and $750 million maturing in 2013. We believe that we will continue to have access to capital markets to refinance our debt as necessary. In general, we intend to refinance our debt as it matures. However, we do not anticipate issuing new debt to refinance the $500 million of debt maturing in June 2010, as that maturity was factored into our 2009 borrowing decisions. Although we were able to access the credit markets in April 2009, the unstable economy may impair our ability to refinance maturing debt at terms that are as favorable as those from which we previously benefited or at terms that are acceptable to us.

32

Table of Contents

The Credit Facility, which makes available to QCII $1.035 billion of additional credit subject to certain restrictions as described below, is currently undrawn and expires in September 2013. The Credit Facility has 13 lenders, each with commitments ranging from $25 million to $100 million. This facility has a cross payment default provision, and this facility and certain other debt issues of QCII and its other subsidiaries also have cross acceleration provisions. When present, these provisions could have a wider impact on liquidity than might otherwise arise from a default or acceleration of a single debt instrument. These provisions generally provide that a cross default under these debt instruments could occur if:

Upon a cross default, the creditors of a material amount of QCII’s debt may elect to declare that a default has occurred under their debt instruments and to accelerate the principal amounts due to those creditors. Cross acceleration provisions are similar to cross default provisions, but permit a default in a second debt instrument to be declared only if, in addition to a default occurring under the first debt instrument, the indebtedness due under the first debt instrument is actually accelerated. As a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII, in the event of such a cross-default or cross-acceleration, our business operations and financial condition could be affected, potentially impacting our credit ratings and access to the capital markets.

The Credit Facility also contains various limitations, including a restriction on using any proceeds from the facility to pay settlements or judgments relating to the legal matters discussed in “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 of this report. In addition, to the extent that QCII’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA (as defined in QCII’s debt covenants), is reduced by cash settlements or judgments relating to the matters discussed in that note, QCII’s debt to consolidated EBITDA ratios under certain debt agreements will be adversely affected. This could reduce QCII’s liquidity and flexibility due to potential restrictions on drawing on its Credit Facility and potential restrictions on incurring additional debt under certain provisions of its debt agreements. As a wholly owned subsidiary of QCII, our business operations and financial condition could be similarly affected, potentially impacting our credit ratings and access to capital markets.

We may also need to obtain additional financing or investigate other methods to generate cash (such as further cost reductions or the sale of assets) if:

Pension Plan

Benefits paid by QCII’s pension plan are paid through a trust. This pension plan is measured annually at December 31. The accounting unfunded status of the pension plan was $790 million at December 31, 2009. Cash funding requirements can be significantly impacted by earnings on investments, the applicable discount rate used to value the benefit obligation, changes in the plan and funding laws and regulations. As a result, it is difficult to determine future funding requirements with a high level of precision; however, in general, current funding laws and regulations require funding deficits to be paid over a seven year period unless the plan is fully funded before

33

Table of Contents

then. QCII will not be required to make a cash contribution to this plan in 2010. Based on currently available information, QCII’s projected required contribution in 2011 is $0 to $120 million. The information necessary to finalize QCII’s 2011 contribution calculations will not be available until later in 2010. It is also very likely, based on current funding laws and regulations, that significantly higher contributions will be required in 2012 and beyond. The amount of any required contributions in 2012 and beyond will depend on earnings on investments, discount rates, changes in the plan and funding laws and regulations.

Substantially all of our employees participate in the QCII pension plan. The amounts contributed by us through QCII are not segregated or restricted to pay amounts due to our employees and may be used to provide benefits to other employees of QCII’s affiliates. Historically, QCII has only required us to pay our portion of their pension contribution. See additional information about QCII’s pension benefits in Note 11—Employee Benefits to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this report.

Post-Retirement Benefits

Certain of QCII’s post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits plans are unfunded. As of December 31, 2009, the unfunded status of all of QCII’s post-retirement benefit plans was $2.525 billion. A trust holds assets that are used to help cover the health care costs of retirees who are former occupational (also referred to as union) employees, and QCII believes that the more liquid assets in the trust will be adequate to provide continuing reimbursements for certain health care costs for approximately five years.

QCII did not make any cash contributions to this trust in 2009 and does not expect to make any significant cash contributions to this trust in the future. QCII therefore anticipates that the majority of the costs that have historically been paid out of this trust will need to be paid by us at some point in the future. As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of the trust assets was $863 million; however, a portion of these assets is comprised of investments with restricted liquidity. In 2008 QCII estimated that the trust would be adequate to provide continuing reimbursements for its occupational post-retirement health care costs for approximately five years. Based on returns on trust assets during 2009, QCII still believes that the more liquid assets in the trust will be adequate to provide continuing reimbursements for its occupational post-retirement health care costs for approximately five years. Thereafter, covered benefits for its eligible retirees who are former occupational employees will be paid either directly through us or from the trust as the assets become liquid. This five year period could be substantially shorter or longer depending on returns on plan assets, the timing of maturities of illiquid plan assets and future changes in benefit obligations. QCII’s estimate of the annual long-term rate of return on the plan assets is 8.0% based on the currently held assets; however, this could vary widely in any given year. The benefits reimbursed from plan assets were $193 million in 2009.

Our eligible employees participate in the QCII post-retirement plan. The amounts contributed by us through QCII are not segregated or restricted to pay amounts due to our employees and may be used to provide benefits to other employees of QCII’s affiliates. Historically, QCII has only required us to pay our portion of their post-retirement contribution. See additional information about QCII’s post-retirement benefits in Note 11—Employee Benefits to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this report.

Historical View

The following table summarizes cash flow activities for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007: