RAND CAPITAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarter ended June 30, 2011
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number: 814-00235
Rand Capital Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
| New York | 16-0961359 | |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
| 2200 Rand Building, Buffalo, NY (Address of Principal executive offices) |
14203 (Zip Code) |
(716) 853-0802
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o | |||
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 2, 2011 there were 6,818,934 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FORM 10-Q
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| Item 1. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
| June 30, 2011 | December 31, | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments at fair value (identified cost: 6/30/11 —
$12,112,105; 12/31/10 — $13,573,041) |
$ | 20,068,121 | $ | 19,364,625 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
10,791,049 | 11,698,653 | ||||||
Interest receivable (net of allowance — 6/30/11—
$122,000, 12/31/10 — $158,245) |
1,236,109 | 1,051,848 | ||||||
Prepaid income taxes |
500,059 | 414,745 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,140,126 | 2,561,389 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 34,735,464 | $ | 35,091,260 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (NET ASSETS) |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Debentures guaranteed by the SBA |
$ | 10,000,000 | $ | 10,000,000 | ||||
Deferred tax liability |
1,467,339 | 1,044,315 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
401,518 | 990,477 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
4,100 | 5,650 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
11,872,957 | 12,040,442 | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity (net assets): |
||||||||
Common stock, $.10 par;
shares authorized 10,000,000; shares issued 6,863,034 |
686,304 | 686,304 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
10,581,789 | 10,581,789 | ||||||
Accumulated net investment loss |
(1,898,961 | ) | (1,648,118 | ) | ||||
Undistributed net realized gain on investments |
8,510,720 | 9,833,282 | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments |
5,029,861 | 3,644,767 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 44,100 shares |
(47,206 | ) | (47,206 | ) | ||||
Net assets (per share 6/30/11 — $3.35, 12/31/10 — $3.38) |
22,862,507 | 23,050,818 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (net assets) |
$ | 34,735,464 | $ | 35,091,260 | ||||
See accompanying notes
3
Table of Contents
RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited)
| Three months | Three months | Six months | Six months | |||||||||||||
| ended | ended | ended | ended | |||||||||||||
| June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Investment income: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest from portfolio companies |
$ | 202,495 | $ | 167,509 | $ | 379,636 | $ | 334,006 | ||||||||
Interest from other investments |
10,000 | 4,005 | 18,081 | 9,189 | ||||||||||||
Dividend and other investment income |
29,442 | 22,389 | 70,556 | 36,291 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
5,776 | 4,525 | 7,580 | 7,328 | ||||||||||||
| 247,713 | 198,428 | 475,853 | 386,814 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries |
118,750 | 115,050 | 237,500 | 230,100 | ||||||||||||
Employee benefits |
23,234 | 25,995 | 65,684 | 84,137 | ||||||||||||
Directors’ fees |
37,500 | 46,795 | 52,500 | 57,750 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees |
25,887 | 32,268 | 76,804 | 90,691 | ||||||||||||
Stockholders and office operating |
40,489 | 45,901 | 74,599 | 71,924 | ||||||||||||
Insurance |
7,800 | 9,655 | 19,846 | 19,820 | ||||||||||||
Corporate development |
17,041 | 14,537 | 32,737 | 23,767 | ||||||||||||
Other operating |
2,568 | 5,232 | 10,194 | 8,028 | ||||||||||||
| 273,269 | 295,433 | 569,864 | 586,217 | |||||||||||||
Interest on SBA obligations |
147,560 | 147,560 | 295,119 | 284,004 | ||||||||||||
Bad debt recovery |
— | (5,983 | ) | — | (5,983 | ) | ||||||||||
Total expenses |
420,829 | 437,010 | 864,983 | 864,238 | ||||||||||||
Investment (loss) before income taxes |
(173,116 | ) | (238,582 | ) | (389,130 | ) | (477,424 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax (benefit) |
(62,683 | ) | (88,331 | ) | (138,287 | ) | (167,784 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment loss |
(110,433 | ) | (150,251 | ) | (250,843 | ) | (309,640 | ) | ||||||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Realized loss on sales and dispositions |
(1,780,611 | ) | — | (2,074,130 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit |
(648,836 | ) | — | (751,568 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net realized loss on investments |
(1,131,775 | ) | — | (1,322,562 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
5,960,102 | 8,728,226 | 5,791,584 | 9,528,226 | ||||||||||||
End of period |
7,956,016 | 8,785,064 | 7,956,016 | 8,785,064 | ||||||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation
before income taxes |
1,995,914 | 56,838 | 2,164,432 | (743,162 | ) | |||||||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
720,357 | 50,327 | 779,338 | (229,797 | ) | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in unrealized
appreciation |
1,275,557 | 6,511 | 1,385,094 | (513,365 | ) | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
143,782 | 6,511 | 62,532 | (513,365 | ) | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations |
$ | 33,349 | $ | (143,740 | ) | $ | (188,311 | ) | $ | (823,005 | ) | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
6,818,934 | 6,818,934 | 6,818,934 | 6,818,934 | ||||||||||||
Basic and diluted net increase (decrease) in net assets
from operations per share |
$ | 0.00 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | |||||
See accompanying notes
4
Table of Contents
RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited)
| Six months | Six months | |||||||
| ended | ended | |||||||
| June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net decrease in net assets from operations |
$ | (188,311 | ) | $ | (823,005 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets to net
cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
20,245 | 20,745 | ||||||
Original issue discount amortization |
(37,000 | ) | — | |||||
Change in interest receivable allowance |
(36,245 | ) | — | |||||
(Increase) decrease in unrealized appreciation of
investments |
(2,164,432 | ) | 743,162 | |||||
Deferred tax benefit |
423,024 | (251,724 | ) | |||||
Net realized loss on portfolio investments |
2,074,130 | — | ||||||
Non-cash conversion of debenture interest |
(47,828 | ) | (324,553 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable |
(148,016 | ) | 54,571 | |||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
401,018 | (35,737 | ) | |||||
Increase in income taxes receivable |
(85,314 | ) | (72,405 | ) | ||||
Decrease in income taxes payable |
— | (1,082,646 | ) | |||||
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued
Expenses |
(588,959 | ) | (160,966 | ) | ||||
Decrease in deferred revenue |
(1,549 | ) | (828 | ) | ||||
Total adjustments |
(190,926 | ) | (1,110,381 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(379,237 | ) | (1,933,386 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Investments originated |
(1,069,999 | ) | (2,580,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from loan repayments |
541,632 | 71,643 | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
— | (846 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(528,367 | ) | (2,509,203 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from SBA debenture |
— | 900,000 | ||||||
Origination costs to SBA |
— | (21,825 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
— | 878,175 | ||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(907,604 | ) | (3,564,414 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
11,698,653 | 9,417,236 | ||||||
End of period |
$ | 10,791,049 | $ | 5,852,822 | ||||
See accompanying notes
5
Table of Contents
RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
For the Three Months and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited)
| Three months | Three months | Six months | Six months | |||||||||||||
| ended | ended | ended | ended | |||||||||||||
| June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net assets at beginning of period |
$ | 22,829,158 | $ | 22,526,616 | $ | 23,050,818 | $ | 23,205,881 | ||||||||
Net investment loss |
(110,433 | ) | (150,251 | ) | (250,843 | ) | (309,640 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized loss on dispositions of investments |
(1,131,775 | ) | — | (1,322,562 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net increase(decrease) in unrealized appreciation |
1,275,557 | 6,511 | 1,385,094 | (513,365 | ) | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations |
33,349 | (143,740 | ) | (188,311 | ) | (823,005 | ) | |||||||||
Net assets at end of period |
$ | 22,862,507 | $ | 22,382,876 | $ | 22,862,507 | $ | 22,382,876 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes
6
Table of Contents
RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
| (a) Company, Geographic Location, Business Description, (Industry) and Website |
Type of Investment | (b) Date Acquired |
(c) Equity |
Cost | (d)(f) Value |
Per Share of Rand |
||||||||||||||||
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments: (j) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Chequed.com,
Inc. (g) Saratoga Springs, NY. Predictive employee selection and development software. (Software) www.chequed.com |
$500,000 convertible promissory notes at 8% due December 31, 2012. | 11/18/10 | 0 | % | $ | 500,000 | $ | 500,000 | $ | .07 | ||||||||||||
Liazon Corporation (e)(g) Buffalo, NY. Employee benefits solution company. (Health Benefits Provider) www.liazon.com |
120,000 Series C-1 preferred shares. 546,667 Series C-2 preferred shares. | 11/9/10 | 4 | % | 858,199 | 1,000,000 | .15 | |||||||||||||||
Mezmeriz, Inc. (g) Ithaca, NY. Developer of micro mirror technology that replaces silicon with carbon fibers in micro-electronic mechanical systems (MEMS) enabling efficient, wide-angle, Pico projectors to be embedded in mobile devices. (Electronics Developer) www.mezmeriz.com |
141,125 Series A preferred shares. | 1/9/08 | 4 | % | 121,509 | 121,509 | .02 | |||||||||||||||
Rheonix, Inc. Ithaca, NY. Developer of microfluidic testing devices including channels, pumps, reaction vessels, & diagnostic chambers, for testing of small volumes of chemicals and biological fluids. (Manufacturing) www.rheonix.com |
9,676 common shares. (g) 694,015 Series A preferred shares. 50,593 common shares. |
10/29/09 | 4 | % | 753,000 | 889,000 | .12 | |||||||||||||||
Somerset Gas Transmission Company, LLC (e) Columbus, OH. Natural gas transportation company. (Oil and Gas) www.somersetgas.com |
26.5337 units. | 7/10/02 | 3 | % | 719,097 | 786,748 | .12 | |||||||||||||||
Synacor Inc. (g) Buffalo, NY. Develops provisioning platforms for aggregation and delivery of content and services across multiple digital devices. (Software) www.synacor.com |
234,558 Series A preferred shares. 600,000 Series B preferred shares. 240,378 Series C preferred shares. 897,438 common shares. | 11/18/02 | 4 | % | 1,349,479 | 4,168,001 | .61 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments |
$ | 4,301,284 | $ | 7,465,258 | $ | 1.09 | ||||||||||||||||
Affiliate Investments: (k) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Carolina Skiff LLC (e)(g) Waycross, GA. Manufacturer of fresh water, ocean fishing and pleasure boats. (Manufacturing) www.carolinaskiff.com |
$985,000 Class A preferred membership interest at 14%. Redeemable December 23, 2012. $500,000 subordinated promissory note at 14% due December 31, 2016. 6.0825% class A common membership interest. (i) Interest receivable $1,180,556 |
1/30/04 | 7 | % | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | .22 | ||||||||||||
EmergingMed.com, Inc. (e)(g) New York, NY. Cancer clinical trial matching and referral service. (Software) www.emergingmed.com |
$675,045 senior subordinated note at 8% due January 19, 2013. Warrants for 8% of common stock. | 12/19/05 | 8 | % | 675,045 | 675,045 | .10 | |||||||||||||||
7
Table of Contents
RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2011 (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2011 (Continued)
(Unaudited)
| (a) Company, Geographic Location, Business Description, (Industry) and Website |
Type of Investment | (b) Date Acquired |
(c) Equity |
Cost | (d)(f) Value |
Per Share of Rand |
||||||||||||||||
Microcision
LLC (e)(g) Philadelphia, PA. Custom manufacturer of medical and dental implants. (Manufacturing). www.microcision.com |
$1,500,000 subordinated promissory note at 5%, 6% deferred interest due December 31, 2013. 15% class A common membership interest. | 9/24/09 | 15 | % | 1,630,109 | 1,630,109 | .24 | |||||||||||||||
Mid America Brick & Structural Clay Products, LLC(g) Mexico, MO. Manufacturer of face brick for residential and commercial construction. (Manufacturing). www.midamericabrick.com |
19.524 membership units. | 6/1/10 | 19 | % | 800,000 | 800,000 | .12 | |||||||||||||||
SOMS Technologies, LLC (g) Valhalla, NY. Produces and markets the microGreen Extended Performance Oil Filter. (Auto Parts Developer) www.microgreenfilter.com |
4,808,224 Series B membership units. | 12/2/08 | 12 | % | 370,687 | 426,403 | .06 | |||||||||||||||
Ultra — Scan Corporation Amherst, NY. Biometrics application developer of ultrasonic fingerprint technology. (Electronics Hardware/Software) www.ultra-scan.com |
536,596 common shares. 107,104 Series A-1 preferred shares. (g) 95,284 Series A-1 preferred shares. |
12/11/92 | 2 | % | 938,164 | 1,203,000 | .18 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal Affiliate Investments |
$ | 5,914,005 | $ | 6,234,557 | $ | .92 | ||||||||||||||||
Control Investments (l) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Advantage 24/7 LLC (g) Williamsville, NY. Marketing program for wine and spirits dealers. (Marketing Company) |
50% Membership interest. | 12/30/10 | 50 | % | $ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | $ | .02 | ||||||||||||
Gemcor II, LLC (e)(g)(h) West Seneca, NY. Designs and sells automatic riveting machines used in the assembly of aircraft components. (Manufacturing) www.gemcor.com |
$500,000 subordinated promissory note at 15% due December 1, 2014. 25 membership units. Warrant to purchase 6.25 membership units. | 6/28/04 | 31 | % | 871,965 | 6,071,965 | .90 | |||||||||||||||
G-TEC Natural Gas Systems Buffalo, NY. Manufactures and distributes systems that allow natural gas to be used as an alternative fuel to gases. (Manufacturing) www.gas-tec.com |
21.6% Class A membership interest. 8% cumulative dividend. | 8/31/99 | 22 | % | 400,000 | 100,000 | .01 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal Control Investments |
$ | 1,371,965 | $ | 6,271,965 | $ | .93 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Investments |
Various | $ | 524,851 | $ | 96,341 | $ | 0 | |||||||||||||||
| Total portfolio investments | $ | 12,112,105 | $ | 20,068,121 | $ | 2.94 | ||||||||||||||||
8
Table of Contents
RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2011 (Continued)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2011 (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
| (a) | At June 30, 2011 restricted securities represented 100% of the value of the investment
portfolio. Restricted securities are subject to one or more restrictions on resale and are not
freely marketable. Freed Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs PC has not examined the business descriptions of
the portfolio companies. Individual securities with values less than $100,000 are included in
“Other Investments.” |
|
| (b) | The Date Acquired column indicates the year in which the Corporation acquired its first
investment in the company or a predecessor company. Freed Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs, PC has not
audited the date acquired of the portfolio companies. |
|
| (c) | The equity percentages estimate the Corporation’s ownership interest in the portfolio
investment. The estimated ownership is calculated based on the percent of outstanding voting
securities held by the Corporation or the potential percentage of voting securities held by the
Corporation upon exercise of warrants or conversion of debentures, or other available data. Freed
Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs, PC has not audited the equity percentages of the portfolio companies.
The symbol “<1%” indicates that the Corporation holds an equity interest of less than one
percent. |
|
| (d) | The Corporation uses Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 “Fair Value Measurements”
which defines fair value and establishes guidelines for measuring fair value. At June 30, 2011, ASC
820 designates all of the Corporation’s investments as “Level 3” assets due to their privately held
restricted nature. Under the valuation policy of the Corporation, unrestricted securities are
valued at the closing price for publicly held securities for the last three days of the month.
Restricted securities are subject to restrictions on resale, and are valued at fair value as
determined by the management of the Corporation and submitted to the Board of Directors for
approval. Fair value is considered to be the amount which the Corporation may reasonably expect to
receive for portfolio securities when sold on the valuation date. Valuations as of any particular
date, however, are not necessarily indicative of amounts which may ultimately be realized as a
result of future sales or other dispositions of securities and these favorable or unfavorable
differences could be material. Among the factors considered in determining the fair value of
restricted securities are the financial condition and operating results, projected operations, and
other analytical data relating to the investment. Also considered are the market prices for
unrestricted securities of the same class (if applicable) and other matters which may have an
impact on the value of the portfolio company. |
|
| (e) | These investments are income producing. All other investments are non-income producing.
Income producing investments have generated cash payments of interest or dividends within the last
twelve months. |
|
| (f) | As of June 30, 2011, the total cost of investment securities approximated $12.1 million. Net
unrealized appreciation was approximately $8.0 million, which was comprised of $8.7 million of
unrealized appreciation and $0.7 million of unrealized depreciation. |
|
| (g) | Rand Capital SBIC, Inc. investment. |
|
| (h) | Reduction in cost and value from previously reported balances reflects current principal
repayment. |
|
| (i) | Represents interest due (amounts over $50,000 net of reserves) from investment included
as interest receivable on the Corporation’s Balance Sheet. |
|
| (j) | Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments are investments that are neither Control Investments nor
Affiliated Investments. |
|
| (k) | Affiliate investments are defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940
Act”), as those Non-Control investments in companies in which between 5% and 25% of the voting
securities are owned or Rand holds a Board seat. |
|
| (l) | Control investments are defined by the 1940 Act as investments in companies in which more than
25% of the voting securities are owned or where greater than 50% of the board representation is
maintained. |
9
Table of Contents
Rand Capital Corporation and Subsidiary
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited)
Note 1. ORGANIZATION
Rand Capital Corporation (“Rand”) was incorporated under the laws of New York in 1969.
Beginning in 1971, Rand operated as a publicly traded, closed-end, diversified management company
that was registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). In
2001 Rand elected to be treated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the 1940 Act. In
2002, Rand formed a wholly-owned subsidiary for the purpose of operating it as a small business
investment company (“SBIC”) licensed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”). The
subsidiary received an SBA license to operate as an SBIC in August 2002. The subsidiary, which had
been organized as a Delaware limited partnership, was converted into a New York corporation on
December 31, 2008, at which time its operations as a licensed small business investment company was
continued by the newly formed corporation under the name of Rand Capital SBIC, Inc. (“Rand SBIC”).
The following discussion describes the operations of Rand and its wholly-owned subsidiary Rand SBIC
(collectively, the “Corporation”).
The Corporation is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “Rand”.
SBIC Subsidiary
Since 2002, Rand has operated a wholly-owned SBIC subsidiary in order to have access to the
various forms of leverage provided by the SBA to SBICs. Rand operates Rand SBIC, and Rand formerly
operated the limited partnership SBIC predecessor of Rand SBIC, for the same investment purposes
and with investments in the same kinds of securities as Rand. The operations of the SBIC
predecessor were, and the operations of Rand SBIC are, consolidated with those of Rand for both
financial reporting and tax purposes.
In 2002 Rand and the predecessor SBIC subsidiary filed an initial Exemption Application with
the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) seeking an order for a number of operating exemptions
that the SEC has commonly granted from certain restrictions under the 1940 Act that would otherwise
limit the operations of the wholly-owned subsidiary. After the filing of the Exemption
Application, the Corporation had extensive discussions with the staff of the Division of Investment
Management of the SEC concerning the application. The principal substantive issue in these
discussions was the structure of the predecessor of Rand SBIC as a limited partnership.
Rand formed the predecessor SBIC in 2002 as a limited partnership because that was the
organizational form that the SBA strongly encouraged for all new entities seeking licenses as
SBICs. Rand organized the SBIC subsidiary in a manner that was consistent with the SBA’s model
limited partnership forms for licensed SBICs. In that structure, the general partner of Rand SBIC
was a limited liability company whose managers were the principal executive officers of Rand.
Under the rules and interpretations of the SEC applicable to BDCs (which the subsidiary SBIC
intended to become), if a BDC is structured in limited partnership form, then it must have general
partners who serve as a board of directors, or a general partner with very limited authority and a
separate board of directors, all of the persons who serve on the board of directors must be natural
persons, and a majority of the directors must not be “interested persons” of the BDC. Since the
managers of the limited liability company general partner of the SBIC subsidiary were the principal
executive officers of Rand, and since both the limited liability company general partner and the
subsidiary SBIC were wholly-owned by Rand, Rand believed that the board of directors of Rand was
the functional equivalent of a board of
directors for both the general partner limited liability company and for the SBIC limited
partnership. Nevertheless, the staff of the Division of Investment Management of the SEC maintained
the view that if the limited partnership subsidiary was to be operated as a limited partnership BDC
in compliance with the 1940 Act, then the organizational documents of the limited partnership would
have to specifically provide that it would have a board of directors consisting of natural persons,
a majority of whom would not be “interested persons.”
10
Table of Contents
With the approval of the SBA, effective December 31, 2008 Rand merged the Rand SBIC limited
partnership into a corporation whose board of directors is the same as that of Rand. The SBA
formally approved the re-licensing of the new corporation as an SBIC in February 2009. As a result
of the merger, Rand SBIC is a wholly-owned corporate subsidiary of Rand, and its board of directors
is comprised of the directors of Rand, a majority of whom are not “interested persons” of Rand or
Rand SBIC.
Following this merger, in February 2009 the Corporation filed a new Exemption Application with
the SEC, which was amended in August 2009. As amended, the Exemption Application seeks an order
under Sections 6(c), 12(d)(1)(J), 57(c), and 57(i) of, and Rule 17d-1 under, the 1940 Act for
exemptions from the application of Sections 12(d)(1), 18(a), 21(b), 57(a)(1), (2), (3), and (4),
and 61(a) of the 1940 Act to certain aspects of its operations. The application also seeks an
order under Section 12(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Act (the “Exchange Act”) for an
exemption from separate reporting requirements for Rand SBIC under Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act. In general, the Corporation’s application seeks exemptions that would permit:
| • | Rand and Rand SBIC to engage in certain related party transactions that the
Corporation would otherwise be permitted to engage in as a BDC if its component parts
were organized as a single corporation; |
| • | Rand, as a BDC, and Rand SBIC, as its BDC/SBIC subsidiary, to meet asset coverage
requirements for senior securities on a consolidated basis; and |
| • | Rand SBIC, as a BDC/SBIC subsidiary of Rand as a BDC, to file Exchange Act reports
on a consolidated basis as part of Rand’s Exchange Act reports. |
The SEC has recently granted exemptions in response to other companies’ applications that
reflected similar issues and factual circumstances, and Rand believes that it will receive the
exemptions it has requested for the operation of Rand SBIC as a BDC subsidiary of Rand.
Although Rand SBIC is operated as if it were a BDC, it is currently registered as an
investment company under the 1940 Act. If the Corporation receives the exemptions described above,
Rand SBIC intends to promptly file an election to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act.
Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation — In Management’s opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial
statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in audited annual financial statements prepared
in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), have been
omitted; however, the Corporation believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading. The interim results for the three and six months ending June
30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
11
Table of Contents
These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
the notes included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010. Information contained in this filing should also be reviewed in conjunction with the
Corporation’s related filings with the SEC prior to the date of this report. Those filings
include, but are not limited to, the following:
N-54A
|
Election to Adopt Business Development Company status | |
DEF-14A
|
Definitive Proxy Statement submitted to shareholders | |
Form 10-K
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 | |
Form 10-Q
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2011, September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 | |
Form N-23C-1
|
Reports by closed-end investment companies of purchases of their own securities |
The Corporation’s website is www.randcapital.com. The Corporation’s annual report
on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, charters for the
Corporation’s Board committees and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) are available through the Corporation’s website.
Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Rand and its wholly-owned subsidiary Rand SBIC, (collectively, the “Corporation”). All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassification — Certain prior year amounts in the stockholders’ equity section of the
“Statement of Financial Position” have been reclassified to reflect the income tax effect which is
consistent with the presentation on the “Statement of Operations”.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — Temporary cash investments having a maturity of three months or
less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents.
Revenue Recognition — Interest Income — Interest income generally is recognized on
the accrual basis except where the investment is in default or otherwise presumed to be in doubt.
In such cases, interest is recognized at the time of receipt. A reserve for possible losses on
interest receivable is maintained when appropriate.
The Rand SBIC interest accrual is also regulated by the SBA’s “Accounting Standards and
Financial Reporting Requirements for Small Business Investment Companies.” Under these rules
interest income cannot be recognized if collection is doubtful, and a 100% reserve must be
established. The collection of interest is presumed to be in doubt when there is substantial doubt
about a portfolio company’s ability to continue as a going concern or the loan is in default more
than 120 days. Management also uses other qualitative and quantitative measures to determine the
value of a portfolio investment and the collectability of any accrued interest.
Revenue Recognition — Dividend Income — The Corporation may receive distributions
from portfolio companies that are limited liability companies and corporations and these
distributions are classified as dividend income on the statement of operations. Dividend income is
recognized on an accrual basis when it can be reasonably estimated.
Original Issue Discount — Investments may include “original issue
discount” or OID income. This occurs when the Corporation purchases a warrant and a note from a
portfolio company simultaneously, which requires an allocation of a portion of the purchase price
to the warrant and reduces the note or debt instrument by an equal amount in the form of a note
discount or OID. The note is reported net of the OID and the OID is amortized into interest income
over the life of the loan. The Corporation recognized $37,000 in OID income for the six months
ended June 30, 2011. The Corporation recorded no OID income for the six months ended June 30,
2010.
12
Table of Contents
Deferred Debenture Costs — SBA debenture origination and commitment costs, which
are included in other assets, are amortized ratably over the terms of the SBA debentures.
Amortization expense was $17,245 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
SBA Leverage — The Corporation has a total of $10,000,000 in outstanding SBA leverage at June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Net Assets per Share — Net assets per share are based on the number of shares of common stock
outstanding. There are no common stock equivalents.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information — Income taxes (refunded) paid, during the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to ($448,227) and $1,009,195, respectively. Interest paid during
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $275,590 and $239,054, respectively. The
Corporation converted $47,828 and $324,553 of interest receivable into investments during the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Accounting Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Stockholders’ Equity (Net Assets) — At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were 500,000
shares of $10.00 par value preferred stock authorized and unissued.
The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 340,946 shares of the
Corporation’s outstanding common stock on the open market through October 21, 2011 at prices that
are no greater than current net asset value. During 2003 and 2002 the Corporation purchased 44,100
shares of its stock for $47,206. No additional shares have been repurchased since 2003.
Profit Sharing and Stock Option Plan — In 2001 the stockholders of the Corporation authorized
the establishment of an Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”). The Option Plan provides
for the award of options to purchase up to 200,000 common shares to eligible employees. In 2002
the Corporation placed the Option Plan on inactive status as it developed a new profit sharing plan
for the Corporation’s employees in connection with the formation of its SBIC subsidiary. As of
June 30, 2011, no stock options had been awarded under the Option Plan. Because Section 57(n) of
the 1940 Act prohibits maintenance of a profit sharing plan for the officers and employees of a BDC
where any option, warrant or right is outstanding under an executive compensation plan, no options
will be granted under the Option Plan while any profit sharing plan is in effect with respect to
the Corporation.
In 2002 the Corporation established a Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”) for its executive
officers in accordance with Section 57(n) of the 1940 Act. Under the Plan, the Corporation will pay
its executive officers aggregate profit sharing payments equal to 12% of the net realized capital
gains of its SBIC subsidiary, net of all realized capital losses and unrealized depreciation of the
SBIC subsidiary, for the fiscal year, computed in accordance with the Plan and the Corporation’s
interpretation of the Plan. Any profit sharing paid or accrued cannot exceed 20% of the
Corporation’s net income, as defined. The profit sharing payments will be split equally between
the Corporation’s two executive officers, who are fully vested in the Plan. There were no
contributions to the Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010. During the year ended
December 31, 2010 the Corporation approved and accrued $584,634 under the profit sharing plan, of
which $568,694 was paid during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The remaining $15,940 is
related to an escrow receivable and will be paid when the escrow is collected. During the year
ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation approved and accrued $133,013 under the Plan which was
paid during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The amounts approved do not exceed the defined
limits.
13
Table of Contents
Income Taxes — The Corporation reviews the tax positions taken to determine if they meet a
“more likely than not threshold” for the benefit of the tax position to be recognized in the
financial statements. A tax position that fails to meet the more likely than not recognition
threshold will result in the recording of either a reduction of an income tax receivable or a
deferred tax asset, or an income tax payable or a deferred tax liability.
There have been no changes in liabilities recorded for uncertain tax positions in the first
half of 2011 and the Corporation does not expect that the amounts of uncertain tax positions will
change significantly within the next 12 months.
It is the Corporation’s policy to include interest and penalties related to income tax
liabilities in income tax expense. There were no amounts recognized for interest or penalties
related to unrecognized tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
The Corporation is currently open to audit under the statute of
limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ending December 31, 2007 through 2010. In
general, the Corporation’s state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of
limitations for the years ended December 31, 2006 through 2010.
Concentration of Credit Risk — At June 30, 2011 Gemcor II, LLC (Gemcor), Synacor Inc.
(Synacor), Microcision, LLC (Microcision) and Carolina Skiff LLC (Carolina Skiff) represent 30%,
21%, 8% and 7%, respectively, of the fair value of the Corporation’s investment portfolio.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements— In May, 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820):
Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). This update results in common principles and
requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements
in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 is required to be applied prospectively in
interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application is not permitted.
Management is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have and does
not believe the adoption will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. INVESTMENTS
Investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the management of the
Corporation and submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. The Corporation invests in loan
instruments, debt instruments, and equity instruments. There is no single standard for determining
fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to
the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistent
valuation process for each investment. The Corporation analyzes and values each investment
quarterly, and records unrealized depreciation for an investment that it believes has become
impaired, including where collection of a loan or realization of the recorded value of an equity
security is doubtful. Conversely, the Corporation will record unrealized appreciation if it
believes that an underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, its equity
security has also appreciated in value. These estimated fair values may differ from the values
that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed and these differences
could be material if our assumptions and judgments differ from results of actual liquidation
events.
In September 2006 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance on Fair
Value Measurements. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. On January 1, 2008, the
Corporation adopted ASC 820.
14
Table of Contents
The Corporation uses several approaches to determine the fair value of an investment. The main
approaches are:
| • | Loan and debt securities are generally valued at the price the security would
command in order to provide a yield to maturity equivalent to the current yield of
similar debt securities. A loan or debt instrument may be reduced in value if it is
judged to be of poor quality and collection is in doubt. A loan or debt security may
also be valued based on the estimated proceeds from the sale of a portfolio company
at its estimated fair value. |
| • | Equity securities may be valued using the “market approach” or “income approach.”
The market approach uses observable prices and other relevant information generated
by similar market transactions. It may include the use of market multiples derived
from a set of comparables to assist in pricing the investment. Additionally, the
Corporation adjusts valuations if a subsequent significant equity financing has
occurred that includes a meaningful portion of the financing by a sophisticated,
unrelated new investor. The income approach employs a cash flow and discounting
methodology to value an investment. |
ASC 820 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, used in the
Corporation’s valuation at the measurement date. |
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices
for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other
observable inputs other than quoted prices. |
||
Level 3: Unobservable and significant inputs to determining the fair value. |
Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement, which is not necessarily an indication of
risks associated with the investment.
Any changes in estimated fair value are recorded in our statement of operations as “Net
increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation.”
In the valuation process, the Corporation uses financial information from its portfolio
companies, which includes both audited and unaudited financial statements, annual projections and
budgets prepared by the portfolio company and other financial and non-financial business
information supplied by the portfolio companies’ management. This information is used to determine
financial condition, performance, and valuation of the portfolio companies. The valuation may be
reduced if a company’s performance and potential have deteriorated significantly. If the factors
which led to the reduction in valuation are overcome, the valuation may be restored.
Another key factor used in valuing equity investments is recent arms-length equity
transactions with unrelated new investors entered into by the portfolio company. Many times the
terms of these equity transactions may not be identical to the equity transactions between the
portfolio company and the Corporation, and the impact of the discrepancy in transaction terms on
the market value of the portfolio company may be difficult or impossible to quantify.
At June 30, 2011 all of the Corporation’s investments are classified in Level 3 due to their
privately held restricted nature.
15
Table of Contents
Loan investments are defined as traditional loan financings with no equity features. Debt
investments are defined as debt financings that include one or more equity features such as
conversion
rights, stock purchase warrants, and/or stock purchase options. A financing may also be
categorized as a debt financing if it is accompanied by the direct purchase of an equity interest
in the company.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
| Fair Value Measurements at Reported Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
| Quoted Prices in | Significant | Other Significant | ||||||||||||||
| Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
| Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
| Description | June 30, 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Loan investments |
$ | 371,964 | — | — | $ | 371,964 | ||||||||||
Debt investments |
3,378,654 | — | — | 3,378,654 | ||||||||||||
Equity investments |
16,317,503 | — | — | 16,317,503 | ||||||||||||
Total Venture
Capital Investments |
$ | 20,068,121 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 20,068,121 | ||||||||
| Fair Value Measurements at Reported Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
| Quoted Prices in | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
| Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
| December 31, | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
| Description | 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Loan investments |
$ | 413,596 | — | — | $ | 413,596 | ||||||||||
Debt investments |
3,595,327 | — | — | 3,595,327 | ||||||||||||
Equity investments |
15,355,702 | — | — | 15,355,702 | ||||||||||||
Total Venture
Capital Investments |
$ | 19,364,625 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 19,364,625 | ||||||||
16
Table of Contents
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
| Fair Value Measurements Using Significant | ||||||||||||||||
| Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Venture Capital Investments | ||||||||||||||||
| Loan | Debt | Equity | ||||||||||||||
| Description | Investments | Investments | Investments | Total | ||||||||||||
Beginning Balance, December 31,
2010, of Level 3 Assets |
$ | 413,596 | $ | 3,595,327 | $ | 15,355,702 | $ | 19,364,625 | ||||||||
Realized Gains or Losses included
in net change in net assets from
operations |
||||||||||||||||
Associates Interactive (Associates) |
— | — | (293,518 | ) | (293,518 | ) | ||||||||||
Niagara Dispensing Technologies,
Inc. (Niagara Dispensing) |
— | (498,828 | ) | (1,281,784 | ) | (1,780,612 | ) | |||||||||
Total Realized Losses |
— | (498,828 | ) | (1,575,302 | ) | (2,074,130 | ) | |||||||||
Unrealized gains or losses included
in net change in net assets from
operations |
||||||||||||||||
Associates |
— | — | 293,519 | 293,519 | ||||||||||||
Liazon Corporation (Liazon) |
— | — | 141,801 | 141,801 | ||||||||||||
Niagara Dispensing |
— | 447,328 | 1,281,784 | 1,729,112 | ||||||||||||
Total Unrealized Gains and Losses |
— | 447,328 | 1,717,104 | 2,164,432 | ||||||||||||
Purchases of Securities/Changes to
Securities/Non-cash conversions |
||||||||||||||||
Chequed.com, Inc. (Chequed) |
— | 250,000 | — | 250,000 | ||||||||||||
Microcision LLC (Microcision) |
— | 47,827 | — | 47,827 | ||||||||||||
Liazon |
— | 37,000 | 819,999 | 856,999 | ||||||||||||
Total Purchases/Changes to
Securities and Non- Cash
conversions |
— | 334,827 | 819,999 | 1,154,826 | ||||||||||||
Repayments of Securities |
||||||||||||||||
Gemcor II, LLC (Gemcor) |
(41,632 | ) | — | — | (41,632 | ) | ||||||||||
Liazon |
— | (500,000 | ) | — | (500,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Repayments of Securities |
(41,632 | ) | (500,000 | ) | — | (541,632 | ) | |||||||||
Transfers within Level 3 |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Transfers in or out of Level 3 |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Ending Balance, June 30, 2011, of
Level 3 Assets |
$ | 371,964 | $ | 3,378,654 | $ | 16,317,503 | $ | 20,068,121 | ||||||||
| Amount of total gains or losses for the period included in changes in net assets attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date and reported within the net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations | $ | 2,164,432 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount of realized losses included in changes in net assets from operations for the period reported above within the net realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations | (2,074,130 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at reporting date | $ | 90,302 | ||||||||||||||
17
Table of Contents
| Fair Value Measurements Using Significant | ||||||||||||||||
| Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Venture Capital Investments | ||||||||||||||||
| Loan | Debt | Equity | ||||||||||||||
| Description | Investments | Investments | Investments | Total | ||||||||||||
Beginning Balance, December 31, 2009,
of Level 3 Assets |
$ | 488,104 | $ | 3,487,120 | $ | 20,290,423 | $ | 24,265,647 | ||||||||
Realized Gains or Losses included in
net change in net assets from
operations |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gains or losses included
in net change in net assets from
operations |
||||||||||||||||
SOMS Technologies, LLC (SOMS) |
— | — | 55,313 | 55,313 | ||||||||||||
Niagara Dispensing Technologies,
Inc. (Niagara Dispensing) |
— | — | (100,000 | ) | (100,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Innov-X Systems, Inc. (Innovex) |
— | — | (700,000 | ) | (700,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Unrealized Gains and Losses |
— | — | (744,687 | ) | (744,687 | ) | ||||||||||
Purchases of Securities/Changes to
Securities/Non-cash conversions |
||||||||||||||||
Microcision LLC (Microcision) |
— | 877,048 | — | 877,048 | ||||||||||||
Mid America Brick (Mid America) |
— | — | 800,000 | 800,000 | ||||||||||||
GridApp Systems Inc. (GridApp) |
— | — | 481,774 | 481,774 | ||||||||||||
Rheonix, Inc. (Rheonix) |
— | — | 250,000 | 250,000 | ||||||||||||
Niagara Dispensing |
— | 222,753 | — | 222,753 | ||||||||||||
EmergingMed.com, Inc. (Emerging Med) |
— | 216,712 | — | 216,712 | ||||||||||||
Mezmeriz, Inc. (Mezmeriz) |
— | — | 21,509 | 21,509 | ||||||||||||
Carolina Skiff LLC (Carolina Skiff) |
— | 18,861 | — | 18,861 | ||||||||||||
SOMS |
— | 15,897 | — | 15,897 | ||||||||||||
Total Purchases/Changes to Securities
and Non- Cash conversions |
— | 1,351,271 | 1,553,283 | 2,904,554 | ||||||||||||
Repayments of Securities |
||||||||||||||||
Gemcor II, LLC (Gemcor) |
(35,865 | ) | (35,781 | ) | — | (71,646 | ) | |||||||||
Total Repayments of Securities |
(35,865 | ) | (35,781 | ) | — | (71,646 | ) | |||||||||
Transfers within Level 3 |
— | (1,270,687 | ) | 1,270,687 | — | |||||||||||
Transfers in or out of Level 3 |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Ending Balance, June 30, 2010, of
Level 3 Assets |
$ | 452,239 | $ | 3,531,923 | $ | 22,369,706 | $ | 26,353,868 | ||||||||
| The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date. | $ | (744,687 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in Net decrease in net assets from operations for the period above are reported as follows: | ||||||||||||||||
| Net Gain (Loss) on Sales and Dispositions | — | |||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at reporting date | $ | (744,687 | ) | |||||||||||||
18
Table of Contents
Note 4. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following schedule provides the financial highlights, calculated based on weighted average
shares outstanding, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010:
| Six months ended | Year ended | |||||||
| June 30, 2011 | December 31, | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | 2010 | |||||||
Income from investment operations (1): |
||||||||
Investment income |
$ | 0.07 | $ | 0.12 | ||||
Expenses |
0.13 | 0.34 | ||||||
Investment loss before income taxes |
(0.06 | ) | (0.22 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
(0.02 | ) | (0.08 | ) | ||||
Net investment loss |
(0.04 | ) | (0.14 | ) | ||||
Net realized and unrealized (loss) gain on investments |
0.01 | 0.12 | ||||||
Decrease in net asset value |
(0.03 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||
Net asset value, beginning of period, based on weighted average
shares |
3.38 | 3.40 | ||||||
Net asset value, end of period, based on weighted average shares |
$ | 3.35 | $ | 3.38 | ||||
Per share market price, end of period |
$ | 2.90 | $ | 3.23 | ||||
Total return based on market value |
(10.22 | )% | (18.84 | %) | ||||
Total return based on net asset value |
(0.82 | )% | (0.67 | )% | ||||
Supplemental data: |
||||||||
Ratio of expenses before income taxes to average net assets |
3.77 | % | 10.24 | % | ||||
Ratio of expenses including taxes to average net assets |
3.17 | % | 7.87 | % | ||||
Ratio of net investment loss to average net assets |
(1.09 | )% | (4.21 | )% | ||||
Portfolio turnover |
5.9 | % | 16.5 | % | ||||
Net assets, end of period |
$ | 22,862,507 | $ | 23,050,818 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding, end of period |
6,818,934 | 6,818,934 | ||||||
| (1) | Per share data are based on weighted average shares outstanding and the results are
rounded |
The Corporation’s interim period results could fluctuate as a result of a number of
factors; therefore results for any one interim period should not be relied upon as being indicative
of performance in future periods.
19
Table of Contents
| Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this report.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this document that do not relate to present or
historical conditions are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of that term in Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and in Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Additional oral or written forward-looking statements may be made by the Corporation from time to
time and those statements may be included in documents that are filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could
cause results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements relating to the
Corporation’s plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions and are intended to be
made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Words such as “believes,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “possible,” “expects,” “estimates,”
“anticipates,” or “plans” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Among the important factors on which such statements are based are assumptions
concerning the state of the national economy and the local markets in which the Corporation’s
portfolio companies operate, the state of the securities markets in which the securities of the
Corporation’s portfolio companies trade or could be traded, liquidity within the national financial
markets, and inflation. Forward-looking statements are also subject to the risks and uncertainties
described in Part II, Item 1A of this report, the text of which is incorporated herein by
reference.
There may be other factors that we have not identified that affect the likelihood that the
forward-looking statements may prove to be accurate. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks
only as of the date it is made and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update
any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made
or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances. New factors
emerge from time to time that may cause our business not to develop as we expect, and we cannot
predict all of them.
Overview
The following discussion will describe the financial position and operations of Rand Capital
Corporation (Rand) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Rand SBIC, Inc. (Rand SBIC) (collectively, the
“Corporation”).
Rand is incorporated in New York and has elected to operate as a business development company
(“BDC”) under the 1940 Act. Its wholly-owned subsidiary, Rand SBIC, operates as a small business
investment company (“SBIC”) regulated by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”). The
Corporation anticipates that most, if not all, of its investments in the next year will be
originated through the SBIC subsidiary.
20
Table of Contents
Business Developments
During the first six months of 2011 the economy continued to improve following the recession
that ended in late 2009. Despite a continued improvement in the economy over the last 18 months,
the recovery may take longer than expected due to the persistently weak labor market and continued
tight credit market, particularly for small businesses. To the extent financial market conditions
continue to improve, the Corporation believes its financial condition and the financial condition
of the portfolio companies should continue to improve as well. It remains difficult to forecast
when future exits will happen.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Corporation prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which require the use of estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. A summary of our critical accounting
policies can be found in the Corporation’s December 31, 2010 Form 10-K under Item 7 “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.
21
Table of Contents
Financial Condition
Overview:
| 6/30/11 | 12/31/10 | Decrease | % Decrease | |||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 34,735,464 | $ | 35,091,260 | $ | (355,796 | ) | (1.0 | %) | |||||||
Total liabilities |
11,872,957 | 12,040,442 | (167,485 | ) | (1.4 | %) | ||||||||||
Net assets |
$ | 22,862,507 | $ | 23,050,818 | $ | (188,311 | ) | (0.8 | %) | |||||||
The Corporation’s financial condition is dependent on the success of its portfolio holdings.
The following summarizes the Corporation’s investment portfolio at the period-ends indicated.
| (Decrease) | % (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||
| 6/30/11 | 12/31/10 | Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||
Investments, at cost |
$ | 12,112,105 | $ | 13,573,041 | $ | (1,460,936 | ) | (10.8 | %) | |||||||
Unrealized appreciation, net |
7,956,016 | 5,791,584 | 2,164,432 | 37.4 | % | |||||||||||
Investments at fair value |
$ | 20,068,121 | $ | 19,364,625 | $ | 703,496 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||
The change in investments, at cost, is comprised of the following:
| Amount | ||||
New Investments |
||||
Liazon Corporation (Liazon) |
$ | 819,999 | ||
Chequed.com, Inc (Chequed) |
250,000 | |||
Total of new investments during the six months ended
June 30, 2011 |
$ | 1,069,999 | ||
Changes to Investments: |
||||
Microcision LLC (Microcision) interest conversion |
$ | 47,828 | ||
Liazon interest conversion |
37,000 | |||
Total of changes to investments during the six months ended
June 30, 2011 |
$ | 84,828 | ||
Investment Repaid/Sold or Liquidated: |
||||
Niagara Dispensing Technologies, Inc. (Niagara Dispensing) |
$ | (1,780,612 | ) | |
Liazon |
(500,000 | ) | ||
Associates Interactive (Associates) |
(293,519 | ) | ||
Gemcor II, LLC (Gemcor) |
(41,632 | ) | ||
Total of investments repaid, sold or liquidated during
the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
$ | (2,615,763 | ) | |
Total change in investments, at cost,
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
$ | (1,460,936 | ) | |
Net asset value (NAV) was $3.35/share at June 30, 2011 versus $3.38/share at December 31,
2010.
The Corporation’s total investments at fair value, as estimated by management and approved by
the Board of Directors, approximated 88% of net assets at June 30, 2011 compared to 84% of net
assets at December 31, 2010.
Cash and cash equivalents approximated 47% of net assets at June 30, 2011 compared to 51% at
December 31, 2010.
22
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Investment Income
The Corporation’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital appreciation on its
equity investments while maintaining a current cash flow from its debenture and pass through equity
instruments. Therefore, the Corporation invests in a mixture of debenture and equity instruments,
which will provide a current return on a portion of the investment portfolio. The equity features
contained in the Corporation’s investment portfolio are structured to realize capital appreciation
over the long-term and may not generate current income in the form of dividends or interest. In
addition, the Corporation earns interest income from investing its idle funds in money market
instruments held at high grade financial institutions.
Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2011 to the six months ended June 30, 2010
| June 30, | June 30, | Increase | % Increase | |||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||
Interest from portfolio companies |
$ | 379,636 | $ | 334,006 | $ | 45,630 | 13.7 | % | ||||||||
Interest from other investments |
18,081 | 9,189 | 8,892 | 96.8 | % | |||||||||||
Dividend and other investment
income |
70,556 | 36,291 | 34,265 | 94.4 | % | |||||||||||
Other income |
7,580 | 7,328 | 252 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||
Total investment income |
$ | 475,853 | $ | 386,814 | $ | 89,039 | 23.0 | % | ||||||||
Interest from portfolio companies — The portfolio interest income increase is due to the
accretion of $37,000 of Original Issue Discount (OID) income on the Liazon investment. OID income
is created when the Corporation invests in a debenture instrument that has a warrant attached to
the instrument. This transaction requires an allocation of a portion of the investment cost to the
warrant and reduces the debt instrument by an equal amount in the form of a note discount or OID.
The note is then reported net of the discount and the discount is accreted into income over the
life of the debenture instrument. The debt instrument associated with this OID was paid in full
during the second quarter of 2011 and therefore all of the remaining OID was recognized as income.
After reviewing the portfolio companies’ performance and the circumstances surrounding the
investments, the Corporation has ceased accruing interest income on the following investment
instrument:
| Interest | Investment | Year that Interest | ||||||||||
| Company | Rate | Cost | Accrual Ceased | |||||||||
G-Tec Natural Gas Systems (G-Tec) |
8 | % | $ | 400,000 | 2004 | |||||||
Interest from other investments — The increase in interest from other investments is
primarily due to higher cash balances in the current year. The cash balance at June 30, 2011 and
2010 was $10,791,049 and $5,852,822, respectively.
Dividend and other investment income — Dividend income is comprised of distributions from
Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) in which the Corporation has invested. The Corporation’s
investment agreements with certain LLCs require the LLCs to distribute funds to the Corporation for
payment of income taxes on its allocable share of the LLCs profits. These dividends will fluctuate
based upon the profitability of the LLCs and the timing of the distributions. In addition, in the
current year the Corporation has begun to receive dividends from a non-LLC portfolio company.
23
Table of Contents
Dividend income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 consisted of a distribution from New
Monarch Machine Tool, Inc. (Monarch) for $66,239 and Carolina Skiff LLC (Carolina Skiff) for
$4,317. The Corporation exited its debt investment in Monarch in 2008 and still retains a small
ownership in the company. Monarch started distributing its profits to its investors during 2011.
Dividend income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 consisted of a distribution from Somerset
Gas Transmission Company (Somerset) for $32,191 and Gemcor II, LLC (Gemcor) for $4,100.
Other income — Other income consists of the revenue associated with the amortization of
financing fees charged to the portfolio companies upon successful closing of Rand SBIC financings.
SBA regulations limit the amount of fees that can be charged to a portfolio company, and the
Corporation typically charges 1% to 3% to the portfolio concerns. These fees are amortized ratably
over the life of the instrument associated with the fees. The unamortized fees are carried on the
balance sheet under “Deferred revenue”. In addition, other income includes fees charged by the
Corporation to its portfolio companies for attendance at the portfolio companies’ board meetings.
The income associated with the amortization of financing fees was $1,550 and $1,328 for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The annualized financing fee income based
on the existing portfolio will be approximately $4,500 for the remainder of 2011 and $100 in 2012.
The income associated with board attendance fees was $6,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010.
Operating Expenses
Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2011 to the six months ended June 30, 2010
| June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | Decrease | % Decrease | |||||||||||||
Total Expenses |
$ | 864,983 | $ | 864,238 | $ | (745 | ) | 0.0 | % | |||||||
Operating expenses predominately consist of interest expense on outstanding SBA borrowings,
compensation expense, and general and administrative expenses including shareholder and office
expenses and professional fees.
Net Realized Gains and Losses on Investments
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporation recognized a realized loss of
($1,780,612) on Niagara Dispensing and a loss of ($293,519) on Associates Interactive LLC
(Associates).
The Corporation recognized a realized loss of ($1,780,612) on its investment in Niagara
Dispensing Technologies, Inc. after the company was sold during the second quarter of 2011. As part
of the sale proceeds, the Corporation was given a multi-year royalty on future product sales. The
Corporation evaluated the new entity’s business projections and determined that its investment has
a value of $73,500 at June 30, 2011. Associates ceased doing business in the first quarter of 2011.
There were no realized gains or losses during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
24
Table of Contents
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation of Investments
The Corporation recorded a net increase in unrealized appreciation on investments of
$2,164,432 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and a decrease of ($743,162) during the six
months ended June 30, 2010.
The increase in unrealized appreciation of $2,164,432 for the six months ended June 30, 2011
was comprised of the following items:
| June 30, 2011 | ||||
Reclass Niagara Dispensing to realized loss |
$ | 1,729,112 | ||
Reclass Associates to a realized loss |
293,519 | |||
Liazon |
141,801 | |||
Total change in net unrealized appreciation
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
$ | 2,164,432 | ||
In accordance with its valuation policy, the Corporation increased the value of its holdings
in Liazon based on a significant equity financing during the second quarter of 2011 by a new
non-strategic outside investor that had a higher valuation for this portfolio company.
The decrease in unrealized appreciation of ($743,162) for the six months ended June 30, 2010
was comprised of the following items:
| June 30, 2010 | ||||
SOMS |
$ | 55,313 | ||
Photonics Products Group, Inc (Photonics) |
1,525 | |||
Innov-X Systems, Inc. (Innovex) |
(700,000 | ) | ||
Niagara Dispensing |
(100,000 | ) | ||
Total change in net unrealized appreciation
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 |
$ | (743,162 | ) | |
In accordance with its valuation policy, the Corporation increased the value of its holdings
in SOMS based on a significant equity financing in June 2010 by a new non-strategic outside
investor that resulted in a higher valuation for this portfolio company.
Photonics is a publicly traded stock (NASDAQ symbol: PHPG.OB) and is marked to market at the
end of each quarter.
The Corporation reduced the valuation of its common equity holdings in Innovex by ($700,000)
based on a pending sale of Innovex to Olympus NDT Corporation. After this valuation change, the
Innovex investment was valued at $5,600,000, which is $4,350,000 over the cost basis of $1,250,000.
The sale was completed on July 1, 2010, and the Corporation recognized a realized gain in the third
quarter of 2010.
The Niagara Dispensing investment was written down $100,000 during the six months ended June
30, 2010 after a review by the Corporation’s management of the company’s financials and an analysis
the liquidation preferences of senior securities.
All of these value adjustments resulted from a review by management using the guidance set
forth by ASC 820 and the Corporation’s established valuation policy.
Net Decrease in Net Assets from Operations
The Corporation accounts for its operations under GAAP for investment companies. The principal
measure of its financial performance is “net (decrease) increase in net assets from operations” on
its consolidated statements of operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the net decrease
in net assets from operations was ($188,311) as compared to a net decrease in net assets from
operations of ($823,005) for the same six month period in 2010. The decrease for the six months
ending June 30, 2011 is a result of a ($250,843) net investment loss and a net realized and
unrealized gain, net of tax, of $62,532. The decrease for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was a
result of a ($309,640) net investment loss and a net decrease in unrealized appreciation of
($513,365).
25
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Corporation’s principal objective is to achieve capital appreciation. Therefore, a
significant portion of the investment portfolio is structured to maximize the potential for capital
appreciation and certain portfolio investments may be structured to provide little or no current
yield in the form of dividends or interest payments.
As of June 30, 2011 the Corporation’s total liquidity, consisting of cash and cash
equivalents, was $10,791,049.
Management expects that cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2011, coupled with the scheduled
interest and dividend payments on its portfolio investments, will be sufficient to meet the
Corporation’s cash needs throughout the next twelve months. The Corporation is anticipating
potential exits from portfolio companies to increase the amount of liquidity available, however
these events are difficult to predict with any certainty and are subject to inherent market risks
and volatility.
| Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
The Corporation’s investment activities contain elements of risk. The portion of the
Corporation’s investment portfolio consisting of equity and debt securities in private companies is
subject to valuation risk. Because there is typically no public market for the equity and
equity-linked debt securities in which it invests, the valuation of the equity interests in the
portfolio is stated at “fair value” as determined in good faith by the management of the
Corporation and submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. This is in accordance with the
Corporation’s investment valuation policy. (The discussion of valuation policy contained in “Note
3. — Investments” in the consolidated financial statements contained in Item 1 of this report is
hereby incorporated herein by reference.) In the absence of readily ascertainable market values,
the estimated value of the Corporation’s portfolio may differ significantly from the values that
would be placed on the portfolio if a ready market for the investments existed. Any changes in
valuation are recorded in the Corporation’s consolidated statement of operations as “Net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) on investments.”
At times the Corporation’s portfolio may include marketable securities traded in the
over-the-counter market. In addition, there may be securities in the Corporation’s portfolio for
which no regular trading market exists. In order to realize the full value of a security, the
market must trade in an orderly fashion or a willing purchaser must be available when a sale is to
be made. Should an economic or other event occur that would not allow markets to trade in an
orderly fashion, the Corporation may not be able to realize the fair value of its marketable
investments or other investments in a timely manner.
As of June 30, 2011 the Corporation did not have any off-balance sheet investments or hedging
investments.
| Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Management report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. The Corporation’s internal control system is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management and board of directors
regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
26
Table of Contents
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions
and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the
Corporation; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material
effect on our consolidated financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial
reporting as of June 30, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. Based on its assessment management believes that, as of June 30, 2011, the Corporation’s
internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, no significant changes occurred in our internal
control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
27
Table of Contents
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
OTHER INFORMATION
| Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
None
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010. The Risk Factors from our 2010 report on Form 10-K remains applicable with the
exception of the following additions:
Fluctuations of Quarterly Results
The Corporation’s quarterly operating results could fluctuate as a result of a number of
factors. These factors include, among others, variations in and the timing of the recognition of
realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which portfolio companies encounter
competition in their markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results
for any one quarter should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future
quarters.
| Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None |
| Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities |
None |
| Item 4. | (Removed and Reserved) |
| Item 5. | Other Information |
None |
28
Table of Contents
| Item 6. | Exhibits |
| (a) | Exhibits |
The following exhibits are filed with this report or are incorporated herein by
reference to a prior filing, in accordance with Rule 12b-32 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| (3) | (i) | Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit (a) (1) of Form N-2 filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on April 22, 1997. |
||
| (3) | (ii) | By-laws of the Corporation incorporated by reference to Exhibit (b) of
Form N-2 filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on April 22, 1997. |
||
| (4) | Specimen certificate of common stock certificate,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (b) of Form N-2 filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on April 22, 1997. |
|||
| (10.1) | Employee Stock Option Plan — incorporated by reference to Appendix B to
the Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement filed on June 1, 2002.* |
|||
| (10.2) | Certificate of Incorporation of Rand Merger Corporation as filed by the
NY Department of State on 12/18/08 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit
1(a) to Registration Statement No. 811-22276 on Form N-5 of Rand Capital
SBIC, Inc. filed with the SEC on 2/6/09. |
|||
| (10.3) | By-laws of Rand Capital SBIC, Inc. — incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2 to Registration Statement No. 811-22276 on Form N-5 of Rand
Capital SBIC, Inc. filed with the SEC on 2/6/09. |
|||
| (10.4) | Certificate of Merger of Rand Capital SBIC, L.P. and Rand Capital
Management, LLC into Rand Merger Corporation, as filed by the NY
Department of State on 12/18/08 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit
1(b) to Registration Statement No. 811-22276 on Form N-5 of Rand Capital
SBIC, Inc. filed with the SEC on 2/6/09. |
|||
| (10.5) | Rand Capital Corporation Amended and Restated Profit Sharing Plan
applicable to Rand Capital SBIC, Inc. — incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 7 to Registration Statement No. 811-22276 on Form N-5 of Rand
Capital SBIC, Inc. filed with the SEC on 2/6/09.* |
|||
| (31.1) | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
filed herewith |
|||
| (31.2) | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
filed herewith |
|||
| (32.1) | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
— Rand Capital Corporation — furnished herewith |
|||
| (32.2) | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
— Rand Capital SBIC, Inc. — furnished herewith |
|||
| * | Management contract or compensatory plan. |
29
Table of Contents
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 5, 2011
| RAND CAPITAL CORPORATION | ||||||
| By: | /s/ Allen F. Grum | |||||
| Allen F. Grum, President | ||||||
| By: | /s/ Daniel P. Penberthy | |||||
| Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer | ||||||
| RAND CAPITAL SBIC, INC. | ||||||
| By: | /s/ Allen F. Grum | |||||
| Allen F. Grum, President | ||||||
| By: | /s/ Daniel P. Penberthy | |||||
| Daniel P. Penberthy, Treasurer | ||||||
30