RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the transition period from                     to                  

Commission file number: 001-34852

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(720) 278-2460

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   

x   Yes  o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     x   Yes  o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o       

Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer  o  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  

Smaller reporting company  o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

 o  Yes  x   No

Number of shares of issuer’s common stock outstanding as of August 9, 2013:  44,949,869

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 Page

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

5

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

12

ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCUSSION ABOUT MARKET RISK

15

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

16

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

16

ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

16

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

16

ITEM 2.     UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

16

ITEM 3.     DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

16

ITEM 4.     MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

16

ITEM 5.     OTHER INFORMATION

17

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS

17

SIGNATURES

18

2

Reporting Currency, Financial and Other Information

All amounts in this report are expressed in thousands of United States (“U.S.”) dollars, unless otherwise indicated.  

Financial information is presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).  

References to “Rare Element,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” mean Rare Element Resources Ltd., our predecessors and consolidated subsidiaries, or any one or more of them, as the context requires.

Change in Fiscal Year End

On September 7, 2012, the Company's board of directors approved a change in our fiscal year end from June 30 to December 31, with the change to the calendar year reporting cycle beginning January 1, 2013.  Consequently, we filed a Transition Report on Form 10-K for the six-month transition period ended December 31, 2012.  The intent of the change was to align the reporting of our financial results more closely with our peers.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Such forward-looking statements concern our anticipated results and developments in our operation in future periods, planned exploration and evaluation of our properties, timing for completion of a feasibility study for the Bear Lodge Rare Earth Element (“REE”) Project, our future capital needs and our ability to meet these needs, our ability to obtain additional financing and plans related to our business and other matters that may occur in the future.  These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and the reasonable assumptions of management.  

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect,” “is expected,” “anticipates” or “does not anticipate,” “plans,” “estimates” or “intends,” or stating that certain actions, events or results “may,” “could,” “would,” “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.  

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations and include, among others, the factors referenced in the “Risk Factors” section of our Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, including, without limitation, risks associated with:

·

our history of losses and need for additional financing;

·

our lack of history of producing metals from our mineral properties;

·

numerous uncertainties that could affect the feasibility or profitability of the Bear Lodge REE Project;

·

the exploration, development, permitting and operations of our Bear Lodge REE Project;

·

increased costs affecting our financial condition;

·

fluctuations in demand for, and price of, rare earth products;

·

an extremely volatile rare earth industry;

·

an increase in global supply or predatory pricing and dumping by our competitors, including China;

·

the establishment of new uses and markets of rare earth products;

·

a shortage of equipment and supplies;

·

mining and resource exploration being an inherently dangerous physical activity;

·

operating in the resource industry, which is highly speculative;

·

resource estimates;

·

potentially inadequate insurance for our operations;

·

mineral operations being subject to market forces outside of our control;

·

the permitting, licensing and approval processes for our operations;

·

the governmental and environmental regulations;

·

future legislation regarding the mining industry and climate change;

·

our land reclamation requirements;

·

proposed legislation;

·

competition in the mining and rare earth elements industries;

·

foreign currency fluctuations;

3

·

our dependence on key personnel;

·

the potential difficulty of attracting and retaining qualified personnel;

·

our executive officers and directors may be engaged in other businesses;

·

title in our properties;

·

enforcement of civil liabilities in the United States;

·

our securities; and

·

tax consequences to U.S. shareholders.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report by the foregoing cautionary statements. We advise you to carefully review the reports and documents we file from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), particularly our Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012. The reports and documents filed by us with the SEC are available at www.sec.gov.   

4

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See accompanying notes to consolidated interim financial statements

5

See accompanying notes to consolidated interim financial statements

6

See accompanying notes to consolidated interim financial statements

7

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise noted)

1.

NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Rare Element Resources Ltd. (collectively, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Rare Element” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia on June 3, 1999.

We are currently in the process of exploring and evaluating the Bear Lodge Rare Earth Element (“REE”) Project in Wyoming.  The Bear Lodge REE Project is located within our Bear Lodge Property which also includes the Sundance Gold Project, which is currently inactive.  In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we are an exploration stage entity.  We have completed a pre-feasibility study on the Bear Lodge REE Project and are preparing a feasibility study. To date, we have no revenue from operations and have an accumulated operating deficit of $86,847 of which $45,935 is attributable to the exploration of our mineral interests.

Our continuing operations and the recoverability of the carrying values of our mineral property interests are dependent upon the discovery and development of economic mineral reserves at the Bear Lodge REE Project, our ability to obtain the necessary permits to mine and on future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition of any of our mineral property interests.  Development and/or start-up of the Bear Lodge REE Project is dependent upon our ability to obtain the necessary financing to complete the exploration, development and/or start-up of the Bear Lodge REE Project.  Although we have been successful in raising capital in the past, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so in the future.

A write down in the carrying values of one or more of our mineral properties may be required in the future as a result of events and circumstances, such as our inability to obtain all the necessary permits, changes in the legal status of our mineral properties, government actions, the results of technical evaluation and changes in economic conditions, including the price of rare-earth oxide (“REO”) concentrate and other commodities or input prices.  We regularly evaluate the carrying value of our mineral properties to determine if impairment is required in view of such factors.

2.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

In accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial statements, these consolidated financial statements do not include certain information and note disclosures that are normally included in annual financial statements prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP.  Accordingly, these unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012, which were included in our Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012.  In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which are of a normal, recurring nature) necessary to present fairly in all material respects our financial position as of June 30, 2013 and the results of our operations and cash flows for the six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 in conformity with U.S. GAAP.  Interim results of operations for the six-months ended June 30, 2013 may not be indicative of results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2013.

3.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.  Included, at times, within cash and cash equivalents is an enhanced yield deposit account that contains an embedded derivative in the form of a foreign currency option.  Due to the short-term nature of the option contract and the low volatility between the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar, the liability portion of the derivative instrument is de minimis. U.S. GAAP defines “fair value” as the price that would be received to sell an asset or be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price) and establishes a fair-value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value using the following definitions (from highest to lowest priority):

·

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

·

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

8

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise noted)

·

Level 3 — Prices or valuation techniques requiring inputs that are both significant to the fair-value measurement and unobservable.

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three-months or less to be cash equivalents.  The Company continually monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions with which it invests.  Periodically throughout the year, the Company has maintained balances in various U.S. operating accounts in excess of U.S. federally insured limits.  

The following table presents information about financial instruments recognized at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and indicates the fair value hierarchy:

4.

EQUIPMENT AND LAND

On April 29, 2013, we completed a land acquisition from the State of Wyoming in conjunction with a third party land exchange resulting in an additional 640 acres owned in patent by the Company subject to a royalty retained by the State of Wyoming. The property is immediately adjacent to our mine site and the cash consideration paid was $980.

9

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise noted)

5.

COMMON SHARES

6.

ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL

Stock-based compensation

We have two stock option plans under which options are outstanding and exercisable, namely the Fixed Stock Option Plan and the 10% Rolling Stock Option Plan. The Fixed Stock Option Plan was originally approved by shareholders on December 11, 2002 and subsequently approved by shareholders on December 7, 2009 following certain amendments to the Fixed Stock Option Plan. The Fixed Stock Option Plan expired upon the adoption of the 10% Rolling Stock Option Plan, which was approved by shareholders on December 2, 2011, and as such, we may no longer grant options under the Fixed Stock Option Plan. However, the terms of the Fixed Stock Option Plan continue to govern all prior awards granted under such plan until such awards have been cancelled, forfeited or exercised in accordance with the terms thereof.  As of June 30, 2013, we had 2,465,000 options outstanding under our Fixed Stock Option Plan, as amended, and 1,850,400 options outstanding under our 10% Rolling Stock Option Plan.

The fair value of each employee stock option award is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and our common shares price on the date of grant. The significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options awarded during the six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 using the Black-Scholes model are as follows:

The compensation expense recognized in our consolidated financial statements for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 for stock option awards was $379 and $954, respectively, and $1,889 and $4,716 for the same periods in 2012.  As of June 30, 2013, there was $447 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining vesting period of 0.4 years.

10

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise noted)

The following table summarizes our stock option activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013:

7.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Our commitments and contingencies include the following items:

Potential environmental contingency

Our mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment.  These laws and regulations are continually changing and generally becoming more restrictive.  We conduct our operations so as to protect public health and the environment, and believe our operations are materially in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.  We have made, and expect to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations.  The ultimate amount of reclamation and other future site-restoration costs to be incurred for existing mining interests is uncertain.

8.

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, supplemental cash flow items consisted of interest received of $478.  For the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, the only supplemental cash flow item was interest received of $252.

11

ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following management’s discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial results and condition of Rare Element Resources Ltd. (collectively, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Rare Element” or the “Company”) for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 has been prepared based on information available to us as of August 9, 2013. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included herewith and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Rare Element for the period ended December 31, 2012 and the related notes thereto filed with our Transition Report on Form 10-K, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). All amounts stated herein are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions.  Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth elsewhere in this report. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

All currency amounts are expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted.  

Introduction

Presently, we are focused on exploring and evaluating the Bear Lodge Rare Earth Element (“REE”) Project located near Sundance, Wyoming. We plan to develop and produce rare earth elements from the Bear Lodge REE Project, subject to obtaining, among other things, a positive feasibility study, the necessary mining permits and the necessary financing to construct the mine and processing facilities.  We also, in the future, may potentially acquire advanced stage REE projects.  As of June 30, 2013, we were considered an exploration stage entity under U.S. GAAP due to the lack of reserves reported under SEC Industry Guide 7.  However, we have updated and reported mineral resources that are National Instrument 43-101 compliant. These resources will be incorporated into our planned feasibility study on the Bear Lodge REE Project.

Outlook

We have sufficient cash on hand to conduct our exploration and evaluation plans through 2014. Our plans for Bear Lodge REE Project over the next twelve months include the following activities:

·

Begin a feasibility study in 2013 that is expected to be complete during 2014.

·

Build and run a pilot plant during the second half of 2013 to test the updated metallurgical process consisting of hydrochloric acid leaching at moderate temperatures, selective precipitation of REEs with oxalic acid, and calcination of REE oxalates at elevated temperature to produce a high-purity (over 90 percent) mixed rare earth oxide (“REO”) powder.

·

Drill targeted at the zones of heavy rare earth element (“HREE”) enrichment to upgrade and expand the Whitetail Ridge resource area. Additional infill drilling to expand the high-grade core of the Bull Hill deposit in support of the feasibility study is currently being evaluated.

·

Continue geological mapping, geochemical sampling and geophysical surveys over selected areas in order to better delineate current target areas and identify new targets for economic HREE-enriched mineralization.

·

Continue to advance discussions with potential customers and technology partners to further our understanding of the forms of rare earth products with the highest demand and value.

·

Conduct engineering trade-off studies to optimize production rates and maximize profitability and efficiencies of the project. One of the models under review is an evaluation of an initial high-grade, lower ore production scenario that would expand plant capacity after several years when demand is projected to be sufficient to support the additional supply.  This would reduce upfront capital costs and boost early economic returns on the project.

·

Advance permitting by entering into the formal National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Impact Study process as soon as possible within the framework processes of the U.S. Forest Service.

12

·

Start the formal permitting process with both the Land Quality Division and the Industrial Siting Division of the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality as soon as possible within the framework of the process.

·

Extend the option on the purchase of up to 840 acres of private land in Upton, Wyoming, where we intend to build the hydromet facilities.

Results of Operations

Summary

Our consolidated net loss for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 was $5,257 or $0.12 per share compared with our consolidated net loss of $8,615 or $0.19 per share for the same period in 2012, which is a decrease of $3,358. Our consolidated net loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 was $9,652 or $0.21 per share compared with our consolidated net loss of $13,932 or $0.31 per share for the same period in 2012, which is a decrease of $4,280.

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with the same period in 2012, the decrease in consolidated net loss was primarily the result of a decrease in stock based compensation of $1,510, a decrease in the write-down of mineral properties of $943 and a decrease in the loss on currency translation of $700.

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012, the decrease in consolidated net loss was primarily the result of a decrease in corporate administration costs of $4,341 (of which $3,762 related to stock based compensation), a decrease in the write-down of mineral properties of $943 and a decrease in exploration and evaluation expense of $519.  These decreases were partially offset by an increase in the loss on currency translation of $1,573.

Exploration and evaluation

Exploration costs were $2,917 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with $2,776 for the same period in 2012, which is an increase of $141.  The increase was primarily the result of metallurgical costs in 2013 not incurred during 2012 offset by decreased exploration costs within the respective periods.  Metallurgical costs include those costs associated with studying our proprietary oxalate process, ore recoveries, characterization, and separation.

Exploration costs were $4,856 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with $5,375 for the same period in 2012, which is a decrease of $519. The decrease was mostly the result of spending on the pre-feasibility study completed during 2012.  Similar costs were not incurred during the six-month period in 2013.

Corporate administration

Corporate administration costs decreased to $1,721 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared with $3,652 for the same period in 2012, a decrease of $1,931. The decrease from the prior period was primarily due to a decrease in stock-based compensation expense. The decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $1,510 was primarily the result of historically declining stock prices, which determine the strike price of the grant and are a significant driver of the expense to be incurred (as measured on the grant date).

Corporate administration costs decreased to $3,415 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, as compared with $7,756 for the same period in 2012, a decrease of $4,341. The decrease from the prior period was primarily due to a decrease in stock-based compensation expense. The decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $3,762 was primarily the result of historically declining stock prices, which determine the strike price of the grant and are a significant driver of the expense to be incurred (as measured on the grant date).

Non-operating income and expenses

Interest income

Interest income decreased to $78 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with $175 for the same period in 2012, a decrease of $97. Interest income decreased to $175 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with $326 for the same period in 2012, a decrease of $151. The decreases in interest income from the prior period is attributable to decreased average cash balances held in interest bearing accounts during the periods as compared with the prior year.

13

Gain/(loss) on currency translation

We report our financial statements in U.S. dollars. Therefore, any foreign currencies owned are converted to U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate. We hold a significant amount of Canadian dollars in Canadian and U.S. banks as a result of past financings that were denominated in Canadian dollars. We continue to hold Canadian dollars due to higher investment returns and as a hedge against Canadian dollar spending.  As the majority of our expenses are in U.S. dollars, we have converted Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars during the past quarter and will continue to do so as market opportunities present more favorable conversion rates. A strengthening Canadian dollar will result in gains and a weakening Canadian dollar will result in losses as long as we continue to hold Canadian dollars.  

The loss on currency translation was $684 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with a loss of $1,384 for the same period in 2012, a decrease in loss of $700.  The difference is primarily caused by a change in cash balances held in Canadian dollars at the respective period ends.  The translated cash balance at June 30, 2013 was approximately $18,481 CAD as compared with $43,681 CAD as of June 30, 2012. The Canadian dollar weakened by 3.3% against the U.S. dollar over the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared to a 2.5% weakening during the same period in 2012.

The loss on currency translation was $1,505 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with a gain of $68 for the same period in 2012, an increase in loss of $1,573.  The Canadian dollar weakened by 5.5% against the U.S. dollar over the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with a 0.3% weakening during the same period in 2012.

Unrealized gain/(loss) on derivatives

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, unrealized gain on derivatives was $85 compared with an unrealized gain of $23 for the same period in 2012, an increase of $62. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, unrealized gain on derivatives was $135 compared with an unrealized loss of $138 for the same period in 2012, an increase of $273. The changes are attributable to differences in market conditions affecting the financial instruments as well as the types of instruments outstanding during the respective periods.  The company’s marketable securities, which were marked-to-market with changes affecting the loss/gain on derivatives, settled during the first quarter of 2013, whereas they were outstanding during the entire six-month period of 2012 accounting for much of the loss during that period.

Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $10,014 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with $8,271 for the same period in 2012.  The increase of $1,743 in cash used is mostly the result of (a) foreign currency fluctuations on our bank accounts held in Canadian dollars, which accounted for an increased use of $1,573 and (b) timing in vendor payments affecting accounts payable accounting for $855. The increased uses above were offset by decreased spending within exploration and corporate administration totaling $1,098.

Investing Activities

Net cash from investing activities was $14,083 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared with net cash used of $14,894 for the same period in 2012. The decrease in cash used in investing activities of $28,977 is primarily due to the net increase in cash from the sale of short-term investments of $15,118 during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 compared with the purchase of short-term investments amounting to $14,633 for the same period in 2012. The decrease was partially offset by the purchase of land for $980 during 2013.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $nil and $718 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The cash received in the 2012 period was the result of employee stock option exercises.

14

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2013, our total current assets were $29,317 compared with $40,640 as of December 31, 2012, which is a decrease of $11,323. The decrease in total current assets is primarily due to a decrease in the combination of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $11,049.

Our working capital as at June 30, 2013 was $27,424 as compared with $37,041 at December 31, 2012.  Management estimates that the current cash position and future cash flows from potential equity financings that we may pursue from time to time will be sufficient for us to carry out our anticipated exploration and evaluation plans through late 2014.

Our plan for the remainder of 2013 is to continue those programs necessary to advance the Bear Lodge REE Project feasibility study, to continue exploration drilling programs, to identify and establish a HREE mineral resource estimate, and to continue moving forward with the Environmental Impact Study and permitting processes, while minimizing expenditures in other areas. The budget contemplates that additional financing would be required by late 2014 to have sufficient working capital to fund the further permitting, evaluation, development and construction of the Bear Lodge REE Project.

We intend to exercise the option covering up to 840 acres of private land in Upton, Wyoming in the fourth quarter of 2014.  The purchase price is the greater of $1 per acre or the appraised value at the time of exercise.

We have an effective shelf registration statement for $50 million in the U.S. and Canada as of July 30, 2013. We expect that we will need to obtain between $25 million and $50 million of additional funding during the Environmental Input Study and permitting processes in order to retain a reasonable amount of available cash. The amount of the funding required prior to receiving all of the necessary operating approvals will depend on the timing of such approvals as well as the level of expenditures for exploration, infrastructure and long-lead time equipment that is approved by the board of directors.    

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

There were no material changes to the contractual obligations disclosed in Item 7 of Part II in our Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCUSSION ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk. Market risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Our market risk comprises three types of risk: interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and other price risk.

Interest rate risk. Our cash and cash equivalents consist of cash held in bank accounts and, at times, guaranteed investment certificates, that earn interest at variable interest rates. Due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments, fluctuations in market rates do not have a significant impact on estimated fair values as of June 30, 2013. Future cash flows from interest income on cash and cash equivalents will be affected by interest rate fluctuations. We manage interest rate risk by maintaining an investment policy that focuses primarily on preservation of capital and liquidity.

Foreign currency risk. We are exposed to foreign currency risk as monetary financial instruments are primarily denominated in Canadian dollars. We have not entered into any foreign currency contracts to mitigate this risk.  We attempt to mitigate this risk by holding six to twelve months of U.S.-based spending in U.S. dollars as a natural hedge against currency fluctuations.  At June 30, 2013, a 1% fluctuation in the Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar exchange rate would have impacted our consolidated net loss by $176.

Other price risk. Other price risk is the risk that the fair or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk or foreign exchange risk. We are not exposed to significant other price risk.

15

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) and Rule 15(d)-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation or of any proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities that are, or would be, likely to have a material adverse effect upon us or our operations, taken as a whole.

ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS

There were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of Part I in our Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012.

ITEM 2.   UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3.   DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.   MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

We consider health, safety and environmental stewardship to be a core value for Rare Element.

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities under the regulation of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). During the period ended June 30, 2013, the Bear Lodge REE Project was not yet in production and as such, was not subject to regulation by the MSHA under the Mine Act.

16

ITEM 5.   OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6.   EXHIBITS

(1) Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

17

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

18