Rebus Holdings, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
one)
x
|
Quarterly
Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
|
For
the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
Or
¨
|
Transition
Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
|
Commission
File Number 333-153829
GENSPERA,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
20-0438951
|
|
State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
2511
N. Loop 1604 W, Suite 204
San
Antonio, TX
|
78258
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code (210) 479-8112
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. x Yes ¨
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨
Yes ¨
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a small reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) ¨ Yes
x No
The number of shares outstanding of
Registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value at May 10, 2010 was
16,033,187.
GenSpera,
Inc.
Page
|
|||
PART
I -
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
4
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
4
|
|
Balance
Sheets as of March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31,
2009
|
4
|
||
Statements
of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|||
Three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from November 21,
2003 (inception) to March 31, 2010
|
5
|
||
Statements
of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)
|
|||
For the period from
November 21, 2003 (inception) to March 31,
2010
|
6
|
||
|
|||
Statements
of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|||
Three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from November 21,
2003 (inception) to March 31, 2010
|
7
|
||
Notes
to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
8
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
13
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
18
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
18
|
|
PART
II -
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
19
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
19
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
19
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
25
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
25
|
|
Item
4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
25
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
25
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
2
ADVISEMENT
We
urge you to read this entire Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the” Risk
Factors” section, the financial statements, and related notes included
herein. As used in this Quarterly Report, unless the context
otherwise requires, the words “we,” “us,”“our,” “the Company,” “GenSpera” and
“Registrant” refer to GenSpera, Inc. Also, any reference to “common
shares,” or “common stock,” refers to our $.0001 par value common
stock. The information contained herein is current as of the
date of this Quarterly Report (March 31, 2010), unless another date is
specified.
We
prepare our interim financial statements in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles. Our financials and results of
operation for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of our prospective financial condition and results of operations for
the pending full fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. The interim financial
statements presented in this Quarterly Report as well as other information
relating to our company contained in this Quarterly Report should be read in
conjunction and together with the reports, statements and information filed by
us with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”).
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. All statements included in this Report, including those related to our
cash, liquidity, resources and our anticipated cash expenditures, as well as any
statements other than statements of historical fact, regarding our strategy,
future operations, financial position, projected costs, prospects, plans and
objectives are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are derived, in part, from various assumptions and analyses we have
made in the context of our current business plan and information currently
available to us and in light of our experience and perceptions of historical
trends, current conditions and expected future developments and other factors we
believe are appropriate in the circumstances. You can generally identify forward
looking statements through words and phrases such as “believe”, “expect”,
“seek”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “budget”, “project”, “may
likely result”, “may be”, “may continue” and other similar
expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these
identifying words. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements, and you should not place undue reliance on our
forward-looking statements.
Our
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the risks
described in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this
Report. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of
any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or strategic
investments. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent our
expectation only as of the day this Report was first filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and should not be relied on as representing our
expectations as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update
forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim
any obligation to do so, even if our expectations change.
When
reading any forward-looking statement you should remain mindful that actual
results or developments may vary substantially from those expected as expressed
in or implied by such statement for a number of reasons or factors, including
but not limited to:
·
|
the success of our research and
development activities, the development of a viable commercial product,
and the speed with which regulatory authorizations may be
achieved;
|
·
|
whether or not a market for our
products develops and, if a market develops, the rate at which it
develops;
|
·
|
our ability to successfully sell
or license our products if a market
develops;
|
·
|
our ability to attract and retain
qualified personnel;
|
·
|
the accuracy of our estimates and
projections;
|
·
|
our ability to fund our
short-term and long-term financing
needs;
|
·
|
changes in our business plan and
corporate growth strategies;
and
|
·
|
other risks and uncertainties
discussed in greater detail in the section captioned “Risk
Factors”
|
3
Each
forward-looking statement should be read in context with and in understanding of
the various other disclosures concerning our company and our business made
elsewhere in this Report as well as our public filings with the SEC. You should
not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement as a prediction of
actual results or developments. We are not obligated to update or revise any
forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report or any other filing
to reflect new events or circumstances unless and to the extent required by
applicable law.
PART
I
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
GENSPERA
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Assets
|
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 2,711,281 | $ | 2,255,311 | ||||
Total
current assets
|
2,711,281 | 2,255,311 | ||||||
Fixed
assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,500 and $708
|
14,333 | 15,125 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization of $30,695 and
$26,858
|
153,473 | 157,310 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 2,879,087 | $ | 2,427,746 | ||||
Liabilities
and stockholders' deficit
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 232,070 | $ | 78,198 | ||||
Accrued
interest - stockholder
|
9,195 | 8,107 | ||||||
Convertible
note payable - stockholder, current portion
|
35,000 | 35,000 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
276,265 | 121,305 | ||||||
Convertible
note payable, net of discount of $0 and $11,046
|
- | - | ||||||
Convertible
notes payable - stockholder, long term portion
|
70,000 | 70,000 | ||||||
Derivative
liabilities
|
3,655,387 | 2,290,686 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
4,001,652 | 2,481,991 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders'
equity deficit:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $.0001 per share; 10,000,000 shares
authorized,
|
||||||||
none
issued and outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, par value $.0001 per share; 80,000,000 shares
authorized,
|
||||||||
16,033,187
and 15,466,446 shares issued and outstanding
|
1,603 | 1,547 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
11,237,425 | 10,135,737 | ||||||
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
(12,361,593 | ) | (10,191,529 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' equity deficit
|
(1,122,565 | ) | (54,245 | ) | ||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity deficit
|
$ | 2,879,087 | $ | 2,427,746 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
4
GENSPERA,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF LOSSES
FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
AND FOR
THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (NOVEMBER 21, 2003) TO MARCH 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
Cumulative Period
|
||||||||||||
from
November 21, 2003
|
||||||||||||
(date of
inception) to
|
||||||||||||
Three Months ended March 31,
|
March 31,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
$ | 395,880 | $ | 199,717 | $ | 3,110,269 | ||||||
Research
and development
|
354,065 | 309,502 | 5,865,606 | |||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
749,945 | 509,219 | 8,975,875 | |||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(749,945 | ) | (509,219 | ) | (8,975,875 | ) | ||||||
Finance
cost
|
- | (472,938 | ) | (518,675 | ) | |||||||
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
(1,423,492 | ) | (572,785 | ) | (2,854,042 | ) | ||||||
Interest
income (expense), net
|
3,373 | (2,608 | ) | (13,001 | ) | |||||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(2,170,064 | ) | (1,557,550 | ) | (12,361,593 | ) | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (2,170,064 | ) | $ | (1,557,550 | ) | $ | (12,361,593 | ) | |||
Net
loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | ||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
15,649,956 | 12,699,314 |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
5
GENSPERA,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY
FROM DATE
OF INCEPTION (NOVEMBER 21, 2003) TO MARCH 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
During the
|
Stockholders'
|
||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Development
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Stage
|
(Deficit)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
November 21, 2003
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||
Sale
of common stock to founders at $0.0001 per share in November,
2003
|
6,100,000 | 610 | (510 | ) | - | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Contributed
services
|
- | - | 120,000 | - | 120,000 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (125,127 | ) | (125,127 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2003
|
6,100,000 | 610 | 119,490 | (125,127 | ) | (5,027 | ) | |||||||||||||
Contributed
services
|
- | - | 192,000 | - | 192,000 | |||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
- | - | 24,102 | - | 24,102 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (253,621 | ) | (253,621 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2004
|
6,100,000 | 610 | 335,592 | (378,748 | ) | (42,546 | ) | |||||||||||||
Contributed
services
|
- | - | 48,000 | - | 48,000 | |||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
- | - | 24,100 | - | 24,100 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (126,968 | ) | (126,968 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
6,100,000 | 610 | 407,692 | (505,716 | ) | (97,414 | ) | |||||||||||||
Contributed
services
|
- | - | 144,000 | - | 144,000 | |||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
- | - | 42,162 | - | 42,162 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (245,070 | ) | (245,070 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
6,100,000 | 610 | 593,854 | (750,786 | ) | (156,322 | ) | |||||||||||||
Shares
sold for cash at $0.50 per share in November, 2007
|
1,300,000 | 130 | 649,870 | - | 650,000 | |||||||||||||||
Shares
issued for services
|
735,000 | 74 | 367,426 | - | 367,500 | |||||||||||||||
Contributed
services
|
- | - | 220,000 | - | 220,000 | |||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
- | - | 24,082 | - | 24,082 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise
of options for cash at $0.003 per share in March and June,
2007
|
900,000 | 90 | 2,610 | - | 2,700 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (691,199 | ) | (691,199 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
9,035,000 | 904 | 1,857,842 | (1,441,985 | ) | 416,761 | ||||||||||||||
Exercise
of options for cash at $0.50 per share on March
7,2008
|
1,000,000 | 100 | 499,900 | - | 500,000 | |||||||||||||||
Sale
of common stock and warrants at $1.00 per share - July and August
2008
|
2,320,000 | 232 | 2,319,768 | - | 2,320,000 | |||||||||||||||
Cost
of sale of common stock and warrants
|
- | - | (205,600 | ) | - | (205,600 | ) | |||||||||||||
Shares
issued for accrued interest
|
31,718 | 3 | 15,856 | - | 15,859 | |||||||||||||||
Shares
issued for services
|
100,000 | 10 | 49,990 | - | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
- | - | 313,743 | - | 313,743 | |||||||||||||||
Contributed
services
|
- | - | 50,000 | - | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||
Beneficial
conversion feature of convertible debt
|
- | - | 20,675 | - | 20,675 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (3,326,261 | ) | (3,326,261 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
12,486,718 | 1,249 | 4,922,174 | (4,768,246 | ) | 155,177 | ||||||||||||||
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle
|
- | - | (444,161 | ) | (290,456 | ) | (734,617 | ) | ||||||||||||
Warrants
issued for extension of debt maturities
|
- | - | 51,865 | - | 51,865 | |||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
- | - | 1,530,536 | - | 1,530,536 | |||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
86,875 | 10 | 104,109 | - | 104,119 | |||||||||||||||
Sale
of common stock and warrants at $1.50 per share - February
2009
|
466,674 | 46 | 667,439 | - | 667,485 | |||||||||||||||
Sale
of common stock and warrants at $1.50 per share - April
2009
|
33,334 | 3 | 49,997 | - | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||
Sale
of common stock and warrants at $1.50 per share - June
2009
|
1,420,895 | 142 | 2,038,726 | - | 2,038,868 | |||||||||||||||
Sale
of common stock and warrants at $1.50 per share - July
2009
|
604,449 | 60 | 838,024 | - | 838,084 | |||||||||||||||
Sale
of common stock and warrants at $1.50 per share - September
2009
|
140,002 | 14 | 202,886 | - | 202,900 | |||||||||||||||
Common
stock and warrants issued as payment of placement fees
|
53,334 | 5 | (5 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Common
stock and warrants issued upon conversion of note and accrued
interest
|
174,165 | 18 | 174,147 | - | 174,165 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (5,132,827 | ) | (5,132,827 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
15,466,446 | 1,547 | 10,135,737 | (10,191,529 | ) | (54,245 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
- | - | 186,742 | - | 186,742 | |||||||||||||||
Sale
of common stock and warrants at $1.65 per share - February and March
2010
|
533,407 | 53 | 806,157 | - | 806,210 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise
of warrants
|
33,334 | 3 | 49,998 | - | 50,001 | |||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of derivative liability upon exercise of warrants
|
- | - | 58,791 | - | 58,791 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (2,170,064 | ) | (2,170,064 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
16,033,187 | $ | 1,603 | $ | 11,237,425 | $ | (12,361,593 | ) | $ | (1,122,565 | ) |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
6
GENSPERA,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
AND FOR
THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (NOVEMBER 21, 2003) TO MARCH 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
Cumulative Period
|
||||||||||||
from
November 21, 2003
|
||||||||||||
(date of
inception) to
|
||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31,
|
March 31,
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (2,170,064 | ) | $ | (1,557,550 | ) | $ | (12,361,593 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net
|
||||||||||||
cash
used in operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,629 | 3,837 | 32,195 | |||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
186,742 | 29,554 | 2,667,086 | |||||||||
Warrants
issued for financing costs
|
- | 467,840 | 467,840 | |||||||||
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
1,423,492 | 572,785 | 2,854,042 | |||||||||
Contributed
services
|
- | - | 774,000 | |||||||||
Amortization
of debt discount
|
- | 5,098 | 20,675 | |||||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
154,960 | (94,479 | ) | 267,689 | ||||||||
Cash
used in operating activities
|
(400,241 | ) | (572,915 | ) | (5,278,066 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
- | - | (15,833 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisition
of intangibles
|
- | - | (184,168 | ) | ||||||||
Cash
used in investing activities
|
- | - | (200,001 | ) | ||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of common stock and warrants
|
806,210 | 699,985 | 8,034,347 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of warrants
|
50,001 | - | 50,001 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from convertible notes - stockholder
|
- | - | 155,000 | |||||||||
Repayments
of convertible notes - stockholder
|
- | - | (50,000 | ) | ||||||||
Cash
provided by financing activities
|
856,211 | 699,985 | 8,189,348 | |||||||||
Net
increase in cash
|
455,970 | 127,070 | 2,711,281 | |||||||||
Cash,
beginning of period
|
2,255,311 | 534,290 | - | |||||||||
Cash,
end of period
|
$ | 2,711,281 | $ | 661,360 | $ | 2,711,281 | ||||||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | - | $ | 79 | ||||||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Non-cash
financial activities:
|
||||||||||||
Derivative
liability reclassified to equity upon exercise of warrants
|
$ | 58,791 | $ | - |
See
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
7
GENSPERA, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
AND
FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 21, 2003
(INCEPTION)
TO MARCH 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary
of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the
accompanying financial statements follows.
Business
and Basis of Presentation
GenSpera
Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our
company”, “our”, “GenSpera” or the “Company” )
was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware in 2003. We are a development
stage entity, as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 915. GenSpera, Inc. is a
pharmaceutical company focused on the development of targeted cancer
therapeutics for the treatment of cancerous tumors, including breast, prostate,
bladder and kidney cancer. Our operations are based in San Antonio,
Texas.
To date,
we have generated no sales revenues, have incurred significant expenses and have
sustained losses. Consequently, our operations are subject to all the risks
inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise. For the period from
inception on November 21, 2003 through March 31, 2010, we have accumulated
losses of $12,361,593.
Liquidity
As of
March 31, 2010, we had working capital of $2,435,016. Our cash flow
used in operations was $400,241 and $572,915 for the three months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At March 31, 2010, we had cash on
hand of approximately $2,711,000 and raised approximately $856,000 in the first
quarter of 2010. Based upon current cash flow projections, management
believes the Company will have sufficient capital resources to meet projected
cash flow requirements through 2010.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying
disclosures. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge
of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future, actual
results may differ from those estimates.
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs include expenses incurred by the Company for research and
development of therapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer and are charged to
operations as incurred. Our research and development expenses consist primarily
of expenditures for toxicology and other studies, manufacturing, clinical trials
and compensation and consulting costs.
GenSpera
incurred research and development expenses of $354,065, $309,502 and $5,865,606
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and from November 21, 2003
(inception) through March 31, 2010, respectively.
8
Loss
Per Share
We use
ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” for calculating the basic and diluted loss per
share. We compute basic loss per share by dividing net loss and net loss
attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding. Basic and diluted loss per share are the same, in that any
potential common stock equivalents would have the effect of being anti-dilutive
in the computation of net loss per share. There were 8,003,903 common share
equivalents at March 31, 2010 and 4,517,867 at March 31, 2009. For the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, these potential shares were
excluded from the shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share as their
inclusion would reduce net loss per share.
Fair
value of financial instruments
Our
short-term financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and other
liabilities, consist primarily of instruments without extended maturities, the
fair value of which, based on management’s estimates, reasonably approximate
their book value. The fair value of long term convertible notes is based on
management estimates and reasonably approximates their book value after
comparison to obligations with similar interest rates and maturities. The fair
value of the Company’s derivative instruments is determined using option pricing
models.
Fair
value measurements
We follow
the guidance established pursuant to ASC 820 which established a framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC
820 defines fair value as the amount that would be received for an asset or paid
to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair
value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820
describes the following three levels of inputs that may be used:
Level 1:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for identical assets and liabilities. The fair value hierarchy
gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
Level 2:
Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets but
corroborated by market data.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs when there is little or no market data available, thereby
requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The fair value hierarchy
gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
The table
below summarizes the fair values of our financial liabilities as of March 31,
2010:
Fair Value at
|
Fair Value Measurement Using
|
|||||||||||||||
March 31,
2010
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||||||
Convertible
notes payable
|
$
|
105,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
105,000
|
||||||||
Warrant
derivative liability
|
|
3,655,387
|
—
|
—
|
3,655,387
|
|||||||||||
$
|
3,760,387
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
3,760,387
|
9
The table
below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3
financial liabilities (warrant derivative liability) for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009.
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Balance
at beginning of year
|
$ | 2,290,686 | $ | - | ||||
Additions
to derivative instruments
|
- | 1,150,593 | ||||||
Change
in fair value of warrant liability
|
1,423,492 | 572,785 | ||||||
Reclassification
to equity upon exercise of warrants
|
(58,791 | ) | - | |||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$ | 3,655,387 | $ | 1,723,378 |
The
following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for these
items:
Warrant derivative liability
— these instruments consist of certain of our warrants with anti-dilution
provisions. These instruments were valued using pricing models which incorporate
the Company’s stock price, volatility, U.S. risk free rate, dividend rate
and estimated life.
Income
Taxes
We
utilize ASC 740 “Income Taxes” which requires the recognition of deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that
have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this
method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future
years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their
financial reporting amounts at each year-end based on enacted tax laws and
statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are
expected to affect taxable income.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We
account for our stock based compensation under ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock
Compensation” using the fair value based method. Under this method, compensation
cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is
recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting
period. This guidance establishes standards for the accounting for
transactions in which an entity exchanges it equity instruments for goods or
services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities
in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the
entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those
equity instruments.
We use
the fair value method for equity instruments granted to non-employees and use
the Black-Scholes model for measuring the fair value of options. The stock based
fair value compensation is determined as of the date of the grant or the date at
which the performance of the services is completed (measurement date) and is
recognized over the vesting periods.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June
2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which will require more
information about the transfer of financial assets where companies have
continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. This
guidance is effective at the start of a company’s first fiscal year beginning
after November 15, 2009, or January 1, 2010 for companies reporting earnings on
a calendar-year basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material
impact on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
10
In June
2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which will change how a company
determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not
controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. Under this
guidance, determining whether a company is required to consolidate an entity
will be based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and design and a
company's ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly
impact the entity's economic performance. This guidance is effective at the
start of a company’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009, or
January 1, 2010 for companies reporting earnings on a calendar-year basis. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position or results of operations.
Other
recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging
Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not, or are not believed by
management to, have a material impact on the Company's present or future
financial statements.
NOTE
2 - CAPITAL STOCK AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
We are
authorized to issue 80,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $.0001
per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $.0001
per share.
During
January and March 2010, we entered into securities purchase agreements with a
number of accredited investors. Pursuant to the terms of the
agreements, we sold 533,407 units resulting in gross proceeds of approximately
$880,000. The price per unit was $1.65. Each unit consists
of: (i) one share of common stock; and (ii) one half common stock purchase
warrant. The warrants have a term of five years and allow the
investors to purchase our common shares at a price per share of
$3.10. The warrants also contain anti-dilution protection in the
event of stock splits, stock dividends and other similar transactions. We
incurred placement agent fees of $73,910 in connection with the
transaction. We also issued a total of 42,673 additional common stock
purchase warrants as compensation. The warrants have the same terms
as the investor warrants except that 12,160 warrants have an exercise price of
$2.20 and 30,513 warrants have an exercise price of $2.94.
During
March, 2010, we issued 33,334 shares of common stock upon exercise of an
equivalent number of warrants and received cash proceeds of
$50,001.
As a
result of the exercise of the warrants, we have reclassified $58,791 of our
warrant derivative liability to paid in capital.
On
February 24, 2010, we granted a total of 77,000 common stock options to two
directors. The options have a weighted average exercise price of $2.30 per
share. The options will vest quarterly over one year. The options lapse if
unexercised after five years. The options have an aggregate grant
date fair value of $54,079, determined using the Black-Scholes method based on
the following weighted average assumptions: (1) risk free
interest rate of 0.245%; (2) dividend yield of 0%; (3) volatility
factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 99%; and
(4) an expected life of the options of 0.625 years. During the three
months ended March 31, 2010 we have recorded an expense of $4,507 related to the
fair value of the options that are expected to vest.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010 we have recorded an expense of $135,200
related to the fair value of the options granted to our chief executive officer
and chief operating officer that vested or are expected to vest.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, we have recorded an expense of $47,035
related to the fair value of options granted to members of our Scientific
Advisory Board that vested during that period.
NOTE
3 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, 33,334 of our warrants subject to
derivative accounting were exercised into common stock. We have recorded an
expense of $21,119 at the date of exercise related to the change in fair value
from January 1, 2010 to the date of exercise. As a result of the exercise of the
warrants, we have reclassified $58,791 of our warrant derivative liability to
paid in capital.
11
At March
31, 2010, we recalculated the fair value of our remaining warrants subject to
derivative accounting and have determined that their fair value at March 31,
2010 is $3,655,387. The value of the warrants was determined using the
Black-Scholes method based on the following
assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 1%;
(2) dividend yield of 0%; (3) volatility factor of the expected market
price of our common stock of 99%; and (4) an expected life of the
warrants of 2 years. We have recorded an expense of $1,402,373 during the
three months ended March 31, 2010 related to the change in fair value during
that period.
On May
14, 2010, our compensation committee approved the 2010 annual base salaries and
2009 discretionary bonuses for our chief executive officer and chief operating
officer. This action results in an increase in 2010 base salaries aggregating
$50,000, retroactive to January 1, 2010. The discretionary bonuses aggregate
$100,000 and shall be paid in shares of common stock from our 2007 stock plan.
For purposes of calculating the number of shares to be issued as payment of the
discretionary bonuses, the grant date is May 14, 2010. We have included an
accrual of $112,500 at March 31, 2010 to reflect the bonuses and
the retroactive increase in salaries.
12
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Our
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated
financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of
operations, financial condition, and cash flows. MD&A is organized as
follows:
|
•
|
Overview — Discussion of
our business and plan of operations, overall analysis of financial and
other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the
remainder of MD&A.
|
|
•
|
Significant Accounting
Policies —
Accounting policies that we believe are important to understanding
the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial
results and forecasts.
|
|
•
|
Results of
Operations
— Analysis of our financial results comparing the first
quarter of 2010 to the comparable period in
2009.
|
|
•
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
— An analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows,
and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of
liquidity.
|
The
various sections of this MD&A contain a number of forward-looking
statements. Words such as “expects,” “goals,” “plans,” “believes,” “continues,”
“may,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer
to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and
trends in our businesses, and other characterizations of future events or
circumstances are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on our
current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors
described throughout this filing and particularly in the “Overview” section (see
also “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q). Our actual results
may differ materially.
Management's
Plan of Operation
We are
pursuing a business plan related to the development of targeted cancer
therapeutics for the treatment of cancerous tumors, including breast, prostate,
bladder, and kidney cancer. We are considered to be in the
development stage as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 915 “Development Stage
Entities”.
Business
Strategy
Our
business strategy is to develop a series of therapeutics based on our
target-activated pro-drug technology platform and bring them through Phase I/II
clinical trials. At that point, we plan to license the rights to further
development of the drug candidates to major pharmaceutical companies. We believe
that major pharmaceutical companies see significant value in drug candidates
that have passed one or more phases of clinical trials, and these organizations
have the resources and expertise to finalize drug development and market the
drugs.
13
Plan
of Operation
On June
23, 2009, we submitted our first Investigational New Drug application (“IND”)
for G-202 to the United States Food and Drug Administration
(“FDA”). On September 4, 2009, we received approval from the FDA for
our IND in order to commence clinical trials. Although we have
received approval from the FDA to commence trials, the outcome of the trials is
uncertain and, if we are unable to satisfactorily complete such trials, or if
such trials yield unsatisfactory results, we will be unable to commercialize our
proposed products. Over the next twelve months we plan to focus on clinical
trials of G-202 in cancer patients.
Additionally,
we will continue to protect our intellectual property position particularly with
regard to the outstanding claims contained within the core PSMA-pro-drug patent
application in the United States. We will also continue to prosecute
the claims contained in our other patent applications in the United
States.
We
anticipate that during 2010 and the first half of 2011 we will be engaged in
conducting the Phase I clinical trial of G-202, and, if appropriate, extension
into a Phase II clinical trial of G-202. The purpose of a Phase I study of G-202
is to evaluate safety, understand the pharmacokinetics (the process by which a
compound is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and eliminated by the body) of
the drug candidate in humans, and to determine an appropriate dosing regimen for
the subsequent clinical studies. We are currently conducting the Phase I study
in refractory cancer patients (those who have relapsed after former treatments)
with any type of solid tumors. This strategy is intended to facilitate
enrollment and perhaps give us a glimpse of safety across a wider variety of
patients. We expect to enroll up to 30 patients in this Phase I study at: (i)
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (Michael Carducci, MD
as Principal Investigator); and (ii) University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer
Center (George Wilding, MD as Principal Investigator).
Assuming
successful completion of the Phase I clinical trial, we expect to conduct a
Phase II clinical trial to determine the therapeutic efficacy of G-202 in cancer
patients. Although we believe that G-202 will be useful across a wide variety of
cancer types, it is usually most efficient and medically prudent to evaluate a
drug candidate in a single tumor type within a single trial. It is currently too
early in the pre-clinical development process to determine which tumor types
will be evaluated, but our current expectation is to conduct up to four separate
concurrent Phase II studies in different tumor types over a time span of 18
months.
We have
identified 4 pro-drug candidates: G-202, G-114, G-115 and Ac-GKAFRR-L12ADT. At
this time, we are engaged solely in the development of G-202. It is anticipated
that the development of the remaining candidates will not commence until we have
sufficient resources to devote to their development.
From
inception through March 31, 2010 the vast majority of costs incurred have been
devoted to G-202. We estimate that we have incurred costs of approximately
$235,000 related to G-114, G-115 and Ac-GKAFRR-L12ADT. All of these costs were
incurred prior to December 2007, at which time we began focusing solely on
G-202. The balance of our costs, aggregating approximately $5,586,000, was
incurred in the development of G-202. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, approximately $2,087,000 and $2,433,000, respectively, was incurred in the
development of G-202. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, we incurred costs of approximately $354,000 and $310,000, respectively, in
the development of G-202.
It is
estimated that the development of G-202 will occur as follows:
It is
estimated that the ongoing Phase I clinical trial will cost an additional
approximately $1,500,000 and will be completed in the second quarter of
2011.
Phase II
clinical studies will cost an additional $7,000,000 and will be completed in the
fourth quarter of 2012. The increase in estimated Phase II costs from
previous disclosures is due to the addition of extra Phase II studies into the
G-202 clinical development plan.
We
anticipate that we will license G-202 to a third party during Phase II clinical
studies. In the event we are not able to license G-202, we will
proceed with Phase III Clinical trials. We estimate that Phase III
Clinical trials will cost approximately $25,000,000 and will be completed in the
fourth quarter of 2015. If all goes as planned, we may expect marketing approval
in the first half of 2017 with an additional $3,000,000 spent to get the NDA
approved. We do not expect material net cash inflows from our own marketing
efforts before early 2017. The Phase III estimated costs are subject
to major revision simply because we have not yet obtained any efficacy data for
our drug in patients and therefore cannot accurately predict what may be the
optimal Phase III patient population. The estimates will become more refined as
we obtain more clinical data.
At this
time, we have suspended the development of our other drug candidates, G-114,
G-115 and Ac-GKAFRR-L12ADT. As a result we are unable to reasonably estimate the
nature, timing and estimated costs and completion dates of those projects at
this time.
We
currently have budgeted $2,227,000 in cash expenditures for the twelve month
period following the date of this report, including (1) $1,064,000 to cover our
projected general and administrative expense during this period; and (2)
$1,163,000 for research and development activities. Our cash on hand as of March
31, 2010 is sufficient to fund our operations for the next 15 months through
June, 2011 after which time we will need to undertake additional
financings.
The
amounts and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly from our
expectations depending upon numerous factors, including our results of
operation, financial condition and capital requirements. Accordingly, we will
retain the discretion to allocate the available funds among the identified uses
described above, and we reserve the right to change the allocation of available
funds among the uses described above.
14
Significant
Accounting Policies
Our
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements describes the significant
accounting policies used in the preparation of the financial statements. Certain
of these significant accounting policies are considered to be critical
accounting policies, as defined below. We do not believe that there have been
significant changes to our accounting policies during the year ended December
31, 2009, as compared to those policies disclosed in the December 31, 2008
financial statements except as disclosed in the notes to financial statements or
through the three month period ended March 31, 2010.
A
critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both material to the
presentation of our financial statements and requires management to make
difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a material effect on
our financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, critical
accounting estimates have the following attributes: 1) we are required to
make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the
estimate; and 2) different estimates we could reasonably have used, or
changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, would have a
material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
Estimates
and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with
certainty. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions believed to be applicable and reasonable under the circumstances.
These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information is
obtained and as our operating environment changes. These changes have
historically been minor and have been included in the financial statements as
soon as they became known. Based on a critical assessment of our accounting
policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the
application of those policies, management believes that our financial statements
are fairly stated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, and present a meaningful presentation of our financial
condition and results of operations. We believe the following critical
accounting policies reflect our more significant estimates and assumptions used
in the preparation of our financial statements:
Use of
Estimates — These financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and,
accordingly, require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Specifically, our management has estimated the expected
economic life and value of our licensed technology, our net operating loss for
tax purposes and our stock, option and warrant expenses related to compensation
to employees and directors and consultants. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Cash and
Equivalents — Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid
investments with maturity of three months or less when purchased. We maintain
our cash in bank deposit accounts, which at times, may exceed federally insured
limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Intangible and
Long-Lived Assets — We follow Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment
", which established a "primary asset" approach to determine the cash flow
estimation period for a group of assets and liabilities that represents the unit
of accounting for a long lived asset to be held and used. Long-lived assets to
be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it
exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use
and eventual disposition of the asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are
reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. We
have not recognized any impairment losses.
Research and
Development Costs — Research and development costs include expenses
incurred by the Company for research and development of therapeutic agents for
the treatment of cancer and are charged to operations as incurred.
Stock Based
Compensation — We account for our share-based compensation under the
provisions of ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”.
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments — Our
short-term financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and other
liabilities, consist primarily of instruments without extended maturities, the
fair value of which, based on management’s estimates, reasonably approximate
their book value. The fair value of long term convertible notes is based on
management estimates and reasonably approximates their book value after
comparison to obligations with similar interest rates and maturities. The fair
value of the Company’s derivative instruments is determined using option pricing
models.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
For a
discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting the Company, refer to Note
1 of Notes to Financial Statements.
15
Result
of Operations – First Quarter
of 2010 Compared to First Quarter of 2009
Our
results of operations have varied significantly from year to year and quarter to
quarter and may vary significantly in the future.
Revenue
We did
not have revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. We do not anticipate any revenues
during 2010.
Operating
Expenses
Operating
expense totaled $749,945 and $509,219 for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The increase in Operating expenses is
primarily the result of increased general and administrative
expenses.
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
$
|
395,880
|
$
|
199,717
|
||||
Research
and development
|
354,065
|
309,502
|
||||||
Total
expense
|
$
|
749,945
|
$
|
509,219
|
General
and Administrative Expenses
G&A
expenses totaled $395,880 and $199,717 for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The increase of $196,163 or 98% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was
primarily attributable to the allocation of 100% of Dr. Dionne’s compensation to
G&A as opposed to the 50% allocation to G&A for the first three quarters
of 2009, plus an increase in Dr. Dionne’s compensation of
$67,500 in 2010. Stock based compensation increased by approximately $67,000,
related primarily to options granted during the third quarter of 2009, and other
compensation increased by approximately $30,000 during the 2010 period.
Professional fees increased by approximately $16,000.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development expenses totaled $354,065 and $309,502 for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We had an
increase of $44,563 or 14% for the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009. A decrease in third party development costs
was offset by an increase in compensation expense. The increase in compensation
was a result of an increase in stock based compensation of approximately $85,000
and an increase in other compensation of $45,000, partially offset by a decrease
attributable to the allocation of 100% of Dr. Dionne’s compensation to G&A
as opposed to the 50% allocation to R & D in 2009.
Our
research and development expenses consist primarily of expenditures for
toxicology and other studies, manufacturing, clinical trials and compensation
and consulting costs. Under the planning and direction of key
personnel, we expect to outsource all of our GLP preclinical development
activities (e.g., toxicology) and GMP manufacturing and clinical development
activities to CROs and CMOs. Manufacturing will be outsourced to
organizations with approved facilities and manufacturing
practices.
Other
Expenses
Other
expenses totaled $1,420,119 and $1,048,331 for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Other
expense:
|
||||||||
Finance
Cost
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(472,938
|
)
|
|||
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
(1,423,492
|
)
|
(572,785
|
)
|
||||
Interest
income (expense) net
|
3,373
|
(2,608
|
)
|
|||||
Total
other expenses
|
$
|
(1,420,119
|
)
|
$
|
(1,048,331
|
)
|
16
Finance
Cost
Finance
Cost totaled $0 and $472,938 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 we incurred
a $415,976 charge for the fair value of additional warrants issued
when the anti-dilution provisions in our warrants issued during the July and
August 2008 financing were triggered plus a $51,864 charge for the fair
value of additional warrants issued as consideration for the extension of the
maturity dates of notes payable. We had no comparable expense during the 2010
period.
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
Change in
fair value of derivative liability totaled $1,423,492 and $572,785 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The
change in the fair value of our warrant derivative liability resulted primarily
from the changes in our stock price and the volatility of our common stock
during the reported periods. Refer to Note 4 to the financial statements
for further discussion on our warrant liabilities.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, 33,334 of our warrants subject to
derivative accounting were exercised into common stock. We have recorded an
expense of $21,119 at the date of exercise related to the change in fair value
from January 1, 2010 to the date of exercise. As a result of the exercise of the
warrants, we have reclassified $58,791 of our warrant derivative liability to
paid in capital.
At March
31, 2010, we recalculated the fair value of our remaining warrants subject to
derivative accounting and have determined that their fair value at March 31,
2010 is $3,655,387. The value of the warrants was determined using the
Black-Scholes method based on the following
assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 1%;
(2) dividend yield of 0%; (3) volatility factor of the expected market
price of our common stock of 99%; and (4) an expected life of the
warrants of 2 years. We have recorded an expense of $1,402,373 during the
three months ended March 31, 2010 related to the change in fair value during
that period.
At March
31, 2009 we recalculated the fair value of our warrants subject to derivative
accounting and have determined that their fair value at March 31, 2009 is
$1,723,377. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the
Black-Scholes method based on the following
assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 0.875%;
(2) dividend yield of 0%; (3) volatility factor of the expected market
price of our common stock of 156%; and (4) an expected life of the
warrants of 2 years. We have recorded an expense of $572,785 during the
three months ended March 31, 2009 related to the change in fair value during
that period.
Interest
expense
We had
net interest income of $3,373 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and net
interest expense of $2,608 for the three months ended March 31,
2009. The increase in net interest income of $5,981 for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was attributable to a
decrease in debt outstanding in 2010 and an increase in interest earned on
deposits.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Since our
inception, we have financed our operations primarily through the private
placement of our securities. Our current monthly cash burn rate is $185,000.We
expect this average monthly cash burn rate to remain constant during the
remainder of the year. We anticipate that our available cash and expected income
will be sufficient to finance most of our current activities for at least the
next 15 months from March 31, 2010, although certain activities and related
personnel may need to be reduced.
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
& Cash Equivalents
|
$
|
2,711,281
|
$
|
661,360
|
||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
$
|
(400,241
|
)
|
$
|
(572,915
|
)
|
||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
856,211
|
699,985
|
Total
cash was $2,711,281 and $661,360 at March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The increase of $2,049,921 at March 31, 2010 compared
to the same period in 2009 was attributable to capital raised through equity
sales in 2009 and 2010.
17
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
In our
operating activities we used cash of $400,241 and $572,915 for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease of $172,674 in
cash used for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period
in 2009 was attributable to a decrease in cash expended on accounts payable of
$249,439, offset by an increase in loss of $76,765 (after adjusting
for non cash items).
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Cash
provided by financing activities was $856,211 and $699,985 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Listed
below are key financing transactions we have entered
into.
|
·
|
During November of 2007, we sold
an aggregate of 1,300,000 common shares resulting in gross proceeds of
$650,000.
|
|
·
|
During March of 2008, we issued
1,000,000 common shares upon the exercise of outstanding warrants which
resulted in gross proceeds to us of
$500,000.
|
|
·
|
During July and August of 2008,
we sold an aggregate of 2,320,000 units resulting in gross proceeds of
$2,320,000.
|
|
·
|
In February and April of 2009, we
sold 500,000 units resulting in gross proceeds of approximately
$750,000.
|
|
·
|
In June and July of 2009, we sold
2,025,344 units resulting in gross proceeds of approximately
$3,038,000.
|
|
·
|
In September of 2009, we sold
140,002 units resulting in gross proceeds of approximately
$210,000.
|
|
·
|
In
January and March of 2010, we sold 553,407 units resulting in gross
proceeds of approximately $880,000.
|
|
·
|
During
March, 2010, we issued 33,334 shares of common stock upon exercise of an
equivalent number of warrants and received cash proceeds of
$50,001.
|
We have
incurred significant operating losses and negative cash flows since inception.
We have not achieved profitability and may not be able to realize sufficient
revenue to achieve or sustain profitability in the future. We do not expect to
be profitable in the next several years, but rather expect to incur additional
operating losses. We have limited liquidity and capital resources and must
obtain significant additional capital resources in order to sustain our product
development efforts, for acquisition of technologies and intellectual property
rights, for preclinical and clinical testing of our anticipated products,
pursuit of regulatory approvals, acquisition of capital equipment, laboratory
and office facilities, establishment of production capabilities, for general and
administrative expenses and other working capital requirements. We rely on cash
balances and the proceeds from the offering of our securities, exercise of
outstanding warrants and grants to fund our operations.
The
source, timing and availability of any future financing will depend principally
upon market conditions, interest rates and, more specifically, on our progress
in our exploratory, preclinical and future clinical development programs.
Funding may not be available when needed — at all, or on terms acceptable
to us. Lack of necessary funds may require us, among other things, to delay,
scale back or eliminate some or all of our research and product development
programs, planned clinical trials, and/or our capital expenditures or to license
our potential products or technologies to third parties.
ITEM
3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK.
|
We are
not required to provide the information required by this items as we are
considered a smaller reporting company, as defined by Rule
229.10(f)(1).
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the Quarterly Reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified
in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the reports filed under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
18
Based on
management’s evaluation (with the participation of our CEO and Chief Financial
Officer (CFO)), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our CEO and
CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act)), are effective to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within
the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and
communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during
the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II
OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
As of the
date of this Report, there are no material pending legal or governmental
proceedings relating to our company or properties to which we are a party, and
to our knowledge there are no material proceedings to which any of our
directors, executive officers or affiliates are a party adverse to us or which
have a material interest adverse to us.
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
We
have described below a number of uncertainties and risks which, in addition to
uncertainties and risks presented elsewhere in this Report, may adversely affect
our business, operating results and financial condition. The uncertainties
and risks enumerated below as well as those presented elsewhere in this Report
should be considered carefully in evaluating us and our business and the value
of our securities. The following important factors, among others, could cause
our actual business, financial condition and future results to differ materially
from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this Report or
presented elsewhere by management from time to time.
Risks
Relating to Our Stage of Development
As
a result of our limited operating history, you cannot rely upon our historical
performance to make an investment decision.
Since
inception in 2003 and through March 31, 2010, we have raised approximately
$8,084,000 in capital. During this same period, we have recorded
accumulated losses totaling $12,361,593. As of March 31, 2010, we had
working capital of $2,435,016 and a stockholders’ deficit of $1,122,565. Our net
losses for the two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009
have been 3,326,261 and $5,132,827, respectively. Since inception, we have
generated no revenue.
Our
limited operating history means that there is a high degree of uncertainty in
our ability to: (i) develop and commercialize our technologies and proposed
products; (ii) obtain approval from the FDA; (iii) achieve market acceptance of
our proposed product, if developed; (iv) respond to competition; or (v) operate
the business, as management has not previously undertaken such actions as a
company. No assurances can be given as to exactly when, if at all, we will be
able to fully develop, license, commercialize, market, sell and derive material
revenues from our proposed products in development.
We
will need to raise additional capital to continue operations.
We
currently generate no cash. We have relied entirely on external financing to
fund operations. Such financing has come primarily from the sale of common stock
to third parties and the exercise of warrants/options. We have expended and will
continue to expend substantial amounts of cash in the development, pre-clinical
and clinical testing of our proposed products. We will require additional cash
to conduct drug development, establish and conduct pre-clinical and clinical
trials and for general working capital needs. We anticipate that we will require
an additional $13 million to take our lead drug through Phase II clinical
evaluations, which is currently anticipated to occur in the fourth quarter of
2012.
19
As of
March 31, 2010, we had cash on hand of approximately $2,711,000 which we
anticipate will fund our operations through June of 2011. Presently,
the Company has an average monthly cash burn rate of approximately
$185,000. We expect this average monthly cash burn rate to remain
constant over the next fifteen months, assuming we do not engage in an
extraordinary transaction or otherwise face unexpected events or
contingencies. Accordingly, we will need to raise additional capital
to fund anticipated operating expenses after June of 2011. In the event we are
not able to secure financing, we may have to delay, reduce the scope of or
eliminate one or more of our research, development or commercialization programs
or product launches or marketing efforts. Any such change may
materially harm our business, financial condition and operations.
Our long
term capital requirements are expected to depend on many factors,
including:
|
·
|
our development
programs;
|
|
·
|
the progress and costs of
pre-clinical studies and clinical
trials;
|
|
·
|
the time and costs involved in
obtaining regulatory
clearance;
|
|
·
|
the costs involved in preparing,
filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent
claims;
|
|
·
|
the costs and our ability to
license our products;
|
|
·
|
competing technological and
market developments;
|
|
·
|
market acceptance of our proposed
products, if developed; and
|
|
·
|
the costs for recruiting and
retaining employees, consultants and
professionals.
|
We cannot
assure you that financing whether from external sources or related parties, will
be available if needed or on favorable terms. If additional financing is not
available when required or is not available on acceptable terms, we may be
unable to fund operations and planned growth, develop or enhance our
technologies, take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive
market pressures.
Raising
needed capital may be difficult as a result of our limited operating
history.
When
making investment decisions, investors typically look at a company’s historical
performance in evaluating the risks and operations of the business and the
business’s future prospects. Our limited operating history makes such evaluation
and an estimation of our future performance substantially more difficult. As a
result, investors may be unwilling to invest in us or such investment may be on
terms or conditions which are not acceptable. If we are unable to secure such
additional finance, we may need to cease operations.
We may not be
able to commercially develop our technologies.
We have
concentrated our research and development on our pro-drug
technologies. Our ability to generate revenue and operate profitably
will depend on our being able to develop these technologies for human
applications. Our technologies are primarily directed toward the development of
cancer therapeutic agents. We cannot guarantee that the results obtained in the
pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of our therapeutic agents will be
sufficient to warrant approval by the FDA. Even if our therapeutic agents are
approved for use by the FDA, there is no guarantee that they will exhibit an
enhanced efficacy relative to competing therapeutic modalities such that they
will be adopted by the medical community. Without significant adoption by the
medical community, our agents will have limited commercial potential which could
harm our ability to generate revenues, operate profitably or remain a viable
business.
Inability
to complete pre-clinical and clinical testing and trials will impair our
viability.
In the
first quarter of 2010, we commenced our first clinical trials of G-202 at the
University of Wisconsin, Carbone Cancer Center in Madison Wisconsin and at the
Sydney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
University.. Although we have commenced our clinical trials,
the outcome of the trials is uncertain and, if we are unable to satisfactorily
complete such trials, or if such trials yield unsatisfactory results, we will be
unable to commercialize our proposed products. No assurances can be given that
our clinical trials will be successful. The failure of such trials could delay
or prevent regulatory approval and could harm our ability to generate revenues,
operate profitably or remain a viable business.
Future
financing will result in dilution to existing stockholders.
We will
require additional financing in the future. We are authorized to issue 80
million shares of common stock and 10 million shares of preferred stock. Such
securities may be issued without the approval or consent of our stockholders.
The issuance of our equity securities in connection with a future financing will
result in a decrease of our current stockholders’ percentage
ownership.
20
Risks
Relating to Intellectual Property and Government Regulation
We
may not be able to withstand challenges to our intellectual property
rights.
We rely
on our intellectual property, including our issued and applied for patents, as
the foundation of our business. Our intellectual property rights may come under
challenge. No assurances can be given that, even if issued, our
patents will survive claims alleging invalidity or infringement on other
patents. The viability of our business will suffer if such patent protection
becomes limited or is eliminated.
We
may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property.
Considerable
research with regard to our technologies has been performed in countries outside
of the United States. The laws protecting intellectual property in some of those
countries may not provide protection for our trade secrets and intellectual
property. If our trade secrets or intellectual property are
misappropriated in those countries, we may be without adequate remedies to
address the issue. At present, we are not aware of any infringement of our
intellectual property. In addition to our patents, we rely on confidentiality
and assignment of invention agreements to protect our intellectual property.
These agreements provide for contractual remedies in the event of
misappropriation. We do not know to what extent, if any, these
agreements and any remedies for their breach will be enforced by a court. In the
event our intellectual property is misappropriated or infringed upon and an
adequate remedy is not available, our future prospects will greatly
diminish.
Our
proposed products may not receive FDA approval.
The FDA
and comparable government agencies in foreign countries impose substantial
regulations on the manufacture and marketing of pharmaceutical products through
lengthy and detailed laboratory, pre-clinical and clinical testing procedures,
sampling activities and other costly and time-consuming procedures. Satisfaction
of these regulations typically takes several years or more and varies
substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the proposed
product. On September 4, 2009, we received approval from the FDA for
our first IND in order to commence clinical trials with our lead drug candidate,
G-202. Although we began the G-202 Phase I clinical trial on
January 19, 2010, we cannot assure you that we will successfully complete the
trial. Further, we cannot yet accurately predict when we might first
submit any product license application for FDA approval or whether any such
product license application would be granted on a timely basis, if at
all. Any delay in obtaining, or failure to obtain, such
approvals could have a materially adverse effect on the commercialization of our
products and the viability of the company.
General
Risks Relating to Our Business and Business Model
We
depend on Craig A. Dionne, PhD, our Chief Executive Officer, and Russell
Richerson, PhD, our Chief Operating Officer, for our continued
operations.
We only
have 2 full time employees. The loss of either Craig A. Dionne, PhD,
our Chief Executive Officer, or Russell Richerson, PhD, our Chief Operating
Officer, would be detrimental to us. Although we have entered into employment
agreements with Messrs Dionne and Richerson, there can be no assurance that
these individuals will continue to provide services to us. A voluntary or
involuntary termination of employment by Messrs. Dionne or Richerson could have
a materially adverse effect on our business. Further, as part of
their employment agreements, Messrs Dionne and Richerson agreed to not compete
with us for a certain amount of time following the termination of their
employment. Once the applicable time of these provisions expires,
Messrs Dionne and Richerson may be employed by a competitor of ours in the
future.
We
may be required to make significant payments to members of our management in the
event their employment with us is terminated or if we experience a change of
control.
We are a
party to employment agreements with each of Craig Dionne, our President and
Chief Executive Officer and Russell Richerson, our Chief Operating
Officer. In the event we terminate the employment of any of these
executives, we experience a change in control, or in certain cases, if such
executives terminate their employment with us, such executives will be entitled
to receive certain severance and related payments. Additionally, in
such instance, certain securities held by Messrs. Dionne and Richerson will
become immediately vested and exercisable. Upon the occurrence of any
such event, our obligation to make such payments could significantly impact our
working capital and accordingly, our ability to execute our business plan which
could have a materially adverse effect to our business. Also, these
provisions may discourage potential takeover attempts.
We
will require additional personnel to execute our business plan.
Our
anticipated growth and expansion into areas and activities requiring additional
expertise, such as clinical testing, regulatory compliance, manufacturing and
marketing, may require the addition of new management personnel and the
development of additional expertise by existing management. There is intense
competition for qualified personnel in such areas. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to continue to attract and retain the qualified
personnel necessary for the development of our business.
21
Our
competitors have significantly greater experience and financial
resources.
We
compete against numerous companies, many of which have substantially greater
financial and other resources than us. Several such enterprises have research
programs and/or efforts to treat the same diseases we target. Companies such as
Merck, Ipsen and Diatos, as well as others, have substantially greater resources
and experience than we do and are situated to compete with us
effectively. As a result, our competitors may bring competing
products to market that would result in a decrease in demand for our product, if
developed, which could have a materially adverse effect on the viability of the
company.
We
intend to rely exclusively upon the third-party FDA-approved manufacturers and
suppliers for our products.
We
currently have no internal manufacturing capability, and will rely exclusively
on FDA-approved licensees, strategic partners or third party contract
manufacturers or suppliers. Should we be forced to manufacture our products, we
cannot give you any assurance that we will be able to develop internal
manufacturing capabilities or procure third party suppliers. In the event we
seek third party suppliers, they may require us to purchase a minimum amount of
materials or could require other unfavorable terms. Any such event would
materially impact our prospects and could delay the development and sale of our
products. Moreover, we cannot give you any assurance that any contract
manufacturers or suppliers that we select will be able to supply our products in
a timely or cost effective manner or in accordance with applicable regulatory
requirements or our specifications.
Our
business is dependent upon securing sufficient quantities of a natural product
that currently grows in very specific locations outside of the United
States.
The
therapeutic component of our products, including our lead compound G-202, is
referred to as 12ADT. 12ADT functions by dramatically raising the levels of
calcium inside cells, which leads to cell death. 12ADT is derived from a
material called thapsigargin. Thapsigargin is derived from the seeds of a plant
referred to as Thapsia
garganica which grows along the coastal regions of the Mediterranean Sea.
We currently secure the seeds from Thapsibiza, SL, a third party supplier. There
can be no assurances that the countries from which we can secure Thapsia garganica will
continue to allow Thapsibiza, SL to collect such seeds and/or to do so and
export the seeds derived from Thapsia
garganica to the United States. In the event we are no
longer able to import these seeds, we will not be able to produce our proposed
drug and our business will be adversely affected.
The
current manufacturing process of G-202 requires acetonitrile.
The
current manufacturing process for G-202 requires the common solvent
acetonitrile. Beginning in late 2008, there was a temporary worldwide shortage
of acetonitrile for a variety of reasons. We observed that during that period of
time the available supply of acetonitrile was of variable quality, some of which
is not suitable for our purposes. If we are unable to successfully
change our manufacturing methods to avoid the reliance upon acetonitrile, we may
incur prolonged production timelines and increased production costs if an
acetonitrile shortage was to reoccur. In an extreme case this situation could
adversely affect our ability to manufacture G-202 altogether, thus significantly
impacting our future operations.
In
order to secure market share and generate revenues, our proposed products must
be accepted by the health care community.
Our
proposed products, if approved for marketing, may not achieve market acceptance
since hospitals, physicians, patients or the medical community in general may
decide not to accept and utilize them. We are attempting to develop products
that will likely be first approved for marketing in late stage cancer where
there is no truly effective standard of care. If approved for use in late stage,
the drugs will then be evaluated in earlier stage where they would represent
substantial departures from established treatment methods and will compete with
a number of more conventional drugs and therapies manufactured and marketed by
major pharmaceutical companies. It is too early in the development cycle of the
drugs for us to accurately predict our major
competitors. Nonetheless, the degree of market acceptance of any of
our developed products will depend on a number of factors,
including:
|
·
|
our demonstration to the medical
community of the clinical efficacy and safety of our proposed
products;
|
|
·
|
our ability to create products
that are superior to alternatives currently on the
market;
|
|
·
|
our ability to establish in the
medical community the potential advantage of our treatments over
alternative treatment methods;
and
|
|
·
|
the reimbursement policies of
government and third-party
payors.
|
If the
health care community does not accept our products for any of the foregoing
reasons, or for any other reason, our business will be materially
harmed.
22
We
may be required to secure land for cultivation and harvesting of Thapsia
garganica.
We
believe that we can satisfy our needs for clinical development of G-202 through
completion of Phase III clinical studies from Thapsia garganica that grows
naturally in the wild. In the event G-202 is approved for commercial
marketing, our current supply of Thapsia garganica may not be
sufficient for the anticipated demand. We estimate that in order to
secure sufficient quantities of Thapsia garganica for the
commercialization of a product comprising G-202, we will need to secure
approximately 100 acres of land to cultivate and grow Thapsia
garganica. We anticipate the cost to lease such land
would be $40,000 per year but have not yet fully assessed what other costs would
be associated with a full-scale farming operation. There can be no assurances
that we can secure such acreage, or that even if we are able to do so, that we
could adequately grow sufficient quantities of Thapsia garganica to satisfy
any commercial objectives that involve G-202. Our inability to secure adequate
seeds will result in us not being able to develop and manufacture our proposed
drug and will adversely impact our business.
Thapsia
garganica and Thapsigargin can cause severe skin irritation.
It has
been known for centuries that the plant Thapsia garganica can cause
severe skin irritation when contact is made between the plant and the
skin. In 1978, thapsigargin was determined to be the skin-irritating
component of the plant Thapsia
garganica. The therapeutic component of our products, including our lead
product G-202, is derived from thapsigargin. We obtain thapsigargin from the
above-ground seeds of Thapsia
garganica. These seeds are harvested by hand and those conducting the
harvesting must wear protective clothing and gloves to avoid skin contact.
Although we obtain the seeds from a third-party contractor located in Spain, and
although the contractor has contractually waived any and all liability
associated with collecting the seeds, it is possible that the contractor or
those employed by the contractor may suffer medical issues related to the
harvesting and subsequently seek compensation from us via, for example,
litigation. No assurances can be given, despite our contractual
relationship with the third party contractor, that we will not be the subject of
litigation related to the harvesting.
The
synthesis of 12ADT must be conducted in special facilities.
There are
a limited number of manufacturing facilities qualified to handle and manufacture
therapeutic toxic agents and compounds. This limits the potential number of
possible manufacturing sites for our therapeutic compounds derived from Thapsia
garganica. No assurances can be provided that these
facilities will be available for the manufacture of our therapeutic compounds
under our time schedules or within the parameters of our manufacturing budget.
In the event facilities are not available for manufacturing our therapeutic
compounds, our business and future prospects will be adversely
affected.
Our
lead therapeutic compound, G-202, has not been subjected to large scale
manufacturing procedures.
To date,
G-202 has only been manufactured at a scale adequate to supply early stage
clinical trials. There can be no assurances that the current procedure for
manufacturing G-202 will work at a larger scale adequate for commercial
needs. In the event G-202 cannot be manufactured in sufficient
quantities, our future prospects could be significantly impacted.
We
may not have adequate insurance coverage.
The
testing, manufacturing, marketing and sale of human therapeutic products entail
an inherent risk of product liability claims. We cannot assure you
that substantial claims will not be asserted against us. In the event
we are forced to expend significant funds on defending such claims beyond our
current coverage, and in the event those funds come from operating capital, we
will be required to reduce our business activities, which could lead to
significant losses.
Provisions
in Delaware law and executive employment agreements may prevent or delay a
change of control
We are
subject to the Delaware anti-takeover laws regulating corporate
takeovers. These anti-takeover laws prevent Delaware corporations
from engaging in a merger or sale of more than 10% of its assets with any
stockholder, including all affiliates and associates of the stockholder, who
owns 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock, for three years
following the date that the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the
corporation’s assets unless:
|
·
|
the Board of Directors approved
the transaction in which the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the
corporation’s assets;
|
|
·
|
after the transaction in which
the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the corporation’s assets, the
stockholder owned at least 85% of the corporation’s outstanding voting
stock, excluding shares owned by directors, officers and employee stock
plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine
confidentially whether shares held under the plan will be tendered in a
tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
·
|
on or after this date, the merger
or sale is approved by the Board of Directors and the holders of at least
two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
stockholder.
|
23
A
Delaware corporation may opt out of the Delaware anti-takeover laws if its
certificate of incorporation or bylaws so provide. We have not opted out of the
provisions of the anti-takeover laws. As such, these laws could prohibit or
delay mergers or other takeover or change of control of GenSpera and may
discourage attempts by other companies to acquire us.
In
addition, employment agreements with certain executive officers provide for the
payment of severance and acceleration of the vesting of options and restricted
stock in the event of termination of the executive officer following a change of
control of GenSpera. These provisions could have the effect of
discouraging potential takeover attempts.
Risks
Relating To Our Common Stock
There
is no established public market for our securities.
On
September 18, 2009, our common shares began quotation on the
OTCBB. Notwithstanding, there has been sporadic trading in our common
shares. Accordingly, there is no established public market for our
securities. An investment in our common stock should be considered
totally illiquid. No assurances can be given that a public market for
our securities will ever materialize. Additionally, even if a public market for
our securities develops and our securities become traded, the trading volume may
be limited, making it difficult for an investor to sell shares.
We
face risks related to compliance with corporate governance laws and financial
reporting standards.
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related new rules and regulations
implemented by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board,
require changes in the corporate governance practices and financial reporting
standards for public companies. These new laws, rules and
regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 relating to internal control over financial reporting (“Section 404”), will
materially increase the Company's legal and financial compliance costs and make
some activities more time-consuming and more burdensome. As a result, management
will be required to devote more time to compliance which could result in a
reduced focus on the development thereby adversely affecting the Company’s
development activities. Also, the increased costs will require the Company to
seek financing sooner that it may otherwise have had to.
Starting
in 2007, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires a company’s
management to assess the company’s internal control over financial reporting
annually and include a report on such assessment in our annual report filed with
the SEC. For small reporting companies with fiscal years ending on or
after June 15, 2010, independent registered public accounting firms will be
required to audit both the design and operating effectiveness of our internal
controls and management's assessment of the design and the operating
effectiveness of such internal controls. If this deadline is not
extended, we will be required to expand substantial capital in connection with
compliance.
Because
of our limited resources, management has concluded that our internal control
over financial reporting may not be effective in providing reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. To mitigate the current limited
resources and limited employees, we rely heavily on direct management oversight
of transactions, along with the use of legal and accounting professionals. As we
grow, we expect to increase our number of employees, which will enable us to
implement adequate segregation of duties within the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission internal control
framework.
We
do not intend to pay cash dividends.
We do not
anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, any
gains on your investment will need to come through an increase in the price of
our common stock. The lack of a market for our common stock makes
such gains highly unlikely.
Our
board of directors has broad discretion to issue additional
securities.
We are
entitled under our certificate of incorporation to issue up to 80,000,000 common
and 10,000,000 “blank check” preferred shares. Blank check preferred shares
provide the board of directors broad authority to determine voting, dividend,
conversion, and other rights. As of March 31, 2010, we have issued and
outstanding 16,033,187 common shares and we have 8,003,903 common shares
reserved for issuance upon the exercise of current outstanding options, warrants
and convertible securities. Accordingly, we will be entitled to issue up to
55,962,910 additional common shares and 10,000,000 additional preferred shares.
Our board may generally issue those common and preferred shares, or options or
warrants to purchase those shares, without further approval by our
shareholders. Any preferred shares we may issue will have such
rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions as may be designated from
time-to-time by our board, including preferential dividend rights, voting
rights, conversion rights, redemption rights and liquidation provisions. It is
likely that we will be required to issue a large amount of additional securities
to raise capital to further our development and marketing plans. It is also
likely that we will be required to issue a large amount of additional securities
to directors, officers, employees and consultants as compensatory grants in
connection with their services, both in the form of stand-alone grants or under
our various stock plans. The issuance of additional securities may cause
substantial dilution to our shareholders.
24
Our
Officers and Scientific Advisors beneficially own approximately 41% of our
outstanding common shares.
Our
Officers and Scientific Advisors own approximately 41% of our issued and
outstanding common shares. As a consequence of their level of stock ownership,
the group will substantially retain the ability to elect or remove members of
our board of directors, and thereby control our management. This group of
shareholders has the ability to significantly control the outcome of corporate
actions requiring shareholder approval, including mergers and other changes of
corporate control, going private transactions, and other extraordinary
transactions any of which may be in opposition to the best interest of the other
shareholders and may negatively impact the value of your investment.
|
·
|
During
January and March 2010, we entered into securities purchase agreements
with a number of accredited investors. Pursuant to the terms of
the agreements, we sold 533,407 units resulting in gross proceeds
of approximately $880,000. The price per unit was
$1.65. Each unit consists of: (i) one share of common stock;
and (ii) one half common stock purchase warrant. The warrants
have a term of five years and allow the investors to purchase our common
shares at a price per share of $3.10. The warrants also contain
anti-dilution protection in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and
other similar transactions. We incurred placement agent fees
of of $70,410 in connection with the transaction. We also
issued a total of 42,673 additional common stock purchase warrants as
compensation. The warrants have the same terms as the investor
warrants except that 12,160 warrants have an exercise price of $2.20 and
30,513 warrants have an exercise price of
$2.94.
|
|
·
|
In
February of 2010, we granted John M. Farah, Jr., Ph.D, one of our outside
directors, options to purchase 39,000 common shares. The
options were granted pursuant to our director compensation plan as
compensation for Dr. Farah’s service on our Board and related
committees. The options have an exercise price of $2.14 per
share, a term of 5 years and vest quarterly over the grant
year.
|
|
·
|
In
March of 2010, we granted Scott Ogilvie, one of our outside directors,
options to purchase 38,000 common shares. The options were
granted pursuant to our director compensation plan as compensation for Mr.
Ogilvie’s service on our Board and related committees. The
options have an exercise price of $2.47 per share, a term of 5 years and
vest quarterly over the grant year.
|
|
·
|
In
May of 2010, our board of directors approved the issuance of a warrant to
purchase 235,000 common shares in exchange for business advisory
services. The warrant has an exercise price of $1.65 per share,
a term of 5 years and provides for cashless exercise after 6 months in the
event the shares underlying the warrant are not registered at the time of
exercise.
|
ITEM
3.
|
DEFAULT
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
None
ITEM
4.
|
(REMOVED
AND RESERVED)
|
None
ITEM
5.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
2010
Annual Base Salaries & Discretionary Bonus
On May
14, 2010, the Compensation Committee approved the fiscal year 2010 annual base
salaries and 2009 discretionary bonuses for our Chief Executive Officer and the
other named executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”) identified in
our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2009. In
doing so, the Compensation Committee did increase the Named Executive Officers’
2010 annual base salaries from their 2009 annual base
salaries. The increase is retroactive as of January 1,
2010. Accordingly, the Named Executive Officers’ fiscal year 2009
annual base salaries remain as follows:
25
Executive Officer
|
Title
|
Base
Compensation
|
||||
Craig
Dionne PhD
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
President
|
$ | 270,000 | |||
Russell
Richerson PhD
|
Chief
Operating Officer and Secretary
|
$ | 220,000 |
The
Compensation Committee also granted discretionary bonuses to our Chief Executive
Officer and Named Executive Officers as follows:
Executive Officer
|
Title
|
Discretionary
Bonus
|
||||
Craig
Dionne PhD
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
President
|
$ | 60,000 | |||
Russell
Richerson PhD
|
Chief
Operating Officer and Secretary
|
$ | 40,000 |
The
discretionary bonuses shall be paid in common shares from our 2007 Stock
Plan. For purposes of calculating the number of shares to be issued
to each respective Named Executive Officer, the grant date shall be considered
to be May 14, 2010.
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
The
exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or incorporated
by reference as part of this Form 10-Q.
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has caused this report to be signed by the undersigned hereunto duly
authorized.
GENSPERA,
INC.
|
||
Date: May
14, 2010
|
|
/s/ Craig
Dionne
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
/s/
Craig Dionne
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
26
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
Incorporated by Reference
|
||||||||||||
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
Filed
Herewith
|
Form
|
Exhibit
No.
|
File No.
|
Filing Date
|
||||||
3.01
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
|
S-1
|
3.01
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
|||||||
3.02
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws
|
8-K
|
3.02
|
333-153829
|
1/11/10
|
|||||||
4.01
|
Specimen
of Common Stock certificate
|
S-1
|
4.01
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
|||||||
4.02**
|
Amended
and Restated GenSpera 2007 Equity Compensation Plan adopted on January ,
2010
|
8-K
|
4.01
|
333-153829
|
1/11/10
|
|||||||
4.03**
|
GenSpera
Form of 2007 Equity Compensation Plan Grant and 2009 Executive
Compensation Plan Grant
|
8-K
|
4.02
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
4.04
|
Form
of 4.0% convertible note issued to shareholder
|
S-1
|
4.05
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
|||||||
4.05
|
Form
of Subscription Agreement for November 2007 offering
|
S-1
|
4.06
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
|||||||
4.06
|
Form
of Warrant dated March 6, 2008 issued to consultant for financial
consulting services.
|
S-1
|
4.07
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
|||||||
4.07
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement—July and August 2008 private
placement
|
S-1
|
4.08
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
|||||||
4.08
|
Form
of Registration Rights Agreement – July and August 2008 private
placement
|
S-1
|
4.09
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
|||||||
4.09
|
Form
of Warrant – July and August 2008 private placement
|
S-1
|
4.10
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
|||||||
4.10
|
Form
of 5.0% convertible debenture issued to TR Winston & Company,
LLC
|
S-1
|
4.12
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
|||||||
4.11
|
Form
of 5.0% convertible debenture modification between TR Winston
& Company, LLC and GenSpera, Inc.
|
8-K
|
10.01
|
333-153829
|
2/20/09
|
|||||||
4.12
|
Form
of 4.0% convertible debenture modification between GenSpera,
Inc. and shareholder
|
8-K
|
10.02
|
333-153829
|
2/20/09
|
27
4.13
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued on 2/17/09 to TR Winston &
Company, LLC
|
8-K
|
10.05
|
333-153829
|
2/20/09
|
|||||||
4.14
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued on 2/17/09 to Craig
Dionne
|
8-K
|
10.06
|
333-153829
|
2/20/09
|
|||||||
4.15
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement dated 2/19/09
|
8-K
|
10.01
|
333-153829
|
2/20/09
|
|||||||
4.16
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated 2/19/09
|
8-K
|
10.02
|
333-153829
|
2/20/09
|
|||||||
4.17
|
Form
of Registration Rights Agreement dated 2/19/09
|
8-K
|
10.03
|
333-153829
|
2/20/09
|
|||||||
4.18
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement dated 6/29/09
|
8-K
|
10.01
|
333-153829
|
7/06/09
|
|||||||
4.19
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement dated 6/30/09
|
8-K
|
10.02
|
333-153829
|
7/06/09
|
|||||||
4.20
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated June of 2009
|
8-K
|
10.03
|
333-153829
|
7/06/09
|
|||||||
4.21
|
Form
of Registration Rights Agreement dated 6/29/09
|
8-K
|
10.04
|
333-153829
|
7/06/09
|
|||||||
4.22
|
Form
of Registration Rights Agreement dated 6/30/09
|
8-K
|
10.05
|
333-153829
|
7/06/09
|
|||||||
4.23**
|
2009
Executive Compensation Plan
|
8-K
|
4.01
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
4.24
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement – 9/2/09
|
8-K
|
10.01
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
4.25
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant – 9/2/09
|
8-K
|
10.02
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
4.26
|
Form
of Registration Rights Agreement—9/2/09
|
8-K
|
10.03
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
4.27
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement – Jan – Mar 2010
|
10-K
|
4.27
|
333-153829
|
3/31/10
|
|||||||
4.28
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant Jan – Mar 2010
|
10-K
|
4.28
|
333-153829
|
3/31/10
|
|||||||
4.29
|
Form
of May 2010 Consultant Warrant
|
*
|
||||||||||
10.01
|
Exclusive
Supply Agreement between GenSpera and Thapsibiza dated January 22,
2008
|
S-1
|
10.02
|
333-153829
|
10/03/08
|
28
10.02**
|
Craig
Dionne Employment Agreement
|
8-K
|
10.04
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
10.03**
|
Craig
Dionne Severance Agreement
|
8-K
|
10.05
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
10.04**
|
Craig
Dionne Proprietary Information, Inventions And Competition
Agreement
|
8-K
|
10.06
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
10.05**
|
Form
of Indemnification Agreement
|
8-K
|
10.07
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
10.06**
|
Russell
Richerson Employment Agreement
|
8-K
|
10.08
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
|||||||
10.07**
|
Russell
Richerson Proprietary Information, Inventions And Competition
Agreement
|
8-K
|
10.09
|
333-153829
|
9/09/09
|
31.1
|
Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
*
|
||||||||||
31.2
|
Certification
of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
*
|
||||||||||
32.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C §
1350.
|
*
|
||||||||||
32.2
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C §
1350.
|
*
|
**Management
contracts or compensation plans or arrangements in which directors or executive
officers are eligible to participate.
29