Recon Technology, Ltd - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011

For the transition period from             to             .

Commission File Number 001-34409

RECON TECHNOLOGY, LTD

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1902 Building C, King Long International Mansion

9 Fulin Road, Beijing 100107

People’s Republic of China

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

+86 (10) 8494 5799

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  £    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  £    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  £    No  £

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes £ No x

The aggregate market value of the ordinary shares, $0.0185 par value per share (“Shares”), of the registrant held by non-affiliates on December 31, 2010 was approximately $12,612,144, based on the closing sales price of $4.65 per share, as reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market, multiplied by the number of outstanding Shares held by non-affiliates on that date (2,712,289).

The Company is authorized to issue 25,000,000 Shares. As of the date of this report, the Company has issued and outstanding 3,951,811 Shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

This Form 10-K incorporates the registration statement filed with the Commission on August 12, 2008, as amended (file no. 333-152964) (the “Registration Statement”), and prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) on July 24, 2009 (the “IPO Prospectus”). The Registration Statement and IPO Prospectus are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II and III of this Form 10-K.

RECON TECHNOLOGY, LTD

FORM 10-K

INDEX

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We have made statements in this annual report that constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements about our plans, objectives, expectations, assumptions or future events. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “we believe,” “we intend,” “may,” “should,” “could” and similar expressions. These statements involve estimates, assumptions, known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Examples of forward-looking statements include:

The ultimate correctness of these forward-looking statements depends upon a number of known and unknown risks and events. Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. Consequently, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to update this forward-looking information. Nonetheless, the Company reserves the right to make such updates from time to time by press release, periodic report or other method of public disclosure without the need for specific reference to this Report. No such update shall be deemed to indicate that other statements not addressed by such update remain correct or create an obligation to provide any other updates.

PART I

General

We are a provider of hardware, software, and on-site services to companies in the petroleum mining and extraction industry in China (“PRC”). We provide services designed to automate and enhance the extraction of petroleum. To this end, we control by contract the PRC companies of Beijing BHD Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd. (“BHD”), Nanjing Recon Technology Co., Ltd. (“Nanjing Recon”) and Jining ENI Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (“ENI”) (only through December 15, 2010) (collectively, the “Domestic Companies”). ENI was one of our contractually controlled affiliates until December 16, 2010, when we ceased to have the power to direct its activities following a change of ownership. As a result of such change, ENI ceased to be our VIE starting December 16, 2010.

We are the center of strategic management, financial control and human resources allocation for the Domestic Companies. Through our contractual relationships with the Domestic Companies, we provide equipment, tools and other hardware related to oilfield production and management, and develop and sell our own specialized industrial automation control and information solutions. However, we do not engage in the production of petroleum or petroleum products.

We believe that one of the most important advancements in China’s petroleum industry has been the automation of significant segments of the exploration and extraction process. The Domestic Companies’ and our automation products and services allow petroleum mining and extraction companies to reduce their labor requirements and improve the productivity of oilfields. The Domestic Companies’ and our solutions allow our customers to locate productive oilfields more easily and accurately, improve control over the extraction process, increase oil yield efficiency in tertiary stage oil recovery, and improve the transportation of crude oil.

Market Background

China is the world’s second-largest consumer of petroleum products, third-largest importer of petroleum and sixth-largest producer of petroleum. In the last twenty years, China’s demand for oil has more than tripled, while its production of oil has only modestly increased. China became a net importer of petroleum in 1983, and, as a result, oil production in China has been aimed at meeting domestic requirements. The oil industry in China is dominated by three state-owned holding companies: China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) and China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC). Foreign companies have also recently become involved in China’s petroleum industry; however, according to Chinese law, China’s national oil companies may take a majority (or minority) stake in any commercial discovery. As a result, the number of major foreign companies involved in the industry is relatively limited: Agip, Apache, BP, ChevronTexaco, ConocoPhillips, Eni, ExxonMobil, Husky Energy, Kerr-McGee, Mitsubishi, Royal Dutch Shell, Saudi Aramco, and Total.

In the past, China’s petroleum companies mined for petroleum by leveraging its abundance of inexpensive labor, rather than focusing on new technologies. For example, a typical, traditional oilfield with an annual capacity of 1,000,000 tons would require between 10,000 and 20,000 laborers. By contrast, when Baker CAC products were employed to explore and automate Cainan Oil Field, a desert oilfield in Xinjiang, annual capacity for the field reached 1,500,000 tons. Moreover, only 400 employees were required to manage the oilfield. After the introduction of Baker CAC’s products into China’s petroleum industry, Chinese companies have also sought to provide automation solutions.

In the primary oil recovery stage, oil pressure in an oil reservoir may be high enough to force oil to the surface. Approximately 20% of oil may be harvested at this stage. The secondary oil recovery stage accounts for another 5% to 15% of oil recovery and involves such efforts as pumps to extract petroleum and the injection of water, natural gas, carbon dioxide or other gasses into the oil reservoir to force oil to the surface. Most oilfields in China have now entered into the tertiary stage of oil recovery, at which oil extraction becomes increasingly difficult and inefficient. Tertiary recovery generally focuses on decreasing oil viscosity to make extraction easier and accounts for between 5% and 15% of oil recovery. Our efforts in tertiary recovery focus on reducing water content in crude oil in order to make extraction more efficient.

Our Products

We currently provide products and services to oil and gas field companies, which focus on the development and production of oil and natural gas. Our products and services described below correlate to the numbered stages of the oilfield production system graphical expression shown below.

Our products and services include:

Equipment for Oil and Gas Production and Transportation

Oil and Gas Development Tools and Equipment

Oil and Gas Production Increasing Techniques

Automation System and Service

ISO9000 Certification

We have received ISO9000 certifications for several of our processes. The International Organization for Standardization consists of a worldwide federation of national standards bodies for approximately 130 countries, and the ISO9000 certification represents an international consensus of these standards bodies, with the aim of creating global standards of product and service quality. We have received ISO9000 certification for the following:

Customers

We operate our business by cooperating with oil companies and their subsidiaries, petroleum administration bureau and local service companies. Most actual control of our direct and indirect clients can be traced to Sinopec and CNPC, the two major Chinese state-owned companies responsible for on-shore petroleum mining and extraction. We have conducted automation projects for plants in three of China’s four highest producing oilfields, Daqing, Shengli and Xinjiang. We have undertaken the automation projects at the following locations, among others:

Sinopec

We provide products and services to Sinopec under a series of agreements, each of which is terminable without notice. We first began to provide services to Sinopec in 1998. Sinopec accounted for approximately 32.39% and 16.49% of our revenues in 2010 and 2011, respectively, and any termination of our business relationships with Sinopec would materially harm our operations.

CNPC

We provide products and services to CNPC under a series of agreements, each of which is terminable without notice. We first began to provide services to CNPC in 2000. CNPC accounted for approximately 48.79% and 60.20% of our revenues in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and any termination of our business relationships with CNPC would materially harm our operations.

Our Strengths

Our Strategies

Our goal is to help our customers improve their efficiency and profitability by providing them with software and hardware solutions and services to improve their ability to locate productive oil reservoirs, manage the oil extraction process, reduce extraction costs, and enhance recovery from extraction activities. Key elements of our strategies include:

Competition

We face competition from a variety of foreign and domestic companies involved in the petroleum mining automation industry. While we believe we effectively compete in our market, our competitors hold a substantial market share.

A few of our existing competitors, as well as a number of potential new competitors, have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do, which could provide them with a significant competitive advantage over us. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete successfully against our current or future competitors in our industry or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our primary domestic competitors include the following: 

Our primary foreign competitors include the following:

Research and Development

We focus our research and development efforts on improving our development efficiency and the quality of our products and services. As of June 30, 2011, our research and development team consisted of 20 experienced engineers, developers and programmers. In addition, some of our support employees regularly participate in our research and development programs.

In the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively, we spent ¥1,775,347 and ¥3,078,391 ($476,236), respectively, on research and development activities.

Intellectual Property

Our success and competitive position is dependent in part upon our ability to develop and maintain the proprietary aspect of our technology. The reverse engineering, unauthorized copying, or other misappropriation of our technology could enable third parties to benefit from our technology without paying for it. We rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret, copyright law and contractual restrictions to protect the proprietary aspects of the Domestic Companies’ and our technology. We seek to protect the source code to the Domestic Companies’ and our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws. While we actively take steps to protect the Domestic Companies’ and our proprietary rights, such steps may not be adequate to prevent the infringement or misappropriation of the Domestic Companies’ and our intellectual property. This is particularly the case in China where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States.

We license the Domestic Companies’ and our software products under signed license agreements that impose restrictions on the licensee’s ability to utilize the software and do not permit the re-sale, sublicense or other transfer of the software. Finally, we seek to avoid disclosure of the Domestic Companies’ and our intellectual property by requiring employees and independent consultants to execute confidentiality agreements.

Although the Domestic Companies and we develop our software products, each is based upon middleware developed by third parties. We integrate this technology, licensed by our customers from third parties in our software products. If our customers are unable to continue to license any of this third party software, or if the third party licensors do not adequately maintain or update their products, we would face delays in the releases of our software until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed or developed, and integrated into our software products. These delays, if they occur, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

There has been a substantial amount of litigation in the software industry regarding intellectual property rights. It is possible that in the future third parties may claim that our current or potential future software solutions infringe their intellectual property. We expect that software product developers will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlap. In addition, we may find it necessary to initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights or to protect our trade secrets. Although the Domestic Companies and we may disclaim certain intellectual property representations to our customers, these disclaimers may not be sufficient to fully protect us against such claims. Any claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require the Domestic Companies and us to enter into royalty or license agreements. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our standard software license agreements contain an infringement indemnity clause under which we agree to indemnify and hold harmless our customers and business partners against liability and damages arising from claims of various copyright or other intellectual property infringement by the Domestic Companies’ and our products. We have never lost an infringement claim and our costs to defend such lawsuits have been insignificant. Although it is possible that in the future third parties may claim that our current or potential future software solutions or we infringe on their intellectual property, we do not currently expect a significant impact on our business, operating results, or financial condition.

We market our products under the following trademarks which are registered with the PRC Trademark Bureau under the State Administration for Industry and Commerce. We currently own or have applied for the following trademarks:

1. Trademark of “Senior” valid from May 14, 2005 through May 13, 2015;

2. Trademark of “BHD” valid from November 7, 2003 through November 6, 2013;

3. We have submitted the trademark application of “Recon” on August 17, 2009. The application was accepted by the PRC Trademark Bureau and is currently under review. We anticipate the approval may be granted in the first half of 2012.

We currently own or have applied for the following 9 patents registered with the State Intellectual Property Office which are applied on our automated services products for the petroleum extraction industry:

1. Patent of oilfield wastewater degreasing treatment plant valid until May 15, 2013;

2. Patent of fracturing packer valid until August 5, 2018;

3. Patent of pressure phase transition furnace valid until June 3, 2019;

4. Patent of vacuum furnace phase transition valid until August 5, 2019;

5. Patent of heavy oil pipeline valid until June 17, 2015;

6. Patent of automatically adjusting negative pressure burner valid until July 22, 2019; and

7. Patent of wireless data instrument diagram valid until December 10, 2018;

8. We have submitted two patent applications (hot water furnace and multifunctional heating furnace) on August 8, 2011. The applications were accepted by the State Intellectual Property Office and are currently under review. We anticipate the approval may be granted in the first half of 2012.

We have registered the following software products with the State Intellectual Property Office:

1. Recon flow control computer monitoring system software was registered and published on February 8, 2008;

2. Recon SCADA field monitoring and data acquisition system software version 2 was published on August 18, 2003, and version 3 was registered and published on April 5, 2008.

Litigation

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such pending or threatened legal proceedings, claims, regulatory inquiries or investigations that we believe will have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

Environmental Matters

We have not incurred material expenses in connection with compliance with Chinese environmental laws and regulations. We do not anticipate expending any material amounts for such compliance purposes for the remainder of our current or succeeding fiscal year.

China’s Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement System

In 1998, China established the State Intellectual Property Office (“SIPO”) to coordinate China’s intellectual property enforcement efforts. SIPO is responsible for granting and enforcing patents, as well as coordinating intellectual property rights related to copyrights and trademarks. Protection of intellectual property in China follows a two-track system. The first track is administrative in nature, whereby a holder of intellectual property rights files a complaint at a local administrative office. Determining which intellectual property agency can be confusing, as jurisdiction of intellectual property matters is diffused throughout a number of government agencies and offices, with each typically responsible for the protection afforded by one statute or one specific area of intellectual property-related law. The second track is a judicial track, whereby complaints are filed through the Chinese court system. Since 1993, China has maintained various intellectual property tribunals. The total volume of intellectual property related litigation, however, remains small.

Although there are differences in intellectual property rights between the United States and China, of most significance to the Company is the inexperience of China in connection with the development and protection of intellectual property rights. Similar to the United States, China has chosen to protect software under copyright law rather than trade secrets, patent or contract law. As such, we will attempt to protect our most significant intellectual property pursuant to Chinese laws that have only recently been adopted. Unlike the United States, which has lengthy case law related to the interpretation and applicability of intellectual property law, China has a less developed body of relevant intellectual property case law.

Regulation on Software Products

On March 1, 2009, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China issued the Administrative Measures on Software Products, or the Software Measures, which became effective as of April 10, 2009, to strengthen the regulation of software products and to encourage the development of the Chinese software industry. Under the Software Measures, a software developer must have all software products imported into or sold in China tested by a testing organization supervised by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. The software industry authorities in provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities and cities with independent planning are in charge of the registration, report and management of software products. Software products can be registered for five years, and the registration is renewable upon expiration. Although Nanjing Recon’s current software products were registered in 2008, there can be no guarantee that the registration will be renewed in 2013 or that the Domestic Companies’ and our future products will be registered.

Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights

China has adopted legislation governing intellectual property rights, including trademarks and copyrights. China is a signatory to the main international conventions on intellectual property rights and became a member of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights upon its accession to the WTO in December 2001.

Copyright. China adopted its first copyright law in 1990. The National People’s Congress amended the Copyright Law in 2001 to widen the scope of works and rights that are eligible for copyright protection. The amended Copyright Law extends copyright protection to software products, among others. In addition, there is a voluntary registration system administered by the China Copyright Protection Center. Unlike patent and trademark registration, copyrighted works do not require registration for protection. Protection is granted to individuals from countries belonging to the copyright international conventions or bilateral agreements of which China is a member. Nanjing Recon has two copyrights for software programs.

Trademark. The Chinese Trademark Law, adopted in 1982 and revised in 1993 and 2001, protects registered trademarks. The Trademark Office under the Chinese State Administration for Industry and Commerce handles trademark registrations and grants a term of ten years to registered trademarks. Trademark license agreements must be filed with the Trademark Office for record. China has a “first-to-register” system that requires no evidence of prior use or ownership. The Domestic Companies and we have registered a number of product names with the Trademark Office.

Regulations on Foreign Exchange

Foreign Currency Exchange. The principal regulations governing foreign currency exchange in China are the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations (1996), as amended, and the Administration Rules of the Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange (1996). Under these regulations, Renminbi are freely convertible for current account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest payments, trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, but not for most capital account items, such as direct investment, loan, repatriation of investment and investment in securities outside China, unless the prior approval of SAFE or its local counterparts is obtained. In addition, any loans to an operating subsidiary in China that is a foreign invested enterprise, cannot, in the aggregate, exceed the difference between its respective approved total investment amount and its respective approved registered capital amount. Furthermore, any foreign loan must be registered with SAFE or its local counterparts for the loan to be effective. Any increase in the amount of the total investment and registered capital must be approved by the PRC Ministry of Commerce or its local counterpart. We may not be able to obtain these government approvals or registrations on a timely basis, if at all, which could result in a delay in the process of making these loans.

The dividends paid by the subsidiary to its shareholder are deemed shareholder income and are taxable in China. Pursuant to the Administration Rules of the Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange (1996), foreign-invested enterprises in China may purchase or remit foreign exchange, subject to a cap approved by SAFE, for settlement of current account transactions without the approval of SAFE. Foreign exchange transactions under the capital account are still subject to limitations and require approvals from, or registration with, SAFE and other relevant PRC governmental authorities.

Regulation of Dividend Distribution. The principal regulations governing the distribution of dividends by foreign holding companies include the Foreign Investment Enterprise Law (1986), as amended, and the Administrative Rules under the Foreign Investment Enterprise Law (2001).

Under these regulations, foreign investment enterprises in China may pay dividends only out of their retained profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, foreign investment enterprises in China are required to allocate at least 10% of their respective retained profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds unless these reserves have reached 50% of the registered capital of the enterprises. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.

Notice 75. On October 21, 2005, SAFE issued Notice 75, which became effective as of November 1, 2005. According to Notice 75, prior registration with the local SAFE branch is required for PRC residents to establish or to control an offshore company for the purposes of financing that offshore company with assets or equity interests in an onshore enterprise located in the PRC. An amendment to registration or filing with the local SAFE branch by such PRC resident is also required for the injection of equity interests or assets of an onshore enterprise in the offshore company or overseas funds raised by such offshore company, or any other material change involving a change in the capital of the offshore company.

Moreover, Notice 75 applies retroactively. As a result, PRC residents who have established or acquired control of offshore companies that have made onshore investments in the PRC in the past are required to complete the relevant registration procedures with the local SAFE branch. Under the relevant rules, failure to comply with the registration procedures set forth in Notice 75 may result in restrictions being imposed on the foreign exchange activities of the relevant onshore company, including the increase of its registered capital, the payment of dividends and other distributions to its offshore parent or affiliate and capital inflow from the offshore entity, and may also subject relevant PRC residents to penalties under PRC foreign exchange administration regulations.

PRC residents who control the Company are required to register with SAFE in connection with their investments in us. Such individuals completed this registration in 2007, and 2008, as amended. If we use our equity interest to purchase the assets or equity interest of a PRC company owned by PRC residents in the future, such PRC residents will be subject to the registration procedures described in Notice 75.

Regulations on Foreign Investment in Automation Service Industry and Oil Exploration and Extraction Industry in PRC. In accordance with the Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment (Revised 2007), the oil and gas automation service industries are in the catalogue of permitted industries, and thus there are no restrictions on foreign investment in such industry. In addition the following industries are encouraged for foreign investment in China:

Employees

As of June 30, 2011, we had 77 employees, all of whom were based in China. Of the total, 8 were in management, 20 were in technical support and research and development, 22 were engaged in sales and marketing, 12 were in financial affairs, and 15 were in administration and procurement. We believe that our relations with our employees are good. We have never had a work stoppage, and our employees are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

Insurance

We do not have any business interruption, litigation or natural disaster insurance coverage for our operations in China. Insurance companies in China offer limited business insurance products. While business interruption insurance is available to a limited extent in China, we have determined that the risks of interruption, cost of such insurance and the difficulties associated with acquiring such insurance on commercially reasonable terms make it impractical for us to have such insurance. Therefore, we are subject to business and product liability exposure. Business or product liability claims or potential regulatory actions could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We do, however, pay certain required insurance amounts in connection with our employees’ wages. The amount and types of insurance we must provide under Chinese and local requirements vary by the location of each of the Domestic Companies. The following table summarizes the types of insurance paid for each of the Domestic Companies:

Nanjing Recon

Housing Fund

Pension

Unemployment Insurance

Medical Insurance

Occupational Injury Insurance

Maternity Insurance

BHD

Pension

Unemployment Insurance

Medical Insurance

Occupational Injury Insurance

ENI (through December 15, 2010)

Pension

Unemployment Insurance

Medical Insurance

Occupational Injury Insurance

Maternity Insurance

The Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item because the Company is a smaller reporting company.

The Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item because the Company is a smaller reporting company.

We currently operate in three facilities throughout China. Our headquarters are located in Beijing.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such pending or threatened legal proceedings, claims, regulatory inquires or investigations that we believe will have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

PART II

(a) Market for Our Ordinary Shares

We completed our initial public offering on July 29, 2009. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sale prices for our ordinary shares as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market.

Fiscal 2011

As of June 30, 2011, there were approximately six holders of record of our ordinary shares. This excludes our ordinary shares owned by shareholders holding ordinary shares under nominee security position listings. On June 30, 2011, the last sales price of our ordinary shares as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market was $2.39 per ordinary share.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares. We anticipate that we will retain any earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. Therefore, we do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements, financial conditions and future prospects and other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Because we are a holding company with no operations of our own and all of our operations are conducted through our Chinese subsidiary, our ability to pay dividends and to finance any debt that we may incur is dependent upon dividends and other distributions paid. In addition, Chinese legal restrictions permit payment of dividends to us by our Chinese subsidiary only out of its accumulated net profit, if any, determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Under Chinese law, our subsidiary is required to set aside a portion (at least 10%) of its after-tax net income (after discharging all cumulated loss), if any, each year for compulsory statutory reserve until the amount of the reserve reaches 50% of our subsidiaries’ registered capital. These funds may be distributed to shareholders at the time of its wind up. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Holding Company Structure.”

Payments of dividends by our subsidiary in China to the Company are also subject to restrictions including primarily the restriction that foreign invested enterprises may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at those banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business after providing valid commercial documents. There are no such similar foreign exchange restrictions in the Cayman Islands.

(b) The section entitled “Use of Proceeds” from our registration statement filed on August 12, 2008, as amended (the “Registration Statement”) is incorporated herein by reference. The effective date of the Registration Statement is July 22, 2009, and the Commission file number assigned to the Registration Statement is 333-152964. The Registration Statement registers the offering of up to 1,700,000 ordinary shares (subject to amendment in accordance with the Securities Act of 1933 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder) (the “Offering”). As of June 30, 2011, the Company has spent proceeds from the Offering in accordance with the following chart:

(c) None.

The Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item because the Company is a smaller reporting company.

The following discussion and analysis of our company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.

Overview

We are a company with limited liability incorporated in 2007 under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Headquartered in Beijing, we provide products and services to oil and gas companies and their affiliates through our Domestic Companies. As the company contractually controlling the Domestic Companies, we are the center of strategic management, financial control and human resources allocation.

Our business is mainly focused on the upstream sectors of the oil and gas industry. We derive our revenues from the sales and provision of (1) hardware products, (2) software products, and (3) services. Our products and services involve most of the key procedures of the extraction and production of oil and gas, and include automation systems, equipment, tools and on-site technical services.

Our VIEs provide the oil and gas industry with equipment, production technologies, automation and services to enhance our customers’ efficiency.

•       Nanjing Recon: Nanjing Recon is a high-tech company that specializes in automation services for oilfield companies. It mainly focuses on providing automation solutions to the oil exploration industry, including monitoring wells, automatic metering to the joint station production, process monitor, and a variety of oilfield equipment and control systems.

•       BHD: BHD is a high-tech company that specializes in transportation equipment and stimulation productions and services. Possessing proprietary patents and substantial industry experience, BHD has built up stable and strong working relationships with the major oilfields in China.

Business Outlook

The oilfield engineering and technical service industry is generally divided into five sections: (1) exploration, (2) drilling and completion, (3) testing and logging, (4) production and (5) oilfield construction. Thus far our businesses have only focused on production. Our management believes it is time to expand our business, leverage our core expertise, and develop new products and services. Management anticipates opportunities both in new markets and our existing markets. We believe that many existing oil wells and oilfields are in need of renewal and improvement on their current equipment to maintain production. Accordingly, products and services such as ours will be in demand as new oil and gas fields are developed and improved. In the next three years, we will focus on the following areas.

Measuring Equipment and Service. Our priority is the development of our well, pipeline and oilfield Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (“SCADA”) engineering project service, oilfield video surveillance and control system, and reforming technical support service. According to industry estimates, the potential market for our wireless indicator and remote monitoring system, SCADA, is approximately RMB 5 billion.

Gathering and Transferring Equipment. (1) Furnace. We estimate total market demand in China for furnaces like ours at about 2,000 units per year, of which 500 are expected to come from new wells and 1,500 are expected to come from reconstruction of old wells. The potential market is estimated at ¥800 million (approximately $121 million) based on an average price of ¥400,000 (approximately $60,498) per furnace. (2) Oil/water separator. We estimate the total market demand in China at about 800 units per year, of which 300 are expected to come from new wells and 500 are expected to come from reconstruction of old wells. The potential market is about ¥400 million (approximately $60 million) based on an average price of ¥500,000 (approximately $75,622). (3) Burner. We estimate total market demand in China at about 5,000 units per year, of which 1,000 are expected to come from new wells and 4,000 are expected to come from reconstruction of old wells. The potential market is about ¥300 million (approximately $45 million) based on an average unit price of ¥60,000 (approximately $9,075).

New Business. Along with the opening of the oilfield service market to private companies, we are starting to establish our own service team equipped with specialized equipment and experienced staff. We expect the new business to start generating revenues during the quarter ended December 31, 2011.

Recent Industry Developments

Our trading business was harmed by our clients’ policy in the last year. Beginning in 2010, big state-owned Chinese oil companies began implementing significant adjustments to their operating strategies. The following strategic initiatives implemented by the large Chinese oil companies have had a significant impact on our business and operations:

•        Development of strategic suppliers, and enhancement of direct cooperation with well-known domestic and international companies;

•        Enhanced cooperation with qualified domestic manufacturers of equipment and suppliers of technology and services; and

•        Increased focus on exploration and exploitation, and introduction of products and techniques through outsourcing with professional private enterprises in the remaining sectors of the industry chain, especially the development and production sectors.

These polices aim to establish stable long-term supply channels and secure better prices and higher quality services. They also help speed up the nationalization of major equipment and critical materials, and the implementation of new products and services.

Accordingly, our businesses were affected in the following ways:

•        Previously, approximately one-third of our revenue came from our business with Sinopec by acting as an agent. This business was primarily conducted by our contractually controlled affiliate, ENI. We received orders mainly by tendering. Then we would need to use our own funds to purchase specified equipment and we get paid after the contract period (usually 1 year). With the previously higher barrier to entry in this market, we were able to make considerable profits. However, our business has suffered as a result of big Chinese oil companies’ policy adjustments. Especially for Sinopec, for the year 2010, its procurement from strategic suppliers rose rapidly to 60%, and this ratio is expected to be over 80% by the end of China’s economic development Twelfth Five Year Plan. We do not manufacture the equipment ourselves and cannot meet the standards for being a strategic supplier to the big oil companies. As a result of such adjustments, our business operated by ENI has experienced difficulty winning larger projects with higher gross profits. However, businesses conducted through our other two VIEs, BHD and Nanjing Recon, are largely unaffected because they are not in the form of trading therefore not subject to the procurement policies to the same extent as ENI is.

•        We now have the opportunity to focus more on our own branded equipment and automation system products and services, which we believe are technologically advanced and competitively priced.

•        We also have the capability to handle independent construction projects. With fast improvement of our integrated design capabilities and rich experience in construction projects, our management expects to fully utilize our advantages.

In an effort to remediate the adverse effects of the market changes, our management is also actively adjusting our operating structure to strip non-essential businesses and maintain a robust core business. We are also accelerating extensive application of our self-developed technologies and products and expanding our sales network to offset the declines in our trading business.

Growth Strategy

As a smaller local company, it is our basic strategy to focus on developing our onshore oilfield business, i.e. the upstream of the industry. Due to the remote location and difficult environment of China’s oil and gas fields, foreign competitors rarely enter those fields.

Large domestic oil companies prefer to focus on their exploration and development businesses to earn higher margins and keep their competitive advantage. With regard to private oilfield service companies, 90% specialize in the manufacture of drilling and production equipment. Thus, the market for technical support and project service is still in its early stage. Our management focuses on providing high quality products and service at oilfields where we have a geographical advantage. Such strategy allows us to avoid conflicts of interest with bigger suppliers of drilling equipment and keep our leading position within the market segment. Our mission is to increase the automation and safety levels of industrial petroleum production in China, and improve its efficiency and effectiveness through advanced technologies. At the same time, we are always looking to improve our business and to increase our earning capability.

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Our operating results in any period are subject to the general conditions typically affecting the Chinese oilfield service industry including:

•   the amount of spending by our customers, primarily those in the oil and gas industry;

•   growing demand from large corporations for improved management and software designed to enhance corporate performance;

•   the procurement processes of our customers, especially those in the oil and gas industry;

•   competition and related pricing pressure from other oilfield service solution providers, especially those targeting the oil and gas industry in China;

•   the ongoing development of the oilfield service market in China; and

•   inflation and other factors.

Unfavorable changes in any of these general conditions could negatively affect the number and size of the projects we undertake, the number of products we sell, the amount of services we provide, the price of our products and services or otherwise affect our results of operations.

Our operating results in any period are more directly affected by company-specific factors including:

•   our continued ability to lead and to control all affiliated entities;

•   our revenue growth;

•   the proportion of our business dedicated to large companies;

•   our ability to successfully develop, introduce and market new solutions and services;

•   our ability to increase our revenues from customers both old and new in the oil and gas industry in China;

•   our ability to effectively manage our operating costs and expenses; and

•   our ability to effectively implement any targeted acquisitions and/or strategic alliances so as to provide efficient access to the markets in the oil and gas industry.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Estimates and Assumptions

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which require us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions. We continually evaluate these estimates and assumptions based on the most recently available information, our own historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates. An accounting policy is considered critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time such estimate is made, and if different accounting estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following policies involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity in their application and require us to make significant accounting estimates. The following descriptions of critical accounting policies, judgments and estimates should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and other disclosures included in this quarterly report. Significant accounting estimates reflected in our Company’s consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, and useful lives of property and equipment.

Consolidation of VIEs

We recognize an entity as a VIE if it either (i) has insufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) has equity investors who lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. We consolidate a VIE as its primary beneficiary when we have both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

Assets recognized as a result of consolidating VIEs do not represent additional assets that could be used to satisfy claims against our general assets. Conversely, liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these VIEs do not represent additional claims on our general assets; rather, they represent claims against the specific assets of the consolidated VIEs.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when the following four criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been provided; (3) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery does not occur until products have been shipped or services have been provided to the client and the client has signed a completion and acceptance report, risk of loss has transferred to the client, client acceptance provisions have lapsed, or the Company has objective evidence that the criteria specified in client acceptance provisions have been satisfied. The sales price is not considered to be fixed or determinable until all contingencies related to the sale have been resolved.

Hardware

Revenue from hardware sales is generally recognized when the product is shipped to the customer and when there are no unfulfilled company obligations that affect the customer’s final acceptance of the arrangement.

Software

The Company sells self-developed software. For software sales, the Company recognizes revenues in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification, Topic 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition,” and related interpretations. Revenue from software is recognized according to project contracts. Contract costs are accumulated during the periods of installation and testing or commissioning. Usually this is short term. Revenue is not recognized until completion of the contracts and receipt of acceptance statements.

Services

The Company provides services to improve software functions and system requirements on separated fixed-price contracts. Revenue is recognized when services are completed and acceptance is determined by a completion report signed by the customer.

Deferred income represents unearned amounts billed to customers related to sales contracts.

Cost of Revenues

When the criteria for revenue recognition have been met, costs incurred are recognized as cost of revenue. Cost of revenues includes wages, materials, handling charges, the cost of purchased equipment and pipes, and other expenses associated with manufactured products and services provided to customers. We expect cost of revenues to grow as our revenues grow. It is possible that we could incur development costs with little revenue recognition, but based upon our past history, we expect our revenues to grow.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for trade accounts receivable, other receivables, advances to suppliers, trade accounts payable, accrued liabilities, advances from customers and notes payable approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Trade receivables and other receivable accounts are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less a provision made for impairment of these receivables. Provisions are applied to trade and other receivables where events or changes in circumstances indicate that the balance may not be collectible. The identification of doubtful accounts requires the use of judgment and estimates of management. Our management must make estimates of the collectability of our accounts receivable. Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Our allowance for trade accounts receivable was ¥1,089,331 and ¥2,854,584 ($441,612) on June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2011, respectively. Specifically, allowance for trade accounts receivable - related parties on June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2011 was ¥0 and ¥184,728 ($28,578), respectively. Allowance for other receivables on June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2011 was ¥154,057 and ¥199,635 ($30,884), respectively. There was no allowance for other receivables from related parties.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

We review the carrying values of our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that they may not be recoverable. When such an event occurs, we project undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition over the remaining life of the asset. If projections indicate that the carrying value of the long-lived asset will not be recovered, we reduce the carrying value of the long-lived asset by the estimated excess of the carrying value over the projected discounted cash flows. In the past, we have not had to make significant adjustments to the carrying values of our long-lived assets, and we do not anticipate a need to do so in the future. However, circumstances could cause us to have to reduce the value of our capitalized software more rapidly than we have in the past if our revenues were to significantly decline. Estimated cash flows from the use of the long-lived assets are highly uncertain and therefore the estimation of the need to impair these assets is reasonably likely to change in the future. Should the economy or the acceptance of our software change in the future, it is likely that our estimate of the future cash flows from the use of these assets will change by a material amount.

Results of Operations

The following consolidated results of operations include the results of operations of the Company and its VIEs, BHD, Nanjing Recon and ENI (through December 15, 2010). The results of operations are those of the VIEs. On December 16, 2010, ENI changed its equity ownership. We ceased to have the power to direct the activities of ENI, which most significantly impact its economic performance as of that date. As a result of the Company’s determination to deconsolidate ENI, ENI’s results of operations have been consolidated in the Company’s results of operations only through December 15, 2010.

Our historical reporting results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.

Revenue

Revenues. Our total revenues for the year ended June 30, 2011 were ¥63,688,467 ($9,852,795), a decrease of ¥53,315,665, or 45.57%, from ¥117,004,132 for the year ended June 30, 2010. During this period, our accessory sales business decreased by ¥30,977,791, or 62.38%, automation business decreased by ¥15,482,850, or 51.04%, and our and sales of transportation equipment decreased by ¥6,855,024, or 18.52%. This was mainly caused by:

Cost and Margin

Cost of Revenues. Our cost of revenues includes raw materials and costs related to design, implementation, delivery and maintenance of products and services. All materials and components we need can be purchased or manufactured under contracts. Usually the prices of electronic components do not fluctuate dramatically due to market competition and will not significantly affect our cost of revenues. However, specialized equipment and incentive chemical products may be directly influenced by the price moves of metal and oil. Additionally, the prices of some imported accessories mandated by our clients can also impact our cost.

Our cost of revenues decreased by ¥24,124,018, or 35.69%, from ¥67,593,524 in the year ended June 30, 2010 to ¥43,469,506 ($6,724,862) for the same period in 2011.

(1)     The decrease of costs was mainly due to the deconsolidation of ENI, which accounted for ¥17,632,489 ($2,727,798); and

(2)     Cost for operations decreased by ¥6,491,529 ($1,004,259), which were mainly due to project delays.

As a percentage of revenues, our cost of revenues increased from 57.77% in the year ended June 30, 2010 to 68.25% in the same period of 2011. This increase was a result of unfinished service projects that had been delayed for which additional costs were incurred during this period. As we move forward with those delayed projects, we expect our revenue to increase and the cost as a percentage of revenues to return to prior levels.

Gross Profit. For the year ended June 30, 2011, our gross profit decreased to ¥20,218,961 ($3,127,933) from ¥49,410,608 for the same period in 2010, a decrease of ¥29,191,647, or 59.08%. For the year ended June 30, 2011, our gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased to 31.75%, from 42.23% for the same period in 2010. As a result of the decrease in our revenues and an increase in our cost, our gross profit decreased and our gross margin dropped.

Our management believes that a higher margin level is very important to secure our business. The domestic oilfield service industry in China is becoming more and more competitive. Our management believes we need to adjust our business structure to place a greater emphasis on our automation and service project business. We are now switching our role from a primary product supplier to an advanced service integrator. Management believes that specializing in providing packaged customized solutions will increase our long-term competitiveness.

Expenses

Selling and Distribution Expenses. Selling and distribution expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenditures of our sales and marketing department, sales commissions, costs of our marketing programs (such as public relations, advertising and trade shows), and an allocation of our facilities and depreciation expenses. Selling expenses decreased by ¥462,651 ($71,573), or 5.64%, from ¥8,198,742 for the year ended June 30, 2010 to ¥7,736,091 ($1,196,796) for the same period of 2011. Selling expenses were stable compared to last year. The percentage of selling expenses in relation to revenue increased from 7.01% to 12.15%, mainly caused by the decrease in revenue. Our management believe the selling and distribution expenses are reasonable, and, as our revenue returns to a normal level, selling and distribution expenses as a percentage of revenue will decrease and remain stable in the long run.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs from our human resources organization, facilities costs, provision for bad debt, depreciation expenses, professional advisor fees, audit fees and other expenses incurred in connection with general operations. General and administrative expenses increased by ¥18,786,490, or 141.58%, from ¥13,269,162 in the year ended June 30, 2010 to ¥32,055,652 ($4,959,105) for the same period of 2011. Of the increase, ¥13,197,026 ($2,041,619) were caused by the deconsolidation of ENI and the remaining part due to: (1) increased salaries by our VIEs to attract talent, (2) increased expenses related to research and development activities and (3) increased expenses related to our planned secondary offering, which was withdrawn due to unfavorable market conditions. General and administrative expenses were 11.34% of total revenues for the year ended June 30, 2010 and 48.64% of total revenues for the same period in 2011. This percentage increase was primarily attributable to the decrease of revenue and increased expenses attributed to the deconsolidation of ENI.

Net Income

Income (Loss) from Operations. Loss from operations was ¥19,572,782 ($3,027,968) for the year ended June 30, 2011, compared to income from operations of ¥27,942,704 for the same period of 2010. As a result of the deconsolidation of ENI, lower revenues and higher administrative expenses, income from operations decreased during this period.

Subsidy Income. We received grants of ¥2,132,880 and ¥822,545 ($127,250) from the local government for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively. These grants were given by the government in the form of income tax return to support local companies in developing advanced technologies and improving their products. Subsidy income for 2010 was higher because we received one-off grants for becoming a public company.

Loss on Deconsolidation. As a result of the deconsolidation of ENI, we suffered a loss of ¥8,989,614 ($1,390,720), which amount was measured as the difference between (a) the aggregate of (i) the fair value of any consideration received, (ii) the fair value of the retained non-controlling investment in ENI at the date in which ENI was deconsolidated, and (iii) the carrying amount of any non-controlling interest in ENI; and (b) the carrying value of the net assets and liabilities of ENI as of December 15, 2010. Our management believes it was an unusual loss and is in the process of initiating a series of safeguards to prevent this from happening in the future.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax is provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to ASC Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences on future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if it is not likely that the asset will be realized. We have not been subject to any income taxes in the United States or the Cayman Islands. Enterprises doing business in PRC are generally subject to enterprise income tax at a rate of 25%; however, Nanjing Recon and BHD were granted certifications of High Technology Enterprise and are taxed at a rate of 15% for taxable income generated. The applicable tax rate for each of our subsidiaries changed in the past few years because of their qualifications and different local policies. For calendar years 2010 and 2011, Nanjing Recon and BHD were taxed at a rate of 15% and ENI was taxed at 25%. Our effective EIT burden will vary, depending on which of our Domestic Companies generate greater revenues. Income tax expense for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 was ¥7,504,877 and ¥665,146 ($102,900), respectively. This decrease was mainly due to a decrease in taxable operating income.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Ordinary Shareholders. As a result of the factors described above, net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders was ¥29,036,375 ($4,492,015) for the year ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of ¥49,094,914, or 244.76%, over net income of ¥20,058,539 for the same period of 2010.

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA. We define adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted for income tax expense, interest expense, non-cash stock compensation expense, and depreciation, amortization expense. We believe it is useful to an equity investor in evaluating our operating performance because (1) it is widely used by investors in our industry to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items such as interest expense, depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting methods, the book value of assets, the capital structure and the method by which the assets were acquired; and (2) it helps investors more meaningfully evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure and asset base from our operating results.

Adjusted EBITDA decreased by ¥49,209,150, or 151.31%, to a loss of ¥16,686,685 ($2,581,481) for the year ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. This was due to adverse operating results of ENI, especially the non-collectable purchase advance, loss of deconsolidation, the construction delays experienced by some of our customers and the extra expenses associated with our annual meeting and our withdrawn secondary offering. These factors caused revenues during the period to decrease while our administrative expenses increased. Compared to the 244.76% decrease in net income (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders, we believe EBITDA more accurately reflects our operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of cash on hand, demand deposits and highly liquid short-term debt investments with stated maturities of no more than six months. As of June 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents in the amount of ¥3,485,944 ($539,286).

Indebtedness. As of June 30, 2011, except for ¥1,743,286 ($269,692) of short-term borrowings, ¥911,399 ($140,996) of short-term borrowings from related parties, and ¥5,000,000 ($773,515) commercial loan from a local bank, we did not have any finance leases or purchase commitments, guarantees or other material contingent liabilities.

Holding Company Structure. We are a holding company with no operations of our own. All of our operations are conducted through the Domestic Companies. As a result, our ability to pay dividends and to finance any debt that we may incur is dependent upon the receipt of dividends and other distributions from the Domestic Companies. In addition, Chinese legal restrictions permit payment of dividends to us by our Domestic Companies only out of its accumulated net profit, if any, determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Under Chinese law, the Domestic Companies are required to set aside a portion (at least 10%) of their after-tax net income (after discharging all cumulated loss), if any, each year for compulsory statutory reserve until the amount of the reserve reaches 50% of the Domestic Companies’ registered capital. These funds may be distributed to shareholders at the time of wind-up. When we were incorporated in the Cayman Islands in August 2007, 5,000,000 ordinary shares were authorized, and 50,000 ordinary shares were issued to Mr. Yin Shenping, Mr. Chen Guangqiang and Mr. Li Hongqi, at a par value of $0.01 each. On December 10, 2007, our company sold 2,632 ordinary shares to an investor at an aggregate consideration of $200,000. On June 8, 2009, in connection with our initial public offering, the Board of Directors approved a 42.7840667-to-1 split of ordinary shares and redeemable ordinary shares to shareholders of record as of such date. After giving effect to the share split of our ordinary shares and the completion of our initial public offering, we had 3,951,811 ordinary shares outstanding.

On December 16, 2010, in light of the change of the ownership of ENI, we ceased to have the power to direct the activities of ENI, which as of that date most significantly impact its economic performance. As a result, ENI ceased to be our VIE starting from the same date.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We have not entered into any financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. In addition, we have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our own shares and classified as shareholders’ equity, or that are not reflected in our financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. Moreover, we do not have any variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

Capital Resources. To date we have financed our operations primarily through cash flows from operations and proceeds from the initial public offering. As of June 30, 2011, we had total assets of ¥114,884,345 ($17,772,951), which includes cash amounting to ¥3,485,944 ($539,286), net accounts receivable from third parties amounting to ¥22,329,705 ($3,454,472), and net accounts receivable from related parties amounting to ¥25,983,172 ($4,019,674). Working capital amounted to ¥73,884,461 ($11,430,146) and shareholders’ equity amounted to ¥81,672,396 ($12,634,962).

Cash from Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities was ¥6,331,632 ($979,523) for the year ended June 30, 2011. This was a decrease of ¥47,569,756 ($7,359,183) from ¥53,901,388 for the year ended June 30, 2010. Specifically, the decrease is mainly due to:

(1)     the decrease in trade accounts receivable because of the deconsolidation of ENI and general improvement in collections;

(2)     the decrease in purchase advances due mainly to receipt of materials at year-end;

(3)     the increase in costs of inventories by ¥9,425,183 during this period for a new on-going new project; and

(4)     the decrease in tax payable due mainly to deconsolidation of ENI and lower net income.

Cash from Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was ¥2,429,394 ($375,834) for the year ended June 30, 2011, an increase of ¥2,169,180 from ¥260,214 for the same period of 2010. The foremost factor for the decrease was the loss of cash associated with the deconsolidation of ENI.

Cash from Financing Activities. Cash flows provided by financing activities amounted to ¥341,235 ($52,791) for the year ended June 30, 2011, compared to cash flows provided by financing activities of ¥63,662,376 for the year ended June 30, 2010. The decrease from 2010 was because we received our IPO funds in fiscal 2010 and not 2011; and we had a higher level of short-term borrowings, net of repayments in fiscal 2010. During the year ended June 30, 2011, we borrowed ¥5,000,000 ($773,515) from a domestic commercial bank to supplement working capital.

Working Capital. Total working capital as of June 30, 2011 amounted to ¥73,884,461, compared to ¥117,601,043 as of June 30, 2010. Total current assets as of June 30, 2011 amounted to ¥114,884,345 ($17,772,951), a slight decrease of ¥61,762,941 compared to ¥175,164,405 at June 30, 2010.

Current liabilities amounted to ¥26,895,978 ($4,160,890) at June 30, 2011, in comparison to ¥57,563,362 at June 30, 2010. The decrease was attributable mainly to the deconsolidation of ENI.

The current ratio increased from 3.04 at June 30, 2010 to 3.75 in June 30, 2011. The change in our current ratio was primarily due to the decrease in our current liabilities.

Operating Lease Agreements. We leased offices for our VIEs in Beijing, Nanjing and Jining through December 31, 2012, July 9, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively. Below is a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations and commitments as of June 30, 2011:

Recently Enacted Accounting Standards

None.

The Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item because the Company is a smaller reporting company.

The Company’s financial statements and the related notes, together with the report of Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP for the year ended June 30, 2010 and the report of Friedman LLP for the year ended June 30, 2011, are set forth following the signature pages of this report.

None.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2011, our company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including our Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. In light of the nature of the adjustments attributable to the late filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were ineffective in timely alerting them to information required to be included in the Company’s periodic U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) filings.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In light of the quarterly reports for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and March 30, 2011 which could no longer be relied upon and required restatement, the Company has conducted a preliminary assessment of its accounting organization and the manner in which the accounting and financial reporting functions are being supported. Based on such assessment, the Company has developed a preliminary plan to strengthen its accounting and financial reporting functions as well as the related disclosure controls and procedures. As of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, the Company has not implemented any of the remedial measures proposed in the preliminary plan.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets;

(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of its management and directors; and

(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company’s internal control system, including (i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring. Based on this assessment, the Company’s management believes that, as of June 30, 2011, its internal control over financing reporting is not effective based on those criteria.

Based on such a finding, the Company has developed a preliminary plan to strengthen its accounting and financial reporting functions as well as the related disclosure controls and procedures. Such plan will require the hiring of additional resources and the deployment of other corporate resources for the accounting department in relation to the financial reporting process. Such additional resources will include the establishment of a work force dedicated to the task of correcting past financial irregularities and maintaining correct financial reporting on an on-going basis. To strengthen the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, the Company has engaged outside consultants that are skilled in SEC reporting and Section 404 compliance to assist in the implementation of the following remedial actions (which are targeted to be completed by June 2012):

• Development and formalization of key accounting and financial reporting policies and procedures;

• Identification and documentation of key controls by business process;

• Enhancement of existing disclosures policies and procedures;

• Formalization of periodic communication between management and the audit committee;

• Implementation of policies and procedures intended to enhance management monitoring and oversight by the Audit Committee; and

• Formalization of a periodic staff training program to enhance their awareness of the key internal control activities.

None.

PART III

Regulation S-K Item 401:

Executive Officers and Directors

The following table sets forth our executive officers and directors, their ages and the positions held by them:

Yin Shenping. Mr. Yin is our Chief Executive Officer. In 2003, Mr. Yin founded Nanjing Recon, a Chinese company that provides services to automate and enhance the extraction of petroleum in China, and has been the Chief Executive Officer since that time. Prior to founding Nanjing Recon, Mr. Yin served as a sales manager for Fujian Haitian Network Company from 1992 through 1994. Mr. Yin has founded and operated a number of companies: Xiamen Hengda Haitian Computer Network Co., Ltd. (1994), Baotou Hengda Haitian Computer Network Co., Ltd. (1997) and Beijing Jingke Haitian Electronic Technology Development Co., Ltd. (1999), and Jingsu Huasheng Information Technology Co., Ltd. (2000). In 2000, Mr. Yin merged the former Nanjing Kingsley Software Engineering Co., Ltd. into Nanjing Recon. Mr. Yin received his bachelor’s degree in 1991 from Nanjing Agricultural University in information systems. Mr. Yin has been chosen as a director because he is one of the founders of the Company and we believe his knowledge of the Company and years of experience in our industry give him the ability to guide the Company as a director.

Liu Jia. Ms. Liu has served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2008. In 2008 Ms. Liu assisted Heilongjiang Province Jintian Group with financial due diligence, field surveys and data analysis. While in college Ms. Liu served internships in Xinghua Certified Public Accountants, Ltd., Beijing Zhongweihuahao Accountants Affairs Office, Tiantong Securities Co., Ltd. and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which internships focused on auditing, accounting and data analysis. Ms. Liu received her bachelor’s degree in 2006 from Beijing University of Chemical Technology, School of Economics and Management and her master’s degree in industrial economics in 2009 from Beijing Wuzi University.

Chen Guangqiang. Mr. Chen has served as our Chief Technology Officer since 2003. Mr. Chen was a geological engineer for the Fourth Oil Extraction Plant of Huabei Oil Field from 1985 through 1993. From 1993 through 1999, Mr. Chen was a chief engineer for Xinda Company, CNPC Development Bureau. From 1999 through 2003, Mr. Chen served as the general manager of Beijing Adar. Mr. Chen received his bachelor’s degree in 1985 from Southwest Petroleum Institute. Mr. Chen has been chosen as a director because he is one of the founders of the Company and we believe we can benefit from his years of engineering experience and management experience in the oil extraction industry.

Nelson N.S. Wong. Mr. Wong joined our Board of Directors in 2008. In 1990 Mr. Wong joined the Vigers Group, a real estate company that provides services in valuation, corporate property services, investment advisory services, general practice surveying, building surveying, commercial, retail and industrial agency, and property and facilities management. Mr. Wong became the Vice Chairman and CEO of the Vigers Group in 1993. In 1995 Mr. Wong established the ACN Group, a business consulting firm, where he has worked continuously and continues to serve as the Chairman and Managing Partner. Mr. Wong received a bachelor’s degree in arts from the PLA Institute of International Relations in Nanjing in 1983. Mr. Wong has been chosen as a director because we believe we can benefit from his leadership skills and management experience.

Hu Jijun. Mr. Hu joined our Board of Directors in 2008. From 1988 to 2003, Mr. Hu served in a variety of positions at our No. 2 test-drill plant, including technician of installation, assets equipment work, electrical installation, control room production dispatcher, Deputy Chief Engineer of the Technology Battalion, and Deputy Director of Production. From 2003 to 2005 he served as Head of the Integrated Battalion and he is currently the Head of the Transport Battalion, Senior Electric Engineer. Mr. Hu graduated as an automated professional from the China University of Petroleum in 1988. Mr. Hu has been chosen as a director because we believe his years of experience and knowledge gained while working at our No. 2 test-drill plant will prove beneficial to the guidance of the Company.

Zhao Shudong. Before retiring in 2006, Mr. Zhao spent over 30 years working in the oilfield industry. From 1970 to 1976, Mr. Zhao worked as a technician in the Daqing oilfield. From 1976 to 1982, Mr. Zhao served as the vice director of the Hubei Oilfield Generalized Geologic Technical Research Institute. Mr. Zhao then spent 11 years as a director and section chief at the Scientific and Technological Development Department of the Huabei Petroleum Administrative Bureau. He was subsequently appointed Chief Geologist of the bureau, a position he held from 1993 to 1999. From 1999 to 2006, Mr. Zhao served as the General Manager of the Huabei Oilfield Company of CNPC. Mr. Zhao studied at the Northeast Petroleum Institute from 1965 to 1970. Mr. Zhao has been chosen as a director nominee because of his extensive experience in the oilfield industry.

Lu Jun. Dr. Lu currently serves as the Chair of the Department of Finance and the Director of Banking for the Research Center at Sun Yat-sen University. Dr. Lu received his Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from Nankai University in 1984. He then earned his Master of Arts degree in economics from Sun Yat-sen University in 1987 and his Doctor of Philosophy degree from Fudan University in 2001. Dr. Lu began working at Sun Yat-sen University in 1987 as an Associate Professor. He also served as an editorial member of the Journal of Sun Yat-sen University Social Science Edition, before becoming the Chair of the Department of Finance in 1998 and the Director of the Banking Research Center in 1999. Dr. Lu has been chosen as a director nominee because of his experience and knowledge in finance and economics.

Sun Wenhui. Ms. Sun has served as the Deputy General Manager of Zhongdan Investment & Credit Guarantee Co., Ltd. since 2003. From 2000 to 2003, she served as the Deputy General Manager of Beijing Gosun Online Telecom Co., Ltd. From 1996 to 2000, Ms. Sun served as the Vice President of the Information Department and General Officer Director for Beijing Guoxin Communication Development Co. Ltd. Prior to that she served as an Assistant Director at Beijing Lin’an Communication Technology Development Company from 1993 to 1996. Ms. Sun received her Bachelor’s degree in computer applications from the Harbin Institute of Technology and her Master’s in Business Administration from the Renmin University of China. Ms. Sun has been chosen as a director nominee because of her extensive management and administrative experience.

Employment Agreements

We have employment agreements with each of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Financial Officer. With the exception of the employment agreement with our Chief Financial Officer, each of these employment agreements provides for an indefinite term. Such employment agreements may be terminated (1) if the employee gives written notice of his or her intention to resign, (2) the employee is absent from three consecutive meetings of the Board of Directors, without special leave of absence from the other members of the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors passes a resolution that such employee has vacated his office, or (3) the death, bankruptcy or mental incapacity of the employee. The employment agreement for our Chief Financial Officer provides for a one-year term, currently expiring on March 12, 2012. Such employment agreement may be terminated if the employee gives thirty days’ written notice of her intention to resign, or if the Board of Directors determines she can no longer perform her duties as Chief Financial Officer and provides her with thirty days’ written notice of termination.

Under Chinese law, we may only terminate employment agreements without cause and without penalty by providing notice of non-renewal one month prior to the date on which the employment agreement is scheduled to expire. If we fail to provide this notice or if we wish to terminate an employment agreement in the absence of cause, then we are obligated to pay the employee one month’s salary for each year we have employed the employee. We are, however, permitted to terminate an employee for cause without penalty to the Company, where the employee has committed a crime or the employee’s actions or inactions have resulted in a material adverse effect to us.

Share Option Pool

In connection with our initial public offering, we established a pool for share options for the Domestic Companies’ and our employees. This pool contains options to purchase up to 790,362 of our ordinary shares. The options will vest at a rate of 20% per year for five years and have an exercise price of the market price of our shares on the date the options are granted. We issued 293,000 options out of our employee share option pool. We held a shareholder meeting in December 2010 and announced the resignation of three directors, as a result of which 100,000 options went back to the pool. Currently, we have 193,000 options outstanding.

Board of Directors and Board Committees

Our board of directors currently consists of seven (7) members. There are no family relationships between any of our executive officers and directors.

The directors are divided into three classes, as nearly equal in number as the then total number of directors permits. Class II directors shall face re-election at our annual general meeting of shareholders in 2012 and every three years thereafter. Class III directors shall face re-election at our annual general meeting of shareholders in 2012 and every three years thereafter. Class I directors shall face re-election at our annual general meeting of shareholders in 2013 and every three years thereafter.

If the number of directors changes, any increase or decrease will be apportioned among the classes so as to maintain the number of directors in each class as nearly as possible. Any additional directors of a class elected to fill a vacancy resulting from an increase in such class will hold office for a term that coincides with the remaining term of that class. Decreases in the number of directors will not shorten the term of any incumbent director. These board provisions could make it more difficult for third parties to gain control of the Company by making it difficult to replace members of our Board of Directors.

A director may vote in respect of any contract or transaction in which he is interested, provided, however, that the nature of the interest of any director in any such contract or transaction shall be disclosed by him at or prior to its consideration and any vote on that matter. A general notice or disclosure to the directors or otherwise contained in the minutes of a meeting or a written resolution of the directors or any committee thereof that a director is a shareholder of any specified firm or company and is to be regarded as interested in any transaction with such firm or company shall be sufficient disclosure and after such general notice it shall not be necessary to give special notice relating to any particular transaction.

There are no membership qualifications for directors. Further, there are no share ownership qualifications for directors unless so fixed by us in a general meeting.

The Board of Directors maintains a majority of independent directors who are deemed to be independent under the definition of independence provided by NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 4200(a)(15). Mr. Zhao, Mr. Lu, Mr. Wang, Mr. Hu and Mr. Sun are our independent directors.

Mr. Yin Shenping currently holds both the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. These two positions have not been consolidated into one position; Mr. Yin simply holds both positions at this time. We do not have a lead independent director because of the foregoing reason and also because we believe our independent directors are encouraged to freely voice their opinions on a relatively small company board. We believe this leadership structure is appropriate because we are a smaller reporting company that recently became listed on a public exchange; as such we deem it appropriate to be able to benefit from the guidance of Mr. Yin as both our principal executive officer and Chairman of the Board.

Our Board of Directors plays a significant role in our risk oversight. The Board of Directors makes all relevant Company decisions. As such, it is important for us to have our Chief Executive Officer serve on the Board as he plays a key role in the risk oversight of the Company. As a smaller reporting company with a small board of directors, we believe it is appropriate to have the involvement and input of all of our directors in risk oversight matters.

Currently, three committees have been established under the board: the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating committee. All of these committees consist solely of independent directors.

The audit committee is responsible for overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of the financial statements of the Company, including the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent auditors. The audit committee consists solely of independent directors, Mr. Zhao Shudong, Mr. Nelson N.S. Wong, and Mr. Hu Jijun. Mr. Wong qualifies as the audit committee financial expert and serves as the chair of the audit committee.

The compensation committee of the board of directors reviews and makes recommendations to the board regarding our compensation policies for our officers and all forms of compensation, and also administers our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans (but our board retains the authority to interpret those plans). The compensation committee consists solely of independent directors, Mr. Hu Jijun, Mr. Nelson N.S. Wong, and Mr. Lu Jun. Mr. Hu serves as the chair of the compensation committee.

The nominating committee of the board of directors is responsible for the assessment of the performance of the board, considering and making recommendations to the board with respect to the nominations or elections of directors and other governance issues. The nominating committee considers diversity of opinion and experience when nominating directors. The nominating committee consists solely of independent directors, Mr. Zhao Shudong, Ms. Sun Wenhui, and Mr. Lu Jun. Mr. Zhao serves as the chair of the nominating committee.

There are no other arrangements or understandings pursuant to which our directors are selected or nominated.

Duties of Directors

Under Cayman Islands law, our directors have a fiduciary duty to the Company to act in good faith in their dealings with or on behalf of the Company and exercise their powers and fulfill the duties of their office honestly. This duty has four essential elements:

In general, Cayman Islands law imposes various duties on directors of a company with respect to certain matters of management and administration of the Company. In addition to the remedies available under general law, the Companies Law imposes fines on directors who fail to satisfy some of these requirements. However, in many circumstances, an individual is only liable if he is knowingly guilty of the default or knowingly and willfully authorizes or permits the default. In comparison, under Delaware law, the business and affairs of a corporation are managed by or under the direction of its board of directors. In exercising their powers, directors are charged with a fiduciary duty of care to protect the interests of the corporation and a fiduciary duty of loyalty to act in the best interests of its shareholders. In addition, under Delaware law, a party challenging the propriety of a decision of the directors bears the burden of rebutting the applicability of the presumptions afforded to directors by the “business judgment rule.” If the presumption is not rebutted, the business judgment rule protects the directors and their decisions, and their business judgments will not be second guessed. If the presumption is rebutted, the directors bear the burden of demonstrating the entire fairness of the relevant transaction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Delaware courts subject directors’ conduct to enhanced scrutiny in respect of defensive actions taken in response to a threat to corporate control and approval of a transaction resulting in a sale of control of the corporation.

Limitation of Director and Officer Liability

Pursuant to our Memorandum and Articles of Association, every director or officer and the personal representatives of the same shall be indemnified and held harmless out of our assets and funds against all actions, proceedings, costs, charges, expenses, losses, damages or liabilities incurred or sustained by him or her in or about the conduct of our business or affairs or in the execution or discharge of his or her duties, powers, authorities or discretions, including without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any costs, expenses, losses or liabilities incurred by him in defending (whether successfully or otherwise) any civil proceedings concerning us or our affairs in any court whether in the Cayman Islands or elsewhere. No such director or officer will be liable for: (a) the acts, receipts, neglects, defaults or omissions of any other such Director or officer or agent; or (b) any loss on account of defect of title to any of our properties; or (c) account of the insufficiency of any security in or upon which any of our money shall be invested; or (d) any loss incurred through any bank, broker or other similar person; or (e) any loss occasioned by any negligence, default, breach of duty, breach of trust, error of judgment or oversight on his or her part; or (f) any loss, damage or misfortune whatsoever which may happen in or arise from the execution or discharge of the duties, powers authorities, or discretions of his or her office or in relation thereto, unless the same shall happen through his or her own dishonesty, gross negligence or willful default.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors, or has been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past ten years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities or commodities laws, any laws respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud in connection with any business entity or been subject to any disciplinary sanctions or orders imposed by a stock, commodities or derivatives exchange or other self-regulatory organization, except for matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement.

Regulation S-K Item 405:

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company under 17 CFR 240.16a-3(e) during its most recent fiscal year and Form 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company with respect to its most recent fiscal year, and any written representation referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the Company is not aware of any director, officer, beneficial owner of more than ten percent of any class of equity securities of the Company registered pursuant to Section 12 that failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the above Forms, reports required by Section 16(a) during the most recent fiscal year or prior years.

Regulation S-K Item 406:

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics and has filed a copy of the Code of Ethics with the Commission.

Regulation S-K Item 407(c)(3):

None.

Regulation S-K Item 407(d)(4) and (5):

The Board of Directors maintains a majority of independent directors who are deemed to be independent under the definition of independence provided by NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 4200(a)(15). The Company has an audit committee, consisting solely of independent directors of the Company, Mr. Zhao Shudong, Mr. Nelson N.S. Wong, and Mr. Hu Jijun. Mr. Wong qualifies as the audit committee financial expert. The Company’s audit committee charter has been filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 and is available on the Company’s website (www.recon.cn).

The following table shows the annual compensation paid by us to Mr. Yin Shenping, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Chen Guangqiang and Mr. Li Hongqi, our two most highly compensated officers other than Mr. Yin Shenping, for the years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

Summary Executive Compensation Table

Director Compensation

All directors hold office until the expiration of their respective terms and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers. Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Employee directors and non-voting observers do not receive any compensation for their services. Non-employee directors are entitled to receive $2,000 per Board of Directors meeting attended. In addition, non-employee directors are entitled to receive compensation for their actual travel expenses for each Board of Directors meeting attended.

Summary Director Compensation Table

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information with respect to beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of the date of this report, for each person known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our ordinary shares, and all of our executive officers and directors individually and as a group. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. Except as indicated below, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all ordinary shares shown as beneficially owned by them. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 4,029,011 Shares, which consists of 3,951,811 Shares outstanding as of January 31, 2012 and 77,200 vested options. Our major shareholders do not possess voting rights that differ from our other shareholders. The address of each of the below shareholders is c/o Recon Technology Ltd, Room 1902, Building C, King Long International Mansion, 9 Fulin Road, Beijing 100107 China.

Transactions with Related Persons

Because we do not have access certification to Jidong Oilfield, Nanjing Recon, one of our Domestic Companies, conducted transactions with Jidong Oilfield through Beijing Yabeinuoda Technology Development Co. Ltd. (“Yabeinuoda), which has access certification to the oilfield and wherein Mr. Yin holds 14% of shares. In the year ended June 30, 2011, Nanjing Recon sold ¥17,780,350 ($2,750,673) of goods and services to Yabeinuoda.  During the same period, Nanjing Recon has accounts receivables from Yabeinuoda in the amount of ¥23,077,900 ($3,570,220) as of June 30, 2011, and ¥1,220,000 was received as of September 30, 2011. Below is a summary of trade accounts receivable with related parties as of June 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

One of the owners of BHD, one of our Domestic Companies, is a 2.06% minority owner of Beijing Aerda Oil Technology Co. Ltd. (“Aerda”). The trade accounts receivable from Aerda was generated primarily from the sale of equipment for oil and gas production. One of the owners of ENI, the Company’s previous VIE which was deconsolidated on December 16, 2010, and his wife collectively controlled Zhongjiyan Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, (“Zhongjiyan”). The trade accounts receivable from Zhongjiyan was generated primarily from the sale of equipment for oil and gas production.

Nanjing Recon also made advance payments in the amount of ¥989,828 ($153,129) to one of its suppliers, Nanjing Youkong Information Technology Co. Ltd. (“Youkong”) for the year ended June 30, 2011. Mr. Yin is a 20% owner of Youkong. Below is a summary of purchase advances to related parties as of June 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively. One of the owners of ENI and his wife collectively controlled Raytheon Energy (Group) Co., Ltd Co., Ltd.

ENI purchased goods and services from and made advance payments to Shandong Kubo Oil Technology Co. Ltd. (“Kubo”), an entity in which Mr. Li Hongliang (Li Hongqi’s brother) and Ms. Wu Jin (Li Hongqi’s wife) hold 100% interest. During the period through December 15, 2010 for the year ended June 30, 2011, ENI purchased ¥5,358,000 ($905,012) of goods and services from Kubo. 

During the period through December 15, 2010 for the year ended June 30, 2011, ENI sold ¥8,991,025 ($1,390,939) of hardware to Zhongjiyan.

In addition, included in the Company’s other receivables as of June 30, 2011 were amounts “due from ENI” which represents a working capital loan to ENI. The loan balance had been in intercompany balances and was eliminated in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements before the deconsolidation of ENI. It was reclassified to other receivables after ENI ceased to be a VIE of the Company on December 16, 2010. In January 2012, ENI agreed to repay the loan on a determined payment schedule, and interest is accrued during the period at an annual rate of 4%. In accordance with the payment schedule, the principal plus accrued interest will be repaid over three years on a quarterly basis. The first four payments are set at RMB 1.2 million each. Accordingly, the current and non-current portion of the amount due from ENI is determined to be RMB 4.8 million and RMB 12,971,481, respectively.

The Company also had short-term borrowings from related parties. Below is a summary of the Company’s short-term borrowings due to related parties as of June 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

Other than as described herein, no transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K have occurred since the beginning of the Company’s last fiscal year.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors maintains a majority of independent directors who are deemed to be independent under the definition of independence provided by NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 4200(a)(15). Messers. Wong, Hu, Zhao, Lu and Sun are our independent directors.

Marcum Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP (“MarcumBP”) was appointed by the Company to serve as its independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2011. Audit services provided by MarcumBP for fiscal 2011 included the examination of the consolidated financial statements of the Company’s and services related to periodic filings made with the SEC. On December 8, 2011, the Audit Committee of the Registrant’s Board of Directors voted to dismiss MarcumBP. During the interim period ended on March 31, 2011 and through December 8, 2011, the Registrant has had no disagreements with MarcumBP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of MarcumBP, would have caused MarcumBP to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in its report on the Registrant’s financial statements for such period.

On December 9, 2011, the Registrant engaged Friedman LLP (“Friedman”) as its independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Registrant’s financial statements. The decision to engage Friedman was recommended by the Audit Committee of the Registrant’s Board of Directors. The Registrant did not make any payments to Friedman during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.

Fees Paid To Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Fees

During fiscal 2011, MarcumBP’s fees for the annual audit of our financial statements and the quarterly reviews of the financial statements were $140,000.

During fiscal 2010, Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP’s fees for the annual audit of our financial statements and the quarterly reviews of the financial statements were $135,000. Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP was appointed by the Company to serve as its independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2010. Audit services provided by Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP for fiscal 2010 included the examination of the consolidated financial statements of the Company’s and services related to periodic filings made with the SEC.

Audit Related Fees

During fiscal 2011, the Company paid MarcumBP $24,362 for audit-related services. These services consisted of advice relating to SEC matters and the filing of a registration statement.

During fiscal 2010, the Company paid Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP $14,750 for audit-related services. These services consisted of advice relating to SEC matters and the filing of a registration statement.

During fiscal 2011, the Company paid Hansen Barnett & Maxwell, P.C. $14,350 for audit-related services. These services related to the filing of a registration statement.

During fiscal 2010, the Company paid Hansen Barnett & Maxwell, P.C. $35,277 for audit-related services. These services related to the filing of a registration statement.

Tax Fees

The Company did not pay MarcumBP for tax services in fiscal 2011.

The Company did not pay Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP for tax services in fiscal 2010.

All Other Fees

The Company did not pay MarcumBP for any other services in fiscal 2011.

The Company did not pay Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP for any other services in fiscal 2010.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies

Before Hansen Barnett & Maxwell, P.C., Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP, MarcumBP and Friedman were engaged by the Company to render audit or non-audit services, their engagements were approved by the Company’s audit committee. All services rendered by Hansen Barnett & Maxwell, P.C., Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP, MarcumBP and Friedman have been so approved.

The following documents are filed herewith:

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Company caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

RECON TECHNOLOGY, LTD

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Recon Technology, Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Recon Technology, Ltd. as of June 30, 2011, and the consolidated related statements of operations and comprehensive loss, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for the year then ended. Recon Technology, Ltd.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Recon Technology, Ltd. as of June 30, 2011, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Friedman LLP

New York, New York

January 31, 2012

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Recon Technology, Ltd

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Recon Technology, Ltd (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2010 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2010.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Recon Technology, Ltd at June 30, 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP

New York, NY

September 27, 2010

RECON TECHNOLOGY, LTD

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 RECON TECHNOLOGY, LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)