REED'S, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
þ
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
o
TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from to
Commission
file number
Commission
file number: 000-32501
REED'S
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
35-2177773
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
13000
South Spring St. Los
Angeles, Ca. 90061
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(310)
217-9400
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
|
Large
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated
Filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller
reporting company þ
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No
þ
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
State
the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity,
as of the latest practicable date:
There
were 8,909,693 shares of the registrant's common stock, $0.0001 par
value, outstanding as of May 15, 2008.
Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one) Yes
o No þ
Although
forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect
the
good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based
on
facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking
statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual
results
and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed
in or
anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause
or
contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include, without
limitation, those specifically addressed under the heading “Trends, Risks,
Challenges, Opportunities That May or Are Currently Affecting Our Business”
below, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Readers
are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which
speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. We file reports with
the
SEC. You can read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s
Public Reference Room, 100 F. Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549 on official
business days during the hours of 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. You can obtain additional
information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling
the SEC
at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov)
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including the
Company.
We
undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements
in
order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date
of this
Quarterly Report. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the
various
disclosures made throughout the entirety of this annual report, which attempt
to
advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our
business,
financial condition, results of operations and
prospects.
Item
1. Financial Statements
REED’S,
INC
CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
March
31, 2008 (Unaudited)
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||
Cash
|
$
|
111,022
|
$
|
742,719
|
||
Inventory
|
2,729,584
|
3,028,450
|
||||
Trade
accounts receivable, net of allowance for
doubtful
accounts and returns and discounts of
$237,769
as of March 31, 2008 and $407,480 as of
December
31, 2007
|
1,456,711
|
1,160,940
|
||||
Other
receivables, net of allowance of $0 as of
March
31, 2008 and $300,000 as of December 31, 2007
|
1,200
|
16,288
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
57,030
|
76,604
|
||||
Total
Current Assets
|
4,355,547
|
5,025,001
|
||||
|
||||||
Property
and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation
of $942,288 as of March 31, 2008
and
$867,769 as of December 31, 2007
|
4,255,742
|
4,248,702
|
||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
||||||
Brand
names
|
800,201
|
800,201
|
||||
Other
intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
of
$-0- as of March 31, 2008 and $5,212 as of
December
31, 2007
|
35,400
|
13,402
|
||||
Total
Other Assets
|
835,601
|
813,603
|
||||
|
||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
9,446,890
|
$
|
10,087,306
|
||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
2,049,600
|
$
|
1,996,849
|
||
Current
portion of long term debt
|
12,697
|
27,331
|
||||
Accrued
interest
|
-
|
3,548
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
81,378
|
54,364
|
||||
|
||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
2,143,675
|
2,082,092
|
||||
Long
term debt, less current portion
|
1,761,044
|
765,753
|
||||
|
||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
3,904,719
|
2,847,845
|
||||
|
||||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
||||||
Preferred
stock, $10.00 par value, 500,000 shares
authorized,
48,121 issued and outstanding at
March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
liquidation
preference of $10.00 per share
|
481,212
|
481,212
|
||||
Common
stock, $.0001 par value, 19,500,000 shares
authorized,
8,907,700 shares issued and
outstanding
at March 31, 2008 and 8,751,721 at
December
31, 2007
|
890
|
874
|
||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
18,131,279
|
17,838,516
|
||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(13,071,210
|
)
|
(11,081,141
|
)
|
||
|
||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
5,542,171
|
7,239,461
|
||||
|
||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
9,446,890
|
$
|
10,087,306
|
||
|
See
accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
2
REED’S,
INC.
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended
|
||||||
|
|
March
31,
2008
|
|
|
March
31,
2007
|
|
SALES
|
$
|
3,564,100
|
$
|
3,012,690
|
||
COST
OF SALES
|
3,044,287
|
2,473,068
|
||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
519,813
|
539,622
|
||||
|
||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||
Selling
|
1,124,128
|
554,165
|
||||
General and
Administrative
|
1,330,146
|
449,343
|
||||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
2,454,274
|
1,003,508
|
||||
|
||||||
LOSS FROM
OPERATIONS
|
(1,934,461
|
)
|
(463,886
|
)
|
||
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
||||||
Interest
Income
|
830
|
23,491
|
||||
Interest
Expense
|
(56,438
|
)
|
(47,551
|
)
|
||
Total
Other Income (Expenses)
|
(55,608
|
)
|
(24,060
|
)
|
||
NET
LOSS
|
$
|
(1,990,069
|
)
|
$
|
(487,946
|
)
|
LOSS
PER SHARE —
Basic and Diluted
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
||||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED
|
8,764,683
|
7,143,185
|
See
accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
3
REED’S
INC.
STATEMENT
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008 (Unaudited)
Common
Shares
|
Stock
Amount
|
Preferred
Shares
|
Stock
Amount
|
Additional
Paid
in Capital
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2008
|
8,751,721
|
$
|
874
|
48,121
|
$
|
481,212
|
$
|
17,838,516
|
$
|
(11,081,141
|
)
|
$
|
7,239,461
|
|||||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
155,979
|
16
|
-
|
-
|
320,746
|
320,762
|
||||||||||||||||
Fair
value of options issued to employees
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(27,983
|
)
|
-
|
(27,983 |
)
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Loss for the three months ended
March,
31, 2008
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,990,069
|
)
|
(1,990,069
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2008
|
8,907,700
|
$
|
890
|
48,121
|
$
|
481,212
|
$
|
18,131,279
|
$
|
(13,071,210
|
)
|
$
|
5,542,171
|
See
accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
4
REED’S
INC.
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
March
31,
2008
|
March
31,
2007
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
(Net
Loss)
|
$ | (1,990,069 | ) |
$
|
(487,946
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
87,920
|
38,836
|
|||||
Fair
value of options issued to employees
|
(27,983 | ) | 25,128 | ||||
Fair
value of consulting
services
paid with the issuance of common stock
|
320,762
|
||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(295,771
|
)
|
(185,626
|
)
|
|||
Inventory
|
298,866
|
(479,324
|
)
|
||||
Prepaid
Expenses
|
19,574
|
(81,856
|
)
|
||||
Other
receivables
|
15,088
|
(11,650
|
)
|
||||
Other
intangibles
|
(35,400
|
)
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
52,751
|
|
128,797
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
27,014
|
7,440
|
|||||
Accrued
interest
|
(3,548
|
)
|
(20,180
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,530,796
|
)
|
(1,066,381
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Increase
in restricted cash
|
-
|
(145,664
|
)
|
||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(81,558
|
)
|
(171,624
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(81,558
|
)
|
(317,288
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
received from long term debt borrowings
|
1,770,000
|
163,276
|
|||||
Increase
in bank overdraft
|
-
|
224,872
|
|||||
Principal
payments on debt
|
(789,343
|
)
|
(45,538
|
)
|
|||
Net payment on
lines of credit
|
-
|
(630
|
)
|
||||
Payment
for public offering expenses
|
-
|
(45,000
|
)
|
||||
Deferred costs |
-
|
(82,585
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
980,657
|
214,395
|
|||||
|
|||||||
NET
DECREASE IN
CASH
|
(631,697
|
)
|
(1,169,274
|
)
|
|||
CASH —
Beginning of period
|
742,719 |
1,638,917
|
|||||
|
|||||||
CASH —
End of period
|
$ | 111,022 |
$
|
469,643
|
|||
|
|||||||
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
59,986
|
$
|
67,732
|
|||
|
|||||||
Taxes
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
See
accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
5
REED’S,
INC.
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS
OF
PRESENTATION
Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
that have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, although management of the Company
believes that the disclosures contained in these financial statements are
adequate to make the information presented herein not misleading. For further
information, refer to the financial statements and the notes thereto included
in
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2008.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenues and expense during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
The
results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the
full
fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
Income
(Loss) per Common Share
Basic
income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available
to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the year. Diluted income per share is calculated assuming the issuance
of
common shares, if dilutive, resulting from the exercise of stock options
and
warrants. As the Company had a loss in the three month-period ended March
31,
2008 and 2007, basic and diluted loss per share are the same because the
inclusion of common share equivalents would be anti-dilutive.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 the calculations of basic and
diluted
loss per share are the same because potential dilutive securities would
have an
anti-dilutive effect. The potentially dilutive securities consisted of
the
following as of March 31, 2008:
Warrants
|
1,668,236
|
|||
Preferred
Stock
|
192,484
|
|||
Options
|
563,333
|
|||
Total
|
2,424,053
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments:
The
carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash, accounts and
other
receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate fair
value
because of their short maturity. The carrying amounts of notes
payable approximate fair value because the related effective interest rates
on these instruments approximate the rates currently available to the
Company.
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards
(SFAS) No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements." This Statement defines fair
value for
certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recorded
at
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance applies to other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
On
February 12, 2008, the FASB finalized FASB Staff Position (FSP) No.157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. This Staff Position delays the
effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities
to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those
fiscal
years, except for those items that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The
adoption
of SFAS No. 157 had no effect on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements:
References
to the “FASB”, “SFAS” and “SAB” herein refer to the “Financial Accounting
Standards Board”, “Statement of Financial Accounting Standards”, and the “SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin”, respectively.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141 (R), “Business
Combinations” (FAS 141(R)), which establishes accounting principles and
disclosure requirements for all transactions in which a company obtains
control
over another business. Statement 141(R) applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Earlier
adoption is prohibited.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51”. SFAS No. 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards that require that the ownership
interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly
identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated statement of financial
position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity; the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling
interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated
statement of income; and changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the
parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be
accounted
for consistently. SFAS No. 160 also requires that any retained noncontrolling
equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair
value
when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also sets forth the disclosure
requirements to identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent
and
the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 applies to all
entities
that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit
organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding
noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate
a
subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption is prohibited. SFAS No. 160 must be applied prospectively as of
the
beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for
the
presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure
requirements are applied retrospectively for all periods presented.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No.
161”). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS
No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS
No. 133”). The objective of SFAS No. 161 is to provide users of financial
statements with an enhanced understanding of how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 requires
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses
on
derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent
features in derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 applies to all derivative
financial instruments, including bifurcated derivative instruments (and
nonderivative instruments that are designed and qualify as hedging instruments
pursuant to paragraphs 37 and 42 of SFAS No. 133) and related hedged items
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations. SFAS No.
161 also amends certain provisions of SFAS No. 131. SFAS No. 161 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. SFAS No. 161
encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods
at
initial adoption. The Company has not yet determined the effect on its
consolidated financial statements, if any, upon adoption of SFAS No.
161.
The
Company does not believe the adoption of the above recent pronouncements,
will
have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial
position, or cash flows.
Concentrations
The
Company’s cash balances on deposit with banks are guaranteed by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100,000. The Company may be exposed
to risk
for the amounts of funds held in one bank in excess of the insurance limit.
In
assessing the risk, the Company’s policy is to maintain cash balances with high
quality financial institutions. The Company had cash balances in excess
of the
$100,000 guarantee during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had two customers,
which accounted for approximately 30% and 13% and 39% and 16% of sales,
respectively . No other customers accounted for more than 10% of sales
in either
period. As of March 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $754,000 and
$71,000, respectively, of accounts receivable from these customers.
Inventory
consists of the following at:
March
31, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
||||||
Raw
Materials
|
$
|
951,688
|
$
|
1,175,580
|
|||
Finished
Goods
|
1,777,896
|
1,848,870
|
|||||
|
$
|
2,729,584
|
$
|
3,028,450
|
3.
Long Term Debt
In
March
2008, the Company originated a note payable with a bank in the amount of
$1,770,000. The note matures in February 2038. The note carries a 8.41% interest
rate, requires a monthly payment of $13,651 and is secured by all of the
land and building owned by the Company. The previous debt secured by land
and
building were paid off as a condition of obtaining this loan.
4.
Stock
Based Compensation
The
impact on our results of operations of recording stock-based compensation
for
the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was to (reduce) increase
selling expenses by $(27,983) and $25,127, respectively, and increase general
and administrative expenses by $0 and $0, respectively. The reduction in
compensation expense resulted from a change in estimated forfeitures of our
total expected stock option compensation expense. In accordance with FAS
123R,
the company recalculated its expected compensation for all options outstanding
at March 31, 2008 and compared it to previously recorded compensation expense
for options in that option pool. The change in forfeiture assumption resulted
from a significant forfeiture of stock options due to many of the option
holders
leaving the employ of the company before they became vested in those
options.
The
amount of the cumulative adjustment to reflect the effect of the forfeited
options is approximately $153,000. The amount of compensation
expense which would have been recognized if the cumulative adjustment
was
not made would have been approximately $126,000.
No
options were issued during the 3 months ended March 31, 2008.
The
following table summarizes stock option activity for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 :
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2008
|
749,000
|
$
|
6.02
|
3.8
|
$
|
732,760-
|
|||||||
Granted
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Forfeited
|
(185,667
|
)
|
$
|
7.24
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2008
|
563,333
|
$
|
5.61
|
3.3
|
$
|
63,350
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2008
|
298,333
|
$
|
3.81
|
2.4
|
$
|
63,350
|
Stock
options granted under our equity incentive plans vest over two and three
years
from the date of grant, ½ and 1/3 per year, respectively, and generally expire
five years from the date of grant. No options were granted during the three
months ended March 31, 2008.
We
calculated the fair value of each warrant award on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The
Company had 1,668,236 of warrants outstanding at March 31, 2008. There was
no
warrant activity in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
5.
Equity
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, 155,979 shares of common stock were
issued to consultants. The stock was valued based on the closing price of
the
Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The aggregate value of stock
issued was $320,762.
6.
Related Party Activity
As
of
December 31, 2007, the Company had a $300,000 note receivable from
an entity
that is partly owned by an advisor to the board of directors. The note
is
secured by all the entity’s assets and intellectual property. The note is
payable on March 25, 2008 and bears interest at 7.50% per annum with
quarterly
interest payments. As of March 31, 2008, the Company has determined
that the
note is deemed uncollectible and the collateral worthless, and has
written off
the entire balance and associated accrued interest.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2008 the Company employed one family member
of the
majority shareholder, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the
Company in a sales role. He was paid approximately $56,250. No stock options
were granted to him during the three months ended March 31,
2008.
7
Item
2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
Overview
We
develop, manufacture, market, and sell natural non-alcoholic and “New Age”
beverages, candies and ice creams. “New Age Beverages” is a category that
includes natural soda, fruit juices and fruit drinks, ready-to-drink teas,
sports drinks, and water. We currently manufacture, market and sell six unique
product lines:
· |
Reed’s
Ginger Brews,
|
· |
Virgil’s
Root Beer and Cream Sodas,
|
· |
China
Colas,
|
· |
Reed’s
Ginger Juice Brews,
|
· |
Reed’s
Ginger Candies, and
|
· |
Reed’s
Ginger Ice Creams
|
We
sell
most of our products in specialty gourmet and natural food stores, supermarket
chains, retail stores and restaurants in the United States and, to a lesser
degree, in Canada. We primarily sell our products through a network of natural,
gourmet and independent distributors. We also maintain an organization of
in-house sales managers who work mainly in the stores serviced by our natural,
gourmet and mainstream distributors and with our distributors. We also work
with
regional, independent sales representatives who maintain store and distributor
relationships in a specified territory. In Southern California, we have our
own
direct distribution system.
Trends,
Risks, Challenges, Opportunities That May or Are Currently Affecting Our
Business
Our
main
challenges, trends, risks, and opportunities that could affect or are affecting
our financial results include but are not limited to:
Fuel
Prices - As oil prices continue to increase, our packaging, production and
ingredient costs will continue to rise. We have attempted to offset the rising
freight costs from fuel price increases by creatively negotiating rates and
managing freight. We will continue to pursue alternative production, packaging
and ingredient suppliers and options to help offset the affect of rising fuel
prices on these expenses.
Low
Carbohydrate Diets and Obesity - Our products are not geared for the low
carbohydrate market. Consumer trends have reflected higher demand for lower
carbohydrate products. Despite this trend, we achieved an increase in our sales
growth in 2006. We monitor these trends closely and have started developing
low-carbohydrate versions of some of our beverages, although we do not have
any
currently marketable low-carbohydrate products.
Distribution
Consolidation - There has been a recent trend towards continued consolidation
of
the beverage distribution industry through mergers and acquisitions. This
consolidation results in a smaller number of distributors to market our products
and potentially leaves us subject to the potential of our products either being
dropped by these distributors or being marketed less aggressively by these
distributors. As a result, we have initiated our own direct distribution to
mainstream supermarkets and natural and gourmet foods stores in Southern
California and to large national retailers. Consolidation among natural foods
industry distributors has not had an adverse affect on our sales.
8
Consumers
Demanding More Natural Foods - The rapid growth of the natural foods industry
has been fueled by the growing consumer awareness of the potential health
problems due to the consumption of chemicals in the diet. Consumers are reading
ingredient labels and choosing products based on them. We design products with
these consumer concerns in mind. We feel this trend toward more natural products
is one of the main trends behind our growth. Recently, this trend in drinks
has
not only shifted to products using natural ingredients, but also to products
with added ingredients possessing a perceived positive function like vitamins,
herbs and other nutrients. Our ginger-based products are designed with this
consumer demand in mind.
Supermarket
and Natural Food Stores - More and more supermarkets, in order to compete with
the growing natural food industry, have started including natural food sections.
As a result of this trend, our products are now available in mainstream
supermarkets throughout the United States in natural food sections. Supermarkets
can require that we spend more advertising money and they sometimes require
slotting fees. We continue to work to keep these fees reasonable. Slotting
fees
in the natural food section of the supermarket are generally not as expensive
as
in other areas of the store.
Beverage
Packaging Changes - Beverage packaging has continued to innovate, particularly
for premium products. There is an increase in the sophistication with respect
to
beverage packaging design. While we feel that our current core brands still
compete on the level of packaging, we continue to experiment with new and novel
packaging designs such as the 5-liter party keg and 750 ml. champagne style
bottles. We have further plans for other innovative packaging
designs.
Packaging
or Raw Material Price Increases - An increase in packaging or raw materials
has
caused our margins to suffer and has negatively impacted our cash flow and
profitability. We continue to search for packaging and production alternatives
to reduce our cost of goods.
Cash
Flow
Requirements - Our growth will depend on the availability of additional capital
infusions. We have a financial history of losses and are dependent on
non-banking sources of capital, which tend to be more expensive and charge
higher interest rates. Any increase in costs of goods will further increase
losses and will further tighten cash reserves.
Interest
Rates - We use lines of credit as a source of capital and are negatively
impacted as interest rates rise.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. GAAP requires
us to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in our financial
statements including various allowances and reserves for accounts receivable
and
inventories, the estimated lives of long-lived assets and trademarks and
trademark licenses, as well as claims and contingencies arising out of
litigation or other transactions that occur in the normal course of business.
The following summarize our most significant accounting and reporting policies
and practices:
Revenue
Recognition. Revenue is recognized on the sale of a product when the product
is
shipped, which is when the risk of loss transfers to our customers, and
collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. A product is not shipped
without an order from the customer and credit acceptance procedures performed.
The allowance for returns is regularly reviewed and adjusted by management
based
on historical trends of returned items. Amounts paid by customers for shipping
and handling costs are included in sales.
Trademark
License and Trademarks. Trademark license and trademarks primarily represent
the
costs we pay for exclusive ownership of the Reed’s® trademark in connection with
the manufacture, sale and distribution of beverages and water and non-beverage
products. We also own the Virgil’s® trademark and the China Cola® trademark. In
addition, we own a number of other trademarks in the United States as well
as in
a number of countries around the world. We account for these items in accordance
with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Under the
provisions of SFAS No. 142, we do not amortize indefinite-lived trademark
licenses and trademarks.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 142, we evaluate our non-amortizing trademark
license and trademarks quarterly for impairment. We measure impairment by the
amount that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the trademark
license and trademarks. The fair value is calculated by reviewing net sales
of
the various beverages and applying industry multiples. Based on our quarterly
impairment analysis the estimated fair values of trademark license and
trademarks exceeded the carrying value and no impairments were identified during
the three months ended March 31, 2008 or March 31, 2007.
Long-Lived
Assets. Our management regularly reviews property, equipment and other
long-lived assets, including identifiable amortizing intangibles, for possible
impairment. This review occurs quarterly or more frequently if events or changes
in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be
recoverable. If there is indication of impairment of property and equipment
or
amortizable intangible assets, then management prepares an estimate of future
cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) expected to result from
the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows are
less
than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to
write
down the asset to its estimated fair value. The fair value is estimated at
the
present value of the future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with
management’s estimates of the business risks. Quarterly, or earlier, if there is
indication of impairment of identified intangible assets not subject to
amortization, management compares the estimated fair value with the carrying
amount of the asset. An impairment loss is recognized to write down the
intangible asset to its fair value if it is less than the carrying amount.
Preparation of estimated expected future cash flows is inherently subjective
and
is based on management’s best estimate of assumptions concerning expected future
conditions. No impairments were identified during the three months ended March
31, 2008 or 2007.
9
Management
believes that the accounting estimate related to impairment of our long lived
assets, including our trademark license and trademarks, is a “critical
accounting estimate” because: (1) it is highly susceptible to change from
period to period because it requires management to estimate fair value, which
is
based on assumptions about cash flows and discount rates; and (2) the
impact that recognizing an impairment would have on the assets reported on
our
balance sheet, as well as net income, could be material. Management’s
assumptions about cash flows and discount rates require significant judgment
because actual revenues and expenses have fluctuated in the past and we expect
they will continue to do so.
In
estimating future revenues, we use internal budgets. Internal budgets are
developed based on recent revenue data for existing product lines and planned
timing of future introductions of new products and their impact on our future
cash flows.
Advertising.
We account for advertising production costs by expensing such production costs
the first time the related advertising is run.
Accounts
Receivable. We evaluate the collectibility of our trade accounts receivable
based on a number of factors. In circumstances where we become aware of a
specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, a
specific reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded which reduces the
recognized receivable to the estimated amount our management believes will
ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of
potential bad debts, bad debt charges are recorded based on our historical
losses and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable
outstanding.
Inventories.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost to purchase and/or manufacture
the
inventory or the current estimated market value of the inventory. We regularly
review our inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and
obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand
and/or our ability to sell the product(s) concerned and production requirements.
Demand for our products can fluctuate significantly. Factors that could affect
demand for our products include unanticipated changes in consumer preferences,
general market conditions or other factors, which may result in cancellations
of
advance orders or a reduction in the rate of reorders placed by customers.
Additionally, our management’s estimates of future product demand may be
inaccurate, which could result in an understated or overstated provision
required for excess and obsolete inventory.
Income
Taxes. Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to
be
payable for the current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is
established for the expected future consequences of temporary differences in
the
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. We consider future
taxable income and ongoing, prudent, and feasible tax planning strategies,
in
assessing the value of our deferred tax assets. If our management determines
that it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized, we
will
reduce the value of these assets to their expected realizable value, thereby
decreasing net income. Evaluating the value of these assets is necessarily
based
on our management’s judgment. If our management subsequently determined that the
deferred tax assets, which had been written down, would be realized in the
future, the value of the deferred tax assets would be increased, thereby
increasing net income in the period when that determination was
made.
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31,
2008
Net
sales
increased by $551,410, or 18.3%, from $3,012,690 in the first three months
ended
2007 to $3,564,100 in the first three months ended 2008. The increase in
net
sales was primarily due to an increase in our Virgil’s product line and our
Reed’s Ginger Brews line. The increase in sales was also primarily due to an
increase in net sales due to newly introduced mainstream distributors and
an
increase in our existing distribution channels of natural food distributors
and
retailers.
The
Virgil’s brand, which includes Root Beer, Cream Soda and Black Cherry Cream
soda, Diet Root Beer, Diet Cream Soda and Diet Black Cherry Cream Soda, realized
an increase in net sales of $641,000, or 43.0% to $1,492,000 in first three
months ended 2008 from $851,000 in first three months ended 2007. The increase
was the result of increased sales in 12 ounce Root Beer of $234,000 or 40.3%
from $580,000 in first three months ended 2007 to $814,000 in first three
months
ended 2008, increased sales in Cream Soda of $116,000 or 184.1% from $63,000
in
the first three months of 2007 to $179,000 in the first three months of 2008,
and increased sales in Black Cherry Cream Soda of $32,000 or 50.8% from $63,000
in the first three months of 2007 to $95,000 in the first three months of
2008.
Also, the Virgil’s Root Beer five-liter party kegs increased $210,000 or 238.6%,
from $88,000 in first three months ended 2007 to $298,000 in first three
months
ended 2008. In addition, the increase in sales in the Virgil’s Brand was the
result of three diet products introduced in the second quarter 2007. The
three
new products include Diet Root Beer, Diet Cream Soda and Diet Black Cherry
Cream
Soda which realized net sales of $54,000 in first three months ended 2008.
10
The
Reeds
Ginger Brew Line increased $388,000 or 26.2% to $1,868,000 in first three
months
ended 2008 from $1,480,000 in first three months ended 2007.
Net
sales
of candy decreased $3,000, or 1.2% to $253,000 in first three months ended
2008
from $256,000 in first three months ended 2007.
The
product mix for our two most significant product lines, Reed’s Ginger Brews and
Virgil’s sodas was 51.2% and 40.9%, respectively of net sales in first three
months ended 2008 and was 56.5% and 32.5%, respectively of net sales in first
three months ended 2007.
Cost
of
sales increased by $571,219, or 23.1%, to $3,044,287 in first three months
ended
2008 from $2,473,068 in first three months ended 2007. As a percentage of
net
sales, cost of sales increased to 85.4% in first three months ended 2008
from
82.1% in first three months ended 2007. Cost of sales as a percentage of
net
sales increased by 3.3%, primarily as a result of increased discounting and
promotions, increased production expenses, increased packaging costs and
increased ingredient costs.
Gross
profit decreased $19,809 or 3.7% to $519,813 in first three months ended
2008
from $539,622 in first three months ended 2007. As a percentage of net sales,
gross profit decreased to 14.6% in the first three months of 2008 from 17.9%
in
the first three months of 2007. Fuel and commodity price increases have caused
an increase in our costs of production from our co-packer. Fuel price increases
have also increased our costs of delivery. In addition, we had increased
costs
of packaging costs. If fuel and commodity prices continue to increase, we
will
have more pressure on our margins.
To
improve gross margins in 2008, we have raised prices on the Reed’s Ginger Brew
line by 20% bringing it more in line with our competitors in the natural
soda
category. In addition, we are implementing systems to track and manage the
approval and use of promotions and discounting to maintain a higher net gross
margin. Finally, we are performing a competitive bidding process for our
third
party co-packing production. We expect to select a co-packer by the third
quarter 2008. We expect to lower our costs of production, thus further improving
our gross margin while maintaining our product quality.
Operating
expenses increased by $1,450,766, or 144.6%, to $2,454,274 in first three
months
ended 2008 from $1,003,508 in first three months ended 2007 and increased
as a
percentage of net sales to 68.9% in first three months ended 2008 from 33.3%
in
first three months ended 2007. The increase was primary the result of increased
selling and general and administrative expenses. In March of 2008, we reduced
our staff by 17 employees, mostly from the sales staff. During
the first quarter of 2008, we implemented a cost reduction strategy to reduce
unnecessary expenses and revised its budget for 2008. We reduced selling
expenses by reducing our work force by 17 employees. We expect to save
approximately $2,000,000 in annual expense with this reduction. We believe
our
operating expenses will decrease approximately $300,000 per
month
beginning in April,2008.
11
Selling
expensed increased by $569,963 or 102.9%, to $1,124,128 in first three months
ended 2008 from $554,165 in first three months ended 2007. The increase in
selling expenses is due to increased salaries of sales personnel, general
selling expenses, promotional costs, non-cash stock option amortization expense,
recruiting costs of sales personnel and public relations. Salaries of sales
personnel increased $411,495 or 135.2% to $715,889 in first three months
ended
2008 from $304,394 in first three months ended 2007. This increase was due
to
increased personnel to support the initiative to increase sales of our product
to the mainstream consumer through mainstream stores and distributors that
support mainstream retailers. General selling expenses increased $133,953
or
115.9% to $249,502 in first three months ended 2008 from $115,549 in first
three
months ended 2007. The increase in general selling expenses was due to the
increased support for the increased sales personnel such as travel and trade
shows. Promotional expenses decreased $6,957 or 6.9%, to $93,965 in first
three
months ended 2008 from $100,922 in first three months ended 2007. The decrease
in promotional expenses was due to decreased demonstrations and sampling.
Non-cash stock option compensation expense decreased $55,110 or 203.2% to
$(27,983) in first three months ended 2008 from $27,127 in first three months
ended 2007. This decrease is due to options which were forfeited. This resulted
in a cumulative adjustment, as discussed in Note 4. In
March
2008, we announced our new strategic direction in sales, whereby our focus
is to
strengthen our product placements in our estimated 10,500 supermarkets
nationwide. This strategy replaces our strategy in first three months ended
2007
that focused on both the supermarkets and a direct store delivery (DSD) effort.
Since March 2008, our sales organization has been reduced by 16 compared
to the
level we had at December 31, 2007. We have found that the most effective
sales
efforts are to grocery stores. We have our products in more than 10,500
supermarket stores across the country and our new direction for 2008 is to
remain focused on these accounts while opening new business with other grocery
stores leveraging our brand equity. We feel that the trend in grocery stores
to
offer their customers natural products can be served with our products. Our
sales personnel are leveraging our success at natural food grocery stores
to
establish new relationships with mainstream grocery stores
General
and administrative expenses increased by $880,803 or 196.0% to $1,330,146
in
first three months ended 2008 from $449,343 in the first three months of
2007.
The increase in general and administrative expenses is due to increased legal,
accounting and investor relations expenses, salaries, general office expenses
and non-cash stock option amortization expense. Legal, accounting and investor
relations expenses increased $297,568 or 312.9% to $392,656 in first three
months ended 2008 from $95,088 in first three months ended 2007. The increase
in
legal, accounting and investor relation expenses was due to a new initiative
in
first three months ended 2008 for investor relations that resulted in an
increase of general and administrative expenses of $121,694. The remaining
increase in legal and accounting costs mostly related to the increased costs
of
reporting and compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
NASDAQ.
Salaries increased by $243,914 or 219.6% to $354,981 in first three months
ended
2008 from $111,067 in first three months ended 2007. The increase was due
to
additional personnel including the newly hired Chief Operating and Chief
Financial Officers. General office expenses increased $116,761 or 68.6% to
$286,626 in first three months ended 2008 from $169,865 in first three months
ended 2007. This increase was mainly due to increased costs to support the
additional personnel such as computers and telephones. In addition, we had
a
one-time non cash expense of $320,762 for consulting services, for which
we
issued stock.
Interest
expense was $56,438 in first three months ended 2008, compared to interest
expense of $47,551 in first three months ended 2007.
Interest
income decreased because of our overall decrease in cash and corresponding
decrease in interest bearing cash accounts.
12
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Historically,
we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of common stock,
preferred stock, convertible debt, a line of credit from a financial
institution, and cash generated from operations. On December 12, 2006, we
completed the sale of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at an offering
price
of $4.00 per share in our initial public offering. The public offering resulted
in gross proceeds of $8,000,000 to us. In connection with the public offering,
we paid aggregate commissions, concessions and non-accountable expenses to
the
underwriters of $800,000, resulting in net proceeds of $7,200,000, excluding
other expenses of the public offering. In addition, we issued, to the
underwriters, warrants to purchase up to approximately an additional 200,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.60 per share (165% of the
public offering price per share), at a purchase price of $0.001 per warrant.
The
underwriters’ warrants are exercisable for a period of five years commencing on
the final closing date of the public offering. From August 3, 2005 through
April
7, 2006, we had issued 333,156 shares of our common stock in connection with
the
public offering. We sold the balance of the 2,000,000 shares in connection
with
the public offering (1,666,844 shares) following October 11, 2006.
From
May
25, 2007 through June 15, 2007, we completed a private placement to accredited
investors only, on subscriptions for the sale of 1,500,000 shares of common
stock and warrants to purchase up to 749,995 shares of common stock, resulting
in an aggregate of $9,000,000 of gross proceeds to us. We sold the shares
at a
purchase price of $6.00 per share. The warrants issued in the private placement
have a five-year term and an exercise price of $7.50 per share. We paid cash
commissions of $900,000 to the placement agent for the private placement
and
issued warrants to the placement agent to purchase up to 150,000 shares of
common stock with an exercise price of $6.60 per share. We also issued
additional warrants to purchase up to 15,000 shares of common stock with
an
exercise price of $6.60 per share and paid an additional $60,000 in cash
to the
placement agent as an investment banking fee. Total proceeds received, net
of
underwriting commissions and the investment banking fee and excluding other
expenses of the private placement, was $8,040,000.
Net
cash
used in operating activities was $1,530,796 in the three months ended March
31, 2008 and resulted primarily from our net loss of $1,990,069 reduced by
a
non-cash expense of $320,762 pertaining to consulting services we issued
stock
for.
We
used
$81,558 in investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
This
use resulted in the purchase of brewing equipment and office
equipment.
Cash
flow
provided from financing activities was $980,657 in the three months ended
March
31, 2008 . This resulted from the Company obtaining a mortgage on its real
estate for $1,770,000 and paying existing real estate and other term debt
of
$789,343.
We
do not
have a line of credit for our working capital, receivables or inventory.
However, we are negotiating to obtain a line of credit facility secured by
our
receivables and inventory. There can be no assurance that we will be offered
or
accept the terms of a line of credit. However, we believe that we will be
able
to obtain a line of credit which would be based on the amount of our eligible
receivables and inventory of up to $3 million. .
We
recognize that operating losses negatively impact liquidity and are working
on
decreasing operating losses. In the first quarter of 2008, we implemented
a cost
reduction program, including a reduction of our staff. Our current business
plan
assumes an increase in sales. Assuming an increase in sales and a reduction
in
our operating costs, we expect to reduce our operating losses in 2008 compared
to 2007. If the increase in sales does not materialize, we will need to further
reduce our operating costs.
13
If
we
have an increase in sales in 2008 and a reduction in operating expenses,
we
believe our current working capital and cash position and our ability to
obtain
a new line of credit will be sufficient to enable us to meet our cash needs
through December 2008.
We
may
not generate sufficient revenues from product sales in the future to achieve
profitable operations. If we are not able to achieve profitable operations
at
some point in the future, we eventually may have insufficient working capital
to
maintain our operations as we presently intend to conduct them or to fund
our
expansion and marketing and product development plans. In addition, our losses
may increase in the future as we expand our manufacturing capabilities and
fund
our marketing plans and product development. These losses, among other things,
have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our working capital,
total assets and stockholders’ equity. If we are unable to achieve
profitability, the market value of our common stock will decline and there
would
be a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
If
we
continue to suffer losses from operations, the proceeds from our public
offering, private placement and borrowings may be insufficient to support
our
ability to expand our business operations as rapidly as we would deem necessary
at any time, unless we are able to obtain additional financing. There can
be no
assurance that we will be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms,
or
at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable
terms, we may not be able to pursue our business objectives and would be
required to reduce our level of operations, including reducing infrastructure,
promotions, personnel and other operating expenses. These events could adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In
addition, some or all of the elements of our expansion plan may have to be
curtailed or delayed unless we are able to find alternative external sources
of
working capital. We would need to raise additional funds to respond to business
contingencies, which may include the need to:
·
|
fund
more rapid expansion,
|
·
|
fund
additional marketing expenditures,
|
·
|
enhance
our operating infrastructure,
|
·
|
respond
to competitive pressures, and
|
·
|
acquire
other businesses.
|
We
cannot
assure you that additional financing will be available on terms favorable
to us,
or at all. If adequate funds are not available or if they are not available
on
acceptable terms, our ability to fund the growth of our operations, take
advantage of opportunities, develop products or services or otherwise respond
to
competitive pressures, could be significantly limited.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements:
References
to the “FASB”, “SFAS” and “SAB” herein refer to the “Financial Accounting
Standards Board”, “Statement of Financial Accounting Standards”, and the “SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin”, respectively.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141 (R), “Business
Combinations” (FAS 141(R)), which establishes accounting principles and
disclosure requirements for all transactions in which a company obtains
control
over another business. Statement 141(R) applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Earlier
adoption is prohibited.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51”. SFAS No. 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards that require that the ownership
interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly
identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated statement of financial
position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity; the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling
interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated
statement of income; and changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the
parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be
accounted
for consistently. SFAS No. 160 also requires that any retained noncontrolling
equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair
value
when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also sets forth the disclosure
requirements to identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent
and
the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 applies to all
entities
that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit
organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding
noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate
a
subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption is prohibited. SFAS No. 160 must be applied prospectively as of
the
beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except for
the
presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation and disclosure
requirements are applied retrospectively for all periods presented.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No.
161”). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS
No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS
No. 133”). The objective of SFAS No. 161 is to provide users of financial
statements with an enhanced understanding of how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 requires
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses
on
derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent
features in derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 applies to all derivative
financial instruments, including bifurcated derivative instruments (and
nonderivative instruments that are designed and qualify as hedging instruments
pursuant to paragraphs 37 and 42 of SFAS No. 133) and related hedged items
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations. SFAS No.
161 also amends certain provisions of SFAS No. 131. SFAS No. 161 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. SFAS No. 161
encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods
at
initial adoption. The Company has not yet determined the effect on its
consolidated financial statements, if any, upon adoption of SFAS No.
161.
The
Company does not believe the adoption of the above recent pronouncements,
will
have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial
position, or cash flows.
14
Inflation
Although
management expects that our operations will be influenced by general economic
conditions, we do not believe that inflation has a material effect on our
results of operations.
Item
3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
applicable.
Item
4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Management's
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
As
of
March 31, 2008, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with
the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
“disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined under Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e).
Our
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31,
2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
(b)
Changes in Internal Controls.
There
were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during
the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 that materially affected, or are reasonably
likely
to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
15
Part
II
Item
1.
Legal Proceedings
There
has
been no change to our disclosure regarding legal proceeding as set forth
in our
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Except
as
set forth in such disclosure, we believe that there are no material litigation
matters at the current time. Although the results of such litigation matters
and
claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the final outcome
of
such claims and proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our
financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.
Item
1A. RISK FACTORS
Not
applicable
Item
2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not
applicable
Item
3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not
applicable
Item
4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not
applicable
Item
5.
Other Information
Not
applicable
Item
6.
Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
of Document
|
31 | Officer's Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32 | Officer's Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
16
SIGNATURE
In
accordance with requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
Reeds, Inc. | ||
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Christopher Reed | |
Chief
Executive Officer, President
and
Chief Financial Officer
|
||
May 20, 2008 |
17