Regenicin, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2016 December (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

Regenicin, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days

[ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [X] No

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 153,483,050 of January 16, 2017.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are as follows:

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the SEC instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period ended December 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the full year.

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY  

Windstar, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Nevada on September 6, 2007. On July 19, 2010, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to Regenicin, Inc. (“Regenicin”). In September 2013, Regenicin formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary for the sole purpose of conducting research in the State of Georgia (together, the “Company”). The subsidiary has no activity since its formation due to the lack of funding. The Company’s original business was the development of a purification device. Such business was assigned to the Company’s former management in July 2010. The Company adopted a new business plan and intended to develop and commercialize a potentially lifesaving technology by the introduction of tissue-engineered skin substitutes to restore the qualities of healthy human skin for use in the treatment of burns, chronic wounds and a variety of plastic surgery procedures.

The Company entered into a Know-How License and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Know-How SPA”) with Lonza Walkersville, Inc. (“Lonza Walkersville”) on July 21, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the Know-How SPA, the Company paid Lonza Walkersville $3,000,000 and, in exchange, the Company was to receive an exclusive license to use certain proprietary know-how and information necessary to develop and seek approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for the commercial sale of technology held by the Cutanogen Corporation (“Cutanogen”), a subsidiary of Lonza Walkersville. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the Know-How SPA, the Company was entitled to receive certain related assistance and support from Lonza Walkersville upon payment of the $3,000,000. Under the Know-How SPA, once FDA approval was secured for the commercial sale of the technology, the Company would be entitled to acquire Cutanogen, Lonza Walkersville’s subsidiary, for $2,000,000 in cash. After prolonged attempts to negotiate disputes with Lonza Walkersville failed, on September 30, 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit against Lonza Walkersville, Lonza Group Ltd. and Lonza America, Inc. (“Lonza America”) in Fulton County Superior Court in the State of Georgia.

On November 7, 2014, the Company entered into an Asset Sale Agreement (the “Sale Agreement”) with Amarantus Bioscience Holdings, Inc., (“Amarantus”). Under the Sale Agreement, the Company agreed to sell to Amarantus all of its rights and claims in the litigation currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Lonza Walkersville and Lonza America, Inc. (the “Lonza Litigation”). This includes all of the Cutanogen intellectual property rights and any Lonza manufacturing know-how technology. In addition, the Company agreed to sell the PermaDerm® trademark and related intellectual property rights associated with it. The purchase price paid by Amarantus was: (i) $3,600,000 in cash, and (ii) shares of common stock in Amarantus having a value of $3,000,000 at the date of the transaction.

The Company is using the net proceeds of the transaction to fund development of cultured cell technology and to pursue approval of the products through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The Company has been developing its own unique cultured skin substitute since we received Lonza’s termination notice.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Interim Financial Statements:

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended December 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending September 30, 2017. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Going Concern:

The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred cumulative losses and has an accumulated deficit of approximately $12.0 million from inception, expects to incur further losses in the development of its business and has been dependent on funding operations through the issuance of convertible debt, private sale of equity securities, and the proceeds from the Asset Sale. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is using the proceeds from the Asset Sale to fund operations. Once the funds are exhausted, management plans to finance operations through the private or public placement of debt and/or equity securities. However, no assurance can be given at this time as to whether the Company will be able to obtain such financing. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. 

Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement:

The Company measures fair value of its financial assets on a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs, used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value: 

• Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

• Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3 - Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The carrying value of cash, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and all loans and notes payable in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets approximated their values as of and December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016 due to their short-term nature.

Common stock of Amarantus represents equity investments in common stock that the Company classifies as available for sale. Such investments are carried at fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Fair value is determined under the guidelines of GAAP which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Realized gains and losses, determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, are included in net income (loss). Unrealized gains and losses considered to be temporary are reported as other comprehensive income (loss) and are included in stockholders equity. Other than temporary declines in the fair value of investment is included in other income (expense) on the statement of operations.

The common stock of Amarantus is valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the security is traded. This valuation methodology is considered to be using Level 1 inputs. The total value of Amarantus common stock at December 31, 2016 is $6,700. The unrealized loss for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $800 and $141,250 net of income taxes, respectively, and was reported as a component of comprehensive loss. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized an other than temporary loss on the stock in the amount of $2.7 million which was recognized in the statement of operations for that fiscal year end. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized another other than temporary loss on the stock in the amount of $292,500 which was recognized in the statement of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. The new standard principally affects accounting standards for equity investments, financial liabilities where the fair value option has been elected, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. Upon the effective date of the new standards, all equity investments in unconsolidated entities, other than those accounted for using the equity method of accounting, will generally be measured at fair value through earnings. There will no longer be an available-for-sale classification and therefore, no changes in fair value will be reported in other comprehensive income (loss) for equity securities with readily determinable fair values. The new guidance on the classification and measurement will be effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-01 on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases , (Topic 842). This new ASU represents a wholesale change to lease accounting and introduces a lease model that brings most leases on the balance sheet. It also eliminates the required use of bright-line tests in current U.S. GAAP for determining lease classification. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 (i.e., calendar periods beginning on January 1, 2019), and interim periods thereafter. Earlier application is permitted for all entities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which is intended to simplify the accounting and reporting for employee share-based payment transactions. The pronouncement is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2016 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

All other recent pronouncements issued by the FASB or other authoritative standards groups with future effective dates are either not applicable or are not expected to be significant to the financial statements of the Company.

NOTE 3 - LOSS PER SHARE

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share gives effect to dilutive convertible securities, options, warrants and other potential common stock outstanding during the period; only in periods in which such effect is dilutive.

The following weighted average securities have been excluded from the calculation of net loss per share for the quarters ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, as the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares:

The following weighted average securities have been excluded from the calculation even though the exercise price was less than the market price of the common shares because the effect of including these potential shares was anti-dilutive due to the net loss incurred during the quarters ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

The effects of options and warrants on diluted earnings per share are reflected through the use of the treasury stock method and the excluded shares that are “in the money” are disclosed above in that manner.

NOTE 4 – DUE FROM RELATED PARTY

The Company expects to purchase “Closed Herd” collagen from Pure Med Farma, LLC (“PureMed”), a development stage company in which the company’s CEO and CFO are member - owners. The Company and PureMed entered into a three year supply agreement on October 16, 2016 naming PureMed as the exclusive provider of collagen to the Company. The Company has agreed to assist PureMed by providing consultants to work on certain tasks in order to gain FDA approval. Such consultants’ costs would be reimbursed by PureMed. For the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company paid consultants on behalf of PureMed in the amount of $64,622.

On December 15, 2016, PureMed issued a note in the amount of $64,622 representing the advances for consultants through that date. Under the terms of the note, interest will accrue at 8% per annum and is payable on or before December 15, 2017. Additionally, the note provides the Company with the option to convert up $42,500 of the balance owed into 17 membership interest units of PureMed at a conversion price of $2,500 per unit. At December 31, 2016, 17 membership units represented 25% of all issued PureMed membership units. The note is collateralized by PureMed’s assets.

During the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not incur costs on behalf of PurMed. The balance of the note plus accrued interest of $5,538 at December 31, 2016 totaled $70,160 and the balance of the note plus accrued interest of $2,646 at September 30, 2016 totaled $67,268.

NOTE 5 - LOANS PAYABLE

Loan Payable:

In February 2011, a shareholder advanced $10,000. The loan does not bear interest and is due on demand. At both December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, the loan payable totaled $10,000.

Loans Payable - Officer:

The Chief Executive Officer in fiscal year 2015 submitted for reimbursement Company expenses paid personally by him. At September 30, 2016, the balance owed to him was $13,009 and during the quarter ended December 31, 2016 that balance was repaid in full. The loan did not bear interest and was due on demand. 

NOTE 6 - BRIDGE FINANCING

On December 21, 2011, the Company issued a $150,000 promissory note to an individual. The note bore interest so that the Company would repay $175,000 on the maturity date of June 21, 2012, which correlated to an effective rate of 31.23%. Additional interest of 10% was charged on any late payments. The note was not paid at the maturity date and the Company is incurring additional interest described above. At both December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, the note balance was $175,000. Interest expense was $4,411 for both quarters ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Accrued interest on the note was $79,301 and $74,890 as of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, respectively.

NOTE 7 - INCOME TAXES

The Company did not incur current tax expense for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

At December 31, 2016, the Company had available approximately $4.9 million of net operating loss carry forwards (“NOLs”) which expire in the years 2029 through 2036. However, the use of the NOLs generated prior to September 30, 2011 totaling $0.7 million is limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), imposes an annual limitation on the amount of taxable income that may be offset by a corporation’s NOLs if the corporation experiences an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Code.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets at December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016 are as follows:

Due to the uncertainty of their realization, a valuation allowance has been established for all of the income tax benefit for these deferred tax assets. 

At both December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, the Company had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required. The Company does not expect that its unrecognized tax benefits will materially increase within the next twelve months. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in general and administrative expense. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 the Company has not recorded any provisions for accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

The Company files its federal income tax returns under a statute of limitations. The 2013 through 2016 tax years generally remain subject to examination by federal tax authorities.

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

Preferred Stock:

Series A

At both December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, 885,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”) were outstanding.

Series A Preferred pays a dividend of 8% per annum on the stated value and have a liquidation preference equal to the stated value of the shares ($885,000 liquidation preference as of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016 plus dividends in arrears as per below). Each share of Series A Preferred Stock has an initial stated value of $1 and are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of 10 for 1.

The dividends are cumulative commencing on the issue date when and if declared by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, dividends in arrears were $410,882 ($.46 per share) and $393,037 ($.44 per share), respectively. 

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Company identified an error in the recording of accrued dividends on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. An immaterial error correction was made in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2015 and in the consolidated statements of changes in Stockholders’ Equity as of October 1, 2014. Preferred stock dividends are no longer accrued and accordingly, a non-cash disclosure for preferred stock dividends in the amount of $17,845 on the statement of cash flows has been removed for the three months ended December 31, 2015.

Series B

On January 23, 2012, the Company designated a new class of preferred stock called Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”). Four million shares have been authorized with a liquidation preference of $2.00 per share. Each share of Series B Preferred is convertible into ten shares of common stock. Holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock have a right to a dividend (pro-rata to each holder) based on a percentage of the gross revenue earned by the Company in the United States, if any, and the number of outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, as follows: Year 1 - Total Dividend to all Series B holders = .03 x Gross Revenue in the U.S. Year 2 - Total Dividend to all Series B holders = .02 x Gross Revenue in the U.S. Year 3 - Total Dividend to all Series B holders = .01 x Gross Revenue in the U.S. At December 31, 2015, no shares of Series B Preferred are outstanding.

NOTE 9 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company’s principal executive offices are located in Little Falls, New Jersey. The headquarters is located in the offices of McCoy Enterprises LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. McCoy. The office is attached to his residence but has its own entrances, restroom and kitchen facilities.

The Company also maintains an office at Carbon & Polymer Research Inc. ("CPR") in Pennington, New Jersey, which is the Company's materials and testing laboratory. An employee of the Company is an owner of CPR. On May 16, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with CPR in which CPR will supply the collagen scaffolds used in the Company's production of the skin tissue. The contract contains a most favored customer clause guaranteeing the Company prices equal or lower than those charged to other customers. The Company has not yet made purchases from CPR.

No rent is charged for either premise.

NOTE 10 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, “Compensation- Stock Compensation .” The Company recognizes compensation expense for all of its grants of stock-based awards based on the estimated fair value on the grant date. Compensation cost for awards is recognized using the straight-line method over the vesting period.

On January 6, 2011, the Company approved the issuance of 885,672 options to each of the four members of the board of directors at an exercise price of $0.035, as amended, per share that were to expire on December 22, 2015. Effective as of the expiration date, the Company extended the term of those options to December 31, 2018. All other contractual terms of the options remained the same. The option exercise price was compared to the fair market value of the Company’s shares on the date when the extension was authorized by the Company, resulting in the immediate recognition of $67,895 in compensation expense. There is no deferred compensation expense associated with this transaction, since all extended options had previously been fully vested. The extended options were valued utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: Exercise price of $0.035, expected volatility of 208%, risk free rate of 1.31% and expected term of 3.03 years. Stock based compensation amounted to $-0- and $67,895 for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Stock-based compensation is included in general and administrative expenses.

NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date of this filing.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Overview  

As reported in our most recent 10K filing, during 2016, the Company continued to pursue its goal of obtaining FDA approval for its product NovaDerm^®. If approved, NovaDerm will be the first and only autologous, cultured skin substitute product allowed for medical use on burns requiring grafting.

NovaDerm^® is a multi-layered tissue-engineered skin prepared by utilizing autologous (patient’s own) skin cells. It is expected to be a graftable collagen based cultured epithelium implant that produces a skin substitute containing both epidermal and dermal components with a collagen base. Clinically, we expect it to behave the same as split thickness allograft skin. It should therefore not be rejected by the immune system of the patient, unlike with porcine or cadaver cellular grafts. Immune system rejection is a serious concern in Xeno-transplant procedures which may have a cellular component. Additionally, the application of our cultured skin substitute should not require any specialized physician training because it is applied the same as in a standard allograft procedure.

As we begin 2017, our priority has been to raise additional funds to finalize our IND application and begin clinical trials. It is estimated that the cost to finalize the IND will be approximately 1.5 million dollars, and the cost to complete Phase1 of the clinical trial will be approximately 2 million dollars. Our major focus in obtaining this funding has been to minimize shareholders' dilution as much as possible, and consequently we are primarily pursuing financing through the issuance of a debt instrument, as well as international licensing agreements.

We have begun the preliminary planning for the clinical trials to the extent we are able, based on funding constraints. We have chosen a CRO to assist in our IND submission and conducting the trials. Clinical site selection and patient recruitment should be somewhat simpler than other clinical trials, as we are limited in site selection to the 150 burn centers qualified to treat catastrophic burns. In addition, the surgical protocol will be similar to the grafting procedures currently in use at those facilities.

The initial trials are planned to begin with ten subjects with an Initial Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) review of safety on the first three subjects once they have reached 6 months’ follow-up. We do not intend to interrupt our trial waiting for the DSMB report.

We are still required to do some additional testing as part of our IND package and have identified several facilities that can help in this process. We have already completed some physical testing allowing us to establish certain specifications on incoming materials. We have also created protocols for biologics testing that will support our IND. Moreover, we are working on the documentation and writing that we need to finalize the IND and will add the data as soon as it becomes available. Despite limited funds, we are determined to make progress where we can until additional financing is available to pay for the more expensive items, such as the CRO contract. We are currently working with several financial advisors in an attempt to obtain the necessary funding.

Our management is considering various possibilities and approaches to obtaining clinical trial materials and manufacturing. While no final decision has been made, management’s approach is to set up the trials so as to allow for a seamless transition into commercial production upon approval. 

In summary, as we move forward in 2017 we hope to accomplish the following milestones:

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

We generated no revenues from September 6, 2007 (date of inception) to December 31, 2016. We do not expect to generate revenues until we are able to obtain FDA approval of our product and thereafter successfully market and sell the product.

We incurred operating expenses of $295,311 for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared with operating expenses of $359,764 for the three months ended December 31, 2015. General and administrative expenses accounted for $290,027 of our operating expenses, and $5,284 was from research and development for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The major difference and shift in operating expenses from the three months ended December 31, 2015 was accounted for by a decrease in stock based compensation for $67,895. Otherwise, operating expenses during the three months ended December 31, 2015 were from General and Administrative expenses in the amount of $291,131 and research and development expense of $738.

Net other expense was $1,511 for the three months ended December 31, 2016, as compared to net other expense of $4,411 for the three months ended December 31, 2015. Other income and expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2016 consisted of interest expenses of $4,411 offset by interest income of $2,900. Other income and expenses for the same period ended 2015 consisted only interest expense of $4,411.

After provision for preferred stock dividends of $17,845, for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we recorded net loss attributable to common shareholders of $299,667 for the three months ended December 31, 2016. By comparison, we recorded net loss attributable to common shareholders of $382,020 for the three months ended December 31, 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2016, we had cash of $50,392 and total current assets of $184,494. As of December 31, 2016, we had current liabilities of $1,935,124. We therefore had negative working capital of $1,750,630.

Operating activities used $155,446 in cash for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in cash was primarily attributable to funding the loss for the period.

Investing activities provided no cash or cost during the reported period. We note that the value of the shares of Amarantus we obtained and which created income from that sale of assets transaction have declined significantly in value since the consummation of the agreement. Financing activities used $13,009 during the three months ended December 31, 2016 to repay loans from officers.

We have issued various promissory notes to meet our short term demands, the terms of which are provided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements accompanying this report. While this source of bridge financing has been helpful in the short term to meet our financial obligations, we will need additional financing to fund our operations, continue with the FDA approval process, and implement our business plan. Our long term financial needs are estimated at about $8-10 million.

Based upon our current financial condition, we do not have sufficient cash to operate our business at the current level for the next twelve months. We intend to fund operations through increased debt and/or equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund expenditures or other cash requirements. We plan to seek additional financing in a private equity or debt offering to secure funding for operations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional funding. If we are not able to secure additional funding, the implementation of our business plan will be impaired. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2016, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Going Concern

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred operating losses from inception, expect to incur further losses in the development of our business, and have been dependent on funding operations through the issuance of convertible debt and private sale of equity securities. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans include continuing to finance operations through the private or public placement of debt and/or equity securities and the reduction of expenditures. However, no assurance can be given at this time as to whether we will be able to achieve these objectives. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2016. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the presence of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has identified the following material weaknesses which have caused management to conclude that, as of December 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both US GAAP and SEC guidelines.

Remediation Plan to Address the Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our company plans to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal controls over financial reporting. During the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we plan to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending September 30, 2017 assuming we are able to obtain necessary funding: (i) appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; and (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting. The remediation efforts set out are largely dependent upon our securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.

We are unable to remedy our controls related to the inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management until we receive financing to hire additional employees. 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings 

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2. Unregistered  Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The information set forth below relates to our issuances of securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 during the reporting period which were not previously included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K.

For the three months ended December 31, 2016, we issued no shares of common stock for the conversion of principal issued under our bridge financing and accrued interest.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.