Regenicin, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)

FORM 10-Q

Regenicin, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [X] No

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 153,483,050 as of August 19, 2016.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are as follows:

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the SEC instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the full year.

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

REGENICIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY  

Windstar, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Nevada on September 6, 2007. On July 19, 2010, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to Regenicin, Inc. (“Regenicin”). In September 2013, Regenicin formed a new wholly-owned subsidiary for the sole purpose of conducting research in the State of Georgia (together, the “Company”). The subsidiary has no activity since its formation due to the lack of funding.

The Company’s original business was the development of a purification device.  Such business was assigned to the Company’s former management in July 2010.

The Company adopted a new business plan and intended to develop and commercialize a potentially lifesaving technology by the introduction of tissue-engineered skin substitutes to restore the qualities of healthy human skin for use in the treatment of burns, chronic wounds and a variety of plastic surgery procedures.

The Company entered into a Know-How License and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Know-How SPA”) with Lonza Walkersville, Inc. (“Lonza Walkersville”) on July 21, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the Know-How SPA, the Company paid Lonza Walkersville $3,000,000 and, in exchange, the Company was to receive an exclusive license to use certain proprietary know-how and information necessary to develop and seek approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for the commercial sale of technology held by the Cutanogen Corporation (“Cutanogen”), a subsidiary of Lonza Walkersville. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the Know-How SPA, the Company was entitled to receive certain related assistance and support from Lonza Walkersville upon payment of the $3,000,000. Under the Know-How SPA, once FDA approval was secured for the commercial sale of the technology, the Company would be entitled to acquire Cutanogen, Lonza Walkersville’s subsidiary, for $2,000,000 in cash.  

After prolonged attempts to negotiate disputes with Lonza Walkersville failed, on September 30, 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit against Lonza Walkersville, Lonza Group Ltd. and Lonza America, Inc. (“Lonza America”) in Fulton County Superior Court in the State of Georgia.

On November 7, 2014, the Company entered into an Asset Sale Agreement (the “Sale Agreement”) with Amarantus Bioscience Holdings, Inc., (“Amarantus”). Under the Sale Agreement, the Company agreed to sell to Amarantus all of its rights and claims in the litigation currently pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Lonza Walkersville and Lonza America, Inc. (the “Lonza Litigation”). This includes all of the Cutanogen intellectual property rights and any Lonza manufacturing know-how technology. In addition, the Company agreed to sell the PermaDerm® trademark and related intellectual property rights associated with it. The purchase price paid by Amarantus was: (i) $3,600,000 in cash, and (ii) shares of common stock in Amarantus having a value of $3,000,000 at the sale date. See Note 4 for a further discussion.

 The Company is using the net proceeds of the transaction to fund development of cultured cell technology and to pursue approval of the products through the FDA. The Company has been developing its own unique cultured skin substitute since receiving Lonza’s termination notice. 

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 Interim Financial Statements:

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending September 30, 2016. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Going Concern:

The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred cumulative losses and has an accumulated deficit of approximately $11.7 million from inception, expects to incur further losses in the development of its business and has been dependent on funding operations through the issuance of convertible debt and private sale of equity securities. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is using the proceeds from the Asset Sale to fund operations. Once the funds are exhausted, management plans to finance operations through the private or public placement of debt and/or equity securities. However, no assurance can be given at this time as to whether the Company will be able to obtain such financing. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. 

 Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement:

The Company measures fair value of its financial assets on a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs, used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:

• Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

• Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3 - Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The carrying value of cash, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and all loans and notes payable in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets approximated their values as of and June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 due to their short-term nature.

Common stock of Amarantus represents equity investments in common stock that the Company classifies as available for sale. Such investments are carried at fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Fair value is determined under the guidelines of GAAP which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Realized gains and losses, determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, are included in net income. Unrealized gains and losses considered to be temporary are reported as other comprehensive income (loss) and are included in stockholders equity. Other than temporary declines in the fair value of investment is included in other income (expense) on the statement of operations.

The common stock of Amarantus is valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the security is traded. This valuation methodology is considered to be using Level 1 inputs. The total value of Amarantus common stock at June 30, 2016 is $12,750. The unrealized loss for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $287,250 and $1,437,500, net of income taxes, respectively, and was reported as a component of comprehensive income (loss). The unrealized gain (loss) for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $(900) and $62,500 net of income taxes, respectively, and was reported as a component of comprehensive income (loss). During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized an other than temporary loss on the stock in the amount of $2.7 million which was recognized in the statement of operations for that fiscal year.

Recent Pronouncements:

Management does not believe that any of the recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. 

Reclassifications:

Certain amounts have been reclassified in the prior year financial statements presented herein, to conform to the current year presentation.

NOTE 3 - INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share gives effect to dilutive convertible securities, options, warrants and other potential common stock outstanding during the period; only in periods in which such effect is dilutive. The following table summarizes the components of the income (loss) per common share calculation: 

The following securities have been excluded from the dilution per share calculation for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016, and for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as their effect would be anti-dilutive: 

The following securities have been excluded from the diluted per share calculation for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares: 

NOTE 4 - SALE OF ASSET

On November 7, 2014, the Company entered into a Sale Agreement with Amarantus, Clark Corporate Law Group LLP ("CCLG") and Gordon & Rees, LLP (“Gordon & Rees”). Under the Sale Agreement, the Company had agreed to sell to Amarantus all of its rights and claims in the Lonza Litigation. These include all of the Cutanogen intellectual property rights and any Lonza manufacturing know-how technology. In addition, the Company had agreed to sell its PermaDerm® trademark and related intellectual property rights associated with it. The purchase price to be paid by Amarantus was: i) $3,500,000 in cash, and ii) shares of common stock in Amarantus having a value of $3,000,000. A portion of the cash purchase price was allocated to repay debt. On January 30, 2015, the agreement was amended whereby the cash portion of the purchase price was increased by $100,000 to $3,600,000 and the final payment was extended to February 20, 2015. Since Amarantus did not adhere to the original and amended agreements, the Company did not record the final installment of $2.5 million until it was received on February 24, 2015.

The payments to CCLG, satisfied in full the obligations owed to CCLG under its secured promissory note. The $3,000,000 in Amarantus common stock was satisfied by the issuance of 37,500,000 shares of Amarantus common stock from Amarantus to the Company. In addition to the sale price, Amarantus paid Gordon & Rees $450,000 upon entering the agreement. The payment to Gordon & Rees was to satisfy in full all contingent litigation fees and costs owed to Gordon & Rees in connection with the Lonza Litigation.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a gain on the sale of assets of $6,604,431. In addition, as a result of the Sale Agreement, the Company determined that it is no longer liable for accounts payable to Lonza in the amount of $973,374. The liability was reversed and included in operating expenses as an item of income during the nine months ended June 30, 2015.

The Company also granted to Amarantus an exclusive five (5) year option to license any engineered skin designed for the treatment of patients designated as severely burned by the FDA developed by the Company. Amarantus can exercise this option at a cost of $10,000,000 plus a royalty of 5% on gross revenues in excess of $150 million.   

NOTE 5 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS

As discussed in Note 1, the Company paid $3,000,000 to Lonza in 2010 to purchase an exclusive know-how license and assistance in gaining FDA approval. The $3,000,000 payment was recorded as an intangible asset. Due to ongoing disputes and pending any settlement of the lawsuit, the Company subsequently determined that the value of the intangible asset and related intellectual property had been fully impaired. As a result, the balance of the intangible asset was $-0- at September 30, 2014.

In August 2010, the Company paid $7,500 and obtained the rights to the trademarks PermaDerm® and TempaDerm® from KJR-10 Corp.

As discussed above in Note 4, the Company sold its intangible assets on November 7, 2014. 

NOTE 6 - LOANS PAYABLE

Loan Payable:

In February 2011, an investor advanced $10,000. The loan does not bear interest and is due on demand. At both June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, the loan payable totaled $10,000.

Loans Payable - Officers:

During the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded expenses that were paid directly by Randall McCoy, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in prior years and were submitted for reimbursement in the amount of $95,000. During the nine months ended June 30, 2016 the Company repaid $57,703 of this loan. At June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, the outstanding balance was $37,297 and $95,000, respectively. The loan does not bear interest and is due on demand.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2015, $15,500 of Company expenses were paid directly by John Weber, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and were submitted for reimbursement. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016 this amount was repaid to the Company.  

NOTE 7 - BRIDGE FINANCING

On December 21, 2011, the Company issued a $150,000 promissory note to an individual. The note bore interest so that the Company would repay $175,000 on the maturity date of June 21, 2012, which correlated to an effective rate of 31.23%. Additional interest of 10% was charged on any late payments. The note was not paid at the maturity date and the Company is incurring interest at 10% per annum. At both June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, the note balance was $175,000. Accrued interest was $70,479 and $57,342 at June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively, which is included in accrued expenses - other on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES

The Company did not incur tax expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016. The provision for income taxes of $2,829,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2015, represents deferred taxes. The Company did not incur tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015.

At June 30, 2016, the Company had available approximately $4.14 million of net operating loss carry forwards which expire in the years 2029 through 2035. However, the use of the net operating loss carryforwards generated prior to September 30, 2011 totaling $0.7 million is limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), imposes an annual limitation on the amount of taxable income that may be offset by a corporation’s NOLs if the corporation experiences an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Code.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets at June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 are as follows: 

Due to the uncertainty of their realization, a valuation allowance has been established for all of the income tax benefit for these deferred tax assets.

At both June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, the Company had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required. The Company does not expect that its unrecognized tax benefits will materially increase within the next twelve months. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in general and administrative expense. As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company has not recorded any provisions for accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

The Company files its federal income tax returns under a statute of limitations. The 2012 through 2015 tax years generally remain subject to examination by federal tax authorities. The Company has not filed any of its state income tax returns since inception. Due to recurring losses, management believes that once such returns are filed, the Company would incur state minimum tax liabilities that were not deemed material to accrue.  

NOTE 9 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

Preferred Stock:

Series A

Series A Preferred pays a dividend of 8% per annum on the stated value and have a liquidation preference equal to the stated value of the shares. Each share of Preferred Stock has an initial stated value of $1 and are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the rate of 10 for 1.

The dividends are cumulative commencing on the issue date whether or not declared. Dividends amounted to $53,149 and $17,652 for the nine and three months ended June 30, 2016, respectively and $52,955 and $17,652, respectively for the corresponding periods in the prior year. At June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, dividends payable total $375,191 and $322,042, respectively.

At both June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, 885,000 shares of Series A Preferred were outstanding.

Series B

On January 23, 2012, the Company designated a new class of preferred stock called Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”). Four million shares have been authorized with a liquidation preference of $2.00 per share. Each share of Series B Preferred is convertible into ten shares of common stock. Holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock have a right to a dividend (pro-rata to each holder) based on a percentage of the gross revenue earned by the Company in the United States, if any, and the number of outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, as follows: Year 1 - Total Dividend to all Series B holders = .03 x Gross Revenue in the U.S. Year 2 - Total Dividend to all Series B holders = .02 x Gross Revenue in the U.S. Year 3 - Total Dividend to all Series B holders = .01 x Gross Revenue in the U.S. At June 30, 2016, no shares of Series B Preferred are outstanding.

 NOTE 10 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees in accordance with FASB ASC 505, “ Equity ”. Costs are measured at the estimated fair value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earlier of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services as defined by ASC 505.

On January 6, 2011, the Company approved the issuance of 885,672 options to each of the four members of the board of directors at an exercise price of $0.035, as amended, per share that were to expire on December 22, 2015. Effective as of the expiration date, the Company extended the term of those options to December 31, 2018. All other contractual terms of the options remained the same. The option exercise price was compared to the fair market value of the Company’s shares on the date when the extension was authorized by the Company, resulting in the immediate recognition of $67,895 in compensation expense. There is no deferred compensation expense associated with this transaction, since all extended options had previously been fully vested. The extended options were valued utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: Exercise price of $0.035, expected volatility of 208%, risk free rate of 1.31% and expected term of 3.03 years. Stock based compensation amounted to $67,895 and $32,365 for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Stock-based compensation is included in general and administrative expenses.

 NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company’s principal executive offices are located in Little Falls, New Jersey. The headquarters is located in the offices of McCoy Enterprises LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. McCoy. The office is attached to his residence but has its own entrances, restroom and kitchen facilities.

The Company also maintains an office at Carbon & Polymer Research Inc. ("CPR") in Pennington, New Jersey, which is the Company's materials and testing laboratory. An employee of the Company is an owner of CPR.

 No rent is charged for either premise.

On May 16, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with CPR in which CPR will supply the collagen scaffolds used in the Company's production of the skin tissue. The contract contains a most favored customer clause guaranteeing the Company prices equal or lower than those charged to other customers. The Company has not yet made purchases from CPR.

The Company expects to purchase “Closed Herd” collagen from PureMed Pharma LLC (“PureMed”), a development stage company in which the company’s CEO and CFO are member - owners. The Company has agreed to assist PureMed by providing consultants to work on certain tasks in order to gain FDA approval and such consultants’ costs would be reimbursed by PureMed. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016, the Company paid consultants on behalf of PureMed in the amount of $9,222 and $64,622, respectively. There were no such advances during the nine months ended June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 the amount due from PureMed was $64,622 and $0, respectively, and reflected in due from related party on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company has classified the advances as non-current as repayment is not expected within the next twelve months.

NOTE 12 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date of this filing. 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Overview

A year and half after filing the lawsuit against Lonza Walkersville, Inc., and Lonza America, Inc. (the “Lonza Litigation”), we began the new 2015 fiscal year in the process of consummating an agreement to sell certain assets, including the Lonza Litigation, to Amarantus Bioscience Holdings, Inc. (the “Amarantus Agreement”). The Amarantus Agreement was finally consummated at the end of February 2015, with their final payment to us and the transfer/dismissal of the Lonza Litigation. Managements' intentions at the time were to utilize the proceeds of the Amarantus Agreement to develop the Company's own autologous Engineered Skin Substitute (ESS). It was estimated that the proceeds from the sale of the Lonza Litigation, including the Amarantus stock received, would fund the development of the new product up to the initiation of clinical trials, while at the same time reducing outstanding liabilities and supporting the business operations of the Company. Unfortunately, due to a decline in the value of the Amarantus stock, management has determined at this time that the proceeds will fall short of that goal and that further funding will most likely need to be raised.

At the start of 2015, we reached an agreement with an internationally recognized institution to provide analytical R&D services for the proposed new product. This was a necessary step in the process of validating the science supporting our new approach. We believe their research has not only provided support for our new science, but has also brought us product improvements in the form of the best starting materials, an extended shelf life, and potentially reducing the manufacturing time of the product. The study has been completed, and final report has been received. This research is part of our request for a Pre IND (investational new drug) meeting with the FDA and will be included in the IND application for FDA approval to start clinical trials. The results of the study have significantly impacted our manufacturing process and therefore will provide the basis of the tech transfer to our chosen manufacturer(s). The same institution that conducted the study will also be producing clinical trial material.

NovaDerm^® was selected as the name for the proposed new product and documents were completed to register the name as a new Regenicin trademark. The NovaDerm^® tradmark is now registered with the Patent and Trademark Office.

We submitted a "Request for Designation" to the FDA to determine which group within the agency would be assigned to evaluate NovaDerm^®. The FDA responded in a phone conversation with our CEO and staff that the NovaDerm^® product would be designated as a "Biologic". NovaDerm^® would thus be the first and only autologous Engineered Skin Substitute classified as a “Biologic” for treatment of burns greater than 30%, which not only serves as a point of product differentiation, but also opened up the opportunity for NovaDerm^® to apply for Orphan Designation, with all available benefits. Regenicin applied for Orphan designation for it’s NovaDerm^® product last April and received word from the FDA that we would be notified of their decision shortly.

Regenicin has submitted a request for a pre-IND meeting with the FDA. A pre-IND meeting can be very valuable in planning a product development program, especially if sponsors' questions are not fully answered by guidances and other information provided by FDA. Early interactions with FDA staff can help to prevent clinical hold issues from arising.  A pre-IND meeting can also provide sponsors’ information that will assist them in preparing to submit complete investigational new drug applications.  Efficient use of FDA resources can lead to more efficient drug development. 

A pre-IND meeting with the FDA is a chance to submit questions about the specifications and controls of our manufacturing process and clinical trial procedures that are not specifically addressed by guidance documents or regulations.

We have entered into a contract with a well recognized Clinical Research Organization to help with managing our clinical trial.

The most significant hurdle in the product development process to overcome, we believe, is the collagen substrate issue. Collagen is used in many products, but it is the essential ingredient to fabricate scaffolds on which cells are grown. Type 1 Bovine Collagen is harvested from corium, which is the lower part of the Dermis layer of the cow hide. The FDA regulations and guidance dictates any animal part used in treatment of humans must be from a "Closed Herd". In our search for Closed Herd collagen, we found that most of the suppliers claiming to sell from a “Closed Herd" were not in fact compliant with the FDA guidance and lacked the traceability required for animal materials used for drugs, devices, biologics or combination products. It was important to our analysis of this issue that the FDA guidance documents clearly state that any product being requested for clinical trials would be denied until the applicant supplied the traceability to demonstrate that all components derived from animals were obtained from “Closed Herds”. Negotiations are still ongoing regarding obtaining collagen supplies and as the result of the importance of this product to our business, as previously reported, both the CEO and CFO of Regenicin have invested and are now owners owners of this vertical supply business.

There are two separate manufacturing processes that must be performed to produce NovaDerm^®. First, the collagen scaffold must be fabricated to act as the platform on which to grow the skin cells. Secondly, the patient’s actual cells must be cultured and organized to make the skin.  Both are highly specialized manufacturing processes and must be performed under strict compliance with Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) as set forth by regulations enforced by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and produced by a manufacturer registered with the FDA. After much discussion, we concluded negotiations and entered into a supply agreement for the manufacture of the collagen scaffolds needed to grow skin for the clinical trials. The manufacturer was selected based on its compliance with these FDA requirements. In addition, we have selected and are in the final stages of concluding a contract with this cGMP compliant manufacturer to produce NovaDerm^® for the clinical trials.

The pre-IND (investigational new drug) package for the FDA is complete and now contains the final results from the analytical R&D services report mentioned above. We submitted a request for a Pre-IND meeting with the FDA. The Pre-IND meeting will give us the opportunity to ask any questions we may have for the FDA as well as getting feedback from the FDA on the information we provide about NovaDerm^®. The meeting will also let us know if the FDA agrees with our plan of commercialization, or if additional information will be needed for the IND application. In order to save time we have already completed much of the IND that will request permission to start clinical trials. The request for the pre-IND meeting was an objective in Q2 of 2016 and has been accomplished.

If we receive orphan designation or are cleared by the FDA to proceed with the clinical trials we will resume, discussions with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Agency (BARDA) related to a grant application for NovaDerm^® product development.

Our Business Moving Forward:

The company goal is to be positioned to enter FDA clinical trials in the second half of 2016. Based on the achievement of the previously stated objectives for the first two calender quarters of 2016, management believes this goal is still obtainable. The following planned steps for our first quarter were reported as follows:

Calendar Q1 2016

In regard to this list of objectives, we can report our progress as follows:

We completed item #1 above, the laboratory portion of the collagen scaffold evaluation for growing Nova Derm and we received a draft of the final report from our analytical research company ( Item #6 above). The results of the study have allowed us to establish measurable specifications to ensure consistent scaffolds to grow NovaDerm. The study looked at commercially available scaffolds, substrates made with and without growth factors and a totally new process to produce collagen scaffolds, supplied by Carbon & Polymer Research. These scaffolds performed very well in growing NovaDerm, and the process for fabricating the scaffolds is cost efficient which will lower the overall cost to produce our product.

We have finalized and executed a contract with Carbon & Polymer Research as the manufacturer of our collagen scaffolds (Item #3 above). This supply contract contains a “Most Favored Customer” clause guaranteeing that Regenicin will be charged prices equal to the lowest prices charged to any customer in the US. This agreement is attached to this report as Exhibit 10.1.

We have also selected our clinical trial manufacturer for NovaDerm^®, however, pricing and terms have not been finalized.

We have concluded contract negotiations with a highly regarded clinical research organization (CRO) (Item #4 above) to manage the clinical trials. The CRO will assist us to assemble the DSMB.

Calendar Q2 2016

In regard to this list of objectives, we can report our progress as follows:

We have completed the Tech Transfer with our clinical trial materials supplier.

Regenicin applied for Orphan designation for it’s NovaDerm^® product last April and received word from the FDA recently that we would be notified of their decision shortly.

We need to wait until we have our pre-IND meeting and select our clinical sites before we submit the documents to the IRB in case there are changes suggested by the FDA.

The first engineering run was completed as part of the recent study.

We requested the Pre-IND meeting from the FDA.

The facility that conducted the research study has the capabilities to perform mouse studies. We have submitted protocols and asked for pricing. No mouse studies will be conducted until after Pre-IND meeting. One of the questions asked of the FDA concerns the mouse study.

Revision of the Pre-IND was made to include the results of the research study. We expect if any revisions are suggested by the FDA at the pre-IND meeting, they will be minor and easily changed.

Carbon & Polymer Research has worked with Regenicin closely to develop collagen scaffold release testing methods and specifications. The specifications were accepted based on the results of the Collagen scaffold evaluation research recently completed.

Calendar Q3 2016

Calendar Q4 2016

Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

We generated no revenues from September 6, 2007 (date of inception) to June 30, 2016. We do not expect to generate revenues until we are able to obtain FDA approval of our product and thereafter successfully market and sell the product.

We incurred operating expenses of $305,470 and $954,398 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016, compared with operating expenses of $438,502 and $911,084 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015. General and administrative expenses accounted for all of our operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. The major difference and shift in operating expenses from the three months ended June 30, 2015 was accounted for by a reduction of general and administrative salaries.

General and administrative expenses accounted for $885,058 and $845,319 of our operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The major difference in the operating expenses from the nine months ended June 30,2015 was a $39,739 increase in general and administrative expenses, $35,530 in Stock based compensation offset by a decrease in research and development expense of $31,955. 

Other expense was $4,363 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to other expense of $18,407 for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Other income and expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016 consisted of only interest expenses of $4,363. Other income and expenses for the same period ended 2015 consisted of an interest expense of $18,407. Other expense was $13,137 for the nine months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to other income of $6,017,793 for the nine months ended June 30, 2015. Other income and expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 consisted of only interest expense of $13,137. Other income and expenses for the same period ended in 2015 consisted of interest expense of $58,408, loss on derivatives liabilities of $528,230 and a gain on the sale of assets of $6,604,431.

Income from operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 included the reversal of accounts payable of $973,374 relating to the Lonza Settlement with no corresponding benefit in the 2016 comparable period.

After provision for preferred stock dividends of $17,652, we had a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $327,485 for the three months ended June 30, 2016. By comparison, we recorded net income attributable to common stockholders after a provision for preferred stock dividends of $17,652 of $474,561 for the three months ended June 30, 2015. After provision for preferred stock dividends of $53,149, we recorded a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $1,020,684 for the nine months ended June 30, 2016. By comparison, we recorded net income attributable to common stockholders after a provision of preferred stock dividends of $52,955 of $3,198,128 for the nine months ended June 30, 2015. Our net income for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily the result of gains recorded from the sale of intellectual property rights to Amarantus.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2016, we had cash of $343,428 and total current assets of $403,607. As of June 30, 2016, we had current liabilities of $2,476,311. We therefore had negative working capital of $2,072,704.

Operating activities used $595,624 in cash for the nine months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in cash for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily attributable to funding the loss for the period.

Investing activities used $64,622 in cash which represented advances to PureMed Farma, a related party, during the reported period. We note that the value of the shares of Amarantus we obtained from the sale of assets have declined significantly in value since the consummation of the agreement. Financing activities reflected a net cash outflow of $57,703 due to net repayment of loans from officers.

We have issued various promissory notes to meet our short term demands, the terms of which are provided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements accompanying this report. While this source of bridge financing has been helpful in the short term to meet our financial obligations, we will need additional financing to fund our operations, continue with the FDA approval process, and implement our business plan. Our short term financial needs are estimated to be $1.0 - $1.5 million for use in funding our clinical trials. Our long term financial needs are estimated to be approximately $8 to $10 million.

Based upon our current financial condition, we do not have sufficient cash to operate our business at the current level for the next twelve months. We intend to fund operations through increased debt and/or equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund expenditures or other cash requirements. We plan to seek additional financing in a private equity offering to secure funding for operations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional funding. If we are not able to secure additional funding, the implementation of our business plan will be impaired. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2016, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Going Concern

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred operating losses from inception, expect to incur further losses in the development of our business, and have been dependent on funding operations through the issuance of convertible debt and private sale of equity securities. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans include continuing to finance operations through the private or public placement of debt and/or equity securities and the reduction of expenditures. However, no assurance can be given at this time as to whether we will be able to achieve these objectives. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2016. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the presence of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has identified the following material weaknesses which have caused management to conclude that, as of June 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both US GAAP and SEC guidelines.

Remediation Plan to Address the Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our company plans to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal controls over financial reporting. During the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we plan to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending September 30, 2016: (i) appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; and (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting. The remediation efforts set out are largely dependent upon our securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.

We are unable to remedy our controls related to the inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management until we receive financing to hire additional employees. 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the nine months ended June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings 

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us. 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The information set forth below relates to our issuances of securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 during the reporting period which were not previously included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K.

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, we issued no shares of common stock.

These securities were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The holders represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view towards distribution. The investors were given adequate information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to the restricted stock.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.