REPUBLIC FIRST BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
Quarterly Period Ended: September
30, 2006
Commission
File Number:
000-17007
Republic
First Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact
name of business issuer as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
|
23-2486815
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
IRS
Employer Identification
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Number
|
1608
Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip
code)
215-735-4422
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for
the
past 90 days.
YES
X
|
NO____
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer ____
|
Accelerated
Filer X
|
Non-accelerated
filer ____
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
YES____
|
NO
X
|
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable
date.
9,743,204 shares
of
Issuer's Common Stock, par value
$0.01
per share,
issued
and outstanding as of November 3, 2006
Page
1
Exhibit
index appears on page 38
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
Part
I: Financial
Information
|
Page
|
Part
II: Other Information
|
|
2
ITEM
1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
|
|
3
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
As
of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
Dollars
in thousands, except share data
(Unaudited)
ASSETS:
|
September
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
12,752
|
$
|
19,985
|
|||
Interest
bearing deposits with banks
|
500
|
768
|
|||||
Federal
funds sold
|
97,822
|
86,221
|
|||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
111,074
|
106,974
|
|||||
Investment
securities available for sale, at fair value
|
76,638
|
37,283
|
|||||
Investment
securities held to maturity at amortized cost
|
|||||||
(Fair
value of $512 and $570 respectively)
|
505
|
559
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
6,094
|
6,319
|
|||||
Loans
receivable (net of allowance for loan losses of
|
|||||||
$7,934
and $7,617, respectively)
|
753,869
|
670,469
|
|||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
5,778
|
3,598
|
|||||
Other
real estate owned
|
499
|
137
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
5,114
|
3,784
|
|||||
Business
owned life insurance
|
11,196
|
10,926
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
9,577
|
10,806
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
980,344
|
$
|
850,855
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||
Demand
– non-interest-bearing
|
$
|
69,399
|
$
|
88,862
|
|||
Demand
– interest-bearing
|
57,378
|
69,940
|
|||||
Money
market and savings
|
241,344
|
223,129
|
|||||
Time
under $100,000
|
154,381
|
128,022
|
|||||
Time
$100,000 or more
|
220,489
|
137,890
|
|||||
Total
Deposits
|
742,991
|
647,843
|
|||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
145,794
|
123,867
|
|||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
5,381
|
1,813
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
7,925
|
7,469
|
|||||
Subordinated
debt
|
6,186
|
6,186
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities
|
908,277
|
787,178
|
|||||
Shareholders’
Equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
Stock, par value $0.01 per share; 10,000,000 shares
|
|||||||
authorized;
no shares issued as of September 30, 2006
|
|||||||
and
December 31, 2005
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock par value $0.01 per share; 20,000,000 shares
|
|||||||
authorized;
shares issued 9,743,204 as of
|
|||||||
September
30, 2006 and 8,753,998 as of December 31, 2005
|
97
|
88
|
|||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
63,057
|
50,203
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
11,026
|
15,566
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost (250,555 shares)
|
(1,688
|
)
|
(1,688
|
)
|
|||
Stock
held by deferred compensation plan
|
(573
|
)
|
(573
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
148
|
81
|
|||||
Total
Shareholders’ Equity
|
72,067
|
63,677
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$
|
980,344
|
$
|
850,855
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
4
Consolidated
Statements of Income
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and
2005
Dollars
in thousands, except per share data
(unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
|
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||
Interest
Income:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
14,868
|
$
|
10,576
|
$
|
42,773
|
$
|
30,347
|
|||||
Interest
and dividend income on federal
|
|||||||||||||
funds
sold and other interest-earning balances
|
248
|
192
|
900
|
863
|
|||||||||
Interest
and dividends on investment securities
|
915
|
465
|
1,991
|
1,350
|
|||||||||
Total
interest income
|
16,031
|
11,233
|
45,664
|
32,560
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
|||||||||||||
Demand
interest-bearing
|
165
|
79
|
379
|
236
|
|||||||||
Money
market and savings
|
2,437
|
1,886
|
6,381
|
4,457
|
|||||||||
Time
under $100,000
|
1,625
|
730
|
4,096
|
2,272
|
|||||||||
Time
$100,000 or more
|
1,851
|
524
|
5,425
|
2,270
|
|||||||||
Other
borrowed funds
|
1,626
|
757
|
3,561
|
1,939
|
|||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
7,704
|
3,976
|
19,842
|
11,174
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
8,327
|
7,257
|
25,822
|
21,386
|
|||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
-
|
315
|
1,374
|
1,137
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income after provision
|
|||||||||||||
for
loan losses
|
8,327
|
6,942
|
24,448
|
20,249
|
|||||||||
Non-Interest
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Loan
advisory and servicing fees
|
194
|
187
|
1,022
|
477
|
|||||||||
Service
fees on deposit accounts
|
309
|
466
|
1,167
|
1,452
|
|||||||||
Gains
on sales and calls of investment securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
97
|
|||||||||
Gains
on sale of other real estate owned
|
130
|
-
|
130
|
-
|
|||||||||
Other
income
|
241
|
251
|
514
|
780
|
|||||||||
874
|
904
|
2,833
|
2,806
|
||||||||||
Non-Interest
expense:
|
|||||||||||||
Salaries
and benefits
|
3,083
|
2,447
|
8,938
|
7,097
|
|||||||||
Occupancy
|
482
|
360
|
1,347
|
1,141
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
|
253
|
214
|
661
|
795
|
|||||||||
Legal
|
145
|
188
|
450
|
528
|
|||||||||
Advertising
|
173
|
37
|
361
|
126
|
|||||||||
Data
processing
|
138
|
129
|
417
|
326
|
|||||||||
Taxes,
other
|
176
|
192
|
567
|
512
|
|||||||||
Other
expenses
|
1,053
|
1,036
|
2,925
|
3,089
|
|||||||||
5,503
|
4,603
|
15,666
|
13,614
|
||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
3,698
|
3,243
|
11,615
|
9,441
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
1,263
|
1,102
|
3,982
|
3,144
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
2,435
|
$
|
2,141
|
$
|
7,633
|
$
|
6,297
|
|||||
Net
income per share
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.26
|
$
|
0.23
|
$
|
0.81
|
$
|
0.69
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.25
|
$
|
0.22
|
$
|
0.79
|
$
|
0.66
|
(See
notes to consolidated financial statements)
5
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|||||||
Dollars
in thousands
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||
September
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
7,633
|
$
|
6,297
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net
|
|||||||
cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,374
|
1,137
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of other real estate owned
|
(130
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Depreciation
|
661
|
795
|
|||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
10
|
-
|
|||||
Gain
on call of securities
|
-
|
(97
|
)
|
||||
Amortization
of discounts on investment securities
|
116
|
222
|
|||||
Increase
in value of business owned life insurance
|
(270
|
)
|
(248
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
(increase) in accrued interest receivable
|
|||||||
and
other assets
|
(333
|
)
|
1,810
|
||||
Decrease
(increase) in accrued expenses
|
|||||||
and
other liabilities
|
4,024
|
(1,330
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
13,085
|
8,586
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of securities:
|
|||||||
Available
for sale
|
(41,066
|
)
|
(18,912
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from principal receipts, calls and maturities of
securities:
|
|||||||
Held
to maturity
|
54
|
212
|
|||||
Available
for sale
|
1,662
|
4,310
|
|||||
Purchase
of FHLB stock
|
-
|
(2,913
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of FHLB stock
|
225
|
-
|
|||||
Net
increase in loans
|
(84,774
|
)
|
(96,345
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
in other interest-earning restricted cash
|
-
|
612
|
|||||
Premises
and equipment expenditures
|
(2,841
|
)
|
(757
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(126,740
|
)
|
(113,793
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Net
proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
680
|
949
|
|||||
Net
increase (decrease) in demand, money market and savings
deposits
|
(13,810
|
)
|
33,288
|
||||
Increase
of overnight borrowings
|
21,927
|
99,723
|
|||||
Repayment
of long term borrowings
|
-
|
(25,000
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase in time deposits
|
108,958
|
41,010
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
117,755
|
149,970
|
|||||
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
4,100
|
44,763
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
106,974
|
36,703
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
111,074
|
$
|
81,466
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
16,274
|
$
|
11,733
|
|||
Taxes
paid
|
$
|
3,700
|
$
|
3,600
|
(See
notes to consolidated financial
statements)
6
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
Dollars
in thousands
(unaudited)
Comprehensive
Income/(loss)
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid
in
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Treasury
Stock at Cost
|
Stock
Held by
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
January 1, 2006
|
$
|
88
|
$
|
50,203
|
$
|
15,566
|
$
|
(1,688
|
)
|
$
|
(573
|
)
|
$
|
81
|
$
|
63,677
|
|||||||||
Total
other comprehensive income, net of reclassification adjustments and
taxes
|
67
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
67
|
67
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
7,633
|
-
|
-
|
7,633
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7,633
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
|
7,700
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
-
|
10
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10
|
||||||||||||||||||
Stock
dividend
(885,279
shares)
|
8
|
12,165
|
(12,173
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Options
exercised
(114,140
shares)
|
1
|
679
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
680
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
September 30, 2006
|
$
|
97
|
$
|
63,057
|
$
|
11,026
|
$
|
(1,688
|
)
|
$
|
(573
|
)
|
$
|
148
|
$
|
72,067
|
|||||||||
|
Comprehensive
Income/(loss)
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid
in
Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock at Cost
|
|
|
Stock
Held by
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
|
|||||
Balance
January 1, 2005
|
$
|
74
|
$
|
42,494
|
$
|
23,867
|
$
|
(1,541
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
330
|
$
|
65,224
|
||||||||||
Total
other comprehensive loss, net of reclassification adjustments and
taxes
|
(241
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(241
|
)
|
(241
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
6,297
|
-
|
-
|
6,297
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,297
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
|
6,056
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
dividend
(924,022
shares)
|
9
|
10,968
|
(10,977
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
Options
exercised (325,181 shares)
|
4
|
945
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
949
|
||||||||||||||||||
First
Bank of Delaware spin-off
|
(5,157
|
)
|
(6,217
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
(22
|
)
|
(11,396
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance
September 30, 2005
|
$
|
87
|
$
|
49,250
|
$
|
12,970
|
$
|
(1,541
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
67
|
$
|
60,833
|
||||||||||
(See
notes to consolidated financial statements)
7
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note
1: Organization
Republic
First Bancorp, Inc. (“the Company”) spun off its former subsidiary, the First
Bank of Delaware, through a pro-rata distribution of one share of the common
stock of the First Bank of Delaware (“FBD”) for every share of the Company’s
common stock outstanding on January 31, 2005. The Company’s financial statements
are presented herein with an effective date of the spin-off as of January 1,
2005. The Company is now a one-bank holding company organized and incorporated
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It is comprised of one
wholly owned subsidiary, Republic First Bank (“Republic”),
a
Pennsylvania state chartered bank. Republic offers a variety of banking services
to individuals and businesses throughout the greater Philadelphia and south
New
Jersey area through its offices and branches in Philadelphia, Montgomery,
Delaware and Camden counties.
Both
Republic and FBD share data processing, accounting, human resources and
compliance services through BSC Services Corp. (”BSC”), which is a subsidiary of
FBD. BSC allocates its cost on the basis of usage, to Republic and FBD, which
classify such costs to the appropriate non-interest expense categories.
The
Company and Republic encounter vigorous competition for market share in the
geographic areas they serve from bank holding companies, other community banks,
thrift institutions and other non-bank financial organizations, such as mutual
fund companies, insurance companies and brokerage companies.
The
Company and Republic are subject to regulations of certain state and federal
agencies. These regulatory agencies periodically examine the Company and its
subsidiary for adherence to laws and regulations. As a consequence, the cost
of
doing business may be affected.
Note
2: Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies:
Basis
of Presentation:
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Republic. The accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for
the year ended December 31, 2006. All significant inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements.
Risks
and Uncertainties and Certain Significant Estimates:
The
earnings of the Company depend on the earnings of Republic. Earnings are
dependent primarily upon the level of net interest income, which is the
difference between interest earned on its interest-earning assets, such as
loans
and investments, and the interest paid on its interest-bearing liabilities,
such
as deposits and borrowings. Accordingly, the results of operations are subject
to risks and uncertainties surrounding their exposure to change in the interest
rate environment.
8
Prepayments
on residential real estate mortgage and other fixed rate loans and
mortgage-backed securities vary significantly and may cause significant
fluctuations in interest margins.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date
of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those
estimates.
Significant
estimates are made by management in determining the allowance for loan losses,
carrying values of other real estate owned and income taxes. Consideration
is
given to a variety of factors in establishing these estimates. In estimating
the
allowance for loan losses, management considers current economic conditions,
diversification of the loan portfolio, delinquency statistics, results of
internal loan reviews, borrowers’ perceived financial and managerial strengths,
the adequacy of underlying collateral, if collateral dependent, or present
value
of future cash flows and other relevant factors. Since the allowance for loan
losses and carrying value of other real estate owned are dependent, to a great
extent, on the general economy and other conditions that may be beyond
Republic’s control, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates of the
allowance for loan losses and the carrying values of other real estate owned
could differ materially in the near term.
The
Company and Republic are subject to federal and state regulations governing
virtually all aspects of their activities, including but not limited to, lines
of business, liquidity, investments, the payment of dividends, and others.
Such
regulations and the cost of adherence to such regulations can have a significant
impact on earnings and financial condition.
Stock
Based Compensation:
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No,
123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, which revises SFAS No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. This
statement requires an entity to recognize the cost of employee services received
in share-based payment transactions and measure the cost on the grant-date
fair
value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which
an
employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The
provisions of SFAS No. 123R were effective January 1, 2006.
In
March
2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107 which expressed the views of the SEC regarding the
interaction between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations. SAB
No.
107 provides guidance related to the valuation of share-based payment
arrangements for public companies, including assumptions such as expected
volatility and expected term.
In
2005,
the Company vested all previously issued unvested options. As a result the
impact of the adoption of SFAS 123 on operations in future periods will be
the
value imputed on future options grants using the methods prescribed in SFAS
No.
123R.
At
September 30, 2006, the Company maintains a Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) under
which the Company grants options to its employees and directors. Under terms
of
the plan, 1.5 million shares of common stock, plus an annual increase equal
to
the number of shares needed to restore the maximum number of shares that may
be
available for grant under the plan to 1.5 million shares, are reserved for
such
options. The Plan provides that the exercise price of each option granted equals
the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Any options
granted vest within one to five years and have a maximum term of 10 years.
9
A
summary
of the status of the Company’s stock options under the Stock Option Plan as of
September 30, 2006 and 2005 and changes during the nine months ended September
30, 2006 and 2005 are presented below:
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||
Outstanding,
beginning of year
|
709,372
|
$
5.97
|
1,018,615
|
$
4.68
|
|||
Granted
|
11,000
|
13.35
|
150,501
|
11.05
|
|||
Exercised
|
(114,140)
|
(5.96)
|
(357,699)
|
(2.50)
|
|||
Forfeited
|
(1,807)
|
(7.41)
|
(5,985)
|
(7.07)
|
|||
Outstanding,
end of period
|
604,425
|
6.10
|
805,432
|
5.39
|
|||
Options
exercisable at period-end
|
593,425
|
5.97
|
654,931
|
4.09
|
|||
Weighted
average fair value of options granted during the period
|
$
5.61
|
$
4.47
|
The
fair
value of each option granted in 2006 is estimated on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions used for those grants: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility
of
29.03%; risk-free interest rate of 4.83% and an expected life of 7.0
years.
The
following table summarizes information about options outstanding under the
Stock
Option Plan as of September 30, 2006.
Options
outstanding
|
Options
exercisable
|
||||||||
Range
of Exercise Prices
|
Number
outstanding
at September
30,
2006
|
Weighted
Average
remaining
contractual
life
(years)
|
Weighted
Average
exercise
price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||
$1.99
|
103,673
|
4.3
|
$
1.99
|
103,673
|
$
1.99
|
||||
$2.99
to $3.91
|
160,591
|
5.5
|
3.23
|
160,591
|
3.23
|
||||
$4.14
to $5.08
|
26,693
|
4.9
|
4.39
|
26,693
|
4.39
|
||||
$6.63
to $7.41
|
157,203
|
7.3
|
6.85
|
157,203
|
6.85
|
||||
$10.93
to $13.35
|
156,265
|
8.7
|
11.33
|
145,265
|
11.18
|
||||
604,425
|
$
6.10
|
593,425
|
$5.97
|
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, $10,000 was recognized in compensation
expense for the Stock Option Plan. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company
accounted for the Stock Option Plan under the recognition and measurement
principles of APB No. 25 and related interpretations. Share-based employee
compensation costs were not reflected in net income, as all options granted
under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of the grant. In 2005, the Company vested all
previously issued unvested options and the Company has granted 11,000 options
during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compensation expense is
recognized on the Stock Option Plan for only the options granted during the
nine
months ended September 30, 2006.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 123, the following table shows pro forma net income
and
earnings per share assuming stock options had been expensed based on the fair
value of the options granted along with significant assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes option valuation model (dollars in thousands,except per share
data).
10
Three
months ended
|
|
Nine
months ended
|
|
||||
|
|
September
30,
|
|
September
30,
|
|
||
|
|
2005
|
|
2005
|
|||
Net
Income as reported
|
$
|
2,141
|
$
|
6,297
|
|||
Stock-based
employee compensation costs determined
|
|||||||
if
the fair value method had been applied to all awards,
|
|||||||
net
of tax
|
-
|
(496
|
)
|
||||
Pro-forma
net income
|
$
|
2,141
|
$
|
5,801
|
|||
Basic
Earnings per Common Share:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
0.23
|
$
|
0.69
|
|||
Pro-forma
|
$
|
0.23
|
$
|
0.63
|
|||
Diluted
Earnings per Common Share:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
0.22
|
$
|
0.66
|
|||
Pro-forma
|
$
|
0.22
|
$
|
0.60
|
The
pro
forma compensation expense is based upon the fair value of the option at grant
date. The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions used for those grants: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility
of
22.17%; risk-free interest rate of 4.03% and an expected life of 9.0
years
Note
3: Reclassifications
and Restatement for 10% Stock Dividend
Certain
items in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have
been
reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation format. There was no
effect on net income for the periods presented herein as a result of
reclassifications. All applicable amounts in these consolidated financial
statements (including stock options and earnings per share information) have
been restated for a 10% stock dividend paid on May 17, 2006.
Note
4: Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
November 2005, the FASB issued final FSP No. 123(R)-3, “Transition Election
Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.” The
FSP provides an alternative method of calculating excess tax benefits (the
Additional Paid-in Capital “APIC” pool) from the method defined in FAS 123(R)
for share-based payments. A one-time election to adopt the transition method
in
this FSP is available to those entities adopting 123(R) using either the
modified retrospective or modified prospective method. Up to one year from
the
initial adoption of FAS 123(R) or the effective date of the FSP is provided
to
make this one-time election. However, until an entity makes its election, it
must follow the guidance in FAS 123(R). The Company is currently evaluating
the
potential impact of calculating the APIC pool with this alternative method
and
has not yet determined which method we will adopt, or the expected impact on
the
Company’s financial position or results of operations.
11
In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments”. SFAS No. 155 amends FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Statement No. 140, and improves the financial reporting of certain hybrid
financial instruments by requiring more consistent accounting that eliminates
exemptions and provides a means to simplify the accounting for these
instruments. Specifically, SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have
embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to
bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for
the
whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all
financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s
first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company is required
to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 155, as applicable, beginning in fiscal
year
2007. Management does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a
material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
In
March
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets —An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”
(“SFAS 156”). SFAS 156 requires that all separately recognized
servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value,
if practicable. The statement permits, but does not require, the subsequent
measurement of servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value.
SFAS 156 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year
that begins after September 15, 2006, which for the Company will be as of
the beginning of fiscal 2007. The Company does not believe that the adoption
of
SFAS 156 will have a significant effect on its financial statements.
In
July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48), which
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation
requires that companies recognize in their financial statements the impact
of a
tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on
audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN
48
are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 with the
cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an
adjustment to opening retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating
the
impact of adopting FIN 48 on our financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“SFAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements. The new guidance is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and
for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 157 on its financial
statements.
On
September 29, 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS
158”), which amends SFAS 87 and SFAS 106 to require recognition of the
overfunded or underfunded status of pension and other postretirement benefit
plans on the balance sheet. Under SFAS 158, gains and losses, prior service
costs and credits, and any remaining transition amounts under SFAS 87 and SFAS
106 that have not yet been recognized through net periodic benefit cost will
be
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax effects, until
they are amortized as a component of net periodic cost. The measurement date
—
the date at which the benefit obligation and plan assets are measured — is
required to be the company’s fiscal year end. SFAS 158 is effective for
publicly-held companies for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006,
except for the measurement date provisions, which are effective for fiscal
years
ending after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently analyzing the
effects of SFAS 158 but does not expect its implementation will have a
significant impact on its financial statements.
12
On
September 13, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 provides interpretive
guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year
misstatements should be considered in quantifying a potential current year
misstatement. Prior to SAB 108, companies might evaluate the materiality of
financial-statement misstatements using either the income statement or balance
sheet approach, with the income statement approach focusing on new
misstatements added in the current year, and the balance sheet approach focusing
on the cumulative amount of misstatement present in a company’s balance sheet.
Misstatements that would be material under one approach could be viewed as
immaterial under another approach, and not be corrected. SAB 108 now requires
that companies view financial statement misstatements as material if they are
material according to either the income statement or balance sheet approach.
The
Company has analyzed SAB 108 and determined that upon adoption it will have
no
impact on its financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position AUG AIR-1, “Accounting for
Planned Major Maintenance Activities” which is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. This position statement eliminates the
accrue-in-advance method of accounting for planned major maintenance
activities. The
Company does not expect this pronouncement to have a significant impact on
the
determination or reporting of its financial results.
Note
5: Legal
Proceedings
The
Company and Republic are from time to time parties (plaintiff or defendant)
to
lawsuits in the normal course of business. While any litigation involves an
element of uncertainty, management, after reviewing pending actions with legal
counsel, is of the opinion that the liabilities of the Company and Republic,
if
any, resulting from such actions will not have a material effect on the
financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
Note
6: Segment
Reporting
As
a
result of the spin-off of FBD in the first quarter of 2005, the tax refund
products and short-term consumer loan segments were also spun off as they were
divisions of that bank. After the spin off, the Company has one reportable
segment: community banking. The community bank segment primarily encompasses
the
commercial loan and deposit activities of Republic, as well as consumer loan
products in the area surrounding its branches.
Note
7: Earnings Per Share:
Earnings
per share (“EPS”) consists of two separate components: basic EPS and diluted
EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for each period presented. Diluted EPS is
calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding plus dilutive common stock equivalents (“CSEs”). CSEs consist
of dilutive stock options granted through the Company’s stock option plan. The
following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in
calculating basic and diluted EPS. CSEs which are anti-dilutive are not included
in the following calculation. At September 30, 2006, and 2005, respectively,
there were no stock options that were not included in the calculation of EPS
because the
13
option
exercise price is greater than the average market price for the period. The
following tables are a comparison of EPS for the three months ended September
30, 2006 and 2005.
Three
months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
2,435,000
|
$
|
2,141,000
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
Per
|
Per
|
||||||||
|
Shares
|
Share
|
Shares
|
Share
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average shares
|
|||||||||||||
For
period
|
9,492,360
|
9,309,321
|
|||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$
|
0.26
|
$
|
0.23
|
|||||||||
Add
common stock equivalents
representing
dilutive stock options
|
256,292
|
337,901
|
|||||||||||
Effect
on basic EPS of dilutive CSE
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|||||||
Equals
total weighted average
|
9,748,652
|
9,647,222
|
|||||||||||
shares
and CSE (diluted)
|
|||||||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$
|
0.25
|
$
|
0.22
|
The
following tables are a comparison of EPS for the nine months ended September
30,
2006 and 2005.
Nine
months ended September 30,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
7,633,000
|
$
|
6,297,000
|
|||||||||
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|||
Weighted
average shares
|
|||||||||||||
For
period
|
9,458,242
|
9,152,400
|
|||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$
|
0.81
|
$
|
0.69
|
|||||||||
Add
common stock equivalents
representing
dilutive stock options
|
255,042
|
424,581
|
|||||||||||
Effect
on basic EPS of dilutive CSE
|
$
|
(.02
|
)
|
$
|
(.03
|
)
|
|||||||
Equals
total weighted average
|
|||||||||||||
shares
and CSE (diluted)
|
9,713,284
|
9,576,981
|
|||||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$
|
0.79
|
$
|
0.66
|
14
Note
8: Comprehensive Income
The
following table displays net income and the components of other comprehensive
income to arrive at total comprehensive income. The only components of other
comprehensive income are those related to the unrealized gains (losses) on
available for sale investment securities.
(dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
|
Three
months ended
|
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
2,435
|
$
|
2,141
|
$
|
7,633
|
$
|
6,297
|
|||||
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
gains (losses) on securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Arising
during the period, net of tax benefit and reclassification
adjustments
|
255
|
(60
|
)
|
67
|
(241
|
)
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
2,690
|
$
|
2,081
|
$
|
7,700
|
$
|
6,056
|
The
accumulated balances related to each component of other comprehensive income
are
as follows (in thousands):
September
30,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
||||||
Unrealized
gains on securities, net of tax
|
$
|
148
|
$
|
67
|
15
The
following is management’s discussion and analysis of significant changes in the
Company’s results of operations, financial condition and capital resources
presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. This discussion
should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
Certain
statements in this document may be considered to be “forward-looking statements”
as that term is defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of
1995, such as statements that include the words “may,” “believes,” “expect,”
“estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “should,” “intend,” “probability,” “risk,”
“target,” “objective” and similar expressions or variations on such expressions.
The forward-looking statements contained herein are subject to certain risks
and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. For example, risks and
uncertainties can arise with changes in: general economic conditions, including
their impact on capital expenditures; new service and product offerings by
competitors and price pressures; and similar items. Readers are cautioned not
to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect
management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no
obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should
carefully review the risk factors described in other documents the Company
files
from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, filed by the Company in 2006 and 2005, and
any
Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company, as well as other
filings.
Financial
Condition:
September
30, 2006 Compared to December 31, 2005
Assets
increased $129.5 million to $980.3 million at September 30, 2006, versus $850.9
million at December 31, 2005. This increase reflected a $83.4 million increase
in net loans and a $39.3 million increase in investment securities. These
increases were funded primarily by increases in deposits of $95.1 million and
short-term borrowings of $21.9 million.
Loans:
The
loan
portfolio represents the Company’s largest asset category and is its most
significant source of interest income. The Company’s lending strategy focuses on
small and medium size businesses and professionals that seek highly personalized
banking services. Net loans increased $83.4 million, to $753.9 million at
September 30, 2006, versus $670.5 million at December 31, 2005. Substantially
all of the increase resulted from commercial and construction loans. The loan
portfolio consists of secured and unsecured commercial loans including
commercial real estate, construction loans, residential mortgages, automobile
loans, home improvement loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, overdraft
lines of credit and others. Commercial loans are originated as either fixed
or
variable rate loans with typical terms of 1 to 5 years. Commercial loans
typically range between $250,000 and $5,000,000 but customers may borrow
significantly larger amounts up to the legal lending limit of approximately
$11.5 million at September 30, 2006. Individual customers may have several
loans
that are secured by different collateral.
16
Investment
Securities:
Investment
securities available-for-sale are investments which may be sold in response
to
changing market and interest rate conditions and for liquidity and other
purposes. The Company’s investment securities available-for-sale consist
primarily of U.S. Government debt securities, U.S. Government agency issued
mortgage-backed securities, and debt securities which include corporate bonds
and trust preferred securities. Available-for-sale securities totaled $76.6
million at September 30, 2006, compared to $37.3 million at year-end 2005.
The
increase of $39.3 million reflected purchases of long term mortgage backed
securities and tax-exempt municipal securities. At September 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, the portfolio had net unrealized gains of $225,000 and
$123,000, respectively.
Investment
securities held-to-maturity are investments for which there is the intent and
ability to hold the investment to maturity. These investments are carried at
amortized cost. The held-to-maturity portfolio consists primarily of debt
securities. At September 30, 2006, securities held to maturity totaled $505,000,
compared to $559,000 at year-end 2005.
FHLB
Stock:
The
Company is required to maintain FHLB stock in proportion to its outstanding
debt
to FHLB. When the debt is repaid, the purchase price of the stock is refunded.
At September 30, 2006, FHLB stock totaled $6.1 million, a decrease of $225,000
from $6.3 million at December 31, 2005.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
Cash
and
due from banks, interest bearing deposits and federal funds sold are all liquid
funds. The aggregate amount in these three categories increased by $4.1 million,
to $111.1 million at September 30, 2006, from $107.0 million at
December 31, 2005, reflecting an $11.6 million increase in federal funds
sold partially offset by a $7.2 million decrease in cash and due from
banks.
Fixed
Assets:
Premises
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, increased $2.2 million to $5.8
million at September 30, 2006, compared to $3.6 million at December 31, 2005,
reflecting 2006 premises and equipment expenditures primarily related to branch
expansion.
Other
Real Estate Owned:
Other
real estate owned amounted to $499,000 at September 30, 2006 compared to
$137,000 December 31, 2005, reflecting the transfer of two commercial real
estate properties from non-accrual loans partially offset by the sale of the
one
commercial real estate property, carried at $137,000.
Business
Owned Life Insurance:
The
balance of business owned life insurance amounted to $11.2 million at September
30, 2006 and $10.9 million at December 31, 2005. The income earned on these
policies is reflected in other income.
Deposits:
Deposits,
which include non-interest and interest-bearing demand deposits, money market,
savings and time deposits including brokered deposits, are the Company’s major
source of funding. Deposits are generally solicited from the Company’s market
area through the offering of a variety of products to attract and retain
customers, with a primary focus on multi-product relationships. Institutional
deposits also may be utilized when they represent a lower-cost funding
alternative.
Period
end deposits increased by $95.1 million to $743.0 million at September 30,
2006,
from $647.8 million at December 31, 2005. Average core deposits for the quarter
decreased 10.0% or $41.6 million from the prior year third quarter to $375.6
million in the third quarter of 2006. Period end time
17
deposits
increased $109.0 million, or 41.0% to $374.9 million at September 30, 2006,
versus $265.9 million at the prior year-end.
Short-term
Borrowings:
Short-term
borrowings, primarily FHLB borrowings, totaled $145.8 million at September
30,
2006 and $123.9 million at December 31, 2005. The balances were comprised wholly
of overnight borrowings.
Shareholders’
Equity:
Total
shareholders’ equity increased $8.4 million to $72.1 million at September
30, 2006,
versus
$63.7 million at December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily the result
of
year-to-date net income of $7.6 million, with the balance of the increase
resulting from the exercise of stock options and a minimal increase in
accumulated other comprehensive income.
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to September 30,
2005
Results
of Operations:
Overview
The
Company's net income increased to $2.4 million or $0.25 per diluted share for
the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $2.1 million, or $0.22
per diluted share for the comparable prior year period. The improvement
reflected a $4.8 million, or 42.7%, increase in total interest income, primarily
due to higher rates and secondarily to a 22.8% increase in average loans
outstanding. Interest expense increased $3.7 million, reflecting higher rates,
a
15.7% increase in average deposits outstanding and a 53.4% increase in higher
cost average other borrowings. Accordingly, net interest income increased $1.1
million between the periods. There was no provision for loan losses in the
third
quarter of 2006, compared to a $315,000 provision expense in the third quarter
of 2005 as a result of recoveries. Non-interest expenses increased $900,000
to
$5.5 million compared to $4.6 million in the third quarter of 2005, primarily
due to higher salaries and benefits reflecting additional commercial loan
production and new branch staff. The return on average assets and average equity
of 1.13% and 13.66% respectively, in the third quarter of 2006 compared to
1.19%
and 14.24% respectively for the same period in 2005.
Analysis
of Net Interest Income
Historically,
the Company's earnings have depended significantly upon net interest income,
which is the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets
and
interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is impacted
by changes in the mix of the volume and rates of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities.
18
For
the three months ended
|
|
For
the three months ended
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
September
30, 2006
|
|
September
30, 2005
|
|
||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Average
|
|
Income/
|
|
Yield/
|
|
Average
|
|
Income/
|
|
Yield/
|
|
||||||
|
|
Balance
|
|
Expense
|
|
Rate
|
|
Balance
|
|
Expense
|
|
Rate
|
|||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
|||||||||||||||||||
and
other interest-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
earning
assets
|
$
|
18,524
|
$
|
248
|
5.31
|
%
|
$
|
20,952
|
$
|
192
|
3.64
|
%
|
|||||||
Securities
|
59,736
|
915
|
6.13
|
%
|
48,752
|
465
|
3.82
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Loans
receivable
|
742,420
|
14,868
|
7.95
|
%
|
604,531
|
10,576
|
6.94
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
820,680
|
16,031
|
7.75
|
%
|
674,235
|
11,233
|
6.61
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
assets
|
36,593
|
39,460
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
857,273
|
$
|
713,695
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Demand-non
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bearing
|
$
|
78,942
|
$
|
86,015
|
|||||||||||||||
Demand
interest-bearing
|
54,003
|
$
|
165
|
1.21
|
%
|
45,972
|
$
|
79
|
0.68
|
%
|
|||||||||
Money
market & savings
|
242,621
|
2,437
|
3.99
|
%
|
285,140
|
1,886
|
2.62
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
285,448
|
3,476
|
4.83
|
%
|
154,399
|
1,254
|
3.22
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
661,014
|
6,078
|
3.65
|
%
|
571,526
|
3,219
|
2.23
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
deposits
|
582,072
|
6,078
|
4.19
|
%
|
485,511
|
3,219
|
2.63
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
borrowings (1)
|
114,227
|
1,626
|
5.65
|
%
|
74,441
|
757
|
4.03
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
liabilities
|
$
|
696,299
|
$
|
7,704
|
4.39
|
%
|
$
|
559,952
|
$
|
3,976
|
2.82
|
%
|
|||||||
Total
deposits and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
other
borrowings
|
775,241
|
7,704
|
3.94
|
%
|
645,967
|
3,976
|
2.44
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Non
interest-bearing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
liabilites
|
11,309
|
8,022
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
70,723
|
59,706
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
shareholders'
equity
|
$
|
857,273
|
$
|
713,695
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
8,327
|
$
|
7,257
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
3.36
|
%
|
3.79
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
4.03
|
%
|
4.27
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
(1)
Includes $6.2 million of trust preferred securities.
|
The
rate
volume table below presents an analysis of the impact on interest income and
expense resulting from changes in average volumes and rates during the period.
For purposes of this table, changes in interest income and expense are allocated
to volume and rate categories based upon the respective changes in average
balances and average rates.
19
Rate/Volume
Table
Three
months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
versus
September 30, 2005
|
|
|||||||
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Due
to change in:
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
Total
|
||||
Interest
earned on:
|
||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
$
|
88
|
$
|
56
|
|||
Securities
|
170
|
280
|
450
|
|||||||
Loans
|
2,761
|
1,531
|
4,292
|
|||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
2,899
|
1,899
|
4,798
|
|||||||
Interest
expense of deposits
|
||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
(25
|
)
|
(61
|
)
|
(86
|
)
|
||||
Money
market and savings
|
427
|
(978
|
)
|
(551
|
)
|
|||||
Time
deposits
|
(1,596
|
)
|
(626
|
)
|
(2,222
|
)
|
||||
Total
deposit interest expense
|
(1,194
|
)
|
(1,665
|
)
|
(2,859
|
)
|
||||
Other
borrowings
|
(566
|
)
|
(303
|
)
|
(869
|
)
|
||||
Total
interest expense
|
(1,760
|
)
|
(1,968
|
)
|
(3,728
|
)
|
||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
1,139
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
$
|
1,070
|
The
Company’s net interest margin decreased 24 basis points to 4.03% for the three
months ended September 30, 2006, versus a comparable 4.27% in the prior year
comparable period, reflecting increased funding costs.
While
yields on interest-bearing assets increased 114 basis points to 7.75% in third
quarter 2006 from 6.61% in third quarter 2005, the yield on total deposits
and
other borrowings increased 150 basis points to 3.94% from 2.44% between those
respective periods. The increase in yields on assets resulted primarily from
the
200 basis points of increases in short-term interest rates between the two
quarters. Increases in short-term interest rates increased yields on loans
tied
to prime, were more than offset by increases in interest paid on deposits,
and
higher cost borrowed funds, primarily overnight FHLB borrowings.
The
Company's net interest income increased $1.1 million, or 14.7%, to $8.3 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2006, from $7.3 million for the prior
year comparable period. As shown in the Rate Volume table above, the increase
in
net interest income was due primarily to the increased volume of loans. Higher
rates on loans resulted primarily from variable rate loans which immediately
adjust to increases in the prime rate. Interest expense increased primarily
as a
result of higher rates on deposits and borrowed funds. Average interest-earning
assets amounted to $820.7 million for third quarter 2006 and $674.2 million
for
third quarter 2005. Substantially all of the $146.4 million increase resulted
from loan growth.
The
Company's total interest income increased $4.8 million, or 42.7%, to $16.0
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, from $11.2 million for
the prior year comparable period. Interest and fees on loans increased $4.3
million, or 40.6%, to $14.9 million for the three months ended September 30,
2006, from $10.6 million for the prior year comparable period. The majority
of
the increase in both loan interest and total interest income resulted from
a
22.8% increase in average loan balances. In third quarter 2006, average loan
balances amounted to $742.4 million, compared to $604.5 million in the
comparable prior year period. The balance of the 40.6% increase in interest
on
loans resulted primarily from the repricing of the variable rate portfolio
to
higher short term market interest rates. Interest and
20
dividends
on investment securities increased $450,000 to $915,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2006, from $465,000 for the prior year comparable period.
This increase reflected rate increases on variable rate securities as well
as an
$11.0 million, or 22.5%, increase in average securities outstanding to $59.7
million for third quarter 2006 from the comparable prior year period. Interest
on federal funds sold and other interest-earning assets increased $56,000,
or
29.2%, as increases in short-term market interest rates more than offset the
impact of the $2.4 million decrease in average balances to $18.5 million for
third quarter 2006 from $21.0 million for the comparable prior year
period.
The
Company's total interest expense increased $3.7 million, or 93.8%, to $7.7
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, from $4.0 million for
the
prior year comparable period. Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $696.3
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, versus $560.0 million
for
the prior year comparable period, or an increase of $136.3 million. The increase
reflected additional funding primarily for loan growth. The $136.3 million
increase reflected average deposit balances which increased $89.5 million and
average other borrowings which increased $39.8 million. The average rate paid
on
interest-bearing liabilities increased 157 basis points to 4.39% for the three
months ended September 30, 2006. Interest expense on time deposit balances
increased $2.2 million to $3.5 million in third quarter 2006, from $1.3 million
in the comparable prior year period. As certificates of deposit (time deposits)
mature, they generally reprice at market rates which are in excess of 5%. Money
market and savings interest expense increased $551,000 to $2.4 million in third
quarter 2006, from $1.9 million in the comparable prior year period. The
majority of the increase in interest expense on deposits reflected the higher
short-term interest rate environment. Rates on total interest-bearing deposits
increased 151 basis points in third quarter 2006 compared to third quarter
2005,
while short term rates increased approximately 200 basis points between those
periods. In addition, higher cost average time deposit balances increased $131.0
million while average money market and savings deposit balances decreased $42.5
million.
Interest
expense on other borrowings increased $869,000 to $1.6 million in third quarter
2006, primarily as a result of increased average balances. Average other
borrowings, primarily overnight FHLB borrowings, increased $40.0 million, or
53.4%, between those respective periods. Rates on overnight borrowings reflected
the higher short-term interest rate environment as the rate of other borrowings
increased to 5.65% in third quarter 2006, from 4.03% in the comparable prior
year period. Interest expense on other borrowings also includes the interest
expense of $6.2 million of trust preferred securities.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
provision for loan losses is charged to operations in an amount necessary to
bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level that reflects the known
and
estimated inherent losses in the portfolio. There was no provision for loan
losses in third quarter 2006 compared to $315,000 in third quarter 2005, as
the
provision required for portfolio growth was offset by the $154,000 in net
recoveries on tax refund loans. The offsetting provision in third quarter 2006
primarily reflected amounts required to increase the allowance for loan growth
in accordance with the Company’s methodology. The comparable third quarter 2005
provision reflected $68,000 in net recoveries on tax refund loans.
Non-Interest
Income
Total
non-interest income decreased $30,000 to $874,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006, compared to $904,000 for the prior year comparable period.
A
decrease of $157,000 in third quarter 2006 related to service fees on deposit
accounts was partially offset by a $130,000 gain on the sale of OREO property.
The decrease in service charge on deposits resulted from the elimination of
currency related services.
21
Non-Interest
Expenses
Total
non-interest expenses increased $900,000
or 19.6% to $5.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, from
$4.6 million for the prior year comparable period. Salaries and employee
benefits increased $636,000 or 26.0%, to $3.1 million for the three months
ended
September 30, 2006, from $2.4 million for the prior year comparable period.
That
increase reflected additional salary expense related to commercial loan and
deposit production including related support staff and two new branches. It
also
reflected annual merit increases which are targeted at approximately 3.5%.
Occupancy
expense increased $122,000, or 34%, to $482,000 in third quarter 2006, compared
to $360,000 in third quarter 2005. Contributing to the increase was the opening
of two new branches in 2006.
Depreciation
expense increased $39,000 or 18.2% to $253,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006, versus $214,000 for the prior year comparable period,
reflecting the impact of the new branches.
Legal
fees decreased $43,000, or 22.9%, to $145,000 in third quarter 2006, compared
to
$188,000 in third quarter 2005.
Advertising
expense increased $136,000, or 367.6%, to $173,000 in third quarter 2006,
compared to $37,000 in third quarter 2005. The increase was primarily due to
higher levels of print and direct mail advertising including advertising related
to the new branches and deposit promotions.
Data
processing expense increased $9,000, or 7.0%, to $138,000 in third quarter
2006,
compared to $129,000 in third quarter 2005.
Taxes,
other than income decreased $16,000, or 8.3%, to $176,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2006, versus $192,000 for the comparable prior year period.
Other
expenses increased $17,000, or 1.6% to $1.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2006, from $1.0 million for the prior year comparable period.
The
increase reflected higher levels of professional fees, training and development
expenses, and various loan related expenses which totaled $111,000. These
expenses were offset by a decrease of $106,000 in internal auditing expense
which reflected reduction in Sarbanes Oxley expenditures.
22
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
provision for income taxes for continuing operations increased $161,000, to
$1.3
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, from $1.1 million for
the
prior year comparable period. That increase was primarily the result of the
increase in pre-tax income. The effective tax rates in those periods were
comparable at 35% and 34% respectively.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to September 30,
2005
Results
of Operations:
Overview
The
Company's net income increased to $7.6 million or $0.79 per diluted share for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to $6.3 million, or $0.66
per
diluted share for the comparable prior year period. The improvement reflected
a
$13.1 million, or 40.2%, increase in total interest income, due primarily to
higher rates and secondarily to a 22.6% increase in average loans outstanding.
Total interest expense increased $8.7 million, also reflecting higher rates
and
a 13.7% increase in average deposits outstanding. Accordingly, net interest
income increased $4.4 million between the periods. The provision for loan losses
in the first nine months of 2006 increased to $1.4 million, compared to $1.1
million provision expense in the first nine months of 2005, reflecting the
impact of $287,000 of commercial and construction loan recoveries in 2005.
Non-interest income remained constant at $2.8 million in the first nine months
of 2006, compared to the first nine months of 2005. Non-interest expense
increased $2.1 million to $15.6 million compared to $13.6 million in the first
nine months of 2005, due primarily to higher salaries and benefits. The return
on average assets and average equity of 1.24% and 15.01% respectively, in the
first nine months of 2006 compared to 1.18% and 14.71% respectively for the
same
period in 2005.
Analysis
of Net Interest Income
Historically,
the Company's earnings have depended significantly upon net interest income,
which is the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets
and
interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is impacted
by changes in the mix of the volume and rates of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities.
23
For
the nine months ended
|
|
For
the nine months ended
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
September
30, 2006
|
|
September
30, 2005
|
|
||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Average
|
|
Income/
|
|
Yield/
|
|
Average
|
|
Income/
|
|
Yield/
|
|
||||||
|
|
Balance
|
|
Expense
|
|
Rate
|
|
Balance
|
|
Expense
|
|
Rate
|
|||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
|||||||||||||||||||
and
other interest-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
earning
assets
|
$
|
25,039
|
$
|
900
|
4.81
|
%
|
$
|
41,885
|
$
|
863
|
2.75
|
%
|
|||||||
Securities
|
48,300
|
1,991
|
5.50
|
%
|
47,526
|
1,350
|
3.79
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Loans
receivable
|
714,695
|
42,773
|
8.00
|
%
|
583,033
|
30,347
|
6.96
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
788,034
|
45,664
|
7.75
|
%
|
672,444
|
32,560
|
6.47
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
assets
|
36,940
|
41,205
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
824,974
|
$
|
713,649
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Demand-non
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bearing
|
$
|
83,231
|
$
|
88,046
|
|||||||||||||||
Demand
interest-bearing
|
54,270
|
$
|
379
|
0.93
|
%
|
48,898
|
$
|
236
|
0.65
|
%
|
|||||||||
Money
market & savings
|
236,160
|
6,381
|
3.61
|
%
|
242,284
|
4,457
|
2.46
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
286,542
|
9,521
|
4.44
|
%
|
201,570
|
4,542
|
3.01
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
660,203
|
16,281
|
3.30
|
%
|
580,798
|
9,235
|
2.13
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
deposits
|
576,972
|
16,281
|
3.77
|
%
|
492,752
|
9,235
|
2.51
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
borrowings (1)
|
86,603
|
3,561
|
5.50
|
%
|
67,353
|
1,939
|
3.85
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
liabilities
|
$
|
663,575
|
$
|
19,842
|
4.00
|
%
|
$
|
560,105
|
$
|
11,174
|
2.67
|
%
|
|||||||
Total
deposits and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
other
borrowings
|
746,806
|
19,842
|
3.55
|
%
|
648,151
|
11,174
|
2.30
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Non
interest-bearing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
liabilites
|
10,194
|
8,211
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
67,974
|
57,287
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
shareholders'
equity
|
$
|
824,974
|
$
|
713,649
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
25,822
|
$
|
21,386
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
3.75
|
%
|
3.80
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
4.38
|
%
|
4.25
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin not including
|
|||||||||||||||||||
tax
refund loans
|
4.15
|
%
|
3.92
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
(1)
Includes $6.2 million of trust preferred securities.
|
24
The
rate
volume table below presents an analysis of the impact on interest income and
expense resulting from changes in average volumes and rates during the period.
For purposes of this table, changes in interest income and expense are allocated
to volume and rate categories based upon the respective changes in average
balances and average rates.
Rate/Volume
Table
Nine
months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
versus
September 30, 2005
|
|
|||||||
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Due
to change in:
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
Total
|
||||
Interest
earned on:
|
||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
($607
|
)
|
$
|
644
|
$
|
37
|
||||
Securities
|
32
|
609
|
641
|
|||||||
Loans
|
7,880
|
4,546
|
12,426
|
|||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
7,305
|
5,799
|
13,104
|
|||||||
Interest
expense of
|
||||||||||
Deposits
|
||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
(38
|
)
|
(105
|
)
|
(143
|
)
|
||||
Money
market and savings
|
165
|
(2,089
|
)
|
(1,924
|
)
|
|||||
Time
deposits
|
(2,823
|
)
|
(2,156
|
)
|
(4,979
|
)
|
||||
Total
deposit interest expense
|
(2,696
|
)
|
(4,350
|
)
|
(7,046
|
)
|
||||
Other
borrowings
|
(792
|
)
|
(830
|
)
|
(1,622
|
)
|
||||
Total
interest expense
|
(3,488
|
)
|
(5,180
|
)
|
(8,668
|
)
|
||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
3,817
|
$
|
619
|
$
|
4,436
|
The
Company’s net interest margin increased 13 basis points to 4.38% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, versus 4.25% in the prior year comparable
period as funding costs lagged increases in prime based loans. Excluding the
impact of tax refund loans, which are substantially all a first quarter event,
the net interest margin was 4.15% in the first nine months of 2006 and 3.92%
in
the prior year comparable period.
While
yields on interest-bearing assets increased 128 basis points to 7.75% in the
first nine months of 2006 from 6.47% in the comparable prior year period, the
yields on total deposits and other borrowings increased 125 basis points to
3.55% from 2.30% between those respective periods. The increase in yields on
assets resulted primarily from the 300 basis point increase in short-term
interest rates between the two periods.
The
Company's net interest income increased $4.4 million, or 20.7%, to $25.8 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, from $21.4 million for comparable
prior year period. As shown in the Rate Volume table above, the increase in
net
interest income was due primarily to the increased volume of loans. Higher
rates
on loans resulted primarily from variable rate loans which immediately adjust
to
increases in the prime rate. Interest expense increased primarily as a result
of
higher rates which lagged the general increase in short-term market rates.
Average interest-earning assets amounted to $788.0 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and $672.4 million for the comparable prior year
period. Substantially all of the $115.6 million increase resulted from loan
growth.
25
The
Company's total interest income increased $13.1 million, or 40.2%, to $45.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, from $32.6 million for
the
comparable prior year period. Interest and fees on loans increased $12.4
million, or 40.9% to $42.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006,
from $30.3 million for the comparable prior year period. The majority of the
increase in both commercial loan interest and total interest income resulted
from a 22.6% increase in average loan balances. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, average loan balances amounted to $714.7 million, compared
to $583.0 million in the comparable prior year period. The balance of the 40.9%
increase in interest on loans resulted primarily from the repricing of the
variable rate loan portfolio to higher short term market interest rates.
Interest and dividends on investment securities increased $641,000 to $2.0
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, from $1.4 million for
the
comparable prior year period. This increase reflected rate increases on variable
rate securities as well as a slight increase in average securities outstanding
to $48.3 million for the first nine months of 2006 from the comparable prior
year period. Interest on federal funds sold and other interest-earning assets
increased $37,000, or 4.3%, as increases in short-term market interest rates
more than offset by the $16.8 million decrease in average balances to $25.0
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from $41.9 million for
the
comparable prior year period.
The
Company's total interest expense increased $8.7 million, or 77.6%, to $19.8
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, from $11.2 million for
the
comparable prior year period. Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $663.6
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, versus $560.1 million
for
the comparable prior year period, or an increase of $103.5 million. The increase
reflected additional funding for loan growth. Average interest bearing deposit
balances increased $84.2 million while average other borrowings increased $19.3
million. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased 133
basis points to 4.00% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Interest
expense on time deposit balances increased $5.0 million to $9.5 million for
the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, from $4.5 million in the comparable prior
year period. As certificates of deposit (time deposits) mature, they generally
reprice at market rates which are in excess of 5%. Money market and savings
interest expense increased $1.9 million to $6.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, from $4.5 million in the comparable prior year period.
The majority of the increase in interest expense on deposits reflected the
higher short-term interest rate environment, which while increased, lagged
the
general increase in short-term market rates. Accordingly, rates on total
interest-bearing deposits increased 126 basis points for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 compared to the comparable prior year period, while short
term rates increased approximately 300 basis points between those
periods.
Interest
expense on other borrowings increased $1.6 million to $3.6 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, primarily as a result of higher short term rates.
Average other borrowings, primarily overnight FHLB borrowings, increased $19.3
million, or 28.6%, between those respective periods. Rates on overnight
borrowings reflected the higher short-term interest rate environment as the
rate
on other borrowings increased to 5.50% for the nine months ended September
30,
2006, from 3.85% in the comparable prior year period. Interest expense on other
borrowings also includes the interest expense of $6.2 million of trust preferred
securities.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
provision for loan losses is charged to operations in an amount necessary to
bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level that reflects the known
and
estimated inherent losses in the portfolio. The provision for loan losses
amounted to $1.4 million for the nine months ended in September 30, 2006
compared to $1.1 million for the comparable prior year period. The nine month
2006 provision reflected
$648,000 for net losses on tax refund loans, which were more than offset by
$1.6
million in related revenues. The remaining provision for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 primarily reflected amounts required to increase the
allowance for loan growth in accordance with the Company’s methodology and
the
comparable nine months 2005 provision reflected $690,000 for losses on tax
26
refund
loans, which were more than offset by $1.2 million in related revenues. In
addition, the nine months 2005 provision was reduced as a result of an
approximate $252,000 recovery on a commercial loan, which had been charged
off
in the prior year. That recovery resulted in a reserve balance which exceeded
that determined by the Company’s methodology, and the quarterly provision was
reduced accordingly.
Non-Interest
Income
Total
non-interest income increased $27,000 to $2.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, from $2.8 million for the comparable prior year period.
An
increase of $545,000 related to loan advisory and servicing fees and a $130,000
gain on the sale of an OREO property were offset by a one-time $251,000 award
in
a lawsuit recorded in other income in 2005, a decrease of $285,000 in service
fees on deposit accounts in 2006, and a $97,000 gain on call of security
recorded in 2005. The decrease in service charges on deposits resulted from
the
elimination of currency related services.
Non-Interest
Expenses
Total
non-interest expenses increased
$2.1 million or 15.1% to $15.7 million for the nine months ended September
30,
2006, from $13.6 million for the comparable prior year period. Salaries and
employee benefits increased $1.8 million or 25.9%, to $8.9 million for the
nine
months ended September 30, 2006, from $7.1 million for the comparable prior
year
period. That increase reflected additional salary expense related to commercial
loan and deposit production including related support staff and two new
branches. It also reflected annual merit increases which are targeted at
approximately 3.5%.
Occupancy
expense increased $206,000, or 18.1%, to $1.3 million for the first nine months
of 2006, compared to $1.1 million for the comparable prior year period. The
increase reflected the opening of two new branches in 2006 as well as higher
repairs, maintenance, and utilities expense.
Depreciation
expense decreased $134,000 or 16.9% to $661,000 for the first nine months ended
September 30, 2006, versus $795,000 for the comparable prior year period. The
decrease was primarily due to the write-off of assets in 2005 that were
determined to have shorter lives than originally expected.
Legal
fees decreased $78,000, or 14.8%, to $450,000 for the first nine months of
2006,
compared to $528,000 for the comparable prior year period.
Advertising
expense increased $235,000, or 186.5%, to $361,000 for the first nine months
of
2006, compared to $126,000 in the comparable prior year period. The increase
was
primarily due to higher levels of TV, radio, print, and direct mail advertising
including advertising related to two new branches and deposit promotions.
Data
processing expense increased $91,000, or 27.9%, to $417,000 for the first nine
months of 2006, compared to $326,000 for the comparable prior year period.
Taxes,
other than income increased $55,000 or 10.7% to $567,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 versus $512,000 for the comparable prior year period.
The increase reflected an increase in Pennsylvania shares tax, which is assessed
at an annual rate of 1.25% on a 6 year moving average of regulatory capital.
The
full amount of the increase resulted from increased capital.
Other
expenses decreased $164,000, or 5.3% to $2.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, from $3.1 million for the comparable prior year
period. Internal audit expense decreased $190,000 reflecting reduced
expense for Sarbanes Oxley compliance.
27
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
provision for income taxes increased $838,000, to $4.0 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, from $3.1 million for the comparable prior
year
period. That increase was primarily the result of the increase in pre-tax
income. The effective tax rates in those periods were 34% and 33% respectively.
The increase in effective rate reflected the impact of a fixed amount of BOLI
tax exempt income compared to increased taxable income increase.
Share-Based
Compensation
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.
123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, which revises SFAS No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. This
statement requires an entity to recognize the cost of employee services received
in share-based payment transactions and measure the cost on the grant-date
fair
value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which
an
employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The
provisions of SFAS No. 123R were effective January 1, 2006.
In
March
2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107 which expressed the views of the SEC regarding the
interaction between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations. SAB
No.
107 provides guidance related to the valuation of share-based payment
arrangements for public companies, including assumptions such as expected
volatility and expected term.
In
2005,
the Company vested all previously issued unvested options. For those vested
options granted prior to January 1, 2006, there is no impact on operations
in
future periods. The accelerated vesting increased pro forma expense in 2005
by
approximately $107,000, and therefore this expense did not impact net income
in
2006 upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R. The impact on operations in future periods
will be the value imputed on future options grants using the methods prescribed
in SFAS No. 123R.
At
September 30, 2006, the Company maintains a Stock Option Plan under which the
Company grants options to its employees and directors. See Note 2 in the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements herein for a further description of this
plan.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, $5,000 and $10,000
respectively, was recognized in compensation expense for the Stock Option Plan.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for the Stock Option Plan under
the recognition and measurement principles of APB No. 25 and related
interpretations. Share-based employee compensation costs were not reflected
in
net income, as all options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal
to
the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant. In
2005, the Company vested all previously issued unvested options, accordingly
there is no compensation expense to be recognized on the Stock Option Plan
during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 on options granted prior to
January 1, 2006.
28
Commitments,
Contingencies and Concentrations
Financial
instruments whose contract amounts represent potential credit risk are
commitments to extend credit of approximately $203.4 million and $203.0 million
and standby letters of credit of approximately $8.0 million and $5.8 million
at
September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Commitments
to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and many require the
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without
being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements. Republic evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on
a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained upon extension of credit
is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held
varies but may include real estate, marketable securities, pledged deposits,
equipment and accounts receivable.
Standby
letters of credit are conditional commitments that guarantee the performance
of
a customer to a third party. The credit risk and collateral policy involved
in
issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending
loan commitments. The amount of collateral obtained is based on management’s
credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include real
estate, marketable securities, pledged deposits, equipment and accounts
receivable. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation
of such collateral would be sufficient to cover the maximum potential amount
of
future payments required under the corresponding guarantees.
29
Regulatory
Matters
The
following table presents the Company’s and Republic’s capital regulatory ratios
at September
30, 2006,
and
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
For
Capital
Adequacy
Purposes
|
To
be well
capitalized
under FRB
capital
guidelines
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||
Dollars
in thousands
|
||||||||||||||
At
September 30, 2006
|
||||||||||||||
Total
risk based capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
$84,491
|
11.47%
|
$58,927
|
8.00%
|
$73,658
|
10.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
85,854
|
11.64%
|
$59,016
|
8.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Tier
one risk based capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
76,557
|
10.39%
|
29,463
|
4.00%
|
44,195
|
6.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
77,920
|
10.56%
|
29,508
|
4.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Tier
one leveraged capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
76,557
|
8.94%
|
42,815
|
5.00%
|
42,815
|
5.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
77,920
|
9.09%
|
42,864
|
5.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Actual
|
For
Capital
Adequacy
purposes
|
To
be well
capitalized
under FRB
capital
guidelines
|
||||||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||
At
December 31, 2005
|
||||||||||||||
Total
risk based capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
$76,537
|
11.71%
|
$52,234
|
8.00%
|
$65,292
|
10.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
77,213
|
11.81%
|
52,299
|
8.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Tier
one risk based capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
68,920
|
10.56%
|
26,117
|
4.00%
|
39,175
|
6.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
69,596
|
10.65%
|
26,149
|
4.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Tier
one leveraged capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
68,920
|
8.81%
|
39,102
|
5.00%
|
39,102
|
5.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
69,596
|
8.89%
|
39,152
|
5.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
Dividend
Policy
The
Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock, but may consider
dividend payments in the future.
Liquidity
Financial
institutions must maintain liquidity to meet day-to-day requirements of
depositors and borrowers, time investment purchases to market conditions and
provide a cushion against unforeseen needs. Liquidity needs can be met by either
reducing assets or increasing liabilities. The most liquid assets consist of
cash, amounts due from banks and federal funds sold.
Regulatory
authorities require the Company to maintain certain liquidity ratios such that
Republic maintains available funds, or can obtain available funds at reasonable
rates, in order to satisfy commitments to borrowers and the demands of
depositors. In response to these requirements, the Company has formed an
Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”), comprised of selected members of the board
of directors and senior management, which monitors such ratios. The purpose
of
the Committee
30
is
in
part, to monitor Republic’s liquidity and adherence to the ratios in addition to
managing relative interest rate risk. The ALCO meets at least quarterly.
Republic’s
most liquid assets, consisting of cash due from banks, deposits with banks
and
federal funds sold, totaled $111.1 million at September 30, 2006, compared
to
$107.0 million at December 31, 2005, due primarily to an increase in
federal funds sold. Loan maturities and repayments, if not reinvested in loans,
also are immediately available for liquidity. At September 30, 2006, Republic
estimated that in excess of $50.0 million of loans would mature or be repaid
in
the three month period that will end December 31, 2006. Additionally, the
majority of its securities are available to satisfy liquidity requirements
through pledges to the FHLB to access Republic’s line of credit.
Funding
requirements have historically been satisfied primarily by generating
transaction accounts and certificates of deposit with competitive rates, and
utilizing the facilities of the FHLB. At September 30, 2006 Republic had
$111.7 million in unused lines of credit readily available under
arrangements with the FHLB and correspondent banks compared to $84.8 million
at
December 31, 2005. These lines of credit enable Republic to purchase funds
for short or long-term needs at rates often lower than other sources and require
pledging of securities or loan collateral.
At
September 30, 2006, Republic had aggregate outstanding commitments (including
unused lines of credit and letters of credit) of $211.5 million. Certificates
of
deposit scheduled to mature in one year amount to $296.9 million at September
30, 2006. There were no FHLB advances outstanding at September 30, 2006, and
short-term borrowings of $145.8 million consisted of $125.8 million in overnight
FHLB borrowings and $20.0 million in federal funds purchased. The Company
anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current
commitments.
Republic’s
target and actual liquidity levels are determined by comparisons of the
estimated repayment and marketability of its interest-earning assets and
projected future outflows of deposits and other liabilities. Republic has
established a line of credit with a correspondent bank to assist in managing
Republic’s liquidity position. That line of credit totaled $15.0 million and was
unused at September 30, 2006. Republic has established a line of credit with
the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh with a maximum borrowing capacity of
approximately $222.5 million. As of September 30, 2006, Republic had
borrowed $125.8 million under that line of credit. Securities also represent
a
primary source of liquidity. Accordingly, investment decisions generally reflect
liquidity over other considerations.
Republic’s
primary short-term funding sources are certificates of deposit and its
securities portfolio. The circumstances that are reasonably likely to affect
those sources are as follows. Republic has historically been able to generate
certificates of deposit by matching Philadelphia market rates or paying a
premium rate of 25 to 50 basis points over those market rates. It is anticipated
that this source of liquidity will continue to be available; however, its
incremental cost may vary depending on market conditions. Republic’s securities
portfolio is also available for liquidity, usually as collateral for FHLB
advances. Because of the FHLB’s AAA rating, it is unlikely those advances would
not be available. But even if they are not, numerous investment companies would
likely provide repurchase agreements up to the amount of the market value of
the
securities.
Republic’s
ALCO is responsible for managing its liquidity position and interest
sensitivity. That committee’s primary objective is to maximize net interest
income while configuring interest-sensitive assets and liabilities to manage
interest rate risk and provide adequate liquidity.
31
Investment
Securities Portfolio
At
September 30, 2006, the Company had identified certain investment securities
that are being held for indefinite periods of time, including securities that
will be used as part of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy and
that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, prepayments and
similar factors. These securities are classified as available for sale and
are
intended to increase the flexibility of the Company’s asset/liability
management. Available for sale securities consisted of U.S. Government Agency
securities and other investments. The book and market values of investment
securities available for sale were $76.4 million and $76.6 million as of
September 30, 2006, respectively. The net unrealized gain on investment
securities available for sale as of that date was approximately
$225,000.
Loan
Portfolio
The
Company’s loan portfolio consists of secured and unsecured commercial loans
including commercial real estate loans, loans secured by one-to-four family
residential property, commercial construction and residential construction
loans
as well as residential mortgages, home equity loans, short-term consumer and
other consumer loans. Commercial loans are primarily term loans made to small
to
medium-sized businesses and professionals for working capital, asset acquisition
and other purposes. Commercial loans are originated as either fixed or variable
rate loans with typical terms of 1 to 5 years. Republic’s commercial loans
typically range between $250,000 and $5,000,000 but customers may borrow
significantly larger amounts up to Republic’s combined legal lending limit of
approximately $11.5 million at September 30, 2006. Individual customers may
have
several loans often secured by different collateral.
Net
loans
increased $83.4 million, to $753.9 million at September 30, 2006, from $670.5
million at December 31, 2005. Commercial and construction growth comprised
substantially all of that increase.
32
The
following table sets forth the Company's gross loans by major categories for
the
periods indicated:
(dollars
in thousands)
|
As
of September 30, 2006
|
|
As
of December 31, 2005
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Balance
|
|
%
of Total
|
|
Balance
|
|
%
of Total
|
|||||
Commercial:
|
|||||||||||||
Real
estate secured
|
$
|
511,164
|
67.1
|
%
|
$
|
446,383
|
65.8
|
%
|
|||||
Construction
and land development
|
170,969
|
22.4
|
141,461
|
20.9
|
|||||||||
Non
real estate secured
|
45,718
|
6.0
|
49,515
|
7.3
|
|||||||||
Unsecured
|
6,929
|
0.9
|
10,620
|
1.6
|
|||||||||
734,780
|
96.4
|
647,979
|
95.6
|
||||||||||
Residential
real estate
|
6,567
|
0.9
|
7,057
|
1.0
|
|||||||||
Consumer,
short-term & other
|
20,456
|
2.7
|
23,050
|
3.4
|
|||||||||
Total
loans
|
761,803
|
100.0
|
%
|
678,086
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(7,934
|
)
|
(7,617
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
loans
|
$
|
753,869
|
$
|
670,469
|
Credit
Quality
Republic’s
written lending policies require specified underwriting, loan documentation
and
credit analysis standards to be met prior to funding, with independent credit
department approval for the majority of new loan balances. A committee of the
Board of Directors oversees the loan approval process to monitor that proper
standards are maintained and approves the majority of commercial
loans.
Loans,
including impaired loans, are generally classified as non-accrual if they are
past due as to maturity or payment of interest or principal for a period of
more
than 90 days, unless such loans are well-secured and in the process of
collection. Loans that are on a current payment status or past due less than
90
days may also be classified as non-accrual if repayment in full of principal
and/or interest is in doubt.
Loans
may
be returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts
contractually due are reasonably assured of repayment within an acceptable
period of time, and there is a sustained period of repayment performance by
the
borrower, in accordance with the contractual terms.
While
a
loan is classified as non-accrual or as an impaired loan and the future
collectibility of the recorded loan balance is doubtful, collections of interest
and principal are generally applied as a reduction to principal outstanding.
When the future collectibility of the recorded loan balance is expected,
interest income may be recognized on a cash basis. In the case where a
non-accrual loan had been partially charged off, recognition of interest on
a
cash basis is limited to that which would have been recognized on the recorded
loan balance at the contractual interest rate. Cash interest receipts in excess
of that amount are recorded as recoveries to the allowance for loan losses
until
prior charge-offs have been fully recovered.
33
The
following summary shows information concerning loan delinquency and other
non-performing assets at the dates indicated.
September
30,
2006
|
December
31,
2005
|
||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
accruing, but past due 90 days or more
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Non-accrual
loans
|
|
|
9,972
|
|
|
3,423
|
|
Total
non-performing loans (1)
|
|
|
9,972
|
|
|
3,423
|
|
Other
real estate owned
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
137
|
|
Total
non-performing assets (2)
|
|
$
|
10,471
|
|
$
|
3,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing
loans as a percentage
of
total loans net of unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
Non-performing
assets as a percentage of total assets
|
1.07
|
%
|
0.42
|
%
|
(1) Non-performing
loans are comprised of (i) loans that are on a nonaccrual basis;
(ii) accruing loans that are 90 days or more past due and
(iii) restructured loans.
(2) Non-performing
assets are composed of non-performing loans and other real estate owned (assets
acquired in foreclosure).
Non
accrual-loans increased $6.5 million, to $10.0 million at September 30, 2006,
from $3.4 million at December 31, 2005. That increase reflected the addition
to
non-accrual loans, of loans to five borrowers in third quarter 2006 totaling
$7.2 million. Of the $7.2 million, a loan to one borrower in the amount of
$2.0
million was paid in full and loans to another borrower totaling $2.4 million
were returned to accrual status, both of which occurred in October 2006.
Partially offsetting the increase in non-accrual was the transfer of $457,000
of
one loan in second quarter 2006 to other real estate owned with $167,000 of
that
loan concurrently charged off.
Problem
loans consist of loans that are included in performing loans, but for which
potential credit problems of the borrowers have caused management to have
serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to continue to comply with
present repayment terms. At September 30, 2006, all identified problem loans
are
included in the preceding table or are classified as substandard or doubtful,
with a specific reserve allocation in the allowance for loan losses (see
“Allowance For Loan Losses”). Management believes that the appraisals and other
estimates of the value of the collateral pledged against the non-accrual loans
generally exceed the amount of its outstanding balances.
The
recorded investment in loans which are impaired totaled $10.0 million at
September 30, 2006, and $3.4 million at December 31, 2005, and the amount of
related valuation allowances was $1.6 million on both of the respective dates.
There were no commitments to extend credit to any borrowers with impaired loans
as of the end of the periods presented herein.
At
September 30, 2006, compared to December 31, 2005, internally classified
substandard loans had increased to $1.1 million from $710,000; while doubtful
loans decreased by $241,000 to approximately $1.9 million from $2.2 million.
There were no loans classified as loss at those dates. The $370,000 increase
in
substandard loans reflected the addition of non-accrual loans to a single
customer totaling $301,000 and the transfer of a $241,000 non-accrual loan
from
special mention status. The $241,000 decrease in doubtful loans reflected the
addition of non-accrual loan totaling $668,000 which was more
34
that
offset by the aforementioned transfer of $457,000 to other real estate owned
with
$167,000 of that loan concurrently charged off,
a
transfer of $42,000 to other real estate owned with $7,000 of the loan
concurrently charged off and two loans totaling $191,000 that paid off in
2006.
Republic
had delinquent loans as follows: (i) 30 to 59 days past due, in the aggregate
principal amount of $2.2 million at September 30, 2006 and $441,000 at December
31, 2005; and (ii) 60 to 89 days past due, at September 30, 2006 and December
31, 2005, in the aggregate principal amount of $114,000
and $62,000, respectively. The increase in the loans delinquent 30 to 59 days
reflects $1.8 million in delinquent loans which are still accruing interest.
Other
Real Estate Owned:
The
balance of other real estate owned increased $362,000 to $499,000 at September
30, 2006, from $137,000 at December 31, 2005. One loan in the amount of $457,000
was transferred from non-accrual status to other real estate owned in second
quarter 2006 and another loan in the amount of $42,000 was transferred from
non-accrual status to other real estate owned in the third quarter 2006 which
was partially offset by the sale of an OREO property valued at
$137,000.
At
September 30, 2006, the Company had no credit exposure to "highly leveraged
transactions" as defined by the Federal Reserve Bank.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
An
analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September
30, 2006, and 2005, and the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 is as
follows:
For
the nine months ended
|
For
the twelve months ended
|
For
the nine months ended
|
||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
September
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
September
30, 2005
|
|||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$
7,617
|
$6,684
|
$
6,684
|
|||
Charge-offs:
|
||||||
Commercial
and construction
|
445
|
29
|
1
|
|||
Tax
refund loans
|
1,286
|
1,113
|
1,113
|
|||
Consumer
|
-
|
21
|
21
|
|||
Total
charge-offs
|
1,731
|
1,163
|
1,135
|
|||
Recoveries:
|
||||||
Commercial
and construction
|
35
|
287
|
287
|
|||
Tax
refund loans
|
639
|
617
|
423
|
|||
Consumer
|
-
|
6
|
5
|
|||
Total
recoveries
|
674
|
910
|
715
|
|||
Net
charge-offs
|
1,057
|
253
|
420
|
|||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,374
|
1,186
|
1,137
|
|||
Balance
at end of period
|
$7,934
|
$7,617
|
$7,401
|
|||
Average
loans outstanding (1)
|
$714,695
|
$602,031
|
$583,033
|
|||
As
a percent of average loans (1):
|
||||||
Net
charge-offs (annualized)
|
0.20%
|
0.04%
|
0.10%
|
|||
Provision
for loan losses (annualized)
|
0.26%
|
0.20%
|
0.26%
|
|||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
1.11%
|
1.27%
|
1.27%
|
|||
Allowance
for loan losses to:
|
||||||
Total
loans, net of unearned income at perod end
|
1.04%
|
1.12%
|
1.15%
|
|||
Total
non-performing loans at period end
|
79.56%
|
222.52%
|
257.69%
|
(1)
Includes nonaccruing loans.
35
Management
makes at least a quarterly determination as to an appropriate provision from
earnings to maintain an allowance for loan losses that is management’s best
estimate of known and inherent losses. The Company’s Board of Directors
periodically reviews the status of all non-accrual and impaired loans and loans
classified by the Republic’s regulators or internal loan review officer, who
reviews both the loan portfolio and overall adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses. The Board of Directors also considers specific loans, pools of similar
loans, historical charge-off activity, economic conditions and other relevant
factors in reviewing the adequacy of the loan loss reserve. Any additions deemed
necessary to the allowance for loan losses are charged to operating
expenses.
The
Company has an existing loan review program, which monitors the loan portfolio
on an ongoing basis. Loan review is conducted by a loan review officer who
reports quarterly, directly to the Board of Directors.
Estimating
the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses at any given date is
difficult, particularly in a continually changing economy. In management’s
opinion, the allowance for loan losses was appropriate at September 30, 2006.
However, there can be no assurance that, if asset quality deteriorates in future
periods, additions to the allowance for loan losses will not be
required.
Republic’s
management is unable to determine in which loan category future charge-offs
and
recoveries may occur. The entire allowance for loan losses is available to
absorb loan losses in any loan category. The majority of the Company's loan
portfolio represents loans made for commercial purposes, while significant
amounts of residential property may serve as collateral for such loans. The
Company attempts to evaluate larger loans individually, on the basis of its
loan
review process, which scrutinizes loans on a selective basis and other available
information. Even if all commercial purpose loans
could be reviewed, there is no assurance that information on potential problems
would be available. The Company's portfolios of loans made for purposes of
financing residential mortgages and consumer loans are evaluated in
groups.
At
September 30, 2006, loans made for commercial and construction, residential
mortgage and consumer purposes, respectively, amounted to $734.8 million, $6.6
million and $20.4 million.
Effects
of Inflation
The
majority of assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary
in
nature. Therefore, a financial institution differs greatly from most commercial
and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets
or
inventories. Management believes that the most significant impact of inflation
on financial results is the Company’s need and ability to react to changes in
interest rates. As discussed previously, management attempts to maintain an
essentially balanced position between rate sensitive assets and liabilities
over
a one year time horizon in order to protect net interest income from being
affected by wide interest rate fluctuations.
36
There
has
been no material change in the Company’s assessment of its sensitivity to market
risk since its presentation in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the SEC.
ITEM
4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the assistance of
management, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the
period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as
of
the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the
Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms,
and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
(b)
Changes in internal controls.
There
has
not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during
our
quarter ended September 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
37
ITEM
1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None
ITEM
1A: RISK FACTORS
No
material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s Form
10-K in response to Item 1A in Part 1 of Form 10-K.
ITEM
2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
None
ITEM
3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM
4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM
5: OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM
6: EXHIBITS
The
following Exhibits are filed as part of this report. (Exhibit numbers correspond
to the exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K for an annual report
on
Form 10-K)
Exhibit
No.
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Issuer has
duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly
authorized.
Republic
First Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
|
|
/s/Harry
D. Madonna
|
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
/s/Paul
Frenkiel
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Dated:
November 9, 2006
39