REPUBLIC FIRST BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2006 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
Quarterly Period Ended: March
31, 2006
Commission
File Number:
000-17007
Republic
First Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact
name of business issuer as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
|
23-2486815
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
IRS
Employer Identification
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Number
|
1608
Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip
code)
215-735-4422
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for
the
past 90 days.
YES
X
|
NO___
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer __
|
Accelerated
Filer X
|
Non-accelerated
filer __
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
YES__
|
NO
X
|
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable
date.
9,741,737 shares
of
Issuer's Common Stock, par value
$0.01
per share,
issued
and outstanding as of May 5, 2006
Page
1
Exhibit
index appears on page 31
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
Part
I: Financial
Information
|
Page
|
Part
II: Other Information
|
|
2
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page
|
|
3
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
As
of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005
Dollars
in thousands, except share data
ASSETS:
|
March
31, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
17,758
|
$
|
19,985
|
|||
Interest
bearing deposits with banks
|
788
|
768
|
|||||
Federal
funds sold
|
78,824
|
86,221
|
|||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
97,370
|
106,974
|
|||||
Investment
securities available for sale, at fair value
|
36,379
|
37,283
|
|||||
Investment
securities held to maturity at amortized cost
|
|||||||
(Fair
value of $568 and $570, respectively)
|
560
|
559
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
5,137
|
6,319
|
|||||
Loans
receivable (net of allowance for loan losses of
|
|||||||
$7,803
and $7,617, respectively)
|
694,107
|
670,469
|
|||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
3,755
|
3,598
|
|||||
Other
real estate owned
|
137
|
137
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
4,095
|
3,784
|
|||||
Business
owned life insurance
|
11,013
|
10,926
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
11,616
|
10,806
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
864,169
|
$
|
850,855
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||
Demand
– non-interest-bearing
|
$
|
81,462
|
$
|
88,862
|
|||
Demand
– interest-bearing
|
59,172
|
69,940
|
|||||
Money
market and savings
|
243,469
|
223,129
|
|||||
Time
less than $100,000
|
108,036
|
128,022
|
|||||
Time
over $100,000
|
182,725
|
137,890
|
|||||
Total
Deposits
|
674,864
|
647,843
|
|||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
105,000
|
123,867
|
|||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
2,833
|
1,813
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
8,358
|
7,469
|
|||||
Subordinated
debt
|
6,186
|
6,186
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities
|
797,241
|
787,178
|
|||||
Shareholders’
Equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share: 10,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|||||||
no
shares issued as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock par value $0.01 per share, 20,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
|||||||
shares
issued 9,740,834 as of March 31, 2006
|
|||||||
and
8,753,998 as of December 31, 2005
|
97
|
88
|
|||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
63,036
|
50,203
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
6,060
|
15,566
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost (250,555 and 227,778 shares, respectively)
|
(1,688
|
)
|
(1,688
|
)
|
|||
Stock
held by deferred compensation plan
|
(573
|
)
|
(573
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(4
|
)
|
81
|
||||
Total
Shareholders’ Equity
|
66,928
|
63,677
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$
|
864,169
|
$
|
850,855
|
(See
notes to consolidated financial statements)
4
Consolidated
Statements of Income
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
Dollars
in thousands, except per share data
(unaudited)
Three
months ended
|
|||||||
March
31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Interest
income:
|
|||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
14,154
|
$
|
9,915
|
|||
Interest
and dividend income on federal
|
|||||||
funds
sold and other interest-earning balances
|
400
|
476
|
|||||
Interest
and dividends on investment securities
|
509
|
441
|
|||||
Total
interest income
|
15,063
|
10,832
|
|||||
Interest
expense:
|
|||||||
Demand
interest-bearing
|
122
|
85
|
|||||
Money
market and savings
|
1,699
|
880
|
|||||
Time
under $100,000
|
1,149
|
777
|
|||||
Time
$100,000 or more
|
2,294
|
1,254
|
|||||
Other
borrowed funds
|
490
|
638
|
|||||
Total
interest expense
|
5,754
|
3,634
|
|||||
Net
interest income
|
9,309
|
7,198
|
|||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,313
|
703
|
|||||
Net
interest income after provision
|
|||||||
for
loan losses
|
7,996
|
6,495
|
|||||
Non-interest
income:
|
|||||||
Loan
advisory and servicing fees
|
511
|
184
|
|||||
Service
fees on deposit accounts
|
453
|
485
|
|||||
Other
income
|
151
|
474
|
|||||
1,115
|
1,143
|
||||||
Non-interest
expenses:
|
|||||||
Salaries
and benefits
|
2,924
|
2,225
|
|||||
Occupancy
|
435
|
379
|
|||||
Depreciation
|
200
|
320
|
|||||
Legal
|
167
|
171
|
|||||
Advertising
|
49
|
45
|
|||||
Data
processing
|
130
|
119
|
|||||
Taxes,
other
|
215
|
143
|
|||||
Other
expenses
|
921
|
1,069
|
|||||
|
5,041
|
4,471
|
|||||
Income
before income taxes
|
4,070
|
3,167
|
|||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
1,399
|
1,045
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
2,671
|
$
|
2,122
|
|||
Net
income per share (1):
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
0.24
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
0.22
|
|||
(1)
Adjusted for 10% stock dividend with a record date of May 5, 2006
and a payable date of May 17,
2006
|
(See
notes to consolidated financial statements)
5
Republic
First Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|||||||
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|||||||
Dollars
in thousands
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Three
months ended
|
|||||||
March
31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
2,671
|
$
|
2,122
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net
|
|||||||
cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,313
|
703
|
|||||
Depreciation
|
200
|
320
|
|||||
Amortization
of discounts on investment securities
|
50
|
38
|
|||||
Increase
in value of business owned life insurance
|
(87
|
)
|
(84
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in accrued interest receivable
|
|||||||
and
other assets
|
(1,121
|
)
|
(274
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in accrued expenses
|
|||||||
and
other liabilities
|
1,909
|
631
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
4,935
|
3,456
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of securities:
|
|||||||
Available
for sale
|
-
|
(100
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from principal receipts, calls and maturities of
securities:
|
|||||||
Held
to maturity
|
-
|
110
|
|||||
Available
for sale
|
768
|
1,036
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of FHLB stock
|
1,182
|
1,317
|
|||||
Net
increase in loans
|
(24,951
|
)
|
(14,577
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in other interest-earning restricted cash
|
-
|
(499
|
)
|
||||
Premises
and equipment expenditures
|
(357
|
)
|
(594
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(23,358
|
)
|
(13,307
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Net
proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
665
|
-
|
|||||
Net
increase in demand, money market and savings deposits
|
2,172
|
73,434
|
|||||
Repayment
of overnight borrowings
|
(18,867
|
)
|
(28,035
|
)
|
|||
Repayment
of long term borrowings
|
-
|
(25,000
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase in time deposits
|
24,849
|
38,625
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
8,819
|
59,024
|
|||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(9,604
|
)
|
49,173
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
106,974
|
36,703
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
97,370
|
$
|
85,876
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
4,735
|
$
|
3,505
|
|||
Taxes
paid
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
(See
notes to consolidated financial statements)
6
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
Dollars
in thousands
(unaudited)
Comprehensive
Income/(loss)
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid
in
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Treasury
Stock at Cost
|
Stock
Held by
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
January 1, 2006
|
$
|
88
|
$
|
50,203
|
$
|
15,566
|
$
|
(1,688
|
)
|
$
|
(573
|
)
|
$
|
81
|
$
|
63,677
|
|||||||||
Total
other comprehensive loss, net of reclassification adjustments and
taxes
|
(85
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(85
|
)
|
(85
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
2,671
|
-
|
-
|
2,671
|
-
|
-
|
2,671
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
|
2,586
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
dividend declared
(885,612
shares)
|
8
|
12,169
|
(12,177
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Options
exercised
(111,436
shares)
|
1
|
664
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
665
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
March 31, 2006
|
$
|
97
|
$
|
63,036
|
$
|
6,060
|
$
|
(1,688
|
)
|
$
|
(573
|
)
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
$
|
66,928
|
||||||||
|
Comprehensive
Income/(loss)
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid
in
Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock at Cost
|
|
|
Stock
Held by
Deferred
Compensation
Plan
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
|
|||||
Balance
January 1, 2005
|
$
|
74
|
$
|
42,494
|
$
|
23,867
|
$
|
(1,541
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
330
|
$
|
65,224
|
||||||||||
Total
other comprehensive loss, net of reclassification adjustments and
taxes
|
(111
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(111
|
)
|
(111
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
2,122
|
-
|
-
|
2,122
|
-
|
-
|
2,122
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
|
2,011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
First
Bank of Delaware spin-off
|
(5,158
|
)
|
(6,216
|
)
|
-
|
(22
|
)
|
(11,396
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
March 31, 2005
|
$
|
74
|
$
|
37,336
|
$
|
19,773
|
$
|
(1,541
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
197
|
$
|
55,839
|
||||||||||
(See
notes to consolidated financial statements)
7
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note
1: Organization
Republic
First Bancorp, Inc. (“the Company”) spun off its former subsidiary, the First
Bank of Delaware, through a pro-rata distribution of one share of the common
stock of the First Bank of Delaware (“FBD”) for every share of the Company’s
common stock outstanding on January 31, 2005. The Company’s financial statements
are presented herein with an effective date of the spin-off as of January 1,
2005. The Company is now a one-bank holding company organized and incorporated
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It is comprised of one
wholly owned subsidiary, Republic First Bank (“Republic”),
a
Pennsylvania state chartered bank. Republic offers a variety of banking services
to individuals and businesses throughout the Greater Philadelphia and South
Jersey area through its offices and branches in Philadelphia, Montgomery, and
Delaware Counties.
Both
Republic and FBD share data processing, accounting, human resources and
compliance services through BSC Services Corp. (”BSC”), which is a subsidiary of
FBD. BSC allocates its cost on the basis of usage, to Republic and FBD, which
classify such costs to the appropriate non-interest expense categories.
The
Company and Republic encounter vigorous competition for market share in the
geographic areas they serve from bank holding companies, other community banks,
thrift institutions and other non-bank financial organizations, such as mutual
fund companies, insurance companies and brokerage companies.
The
Company and Republic are subject to regulations of certain state and federal
agencies. These regulatory agencies periodically examine the Company and its
subsidiary for adherence to laws and regulations. As a consequence, the cost
of
doing business may be affected.
Note
2: Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies:
Basis
of Presentation:
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Republic. The accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2006
are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ended December 31, 2006. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions
have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Risks
and Uncertainties and Certain Significant Estimates:
The
earnings of the Company depend on the earnings of Republic. Earnings are
dependent primarily upon the level of net interest income, which is the
difference between interest earned on its interest-earning assets, such as
loans
and investments, and the interest paid on its interest-bearing liabilities,
such
as deposits and borrowings. Accordingly, the results of operations are subject
to risks and uncertainties surrounding their exposure to change in the interest
rate environment.
8
Prepayments
on residential real estate mortgage and other fixed rate loans and
mortgage-backed securities vary significantly and may cause significant
fluctuations in interest margins.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date
of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those
estimates.
Significant
estimates are made by management in determining the allowance for loan losses,
carrying values of other real estate owned and income taxes. Consideration
is
given to a variety of factors in establishing these estimates. In estimating
the
allowance for loan losses, management considers current economic conditions,
diversification of the loan portfolio, delinquency statistics, results of
internal loan reviews, borrowers’ perceived financial and managerial strengths,
the adequacy of underlying collateral, if collateral dependent, or present
value
of future cash flows and other relevant factors. Since the allowance for loan
losses and carrying value of other real estate owned are dependent, to a great
extent, on the general economy and other conditions that may be beyond
Republic’s control, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates of the
allowance for loan losses and the carrying values of other real estate owned
could differ materially in the near term.
The
Company and Republic are subject to federal and state regulations governing
virtually all aspects of their activities, including but not limited to, lines
of business, liquidity, investments, the payment of dividends, and others.
Such
regulations and the cost of adherence to such regulations can have a significant
impact on earnings and financial condition.
Share-Based
Compensation:
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No,
123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, which revises SFAS No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. This
statement requires an entity to recognize the cost of employee services received
in share-based payment transactions and measure the cost on the grant-date
fair
value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which
an
employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The
provisions of SFAS No. 123R are effective January 1, 2006.
In
March
2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107 which expressed the views of the SEC regarding the
interaction between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations. SAB
No.
107 provides guidance related to the valuation of share-based payment
arrangements for public companies, including assumptions such as expected
volatility and expected term.
In
2005,
the Company vested all previously issued unvested options. The impact on
operations in future periods will be the value imputed on future options grants
using the methods prescribed in SFAS No. 123R.
At
March
31, 2006, the Company maintains a Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) under which the
Company grants options to its employees and directors. Under terms of the plan,
1.5 million shares of common stock, plus an annual increase equal to the number
of shares needed to restore the maximum number of shares that may be available
for grant under the plan to 1.5 million shares, are reserved for such options.
The Plan provides that the exercise price of each option granted equals the
market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Any options granted
vest within one to five years and has a maximum term of 10 years.
9
A
summary
of the status of the Company’s stock options under the Stock Option Plan as of
March 31, 2006 and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2006 are
presented below:
For
the Three Months Ended
|
|||
March
31, 2006
|
|||
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
||
Outstanding,
beginning of year
|
709,372
|
$
5.97
|
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
(111,436)
|
(5.97)
|
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
Outstanding,
end of period
|
597,936
|
5.97
|
|
Options
exercisable at period-end
|
597,936
|
5.97
|
|
Weighted
average fair value of options granted during the period
|
$
-
|
The
following table summarizes information about options outstanding under the
Stock
Options Plan as of March 31, 2006.
Options
outstanding
|
Options
exercisable
|
|||||||||||||
Range
of Exercise Prices
|
Number
outstanding at March 31,
2006
|
Weighted
Average
remaining
contractual
life
(years)
|
Weighted
Average
exercise
price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||
$1.99
|
103,673
|
4.8
|
$
1.99
|
103,673
|
$
1.99
|
|||||||||
$2.99
to $3.91
|
160,591
|
6.0
|
3.23
|
160,591
|
3.23
|
|||||||||
$4.14
to $5.08
|
28,493
|
5.2
|
4.38
|
28,493
|
4.38
|
|||||||||
$6.63
to $7.41
|
159,914
|
7.8
|
6.85
|
159,914
|
6.85
|
|||||||||
$10.93
to $11.95
|
145,265
|
9.2
|
11.17
|
145,265
|
11.17
|
|||||||||
597,936
|
$
5.97
|
597,936
|
$5.97
|
During
the three months ended March 31, 2006, $0 was recognized in compensation expense
for the Stock Options Plan. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted
for
the Stock Option Plan under the recognition and measurement principles of APB
No. 25 and related interpretations. Share-based employee compensation costs
were
not reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plan had an
exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on
the
date of the grant. Since, in 2005, the Company vested all previously issued
unvested options and the Company has granted no options during the three months
ended March 31, 2006, there is no compensation expense to be recognized on
the
Stock Option Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2006.
10
In
accordance with SFAS No. 123, the following table shows pro forma net income
and
earnings per share assuming stock options had been expensed based on their
fair
value of the options granted along with
significant assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model
(dollars in thousands, except per share date)
Three
months ended
|
|
|||
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
||
Net
Income as reported
|
$
|
2,122
|
||
Stock-based
employee compensation costs determined
|
||||
if
the fair value method had been applied to all awards,
|
||||
net
of tax
|
(52
|
)
|
||
Pro-forma
net income
|
$
|
2,070
|
||
Basic
Earnings per Common Share:
|
||||
As
reported
|
$
|
0.24
|
||
Pro-forma
|
$
|
0.23
|
||
Diluted
Earnings per Common Share:
|
||||
As
reported
|
$
|
0.22
|
||
Pro-forma
|
$
|
0.22
|
The
pro
forma compensation expense is based upon the fair value of the option at grant
date. The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions used for those grants: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility
of
between 32.2% and 35.2%; risk-free interest rate of between 3.24% and 3.77%
and
an expected life of 5.0 years.
Note
3: Reclassifications
and Restatement for 12% and 10% Stock Dividends
Certain
items in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have
been
reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation format. There was no
effect on net income for the periods presented herein as a result of
reclassifications. All applicable amounts in these consolidated financial
statements (including stock options and earnings per share information) have
been restated for a 12% stock dividend paid on June 7, 2005, and a 10% stock
dividend to be paid on May 17, 2006.
Note
4: Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
March
2004, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue
No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments.” EITF 03-1 provides guidance on other-than-temporary
impairment models for marketable debt and equity securities accounted for under
SFAS 115 and non-marketable equity securities accounted for under the cost
method. The EITF developed a basic three-step model to evaluate whether an
investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. In November 2005, the FASB
approved the issuance of FASB Staff Position FAS No. 115-1 and FAS 124-1, “The
Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments.” The FSP addresses when an investment is considered impaired,
whether the impairment is other-than-temporary and the measurement of an
impairment loss. The FSP also includes accounting considerations subsequent
to
the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain
disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as
other-than-temporary. The FSP is effective for reporting periods beginning
after
December 15, 2005 with earlier application permitted. For the Company, the
effective was the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The adoption of this accounting
principle did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position
or results of operations.
11
In
May
2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections- a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS No. 154
replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and FASB Statement No. 3,
“Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changes the
accounting and reporting requirements for a change in accounting principle.
SFAS
No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in an accounting principle, as well
as
to changes required by a new accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance
that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS
No.
154 is effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005 and requires retrospective application
to prior periods’ financial statements for most voluntary changes in an
accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to do so. The Company adopted
this guidance on January 1, 2006. The adoption did not have a material effect
on
the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In
October 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 13-1 (“FSP FAS 13-1”),
which requires companies to expense rental costs associated with ground or
building operating leases that are incurred during a construction period. As
a
result, companies that are currently capitalizing these rental costs are
required to expense them beginning in its first reporting period beginning
after
December 15, 2005. FSP FAS 13-1 is effective for the Company as of the first
quarter of fiscal 2006. The provisions of FSP FAS 13-1 did not have an impact
on
the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In
November 2005, the FASB issued final FSP No. 123(R)-3, “Transition Election
Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards.” The
FSP provides an alternative method of calculating excess tax benefits (the
Additional Paid-in Capital “APIC” pool) from the method defined in FAS 123(R)
for share-based payments. A one-time election to adopt the transition method
in
this FSP is available to those entities adopting 123(R) using either the
modified retrospective or modified prospective method. Up to one year from
the
initial adoption of FAS 123(R) or the effective date of the FSP is provided
to
make this one-time election. However, until an entity makes its election, it
must follow the guidance in FAS 123(R). The Company is currently evaluating
the
potential impact of calculating the APIC pool with this alternative method
and
has not yet determined which method we will adopt, or the expected impact on
the
Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In
January 2006, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of SFAS No. 143,”
(“FIN 47”). This Interpretation provides clarification with respect to the
timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets when the timing and/or method of
settlement of the obligation are conditional on a future event. The adoption
of
FIN 47 did not materially impact the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
In
February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments”. SFAS No. 155 amends FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Statement No. 140, and improves the financial reporting of certain hybrid
financial instruments by requiring more consistent accounting that eliminates
exemptions and provides a means to simplify the accounting for these
instruments. Specifically, SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have
embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to
bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for
the
whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all
financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s
first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company is required
to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 155, as applicable, beginning in fiscal
year
2007. Management does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a
material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of
operations.
12
In
March
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets —An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”
(“SFAS 156”). SFAS 156 requires that all separately recognized
servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value,
if practicable. The statement permits, but does not require, the subsequent
measurement of servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value.
SFAS 156 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year
that begins after September 15, 2006, which for the Company will be as of
the beginning of fiscal 2007. The Company does not believe that the adoption
of
SFAS 156 will have a significant effect on its financial statements.
In
February 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-4,
“Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee
Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent
Event.” This position amends SFAS 123R to incorporate that a cash
settlement feature that can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a
contingent event that is outside the employee’s control does not meet certain
conditions in SFAS 123R until it becomes probable that the event will
occur. The guidance in this FASB Staff Position shall be applied upon initial
adoption of Statement 123R. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
that the adoption of SFAS 123R will have on its financial statements.
Note
5: Legal
Proceedings
The
Company and Republic are from time to time parties (plaintiff or defendant)
to
lawsuits in the normal course of business. While any litigation involves an
element of uncertainty, management, after reviewing pending actions with legal
counsel, is of the opinion that the liabilities of the Company and Republic,
if
any, resulting from such actions will not have a material effect on the
financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
Note
6: Segment
Reporting
As
a
result of the spin-off of FBD in the first quarter of 2005, the tax refund
products and short-term consumer loan segments were also spun off as they were
divisions of that bank. In the normal course of business, tax refund loans
may
continue to be purchased from FBD. After the spin off, the Company has one
reportable segment: community banking. The community bank segment primarily
encompasses the commercial loan and deposit activities of Republic, as well
as
consumer loan products in the area surrounding its branches.
Note
7: Earnings Per Share:
Earnings
per share (“EPS”) consists of two separate components: basic EPS and diluted
EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for each period presented. Diluted EPS is
calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding plus dilutive common stock equivalents (“CSEs”). CSEs consist
of dilutive stock options granted through the Company’s stock option plan. The
following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in
calculating basic and diluted EPS. CSEs which are anti-dilutive are not included
in the following calculation. At March 31, 2006, and 2005, respectively, there
were no stock options that were not included in the calculation of EPS because
the option exercise price is greater than the average market price for the
period. The following tables are a comparison of EPS for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005. EPS has been restated for a stock dividend paid on
June
7, 2005 and a stock dividend payable on May 17, 2006 (See Note 3).
13
Three
months ended March 31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||
Net
Income
|
$2,671,000
|
$2,122,000
|
|||
Per
|
Per
|
||||
Shares
|
Share
|
Shares
|
Share
|
||
Weighted
average shares
|
|||||
for
period
|
9,391,009
|
8,914,913
|
|||
Basic
EPS
|
$0.28
|
$0.24
|
|||
Add
common stock equivalents
representing
dilutive stock options
|
249,836
|
593,217
|
|||
Effect
on basic EPS of dilutive CSE
|
$
-
|
$(.02)
|
|||
Equals
total weighted average
|
|||||
shares
and CSE (diluted)
|
9,640,845
|
9,508,130
|
|||
Diluted
EPS
|
$0.28
|
$0.22
|
Note
8: Comprehensive Income
The
components of comprehensive income, net of related tax, are as follows (in
thousands):
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||
Net
income
|
$2,671
|
$2,122
|
|||
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
|||||
Unrealized
losses on securities:
|
|||||
Arising
during the period, net of tax benefit of $44 and $57
|
(85)
|
(111)
|
|||
Comprehensive
income
|
$2,586
|
$2,011
|
|||
The
accumulated balances related to each component of other comprehensive
income (loss) are as follows (in thousands):
|
|||||
March
31,
|
|||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||
Unrealized
gains (losses) on securities
|
$(4)
|
$197
|
14
The
following is management’s discussion and analysis of significant changes in the
Company’s results of operations, financial condition and capital resources
presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. This discussion
should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
Certain
statements in this document may be considered to be “forward-looking statements”
as that term is defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of
1995, such as statements that include the words “may,” “believes,” “expect,”
“estimate,” “project,” “anticipate,” “should,” “intend,” “probability,” “risk,”
“target,” “objective” and similar expressions or variations on such expressions.
The forward-looking statements contained herein are subject to certain risks
and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. For example, risks and
uncertainties can arise with changes in: general economic conditions, including
their impact on capital expenditures; new service and product offerings by
competitors and price pressures; and similar items. Readers are cautioned not
to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect
management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no
obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. Readers should
carefully review the risk factors described in other documents the Company
files
from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, filed by the Company in 2006 and 2005, and
any
Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company, as well as other
filings.
Financial
Condition:
March
31, 2006 Compared to December 31, 2005
Assets
increased $13.3 million to $864.2 million at March 31, 2006, versus $850.9
million at December 31, 2005. This increase reflected a $23.6 million increase
in net loans. These loans were funded primarily by increases in time
certificates of deposits. The increase in loans was partially offset by a $9.6
million decrease in cash and cash equivalents.
Loans:
The
loan
portfolio represents the Company’s largest asset category and is its most
significant source of interest income. The Company’s lending strategy focuses on
small and medium size businesses and professionals that seek highly personalized
banking services. Net loans increased $23.6 million, to $694.1 million at March
31, 2006, versus $670.5 million at December 31, 2005. Substantially all of
the
increase resulted from commercial and construction loans. The loan portfolio
consists of secured and unsecured commercial loans including commercial real
estate, construction loans, residential mortgages, automobile loans, home
improvement loans, home equity loans and lines of credit, overdraft lines of
credit and others. Commercial loans are originated as either fixed or variable
rate loans with typical terms of 1 to 5 years. Commercial loans typically range
between $250,000 and $5,000,000 but customers may borrow significantly larger
amounts up to the legal lending limit of approximately $11.5 million at March
31, 2006. Individual customers may have several loans that are secured by
different collateral.
15
Investment
Securities:
Investment
securities available-for-sale are investments which may be sold in response
to
changing market and interest rate conditions and for liquidity and other
purposes. The Company’s investment securities available-for-sale consist
primarily of U.S. Government debt securities, U.S. Government agency issued
mortgage-backed securities, and debt securities which include corporate bonds
and trust preferred securities. Available-for-sale securities totaled $36.4
million at March 31, 2006, compared to $37.3 million at year-end 2005. The
decrease reflected principal payments on mortgage backed securities. At March
31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the portfolio had net unrealized losses of
$6,000 and net unrealized gains of $123,000, respectively.
Investment
securities held-to-maturity are investments for which there is the intent and
ability to hold the investment to maturity. These investments are carried at
amortized cost. The held-to-maturity portfolio consists primarily of debt
securities and stocks. At March 31, 2006, securities held to maturity totaled
$560,000, compared to $559,000 at year-end 2005.
FHLB
Stock:
Republic
is required to maintain FHLB stock in proportion to its outstanding debt to
FHLB. When the debt is repaid, the purchase price of the stock is refunded.
At
March 31, 2006, FHLB stock totaled $5.1 million, a decrease of $1.2 million
from
$6.3 million at December 31, 2005.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
Cash
and
due from banks, interest bearing deposits and federal funds sold are all liquid
funds. The aggregate amount in these three categories decreased by $9.6 million,
to $97.4 million at March 31, 2006, from $107.0 million at December 31,
2005, reflecting a decrease in federal funds sold.
Fixed
Assets:
The
balance in premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, was $3.8
million at March 31, 2006, compared to $3.6 million at December 31, 2005,
reflecting 2006 premises and equipment expenditures.
Other
Real Estate Owned:
Other
real estate owned amounted to $137,000 at March 31, 2006 and December 31,
2005.
Bank
Owned Life Insurance:
The
balance of bank owned life insurance amounted to $11.0 million at March 31,
2006
and $10.9 million at December 31, 2005. The income earned on these policies
is
reflected in other income.
Other
Assets:
Other
assets increased by $0.8 million to $11.6 million at March 31, 2006, from $10.8
million at December 31, 2005, principally resulting from an increase in prepaid
taxes and insurance.
Deposits:
Deposits,
which include non-interest and interest-bearing demand deposits, money market,
savings and time deposits including brokered deposits, are Republic’s major
source of funding. Deposits are generally solicited from the Company’s market
area through the offering of a variety of products to attract and retain
customers, with a primary focus on multi-product relationships. Institutional
deposits also may be utilized when they represent a lower-cost funding
alternative.
Total
deposits increased by $27.0 million to $674.9 million at March 31, 2006 from
$647.8 million at December 31, 2005. The majority of that increase represents
balances that are likely short-term. Average core deposits increased 14.0%
or
$45.3 million more than the prior year period to $368.1 million in the first
quarter of 2006. Deposit growth benefited from the Company’s business
development efforts. Period end time deposits increased $24.8 million, or 9.3%
to $290.8 million at March 31, 2006, versus $265.9 million at the prior
year-end. The increase resulted primarily from the addition of institutional
deposits which were the least costly funding alternative available.
16
FHLB
Borrowings:
FHLB
borrowings totaled $105.0 million at March 31, 2006 and $123.9 million at
December 31, 2005. The balances were comprised wholly of overnight
borrowings.
Shareholders’
Equity:
Total
shareholders’ equity increased $3.3 million to $66.9 million at March 31,
2006,
versus
$63.7 million at December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily the result
of
year-to-date net income of $2.7 million, with the balance of the increase
resulting from the exercise of stock options partially offset by a minimal
reduction in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2006 compared to March 31, 2005
Results
of Operations:
Overview
The
Company's net income increased to $2.7 million or $0.28 per diluted share for
the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to $2.1 million, or $0.22 per
diluted share for the comparable prior year period. There was a $4.2 million,
or
39.1%, increase in total interest income, reflecting higher rates and a 23.6%
increase in average loans outstanding while interest expense increased $2.1
million, also reflecting higher rates and a 16.3% increase in average deposits
outstanding. Accordingly, net interest income increased $2.1 million between
the
periods. Increases in short term interest rates also increased yields on loans
tied to prime, which exceeded increases in interest paid on certain deposits,
contributing to the increased margin. The provision for loan losses in the
first
quarter of 2006 increased to $1.3 million, compared to $703,000 provision
expense in the first quarter of 2005, reflecting the impact of $259,000 of
recoveries and fewer tax refund charge-offs in that quarter. Non-interest income
remained at $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared
to
the prior year period. Non-interest expenses increased $570,000 to $5.0 million
compared to $4.5 million in the first quarter of 2005, primarily due to higher
salaries and benefits. Return on average assets and average equity from
continuing operations of 1.33% and 16.63% respectively, in the first quarter
of
2006 compared to 1.15% and 15.48% respectively for the same period in
2005.
17
Analysis
of Net Interest Income
Historically,
the Company's earnings have depended significantly upon net interest income,
which is the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets
and
interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is impacted
by changes in the mix of the volume and rates of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities.
For
the three months ended
|
|
For
the three months ended
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
March
31, 2006
|
|
March
31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Average
|
|
Income/
|
|
Yield/
|
|
Average
|
|
Income/
|
|
Yield/
|
|
||||||
|
|
Balance
|
|
Expense
|
|
Rate
|
|
Balance
|
|
Expense
|
|
Rate
|
|||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
|||||||||||||||||||
and
other interest-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
earning
assets
|
$
|
36,130
|
$
|
400
|
4.49
|
%
|
$
|
77,425
|
$
|
476
|
2.50
|
%
|
|||||||
Securities
|
41,663
|
509
|
4.89
|
%
|
48,779
|
444
|
3.64
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Loans
receivable
|
700,896
|
14,154
|
8.19
|
%
|
567,247
|
9,912
|
7.09
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
778,689
|
15,063
|
7.85
|
%
|
693,451
|
10,832
|
6.33
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
assets
|
37,689
|
43,694
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
816,378
|
$
|
737,145
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Demand-non
interest
|
|||||||||||||||||||
bearing
|
$
|
86,076
|
$
|
93,558
|
|||||||||||||||
Demand
interest-bearing
|
61,943
|
$
|
122
|
0.80
|
%
|
55,029
|
$
|
85
|
0.63
|
%
|
|||||||||
Money
market & savings
|
220,053
|
1,698
|
3.13
|
%
|
174,225
|
880
|
2.05
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
336,529
|
3,444
|
4.15
|
%
|
283,087
|
2,031
|
2.91
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
704,601
|
5,264
|
3.03
|
%
|
605,899
|
2,996
|
2.01
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
deposits
|
618,525
|
5,264
|
3.45
|
%
|
512,341
|
2,996
|
2.37
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Other
borrowings (1)
|
36,932
|
490
|
5.38
|
%
|
68,336
|
638
|
3.79
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
liabilities
|
$
|
655,457
|
$
|
5,754
|
3.56
|
%
|
$
|
580,677
|
$
|
3,634
|
2.54
|
%
|
|||||||
Total
deposits and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
other
borrowings
|
741,533
|
5,754
|
3.15
|
%
|
674,235
|
3,634
|
2.19
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Non
interest-bearing
|
|||||||||||||||||||
liabilites
|
9,701
|
8,077
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
65,144
|
54,833
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
shareholders'
equity
|
$
|
816,378
|
$
|
737,145
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
9,309
|
$
|
7,198
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
4.29
|
%
|
3.79
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
4.85
|
%
|
4.20
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
(1)
Includes $6.2 million of trust preferred
securities
|
18
The
rate
volume table below presents an analysis of the impact on interest income and
expense resulting from changes in average volumes and rates during the period.
For purposes of this table, changes in interest income and expense are allocated
to volume and rate categories based upon the respective changes in average
balances and average rates.
Rate/Volume
Table
Three
months ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
versus
March 31, 2005
|
|
|||||||
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Due
to change in:
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
Total
|
||||
Interest
earned on:
|
||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
$
|
(464
|
)
|
$
|
388
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
||
Securities
|
(86
|
)
|
151
|
65
|
||||||
Loans
|
2,699
|
1,543
|
4,242
|
|||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
2,149
|
2,082
|
4,231
|
|||||||
Interest
expense of deposits
|
||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
(14
|
)
|
(23
|
)
|
(37
|
)
|
||||
Money
market and savings
|
(354
|
)
|
(464
|
)
|
(818
|
)
|
||||
Time
deposits
|
(547
|
)
|
(866
|
)
|
(1,413
|
)
|
||||
Total
deposit interest expense
|
(915
|
)
|
(1,353
|
)
|
(2,268
|
)
|
||||
Other
borrowings
|
417
|
(269
|
)
|
148
|
||||||
Total
interest expense
|
(498
|
)
|
(1,622
|
)
|
(2,120
|
)
|
||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
1,651
|
$
|
460
|
$
|
2,111
|
The
Company’s net interest margin increased 65 basis points to 4.85% for the three
months ended March 31, 2006, versus 4.20% in the prior year comparable period.
Excluding the impact of tax refund loans, which are substantially all a first
quarter event, the net interest margin was 4.25% in first quarter 2006 and
3.69%
in first quarter 2005.
While
yields on interest-bearing assets increased 152 basis points to 7.85% in first
quarter 2006 from 6.33% in first quarter 2005, the yield on total deposits
and
other borrowings increased 96 basis points to 3.15% from 2.19% between those
respective periods. The increase in yields on assets resulted primarily from
the
250 basis point increase in short-term interest rates between the two quarters.
The increases in short-term interest rates that increased yields on loans tied
to prime, exceeded increases in interest paid on deposits.
The
Company's net interest income increased $2.1 million, or 29.3%, to $9.3 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from $7.2 million for the prior
year
comparable period. As shown in the Rate Volume table above, the increase in
net
interest income was due primarily to the increased volume of loans. Higher
rates
on loans resulted primarily from variable rate loans which immediately adjust
to
increases in the prime rate. Interest expense increased primarily as a result
of
higher rates which lagged the general increase in short-term market rates.
Average interest-earning assets amounted to $778.7 million for first quarter
2006 and $693.5 million for first quarter 2005. Substantially all of the $85.2
million increase resulted from loan growth.
19
The
Company's total interest income increased $4.2 million, or 39.1%, to $15.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from $10.8 million for the
prior year comparable period. Interest and fees on loans increased $4.2 million,
or 42.8%, to $14.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from
$9.9
million for the prior year comparable period. The majority of the increase
in
both commercial loan interest and total interest income resulted from a 23.6%
increase in average loan balances. In first quarter 2006, average loan balances
amounted to $700.9 million, compared to $567.2 million in the comparable prior
year period. The balance of the 42.8% increase in interest on loans resulted
primarily from the repricing of the variable rate portfolio to higher short
term
market interest rates. Interest and dividends on investment securities increased
$65,000 to $509,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from $444,000
for
the prior year comparable period. This increase reflected rate increases on
variable rate securities that were partially offset by a $7.1 million, or 14.6%,
decrease in average securities outstanding to $41.7 million for first quarter
2006 from the comparable prior year period. Interest on federal funds sold
and
other interest-earning assets decreased $76,000, or 16.0%, as increases in
short-term market interest rates were more than offset by the $41.3 million
decrease in average balances to $36.1 million for first quarter 2006 from $77.4
million for the comparable prior year period.
The
Company's total interest expense increased $2.1 million, or 58.3%, to $5.8
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from $3.6 million for the
prior year comparable period. Interest-bearing liabilities averaged $655.5
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, versus $580.7 million for
the
prior year comparable period, or an increase of $74.8 million. The increase
reflected additional funding utilized for loan growth. Average deposit balances
increased $98.7 million which facilitated a $31.4 million decrease in average
other borrowings. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities
increased 102 basis points to 3.56% for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Interest expense on time deposit balances increased $1.4 million to $3.4 million
in first quarter 2006, from $2.0 million in the comparable prior year period.
Money market and savings interest expense increased $0.8 million to $1.7 million
in first quarter 2006, from $880,000 in the comparable prior year period. The
majority of the increase in interest expense on deposits reflected the higher
short-term interest rate environment, which while increased, lagged the general
increase in short-term market rates. Accordingly, rates on total
interest-bearing deposits increased 108 basis points in first quarter 2006
compared to first quarter 2005, while short term rates increased approximately
250 basis points between those periods.
Interest
expense on other borrowings decreased $148,000 to $490,000 in first quarter
2006, as a result of decreased average balances. Average other borrowings,
primarily overnight FHLB borrowings, decreased $31.4 million, or 46.0%, between
those respective periods. These reductions in balances reflected the increases
in deposit balances, which were utilized as a less costly funding source for
loan growth. Rates on overnight borrowings reflected the higher short-term
interest rate environment as the rate of other borrowings increased to 5.38%
in
first quarter 2006, from to 3.79% in the comparable prior year period. Interest
expense on other borrowings also includes the impact of $6.2 million of trust
preferred securities.
Provision
for Loan Losses
The
provision for loan losses is charged to operations in an amount necessary to
bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level that reflects the known
and
estimated inherent losses in the portfolio. The provision for loan losses
amounted to $1.3 million in first quarter 2006 compared to $703,000 in first
quarter 2005. The first quarter 2006 provision reflected $1.1 million for losses
on tax refund loans, which were more than offset by $1.5 million in related
revenues. The remaining provision in first quarter 2006 primarily reflected
amounts required to increase the allowance for loan growth in accordance with
the Company’s methodology. The comparable first quarter 2005 provision reflected
$919,000 for losses on tax refund loans, which were more than offset by $1.1
million in related revenues. In addition, the first quarter 2005 provision
was
reduced as a result of an approximate $252,000 recovery on a commercial loan,
which had been charged off in the prior year. That recovery resulted in a
reserve balance which exceeded that determined by the Company’s methodology. The
quarterly provision was reduced accordingly.
20
Non-Interest
Income
Total
non-interest income remained at $1.1 million for the three months ended March
31, 2006, compared to the prior year comparable period. An increase of $327,000
in first quarter 2006 related to loan advisory and servicing fees was offset
by
a one-time $251,000 award in a lawsuit recorded in other income in first quarter
2005.
Non-Interest
Expenses
Total
non-interest expenses increased $570,000 or 12.7% to $5.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006, from $4.5 million for the prior year comparable
period. Salaries and employee benefits increased $699,000 or 31.4%, to $2.9
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from $2.2 million for the
prior year comparable period. That increase reflected additional salary expense
related to commercial loan and deposit production including related support
staff. It also reflected annual merit increases which are targeted at
approximately 3.5%.
Occupancy
expense increased $56,000, or 14.8%, to $435,000 in first quarter 2006, compared
to $379,000 in first quarter 2005. The increase reflected higher repairs and
maintenance expense.
Depreciation
expense decreased $120,000 or 37.5% to $200,000 for the three months ended
March
31, 2006, versus $320,000 for the prior year comparable period. The decrease
was
primarily due to the write-off of assets in first quarter 2005 that were
determined to have shorter lives than originally expected.
Legal
fees decreased $4,000, or 2.3%, to $167,000 in first quarter 2006, compared
to
$171,000 in first quarter 2005.
Advertising
expense increased $4,000, or 8.9%, to $49,000 in first quarter 2006, compared
to
$45,000 in first quarter 2005.
Data
processing expense increased $11,000, or 9.2%, to $130,000 in first quarter
2006, compared to $119,000 in first quarter 2005.
Taxes,
other increased $72,000, or 50.3%, to $215,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2006, versus $143,000 for the comparable prior year period. The increase
reflected an increase in Pennsylvania shares tax, which is assessed at an annual
rate of 1.25% on a 6 year moving average of regulatory capital. The full amount
of the increase resulted from increased capital.
Other
expenses decreased $148,000, or 13.8% to $920,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2006, from $1.1 million for the prior year comparable period.
Professional fees decreased approximately $76,000, reflecting reductions in
recruiting expenses. Auditing expenses decreased $44,000 reflecting reduced
expense for Sarbanes Oxley compliance.
21
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
provision for income taxes for continuing operations increased $354,000, to
$1.4
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, from $1.0 million for the
prior year comparable period. That increase was primarily the result of the
increase in pre-tax income. The effective tax rates in those periods were 34%
and 33% respectively.
Share-Based
Compensation
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.
123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, which revises SFAS No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and supersedes Accounting Principles
Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. This
statement requires an entity to recognize the cost of employee services received
in share-based payment transactions and measure the cost on the grant-date
fair
value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which
an
employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The
provisions of SFAS No. 123R are effective January 1, 2006.
In
March
2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107 which expressed the views of the SEC regarding the
interaction between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations. SAB
No.
107 provides guidance related to the valuation of share-based payment
arrangements for public companies, including assumptions such as expected
volatility and expected term.
In
2005,
the Company vested all previously issued unvested options. For those vested
options granted prior to January 1, 2006, there is no impact on operations
in
future periods. The accelerated vesting increased pro forma expense in 2005
by
approximately $107,000, and therefore this expense did not impact net income
in
2006 upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R. The impact on operations in future periods
will be the value imputed on future options grants using the methods prescribed
in SFAS No. 123R.
At
March
31, 2006, the Company maintains a Stock Option Plan under which the Company
grants options to its employees and directors. See Note 2 in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements herein for a further description of this
plan.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2006, $0 was recognized in compensation expense
for the Stock Options Plan. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted
for
the Stock Option Plan under the recognition and measurement principles of APB
No. 25 and related interpretations. Share-based employee compensation costs
were
not reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plan had an
exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on
the
date of the grant. Since, in 2005, the Company vested all previously issued
unvested options and the Company has granted no options during the three months
ended March 31, 2006, there is no compensation expense to be recognized on
the
Stock Option Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2006. As of March
31,
2006, no additional compensation expense will be recognized over the remaining
life of the options granted prior to January 1, 2006 due to the vesting of
all
previously issued unvested options in 2005.
22
Commitments,
Contingencies and Concentrations
Financial
instruments whose contract amounts represent potential credit risk are
commitments to extend credit of approximately $210.1 million and $203.0 million
and standby letters of credit of approximately $4.5 million and $5.8 million
at
March 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Commitments
to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and many require the
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without
being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements. Republic evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on
a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained upon extension of credit
is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held
varies but may include real estate, marketable securities, pledged deposits,
equipment and accounts receivable.
Standby
letters of credit are conditional commitments that guarantee the performance
of
a customer to a third party. The credit risk and collateral policy involved
in
issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending
loan commitments. The amount of collateral obtained is based on management’s
credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include real
estate, marketable securities, pledged deposits, equipment and accounts
receivable. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation
of such collateral would be sufficient to cover the maximum potential amount
of
future payments required under the corresponding quarantees.
23
Regulatory
Matters
The
following table presents the Company’s and Republic’s capital regulatory ratios
at March
31,
2006,
and
December 31, 2005:
Actual
|
For
Capital
Adequacy
purposes
|
To
be well capitalized under FRB capital guidelines
|
||||||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||
Dollars
in thousands
|
||||||||||||||
At
March 31, 2006
|
||||||||||||||
Total
risk based capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
$79,392
|
11.72%
|
$54,182
|
8.00%
|
$67,727
|
10.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
80,736
|
11.90%
|
$54,271
|
8.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Tier
one risk based capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
71,589
|
10.57%
|
27,091
|
4.00%
|
40,636
|
6.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
72,933
|
10.75%
|
27,136
|
4.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Tier
one leveraged capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
71,589
|
8.78%
|
40,756
|
5.00%
|
40,756
|
5.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
72,933
|
8.93%
|
40,819
|
5.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Actual
|
For
Capital
Adequacy
purposes
|
To
be well capitalized under FRB capital guidelines
|
||||||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||
At
December 31, 2005
|
||||||||||||||
Total
risk based capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
$76,537
|
11.71%
|
$52,234
|
8.00%
|
$65,292
|
10.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
77,213
|
11.81%
|
52,299
|
8.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Tier
one risk based capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
68,920
|
10.56%
|
26,117
|
4.00%
|
39,175
|
6.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
69,596
|
10.65%
|
26,149
|
4.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Tier
one leveraged capital
|
||||||||||||||
Republic
|
68,920
|
8.81%
|
39,102
|
5.00%
|
39,102
|
5.00%
|
||||||||
Company
|
69,596
|
8.89%
|
39,152
|
5.00%
|
-
|
N/A
|
Dividend
Policy
The
Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock, but may consider
dividend payments in the future.
Liquidity
Financial
institutions must maintain liquidity to meet day-to-day requirements of
depositors and borrowers, time investment purchases to market conditions and
provide a cushion against unforeseen needs. Liquidity needs can be met by either
reducing assets or increasing liabilities. The most liquid assets consist of
cash, amounts due from banks and federal funds sold.
Regulatory
authorities require the Company to maintain certain liquidity ratios such that
Republic maintains available funds, or can obtain available funds at reasonable
rates, in order to satisfy commitments to borrowers and the demands of
depositors. In response to these requirements, the Company has formed an
Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”), comprised of selected members of the board
of directors and senior management, which monitors such ratios. The purpose
of
the Committee is in part, to monitor Republic’s liquidity and adherence to the
ratios in addition to managing relative interest rate risk. The ALCO meets
at
least quarterly.
24
Republic’s
most liquid assets, consisting of cash due from banks, deposits with banks
and
federal funds sold, totaled $97.4 million at March 31, 2006, compared to $107.0
million at December 31, 2005, due primarily to a decrease in federal funds
sold. Loan maturities and repayments, if not reinvested in loans, also are
immediately available for liquidity. At March 31, 2006, Republic estimated
that
in excess of $50.0 million of loans would mature or be repaid in the six month
period that will end September 30, 2006. Additionally, the majority of its
securities are available to satisfy liquidity requirements through pledges
to
the FHLB to access Republic’s line of credit.
Funding
requirements have historically been satisfied primarily by generating
transaction accounts and certificates of deposit with competitive rates, and
utilizing the facilities of the FHLB. At March 31, 2006 Republic had
$132.5 million in unused lines of credit readily available under
arrangements with the FHLB and correspondent banks compared to $84.8 million
at
December 31, 2005. These lines of credit enable Republic to purchase funds
for short or long-term needs at rates often lower than other sources and require
pledging of securities or loan collateral. The amount of available credit has
been decreasing with the prepayment of mortgage backed loans and securities.
At
March
31, 2006, Republic had aggregate outstanding commitments (including unused
lines
of credit and letters of credit) of $214.6 million. Certificates of deposit
scheduled to mature in one year totaled $233.4 million at March 31, 2006. There
were no FHLB advances outstanding at March 31, 2006, and short-term borrowings
of $105.0 million consisted wholly of overnight FHLB borrowings. The Company
anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current
commitments.
Republic’s
target and actual liquidity levels are determined by comparisons of the
estimated repayment and marketability of its interest-earning assets and
projected future outflows of deposits and other liabilities. Republic has
established a line of credit with a correspondent bank to assist in managing
Republic’s liquidity position. That line of credit totaled $15.0 million and was
unused at March 31, 2006. Republic has established a line of credit with the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh with a maximum borrowing capacity of
approximately $222.5 million. As of March 31, 2006, Republic had borrowed
$105.0 million under that line of credit. Securities also represent a primary
source of liquidity. Accordingly, investment decisions generally reflect
liquidity over other considerations.
Republic’s
primary short-term funding sources are certificates of deposit and its
securities portfolio. The circumstances that are reasonably likely to affect
those sources are as follows. Republic has historically been able to generate
certificates of deposit by matching Philadelphia market rates or paying a
premium rate of 25 to 50 basis points over those market rates. It is anticipated
that this source of liquidity will continue to be available; however, its
incremental cost may vary depending on market conditions. Republic’s securities
portfolio is also available for liquidity, usually as collateral for FHLB
advances. Because of the FHLB’s AAA rating, it is unlikely those advances would
not be available. But even if they are not, numerous investment companies would
likely provide repurchase agreements up to the amount of the market value of
the
securities.
Republic’s
ALCO is responsible for managing its liquidity position and interest
sensitivity. That committee’s primary objective is to maximize net interest
income while configuring interest-sensitive assets and liabilities to manage
interest rate risk and provide adequate liquidity.
Investment
Securities Portfolio
At
March
31, 2006, the Company had identified certain investment securities that are
being held for indefinite periods of time, including securities that will be
used as part of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy and that may
be sold in response to changes in interest rates, prepayments and similar
factors. These securities are classified as available for sale and are intended
to increase the flexibility of the Company’s asset/liability management.
Available for sale securities consisted of U.S. Government Agency securities
and
other investments. The book and market values of investment securities available
for sale were $36.4 million and $36.4 million as of March 31, 2006,
respectively. The net unrealized loss on investment securities available for
sale as of that date was approximately $6,000.
25
Loan
Portfolio
The
Company’s loan portfolio consists of secured and unsecured commercial loans
including commercial real estate loans, loans secured by one-to-four family
residential property, commercial construction and residential construction
loans
as well as residential mortgages, home equity loans, short-term consumer and
other consumer loans. Commercial loans are primarily term loans made to small
to
medium-sized businesses and professionals for working capital, asset acquisition
and other purposes. Commercial loans are originated as either fixed or variable
rate loans with typical terms of 1 to 5 years. Republic’s commercial loans
typically range between $250,000 and $5,000,000 but customers may borrow
significantly larger amounts up to Republic’s combined legal lending limit of
approximately $11.5 million at March 31, 2006. Individual customers may have
several loans often secured by different collateral.
Net
loans
increased $23.6 million, to $694.1 million at March 31, 2006, from $670.5
million at December 31, 2005. Commercial and construction growth comprised
substantially all of that increase.
The
following table sets forth the Company's gross loans by major categories for
the
periods indicated:
(dollars
in thousands)
|
As
of March 31, 2006
|
|
As
of December 31, 2005
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Balance
|
|
%
of Total
|
|
Balance
|
|
%
of Total
|
|||||
Commercial:
|
|||||||||||||
Real
estate secured
|
$
|
448,363
|
63.9
|
%
|
$
|
446,383
|
65.8
|
%
|
|||||
Construction
and land development
|
162,072
|
23.1
|
141,461
|
20.9
|
|||||||||
Non
real estate secured
|
53,278
|
7.6
|
49,515
|
7.3
|
|||||||||
Non
real estate unsecured
|
8,508
|
1.2
|
10,620
|
1.6
|
|||||||||
672,221
|
95.8
|
647,979
|
95.6
|
||||||||||
Residential
real estate
|
6,658
|
0.9
|
7,057
|
1.0
|
|||||||||
Consumer
& other
|
23,031
|
3.3
|
23,050
|
3.4
|
|||||||||
Total
loans, net of unearned income
|
701,910
|
100.0
|
%
|
678,086
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||||
Less:
allowance for loan losses
|
(7,803
|
)
|
(7,617
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
loans
|
$
|
694,107
|
$
|
670,469
|
Credit
Quality
Republic’s
written lending policies require specified underwriting, loan documentation
and
credit analysis standards to be met prior to funding, with independent credit
department approval for the majority of new loan balances. A committee of the
Board of Directors oversees the loan approval process to monitor that proper
standards are maintained and approves the majority of commercial
loans.
Loans,
including impaired loans, are generally classified as non-accrual if they are
past due as to maturity or payment of interest or principal for a period of
more
than 90 days, unless such loans are well-secured and in the process of
collection. Loans that are on a current payment status or past due less than
90
days may also be classified as non-accrual if repayment in full of principal
and/or interest is in doubt.
26
Loans
may
be returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts
contractually due are reasonably assured of repayment within an acceptable
period of time, and there is a sustained period of repayment performance by
the
borrower, in accordance with the contractual terms.
While
a
loan is classified as non-accrual or as an impaired loan and the future
collectibility of the recorded loan balance is doubtful, collections of interest
and principal are generally applied as a reduction to principal outstanding.
When the future collectibility of the recorded loan balance is expected,
interest income may be recognized on a cash basis. In the case where a
non-accrual loan had been partially charged off, recognition of interest on
a
cash basis is limited to that which would have been recognized on the recorded
loan balance at the contractual interest rate. Cash interest receipts in excess
of that amount are recorded as recoveries to the allowance for loan losses
until
prior charge-offs have been fully recovered.
The
following summary shows information concerning loan delinquency and other
non-performing assets at the dates indicated.
March
31,
2006
|
December
31,
2005
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||
Loans
accruing, but past due 90 days or more
|
$
-
|
$
-
|
Non-accrual
loans
|
3,556
|
3,423
|
Total
non-performing loans (1)
|
3,556
|
3,423
|
Other
real estate owned
|
137
|
137
|
Total
non-performing assets (2)
|
$3,693
|
$3,560
|
Non-performing
loans as a percentage of total loans net of unearned
Income
|
0.51%
|
0.50%
|
Non-performing
assets as a percentage of total assets
|
0.43%
|
0.42%
|
(1)
|
Non-performing
loans are comprised of (i) loans that are on a nonaccrual basis;
(ii) accruing loans that are 90 days or more past due and
(iii) restructured loans.
|
(2)
|
Non-performing
assets are composed of non-performing loans and other real estate
owned
(assets acquired in foreclosure).
|
Non
accrual-loans increased $0.1 million, to $3.6 million at March 31, 2006, from
$3.4 million at December 31, 2005. The increase reflected the transition of
two
loans totaling $425,000 to non accrual status in first quarter 2006 from 30
to
59 days past due at December 31, 2005.
Problem
loans consist of loans that are included in performing loans, but for which
potential credit problems of the borrowers have caused management to have
serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to continue to comply with
present repayment terms. At March 31, 2006, all identified problem loans are
included in the preceding table or are classified as substandard or doubtful,
with a specific reserve allocation in the allowance for loan losses (see
“Allowance For Loan Losses”). Management
believes that the appraisals and other estimates of the value of the collateral
pledged against the non-accrual loans generally exceed the amount of its
outstanding balances.
27
The
recorded investment in loans which are impaired totaled $3.6 million at March
31, 2006, and $3.4 million at December 31, 2005, and the amount of related
valuation allowances were $1.5 million and $1.6 million respectively at those
dates. There were no commitments to extend credit to any borrowers with impaired
loans as of the end of the periods presented herein.
At
March
31, 2006, compared to December 31, 2005, internally classified substandard
loans
had increased to $1.0 million from $710,000; while doubtful loans increased
by
$765,000 to approximately $2.9 million from $2.2 million. There were no loans
classified as loss at those dates. The $340,000 increase in substandard loans
reflected the transfer of delinquent, but still accruing, loans to a single
customer totaling $307,000. The $765,000 increase in doubtful loans reflected
the transfer of delinquent, but still accruing, loans to a single customer
totaling $1.0 million.
Republic
had delinquent loans as follows: (i) 30 to 59 days past due, in the aggregate
principal amount of $3.5 million at March 31, 2006 and $441,000 at December
31,
2005; and (ii) 60 to 89 days past due, at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
in the aggregate principal amount of $165,000 and $62,000,
respectively.
The
increase in the loans delinquent 30 to 59 days reflects the $1.0 million loan
transferred to doubtful and another unrelated loan of $786,000.
Other
Real Estate Owned:
The
balance of other real estate owned amounted to $137,000 at March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005. There was no activity during 2006.
At
March
31, 2006, the Company had no credit exposure to "highly leveraged transactions"
as defined by the Federal Reserve Bank.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
An
analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March
31,
2006, and 2005, and the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 is as
follows:
For
the three months ended
|
For
the twelve months ended
|
For
the three months ended
|
||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
March
31, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
March
31, 2005
|
|||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$
7,617
|
$6,684
|
$6.684
|
|||
Charge-offs:
|
||||||
Commercial
and construction
|
67
|
29
|
1
|
|||
Tax
refund loans
|
1,060
|
1,113
|
920
|
|||
Consumer
|
-
|
21
|
14
|
|||
Total
charge-offs
|
1,127
|
1,163
|
935
|
|||
Recoveries:
|
||||||
Commercial
and construction
|
-
|
287
|
259
|
|||
Tax
refund loans
|
-
|
617
|
-
|
|||
Consumer
|
-
|
6
|
2
|
|||
Total
recoveries
|
-
|
910
|
261
|
|||
Net
charge-offs
|
1,127
|
253
|
674
|
|||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,313
|
1,186
|
703
|
|||
Balance
at end of period
|
$7,803
|
$7,617
|
$6,713
|
|||
Average
loans outstanding (1)
|
$700,896
|
$602,031
|
$567,247
|
|||
As
a percent of average loans (1):
|
||||||
Net
charge-offs (annualized)
|
0.65%
|
0.04%
|
0.48%
|
|||
Provision
for loan losses (annualized)
|
0.76%
|
0.20%
|
0.50%
|
|||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
1.11%
|
1.27%
|
1.18%
|
|||
Allowance
for loan losses to:
|
||||||
Total
loans, net of unearned income at period end
|
1.11%
|
1.12%
|
1.19%
|
|||
Total
non-performing loans at period end
|
219.43%
|
222.52%
|
209.00%
|
|||
(1)
Includes nonaccruing loans.
28
Management
makes at least a quarterly determination as to an appropriate provision from
earnings to maintain an allowance for loan losses that is management’s best
estimate of known and inherent losses. The Company’s Board of Directors
periodically reviews the status of all non-accrual and impaired loans and loans
classified by the Republic’s regulators or internal loan review officer, who
reviews both the loan portfolio and overall adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses. The Board of Directors also considers specific loans, pools of similar
loans, historical charge-off activity, economic conditions and other relevant
factors in reviewing the adequacy of the loan loss reserve. Any additions deemed
necessary to the allowance for loan losses are charged to operating
expenses.
The
Company has an existing loan review program, which monitors the loan portfolio
on an ongoing basis. Loan review is conducted by a loan review officer who
reports quarterly, directly to the Board of Directors.
Estimating
the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses at any given date is
difficult, particularly in a continually changing economy. In management’s
opinion, the allowance for loan losses was appropriate at March 31, 2006.
However, there can be no assurance that, if asset quality deteriorates in future
periods, additions to the allowance for loan losses will not be
required.
Republic’s
management is unable to determine in which loan category future charge-offs
and
recoveries may occur. The entire allowance for loan losses is available to
absorb loan losses in any loan category. The majority of the Company's loan
portfolio represents loans made for commercial purposes, while significant
amounts of residential property may serve as collateral for such loans. The
Company attempts to evaluate larger loans individually, on the basis of its
loan
review process, which scrutinizes loans on a selective basis and other available
information. Even if all commercial purpose loans
could be reviewed, there is no assurance that information on potential problems
would be available. The Company's portfolios of loans made for purposes of
financing residential mortgages and consumer loans are evaluated in
groups.
At March
31, 2006, loans made for commercial and construction, residential mortgage
and
consumer purposes, respectively, amounted to $672.2 million, $6.7 million and
$23.0 million.
Effects
of Inflation
The
majority of assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary
in
nature. Therefore, a financial institution differs greatly from most commercial
and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets
or
inventories. Management believes that the most significant impact of inflation
on financial results is the Company’s need and ability to react to changes in
interest rates. As discussed previously, management attempts to maintain an
essentially balanced position between rate sensitive assets and liabilities
over
a one year time horizon in order to protect net interest income from being
affected by wide interest rate fluctuations.
29
There
has
been no material change in the Company’s assessment of its sensitivity to market
risk since its presentation in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the SEC.
(a)
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the assistance of
management, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the
period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as
of
the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the
Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms,
and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
(b)
Changes in internal controls.
There
has
not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during
our
quarter ended March 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
30
ITEM
1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None
ITEM
1A: RISK FACTORS
No
material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s Form
10-K in response to Item 1A in Part 1 of Form 10-K.
ITEM
2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
None
ITEM
3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM
4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM
5: OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM
6: EXHIBITS
The
following Exhibits are filed as part of this report. (Exhibit numbers correspond
to the exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K for an annual report
on
Form 10-K)
Exhibit
No.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Issuer has
duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly
authorized.
Republic
First Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
|
|
/s/Harry
D. Madonna
|
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
/s/Paul
Frenkiel
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Dated:
May 9, 2006
32