RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC. - Annual Report: 2015 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended May 30, 2015

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 0-32113

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

17101 Armstrong Avenue, Irvine, California 92614

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (714) 430-6400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None (Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes   ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of November 28, 2014 (the last trading day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the approximate aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $547,873,000 (based upon the closing price for shares of the registrant’s common stock as reported by The Nasdaq Global Select Market). As of July 20, 2015, there were approximately 37,390,189 shares of common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent stated herein.

Table of Contents

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, “Resources,” “Resources Connection,” “Resources Global Professionals,” “RGP,” “Resources Global,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the business of Resources Connection, Inc. and its subsidiaries. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “fiscal,” “year” or “fiscal year” refer to our fiscal year that consists of the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday in May closest to May 31. The fiscal years ended May 30, 2015 and May 25, 2013 consisted of 52 weeks while the year ended May 31, 2014 consisted of 53 weeks.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information incorporated herein by reference, contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical facts. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should” or “will” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

Our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements and those of our industry may be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These statements and all phases of our operations are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those made in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking statements in this filing to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table of Contents

PART I

Overview

Resources Connection is a multinational consulting firm; its operating entities primarily provide services under the name Resources Global Professionals (“RGP” or the “Company”). The Company provides consulting and business initiative support services to its global client base in the areas of accounting; finance; corporate governance, risk and compliance management; corporate advisory, strategic communications and restructuring; information management; human capital; supply chain management; healthcare solutions; and legal and regulatory.

We assist our clients with projects requiring specialized expertise in:

We were founded in June 1996 by a team at Deloitte LLP (“Deloitte”), led by our chairman, Donald B. Murray, who was then a senior partner with Deloitte. Our founders created the Company to capitalize on the increasing demand for high quality outsourced professional services. We operated as a part of Deloitte until April 1999. In April 1999, we completed a management-led buyout. In December 2000, we completed our initial public offering of common stock and began trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market. We currently trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. We operate under the acronym RGP, branding for our operating entity name of Resources Global Professionals.

Our business model combines the client service orientation and commitment to quality from our legacy as part of a Big Four accounting firm with the entrepreneurial culture of an innovative, dynamic company. We are positioned to take advantage of what we believe are two continuing trends in the outsourced professional services industry: global demand for flexible, outsourced professional services by corporate clients and highly-experienced professionals interested in working in a non-traditional professional services firm. We believe our business model allows us to simultaneously offer challenging yet flexible career opportunities to attract well qualified, experienced professionals and to attract clients with enterprise-wide, global consulting needs.

As of May 30, 2015, we employed or contracted with 2,516 consultants serving clients. Our consultants have professional experience in a wide range of industries and functional areas and tend to be in the latter third of their careers, many with advanced professional degrees or designations. We offer our consultants careers that combine the flexibility of project-based consulting work with many of the advantages of working for a traditional professional services firm.

3

Table of Contents

We served a diverse base of over 1,700 clients during fiscal 2015, ranging from large multinational corporations to mid-sized companies to small entrepreneurial entities, in a broad range of industries. As of May 30, 2015, we served our clients from 45 offices in the United States and from 23 offices within 19 countries abroad.

Our offices serve our multinational clients throughout the world with a client focus rather than from a regional/office perspective. To build our presence and ability to serve multinational clients, we have established new RGP offices in countries outside of the United States and completed a number of acquisitions prior to fiscal 2015 (including acquisitions in Australia, India, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom).

Revenue from the Company’s major geographic areas was as follows (in thousands):

See Note 14 — Segment Information and Enterprise Reporting — to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the Company’s domestic and international operations and Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors — Our ability to serve clients internationally is integral to our strategy and our international activities expose us to additional operational challenges that we might not otherwise face” for information regarding the risks attendant to our international operations.

We believe our distinctive culture is a valuable asset and is, in large part, due to our management team, which has extensive experience in the professional services industry. Most of our senior management and office managing directors have Big Four, management consulting and/or Fortune 500 experience and an equity interest in the Company. This team has created a culture of professionalism and a client service orientation that we believe fosters in our consultants a feeling of personal responsibility for, and pride in, client projects and enables us to deliver high-quality service and results to our clients.

Industry Background

Changing Market for Project- or Initiative-Based Professional Services

RGP’s services cover a range of professional areas. The market for professional services is broad and fragmented and independent data on the size of the market is not readily available. We believe that companies may be more willing to choose alternatives to traditional professional service providers because of evolving economic competitive pressure and significant increases in government-led regulatory requirements, such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. We believe RGP is positioned as a viable alternative to traditional accounting, consulting and law firms in numerous instances because, by using project consultants, companies can:

Typically, companies use a variety of alternatives to fill their project needs. Companies outsource entire projects to consulting firms which provides them access to the expertise of the firm but often entails significant cost and less management control of the project. Companies also supplement their internal resources with employees from the Big Four accounting firms or other traditional professional services firms. Companies use temporary employees from traditional and Internet-based staffing firms, although these employees may be less experienced or less qualified than employees from professional services firms. Finally, some companies rely solely on their own employees who may lack the requisite time, experience or skills.

4

Table of Contents

Supply of Project Consultants

Based on discussions with our consultants, we believe that the number of professionals seeking to work on a project basis has historically increased due to a desire for:

The employment alternatives available to professionals may fulfill some, but not all, of an individual’s career objectives. A professional working for a Big Four firm or a consulting firm may receive challenging assignments and training, but may encounter a career path with less choice and less flexible hours, extensive travel and limited control over work engagements. Alternatively, a professional who works as an independent contractor faces the ongoing task of sourcing assignments and significant administrative burdens.

Resources Global Professionals’ Solution

We believe that RGP is positioned to capitalize on the confluence of the industry trends described above. We believe, based on discussions with our clients, that RGP provides high-quality services to clients seeking project professionals because we are able to combine all of the following:

Resources Global Professionals’ Strategy

Our Business Strategy

We are dedicated to serving our clients with highly qualified and experienced professionals in support of projects and initiatives in the areas of accounting; finance; corporate governance, risk and compliance management; corporate advisory, strategic communications and restructuring; information management; human capital; supply chain management; healthcare solutions; and legal and regulatory. Our objective is to be the leading provider of these project-based professional services. We have developed the following business strategies to achieve this objective:

5

Table of Contents

Our Growth Strategy

Since inception, our growth has been primarily organic rather than via acquisition. We believe that we have significant opportunity for continued strong organic growth in our core business as the global economy strengthens and economic uncertainties decrease and that, in addition, we can grow opportunistically through strategic acquisitions. In both our core and acquired businesses, key elements of our growth strategy include:

Consultants

We believe that an important component of our success has been our highly qualified and experienced consultants. As of May 30, 2015, we employed or contracted with 2,516 consultants engaged with clients. Our consultants have professional

6

Table of Contents

experience in a wide range of industries and functional areas. We provide our consultants with challenging work assignments, competitive compensation and benefits, and continuing education and training opportunities, while offering more choice concerning work schedules and more control over choosing client engagements.

Almost all of our consultants in the United States are employees of RGP. We typically pay each consultant an hourly rate for each consulting hour worked and for certain administrative time and overtime premiums, and offer benefits, including: paid time off and holidays; a discretionary bonus program; group medical and dental programs, each with an approximate 30-50% contribution by the consultant; a basic term life insurance program; a 401(k) retirement plan with a discretionary company match; and professional development and career training. Typically, a consultant must work a threshold number of hours to be eligible for all of these benefits. In addition, we offer our consultants the ability to participate in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which enables them to purchase shares of the Company’s stock at a discount. We intend to maintain competitive compensation and benefit programs.

Internationally, our consultants are a blend of employees and independent contractors. Independent contractor arrangements are more common abroad than in the United States due to the labor laws, tax regulations and customs of the international markets we serve. A few international practices also utilize a partial “bench model” that is, certain consultants are paid a weekly salary rather than for each consulting hour worked with bonus eligibility based upon utilization.

Clients

We provide our services and solutions to a diverse client base in a broad range of industries. In fiscal 2015, we served over 1,700 clients from offices located in 20 countries. Our revenues are not concentrated with any particular client or within any particular industry. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue for the years ended May 30, 2015, May 31, 2014 and May 25, 2013, and in fiscal 2015, our 10 largest clients accounted for approximately 16% of our revenues.

The clients listed below represent the multinational and industry diversity of our client base in fiscal 2015.

Services and Products

RGP was founded with a business model and operating philosophy rooted in the support of client-led projects and consulting initiatives. Partnering with business leaders, we help clients implement internal initiatives. Often, we deliver our services to clients across multiple functional areas of expertise with consultants from several disciplines working on the same project. Our areas of core competency include: finance and accounting; information management; human capital; corporate advisory, strategic communications and restructuring services; legal and regulatory; governance, risk and compliance; supply chain management and healthcare solutions.

Finance & Accounting

RGP’s Finance and Accounting services encompass accounting operations, financial reporting, internal controls, financial analyses and business transactions. Clients utilize our services to bring accomplished talent to bear on internally driven change initiatives or externally mandated change, such as required Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) implementations, as

7

Table of Contents

well as day-to-day operational issues. We provide specialized skills and then transfer knowledge to clients in order to help them leverage their own personnel. RGP specializes in providing customized solutions to our clients’ most pressing business problems, through project management and providing access to full project teams for a specific initiative; but our scalability and global reach also put us in the ideal position to help organizations manage peak workload periods or add specific skill sets to ongoing client projects.

Our Finance and Accounting core competencies include:

Sample Engagement — Revenue Recognition Assessment: Faced with the complexities of implementing the FASB’s new revenue recognition guidance, Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, a consumer products Fortune 500 client with world-wide operations engaged RGP to perform an assessment of its accounting policies and procedures, revenue reporting, and other related processes, including:

8

Table of Contents

Sample Engagement — Merger of Two Firms to Create a Fortune 50 Company: When a global leader in financial services entered into an agreement to merge with another large global financial services company, RGP partnered with the integration team to ensure a successful merger. Our team of 50 professionals was tasked with:

Sample Engagement — Financial Statement Carve-Out: After announcing its intention to divest one of its business units, our client, a provider of personal computer accessories, needed to report the business unit as a discontinued operation for all accounting periods presented in its next public filing, an annual report on Form 10-K, as well as subsequent quarterly and annual SEC filings until completion of the sale. To help with marketing the business unit, the client also needed to prepare audited financial statements for the business unit’s current and previous two years of operations on a stand-alone basis. The company had never prepared separate financial statements for this business unit and did not have sufficient capacity or knowledge within its financial reporting resources to do so. We completed the required financial statements, including:

Sitrick Brincko Group

Sitrick Brincko Group (“Sitrick”) offers a unique combination of strategic counsel, tactical execution, and organizational and logistical support critical to both public and private companies and high profile individuals, both in the United States and overseas. Its extensive experience in strategic, corporate, financial and transactional communications as well as general management, finance, strategic planning, manufacturing and distribution have made Sitrick a partner to boards of directors and management engaged in acquisitions, proxy fights, litigation, management changes, government inquisitions, corporate reorganizations or when repositioning, redirecting or unwinding a business.

Combined with RGP’s broad capabilities and global footprint, Sitrick offers a wide variety of services to clients, including:

9

Table of Contents

Sample Engagement — Financial Restructuring: Sitrick, working with the board of directors, management and other advisors, developed and implemented the strategic communications for the successful restructuring and change in management of a large beverage distributor. This was a cross-border engagement, with the company based in Poland, new investors and management based in Russia and the restructuring in the United States.

Sample Engagement — Litigation Support: Sitrick was retained by a technology company to provide litigation support for a patent infringement suit the company was about to file against a much larger and better known competitor. Sitrick developed a communications strategy that resulted in the case being settled within two days of its filing.

Sample Engagement — Proxy Contest: Sitrick provided strategic communications counsel in a proxy contest launched against an Israeli company where a hedge fund was trying to take control of the board of directors. The company successfully maintained control of the board of directors.

Information Management

RGP’s Information Management practice provides planning and execution services in four primary areas: Program & Project Management; Business & Technology Integration; Data Strategy & Management; and IT Strategy & Advisory. By focusing on the initiative as defined by our clients, RGP can provide continuity of service from the creation or expansion of an overall IT strategy through post-implementation support. In addition to these services, we have expertise in a variety of technology solutions: Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) systems; strategic “front-of-the-house systems” human resources (“HR”) information systems; supply chain management systems; core finance and accounting systems; audit compliance systems; and financial reporting, planning and consolidation systems.

The following are examples of the core competencies of our Information Management practice:

Program & Project Management

Business & Technology Integration

Data Strategy & Management

IT Strategy & Advisory

10

Table of Contents

Sample Engagement — Integration and Optimization of Significant Acquisition: A large publicly-traded entertainment conglomerate acquired a regional entity that provided home security and monitoring. Our client needed to integrate its existing ordering, billing, supply chain and installation systems with the acquired entity’s systems in order to sell and deliver these new capabilities across its current and prospective customer base. Working with the client’s implementation team, RGP’s activities included:

Sample Engagement — BI Strategy/Implementation: A large state utility company required assistance in restarting and reenergizing a stalled enterprise-wide BI initiative focused on increasing overall data definition/management, analysis and reporting to support enterprise-wide business decision making. The RGP engagement consisted of:

Sample Engagement — Cyber Security Operations and Analysis Center (“CSOAC”) Design and Technology Selection: A United States federal electric power agency engaged RGP to design a cyber-security function to identify threats, weaknesses and vulnerabilities and to help prevent and mitigate attacks on its networks and systems. The CSOAC will focus on real time or near real time feed of security information from intrusion detection systems, firewalls and operating systems, and near real time vulnerability and configuration scans, including event correlation and analysis to prevent current and future cyber-security attacks. RGP activities included:

Sample Engagement — System Redesign and Reimplementation: After spending $100 million on a large consulting firm’s unsuccessful implementation of SAP software, our client, a privately-held manufacturer and exporter of dairy products, engaged us to lead a system review, redesign and reimplementation initiative. As the Chief Information Officer’s strategic IT partner, RGP was responsible for activities such as:

11

Table of Contents

Sample Engagement — Data Analytics PMO: RGP consultants assisted our client with the launch of a Data Analytics Program to better capitalize upon its leading data/analytics processes. The use of data to drive operating decisions has long been a fundamental element behind our client’s competitive positioning and an ongoing source of competitive advantage. Their data infrastructure was scaled up in 2014 to accommodate the increasing demand for new data in their enterprise data platform. The Data Analytics Program has enabled better decision making on pricing, customer segmentation, marketing and yield management. The RGP engagement consisted of:

Human Capital

RGP’s Human Capital consultants apply project-management and business analysis skills to help solve the people aspects of business problems. The two primary areas of focus of our human capital practice are change management/business transformation and HR operations. To achieve the desired business outcome, our Human Capital professionals work with client teams to help drive their change management initiatives to successful completion. We help our clients with the people challenges of acquisitions, mergers, downsizing, reorganizations, system implementations or legislative requirements (Sarbanes, Basel II, HIPAA, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, etc.). Our Human Capital professionals also have HR operations and technology skills that provide clients with the means to achieve their initiatives. Our Human Capital core competencies revolve around:

Organizational Development and Effectiveness

HR Technology

HR Operations

12

Table of Contents

Sample Engagement — Organizational Design: A Fortune 500 life insurance company wanted to design a new organizational and operating model to provide more efficient, “silo-free” operations. Partnering with RGP, our consultants provided subject-matter expertise on organizational design and an operating model development approach, process and content. Specifically, RGP supported the initiative by:

Sample Engagement — Implementation of HR system: A Fortune 500 provider of electronic products and services selected Workday as their world-wide HR system in order to improve HR workload and processes. The new system would replace the existing, manually intensive and inefficient spreadsheet based process, allowing HR management to focus on analysis rather than data development and reconciliation. RGP lead the initiative in the region by developing and implementing a deployment plan and assessing the impact and success of the software usage upon completion.

Sample Engagement — Change Management for ERP Implementation: Following a global retailer’s highly customized and ineffective Oracle R12 Projects Module implementation, RGP developed, led and helped execute the change management program related to the system’s re-implementation and upgrade. We worked alongside the client’s internal project manager and a system integration firm to ensure the re-implementation’s sustainable success.

Legal & Regulatory

RGP Legal helps clients drive and execute their legal, risk management and regulatory initiatives. Our consultants (comprised of attorneys, compliance professionals, paralegals and contract managers) have significant experience working at the nation’s top law firms and companies. RGP Legal provides general counsel access to exceptional talent on an agile basis for the exact subject-matter knowledge and business perspective required for a particular task or workflow. Generally, RGP Legal is engaged to work directly with in-house counsel or with traditional outside counsel for projects or pieces of “unbundled” work. Examples of our core competencies include:

Commercial Transactions

Compliance Initiatives

Law Department Operations

13

Table of Contents

Litigation Support

Sample Engagement — Workflow Allocation and Unbundling: A publicly traded financial services company embarked on a significant acquisition effort, only to have the project sidelined by an antitrust review by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”). After engaging outside counsel to lead a Hart-Scott-Rodino filing and strategy negotiations, the client determined it needed an agile, lower-cost partner to support a massive second level review.

RGP was engaged to provide 15 experienced attorneys to prepare for the DOJ’s review. Our work involved significant analysis of business development, marketing and attorney-client documentation. Consultants’ responsibilities included technology-assisted review, project management, report writing and analytics.

Sample Engagement — Development and Implementation of Knowledge Management Tool: Our client, a multi-million dollar asset management firm, lacked an efficient tool for handling information related to their investment/private equity funds. As a result, in-house attorneys often started deals without the benefit of knowledge gleaned from previously negotiated agreements. Documents were difficult to locate, important deal information was lost, and providing information to regulators and third parties was often time consuming and inefficient.

Leveraging the expertise of one of our attorney consultants, a former general counsel for a financial services company with extensive technology expertise, RGP designed a knowledge management tool to increase efficiencies in the client’s deal flow and archiving process. RGP crafted a simple searchable database tool that provided an effective way to access, retrieve, archive and leverage important deal information. RGP also conducted a gap analysis on missing deal documents and developed training to ensure attorney buy-in and acceptance.

Sample Engagement — Unbundling Support for M&A Activity: Our client, a world leader in the in-flight entertainment and communication solutions business, turned to RGP for supplemental support and expertise in connection with a buy-side acquisition. The client’s general counsel engaged us to supplement the bandwidth of the in-house team. Our consultants drove the diligence process, collaborated extensively with internal business units and, working closely with lead outside counsel who focused on the strategy and structure of the deal, assisted in the drafting of deal documents. By multi-sourcing the work needed to support the transaction, the client reduced its legal spend on the deal significantly.

Sample Engagement — Unbundling Fact Finding Activities in Class Action Litigation: Challenged with the process of managing a massive wage and hour class action lawsuit, our client, a multinational publicly-traded food service chain, engaged RGP to provide a seasoned team of attorneys to conduct employee interviews critical to revealing issues important in responding to the class certification process.

After conducting the interviews, our consultants teamed with the client and outside counsel to determine the merit and relevancy of each declaration. The project was completed rapidly over a two-week period and the client reported significant cost savings versus traditional solutions.

Supply Chain Management

RGP’s Supply Chain Management practice assists clients in the planning, execution, maintenance and troubleshooting of complex supply chain systems and processes. Our consultants work as part of client teams to reduce the total cost of ownership, improve business performance and produce results. Specifically, our core competencies include:

Supply Chain Strategy and Advisory

14

Table of Contents

Procurement and Supplier Management

Logistics and Materials Management

Supply Chain Planning and Forecasting

Manufacturing and Operations

Supply Chain Risk and Compliance

Sample Engagement — Vendor Risk Management Software Selection and Monitoring: A major publicly-traded financial services company wanted to effectively and proactively identify and manage previously unaddressed significant vendor risks. Working collaboratively, a cross-functional team of client personnel and RGP consultants developed a comprehensive vendor performance monitoring function. The team identified three key project work streams: 1) establishment of solutions to support and maintain the client’s third party vendor management processes, systems, standards and metrics tracking; 2) development of user guides and materials and training on the selected software tool to support the function; 3) development and support of the day to day processes to ensure compliance with regulations, guidelines and firm requirements. Specifically, RGP was responsible for:

15

Table of Contents

Sample Engagement — Procure-to-Pay Assessment: A large multinational consumer electronic company needed assistance in conducting an assessment of its Procure-to-Pay process to review performance and to identify recommendations to fill gaps. The client had two primary goals: 1) to assess the current state; and 2) to provide insights on the future state, with comparison to leading practices and a high-level implementation roadmap. RGP, acting in project management and business analyst roles, was tasked with:

Sample Engagement — Strategic Sourcing: Using the end-to-end strategic sourcing/category excellence methodology, our consultants helped a large multinational transportation company develop an approach and methodology to achieve multi-million dollar cost savings. Specifically, RGP helped by:

Sample Engagement — Conflict Minerals Compliance: For a large, global technology component manufacturer, RGP helped address its complex global supply chain related to compliance requirements adopted by the SEC pursuant to Dodd Frank Section 1502. RGP’s Conflict Minerals compliance team applied their deep functional experience in supply chain management and risk assessment and engaged with the client’s designated team to design and deploy a customized end-to-end Conflict Minerals compliance program, including Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (“RCOI”) and due diligence process design. RGP project activities included:

Governance, Risk and Compliance (“GRC”): Corporate Governance, Risk Management, Internal Audit and Compliance Services

RGP’s GRC practice assists clients with a variety of governance, risk management, internal audit and compliance initiatives. The professionals in our GRC practice have experience in operations, controllership and internal and external audit and serve our clients in any number of roles required — from program manager to team member. In addition to helping clients worldwide in the areas of audit, risk and compliance, we are able to draw on RGP’s other practice areas to bring the required business expertise to the engagement. Our GRC core competencies include:

Enterprise Risk Management

16

Table of Contents

Contract and Regulatory Compliance Audits

Sox and Internal Controls

Operational and IT Audits

Sample Engagement — Internal Audit Co-Sourcing and Internal Control Framework: A global insurance provider engaged RGP to provide co-sourced internal audit functions as well as to implement their Internal Control Framework (“ICF”). After identifying high risk projects and processes in the IT function, we assisted with the following deliverables:

For the ICF project, RGP consultants were deployed in the US and internationally to document and review accounting and IT processes and controls and to provide recommendations for improvement.

Sample Engagement — Banking Compliance Support: Our client, a Fortune 500 financial services company, wanted to develop and implement a more formal approach to the assessment of the company’s regulatory risk profile. Previously, decisions on assessment of regulatory risk were more of an intuitive exercise than a formalized methodology. To help the client evolve its process, RGP was responsible for the entire project, including:

The final deliverable allowed bank management to better allocate limited resources to maximize coverage of critical compliance issues using the quantifiable basis of risk assessment. Ultimately, RGP consultants deployed the methodology through other facets of the company’s operation, including property/casualty and life insurance and investment management.

Sample Engagement — Audit IT Security Controls: The CIO of a global healthcare company headquartered in Europe planned a series of global IT audits. Working as a part of a client team, RGP was responsible for an assessment of the maturity of the IT

17

Table of Contents

security organization, implementation of the IT security governance model, conducting a series of interviews with top management stakeholders in the IT organization, and transfer of knowledge on audit techniques.

Sample Engagement — Global Sarbanes Implementation: The CFO of a privately-held international manufacturer of building products wanted to help enhance the company’s ability to compete for capital by becoming Sarbanes compliant.

RGP implemented Sarbanes at over 100 sites across 14 countries. Our international team of 32 consultants served as the client’s lead IT project manager, Sarbanes experts and team leads to ensure finance, operations and IT compliance with initial Sarbanes’ requirements and to provide the education and knowledge transfer to help ensure future compliance. Specific duties included: planning, scheduling, documentation, segregation of duties analysis, end-user computing analysis, testing, and remediation.

Sample Engagement — Post Merger Integration: A United States based pharmaceutical company with global operations acquired an India-based pharmaceutical developer and manufacturer with a strong product pipeline focused on niche first-to-file and first-to-market products. The client faced a significant challenge since the acquired company lacked internal controls and violated numerous regulatory standards.

The client engaged RGP to ensure full compliance of the acquired company with standards applicable to the parent company in the United States from finance and accounting, operational, ethical and governance standpoints. Tasks included post-merger integration execution, a “forensic audit” of internal controls and identification of significant internal control deficiencies.

policyIQ

RGP’s policyIQ is our proprietary cloud-based GRC software application, enabling the focused management of a wide range of GRC processes, including Risk Assessments, Sarbanes Compliance, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Policy and Procedure Management, Internal Audit Programs, Anti-Corruption Compliance and Conflict Minerals Compliance. PolicyIQ can be implemented quickly to manage a specific aspect of an overall GRC program, or easily scaled to integrate multiple initiatives, allowing the organization to realize greater efficiency. Additionally, our engagement teams often utilize policyIQ as a tool to assist in the efficient collection, storing and review of project workpapers, deliverables and other critical project content. Business problems that our clients have used policyIQ to resolve include:

Sample Engagement — Fresh Approach to Sarbanes Compliance: For a publicly traded pharmaceutical company in acquisition mode, RGP was engaged to assist with a fresh approach to their Sarbanes compliance program. Using policyIQ, our consulting team was able to:

18

Table of Contents

Operations

We generally provide our professional services to clients at a local level, with the oversight of our regional managing directors and consultation of our corporate management team. The managing director, client service director(s) and recruiting director(s) in each office are responsible for initiating client relationships, identifying consultants specifically skilled to perform client projects, ensuring client and consultant satisfaction throughout engagements and maintaining client relationships post-engagement. Throughout this process, the corporate management team and regional managing directors are available to consult with the managing director with respect to client services.

Our offices operate in an entrepreneurial manner. The managing directors of our offices are given significant autonomy in the daily operations of their respective offices, and are responsible for overall guidance and supervision, budgeting and forecasting, sales and marketing, pricing and hiring within their office. We believe that a substantial portion of the buying decisions made by our clients are made on a local or regional basis and that our offices most often compete with other professional services providers on a local or regional basis. Because our managing directors are in the best position to understand the local and regional outsourced professional services market and because clients often prefer local relationships, we believe that a decentralized operating environment maximizes operating performance and contributes to employee and client satisfaction.

We believe that our ability to deliver professional services successfully to clients is dependent on our managing directors working together as a collegial and collaborative team, at times working jointly on client projects. To build a sense of team effort and increase camaraderie among our managing directors, we have an incentive program for our office management that awards annual bonuses based on both the performance of the Company and the performance of the individual’s particular office and the individual. We also share across the Company the best and most effective practices of our highest achieving offices and use this as an introductory tool with new managing directors. New managing directors also spend time with another practice, partnering with experienced managing directors and other senior management personnel. This allows the veteran managing directors to share their success stories, foster the culture of the Company with new managing directors and review specific client and consultant development programs. We believe these team-based practices enable us to better serve clients who prefer a centrally organized service approach.

From our corporate headquarters in Irvine, California, we provide centralized administrative, marketing, finance, HR, IT, legal and real estate support. Our financial reporting is also centralized in our corporate service center. This center handles invoicing, accounts payable and collections, and administers HR services including employee compensation and benefits administration for North American offices. We also have a business support operations center in our Utrecht, Netherlands office to provide centralized finance, HR, IT, payroll and legal support to our European offices. In addition, in North America, we have a corporate networked IT platform with centralized financial reporting capabilities and a front office client management system. These centralized functions minimize the administrative burdens on our office management and allow them to spend more time focused on client and consultant development.

Business Development

Our business development initiatives are composed of:

Our business development efforts are driven by the networking and sales efforts of our management. In addition, the local office managing directors are assisted by management professionals focused on business development efforts on a national basis based on firm-wide and industry-focused initiatives. These business development professionals, teamed with the managing director

19

Table of Contents

and client service teams, are responsible for initiating and fostering relationships with the senior management and decision makers of our targeted client companies. These local efforts are supplemented with national marketing assistance. We believe that these efforts have been effective in generating incremental revenues from existing clients and developing new client relationships.

Our brand marketing initiatives help develop RGP’s image in the markets we serve. Our brand is reinforced by our professionally designed website, television, print, radio and online advertising, direct marketing, seminars, initiative-oriented brochures, social media and public relations efforts. We believe that our branding initiatives, coupled with our high-quality client service, help to differentiate us from our competitors and to establish RGP as a credible and reputable global professional services firm.

Competition

We operate in a competitive, fragmented market and compete for clients and consultants with a variety of organizations that offer similar services. Our principal competitors include:

We compete for clients on the basis of the quality of professionals, the timely availability of professionals with requisite skills, the scope and price of services, and the geographic reach of services. We believe that our attractive value proposition, consisting of our highly qualified consultants, relationship-oriented approach and professional culture, enables us to differentiate ourselves from our competitors. Although we believe we compete favorably with our competitors, many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources, generate greater revenues and have greater name recognition than we do.

Employees

As of May 30, 2015, we had a total of 3,258 employees, including 742 corporate and local office employees and 2,516 consultants. Our employees are not covered by any collective bargaining agreements.

Available Information

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 17101 Armstrong Avenue, Irvine, California 92614. The Company’s telephone number is (714) 430-6400 and its website address is http://www.rgp.com. The information set forth in the website does not constitute part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We file our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the SEC electronically. These reports are maintained on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

A free copy of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports may be obtained on our website at http://www.rgp.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports with the SEC.

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making a decision to buy shares of our common stock. The order of the risks is not an indication of their relative weight or importance. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us but do represent those risks and uncertainties that we believe are material to us. Additional risks and

20

Table of Contents

uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also adversely impact and impair our business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you might lose all or part of your investment. When determining whether to buy our common stock, you should also refer to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our financial statements and the related notes.

A future economic downturn or change in the use of outsourced professional services consultants could adversely affect our business.

While we believe general economic conditions continue to improve in most parts of the world, there continues to be some uncertainty regarding general economic conditions within some regions and countries in which we operate, leading to reluctance on the part of some multinational companies to spend on discretionary projects. Deterioration of or increased uncertainty related to the global economy or tightening credit markets could result in a reduction in the demand for our services and adversely affect our business in the future. In addition, the use of professional services consultants on a project-by-project basis could decline for non-economic reasons. In the event of a reduction in the demand for our consultants, our financial results would suffer.

Economic deterioration at one or more of our clients may also affect our allowance for doubtful accounts. Our estimate of losses resulting from our clients’ failure to make required payments for services rendered has historically been within our expectations and the provisions established. However, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of our clients could cause unfavorable trends in receivable collections and cash flows and additional allowances may be required. These additional allowances could materially affect the Company’s future financial results.

In addition, we are required to periodically, but at least annually, assess the recoverability of certain assets, including deferred tax assets and goodwill. Softening of the United States economy and international economies could adversely affect our evaluation of the recoverability of deferred tax assets, requiring us to record additional tax valuation allowances. Our assessment of impairment of goodwill is currently based upon comparing our market capitalization to our net book value. Therefore, a significant downturn in the future market value of our stock could potentially result in impairment reductions of goodwill and such an adjustment could materially affect the Company’s future financial results and financial condition.

The market for professional services is highly competitive, and if we are unable to compete effectively against our competitors, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

We operate in a competitive, fragmented market, and we compete for clients and consultants with a variety of organizations that offer similar services. The competition is likely to increase in the future due to the expected growth of the market and the relatively few barriers to entry. Our principal competitors include:

We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively against existing or future competitors. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources, greater revenues and greater name recognition, which may afford them an advantage in attracting and retaining clients and consultants and in offering pricing concessions. Some of our competitors in certain markets do not provide medical and other benefits to their consultants, thereby allowing them to potentially charge lower rates to clients. In addition, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to changes in companies’ needs and developments in the professional services industry.

21

Table of Contents

Our business depends upon our ability to secure new projects from clients and, therefore, we could be adversely affected if we fail to do so.

We do not have long-term agreements with our clients for the provision of services and our clients may terminate engagements with us at any time. The success of our business is dependent on our ability to secure new projects from clients. For example, if we are unable to secure new client projects because of improvements in our competitors’ service offerings, or because of a change in government regulatory requirements, or because of an economic downturn decreasing the demand for outsourced professional services, our business is likely to be materially adversely affected. New impediments to our ability to secure projects from clients may develop over time, such as the increasing use by large clients of in-house procurement groups that manage their relationship with service providers.

We may be legally liable for damages resulting from the performance of projects by our consultants or for our clients’ mistreatment of our consultants.

Many of our engagements with our clients involve projects that are critical to our clients’ businesses. If we fail to meet our contractual obligations, we could be subject to legal liability or damage to our reputation, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. While we are not currently subject to any client-related legal claims which we believe are material, it remains possible, because of the nature of our business, that we may be involved in litigation in the future that could materially affect our future financial results. Claims brought against us could have a serious negative effect on our reputation and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because we are in the business of placing our consultants in the workplaces of other companies, we are subject to possible claims by our consultants alleging discrimination, sexual harassment, negligence and other similar activities by our clients. We may also be subject to similar claims from our clients based on activities by our consultants. The cost of defending such claims, even if groundless, could be substantial and the associated negative publicity could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain consultants and clients.

We may not be able to grow our business, manage our growth or sustain our current business.

Historically, we have grown by opening new offices and by increasing the volume of services provided through existing offices. Since the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we have had difficulty sustaining consistent revenue growth either quarter-over-quarter or in sequential quarters. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or expand our market presence in our current locations or to successfully enter other markets or locations. Our ability to continue to grow our business will depend upon an improving global economy and a number of factors, including our ability to:

Even if we are able to resume more rapid growth in our revenue, the growth will result in new and increased responsibilities for our management as well as increased demands on our internal systems, procedures and controls, and our administrative, financial, marketing and other resources. For instance, a limited number of clients are requesting that certain engagements be of a fixed fee nature rather than our traditional hourly time and materials approach, thus shifting a portion of the burden of financial risk and monitoring to us. Failure to adequately respond to these new responsibilities and demands may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

22

Table of Contents

Our ability to serve clients internationally is integral to our strategy and our international activities expose us to additional operational challenges that we might not otherwise face.

Our international activities require us to confront and manage a number of risks and expenses that we would not face if we conducted our operations solely in the United States. Any of these risks or expenses could cause a material negative effect on our operating results. These risks and expenses include:

We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, companies, and these acquisitions could disrupt our business.

We have acquired several companies and we may continue to acquire companies in the future. Entering into an acquisition entails many risks, any of which could harm our business, including:

We must provide our clients with highly qualified and experienced consultants, and the loss of a significant number of our consultants, or an inability to attract and retain new consultants, could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our business involves the delivery of professional services, and our success depends on our ability to provide our clients with highly qualified and experienced consultants who possess the skills and experience necessary to satisfy their needs. At various times, such professionals can be in great demand, particularly in certain geographic areas or if they have specific skill sets. Our ability to attract and retain consultants with the requisite experience and skills depends on several factors including, but not limited to, our ability to:

23

Table of Contents

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in accomplishing any of these factors and, even if we are, we cannot assure that we will be successful in attracting and retaining the number of highly qualified and experienced consultants necessary to maintain and grow our business.

Decreased effectiveness of equity compensation could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain employees.

We have historically used stock options as a component of our employee compensation program in order to align employees’ interests with the interests of our stockholders, encourage employee retention and provide competitive compensation packages. A significant portion of our options outstanding awarded prior to fiscal 2012 are priced at more than the current per share market value of our stock, limiting the grants from those years as a significant incentive to retain employees.

Our computer hardware and software and telecommunications systems are susceptible to damage, breach or interruption.

The management of our business is aided by the uninterrupted operation of our computer and telecommunication systems. These systems are vulnerable to security breaches, natural disasters or other catastrophic events, computer viruses, or other interruptions or damage stemming from power outages, equipment failure or unintended usage by employees. In particular, our employees may have access or exposure to personally identifiable or otherwise confidential information and customer data and systems, the misuse of which could result in legal liability. In addition, we rely on information technology systems to process, transmit and store electronic information and to communicate among our locations around the world and with our clients, partners and consultants. The breadth and complexity of this infrastructure increases the potential risk of security breaches. Security breaches, including cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions by computer hackers, foreign governments, cyber terrorists or others with grievances against the industry in which we operate or us in particular, may disable or damage the proper functioning of our networks and systems. It is possible that our security controls over personal and other data may not prevent unauthorized access to, or destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of personally identifiable or other proprietary, confidential, sensitive or valuable information of ours or others; this access could lead to potential unauthorized disclosure of confidential Company or client information that others could use to compete against us or for other disruptive, destructive or harmful purposes and outcomes. Any such disclosure or damage to our networks and systems could subject us to third party claims against us and reputational harm. If these events occur, our ability to attract new clients may be impaired or we may be subjected to damages or penalties. In addition, system-wide or local failures of these information technology systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our cash and short-term investments are subject to economic risk.

The Company invests its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in foreign and domestic bank deposits, money market funds, commercial paper and certificates of deposit. Certain of these investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks. In the event these risks caused a decline in value of any of the Company’s investments, it could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition.

Our business could suffer if we lose the services of one or more key members of our senior management.

Our future success depends upon the continued employment of our senior management team. The unforeseen departure of one or more key members of our senior management team could significantly disrupt our operations.

Our quarterly financial results may be subject to significant fluctuations that may increase the volatility of our stock price.

Our results of operations could vary significantly from quarter to quarter. Factors that could affect our quarterly operating results include:

24

Table of Contents

Due to these factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not meaningful indicators of future performance. It is possible that in some future periods, our results of operations may be below the expectations of investors. If this occurs, the price of our common stock could decline.

If our internal control over financial reporting does not comply with the requirements of Sarbanes, our business and stock price could be adversely affected.

Section 404 of Sarbanes requires us to evaluate periodically the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and to include a management report assessing the effectiveness of our internal controls as of the end of each fiscal year. Our management report on internal controls is contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Section 404 also requires our independent registered public accountant to report on our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management does not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors or acts of fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, involving us have been, or will be, detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can also be circumvented by individual acts of a person, or by collusion among two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot assure you that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to errors or fraudulent acts may occur and not be detected.

Although our management has determined, and our independent registered public accountant has attested, that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 30, 2015, we cannot assure you that we or our independent registered public accountant will not identify a material weakness in our internal controls in the future. A material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting may require management and our independent registered public accountant to evaluate our internal

25

Table of Contents

controls as ineffective. If our internal control over financial reporting is not considered adequate, we may experience a loss of public confidence, which could have an adverse effect on our business and our stock price. Additionally, if our internal control over financial reporting otherwise fails to comply with the requirements of Sarbanes, our business and stock price could be adversely affected.

We may be subject to laws and regulations that impose difficult and costly compliance requirements and subject us to potential liability and the loss of clients.

In connection with providing services to clients in certain regulated industries, such as the gaming and energy industries, we are subject to industry-specific regulations, including licensing and reporting requirements. Complying with these requirements is costly and, if we fail to comply, we could be prevented from rendering services to clients in those industries in the future. Additionally, changes in these requirements, or in other laws applicable to us, in the future could increase our costs of compliance.

In addition, we may face challenges from certain state regulatory bodies governing the provision of certain professional services, like legal services or audit services. The imposition of such regulations could require additional financial and operational burdens on our business.

It may be difficult for a third party to acquire the Company, and this could depress our stock price.

Delaware corporate law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could delay, defer or prevent a change of control of the Company or our management. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. As a result, these provisions could limit the price that future investors are willing to pay for your shares. These provisions:

We are required to recognize compensation expense related to employee stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. There is no assurance that the expense that we are required to recognize measures accurately the value of our share-based payment awards and the recognition of this expense could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

We measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based compensation based on estimated values. Thus, our operating results contain a non-cash charge for stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and our

26

Table of Contents

employee stock purchase plan. In general, accounting guidance requires the use of an option-pricing model to determine the value of share-based payment awards. This determination of value is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because our employee stock options have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion the existing valuation models may not provide an accurate measure of the value of our employee stock options. Although the value of employee stock options is determined using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.

We may be unable to or elect not to pay our quarterly dividend payment.

The Company pays a regular quarterly dividend, subject to quarterly board of director approval. The payment of, or continuation of, the quarterly dividend is at the discretion of our board of directors and is dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, tax treatment of dividends in the United States, potential future contractual restrictions contained in credit agreements and other agreements and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. We can give no assurance that dividends will be declared and paid in the future. The failure to pay the quarterly dividend or the discontinuance of the quarterly dividend could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, including our brand name. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, the value of such rights may diminish and our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We believe that establishing, maintaining and enhancing the RGP and Resources Global Professionals brand name is essential to our business. We have applied for United States and foreign registrations on these service marks. We have previously obtained United States registrations on our Resources Connection service mark and puzzle piece logo, Registration No. 2,516,522 registered December 11, 2001; No. 2,524,226 registered January 1, 2002; and No. 2,613,873, registered September 3, 2002, as well as certain foreign registrations. On March 29, 2013, we filed a United States trademark application for our RGP service mark and puzzle piece logo, Serial No. 85/890,836 as well as United States trademark applications on our RGP service mark, puzzle piece and tag line, Serial No. 85/890,838; our RGP Healthcare service mark and puzzle piece logo, Serial No. 85/890,839; our RGP Legal service mark and puzzle piece logo, Serial No. 85/890,843; and our RGP Search service mark and puzzle piece logo, Serial No. 85/890,845. We received approval of these applications and registration was granted as of December 2, 2014.

We had been aware from time to time of other companies using the name “Resources Connection” or some variation thereof and this contributed to our decision to adopt the operating company name of Resources Global Professionals. We obtained United States registration on our Resources Global Professionals service mark, Registration No. 3,298,841 registered September 25, 2007. However, our rights to this service mark are not currently protected in some of our foreign registrations, and there is no guarantee that any of our pending applications for such registration (or any appeals thereof or future applications) will be successful. Although we are not aware of other companies using the name “Resources Global Professionals” at this time, there could be potential trade name or service mark infringement claims brought against us by the users of these similar names and marks and those users may have service mark rights that are senior to ours. If these claims were successful, we could be forced to cease using the service mark “Resources Global Professionals” even if an infringement claim is not brought against us. It is also possible that our competitors or others will adopt service names similar to ours or that our clients will be confused by another company using a name, service mark or trademark similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity. We cannot assure you that our business would not be adversely affected if confusion did occur or if we were required to change our name.

In 2014, we developed a software product for the healthcare industry to address enterprise-wide incident management and patient safety issues. We have applied for registration in the United States and in the appropriate jurisdictions on the service mark for this product. On February 13, 2014, we filed a Nonprovisional Application, App. No. H180290, with the United States Patent Office for patent protection for this invention. There is no guarantee that this pending patent application will be approved. In addition, if our patent application is approved, third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe our proprietary rights and third parties may challenge the proprietary rights held by us. In any or each of these cases, we may be required to expend significant time and expense in order to prevent infringement or to enforce our rights.

27

Table of Contents

Not applicable.

As of May 30, 2015, we maintained 45 domestic offices, all under operating lease agreements (except for the Irvine, California location), in the following metropolitan areas:

As of May 30, 2015, we maintained 23 international offices under operating lease agreements, located in the following cities and countries:

Our corporate offices are located in Irvine, California. We own an approximately 56,200 square foot office building in Irvine, California, of which we occupied approximately 38,000 square feet as of May 30, 2015, including space occupied by our Orange County, California practice. Approximately 18,200 square feet is leased to independent third parties.

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings; however, we are a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.

Not applicable.

28

Table of Contents

PART II

Price Range of Common Stock

Our common stock has traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RECN” since December 15, 2000. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. The approximate number of holders of record of our common stock as of July 6, 2015 was 36 (a holder of record is the name of an individual or entity that an issuer carries in its records as the registered holder (not necessarily the beneficial owner) of the issuer’s securities).

The following table sets forth the range of high and low closing sales prices reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for our common stock for the periods indicated.

Dividend Policy

Our board of directors has established a quarterly dividend, subject to quarterly board of directors’ approval. Pursuant to declaration and approval by our board of directors, we paid a dividend of $0.08 per share of common stock during each quarter in fiscal 2015 and $0.07 per share of common stock during each quarter in fiscal 2014. On April 28, 2015, our board of directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share of our common stock. The dividend was payable on June 18, 2015 to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 21, 2015. Continuation of the quarterly dividend will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business condition, contractual restrictions contained in our credit agreement and other agreements, and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

Issuances of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In April 2011, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program, authorizing the purchase, at the discretion of our senior executives, of our common stock for an aggregate dollar limit not to exceed $150.0 million. This program commenced in July 2011 when the previous program’s authorized limit had been met. Subject to the aggregate dollar limit, the currently authorized stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Repurchases under the program may take place in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan.

29

Table of Contents

The table below provides information regarding our stock repurchases made during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 under our stock repurchase program.

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the annual percentage change in the cumulative total return to the holders of our common stock with the cumulative total return of the Russell 3000 Index, a customized peer group consisting of eleven companies listed below the following table and a combined classification of companies under Standard Industry Codes as 8742-Management Consulting Services for the five years ended May 30, 2015. The graph assumes $100 was invested on May 28, 2010 in our common stock and in each index (based on prices from the close of trading on May 28, 2010), and that all dividends are reinvested. Stockholder returns over the indicated period may not be indicative of future stockholder returns.

The information contained in the performance graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

The Company’s customized peer group includes the following eleven professional services companies that we believe reflect the competitive landscape in which the Company operates and acquires talent: CRA International, Inc.; FTI Consulting, Inc.; Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.; Hudson Global, Inc.; Huron Consulting Group Inc.; ICF International, Inc.; Kforce, Inc.; Korn/Ferry International; Navigant Consulting, Inc.; The Advisory Board Company; and The Corporate Executive Board Company. The Company’s compensation committee, a committee of our board of directors comprised of independent directors, reviews the composition of the peer group annually to ensure its alignment with the Company’s size, practice areas, business model delivery and geographic reach.

30

Table of Contents

You should read the following selected historical consolidated financial data in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes beginning on page 47 and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 33. The Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the years ended May 26, 2012 and May 28, 2011 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data at May 25, 2013, May 26, 2012 and May 28, 2011 were derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the years ended May 30, 2015, May 31, 2014 and May 25, 2013 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data at May 30, 2015 and May 31, 2014 were derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any future periods.

31

Table of Contents

32

Table of Contents

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in Part I Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

RGP is a multinational consulting firm that provides consulting and business initiative support services to its global client base in the areas of accounting; finance; corporate governance, risk and compliance management; corporate advisory, strategic communications and restructuring; information management; human capital; supply chain management; healthcare solutions; and legal and regulatory. We assist our clients with projects requiring specialized expertise in:

We were founded in June 1996 by a team at Deloitte, led by our chairman, Donald B. Murray, who was then a senior partner with Deloitte. Our founders created Resources Connection to capitalize on the increasing demand for high quality outsourced professional services. We operated as a part of Deloitte until April 1999. In April 1999, we completed a management-led buyout in partnership with several investors. In December 2000, we completed our initial public offering of common stock and began trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market. We currently trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. We operate under the acronym RGP, branding for our operating entity name of Resources Global Professionals.

We operated solely in the United States until fiscal year 2000, when we opened our first three international offices and began to expand geographically to meet the demand for project consulting services across the world. As of May 30, 2015, we served clients from offices in 20 countries, including 23 international offices and 45 offices in the United States. Our global footprint allows the Company to support the global initiatives of our multinational client base.

We expect to continue opportunistic domestic and multinational expansion while also investing in complementary professional services lines that we believe will augment our service offerings.

We primarily charge our clients on an hourly basis for the professional services of our consultants. We recognize revenue once services have been rendered and invoice the majority of our clients in the United States on a weekly basis. Some of our clients served by our international offices are billed on a monthly basis. Our clients are contractually obligated to pay us for all hours

33

Table of Contents

billed. To a much lesser extent, we also earn revenue if a client hires one of our consultants. This type of contractually non-refundable revenue is recognized at the time our client completes the hiring process and represented 0.5% of our revenue for each of the years ended May 30, 2015, May 31, 2014 and May 25, 2013. We periodically review our outstanding accounts receivable balance and determine an estimate of the amount of those receivables we believe may prove uncollectible. Our provision for bad debts, if any, is included in our selling, general and administrative expenses.

The costs to pay our professional consultants and all related benefit and incentive costs, including provisions for paid time off and other employee benefits, are included in direct cost of services. We pay most of our consultants on an hourly basis for all hours worked on client engagements and, therefore, direct cost of services tends to vary directly with the volume of revenue we earn. We expense the benefits we pay to our consultants as they are earned. These benefits include paid time off and holidays; a discretionary bonus plan; subsidized group health, dental and life insurance programs; a matching 401(k) retirement plan; the ability to participate in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”); and professional development and career training. In addition, we pay the related costs of employment, including state and federal payroll taxes, workers’ compensation insurance, unemployment insurance and other costs. Typically, a consultant must work a threshold number of hours to be eligible for all of the benefits. We recognize direct cost of services when incurred.

Selling, general and administrative expenses include the payroll and related costs of our internal management as well as general and administrative, marketing and recruiting costs. Our sales and marketing efforts are led by our management team who are salaried employees and earn bonuses based on operating results for the Company as a whole and within each individual’s geographic market.

The Company’s fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks, ending on the Saturday in May closest to May 31. Fiscal years 2015 and 2013 consisted of four 13 week quarters and a total of 52 weeks of activity for the fiscal year. For fiscal years of 53 weeks, such as fiscal 2014, the first three quarters consisted of 13 weeks each and the fourth quarter consisted of 14 weeks.

Critical Accounting Policies

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The following represents a summary of our critical accounting policies, defined as those policies that we believe: (a) are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and (b) involve inherently uncertain issues that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.

Valuation of long-lived assets — We assess the potential impairment of long-lived tangible and intangible assets periodically or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Our goodwill and certain other intangible assets are not subject to periodic amortization. These assets are considered to have an indefinite life and their carrying values are required to be assessed by us for impairment at least annually. Depending on future market values of our stock, our operating performance and other factors, these assessments could potentially result in impairment reductions of these intangible assets in the future and this adjustment may materially affect the Company’s future financial results and financial condition.

Allowance for doubtful accounts — We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from our clients failing to make required payments for services rendered. We estimate this allowance based upon our knowledge of the financial condition of our clients (which may not include knowledge of all significant events), review of historical receivable and reserve trends and other pertinent information. While such losses have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of our clients could cause unfavorable trends in receivable collections and additional allowances may be required. These additional allowances could materially affect the Company’s future financial results.

34

Table of Contents

Income taxes — In order to prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to make estimates of income taxes, if applicable, in each jurisdiction in which we operate. The process incorporates an assessment of any current tax exposure together with temporary differences resulting from different treatment of transactions for tax and financial statement purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The recovery of deferred tax assets from future taxable income must be assessed and, to the extent recovery is not likely, we will establish a valuation allowance. An increase in the valuation allowance results in recording additional tax expense and any such adjustment may materially affect the Company’s future financial result. If the ultimate tax liability differs from the amount of tax expense we have reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, an adjustment of tax expense may need to be recorded and this adjustment may materially affect the Company’s future financial results and financial condition.

Revenue recognition — We primarily charge our clients on an hourly basis for the professional services of our consultants. We recognize revenue once services have been rendered and invoice the majority of our clients in the United States on a weekly basis. Some of our clients served by our international offices are billed on a monthly basis. Our clients are contractually obligated to pay us for all hours billed. To a much lesser extent, we also earn revenue if a client hires one of our consultants. This type of contractually non-refundable revenue is recognized at the time our client completes the hiring process.

Stock-based compensation — Under our 2014 Performance Incentive Plan, officers, employees, and outside directors have received or may receive grants of restricted stock, stock units, options to purchase common stock or other stock or stock-based awards. Under our ESPP, eligible officers and employees may purchase our common stock in accordance with the terms of the plan.

The Company estimates a value for employee stock options on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. We have elected to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which takes into account assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Additional variables to be considered are the expected term, expected dividends and the risk-free interest rate over the expected term of our employee stock options. In addition, because stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures must be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience. If facts and circumstances change and we employ different assumptions in future periods, the compensation expense recorded may differ materially from the amount recorded in the current period.

The Company uses its historical volatility over the expected life of the stock option award to estimate the expected volatility of the price of its common stock. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee stock options. The impact of expected dividends ($0.08 per share for each quarter during fiscal 2015 and $0.07 per share for each quarter of fiscal 2014) is also incorporated in determining the estimated value per share of employee stock option grants. Such dividends are subject to quarterly board of director approval. The Company’s expected life of stock option grants is 5.5 years for non-officers and 7.5 years for officers. The Company uses its historical volatility over the expected life of the stock option award to estimate the expected volatility of the price of its common stock. The Company reviews the underlying assumptions related to stock-based compensation at least annually.

We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

35

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, our Consolidated Statements of Operations data. These historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

Our operating results for the periods indicated are expressed as a percentage of revenue below.

36

Table of Contents

We also assess the results of our operations using EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin. EBITDA is defined as our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA plus stock-based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA Margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by revenue. These measures assist management in assessing our core operating performance. The following table presents EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the periods indicated and includes a reconciliation of such measures to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:

The financial measures and key performance indicators we use to assess our financial and operating performance above are not defined by, or calculated in accordance with, GAAP. A non-GAAP financial measure is defined as a numerical measure of a company’s financial performance that (i) excludes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding amounts, that are included in the comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the consolidated statement of operations; or (ii) includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of including amounts, that are excluded from the comparable measure so calculated and presented.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin provide useful information to our investors because they are financial measures used by management to assess the core performance of the Company. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are not measurements of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or construed as substitutes for net income or other cash flow data prepared in accordance with GAAP for purposes of analyzing our profitability or liquidity. These measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income, earnings per share, cash flows or other measures of financial performance prepared in conformity with GAAP.

Further, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin have the following limitations:

Because of these limitations, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin should not be considered a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.

37

Table of Contents

Year Ended May 30, 2015 Compared to Year Ended May 31, 2014

Computations of percentage change period over period are based upon our results, as rounded and presented herein.

Revenue. Revenue increased $23.4 million, or 4.1%, to $590.6 million for the year ended May 30, 2015 from $567.2 million for the year ended May 31, 2014. While we deliver our services to clients in a similar fashion across the globe, in fiscal 2015 revenue increased in North America and Asia Pacific but declined in Europe as compared to fiscal 2014. In light of continuing global economic uncertainty, we believe that certain geographic sectors of our global clients and prospects are initiating operational improvement projects cautiously, resulting in reduced levels of consulting spending, particularly in most European markets. Results in fiscal 2015 consisted of 52 weeks while fiscal 2014 consisted of 53 weeks. Revenue during the extra week of fiscal 2014 (which included the Memorial Day holiday in the United States) was $9.8 million. Excluding this extra week in fiscal 2014, revenue in fiscal 2015 increased $33.2 million (6.0%) over the fiscal 2014 amount. Comparing the 52-week period in fiscal 2015 to the 53-week period in fiscal 2014, the number of hours worked increased 8.1% compared to the prior year, offset by a 4.0% decrease in average bill rates from the prior year.

The number of consultants on assignment at the end of fiscal 2015 was 2,516 compared to the 2,401 consultants engaged at the end of fiscal 2014 (the average number of consultants assigned was 2,487 in fiscal 2015 compared to 2,254 in fiscal 2014).

We operated 68 offices (23 abroad) at both May 30, 2015 and May 31, 2014. Our clients do not sign long-term contracts with us. As such, there can be no assurance as to future demand levels for the services that we provide or that future results can be reliably predicted by considering past trends.

Revenue for the Company’s major geographies across the globe consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

Our financial results are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the United States dollar. Revenues denominated in foreign currencies are translated into United States dollars at the monthly average exchange rates in effect during each period. Thus, as the value of the United States dollar fluctuates relative to the currencies in our non-United States based operations, our revenue can be impacted. Using the comparable fiscal 2014 conversion rates, international revenues would have been higher than reported under GAAP by $8.8 million for the year ended May 30, 2015. Using these constant currency rates, the increase in revenue in North America and Asia Pacific would have been 8.8% and 12.1%, respectively, while the decline in Europe would have been 15.5%.

The strengthening of the U.S. dollar against most of the currencies of the international countries in which we operate was partially the cause of the average bill rate decline. Using the same exchange rates in fiscal 2015 as in fiscal 2014, the average bill rate would have decreased 2.4%. Average bill rates were also adversely impacted by a significant client engagement in the Philippines where bill rates are lower than most metropolitan areas.

Direct Cost of Services. Direct cost of services increased $10.8 million, or 3.1%, to $362.2 million for the year ended May 30, 2015 from $351.4 million for the year ended May 31, 2014. Comparing fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2014, direct cost of services increased primarily because of an 8.1% increase in hours worked, partially offset by a 4.8% decrease in the average consultant pay rate per hour. As noted above, fiscal 2015 consisted of 52 weeks while fiscal 2014 consisted of 53 weeks; we estimate that fiscal 2014 direct cost of services included an additional approximate $5.9 million because of this extra week. The direct cost of services as a percentage of revenue (“direct cost of services percentage”) was 61.3% and 61.9% for the years ended May 30, 2015 and May 31,

38

Table of Contents

2014, respectively. The improvement in the direct cost of services percentage resulted primarily from a favorable change in the bill rate/pay rate relationship (bill rates were down 4.0% overall while the pay rate average decreased 4.8%). Average pay rates also decreased because of the strengthening U.S. dollar (similar to impact on average bill rates) and a significant client engagement in the Philippines where bill rates are lower than most metropolitan areas.

Our target direct cost of services percentage is 60% for all of our offices.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“S, G & A”). S, G & A increased $1.3 million, or 0.8%, to $173.8 million for the year ended May 30, 2015 from $172.5 million for the year ended May 31, 2014. However, S, G & A decreased as a percentage of revenue from 30.4% in fiscal 2014 to 29.4% in fiscal 2015. Management and administrative head count was 742 at the end of fiscal 2015 and 712 at the end of fiscal 2014. The increase in S, G & A between the two fiscal periods was primarily attributable to headcount additions and related costs in U.S. offices experiencing growth. Comparing total S, G &A in fiscal 2015 to an adjusted 52-week fiscal 2014, S, G & A would have increased about 2.1%.

Sequential Operations. On a sequential quarter basis, fiscal 2015 fourth quarter revenue increased 1.4% to $148.8 million from $146.8 million, and hours worked improved 2.6% while bill rates were down 1.7%. The decrease in bill rates is attributable to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against currencies in most of our foreign operations. The Company’s sequential revenue increased in North America (0.3%) and Asia Pacific (17.4%), and was flat in Europe; on a constant currency basis, sequential revenue increased in North America (0.4%), Asia Pacific (18.5%) and Europe (5.9%). In addition, while the fourth quarter contained the Memorial Day holiday in the U.S., the third quarter included the Christmas, New Year’s and Chinese New Year’s holidays.

The direct cost of services percentage improved from 62.7% in the third quarter to 61.2% in the fourth quarter. This improvement is primarily attributable to only one compensated holiday in the United States during the fourth quarter compared to two in the third quarter and the declining impact of payroll taxes as the calendar year progresses.

S, G & A expenses decreased $1.0 million from the quarter ended February 28, 2015 to the quarter ended May 30, 2015, primarily as a result of the declining impact of payroll taxes as the calendar year progresses and reduced spending for marketing. The leverage of S, G & A expenses improved to 28.5% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to 29.6% in the third quarter. This was attributable to the improved revenue in the fourth quarter, which provided leverage on certain fixed expenses, such as rent, in the fourth quarter.

Amortization and Depreciation Expense. Amortization of intangible assets decreased from $1.7 million in fiscal 2014 to $918,000 in fiscal 2015. During fiscal 2015, virtually all of the Company’s intangible assets were fully amortized except for a $90,000 remaining balance as of May 30, 2015. The remaining balance will be amortized during the fiscal year ending May 28, 2016. After fiscal 2016, absent an acquisition, there will be no remaining unamortized balances of intangible assets.

Depreciation expense decreased from $3.6 million for the year ended May 31, 2014 to $3.4 million for the year ended May 30, 2015. Depreciation decreased as a number of assets were fully depreciated during fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015.

Interest Income. Interest income declined to $148,000 in fiscal 2015 compared to $168,000 in fiscal 2014. The decrease in interest income is the result of lower cash balances available for investment in fiscal 2015. The Company has invested available cash in certificates of deposit and money market investments that have been classified as cash equivalents due to the short maturities of these investments. As of May 30, 2015, the Company had $25.0 million of investments in commercial paper and U.S. Government Agency securities with remaining maturity dates between three months and one year from the balance sheet date which are classified as short-term investments and considered “held-to-maturity” securities.

Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased from $18.3 million (effective rate of 47.9%) for the year ended May 31, 2014 to $22.9 million (effective rate of 45.4%) for the year ended May 30, 2015. The provision for taxes in both fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014 resulted from taxes on income from operations in the United States and certain other foreign jurisdictions, a lower benefit for losses in certain foreign jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the United States statutory rates, and no benefit for losses in jurisdictions in which a valuation allowance on operating loss carryforwards had previously been established. The increase in the provision for income taxes is because of higher pretax income, primarily from the U.S. The effective tax rate

39

Table of Contents

decreased because of higher U.S. pretax income coupled with lower international pretax losses. Decreased losses from countries with valuation allowances allow the tax expense to be spread over a higher pretax base, which lowers the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate in both fiscal years disproportionally magnifies the effect of the components of the tax rate that differ from the standard federal rate, including non-deductible permanent differences and incentive stock options (“ISOs”). Based upon current economic circumstances, management will continue to monitor the need to record additional or release existing valuation allowances in the future, primarily related to certain foreign jurisdictions. Realization of the currently reserved foreign deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient future taxable income in those foreign territories.

Periodically, the Company reviews the components of both book and taxable income to analyze the adequacy of the tax provision. There can be no assurance that the Company’s effective tax rate will remain constant in the future because of the lower benefit from the United States statutory rate for losses in certain foreign jurisdictions, the limitation on the benefit for losses in jurisdictions in which a valuation allowance for operating loss carryforwards has previously been established, and the unpredictability of timing and the amount of eligible disqualifying ISO exercises.

The Company cannot recognize a tax benefit for certain ISO grants unless and until the holder exercises his or her option and then sells the shares within a certain period of time. In addition, the Company can only recognize a potential tax benefit for employees’ acquisition and subsequent sale of shares purchased through the ESPP if the sale occurs within a certain defined period. As a result, the Company’s provision for income taxes is likely to fluctuate from these factors for the foreseeable future. Further, those tax benefits associated with ISO grants fully vested at the date of adoption of the current accounting rules governing stock awards will be recognized as additions to paid-in capital when and if those options are exercised and not as a reduction to the Company’s tax provision. The Company recognized a benefit of approximately $2.2 million and $2.1 million related to stock-based compensation for nonqualified stock options expensed and for eligible disqualifying ISO exercises during fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. The proportion of expense related to non-qualified stock option grants (for which the Company may recognize a tax benefit in the same quarter as the related compensation expense in most instances) is significant as compared to expense related to ISOs (including ESPPs). However, the timing and amount of eligible disqualifying ISO exercises cannot be predicted. The Company predominantly grants nonqualified stock options to employees in the United States.

The Company has maintained a position of being indefinitely reinvested in its foreign subsidiaries’ earnings by not expecting to remit foreign earnings in the foreseeable future. Being indefinitely reinvested does not require a deferred tax liability to be recognized on the foreign earnings. Management’s indefinite reinvestment position is supported by:

Year Ended May 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended May 25, 2013

Computations of percentage change period over period are based upon our results, as rounded and presented herein.

Revenue. Revenue increased $10.9 million, or 2.0%, to $567.2 million for the year ended May 31, 2014 from $556.3 million for the year ended May 25, 2013. We deliver our services to clients in a similar fashion across the globe; however in fiscal 2014, revenue increased in North America but declined in Europe and Asia Pacific as compared to fiscal 2013. Results in fiscal 2014 consisted of 53 weeks while fiscal 2013 consisted of 52 weeks. Revenue during the extra week of fiscal 2014 (which included the Memorial Day holiday in the United States) was $9.8 million. Excluding this extra week in fiscal 2014, revenue increased $1.1 million (0.2%) over the fiscal 2013 amount. For the 53-week period in fiscal 2014, the number of hours worked increased 3.5% compared to the prior year, offset by a 1.6% decrease in average bill rates from the prior year.

40

Table of Contents

The number of consultants on assignment at the end of fiscal 2014 was 2,401 compared to the 2,208 consultants engaged at the end of fiscal 2013 (the average number of consultants assigned was 2,254 in fiscal 2014 compared to 2,270 in fiscal 2013).

We operated 68 offices (23 abroad) at May 31, 2014 and 73 offices (26 abroad) at May 25, 2013 as we consolidated certain offices in contiguous areas. Our clients do not sign long-term contracts with us. As such, there can be no assurance as to future demand levels for the services that we provide or that future results can be reliably predicted by considering past trends.

Revenue for the Company’s major geographies across the globe consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

Our financial results are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the United States dollar. Revenues denominated in foreign currencies are translated into United States dollars at the monthly average exchange rates in effect during each quarter. Thus, as the value of the United States dollar fluctuates relative to the currencies in our non-United States based operations, our revenue can be impacted. Using the comparable fiscal 2013 conversion rates, international revenues would have been higher than reported under GAAP by $981,000 for the year ended May 31, 2014.

Direct Cost of Services. Direct cost of services increased $9.4 million, or 2.7%, to $351.4 million for the year ended May 31, 2014 from $342.0 million for the year ended May 25, 2013. Direct cost of services increased primarily because of a 3.5% increase in hours worked compared to the prior year while the average consultant pay rate per hour was flat compared to the prior year. As noted above, fiscal 2014 consisted of 53 weeks while fiscal 2013 consisted of 52 weeks; we estimate this added approximately $5.9 million to the total of direct cost of services for fiscal 2014. The direct cost of services percentage was 61.9% and 61.5% for the years ended May 31, 2014 and May 25, 2013, respectively. The increase in the direct cost of services percentage resulted primarily from an unfavorable change in the bill rate/pay rate relationship (bill rates were down 1.6% overall compared to no change in pay rate average) offset by a decrease in zero margin client reimbursements.

Our target direct cost of services percentage is 60% for all of our offices.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. S, G & A increased $4.2 million, or 2.5%, to $172.5 million for the year ended May 31, 2014 from $168.3 million for the year ended May 25, 2013. In addition, S, G & A increased as a percentage of revenue from 30.3% in fiscal 2013 to 30.4% in fiscal 2014. Management and administrative head count was 712 at the end of fiscal 2014 and 707 at the end of fiscal 2013. S, G & A increased in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 primarily because of an increase in management compensation, related benefits, business expenses and stock compensation expense because of the 53 weeks of activity in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013’s 52 weeks; absent the extra week, S, G & A would have increased about 1.2%, attributable to no single significant category.

Sequential Operations. On a sequential quarter basis, fiscal 2014 fourth quarter revenue increased 18.2% to $156.8 million from $132.7 million, hours worked improved 18.4% and bill rates were flat. The improvement in hours worked is partially attributable to the 14^th week of activity in the fourth quarter as compared to the 13 week quarter in the third quarter; revenue during the extra week was approximately $9.8 million, including the Memorial Day holiday. In addition, while the fourth quarter contained the Memorial Day holiday, the third quarter included the Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year’s holidays. The direct cost of services percentage decreased from 64.0% in the third quarter to 61.1% in the fourth quarter. This decrease is primarily attributable to the absence of paid holidays in the United States during the fourth quarter, the declining impact of payroll taxes as the calendar year progresses and improvement in the bill rate/pay rate ratio. The direct cost of services percentage was also negatively impacted by approximately $331,000 related to the European headcount reduction that affected consultants in the fourth quarter.

41

Table of Contents

S, G & A expenses increased $4.6 million from the quarter ended February 22, 2014 to the quarter ended May 31, 2014, primarily as a result of $1.7 million for severance and related expenses for headcount reductions in certain European offices; in addition, salary and related benefits and bonuses increased due to the additional 14^th week in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, offset by reduced spending for marketing during the quarter. The leverage of S, G & A expenses was improved to 29.5% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to 31.3% in the third quarter. This was attributable to the improved revenue in the fourth quarter, as well as leverage on certain fixed expenses, such as rent, in the fourth quarter.

Amortization and Depreciation Expense. Amortization of intangible assets was flat at $1.7 million in both fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013. No intangibles were fully amortized during fiscal 2014.

Depreciation expense decreased from $4.6 million for the year ended May 25, 2013 to $3.6 million for the year ended May 31, 2014. Depreciation decreased as a number of assets were fully depreciated during fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014.

Interest Income. Interest income declined to $168,000 in fiscal 2014 compared to $175,000 in fiscal 2013. The decrease in interest income is the result of lower cash balances available for investment in fiscal 2014. The Company has invested available cash in certificates of deposit, money market investments and commercial paper that have been classified as cash equivalents due to the short maturities of these investments. As of May 31, 2014, the Company had $34.0 million of investments in commercial paper and certificates of deposit with remaining maturity dates between three months and one year from the balance sheet date classified as short-term investments and considered “held-to-maturity” securities.

Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes decreased from $19.4 million (effective rate of 48.6%) for the year ended May 25, 2013 to $18.3 million (effective rate of 47.9%) for the year ended May 31, 2014. The effective tax rate decreased primarily as a result of expiring statutes of limitations in the Company’s FIN 48 reserves. In addition, the provision for taxes in each of fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 resulted from taxes on income from operations in the United States and certain other foreign jurisdictions, a lower benefit for losses in certain foreign jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the United States statutory rates, and no benefit for losses in jurisdictions in which a valuation allowance on operating loss carryforwards had previously been established. The effective tax rate in both fiscal years disproportionally magnifies the effect of the components of the tax rate that differ from the standard federal rate, including non-deductible permanent differences and incentive stock options (“ISOs”). Based upon current economic circumstances, management will continue to monitor the need to record additional valuation allowances in the future, primarily related to certain foreign jurisdictions. Realization of the currently reserved foreign deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient future taxable income in those foreign territories.

The Company cannot recognize a tax benefit for certain ISO grants unless and until the holder exercises his or her option and then sells the shares within a certain period of time. In addition, the Company can only recognize a potential tax benefit for employees’ acquisition and subsequent sale of shares purchased through the ESPP if the sale occurs within a certain defined period. As a result, the Company’s provision for income taxes is likely to fluctuate from these factors for the foreseeable future. Further, those tax benefits associated with ISO grants fully vested at the date of adoption of the current accounting rules governing stock awards will be recognized as additions to paid-in capital when and if those options are exercised and not as a reduction to the Company’s tax provision. The Company recognized a benefit of approximately $2.1 million and $2.3 million related to stock-based compensation for nonqualified stock options expensed and for eligible disqualifying ISO exercises during fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively. The proportion of expense related to non-qualified stock option grants (for which the Company may recognize a tax benefit in the same quarter as the related compensation expense in most instances) is significant as compared to expense related to ISOs (including ESPPs). However, the timing and amount of eligible disqualifying ISO exercises cannot be predicted. The Company predominantly grants nonqualified stock options to employees in the United States.

The Company has maintained a position of being indefinitely reinvested in its foreign subsidiaries’ earnings by not expecting to remit foreign earnings in the foreseeable future. Being indefinitely reinvested does not require a deferred tax liability to be recognized on the foreign earnings. Management’s indefinite reinvestment position is supported by:

42

Table of Contents

Management determined during the fiscal year ended May 25, 2013 that it was a prudent time to make an exception to the indefinite reinvestment position and approved the payment of a one-time dividend from RGP Japan of $9.7 million and RGP Hong Kong of $3.9 million. The one-time exception is based upon opportunistic timing for a dividend distribution because of the favorable exchange rates between the United States and Japan for a tax beneficial result from both RGP Japan and RGP Hong Kong. After the one-time dividend, management’s intent and ability for indefinite reinvestment has continued for all entities, including RGP Japan and RGP Hong Kong.

Quarterly Results

The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly Consolidated Statements of Operations data for each of the eight quarters in the two-year period ended May 30, 2015. In the opinion of management, this data has been prepared on a basis substantially consistent with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this document, and includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the data. The quarterly data should be read together with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this document. The operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any future period.