RespireRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. - Quarter Report: 2003 March (Form 10-Q)

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

Indicate by mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

16,943,662 shares of Common Stock as of May 12, 2003

CORTEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
INDEX

Page 2 of 22

PART I.          FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.     Financial Statements

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes.

Note:  The balance sheet as of June 30, 2002 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.

Page 3 of 22

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

Page 4 of 22

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

Page 5 of 22

Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2003. For further information, refer to the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In January 1999, Cortex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Cortex” or the “Company”) entered into a research collaboration and exclusive worldwide license agreement with NV Organon (“Organon”), a subsidiary of Akzo Nobel (Note 2). The agreement will enable Organon to develop and commercialize the Company’s AMPAKINE^® technology for the treatment of schizophrenia and depression. In October 2000, the Company entered into a research collaboration and exclusive license agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier (“Servier”), in defined territories. The agreement, as amended in October 2002, will enable Servier to develop and commercialize the Company’s AMPAKINE technology for the treatment of anxiety disorders and memory impairment associated with aging and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (Note 3).

The Company is seeking collaborative arrangements with other pharmaceutical companies for other applications of the AMPAKINE compounds, under which such companies would provide additional capital to the Company in exchange for exclusive or non-exclusive license or other rights to the technologies and products that the Company is developing. Competition for corporate partnering with major pharmaceutical companies is intense, with a large number of biopharmaceutical companies attempting to arrive at such arrangements. Accordingly, although the Company is in discussions with candidate companies, there is no assurance that an agreement will arise from these discussions in a timely manner, or at all, or that an agreement that may arise from these discussions will successfully reduce the Company’s short or longer-term funding requirements.

To supplement its existing resources, the Company is seeking to raise additional capital through the sale of debt or equity. There can be no assurance that such capital will be available on favorable terms, or at all. If additional funds are raised by issuing equity securities, dilution to existing stockholders is likely to result.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes research revenue from its collaboration with Servier (Note 3) as services are performed under the agreement. The Company records grant revenues as the expenses related to the grant projects are incurred. All amounts received under collaborative research agreements or research grants are nonrefundable, regardless of the success of the underlying research.

Revenues from milestone payments are recognized when earned, as evidenced by written acknowledgement from the collaborator, provided that (i) the milestone event is substantive and its achievement was not reasonably assured at the inception of the agreement, and (ii) the Company’s performance obligations after the milestone achievement will continue to be funded by the collaborator at a comparable level to that before the milestone achievement. If both of these criteria are not met, the

Page 6 of 22

milestone payment would be recognized over the remaining period of the Company’s performance obligations under the arrangement. Royalties, if any, will be recognized as earned.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company has elected to account for its employee stock options in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). Under APB 25, because the Company’s employee stock options have been granted at exercise prices equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recorded.

The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), and SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of SFAS No. 123,” which requires compensation expense to be disclosed based on the fair value of the options granted at the date of grant.

Pro forma information regarding net loss and net loss per share has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock plans under the fair value method. The fair value was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively: weighted average risk-free interest rates of 3.0% and 3.5%; dividend yields of 0%; volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock of 97% and 68%; and a weighted average life of 2.8 years and 4.7 years. For the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, the fair value was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: weighted average risk-free rates of 2.9% and 3.5%; dividend yields of 0%; volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock of 97% and 68%; and a weighted average life of 4.5 years and 4.7 years.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion the existing models do not provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized as expense over the vesting period of the options, resulting in the following pro forma information for the three-month and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002:

Page 7 of 22

Re-priced Employee Stock Options

In March 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 44 (“FIN 44”), “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB 25.” As required, the Company adopted FIN 44 on July 1, 2000. FIN 44 requires that stock options that have been modified to reduce the exercise price be accounted for as variable. Prior to release of FIN 44, in December 1998 the Company re-priced previously issued stock options. By adopting FIN 44, the Company now applies variable accounting for these options. Consequently, if the market price of the Company’s stock increases, the Company will recognize additional non-cash compensation expense that it otherwise would not have incurred.

Due to fluctuations in the market price of the Company’s common stock, for the three months ended March 31, 2003, applying FIN 44 had no impact on the Company’s net loss or the net loss per share. For the three months ended March 31, 2002, the effect of applying FIN 44 was a decrease in the net loss of $8,000, with no impact of the net loss per share.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2003, applying FIN 44 had no impact on the Company’s net loss or net loss per share. For the nine months ended March 31, 2002, the effect of applying FIN 44 was an increase in the net loss of $69,000, with no impact on the net loss per share.

Note 2 — Research and License Agreement with NV Organon

In January 1999, the Company entered into a research collaboration and exclusive worldwide license agreement with Organon, a pharmaceutical business unit of Akzo Nobel (The Netherlands). The agreement will enable Organon to develop and commercialize the Company’s proprietary AMPAKINE technology for the treatment of schizophrenia and depression.

In connection with the agreement, the Company received an up-front license payment of $2,000,000 and research support payments of up to $3,000,000 per year for the two years ended in mid-January 2001. The Company achieved its first milestone from the agreement in May 2000, when Organon selected a candidate AMPAKINE compound to pursue in Phase I clinical testing for schizophrenia. Achieving this milestone triggered a $2,000,000 payment to Cortex from Organon. In September 2001, the second milestone payment of $2,000,000 was triggered when Organon elected to continue developing the compound by entering Phase II clinical testing. Cortex remains eligible for additional milestone payments based upon further clinical development, and ultimately, royalties on worldwide sales.

Note 3 — Research and License Agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier

In October 2000, the Company entered into a research collaboration and exclusive license agreement with Servier. The agreement will enable Servier to develop and commercialize Cortex’s proprietary AMPAKINE technology for the treatment of declines in cognitive performance associated with aging and neurodegenerative diseases. The indications covered include, but are not limited to, Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment (“MCI”), sexual dysfunction, and the dementia associated with multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The territory covered by the exclusive license excludes North America, allowing Cortex to retain commercialization rights in its domestic market. The territory covered by the agreement also excludes South America (except Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela), Australia and New Zealand. The agreement includes an up-front payment by Servier of $5,000,000 and research support payments of approximately $2,000,000 per year for three years (subject to Cortex providing agreed-upon levels of research personnel and subject to annual adjustment based upon the increase in the U.S. Department of Labor’s Consumer Price Index). Cortex is eligible to receive milestone payments, based upon successful clinical development, plus royalty payments on sales in licensed territories.

In October 2002, Servier and the Company agreed to amend the October 2000 agreement. Under the amendment, Servier will provide the Company with $4,000,000 of additional research support, in

Page 8 of 22

exchange for rights to the Company’s AMPAKINE compounds as a potential treatment for anxiety disorders in Servier’s licensed territories. The $4,000,000 will be paid in quarterly installments of $500,000 over a two-year period, beginning in October 2002.

Cortex had been recording revenue from Servier’s earlier $5,000,000 up-front payment over the three-year collaborative research phase that began in December 2000. With the amendment to the agreement signed in October 2002, Cortex adjusted the period that the Company records the Servier licensing revenue to include the extended research term.

Note 4 — Advance from the Institute for the Study of Aging

In June 2000, the Company received $247,300 from the Institute for the Study of Aging (the “Institute”) to fund testing of the Company’s AMPAKINE CX516 in patients with MCI. Patients with MCI represent the earliest clinically-defined group with memory impairment beyond that expected for normal individuals of the same age and education, but such patients do not meet the clinical criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. The Institute is a non-profit foundation based in New York City and dedicated to the improvement in quality of life for the elderly.

The funding from the Institute must be used solely for the Company’s clinical trials in MCI patients, which began enrollment in March 2002. Cortex has recorded the unused balance from amounts received from the Institute as restricted cash in the Company’s balance sheet. Provided that Cortex complies with the conditions of the funding agreement, including the restricted use of the amounts received, repayment of the advance shall be forgiven unless Cortex enters an AMPAKINE compound into Phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. Upon such potential clinical trials, repayment would include interest computed at a rate equal to one-half of the prime lending rate. In lieu of cash, in the event of repayment the Institute may elect to receive the balance of outstanding principal and accrued interest as shares of Cortex common stock. The conversion price for such form of repayment shall initially equal $4.50 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances.

Page 9 of 22

Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report and with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” presented in the Company’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Introductory Note

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Company intends that such forward looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, (i) future research plans, expenditures and results, (ii) potential collaborative arrangements, (iii) the potential utility of the Company’s proposed products and (iv) the need for, and availability of, additional financing.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations, which involve a number of risks and uncertainties and assumptions regarding the Company’s business and technology. These assumptions involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future scientific, economic and competitive conditions, and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the results contemplated in forward-looking statements will be realized and actual results may differ materially. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives or plans of the Company will be achieved. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in this and other documents that the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and subsequent Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Management Estimates

The Securities and Exchange Commission defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in management’s view, most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and most demanding of its judgment. The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon its financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities.

The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. This process forms the basis for making

Page 10 of 22

judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 101”). SAB 101 provides guidance in applying accounting principles generally accepted in the United States to revenue recognition issues, and specifically addresses revenue recognition for up-front, nonrefundable fees received in connection with research collaboration arrangements.

In accordance with SAB 101, revenues from up-front fees from the Company’s collaborators are deferred and recorded over the term that it provides ongoing services. Similarly, research support payments are recorded as revenue as it performs the research under the related agreements. The Company records grant revenues as it incurs expenses related to the grant projects. All amounts received under collaborative research agreements or research grants are nonrefundable, regardless of the success of the underlying research.

Revenues from milestone payments are recognized when earned, as evidenced by written acknowledgment from the Company’s collaborator, provided that (i) the milestone event is substantive and its achievement was not reasonably assured at the inception of the agreement, and (ii) the Company’s performance obligations after the milestone achievement will continue to be funded by its collaborator at a comparable level to that before the milestone achievement. If both of these criteria are not met, the milestone payment is recognized over the remaining minimum period of the Company’s performance obligations under the agreement.

The Company’s revenue recognition policies, although critical in management’s view, are not the sole accounting policies that it has adopted. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

Results of Operations

General

In January 1999, the Company entered into a research collaboration and exclusive worldwide license agreement with NV Organon (“Organon”), a pharmaceutical business unit of Akzo Nobel. The agreement will allow Organon to develop and commercialize the Company’s proprietary AMPAKINE^® technology for the treatment of schizophrenia and depression. In connection with the agreement, the Company received a $2,000,000 up-front licensing payment and research support payments of approximately $3,000,000 per year for the two years ended in mid-January 2001.

The agreement with Organon also includes milestone payments based upon clinical development, plus royalty payments on worldwide sales. Cortex achieved its first milestone under the agreement in May 2000, when Organon selected a candidate compound to pursue in Phase I clinical testing as a treatment for schizophrenia. Achieving this milestone triggered a $2,000,000 payment to Cortex from Organon, which was recorded as revenue upon achievement.

Page 11 of 22

Cortex achieved its second milestone under the agreement in September 2001, when Organon elected to continue development of the selected compound in Phase II clinical testing. Achieving the second milestone triggered another $2,000,000 payment to Cortex from Organon, with the related revenue recorded upon achievement of the milestone.

In October 2000, the Company entered into a research collaboration and exclusive license agreement with Les Laboratoires Servier (“Servier”). The agreement will allow Servier to develop and commercialize the Company’s AMPAKINE technology for the treatment of declines in cognitive performance associated with aging and neurodegenerative diseases. The indications covered include, but are not limited to, Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment (“MCI”), sexual dysfunction, and the dementia associated with multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The agreement includes an up-front payment by Servier of $5,000,000 and research support payments of approximately $2,000,000 per year for three years (subject to Cortex providing agreed-upon levels of research personnel). The agreement also includes milestone payments, plus royalty payments on sales in licensed territories.

In October 2002, in exchange for an additional $4,000,000 of research support, Servier expanded its rights to the AMPAKINE compounds to include the field of anxiety disorders, in its licensed territories. The $4,000,000 will be paid in quarterly installments of $500,000 over a two-year period, beginning in October 2002.

From inception of the October 2000 agreement through March 31, 2003, Cortex has received research support payments of $5,771,000 from Servier, including two quarterly supplemental installments of $500,000 under the October 2002 amendment to the agreement, as detailed above.

From inception (February 10, 1987) through March 31, 2003, the Company has sustained losses aggregating $41,972,000. Continuing losses are anticipated over the next several years. During that time, the Company’s ongoing operating expenses will only be offset, if at all, by proceeds from Small Business Innovative Research (“SBIR”) grants, research support payments from the collaboration with Servier and by possible milestone payments from Organon and Servier. Ongoing operating expenses may also be funded by payments under planned strategic alliances that the Company is seeking with other pharmaceutical companies for the clinical development, manufacturing and marketing of its products. The nature and timing of payments to Cortex under the Organon and Servier agreements or other planned strategic alliances, if and when entered into, are likely to significantly affect the Company’s operations and financing activities and to produce substantial period-to-period fluctuations in reported financial results. Over the longer term, the Company will require successful commercial development of its products by Organon, Servier or its other prospective partners to attain profitable operations from royalties or other product-based revenues.

Comparison of the Three Months and Nine Months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002

For the three months ended March 31, 2003, the net loss of $140,000 compares with a net loss of $839,000 for the corresponding prior year period. For the nine months ended March 31, 2003, the net loss of $1,090,000 compared to a net loss of $600,000 for the corresponding prior year period.

Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003 increased from $1,154,000 to $1,379,000, or by 20% compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002. Research revenues for the current year

Page 12 of 22

period include $500,000 related to the amendment to the agreement signed with Servier in October 2002. That amendment granted Servier rights to the Company’s AMPAKINE technology in the field of anxiety disorders, in Servier’s licensed territories. In exchange for those rights, Cortex will receive $4,000,000 of research support from Servier, paid as $500,000 per quarter over a two-year period.

With the amendment to the agreement, Cortex extended the period that it amortizes revenues from Servier’s earlier up-front fee. Under the original October 2000 agreement, Cortex received a $5,000,000 licensing fee from Servier, which Cortex was recording as revenue over that agreement’s three-year collaborative research phase. After amending the agreement in October 2002, Cortex began amortizing the remaining unearned licensing revenues over the two-year period of the extended research support. Compared to the corresponding prior year period, licensing revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003 decreased by $170,000 as a result of this change.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2003, revenues decreased from $5,326,000 to $3,883,000, or by 27% compared to the corresponding prior year period, primarily due to a $2,000,000 milestone payment. Organon triggered this milestone in September 2001 when it elected to continue its development of an AMPAKINE compound by entering Phase II studies for schizophrenia. Cortex recorded the revenue from this milestone payment upon achievement.

Revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2003 included research revenues of $1,000,000 related to the amendment to the agreement with Servier in October 2002. For the same current year period, licensing revenues decreased $339,000 due to the extended term of amortizing Servier’s up-front payment from the October 2000 agreement, as detailed above.

For both the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2003, grant revenues decreased relative to the corresponding prior year periods due to decreased expenses for the schizophrenia project.

Research and development expenses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2003 decreased from $1,418,000 to $968,000, or by 32%, compared to the corresponding prior year period. The decrease primarily resulted from charges incurred in the prior year period for the Phase II clinical study in MCI, which began enrollment in March 2002. The decrease for the current year period also reflected decreased personnel-related expenses from comparatively lower staffing levels.

For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003, research and development expenses decreased from $4,023,000 to $2,924,000, or by 27%, compared to the corresponding prior year period. The decrease included technology access payments related to the Organon milestone achieved in the prior year period. Cortex licenses the AMPAKINE technology from the University of California. Under the related agreement, Cortex is required to remit a portion of certain remuneration received in connection with sublicensing agreements. In September 2001, when Cortex achieved its milestone under its agreement with Organon, a technology access payment to the University of California became due. Along with the timing of technology access fees, the decreased research and development expenses for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003 reflected lower staffing levels, lower non-cash, stock compensation charges and the timing of expenses for the cross national Phase II clinical study in MCI being conducted with Servier.

General and administrative expenses of $553,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2003 were materially consistent with expenses for the corresponding prior year period. For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003, general and administrative expenses increased from $1,965,000 to $2,062,000, or by 5%, compared to the corresponding prior year period, primarily due to severance costs to the Company’s former President and Chief Executive Officer. 

Page 13 of 22

The Company believes that inflation and changing prices have not had a material impact on its ongoing operations to date.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources

From inception (February 10, 1987) through March 31, 2003, Cortex has funded its organizational and research and development activities primarily through the issuance of equity securities, funding related to collaborative agreements and net interest income.

Research and licensing payments received in connection with the January 1999 agreement with Organon totaled $11,880,000 as of March 31, 2003. This amount includes a $2,000,000 milestone payment from the agreement, triggered in September 2001 when Organon elected to continue development of an AMPAKINE compound by entering Phase II clinical testing. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company may receive additional milestone payments based on further clinical development of the licensed technology and, ultimately, royalties on worldwide sales.

Under the agreement with Servier signed in October 2000 and amended in October 2002, Cortex received research and licensing payments of $10,771,000 through March 31, 2003. The October 2000 agreement currently provides research support of approximately $2,000,000 per year through early December 2003. The agreement also includes milestone payments based upon successful clinical development and royalties on sales in licensed territories. Beginning in October 2002, Servier agreed to provide the Company an additional $4,000,000 of research support, to be paid in quarterly installments of $500,000 over a two-year period ending in early October 2004.

In October 2000, the Company received notice of a Phase II SBIR award from the National Institutes of Health. The award will provide up to $1,074,000 over a three-year period and will support the Company’s research of its AMPAKINE compounds as a potential new therapy for stroke. As of March 31, 2003, Cortex has received approximately $570,000 related to this grant award.

In October 2001, the Company received notice of a second Phase II SBIR award from the National Institutes of Health. This award will provide up to $770,000 over a two-year period. The award will allow Cortex to follow-up on previously reported clinical tests of the AMPAKINE CX516 as a combination therapy for schizophrenia. Earlier tests were encouraging, with AMPAKINE-treated patients showing improvement in a number of clinical and neurocognitive scores. As of March 31, 2003, Cortex has received $459,000 in connection with this grant award.

Cash Proceeds

As of March 31, 2003, the Company had cash and cash equivalents totaling $173,000, accounts receivable of $100,000 and a working capital deficit of $1,325,000. In comparison, as of June 30, 2002, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $1,849,000, accounts receivable of $115,000 and a working capital deficit of $349,000. The decreases in cash and working capital reflect amounts required to fund the Company’s operations.

As of March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2002, current liabilities included deferred revenue relating to the Company’s $5,000,000 non-refundable, up-front payment from Servier in October 2000. In

Page 14 of 22

accordance with SAB No. 101, the revenue related to the up-front fee is being amortized over the collaborative research phase that ends, as extended, in early October 2004.

Current liabilities as of March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2002 also included the advance from the Institute for the Study of Aging (the “Institute”). This advance is being utilized to offset the Company’s limited expenses related to the cross national Phase II study in MCI being conducted with Servier. According to the agreed-upon terms, repayment of the advance shall be forgiven unless the Company enters Phase III clinical testing for Alzheimer’s disease. In the event that the Company enters such clinical trials with one of its AMPAKINE compounds, the Company believes that sufficient payments would become available under its partnering agreements to permit repayment of the advance.

Commitments

The Company leases approximately 32,000 square feet of research laboratory, office and expansion space under an operating lease that expires May 31, 2004. The remaining commitments under the lease agreement for the years ending June 30, 2003 and 2004 total $47,000 and $293,000, respectively.

The Company is committed to $403,000 for sponsored research and other remuneration to academic institutions, payable over the next twelve months. Remaining Cortex commitments for Phase I/IIa clinical studies of the AMPAKINE compounds are not significant.

In August 2002, the Company became committed to severance payments to its former President and Chief Executive Officer. As of March 31, 2003, the remaining severance commitments approximated $101,000, which will be paid through semi-monthly installments into mid-August 2003.

In June 2000, the Company received $247,000 from the Institute, which will partially offset the Company’s limited costs for its testing in patients with MCI. Given that Cortex must use the funding from the Institute solely for the clinical trials, the Company has recorded the unused balance from the amounts received as restricted cash in its balance sheet. Provided that Cortex complies with the conditions of the funding agreement, including the restricted use of the amounts received, repayment of the advance shall not be required unless Cortex enters an AMPAKINE compound into Phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease. Upon such potential clinical trials, repayment would include interest computed at a rate equal to one-half of the prime lending rate. In lieu of cash, in the event of repayment the Institute may elect to receive the balance of outstanding principal and accrued interest as shares of Cortex common stock. The conversion price for such form of repayment shall initially equal $4.50 per share, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances.

Staffing

As of March 31, 2003, Cortex had a total of 20 full-time research and administrative employees. Significant increases to staffing are not planned through fiscal year 2004 unless new sources of funding are realized. Similarly, no significant investments in plant or equipment are planned through fiscal year 2004.

Page 15 of 22

Outlook

Cortex anticipates that its cash and cash equivalents — and the scheduled research support payments from its agreements with Servier — will be sufficient to satisfy its capital requirements into early fiscal year 2004. Additional funds will be required to continue operations beyond that time. Cortex may also receive milestone payments from the Organon and Servier agreements. However, there is no assurance that the Company will receive additional milestone payments from Organon or Servier within the desired timeframe, or at all.

In order to provide for both its immediate and longer-term capital requirements, the Company is presently seeking additional collaborative or other arrangements with larger pharmaceutical companies. Under these agreements, it is intended that such companies would provide capital to the Company in exchange for an exclusive or non-exclusive license or other rights to certain of the technologies and products that the Company is developing. Competition for such arrangements is intense, however, with a large number of biopharmaceutical companies attempting to secure alliances with more established pharmaceutical companies. Although the Company has been engaged in discussions with candidate companies, there is no assurance that an agreement or agreements will arise from these discussions in a timely manner, or at all, or that revenues that may be generated thereby will offset operating expenses sufficiently to reduce the Company’s short and longer-term funding requirements.

Because there is no assurance that the Company will secure additional corporate partnerships, the Company is seeking to raise additional capital through the sale of debt or equity securities. There is no assurance that funds will be available on favorable terms, or at all. If equity securities are issued to raise additional funds, dilution to existing stockholders is likely to result. Such additional capital would, more importantly, enhance the ability of Cortex to achieve significant milestones in its efforts to develop the AMPAKINE technology.

Additional Risks and Uncertainties

The Company’s proposed products are in the preclinical or early clinical stage of development and will require significant further research, development, clinical testing and regulatory clearances. They are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of products based on innovative technologies. These risks include, but are not limited to, the possibilities that any or all of the proposed products will be found to be ineffective or unsafe, or otherwise fail to receive necessary regulatory clearances; that the proposed products, although effective, will be uneconomical to market; that third parties may now or in the future hold proprietary rights that preclude the Company from marketing them; or that third parties will market superior or equivalent products. Accordingly, the Company is unable to predict whether its research and development activities will result in any commercially viable products or applications. Further, due to the extended testing and regulatory review process required before marketing clearance can be obtained, the Company does not expect to be able to commercialize any therapeutic drug for at least five years, either directly or through its current or prospective corporate partners or licensees. There can be no assurance that the Company’s proposed products will prove to be safe or effective or receive regulatory approvals that are required for commercial sale.

Page 16 of 22

Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to certain market risks associated with interest rate fluctuations on its marketable securities and borrowing arrangement. All investments in marketable securities are entered into for purposes other than trading. The Company is not subject to risks from currency rate fluctuations as it does not typically conduct transactions in foreign currencies. In addition, the Company does not utilize hedging contracts or similar instruments.

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk arises from financial instruments entered into in the normal course of business. Certain of the Company’s financial instruments are fixed rate, short-term investments in government and corporate notes and bonds. Changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of the investments, however, because these financial instruments are considered “available for sale,” all such changes are reflected in the financial statements in the period affected. The Company manages interest rate risk on its investment portfolio by matching scheduled investment maturities with its cash requirements. As of March 31, 2003, the Company’s investment portfolio had a fair value and carrying amount of approximately $200,000, which includes amounts classified as restricted cash on the Company’s balance sheet. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10% from levels as of March 31, 2003, the resulting decline in the fair value of fixed rate bonds held within the portfolio would not be material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

The Company’s borrowing consists of its advance from the Institute for the Study of Aging, which is subject to potential repayment in the event that Cortex enters an AMPAKINE compound into Phase III clinical testing as a potential treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Potential repayment would include interest accruing at a discount to the prime lending rate. Changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of such debt, but, based upon historical activity, such changes are not expected to have a material impact on earnings or cash flows. As of March 31, 2003, the principal and accrued interest of the advance amounted to $269,000.

Item 4.     Controls and Procedures

Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Company performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings under the Exchange Act of 1934. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these internal controls subsequent to the evaluation.

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2.     Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

In connection with a professional services agreement, during the three months ended March 31, 2003 the Company issued warrants to purchase 104,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to two investors. The warrants have a weighted-average exercise price of $0.79 per share and a five-year

Page 17 of 22

term. The sale and issuance of the warrants were made in reliance upon the exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, set forth in Section 4(2) thereof as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering. The warrants contain representations to support the Company’s reasonable belief that the purchasers are familiar with or have access to information concerning the operations and financial condition of the Company, and the purchasers are acquiring the warrants and the underlying shares of Common Stock for investment and not with a view to the distribution thereof. At the time of the issuance, the warrants will be deemed to be a restricted security for the purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the certificate representing the warrants (and the shares issued upon exercise) will bear legends to that effect.

Item 6.     Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Page 18 of 22

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D., certify that:

Page 19 of 22

Page 20 of 22

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Maria S. Messinger, certify that:

Page 21 of 22

Page 22 of 22