RiceBran Technologies - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
____________________
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
one)
x |
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from _________ to
_________
Commission
File Number 0-32565
____________________
NUTRACEA
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
California
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
87-0673375
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
5090
North 40th
St., Suite 400
Phoenix,
AZ
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
85018
(Zip
Code)
|
Issuer’s
telephone number, including area code: (602)
522-3000
|
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer:, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange.
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer x
Non-accelerated
filer o (do not check if a smaller
reporting company) Smaller reporting company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
l2b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o
No
x
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
State
the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity,
as of the latest practicable date: 167,993,724 as of August 6,
2008.
FORM
10-Q
Index
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
(a)
Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheets at June 30, 2008 (Unaudited) and December
31,
2007
|
4
|
|||||
|
|||||||
|
(b)
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months
ended June
30, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|||||
|
|||||||
(c)
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
6
|
|||||
|
|||||||
|
(d)
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June
30, 2008
and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
7
|
|||||
|
|||||||
|
(e)
Notes
to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
|
9
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
27
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
38
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
38
|
|||||
|
|||||||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
39
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
39
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
39
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
46
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
46
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
46
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
47
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
48
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Signatures
|
49
|
||||||
Certifications
|
2
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements
other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for
purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to,
any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements
of
the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any
statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements
regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of belief;
and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.
Forward-looking
statements may include the words “may,” “could,” “will,” “estimate,” “intend,”
“continue,” “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” or other similar words. The
forward-looking statements contained herein reflect our current views with
respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in such
forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, risks and uncertainties,
including the factors that may affect future results set forth in this Current
Report on Form 10-Q and in our annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward looking
statements as a result of developments occurring after the date of this
quarterly report.
3
PART
1. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements
|
June
30,
2008
(Unaudited)
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
16,067,000
|
$
|
41,298,000
|
|||
Restricted
cash
|
906,000
|
758,000
|
|||||
Trade
accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$3,177,000
and $2,999,000, respectively
|
4,270,000
|
2,346,000
|
|||||
Inventories
|
4,947,000
|
1,808,000
|
|||||
Notes
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful notes receivable of
$573,000
and $250,000, respectively
|
858,000
|
2,936,000
|
|||||
Deposits
and other current assets
|
2,828,000
|
2,545,000
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
current assets
|
29,876,000
|
51,691,000
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Restricted
cash
|
3,248,000
|
1,791,000
|
|||||
Notes
receivable, net of current portion
|
-
|
5,039,000
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
43,317,000
|
19,328,000
|
|||||
Investment
in joint ventures
|
11,786,000
|
1,191,000
|
|||||
Patents
and trademarks, net of accumulated amortization
|
5,349,000
|
5,743,000
|
|||||
Other
non-current
|
132,000
|
-
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
52,668,000
|
39,510,000
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
146,376,000
|
$
|
124,293,000
|
|||
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
14,863,000
|
$
|
7,506,000
|
|||
Deferred
revenue
|
12,000
|
90,000
|
|||||
Note
payable
|
23,000
|
23,000
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
14,898,000
|
7,619,000
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Long-term
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Long-term
liabilities
|
7,350,000
|
-
|
|||||
Notes
payable, net of current portion
|
64,000
|
77,000
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
22,312,000
|
7,696,000
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, no par value, 350,000,000 shares authorized,
167,744,000
and 144,108,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
198,623,000
|
177,813,000
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(74,061,000
|
)
|
(61,216,000
|
)
|
|||
Foreign
currency cumulative translation gain
|
(498,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
124,064,000
|
116,597,000
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholder’s equity
|
$
|
146,376,000
|
$
|
124,293,000
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
4
NUTRACEA
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Three
Months
Ended
June
30, 2007
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2007
|
||||||||||
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Product
sales
|
$
|
10,314,000
|
$
|
7,996,000
|
$
|
15,425,000
|
$
|
9,993,000
|
|||||
Licensing
fees
|
-
|
5,000,000
|
-
|
5,000,000
|
|||||||||
Total
revenue
|
10,314,000
|
12,996,000
|
15,425,000
|
14,993,000
|
|||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
7,277,000
|
3,863,000
|
12,071,000
|
4,976,000
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
3,037,000
|
9,133,000
|
3,354,000
|
10,017,000
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
|||||||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
738,000
|
170,000
|
1,002,000
|
291,000
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
5,871,000
|
5,657,000
|
11,049,000
|
7,970,000
|
|||||||||
Professional
fees
|
1,125,000
|
1,536,000
|
3,083,000
|
1,995,000
|
|||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
7,734,000
|
7,363,000
|
15,134,000
|
10,256,000
|
|||||||||
(Loss)
income from operations
|
(4,697,000
|
)
|
1,770,000
|
(11,780,000
|
)
|
(239,000
|
)
|
||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
161,000
|
876,000
|
421,000
|
1,388,000
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(365,000
|
)
|
-
|
(485,000
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Gain
on settlement
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,250,000
|
|||||||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
(331,000
|
)
|
(309,000
|
)
|
(331,000
|
)
|
(309,000
|
)
|
|||||
Other
expenses
|
(586,000
|
)
|
-
|
(341,000
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Loss
on equity investment
|
(63,000
|
)
|
(250,000
|
)
|
(80,000
|
)
|
(250,000
|
)
|
|||||
Total
(loss) income before income tax
|
(5,881,000
|
)
|
2,087,000
|
(12,596,000
|
)
|
1,840,000
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
(282,000
|
)
|
(85,000
|
)
|
(319,000
|
)
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|||||
Net
(loss) income from continuing
operations
|
(6,163,000
|
)
|
2,002,000
|
(12,915,000
|
)
|
1,755,000
|
|||||||
Minority
interest
|
70,000
|
-
|
70,000
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(6,093,000
|
)
|
2,002,000
|
$
|
(12,845,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,755,000
|
||||
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted (loss) earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
(loss) income per share
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
|||
Fully
diluted (loss) income per share
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
|||
Weighted
average basic number of
|
|||||||||||||
shares
outstanding
|
151,867,000
|
136,257,000
|
145,545,000
|
118,952,000
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average diluted number of
|
|||||||||||||
shares
outstanding
|
151,867,000
|
167,259,000
|
145,545,000
|
148,954,000
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
5
NUTRACEA
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2007
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2007
|
|||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(6,093,000
|
)
|
$
|
2,002,000
|
$
|
(12,845,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,755,000
|
|||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|||||||||||||
Foreign
currency
|
|||||||||||||
translation
(loss)
|
(498,000
|
)
|
- |
(498,000
|
)
|
- | |||||||
Unrealized
gain on
|
|||||||||||||
marketable
securities
|
-
|
91,000
|
-
|
91,000
|
|||||||||
Net
comprehensive (loss) income
|
$
|
(6,591,000
|
)
|
$
|
2,093,000
|
$
|
(13,343,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,846,000
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
6
NUTRACEA
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(12,845,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,755,000
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in
operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,738,000
|
894,000
|
|||||
Provision
for doubtful notes receivable
|
84,000
|
-
|
|||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts receivable
|
323,000
|
1,055,000
|
|||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
331,000
|
309,000
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
1,454,000
|
1,263,000
|
|||||
Recognition
of deferred income
|
(78,000
|
)
|
(73,000
|
)
|
|||
Loss
on equity investments
|
80,000
|
250,000
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Net
changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of effects
|
|||||||
of
Irgovel acquisition and Vital Living, Inc. consolidation):
|
|||||||
Trade
accounts receivable
|
(765,000
|
)
|
(4,752,000
|
)
|
|||
Inventories
|
(2,489,000
|
)
|
36,000
|
||||
Deposits
and other current assets
|
241,000
|
(380,000
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
4,842,000
|
(726,000
|
)
|
||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
702,000
|
-
|
|||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(6,382,000
|
)
|
(369,000
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Restricted
cash
|
(1,606,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Proceeds
from payments of notes receivable
|
6,978,000
|
1,796,000
|
|||||
Issuance
of notes receivable
|
(182,000
|
)
|
(5,029,000
|
)
|
|||
Investment
in Irgovel (net of cash acquired with purchase)
|
(14,970,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(17,698,000
|
)
|
(6,026,000
|
)
|
|||
Investment
in PIN
|
(10,675,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Investment
in Grainnovation, Inc.
|
-
|
(2,168,000
|
)
|
||||
Investment
in Vital Living, Inc.
|
-
|
(5,144,000
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of other intangible assets
|
(33,000
|
)
|
(109,000
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(38,186,000
|
)
|
(16,680,000
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from equity financing, net of expenses
|
18,775,000
|
46,805,000
|
|||||
Proceeds
from exercise of common stock options
|
685,000
|
6,877,000
|
|||||
Registration
costs
|
(104,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Payments
on notes payable
|
(13,000
|
)
|
--
|
||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
19,343,000
|
53,682,000
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Effect
of foreign currency
|
(6,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash
|
(25,231,000
|
)
|
36,633,000
|
||||
Cash,
beginning of period
|
41,298,000
|
14,867,000
|
|||||
Cash,
end of period
|
$
|
16,067,000
|
$
|
51,500,000
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
382,000
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$
|
184,000
|
$
|
85,000
|
|||
Non-cash
disclosures of investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable converted to note receivable
|
$ | - |
$
|
3,881,000
|
|||
Accrual
for investment in Grain Enhancements joint venture
|
$ | - |
$
|
1,500,000
|
|||
Conversion
of preferred stock to common stock
|
$ | - |
$
|
5,488,000
|
|||
Unrealized
gain on marketable securities
|
$ | - |
$
|
91,000
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
7
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements
of
NutraCea have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in NutraCea’s
Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management,
all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim
periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
for
the full year. Notes to the consolidated financial statements that would
substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited financial
statements for 2007 as reported in the 2007 10-K have been omitted.
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of
NutraCea and our wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as a variable interest
entity, Vital Living, Inc., for which we are the primary beneficiary as defined
by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), Interpretation No. 46
(revised 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” or FIN 46R. We
have a 90% interest in NutraCea-Cura LLC, which is also consolidated under
FIN
46R. In February 2007, we acquired 100% ownership of Irgovel, which operates
a
rice-bran oil manufacturing facility in Pelotas, Brazil (see Note 10). In March
and June, 2008, through our newly-formed wholly owned subsidiary Medan, we
acquired an aggregate of 51% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of
PT
Panganmas Inti Nusantara, an Indonesian
Company (“PIN”), All inter-company accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
We
operate in two business segments (see Note 14); the NutraCea segment, which
manufactures and distributes nutritional supplements primarily derived from
Stabilized Rice Bran (“SRB”), and the Irgovel segment, which consists of our
rice-bran oil manufacturing subsidiary in Pelotas, Brazil. PIN has no sales
or
significant operations at this time, therefore we include its financial
information in our NutraCea segment.
Foreign
currencies
The
functional currency for the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Irgovel, is
the Brazilian Real (R$). The functional currency for PIN is the Indonesian
Rupiah (Rp$). Accordingly, balance sheet accounts of these subsidiaries are
translated into United States dollars using the exchange rate in effect at
the
balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses are translated using the average
exchange rates in effect during the period. The gains and losses from foreign
currency translation of the financial statements of these subsidiaries are
reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity under the caption
“Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.”
2. STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
On
January 1, 2006, NutraCea adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS
123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) replaced SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25.
SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants
of
employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based
on
their fair values. NutraCea adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective
method which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January
1, 2006. The consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 reflect the impact of adopting SFAS 123(R).
For
all
agreements where stock is awarded as partial or full consideration, the expense
is valued at the fair value of the stock. Expenses for stock options and
warrants issued to consultants and employees are calculated based upon fair
value using the Black-Scholes valuation model.
8
Stock-based
compensation expenses consisted of the following for the three and six months
ended June 30:
|
Three
Months
Ended
June
30,
2008
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2007
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2007
|
|||||||||
Consultants
|
$
|
12,000
|
$
|
266,000
|
$
|
409,000
|
$
|
281,000
|
|||||
Directors
|
197,000
|
50,000
|
394,000
|
87,000
|
|||||||||
Employees
|
195,000
|
509,000
|
651,000
|
840,000
|
|||||||||
To
directors and former director for services
outside
of directors duties
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
55,000
|
|||||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
404,000
|
$
|
825,000
|
$
|
1,454,000
|
$
|
1,263,000
|
The
Company used the following weighted-average assumptions to estimate the fair
value of options and warrants granted for the three months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007:
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.27 | % |
41.11
|
%
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
82.0 | % |
67.0
|
%
|
|||
Expected
term (years)
|
2.68 |
1.5
|
|||||
Resulting
average fair value
|
$ | 0.42 |
$
|
0.57
|
The
Company’s unrecognized compensation expense, before income tax and adjusted for
estimated forfeitures, related to outstanding unvested stock-based awards as
of
June 30, 2008 was approximately as follows:
Weighted
average Remaining Expense Life (years)
|
Unrecognized
Expense
|
||||||
Options
and warrants
|
3.65
|
$
|
2,724,000
|
3. MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
On
September 8, 2004, NutraCea purchased 1,272,026 shares of Langley Park
Investment Trust, PLC (“Langley”), a United Kingdom closed-end mutual fund that
is actively traded on a London exchange. Per the Stock Purchase Agreement,
NutraCea paid with 7,000,000 shares of its own common stock. On September 8,
2006, NutraCea commenced a lawsuit against Langley in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division regarding
this
transaction. The matter was settled on March 27, 2007. Pursuant to the
settlement, NutraCea received $1,250,000 from Langley in March, 2007. The
$1,250,000 settlement is included in the statement of operations as other income
in the six months ended June 30, 2007. During the third quarter of 2007 Langley
ceased trading and began the process of liquidating the investments. NutraCea
has received cash of $127,000 from this liquidation. The realizable value of
the
balance of the funds is uncertain and as a result we have recorded the fair
market value of Langley as $0 at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
9
4. INVENTORY
Inventories
by segment are composed of the following;
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
NutraCea
|
Irgovel
|
NutraCea
|
||||||||||
Finished
goods
|
$
|
3,122,000
|
$
|
2,089,000
|
$
|
1,033,000
|
$
|
1,396,000
|
|||||
Work
in process
|
524,000
|
-
|
524,000
|
-
|
|||||||||
Raw
materials
|
1,069,000
|
674,000
|
395,000
|
184,000
|
|||||||||
Packaging
supplies
|
232,000
|
232,000
|
-
|
228,000
|
|||||||||
Total
inventories
|
$
|
4,947,000
|
$
|
2,995,000
|
$
|
1,952,000
|
$
|
1,808,000
|
5. NOTES
RECEIVABLE
At
June
30, 2008, we held seven secured promissory notes payable to the Company with
aggregate outstanding amounts under these notes of $858,000 (net of allowance
for doubtful notes receivable of $573,000), $858,000 is reported as current
and
$0 as long-term. These secured promissory notes bear interest at annual rates
ranging from 5% to 10% with the principal and all accrued interest due and
payable to us at dates ranging from July 2008 to December 2008.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2008 we loaned a total of $182,000 to certain
strategic customers, which loans were evidenced by promissory notes, and
received payments totaling $6,977,000 on existing promissory notes. During
the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 we also accrued interest income of
$150,000 and $398,000, respectively, and received cash payments of $26,000
and
$72,000 for accrued interest, respectively.
At
December 31, 2007, NutraCea had outstanding notes receivable from material
strategic customers as follows:
A
$1,968,000 note due from ITV Global, an infomercial marketing company. This
note
represents ITV’s payment obligation for a sale made in December, 2007. The note
carries scheduled payments over a five month period. We obtained a security
interest in certain assets of the customer to secure payments under the note.
As
of June 30, 2008 this note was paid in full.
In
April
2007, we converted $365,000 of a customers’ accounts receivable to a note
receivable, combining it with an existing note from that customer for a total
note receivable of $500,000, bearing interest at 10% and due in October 2007.
In
December, 2008, the note was modified, and the accrued interest added, for
a new
total of $543,000. This note was past due as of December 31, 2007. We recorded
an allowance for doubtful notes of $250,000 against this receivable for the
year
ended December 31, 2007. In March, 2008 we re-negotiated the settlement terms
and extended the due date to April 2008, received payment of the penalty
interest due of $10,000 on this note and added the remaining accrued interest
due on the note to the balance due creating a total note receivable of $542,000.
As of June 30, 2008 this note remains unpaid therefore we have recorded an
additional allowance for doubtful accounts of $243,000 against this note in
the
first quarter of 2008 (see Note 9).
During
the second quarter of 2007, we granted to Pacific Holdings Advisors Limited
(“PAHL”) certain rights under a license to use and distribute SRB. PAHL paid a
one-time fee of $5,000,000 for these rights by issuing to NutraCea an interest
bearing promissory note due over five year terms. In January 2008, the payment
terms of the promissory note were amended to allow for the forgiveness of
accrued interest on the note if the full principal was paid by March 31, 2008.
We received the $5,000,000 payment on April 1, 2008, however, as the payment
was
in transit on that date we agreed to honor the forgiveness of interest due
through March 31, 2008 of approximately $175,000.
10
6. PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment consists of the following:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Land
|
$
|
237,000
|
$
|
15,000
|
|||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
2,603,000
|
2,405,000
|
|||||
Vehicles
|
66,000
|
-
|
|||||
Computers
and software
|
488,000
|
402,000
|
|||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
1,854,000
|
700,000
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
28,830,000
|
14,243,000
|
|||||
Construction
in progress
|
13,281,000
|
4,347,000
|
|||||
Total
property, plant, and equipment
|
47,359,000
|
22,112,000
|
|||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(4,042,000
|
)
|
(2,784,000
|
)
|
|||
Total
property, plant, and equipment, net
|
$
|
43,317,000
|
$
|
19,328,000
|
Depreciation
expense (before allocation to cost of goods sold) for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $792,000 and $464,000, respectively.
Depreciation
expense (before allocation to cost of goods sold) for the six months ended
June
30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,311,000 and $642,000, respectively.
7. OTHER
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Other
intangibles consisted of the following at:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Patents
|
$
|
2,690,000
|
$
|
2,657,000
|
|||
Copyrights
and trademarks
|
3,288,000
|
3,288,000
|
|||||
Non-compete
agreements
|
650,000
|
650,000
|
|||||
License
and supply agreement
|
220,000
|
220,000
|
|||||
Subtotal
of other intangible assets
|
6,848,000
|
6,815,000
|
|||||
Less
accumulated amortization
|
(1,499,000
|
)
|
(1,072,000
|
)
|
|||
Total
other intangible assets, net
|
$ | 5,349,000 |
$
|
5,743,000
|
11
Amortization
expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $136,000 and
$152,000, respectively. Amortization expense for the six months ended June
30,
2008 and 2007 was $427,000 and $252,000, respectively.
8. (LOSS)
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic
(loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during all periods presented.
Options and warrants are excluded from the basic loss per share calculation
and
are considered in calculating the diluted (loss) earnings per
share.
The
dilutive effect of outstanding options, warrants is calculated using the
treasury stock method and the dilutive effect of the convertible series B
preferred stock, and convertible series C preferred stock is calculated using
the as-if converted method.
As
of
June 30, 2008 and 2007, options and warrants to purchase approximately
52,008,000 and 47,129,000 shares of our common stock were outstanding,
respectively. These are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share
at June 30, 2008 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
Components
of basic and diluted loss per share were as follows:
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(6,093,000
|
)
|
$
|
2,002,000
|
$
|
(12,845,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,755,000
|
|||
Weighted
average outstanding
shares
of common stock
|
151,867,000
|
136,257,000
|
145,545,000
|
118,952,000
|
|||||||||
Convertible
preferred stock
|
-
|
2,000
|
-
|
2,000
|
|||||||||
Common
stock equivalents
|
-
|
31,000,000
|
-
|
30,000,000
|
|||||||||
Total
diluted shares
|
151,867,000
|
167,259,000
|
145,545,000
|
148,954,000
|
|||||||||
(Loss)
earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
At
June
30, 2008, and 2007, the number of “in-the-money” options and warrants
outstanding was approximately 19,754,000 and 41,279,000, respectively. The
weighted average exercise price of “in-the-money” anti-dilutive options and
warrants for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $0.43 and $1.35,
respectively.
12
9. CONCENTRATION
OF CREDIT
RISK
Financial
instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit
risk consist primarily of
trade
accounts receivable and notes receivable for sales to major customers. We
perform credit evaluations on our customers’ financial condition and generally
do not require collateral on accounts receivable.
Accounts
receivable
We
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts on our receivables based upon
expected collection of all accounts receivable. A summary of the activity in
the
allowance for doubtful accounts for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
and 2007 follows:
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
3,168,000
|
$
|
20,000
|
$
|
2,999,000
|
$
|
20,000
|
|||||
Irgovel
acquisition
|
- | - |
94,000
|
-
|
|||||||||
Adjusted
beginning balance
|
3,168,000
|
20,000
|
3,093,000
|
20,000
|
|||||||||
Provision
for allowance for doubtful
|
|||||||||||||
accounts
charged to operations
|
80,000
|
1,055,000
|
173,000
|
1,055,000
|
|||||||||
Losses
charged against allowance
|
- | - |
(21,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
Recoveries
of accounts previously
|
|||||||||||||
allowed
for
|
(71,000
|
)
|
- |
(68,000
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$
|
3,177,000
|
$
|
1,075,000
|
$
|
3,177,000
|
$
|
1,075,000
|
During
the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 we recorded an allowance for
doubtful accounts receivable of $9,000 and $1,075,000, respectively.
Our
provision for allowance for doubtful accounts for the three months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007 was $80,000, and $1,055,000, respectively.
Our
provision for allowance for doubtful accounts expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $173,000, and $1,055,000, respectively.
The
following table lists the concentrations of sales and accounts receivable by
customer for each of our segments for the indicated periods:
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
||||||||||||
NutraCea
|
Irgovel
|
NutraCea
|
Irgovel
|
||||||||||
Revenues
for period
|
$
|
3,935,000
|
$
|
6,379,000
|
$
|
6,809,000
|
$
|
8,616,000
|
|||||
Number
of customers with sales
|
|||||||||||||
greater
than 4% of total revenues
|
5
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
|||||||||
Total
percentage of sales by
|
|||||||||||||
Customers
with greater than 4%
|
34
|
%
|
9
|
%
|
21
|
%
|
16
|
%
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable at end of period
|
$
|
1,721,000
|
$
|
2,549,000
|
$
|
1,721,000
|
$
|
2,549,000
|
|||||
Number
of customers with accounts
|
|||||||||||||
Receivable
balances greater than
|
|||||||||||||
4%
of total accounts receivable
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|||||||||
Total
percentage of receivables held
|
|||||||||||||
by
customers with greater than
|
|||||||||||||
4%
of total receivables
|
67
|
%
|
35
|
%
|
67
|
%
|
35
|
%
|
For
the
three months ended June 30, 2007, two customers accounted for a total of 54%
of
sales: 30%, and 24% respectively. No other customer accounted for more than
3%
of total sales.
13
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2007, two customers accounted for a total of 49%
of
sales: 26%, and 23% respectively. No other customer accounted for more than
5%
of total sales. At June 30, 2007, three customers accounted for 82% of total
accounts receivable: 33%, 29%, and 20% respectively. No other customer accounted
for more than 3% of the total outstanding accounts receivable.
Notes
receivable
We
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts on our notes receivables based
upon
expected collection of all notes receivable. A summary of the activity in the
allowance for doubtful accounts for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008
and 2007 follows:
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2008
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
543,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
250,000
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Provision
for allowance for doubtful
|
|||||||||||||
notes
receivable charged to operations
|
30,000
|
-
|
293,000
|
-
|
|||||||||
Losses
charged against allowance
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Recoveries
of accounts previously allowed for
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$
|
573,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
543,000
|
$
|
-
|
10. ACQUISITIONS
AND JOINT VENTURES
Irgovel
On
January 31, 2008, NutraCea entered into a Quotas (share) Purchase and Sale
Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with the Quota Holders (“Sellers”) of Irgovel -
Industria Riograndens De Oleos Vegetais Ltda., a limited liability company
organized under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil (“Irgovel”).
Irgovel, located in Brazil, owns and operates a rice bran oil processing
facility in Pelotas, Brazil, South America.
In
February 2008, we completed the purchase of Irgovel paying $15,049,000 for
100%
of the company. The total consideration of $15,049,000 includes approximately
$50,000 in legal fees which we incurred and added to the purchase price
and
a
$649,000 hold-back provision which was due to the sellers in June
2008.
Additionally, we agreed to fund as necessary up to $5,300,000 to pay deferred
taxes due to the Brazilian government. These deferred taxes are included in
the
liabilities on Irgovel’s financial statements and are payable over periods up to
15 years.
The
following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired
and
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The Company believes the fair
values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on
reasonable assumptions. The purchase price allocations for the Irgovel
acquisition are preliminary and the Company is obtaining third-party valuations
of property, plant, and equipment and certain intangible assets. Accordingly,
the Company’s fair value estimates for the purchase price allocation may change
during the allowable allocation period, which is up to one year from the
acquisition date, if additional information becomes available:
14
Cash
|
$
|
79,000
|
||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,242,000
|
|||
Inventory
|
979,000
|
|||
Other
current assets
|
635,000
|
|||
Property
and equipment
|
7,605,000
|
|||
Other
non-current assets
|
23,000
|
|||
Goodwill
|
13,158,000
|
|||
Total
Assets
|
23,721,000
|
|||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
2,516,000
|
|||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
6,156,000
|
|||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
15,049,000
|
See
Note
11 for pro forma consolidated results of operations presented as though the
acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2007.
Medan,
LLC.
On
January 24, 2008, NutraCea, through a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary,
Medan, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Medan”), entered into a Stock
Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with Fortune Finance Overseas Ltd., a
British Virgin Islands company (“FFOL”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on
March 28, 2008, Medan purchased 9,700 outstanding shares of capital stock of
PT
Panganmas Inti Nusantara, an Indonesian Company (“PIN”), from FFOL for
$8,175,000 after Indonesian approval of PIN’s Foreign Investment Application.
In
June,
2008, Medan purchased an additional 3,050 shares directly from PIN for
$2,500,000 after certain government approvals were obtained, raising Medan’s
interest in PIN to 51%. The remaining 49% of the common stock of PIN is owned
by
FFOL.
We
made
this acquisition in order to construct and operate a full scale wheat mill
incorporating our stabilization technology applied to wheat bran. PIN owns
land
and has obtained the permits necessary to construct a wheat facility in Kuala
Tnajung, Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia. A director of FFOL is also a director
of PAHL. Medan and FFOL entered a voting agreement wherein each party will
vote
all of it’s shares in a manner so that PIN’s Board of Directors and Board of
Commissioners shall consist of an even number of persons designated each by
Medan and FFOL. The Purchase Agreement required us to pay Theorem Capital
Partners a $500,000 commission upon the completion of the transaction, payable
in two installments. The first $250,000 of the commission was paid in June,
2008, the balance was paid in July, 2008. Additionally, upon completion of
the
transaction we granted to Theorem an option to purchase 500,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price per share of $1.50, which expires in five
years. The fair value of this option is approximately $128,000 and was charged
to professional fees in our statement of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2008.
Concurrently
with the Purchase Agreement, NutraCea entered into a Wheat Bran Stabilization
Equipment Lease (“Lease”) with PIN. Pursuant to the Lease, NutraCea will lease
to PIN wheat stabilization equipment developed by NutraCea for use at PIN’s
facility. The term of the lease will be for 15 years with an automatic extension
of 5 years if the facility is fully operational and the equipment is still
being
used in the operations of the facility. The lease amount payable by PIN will
be
the actual cost incurred for manufacturing and installing the equipment at
the
facility.
Prior
to
our initial acquisition PIN was engaged in a flour trading operation. PIN
divested itself of its trading operations in the first quarter of 2008 prior
to
our initial investment. After the date of our initial investment PIN has no
sales and its operations are only those related to the preparation of the wheat
mill project.
As
we
have a non-controlling interest in PIN our investment in PIN is accounted for
under the equity method of accounting. At June 30, 2008 the value of our
investment was $10,648,000. Our share of the net loss of PIN for the period
from
March 28, 2008 through June 30, 2008 was approximately $27,000.
15
Summary
financial information of PIN at June 30, 2008 is:
Assets
|
||||
Cash
|
$
|
2,735,000
|
||
Prepaid
expenses
|
147,000
|
|||
Land
and equipment (net)
|
4,269,000
|
|||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
7,151,000
|
||
Liabilities
and equity
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
2,213,000
|
||
Shareholders
equity
|
4,938,000
|
|||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$
|
7,151,000
|
As
of
June 30, 2008 the book value of PIN’s assets was $4,938,000 and Medan’s 51%
interest in these assets was approximately $2,469,000. The differences
between the carrying amounts of strategic equity investment accounted for using
the equity method and the Company’s underlying equity in the net assets of PIN
was $8,206,000. Based upon our economic analysis, we believe PIN’s fair
value far exceeds the book value of its assets.
Rice
Science LLC
In
December 2007 we formed Rice Science, LLC (“Rice Science”), a Delaware limited
liability company, with Herbal Science Singapore PTe., Ltd. (“Herbal Science”),
a Singapore corporation. We formed this LLC with Herbal Science to acquire
from
Herbal Science certain isolates license rights and to commercialize and sell
the
SRB isolates. NutraCea and Herbal Science have an 80% and 20% interest in the
operating results, respectively, but Herbal Science has no interest in the
initial capital contributions.
We
made
an initial capital contribution to Rice Science in December 2007 of $1,200,000
as specified in the limited liability company agreement for Rice Science. We
may
make an additional $1,000,000 contribution at our discretion and maintain our
80% holding. Herbal Science contributed certain licenses as their capital
contribution with a deemed value of $440,000. There are no further capital
contributions required of either member. However Herbal Science does not have
an
interest in the initial capital contributed by NutraCea and will not have a
minority interest until there are results of operations.
NutraCea
holds an 80% interest in Rice Science and therefore will account for the
investment as a consolidated subsidiary. Summary financial information for
Rice
Science as of June 30, 2008 is as follows:
Assets
|
||||
Cash
|
$
|
850,000
|
||
Receivable
from Herbal Science
|
70,000
|
|||
920,000
|
||||
Liabilities
and Equity
|
||||
Members
equity
|
||||
Members
equity - Herbal Science
|
-
|
|||
Members
equity - NutraCea, Inc.
|
920,000
|
|||
Total
members equity
|
920,000
|
|||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$
|
920,000
|
In
June
2008, Rice Science made a payment of $350,000 to Herbal Science for on-going
research programs to commercialize SRB isolates. This amount is included in
our
consolidated statement of operations under Research and Development expenses.
Herbal Science’s $70,000 share of the $350,000 expense is included in our
consolidated balance sheet as a non-current receivable.
Grainnovation,
Inc.
In
April
2007, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Grainnovation, Inc.
(“Grainnovation”) a privately held company that had equipment for pelletizing
horse feed for equine customers of strategic value to NutraCea, and certain
assets used in Grainnovations’s business for a total of $2,150,000, of which
$1,605,000 of the purchase price was paid at closing, with the balance held
in
third-party escrow. In November, 2007, the second installment of $235,000 due
was distributed and in April 2008 the last and final installment of $310,000
was
distributed to the sellers from the third-party escrow as agreed.
16
The
following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired
and
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. We incurred $20,000 in legal
fees relating to this purchase, which are added to the purchase price and
Goodwill. The Company believes the fair values assigned to the assets acquired
and liabilities assume were based on reasonable assumptions.
Cash
|
$
|
1,000
|
||
Accounts
receivable
|
26,000
|
|||
Inventory
|
11,000
|
|||
Property
and equipment
|
623,000
|
|||
Covenant
not to compete
|
650,000
|
|||
Goodwill
|
917,000
|
|||
Total
Assets
|
2,228,000
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
58,000
|
|||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
2,170,000
|
Grain
Enhancements LLC
In
June
2007, we entered into a joint venture with PAHL to form Grain Enhancements
LLC
(“Grain Enhancements”), a Delaware limited liability company. NutraCea and PAHL
each hold a 47.5% share of Grain Enhancements. The remaining interest is held
by
Theorem Group LLC (“Theorem”) (3.333%) and Ho’okipa Capital Partners, Inc.
(1.667%). The purpose of Grain Enhancements is to develop and market stabilized
rice bran (“SRB”) and related products in certain Southeast Asian countries.
Grain Enhancements will purchase SRB exclusively from NutraCea until its own
facilities are in operation and NutraCea will lease to Grain Enhancements at
NutraCea’s manufacturing cost the necessary equipment for such facilities.
Payments under the equipment lease will be payable in full upon installation
of
the equipment.
Under
the
limited liability agreement for the joint venture, NutraCea and PAHL will
contribute up to $5,000,000 each to Grain Enhancements to fund the operations,
of which $1,500,000 each was due on June 30, 2007. Both members made their
initial contribution in July 2007. Additionally, NutraCea and PAHL were each
required to contribute to Grain Enhancements $2,000,000 no later than October
2007, and $1,500,000 no later than August 2008. Only the initial capital
contribution of $1,500,000 from each member has been made. On January 24, 2008,
NutraCea and PAHL amended certain terms of the Operating Agreement. Pursuant
to
the modified agreement, the timing of mandatory capital contributions of the
members was changed from the agreed upon schedule to a determination by Grain
Enhancements finance committee on an as-needed basis. In addition, PAHL will
no
longer receive a monthly management fee.
Theorem
was paid $750,000 and $500,000 by NutraCea and Grain Enhancements, respectively,
for services relating to the formation of the joint venture. Our portion of
Grain Enhancements net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
was
$35,000 and $53,000, respectively.
Our
investment in Grain Enhancements is accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. At June 30, 2008 the book value of our investment was $1,139,000.
17
Summary
financial information of Grain Enhancements, LLC at June 30, 2008
is:
Assets
|
||||
Cash
|
$
|
2,290,000
|
||
Liabilities
and equity
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
12,000
|
||
Members
equity
|
3,000,000
|
|||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(722,000
|
)
|
||
Total
equity
|
2,278,000
|
|||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$
|
2,290,000
|
Vital
Living, Inc.
In
April
2007, we acquired from their holders outstanding shares of Series D Convertible
Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock”) and secured convertible notes
(“Notes”) of Vital Living, Inc. (“VLI”), a publicly traded company. VLI
distributes nutritional supplements using similar processes as NutraCea for
manufacturing and distribution. We paid $1,000,000 for 1,000,000 shares of
Series D Preferred Stock and $4,226,000 for the outstanding Notes. The Series
D
Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1.00 per share senior to the
liquidation preferences of Vital Living’s Series B Preferred Stock and Senior C
Preferred Stock. The Notes bear interest at 12% per annum, payable June 15
and
December 15, mature in December 2008 and are secured by a security interest
in
substantially all of Vital Living’s assets. Originally, the Notes were
convertible into VLI common stock and VLI had the option of paying the interest
on the Notes in shares of Vital Living common stock. On September 11, 2007,
NutraCea and VLI entered into a letter agreement confirming their agreement
to
eliminate the conversion rights of the Notes. In addition, the parties agreed
that until such time, if any, as NutraCea gives 30 days prior written notice
to
VLI, VLI may not pay accrued interest under the Notes in shares of Vital Living
Common Stock, without NutraCea’s consent, and that during such time VLI will not
be deemed to be in default under the Notes as a result of not paying accrued
interest in such shares.
On
September 28, 2007, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset
Purchase Agreement”) with VLI. The Asset Purchase Agreement provides that we
will purchase substantially all of Vital Living’s intellectual property and
other assets used by VLI and certain subsidiaries in its business, including
rights to nutritional supplements and nutraceutical products that are marketed
for distribution to healthcare practitioners. As part of the transaction, VLI
will assign to NutraCea its rights under various distribution and other
agreements relating to the products being acquired. We will not acquire
inventory, raw materials, cash, or accounts receivable of VLI.
The
purchase price consists of (i) $1,500,000 to be paid by NutraCea at the closing,
(ii) cancellation of outstanding indebtednesses of VLI, its subsidiaries and
certain related entities to NutraCea, including all of the Notes, and (iii)
cancellation of all shares of Series D Preferred Stock of VLI held by NutraCea.
Completion of the transaction is subject to a variety of customary closing
conditions, including, among other things, approval of the transaction by the
stockholders of VLI at a special meeting of stockholders of Vital Living and
the
absence of a material adverse effect on the assets between the date of the
agreement and the closing date. The Purchase Agreement contains customary
representations and warranties of the parties, covenants, closing conditions,
and certain termination rights for both NutraCea and VLI, and further provides
that, upon termination of the Purchase Agreement under specified circumstances,
Vital Living may be required to pay NutraCea a termination fee. NutraCea expects
that the transaction will close in the third quarter of 2008, although the
actual timing of the closing will depend on many factors including preparation
of the proxy statement and the SEC’s review of the proxy statement, and the
closing may occur later than the third quarter of 2008.
We
purchased the Senior Secured Convertible Notes and Preferred Stock of VLI as
a
means of affecting a subsequent acquisition of the productive assets of VLI,
either through a merger or asset sale. Our purchase of Preferred Stock allowed
us to control an outstanding class of capital stock, and our purchase of the
convertible notes allowed us to obtain a senior secured position with respect
to
Vital Living’s assets. Vital Living has a set of products that are complementary
to our products and an established marketing channel that would enable NutraCea
to market its own products without the expense of building the marketing base.
In addition, some VLI products are suitable for modification to include
NutraCea’s stabilized rice bran as a key ingredient, which we believe would
further enhance and develop the NutraCea brand.
Our
accounting for the purchase of these securities of VLI qualifies as a Variable
Interest Entity (“VIE”) in accordance with FIN 46R. As the primary beneficiary,
we have consolidated VLI.
18
The
purchase price allocated to the assets and liabilities in April 2007 is as
follows:
Assets
|
||||
Cash
|
$
|
83,000
|
||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,017,000
|
|||
Inventory
|
30,000
|
|||
Property
and equipment
|
15,000
|
|||
Other
assets
|
15,000
|
|||
Goodwill
|
6,278,000
|
|||
Total
Assets
|
7,438,000
|
|||
Liabilities
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
737,000
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
725,000
|
|||
Notes
payable
|
750,000
|
|||
Total
Liabilities
|
2,212,000
|
|||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
5,226,000
|
We
have
included in our balance sheet at June 30, 2008 the financial position of VLI
as
of the period ended June 30, 2008, and VLI’s results of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008 in our statement of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, while eliminating inter-company balances.
The effect on our consolidated, condensed balance sheet at June 30, 2008 was
a
decrease in total assets of $1,021,000, an increase in total liabilities of
$1,675,000 and a decrease in shareholder equity of $2,696,000. The effect on
our
consolidated income statement for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was an
increase in revenues of $1,147,000, an increase in cost of goods sold of
$720,000, an increase in expenses of $488,000, and a decrease in net income
of
$62,000.
Rice
RX LLC
In
December 2007 we formed Rice Rx LLC (“RRX”), a Delaware LLC, with Herbal Science
Singapore PTe. Ltd. (“Herbal Science”), a Singapore corporation. We formed RRX
with Herbal Science to obtain and commercialize certain patentable
pharmaceutical license rights from Herbal Science. NutraCea and Herbal Science
each have a 50% interest in RRX.
Commencing
in July 2008, if and to the extent the members determine that capital
contributions are necessary, each member agrees to contribute capital of up
to
$150,000.
In
conjunction with the formation of RRX, NutraCea sold to Herbal Science for
$300,000 an exclusive license to develop, manufacture and sell certain SRB
isolates and identify and commercialize certain patentable pharmaceuticals.
Payment for this license was made in the form of $150,000 cash received in
December, 2007, and the execution of a promissory note payable to NutraCea
for
$150,000 at the Bank of America prime rate of interest and due in December
2008.
Our
investment in RRX is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. As
of
June 30, 2008 no capital contributions had been made, and RRX had no operations,
expenses or income.
11. ACQUISITION
PRO-FORMAS
In
February, 2008, we acquired 100% of Irgovel (see Note 10). Presented below
are
the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the three and
six
month periods ending June 30, 2008 and 2007 presented as though our acquisition
of Irgovel had occurred on January 1, 2007. This pro forma data is presented
for
informational purposes only and does not purport to be indicative of the results
of future operations of the Company or of the results that would have actually
been attained had the acquisition taken place at the beginning of
2007.
19
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Three
Months
Ended
June
30, 2007
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2008
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2007
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Revenues:
|
$
|
10,026,000
|
$
|
16,075,000
|
$
|
17,100,000
|
$
|
20,234,000
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
7,088,000
|
6,333,000
|
13,327,000
|
9,154,000
|
|||||||||
Gross profit
|
2,938,000
|
9,742,000
|
3,773,000
|
11,080,000
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
7,770,000
|
7,947,000
|
15,351,000
|
11,235,000
|
|||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(4,832,000
|
)
|
1,795,000
|
(11,578,000
|
)
|
(155,000
|
)
|
||||||
Non-operating
expenses, other and taxes
|
(1,359,000
|
)
|
103,000
|
(1,447,000
|
)
|
1,746,000
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income available to
|
|||||||||||||
common
shareholders
|
$ |
(6,191,000
|
)
|
$ |
1,898,000
|
$ |
(13,025,000
|
)
|
$ |
1,591,000
|
|||
Basic
and diluted (loss) income per share
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
(loss) income per share
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
|||
Fully
diluted (loss) income per share
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
$
|
0.01
|
|||
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
average basic number
|
|||||||||||||
of
shares outstanding
|
151,867,000
|
136,257,000
|
145,545,000
|
118,952,000
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average fully diluted number
|
|||||||||||||
of
shares outstanding
|
151,867,000
|
167,259,000
|
145,545,000
|
148,954,000
|
12. NOTES
PAYABLE
In
October 2007, we executed an un-secured promissory note in favor of the lessor
of our new West Sacramento warehouse for $105,000 at 8% due over four years
in
payments of $2,572 per month for the build-out of tenant improvements. At June
30, 2008 the short-term portion of this note was approximately $23,000 and
the
remaining long-term portion was approximately $64,000.
13. RESTRICTED
CASH
Under
certain agreements we must maintain restricted cash balances in order to satisfy
future obligations. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 we had the following
amounts held in restricted interest-bearing accounts:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Current
restricted cash
|
|||||||
Corporate
office lease
|
$
|
895,000
|
$
|
448,000
|
|||
Grainnovations
purchase escrow
|
-
|
310,000
|
|||||
Other
|
11,000
|
-
|
|||||
Total
current restricted cash
|
906,000
|
758,000
|
|||||
Non-current
restricted cash
|
|||||||
Corporate
office lease
|
1,343,000
|
1,791,000
|
|||||
Irgovel
purchase escrow
|
1,905,000
|
-
|
|||||
Total
long-term restricted cash
|
3,248,000
|
1,791,000
|
|||||
Total
restricted cash
|
$
|
4,154,000
|
$
|
2,549,000
|
20
14. RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Medan,
LLC
In
March
2008, our wholly owned subsidiary Medan, LLC purchased 9,700 shares of PIN
(see
Note 10) from FFOL for $8,175,000. A director of FFOL is also a director of
PAHL. In June 2008, Medan purchased an additional 3,050 shares directly from
PIN
for $2,500,000 raising our interest in PIN to 51%.
Vital
Living, Inc.
In
conjunction with our purchase of certain securities of VLI (Note 10), we began
consolidating VLI financial results into our financial results. Additionally,
during fiscal 2007, we entered into a business relationship with Wellness
Watchers Global, LLC (“WWG”), the major customer of VLI. The chief executive
officer of VLI, is also a principal member of WWG. During the year ended
December 31, 2007, we recorded sales of $2,460,000 to WWG. In the six months
ended June 30, 2008 we recorded $192,000 of sales to WWG. At June 30, 2008
we
had $1,440,000 due from this customer included in our accounts receivable of
$4,703,000 (net of allowance for doubtful accounts). As of June, 2008 the CEO
of
VLI has advanced VLI $462,000 of short-term, non-interest bearing loans which
are included in the liabilities of VLI. In our consolidated balance sheet we
have offset the $462,000 due to VLI’s CEO from VLI against accounts receivable
due VLI from WWG.
15. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
Contractual
Obligations
We
lease
corporate office space in Phoenix, AZ, warehouse facilities in Sacramento,
California, property for our production facilities in Lake Charles, Louisiana
and Freeport Texas, and a small office in Burley, Idaho. Future amounts due
under these leases at June 30, 2008 are included in the following
table:
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||
2008
|
$
|
751,000
|
||
2009
|
1,582,000
|
|||
2010
|
1,631,000
|
|||
2011
|
1,654,000
|
|||
2012
|
1598,000
|
|||
2013
|
1,649,000
|
|||
Thereafter
|
5,004,000
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
13,869,000
|
Total
rent expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $410,000
and
$27,000, respectively. Total rent expense for the six months ended June 30,
2008
and 2007 was $846,000 and $276,000, respectively.
16. BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
We
operate in two business segments; NutraCea, which manufactures and distributes
nutritional supplements primarily derived from SRB (operating results from
VLI
are included in our NutraCea segment), and Irgovel, our rice-bran oil
manufacturing subsidiary in Pelotas, Brazil. Operating results for the three
and
six months ended June 30, 2008 (the period for Irgovel is from February 19,
2008
through June 30, 2008) and summary financial information as of June 30, 2008
for
the segments are presented in the following table:
Summary
Financial Information
|
Three
Months Ended
June 30, 2008
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||
Operating
Results
|
NutraCea
|
Irgovel
|
NutraCea
|
Irgovel
|
|||||||||
Net
revenues
|
$
|
3,935,000
|
$
|
6,379,000
|
$
|
6,809,000
|
$
|
8,616,000
|
|||||
Total
cost of sales
|
3,169,000
|
4,108,000
|
6,364,000
|
5,707,000
|
|||||||||
Gross
Margin
|
766,000
|
2,271,000
|
445,000
|
2,909,000
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
6,906,000
|
828,000
|
13,783,000
|
1,351,000
|
|||||||||
Net
(loss) income from operations
|
(6,140,000
|
)
|
1,443,000
|
(13,338,000
|
)
|
1,558,000
|
|||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
(758,000
|
)
|
(426,000
|
)
|
(275,000
|
)
|
(541,000
|
)
|
|||||
Net
(loss) income before taxes
|
$
|
(6,898,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,017,000
|
(13,613,000
|
)
|
1,017,000
|
|||||
Asset
Summary
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
119,676,000
|
$
|
26,700,000
|
$
|
119,676,000
|
$
|
26,700,000
|
21
17. STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
Common
Stock
During
the three months ended June 30, 2008 we:
issued
50,000 shares of our common stock to our Chief Operating Officer, in accordance
with a restricted grant agreement, valued at $37,500.
retired
53,096 shares of our common stock. These shares were originally issued to RiceX
and converted to NutraCea shares at the date of the merger in October, 2005.
April
2008 Registered Direct Offering
In
April
2008
we
issued in a registered offering common stock and warrants for aggregate gross
proceeds of approximately $20,000,000 ($18,775,000 after offering expenses).
We
issued an aggregate of 22,222,223 shares of common stock and warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 6,666,664 shares of our common stock combined in
“units” at a price of $0.90 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of
NutraCea common stock and a five year warrant to purchase 0.3 of a share of
NutraCea common stock at an exercise price of $1.20 per share. An advisor for
the financing received a customary 6% cash fee based on aggregate proceeds
received from the investors, reasonable expenses, and a five year warrant to
purchase 1,333,333 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.20.
The
fair value of these warrants to purchase 7,999,997 shares of common stock using
the Black-Scholes method is approximately $3,102,000. If the warrants issued
to
the investors and the financial advisor are exercised in full, we would receive
approximately $9,600,000.
Options
and Warrants
During
the three months ended June 30, 2008 we:
issued
to
a new employee an option to purchase a total of 50,000 shares of common stock
with vesting periods beginning one year from the date of grant to three years.
The options expire in five years and have an exercise price of $1.00 per
share.
issued
to
fourteen investors warrants to purchase a total of 6,666,664 shares of common
stock in conjunction with a Registered Direct Offering. The warrants vest
immediately, expire in five years and have an exercise price of $1.20 per
share.
issued
a
warrant to purchase 1,333,333 shares of our common stock to an advisor for
our
April, 2008 registered direct offering. The warrants vest immediately, expire
in
five years and have an exercise price of $1.20 per share.
issued
options to purchase 35,000 shares of our common stock to each of our six
non-employee directors. The options vest monthly over twelve months, expire
in
five years and have an exercise price of $0.86 per share.
22
issued
warrants to purchase 166,666 shares of our common stock each to three advisors
under a performance agreement. The warrants vest upon completion of the
agreements, expired in five years and have an exercise price of $1.50 per
share.
The
expense for stock options and warrants issued to consultants and employees
are
calculated at fair value using the Black-Scholes valuation method.
18. SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
In
July,
2008 one holder of our common stock exercised warrants and received a total
of
250,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$50,000.
19. FOREIGN
CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENTS
In
February, 2008 we acquired our Irgovel subsidiary in Pelotas, Brazil. We account
for the operations of Irgovel in the Brazilian Real (R$) and include the results
of operations and financial position in our consolidated financial statements
using the U.S. Dollar Unit of Measure method allowed under FAS 52. The
translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars is performed for monetary
balance sheet accounts using current exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date and for income and expense accounts using monthly average exchange
rates. Non-monetary accounts are re-measured using historical exchange rates.
The cumulative effects of translating the functional currencies into the U.S.
dollar are included in other comprehensive income.
The
following table lists the components of the accumulated translation (loss)
or
gain and the effect in US dollars.
Accumulated
Translation
(Loss)/Gain
|
|||||||
Six
Months Ended
June 30, 2008
|
|||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Net
income
|
R$
|
1,195,000
|
31,000
|
||||
Property,
plant, and equipment
|
13,302,000
|
(704,000
|
)
|
||||
Goodwill
|
23,015,000
|
(1,217,000
|
)
|
||||
Investment
from parent
|
R$
|
26,323,000
|
1,392,000
|
||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$
|
(498,000
|
)
|
20. IMPLEMENTATION
OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
During
the six months ended June 30, 2008, we implemented the following new accounting
policies;
Fair
Value Measurements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure
assets and liabilities. It also responds to investors’ requests for expanded
information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities
at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of
fair valued measurements on earnings. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever standards
require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and
does
not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for financial assets and liabilities in financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The
Company adopted this statement for financial assets and liabilities measured
at
fair value effective January 1, 2008. There was no financial statement impact
as
a result of adoption. In accordance with the guidance of FASB Staff Position
No.
157-2, the Company has postponed adoption of the standard for non-financial
assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis,
until the fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of FAS
157
did not have a material impact on the Company’s fair value measurements. The
provisions of FAS 157 have not been applied to non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities.
23
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115" ("FAS 159").
FAS 159
permits companies to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. The Company adopted FAS 159
in
the first quarter of 2008; as the Company did not apply the fair value option
to
any of its outstanding instruments, FAS 159
did
not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Business
Combinations and Non-controlling Interests
In
December 2007, the FASB released FAS 141R, “Business
Combinations”
and FAS
160, “Non-controlling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” Both
standards will be effective for transactions that occur after January 1,
2009.
FAS
141R
applies to all business combinations and will require the acquiring entity
to
recognize the assets and liabilities acquired at their respective fair
value. This standard changes the accounting for business combinations
in several areas. If we complete an acquisition after the effective
date of FAS 141R, some of these changes could result in increased volatility
in
our results of operations and financial position. For example,
transaction costs, which are currently capitalized in a business combination,
will be expensed as incurred. Additionally, pre-acquisition
contingencies (such as in-process lawsuits acquired) and contingent
consideration (such as additional consideration contingent on specified events
in the future) will be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date, with
subsequent changes in fair value reflected in our results of
operations. Under current accounting guidance, adjustments to these
contingencies are reflected in the allocation of purchase price if they occur
within a certain period of time after the acquisition date.
24
Item
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
NutraCea
is a health-science company focused on the development and distribution of
products based upon the use of stabilized rice bran and proprietary rice bran
formulations. Rice bran is the outer layer of brown rice which until recently
was an under-utilized by-product of the commercial rice industry. These products
include food supplements and medical foods which provide health benefits for
humans and animals (known as "nutraceuticals") based on stabilized rice bran,
rice bran derivatives and the rice bran oils. In February 2008, we acquired
100%
of Irgovel in Pelotas, Brazil (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial
statements contained herein), which operates a rice-bran oil manufacturing
plant. Rice bran oil is a natural addition to NutraCea's portfolio of value
added products derived from rice bran. A co-product of rice bran oil is
defatted rice bran that is currently widely used in animal feeding and has
great
potential as a food ingredient in human food products after applying
NutraCea’s proprietary, patent and patent-pending processes.
Beginning
in the first quarter of 2008 with the acquisition of our Irgovel subsidiary
we
began reporting in two business segments; the Irgovel segment for the
manufacture and sale of rice-bran oil products by Irgovel subsidiary, and the
NutraCea segment for the manufacture and sale of our SRB and SRB derived
products. The following is a discussion of the consolidated financial condition
of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007.
THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007
For
the
three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company’s net loss was $6,093,000, or
($0.04) per share, compared to a profit of $2,002,000 or $0.01 per share, in
the
same period of 2007, a decrease in net income of $8,095,000. The increased
net
loss for the quarter was primarily due to the decreased gross margin of
$6,096,000, an increase of $371,000 in operating expenses, and a net increase
in
other expenses, other income, and income taxes of $1,628,000.
Our
NutraCea segment contributed a loss before income taxes of $6,898,000 and our
Irgovel segment contributed income before taxes of $1,017,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 (see Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements
included herein).
Revenues,
cost of sales and gross margin
Our
consolidated net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 of
$10,314,000 decreased $2,682,000 from the $12,996,000 consolidated revenues
recorded in the same period last year. This decrease is comprised of a
$4,066,000 decrease in product sales and the decrease of $5,000,000 in licensing
fee revenue by our NutraCea segment, offset by $6,381,000 of sales contributed
by our Irgovel subsidiary. The $4,066,000 decrease in product sales by our
NutraCea segment is due to an increase of $615,000 in sales in our core SRB
product lines offset by sales in the three months ended June 30, 2007 of
$2,080,000 to a new customer and a $2,601,000 of proprietary products to a
single customer.
Gross
margins on product sales in the three months ended June 30, 2008 were
$3,037,000, or 29% compared to $9,133,000, or 70%, a decrease of $6,096,000
compared to the same period last year. Gross margins on our various product
lines vary widely and the gross margins are impacted from period to period
by
sales mix and utilization of production capacity. Our investment in production
capacity during 2007 and the first six months of 2008 has increased our fixed
operating costs in our NutraCea segment by approximately $750,000 per quarter.
Additionally, during the second quarter of 2008 our NutraCea segment operated
at
30% capacity overall due to difficulties in obtaining adequate quantities of
useable rice bran. Our Mermentau plant was idle from May through July because
the rice mill that supplies the plant was not milling rice because of business
conditions at their mill un-related to our operations. Our Lake Charles plant
began operations in May, 2008 however full production levels have not been
reached because the rice mill was phasing in our contract for rice bran. The
combination of increased fixed costs and under-utilization of production
capacity, along with the $4,995,000 decline in license fees, contributed to
the
increase in cost of goods sold in our NutraCea segment from 30% to 81% for
the
quarter ending June 30, 2008. We anticipate that beginning in August, 2008
both
rice mills will be operational and our plants will be receiving 100% of the
output from each mill. If, however, adequate supplies of raw rice bran remain
too low to run our plants at our desired capacity levels we may continue to
have
lower than desired gross profit margins on our NutraCea product sales.
The
following table illustrates the gross margin contribution by each of our
segments during the three months ended:
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
Increase/
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
%
|
NutraCea
|
%
|
Irgovel
|
%
|
NutraCea
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net
product sales
|
$
|
10,309,000
|
$
|
3,930,000
|
$
|
6,379,000
|
$
|
7,996,000
|
$
|
2,313,000
|
||||||||||||||||||
Royalty
and licensing
|
5,000
|
5,000
|
-
|
5,000,000
|
(4,995,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
10,314,000
|
100
|
3,935,000
|
100
|
6,379,000
|
100
|
12,996,000
|
100
|
(2,682,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
7,277,000
|
71
|
3,169,000
|
81
|
4,108,000
|
64
|
3,863,000
|
30
|
3,414,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Gross
Margin
|
$
|
3,037,000
|
29
|
$
|
766,000
|
19
|
$
|
2,271,000
|
36
|
$
|
9.133,000
|
70
|
$
|
(6,096,000
|
)
|
Operating
expenses
Research
and Development (“R&D”) expenses were $738,000 and $170,000 for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, an increase of $568,000. The
increase was attributed to higher product development costs and employee related
expenses due to increased R&D activities and expanded scientific staff
compared to the same period last year. We paid $350,000 to Herbal Science
Singapore PTE. LTD, the 20% minority member of our research subsidiary Rice
Science, LLC., for on-going research programs to commercialize SRB isolates.
The
Company expects to continue research and development expenditures to establish
the scientific basis for health claims of existing products and to develop
new
products and applications.
Sales,
General and Administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $5,871,000 and $5,657,000
in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, an increase
of
$214,000, or 4%. This increase is due to $1,351,000 of SG&A costs for our
Irgovel subsidiary, offset by a $1,137,000 reduction of total SG&A costs in
our NutraCea segment. SG&A expenses for our Irgovel subsidiary consist of
marketing, selling, and administrative expenses.
Specific
changes in SG&A expense is detailed in the following schedule for the three
months ended:
|
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
Increase
/(Decrease)
|
|||||||
Selling,
General, and Administrative Expenses
|
||||||||||
Payroll
|
$
|
1,582,000
|
$
|
1,472,000
|
$
|
110,000
|
||||
Employee
benefits, payroll taxes, and hiring
|
||||||||||
expenses
|
280,000
|
142,000
|
138,000
|
|||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
223,000
|
612,000
|
(389,000
|
)
|
||||||
Allowance
for bad debt expense, net
|
105,000
|
1,055,000
|
(950,000
|
)
|
||||||
Operations
|
258,000
|
310,000
|
(52,000
|
)
|
||||||
Travel
and entertainment
|
238,000
|
349,000
|
(111,000
|
)
|
||||||
Rent
and facility costs
|
436,000
|
249,000
|
187,000
|
|||||||
Stock
based compensation (net of amounts applied to
|
||||||||||
R&D
and professional fees)
|
770,000
|
909,000
|
(139,000
|
)
|
||||||
Amortization
|
218,000
|
222,000
|
(4,000
|
)
|
||||||
Depreciation
, net of
|
||||||||||
allocation
to cost of goods sold
|
248,000
|
118,000
|
130,000
|
|||||||
Administration,
insurance, and other
|
162,000
|
219,000
|
(57,000
|
)
|
||||||
Total
NutraCea segment
|
4,520,000
|
5,657,000
|
(1,137,000
|
)
|
||||||
Total
Irgovel segment
|
1,351,000
|
-
|
1,351,000
|
|||||||
Total
selling, general and administrative expenses
|
$
|
5,871,000
|
$
|
5,657,000
|
$
|
214,000
|
In
the
three months ended June 30, 2008 our provision for the allowance for bad debt
expense was $105,000 compared to $1,055,000 in the three months ended June
30,
2007, a decrease of $950,000. This change is the result of a $105,000 additional
provision for a doubtful accounts receivable.
25
Professional
fees were $1,125,000 and $1,536,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008
and
2007, respectively, a decrease of $411,000. This decrease is primarily due
to
the $707,000 decrease in broker and commission fees. The following table lists
the changes in each of the professional fees accounts for the three month
periods ended:
Professional
Fees
|
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
Increase/Decrease
|
|||||||
Legal
|
$
|
374,000
|
$
|
172,000
|
$
|
202,000
|
||||
Accounting
|
366,000
|
249,000
|
117,000
|
|||||||
Other
consulting fees
|
169,000
|
173,000
|
(4,000
|
)
|
||||||
Broker
and commission fees
|
43,000
|
750,000
|
(707,000
|
)
|
||||||
Shareholder
relations
|
173,000
|
192,000
|
(19,000
|
)
|
||||||
Total
NutraCea segment
|
1,125,000
|
1,536,000
|
(411,000
|
)
|
||||||
Total
Irgovel segment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Total
professional fees
|
$
|
1,125,000
|
$
|
1,536,000
|
$
|
(411,000
|
)
|
Other
income and expense
Other
expenses (net of income) were $1,184,000 in the three months ended June 30,
2008
compared to a net other income of $317,000 for the three month ended June 30,
2007. This $1,501,000 increase is detailed in the following table.
Other
income (expense)
|
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
(Increase)/Decrease
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
$
|
161,000
|
$
|
876,000
|
$
|
(715,000
|
)
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
(365,000
|
)
|
-
|
(365,000
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
(331,000
|
)
|
(309,000
|
)
|
(22,000
|
)
|
||||
Other
expenses
|
(586,000
|
)
|
-
|
(586,000
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
on equity investments
|
(63,000
|
)
|
(250,000
|
)
|
187,000
|
|||||
Total
other (expense) income
|
$
|
(1,184,000
|
)
|
$
|
317,000
|
$
|
(1,501,000
|
)
|
Interest
income decreased $715,000 due to lower cash balances being available for
investment.
Interest
expense increased $365,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 due to
$262,000 of interest expense on our Irgovel subsidiary for interest on accounts
receivable credit lines and $103,000 of interest incurred in our NutraCea
segment for our note payable for the leasehold improvements for our
warehouse/office in West Sacramento, California, and the interest
Loss
on
disposal of assets increased $22,000 due to a write-down of $331,000 of
inventory related to an infomercial product line compared to the $309,000 charge
in the three months ending June 30, 2007 for the abandonment of leasehold
improvements in our Sacramento office when we moved the corporate office to
Phoenix, AZ.
Other
expenses increased $586,000 due to a $221,000 reversal of a an accrued late
fee,
$205,000 lawsuit settlement on our VIE consolidated subsidiary Vital Living,
and
$160,000 of other non-operating charges on our Irgovel segment.
The
loss
on equity investments decreased $187,000. Our loss on the equity investments
in
GE and PIN from operations was $63,000 compared to the $250,000 loss in the
prior period which was due to the payment of the broker’s commission relating to
the formation of GE.
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company’s net loss was $12,845,000, or
($0.09) per share, compared to net income of $1,755,000, or $0.01 per share,
in
the same period of 2007, showing a decrease of $14,600,000. The decrease for
the
six month period was primarily due to the $5,410,000 increase in product sales,
offset by the $4,978,000 decline in license fee revenue, and a $7,095,000
increase in cost of goods sold which combined to result in a $6,663,000 decrease
in gross margin. Additionally, operating expenses increased $4,878,000 and
other
expenses (net of other income) increased $3,167,000.
Our
NutraCea segment contributed a loss before income taxes of $12,170,000 and
our
Irgovel segment contributed income before taxes of $1,017,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 (see Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements
included herein).
26
Revenues,
cost of sales and gross margin
Our
consolidated revenues through June 30, 2008 of $15,425,000 increased $432,000,
or 3%, from the same period last year. The revenue increase is attributable
to
$8,618,000 in sales contributed by our Irgovel segment, offset by a $3,206,000
decline in product sales and the decline of $4,978,000 of license fee revenues
by our NutraCea segment. The $3,206,000 decline in product sales from our
NutraCea segment is due to an increase of $1,475,000 in sales in our SRB product
lines offset by sales in the six months ended June 30, 2007 of $2,080,000 to
a
new customer and a $2,601,000 of proprietary products to a single
customer.
Gross
margins on sales in the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $3,354,000, or
22%,
compared to $10,017,000, or 67%, during the same period last year, a decline
of
$6,663,000. Gross margins on our various product lines vary widely and the
gross
margins are impacted from period to period by sales mix and utilization of
production capacity. Our investment in production capacity during 2007 and
the
first six months of 2008 has increased our fixed operating costs in our NutraCea
segment by approximately $750,000 per quarter. Additionally, during the six
months ended June 30, 2008 our NutraCea segment operated at 42% capacity overall
due to difficulties in obtaining adequate quantities of useable rice bran.
Our
Mermentau plant was idle from May, 2008 through July, 2008 because the mill
that
supplies the plant was not milling rice because of business conditions at their
mill un-related to our operations. Our Lake Charles plant began operations
in
May, 2008, however full production levels have not been reached because the
rice
mill was phasing in our contract for rice bran. The combination of increased
fixed costs and under-utilization of production capacity, along with the decline
of $4,978,000 in license and royalty fees, contributed to the increase in cost
of goods sold in our NutraCea segment from 33% to 86% for the six months ending
June 30, 2008. We anticipate that beginning in August, 2008 both rice mills
will
be operational and our plants will be receiving 100% of the output from each
mill. If, however, adequate supplies of rice bran remain too low to run our
plants at our desired capacity levels we may continue to have lower than desired
gross profit margins on our NutraCea product sales.
Also,
during the six months ended June 30, 2008 we recorded a charge to cost of goods
of $515,000 on our NutraCea segment relating to a credit to a customer to
reimburse the customer for products purchased by it, totaling $903,000 during
2007 ultimately determined by the customer to not meet its specifications.
This
credit relates to a specialty product made for this customer only and is the
only significant warranty cost that we have incurred. The customer has agreed
to
apply the credit against future purchases. We know of no other product warranty
contingencies.
The
following table illustrates the gross margin contribution by each of our
segments during the six months ended:
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
Increase/
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated
|
%
|
NutraCea
|
%
|
Irgovel
|
%
|
NutraCea
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
product sales
|
$
|
15,393,000
|
$
|
6,777,000
|
$
|
8,616,000
|
$
|
9,983,000
|
$
|
5,410,000
|
||||||||||||||||||
Royalty
and licensing
|
32,000
|
32,000
|
-
|
5,010,000
|
(4,978,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
15,425,000
|
100
|
6,809,000
|
100
|
8,616,000
|
100
|
14,993,000
|
100
|
432,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
11,556,000
|
75
|
5,849,000
|
86
|
5,707,000
|
66
|
4,976,000
|
33
|
6,580,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Product
warranty cost
|
515,000
|
3
|
515,000
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
515,000
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total
cost of sales
|
12,071,000
|
78
|
6,364,000
|
94
|
5,707,000
|
66
|
4,976,000
|
33
|
7,095,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Gross
Margin
|
$
|
3,354,000
|
22
|
$
|
445,000
|
6
|
$
|
2,909,000
|
34
|
$
|
10,017,000
|
67
|
$
|
(6,663,000
|
)
|
27
Operating
expenses
R&D
expenses were $1,002,000 and $291,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008,
and 2007, respectively, an increase of $711,000. The increase was attributed
to
higher product development costs and employee related expenses due to increased
R&D activities and expanded scientific staff compared to the same period
last year. We paid $350,000 to Herbal Science Singapore PTE. LTD, the 20%
minority member of our research subsidiary Rice Science, LLC for on-going
research programs to commercialize SRB Isolates. The Company expects to continue
research and development expenditures to establish the scientific basis for
health claims of existing products and to develop new products and applications.
SG&A
expenses were $11,049,000 and $7,970,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 respectively, an increase of $3,079,000, or 39%. This increase is
due
to a $1,728,000, or 22%, increase in our Nutracea segment due to expanded
investment in personnel, infrastructure, and sales and marketing activities
to
meet anticipated future demands (with the exception of bad debt expense - see
below), and $1,351,000 of SG&A from our Irgovel subsidiary. SG&A
expenses for our Irgovel subsidiary consist of marketing, selling, and
administrative expenses.
Specific
changes in SG&A expense is detailed in the following schedule for the six
months ended:
Selling,
General, and Administrative Expenses
|
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
|||||||
Payroll
|
$
|
3,064,000
|
$
|
2,256,000
|
$
|
808,000
|
||||
Employee
benefits, payroll taxes,
|
||||||||||
and
hiring expenses
|
505,000
|
424,000
|
81,000
|
|||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
696,000
|
869,000
|
(173,000
|
)
|
||||||
Allowance
for bad debt expense, net
|
495,000
|
1,055,000
|
(560,000
|
)
|
||||||
Operations
|
625,000
|
455,000
|
170,000
|
|||||||
Travel
and entertainment
|
587,000
|
469,000
|
118,000
|
|||||||
Rent
and facility cost
|
846,000
|
276,000
|
570,000
|
|||||||
Stock
based compensation, net of amounts
|
||||||||||
allocated
to R&D and professional fees
|
1,390,000
|
1,263,000
|
127,000
|
|||||||
Amortization
|
427,000
|
252,000
|
175,000
|
|||||||
Depreciation,
net of
|
||||||||||
allocation
to cost of goods sold
|
525,000
|
218,000
|
307,000
|
|||||||
Administration,
insurance, and other
|
538,000
|
433,000
|
105,000
|
|||||||
Total
NutraCea segment
|
9,698,000
|
7,970,000
|
1,728,000
|
|||||||
Total
Irgovel segment
|
1,351,000
|
-
|
1,351,000
|
|||||||
Total
selling, general and administrative expenses
|
$
|
11,049,000
|
$
|
7,970,000
|
$
|
3,079,000
|
In
the
six months ended June 30, 2008 our provision for the allowance for bad debt
expense was $495,000 compared to $1,055,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2007, a decrease of $560,000. This change is the result of an additional
$152,000 provision for doubtful accounts receivable and an additional $323,000
provision for doubtful notes receivable.
Professional
fees were $3,083,000 and $1,995,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and
2007, respectively, an increase of $1,088,000. The higher professional fees
in
2008 are due to $393,000 of legal fees for our acquisition of Irgovel and our
joint venture agreement with Bright. Broker and commission fees of $793,000
and
$750,000, respectively include a $500,000 commission associated with our
acquisition of PIN in 2008 and the $750,000 commission paid in 2007 for our
Grain Enhancements joint venture. . Professional fees include costs related
to
accounting, legal and consulting services. The following table lists the
increases in each of the professional fees accounts for the three month periods
ended:
Professional
Fees
|
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|||||||
Legal
|
$
|
853,000
|
$
|
255,000
|
$
|
598,000
|
||||
Accounting
|
811,000
|
505,000
|
306,000
|
|||||||
Other
consulting fees
|
311,000
|
218,000
|
93,000
|
|||||||
Broker
and commission fees
|
793,000
|
750,000
|
43,000
|
|||||||
Shareholder
relations
|
315,000
|
267,000
|
48,000
|
|||||||
Total
NutraCea segment
|
3,083,000
|
1,995,000
|
1,088,000
|
|||||||
Total
Irgovel segment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Total
Professional Fees
|
$
|
3,083,000
|
$
|
1,995,000
|
$
|
1,088,000
|
28
Other
income and expense
Other
expenses (net of other income) were $816,000 for the six months ended June
30,
2008 compared to other income (net of other expenses) of $2,079,000 in the
six
months ended June 30, 2007, an increase in net expense of 2,895,000.
Other
(expenses) income
|
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
(Increase)/Decrease
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
$
|
421,000
|
$
|
1,388,000
|
$
|
(967,000
|
)
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
(485,000
|
)
|
-
|
(485,000
|
)
|
|||||
Gain
on lawsuit settlement
|
-
|
1,250,000
|
(1,250,000
|
)
|
||||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
(331,000
|
)
|
(309,000
|
)
|
(22,000
|
)
|
||||
Other
expenses
|
(341,000
|
)
|
-
|
(341,000
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
on equity investments
|
(80,000
|
)
|
(250,000
|
)
|
170,000
|
|||||
Total
other (expenses) income
|
$
|
(816,000
|
)
|
$
|
2,079,000
|
$
|
(2,895,000
|
)
|
Interest
income decreased $967,000 due to lower cash balances being available for
investment.
Interest
expense increased $485,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 due to
$382,000 of interest expense on our Irgovel subsidiary for interest on accounts
receivable credit lines and $103,000 of interest incurred in our NutraCea
segment for our note payable for the leasehold improvements for our
warehouse/office in West Sacramento, California, and the interest incurred
during the second quarter for the three month note payable issued for the
purchase of our new building in Phoenix, Arizona.
In
the
six months ended June 30, 2007 we received a $1,250,000 payment for the
settlement of a lawsuit (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements
included herein).
Loss
on
disposal of assets increased $22,000 due to a write-down of $331,000 of
inventory related to an infomercial product line compared to the $309,000 charge
in the three months ending June 30, 2007 for the abandonment of leasehold
improvements in our Sacramento office when we moved the corporate office to
Phoenix, AZ.
Other
expenses increased $341,000 due to $205,000 lawsuit settlement on our VIE
consolidated subsidiary Vital Living, and $136,000 of other non-operating
charges on our Irgovel segment.
The
loss
on equity investments decreased $170,000. Our loss on the equity investments
in
GE and PIN from operations was $80,000. The $250,000 loss in the prior period
was due to the payment of the broker’s commission relating to the formation of
GE.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As
of
June 30, 2008, our source of liquidity was cash in the amount of $16,067,000.
Our cash decreased by $25,231,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008 from
our
cash position of $41,298,000 at December 31, 2007. The decrease in cash was
primarily due to our $14,970,000 (net of cash acquired with the purchase)
investment in Irgovel, the purchase of property, plant, and equipment of
17,698,000 (including $8,400,000 for an industrial building in Phoenix) and
our
purchase of 51% of PIN (see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements
contained herein) for $10,675,000, offset by the receipt of approximately
$18,775,000 (net of expenses) from our registered direct offering of equity
in
April, 2008.
On
April
1, 2008 we received $5,000,000 from PAHL in payment of the note receivable
entered into in June 2007 for the sale to PAHL of licensing rights. Originally
due over five year terms, the note was modified in January 2008 to allow for
the
forgiveness of accrued interest on the note if the full principal was paid
by
March 31, 2008. As the payment was in transit on that date the company agreed
to
honor the forgiveness of interest due thru March 31, 2008 of approximately
$175,000.
29
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2008, net cash used in operations was $6,382,000,
compared to cash used in operations in the same period of 2007 of $369,000,
an
increase of $6,013,000. This increase in cash used in operations resulted from
the increase in our net loss of $14,600,000, offset by the net increase in
non-cash charges against income of $234,000 and the net increase in the change
in operating assets and liabilities of $8,353,000.
Inventories
increased in the six months ended June 30, 2008 by $3,139,000, from the
$1,808,000 balance at December 31, 2007. $1,952,000 of this increase is due
to
our acquisition of Irgovel. The balance of the increase, or $1,187,000 on our
NutraCea segment was caused by our intentional growth of inventory levels in
anticipation of future orders. With the completion of our Mermentau and Lake
Charles, Louisiana, plants, our production capacity now is able to meet current
contracted demand. We have increased sales of our core SRB product lines by
$1,475,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period
last year, and believe that such sales growth will continue.
Cash
used
in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $38,186,000,
compared to $16,680,000 for the same period of 2007. This increase of
$21,506,000 was primarily caused by our $14,970,000 (net of $79,000 cash
acquired with the purchase) investment in Irgovel (see Note 10 in our
consolidated financial statements contained herein), an increase of $17,698,000
in expenditures for plant expansions and other fixed assets, and our $10,675,000
investment in PIN (see Note 10), offset by the receipt of $6,978,000 in payments
due on notes receivable.
Cash
provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, was approximately $19,343,000, and $53,682,000, respectively, a decrease
of $34,339,000. This decrease is primarily composed of a $28,030,000 decrease
in
the proceeds of our direct offerings, and a decrease of $6,192,000 decrease
in
proceeds from the exercise of common stock options and warrants.
In
April
2008
we
issued in a registered offering, common stock and warrants for aggregate gross
proceeds of approximately $20,000,000 ($18,775,000 after offering expenses).
We
issued an aggregate of 22,222,223 shares of common stock and warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 6,666,664 shares of our common stock combined in
“units” at a price of $0.90 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of
Nutracea common stock and a five year warrant to purchase 0.3 of a share of
NutraCea common stock at an exercise price of $1.20 per share. An advisor for
the financing received a customary 6% cash fee, base on aggregate gross proceeds
received from the investors, reasonable expenses and a warrant to purchase
1,333,333 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.20. Using the
Black-Scholes method, the fair value of these warrants to purchase 7,999,997
shares of common stock is approximately $3,102,000. If exercised, we would
receive approximately $9,600,000.
On
February 15, 2007, we sold an aggregate of 20,000,000 shares of our common
stock
at a price of $2.50 per share in connection with a private placement for
aggregate gross proceeds of $50,000,000 ($46,805,000 after offering expenses).
Additionally, the investors were issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of
10,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.25 per share.
An advisor for the financing received a customary 6% cash-fee, based on
aggregate gross proceeds received from the investors, reasonable expenses and
a
warrant to purchase 1,200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price per
share of $3.25. The warrants have a term of five years and are exercisable
after
August 16, 2007.
We
believe we have sufficient cash reserves to meet all anticipated short-term
operating requirements. We anticipate raising capital to complete our capital
improvement projects in the United States and Brazil.
Purchase
of customer list
During
the third quarter of 2008 we expect to complete the purchase of a customer
list
and existing book of business from one of our rice mill suppliers for
$3,100,000.
Long-term
financing needs
In
January 2008 we entered into an agreement to construct a wheat mill in Indonesia
and acquired 51% of an Indonesian company, PIN (see Note 10 to the financial
statements included herein), which owns lands and has the approvals necessary
for the construction of such a mill. We anticipate that this project will
require additional funding of approximately $25,000,000, of which approximately
$12,500,000 will be invested each by the minority partner and
NutraCea.
30
In
April
2008 we announced an agreement to form a joint venture with Bright Holdings
(Hong Kong) Company, Ltd. (“Bright”), to develop, construct, and operate
facilities in China to produce, market, distribute and sell rice oil, defatted
rice bran and other products derived from rice bran. NutraCea will have an
approximate 72% interest in the joint venture, but will designate 80% of the
board members and contribute 80% of the capital investment. NutraCea and
Bright’s capital contributions to the joint venture are to total approximately
$64,000,000, of which NutraCea will be required to contribute approximately
$51,000,000 over the next twenty-four months.
We
expect
to meet these funding requirements by raising additional capital through sales
of equity or debt or a combination thereof.
OFF
BALANCE SHEET ARANGEMENTS
We
have
not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have
financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments
or
other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risk,
contingent liabilities, or any other obligation under a variable interest in
an
unconsolidated entity that provides financing and liquidity support or market
risk or credit risk support to the Company.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
are
based upon unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the
United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding uncertainties that affect the
reported amounts presented and disclosed in the financial statements. Management
reviews these estimates and assumptions based on historical experience, changes
in business conditions and other relevant factors that they believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances. In any given reporting period, actual
results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing our
financial statements.
Critical
accounting policies are those that may have a material impact on our financial
statements and also require management to exercise significant judgment due
to a
high degree of uncertainty at the time the estimate is made. Management has
discussed the development and selection of our accounting policies, related
accounting estimates and the disclosures set forth below with the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors. We believe our critical accounting policies
include those addressing revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts,
and valuation of goodwill and intangible assets.
Revenue
Recognition
We
derive
our revenue primarily from product sales. Product is shipped when an approved
purchase order is received. Products shipped by us are generally sold FOB
Origin, with the customer taking title to the product once it leaves our plant
via common carrier as that is when risk of loss is transferred. At this point,
the price to the customer is fixed and determinable, and collectability is
reasonably assured. Deposits are deferred until either the product has shipped
or conditions relating to the sale have been substantially
performed.
On
occasion, we receive purchase orders for multiple product deliveries. In these
situations, each delivery is individually evaluated to determine appropriate
revenue recognition. Each delivery is generally considered to be a separate
unit
of accounting for the purposes of revenue recognition and, in all instances,
persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery, pricing and collectability
must
be determined or accomplished, as applicable, before revenue is recognized.
In
addition, if the purchase order includes customer acceptance provisions, no
revenue is recognized until customer acceptance occurs. Revenue is accounted
for
at the point of shipment FOB Origin, unless accompanied by a memorandum of
understanding detailing the requirement of customer acceptance in order to
transfer title, in which case revenue is recognized at the time of such
acceptance.
Sometimes
a customer order is completed and such order is stored at the warehouse at
the
customer’s request. In these cases, we refer to
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (SAB
104),
which
requires four basic criteria be met before we recognize revenue on bill and
hold
transactions:
31
(1)
our
purchase orders demonstrates that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
(2) risk
of ownership has passed to those customers requesting that the transaction
be on
a bill and hold basis because of their fulfillment business practices for
ensuring goods are available to meet their customers demands; all our
obligations and no further performance obligations by us are required; our
customers have made arrangements for future shipping instructions with our
third
party manufacture where they store their inventory occupy warehouse space;
and
the customer has acknowledged taking title and risk of loss for the product
purchased.
(3) the
selling price has been fixed and determinable; and
(4)
collectability is reasonably assured.
In
order
to assess whether the price is fixed and determinable, we ensure there are
no
refund rights. If payment terms are based on future performance or a right
of
return exists, we defer revenue recognition until the price becomes fixed and
determinable. We assess collectability based on a number of factors, including
past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the
customer. If we determine that collection of a payment is not reasonably
assured, revenue recognition is deferred until the time collection becomes
reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of payment. Changes in
judgments and estimates regarding application of SAB No. 104 might result in
a
change in the timing or amount of revenue recognized.
Occasionally,
we will grant exclusive use of our labels by customers in specific territories
in exchange for a nonrefundable fee. Under
EITF
00-21, Revenue Recognition with Multiple Deliverables,
each
label licensing provision is considered to be a separate unit of accounting.
Each agreement is individually evaluated to determine appropriate revenue
recognition in accordance with
SAB
104.
If all
of the following four SAB 104 basic criteria are met, revenue will be
recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
(2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and
determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of
criteria (3) and (4) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed
nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability
of
those amounts.
Additionally,
the
license agreement is expressly not contingent on any future performance
requirements by NutraCea or customers, nor tied to special discount to market
pricing. The license agreement is not a vehicle for favored, discounted pricing.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The
allowance for doubtful accounts is based on our assessment of the collectability
of specific customer accounts and the aging of accounts receivable and notes
receivable. We analyze historical bad debts, the aging of customer
accounts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic
trends and changes in our customer payment patterns when evaluating the adequacy
of the allowance for doubtful accounts. From period to period, differences
in judgments or estimates utilized may result in material differences in the
amount and timing of our bad debt expenses.
We
continuously monitor collections from our customers and maintain an allowance
for doubtful accounts based upon our historical experience and any specific
customer collection issues that we have identified. Credit losses have
historically exceeded our expectations and the provisions established.
Accordingly, there is a risk that credit losses in the future also may exceed
our provisions in which case our operating results would be adversely affected.
In 2007, NutraCea experienced significant credit losses of $3,233,000 compared
to $9,000 in the prior year. These sales were made to customers that had good
payment history, fit our strategic business plan and, depending on the
transaction size, provided a substantial down payment. However, these customers
encountered business difficulties and were unable to make payments. In addition,
another customer had difficulties funding their marketing plan. We continue
to
evaluated our credit policy to ensure that the customers are worthy of terms
and
will support our business plans.
Valuation
of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
assets, consisting primarily of property and equipment, patents and trademarks,
and goodwill, comprise a significant portion of our total assets. Long-lived
assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable. We assess the
impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
Impairment is reviewed at least annually, generally in the fourth quarter of
each year.
32
Factors
we consider important that could trigger an impairment, include the
following:
§ |
significant
underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future
operating results;
|
§ |
Significant
changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy
for our overall business;
|
§ |
Significant
negative industry or economic
trends;
|
§ |
Significant
declines in our stock price for a sustained period;
and
|
§ |
Decreased
market capitalization relative to net book
value.
|
When
there is an indication that the carrying value of goodwill or a long-lived
asset
may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above
indicators, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount exceeds
its
fair value.
Our
impairment analyses require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment
to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including estimating the
profitability of future business strategies. We have not made any material
changes in our impairment assessment methodology during the past two fiscal
years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be
a
material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate long-lived
asset impairment losses. However, if actual results are not consistent with
our
estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair
values, we may be exposed to losses that could be material.
Recoverability
of assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying value of an asset to
the
future net cash flows expected to be generated by those assets. The cash flow
projections are based on historical experience, management’s view of growth
rates within the industry, and the anticipated future economic
environment.
When
we
determine that the carrying value of patents and trademarks, long-lived assets
and related goodwill and enterprise-level goodwill may not be recoverable based
upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, it
measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using
a
discount rate determined by its management to be commensurate with the risk
inherent in its current business model. During 2007, in connection with the
annual impairment testing, NutraCea recorded an impairment loss of $1.3 million
in association with the Vital Living transaction. This is the first impairment
loss incurred by us.
Goodwill
impairment
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 142, the
Company is required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually. The
goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of individual reporting units
to the carrying value of these reporting units. If fair value is less than
carrying value then a goodwill impairment may be present. The market value
of
the Company’s common stock is an indicator of fair value and a consideration in
determining the fair value of the company’s reporting units. SFAS
142
also requires goodwill to be tested for impairment between the annual test
if an
event occurs or circumstances change that “more likely than not” reduce the fair
value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.
While
there have been no significant changes in four of five triggering factors listed
above, our share price has declined by 48% from $1.40 per share at December
31,
2007, to $0.73 per share at June 30, 2008, indicating a significant decline
in
market capitalization.
At
June
30, 2008 the market value of our stock was $0.73. This fair market price
multiplied by the company’s outstanding common stock (including the addition of
a 20% control premium) yields a fair value of approximately $147,000,000 which
exceeds the companies carrying value of approximately $124,000,000. Based on
this analysis we
can
conclude that it is “more likely than not” that fair value exceeds carrying
value at June 30, 2008. Therefore, we have concluded that no triggering events
have occurred as of June 30, 2008 that would require an interim impairment
test.
As
of
August 7, 2008 the market price of our stock was $0.68 which multiplied by
the
company’s outstanding common stock (including the addition of a 20% control
premium) at June 30, 2008 yields a fair value of approximately $137,000,000
which exceeds the companies carrying value of approximately $124,000,000 which
indicates that no triggering event has occurred that would require an interim
impairment test.
If,
however, the market value of the Company’s common stock continues to decline
then the carrying value of the company could exceed fair value which would
require us to perform an interim impairment test. For example, if our share
price declined to a sustained level of around $0.45 per share, this could result
in an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill of our NutraCea segment
of up
to approximately $32,000,000.
33
Stock-Based
Compensation
We
have a
stock incentive plan that provides for the issuance of stock options, restricted
stock and other awards to employees and service providers. We
calculate compensation expense according
to the
provisions of revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), or SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” Under
SFAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the
grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized
as
expense over the employee’s requisite service period. We have awards with
performance conditions. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R)
on January 1, 2006, using a modified prospective application. Accordingly,
prior periods have not been revised for comparative purposes. Stock-based
compensation expense recognized is based on the value of share-based payment
awards that are ultimately expected to vest, which coincides with the award
holder’s requisite service period.
We
estimate the value of our share-based payment awards using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, and amortize all new grants as
expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
Our
stock
options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded
options, and changes in the assumptions can materially affect the fair value
estimates. Because valuation model assumptions are subjective, in our opinion,
existing valuation models, including the Black-Scholes-Merton model, may not
provide reliable measures of the fair values of our share-based compensation
awards. There is not currently a generally accepted market-based mechanism
or
other practical application to verify the reliability and accuracy of the
estimates stemming from these valuation models. Although we estimate the fair
value of employee share-based awards in accordance with SFAS 123(R) and the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, or SAB No. 107, the option-pricing model
we use may not produce a value that is indicative of the fair value achieved
in
a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.
The
determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes-Merton model is affected by our stock price and the
historical volatility on our traded options, as well as the input of other
subjective assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not limited to,
the
expected term of stock options and our expected stock price volatility over
the
term of the awards.
SFAS No. 123(R)
requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if
necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those
estimates. We assess the forfeiture rate on a quarterly basis and revise the
rate when deemed necessary.
Adoption
of recent accounting pronouncements
Fair
Value Measurements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure
assets and liabilities. It also responds to investors’ request for expanded
information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities
at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of
fair valued measurements on earnings. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever standards
require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and
does
not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for financial assets and liabilities in financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The
Company adopted this statement for financial assets and liabilities measured
at
fair value effective January 1, 2008. There was no financial statement impact
as
a result of adoption. In accordance with the guidance of FASB Staff Position
No.
157-2, the Company has postponed adoption of the standard for non-financial
assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis,
until the fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of FAS
157
did not have a material impact on the Company’s fair value measurements. The
provisions of FAS 157 have not been applied to non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities.
34
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115"
("FAS 159"). FAS 159 permits companies to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The Company adopted
FAS 159 in the first quarter of 2008; as the Company did not apply the fair
value option to any of its outstanding instruments, FAS 159 did not have an
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
Business
Combinations and Non-controlling Interests
In
December 2007, the FASB released FAS 141R, “Business
Combinations”
and FAS
160, “Non-controlling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” Both
standards will be effective for transactions that occur after January 1,
2009.
FAS
141R
applies to all business combinations and will require the acquiring entity
to
recognize the assets and liabilities acquired at their respective fair
value. This standard changes the accounting for business combinations
in several areas. If we complete an acquisition after the effective
date of FAS 141R, some of these changes could result in increased volatility
in
our results of operations and financial position. For example,
transaction costs, which are currently capitalized in a business combination,
will be expensed as incurred. Additionally, pre-acquisition
contingencies (such as in-process lawsuits acquired) and contingent
consideration (such as additional consideration contingent on specified events
in the future) will be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date, with
subsequent changes in fair value reflected in our results of
operations. Under current accounting guidance, adjustments to these
contingencies are reflected in the allocation of purchase price if they occur
within a certain period of time after the acquisition date.
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our
cash
and cash equivalents have been maintained only with maturities of 30 days or
less. Our short-term investments have interest reset periods of 30 days or
less.
These financial instruments may be subject to interest rate risk through lost
income should interest rates increase during their limited term to maturity
or
resetting of interest rates. As of June 30, 2008, we had approximately $87,000
of long-term debt bearing interest at 8%. Future borrowings, if any, would
bear
interest at negotiated rates and would be subject to interest rate risk. We
do
not believe that a hypothetical adverse change of 10% in interest rates would
have a material effect on our financial position.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
We
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation
of
management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2008, our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective to ensure that information we are required to
disclose by NutraCea in reports that we file or submit under the Securities
and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and
that
such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During
the quarter covered by this report, there was no change in NutraCea’s internal
control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially effect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
35
PART
2.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
From
time
to time we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business.
While the outcome of lawsuits and other proceedings against us cannot be
predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, individually or in
the
aggregate, no such lawsuits are expected to have a material effect on our
financial position or results of operations.
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
Investors
or potential investors in our stock should carefully consider the risks
described below. Our stock price will reflect the performance of our business
relative to, among other things, our competition, expectations of securities
analysts or investors, and general economic market conditions and industry
conditions. One should carefully consider the following factors in connection
with any investment in our stock. Our business, financial condition and results
of operations could be materially adversely affected if any of the following
risks occur. Should any or all of the following risks materialize, the trading
price of our stock could decline, and investors could lose all or part of their
investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We
have a limited operating history and have generated
losses in each quarter of 2008 and for each year other than
2006.
We
began
operations in February 2000 and incurred losses in each reporting period other
than the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2006 and the second quarter
of
2007. Our prospects for financial success are difficult to forecast because
we
have a relatively limited operating history. Our prospects for financial success
must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently
encountered by companies in new, unproven and rapidly evolving markets. Our
business could be subject to any or all of the problems, expenses, delays and
risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including
limited capital resources, possible delays in product development, possible
cost
overruns due to price and cost increases in raw product and manufacturing
processes, uncertain market acceptance, and inability to respond effectively
to
competitive developments and attract, retain and motivate qualified employees.
Therefore, there can be no assurance that our business or products will be
successful, that we will be able to achieve or maintain profitable operations
or
that we will not encounter unforeseen difficulties that may deplete our capital
resources more rapidly than anticipated.
There
are significant market risks associated with our
business.
We
have
formulated our business plan and strategies based on certain assumptions
regarding the size of the rice bran market, our anticipated share of this
market, and the estimated price and acceptance of our products. These
assumptions are based on the best estimates of our management; however, there
can be no assurance that our assessments regarding market size, potential market
share attainable by us, the price at which we will be able to sell our products,
market acceptance of our products, or a variety of other factors will prove
to
be correct. Any future success may depend upon factors including changes in
the
dietary supplement industry, governmental regulation, increased levels of
competition, including the entry of additional competitors, increased success
by
existing competitors, changes in general economic conditions, increases in
operating costs including costs of production, supplies, personnel, equipment,
and reduced margins caused by competitive pressures.
We
may face
difficulties integrating businesses we acquire,
As
part
of our strategy, we expect to review opportunities to buy other businesses
or
technologies that would complement our current products, expand the breadth
of
our markets or enhance technical capabilities, or that may otherwise offer
growth opportunities. In the event of any future acquisitions, we
could:
·
|
issue
stock that would dilute current shareholders’ percentage
ownership;
|
·
|
incur
debt; or
|
·
|
assume
liabilities.
|
These
purchases also involve numerous risks, including:
36
·
|
problems
combining the purchased operations, technologies or
products;
|
·
|
unanticipated
costs;
|
·
|
diversion
of management’s attention from our core
business;
|
·
|
adverse
effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and
customers;
|
·
|
risks
associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior
experience; and
|
·
|
potential
loss of key employees of purchased
organizations.
|
We
cannot
assure you that we will be able to successfully integrate any businesses,
products, technologies or personnel that we might purchase in the
future.
We
intend to pursue significant foreign operations and there are inherent risks
in
operating abroad.
An
important component of our business strategy is to build rice bran stabilization
facilities in foreign countries and to market and sell our products
internationally. For example, we recently entered into a joint ventures to
produce and market our SRB products in Southeast Asia and China and purchased
a
company in Brazil that manufactures rice bran oil. There are risks in operating
stabilization facilities in developing countries because, among other reasons,
we may be unable to attract sufficient qualified personnel, intellectual
property rights may not be enforced as we expect, power may not be available
as
contemplated. Should any of these risks occur, we may be unable to maximize
the
output from these facilities and our financial results may decrease from our
anticipated levels. The inherent risks of international operations could
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations. The types of risks faced in connection with international operations
and sales include, among others:
|
·
|
cultural
differences in the conduct of
business;
|
|
·
|
fluctuations
in foreign exchange rates;
|
|
·
|
greater
difficulty in accounts receivable collection and longer collection
periods;
|
|
·
|
impact
of recessions in economies outside of the United
States;
|
|
·
|
reduced
protection for intellectual property rights in some
countries;
|
|
·
|
unexpected
changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
·
|
tariffs
and other trade barriers;
|
|
·
|
political
conditions in each country;
|
|
·
|
management
and operation of an enterprise spread over various
countries;
|
|
·
|
the
burden and administrative costs of complying with a wide variety
of
foreign laws; and
|
|
·
|
currency
restrictions.
|
We
depend on limited number of customers.
During
2007, our NutraCea segment received approximately 51% of product sales revenue
from six customers and approximately 15% of our revenue from one customer.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, two customers accounted for 12%
of
our sales in our NutraCea segment. A loss of any of these customers could have
a
material adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.
37
The
inability of our significant customers to meet their obligations to us may
adversely affect our financial results.
We
are
subject to credit risk due to concentration of our trade accounts receivables
and notes receivables. For our NutraCea segment, as of June 30, 2008, two
customers accounted for 61% of our $4,898,000 gross trade accounts receivables.
Both of these customers balances are past due and we have recorded a 100%
allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,084,000. In addition, we acquired secured
promissory notes of Vital Living, Inc. with aggregate principal amounts of
$4,226,000 in connection with our entering into an asset purchase agreement
with
Vital Living to acquire Vital Living’s assets. While we obtain personal
guarantees and security interests backing these obligations when possible,
many
of these obligations are not guaranteed or secured. The inability of our
significant customers and obligors to meet their obligations to us, or, in
the
case of Vital Living, the deterioration of Vital Living’s financial condition or
assets before we are able to consummate our asset purchase, may adversely
affect
our financial condition and results of operations.
We
rely upon a limited number of product offerings.
The
majority of our products are based on stabilized rice bran. Although we will
market stabilized rice bran as a dietary supplement, as an active food
ingredient for inclusion in our products and in other companies’ products, and
in other ways, a decline in the market demand for our products, as well as
the
products of other companies utilizing our products, could have a significant
adverse impact on us.
We
are dependent upon our marketing efforts.
We
are
dependent on our ability to market products to animal food producers, food
manufacturers, mass merchandise and health food retailers, and to other
companies for use in their products. We must increase the level of awareness
of
dietary supplements in general and our products in particular. We will be
required to devote substantial management and financial resources to these
marketing and advertising efforts and there can be no assurance that it will
be
successful.
We
rely upon an adequate supply of raw rice bran.
The
majority of our current products depend on our proprietary technology using
unstabilized or raw rice bran, which is a by-product from milling paddy rice
to
white rice. Our ability to manufacture stabilized rice bran raw is currently
limited to the production capability of our production equipment at Farmers’
Rice Co-operative and Archer Daniels Midland, our own plants located next to
the
Louisiana Rice Mill in Mermentau, Louisiana, Farmer’s Rice Inc. in Lake Charles,
Louisiana, and American Rice, Inc. in Freeport, Texas, and our single
value-added products plant in Dillon, Montana. We currently are capable of
producing enough finished products at our facilities to meet current demand.
With the exception of our newly acquired rice bran oil facility in Pelotas,
Brazil, our existing plants do not allow for dramatic expansion , therefore
additional domestic production capacity will be needed if demand increases.
We
are
pursuing other supply sources in the United States and in foreign countries
and
anticipate being able to secure alternatives and back-up sources of rice bran.
However, there can be no assurance that we will continue to secure adequate
sources of raw rice bran to meet our requirements to produce stabilized rice
bran products. For example, our Mermentau plant was idle from May through July,
2008, because the rice mill that supplies the plant was not milling rice due
to
business reasons un-related to our operations. In addition, since rice bran
has
a limited shelf life, the supply of rice bran is affected by the amount of
rice
planted and harvested each year. If economic or weather conditions adversely
affect the amount of rice planted or harvested, the cost of rice bran products
that we use may increase. We are not generally able to pass cost increases
to
our customers and any increase in the cost of stabilized rice bran products
would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We
face risks in our wheat bran stabilization efforts.
In
January 2008, through a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary, we entered an
agreement to develop and lease Wheat Bran Stabilization equipment to an
Indonesian company. Our efforts to prove our Wheat Bran Stabilization technology
on an industrial scale may not be successful and the demand for stabilized
wheat
bran products may not grow as we anticipate.
38
We
identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting,
which could impact negatively our ability to report our results of operations
and financial condition accurately and in a timely
manner.
As
required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management conducted
an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting at December 31, 2007. We identified two material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting and concluded that, as of December
31,
2007, we did not maintain effective control over financial reporting based
on
criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued
by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Each
of
our material weaknesses results in a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements that we prepare
will
not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result, we must perform
additional work to obtain reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
our
financial statements.
If
we are
unsuccessful in implementing or following our remediation plan, or fail to
update our internal control over financial reporting as our business evolves
or
to integrate acquired businesses into our controls system, we may not be able
to
timely or accurately report our financial condition, results of operations
or
cash flows or to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures. If
we
are unable to report financial information in a timely and accurate manner
or to
maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures, we could be subject
to,
among other things, regulatory or enforcement actions by the SEC, securities
litigation and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could
adversely affect our business prospects and the market value of our common
stock.
We
face competition.
Competition
in our targeted industries, including nutraceuticals, functional food
ingredients, rice bran oils, animal feed supplements and companion pet food
ingredients is vigorous, with a large number of businesses engaged in the
various industries. Many of our competitors have established reputations for
successfully developing and marketing their products, including products that
incorporate bran from other cereal grains and other alternative ingredients
that
are widely recognized as providing similar benefits as rice bran. In addition,
many of our competitors have greater financial, managerial, and technical
resources than us. If we are not successful in competing in these markets,
we
may not be able to attain our business objectives.
We
have
not yet achieved positive cash flow
We
have
not generated a positive cash flow from operations continuous period to period
since commencing operations, and have relied primarily on cash raised from
the
sale of our securities to fund capital investments and acquisitions. We raised
in a public offering of our common stock and warrants to purchase our common
stock approximately $20,000,000 in April 2008. Additionally, we raised in
private placements of equity approximately $50,000,000 in February 2007,
$17,560,000 in May 2006, and $8,000,000 in October 2005. While we believe that
we have adequate cash reserves and working capital to fund current operations,
our ability to meet long term business objectives may be dependent upon our
ability to raise additional financing through public or private equity
financings, establish increasing cash flow from operations, enter into
collaborative or other arrangements with corporate sources, or secure other
sources of financing to fund long-term operations. There is no assurance that
external funds will be available on terms acceptable to us in sufficient amount
to finance operations until we do reach sufficient positive cash flow to fund
our capital expenditures. In addition, any issuance of securities to obtain
such
funds would dilute percentage ownership of our shareholders. Such dilution
could
also have an adverse impact on our earnings per share and reduce the price
of
our common stock. Incurring additional debt may involve restrictive covenants
and increased interest costs and demand on future cash flow. Our inability
to
obtain sufficient financing may require us to delay, scale back or eliminate
some or all of our product development and marketing programs.
Our
products could fail to meet applicable regulations which could have a material
adverse affect on our financial performance.
The
dietary supplement and cosmetic industries are subject to considerable
government regulation, both as to efficacy as well as labeling and advertising.
There is no assurance that all of our products and marketing strategies will
satisfy all of the applicable regulations of the Dietary Supplement, Health
and
Education Act, the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration and/or the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Failure to meet any
applicable regulations would require us to limit the production or marketing
of
any non-compliant products or advertising, which could subject us to financial
or other penalties.
39
Our
success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents, licenses and other
intellectual property rights for our products and
technology.
We
have
one patent entitled Methods for Treating Joint Inflammation, Pain and Loss
of
Mobility, which covers both humans and mammals. In addition, our subsidiary
RiceX has five United States patents and may decide to file corresponding
international applications. RiceX holds patents to the production of Beta Glucan
and to a micro nutrient enriched rice bran oil process. RiceX also holds patents
to a method to treat high cholesterol, to a method to treat diabetes and to
a
process for producing Higher Value Fractions from stabilized rice bran. The
process of seeking patent protection may be long and expensive, and there can
be
no assurance that patents will be issued, that we will be able to protect our
technology adequately, or that competition will not be able to develop similar
technology.
There
currently are no claims or lawsuits pending or threatened against us or RiceX
regarding possible infringement claims, but there can be no assurance that
infringement claims by third parties, or claims for indemnification resulting
from infringement claims, will not be asserted in the future or that such
assertions, if proven to be accurate, will not have a material adverse affect
on
our business, financial condition and results of operations. In the future,
litigation may be necessary to enforce our patents, to protect our trade secrets
or know-how or to defend against claimed infringement of the rights of others
and to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others.
Any
litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of our efforts, which
could have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and results
of
operations. Adverse determinations in any litigation could result in the loss
of
our proprietary rights, subjecting us to significant liabilities to third
parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties or prevent us from
manufacturing or selling our systems, any of which could have a material adverse
affect on our financial condition and results of operations. There can be no
assurance that a license under a third party’s intellectual property rights will
be available to us on reasonable terms, if at all.
We
are dependent on key employees and consultants.
Our
success depends upon the efforts of our top management team, including the
efforts of Bradley D. Edson, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Todd
C.
Crow, our Chief Financial Officer, Leo Gingras, our Chief Operating Officer,
and
Kody K. Newland, our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Although
we
have written employment agreements with each of the foregoing individuals,
other
than Ms. Adelman, there is no assurance that such individuals will not die,
become disabled, or resign. In addition, our success is dependent upon our
ability to attract and retain key management persons for positions relating
to
the marketing and distribution of our products. There is no assurance that
we
will be able to recruit and employ such executives at times and on terms
acceptable to us.
Our
products may require clinical trials to establish efficacy and
safety.
Certain
of our products may require clinical trials to establish our benefit claims
or
their safety and efficacy. Such trials can require a significant amount of
resources and there is no assurance that such trials will be favorable to the
claims we make for our products, or that the cumulative authority established
by
such trials will be sufficient to support our claims. Moreover, both the
findings and methodology of such trials are subject to challenge by the FDA
and
scientific bodies. If the findings of our trials are challenged or found to
be
insufficient to support our claims, additional trials may be required before
such products can be marketed.
Risks
Related to Our Stock
Our
Stock Price is Volatile.
The
market price of a share of our common stock has fluctuated significantly in
the
past and may continue to fluctuate significantly in the future. The high and
low
closing prices of a share of common stock for the following periods
were:
40
High
|
Low
|
||||||
Three
months ended June 30, 2008
|
$
|
1.13
|
$
|
0.69
|
|||
Six
months ended June 30, 2008
|
$ |
1.56
|
$ |
0.69
|
|||
Twelve
months ended December 31, 2007
|
$
|
5.00
|
$
|
0.75
|
|||
Twelve
months ended December 31, 2006
|
$
|
2.74
|
$
|
0.60
|
The
market price of a share of our common stock may continue to fluctuate in
response to a number of factors, including:
·
|
announcements
of new products or product enhancements by us or our
competitors;
|
·
|
fluctuations
in our quarterly or annual operating
results;
|
·
|
developments
in our relationships with customers and
suppliers;
|
·
|
the
loss of services of one or more of our executive officers or other
key
employees;
|
·
|
announcements
of technological innovations or new systems or enhancements used
by us or
our competitors;
|
·
|
developments
in our or our competitors intellectual property
rights;
|
·
|
adverse
effects to our operating results due to impairment of
goodwill;
|
·
|
failure
to meet the expectation of securities analysts’ or the public;
and
|
·
|
general
economic and market conditions.
|
We
have significant “equity overhang” which could adversely affect the market price
of our common stock and impair our ability to raise additional capital through
the sale of equity securities.
As
of
Augusts 4, 2008, 167,993,724 shares of our common stock were outstanding.
Additionally, as of August 4, 2008, options and warrants to purchase
approximately 51,121,000 shares of our common stock were outstanding. The
possibility that substantial amounts of our outstanding common stock may be
sold
by investors or the perception that such sales could occur, often called “equity
overhang,” could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and could
impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity
securities in the future.
Sales
of Our Stock Pursuant to Registration Statements May Hurt Our Stock
Price
We
granted registration rights to the investors in our October 2005, May 2006
and
February 2007 capital stock and warrant financings. As of August 4, 2008,
approximately 33,721,000 shares of our common stock remained eligible for resale
pursuant to outstanding registration statements filed for these investors.
In
addition, we have filed a registration statement to cover our issuance and
sale
of up to $125,000,000 of common stock, preferred stock, and warrants to purchase
common or preferred stock. We sold an aggregate of 22,222,223 shares of common
stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate 6,666,664 shares of our common
stock
for gross proceeds of $20,000,000 pursuant to that registration statement in
April, 2008. Additional sales or potential sales of a significant number of
shares into the public markets may negatively affect our stock
price.
The
Exercise of Outstanding Options and Warrants May Dilute Current
Shareholders
As
of
August 4, 2008, there were outstanding options and warrants to purchase
approximately 51,121,000 shares of our common stock. Holders of these options
and warrants may exercise them at a time when we would otherwise be able to
obtain additional equity capital on terms more favorable to us. Moreover, while
these options and warrants are outstanding, our ability to obtain financing
on
favorable terms may be adversely affected.
41
We
may need to raise funds through debt or equity financings in the future, which
would dilute the ownership of our existing shareholders and possibly subordinate
certain of their rights to the rights of new
investors.
We
may
choose to raise additional funds in debt or equity financings if they are
available to us on terms we believe reasonable to increase our working
capital, strengthen our financial position or to make acquisitions. Any
sales of additional equity or convertible debt securities would result in
dilution of the equity interests of our existing shareholders, which could
be
substantial. Additionally, if we issue shares of preferred stock or convertible
debt to raise funds, the holders of those securities might be entitled to
various preferential rights over the holders of our common stock, including
repayment of their investment, and possibly additional amounts, before any
payments could be made to holders of our common stock in connection with an
acquisition of the company. Such preferred shares, if authorized, might be
granted rights and preferences that would be senior to, or otherwise adversely
affect, the rights and the value of our common stock. Also, new investors may
require that we and certain of our shareholders enter into voting arrangements
that give them additional voting control or representation on our board of
directors.
The
authorization of our preferred stock may have an adverse effect on the rights
of
holders of our common stock.
We
may,
without further action or vote by holders of our common stock, designate and
issue shares of our preferred stock. The terms of any series of preferred stock
could adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock and thereby
reduce the value of our common stock. The designation and issuance of preferred
stock favorable to current management or shareholders could make it more
difficult to gain control of our Board of Directors or remove our current
management and may be used to defeat hostile bids for control which might
provide shareholders with premiums for their shares.
Compliance
with corporate governance and public disclosure regulations may result in
additional expenses.
Changing
laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public
disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and new regulations issued
by the Securities and Exchange Commission, are creating uncertainty for
companies. In order to comply with these laws, we may need to invest substantial
resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment would result
in
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management
time
and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance
activities.
Our
officers and directors have limited liability and have indemnification
rights
Our
Articles of Incorporation and by-laws provide that we may indemnify our officers
and directors against losses sustained or liabilities incurred which arise
from
any transaction in that officer’s or director’s respective managerial capacity
unless that officer or director violates a duty of loyalty, did not act in
good
faith, engaged in intentional misconduct or knowingly violated the law, approved
an improper dividend, or derived an improper benefit from the
transaction.
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item
3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
None
42
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
a. |
We
held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 4, 2008 (“Annual
Meeting”). Out of 145,076,146 shares of common stock entitle to vote at
such meeting, there were present in person or by proxy 119,233,240
shares
of common stock.
|
b. |
At
the Annual Meeting, the following seven individuals were elected
to the
Company’s Board of Directors.
|
Nominee
|
Votes
Cast For
|
Withheld
or Against
|
Bradley
D. Edson
|
105,344,724
|
13,878,516
|
David
S. Bensol
|
106,137,184
|
13,086,056
|
Wesley
K. Clark
|
105,467,183
|
13,756,057
|
James
Lintzenich
|
107,498,679
|
11,724,561
|
Edward
L McMillan
|
107,970,032
|
11,253,208
|
Steven
W. Saunders
|
108,320,838
|
10,902,402
|
Kenneth
L. Shropshire
|
108,161,577
|
11,061,663
|
c. |
The
following additional proposals were considered at the Annual Meeting
and
were not approved by the vote of the stockholders, in accordance
with the
tabulation shown below:
|
(1)
Proposal to approve an amendment to the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to
limit the number of shares that may be granted to any person annually in order
to allow NutraCea to receive certain corporate income tax deductions that may
otherwise be limited by Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m):
Votes
For
|
Votes
Against
|
Abstain
|
Broker
non-vote
|
33,118,946
|
9,835,876
|
441,864
|
75,827,554
|
(2)
Proposal to approve an amendment to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to increase
the size of the automatic annual option grants to our non-employee directors:
Votes
For
|
Votes
Against
|
Abstain
|
Broker
non-vote
|
24,666,519
|
18,079,939
|
649,227
|
75,827,555
|
Item
5.
Other
Information
In
August
2008 we amended Bradley Edson’s employment agreement with us to clarify
that our board of directors or the Compensation Committee of NutraCea’s
board of directors, at their discretion, could grant cash bonuses to Mr.
Edson. Our board of directors approved the amendment on the same
date.
Vital
Living, Inc.
As
discussed elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, NutraCea holds
secured promissory notes of Vital Living, Inc. that have aggregate principal
amounts of $4,226,000. Vital Living’s obligations under the notes are secured by
a security interest in substantially all of the assets of Vital Living, and
the
principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the notes become due and payable
on
December 15, 2008.
43
On
August
7, 2008 we delivered a notice of default to Vital Living declaring that an
event
of default has occurred under the notes and that all amounts payable under
the
notes be immediately due and payable. We declared an event of default based
upon
Vital Living’s written admission to NutraCea that it is unlikely to be able to
meet its obligations under the notes and, among other things, Vital Living’s low
levels of cash and cash equivalents.
We
are
evaluating our options under the notes and the related security agreement,
including foreclosing on the collateral that secures the notes. As of the date
we filed this report of Form 10-Q, Vital Living has not responded to our notice
of default. Vital Living may disagree with our belief that an event of default
has occurred. If we decide to foreclose on the collateral, we may not be able
to
do so in a timely or complete manner.
Item
6. Exhibits
The
following exhibits are attached hereto and filed herewith:
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
of Exhibit
|
1.1(1)
|
Placement
Agency Agreement, dated April 24, 2008, by and between NutraCea and
Rodman
& Renshaw, LLC
|
2.1
|
Schedules
to Quotas Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated January 31, 2008, between
NutraCea and Quota Holders of Irgovel Industria Riograndens De Oleos
Vegitais Ltda.
|
4.1(1)
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant.
|
10.1
|
Second
Amendment of Employment Agreement between NutraCea and Todd C.
Crow.
|
10.2
|
Form
of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement for 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan.
|
10.3(1)
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2008, by
and
between NutraCea and each investor signatory thereto.
|
10.4+
|
Shareholders’s
Agreement
dated June 25, 2008.
|
10.5
|
Second Amendment
of Employment Agreement between NutraCea and Brad
Edson.
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Office Pursuant to
18
U.S.C. §1350 and §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
+
Confidential
treatment requested as to certain portions
(1)
incorporated herein by reference to exhibits previously filed on Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 28, 2008.
44
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
NUTRACEA | ||
|
|
|
Dated: August 11, 2008 | /s/ Bradley Edson | |
Bradley Edson |
||
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Dated: August 11, 2008 | /s/ Todd C Crow | |
Todd C. Crow, |
||
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
45