Rocky Mountain Industrials, Inc. - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019

Or

For the transition period from ______ to _______

Commission file number: 0-55402

RMR Industrials, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(720) 614-5213

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Class B Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

(Title of each class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files)..    Yes  ¨    No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of the Common Stock on September 30, 2019 was N/A.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had 35,785,858 Shares of Class A Common Stock and 4,448,919 Shares of Class B Common Stock, and 29.5 preferred shares outstanding.

Table of Contents

STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not statements of historical facts are "forward-looking statements." Forward-looking statements may include our statements regarding our goals, beliefs, strategies, objectives, plan, including product and service developments, future financial conditions, results or projections or current expectations. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "estimates," "intends," "plan" "expects," "may," "will," "should," "predicts," "anticipates," "continues," or "potential," or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We remind readers that forward-looking statements are merely predictions and therefore inherently subject to uncertainties and other factors and involve known and unknown risks that could cause the actual results, performance, levels of activity, our achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, levels of activity, achievements, or industry results, expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements appear in Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," as well as elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Our management has included projections and estimates in this report, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the SEC or otherwise publicly available.  We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.  We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Unless otherwise specified or required by context, as used in this Report, the terms "we," "our," "us" and the "Company" refer collectively to RMR Industrials, Inc. (“RMR”) and its wholly/majority-owned subsidiaries, RMR Aggregates, Inc., RMR Logistics, Inc., Rail Land Company, LLC, RMR Recycling, Inc., RMR Water, LLC and RMR Ready Mix, Inc.. Unless otherwise indicated, the term "common stock" refers to shares of our Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP).

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING EXPLORATION STAGE STATUS

AND USE OF CERTAIN MINING TERMS

We are considered an “exploration stage” company under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7, Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations (“Guide 7”), because we do not have reserves as defined under Guide 7.  Reserves are defined in Guide 7 as that part of a mineral deposit which can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.  The establishment of reserves under Guide 7 requires, among other things, certain spacing of exploratory drill holes to establish the required continuity of mineralization and the completion of a detailed cost or feasibility study.  Since we have no reserves as defined in Guide 7, we have not exited the exploration stage and continue to report our financial information as an exploration stage entity as required under relevant accounting principles.  We will remain an exploration stage company under Guide 7 until such time as we demonstrate reserves in accordance with the criteria in Guide 7.

Since we have no reserves, we will expense all mine construction costs, even though these expenditures are expected to have a future economic benefit in excess of one year.  We will also expense our reclamation and remediation costs at the time the obligation is incurred.  Companies that have reserves and have exited the exploration stage typically capitalize these costs, and subsequently amortize them on a units-of-production basis as reserves are mined, with the resulting depletion charge allocated to inventory, and then to cost of sales as the inventory is sold.  As a result of these and other differences, our financial statements will not be comparable to the financial statements of mining companies that have established reserves and have exited the exploration stage.

We use certain terms in this report such as “production,” “mining or processing activities,” and “mine construction.”  Production means the estimated quantities (tonnage) delivered or shipped to our customers, which may result in disclosure of related limestone and dolomite sales.  Mining or processing activities means the process of extracting limestone and dolomite from the earth and treating that material.  Mine construction means work carried out to access areas in the mine containing limestone and dolomite, which principally includes road construction, ramp construction and ancillary activities.  We use these terms in this report since we believe they are necessary and helpful for the reader to understand our business and operations.  However, we caution you that we do not have reserves and therefore have not exited the exploration stage as defined in Guide 7, and our use of the terminology described above is not intended to indicate that we have established reserves or have exited the exploration stage for purposes of Guide 7.  Furthermore, since we do not have reserves, we cannot provide any indication or assurance as to how long we will likely continue mining activities at our mine site or whether such activities will be profitable.  

PART I

Overview

RMR’s predecessor entity was incorporated in August, 2012 as a Nevada corporation. We are an exploration stage company dedicated to operating industrial assets in the United States (U.S.) including minerals, materials and services. Our strategy is to become a key provider of industrial materials and services in the Rocky Mountain region. We utilize differentiated operational capabilities, which we believe will allow us to outperform conventional operators through diverse markets.

We have a strategy to own, operate, develop, acquire and vertically integrate complementary industrial businesses. The experienced management team of RMR has a multi-cycle track record of operating industrial resource businesses.

We operate the Mid-Continent Quarry in Garfield County, Colorado, producing chemical-grade calcium carbonate that currently services local and regional customers in a variety of end markets, including but not limited to mining, manufacturing, construction, and agriculture. The Mid-Continent Quarry, which is located outside the city of Glenwood Springs, consists of 44 unpatented mining claims owned by the Bureau of Land Management and controlled by RMR. The operation currently serves Arch Coal, local construction firms, and various city and county government construction projects. The quarry is currently undergoing an expansion and modernization effort. For the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, we produced and sold 34,060 and 35,890 tons of high-calcium limestone, respectively, from the Mid-Continent Quarry. Please reference “Cautionary Note Regarding Exploration Stage Status and Use of Certain Mining Terms” for disclosure concerning the current stage of our mineral explorations.

We are also actively developing Rocky Mountain Rail Park (the “Rail Park”), a dedicated rail-served industrial business park serving the greater Denver market. In February 2018, we acquired approximately 470 acres of land in Bennett, Colorado which serves as the foundation for the Rail Park. In the July of 2018 we exercised our option to acquire an additional approximately 150 acres for a total of 620 acres. The development acreage is in the process of being titled and rezoned for appropriate industrial use. The Company’s development of the Rail Park is intended to expand the customer base for our products by utilizing rail freight capabilities to reach customers in the greater Denver area and by expanding our business to include rail transportation solutions and services. We intend to be the permanent owner and operator of the Rail Park and once operational, the facility will seek to establish a new industrial hub for rail transportation and related services serving Adams County, Colorado and the greater Denver metropolitan area.

Rail freight capabilities allow the Mid-Continent Quarry’s products to access the Denver market, where demand for calcium carbonate is currently strong and supply is relatively limited. The market opportunity is primarily centered on front range infrastructure demands, but also includes fertilizer, animal feed, and multiple other industrial applications. According to the USGS Natural Aggregates Statistics and information the Denver metro area’s 2018 demand for construction aggregate was approximately 44 million metric tons per year, 33.1 million metric tons of sand and gravel and 13.9 million metric tons or crushed stone. The area experiences supply shortages in peak seasons, creating a natural market for our products. We believe we are well-positioned to benefit from this market environment.

In April 2019, RMR Logistics, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an asset purchase agreement with H2K, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (the “Seller”) pursuant to which the Company acquired the Seller’s trucking, hauling, paving, road building, dirt work, sewer line, and demolition services operations for $2.2 million with $400,000 being deferred for one year from the date of acquisition.

In addition to developing and expanding our existing assets, we expect to supplement our growth with strategic acquisitions of related business and integrating these businesses to achieve economies of scale and synergies. We target companies in various sectors directed towards industrial and/or infrastructure applications, including but not limited to construction materials, industrial minerals, industrial resources, logistical solutions, and transportation.

Competitive Strengths

Our management team has extensive experience in investing in and operating natural resource assets. We believe our potential competitive strengths to be the following:

Application of Management Expertise. Our team has expertise in engineering, operations, finance and general management within the industrials resource sector.

Management Operating and Investing Experience.  Over the course of their careers, the members of our management team have developed a broad international network of contacts and corporate relationships which we believe will serve as a useful source of investment opportunities. The management team has applied its deep understanding of historical precedents in the natural resource markets to the development of our business and strategy. Some of our management team members have been working together for the last ten years, and over that time have assembled a team of industrial resources and investment professionals to pursue investments across the industry.

Revenues and Customers

For the year ended March 31, 2019, 73% of our consolidated revenue was from one customer. At March 31, 2019, approximately 73 % of our accounts receivable were due from the same customer.

Industry and Competition

Limestone

Limestone, or calcium carbonate is used in a variety of applications including coal mining, coal fired power plants, construction aggregates, glass bottle and steel manufacturing, and agriculture. Regional competitors include Pete Lien & Sons, Inc., and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.

Construction Aggregates

Aggregates are key material components used in the production of cement, ready-mixed concrete and asphalt paving mixes for the residential, nonresidential and public infrastructure markets and are also widely used for various applications and products, such as road and building foundations, railroad ballast, erosion control, filtration, roofing granules and in solutions for snow and ice control. Generally extracted from the earth using surface or underground mining methods, aggregates are produced from natural deposits of various materials such as limestone, sand and gravel, granite and trap rock.

Markets are typically local due to high transport costs and are generally fragmented, with numerous participants operating in localized markets. According to the 2018 U.S. Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook, the U.S. market for these products was estimated at approximately 2.2 billion tons in 2017 valued at $23.0 billion. Relative to other construction materials, such as cement, aggregates consumption is more heavily weighted towards public infrastructure and maintenance repair. However, the mix of end uses can vary widely by geographic location, based on the nature of construction activity in each market. Typically, three to six competitors comprise the majority market share in each local market because of constraints around the availability of natural resources and transportation. Regional competitors for construction aggregates in Colorado include Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., Albert Frei & Sons, Inc., Aggregate Industries, Brannan Sand & Gravel Co., LLC, L.G. Everist, Inc., and BURNCO.

Industrial Minerals

The industrial minerals sector encompasses a large variety of minerals including: limestone, chamottes, ball clay, feldspar, graphite, ground silica, kaolin, pegmatite, quartz, mica, bauxite, bentonite, metakaolins, zeolite, frac sand, aggregates and dolomite. Industrial minerals are used in a variety of end projects for a variety of purposes. These minerals are used in ceramics, paints, plastics, paper, rubber, food, cosmetics, and many other products.

There are typically significant barriers to entry into industrial mineral production due to the scarcity of economically viable resources from which to extract the minerals. Geographical location of the resource drives a large portion of the competitive advantages or disadvantages of an operation. Large companies in this sector include Imerys, W.R. Grace, and Minerals Technologies.

Environmental and Government Regulation

Our operations are and will be subject to extensive federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances in the United States and abroad relating to the protection of the environment and human health and to safety, including those pertaining to chemical manufacture and distribution, waste generation, storage and disposal, discharges to waterways, and air emissions and various other health and safety matters. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance with their regulations, and violators may be subject to civil, criminal and administrative penalties, injunctions or both. We will devote significant financial resources to ensure compliance. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all the applicable laws and regulations.

We anticipate that the regulation of our business operations under federal, state and local environmental laws in the United States and abroad will increase and become more stringent over time. We cannot estimate the impact of increased and more stringent regulation on our operations, future capital expenditure requirements or the cost of compliance.

United States Regulation. Statutory programs relating to protection of the environment and human health and to safety in the United States include, among others, the following. 

CERCLA. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, also known as “CERCLA” and “Superfund”, and comparable state laws generally impose joint and several liability for costs of investigation and remediation and for natural resource damages, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons with respect to the release into the environment of specified substances, including under CERCLA those designated as “hazardous substances.” These “potentially responsible parties” include the present and certain former owners or operators of the site where the release occurred and those that disposed or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substance at the site. These liabilities can arise in association with the properties where operations were conducted, as well as disposal facilities where wastes were sent. Many states have adopted comparable or more stringent state statutes. In the course of our operations, we generated materials that fall within CERCLA’s definition of hazardous substances. We may be the owner or operator of sites on which hazardous substances have been released and may have generated hazardous substances that have been transported to or otherwise released upon offsite facilities. We may be responsible under CERCLA for all or part of the costs to clean up facilities at which such substances have been released by previous owners or operators and offsite facilities to which our wastes were transported and for associated damages to natural resources.

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (“RCRA”) and comparable state laws regulate the treatment, storage, disposal, remediation and transportation of wastes, specifically under RCRA those designated as “hazardous wastes.” The EPA and various state agencies have limited the disposal options for these wastes and impose numerous regulations upon the treatment, storage, disposal, remediation and transportation of them. Our operations generate wastes that are subject to RCRA and comparable state statutes. Furthermore, wastes generated by our operations that are currently exempt from treatment as hazardous wastes may be designated in the future as hazardous wastes under RCRA or other applicable statutes and, therefore, may be subject to more rigorous and costly treatment, storage and disposal requirements. Governmental agencies (and in the case of civil suits, private parties in certain circumstances) can bring actions for failure to comply with RCRA requirements, seeking administrative, civil, or criminal penalties and injunctive relief, to compel us to abate a solid or hazardous waste situation that presents an imminent or substantial endangerment to health or the environment.

Clean Water Act. The federal Clean Water Act imposes restrictions and strict controls regarding the discharge of pollutants, including dredged and fill materials into waters of the United States. Under the Clean Water Act, and comparable state laws, the government (and in the case of civil suits, private parties in certain circumstances) can bring actions for failure to comply with Clean Water Act requirements and enforce compliance through civil, criminal and administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of hazardous substances and of other pollutants. In the event of an unauthorized discharge of pollutants, we may be liable for penalties and subject to injunctive relief.

Clean Air Act. The federal Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended and comparable state and local laws restrict the emission of air pollutants from many sources and also impose various monitoring and reporting requirements. These laws may require us to obtain pre-approval for the construction or modification of certain projects or facilities expected to produce or significantly increase air emissions, obtain and strictly comply with air permit requirements or utilize specific equipment or technologies to control emissions. Governmental agencies (and in the case of civil suits, private parties in certain circumstances) can bring actions for failure to strictly comply with air pollution regulations or permits and generally enforce compliance through administrative, civil or criminal enforcement actions, resulting in fines, injunctive relief (which could include requiring us to forego construction, modification or operation of sources of air pollutants) and imprisonment. While we may be required to incur certain capital expenditures for air pollution control equipment or other air emissions-related issues, we do not believe that such requirements will have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Greenhouse Gas Regulation. More stringent laws and regulations relating to climate change and greenhouse gases (GHGs) may be adopted in the future and could cause us to incur material expenses in complying with them. The EPA has begun to regulate GHGs as pollutants under the CAA. The EPA adopted rules to permit GHG emissions from stationary sources under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V permitting programs including the “Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule,” requiring that the largest sources first obtain permits for GHG emissions. The United States Supreme Court, however, ruled in 2014 that the EPA did not have the authority to require permits for GHG emissions and also did not have the authority to adopt that rule. The EPA may not treat GHGs as an air pollutant for purposes of determining whether a source is a major source that is required to obtain a Prevention of Significant Deterioration or Title V permit. The Court did hold that if a source required a permit under the program because of other pollutants, the EPA had the authority to require that the source demonstrate that it would use the best available control technology to minimize GHG emissions that exceeded a minimal amount.

Because of the lack of any comprehensive legislation program addressing GHGs, the EPA is using its existing regulatory authority to promulgate regulations requiring reduction in GHG emissions from various categories of sources, starting with fossil fuel-fired power plants. Specifically, in June 2019, the EPA issued the final Affordable Clean Energy (“ACE”) rule, which, among other things, establishes emission guidelines for states to develop plans to address GHG emissions from existing coal-fired power plants. The ACE rule replaces the Clean Power Plan that the EPA had issued in 2015. There is a great deal of uncertainty as to how and when additional federal regulation of GHGs might take place. Some members of Congress have expressed the intention to promote legislation to curb the EPA’s authority to regulate GHGs. In addition to federal regulation, a number of states, individually and regionally, and localities also are considering implementing or have implemented GHG regulatory programs. These regional and state initiatives may result in so–called cap–and–trade programs, under which overall GHG emissions are limited and GHG emission “allowances” are then allocated and sold to and between persons subject to the program. These and possibly other regulatory requirements could result in our incurring material expenses to comply, for example by being required to purchase or to surrender allowances for GHGs resulting from other operations or otherwise being required to control or reduce emissions.

Health and Safety. Our operations are also governed by laws and regulations relating to workplace safety and worker health, principally regulations and requirements from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”). The OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA’s community right-to-know regulations and similar state programs may require us to organize and/or disclose information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations. Failure to comply with requirements from these laws and regulations can result in sanctions such as fines and penalties and claims for personal injury and property damage. These requirements may also result in increased operating and capital costs in the future. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with these applicable requirements.

Licenses, Permits and Product Registrations. Certain licenses, permits and product registrations are required for our products and operations in the United States, and in other countries where we do business. The licenses, permits and product registrations are subject to revocation, modification and renewal by governmental authorities. In the United States in particular, producers and distributors of chemicals such as penta and creosote are subject to registration and notification requirements under federal law (including under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”) and the Toxic Substances Control Act, and comparable state law) in order to sell those products in the United States. Compliance with these laws has had, and in the future will continue to have, a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Under FIFRA, the law’s registration system requires an ongoing submission to the EPA of substantial scientific research and testing data regarding the chemistry and toxicology of pesticide products by manufacturers. 

Available Information

We maintain a website at http://rmrholdings.com/ that contains additional information about our Company.

Employees

We currently have 21 full-time employees.

Risks Relating to Our Business

We have incurred losses in prior periods and may incur losses in the future.

We may not achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. Our operations are subject to the risks and competition inherent in the establishment of a business enterprise. There can be no assurance that future operations will be profitable. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have an adverse impact on us.

Our future is dependent upon our ability to obtain financing. If we do not obtain such financing, we may have to cease our activities and investors could lose their entire investment.

There is no assurance that we will operate profitably or generate positive cash flow in the future. We will require additional financing in order to proceed with our business plan and acquire existing businesses that manufacture and distribute chemicals and minerals. We will also require additional financing to sustain our business operations if we are not successful in earning revenues. We may not be able to obtain financing on commercially reasonable terms or terms that are acceptable to us when required. Our future is dependent upon our ability to obtain financing. If we do not obtain such financing, our business could fail and investors could lose their entire investment.

Our business may fail, and investors may lose all of their investment in our Company.

We are a company with a limited operating history and our future profitability is uncertain. We have yet to generate positive earnings and there can be no assurance that we will ever operate profitably. If our business plan is not successful and we are not able to operate profitably, then our stock may become worthless and investors may lose all of their investment in our Company.

We anticipate that we will incur increased operating expenses prior to realizing significant revenues. We therefore expect to incur significant losses into the foreseeable future. We recognize that, if we are unable to generate significant revenues from the sale of our products in the future, we will not be able to earn profits or continue operations. There is no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will prove successful, and we can provide no assurance that we will generate any revenues or ever achieve profitability. If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our business will fail, and investors may lose all of their investment in our Company.

Our limited operating history makes evaluating our business and future prospects difficult and may increase the risk of your investment.

Our limited operating history may not provide a meaningful basis on which to evaluate our business. We will continue to encounter risks and difficulties frequently experienced by companies at a similar stage of development, including our potential failure to:

If we are not successful in addressing any or all of these risks, then our business may be materially and adversely affected.

If we are unable to identify, fund and execute new acquisitions, we will not be able to execute a key element of our business strategy.

Our strategy is to grow primarily by acquiring additional businesses and product lines. We cannot give any assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage additional businesses and product lines. Financing for acquisitions may not be available, or may be available only at a cost or on terms and conditions that are unacceptable to us. Further, acquisitions may involve a number of special risks or effects, including diversion of management’s attention, failure to retain key acquired personnel, unanticipated events or circumstances, legal liabilities, impairment of acquired intangible assets and other one-time or ongoing acquisition-related expenses. Some or all of these special risks or effects could have a material adverse effect on our financial and operating results. In addition, we cannot assure you that acquired businesses or product lines, if any, will achieve anticipated revenues and earnings, or that we will not assume unanticipated liabilities.

In addition, we may not be able to successfully or profitably integrate, operate, maintain and manage our newly acquired operations or their employees. We may not be able to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies, which may lead to operational inefficiencies.

Loss of key members of our management team could disrupt our business.

We depend on the continued employment and performance of our senior executives and other key members of our management team. If any of these individuals resigns or becomes unable to continue in his or her present role and is not adequately replaced, our business operations and our ability to implement our growth strategies could be materially disrupted.

The industries in which we compete are highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete effectively with our competitors that have greater financial resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The industries in which we operate are highly competitive. Among our competitors are some of the world's largest chemical companies that have their own raw material resources. Changes in the competitive landscape could make it difficult for us to retain our competitive position. In addition, some of the companies with whom we compete may be able to produce products more economically than we can. Furthermore, most of our competitors have greater financial resources, which may enable them to invest significant capital into their businesses, including expenditures for research and development.

Increases in the price of our primary raw materials may decrease our profitability and adversely affect our liquidity, cash flow, financial condition and results of operations.

The prices we pay for raw materials in our businesses may increase significantly, and we may not always be able to pass those increases through to our customers fully and timely. In the future, we may be unable to pass on increases in our raw material costs, and raw material price increases may erode the profitability of our products by reducing our gross profit. Price increases for raw materials may also increase our working capital needs, which could adversely affect our liquidity and cash flow. For these reasons, we cannot assure you that raw material cost increases in our businesses would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The Company will operate in competitive environment which gives rise to operating and market risk exposure.

The Company expects to sell a broad range of products and services in a competitive, environment, and to compete for sales on the basis of product quality, price, technology and customer service. Increased levels of competition could result in lower prices or lower sales volume, which could have a negative impact on the Company's results of operations.

Economic conditions around the world, and in certain industries in which the Company does business also impact sales prices and volume. As a result, market uncertainty or an economic downturn in the geographic areas or industries in which we sell our products could reduce demand for these products and result in decreased sales volume, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

In addition, volatility and disruption of financial markets could limit customers' ability to obtain adequate financing to maintain operations, which could result in a decrease in sales volume and have a negative impact on our results of operations. The Company's business operations may also give rise to market risk exposure related to changes in interest rates, commodity prices and other market factors such as equity prices.

Disruptions in production at our processing facilities, both planned and unplanned, may have a material impact on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.

Manufacturing and mining facilities in our industry are subject to planned and unplanned production shutdowns and outages. Unplanned production disruptions may occur for external reasons including natural disasters, weather, disease, strikes, transportation interruption, government regulation, political unrest or terrorism, or internal reasons, such as fire, unplanned maintenance or other problems. Alternative facilities with sufficient capacity may not be available, may cost substantially more or may take a significant time to increase production or qualify with our customers, each of which could negatively impact our business, results of operations and/or financial condition. Long-term production disruptions may cause our customers to seek alternative supply which could further adversely affect our profitability.

We will expend large amounts of money for environmental compliance in connection with our operations.

We are subject to stringent regulations under numerous U.S. federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations relating to, among other things, the generation, storage, handling, discharge, disposition and stewardship of hazardous wastes and other materials. We will expend substantial funds to comply with such laws and regulations and have established a policy intended to minimize our emissions to the environment. Nevertheless, legislative, regulatory and economic uncertainties (including existing and potential laws and regulations pertaining to climate change) make it difficult for us to project future spending for these purposes and if there are changes to applicable regulatory requirements, we may be required to expend substantial additional funds to remain in compliance.

We are subject to environmental clean-up costs, fines, penalties and damage claims that have been and continue to be costly.

We are subject to the risk of lawsuits and regulatory actions in connection with current and former operations (including divested businesses) for breaches of environmental laws or regulations or in connection with clean-up obligations. Lawsuits and investigations may be initiated by public or private parties under various environmental laws, including with respect to off-site disposal at facilities where we have been identified as a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, commonly referred to as CERCLA, or similar laws.

Increased concerns regarding the safe use of chemicals in commerce and their potential impact on the environment have resulted in more restrictive regulations from local, state and federal governments and could lead to new regulations.

Concerns regarding the safe use of chemicals in commerce and their potential impact on health and the environment reflect a growing trend in societal demands for increasing levels of product safety and environmental protection. These concerns could manifest themselves in stockholder proposals, preferred purchasing and continued pressure for more stringent regulatory intervention. These concerns could also influence public perceptions, the viability of the Company's products, the Company's reputation and the cost to comply with regulations. In addition, terrorist attacks and natural disasters have increased concerns about the security and safety of chemical production and distribution. These concerns could have a negative impact on the Company's results of operations.

Local, state and federal governments continue to propose new regulations related to the security of chemical plant locations and the transportation of hazardous chemicals, which could result in higher operating costs.

We work with dangerous materials that can injure our employees, damage our facilities and disrupt our operations.

Some of our operations involve the handling of hazardous materials that may pose a risk of fire, explosion, or the release of hazardous substances. Such events could result from terrorist attacks, natural disasters, or operational failures, and might cause injury or loss of life to our employees and others, environmental contamination, and property damage. These events could lead a temporary shutdown of an affected plant, or portion thereof, and we could be subject to penalties or claims as a result. A disruption of our operations caused by these or other events could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our ability to operate and/or expand our mining operations may be affected by our ability to secure proper permits.

Environmental and zoning regulations have made it increasingly difficult for the aggregates industry to expand existing quarries and to develop new quarry operations. Our mining operations could be materially impacted from being unable to maintain existing permits to operate the quarry or being unable to secure new permits to support the expansion of the quarry.

We may be subject to claims of infringement of the intellectual property rights of others, which could hurt our business.

From time to time, we expect to face infringement claims from our competitors or others alleging that our processes or products infringe on their proprietary technologies. Any claims that our products or processes infringe the intellectual property rights of others, regardless of the merit or resolution of the claims, could cause us to incur significant costs in responding to, defending and resolving the claims, and may divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel from our business. If we are found to be infringing on the proprietary technology of others, we may be liable for damages, and we may be required to change our processes, redesign our products, pay others to use the technology or stop using the technology or producing the infringing product. Even if we ultimately prevail, the existence of the lawsuit could prompt our customers to switch to products that are not the subject of infringement suits.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock and Our Status as a Public Company

We will be required to incur significant costs and require significant management resources to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and any failure to comply or any adverse result from such evaluation may have an adverse effect on our stock price.

As a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”). Section 404 requires us to include an internal control report with the Annual Report on Form 10-K. This report must include management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year. This report must also include disclosure of any material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting that we have identified. Failure to comply, or any adverse results from such evaluation could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect on the trading price of our equity securities.

Achieving continued compliance with Section 404 may require us to incur significant costs and expend significant time and management resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to fully comply with Section 404. As a result, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have an adverse effect on the trading price of our securities, as well as subject us to civil or criminal investigations and penalties.

Our directors and executive officers have voting control over the Company.

Our founders, who also comprise a majority of the Company’s management team, have significant ownership of the Company, including a majority of our voting stock. This gives them the ability to control most, if not all, Company decisions.

Our directors and executive officers as a group own, directly or indirectly, approximately 57% of the Company Class A Common Stock (the Company’s voting capital stock), effectively giving them voting control on most, if not all, decisions submitted to a shareholder vote, including the election of our directors and mergers and other major transactions. Such concentration of ownership and control could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company even when such a change of control would be in the best interests of the Company’s other shareholders. Accordingly, other investors will have little voice in our management decisions and will exercise very little control over us. In addition, the applicable sections of the Nevada Revised Statutes provide that certain actions must be approved by a specified percentage of shareholders. In the event that the requisite approval of shareholders is obtained, dissenting shareholders would be bound by such vote. Accordingly, no persons should purchase any shares unless they are willing to entrust all aspects of control to our management.

Indemnification rights held by our directors, officers and employees may result in substantial expenditures by our company and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers and employees.

The indemnification obligations provided in our articles of incorporation and our bylaws to our directors and officers could result in the Company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resulting costs may also discourage us from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our shareholders against our directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders. We may also provide indemnification rights to our employees with similar results.

Trading in our stock is subject to regulatory restrictions that limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

There is currently no active trading market for our stock, and applicable SEC and other rules may prevent such a market from developing. For example:

Each of these factors limits liquidity in the market for our common stock, and may therefore make it more difficult for our shareholders to sell their stock. The lack of trading in our stock may in turn make it more difficult for us to raise capital through issuances of stock, as potential investors may be reluctant to invest given the difficulties they may face if they later choose to sell the stock they purchase.

To date, we have not paid any cash dividends and no cash dividends will be paid in the foreseeable future.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future and we may not have sufficient funds legally available to pay dividends. Even if the funds are legally available for distribution, we may nevertheless decide not to pay any dividends. We presently intend to retain all earnings for our operations.

If we issue additional shares in the future, it will result in the dilution of our existing shareholders.

Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of up 2,150,000,000 shares, of which 2,000,000,000 are shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, 100,000,000 are shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 50,000,000 are shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share. Our Board of Directors may choose to issue some or all of such shares to acquire one or more companies or properties and to fund our overhead and general operating requirements. The issuance of any such shares may reduce the book value per share and may contribute to a reduction in the market price of the outstanding shares of our common stock. If we issue any such additional shares, such issuance will reduce the proportionate ownership and voting power of all current shareholders. Further, such issuance may result in a change of control of our Company.

We are an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act of 2012, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”), and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We are choosing to take advantage of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. As a result, our financial statements may not be comparable to those of companies that comply with public company effective dates.

We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, although we will lose that status sooner if our revenues exceed $1 billion, if we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three year period, or if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any May 30.

Not applicable

Our principal executive offices are located in Denver, Colorado where we lease approximately 4,648 square feet under an arrangement that expires in February 2022. In Beverly Hills, California we lease approximately 2,238 square feet of office space for management, sales and support staff under an arrangement that expires in January 2022. The Company feels that this space is sufficient until the Company significantly expands operations. The Company through its subsidiary Rail Land Company owns an approximate 620-acre parcel of real property located in Bennett, Colorado. The Company’s development of the Rail Park is intended to expand the customer base for our products by utilizing rail freight capabilities to reach customers in the greater Denver area and by expanding our business to include rail transportation solutions and services

Please reference “Cautionary Note Regarding Exploration Stage Status and Use of Certain Mining Terms” in Item 1 related to stage of our mineral explorations, all of which are without reserves, as defined by Guide 7.

Background

RMR, through its subsidiary, RMR Aggregates, Inc., owns 44 mining claims on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) property in Garfield County, Colorado. The mining claims encompass 880 acres (20 acres each) and are for chemical grade limestone found within the Leadville Limestone formation. RMR purchased the mining claims and the associated mining facilities and equipment from CalX Minerals in October of 2016.

The mineral rights are controlled through unpatented mining claims, the extents of which are shown on Figure 1. RMR has the legal right to enter through the provisions of the 1872 Mining Law. The claims grant RMR the right to remove the minerals within each claim under a Plan of Operations which must be approved by the BLM. RMR does not have any surface rights or surface ownership with the claims. However, RMR may conduct surface activities and install structures on the surface so long as the approved Plan of Operations allows. There is no set duration or term to the mining claims. RMR retains the rights to the mining claims through the payment of claim renewal fees, to the BLM, in September of each year. Each of the 44 claims requires a renewal fee payment of $165 per claim. RMR is responsible for paying these claim renewal fees each year. All claims are listed below in Table 1.

There are no active plans for future exploration.

Table 1 – RMR mining claims

RMR operates the Mid-Continent Quarry on 6 of the 44 BLM mining claims it owns. RMR is permitted by the BLM and Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety (the “DRMS”) to operate and extract limestone from the six claims in which the Mid-Continent Quarry is located. The six claims cover a total of 120 acres. RMR operates the quarry within a 38-acre boundary stipulated by its CO DRMS permit.

Additionally, RMR has additional exploration property consisting of the remaining 38 mining claims (760 acres) not currently included with the Mid-Continent Quarry. This property surrounds the Mid-Continent Quarry property with the majority of the acreage existing to the north and east of the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry property (see Figure 1).

The boundaries of the Mid-Continent Quarry and the exploration property follow the boundaries of the mining claims on which they are located.

Figure 1 - Mid-Continent Quarry area map with mining claims

Location and Access

The Mid-Continent Quarry is located about 1 mile north of the city of Glenwood Springs in Garfield County, Colorado. Access to the quarry is provided by a BLM dirt road called Transfer Trail.

The terrain of the location is dominated by a hillside with a slope that ranges between 2H:1V and 3H:1V. Vegetation is mostly composed of sparse grasses, shrubs, and evergreen trees.

Geology and Mineralization

The quarry area is located in the Leadville Limestone formation and is bound by an unnamed fault to the north and the West Glenwood Fault to the south. The limestone outcrops to the east and to the west creating a natural boundary for the edges of the deposit. The deposit is roughly tabular in nature, with a west-northwest to east-southeast strike and 10-30° dip to the south-southwest. The Leadville Limestone formation ranges from approximately 150-175 feet thick in the quarry area.

Facilities

RMR owns a limestone milling facility located within the 38-acre mining boundary. Additionally, RMR owns and operates various pieces of crushing, screening, and heavy mobile equipment used for extracting and sizing the limestone in the quarry.

Current Status

Shortly after RMR purchased the property, extensive site cleanup was performed. RMR performs daily activities related to the production of limestone. This work includes blasting rock, transporting rock with excavators and front-end loaders and crushing and screening rock into usable sized pieces. To perform these activities, RMR has incurred costs, and will continue to incur costs. These costs include payment for supplies, equipment, labor, and other associated expenses related to the extraction of limestone.

The power at the site is provided by Glenwood Springs Utilities. RMR does not have a direct water connect and utilizes water transported to the site and purchased from nearby locations for all water needs. The quarry is currently in excellent working condition.

Exploration of Property

RMR has not performed any exploration drilling of its own on the property outside of the quarry. RMR has performed surface sampling of the limestone on sections of this property. Testing results from the surface sampling have shown the limestone in this property to be nearly identical in nature to the chemical grade limestone found in the quarry.

Historical exploration drilling, occurring between 1958-1976, took place over large sections of the property outside of the quarry. Testing results from this drilling show the existence of chemical grade limestone like the limestone found in the quarry. There are no active plans for future exploration.

The costs associated with our properties can be found in Note F to our consolidated financial statements.

RMR Industrials, Inc. (“RMR”) filed lawsuits against the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado (“BOCC”) in State and Federal Courts. The State Court action seeks judicial review pursuant to C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) of the BOCC’s May 8, 2019 Notice of Violation issued to Rocky Mountain Resources based on a decision of the BOCC at its public meeting on April 22, 2019. RMR is seeking only judicial review of this quasi-judicial determination and decision by the BOCC and is not seeking any monetary damages from the BOCC in the State Court Action. In the Federal Court action, RMR seeks additional relief, including a permanent injunction, for violations of its rights to substantive and procedural due process pursuant to the United States Constitution and for declaratory relief regarding preemption of federal law. The Federal Court action has been stayed pending resolution of the State Court action.

The operation of the Mid-Continent Quarry is subject to regulation by MSHA under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). MSHA inspects the quarry on a regular basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. Whenever MSHA issues a citation or order, it also generally proposes a civil penalty, or fine, related to the alleged violation. Citations or orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed.

Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act), the Company is required to present information regarding certain mining safety and health citations which MSHA has issued with respect to its aggregates mining operations in its periodic reports filed with the SEC. In evaluating this information, consideration should be given to factors such as: (i) the number of citations and orders will vary depending on the size of the quarry or mine and type of operations (underground or surface), (ii) the number of citations issued will vary from inspector to inspector and location to location, and (iii) citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and in that process, may be reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed.

The Company presents the following items regarding certain mining safety and health matters for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:

PART II

Market Information

Our Class B Common Stock is currently quoted on the Over the Counter Market under the symbol “RMRI”. No shares of Class B Common Stock have traded on the Over the Counter Market to date.

Holders

As of December 31, 2019, there were approximately 121 holders of record of our Class B Common Stock, and three holders of record of our Class A Common Stock.

Dividends

We plan to retain any earnings for the foreseeable future for our operations. We have never paid any dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.

Recent Issuance of Unregistered Securities

We issued the following unregistered securities during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:

Subsequent to March 31, 2019, the Company issued 29.5 preferred stock and received $2,952,000 in gross proceeds. During the same period accredited investors exercised warrants to purchase 175,000 shares of Class B common stock at an exercise price of $12.50 - $20.00.

On December 3, 2019, an accredited investor owning 5,263 shares of RMR Aggregates common stock elected to convert its common stock of RMR Aggregates in to 166,667 shares of RMRI Class B common stock, pursuant to an Equity Conversion Agreement between the accredited investor, RMR Aggregates and RMRI. Upon conversion, RMR Aggregates became a wholly owned subsidiary of RMRI.

We relied on an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act with respect to the foregoing issuance.

Not applicable.

Forward-Looking Statements

All statements in this report other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements”. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those relating to the following: our ability to secure necessary financing; fluctuations in interest rates; our ability to continue to grow and implement growth strategies, and future cash needs and operations and our business plans.

When used in this document, the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “plans,” “project,” and similar expressions are intended to be among the statements that identify forward-looking statements. Our results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those relating to costs, delays and difficulties related to our ability to attract and retain skilled managers and other personnel; the intense competition within our industry; the uncertainty of our ability to manage and continue our growth and implement our business strategy; our vulnerability to general economic conditions; accuracy of accounting and other estimates; our future financial and operating results, cash needs and demand for services; and our ability to maintain and comply with permits and licenses; as well as other risk factors described in this Report. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those projected.

Overview

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada in August, 2012 under the name “Online Yearbook” with the principal business objective of developing and marketing online yearbooks for schools, companies and government agencies.

In November, 2014, Rocky Mountain Resource Holdings, Inc. (“RMRH”) became our majority shareholder by acquiring 5,200,000 shares of our common stock (the “Shares”), or 69.06% of the then issued and outstanding shares, pursuant to stock purchase agreements with Messrs. El Maraana and Salah Blal, our former officers and directors. The Shares were acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $357,670.

In December 2014, we changed our name to “RMR Industrials, Inc.” in connection with the change in our business plan.

In February, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), we entered into and consummated a merger transaction pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, OLYB Acquisition Corporation, a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”) and RMR IP, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“RMR IP”). In accordance with the terms of Merger Agreement, on the Closing Date, Merger Sub merged with and into RMR IP (the “Merger”), with RMR IP surviving the Merger as our wholly owned subsidiary. Chad Brownstein and Gregory M. Dangler are directors of the Company and co-owners of RMRH, which was the majority shareholder of the Company prior to the Merger. Additionally, Messrs. Brownstein and Dangler were indirect controlling shareholders and directors of RMR IP prior to the Merger. As such, the Merger was among entities under the common control of Messrs. Brownstein and Dangler.

In July, 2016, we formed RMR Aggregates, Inc., a Colorado corporation (“RMR Aggregates”), as our wholly-owned subsidiary. RMR Aggregates was formed to hold assets whose primary focus is the mining and processing of industrial minerals for the manufacturing, construction and agriculture sectors. These minerals include limestone, aggregates, marble, silica, barite and sand.

In October, 2016, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement with CalX Minerals, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“CalX”), RMR Aggregates completed the purchase of substantially all of the assets associated with the Mid-Continent Quarry on 41 BLM unpatented placer mining claims in Garfield County, Colorado. CalX assets include the mining claims, improvements, access rights, water rights, equipment, inventory, contracts, permits, certain intellectual property rights, and other tangible and intangible assets associated with the limestone mining operation.

In January 2018, the Company formed Rail Land Company, LLC (“Rail Land Company”) as a wholly-owned subsidiary to acquire and develop a rail terminal and services facility (the “Rail Park”). Rail Land Company purchased an approximately 470-acre parcel of real property located in Bennett, Colorado in February, 2018. In the July of 2018 we exercised our option to acquire an additional approximately 150 acres for a total of 620 acres. Additionally, Rail Land Company entered into Option Agreements to acquire 150 acres of real property and a total of 250 acres of mineral rights in Bennett. The acreage is in the process of being entitled and rezoned for the development of the Rail Park. The Company’s development of the Rail Park is intended to expand the customer base for our products by utilizing rail freight capabilities to reach customers in the greater Denver area and by expanding our business to include rail transportation solutions and services.  

Subsequent to the financial year end, in April, 2019, RMR Logistics, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“RMR Logistics”), entered into an asset purchase agreement with H2K, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“the Seller”) pursuant to which it acquired the Seller’s trucking, hauling, paving, road building, dirt work, sewer line, and demolition service operations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Management considers many factors in selecting appropriate financial accounting policies and controls, and in developing the estimates and assumptions that are used in the preparation of these financial statements. Management must apply significant judgment in this process. In addition, other factors may affect estimates, including: expected business and operational changes, sensitivity and volatility associated with the assumptions used in developing estimates, and whether historical trends are expected to be representative of future trends. The estimation process may yield a range of potentially reasonable estimates of the ultimate future outcomes and management must select an amount that falls within that range of reasonable estimates. Although these estimates are based on the Company’s knowledge of current events and actions it may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately materially differ from those estimated amounts and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements.

Segment Reporting

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. As of March 31, 2019, the Company views its operations and manages its business as two operating segments, Aggregates mining and Rail Park development. As described in “—Overview”, RMR Logistics acquired certain trucking, hauling, paving, road building, dirt work, sewer line, and demolition services assets subsequent to year end. Accordingly, as at the date of this report, the Company has added Logistics as a third segment of its operations. 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2019, the Company had cash of $528,417 and no cash equivalents. The Company may occasionally maintain cash balances in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The amounts are held with major financial institutions and are monitored by management to mitigate credit risk.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Asset impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the asset. Any impairment losses are measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows and are charged to income on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups. The Company’s estimates of future cash flows are based on numerous assumptions, including expected commodity prices, production levels, capital requirements and estimated salvage values. It is possible that actual future cash flows will be significantly different than the estimates, as actual future quantities of recoverable material, future commodity prices, production levels and costs and capital are each subject to significant risks and uncertainties. As of March 31, 2019, the Company’s mineral resources do not meet the definition of proven or probable reserves or value beyond proven or probable reserves and any potential revenue has been excluded from the cash flow assumptions. Accordingly, recoverability of the long-lived assets’ capitalized cost is based primarily on estimated salvage values or alternative future uses. 

Fair Value Measurements

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:

- Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

- Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or inputs that are corroborated by market data

- Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data

Revenue Recognition

The Company earns revenue from the sale of products and services, which primarily include limestone, aggregates material and freight and delivery of customer products. 

Revenue for product sales is recognized when evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, title passes, which generally is when the product is shipped, and collection is reasonably assured. Product revenue generally includes sales of limestone and aggregates, net of discounts or allowances, if any, and freight and delivery charges billed to customers. Freight and delivery charges associated with cement sales are recorded on a net basis together with freight costs within cost of sales.

Accrued Reclamation Liability

The Company incurs reclamation liabilities as part of its mining activities. Quarry activities require the removal and relocation of significant levels of overburden to access materials of usable quantity and quality. The same overburden material is used to reclaim depleted mine areas, which must be sloped to a certain gradient and seeded to prevent erosion in the future. Reclamation methods and requirements can differ depending on the quarry and state rules and regulations in existence for certain locations. As of March 31, 2019, the Company’s undiscounted reclamation obligations totaled approximately $222,081, which is expected to be settled within the next 20 years.

Reclamation costs resulting from the normal use of long-lived assets, either owned or leased, are recognized over the period the asset is in use. The obligation, which cannot be reduced by estimated offsetting cash flows, is recorded at fair value as a liability at the obligating event date and is accreted through charges to operating expenses. The fair value is based on our estimate for a third party to perform the legally required reclamation tasks including a reasonable profit margin. This fair value is also capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the underlying asset and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset.

The mining reclamation reserve is based on management’s estimate of future cost requirements to reclaim property at its operating quarry site. Costs are estimated in current dollars and inflated until the expected time of payment using a future estimated inflation rate and then discounted back to present value using a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate on obligations of similar maturity adjusted to reflect our credit rating. The Company will review reclamation liabilities at least every three years for a revision to the cost or a change in the estimated settlement date. Additionally, reclamation liabilities are reviewed in the period that a triggering event occurs that would result in either a revision to the cost or a change in the estimated settlement date. Examples of events that would trigger a change in the cost include a new reclamation law or amendment to an existing mineral lease. Examples of events that would cause a change in the estimated settlement date include the acquisition of additional reserves or early or delayed closure of a site. Any affect to earnings from cost revisions is included in cost of revenue.

Net Loss per Common Share

Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for the potentially dilutive effects of converting stock options or restricted stock purchase rights outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and the potential dilutive effects of stock options or restricted stock purchase rights outstanding during the period determined using the treasury stock method. There are no such anti-dilutive common share equivalents outstanding as March 31, 2019 which were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per common share.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires, among other things, that deferred income taxes be provided for temporary differences between the tax bases of the Company's assets and liabilities and their financial statement reported amounts. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

A valuation allowance is recorded by the Company when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In making such a determination, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the amount of the valuation allowance. When the Company establishes or reduces the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, its provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made.

Additionally, the Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit recognized in the financial statements for a particular tax position is based on the largest benefit that is more likely than not to be realized upon settlement. Accordingly, the Company establishes reserves for uncertain tax positions. The Company has not recognized interest or penalties in its statement of operations and comprehensive loss since inception. 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, which will result in lessees recognizing most leases on the balance sheet. Lessees are required to disclose more quantitative and qualitative information about their leases than current U.S. GAAP requires. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.

Management believes that, other than described above in relation to ASU 2016-02 recently issued accounting pronouncements will have no impact on the financial statements of the Company. As this standard is applicable for the Company for the financial year commencing April 1, 2019 the Company has evaluated the impact of this guidance and has determined that the Company will record a right of use asset of $526,735 and a lease liability of $526,735 on April 1, 2019.

Results of Operations for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2019 compared to the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018

Revenues

Revenues for the year ended March 31, 2019 were $1,430,338, compared to sales of $1,060,438 for the same period in the prior year. The increase of $369,900 relates largely due to an increase in the sales price per ton realized of $4.80 or 25.2%. This increased realized price per ton was driven by the sale of increased volumes of our heavy to very large product.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold for the year ended March 31, 2019, was $ 1,304,256 compared to $961,809 for the year ended March 31, 2018.The increase in cost of goods sold is largely due to the increase in freight costs as a result of the Company shipping heavier products to our customers.

Selling, general and administrative

Operating expenses for the year ended March 31, 2019 were $ 8,835,445 compared to operating expenses for the year ended March 31, 2018 of $5,472,254. Selling, general and administrative expenses consisted of overhead costs related to mining operations, consulting services from related parties, public company costs and amortization of intangible assets. The main increases consist of $590,000 increase in legal fees, including legal fees relating to the Company’s mine expansion project and the development of the Company’s Rail Park project. Salaries and wages increased $2,400,000 due to the Company increasing staffing largely in relation to the Company’s Rail Park project.

Loss on extinguishment of debt

The loss on extinguishment of debt arose on the Company settling debt outstanding with shares that had a fair value of $12,083,317 greater than the fair value of the debt extinguished.

Other income

The increase in Other income is largely driven by $1,000,000 in income received on the sale of an easement on the Company's Rail Park property.

Interest expense, net

Interest decreased as a result of the extinguishment of debt and repayment of notes payable during the year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2019, we had current assets of $932,180, total current liabilities of $2,734,144 and working capital deficit of $1,801,964. We have incurred an accumulated loss of $35,428,938 since inception. Our independent auditors have issued an audit opinion for our financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2019, which includes a statement expressing substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern due to our limited liquidity and our lack of revenues.

We do not generate adequate cash flows to support our existing operations. Moreover, the historical and existing capital structure is not adequate to fund our planned growth. Our current cash requirements are significant due to our business plan, which contemplates future acquisitions, development of the Company’s Rail Park asset and expansion of the Company’s mining operations. We anticipate generating losses through 2020 and into 2021. We anticipate that we will be able to raise sufficient amounts of working capital in the near term through debt or equity offerings as may be required to meet short-term obligations, although this cannot be guaranteed.

Other than as stated above, we currently do not have any arrangements for additional financing, and we may not be able to obtain financing when required. Our future is dependent upon our ability to obtain financing, a successful marketing and promotion program and, further in the future, achieving a profitable level of operations. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments. We will require additional funds to achieve and maintain compliance with SEC reporting obligations and to remain in good standing with the state of Nevada. There are no assurances that we will be able to raise the required working capital on favorable terms, in a timely manner or at all. Any failure to secure additional financing may force us to modify our business plan. In addition, we cannot be assured of profitability in the future.

Going Concern

We have incurred net losses since our inception on October 15, 2014 through March 31, 2019 totaling $35,428,938 and have completed the preliminary stages of our business plan.  We anticipate incurring additional losses and will depend on additional financing in order to meet our continuing obligations and ultimately to attain profitability.  Our ability to obtain additional financing, whether through the issuance of additional equity or through the assumption of debt, is uncertain.  Accordingly, our independent auditors’ report on our financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 includes an explanatory paragraph regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern, including additional information contained in the notes to our financial statements describing the circumstances leading to this disclosure.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the uncertainty about our ability to continue our business.

The Company is currently working through a number of opportunities to ensure the business will continue as a going concern. These include:

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Not applicable.

The financial statements required by this item are included after the signature page of this filing.

Not applicable.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Accounting of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Accounting concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weakness described below.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company maintains internal controls over financial reporting that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating the internal controls over financial reporting, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included an assessment of the design of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2019, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weakness discussed below.

In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

This report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this report. 

Material Weakness and Related Remediation Initiatives

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of March 31, 2019, due to the Company’s budget constraints, the Company’s accounting department does not maintain the number of accounting personnel (either in-house or external) necessary to ensure more complete and effective financial reporting controls. Due to this situation, we did not perform timely and sufficient internal or external review of our current fiscal year financial reporting, which resulted in untimely financial statement filings. 

It is reasonably possible that, if not remediated, this material weakness could result in a material misstatement in our reported financial statements in a future annual or interim period. We are developing an action plan for this material weakness, which involves hiring qualified accounting personnel and establishing a formal audit committee. We are uncertain at this time of the costs required to remediate the material weakness.

Because the remedial actions will require the hiring of additional personnel, and extensive reliance on manual review and approval, the successful operation of the controls for at least several quarters may be required before management is able to conclude that the material weakness has been remediated. We intend to continue to evaluate and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting systems. These efforts require significant time and resources. If we are unable to establish effective internal control over our financial reporting, we may encounter difficulties in the audit or review of our financial statements by our independent registered public accounting firm, which in turn may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP and to comply with our SEC reporting obligations.

Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control systems are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, no evaluation of internal control over financial reporting can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been or will be detected.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The following change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter will materially affect, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. The Company employed a dedicated VP of Accounting in September 2019. Part of the role of the VP of Accounting is to address the Company’s compliance with new accounting pronouncements and to work to implement and establish applicable controls and processes within the organization.

None.

PART III

Our directors and executive officers are as follows:

Chad Brownstein is our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. He is responsible for the corporate strategy and board oversight for all investments. Mr. Brownstein has been the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company since 2014. Mr. Brownstein is responsible for assisting the corporate strategy and board oversight for all acquisition opportunities at RMRI. Since 2008, Mr. Brownstein has been a partner at Rocky Mountain Resource Holdings, a natural resource operating and investment company, and/or its predecessors or affiliates. Previously, from 2009 to 2017, Mr. Brownstein was a board member of the Banc of California. Previously, from 2009 to 2012, Mr. Brownstein was a principal member of Crescent Capital Group, an investment firm (formerly Trust Company of the West Leveraged Finance Group) focused on special situations. During 2008, Mr. Brownstein was a Senior Advisor at Knowledge Universe Ltd., a global education company, where he focused on turnaround operations. From 2000 to 2007, he was a Partner at ITU Ventures, a venture capital firm, making venture and growth investments with a specialization in corporate strategy. Mr. Brownstein began his career in 1996 at Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette in the Merchant and Investment Banking divisions. Mr. Brownstein is either a current or past member of the Cedars Sinai Board of Governors, Los Angeles Conservation Corps, Prospect Global Resources, and The Palisades Group LLC, a Banc of California Company. Mr. Brownstein attended Columbia Business School and received his B.A. from Tulane University. We believe Mr. Brownstein’s extensive experience with investments and acquisitions will bring value to the Company as we seek to grow our business.

Gregory Dangler Mr. Dangler has been the President, and Director of the Company since 2014. Mr. Dangler is responsible for the day-to-day operations and corporate financial strategy of RMR. Since 2008, Mr. Dangler has been a partner at Rocky Mountain Resource Holdings and/or its predecessors or affiliates. Previously, from 2012-2014, Mr. Dangler held multiple positions, including Chief Restructuring Officer of Prospect Global Resources, a natural resource development company. Prior to that, in 2009, Mr. Dangler founded a venture-backed technology company. As the chief executive of that company, he raised institutional capital and expanded the company’s global presence with operating interests in Africa and South America. From 2006 to 2007, Mr. Dangler was an associate with ITU Ventures, a venture capital firm, making venture and growth investments. While with ITU, Mr. Dangler executed private and public equity transactions, directed M&A activity, and provided strategic support to portfolio companies. In 2000, Mr. Dangler began his career in the U.S. Air Force and by 2004 was managing complex infrastructure projects. Mr. Dangler received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Air Force Academy and an M.B.A. from the University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business. We believe Mr. Dangler’s knowledge and experience in the industrial resources industry and with emerging growth companies will help to further the Company’s goals and business efforts.

Andrew Peltz has served as a director on our Board since February 2015. Mr. Peltz is currently Co-Executive Chairman and a founding partner of iBorrow, L.P., a nationally recognized commercial real estate lender. In addition to his duties at iBorrow, Mr. Peltz is a Partner at Peltz Capital Management (“PCM”). Prior to iBorrow and PCM, Mr. Peltz worked at Triarc Companies, Inc. from 1999 to 2003 where he held the titles of Vice President, Investment Services and Associate of Corporate Development. He was primarily responsible for the day-to-day oversight of Triarc’s $650 million plus investment portfolio. Prior to Triarc, Mr. Peltz was Senior Investment Banker at Credit Agricole Lazard Financial Products Bank, a joint venture between Lazard Freres & Co. and Credit Agricole, from 1997 to 1998, where he specialized in structured finance transactions. From 1996 to 1997, Mr. Peltz also served as a marketing associate for Lazard Asset Management, a division of Lazard Freres & Co., where he marketed a vast array of fixed income, equity and alternative investment products. Mr. Peltz holds a BFA from New York University. We believe that Mr. Peltz’s education, management and accounting experience make him a valuable member of the Company’s board of directors.

Barry Munitz was nominated and appointed as a director on our Board in March 2018. Dr. Munitz is Chancellor Emeritus of the California State University System, President of the Cotsen Foundations for the Art of Teaching and for Academic Research, Vice Chair of the Broad Family Education Foundation, and Senior Advisor to the Milken Institute. Previously, Dr. Munitz served as President and CEO of the J. Paul Getty Trust, overseeing the Trust’s two museums, its Foundation and its Research and Conservation Institutes, and managing its endowment portfolio. At California State University, he supervised the system’s expansion from 18 to 23 campuses. The system now has student enrollment in excess of one half million and more than 50,000 employees. As a corporate executive for a decade, he was President of Federated Development, and vice chairman of the publicly held Maxxam Corporation, a natural resources, finance, and real estate holding company. Dr. Munitz was the founding (and the only) chair of California’s P-16 Council, a group of education, business, and community leaders charged with developing strategies to improve education from preschool through post-graduate, while also chairing the California Education Roundtable. He was a Trustee of the Courtauld Institute in London, is a founding board member of Sherry Lansing’s EnCorps board, and was a 20-year director at Navient (formerly Sallie Mae), was a public director of the Sun America Corporation, Kaufman & Broad, and LeapFrog Incorporated, and chaired the board of trustees at Sierra Nevada College and the American Council of Education. Dr. Munitz is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and held the White House seat on the Congressional Higher Education Cost Commission. He was Chancellor of the University of Houston and academic vice president of the University of Illinois system. He received a Ph.D. in comparative literature from Princeton University, a Baccalaureate degree at Brooklyn College, and holds honorary degrees from Whittier College, Claremont Graduate University, the California State University, the University of Southern California, Notre Dame, Pepperdine, and the University of Edinburgh. We believe that Dr. Munitz’s education and management experience make him a valuable member of the Company’s board of directors.

Brandon Pilot was nominated and appointed as a director on our Board in March 2018. Mr. Pilot is a Partner at Bienville Capital, a New York based investment firm. He serves on the investment team focused on the firm’s private capital opportunities and works closely with several of Bienville’s family office relationships. Prior to Bienville, Mr. Pilot worked on the investment team for a single family office. Prior to that, Mr. Pilot worked as an Analyst at Founders Investment Banking, a middle-market investment bank focused on the industrial services sector. Mr. Pilot earned a Master’s Degree in Business Administration with a concentration in Finance, and a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Management, from The University of Alabama. Mr. Pilot is on the Board of Outback America and is a Co-founder of the Believe UA Mentoring Program. We believe that Mr. Pilot’s education and investing experience make him a valuable member of the Company’s board of directors.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers. Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, whose Chairman of the Board, Norman Brownstein, is the father of our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, provides services to the Company. Legal fees paid by the Company to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP in the year ended March 31, 2019 were $438,576.

Board Composition

Our By-Laws provide that the Board of Directors shall consist of not less than one (1) nor more than fifteen (15) directors. Each director of the Company serves until his successor is elected and qualified, subject to removal by the Company's majority shareholders. Officers shall hold their offices for such terms and shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as shall be determined by the Board of Directors, and each officer shall hold his office until his successor is elected and qualified, or until his earlier resignation or removal.

Audit Committee

Our Board of Directors has not established a separate audit committee within the meaning of Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Instead, the entire Board of Directors acts as the audit committee and will continue to do so until such time as a separate audit committee is established.  

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all Company directors, officers and employees which is available upon written request to the Company at c/o RMR Industrials, Inc., 4601 DTC Blvd., Suite 130, Denver, Colorado, 80237.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our Board of Directors as a whole. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors and officers have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation and audit issues that may affect management decisions.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

No director, executive officer, significant employee or control person of the Company has been involved in any legal proceeding listed in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K in the past 10 years.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and shareholders holding more than 10% of our outstanding Class B Common Stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of our Class B Common Stock. Executive officers, directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our Class B Common Stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Barry Munitz and Brandon Pilot were required to report their ownership interest within 10 days of becoming directors of the Company. These reports have not yet been filed.

Chad Brownstein, our Chief Executive Officer and a director, and Gregory Dangler, our President and a director, were required to report their indirect ownership interest in the acquisition of shares by Industrial Management LLC on January 30, 2018. Messrs. Brownstein and Dangler were required to file Forms 4 no later than February 1, 2018. These reports have not yet been filed.

Except as set forth above, based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 delivered to us as filed with the SEC during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, none of our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our Class B Common Stock failed to timely file the reports required pursuant to Section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act.

Nominations to the Board of Directors

Our directors play a critical role in guiding our strategic direction and oversee the management of the Company. Board candidates are considered based upon various criteria, such as their broad-based business and professional skills and experiences, a global business and social perspective, concern for the long-term interests of the shareholders, diversity, and personal integrity and judgment

In addition, directors must have time available to devote to Board activities and to enhance their knowledge in the growing business. Accordingly, we seek to attract and retain highly qualified directors who have sufficient time to attend to their substantial duties and responsibilities to the Company.

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Board will consider candidates suggested by shareholders. If a shareholder wishes to formally place a candidate’s name in nomination, however, he or she must do so in accordance with the provisions of the Company’s Bylaws. Suggestions for candidates to be evaluated by the directors must be sent to the Board of Directors, c/o RMR Industrials, Inc., 4601 DTC Blvd., Suite 130, Denver, Colorado.

As of March 31, 2019, we did not effect any material changes to the procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

Board Leadership Structure and Role on Risk Oversight

Gregory Dangler, Chad Brownstein Andrew Peltz, Barry Munitz and Brandon Pilot comprise our Board of Directors, with Mr. Brownstein serving as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. We have determined this leadership structure is appropriate for us based on our existing operations. The Board of Directors will continue to evaluate our leadership structure and modify as appropriate based on our size, resources and operations.

Currently, our Board of Directors is establishing procedures to determine an appropriate role for the Board of Directors in the Company’s risk oversight function.

The following table sets forth information concerning the annual and long-term compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officers and directors for all services rendered in all capacities to our Company for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

On October 15, 2014, RMR IP (now known as RMR Logistics, Inc. (RMRL)), the Company’s subsidiary, entered into consulting agreements with each of Gregory Dangler, who is our current President, and Chad Brownstein, who is our current Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which each of Mr. Dangler and Brownstein would provide services related to their roles as executive officers of the Company. The Company has accrued $1,315,000 for unpaid officers’ compensation expense in accordance with such consulting agreements through March 31, 2019. Under the terms of each consulting agreement, each consultant shall serve as an executive officer to the Company and receive monthly compensation of $35,000. The consulting agreements may be terminated by either party for breach or upon thirty days prior written notice.

On October 15, 2014, RMR IP (now known as RMR Logistics, Inc.) entered into consulting agreements with each of Principio Management LLC, which holds 9,499,657 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company (26.55%), and 77727111, LLC, is the owner of 10,791,701 shares of Class A Common Stock of the Company (30.16%), relating to certain services provided by each of these entities. Mr. Dangler is the sole owner of Principio Management LLC and Mr. Brownstein is the sole owner of 77727111, LLC.

On February 1, 2015, RMR IP (now known as RMR Logistics, Inc.) entered into a management services agreement with Industrial Management LLC (“IM”), to provide services to RMR IP (now known as RMR Logistics, Inc.) and affiliated entities, which include assistance in operational and administrative matters, identifying, analyzing, and structuring growth initiatives, and potential strategic acquisitions. Chad Brownstein is a Manager of IM. As compensation for these services, RMR IP (now known as RMR Logistics, Inc.) will pay to IM an annual cash management fee in an amount equal to the greater of 2% of the Company’s annual gross revenues or $1,000,000, and a development fee with respect to any capital project incurred by RMR IP (now known as RMR Logistics, Inc.) equal to 2% of total project costs. In addition, IM has the option to be assigned all available royalties from RMR IP’s (now known as RMR Logistics, Inc.) mineral holdings, leases or interests greater than 75% of net revenue interests for all mineral rights or production of minerals. At IM’s sole discretion, it may choose to accept a preferred convertible security with a 15% dividend accruing quarterly in lieu of cash for some or all of the annual management fee, development fee and royalty assignments. Such preferred convertible securities shall be convertible into either Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock (as applicable) at a conversion price equal to fifty percent of the market price of the applicable Class B Common Stock on the day prior to the date of issuance. In addition, these preferred convertible securities are callable for a cash, for a period of six months following the date of issuance; provided, however, that if called, IM shall have the option to convert the called preferred stock into either Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock (as applicable) at a conversion price equal to sixty-six and two thirds percent of the market price of the applicable Class B Common Stock on the business day immediately preceding the issuance date of preferred stock, and will include a blocker provision. In connection with the management services agreement with IM, RMR IP (now known as RMR Logistics, Inc.) entered into a registration rights agreement which requires RMR IP to register for resale any securities issued as consideration under the management services agreement. The registration rights agreements provide for both demand and piggy back registration rights, and requires that IM not transfer any shares of RMR IP (now known as RMR Logistics, Inc.) during a 90 day period following the effective date of a registration statement. The registration rights agreement terminates when the shares held by IM become eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144. On January 30, 2018, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with IM and consummated the purchase of all the assets of IM, including any accrued payments payable to IM, for a total consideration of 882,352 shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock. The share consideration represents an estimated fair value of $15,000,000. Following the closing of the transaction, the Company had no remaining liabilities or accrued payments owed to IM.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth with the compensation paid to our non-management directors in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019. 

We have no pension, annuity, bonus, insurance, stock options, profit sharing, or similar benefit plans. No stock options or stock appreciation rights have been granted to any of our directors or executive officers; none of our directors or executive officers exercised any stock options or stock appreciation rights; and none of them hold unexercised stock options.

Outstanding Equity Awards

As of March 31, 2019, there were 22,500 shares of stock awards outstanding for our directors and officers. 

Compensation of Directors

Other than as disclosed in the compensation table above, our directors do not receive compensation for their services as directors.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

None.

Employment Agreements

None.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No interlocking relationship exists between our board of directors and the board of directors or compensation committee of any other company, nor has any interlocking relationship existed in the past.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock (on a post reverse-split basis) as of December 31, 2019, for (i) each director and officer, (ii) all of our directors and officers as a group, and (iii) each person known to us to own beneficially five percent (5%) or more of the outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock. Unless otherwise specified below, the address of each of the persons listed in the table below is c/o RMR Industrials, Inc., 4601 DTC Blvd., Suite 130, Denver, Colorado, 80237.

To our knowledge, except as indicated in the footnotes to this table or pursuant to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock indicated.

The Company is not aware of any arrangement, including any pledge by any person of the Company’s securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

On February 26, 2015, our Board of Directors and our stockholders approved and adopted the RMR Industrials Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).

The Plan permits us to grant a variety of forms of awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based awards, to allow us to adapt our incentive compensation program to meet our needs. The number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the Plan to employees, directors and/or consultants in such awards is 2,244,789 shares as of March 31, 2019. Our Board of Directors currently serves as the administrator of the Plan. As of March 31, 2019, 819,118 restricted shares and 300,000 options have been issued under the Plan.

Restricted Stock Awards

During the twelve months ended March 31, 2019, the Company granted 654,118 shares of restricted stock under the 2015 Plan and 180,000 shares of restricted stock have been forfeited. The shares vest over a period between two and four- years from the grant date provided that the award recipient continues to be employed by us through each of those vesting dates.

Stock Options

The Company grants non-qualified stock options to certain employees that give them the right to acquire our Class B common stock under the 2015 Plan. The exercise price of options granted is equal to the closing price per share of our stock at the date of grant. The options vest at a rate of 33% on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date provided that the award recipient continues to be employed by us through each of those vesting dates, and expire ten years from the date of grant. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2019, the Company did not grant any stock options and 100,000 stock options were forfeited. As of March 31, 2019, 200,000 stock options remain outstanding and no stock options have vested.

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, whose Chairman of the Board, Norman Brownstein, is the father of our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, provides services to the Company. Legal fees paid by the Company to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP in the year ended March 31, 2019 were $438,576. 

Other than as set forth above, during the last two completed fiscal years, none of our current officers or directors have been involved in any material proceeding adverse to the Company or any transactions with the Company or any of its directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates that are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

Although we have adopted a Code of Ethics, we also rely on our Board to review related party transactions on an ongoing basis to address conflicts of interest. Our Board reviews a transaction in light of the affiliation of the relevant director, officer or employee and such person’s immediate family. Transactions are presented to our Board for approval before they are entered into or, if this is not possible, for ratification after the transaction has occurred. Our Board approves or ratifies a transaction if it determines that the transaction is consistent with the best interests of the Company.

Director Independence

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, we had three independent directors on our board. We evaluate independence by the standards for director independence established by applicable laws, rules, and listing standards including, without limitation, the standards for independent directors established by The New York Stock Exchange, Inc. and the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Subject to some exceptions, these standards generally provide that a director will not be independent if (a) the director is, or in the past three years has been, an employee of ours; (b) a member of the director’s immediate family is, or in the past three years has been, an executive officer of ours; (c) the director or a member of the director’s immediate family has received more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from us other than for service as a director (or for a family member, as a non-executive employee); (d) the director or a member of the director’s immediate family is, or in the past three years has been, employed in a professional capacity by our independent public accountants, or has worked for such firm in any capacity on our audit; (e) the director or a member of the director’s immediate family is, or in the past three years has been, employed as an executive officer of a company where one of our executive officers serves on the compensation committee; or (f) the director or a member of the director’s immediate family is an executive officer of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, us in an amount which, in any twelve-month period during the past three years, exceeds the greater of $1,000,000 or two percent of that other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

The following table sets forth all fees we incurred in connection with professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, BF Borgers CPA PC during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:

PART IV

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements  

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this A report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the shareholders and the board of directors of RMR Industrials, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of RMR Industrials, Inc. as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note C to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a significant accumulated deficit. In addition, the Company continues to experience negative cash flows from operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note C. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/S/ BF Borgers CPA PC

BF Borgers CPA PC

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2018

Lakewood, CO

January 3, 2020

RMR Industrials, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

RMR INDUSTRIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

RMR INDUSTRIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

RMR INDUSTRIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS