Rogue One, Inc. - Annual Report: 2013 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013

OR

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 00-24723

FRESH PROMISE FOODS, INC.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

1111 Alderman Drive, Suite 210

Alpharetta, Georgia 30005

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(770) 521-9826

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.00001 par value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2013, was $290,391. As of March 30, 2014 the registrant had 92,707,673 shares of its common stock, par value $0.00001, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following cautionary statements identify important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements made in this amended. Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) and in other reports and documents published by us from time to time. Any statements about our beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations, assumptions, future events or performance are not historical facts and may be forward-looking. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “believes,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimated,” “intend,” “plan,” “projection,” “outlook” and the like, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). However, as we issue “penny stock,” as such term is defined in Rule 3a51-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act, we are ineligible to rely on these safe harbor provisions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of our Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned to carefully read all “Risk Factors” set forth under Item 1A and not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any such factors or to announce publicly the results of any revisions of the forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference herein to reflect future events or developments, except as required by the Exchange Act. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict which will arise or to assess with any precision the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Unless otherwise provided in this Report, references to “Fresh Promise Foods”, “StaKool”, the “Company,” the “Registrant,” the “Issuer,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Fresh Promise Foods, Inc.

PART 1

Item 1. Business

Overview

History of Fresh Promise Foods, Inc.

The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware under the name, PLR, Inc. in 1993, and went through a series of name changes and reorganizations. In November 1997, PLR, Inc. changed its name to Integrated Carbonics Corp. and moved its domicile to the State of Nevada. On July 23, 1999, Integrated Carbonics Corp. changed its name to Urbana.ca, Inc. (“URBA”). On April 11, 2003, URBA changed its name to PSPP Holdings, Inc. On August 11, 2008, PSPP Holdings, Inc. changed its name to Cynosure Holdings, Inc. by filing a Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada. On August 21, 2008, the Company changed its name to Hybid Hospitality, Inc. by filing a Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. On December 16, 2009, the Company changed its name to Stakool, Inc.

On June 16, 2011, Stakool entered into a Letter of Intent of Sale and Purchase with Anthus Life Corp., a privately held Nevada corporation (“Anthus Life”).

On July 20, 2011, Stakool and Anthus Life executed an Agreement of Sale and Purchase whereby Anthus Life received 77,588,470 shares of 79,388,470 issued and outstanding shares of Stakool common stock, as well as 10,000,000 Preferred Shares of Stakool in exchange for scheduled payments, totaling $350,000 and 1,300,000 shares of Stakool common stock the “Agreement of Sale and Purchase”). The parties amended the Agreement of Purchase and Sale as of January 19, 2012, providing, among other things, for the issuance of an additional 2,650,000 shares of Stakool common stock to certain parties. All stock has been issued under the Agreement of Sale and Purchase and, as of December 31, 2012, $355,000 has been paid.

Anthus Life Corp. was incorporated in Nevada on June 4, 2009. Anthus was a developer and manufacturer of natural and organic food products packaged for consumer consumption. The Company had one product line in the natural food category. In 2013 the Company terminated its production of products due to a lack of working capital. However as additional funds have been secured by the new management team, production will resume in the near future.

On March 15, 2013 all officers and directors resigned from the Company and Mr. Joseph C. Canouse was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director. 

Effective August 5, 2013, the Company completed a 1 for 100 reverse stock split, which reduced the number of issued and outstanding common shares from 2,903,888,889 to approximately 29,039,066. Fractional shares produced as a result of this reverse stock split were rounded up to the next whole share. The consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse stock split.

On September 26, 2013, the name of the Company was changed to Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. and the Company also reduced the number of authorized shares of common stock from four billion (4,000,000,000) to four hundred seventy five million (475,000,000).

Current Products, Potential Product Categories and Extension

Fresh Promise Foods is a consumer products company focused on the “Core Wellness” sector of health and wellness. The “health and wellness” mega trend drives the overall natural ingredients market. Increasing incidence of lifestyle-based disorders, such as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), obesity, osteoporosis and diabetes, has propelled consumers to resort to natural alternatives. Moreover, the number of articles and newsletters circulated in media describing the ill-effects of consuming synthetic ingredients has further cautioned consumers. Consumers perceive natural ingredients as having a positive impact on general health, while synthetic ingredients have certain detrimental effects on health. As a result, food manufacturers have promptly responded to the situation by completely replacing or partially replacing synthetic ingredients with their natural counterparts.

It is becoming clearer that healthy eating is transitioning from a niche market to the mainstream. Health and wellness-focused products are expanding rapidly, with eight out of ten of the fastest growing food and beverage categories inextricably linked to consumer perceptions of health.

Intellectual Property

The Company has no registered patents, however, its products are formulated utilizing its own proprietary formulations. The Company has many Trademarks that have been filed and owns more than 50 URL’s.

Production, Sources of Raw Materials and the Names of Principal Suppliers

An experienced core management team has reviewed, studied and analyzed the natural and/or organic product market. Our strategy includes establishing a procurement program and working with outside professionals to build our business, create brands through eco-friendly packaging and distinctive labeling, and develop key distribution relationships.

Marketing Strategy

The strategy is to have our brand name strongly associated on all of our distributed products and to focus on finding and developing the best FDA/USDA certified natural and/or organic food product options for North America and beyond. During 2014, the Company plans to introduce its own brand and either build or buy other complementary products. For 2014, our R&D team is diligently working to develop additional product line extensions to include several products for the natural and organic food market as well as for the health and wellness market.

We have secured a manufacturer with the requisite governmental approval, having completed the package design and is distributing the initial product offering. We are excited about the opportunity to bring healthy, great tasting, and natural and/or organic food and beverage products at affordable prices to the North American market.

Fresh Promise Foods will strive to become a leader in the quality food and beverage business. We are a mission-driven company that aims to set the standards of excellence for food manufacturers. We are building a business in which high standards permeate all aspects of our company and quality ingredients, the latest food technology and great marketing permeate all aspects of our products.

We believe that once the consumer tastes our product line, he or she will become a loyal consumer and will seek out our product because of the health benefits, value in price, quality of the product and the good taste of the product, thus becoming a returning and loyal consumer.

Words like “Natural,” “clean label,” “green,” “eco-friendly”, “organic”, “non GMO” and “sustainability” are the new buzzwords in today’s food and beverage industry. Products and ingredients bearing these tags have created demand among consumers, and therefore have been significant purchase influencers. The markets for these natural and naturally derived products are growing at a fast rate, creating an immense profit potential for food and beverage manufacturers. The past two decades have witnessed consumers becoming more health conscious and resorting to preventive measures, rather than reactionary ones. Functional foods and beverages play a major role in this segment, promoting the concept of healthiness-on-the-go. These functional foods and beverages include health ingredients, which may promote general health and well-being by preventing certain diseases. However, the industry also confronts certain challenges in coping with the demand of natural ingredients used in food and beverage applications, particularly in terms of sustainability.

Competition

There are multiple competitors across the entire landscape as competition is very fragmented. We strive to stand apart from the competition through a focused strategy and great marketing.

Employees

At the present time, the Company has four employees.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks. We caution you that the following important factors, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf in filings with the SEC, press releases, communications with investors and oral statements. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this and in any other public statements we make may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many factors mentioned in the discussion below will be important in determining future results. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Actual future results may vary materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosure we make in our reports filed with the SEC.

An investment in our Company involves a substantial risk of loss. You should carefully consider the risks described below, before you make any investment decision regarding our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties, including those generally affecting the market in which we operate or that we currently deem immaterial, may also impair our business. If any such risks actually materialize, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

The following risk factors are not exhaustive and the risks discussed herein do not purport to be inclusive of all possible risks but are intended only as examples of possible investment risks. To facilitate understanding of the various business risks applicable to our Company and the strategic alliance companies through which we intend to operate our business during the foreseeable future, the risk factors discussed herein address our Company together with the risks applicable to our operations that we intend to conduct with our strategic alliance partners.

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO FRESH PROMSIE FOODS, INC. AND ITS BUSINESS

THE COMPANY IS SUBJECT TO THE RISKS INHERENT IN A NEWLY-CREATED BUSINESS.

The Company is subject to substantially all the risks inherent in a newly-created business. As a result of its small size and capitalization and limited operating history, the Company is particularly susceptible to adverse effects of changing economic conditions and consumer tastes, competition, and other contingencies or events beyond the control of the Company. It may be more difficult for the Company to prepare for and respond to these types of risks and the risks described elsewhere in this Form 10-K than for a company with an established business and operating cash flow. If the Company is not able to manage these risks successfully, the Company’s operations could be negatively impacted. Due to changing circumstances, the Company may be forced to change dramatically, or even terminate, its planned operations.

INVESTORS MAY LOSE THEIR ENTIRE INVESTMENT IF FRESH PROMISE FOODS, INC. FAILS TO IMPLEMENT ITS BUSINESS PLAN.

The Company expects to face substantial risks, uncertainties, expenses, and difficulties because it is a development-stage company. The Company has no demonstrable operations record of substance upon which you can evaluate the company’s business and prospects. The Company’s prospects must be considered in light of the risks, uncertainties, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stages of development. The Company cannot guarantee that it will be successful in accomplishing its objectives.

As of the date of this filing the Company has had only limited start-up operations and has generated minimal revenues. Considering these facts, our independent auditors have raised substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern in the independent auditors’ report to the financial statements filed with our Form 10-K. In addition, the company’s lack of operating capital could negatively affect the value of its common shares and could result in the loss of your entire investment.

WE RELY ON OUR PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND IF HE LEAVES US, OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.

We rely heavily on our President and Chief Executive Officer, Kevin Quirk for our success. His experience and input create the foundation for our business and he is responsible for the directorship and control over our activities. Moving forward, should we lose the services of Mr. Quirk, for any reason, we will incur costs associated with recruiting a replacement and delay in our operations. If we are unable to replace Mr. Quirk with another suitably trained individual, we may be forced to scale back or curtail our business plan. As a result of this, your investment in us could be devalued.

WE HAVE NOT AND DO NOT ANTICIPATE PAYING ANY CASH DIVIDEND ON OUR COMMON STOCK AND BECAUSE OF THIS OUR SECURITIES COULD FACE DEVALUATION IN THE MARKET.

We have paid no cash dividends on our Common Stock to date and it is not anticipated that any cash dividends will be paid to holders of our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. While our dividend policy will be based on the operating results and capital needs of our business operations, it is anticipated that any earnings will be retained to finance our business operations and future expansion.

CHANGES IN CONSUMER PREFERENCES AND DISCRETIONARY SPENDING MAY HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR REVENUE, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.

Shifts in consumer preferences away from our products, our inability to develop new products that appeal to consumers, or changes in our product mix that eliminate items popular with some consumers could harm our business. Also, our success depends to a significant extent on discretionary consumer spending, which is influenced by general economic conditions and the availability of discretionary income. Accordingly, we may experience declines in revenue during economic downturns or during periods of uncertainty. Any material decline in the amount of discretionary spending could have a material adverse effect on our sales, results of operations, business and financial condition.

FLUCTUATIONS IN VARIOUS COMMODITY, PACKAGING AND SUPPLY COSTS, COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATING RESULTS.

The prices of the main ingredients in our offerings can be highly volatile. Supplies and prices of the various products that we use to prepare our products can be affected by a variety of factors, such as weather, seasonal fluctuations, demand, politics and economics in the producing countries. An increase in pricing of any major ingredients that we use in our products could have a significant adverse effect on our profitability In addition; higher diesel prices have, in some cases, resulted in the imposition of surcharges on the delivery of commodities to distributors. Additionally, higher diesel and gasoline prices may affect our supply costs and may affect our sales going forward. To help mitigate the risks of volatile commodity prices and to allow greater predictability in pricing, we hope to enter into fixed price or to-be-fixed priced purchase commitments. We cannot assure you that these activities will be successful or that they will not result in our paying substantially more than would have been required absent such activities. We do not presently have any multi-year pricing agreements (with fixed processing costs), and none with guaranteed volume commitments.

We may not be able to prevent others from using our intellectual property, and may be subject to claims by third parties that we infringe on their intellectual property.

Our products are created using proprietary formulations; however, we have no registered patents. Preventing and policing the unauthorized use of our intellectual property is often difficult and any steps we take may not, in every case, prevent the infringement by unauthorized third parties. Further, there can be no assurance that our efforts to enforce our rights and protect our intellectual property will be successful. We may need to resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, which may result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.

Further, although management does not believe that our products infringe on the intellectual rights of others, there is no assurance that we will not be the target of infringement or other claims. Such claims, even if not true, could result in significant legal and other costs and may be a distraction to our management or interrupt our business.

LITIGATION AND PUBLICITY CONCERNING PRODUCT QUALITY, HEALTH AND OTHER ISSUES, WHICH CAN RESULT IN LIABILITIES AND ALSO CAUSE CONSUMERS TO AVOID OUR PRODUCTS, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.

Beverage and food service businesses can be adversely affected by litigation and complaints from consumers or government authorities resulting from food and beverage quality, illness, injury or other health concerns or operating issues stemming from one retail location or a limited number of retail locations. Adverse publicity about these allegations may negatively affect us, regardless of whether the allegations are true, by discouraging consumers from buying our products. We could also incur significant liabilities, if a lawsuit or claim results in a decision against us, or litigation costs, regardless of the result.

BEVERAGE AND FOOD SAFETY CONCERNS AND INSTANCES OF FOOD-BORNE ILLNESSES COULD HARM OUR CONSUMERS, RESULT IN NEGATIVE PUBLICITY AND CAUSE THE TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF SOME CONSUMERS’ STORES AND, IN SOME CASES, COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PRICE AND AVAILABILITY OF FRUITS, ANY OF WHICH COULD HARM OUR BRAND REPUTATION, RESULT IN A DECLINE IN SALES OR AN INCREASE IN COSTS.

We consider food and beverage safety a top priority and will dedicate substantial resources towards ensuring that consumers enjoy high-quality, safe and wholesome products. However, we cannot guarantee that controls and training will be fully effective in preventing all food-borne illnesses. Furthermore, reliance on third-party suppliers and distributors increases the risk that food-borne illness incidents (such as E. coli, Hepatitis A, Salmonella or Listeria) could occur outside of our control and at multiple locations. We will utilize High Pressure Processing (HPP) whenever possible to mitigate these risk.

Instances of food-borne illnesses, whether real or perceived, and whether at our consumers’ stores or those of our competitors, could harm consumers and otherwise result in negative publicity about us or the products we serve, which could adversely affect sales. If there is an incident involving consumers’ C-stores and other approved channels serving contaminated products, consumers may be harmed, our sales may decrease and our brand name may be impaired. If consumers become ill from food-borne illnesses, we could be forced to temporarily suspend some operations. If we react to negative publicity by changing our products or other key aspects of the Fresh Promise experience, we may lose consumers who do not accept those changes, and may not be able to attract enough new consumers to produce the revenue needed to make our operations profitable. In addition, we may have different or additional competitors for our intended consumers as a result of making any such changes and may not be able to compete successfully against those competitors. Food safety concerns and instances of food-borne illnesses and injuries caused by food contamination have in the past, and could in the future, adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients and cause consumers to shift their preferences, particularly if we choose to pass any higher ingredient costs along to consumers. As a result, our costs may increase and our sales may decline. A decrease in consumer traffic as a result of these health concerns or negative publicity, or as a result of a change in our products or smoothie experience or a temporary suspension of any of our consumer operations, could materially harm our business.

THE FOOD SERVICE INDUSTRY HAS INHERENT OPERATIONAL RISKS THAT MAY NOT BE ADEQUATELY COVERED BY INSURANCE.

We can give no assurance that we will be adequately insured against all risks or that our insurers will pay a particular claim. Furthermore, in the future, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates for our operations. We may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our own claim records but also the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which we may receive indemnity insurance coverage for tort liability. Our insurance policies may also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions which, although we may believe are standard in the food service industry, may nevertheless increase our costs.

THE PLANNED INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF STORES WHERE ARE OUR PRODUCTS WILL BE AVAILABLE MAY MAKE FUTURE RESULTS UNPREDICTABLE.

Our future results depend on various factors, including successful selection of new markets, market acceptance of Fresh Promise Foods brands, consumer recognition of the quality of our products and willingness to pay our prices (which reflect our often higher ingredient costs,) the quality and performance of our equipment and general economic conditions. In addition, as with the experience of other retail food and beverage concepts who have tried to expand nationally, we may find that the Fresh Promise Foods concept has limited or no appeal to consumers in new markets or we may experience a decline in the popularity of our brands. Newly opened stores may not succeed, future markets may not be successful and average store revenue may not meet expectations.

OUR FAILURE TO MANAGE OUR GROWTH EFFECTIVELY COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS.

Our plans call for a significant increase in the number of consumers. Product supply, financial and management controls and information systems may be inadequate to support our expansion. Managing our growth effectively will require us to continue to enhance these systems, procedures, and controls and to hire, train and retain management and staff. We may not respond quickly enough to the changing demands that our expansion will impose on our management, employees and existing infrastructure. We also place a lot of importance on our culture, which we believe will be an important contributor to our success. As we grow, however, we may have difficulty maintaining our culture or adapting it sufficiently to meet the needs of our operations. Our failure to manage our growth effectively could harm our business and operating results.

OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY AND COULD FALL BELOW THE EXPECTATIONS OF INVESTORS DUE TO VARIOUS FACTORS.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly because of various factors, including:

Because of these factors, results for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year. Average consumers’ store revenue or comparable store revenue in any particular future period may decrease. In the future, our operating results may fall below the expectations of investors. In that event, the value of our Common Stock or other securities would likely decrease.

OUR CONSUMERS AND SUPPLIERS COULD TAKE ACTIONS THAT HARM OUR REPUTATION AND REDUCE OUR PROFITS.

Consumers and suppliers are separate entities and are not our employees. Further, we do not exercise control over the day-to-day operations of our consumers and suppliers. Any operational shortcomings of our consumers and suppliers are likely to be attributed to our system-wide operations and could adversely affect our reputation and have a direct negative impact on our profits.

OUR REVENUE IS SUBJECT TO VOLATILITY BASED ON WEATHER AND VARIES BY SEASON.

Seasonal factors could also cause our revenue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Our revenue may be lower during the winter months and the holiday season and during periods of inclement weather and higher during the spring, summer and fall months. Our revenue will likely also vary from quarter to quarter as a result of the number of trading days, that is, the number of days in a quarter when stores are open.

WE COULD FACE LIABILITY FROM OUR CONSUMERS, SUPPLIERS OR GOVERNMENT.

A consumer, supplier or government agency may bring legal action against us based on the consumer/ supplier relationships. Various state and federal laws govern our relationship with consumers and suppliers. If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be liable for damages to consumers or suppliers and fines or other penalties. Expensive litigation with our consumers/suppliers or government agencies may adversely affect both our profits and our important relations with our consumer/suppliers.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL ON ACCEPTABLE TERMS.

Developing our business may require significant capital in the future. To meet our capital needs, we expect to rely on our cash flow from operations and potentially, third-party financing. Third-party financing may not, however, be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. Our ability to obtain additional funding will be subject to various factors, including market conditions, our operating performance, lender sentiment and our ability to incur additional debt in compliance with other contractual restrictions, such as financial covenants under our credit facility. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions of additional financings unattractive. Our inability to raise capital could impede our growth.

LITIGATION COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT US BY DISTRACTING MANAGEMENT, INCREASING OUR EXPENSES OR SUBJECTING US TO MATERIAL MONEY DAMAGES AND OTHER REMEDIES.

Our consumers could file complaints or lawsuits against us alleging that we are responsible for some illness or injury their consumers suffered at or after a visit to their stores, or that we have problems with food quality or operations. We are also subject to a variety of other claims arising in the ordinary course of our business, including personal injury claims, contract claims and claims alleging violations of federal and state law regarding workplace and employment matters, discrimination and similar matters, and we could become subject to class action or other lawsuits related to these or different matters in the future. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid, or whether we are ultimately held liable, claims may be expensive to defend and may divert time and money away from our operations and hurt our performance. A judgment significantly in excess of our insurance coverage for any claims could materially and adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. Any adverse publicity resulting from these allegations may also materially and adversely affect our reputation or prospects, which in turn could adversely affect our results. The food and beverage services industry has been subject to a growing number of claims based on the nutritional content of food products they sell and disclosure and advertising practices.

WE MAY ALSO INCUR COSTS RESULTING FROM OTHER SECURITY RISKS WE MAY FACE IN CONNECTION WITH OUR ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF CONFIDENTIAL CONSUMER INFORMATION.

We rely on commercially available software and other technologies to provide security for processing and transmission of consumer credit card data. Our systems could be compromised in the future, which could result in the misappropriation of consumer information or the disruption of systems. Either of those consequences could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and business or subject it to additional liabilities.

WE ARE EXPOSED TO INCREASED COSTS AND RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLIANCE WITH CHANGING LAWS, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS IN GENERAL, AND SPECIFICALLY WITH INCREASED AND NEW REGULATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND DISCLOSURE STANDARDS.

We expect to spend an increased amount of management time and external resources to comply with existing and changing laws, regulations and standards in general, and specifically relating to corporate governance. In particular, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires management to annually review and evaluate all of our internal control systems, and file attestations of the effectiveness of these systems by our management and by our independent auditors. This process may require us to hire additional personnel and use outside advisory services and result in additional accounting and legal expenses. If in the future our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or independent auditors determine that our controls over financial reporting are not effective as defined under Section 404, investor perceptions may be adversely affected and could cause a decline in the value of our stock. If our independent auditors are unable to provide an unqualified attestation of management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, or disclaim an ability to issue an attestation, it could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports, adversely affect our stock value and our ability to access the capital markets or borrow money. Failure to comply with other existing and changing laws, regulations and standards could also adversely affect the Company.

THE REPORT OF OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS INDICATES UNCERTAINTY CONCERNING OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN AND THIS MAY IMPAIR OUR ABILITY TO RAISE CAPITAL TO FUND OUR BUSINESS PLAN.

Our independent auditors have raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We cannot assure you that this will not impair our ability to raise capital on attractive terms. Additionally, we cannot assure you that we will ever achieve significant revenues and therefore remain a going concern.

COMPETITORS WITH MORE RESOURCES MAY FORCE US OUT OF BUSINESS.

We will compete with many well-established companies, food and beverage service, C-stores and other approved channels and otherwise, on the basis of taste, quality and price of product offered, consumer service, atmosphere, location and overall guest experience. Aggressive pricing by our competitors or the entrance of new competitors into our markets could reduce our revenue and profit margins.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS, INC. MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ATTAIN PROFITABILITY WITHOUT ADDITIONAL FUNDING, WHICH MAY BE UNAVAILABLE.

The Company has limited capital resources. To date, the Company has funded its operations from limited funding and has not generated sufficient cash from operations to be profitable or to maintain sufficient inventory. Unless the Company begins to generate sufficient revenues to finance operations as a going concern, the Company may experience liquidity and solvency problems. Such liquidity and solvency problems may force the Company to cease operations if additional financing is not available.

THE COST TO MEET OUR REPORTING AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS AS A PUBLIC COMPANY SUBECT TO THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 WILL BE SUBSTANTIAL AND MAY RESULT IN US HAVING INSUFFICIENT FUNDS TO EXPAND OUR BUSINESS OR EVEN MEET ROUTINE BUSINESS OBLIGATIONS.

Subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, we will incur ongoing expenses associated with professional fees for accounting, legal, and a host of other expenses for annual reports and proxy statements.

WE MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY IN ATTRACTING AND RETAINING MANAGEMENT AND OUTSIDE INDEPENDENT MEMBERS TO OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS A RESULT OF THEIR CONCERNS RELATING TO THEIR INCREASED PERSONAL EXPOSURE TO LAWSUITS AND STOCKHOLDER CLAIMS BY VIRTUE OF HOLDING THESE POSITIONS IN A PUBLICLY-HELD COMPANY.

The directors and management of publicly-traded corporations are increasingly concerned with the extent of their personal exposure to lawsuits and stockholder claims, as well as governmental and creditor claims which may be made against them, particularly in view of recent changes in securities laws imposing additional duties, obligations and liabilities on management and directors. Due to these perceived risks, directors and management are also becoming increasingly concerned with the availability of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance to pay on a timely basis the costs incurred in defending such claims. We currently do not carry directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance has recently become much more expensive and difficult to obtain. If we are unable to provide directors’ and officers’ liability insurance at affordable rates or at all, it may become increasingly more difficult to attract and retain qualified outside directors to serve on our board of directors.

We may lose potential independent board members and management candidates to other companies that have greater directors’ and officers’ liability insurance to insure them from liability or to companies that have revenues or have received greater funding to date which can offer more lucrative compensation packages. The fees of directors are also rising in response to their increased duties, obligations and liabilities as well as increased exposure to such risks. As a company with a limited operating history and limited resources, we will have a more difficult time attracting and retaining management and outside independent directors than a more established company due to these enhanced duties, obligations and liabilities.

WE MAY NOT ACHIEVE RESULTS SIMILAR TO THE FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS.

Projections and estimated financial results are based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and, though considered reasonable by us, are subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the projected results will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly lower than projected. Neither we nor any other person or entity assumes any responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the projections.

OUR DIRECTORS HAVE THE RIGHT TO AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL SHARES OF OUR PREFERRED STOCK.

Our directors, within the limitations and restrictions contained in our articles of incorporation and without further action by our stockholders, have the authority to issue shares of preferred stock from time to time in one or more series and to fix the number of shares and the relative rights, conversion rights, voting rights, and terms of redemption, liquidation preferences and any other preferences, special rights and qualifications of any such series. Any issuance of shares of preferred stock could adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock.

IF THERE IS A MARKET FOR OUR SECURITIES IN THE FUTURE, OUR STOCK PRICE MAY BE VOLATILE AND ILLIQUID.

We can make no assurance that there will be a public market for our common Stock in the future. If there is a market for our Common Stock in the future, we anticipate that such market may be illiquid and might be subject to wide fluctuations in response to several factors, including, but not limited to the following factors:

CONVERSION OF OUR PROMISSORY NOTES OR SALES OF A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK INTO THE PUBLIC MARKET BY SELLING SHAREHOLDERS MAY CAUSE A REDUCTION IN THE PRICE OF OUR STOCK AND PURCHASERS WHO ACQUIRE SHARES FROM THE SELLING SHAREHOLDERS MAY LOSE SOME OR ALL OF THEIR INVESTMENTS.

If a market for our shares develops, sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public market could cause a reduction in the price of our Common Stock. If selling Shareholders resell a substantial portion of the issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock it could have an adverse effect on the price of our Common Stock. As a result of any such decreases in the price of our Common Stock, purchasers who acquire shares from Selling Shareholders may lose some or all of their investment.

OUR EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS WILL EXPERIENCE DILUTION.

We will need to raise additional funds, and these funds may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. Furthermore, if we issue equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, our existing shareholders will experience dilution, and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preference, and privileges senior to those of our existing shareholders. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, execute our business plan, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated consumer requirements.

There is no assurance that we will be profitable, and we may not be able to successfully develop, manage or market our products and services. We may not be able to attract or retain qualified executives and technological personnel and our products and services may become obsolete. Government regulation may hinder our business. Additional dilution in outstanding stock ownership will be incurred due to the issuance of more shares, stock options, or the exercise of stock options, and other risks inherent in our business.

Currently, there is a public market for our securities, but there can be no assurances that the public market will develop further and, if developed further, it is likely to experience significant price fluctuations.

We have a trading symbol for our common stock, namely ‘FPFI’. 21,872,377 shares of our common stock were traded during the year ended December 31, 2012. Trading volume increased to 174,487,766 for the year ending December 31, 2013. However, there can be no assurances as to whether:

Prices for our common stock will be determined in the marketplace and may be influenced by many factors, including the depth and liquidity of the market for shares of our common stock, developments affecting our business, including the impact of the factors referred to elsewhere in these risk factors, investor perception of our Company and general economic and market conditions.

We are subject to the penny stock rules which will make our securities more difficult to sell.

We are subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules because our securities sell below $5.00 per share. The penny stock rules require broker-dealers to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to completing the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation.

Furthermore, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction, the broker dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. The penny stock rules are burdensome and may reduce purchases of any offerings and reduce the trading activity for our securities. As long as our securities are subject to the penny stock rules, the holders of such securities will find it more difficult to sell their securities.

We are not likely to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

We currently intend to retain any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Accordingly, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but will review this policy as circumstances dictate.

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE BY OUR CURRENT STOCKHOLDERS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR STOCK PRICE.

The sale of a significant number of shares of common stock at any particular time could be difficult to achieve at the market prices prevailing immediately before such shares are offered. In addition, sales of substantial amounts of common stock, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants, under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 144 or otherwise could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital at that time through the sale of our securities.

NEED FOR ANY GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL OF PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS.

Companies have been the target of class action lawsuits and other proceedings alleging, among other things, violations of federal and state workplace and employment laws. Proceedings of this nature, if successful, could result in our payment of substantial damages.

Our results of operations may be adversely affected by legal or governmental proceedings brought by or on behalf of employees or consumers. In recent years, a number of companies, including juice companies, have been subject to lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, alleging violations of federal and state law. A number of these lawsuits have resulted in the payment of substantial awards by the defendants. Although we are not currently a party to any material class action lawsuits, we could incur substantial damages and expenses resulting from lawsuits, which would increase the cost of operating the business and decrease the cash available for other uses.

GOVERNMENT AND INDUSTRY REGULATION.

We are subject to various federal, state and local regulations. Our products are subject to state and local regulation by health, sanitation, food and workplace safety and other agencies. We may experience material difficulties or failures in obtaining the necessary licenses or approvals for new products which could delay planned execution of our business plan. We are subject to the U.S. Americans with Disabilities Act and similar state laws that give civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations and other areas. We may in the future have to modify office and warehouse space, for example by adding access ramps or redesigning certain architectural fixtures, to provide service to or make reasonable accommodations for disabled persons. The expenses associated with these modifications could be material. Our operations are also subject to the U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs such matters as minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions, along with the U.S. Americans with Disabilities Act, family leave mandates and a variety of similar laws enacted by the states that govern these and other employment law matters. In addition, federal proposals to introduce a system of mandated health insurance and flexible work time and other similar initiatives could, if implemented, adversely affect our operations. In recent years, there has been an increased legislative, regulatory and consumer focus on nutrition and advertising practices in the food industry. As a result, we may in the future become subject to initiatives in the area of nutrition disclosure or advertising, such as requirements to provide information about the nutritional content of our products, which could increase our expenses.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable

Item 2. Properties

The Company had leased office space in Jacksonville, Florida beginning in November 2010. With the change in management and control of the Company, the headquarters was moved to Alpharetta, Georgia. The Jacksonville lease was terminated. Furniture located in the Jacksonville office was deemed impaired and not suitable to relocate. Currently the company shares office facilities with related parties under a shared service agreement. In 2013 the Company was not required to pay office rental.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We, together with certain other parties (collectively, the “Defendants”), are currently involved in litigation against Kyle Gotshalk, Leonard Gotshalk, Clinton Hall, LLC, Richard Maher and Patrick O’Loughlin (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”). On April 25, 2013, the Plaintiffs filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the District of Nevada alleging claims including securities fraud and breach of contract. The Company believes these claims to be unfounded and the Company is prepared to file an answer with the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, together with counterclaims against the Plaintiffs.  The Company is continuing to vigorously defend itself against this lawsuit.

Except as set forth above, we are not currently involved in any litigation that we believe could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Except as set forth above, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our Company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our Company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our Company’s or our Company’s subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(a) Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on OTCBB under the symbol FPFI. The following table sets forth for the indicated periods the high and low sales prices per share for our common stock on the OTCQB. All prices have been adjusted for the reverse stock split completed in 2013.

(b) Holders

As of March 28, 2014, there were approximately 292 stockholders of record of our common stock, and the closing price of our common stock was $0.0048 per share as reported by OTCBB.

(c) Dividends

Since our inception, we have not declared nor paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our current policy is to retain any earnings in order to finance our operations. Our Board of Directors will determine future declarations and payments of dividends, if any, in light of the then-current conditions it deems relevant and in accordance with applicable corporate law.

(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

As of the date hereof, we have not adopted an equity compensation plan and have not granted any stock options.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

We make forward-looking statements in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this report based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management and on information currently available to us. Forward-looking statements include information about our possible or assumed future results of operations which follow under the headings “Business and Overview,” “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” and other statements throughout this report preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates” or similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements, including the risks and uncertainties described below and other factors we describe from time to time in our periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We therefore caution you not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this report speak only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Plan Of Operations

The Company strives to become a leading supplier of natural and organic products by maintaining the highest standards for quality, consistency, sustainability, product assortments, value-added support services and integrity in our business and personal relationships. Through trust and our commitment to quality we will build a loyal consumer following throughout North America.

An experienced core management team is in place and has reviewed, studied and analyzed the natural and/or organic product market. The Company plans to establish a procurement program and will work with outside professionals to build its business, create brands through eco-friendly packaging and distinctive labeling, and develop key distribution relationships.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Annual report on Form 10-K and other reports filed by Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contain or may contain forward-looking statements (collectively the “Filings”) and information that are based upon beliefs of, and information currently available to, the Company’s management as well as estimates and assumptions made by Company’s management. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are only predictions and speak only as of the date hereof. When used in the Filings, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “future”, “intend”, “plan”, or the negative of these terms and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or the Company’s management identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current view of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ significantly from those anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended, or planned.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, the Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Our financial statements would be affected to the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.

SHARE-BASED EXPENSE

ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all share-based payment transactions in which employee services are acquired. Transactions include incurring liabilities, or issuing or offering to issue shares, options, and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation rights. Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).

 The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50, Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees. Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable: (a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued. The fair value of the share-based payment transaction is determined at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date.

Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

Revenues

Total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $64 and $17,432, respectively. The decline in revenue was the result of the termination of our marketing and sales programs which we could not pursue due to a lack of working capital. Cost of goods sold was $2,515 and $36,491 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Gross Margin was ($2,451) and ($19,056) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Expenses

Operating expenses: Total net operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $476,524 and $3,934,440. Operating expenses consisted of professional fees of $299,818, an decrease from the prior year of $154,383. This decrease was due primarily to a reduction in fees to the consulting company owned by the previous Company President & CEO. Our payroll expense increased from $0 in 2012 to $95,125 in 2013. This was the result of adding experienced staff members to execute our business plan. In 2012 the Company had no employees which resulted in no payroll expense recorded. Products were manufactured, sold, and distributed by third parties. The Stock-based compensation declined from $3,062,015 in 2012 to $29,570 in 2013. Previous management had used stock to compensate certain service providers and consultants due to the shortage of liquidity. Expense for investor and public relations increased to $20,070 in 2013 from $1,970 in 2012 as the new management team increased efforts to communicate our goals and programs to current and potential investors. Advertising for product sales declined by $8,924, from $9,262 in 2012 to $338 in 2013 as we terminated production of previous food products and the associated sales programs. Our travel expense increased to $11,965 in 2013 from $8,382 in 2012 due to additional travel in conjunction with our program to acquire other food industry companies. Expenses for licenses and permits totaled $5,609 in 2013 due to reverse stock split and name change. No expenditures were made in 2012 in this expense category. Our cost for communication decreased from $4,645 in 2012 to $3,000 in 2013. Other general and administrative expenses increased by $1,746.

Other income and expenses: Other income and expenses decreased from $1,431,487 in 2012, to $160,109 in 2013. Our 2013 expense in this category included a loss on the issuance of stock to a former financing source of $109,600. The Company had expensed $262,500 in 2012. In 2013 the amortization of debt discount was $255,625 an increase of $225,612 from 2012. The Company issues convertible notes to finance operations. Some notes have embedded derivative features. The value of these instruments fluctuate as the trading price of our common stock changes. During 2013 we experienced a non-cash gain of $679,347 from the decline in the value of these derivative features. We also incurred a non-cash expense of $395,296 in conjunction with the issuance of these notes. Our interest expenses increased by $78,542, from $8,344 in 2012 to $86,886 in 2013. This increase was the result of the issuance of interest bearing convertible promissory notes needed to finance the Company. A former note holder forgave an indebtedness of $6,000 and accrued interest of $2,000 which we recognized as income. In 2012 Other income and expense had included an expense of $707,450 recorded as Loyalty expense representing the value of stock to long term shareholders and an expense of $320,688 for losses incurred on debt settlements. No charges were recorded for these categories in 2013.

Liquidity & Capital Resources

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

The Company sustained a loss of $639,084 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $5,384,983 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Because of the absence of positive cash flows from operations, the Company requires additional funding for continuing the development and marketing of products. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

We are presently unable to meet our obligations as they come due. At December 31, 2013 we had minimal assets and a working capital deficit of $903,232. Our working capital deficit is due to the results of operations.

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $190,753 and $179,022, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities primarily includes our net loss, accrued salaries, the amortization of debt discounts and debt premium expense, derivative expense, losses on stock issued under our previous financing agreement, convertible notes issued for services, accrued interest, a consulting agreement with former officer, and stock-based compensation. Cash generated through operations included a change in the value of derivative liabilities.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $223,750 and $163,800, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively included the issuance of convertible notes ($229,000 and $150,800) and the sale of preferred stock ($5,000 and $15,560). In 2013 we also retired a convertible note for a cash payment of $10,250.

We anticipate that our cash requirements will arise from the need to fund our growth from operations, pay current obligations and future capital expenditures. The primary sources of funding in the near term for such requirements are expected to be cash generated from raising additional funds by the issuance of convertible notes. However, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow or obtain additional financing on terms satisfactory to us, if at all, to remain a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our obligations on a timely basis and ultimately to attain profitability. In addition, our Plan of Operation for the next twelve months is to raise capital to continue to expand our operations. We are presently engaged in capital raising activities through one or more private offering of our company’s securities. See “Note 10– Going Concern” in our financial statements for additional information as to the possibility that we may not be able to continue as a “going concern.”

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors

Phone (248) 203-0080

Fax (248) 281-0940

30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175

Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586

www.sucpas.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Boards of Directors

Fresh Promise Foods, Inc.

(formerly known as Stakool, Inc.)

Alpharetta, Georgia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Stakool, Inc. (now known as Fresh Promise Food, Inc.), as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Stakool, Inc. (now known as Fresh Promise Food, Inc.) as of December 31, 2012 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Stakool, Inc. (now known as Fresh Promise Food, Inc.) will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has negative working capital, has received limited revenue from sales of products or services, and has incurred losses from operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans with regard to these matters are described in Note 2. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Fresh Promise Foods, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. as of December 31, 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. as of December 31, 2013 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $639,084 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the Company had an accumulated deficit of $7,608,511 and a working capital deficit of $903,232 at December 31, 2013. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 10. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The consolidated financial statements of Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 were audited by other auditors whose report dated April 14, 2013, on these consolidated financial statements included an emphasis-of-matter paragraph that described the going concern uncertainty discussed in Note 2 to the December 31, 2012 consolidated financial statements.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC

 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS

Stakool, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Delaware under the name, PLR, Inc. in 1993, and went through a series of name changes and reorganizations. In November 1997 the Company moved its domicile to the State of Nevada. Through 2008 several additional name changes were made. On August 21, 2008, the Company changed its name to Hybid Hospitality, Inc.

On June 16, 2011, Stakool entered into a Letter of Intent of Sale and Purchase with Anthus Life Corp., a privately held Nevada corporation (“Anthus Life”).

On July 20, 2011, Stakool and Anthus Life executed an Agreement of Sale and Purchase whereby Anthus Life received 77,588,470 shares of 79,388,470 issued and outstanding shares of Stakool common stock, as well as 10,000,000 Preferred Shares of Stakool in exchange for scheduled payments, totaling $350,000 and 1,300,000 shares of Stakool common stock the “Agreement of Sale and Purchase”). The parties amended the Agreement of Purchase and Sale as of January 19, 2012, providing, among other things, for the issuance of an additional 2,650,000 shares of Stakool common stock to certain parties. All stock has been issued under the Agreement of Sale and Purchase and, as of December 31, 2012, $355,000 has been paid.

Anthus Life Corp. was incorporated in Nevada on June 4, 2009. Anthus was a developer and manufacturer of natural and organic food products packaged for consumer consumption. The Company had one product line in the natural food category. In 2013 the Company terminated its production of products due to a lack of working capital. However as additional funds have been secured by the new management team, production will resume in the near future.

On March 15, 2013 all officers and directors resigned from the Company and Mr. Joseph C. Canouse was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director. On April 20, 2013 Mr. Kevin P. Quirk joined the Company and was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Canouse, who continued as a Director, assumed the title of Chief Financial Officer.

Effective August 5, 2013 the Company completed a 1 for 100 reverse stock split, which reduced the number of issued and outstanding common shares from 2,903,888,889 to approximately 29,039,066. Fractional shares produced as a result of this reverse stock split were rounded up to the next whole share. The consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse stock split.

On September 26, 2013 the name of the Company was changed to Fresh Promise Foods, Inc. and the Company also reduced the number of authorized shares of common stock from four billion (4,000,000,000) to four hundred seventy five million (475,000,000).

The company is headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia and currently in the process of developing new health frood products and seeking acquisition opportunities.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred a net loss of $639,084 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the Company had an accumulated deficit of $7,608,511 and a working capital deficit of $903,232 of December 31, 2013. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plan to obtain such resources for the Company include, obtaining capital from management and significant stockholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses. However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain sufficient additional funds when needed or that such funds, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to the Company. In addition, profitability will ultimately depend upon the level of revenues received from business operations. However, there is no assurance that the Company will attain profitability. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

ACCOUNTING BASIS

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP accounting”). The Company has adopted a December 31 fiscal year end.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Fresh Promise Foods Inc., Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Anthus Life Corp. All significant inter-company balances and transactions within the Company and subsidiary have been eliminated upon consolidation.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Fresh Promise Foods Inc. considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had $33,335 and $338 cash, respectively.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

CASH FLOWS REPORTING

The Company follows ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net loss to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s financial instruments are carried at the approximate fair value due either to length of maturity or interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates unless otherwise disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company has adopted the guidance under ASC Topic 820 for financial instruments measured on a fair value on a recurring basis. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data and requires disclosures for assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on their level in the hierarchy. Further authoritative accounting guidance (ASU No. 2009-05) under ASC Topic 820, provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liabilities is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the techniques provided for in this update.

The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of input, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are the following:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2 – Input other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liabilities.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” and ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. Derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as adjustments to fair value of derivatives. The effects of interactions between embedded derivatives are calculated and accounted for in arriving at the over all fair value of the financial instruments. In addition, the fair value of free standing derivative instruments such as warrant and option derivatives are valued using the Black-Scholes model.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (CONTINUED)

The Company uses Level 3 inputs for its valuation methodology for the embedded conversion option liabilities as their fair value as their fair value were determined by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on various assumptions. The Company’s derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as adjustments to fair value of derivatives.

The following table sets forth the liabilities at December 31, 2013, which is recorded on the balance sheet at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required, these are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:

The following table sets forth a summary of change in fair value of our derivative liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2013:

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

INVENTORIES

Inventories previously consisted of natural and organic food products, wrappers and boxes, and were stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost was determined on the average cost method. Inventories are reviewed and reconciled periodically. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the company maintained no inventory.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The Company’s receivables had consisted of billings to customers for products invoiced and shipped and one temporary cash advance to a related party. The Company charges off receivables if they determine that the amount is no longer collectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts was zero at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Bad debt expense related to customer receivables for the year ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was zero and $462 respectively.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Currently the company has no capital assets. Previously assets were depreciated over their estimated useful lives, three to seven years using the straight-line method of depreciation for book purposes.

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net income (loss) per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share.” The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period is used to compute basic earning or loss per share. Diluted earnings or loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares and diluted potential common shares outstanding. Dilutive potential common shares are additional common shares assumed to be exercised.

Basic net income (loss) per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Company’s net loss available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had convertible notes and warrants outstanding that could be converted into approximately 91,935,386 common shares based up the closing bid price of the company’s common stock at December 31, 2013.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company derives revenue from the sale of its products. The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

SHARE-BASED EXPENSE

ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all share-based payment transactions in which employee services are acquired. Transactions include incurring liabilities, or issuing or offering to issue shares, options, and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation rights. Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50, Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees. Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable: (a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued. The fair value of the share-based payment transaction is determined at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date.

Share-based expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled $29,570 and $3,062,015, respectively.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to the Company. Management has reviewed the aforementioned rules and releases and believes any effect will not have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the provisions of ASC 740-10, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires, among other things, an asset and liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The asset and liability approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities

A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets for which management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred asset will not be realized. 

The Company follows the provisions of the ASC 740 -10 related to, Accounting for Uncertain Income Tax Positions. When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 740-10, the benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above should be reflected as a liability for uncertain tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. The Company believes its tax positions will be highly certain of being upheld upon examination. As such, the Company has not recorded a liability for uncertain tax benefits.

The Company has adopted ASC 740-10-25 Definition of Settlement, which provides guidance on how an entity should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits and provides that a tax position can be effectively settled upon the completion of an examination by a taxing authority without being legally extinguished. For tax positions considered effectively settled, an entity would recognize the full amount of tax benefit, even if the tax position is not considered more likely than not to be sustained based solely on the basis of its technical merits and the statute of limitations remains open. Management has not filed tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2013. Tax returns for tax years 2012, 2011, and 2010 remain subject to IRS examination under the three year statute of limitations.

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment is recorded at cost. The Company depreciates the equipment using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the equipment. The useful lives are estimated to be between 3 and 7 years. Depreciation expense was $200 and $483 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company determined that the office equipment located at its previous office location in Jacksonville, Florida was impaired and not worth relocating to the new office. An expense for this equipment was recorded of $628 for the year ended December 31, 2013. Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 5 – STOCK PAYABLE

On April 26, 2012, The Company entered into an agreement with Ironridge Global to settle $284,917 in accounts payable (which includes the balance of the Note Payable for the acquisition of Fresh PROMISE FOODS Inc. by Anthus Life Corp., outstanding legal fees, filing fees, packaging costs and certain manufacturing costs), in exchange for unregistered shares of common stock. Pursuant to an order approving stipulation for settlement of claims between Ironridge and the Company, Ironridge is entitled to receive 1 million common shares plus that number of shares with an aggregate value equal to $332,748, divided by 70% of the following: the volume weighted average price of the issuer’s common stock over that number of consecutive trading days following the date of receipt required for the aggregate trading volume to exceed $1.75 million, not to exceed the arithmetic average of the individual daily volume weighted average prices of any five trading days during such period.

Ironridge is prohibited from receiving any shares of common stock that would cause it to be deemed to beneficially own more than 9.99% of the Company’s total outstanding shares at any one time. Ironridge received an initial issuance of 97,150 shares, and may be required to return or be entitled to receive shares, based on the calculation summarized in the prior paragraph. For purposes of calculating the percent of class, the initial issuance to Ironridge was based upon a total of 875,491 shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the issuance of shares to Ironridge, such that 97,150 shares issued would represent approximately 9.99% of the outstanding common stock after such issuance. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, Ironridge received 17,800,000 and additional 5,357,150 shares respectively, which were recorded at $234,200 and $354,103 respectively. For the same periods the company recorded losses on these transactions of $109,600 and $316,602 respectively. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance of shares due Ironridge Global was 24,378,310 and 42,178,310 respectively, which was recorded at values of $170,648 and $295,318 respectively. Carrying value of amounts due under this agreement are computed by multiplying the percentage of total shares due issued to Ironridge times the initial value of the obligation recorded in 2012. In connection with the transaction, Ironridge agreed not to hold any short position in the issuer’s common stock, and not to engage in or affect, directly or indirectly, any short sale until at least 180 days after the end of the calculation period.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 6 – NOTES AND CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

Convertible notes payable consist of the following at December 31, 2013 and 2012:

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 6 – NOTES AND CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 6 – NOTES AND CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 6 – NOTES AND CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 6 – NOTES AND CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 7 –RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 2,000,000,000 shares of common stock and 1 share of convertible preferred B stock to an officer and director that has been classified as stock based compensation during the year ended December 31, 2012. The Company also recorded consulting expense paid to this director of $50,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012. In 2013 the 2,000,000,000 shares (20,000,000 post-reverse split) were transferred to Joseph Canouse and subsequently cancelled.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 35,000 shares of convertible preferred C stock for services rendered to related parties.

At the time of his appointment Mr. Canouse received the 1 share of convertible Preferred B stock previously issued to a director. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 1 additional shares of convertible preferred B stock to Mr. Quirk when he joined the Company. The stock has no par value and is not traded publicly.

NOTE 8 –STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

The Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the state of Nevada on July 23, 2012 to change the designation of its capital and preferred stock, as follows. The authorized common stock of the Company consist of 4,000,000,000 shares with a par value $0.00001. The Company also has 100,000,000 shares of par value $0.00001 Preferred A stock authorized, 10 shares of par value $0.00001 Preferred B stock authorized, and 30,000,000 par value $0.00001 par value Preferred C stock authorized. The Company adjusted the par value and additional paid in capital accounts on its balance sheet at September 30, 2012 for common and Preferred A stocks.

Series A Preferred stock has been cancelled.

Series B Preferred

Each one share of Series B Preferred has voting rights equal to four times the sum of all shares of common stock issued and outstanding at time of voting, plus all shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued and outstanding at time of voting, divided by the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding at the time of voting.

By unanimous written consent of the Board, the Board issued an aggregate of two (2) shares of Series B Preferred, to two individuals (the “Series B Stockholders”). As a result of the voting rights granted to the Series B Preferred, the Series B Stockholders together hold in the aggregate approximately 80% of the total voting power of all issued and outstanding voting capital of the Company.

Series C Preferred

Series C Preferred Stock has voting rights of one vote per share owned. The Preferred C stock is convertible into common stock of the Company at the rate of 0.10 per common share for each share of Preferred C stock. The holders of Series C Preferred stock are entitled to receive any dividend declared by the Board of Directors.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 19,500 shares of restricted common stock to initial private placement investors in Anthus Life per terms of their subscription agreements.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 36,500 shares of common stock and 9,000 shares of Convertible Preferred C stock to consultants for services. The Company also issued 9,000 shares of Convertible Preferred C stock to a consultant for deferred services.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, he Company issued 26,500 shares of common stock to the former management per the acquisition agreement.

During the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock, 35,000 shares of Convertible Preferred C stock and 1 share of Convertible Preferred B stock to related parties that has been classified as stock based compensation during the year ended December 31, 2012.

On January 10, 2012, the Company retired 358,785 shares of common stock held in treasury at December 31, 2011.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company converted five convertible notes payable from non-related parties along with the accrued interest for a total of $93,443 into 4,113,547 shares of its common stock. The Company also issued 100,000 shares of common stock for $2,000 to a non-related party.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 5,200 shares of preferred C stock for $13,000 in cash.

On April 26, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with Ironridge Global to settle $284,917 in accounts payable (which includes the balance of the Note Payable for the acquisition of Stakool by Anthus Life Corp., outstanding legal fees, filing fees, packaging costs and certain manufacturing costs), in exchange for unregistered shares of common stock. Ironridge received an initial issuance of 97,150 shares of the Company’s common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company issued an additional 5,260,000 shares of unrestricted common stock to Ironridge.

On September 14, 2012, the Company filed a Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Form S-8 registered 4,000,000 shares of its common stock in connection with the Company’s 2012 Incentive Stock Plan.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 8 –STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) CONTINUED

During the month of October 2012, the Company issued 282,980 shares of the Company’s Convertible Preferred C stock. The stock was issued as an addendum to the subscription agreements associated with the open private placement investments made by various investors between fiscal year 2009 and 2011.

On October 5, 2012 the Company issued 3,750,000 shares of its common stock without restriction to various consultants for services. The Company registered the common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-8 on September 14, 2012.

On October 10, 2012 the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock without restriction to Asher Enterprise, Inc. at a value of $15,000. The shares were issued as principal reduction to a Promissory Note dated January 16, 2012 between the Company and a non-related party.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 150,000 shares of restricted common stock to initial private placement investors in Anthus Life per terms of their subscription agreements.

During the year ended December 31, 2012 the Company retired 10,000,000 shares of its Preferred A stock, which accounted for all of the issued and outstanding Preferred A Stock.

The Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the state of Nevada on November 5, 2013 to change the designation of its capital and preferred stock, as follows:

The authorized common stock of the Company consist of 475,000,000 shares with a par value $0.00001. The Company also has 100,000,000 shares of par value $0.00001 Preferred C stock authorized and 10 shares of par value $0.00001 Preferred B stock authorized., and 30,000,000 par value $0.00001 par value Preferred C stock authorized. The Company adjusted the par value and additional paid in capital accounts on its balance sheet at September 30, 2013 for common and Preferred A stocks.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 48,733,764 shares of common stock and cancelled 20,000,000 shares of common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 2,256,982 shares of common stock to service providers, 28,676,129 shares of common stock in conjunction with the conversion of promissory notes, 17,800,000 shares of common stock in to IronRidge Global under an agreement previous described in this filing, and 653 shares of common stock in conjunction with the rounding of shares produced by the reverse stock split previously described in this filing.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the former CEO of the Company transferred 2 shares of Preferred Series B to Mr. Joseph C. Canouse when he assumed the positions of President and CEO. Subsequently, when Mr. Kevin Quirk became CEO of the Company Mr. Canouse transferred 1 share of the Preferred Series B stock to Mr. Quirk.

The Company also recorded the cancellation of previous reported treasury stock with a book value of $208.

On September 26, 2013 the Company issued a convertible note with an embedded warrant agreement. The agreement provides for the purchase of 4,000,000 shares of common stock of the company at $0.02 per share. The warrant expires on September 26, 2015. The fair value of the warrant was estimated, at the date of the grant at $140,000 using the Black-Sholes option –pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 0.01 %, volatility factor of 720%, and an expected life of two years.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2013

NOTE 8 –STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) CONTINUED

On October 21, 2013 the Company issued a convertible note with an embedded warrant agreement. The agreement provides for the purchase of 400,000 shares of common stock of the company at $0.02 per share. The warrant expires on October 21, 2015. The fair value of the warrant was estimated, at the date of the grant at $5,600 using the Black-Sholes option –pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 0.01 %, volatility factor of 598%, and an expected life of two years.

On October 29, 2013 the Company issued a convertible note with an embedded warrant agreement. The agreement provides for the purchase of 133,334 shares of common stock of the company at $0.02 per share. The warrant expires on October 29, 2015. The fair value of the warrant was estimated, at the date of the grant at $3,099 using the Black-Sholes option –pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 0.011 %, volatility factor of 599%, and an expected life of two years.

The following table sets forth common share purchase warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2013:

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2012

NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of $7,608,511 that may be available to reduce future years’ taxable income through 2028. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses have been recognized in these consolidated financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has not recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these tax loss carry-forwards.

The provision for Federal income tax consists of the following for the years 2013 and 2012:

A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 34% to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows as of December 31, 2013 and 2011:

The Company’s valuation allowance increased by $175,823 in 2013. Tax net operating loss carryforwards may be limited pursuant to the IRS Section 382 in the event of certain ownership changes.

FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2012

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 2, 2014 the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock to a service provider for services rendered. An expense of $2,950.00 was recorded for this transaction.

On January 16, 2014 the Company issued 2,664,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the partial conversion of a of a promissory note dated June 4, 2013 for $4,000 face value plus accrued interest of $103. The conversion price of the stock issued in this transaction was $0.0015 as provided by the note agreement..

On February 4, 2014 the Company issued 5,050,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the partial conversion of a promissory note dated July 23, 2013 for $10,100 face value plus accrued interest of $66. The conversion price of the stock issued in this transaction was $0.002 as provided by the note agreement..

On February 6, 2014 the Company issued 2,804,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the partial conversion of a portion of a promissory note dated June 4, 2013 for $7,000 face value plus accrued interest of $560. The conversion price of the stock issued in this transaction was $0.0026 as provided by the note agreement..

On February 12, 2014 the Company issued 3,666,667 shares of common stock in conjunction with the partial conversion of a promissory note issued under a consulting agreement with a former officer.

On February 13, 2014 the Company issued 3,010,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the conversion of a portion of a promissory note dated July 23, 2013 for $5,400 principal plus accrued interest of $620. The conversion price of the stock issued in this transaction was $0.002 as provided by the note agreement..

On February 20, 2014 the Company issued 2,543,235 shares of common stock in conjunction with the partial conversion of a portion of a promissory note dated March 05, 2013 for $5,000 principal. The conversion price of the stock issued in this transaction was $0.0019 as provided by the note agreement..

On February 28, 2014 the Company issued 1,792,813 shares of common stock in conjunction with the partial conversion of a portion of a promissory note dated June 4, 2013 for $4,000 principal. The conversion price of the stock issued in this transaction was $0.0022 as provided by the note agreement..

On March 25, 2014 the Company issued 8,000,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the settlement agreement with Ironridge Global, previous discussed. The stock was recorded at $56,000 but had a fair market value of $80,000. The Company recorded a loss on this issuance of $24,000.

We, together with certain other parties (collectively, the “Defendants”), are currently involved in litigation against Kyle Gotshalk, Leonard Gotshalk, Clinton Hall, LLC, Richard Maher and Patrick O’Loughlin (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”). On April 25, 2013, the Plaintiffs filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the District of Nevada alleging claims including securities fraud and breach of contract. The Company believes these claims to be unfounded and the Company is prepared to file an answer with the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, together with counterclaims against the Plaintiffs. The Company is continuing to vigorously defend itself against this lawsuit and in March 2014 has retained an attorney in Nevada to pursue the matter.

Except as set forth above, we are not currently involved in any litigation that we believe could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Except as set forth above, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our Company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our Company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our Company’s or our Company’s subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

In accordance with ASC 855-10, the Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to December 31, 2013 to the date these consolidated financial statements were issued, and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose in these consolidated financial statements.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants and Financial Disclosure

On July 17, 2013, Stakool Inc. dismissed Silberstein Ungar, PLLC as its independent registered public accounting firm and engaged D’Arelli Pruzansky, P.A. as our independent registered public accounting firm. Silberstein Ungar PLLC audited our financial statements for the periods ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 and review the financials prepared by the previous public accounting firm for the period ended December 31, 2010. The dismissal of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC was approved by our Board of Directors on July 17, 2013. Silberstein Ungar PLLC did not resign or decline to stand for re-election.

Neither the report of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC dated April 14, 2013 on our balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 nor the report of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC dated April 17, 2012 on our balance sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was either such report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that both such reports raised substantial doubts on our ability to continue as a going concern.

During our two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period preceding our decision to dismiss Silberstein Ungar, PLLC we had no disagreements with the firm on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope of procedure which disagreement if not resolved to the satisfaction of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report.

During our two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period prior to retaining D’Arelli Pruzansky, P.A. (1) neither we nor anyone on our behalf consulted D’Arelli Pruzansky, P.A. regarding (a) either the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements or (b) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement or a reportable event as set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and (v), respectively, of Regulation S-K, and (2) D’Arelli Pruzansky, P.A. did not provide us with a written report or oral advice that they concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue.

We provided Silberstein Ungar, PLLC with a copy of this Current Report on Form 8-K prior to its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and requested that the firm furnish us with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether they agree with the statements made in this Current Report on Form 8-K, and if not, stating the aspects with which they do not agree. A copy of the letter provided by Silberstein Ungar, PLLC is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a) EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), in connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as of December 31, 2013.

Based on the review described above, our Chief Executive Officer determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

(b) MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred subsequent to our evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting for the period ended December 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Our Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting under the supervision of the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Management evaluated the design and operation of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and has concluded that such internal control over financial reporting were not effective.

An evaluation was performed, under the supervision of, and with the participation of, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-(e) to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not adequate and effective, as of December 31, 2013, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the system are met and cannot detect all deviations. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of control can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud or deviations, if any, within the Company have been detected.

This report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this report.

Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10 percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. These Section 16 reporting persons are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16 forms they file.

Item 11. Executive Summary and Compensation

Information Regarding the Directors of FRESH PROMISE FOODS INC., Inc.

Our bylaws provide that our board of directors shall consist of at least one member and will be determined by resolution of our board of directors. The number of members of our board of directors is currently two.

The following table lists our directors and provides their respective ages and titles as of December 31, 2013.

(1) Effective March 15, 2013, Peter Hellwig, Kenji Katayama, and Christian Breda resigned as directors and from all officer positions then currently held; as of such date Joseph C. Canouse was appointed as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer.

(2) Effective April 20, 2013, Kevin P. Quirk was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and as a Director. As of such date, Joseph C. Canouse resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer, assuming the roles of Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors.

(3) Effective February 8, 2013, Elsa Desousa, was removed from the Board of Directors.

Executive Summaries

Kevin P. Quirk, age 46, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director Mr. Quirk, age 46, an accomplished executive with more than two decades of consumer products operating experience spanning general management and senior marketing roles in Fortune 500 corporations and start-up ventures, is now responsible for determing the Company’s strategic direction and managing performance against overall business objectives in keeping with the Company’s mission. Most recently, Mr. Quirk was raising capital for innovative start-up companies in the consumer products space. Prior to that, Mr. Quirk founded White Hat Brands, LLC, a functional beverage manufacturer focused on children’s health and wellness issues, which he later sold after raising multiple rounds of financing and stewarding the business to a successful exit. Prior to that Mr. Quirk held a variety of senior-level marketing positions for the Coca-Cola Company, where he initially hired into the Coca-Cola Accelerated Program, the company’s coveted management training program, and later served as Director of Marketing for Minute Maid brands. In addition, Mr. Quirk spent nearly a decade at Anheuser-Busch, where he worked in brand management, field sales and marketing, wholesaler development, and strategic planning, most notably as Market Development Manager of the Wisconsin territory and as founder of such company’s business development group, providing internal management consulting to a network of over 800 distributors. Mr. Quirk holds a BS in Marketing and a BA in Communications from Saint Louis University, and a letter of MBA equivalence from Harvard Business School.

Joseph C. Canouse, age 50, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Canouse, age 49, combines over twenty plus years of experience in finance, consulting and public company restructuring. Previously, he had been involved in financing public and private companies where his firms raised over one billion dollars, primarily in the firm he founded in 1995, J.P. Carey. From 2011 through present, Mr. Canouse has been the Chief Executive Officer for Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc., an aviation-related company. From 2011 to present he has held the same position for Expert Group, Inc., a company that transitioned from financial services to becoming involved in bottling natural spring water. He has an undergraduate degree from Stetson University where he graduated in 1986.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers, or persons nominated or chosen by the Company to become directors or executive officers.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Company does not currently have any committees.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own 10% or more of a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all reports filed by them in compliance with Section 16(a).

Based solely on our review of certain reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the reports required to be filed with respect to transactions in our common stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, were timely, except for Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, which was filed on May 23, 2013.

Code of Ethics

We have not yet adopted a code of ethics because we wanted to complete our constitution of the Board prior to adopting such code of ethics to allow the entire Board to review and approve a code of ethics.

Legal Proceedings

There are no material proceedings to which any director or officer, or any associate of any such director or officer, is a party that is adverse to our Company or any of our subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to our Company or any of our subsidiaries. No director or executive officer has been a director or executive officer of any business which has filed a bankruptcy petition or had a bankruptcy petition filed against it during the past ten years. No director or executive officer has been convicted of a criminal offense or is the subject of a pending criminal proceeding during the past ten years. No director or executive officer has been the subject of any order, judgment or decree of any court permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities during the past ten years. No director or officer has been found by a court to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law during the past ten years.

Executive Compensation.

The following table sets forth compensation for each of the past three fiscal years with respect to each person who served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and each of the four most highly-compensated executive officers of the Company who earned a total annual salary and bonuses that exceeded $100,000 in any of the two preceding fiscal years.