ROLLINS INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
Commission File Number 1-4422
ROLLINS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
51-0068479 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2170 Piedmont Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia
(Address of principal executive offices)
30324
(Zip Code)
(404) 888-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Small reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Rollins, Inc. had 99,039,636 shares of its $1 par value Common Stock outstanding as of October 15, 2009.
ROLLINS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
||
|
|
|
|
30 |
|||
|
|
||
Exhibit Index |
|
||
|
|
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION |
|
|
|
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION |
|
|
|
EX-32.1: CERTIFICATION |
|
2
ROLLINS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(in thousands except share
data)
(unaudited)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
26,221 |
|
$ |
13,716 |
|
Trade receivables, short-term, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,186 and $6,371, respectively |
|
70,750 |
|
56,884 |
|
||
Accounts receivable - other, net |
|
2,338 |
|
2,185 |
|
||
Materials and supplies |
|
10,341 |
|
10,893 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
17,628 |
|
20,018 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
14,143 |
|
13,142 |
|
||
Total Current Assets |
|
141,421 |
|
116,838 |
|
||
Trade receivables, long-term, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $994 and $1,168, respectively |
|
9,599 |
|
11,124 |
|
||
Equipment and property, net |
|
77,223 |
|
78,625 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
189,355 |
|
187,266 |
|
||
Customer contracts |
|
120,510 |
|
129,092 |
|
||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
22,742 |
|
25,719 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
16,669 |
|
17,886 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
8,008 |
|
5,967 |
|
||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
585,527 |
|
$ |
572,517 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
16,616 |
|
18,782 |
|
||
Accrued insurance |
|
15,605 |
|
15,404 |
|
||
Accrued compensation and related liabilities |
|
58,208 |
|
56,334 |
|
||
Unearned revenues |
|
95,361 |
|
88,288 |
|
||
Accrual for termite contracts |
|
4,000 |
|
5,452 |
|
||
Capital leases |
|
263 |
|
450 |
|
||
Line of credit |
|
45,000 |
|
65,000 |
|
||
Other current liabilities |
|
25,610 |
|
23,117 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
260,663 |
|
272,827 |
|
||
Capital leases, less current portion |
|
60 |
|
171 |
|
||
Accrued insurance, less current portion |
|
27,687 |
|
23,483 |
|
||
Accrual for termite contracts, less current portion |
|
7,600 |
|
8,848 |
|
||
Accrued pension |
|
14,992 |
|
20,353 |
|
||
Long-term accrued liabilities |
|
21,297 |
|
18,402 |
|
||
Total Liabilities |
|
332,299 |
|
344,084 |
|
||
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, without par value; 500,000 authorized, zero shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, par value $1 per share; 170,000,000 shares authorized, 99,039,636 and 100,040,969 shares issued, respectively |
|
99,040 |
|
100,041 |
|
||
Paid in capital |
|
20,849 |
|
18,087 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(32,660 |
) |
(34,758 |
) |
||
Retained earnings |
|
165,999 |
|
145,063 |
|
||
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
253,228 |
|
228,433 |
|
||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
585,527 |
|
$ |
572,517 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(in thousands except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Customer services |
|
$ |
286,852 |
|
$ |
277,911 |
|
$ |
814,391 |
|
$ |
772,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cost of services provided |
|
147,436 |
|
145,415 |
|
414,440 |
|
401,444 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
9,321 |
|
9,031 |
|
28,124 |
|
24,347 |
|
||||
Sales, general and administrative |
|
93,233 |
|
91,440 |
|
267,027 |
|
254,958 |
|
||||
(Gain)/Loss on sales of assets |
|
30 |
|
(154 |
) |
7 |
|
(189 |
) |
||||
Interest expense (income), net |
|
159 |
|
174 |
|
846 |
|
(152 |
) |
||||
|
|
250,179 |
|
245,906 |
|
710,444 |
|
680,408 |
|
||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
36,673 |
|
32,005 |
|
103,947 |
|
92,080 |
|
||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current |
|
13,196 |
|
12,531 |
|
37,642 |
|
36,661 |
|
||||
Deferred |
|
744 |
|
(330 |
) |
2,282 |
|
(962 |
) |
||||
|
|
13,940 |
|
12,201 |
|
39,924 |
|
35,699 |
|
||||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
22,733 |
|
$ |
19,804 |
|
$ |
64,023 |
|
$ |
56,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDER: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Distributed |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Undistributed |
|
0.16 |
|
0.14 |
|
0.43 |
|
0.37 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Distributed |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Undistributed |
|
0.16 |
|
0.14 |
|
0.43 |
|
0.37 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
DIVIDENDS PAID PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.0625 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.1875 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net Income |
|
$ |
64,023 |
|
$ |
56,381 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
28,124 |
|
24,347 |
|
||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
2,282 |
|
(962 |
) |
||
Provision for bad debts |
|
6,525 |
|
6,096 |
|
||
Stock based compensation expense |
|
4,350 |
|
3,248 |
|
||
(Gain)/loss on sales of assets |
|
7 |
|
(189 |
) |
||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments |
|
(140 |
) |
(65 |
) |
||
Other, net |
|
73 |
|
(495 |
) |
||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Trade accounts receivables |
|
(17,856 |
) |
(15,791 |
) |
||
Accounts receivables - other |
|
(90 |
) |
97 |
|
||
Materials and supplies |
|
820 |
|
(437 |
) |
||
Other current assets |
|
(4,061 |
) |
973 |
|
||
Other non-current assets |
|
(1,245 |
) |
(1,574 |
) |
||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
4,016 |
|
(396 |
) |
||
Unearned revenue |
|
6,670 |
|
8,862 |
|
||
Accrued insurance |
|
4,406 |
|
57 |
|
||
Accrual for termite contracts |
|
(2,700 |
) |
(3,740 |
) |
||
Pension Funding |
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
||
Long-term accrued liabilities |
|
1,989 |
|
1,200 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
92,193 |
|
77,612 |
|
||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash used for acquisitions of companies, net of cash acquired |
|
(5,424 |
) |
(136,453 |
) |
||
Purchases of equipment and property |
|
(9,817 |
) |
(10,142 |
) |
||
Cash from sales of franchises |
|
9 |
|
225 |
|
||
Proceeds from sales of assets |
|
39 |
|
142 |
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(15,193 |
) |
(146,228 |
) |
||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Repayments/(borrowings), under line of credit agreement, net |
|
(20,000 |
) |
41,500 |
|
||
Cash paid for common stock purchased |
|
(24,981 |
) |
(10,131 |
) |
||
Dividends paid |
|
(20,928 |
) |
(18,911 |
) |
||
Book overdrafts in bank accounts |
|
600 |
|
2,300 |
|
||
Proceeds received upon exercise of stock options |
|
92 |
|
326 |
|
||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
(377 |
) |
(664 |
) |
||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments |
|
140 |
|
65 |
|
||
Net cash provided by/(used) in financing activities |
|
(65,454 |
) |
14,485 |
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
959 |
|
(815 |
) |
||
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
12,505 |
|
(54,946 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
13,716 |
|
71,280 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
26,221 |
|
$ |
16,334 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
952 |
|
$ |
589 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
32,582 |
|
$ |
30,678 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Income |
|
Common |
|
Paid-in |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Retained |
|
|
|
||||||
(in thousands) |
|
(Loss) |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Loss |
|
Earnings |
|
Total |
|
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
100,041 |
|
$ |
18,087 |
|
$ |
(34,758 |
) |
$ |
145,063 |
|
$ |
228,433 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
64,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,023 |
|
64,023 |
|
|||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
||||||
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
66,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,928 |
) |
(20,928 |
) |
||||||
Common Stock Purchased and Retired |
|
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(22,159 |
) |
(23,609 |
) |
||||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
463 |
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,350 |
|
||||||
Common stock options exercised, net of shares surrendered |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
(1,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,279 |
) |
||||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
||||||
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
99,040 |
|
$ |
20,849 |
|
$ |
(32,660 |
) |
$ |
165,999 |
|
$ |
253,228 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
6
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND OTHER
Basis of Preparation - The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Rollins, Inc. (the Company), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to quarterly reporting on Form 10-Q. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards CodificationTM (ASC) 810, Consolidation and Rule 3A-02(a) of Regulation S-X. In accordance with ASC 810 and Rule 3A-02(a) of Regulation S-X, the Companys policy is to consolidate all subsidiaries and investees where it has voting control. The Company does not have any subsidiaries or investees where it has less than a 100% equity interest or less than 100% voting control, nor does it have any interest in other investees, joint ventures, or other variable interest entities that require consolidation under FASB ASC No. 810, Consolidation.
Footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements included herein contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2009, the results of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and its cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
The Company has only one reportable segment, its pest and termite control business. The Companys results of operations and its financial condition are not reliant upon any single customer or a few customers or the Companys foreign operations.
A group that includes the Companys Chairman of the Board, R. Randall Rollins, and his brother, Gary W. Rollins, who is also a director of the Company, and certain companies under their control, controls in excess of 50% of the Companys voting power.
Estimates Used in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial StatementsThe preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying notes and financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash EquivalentsThe Company considers all investments with an original or purchased maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments, all of which are cash equivalents, are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value. At times, cash and cash equivalents may exceed federally insured amounts.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - In accordance with FASB ASC No. 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and other, the Company classifies intangible assets into three categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization; (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization; and (3) goodwill. The Company does not amortize intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired. Such conditions may include an economic downturn or a change in the assessment of future operations. The Company performs impairment tests of goodwill at the Company level. Such impairment tests for goodwill include comparing the fair value of the appropriate reporting unit (the Company) with its carrying value. The Company performs impairment tests for indefinite-lived intangible assets by comparing the fair value of each indefinite-lived intangible asset unit to its carrying value. The Company recognizes an impairment charge if the assets carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The Company completed its most recent annual impairment analyses as of September 30, 2009. Based upon the results of these analyses, the Company has concluded that no impairment of its goodwill or other intangible assets was indicated.
7
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - In accordance with FASB ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, the Companys long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets with definite lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. The Company completed its most recent annual impairment analyses as of September 30, 2009. Based upon the results of these analyses, the Company has concluded that no impairment of its long-lived assets was indicated.
Franchising Program Orkin had 64 franchises as of September 30, 2009, including international franchises in Mexico, established in 2000, Panama, established in 2003, Costa Rica, established in 2006, Honduras, the United Arab Emirates, the Dominican Republic and South Korea established in 2007, the State of Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Kingdom of Bahrain and the State of Kuwait established in 2008, and Cyprus established in October 2009. Transactions with franchises involve sales of customer contracts to establish new franchises, initial franchise fees and royalties. The customer contracts and initial franchise fees are typically sold for a combination of cash and notes due over periods ranging up to five years. These amounts are included as trade receivables in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
|
|
At September 30, |
|
At December 31, |
|
||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Notes receivable from Franchises |
|
$ |
3,733 |
|
$ |
3,947 |
|
The Company recognizes gains from the sale of customer contracts at the time they are sold to franchises and collection on the notes is reasonably assured. The Company recognized a net loss for the sale of customer contracts for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 due to customer adjustments. These amounts are included as revenues in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
Sale of customer contracts (gain)/loss |
|
$ |
41 |
|
$ |
36 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
(644 |
) |
Initial domestic franchise fees are deferred for the duration of the initial contract period and are included as unearned revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
|
|
At September 30, |
|
At December 31, |
|
||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Deferred Franchise Fees |
|
$ |
2,298 |
|
$ |
2,219 |
|
Royalties from franchises are accrued and recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 952-605 Franchisor Revenue Recognition, as revenues as earned on a monthly basis.
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
Revenues from Franchises |
|
$ |
741 |
|
$ |
647 |
|
$ |
2,236 |
|
$ |
2,086 |
|
The Companys maximum exposure to loss relating to the franchises (notes receivable less deferred franchise fees) aggregated $1.4 million, $1.7 million and $1.7 million at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively.
8
Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsThe Companys financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade and notes receivables, accounts payable and other short-term liabilities. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate their fair values.
The Company has a Revolving Credit Agreement with SunTrust Bank and Bank of America, N.A. for an unsecured line of credit of up to $175.0 million, which includes a $75.0 million letter of credit subfacility, and a $10.0 million swingline subfacility. As of September 30, 2009, borrowings of $45.0 million were outstanding under the line of credit and no borrowings under the swingline subfacility. The fair value of outstanding borrowings at September 30, 2009 were approximately $43.2 million.
Seasonality The business of the Company is affected by the seasonal nature of the Companys pest and termite control services. The increase in pest pressure and activity, as well as the metamorphosis of termites in the spring and summer (the occurrence of which is determined by the timing of the change in seasons), has historically resulted in an increase in the revenue of the Companys pest and termite control operations during such periods as evidenced by the following chart.
Consolidated Net Revenues |
||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|||
First Quarter |
|
$ |
242,972 |
|
$ |
210,078 |
|
$ |
201,232 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
284,567 |
|
284,499 |
|
239,618 |
|
|||
Third Quarter |
|
286,852 |
|
277,911 |
|
238,116 |
|
|||
Fourth Quarter |
|
N/A |
|
248,076 |
|
215,954 |
|
|||
Year ended December 31, |
|
$ |
N/A |
|
$ |
1,020,564 |
|
$ |
894,920 |
|
Subsequent Events-The Company has considered subsequent events through October 30, 2009, the date of issuance, in preparing the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
NOTE 2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued certain amendments as codified in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820-10, Fair Value Disclosures. ASC 820-10 affirms that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. An entity is required to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. The Company adopted the provisions in the second quarter of 2009 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new standard, as codified in FASB ASC Topic 855 Subsequent Events. FASB ASC Topic 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In addition, it provides guidance regarding the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The Company adopted this standard in the second quarter of 2009 and the adoption did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-01 titled Topic 105-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168-The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles has become the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities, effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission
9
(SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The FASB now issues Accounting Standards Updates that are not considered authoritative in their own right, but will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance, and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. The Company adopted this standard in the third quarter of 2009 and the adoption did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments, that require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial information including whenever it issues summarized financial information for interim reporting periods. In addition, entities must disclose, in the body or in the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information for interim reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods, the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position. The Company adopted these amendments in the second quarter of 2009 the adoption did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 805-20 Identifiable Assets and Liabilities, and Any Noncontrolling Interest which clarifies ASC 805 Business Combinations, to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. The amendments require that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated. If fair value cannot be reasonably estimated, the asset or liabilities would generally be recognized in accordance with ASC 450 Contingencies, if the criteria for disclosures under that topic are met. The disclosures are required for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted these amendments in the first quarter of 2009 the adoption did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing. These amendments require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. These amendments are effective January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity, with early application not being permitted. Adoption of these provisions is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 810-10, Consolidation Variable Interest Entities. These amendments change how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entitys purpose and design and the reporting entitys ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entitys economic performance. These amendments are effective January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity, with early application not being permitted. Adoption of these provisions is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-5, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value which amends ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following methods: 1) a valuation technique that uses a) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or b) quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets and/or 2) a valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of ASC Topic 820 (e.g. an income approach or market approach). ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to adjust to include inputs relating to the existence of transfer restrictions on that liability. The amendments in this ASU are effective in the fourth quarter of 2009. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-12, Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). ASU 2009-12 amends ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements-Overall. The amendments in ASU 2009-12 provide a practical expedient to measure investments that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis but do not have a readily determinable fair value. The investments can be valued on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment. There are additional disclosure requirements by major category of investments and the nature of restrictions on the investors ability to redeem its investments. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual
10
periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these amendments to its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, which amends ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition; Multiple-Element Arrangements. These amendments provide clarification on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated. An entity is required to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables in the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price. These amendments also eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method. The amendments significantly expand the disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. These provisions are to be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these amendments to its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 715-20, Compensation Retirement Benefits, Defined Benefit Plans. These amendments require additional disclosures regarding how investment decisions are made: the major categories of plan assets; the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period; and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets The disclosures about plan assets are required to be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, with no restatement required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative purposes, upon initial application. Earlier application of the provisions is permitted. The Company is currently in the process of determining the additional disclosures required upon the adoption of these amendments.
There were various other accounting standards and interpretations issued during 2008 or 2009 to October 30, 2009, none of which are expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial position, operations or cash flows.
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS
Acquisition of HomeTeam Pest Defense:
On April 3, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Centex Home Services, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, HomeTeam Pest Defense, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and HomeTeam Pest Defense, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, related to the business of providing termite and pest control services to homebuilders, businesses and homeowners. The final purchase price paid for the acquisition was $134.0 million. The purchase price was negotiated at arms length.
At the time of the acquisition, HomeTeam Pest Defense, with its unique Taexx in the wall system, was recognized as a premier pest control business and ranked as the 4th largest company in the industry. HomeTeam Pest Defense services home builders nationally.
HomeTeam Pest Defense recorded revenues of approximately $134.0 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. The Companys consolidated statements of income include the results of operations of HomeTeam Pest Defense for the period beginning April 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009.
A summary of the fair values of HomeTeams assets and liabilities, at the date of acquisition, were as follows:
(dollars in thousands) |
|
at April 1, 2008 |
|
|
Assets acquired |
|
156,812 |
|
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
(22,768 |
) |
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
134,044 |
|
11
The 2008 pro forma financial information presented below gives effect to the HomeTeam Pest Defense acquisition as if it had occurred as of the beginning of our fiscal year 2008. The information presented below is for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of results that would have been achieved if the acquisition actually had occurred as of the beginning of such year or results which may be achieved in the future.
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Actual |
|
Proforma |
|
||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Customer services |
|
$ |
814,391 |
|
$ |
803,956 |
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
103,947 |
|
92,600 |
|
||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
39,924 |
|
35,898 |
|
||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
64,023 |
|
$ |
56,702 |
|
INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic |
|
99,615 |
|
100,905 |
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted |
|
99,924 |
|
101,348 |
|
Acquisition of Crane Pest Control:
The Company completed the acquisition of Crane Pest Control, Inc. effective December 31, 2008. Crane Pest Control was established in 1930 in San Francisco, California. The Company had annual revenues of over $10 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and is a leading provider of advanced pest management, serving northern California and the Reno/Tahoe basin. Crane Pest Controls primary service is commercial pest control and its existing business complements the services that Rollins offers through its subsidiary, Orkin.
NOTE 4. DEBT
On March 28, 2008, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement with SunTrust Bank and Bank of America, N.A. for an unsecured line of credit of up to $175 million, which includes a $75 million letter of credit subfacility, and a $10 million swingline subfacility. As of September 30, 2009, borrowings of $45.0 million were outstanding under the line of credit and no borrowings were outstanding under the swingline subfacility. The Company maintains approximately $34.9 million in letters of credit, which reduces its borrowing capacity under the credit facility. These letters of credit are required by the Companys fronting insurance companies and/or certain states, due to the Companys self-insured status, to secure various workers compensation and casualty insurance contracts, although the Company believes that it has adequate liquid assets, funding sources and insurance accruals to accommodate such claims. The Revolving Credit Agreement is guaranteed by certain of Rollins domestic subsidiaries. The maturity date of the Credit Agreement is March 27, 2013. Outstanding balances of individual tranches under the Credit Agreement currently mature within twelve months. Revolving loans under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at one of the following two rates, at the Companys election:
· the Base Rate, which is the greater of SunTrust Banks prime rate for the day of the borrowing or a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%; or
· with respect to any Eurodollar borrowings, Adjusted LIBOR (which equals LIBOR as increased to account for the maximum reserve percentages established by the U.S. Federal Reserve) plus an additional amount, which varies between 0.50% and 0.75%, based upon Rollins then-current debt-to-EBITDA ratio. As of September 30, 2009, the additional rate allocated was 0.50%.
As of September 30, 2009, the effective interest rate on the outstanding borrowing under the line of credit was 0.80%. The Revolving Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including, without limitation, certain financial covenants including covenants restricting the Companys ability to incur certain indebtedness or liens, or to merge or consolidate with or sell substantially all of its assets to another entity. Further, the Revolving Credit Agreement contains
12
financial covenants restricting the Companys ability to permit the ratio of the Companys consolidated debt to EBITDA to exceed 2.5 to 1.
The Company remained in compliance with applicable debt covenants at September 30, 2009 and expects to maintain compliance throughout 2009.
NOTE 5. EARNINGS PER SHARE
In accordance with FASB ASC No. 260, Earnings Per Share, the Company presents basic EPS and diluted EPS under the two-class method presented below (in thousands except per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
22,733 |
|
$ |
19,804 |
|
$ |
64,023 |
|
$ |
56,381 |
|
Less distributed earnings (dividends declared during the period) |
|
(6,933 |
) |
(6,300 |
) |
(20,928 |
) |
(18,906 |
) |
||||
Undistributed earnings for the period |
|
$ |
15,800 |
|
$ |
13,504 |
|
$ |
43,095 |
|
$ |
37,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Allocation of undistributed earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic allocation to unrestricted common stockholders |
|
$ |
15,509 |
|
$ |
13,283 |
|
$ |
42,302 |
|
$ |
36,890 |
|
Basic allocation to participating securities |
|
$ |
291 |
|
$ |
221 |
|
$ |
793 |
|
$ |
585 |
|
Diluted allocation to unrestricted common stockholders |
|
$ |
15,510 |
|
$ |
13,284 |
|
$ |
42,305 |
|
$ |
36,892 |
|
Diluted allocation to participating securities |
|
$ |
290 |
|
$ |
220 |
|
$ |
790 |
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Unrestricted outstanding common shares |
|
97,301 |
|
99,233 |
|
97,783 |
|
99,329 |
|
||||
Add Participating securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Restricted stock units outstanding |
|
1,824 |
|
1,649 |
|
1,833 |
|
1,576 |
|
||||
Total participating securities |
|
1,824 |
|
1,649 |
|
1,833 |
|
1,576 |
|
||||
Total Basic Shares Outstanding |
|
99,125 |
|
100,882 |
|
99,616 |
|
100,905 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Fully Diluted Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Unrestricted outstanding common shares |
|
97,301 |
|
99,233 |
|
97,783 |
|
99,329 |
|
||||
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock options |
|
303 |
|
391 |
|
308 |
|
443 |
|
||||
Fully diluted common stock |
|
97,604 |
|
99,624 |
|
98,091 |
|
99,772 |
|
||||
Participating securities |
|
1,824 |
|
1,649 |
|
1,833 |
|
1,576 |
|
||||
Total Fully diluted shares |
|
99,428 |
|
101,273 |
|
99,924 |
|
101,348 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Unrestricted common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Distributed earnings |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Undistributed earnings |
|
0.16 |
|
0.14 |
|
0.43 |
|
0.37 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Participating securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Distributed earnings |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Undistributed earnings |
|
0.16 |
|
0.13 |
|
0.43 |
|
0.37 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Fully diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Unrestricted common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Distributed earnings |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Participating securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Distributed earnings |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Undistributed earnings |
|
0.16 |
|
0.13 |
|
0.43 |
|
0.37 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
13
During the third quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company repurchased 146,300 shares of its common stock in the open market at a weighted-average price of $17.81 per share with a total of 1,450,100 shares repurchased year-to-date at a weighted-average price of $16.28 per share. In total, 3.2 million additional shares may be purchased under its share repurchase program. Rollins, Inc. has had a buyback program in place for a number of years and has routinely purchased shares when it felt the opportunity was desirable. The Board authorized the purchase of 5.0 million additional shares of the Companys common stock in October 2008. This authorization enables the Company to continue the purchase of Rollins, Inc. common stock when appropriate, which is an important benefit, resulting from the Companys strong cash flows. The stock buy-back program has no expiration date.
NOTE 6. GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. The carrying amount of goodwill was $189.4 million as of September 30, 2009 and $187.3 million as of December 31, 2008. Goodwill increased $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 due to acquisitions, finalization of allocation of purchase prices of previous acquisitions and foreign currency translations. The carrying amount of goodwill in foreign countries was $10.7 million as of September 30, 2009 and $7.7 million as of December 31, 2008.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, are as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
187,266 |
|
Goodwill acquired and finalization of allocation of purchase price on previous acquisitions |
|
1,119 |
|
|
Goodwill adjustments due to currency translation |
|
970 |
|
|
Goodwill as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
189,355 |
|
NOTE 7. CUSTOMER CONTRACTS AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Customer contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of the agreements, as straight-line best approximates the ratio that current revenues bear to the total of current and anticipated revenues, based on the estimated lives of the assets. In accordance with FASB ASC 350 Intangibles - Goodwill and other, the expected lives of customer contracts were reviewed, and it was determined that customer contracts should be amortized over a life of 8 to 20 years dependent upon customer type. The carrying amount and accumulated amortization for customer contracts were as follows:
|
|
At September 30, |
|
At December 31, |
|
||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Customer Contracts |
|
$ |
207,452 |
|
$ |
207,789 |
|
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
(86,942 |
) |
(78,697 |
) |
||
Customer contracts, net |
|
$ |
120,510 |
|
$ |
129,092 |
|
The carrying amount of customer contracts in foreign countries was $3.6 million as of September 30, 2009 and $4.1 million as of December 31, 2008.
14
Other intangible assets include non-compete agreements, patents and trade names. Non-compete agreements are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 3 to 20 years and patents are amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. The carrying amount and accumulated amortization for other intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
At September 30, |
|
At December 31, |
|
||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Other intangible assets |
|
$ |
32,086 |
|
$ |
34,121 |
|
Less: Accumulated amortization |
|
(9,344 |
) |
(8,402 |
) |
||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
22,742 |
|
$ |
25,719 |
|
Total amortization expense was approximately $16.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $19.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
NOTE 8. CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of business, certain of the Companys subsidiaries, are defendants in a number of lawsuits or arbitrations, which allege that plaintiffs have been damaged as a result of the rendering of services by the defendant subsidiary. The subsidiaries are actively contesting these actions. Some lawsuits have been filed (John Maciel v. Orkin, Inc., et al.; Ronald and Ileana Krzyzanowsky et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. and Rollins, Inc.; Roy Sheppard et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. and Rollins, Inc.; and Jennifer Thompson and Janet Flood v. Philadelphia Management Company, Parkway Associated, Parkway House Apartments, Barbara Williams, and Western Pest Services) in which the plaintiffs are seeking certification of a class. The cases originate in California, Arkansas, and Pennsylvania, respectively. The Maciel lawsuit, a wage and hour related matter, was filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California and has been scheduled for a class certification hearing on March 24, 2010. The Krzyzanowsky lawsuit, a termite service related matter, was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and has not been scheduled for a class certification hearing. The Sheppard lawsuit, a termite service related matter, was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. In June 2009, the Court granted Orkins Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissed the Sheppard case in its entirety. The Flood lawsuit, a bed bug service related matter filed by residents of an apartment complex, was filed in late August 2009 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, and has not been scheduled for a class certification hearing. The Company believes these matters are without merit and intends to vigorously contest certification and defend itself through trial or arbitration, if necessary. The Company does not believe that any pending claim, proceeding or litigation, either alone or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or liquidity; however, it is possible that an unfavorable outcome of some or all of the matters, however unlikely, could result in a charge that might be material to the results of an individual quarter.
Orkin is involved in certain environmental matters primarily arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the Companys liability under any of these matters would not and did not materially affect its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Environmental remediation is reported on a non-discounted basis.
NOTE 9. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
During the third quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company repurchased 146,300 shares of its $1 par value common stock at a weighted average price of $17.81 per share with a total of 1,450,100 shares repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 at a weighted average of $16.28 per share. In addition, during the third quarter ended September 30, 2009, approximately 29,000 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise of stock options by employees; in total for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, approximately 100,000 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise of stock options by employees. In total, 3.2 million additional shares may be purchased under its share repurchase program. Rollins, Inc. has had a buyback program in place for a number of years and has routinely purchased shares when it felt the opportunity was desirable. The Board authorized the purchase of 5.0 million additional shares of the Companys common stock in October 2008. This authorization enables the Company to continue the purchase of Rollins, Inc. common stock when appropriate, which is an important benefit, resulting from the Companys strong cash flows. The stock buy-back program has no expiration date.
Stock options, time lapse restricted shares (TLRSs) and restricted stock units have been issued to officers and other management employees under the Companys Employee Stock Incentive Plans. The stock options generally vest over a five-year period and expire ten years from the issuance date.
15
TLRSs provide for the issuance of a share of the Companys Common Stock at no cost to the holder and generally vest after a certain stipulated number of years from the grant date, depending on the terms of the issue. The Company issued TLRSs that vest over ten years prior to 2004. TLRSs issued 2004 and later vest in 20 percent increments starting with the second anniversary of the grant, over six years from the date of grant. During these years, grantees receive all dividends declared and retain voting rights for the granted shares. The agreements under which the restricted stock is issued provide that shares awarded may not be sold or otherwise transferred until restrictions established under the plans have lapsed.
During the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, approximately 29,000 and 70,000 shares, respectively, of common stock were issued upon exercise of stock options by employees. In total for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, approximately 100,000 and 264,000 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise of stock options by employees.
The Companys only remaining options outstanding at September 30, 2009 are the grants issued during the first quarter of 2003 which expire in 2013. The Company did not grant any stock options in any years following the 2003 grants.
The Company issues new shares from its authorized but unissued share pool. At September 30, 2009 approximately 4.4 million shares of the Companys common stock were reserved for issuance.
The following table summarizes the components of the Companys stock-based compensation programs recorded as expense:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
Time lapse restricted stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pre-tax compensation expense |
|
$ |
1,450 |
|
$ |
1,145 |
|
$ |
4,350 |
|
$ |
3,248 |
|
Tax benefit |
|
(558 |
) |
(431 |
) |
(1,675 |
) |
(1,254 |
) |
||||
Restricted stock expense, net of tax |
|
$ |
892 |
|
$ |
714 |
|
$ |
2,675 |
|
$ |
1,994 |
|
As of September 30, 2009, $20.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to time-lapse restricted shares is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 4.1 years.
Options activity outstanding under the Companys stock option plan as of September 30, 2009 and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Contractual Term |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
(in thousands except per share data) |
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
(in years) |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
658 |
|
$ |
7.08 |
|
3.39 |
|
$ |
7,236 |
|
Exercised |
|
(101 |
) |
6.79 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
||
Forfeited |
|
(3 |
) |
4.83 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
||
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
554 |
|
7.14 |
|
2.74 |
|
6,483 |
|
||
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
|
554 |
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
2.74 |
|
$ |
6,483 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2009. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Companys stock.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 was $1.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively. Exercise of options through the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 resulted in cash receipts of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The Company recognized a tax benefit of
16
approximately $47,000 during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, which has been recorded as an increase to paid-in capital, and did not recognize a tax benefit for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 related to the exercise of employee stock options. The Company recognized a tax benefit of approximately $140,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and approximately $65,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The following table summarizes information on unvested restricted stock outstanding as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
(in thousands except per share data) |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unvested Restricted Stock Units at December 31, 2008 |
|
1,635 |
|
$ |
14.70 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(17 |
) |
14.22 |
|
|
Vested |
|
(274 |
) |
12.76 |
|
|
Granted |
|
481 |
|
16.48 |
|
|
Unvested Restricted Stock Units at September 30, 2009 |
|
1,825 |
|
$ |
15.46 |
|
NOTE 10. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Pension |
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|||
(in thousands) |
|
Liability |
|
Translation |
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(36,874 |
) |
$ |
2,116 |
|
$ |
(34,758 |
) |
Change during 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Before-tax amount |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
3,422 |
|
|||
Tax benefit |
|
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
(1,324 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
2,098 |
|
|||
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
(36,874 |
) |
$ |
4,214 |
|
$ |
(32,660 |
) |
NOTE 11. ACCRUAL FOR TERMITE CONTRACTS
In accordance with FASB ASC No. 450 Contingencies, the Company maintains an accrual for termite claims representing the estimated costs of reapplications, repairs and associated labor and chemicals, settlements, awards and other costs relative to termite control services. Factors that may impact future cost include termiticide life expectancy and government regulation.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the accrual for termite contracts is as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
14,300 |
|
$ |
18,000 |
|
Current year provision |
|
1,947 |
|
3,364 |
|
||
Settlements, claims and expenditures |
|
(4,647 |
) |
(7,064 |
) |
||
Ending balance |
|
$ |
11,600 |
|
$ |
14,300 |
|
17
NOTE 12. PENSION AND POST RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The following represents the net periodic pension benefit costs and related components in accordance with FASB ASC No. 715 Compensation - Retirement Benefits:
Components of Net Pension Benefit Cost/(Gain)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
Interest cost |
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
$ |
2,270 |
|
$ |
7,149 |
|
$ |
6,810 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(2,743 |
) |
(3,086 |
) |
(8,229 |
) |
(9,258 |
) |
||||
Amortization of net loss |
|
240 |
|
271 |
|
720 |
|
813 |
|
||||
Net periodic benefit cost (Gain) |
|
$ |
(120 |
) |
$ |
(545 |
) |
$ |
(360 |
) |
$ |
(1,635 |
) |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company made a contribution to its defined benefit retirement plan (the Plan) of $5.0 million.
NOTE 13. PERIODIC INCOME TAX RATE
The Company determines its periodic income tax expense based upon the current period income and the annual estimated tax rate for the Company, adjusted for any change to prior year estimates. The estimated tax rate is revised, if necessary, as of the end of each successive interim period during the fiscal year to the Companys current annual estimated tax rate.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
On October 28, 2009, Rollins, Inc. reported its 14th consecutive quarter of improved earnings of $22.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $19.8 million for the prior year quarter, a 14.8% improvement. Revenues increased 3.2% to $286.9 million for the quarter while earnings for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 were $0.23 per diluted share, a 15.0% improvement over the $0.20 per diluted share reported the prior year quarter.
Rollins continues to be financially solid generating $92.2 million in cash from operations year to date. The Company has paid back, as of September 30, 2009, $45.0 million of the $90.0 million borrowed in April 2008 to finance the HomeTeam Pest Defense acquisition. In addition, the Company repurchased 146,300 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $17.81 per share during the third quarter bringing the total number of shares repurchased year-to-date to 1,450,100 at a weighted average price of $16.28. In total, approximately 3.2 million additional shares may be repurchased under the Companys share purchase program.
The Board of Directors, at its quarterly meeting on January 27, 2009, approved a 12% increase in the Companys quarterly dividend. This marked the seventh consecutive year the Board has increased its dividend a minimum of 12% or greater. On October 28, 2009, the Company declared its regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.07 per share.
In July, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors announced the promotion of Glen Rollins to executive vice president of Rollins and CEO of Orkin, Inc. and Harry J. Cynkus to vice president of Rollins. Gary W. Rollins will continue as Chairman of Orkin, as well as president of Rollins Inc.
Rollins subsidiary, Orkin, was recognized by The Web Marketing Association as the winner of the 2009 Web Award for Best Diversified Business Website. The competition honors the best websites from companies in 96 industries around the world based on design, ease of use, use of technology, etc.
18
Results of Operations
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
%Better/ |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
%Better/ |
|
||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
prior year |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
prior year |
|
||||
Revenues |
|
$ |
286,852 |
|
$ |
277,911 |
|
3.2 |
% |
$ |
814,391 |
|
$ |
772,488 |
|
5.4 |
% |
Cost of services provided |
|
147,436 |
|
145,415 |
|
(1.4 |
) |
414,440 |
|
401,444 |
|
(3.2 |
) |
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
9,321 |
|
9,031 |
|
(3.2 |
) |
28,124 |
|
24,347 |
|
(15.5 |
) |
||||
Sales, general and administrative |
|
93,233 |
|
91,440 |
|
(2.0 |
) |
267,027 |
|
254,958 |
|
(4.7 |
) |
||||
Gain on sale of assets |
|
30 |
|
(154 |
) |
(119.5 |
) |
7 |
|
(189 |
) |
(103.7 |
) |
||||
Interest (income)/expense |
|
159 |
|
174 |
|
8.6 |
|
846 |
|
(152 |
) |
N/M |
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
36,673 |
|
32,005 |
|
14.6 |
|
103,947 |
|
92,080 |
|
12.9 |
|
||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
13,940 |
|
12,201 |
|
(14.3 |
) |
39,924 |
|
35,699 |
|
(11.8 |
) |
||||
Net Income |
|
$ |
22,733 |
|
$ |
19,804 |
|
14.8 |
% |
$ |
64,023 |
|
$ |
56,381 |
|
13.6 |
% |
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
Revenues for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 increased $9.0 million to $286.9 million or 3.2% compared to $277.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The Company was negatively impacted by the change in the Canadian foreign currency exchange rate and favorably impacted by the Crane acquisition which was completed on December 31, 2008. Crane Pest Control contributed $2.8 million in revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Foreign operations accounted for approximately 8% of total revenues during the third quarter of 2009 and 2008.
Commercial pest control continues to be the largest and fastest growing part of Rollins business. Commercial pest control represents over 40% of the Companys revenues during the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 and grew 6.1% for the quarter compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The Company has expanded its sales staff, and enjoyed a very strong quarter in commercial sales and national account sales. The cancellation rate improved for the quarter, as well. Commercial fumigations, a relatively small part of the Companys commercial business, were up 12.4% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Additionally, national account sales were aided by some one time events as well as further penetration of existing accounts and new customers.
Residential pest control service which represents approximately 40% of Rollins revenues, increased slightly by 0.3% during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Residential leads were up for the quarter while cancellations remained flat.
Termite service revenue, which is nearly 18% of Rollins business for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009, increased 3.4% compared to the same period in 2008. Additional sales people and improved productivity contributed to a 7.7% sales increase.
The revenues of the Company are affected by the seasonal nature of the Companys pest and termite control services. The increase in pest pressure and activity, as well as the metamorphosis of termites in the spring and summer (the occurrence of which is determined by the timing of the change in seasons), has historically resulted in an increase in the Companys revenue as evidenced by the following chart.
19
Consolidated Net Revenues
(in thousands)
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|||
First Quarter |
|
$ |
242,972 |
|
$ |
210,078 |
|
$ |
201,232 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
284,567 |
|
284,499 |
|
239,618 |
|
|||
Third Quarter |
|
286,852 |
|
277,911 |
|
238,116 |
|
|||
Fourth Quarter |
|
N/A |
|
248,076 |
|
215,954 |
|
|||
Year ended December 31, |
|
$ |
N/A |
|
$ |
1,020,564 |
|
$ |
894,920 |
|
Cost of Services provided for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 increased $2.0 million or 1.4%, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2008. Gross margin for the quarter increased to 48.6% versus 47.7% in the prior year. Margin improved due primarily to $2.9 million dollar reduction in fleet cost due to lower cost of fuels and reduced number of vehicles as well improvements in service technician productivity. These improvements were partially offset by increases in cost of risk and material and supply costs.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 increased to $9.3 million, an increase of 3.2 % or $0.3 million versus the prior year third quarter.
Sales, General and Administrative Expenses for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 increased $1.8 million or 2.0%, to 32.5% of revenues, decreasing from 32.9% for the third quarter ended September 30, 2008. Savings in fuel and travel, were offset by increase in administrate and sales salaries, as we expanded sales staffing, higher stock based compensation expenses, and higher personnel related costs, primarily pension and medical claim costs.
Interest (Income)/Expense for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 remained flat at $0.2 million expense, compared to the third quarter ended September 30, 2008. Interest expense is comprised primarily of interest on the Companys debt related to the April 2008 acquisition of HomeTeam.
Income Taxes for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 increased to $13.9 million, a 14.3% increase from $12.2 million reported third quarter 2008, and reflects increased pre-tax income over the prior year period. The effective tax rate was 38.0% for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 versus 38.1% for the third quarter ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to differences in state tax rates.
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
Revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, increased to $814.4 million compared to $772.5 million for the period ended September 30, 2008. The Company was negatively impacted by the change in the Canadian foreign currency exchange rate and favorably impacted by the HomeTeam acquisition of April 2008 and Crane acquisition of December 31, 2008.
Commercial pest control continues to be the largest and fastest growing part of Rollins business. Commercial pest control represents over 40% of the Companys revenues for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 and grew 4.1% year-to-date compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2008. The Companys expanded sales staff helped strong growth in commercial sales and national account sales as well as the addition of HomeTeam Pest Defense in April 2008.
Residential pest control service which represents approximately 40% of Rollins revenues, increased 6.4% year-to-date September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Termite service revenue, which is nearly 18% of Rollins business for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, increased 7.2% compared to the same period in 2008.
Cost of services provided for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, increased $13.0 million, or 3.2% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Gross margins year-to-date increased to 49.1 % from 48.0% in the prior year. Margins improved due to lower cost of fuel and improved productivity.
Depreciation and amortization for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, increased $3.8 million to $28.1 million, an increase of 15.5%. This was due primarily to amortization of intangibles which increased $2.2 million as a result of
20
recognizing a full year of amortization on acquisitions this year for HomeTeam acquired April 1, 2008, and Crane acquired December 31, 2008.
Sales, General and Administrative Expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, increased $12.1 million, or 4.7% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 representing 32.8% of revenues compared to 33.0% of revenues in the prior year period. The increase in total dollars reflects in part having a full year of HomeTeams expenses in 2009 compared to six months as of September 30, 2008.
Interest (Income)/Expense for the period ended September 30, 2009 was $0.8 million expense, a increase of $1.0 million from $(0.2) million income for the period ended September 30, 2008 due primarily to interest on outstanding debt related to the April 2008 acquisition of HomeTeam Pest Defense.
Income Taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased to $39.9 million, a 11.8% increase from $35.7 million reported for the same period in 2008, and reflect increased pre-tax income over the prior year period. The effective tax rate was 38.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 versus 38.8% for the nine month ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to differences in state tax rates.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company views its critical accounting policies to be those policies that are very important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and that require managements most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. The circumstances that make these judgments difficult or complex relate to the need for management to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company believes its our critical accounting policies to be as follows:
Accrual for Termite ContractsThe Company maintains an accrual for termite claims representing the estimated costs of reapplications, repairs and associated labor and chemicals, settlements, awards and other costs relative to termite control services. Factors that may impact future cost include chemical life expectancy and government regulation. It is significant that the actual number of claims has decreased in recent years due to changes in the Companys business practices. However, it is not possible to precisely predict future significant claims. Positive changes to our business practices include revisions made to our contracts, more effective treatment methods, more effective termiticides, and expanding training.
Accrued InsuranceThe Company self-insures, up to specified limits, certain risks related to general liability, workers compensation and vehicle liability. The estimated costs of existing and future claims under the self-insurance program are accrued based upon historical trends as incidents occur, whether reported or unreported (although actual settlement of the claims may not be made until future periods) and may be subsequently revised based on developments relating to such claims. The Company contracts an independent third party actuary on an annual basis to provide the Company an estimated liability based upon historical claims information. The actuarial study is a major consideration, along with managements knowledge of changes in business practices and existing claims compared to current balances. The reserve is established based on all these factors. Due to the uncertainty associated with the estimation of future loss and expense payments and inherent limitations of the data, actual developments may vary from the Companys projections. This is particularly true since critical assumptions regarding the parameters used to develop reserve estimates are largely based upon judgment. Therefore, changes in estimates may be material. Managements judgment is inherently subjective and a number of factors are outside managements knowledge and control. Additionally, historical information is not always an accurate indication of future events. It should be noted that the number of claims have been decreasing due to the Companys proactive risk management to develop and maintain ongoing programs. Initiatives that have been implemented include pre-employment screening and an annual motor vehicle report required on all its drivers, post-offer physicals for new employees, and pre-hire, random and post-accident drug testing. The Company has improved the time required to report a claim by utilizing a Red Alert program that provides serious accident assessment twenty four hours a day and seven days a week and has instituted a modified duty program that enables employees to go back to work on a limited-duty basis.
Revenue RecognitionThe Companys revenue recognition policies are designed to recognize revenues at the time services are performed. For certain revenue types, because of the timing of billing and the receipt of cash versus the timing of performing services, certain accounting estimates are utilized. Residential and commercial pest control services are primarily recurring in nature on a monthly or bi-monthly basis, while certain types of commercial customers may receive multiple treatments within a given month. In general, pest control customers sign an initial one-year contract, and revenues are recognized at the time services are performed. For pest control customers, the Company offers a discount for those customers who prepay for a full year of services. The Company defers recognition of these advance payments and recognizes the revenue as the services are rendered. The Company classifies the discounts related to the advance payments as a reduction in revenues. Termite baiting revenues are recognized based on the delivery of the individual units of accounting. At the inception of a new baiting services contract upon quality control review of the installation, the Company recognizes revenue for the delivery of the
21
monitoring stations, initial directed liquid termiticide treatment and installation of the monitoring services. The amount deferred is the fair value of monitoring services to be rendered after the initial service. Fair values are generally established based on the prices charged when sold separately by the Company. The amount deferred for the undelivered monitoring element is then recognized as income on a straight-line basis over the remaining contract term, which results in recognition of revenue in a pattern that approximates the timing of performing monitoring visits. Baiting renewal revenue is deferred and recognized over the annual contract period on a straight-line basis that approximates the timing of performing the required monitoring visits.
Revenue received for traditional termite treatments is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining contract term; and, the cost of reinspections, reapplications and repairs and associated labor and chemicals are expensed as incurred. For outstanding claims, an estimate is made of the costs to be incurred (including legal costs) based upon current factors and historical information. The performance of reinspections tends to be close to the contract renewal date and, while reapplications and repairs involve an insubstantial number of the contracts, these costs are incurred over the contract term. As the revenue is being deferred, the future cost of reinspections, reapplications and repairs and associated labor and chemicals applicable to the deferred revenue are expensed as incurred. The Company accrues for noticed claims. The costs of providing termite services upon renewal are compared to the expected revenue to be received and a provision is made for any expected losses.
As the revenue is being deferred, the future cost of reinspections, reapplications and repairs and associated labor and chemicals applicable to the deferred revenue are expensed as incurred and no longer accrued. The Company will continue to accrue for noticed claims.
Contingency AccrualsThe Company is a party to legal proceedings with respect to matters in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with FASB ASC No. 450 Contingencies, the Company estimates and accrues for its liability and costs associated with the litigation. Estimates and accruals are determined in consultation with outside counsel. Because it is not possible to accurately predict the ultimate result of the litigation, judgments concerning accruals for liabilities and costs associated with litigation are inherently uncertain and actual liability may vary from amounts estimated or accrued. However, in the opinion of management, the outcome of the litigation will not have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Defined benefit pension plan In 2002, the Company ceased all future benefit accruals under the defined benefit plan, although the Company remains obligated to provide employees benefits earned through March 2002. The Company accounts for the defined benefit plan in accordance with FASB ASC No. 715 Compensation- Retirement Benefits, and engages an outside actuary to calculate its obligations and costs. With the assistance of the actuary, the Company evaluates the significant assumptions used on a periodic basis including the estimated future return on plan assets, the discount rate, and other factors, and makes adjustments to these liabilities as necessary.
The Company chooses an expected rate of return on plan assets based on historical results for similar allocations among asset classes, the investments strategy, and the views of our investment adviser. Differences between the expected long-term return on plan assets and the actual return are amortized over future years. Therefore, the net deferral of past asset gains (losses) ultimately affects future pension expense. The Companys assumption for the expected return on plan assets for 2009 is seven percent compared to eight percent in 2008.
The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the pension liabilities could be effectively settled at the end of the year. In estimating this rate, the Company utilizes a yield curve approach. The approach utilizes an economic model whereby the Companys expected benefit payments over the life of the plan is forecasted and then compared to a portfolio of corporate bonds that will mature at the same time that the benefit payments are due in any given year. The economic model then calculates the one discount rate to apply to all benefit payments over the life of the plan which will result in the same total lump sum as the payments from the corporate bonds. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations. The discount rate was 6.81 percent as of December 31, 2008 compared to 6.25 percent in 2007 and 5.50 percent in 2006. A lower discount rate increases the value of benefit obligation.
As of December 31, 2008, the defined benefit plan was under-funded by $20.4 million and the recorded change within accumulated other comprehensive income decreased stockholders equity in 2008 by $42.0 million before tax.
22
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Flow
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
92,193 |
|
$ |
77,612 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(15,193 |
) |
(146,228 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by/(used) in financing activities |
|
(65,454 |
) |
14,485 |
|
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
959 |
|
(815 |
) |
||
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
12,505 |
|
(54,946 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
13,716 |
|
71,280 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
26,221 |
|
$ |
16,334 |
|
The Company believes its current cash and cash equivalents balances, future cash flows expected to be generated from operating activities and available borrowings under its $175.0 million credit facility will be sufficient to finance its current operations and obligations, and fund expansion of the business for the foreseeable future. The Companys operating activities generated net cash of $92.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared with cash provided by operating activities of $77.6 million for the same period in 2008.
The Company made a contribution to its defined benefit retirement plan (the Plan) of $5.0 million during fiscal 2009. In the opinion of management, additional Plan contributions will not have a material effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company invested approximately $9.8 million in capital expenditures during the first nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $10.1 million during the same period in 2008, and expects to invest approximately $4.0 million for the remainder of 2009. Capital expenditures for the first nine months consisted primarily of the purchase of equipment replacements and technology related projects. During the first nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company made expenditures for acquisitions totaling $5.4 million, compared to $136.5 million during the same period in 2008. Cash on hand and borrowings under a senior unsecured revolving credit facility primarily funded expenditures for acquisitions. A total of $20.9 million was paid in cash dividends ($0.21 per share) during the first nine months of 2009, compared to $18.9 million or ($0.1875 per share) during the same period in 2008. The Company repurchased 1.5 million shares during the first nine months of 2009 of its $1 par value common stock at a weighted average price of $16.28. The capital expenditures and cash dividends were funded through existing cash balances, operating activities and borrowings under a senior unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company continues to seek new acquisitions.
To date the Company has paid back $45.0 million of the borrowed $90 million used to finance the HomeTeam acquisition. Also during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company repurchased 146,300 shares of common stock at a weighted price of $17.81 per share bringing the total number of shares repurchased year-to-date to 1,450,100 at a weighted average of $16.28. In total, approximately 3.2 million additional shares may be repurchased under the Companys share purchase program.
Rollins balance sheet as of September 30, 2009, includes short-term unearned revenues of $95.4 million dollars, representing almost 9% of our annual revenue. This represents cash paid to the Company by its customers in advance of services that will be recognized over the next twelve months.
The Companys $26.2 million of total cash at September 30, 2009, includes approximately $5.3 million invested in various money market funds. The remaining $20.9 million of cash at September 30, 2009 is primarily cash held at various banking institutions. Approximately $17.1 million is held in cash accounts at international bank institutions and the remaining $3.8 million is primarily held in non-interest-bearing accounts at various domestic banks. Late in 2008 and later updated in August 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approved a final rule to strengthen the agencys Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. This program guarantees newly issued senior unsecured debt of banks, thrifts, and certain holding companies, and provides full coverage of non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts. Under this program, participating institutions will be able to provide customers full coverage (above the current $250,000 level) on non-interest bearing accounts, which currently will be in effect until June 30, 2010. All of the domestic banks where our balances exceed $250,000 are participating in this program.
23
On March 28, 2008, the Company entered into a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of March 28, 2008 to acquire, through the purchase of assets, the business of HomeTeam Pest Defense, which provides termite and pest control services to homebuilders, businesses and homeowners. The aggregate amount paid was a combination of $47.7 million in cash on hand, as well as $90.0 million in borrowings from the below mentioned credit facility, totaling $137.7 million. The Company closed the purchase of the HomeTeam Pest Defense acquisition on April 3, 2008. Through the period ended September 30, 2009, the Company paid back, $45.0 million of the $90.0 million that was borrowed to fund the HomeTeam acquisition.
On March 28, 2008, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement with SunTrust Bank and Bank of America, N.A. for an unsecured line of credit of up to $175 million, which includes a $75 million letter of credit subfacility, and a $10 million swingline subfacility. As of September 30, 2009, borrowings of $45.0 million were outstanding under the line of credit and no borrowings were outstanding under the swingline subfacility. The Company maintains approximately $34.9 million in letters of credit, which reduces its borrowing capacity under the credit facility. These letters of credit are required by the Companys fronting insurance companies and/or certain states, due to the Companys self-insured status, to secure various workers compensation and casualty insurance contracts, although the Company believes that it has adequate liquid assets, funding sources and insurance accruals to accommodate such claims. The Revolving Credit Agreement is guaranteed by certain of Rollins domestic subsidiaries. The maturity date of the Credit Agreement is March 27, 2013. Outstanding balances of individual tranches under the Credit Agreement currently mature in 2009. Revolving loans under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at one of the following two rates, at the Companys election:
· the Base Rate, which is the greater of SunTrust Banks prime rate for the day of the borrowing or a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%; or
· with respect to any Eurodollar borrowings, Adjusted LIBOR (which equals LIBOR as increased to account for the maximum reserve percentages established by the U.S. Federal Reserve) plus an additional amount, which varies between 0.50% and 0.75%, based upon Rollins then-current debt-to-EBITDA ratio. As of September 30, 2009, the additional rate allocated was 0.50%.
As of September 30, 2009, the effective interest rate on the outstanding borrowing under the line of credit was 0.80%. The Revolving Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including, without limitation, certain financial covenants including covenants restricting the Companys ability to incur certain indebtedness or liens, or to merge or consolidate with or sell substantially all of its assets to another entity. Further, the Revolving Credit Agreement contains financial covenants restricting the Companys ability to permit the ratio of the Companys consolidated debt to EBITDA to exceed 2.5 to 1.
The Company remained in compliance with applicable debt covenants at September 30, 2009 and expects to maintain compliance throughout 2009.
Litigation
Orkin, one of the Companys subsidiaries, is aggressively defending the following lawsuits in which the plaintiffs are seeking class certification: John Maciel v. Orkin, Inc., et al. (pending in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California); Ronald and Ileana Krzyzanowsky et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. and Rollins, Inc. (pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California); and Roy Sheppard et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. and Rollins, Inc. (pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas). In June 2009 in the Sheppard lawsuit, the Court granted Orkins Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissed the case in its entirety. The Maciel v. Orkin case has been scheduled for a class certification hearing on March 24, 2010. Western, another of the Companys subsidiaries, is aggressively defending the Jennifer Thompson and Janet Flood v. Philadelphia Management Company, Parkway Associated, Parkway House Apartments, Barbara Williams, and Western Pest Services lawsuit (pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania).The remaining matters have not been scheduled for a class certification hearing. Other lawsuits against Orkin, Western and other subsidiaries of the Company, and in some instances the Company, are also being vigorously defended. For further discussion, see Note 8 to the accompanying financial statements.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued certain amendments as codified in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820-10, Fair Value Disclosures. ASC 820-10 affirms that the objective of fair value
24
when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. An entity is required to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. The Company adopted the provisions in the second quarter of 2009 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new standard, as codified in FASB ASC Topic 855 Subsequent Events. FASB ASC Topic 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In addition, it provides guidance regarding the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The Company adopted this standard in the second quarter of 2009 and the adoption did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-01 titled Topic 105-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168-The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles has become the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities, effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The FASB now issues Accounting Standards Updates that are not considered authoritative in their own right, but will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance, and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. The Company adopted this standard in the third quarter of 2009 and the adoption did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments, that require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial information including whenever it issues summarized financial information for interim reporting periods. In addition, entities must disclose, in the body or in the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information for interim reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods, the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position. The Company adopted these amendments in the second quarter of 2009 the adoption did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 805-20 Identifiable Assets and Liabilities, and Any Noncontrolling Interest which clarifies ASC 805 Business Combinations, to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. The amendments require that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated. If fair value cannot be reasonably estimated, the asset or liabilities would generally be recognized in accordance with ASC 450 Contingencies, if the criteria for disclosures under that topic are met. The disclosures are required for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted these amendments in the first quarter of 2009 the adoption did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing. These amendments require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. These amendments are effective January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity, with early application not being permitted. Adoption of these provisions is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 810-10, Consolidation Variable Interest Entities. These amendments change how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entitys purpose and design and the reporting entitys
25
ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entitys economic performance. These amendments are effective January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity, with early application not being permitted. Adoption of these provisions is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-5, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value which amends ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following methods: 1) a valuation technique that uses a) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or b) quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets and/or 2) a valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of ASC Topic 820 (e.g. an income approach or market approach). ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to adjust to include inputs relating to the existence of transfer restrictions on that liability. The amendments in this ASU are effective in the fourth quarter of 2009. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-12, Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). ASU 2009-12 amends ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements-Overall. The amendments in ASU 2009-12 provide a practical expedient to measure investments that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis but do not have a readily determinable fair value. The investments can be valued on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment. There are additional disclosure requirements by major category of investments and the nature of restrictions on the investors ability to redeem its investments. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these amendments to its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, which amends ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition; Multiple-Element Arrangements. These amendments provide clarification on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated. An entity is required to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables in the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price. These amendments also eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method. The amendments significantly expand the disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. These provisions are to be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these amendments to its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC 715-20, Compensation Retirement Benefits, Defined Benefit Plans. These amendments require additional disclosures regarding how investment decisions are made: the major categories of plan assets; the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period; and significant concentrations of risk within plan assets The disclosures about plan assets are required to be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, with no restatement required for earlier periods that are presented for comparative purposes, upon initial application. Earlier application of the provisions is permitted. The Company is currently in the process of determining the additional disclosures required upon the adoption of these amendments.
There were various other accounting standards and interpretations issued during 2008 or 2009 to October 30, 2009, none of which are expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial position, operations or cash flows.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the Companys expectation to maintain compliance with debt covenants; the effect of the future adoption of recent accounting pronouncements on the Companys financial statements; statements regarding managements expectation regarding the effect of the ultimate resolution of pending legal actions on the Companys financial position, results of operation and liquidity; managements belief that future costs of the Company for environmental matters will not be material to the Companys financial condition, operating results, and liquidity; the Companys belief that its current cash and cash equivalent balances, future cash flows expected to be generated from operating activities and available borrowings will be sufficient to finance its current operations and obligations, and fund planned investments for expansion of the business for the foreseeable future; possible defined benefit retirement plan contributions and their effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations and liquidity; estimated 2009 capital expenditures; the Companys belief that it has adequate liquid assets, funding sources and insurance accruals to accommodate various workers compensation and casualty insurance contracts; and the Companys belief that interest rate exposure and foreign exchange rate
26
risk will not have a material effect on the Companys results of operations going forward. The actual results of the Company could differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements because of various risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, the possibility of an adverse ruling against the Company in pending litigation; general economic conditions; market risk; changes in industry practices or technologies; the degree of success of the Companys termite process reforms and pest control selling and treatment methods; the Companys ability to identify and integrate potential acquisitions; climate and weather conditions; competitive factors and pricing practices; potential increases in labor costs; and changes in various government laws and regulations, including environmental regulations. All of the foregoing risks and uncertainties are beyond the ability of the Company to control, and in many cases the Company cannot predict the risks and uncertainties that could cause its actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. A more detailed discussion of potential risks facing the Company can be found in the Companys Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company does not undertake to update its forward looking statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As of September 30, 2009, the Company maintained an investment portfolio (included in cash and cash equivalents) subject to short-term interest rate risk exposure. The Company is subject to interest rate risk exposure through borrowings on its $175 million credit facility. The Company is also exposed to market risks arising from changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company believes that this foreign exchange rate risk will not have a material effect upon the Companys results of operations going forward. There have been no material changes to the Companys market risk exposure since the end of fiscal year 2008.
ITEM 4. CONTROL AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of September 30, 2009. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level such that the material information relating to Rollins, Inc., including our consolidated subsidiaries, and required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and was made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.
In addition, except as noted in the following paragraph, managements quarterly evaluation identified no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the third quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As of September 30, 2009 we did not identify any material weaknesses in our internal controls, and therefore no corrective actions were taken.
The Company acquired the HomeTeam Pest Defense business on April 3, 2008. Since the date of acquisition, the Company has been analyzing, evaluating, and implementing changes in HomeTeams procedures and controls to determine their effectiveness and to make them consistent with our internal controls and procedures. We have performed additional procedures to review accounting records and substantiate the financial information of HomeTeam included in this report. HomeTeams total revenues following the acquisition accounted for 12.1% of the Companys consolidated revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 8.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
27
See Note 8 to Part I, Item 1 for discussion of certain litigation.
See the Companys risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Shares repurchased by Rollins and affiliated purchases during the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
Maximum number of |
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
shares purchased |
|
shares that may yet |
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
as part of publicly |
|
be purchased under |
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
Price paid per |
|
announced repurchases |
|
the repurchase plans |
|
|
Period |
|
(1) |
|
Share |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
|
July 1 to 31, 2009 |
|
6,423 |
|
$ |
18.50 |
|
0 |
|
3,324,991 |
|
August 1 to 31, 2009 |
|
109,800 |
|
17.84 |
|
109,800 |
|
3,215,191 |
|
|
September 1 to 30, 2009 |
|
41,185 |
|
17.88 |
|
36,500 |
|
3,178,691 |
|
|
Total |
|
157,408 |
|
$ |
17.87 |
|
146,300 |
|
3,178,691 |
|
(1) Includes repurchases in connection with exercise of employee stock options in the following amount: July 2009: 6,423; September 2009: 4,685.
(2) These shares were repurchased under the October 2008 plan to repurchase up to 5.0 million shares of the Companys common stock. This plan has no expiration date.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None
28
Item 6. |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(a) |
Exhibits |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) (i) |
(A) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Rollins, Inc. dated July 28, 1981, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (3)(i)(A) as filed with the registrants Form 10-Q filed August 1, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B) Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Rollins, Inc. dated August 20, 1987, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (3)(i)(B) to the registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C) Certificate of Change of Location of Registered Office and of Registered Agent dated March 22, 1994, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (3)(i)(C) filed with the registrants Form 10-Q filed August 1, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(D) Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Rollins, Inc. dated April 25, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(D) filed with the Registrants 10-Q filed October 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
Amended and Restated By-laws of Rollins, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 as filed with the registrants Form 8-K dated October 23, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Rollins, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (4) as filed with its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1) |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.2) |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.1) |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
29
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
ROLLINS, INC. |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: October 30, 2009 |
By: |
/s/Gary W. Rollins |
|
|
Gary W. Rollins |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: October 30, 2009 |
By: |
/s/Harry J. Cynkus |
|
|
Harry J. Cynkus |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
30