RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-20797
RUSH ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
74-1733016 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
555 I.H. 35 South, Suite 500
New Braunfels, Texas 78130
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
New Braunfels, Texas 78130
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(830) 626-5200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicated below is the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
stock, as of November 4, 2009.
Number of | ||
Shares | ||
Title of Class | Outstanding | |
Class A Common Stock, $.01 Par Value Class B Common Stock, $.01 Par Value |
26,432,073 10,686,983 |
RUSH ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | Financial Statements. |
RUSH ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(In Thousands, Except Shares)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 136,731 | $ | 146,411 | ||||
Investments |
7,575 | 7,575 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
41,407 | 55,274 | ||||||
Inventories |
274,758 | 362,234 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
2,270 | 3,369 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
9,112 | 6,730 | ||||||
Total current assets |
471,853 | 581,593 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
343,545 | 332,147 | ||||||
Goodwill, net |
141,065 | 141,904 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
1,047 | 1,146 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 957,510 | $ | 1,056,790 | ||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Floor plan notes payable |
$ | 196,649 | $ | 282,702 | ||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
57,576 | 37,665 | ||||||
Current maturities of capital lease obligations |
5,700 | 3,454 | ||||||
Trade accounts payable |
25,670 | 31,530 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
39,660 | 49,125 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
325,255 | 404,476 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
132,755 | 172,011 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, net of current maturities |
23,584 | 11,366 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
51,411 | 52,896 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share;
1,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares outstanding
in 2009 and 2008 |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $.01 per share;
60,000,000 class A shares and 20,000,000 class B
shares authorized; 26,578,748 class A shares and
12,325,737 class B shares issued and 26,430,122
class A shares and 10,685,894 class B shares
outstanding in 2009; 26,327,734 class A shares and
12,324,987 class B shares issued and 26,255,974
class A shares and 10,685,144 class B shares
outstanding in 2008 |
388 | 386 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
187,930 | 183,818 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost: 1,639,843 shares |
(17,948 | ) | (17,948 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
254,135 | 249,785 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
424,505 | 416,041 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 957,510 | $ | 1,056,790 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
RUSH ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
New and used truck sales |
$ | 179,121 | $ | 259,518 | $ | 562,263 | $ | 808,181 | ||||||||
Parts and service |
102,830 | 124,129 | 314,760 | 362,174 | ||||||||||||
Construction equipment sales |
4,424 | 11,672 | 16,908 | 47,571 | ||||||||||||
Lease and rental |
13,300 | 14,205 | 40,012 | 40,605 | ||||||||||||
Finance and insurance |
1,748 | 2,723 | 5,731 | 9,520 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,015 | 1,449 | 3,978 | 4,221 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
302,438 | 413,696 | 943,652 | 1,272,272 | ||||||||||||
Cost of products sold: |
||||||||||||||||
New and used truck sales |
167,396 | 241,923 | 530,069 | 754,265 | ||||||||||||
Parts and service |
61,949 | 72,784 | 191,173 | 211,413 | ||||||||||||
Construction equipment sales |
4,333 | 10,634 | 15,715 | 43,006 | ||||||||||||
Lease and rental |
11,756 | 11,970 | 35,273 | 34,611 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of products sold |
245,434 | 337,311 | 772,230 | 1,043,295 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
57,004 | 76,385 | 171,422 | 228,977 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
51,934 | 58,371 | 154,363 | 174,328 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,866 | 4,039 | 12,657 | 11,841 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
1,204 | 13,975 | 4,402 | 42,808 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
1,542 | 1,833 | 4,673 | 5,533 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
88 | 25 | 165 | 79 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income before taxes |
(250 | ) | 12,167 | (106 | ) | 37,354 | ||||||||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
(3,258 | ) | 4,167 | (4,456 | ) | 13,612 | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,008 | $ | 8,000 | $ | 4,350 | $ | 23,742 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.62 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.61 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
37,110 | 38,417 | 37,047 | 38,416 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
37,780 | 38,842 | 37,469 | 38,908 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
RUSH ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,350 | $ | 23,742 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
30,617 | 28,467 | ||||||
(Gain) on sale of property and equipment |
(165 | ) | (215 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options
and employee stock purchases |
3,086 | 3,049 | ||||||
Provision (benefit) for deferred income tax expense |
(3,867 | ) | 7,884 | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
(227 | ) | (693 | ) | ||||
Change in accounts receivable, net |
13,867 | (4,746 | ) | |||||
Change in inventories |
97,047 | 29,974 | ||||||
Change in prepaid expenses and other, net |
1,099 | (951 | ) | |||||
Change in trade accounts payable |
(5,860 | ) | (7,082 | ) | ||||
Change in accrued expenses |
(9,238 | ) | (13,403 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
130,709 | 66,026 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of investments |
| (355,575 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of investments |
| 348,000 | ||||||
Acquisition of property and equipment |
(32,978 | ) | (46,511 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
464 | 1,389 | ||||||
Business acquisitions |
| (37,392 | ) | |||||
Change in other assets |
11 | 121 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
(32,503 | ) | (89,968 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
14,423 | 21,107 | ||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(33,768 | ) | (29,335 | ) | ||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
(3,489 | ) | (4,470 | ) | ||||
Draws (payments) on floor plan notes payable, net |
(86,053 | ) | 2,546 | |||||
Debt issuance costs |
(27 | ) | (66 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of common stock |
| (10,067 | ) | |||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
227 | 693 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of shares relating to employee stock options and
employee stock purchases |
801 | 1,060 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities |
(107,886 | ) | (18,532 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(9,680 | ) | (42,474 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
146,411 | 187,009 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 136,731 | $ | 144,535 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 11,055 | $ | 12,227 | ||||
Income taxes, net of refunds |
$ | 3,512 | $ | 6,098 | ||||
Noncash investing activities: |
||||||||
Assets acquired under capital leases |
$ | 17,953 | $ | 1,880 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
RUSH ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1 Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Rush
Enterprises, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the Company), without
audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. All
adjustments have been made to the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements,
which, in the opinion of the Companys management, are necessary for a fair presentation of
the Companys operating results. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations. It is recommended that these interim consolidated
financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the
notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results
that may be expected for any other interim periods or the full fiscal year.
The Company has reviewed and evaluated events and transactions which have occurred
subsequent to September 30, 2009 through November 9, 2009, the date of issuance of these
financial statements.
2 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company performs an annual impairment review of goodwill during the fourth quarter of
each year, however, an interim evaluation of goodwill was required during the second quarter
of 2009 due to General Motors decision to terminate production of medium-duty GMC trucks,
which resulted in the winding-down of the Companys medium-duty GMC truck franchises.
Management is not aware of any additional impairment charge that may currently be
required; however, a change in economic conditions, if one occurs, could result in an
impairment charge in future periods.
3 Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is contingently liable to finance companies for certain notes initiated on
behalf of such finance companies related to the sale of trucks and construction equipment.
The majority of finance contracts are sold without recourse against the Company. For those
finance contracts sold with recourse, the liability associated with a majority of such
contracts is generally limited to 5% to 20% of the outstanding amount of each note initiated
on behalf of the finance company. However, the Company has a finance program that accepts 100%
liability, with some restrictions, for the outstanding amount of each note initiated on behalf
of the finance company. In order for a contract to be accepted into this finance program, a
customer must meet strict credit requirements or maintain a significant equity position in the
truck being financed; consequently, less than 1% of the Companys portfolio balance related to
finance contracts sold by the Company are under this 100% liability finance program and the
Company does not expect to finance a significant percentage of its truck sales under this 100%
liability finance program in the future. The Company provides for an allowance for
repossession losses and early repayment penalties that it may be liable for under finance
contracts sold.
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. The Company believes it is unlikely that the final outcome of any of the
claims or proceedings to which the Company is a party would have a material adverse effect on
the Companys financial position or results of operations; however, due to the inherent
uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular
claim or proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations for the fiscal period in which such resolution occurred.
6
Table of Contents
4 Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted
earnings per share, net income
available to common shareholders |
$ | 3,008,000 | $ | 8,000,000 | $ | 4,350,000 | $ | 23,742,000 | ||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per
share, adjusted weighted average
shares outstanding |
37,109,673 | 38,416,823 | 37,046,915 | 38,415,892 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Employee and director stock options
and restricted share awards |
670,701 | 425,654 | 421,659 | 491,654 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings
per share, adjusted weighted
average shares outstanding and
assumed conversions |
37,780,374 | 38,842,477 | 37,468,574 | 38,907,546 | ||||||||||||
Basic (loss) earnings per common share |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.62 | ||||||||
Diluted (loss) earnings per common
share and common share equivalents |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.61 | ||||||||
Options to purchase shares of common stock that were outstanding for the three
months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 that were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive are
as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Anti-dilutive options |
505,830 | 1,532,218 | 1,557,356 | 1,083,759 | ||||||||||||
5 Stock Options
Valuation and Expense Information
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) topic 718-10, Compensation Stock Compensation, which requires the
measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to
the Companys employees and directors including employee stock options, restricted share
awards and employee stock purchases related to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on
estimated fair values. Stock-based compensation expense, calculated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model and included in Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) expense, was
$0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008.
Stock-based compensation expense, included in SG&A expense, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was $3.1 million and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $3.0
million. As of September 30, 2009, there was $4.4 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Rush
Enterprises, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.9 years.
6 Investments
The Company assesses its investments for impairment on a quarterly basis. If the
investments are deemed to be impaired, the Company determines whether the impairment is
temporary or other than temporary. If the impairment is deemed to be temporary, the Company
records an unrealized loss in other comprehensive income. If the impairment is deemed other
than temporary, the Company records the impairment in the Companys consolidated statement of
operations.
The Company historically invested in interest-bearing short-term investments primarily
consisting of investment-grade auction rate securities classified as available-for-sale and
reported at fair value. These types of investments were designed to provide liquidity through
an auction process that reset the applicable interest rates at predetermined periods ranging
from 1 to 35 days. This reset mechanism was intended to allow existing investors to continue
to own their respective interest in the auction rate security or to gain immediate liquidity
by selling their interests at par.
7
Table of Contents
As a result of the liquidity issues experienced in the global capital markets, auctions
for investment grade securities held by the Company have failed. An auction fails when there
is insufficient demand. However, a failed auction does not represent a default by the issuer.
The auction rate securities continue to pay interest in accordance with the terms of the
underlying security; however, liquidity will be limited until there is a successful auction or
until such time as other markets for these investments develop. The Company believes that its
auction rate securities will liquidate within the next twelve months and has classified them
as a current asset on its consolidated balance sheet. The Company has the intent and ability
to hold these auction rate securities until liquidity returns to the market. The Company does
not believe that the lack of liquidity relating to its auction rate securities will have a
material impact on its ability to fund operations.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company holds $7.6 million of auction rate securities with
underlying tax-exempt municipal bonds with stated maturities of 21 years. These bonds have
credit wrap insurance and a credit rating of A by Standard & Poors.
The Company believes that the credit quality and fair value of the auction rate
securities it holds has not been negatively impacted; therefore, no impairment charges have
been recorded as of September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has valued
these investments at fair value, which approximates cost. The Company used observable inputs
to determine fair value, including consideration of broker quotes, the overall quality of the
underlying municipality, the credit quality of the insurance company, as well as successful
subsequent auctions. Accordingly, the Company has considered this fair value to be a Level 2
valuation under ASC topic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly SFAS
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements). If the credit quality of these investments deteriorates,
or adverse developments occur in the bond insurance market, the Company may be required to
record an impairment charge on these investments in the future.
7 Inventory
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a net write-down of $3.4
million on new medium-duty GMC truck inventory and a net write-down of $0.6 million on its GMC
parts inventory due to General Motors decision to discontinue manufacturing GMC medium-duty
trucks and to wind-down the Companys medium-duty GMC truck franchise agreements. During the
third quarter of 2009, the Company adjusted the estimated impairment charge related to the
medium-duty GMC truck and parts inventories because it was able to sell some of the inventory
at higher prices than originally estimated, which resulted in a net credit to cost of sales of
$1.5 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2009. See Note 11 for
further discussion of the wind-down of the Companys medium-duty GMC truck franchise
agreements.
8 Segment Information
The Company currently has two reportable business segments: the Truck Segment and the
Construction Equipment Segment. The Truck Segment operates a network of Rush Truck Centers
that provides an integrated one-stop source for the trucking needs of its customers, including
retail sales of new and used medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks; aftermarket parts, service and
body shop facilities; and a wide array of financial services, including the financing of new
and used truck purchases, insurance products and truck leasing and rentals. The Construction
Equipment Segment operates a full-service John Deere construction equipment dealership that
serves the Houston, Texas metropolitan area. Construction Equipment Segment operations include
the retail sale of new and used construction equipment, aftermarket parts and service
facilities, and the financing of new and used construction equipment.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies in the annual report. The Company evaluates performance based
on income before income taxes not including extraordinary items.
The Company accounts for intersegment sales and transfers as if the sales or transfers
were to third parties; that is, at current market prices. There were no material intersegment
sales during the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
8
Table of Contents
The Companys reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different
products and services. They are managed separately because each business unit requires
different technology and marketing strategies. Business units were maintained through
expansion and acquisitions. The following table contains summarized information about
reportable segment profit or loss and segment assets for the periods ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 (in thousands):
Construction | ||||||||||||||||
Truck | Equipment | |||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | All Other | Totals | |||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 289,994 | $ | 8,496 | $ | 3,948 | $ | 302,438 | ||||||||
Segment income (loss) before taxes |
326 | 32 | (608 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||||||||
Segment assets |
900,657 | 30,671 | 26,182 | 957,510 | ||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 901,504 | $ | 29,648 | $ | 12,500 | $ | 943,652 | ||||||||
Segment income (loss) before taxes |
201 | 1,173 | (1,480 | ) | (106 | ) | ||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 392,686 | $ | 16,859 | $ | 4,151 | $ | 413,696 | ||||||||
Segment income (loss) before taxes |
11,727 | 1,108 | (668 | ) | 12,167 | |||||||||||
Segment assets |
984,214 | 29,754 | 27,889 | 1,041,857 | ||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 1,194,984 | $ | 63,928 | $ | 13,360 | $ | 1,272,272 | ||||||||
Segment income (loss) before taxes |
33,910 | 4,876 | (1,432 | ) | 37,354 |
Revenues from segments below the quantitative thresholds requiring them to be reported
separately are attributable to three operating segments of the Company. These segments include
a tire company, an insurance agency, and a hunting lease operation. None of these segments has
ever met any of the quantitative thresholds that would require them to be reported separately.
9 Income Taxes
The Company accrued unrecognized income tax benefits totaling $1.9 million as a component
of accrued liabilities as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The unrecognized tax
benefits of $1.9 million at September 30, 2009, if recognized, would impact the Companys
effective tax rate. Included in this $1.9 million accrual is accrued interest of $185,000
related to unrecognized tax benefits. No amounts were accrued for penalties.
As of September 30, 2009, the tax years ended December 31, 2005, through 2008 remained
subject to examination by tax authorities. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is currently
examining the Companys federal income tax return for the tax years 2005, 2006 and 2007.
Although the ultimate resolution on these examinations has not been reached, management
previously recorded and reassessed its estimate of uncertain tax positions as of September 30,
2009.
Prior to the application of alternative fuel vehicle tax credits, the Company provided
for taxes at a 63.0% rate in the third quarter of 2009, compared to a rate of 37.5% in the
third quarter of 2008. The tax rate in the third quarter of 2009 was offset $3.8 million by
tax credits for sales of alternative fuel vehicles to tax-exempt entities. The tax rate in
the third quarter of 2008 was offset $0.4 million by tax credits for sales of alternative
fuel vehicles to tax-exempt entities. During 2009, the Company has applied for $5.0 million
of alternative fuel vehicle tax credits for sales of alternative fuel vehicles to tax-exempt
municipalities. For the remainder of 2009, the Company expects to provide for taxes at a rate
of 62.0% prior to the application of alternative fuel vehicle tax credits. The increase in
the Companys tax rate during 2009 is primarily due to state taxation regulations and
non-deductible expenses. As a result, the Companys effective tax rate may vary
significantly depending on the number of alternative fuel vehicles sold to tax-exempt entities
in any given period.
9
Table of Contents
10 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair
value of financial instruments at September 30, 2009:
The carrying value of current assets and current liabilities approximates the fair value
due to the short maturity of these items.
The fair value of the Companys long-term debt is based on secondary market indicators.
Since the Companys debt is not quoted, estimates are based on each obligations
characteristics, including remaining maturities, interest rate, credit rating, collateral,
amortization schedule and liquidity. The carrying amount approximates fair value.
11 Medium-Duty GMC Truck Franchises
During the second quarter of 2009, General Motors made the decision to terminate its
medium-duty GMC truck production and wind-down the Companys medium-duty GMC truck franchises,
which forced the Company to take a $6.7 million pre-tax asset impairment charge. The
impairment charge was offset by $1.8 million in assistance from General Motors. In the second
quarter of 2009, this impairment charge resulted in a net charge to cost of sales of $4.0
million, a net charge to SG&A expense of $0.1 million and a charge to amortization expense of
$0.8 million. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company adjusted the estimated impairment
charge related to the medium-duty GMC truck and parts inventories, which resulted in a net
credit to cost of sales of $1.5 million.
12 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC or the Codification) as the source of authoritative
GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive
releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission under federal securities laws are also
sources of authoritative GAAP for Securities and Exchange Commission registrants. The
Codification supercedes all non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting
standards that existed at the Codifications effective date. All guidance contained in the
Codification carries an equal level of authority. These standards are effective for interim
and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
10
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. |
Certain statements contained in this Form 10-Q (or otherwise made by the Company or on
the Companys behalf from time to time in other reports, filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, news releases, conferences, website postings or otherwise) that are not
statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of
1934, as amended(the Exchange Act), notwithstanding that such statements are not
specifically identified. Forward-looking statements include statements about the Companys
financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management of the Company
for future operations. These forward-looking statements reflect the best judgments of the
Company about the future events and trends based on the beliefs of the Companys management as
well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the Companys management.
Use of the words may, should, continue, plan, potential, anticipate, believe,
estimate, expect and intend and words or phrases of similar import, as they relate to
the Company or its subsidiaries or Company management, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.
Forward-looking statements reflect the current view of the Company with respect to future
events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, those set forth under Item 1ARisk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as well as future growth rates and margins for certain of our
products and services, future demand for our products and services, risks associated with the
current recession and its impact on capital markets and liquidity, competitive factors,
general economic conditions, cyclicality, market conditions in the new and used truck and
equipment markets, customer relations, relationships with vendors, the interest rate
environment, governmental regulation and supervision, seasonality, distribution networks,
product introductions and acceptance, technological change, changes in industry practices,
one-time events and other factors described herein and in the Companys quarterly and other
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (collectively, Cautionary
Statements). Although the Company believes that its expectations are reasonable, it can give
no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Based upon changing conditions,
should any one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in any
forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the applicable Cautionary Statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as
the date on which they are made and the Company undertakes no duty to update or revise any
forward-looking statements.
The following comments should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
Note Regarding Trademarks Used in This Form 10-Q
Peterbilt® is a registered trademark of Peterbilt Motors Company.
PACCAR® is a registered trademark of PACCAR, Inc. GMC® is a registered
trademark of General Motors Corporation. Hino® is a registered trademark of Hino
Motors, Ltd. UD® is a registered trademark of Nissan Diesel Motor Co., Ltd.
Isuzu® is a registered trademark of Isuzu Motors Limited. John Deere® is
a registered trademark of Deere & Company. Kenworth® is a registered trademark of
PACCAR, Inc. doing business as Kenworth Truck Company. Volvo® is a registered
trademark of Volvo Trademark Holding AB. Freightliner® is a registered trademark of
Freightliner Corporation. Mack® is a registered trademark of Mack Trucks, Inc.
Navistar® is a registered trademark of Navistar International Corporation.
Caterpillar® is a registered trademark of Caterpillar, Inc. Cummins® is
a registered trademark of Cummins Engine Company, Inc. PacLease® is a registered
trademark of PACCAR Leasing Corporation. CitiCapital® is a registered trademark of
Citicorp. Ford® is a registered trademark of Ford Motor Company.
Cummins® is a registered trademark of Cummins Intellectual Property, Inc. Eaton is
a registered trademark of Eaton Corporation. Arvin Meritor® is a registered
trademark of Meritor Technology, Inc.® Case is a registered trademark of Case
Corporation. Komatsu® is a registered trademark of Kabushiki Kaisha Komatsu
Seisakusho Corporation Japan. The CIT Group® is a registered trademark of CIT
Group Holdings, Inc. JPMorgan Chase® is a registered trademark of JP Morgan Chase
& Co. SAP® is a registered trademark of SAP Aktiengesellschaft.
International® is a registered trademark of Navistar International Transportation
Corp. Blue Bird® is a registered trademark of Blue Bird Investment Corporation.
11
Table of Contents
General
Rush Enterprises, Inc. was incorporated in Texas in 1965 and currently consists of two
operating segments: the Truck Segment and the Construction Equipment Segment. The Company
conducts business through numerous subsidiaries, all of which it wholly owns, directly or indirectly. Its principal offices are located at 555
IH 35 South, New Braunfels, Texas 78130.
The Company is a full-service, integrated retailer of premium transportation and
construction equipment and related services. The Companys Rush Truck Centers sell vehicles
manufactured by Peterbilt Motors Company (a division of PACCAR, Inc.), International, Volvo,
GMC, Hino, UD, Ford, Isuzu and Blue Bird. The Company also operates two John Deere
construction equipment dealerships at its Rush Equipment Centers in Southeast Texas. The
newest construction equipment dealership opened in Rose City, Texas in July 2008. Through its
strategically located network of Rush Truck Centers and its Rush Equipment Centers, the
Company provides one-stop service for the needs of its customers, including retail sales of
new and used trucks and construction equipment, aftermarket parts sales, service and repair
facilities, and financing, leasing and rental, and insurance products.
The Companys Rush Truck Centers are principally located in high traffic areas throughout
the southern United States. Since commencing operations as a Peterbilt heavy-duty truck
dealer in 1966, the Company has grown to operate more than 50 Rush Truck Centers in Alabama,
Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma,
Tennessee and Texas.
Our business strategy consists of providing our customers with competitively priced
products supported with timely and reliable service through our integrated dealer network. We
intend to continue to implement our business strategy, reinforce customer loyalty and remain a
market leader by continuing to develop our Rush Truck Centers and Rush Equipment Centers as we
extend our geographic focus through strategic acquisitions of new locations and expansions of
our existing facilities and product lines.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations are based on the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S.
GAAP). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires the Company to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The
Company believes the following accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined by
specific identification of new and used truck and construction equipment inventory and by the
first-in, first-out method for tires, parts and accessories. An allowance is provided when it
is anticipated that cost will exceed net realizable value.
Goodwill
The Company applies the provisions of ASC topic 350-20, Intangibles Goodwill and
Other (formerly SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets), in accounting for
goodwill. ASC topic 350-20 requires that goodwill and other intangible assets that have
indefinite useful lives may not be amortized, but instead must be tested at least annually for
impairment, and intangible assets that have finite useful lives should continue to be
amortized over their useful lives. ASC topic 350-20 also provides specific guidance for
testing goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets for impairment. ASC topic 350-20
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions in order to allocate goodwill to
reporting units and to determine the fair value of a reporting units net assets and
liabilities, including, among other things, an assessment of market condition, projected cash
flows, interest rates and growth rates, which could significantly impact the reported value of
goodwill and other intangible assets. ASC topic 350-20 requires, in lieu of amortization, an
annual impairment review of goodwill.
The Company performs an annual impairment review of goodwill during the fourth quarter of
each year or when events or circumstances indicate a change may have occurred. An interim
evaluation of goodwill was required during the second quarter of 2009 due to General Motors
decision to terminate production of medium-duty GMC trucks, which resulted in the winding-down
of the Companys medium-duty GMC truck franchises.
Management is not aware of any additional impairment charge that may currently be
required; however, a change in economic conditions, if one occurs, could result in an
impairment charge in future periods.
12
Table of Contents
Revenue Recognition Policies
Income on the sale of a truck or a piece of construction equipment is recognized when the
customer executes a purchase contract with us, the unit has been delivered to the customer and
there are no significant uncertainties related to financing or collectibility. Lease and
rental income is recognized over the period of the related lease or rental agreement. Parts
and service revenue is recognized at the time the Company sells the parts to its customers or
at the time the Company completes the service work order related to service provided to the
customers unit. Payments received on prepaid maintenance plans are deferred as a component of
accrued expenses and recognized as income when the maintenance is performed.
Finance and Insurance Revenue Recognition
Finance income related to the sale of a unit is recognized when the finance contract is
sold to a finance company. The Company arranges financing for customers through various
retail funding sources and receives a commission from the lender equal to either the
difference between the interest rates charged to customers over the predetermined interest
rates set by the financing institution or a commission for the placement of contracts. The
Company also receives commissions from the sale of various insurance products to customers.
Revenue is recognized by the Company upon the sale of such finance and insurance contracts to
the finance and insurance companies net of a provision for estimated repossession losses and
interest charge-backs on finance contracts. The Company is not the obligor under any of these
underlying contracts. In the case of finance contracts, a customer may prepay, or fail to pay,
thereby terminating the underlying contract. If the customer terminates a retail finance
contract or other insurance product prior to scheduled maturity, a portion of the commissions
previously paid to the Company may be charged back to the Company depending on the terms of
the relevant contracts. The estimate of ultimate charge-back exposure is based on the
Companys historical charge-back expense arising from similar contracts, including the impact
of refinance and default rates on retail finance contracts and cancellation rates on other
insurance products. The actual amount of historical charge-backs has not been significantly
different than the Companys estimates.
Insurance Accruals
The Company is partially self-insured for medical, workers compensation, and property and
casualty insurance and calculates a reserve for those claims that have been incurred but not
reported and for the remaining portion of those claims that have been reported. The Company
uses information provided by third-party administrators to determine the reasonableness of the
calculations it performs.
Accounting for Income Taxes
Significant management judgment is required to determine the provisions for income taxes
and to determine whether deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered
or settled. When it is more likely than not that all or some portion of specific deferred
income tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance must be established for the
amount of deferred income tax assets that are determined not to be realizable. The Company
has a valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets in certain states. Accordingly, the
facts and financial circumstances impacting state deferred income tax assets are reviewed
quarterly and managements judgment is applied to determine the amount of valuation allowance
required in any given period.
Additionally, despite the Companys belief that its tax return positions are consistent
with applicable tax law, management believes that certain positions may be challenged by
taxing authorities. Settlement of any challenge can result in no change, a complete
disallowance, or some partial adjustment reached through negotiations.
13
Table of Contents
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted ASC topic 740-10, Income Taxes,
(formerly Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48). ASC topic 740-10
clarified the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC topic 740-10 prescribes how a company
should recognize, measure, present and disclose uncertain tax positions that the company has
taken or expects to take in its income tax returns. ASC topic 740-10 requires that only
income tax benefits that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold be recognized
or continue to be recognized on its effective date. The Companys income tax expense includes
the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that it considers appropriate, as
well as related interest. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue would require use of
the Companys cash and a charge to income tax expense. Favorable resolution would be
recognized as a reduction to income tax expense at the time of resolution.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The Company applies the provisions of ASC topic 718-10, Compensation Stock
Compensation (formerly SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment), which requires
the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards
made to employees and directors including grants of employee stock options and restricted
stock and employee stock purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on estimated
fair values.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of
share-based payment awards on the date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that
is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in
the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations.
14
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis includes the Companys historical results of
operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain financial data as a
percentage of total revenues:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
New and used truck sales |
59.2 | % | 62.7 | % | 59.6 | % | 63.5 | % | ||||||||
Parts and service |
34.0 | 30.0 | 33.4 | 28.5 | ||||||||||||
Construction equipment sales |
1.5 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
Lease and rental |
4.4 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Finance and insurance |
0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Other |
0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||
Cost of products sold |
81.2 | 81.5 | 81.8 | 82.0 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
18.8 | 18.5 | 18.2 | 18.0 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
17.2 | 14.1 | 16.4 | 13.7 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.2 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
0.4 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 3.4 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
-0.1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
-1.1 | 1.0 | -0.5 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
Net Income |
1.0 | % | 2.0 | % | 0.5 | % | 1.9 | % | ||||||||
The following table sets forth the unit sales and revenue for new heavy-duty, new
medium-duty, and used trucks and the absorption rate for the periods indicated (revenue in
millions):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | % | September 30, | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Change | 2009 | 2008 | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Truck unit sales: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New heavy-duty trucks |
1,030 | 1,350 | (23.7 | %) | 3,016 | 4,281 | (29.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
New medium-duty trucks |
637 | 919 | (30.7 | %) | 2,029 | 2,870 | (29.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total new truck unit sales |
1,667 | 2,269 | (26.5 | %) | 5,045 | 7,151 | (29.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Used truck unit sales |
760 | 936 | (18.8 | %) | 2,113 | 2,631 | (19.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Truck revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
New heavy-duty trucks |
$ | 116.2 | $ | 162.4 | (28.4 | %) | $ | 356.5 | $ | 515.6 | (30.9 | %) | ||||||||||||
New medium-duty trucks |
37.1 | 54.2 | (31.5 | %) | 126.6 | 166.5 | (24.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Total new truck revenue |
$ | 153.3 | $ | 216.6 | (29.2 | %) | $ | 483.1 | $ | 682.1 | (29.2 | %) | ||||||||||||
Used truck revenue |
$ | 25.6 | $ | 41.8 | (38.8 | %) | $ | 78.1 | $ | 122.8 | (36.4 | %) | ||||||||||||
Other truck revenue(1) |
$ | 0.2 | $ | 1.1 | (81.8 | %) | $ | 1.1 | $ | 3.3 | (66.7 | %) | ||||||||||||
Absorption rate: |
96.4 | % | 108.6 | % | (11.2 | %) | 96.3 | % | 106.3 | % | (9.4 | %) | ||||||||||||
(1) | Includes sales of glider kits, truck bodies, trailers and other new equipment. |
15
Table of Contents
Key Performance Indicator
Absorption Rate
Management uses many performance metrics to evaluate the performance of its truck
dealerships, but considers its absorption rate to be of critical importance. Absorption
rate is calculated by dividing the gross profit from the parts, service and body shop
departments by the overhead expenses of all of a truck dealerships departments, except for
the selling expenses of the new and used truck departments and carrying costs of new and used
truck inventory. When 100% absorption is achieved, then gross profit from the sale of a
truck, after sales commissions and inventory carrying costs, directly impacts operating
profit. In 1999, the Companys truck dealerships absorption rate was approximately 80%. The
Company has made a concerted effort to increase its absorption rate since 1999. The Companys
truck dealerships achieved a 108.6% absorption rate for the third quarter of 2008, and 96.4%
absorption rate for the third quarter in 2009.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
As expected, continued weak truck and aftermarket sales caused the third quarter of 2009
to be another challenging operating period. The Companys Class 8 truck deliveries increased
in the third quarter of 2009 over the second quarter of 2009, as several large fleet customers
took delivery of trucks. This helped mitigate the effect of continued depressed U.S. Class 8
retail truck sales, which were down 33.0% over the third quarter of 2008, while the Companys
truck sales were down only 24.0% for the same time period.
The Company does not anticipate a significant truck pre-buy to occur in the fourth
quarter of 2009 as lingering depressed conditions in the overall economy and tight credit
continue to negatively impact freight movement, causing continued excess capacity and
depressed trade values. These factors have forced both vocational and fleet buyers to
lengthen their replacement cycles beyond historical norms, most likely extending any
substantial upturn in new truck purchases well into the second half of 2010.
Aftermarket parts, service and body shop sales were negatively impacted by excess
capacity again this quarter, as many customers have been able to put their excess truck
capacity into service, allowing them to delay repair and maintenance and use parked trucks for
replacement parts needs. A 21.0% decline in parts, service and body shop gross profit was
offset by a reduction in general and administrative expenses of 9.0%, resulting in an
absorption rate of 96.4% in the third quarter of 2009.
A.C.T. Research Co., LLC (A.C.T. Research), a truck industry data and forecasting
service provider, currently predicts U.S. retail sales of Class 8 trucks of approximately
94,800 units in 2009, a 32.2% decline from the number of units sold in 2008. The Company
believes the Class 8 truck market will remain weak until general economic conditions in the
U.S. begin to improve. A.C.T. Research currently predicts U.S. retail sales of Class 8 trucks
of approximately 119,500 units in 2010.
A.C.T. Research currently predicts U.S. retail sales of Class 4, 5, 6, and 7 medium-duty
trucks of approximately 106,000 units in 2009, a 38.9% decline from the number of units sold
in 2008. The Company believes the medium-duty truck market will remain weak until general
economic conditions in the U.S. begin to improve. A.C.T. Research currently predicts U.S.
retail sales of Class 4, 5, 6, and 7 medium-duty trucks of approximately 123,500 units in
2010.
The Companys overall parts, service and body shop sales decreased 17.2% in the third
quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008. We anticipate parts, service and body
shop sales to remain weak until general economic conditions improve.
In the third quarter of 2009, the Companys construction equipment segment revenue
decreased by 49.6% compared to the third quarter of 2008. This decrease is attributable to
the weakening construction equipment market in the Houston area. Current industry forecasts
suggest that construction equipment sales will decline approximately 50% in the Companys area
of responsibility during 2009 due to lower housing starts, decreased oil and gas activity and
general economic conditions.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company incurred a $4.9 million pre-tax impairment
charge related to General Motors decision to discontinue manufacturing medium-duty trucks and
to wind-down the Companys GMC Medium-Duty Truck Dealership Agreements. A significant portion
of the impairment charge was an estimate of the inventory valuation allowance associated with
the disposal of the Companys remaining GMC truck and parts inventories. During the third
quarter, the Company adjusted the estimated impairment charge related to its GMC truck and
parts inventory
because it was able to sell some of the GMC inventory at higher prices than originally
estimated, which resulted in an increase to pre-tax earnings of approximately $1.5 million, or
$0.02 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2009.
16
Table of Contents
The Company earns federal income tax credits on the sale of alternative fuel vehicles to
tax-exempt entities. These tax credits are reflected as tax benefits in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Operations. A portion of these tax credits are passed back to the
tax-exempt customer and are reflected as SG&A expense to the Company in the quarter in which
the trucks are sold. These alternative fuel tax credits and the amount passed back to the
customers are directly attributable to the sale of a truck. Accordingly, the Company believes
the tax credits and the amounts passed back to customers should be considered operating items
when analyzing the financial performance of the Company. The Company believes its history of
serving municipalities and other tax-exempt customers that cannot claim these federal tax
credits, its ability to utilize tax credits and pass back savings to these tax-exempt
customers, and its position as a leading dealer of alternative fuel vehicles provide the
Company with a distinct advantage over its competition when offering alternative fuel vehicles
to tax-exempt entities.
The ongoing weakness in the economy and tight credit markets continue to impact consumer
confidence and spending, which have a direct impact on freight demand and, ultimately, our
financial performance. Overall economic uncertainty continues to make it difficult for the
Company to forecast future results of operations.
Revenues
Revenues decreased $111.3 million, or 26.9%, in the third quarter of 2009, compared to
the third quarter of 2008. Sales of new and used trucks decreased $80.4 million, or 31.0%, in
the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. Uncertain economic
conditions, the weak freight environment, slowing construction markets and tight credit
markets contributed to decreased demand for trucks and construction equipment as well as
aftermarket service in the third quarter of 2009. The Company does not believe that demand
for its products and services will increase until general economic conditions begin to improve
and credit is made available on reasonable terms to a wider range of buyers.
The Company sold 1,030 heavy-duty units in the third quarter of 2009, a 23.7% decrease
compared to 1,350 heavy-duty trucks in the third quarter of 2008. According to A.C.T.
Research, the U.S. Class 8 truck market decreased 33.0% in the third quarter of 2009, compared
to the third quarter of 2008. The Companys share of the U.S. Class 8 truck sales market was
approximately 3.9% in 2008. The Company expects its share to range between 3.9% and 4.2% of
the U.S. Class 8 truck market in 2009, which would result in the sale of approximately 3,600
to 4,000 Class 8 trucks based on A.C.T. Researchs current U.S. retail sales estimates of
94,800 units.
The Company sold 637 medium-duty trucks, including 76 buses, in the third quarter of
2009, a 30.7% decrease compared to 919 medium-duty trucks, including 74 buses, in the third
quarter of 2008. A.C.T. Research estimates that unit sales of Class 4 through 7 trucks in the
U.S. decreased approximately 31.0% in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter
of 2008. In 2008, the Company achieved a 2.1% share of the Class 4 through 7 truck sales
market in the U.S. The Company expects its share to range between 2.4% and 2.5% of the U.S.
Class 4 through 7 truck sales market in 2009. This market share percentage would result in
the sale of approximately 2,600 to 2,800 of Class 4 through 7 trucks in 2009 based on A.C.T.
Researchs current U.S. retail sales estimates of 106,000 units.
The Company sold 760 used trucks in the third quarter of 2009, an 18.8% decrease compared
to 936 used trucks in the third quarter of 2008. For 2009, used truck sales volumes and
prices will be primarily driven by general economic conditions and the availability of credit,
which collectively have had a severe impact on this market since 2008. The Company expects to
sell approximately 2,700 to 2,900 used trucks in 2009.
Parts and service sales decreased $21.3 million, or 17.2%, in the third quarter of 2009,
compared to the third quarter of 2008. The Company expects parts and service sales to remain
weak through the remainder of 2009.
Sales of new and used construction equipment decreased $7.2 million, or 62.1%, in the
third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. This decrease was largely
attributable to the weakening construction market in the Houston area. John Deeres rolling
twelve month average market share in the Houston area construction equipment market increased
to 20.3% as of September 30, 2009, from a rolling twelve month average of 17.7% as of
September 30, 2008. In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company expects new construction
equipment unit sales in our area of responsibility to decrease approximately 60% to 70%,
compared to 2008.
Truck lease and rental revenues decreased $0.9 million, or 6.4%, in the third quarter of
2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in lease and rental revenue is
primarily attributable to decreased utilization of vehicles in the Companys rental fleet and
decreased variable rental revenue that is based on the miles that vehicles being leased are
driven. The Company expects lease and rental revenue to remain flat for the remainder of
2009, compared to 2008.
17
Table of Contents
Finance and insurance revenues decreased $1.0 million, or 35.8%, in the third quarter of
2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in finance and insurance revenue is
a direct result of the decline in truck sales and the tight credit market. The Company
expects finance and insurance revenue to fluctuate proportionately with the new Class 8 truck
market in 2009. Finance and insurance revenues have limited direct costs and, therefore,
contribute a disproportionate share of the Companys operating profits.
Other income decreased $0.4 million, or 30.0% in the third quarter of 2009, compared to
the third quarter of 2008. Other income consists primarily of the gain on sale realized on
trucks from the lease and rental fleet, commissions earned from John Deere for direct
manufacturer sales into our area of responsibility, document fees related to truck sales and
purchase discounts.
Gross Profit
Gross profit decreased $19.4 million, or 25.4%, in the third quarter of 2009, compared to
the third quarter of 2008. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased to 18.8% in the
third quarter of 2009, from 18.5% in the third quarter of 2008. This slight increase is
primarily a result of a change in our product sales mix. Truck sales, a lower margin revenue
item, decreased as a percentage of total revenue to 59.2% in the third quarter of 2009, from
62.7% in the third quarter of 2008. Parts and service revenue, a higher margin revenue item,
increased as a percentage of total revenue to 34.0% in the third quarter of 2009, from 30.0%
in the third quarter of 2008.
Gross margins on Class 8 truck sales decreased to 4.5% in the third quarter of 2009, from
6.8% in the third quarter of 2008. Gross margins on Class 8 truck sales were negatively
impacted by decreased demand for new trucks and a change in our product sales mix that
included increased fleet sales, which are a lower margin revenue item. For the remainder of
2009, the Company expects overall gross margins from Class 8 truck sales of approximately 5.0%
to 7.0%.
Gross margins on medium-duty truck sales increased to 11.1% in the third quarter of 2009,
from 5.2% in the third quarter of 2008. The increase in gross margin during the third quarter
of 2009 is largely attributable to a $1.4 million adjustment to the valuation allowance
related to GMC medium-duty truck inventory that was recorded in the second quarter of 2009.
The Company adjusted the valuation allowance because it was able to sell some of the GMC
medium-duty truck inventory at higher prices than originally estimated. For the remainder of
2009, the Company expects overall gross margins from medium-duty truck sales of approximately
5.0% to 7.0%.
Gross margins on used truck sales increased to 9.3% in the third quarter of 2009, from
8.8% in the third quarter of 2008. The Company expects margins on used trucks will be in the
range of approximately 6.5% to 8.5% during the remainder of 2009, but this will largely depend
upon general economic conditions and the availability of credit.
Gross margins from the Companys parts, service and body shop operations decreased to
39.8% in the third quarter of 2009, from 41.4% in the third quarter of 2008. Gross profit for
the parts, service and body shop departments decreased to $40.9 million in the third quarter
of 2009, from $51.3 million in the third quarter of 2008. The Company expects gross margins
on parts, service and body shop operations of approximately 39.0% to 41.0% during the
remainder of 2009.
Gross margins on new and used construction equipment sales decreased to 2.1% in the third
quarter of 2009, from 8.9% in the third quarter of 2008. This decrease in gross margin is
primarily attributable to a dramatic decrease in demand for construction equipment and change
in our product sales mix. The Company expects gross margins for the remainder of 2009 to
range from approximately 4.0% to 8.0% as the Company continues its efforts to increase its
market share.
Gross margins from truck lease and rental sales decreased to 11.6% in the third quarter
of 2009, from approximately 15.7% in the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in lease and
rental revenue is primarily attributable to decreased utilization of vehicles in the Companys
rental fleet and decreased variable rental revenue that is based on the miles that vehicles
being leased are driven. The Company expects gross margins from lease and rental sales of
approximately 11.0% to 16.0% during the remainder of 2009. The Companys policy is to
depreciate its lease and rental fleet using a straight line method over the customers
contractual lease term. The lease unit is depreciated to a residual value that approximates
fair value at the expiration of the lease term. This policy results in the Company realizing
reasonable gross margins while the unit is in service and a corresponding gain or loss on sale
when the unit is sold at the end of the lease term.
Finance and insurance revenues and other income, as described above, have limited direct
costs and, therefore, contribute a disproportionate share of gross profit.
18
Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased $6.4 million, or 11.0%,
in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. SG&A expenses as a
percentage of sales increased to 17.2% in the third quarter of 2009, from 14.1% in the third
quarter of 2008. SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales have historically ranged from 10.0%
to 15.0%. In general, when new and used truck revenue decreases as a percentage of revenue,
SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue will be at, or exceed, the higher end of this range.
In the third quarter of 2009, the selling portion of SG&A expenses, which consists primarily
of commissions on truck and construction equipment sales, decreased 32.7% and the general and
administrative portion of SG&A expenses decreased 9.0% compared to the third quarter of 2008.
The Company earns federal income tax credits on the sale of alternative fuel vehicles to
tax-exempt entities. A portion of these tax credits are passed back to the tax-exempt
customer and are reflected as SG&A expense to the Company. For the remainder of 2009, the
Company expects the selling portion of SG&A expenses to be approximately 25% to 28% of new and
used truck gross profit. The selling portion of SG&A expenses varies based on the gross
profit derived from truck sales. The Company has taken continuous action throughout the past
two years to reduce overhead expenses to a level more appropriate to serve the declining
market. The Company will continue to adjust the general and administrative portion of SG&A
expenses in accordance with market conditions.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense decreased $0.3 million, or 15.9%, in the third quarter of 2009,
compared to the third quarter of 2008. If floor plan interest rates remain at current levels,
the Company expects net interest expense in 2009 to decrease approximately 15.0% compared to
2008.
Income Before Income Taxes
Income before income taxes decreased $12.4 million, or 102.1%, in the third quarter of
2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, as a result of the factors described above.
Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased $7.4 million, or 178.2%, in the third quarter of 2009, compared to
the third quarter of 2008. Prior to the application of alternative fuel vehicle tax credits,
the Company provided for taxes at a 63.0% rate in the third quarter of 2009, compared to a
rate of 37.5% in the third quarter of 2008. The tax rate in the third quarter of 2009 was
offset $3.8 million by tax credits for sales of alternative fuel vehicles to tax-exempt
entities. The tax rate in the third quarter of 2008 was offset $0.4 million by tax credits
for sales of alternative fuel vehicles to tax-exempt entities. For the remainder of 2009, the
Company expects to provide for taxes at a rate of 62.0% prior to the application of
alternative fuel vehicle tax credits. The increase in the Companys tax rate during 2009 is
primarily due to state taxation regulations and non-deductible expenses. The Companys
effective tax rate may vary significantly depending on the number of alternative fuel vehicles
sold to tax-exempt entities.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Unless otherwise stated below, the Companys variance explanations and future
expectations with regard to the items discussed in this section are set forth in the
discussion of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended
September 30, 2008.
Revenues decreased $328.6 million, or 25.8%, in the first nine months of 2009, compared
to the first nine months of 2008. Sales of new and used trucks decreased $245.9 million, or
30.4%, in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.
The Company sold 3,016 heavy-duty units in the first nine months of 2009, a 29.5%
decrease compared to 4,281 heavy-duty trucks in the first nine months of 2008. According to
A.C.T. Research, the U.S. Class 8 truck market decreased 35.0% in the first nine months of
2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.
The Company sold 2,029 medium-duty trucks, including 287 buses, in the first nine months
of 2009, a 29.3% decrease compared to 2,870 medium-duty trucks, including 74 buses, in the
first nine months of 2008. A.C.T. Research estimates that unit sales of Class 4 through 7
vehicles in the U.S decreased approximately 42.0% in the first nine months of 2009, compared
to the first nine months of 2008.
19
Table of Contents
The Company sold 2,113 used trucks in the first nine months of 2009, a 19.7% decrease
compared to 2,631 used trucks in the first nine months of 2008.
Parts and service sales decreased $47.4 million, or 13.1%, in the first nine months of
2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.
Sales of new and used construction equipment decreased $30.7 million, or 64.5%, in the
first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.
Truck lease and rental revenues decreased $0.6 million, or 1.5%, in the first nine months
of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.
Finance and insurance revenues decreased $3.8 million, or 39.8%, in the first nine months
of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.
Other income decreased $0.2 million, or 5.8%, in the first nine months of 2009, compared
to the first nine months of 2008. Other income consists of the gain on sale realized on
trucks from the lease and rental fleet, commissions earned from John Deere for direct
manufacturer sales into our area of responsibility, document fees related to truck sales and
purchase discounts.
Gross Profit
Gross profit decreased $57.6 million, or 25.1%, in the first nine months of 2009,
compared to the first nine months of 2008. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased to
18.2% in the first nine months of 2009, from 18.0% in the first nine months of 2008. Truck
sales, a lower margin revenue item, decreased as a percentage of total revenue to 59.6% in the
first nine months of 2009, from 63.5% in the first nine months of 2008. Parts and service
revenue, a higher margin revenue item, increased as a percentage of total revenue to 33.4% in
the first nine months of 2009, from 28.5% in the first nine months of 2008.
Gross margins on Class 8 truck sales decreased to 5.7% in the first nine months of 2009,
from 7.9% in the first nine months of 2008.
Gross margins on medium-duty truck sales decreased to 5.2% in the first nine months of
2009, from 5.5% in the first nine months of 2008.
Gross margins on used truck sales increased to 6.6% in the first nine months of 2009,
from 3.4% in the first nine months of 2008. The lower level of gross margins in the first
nine months of 2008 was primarily the result of a $5.4 million write-down of used truck
inventory in the second quarter of 2008.
Gross margins from the Companys parts, service and body shop operations decreased to
39.3% in the first nine months of 2009, from 41.6% in the first nine months of 2008. Gross
profit for the parts, service and body shop departments was $123.6 million in the first nine
months of 2009, compared to $150.8 million in the first nine months of 2008.
Gross margins on new and used construction equipment sales were 7.1% in the first nine
months of 2009, compared to 9.6% in the first nine months of 2008.
Gross margins from truck lease and rental sales decreased to 11.8% in the first nine
months of 2009, from approximately 14.8% in the first nine months of 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses decreased $20.0 million, or 11.5%, in the first nine months of 2009,
compared to the first nine months of 2008. SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales was 16.4%
in the first nine months of 2009, and 13.7% in the first nine months of 2008.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense decreased $0.9 million, or 15.5%, in the first nine months of 2009,
compared to the first nine months of 2008.
20
Table of Contents
Income before Income Taxes
Income before income taxes decreased $37.5 million, or 100.3%, in the first nine months
of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased $18.1 million, or 132.7%, in the first nine months of 2009,
compared to the first nine months of 2008. The Company provided for taxes at a 62.0% rate in
the first nine months of 2009, compared to a rate of 37.5% in the first nine months of 2008.
The tax rate in the first nine months of 2009 was offset $5.0 million by tax credits for sales
of alternative fuel vehicles to tax-exempt entities. The tax rate in the first nine months of
2008 was offset $0.4 million by tax credits for sales of alternative fuel vehicles to
tax-exempt entities. The increase in the Companys tax rate during 2009 is primarily due to
state taxation regulations and non-deductible expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys short-term cash requirements are primarily for working capital, inventory
financing, the improvement and expansion of existing facilities, the implementation of SAP
enterprise software and dealership management system, and the construction of new facilities.
Historically, these cash requirements have been met through the retention of profits and
borrowings under our floor plan arrangements. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had
working capital of approximately $146.6 million, including $136.7 million in cash available to
fund our operations. The Company believes that these funds are sufficient to meet its
short-term and long-term cash requirements.
The Company may request working capital advances in the minimum amount of $100,000 under
its Amended and Restated Wholesale Security Agreement with GE Capital, its primary truck
lender. However, such working capital advances may not cause the total indebtedness owed GE
Capital to exceed an amount equal to the wholesale advances made against the then current
inventory less any payment reductions then due. There were no working capital advances
outstanding under this agreement at September 30, 2009.
The Company has a secured line of credit that provides for a maximum borrowing of $8.0
million. There were no advances outstanding under this secured line of credit at September
30, 2009, however, $6.1 million was pledged to secure various letters of credit related to
self-insurance products, leaving $1.9 million available for future borrowings as of September
30, 2009.
The Companys long-term real estate debt agreements require the Company to satisfy
various financial ratios such as the debt to worth ratio and the fixed charge coverage ratio.
The Companys floor plan financing agreement with GE Capital does not contain financial
covenants. At September 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants. The
Company does not anticipate any breach of the covenants in the foreseeable future.
Titan Technology Partners is currently implementing SAP enterprise software and a new SAP
dealership management system for the Company. The total cost of the SAP software and
implementation is estimated to be approximately $32.0 million. As of September 30, 2009, the
Company had cumulative expenditures of $26.5 million related to the SAP project. The Company
expects to spend approximately $2.1 million to $2.6 million related to the SAP project during
the remainder of 2009.
The Company is currently constructing a new facility for its Rush Truck Center location
in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma at an estimated cost of $14.5 million. As of September 30, 2009,
the Company had expenditures of $12.7 million related to the construction of the new facility.
The Company also expects to make capital expenditures for recurring items such as
computers, shop tools and equipment and vehicles of approximately $5.0 million during 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had expenditures of approximately $4.0 million related
to these recurring items.
On July 22, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program
authorizing the Company to repurchase, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $20,000,000 of
its shares of Class A common stock and/or Class B common stock. Repurchases will be made at
times and in amounts as the Company deems appropriate and will be made through open market
transactions, privately negotiated transactions and other lawful means. The manner, timing and
amount of any repurchases will be determined by the Company based on an evaluation of market
conditions, stock price and other factors, including those related to the ownership
requirements of its dealership agreements with manufacturers it
represents. The stock repurchase program has no expiration date and may be suspended or
discontinued at any time. While the stock repurchase program does not obligate the Company to
acquire any particular amount or class of common stock, the Company anticipates that it will
be repurchasing primarily shares of its Class B common stock. As of September 30, 2009, the
Company has repurchased 1,639,843 shares of its Class B common stock at an aggregate cost of
$17.9 million, none of which occurred during the third quarter of 2009.
21
Table of Contents
The Company currently anticipates funding its capital expenditures relating to the SAP
software and implementation, construction of new Rush Truck Centers, recurring expenses and
any stock repurchases through its operating cash flow. The Company expects to finance 70% to
80% of the appraised value of newly constructed Rush Truck Centers upon completion, which will
increase the Companys cash and cash equivalents by that amount.
The Company has no other material commitments for capital expenditures as of September
30, 2009, except that the Company will continue to purchase vehicles for its lease and rental
division and authorize capital expenditures for improvement and expansion of its dealership
facilities based on market opportunities. The Company expects to purchase or lease trucks
worth approximately $35.0 million for its leasing operations in 2009, depending on customer
demand, which it will finance.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $9.7 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, and decreased by $42.5 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The major components of these changes are discussed below.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities include net income adjusted for non-cash items and
the effects of changes in working capital. During the first nine months of 2009, operating
activities resulted in net cash provided by operations of $130.7 million. Cash provided by
operating activities was primarily impacted by the decrease in inventories and accounts
receivable which was offset by the decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses. During
the first nine months of 2008, operating activities resulted in net cash provided by
operations of $66.0 million.
Cash flows from operating activities as adjusted for all draws and (payments) on floor
plan notes (Adjusted Cash Flows from Operating Activities) was $44.7 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, and $68.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Generally, all vehicle and construction equipment dealers finance the purchase of
vehicles and construction equipment with floor plan borrowings, and our agreements with our
floor plan providers require us to repay amounts borrowed for the purchase of such vehicles
and equipment immediately after they are sold. As a result, changes in floor plan notes
payable are directly linked to changes in vehicle and construction equipment inventory.
However, as reflected in our consolidated statements of cash flows, changes in inventory are
recorded as cash flows from operating activities, and draws and (payments) on floor plan notes
are recorded as cash flows from financing activities.
Management believes that information about Adjusted Cash Flows from Operating Activities
provides investors with a relevant measure of liquidity and a useful basis for assessing the
Companys ability to fund its activities and obligations from operating activities. Floor
plan notes payable is classified as a current liability and, therefore, is included in the
working capital amounts discussed above.
Adjusted Cash Flows from Operating Activities is a non-GAAP financial measure and should
be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, cash flows from operating
activities as reported in our consolidated statements of cash flows in accordance with U.S.
GAAP. Additionally, this measure may vary among other companies; thus, Adjusted Cash Flows
from Operating Activities as presented herein may not be comparable to similarly titled
non-GAAP financial measures of other companies. Set forth below is a reconciliation of cash
flow from operating activities as reported in our consolidated statement of cash flows, as if
all changes in floor plan notes payable were classified as an operating activity (in
thousands).
Nine months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities (U.S. GAAP) |
$ | 130,709 | $ | 66,026 | ||||
(Draws) payments on floor plan notes payable |
(86,053 | ) | 2,546 | |||||
Adjusted Cash Flows from Operating Activities (Non-GAAP) |
$ | 44,656 | $ | 68,572 | ||||
22
Table of Contents
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
During the first nine months of 2009, cash used in investing activities was $32.5
million. Cash flows used in investing activities consist primarily of cash used for capital
expenditures. Capital expenditures of $33.0 million consisted of purchases of property and
equipment, improvements to our existing dealership facilities and construction of our new
facility in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Property and equipment purchases during the first nine
months of 2009 consisted of $9.8 million for additional units for the rental and leasing
operations, which was directly offset by borrowings of long-term debt. The Company expects to
purchase or lease trucks worth approximately $35.0 million for its leasing operations in 2009,
depending on customer demand, all of which will be financed. During 2009, the Company expects
to make capital expenditures for recurring items such as computers, shop equipment and
vehicles of approximately $5.0 million in addition to $7.0 million to $8.0 million for the SAP
project described above.
During the first nine months of 2008, cash used in investing activities was $90.0
million. The Company purchased investments of $355.6 million which was offset by proceeds
from the sale of these investments of $348.0 million. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for an explanation of these investments. Capital expenditures consisted
of purchases of property and equipment, and improvements to our existing dealership facilities
of $46.5 million. Property and equipment purchases during the first nine months of 2008
consisted of $17.6 million for additional units for the rental and leasing operations, which
was directly offset by borrowings of long-term debt. Cash used in business acquisitions was
$37.4 million during the first nine months of 2008.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash flows from financing activities include borrowings and repayments of long-term debt
and net proceeds of floor plan notes payable. Cash used in financing activities was $107.9
million during the first nine months of 2009. The Company had borrowings of long-term debt of
$14.4 million and repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $37.3 million
during the first nine months of 2009. The Company had net payments of floor plan notes
payable of $86.1 million during the first nine months of 2009. The borrowings of long-term
debt were primarily related to units for the rental and leasing operations.
Cash used in financing activities was $18.5 million during the first nine months of 2008.
The Company had borrowings of long-term debt of $21.1 million and repayments of long-term
debt and capital lease obligations of $33.8 million during the first nine months of 2008.
The Company had net draws of floor plan notes payable of $2.5 million during the first nine
months of 2008. The borrowings of long-term debt were primarily related to refinancing of
real estate and financing of the lease and rental fleet.
Substantially all of the Companys truck purchases are made on terms requiring payment
within 15 days or less from the date the trucks are invoiced from the factory. Effective
August 1, 2007, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Wholesale Security Agreement
with GE Capital. Interest under the floor plan financing agreement is payable monthly and the
rate varies from LIBOR plus 1.15% to LIBOR plus 1.50% depending on the average aggregate
month-end balance of debt. The Company finances substantially all of the purchase price of
its new truck inventory, and the loan value of its used truck inventory under the floor plan
financing agreement with GE Capital, under which GE Capital pays the manufacturer directly
with respect to new trucks. The Company makes monthly interest payments to GE Capital on the
amount financed, but is not required to commence loan principal repayments on any vehicle
until such vehicle has been floor planned for 12 months or is sold. The floor plan financing
agreement allows for prepayments and working capital advances with monthly adjustments to the
interest due on outstanding advances. On September 30, 2009, the Company had approximately
$176.9 million outstanding under its floor plan financing agreement with GE Capital.
Substantially all of the Companys new construction equipment purchases are financed by
John Deere and JPMorgan Chase (Chase). The agreement with John Deere provides an interest
free financing period after which time the amount financed is required to be paid in full.
When construction equipment is sold prior to the expiration of the interest free finance
period, the Company is required to repay the principal within approximately ten days of the
sale. If the construction equipment financed by John Deere is not sold within the interest
free finance period, it is transferred to the Chase floor plan arrangement. New and used
construction equipment is financed to a maximum of book value under a floor plan arrangement
with Chase. The Company makes monthly interest payments on the amount financed and is
required to commence loan principal repayments on construction equipment as book value is
reduced. Principal payments for sold new and used construction equipment are made to Chase no
later than the 15th day of each month following the sale. The loans are
collateralized by a lien on the construction equipment. As of September 30, 2009, the
Companys floor plan arrangement with Chase permitted the financing of up to $20.0 million in
construction equipment. On September 30, 2009, the Company
had $4.5 million outstanding under its floor plan financing arrangements with John Deere and
$15.2 million outstanding under its floor plan financing arrangement with Chase.
23
Table of Contents
Backlog
On September 30, 2009, the Companys backlog of truck orders was approximately $98.0
million compared to a backlog of truck orders of approximately $168.4 million on September 30,
2008. The Company includes only confirmed orders in its backlog. The Company sells the
majority of its new trucks by customer special order, with the remainder sold out of
inventory. The delivery time for a custom-ordered truck varies depending on the truck
specifications and demand for the particular model ordered; however, due to the decreased
demand for trucks, delivery times for heavy-duty trucks have decreased significantly from
delivery times during periods of peak demand.
Seasonality
The Companys truck business is moderately seasonal. Seasonal effects on new truck sales
related to the seasonal purchasing patterns of any single customer type are mitigated by the
Companys diverse customer base, including small and large fleets, governments, corporations
and owner operators. However, truck parts and service operations historically have experienced
higher volumes of sales in the second and third quarters.
Seasonal effects in the construction equipment business are weather-related. Seasonal
effects on construction equipment sales related to the seasonal purchasing patterns of any
single customer type are mitigated by the Companys diverse customer base that includes
contractors for residential and commercial construction, utility companies, federal, state and
local government agencies, and various petrochemical, industrial and material supply
businesses that require construction equipment in their daily operations.
Cyclicality
The Companys business is dependent on a number of factors relating to general economic
conditions, including fuel prices, interest rate fluctuations, economic recessions,
environmental and other government regulations and customer business cycles. Unit sales of new
trucks have historically been subject to substantial cyclical variation based on these general
economic conditions. According to data published by A.C.T. Research, in recent years total
domestic retail sales of new Class 8 trucks have ranged from a low of approximately 140,000 in
2001 and 2008 to a high of approximately 291,000 in 2006. Through geographic expansion,
concentration on higher margin parts and service operations and diversification of its
customer base, the Company believes it can reduce the negative impact on the Companys
earnings of cyclical trends affecting the heavy-duty truck industry.
Environmental Standards and Other Governmental Regulations
Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations,
including laws and regulations designed to protect the environment by regulating the discharge
of materials into the environment. EPA emission guidelines have traditionally had a major
impact on our operations.
EPA emissions guidelines regarding nitrous oxides are scheduled to go into effect for all
diesel engines built subsequent to January 1, 2010. Changes in diesel engine emissions
guidelines have traditionally resulted in significant pre-buys of Class 8 trucks in the period
prior to the effective date of such emission guidelines. However, based on current economic
and market conditions, the Company does not expect as significant of a pre-buy of Class 8
trucks to occur in 2009 as has occurred in the past. The magnitude of any pre-buy will be
largely dependent upon general economic conditions in the U.S. through the remainder of 2009.
24
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Market risk, including interest rate risk and other relevant market rate or price risks,
represents the risk of loss that may impact the financial position, results of operations, or
cash flows of the Company.
The Company is exposed to some market risk through interest rates related to our floor
plan financing agreements, variable rate debt and discount rates related to finance sales.
Floor plan borrowings are based on LIBOR and are used to meet working capital needs. As of
September 30, 2009, the Company had floor plan borrowings of approximately $196.6 million.
Assuming an increase or decrease in LIBOR of 100 basis points, annual interest expense could
correspondingly increase or decrease by approximately $2.0 million. The Company provides all
customer financing opportunities to various finance providers. The Company receives all
finance charges in excess of a negotiated discount rate from the finance providers in the
month following the date of the financing. The negotiated discount rate is variable, thus
subject to interest rate fluctuations. This interest rate risk is mitigated by the Companys
ability to pass discount rate increases to customers through higher financing rates.
The Company is also exposed to some market risk through interest rates related to the
investment of our current cash and cash equivalents which totaled $136.7 million on September
30, 2009. These funds are generally invested as a prepayment against our floor plan financing
debt or in variable interest rate instruments in accordance with the Companys investment
policy. As such instruments mature and the funds are reinvested, we are exposed to changes in
market interest rates. This risk is mitigated by managements ongoing evaluation of the best
investment rates available for current and noncurrent high quality investments. If market
interest rates were to increase or decrease immediately and uniformly by 100 basis points, the
Companys annual earnings on cash and cash equivalents could correspondingly increase or
decrease by approximately $1.4 million.
In the past, the Company invested in interest-bearing short-term investments consisting
of investment-grade auction rate securities classified as available-for-sale. As a result of
the recent liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, auctions for
investment grade securities held by the Company have failed. The auction rate securities
continue to pay interest in accordance with the terms of the underlying security; however,
liquidity will be limited until there is a successful auction or until such time as other
markets for these investments develop.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company holds $7.6 million of auction rate securities with
underlying tax-exempt municipal bonds with stated maturities of 21 years. Given the current
market conditions in the auction rate securities market, if the Company determines that the
fair value of these securities has temporarily decreased by 10%, the Companys equity could
correspondingly decrease by approximately $0.8 million. If it is determined that the fair
value of these securities is other-than-temporarily impaired by 10%, the Company could record
a loss on its Consolidated Statements of Operations of approximately $0.8 million. For
further discussion of the risks related to our auction rate securities, see Note 6 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 1A Risk Factors in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the 2008 Annual Report).
The Company has not used derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures.
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September
30, 2009 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules
and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to Company management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
25
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time, we are involved in litigation arising out of the Companys operations
in the ordinary course of business. We maintain liability insurance, including product
liability coverage, in amounts deemed adequate by management. To date, aggregate costs to us
for claims, including product liability actions, have not been material. However, an uninsured
or partially insured claim, or claim for which indemnification is not available, could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations. We
believe that there are no claims or litigation pending, the outcome of which could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations. However,
due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance that the resolution
of any particular claim or proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations for the fiscal period in which such
resolution occurred.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.
While we attempt to identify, manage and mitigate risks and uncertainties associated with
our business to the extent practical under the circumstances, some level of risk and
uncertainty will always be present. Item 1A of the 2008 Annual Report describes some of the
risks and uncertainties associated with our business that have the potential to materially
affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
There has been no material change in our risk factors disclosed in the 2008 Annual
Report.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
The Company did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities during the third
quarter of 2009.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its Class A Common Stock or Class B Common
Stock during the third quarter of 2009.
Maximum Number (or | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Total Number | Average Price | Shares Purchased | Value) of Shares that | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Paid Per | as Part of Publicly | May Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Share | Announced Plans | Under the Plan (1)(2) | ||||||||||||
July 1 31, 2009 |
| $ | 0.00 | | $ | 2,093,321 | ||||||||||
August 1 31, 2009 |
| $ | 0.00 | | 2,093,321 | |||||||||||
September 1 30, 2009 |
| $ | 0.00 | | 2,093,321 | |||||||||||
3rd Quarter Total |
| $ | 0.00 | | $ | 2,093,321 | ||||||||||
(1) | On July 22, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program
authorizing the Company to repurchase, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $20,000,000 of
its shares of Class A Common Stock and/or Class B Common Stock. The stock repurchase program
has no expiration date and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. |
|
(2) | As of September 30, 2009, the Company has repurchased 1,639,843 shares of its Class B
common stock at a cost of $17.9 million, none of which occurred during the 2009 fiscal year. |
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not Applicable
ITEM 5. Other Information.
Not Applicable
26
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. Exhibits.
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Exhibit Title | |||
3.1 | Restated Articles of Incorporation of Rush Enterprises,
Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of
the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No.
000-20797) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008) |
|||
3.2 | Rush Enterprises, Inc. Amended and Restated Bylaws
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No.
000-20797) filed for the quarter ended June 30, 2009). |
|||
31.1 | * | Certification of CEO pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
31.2 | * | Certification of CFO pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
32.1 | ** | Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
||
32.2 | ** | Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
* | filed herewith |
|
** | furnished herewith |
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
RUSH ENTERPRISES, INC. |
||||
Date: November 9, 2009 | By: | /s/ W.M. RUSTY RUSH | ||
W.M.RustyRush | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
Date: November 9, 2009 | By: | /s/ STEVEN L. KELLER | ||
Steven L. Keller | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
28
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Exhibit Title | |||
31.1 | * | Certification of CEO pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
31.2 | * | Certification of CFO pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
32.1 | ** | Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
||
32.2 | ** | Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
* | filed herewith |
|
** | furnished herewith |
29