RVL Pharmaceuticals plc - Quarter Report: 2019 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-38709

Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Ireland		Not Applicable
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

400 Crossing Boulevard

Bridgewater, NJ 08807

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(908) 809-1300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Ordinary Shares	OSMT	Nasdaq Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ☐		Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☒		Smaller reporting company ☒
		Emerging growth company ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒.

There were 52,518,924 ordinary shares ($0.01 nominal value per share) outstanding as of August 7, 2019.

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report, including the section entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this report, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words "believe," "may," "will," "plan," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "intend," "expect" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, short- and long-term business operations and objectives and financial needs. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements we make regarding: our intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, future operations; future financial performance, trends and events, particularly relating to sales of current products and the development, approval and introduction of new products; FDA and other regulatory applications, approvals and actions; the continuation of historical trends; and the sufficiency of our cash balances and cash generated from operating and financing activities for future liquidity and capital resource needs.

We may not achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place significant reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. Important factors that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include the following:

if we are unable to successfully develop or commercialize new products, or do so on a timely or cost effective basis, our operating results will suffer;

due to our dependence on a limited number of products, our business could be materially adversely affected if one or more of our key products do not perform as well as expected;

failures of or delays in clinical trials could result in increased costs to us and could jeopardize or delay our ability to obtain regulatory approval and commence sales of new products;

we are, and will continue to be in the future, a party to legal proceedings that could result in adverse outcomes;

as of June 30, 2019, we had total outstanding debt of approximately $267.4 million (net of deferred financing costs), and we had unused commitments of $50.0 million under our senior secured credit facilities. Our substantial debt could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to raise additional capital to fund operations and could limit our ability to pursue our growth strategy or react to changes in the economy or our industry;

we face intense competition from both brand and generic companies, which could significantly limit our growth and materially adversely affect our financial results;

a business interruption at our manufacturing facility, our warehouses or at facilities operated by third parties that we rely on could have a material adverse effect on our business;

our profitability depends on our major customers, and if our relationships with them do not continue as expected, our business, prospects and results of operations could materially suffer;

if we are unable to develop or maintain our sales capabilities, we may not be able to effectively market or sell our products;

Table of Contents

our competitors and other third parties may allege that we are infringing their intellectual property, forcing us to expend substantial resources in resulting litigation, and any unfavorable outcome of such litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business;

our profitability depends on coverage and reimbursement by governmental authorities and other third-party payors and healthcare reform and other future legislation creates uncertainty and may lead to reductions in coverage or reimbursement levels;

we are subject to extensive governmental regulation and we face significant uncertainties and potentially significant costs associated with our efforts to comply with applicable regulations;

our products or product candidates may cause adverse side effects that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, or result in significant negative consequences following regulatory approval;

manufacturing or quality control problems may damage our reputation, require costly remedial activities or otherwise negatively impact our business; and

other factors that are described in the "Risk Factors" section of our Annual Report of Form 10-K that was filed on March 28, 2019.

The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date hereof. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements (unaudited).	5
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018	5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss – Three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	6
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity – Three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	7
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018	8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	9
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	25
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	45
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures.	45
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.	46
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.	47
ITEM 6. Exhibits.	47

SIGNATURES	48

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.Financial Statements.

OSMOTICA PHARMACEUTICALS PLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
		(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	63,736,997	$	70,834,496
Trade accounts receivable, net		68,142,413		56,423,866
Inventories, net		27,875,268		24,383,021
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		14,220,119		20,743,685
Total current assets		173,974,797		172,385,068
Property, plant and equipment, net		31,084,436		31,263,432
Operating lease assets		6,375,357		—
Intangibles, net		330,887,844		490,389,723
Goodwill		100,854,816		100,854,816
Other non-current assets		658,069		751,927
Total assets	$	643,835,319	$	795,644,966
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts payable	$	18,916,544	$	24,869,593
Accrued liabilities		75,524,908		87,236,940
Current portion of long-term debt, net of deferred financing costs		991,459		1,774,199
Current portion of obligation under finance leases		130,505		119,344
Current portion of lease liability		2,206,038		—
Income taxes payable - current portion		134,405		393,552
Total current liabilities		97,903,859		114,393,628
Long-term debt, net of non-current deferred financing costs		267,365,629		266,802,911
Long-term portion of obligation under finance leases		101,363		137,949
Long-term portion of lease liability		4,382,686		—
Income taxes payable - long term portion		1,803,512		1,803,512
Deferred taxes		14,367,524		26,237,841
Total liabilities		385,924,573		409,375,841
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 12)
Shareholders' equity:
Ordinary shares ($0.01 nominal value 400,000,000 shares authorized, 52,518,924 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018)		525,189		525,189
Preferred shares ($0.01 nominal value 40,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding)		—		—
Euro deferred shares (€1.00 nominal value 25,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding)		—		—
Additional paid in capital		492,445,699		489,949,791
Accumulated deficit		(233,213,959)		(102,359,672)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,846,183)		(1,846,183)
Total shareholders' equity		257,910,746		386,269,125
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	643,835,319	$	795,644,966

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHARMACEUTICALS PLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018			2019		2018

Net product sales	$	56,215,280	$	71,985,642		$	112,615,222	$	130,819,848
Royalty revenue		779,776		(210,548)			1,500,983		752,280
Licensing and contract revenue		537,325		83,808			542,522		87,624
Total revenues		57,532,381		71,858,902			114,658,727		131,659,752
Cost of goods sold (inclusive of amortization of intangibles)		32,643,961		33,676,464			61,847,242		67,338,130
Gross profit		24,888,420		38,182,438			52,811,485		64,321,622
Selling, general and administrative expenses		25,512,488		16,675,943			47,168,154		33,837,905
Research and development expenses		5,360,196		8,866,779			15,124,456		18,941,080
Impairment of intangibles		125,765,610		—			125,765,610		—
Total operating expenses		156,638,294		25,542,722			188,058,220		52,778,985
Operating income (loss)		(131,749,874)		12,639,716			(135,246,735)		11,542,637
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount		4,551,590		5,241,360			9,052,208		10,084,399
Other non-operating expense (gain)		14,734		(309,145)			(542,213)		(446,598)
Total other non-operating expense (gain)		4,566,324		4,932,215			8,509,995		9,637,801
Income (loss) before income taxes		(136,316,198)		7,707,501			(143,756,730)		1,904,836
Income tax benefit (expense)		11,662,211		(1,819,402)			12,902,443		(624,083)
Net income (loss)	$	(124,653,987)	$	5,888,099		$	(130,854,287)	$	1,280,753
Other comprehensive loss, net
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments		—		(722,230)			—		(1,090,344)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(124,653,987)	$	5,165,869		$	(130,854,287)	$	190,409
Income (loss) per share attributable to shareholders
Basic and Diluted	$	(2.37)	$	0.14		$	(2.49)	$	0.03
Weighted average shares basic and diluted
Basic and Diluted		52,518,924		42,855,722	(a)		52,518,924		42,855,722	(a)

(a)

Represents 1,000,367 weighted-average units multiplied by approximately 42.84 (rounded down to the nearest whole share), which was the ratio at which common units of Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. were converted to ordinary shares of Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc immediately prior to the Company’s initial public offering. See Note 1, Organization and Nature of Operations.

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHARMACEUTICALS PLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 AND JUNE 30, 2018

(Unaudited)


											Accumulated
											other
	Ordinary shares				Additional		Accumulated		Partners’		comprehensive
	Shares		Amount		paid in capital		deficit		capital		loss		Total
Balance at January 1, 2018		—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	436,416,914	$	(633,146)	$	435,783,768
Cumulative effect of change in accounting standard		—		—		—		—		1,047,477		—		1,047,477
Net loss		—		—		—		—		(4,607,346)		—		(4,607,346)
Change in foreign currency translation		—		—		—		—		—		(368,114)		(368,114)
Distributions		—		—		—		—		(2,026)				(2,026)
Balance at March 31, 2018		—		—		—		—		432,855,019		(1,001,260)		431,853,759
Net loss		—		—		—		—		5,888,099		—		5,888,099
Change in foreign currency translation		—		—		—		—		—		(722,230)		(722,230)
Balance at June 30, 2018		—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	438,743,118	$	(1,723,490)	$	437,019,628


											Accumulated
											other
	Ordinary shares				Additional		Accumulated		Partners’		comprehensive
	Shares		Amount		paid in capital		deficit		capital		loss		Total
Balance at January 1, 2019		52,518,924	$	525,189	$	489,949,791	$	(102,359,672)	$	—	$	(1,846,183)	$	386,269,125
Net loss		—		—		—		(6,200,300)		—		—		(6,200,300)
Share compensation		—		—		1,168,863		—		—		—		1,168,863
Balance at March 31, 2019		52,518,924		525,189		491,118,654		(108,559,972)		—		(1,846,183)		381,237,688
Net loss		—		—		—		(124,653,987)		—		—		(124,653,987)
Share compensation		—		—		1,327,045		—		—		—		1,327,045
Balance at June 30, 2019		52,518,924	$	525,189	$	492,445,699	$	(233,213,959)	$	—	$	(1,846,183)	$	257,910,746

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHARMACEUTICALS PLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(130,854,287)	$	1,280,753
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		35,991,509		40,866,608
Share compensation		2,495,908		—
Impairment of intangibles		125,765,610		—
Deferred income tax benefit		(11,870,317)		(4,309,577)
Loss on sale of fixed assets		53,326		—
Bad debt provision		(157,175)		(239,604)
Amortization of deferred financing and loan origination fees		656,574		839,107
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, net		(11,561,372)		(23,112,006)
Inventories, net		(3,492,247)		(9,078,808)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		6,523,566		5,800,117
Trade accounts payable		(5,953,049)		(5,419,606)
Accrued and other current liabilities		(11,757,817)		(6,680,941)
Net cash used in operating activities		(4,159,771)		(53,957)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(2,091,148)		(2,181,262)
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,091,148)		(2,181,262)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payments to affiliates		—		(2,026)
Payments on finance lease obligations		(63,843)		(54,391)
Proceeds from insurance financing loan		1,314,246		974,699
Repayment of insurance financing loan		(2,096,983)		(194,960)
Repayment of debt		—		(4,093,376)
Net cash used in financing activities		(846,580)		(3,370,054)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(7,097,499)		(5,605,273)
Effect on cash of changes in exchange rate		—		(729,633)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		70,834,496		34,743,152
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	63,736,997	$	28,408,246
Supplemental disclosure of cash and non-cash transactions:
Cash paid for interest	$	8,271,400	$	9,669,384
Cash paid for taxes	$	365,332	$	265,447

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Organization and Nature of Operations

Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc (formerly known as Lilydale Limited and Osmotica Pharmaceuticals Limited) is an Irish public limited company. Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. acquired Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc on April 30, 2018 for the purpose of facilitating an offering of ordinary shares in an initial public offering (“IPO”). On October 22, 2018, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc completed its IPO, in which it issued and allotted 7,647,500 ordinary shares at a public offering price of $7.00 per share. The number of shares issued in the IPO reflected the exercise in full of the underwriters’ option to purchase 997,500 additional ordinary shares. In addition, the Company issued and allotted 2,014,285 ordinary shares at the public offering price in a private placement to investment funds affiliated with Avista Capital Partners, Altchem Limited and an entity controlled by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. The aggregate net proceeds from the IPO and the private placement were approximately $58.1 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.

Immediately prior to the IPO and prior to the commencement of trading of Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc’s ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. undertook a series of restructuring transactions that resulted in Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc being the direct parent of Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp with each holder of common units of Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. receiving approximately 42.84 ordinary shares of Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc in exchange for each such common unit. In addition, each holder of an option to purchase common units of Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. received an option to purchase the number of ordinary shares of Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc determined by multiplying the number of units underlying such option by approximately 42.84 (rounded down to the nearest whole share) and dividing the exercise price per unit for such option by approximately 42.84 (rounded up to the nearest whole cent). These transactions are referred to as the “Reorganization”.

Until the Reorganization, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc did not conduct any operations (other than activities incidental to its formation, the Reorganization and the pursuit of an initial public offering). Upon the completion of the Reorganization, the historical consolidated financial statements of Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. became the historical financial statements of Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc. Accordingly, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial information as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 included herein reflect the financial information of Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp.

Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp.is a Luxembourg special limited partnership, formed on December 3, 2015 in connection with a business combination (the “Merger”), effective February 3, 2016, pursuant to a definitive agreement among Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp., Vertical/Trigen Holdings, LLC (“Vertical/Trigen”) and its members, and Osmotica Holdings Corp Limited and its shareholders, among others. Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. and several other holding companies and partnerships were formed as a result of the Merger. Pursuant to the Merger, Vertical/Trigen was deemed to be the accounting acquirer. Osmotica is a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of specialty products that target markets with underserved patient populations.

Unless otherwise indicated or required by the context, references throughout to “Osmotica,” or the “Company”, refer to (i) prior to the completion of the Reorganization, Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including, from and after April 30, 2018, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc, and (ii) following the completion of the Reorganization, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp.

Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation—The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and under the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

(“SEC”) for interim reporting. In management’s opinion, the interim financial data presented includes all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring items) necessary for fair presentation. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain information required by GAAP has been condensed or omitted in accordance with rules and regulations of the SEC. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period or for the year ending December 31, 2019 or any period thereafter. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of December 31, 2018 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2018. Except for the lease accounting policy that was updated as a result of adopting Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016‑02, (Leases Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842), the Company’s significant accounting policies have not changed substantially from those previously described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 that are included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Basic and Diluted Loss per Share—Basic and diluted net loss per share is determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average ordinary shares outstanding during the period. For all periods presented with a net loss, the shares underlying the ordinary share options have been excluded from the calculation because their effect would be anti‑dilutive. Therefore, the weighted-average shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted loss per share are the same for periods with a net loss.

The following potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding as they would be anti‑dilutive as of June 30, 2019 and 2018:


	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2019	2018		2019	2018
Restricted stock units	1,438,016	—		1,438,016	—
Options to purchase ordinary shares	3,169,222	3,028,788	(a)	3,169,222	3,015,936	(a)

(a)

Represents 70,700 units for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 70,400 units for the six months ended June 30, 2018 multiplied by approximately 42.84 (rounded down to the nearest whole share), which was the ratio at which common units of Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. were converted to ordinary shares of Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc immediately prior to the Company’s initial public offering. See Note , Organization and Nature of Operations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short and long‑term debt. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt approximate book value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments.

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

The valuation hierarchy is composed of three levels. The classification within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The levels within the valuation hierarchy are described below:

Level 1 — Assets and liabilities with unadjusted, quoted prices listed on active market exchanges. Inputs to the fair value measurement are observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Inputs to the fair value measurement are determined using prices for recently traded assets and liabilities with similar underlying terms, as well as direct or indirect observable inputs, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 — Inputs to the fair value measurement are unobservable inputs, such as estimates, assumptions, and valuation techniques when little or no market data exists for the assets or liabilities.

Segment Reporting—The Company operates in one business segment which focuses on developing and commercializing pharmaceutical products that target markets with underserved patient populations. The Company’s business offerings have similar economic and other characteristics, including the nature of products, manufacturing and acquiring processes, types of customers, distribution methods and regulatory environment. The chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) reviews profit and loss information on a consolidated basis to assess performance and make overall operating decisions. The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the financial results of the Company’s one reportable operating segment. The Company has no significant revenues or tangible assets outside of the United States.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

The FASB issued ASU 2016‑02, “Leases (Topic 842)” in February 2016 and subsequent ASUs in 2018 and 2019 (collectively referred to as “Topic 842”) on the treatment of leases, which guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. Under Topic 842, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short‑term leases) at the commencement date: 1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and 2) a right‑of‑use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Entities are allowed to apply Topic 842 using a modified retrospective approach either (1) retrospectively to each reporting period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative effect adjustment recognized at the beginning of the earliest comparative period; or (2) retrospectively at the beginning of the period of adoption through a cumulative-effective adjustment. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply.

On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Topic 842 using the modified retrospective basis with a cumulative-effect adjustment at the beginning of the period of adoption and therefore did not revise prior period information or disclosure. Further, the Company elected the package of practical expedients upon transition that allows the Company not to reassess the lease classification for expired and existing leases, whether initial direct costs qualify for capitalization for any expired or existing leases or whether any expired contracts are or contain leases. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 resulted in the recognition of operating leases and lease liabilities of approximately $6.2 million on the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019. The operating leases and lease liabilities primarily related to real estate leases.

The impact of the adoption of Topic 842 on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019 was as follows (in thousands):

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)


	December 31, 2018		Adoption adjustment		January 1, 2019
Operating lease assets	$	—	$	6,245,147	$	6,044,528
Deferred rent liability		200,619		(200,619)		—
Current portion of lease liability		—		1,709,138		1,709,138
Long-term portion of lease liability		—		4,536,009		4,536,009

See Note 11, Leases for additional information.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018‑02, Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) — Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This standard allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. This standard is effective for the Company for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively. The Company adopted that standard effective January 1, 2019 and concluded there was no financial statement impact related to ASU 2018-02.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which introduces a new methodology for accounting for credit losses on financial instruments, including available-for-sale debt securities. The guidance establishes a new “expected loss model” that requires entities to estimate current expected credit losses on financial instruments by using all practical and relevant information. Any expected credit losses are to be reflected as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of available-for-sale debt securities. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new accounting standard and does not expect its impact to be material.

Note 3. Revenues

The Company’s performance obligations are to provide its pharmaceutical products based upon purchase orders from distributors. The performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time, typically upon delivery, when the customer obtains control of the pharmaceutical product. The Company invoices its customers after the products have been delivered and invoice payments are generally due within 60 days of invoice date.

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

The following table disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers by pharmaceutical products:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
Pharmaceutical Product	2019		2018		2019		2018
Venlafaxine ER	$	18,293,122	$	19,662,452	$	39,900,211	$	34,484,004
Methylphenidate ER		17,100,286		39,146,241		37,889,769		67,325,502
Lorzone		4,063,375		3,972,248		8,331,893		8,211,922
Divigel		6,919,856		4,983,321		12,416,516		9,932,868
OB Complete		2,675,592		2,749,705		4,606,108		5,100,697
Other		7,163,049		1,471,675		9,470,725		5,764,855
Net product sales		56,215,280		71,985,642		112,615,222		130,819,848
Royalty revenue		779,776		(210,548)		1,500,983		752,280
License and contract revenue		537,325		83,808		542,522		87,624
Total revenues	$	57,532,381	$	71,858,902	$	114,658,727	$	131,659,752

When the Company receives consideration from a customer, or such consideration is unconditionally due from a customer prior to the transfer of products to the customer under the terms of a contract, the Company records a contract liability. The Company classifies contract liabilities as deferred revenue. The Company had no deferred revenue as of June 30, 2019. Upon adoption of ASC Topic 606, the Company did not have any contract assets or liabilities. The Company has elected to apply the exemption under paragraph 606‑10‑50‑14(a) related to remaining performance obligations as all open purchase orders are expected to be satisfied with a period of one year from the date of the purchase order.

Contract assets primarily relate to rights to consideration for goods or services transferred to the customer when the right is conditional on something other than the passage of time. Contract assets are transferred to accounts receivable when the rights become unconditional. The Company had no contract assets as of June 30, 2019. The Company has no costs to obtain or fulfill contracts meeting the capitalization criteria under ASC Topic 340, Other Assets and Deferred Costs.

Note 4. Accounts Receivable, Sales and Allowances

The nature of the Company’s business inherently involves, in the ordinary course, significant amounts and substantial volumes of transactions and estimates relating to allowances for product returns, chargebacks, rebates, doubtful accounts and discounts given to customers. This is typical of the pharmaceutical industry and not necessarily specific to the Company. Depending on the product, the end‑user customer, the specific terms of national supply contracts and the particular arrangements with the Company’s wholesale customers, certain rebates, chargebacks and other credits are deducted from the Company’s accounts receivable. The process of claiming these deductions depends on wholesalers reporting to the Company the amount of deductions that were earned under the terms of the respective agreement with the end‑user customer (which in turn depends on the specific end‑user customer, each having its own pricing arrangement, which entitles it to a particular deduction). This process can lead to partial payments against outstanding invoices as the wholesalers take the claimed deductions at the time of payment.

Accounts receivable result primarily from sales of pharmaceutical products, amounts due under revenue sharing, license and royalty arrangements, which inherently involves, in the ordinary course of business, estimates relating to allowances for product returns, chargebacks, rebates, doubtful accounts and discounts given to customers. Credit is extended based on the customer’s financial condition, and, generally, collateral is not required. The Company ages its accounts receivable using the corresponding sale date of the transaction and considers accounts past due based on terms agreed upon in the transaction, which is generally 30 to 60 days for branded and generic sales, depending on the customer and the products purchased.

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

With the exception of the provision for doubtful accounts, which is reflected as part of selling, general and administrative expense, the provisions for the following customer reserves are reflected as a reduction of revenues in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Trade accounts receivable, net consisted of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018
Gross trade accounts receivable
Trade accounts receivable	$	128,549,144	$	146,419,682
Royalty accounts receivable		156,580		238,960
Other receivable		617,639		1,562,287
Less reserves for:
Chargebacks		(35,408,296)		(38,861,232)
Commercial rebates		(22,204,635)		(49,231,445)
Discounts and allowances		(3,397,311)		(3,510,242)
Doubtful accounts		(170,708)		(194,144)
Total trade accounts receivable, net	$	68,142,413	$	56,423,866

The Company recorded the following adjustments to gross product sales:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Gross product sales	$	251,405,374	$	245,572,890	$	482,953,560	$	462,651,386
Less provisions for:
Chargebacks		(136,802,341)		(93,063,695)		(238,035,802)		(173,425,722)
Government and managed care rebates		(7,538,243)		(4,757,168)		(10,061,497)		(10,342,866)
Commercial rebates		(40,204,675)		(63,397,053)		(104,802,934)		(123,388,006)
Product returns		(4,151,074)		(5,713,789)		(5,177,413)		(11,561,103)
Discounts and allowances		(5,092,440)		(5,356,544)		(9,793,665)		(10,441,944)
Advertising and promotions		(1,401,321)		(1,298,999)		(2,467,027)		(2,671,897)
Net product sales	$	56,215,280	$	71,985,642	$	112,615,222	$	130,819,848

The activity in the Company’s allowance for customer deductions against trade accounts receivable was as follows:


					Discounts
			Commercial		and		Doubtful
	Chargebacks		Rebates		Allowances		Accounts		Total
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	38,861,232	$	49,231,445	$	3,510,242	$	194,144	$	91,797,063
Provision		238,035,802		104,802,934		9,793,665		(157,175)		352,475,226
Charges processed		(241,488,738)		(131,829,744)		(9,906,596)		133,739		(383,091,339)
Balance at June 30, 2019	$	35,408,296	$	22,204,635	$	3,397,311	$	170,708	$	61,180,950

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

The activity in the Company’s accrued liabilities for customer deductions by account was as follows:


			Government and
	Product		Managed Care
	Returns		Rebates		Total
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	48,463,509	$	9,980,876	$	58,444,385
Provision		5,177,413		10,061,497		15,238,910
Charges processed		(6,513,688)		(12,744,283)		(19,257,971)
Balance at June 30, 2019	$	47,127,234	$	7,298,090	$	54,425,324

Provisions and utilizations of provisions activity in the current period which relate to the prior period revenues are not provided because to do so would be impracticable. The current systems and processes of the Company do not capture the chargeback and rebate settlements by the period in which the original sales transaction was recorded. The Company uses a combination of factors and applications to estimate the dollar amount of reserves for chargebacks and rebates at each month end. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized is not probable of occurring when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The Company regularly monitors the reserves based on an analysis of the Company’s product sales and most recent claims, wholesaler inventory, current pricing, and anticipated future pricing changes. If amounts are different from the estimate due to changes from estimated rates, accrual rate adjustments are considered prospectively when determining provisions in accordance with authoritative GAAP.

Note 5. Inventories

The components of inventories, net of allowances, were as follows:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018
Finished goods	$	15,523,131	$	15,577,104
Work in process		1,358,960		1,138,906
Raw materials and supplies		10,993,177		7,667,011
	$	27,875,268	$	24,383,021

The Company maintains an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory, as well as inventory where its cost is in excess of its net realizable value. The activity in the allowance for excess, obsolete, and net realizable value inventory account was as follows:



		June 30,		December 31,
		2019		2018
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,561,082	$	3,066,620
Provision		2,154,408		2,926,472
Charges processed		(1,430,030)		(4,432,010)
Balance at end of period	$	2,285,460	$	1,561,082

Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company tests goodwill and indefinite‑lived intangible assets for impairment annually as of October 1st, or more frequently whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. During the second

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

quarter of 2019 circumstances and events related to the pricing of certain of our generic products prompted the Company to evaluate certain of our intangible assets for impairment. Following such evaluation, the Company determined that the net present value of certain intangible assets had decreased below their carrying value and thus impaired the intangible assets. Product Rights, Developed Technologies and Distribution Rights have therefore been impaired by $17,920,049, $57,165,587 and $50,679,974, respectively due to lower than expected cash flows, and the decision to discontinue selling one product.

The price erosion as described above as well as the impairment recognized on the intangible assets prompted the Company to additionally evaluate goodwill for impairment. Based on this evaluation, the Company determined that the fair value of goodwill exceeded its carrying value and as a result, no impairment of goodwill was recognized. The carrying value of goodwill was $100,854,816 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, net of impairment charges of $86,318,000 recognized in 2018.

The following table sets forth the major categories of the Company’s intangible assets and the weighted‑average remaining amortization period for those assets that were not already fully amortized:


	June 30, 2019
									Weighted
									Average
									Remaining
	Gross						Net		Amortization
	Carrying		Accumulated				Carrying		Period
	Amount		Amortization		Impairment		Amount		(Years)
Distribution Rights	$	98,433,377	$	(20,863,650)	$	(50,679,974)	$	26,889,753	11.0
Product Rights		348,599,941		(136,957,469)		(17,920,049)		193,722,423	3.6
Tradenames		13,485,000		(2,682,241)		—		10,802,759	15.5
Developed Technology		125,460,333		(32,821,837)		(57,165,587)		35,472,909	11.7
IPR&D		64,000,000		—		—		64,000,000	Indefinite Lived
	$	649,978,651	$	(193,325,197)	$	(125,765,610)	$	330,887,844


	December 31, 2018
									Weighted
									Average
	Gross						Net		Remaining
	Carrying		Accumulated				Carrying		Amortization
	Amount		Amortization		Impairment		Amount		Period (Years)
Distribution Rights	$	98,433,377	$	(17,229,374)	$	—	$	81,204,003	12.0
Product Rights		326,530,149		(109,056,754)		—		217,473,395	4.0
Tradenames		13,485,000		(2,329,284)		—		11,155,716	16.0
Developed Technology		138,133,333		(30,973,516)		(10,303,208)		96,856,609	12.6
IPR&D		91,300,000		—		(7,600,000)		83,700,000	Indefinite Lived
	$	667,881,859	$	(159,588,928)	$	(17,903,208)	$	490,389,723

The gross carrying amount in the tables above are inclusive of $28,299,941 and $17,886,772 in 2019 and 2018, respectively and $10,379,892 and $6,156,564 of accumulated amortization for assets that have been fully impaired in 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

Changes in the net carrying amount of intangible assets were as follows:


	Distribution		Product				Developed
	Rights		Rights		Tradenames		Technology		IPR&D		Total
December 31, 2018	$	81,204,003	$	217,473,395	$	11,155,716	$	96,856,609	$	83,700,000	$	490,389,723
Amortization		(3,634,276)		(25,530,923)		(352,957)		(4,218,113)		—		(33,736,269)
Impairments		(50,679,974)		(17,920,049)		—		(57,165,587)		—		(125,765,610)
Reclassifications(A)		—		19,700,000		—		—		(19,700,000)		—
June 30, 2019	$	26,889,753	$	193,722,423	$	10,802,759	$	35,472,909	$	64,000,000	$	330,887,844

(A) IPR&D in the amount of $19.7 million related to Osmolex ER was reclassified to Product Rights in the first quarter of 2019 when the product was launched. Osmolex ER was fully impaired during the second quarter of 2019.

As part of the Company’s goodwill and intangible asset impairment assessments, the Company estimates the fair values of the reporting unit and intangible assets using an income approach that utilizes a discounted cash flow model, or, where appropriate, a market approach. The discounted cash flow models are dependent upon the Company’s estimates of future cash flows and other factors. These estimates of future cash flows involve assumptions concerning (i) future operating performance, including future sales, long‑term growth rates, operating margins, variations in the amounts, allocation and timing of cash flows and the probability of achieving the estimated cash flows and (ii) future economic conditions. These assumptions are based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. The discount rates applied to estimated cash flows for the Company’s interim indefinite-lived asset impairment test for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was 17%. The Company believes the discount rates and other inputs and assumptions are consistent with those that a market participant would use. Any impairment charges resulting from annual or interim goodwill and intangible asset impairment assessments are recorded to Impairment of intangible assets in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Amortization expense of $16,868,134 and $19,302,132 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $33,736,269 and $38,674,805 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively was recorded as cost of goods sold. The amortization expense of acquired intangible assets for each of the following periods are expected to be as follows:


	Amortization
Years ending December 31	Expense
Remainder of 2019	$	26,901,570
2020		50,339,141
2021		44,894,160
2022		38,005,544
2023		35,834,234
Thereafter		70,913,195
Total	$	266,887,844

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

Note 7. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018
Accrued product returns	$	47,127,234	$	48,463,509
Accrued royalties		2,450,149		3,597,957
Accrued compensation		6,551,636		8,672,913
Accrued government and managed care rebates		7,298,090		9,980,876
Accrued research and development		3,649,115		8,337,812
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		7,625,466		7,362,941
Customer coupons		823,218		719,578
Deferred revenue		—		101,354
Total	$	75,524,908	$	87,236,940

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into contractual agreements with wholesalers pursuant to which the wholesalers distribute sales of Company products to customers and provide sales data to the Company. In return the wholesalers charge the Company a fee for services and other customary rebates and chargebacks based on distribution sales of Company products through the wholesalers and downstream customers.

Note 8. Financing Arrangements

The composition of the Company’s debt and financing obligations is as follows:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018
CIT Bank, N.A. Term Loan, net of deferred financing costs of $3,994,309 and $4,557,025 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively	$	267,365,629	$	266,802,911
Note payable — insurance financing		991,459		1,774,199
Total debt and financing obligations		268,357,088		268,577,110
Less: current portion		(991,459)		(1,774,199)
Long-term debt	$	267,365,629	$	266,802,911

Term Loan

As of June 30, 2019, the interest rate was 6.15% for the Company’s Term A Loan and 6.65% for the Term B Loan. As of December 31, 2018, the interest rate was 6.09% for the Term A Loan and 6.59% for the Term B Loan. The Company was in compliance with all covenants of the Term Loan Agreement as of June 30, 2019.

Revolving Facility

As of June 30, 2019 there were no amounts drawn under the $50 million Revolving Facility with CIT Bank, N.A.

Note 9. Concentrations and Credit Risk

In the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, a significant portion of the Company’s gross product sales reported were through three customers, and a significant portion of the Company’s accounts receivable as of June 30,

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

2019 and December 31, 2018 were due from these customers as well. The following table sets forth the percentage of the Company’s gross sales and accounts receivable attributable to these customers for the periods indicated:


	Gross Product Sales				Gross Product Sales
	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Amerisource Bergen	7	%	7	%	7	%	7	%
Cardinal Health	59	%	55	%	57	%	55	%
McKesson	31	%	34	%	33	%	34	%
Combined Total	97	%	96	%	97	%	96	%


	Gross Account
	Receivables
	June 30,		December 31,
	2019		2018
Amerisource Bergen	6	%	6	%
Cardinal Health	68	%	61	%
McKesson	23	%	29	%
Combined Total	97	%	96	%

Purchasing

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, one supplier accounted for more than 96% and 83%, respectively, of the Company’s purchases of raw materials for products that are manufactured by the Company. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, one supplier accounted for approximately 97% and 89%, respectively, of the Company’s purchases of raw materials for products that are manufactured by the Company.

The Company purchases various Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient, or API of finished products at contractual minimum levels through agreements with third parties. Individually, none of these agreements are material to the Company, therefore, the Company does not believe at this time that any of the purchase obligations represent levels above the normal course of business.

Note 10. Incentive Plans

The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $1,327,045 and $0 during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $2,495,908 and $0 during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of June 30, 2019, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation awards amounted to $12,952,690. During the three and six months ended on June 30, 2019, the Company granted 69,185 and 1,443,520, respectively, of restricted stock units. As of June 30, 2019 there were 1,438,016 restricted stock units outstanding and the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of the non-vested stock options was 1.7 years and for non-vested restricted stock units was 3.69 years.

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

Note 11. Leases

The Company leases its New Jersey office and warehouse facilities under non‑cancelable leases that expire in July 2022 and December 2023, respectively. On September 6, 2018, the Company entered into a sublease agreement that expires November 2023 to lease additional office space in its New Jersey location. The Company leases office and warehouse facilities in Tampa, Florida, under a non‑cancelable lease that expires in October 2023. The Company leases its Argentina office and warehouse facilities under a lease that originally expired in December 31, 2014, but was amended to extend to December 31, 2020. The Company leases its Hungary office and warehouse facilities under a lease that expires on February 14, 2022. The Company also leases its North Carolina office, which lease has been renewed through July 31, 2020. Some of these leases contain options to renew, but for the majority of leases we have concluded that it was not reasonably certain that we would exercise the options to extend the lease or terminate the lease. In 2018, the Company began leasing vehicles under a cancelable fleet lease that has successive one-year renewal terms. We evaluate the term of these leases and recognize the leases over the period which we believe is reasonably certain to exercise.

We assess whether an arrangement is a lease or contains a lease at inception. For arrangements considered leases or that contain a lease that is accounted for separately, we determine the classification and initial measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability at the lease commencement date, which is the date that the underlying asset becomes available for use. The Company has elected to account for non-lease components associated with our leases and lease components as a single lease component.

The Company recognizes a right-of use asset, which represents the Company’s right to use the underlying asset for the lease term, and a lease liability, which represents the present value of the Company’s obligation to make payments arising over the lease term. The present value of the lease payments are calculated using either the implicit interest rate in the lease or an incremental borrowing rate.

Our lease assets and liabilities were classified as follows on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2019:


Leases	Classification	Balance at June 30, 2019
Assets
Operating	Operating Lease Assets	$	6,375,357
Finance	Property, plant and equipment, net		248,453
Total leased assets		$	6,623,810

Liabilities
Current
Operating	Current portion of lease liability	$	2,206,038
Finance	Current portion of obligations under finance leases		130,505

Non-current
Operating	Long-term portion of lease liability		4,382,686
Finance	Long-term portion of obligations under finance leases		101,363
Total lease liabilities		$	6,820,592

The Company recognizes lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The components of lease cost are as follows:

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)


Lease Cost	Classification	Three months ended June 30, 2019		Six months ended June 30, 2019
Operating lease cost	SG&A expenses	$	512,727	$	978,281
	R&D expenses		38,575		81,002
	Cost of goods sold		91,899		183,106

Finance lease cost
Amortization of leased assets	Depreciation and amortization		32,479		64,056
Interest on lease liabilities	Interest expense		1,091		2,237
Total lease cost		$	676,771	$	1,308,682

Total rent expense charged to selling, general and administrative expenses was $512,727 and $170,821 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively and $978,281 and $328,134 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Total rent expense charged to research and development was $38,575 and $60,748 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively and $81,002 and $146,568 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The rent expense charged to cost of goods sold was $91,899 and $89,849 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $183,106 and $182,816 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The table below shows the future minimum rental payments, exclusive of taxes, insurance and other costs, under the leases as follows:


Years ending December 31	Operating Leases
Remainder of 2019	$	1,238,074
2020		2,485,755
2021		2,049,045
2022		907,013
2023		490,515
Total lease payments		7,170,402
Less: interest		581,678
Present value of lease payments	$	6,588,724

The Company has future minimum lease payments required under the finance leases of $236,084 less interest expense of $4,216 for total present value lease payments of $231,868 for the remainder of the year ended December 31, 2019 through December 31, 2022.

The weighted-average remaining lease term and the weighted-average discount rate of our leases were as follows:

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)


Lease Term and Discount Rate	June 30, 2019
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases		3.19
Finance leases		1.74

Weighted average discount rate
Operating leases		5.05	%
Finance leases		1.79	%


Other Information	June 30, 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	(1,242,389)
Operating cash flows from finance leases		(2,237)
Financing cash flows from finance leases		(63,843)

Amortization of assets held under the finance lease is included in depreciation expense as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recorded $553,860 and $1,369,479, respectively, of leases assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities and $20,134 and $38,418, respectively, of leased assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities.

Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies

Contingent Milestone Payments

The Company has entered into strategic business agreements for the development and marketing of finished dosage form pharmaceutical products with various pharmaceutical development companies. Each strategic business agreement includes a future payment schedule for contingent milestone payments and in certain strategic business agreements, minimum royalty payments. The Company will be responsible for contingent milestone payments and minimum royalty payments to these strategic business partners based upon the occurrence of future events. Each strategic business agreement defines the triggering event of its future payment schedule, such as meeting product development progress timelines, successful product testing and validation, successful clinical studies, and various U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory approvals.

The following table lists the Company’s enforceable and legally binding royalty obligations as of June 30, 2019:


	Royalty Obligations
Less than 1 year	$	1,281,250
1 to 3 years		3,093,750
3 to 5 years		2,000,000
More than 5 years		1,583,333
Total	$	7,958,333

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

The Company is engaged in various supply agreements with third parties which obligate the Company to purchase various API or finished products at contractual minimum levels. None of these agreements are individually or in the aggregate material to the Company. Further, the Company does not believe at this time that any of the purchase obligations represent levels above that of normal business demands.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is a party in legal proceedings and potential claims arising from time to time in the ordinary course of its business. The amount, if any, of ultimate liability with respect to such matters cannot be determined. Despite the inherent uncertainties of litigation, management of the Company believes that the ultimate disposition of such proceedings and exposures will not have a material adverse impact on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

On February 16, 2018, the Company received FDA approval for its amantadine extended release tablets under the trade name OSMOLEX ER. On that same date the Company filed in the Federal District Court for the District of Delaware a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement of certain patents owned by Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Osmotica Pharmaceutical US LLC and Vertical Pharmaceuticals, LLC vs. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Adamas Pharma, LLC). Adamas was served with the Complaint on February 21, 2018. Adamas filed an answer on April 13, 2018 denying the allegations in the Complaint and reserving the ability to raise counterclaims as the litigation progresses. On September 20, 2018, Adamas filed an amended answer to the Company’s Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement, with counterclaims alleging infringement of certain patents included in the Company’s Complaint and requesting that the court grant Adamas damages, injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. The action is ongoing, but was stayed on May 23, 2019 at the parties’ joint request.

On April 30, 2019, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc was served with a complaint in an action entitled Leo Shumacher, et al., v. Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County No. SOM-L-000540-19. On May 10, 2019, a Complaint entitled Jeffrey Tello, et al., v. Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County No. SOM-L-000617-19 was filed in the same court as the Shumacher action. The complaints name Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc, certain of its directors and officers and the underwriters of its initial public offering as defendants in putative class actions alleging violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 related to the disclosures contained in the registration statement and prospectus used for the Company’s initial public offering of ordinary shares. On July 22, 2019, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint consolidating the two actions, reiterating the previously pled allegations and adding an additional individual defendant. The Company disputes the allegations in the complaint and intends to vigorously defend against the action. However, this litigation matter is still in an early stage and there is no assurance that we will be successful in our defense or that insurance will be available or adequate to fund any settlement or judgment or the litigation costs of the action, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. At this time there is no loss that is probable or reasonably estimatable.

Note 13. Income Taxes

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $12.9 million on $143.8 million of loss before income tax, compared to $0.6 million of income tax expense on $1.9 million of income before income tax during the comparable 2018 period. The tax benefit resulted from an impairment charge on certain assets which required the Company to record a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.

Income taxes for the interim periods have been based on an estimated annual worldwide effective tax rate. During the six month period ended June 30, 2019, the annualized worldwide effective tax rate was 10% as compared to 15% in the six

Table of Contents

OSMOTICA PHAMACEUTICALS PLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(UNAUDITED)

month period ended June 30, 2018. Income tax (expense) benefit differs from the statutory income tax rate primarily due to the occurrence of orphan drug and research development credits, recording of a valuation allowance and the addition of state and foreign taxes.

The Company provides reserves for potential payments of income tax to various tax authorities or does not recognize income tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions and other issues. Tax benefits for uncertain tax positions are based on a determination of whether a tax benefit taken by the Company in its tax filings or positions is more likely than not to be realized, assuming that the matter in question will be decided based on its technical merits. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties in the provision for income taxes.

The Company recently received notification that the Internal Revenue Service will be conducting an audit of Osmotica Pharmaceuticals Corp., for tax year 2017.

Valuation Allowance

Net deferred tax assets arise due to the recognition of income and expense items for tax purposes, which differ from those used for financial statement purposes. ASC 740, Income Taxes, provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if the realization of such assets is more likely than not. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance in the second quarter of year ending 2019, the Company considered all available objective and verifiable evidence both positive and negative, including historical levels of pre-tax income (loss) both on a consolidated basis and tax reporting entity basis, legislative developments, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future pre-tax income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.

The Company assesses the realizability of the deferred tax assets at each balance sheet date based on actuals and forecasted operating results in order to determine the proper amount, if any, of a valuation allowance. As a result of this analysis, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that it will not realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and therefore has recorded a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of its net deferred tax assets. The Company continues to maintain valuation allowances on deferred tax assets applicable to entities in foreign jurisdictions for which separate income tax returns are filed, where realization of the related deferred tax assets from future profitable operations is not reasonably assured.

Note 14. Related Parties

Prior to our IPO the Company paid quarterly advisory and monitoring fees to certain shareholders. The Company had accrued $51,782 and $83,818 as liabilities, as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, and had recognized an immaterial amount and $250,000 of related expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively and an immaterial amount and $520,147 of related expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Further, the Company leases its Argentina office and warehouse space facilities through a related party lease. The term of the operating lease is through December 31, 2020. For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred rent expense under this lease of $44,086 and $69,426, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred rent expense under this lease of $92,574 and $151,371, respectively.

On August 22, 2018, the Company entered into a Master Service Agreement with United Biosource, LLC or (“UBC”), an Avista Capital Partners portfolio company, for prescription processing and patient access services. In November 2018, the Company and UBC entered into a Statement of Work for services valued at approximately $2.4 million. The Company entered into a change order effective April 5, 2019 and increased the budget by an incremental $211,038.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The statements in the discussion and analysis regarding industry outlook, our expectations regarding the performance of our business and the forward‑looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward‑Looking Statements.” Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward‑looking statements. This discussion and analysis is based upon the historical financial statements of Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc and Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. Prior to the Reorganization (as defined in Note 1, Organization and Nature of Operations, to our consolidated financial statements included in this report), Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc had no material assets and conducted no operations other than activities incidental to its formation, the Reorganization and our initial public offering. All references to years, unless otherwise noted, refer to our fiscal years, which end on December 31.

Overview

We are a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of specialty products that target markets with underserved patient populations. In the six months ended June 30, 2019, we generated total revenues across our existing portfolio of promoted specialty neurology and women’s health products, as well as our non‑promoted products, which are primarily complex formulations of generic drugs. In 2017, we received regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, for M‑72 (methylphenidate hydrochloride extended‑release tablets, 72 mg) for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD in patients aged 13 to 65, and, in 2018, we received regulatory approval from the FDA for Osmolex ER (amantadine extended‑release tablets) for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease and drug‑induced extrapyramidal reactions, which are involuntary muscle movements caused by certain medications, in adults. We launched M‑72 in the second quarter of 2018 and completed the launch of Osmolex ER in January 2019. In addition, we have a late‑stage development pipeline highlighted by two new drug application or NDAs, candidates, both of which have completed Phase III clinical trials: Ontinua ER (arbaclofen extended‑release tablets) for muscle spasticity in multiple sclerosis patients and RVL‑1201 (oxymetazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, 0.1%) for the treatment of acquired blepharoptosis, or droopy eyelid. Many of our products use our proprietary osmotic‑release drug delivery system, Osmodex, which we believe offers advantages over alternative extended‑release, or ER, technologies.

Our core competencies span drug development, manufacturing and commercialization. Our specialized neurology and women’s health sales teams support the ongoing commercialization of our existing promoted product portfolio as well as the launch of new products. As of June 30, 2019, we actively promoted six products: Osmolex ER, M‑72, Lorzone (chlorzoxazone scored tablets) and ConZip (tramadol hydrochloride extended‑release capsules) in specialty neurology; and OB Complete, our family of prescription prenatal dietary supplements, and Divigel (estradiol gel, 0.1%) in women’s health. As of June 30, 2019, we sold a portfolio consisting of approximately 30 non‑promoted products. The cash flow from these non‑promoted products has contributed to our investments in research and development and business development activities. Certain of our key products, particularly those that incorporate our proprietary Osmodex drug delivery system, are or are expected to be manufactured in our Marietta, Georgia facility. Many of our existing products benefit from several potential barriers to entry, including intellectual property protection, formulation and manufacturing complexities, data exclusivity, as well as U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, or DEA, regulation and quotas for API.

Our non-promoted products compete in generic markets where barriers to entry are lower than markets in which certain of our promoted products compete. Generic products generally contribute most significantly to revenues and gross margins at the time of launch or in periods of limited competition. In the U.S. the consolidation of buyers in recent years has increased competitive pressures on the industry as a whole. As such, the timing of new product launches can have a significant impact on a company’s financial results. The entrance into the market of additional competition can have a negative impact on the pricing and volume of the affected products which are outside the company’s control. In particular, both methylphenidate ER tablets and venlafaxine ER tablets, or VERT, have experienced, and are expected to continue to experience, significant pricing erosion due to additional competition from other generic pharmaceutical companies. This generic pricing erosion has resulted in, and is expected to continue to result in lower net sales, revenue and profitability from methylphenidate ER tablets and venlafaxine ER tablets in the remainder of 2019 and subsequent years.

Table of Contents

We are focused on transitioning our business and revenue mix to place a greater emphasis on specialty pharmaceuticals by progressing our pipeline, which is highlighted by two candidates under clinical development — arbaclofen ER and RVL‑1201. We developed arbaclofen ER using our proprietary Osmodex drug delivery system and believe this formulation will provide an efficacious and safe treatment for spasticity in multiple sclerosis patients. In the first quarter of 2019 we received topline data from our second Phase III clinical trial of arbaclofen in multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity. The study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study in which treatment groups received either placebo, 40 mg arbaclofen per day or 80 mg arbaclofen per day. The co-primary endpoints were change from baseline in Total Numeric-transformed Ashworth Scale, or TNmAS, and Clinician Global Impression of Change, or CGIC, on day 84. Arbaclofen did not demonstrate superiority to placebo as measured by the CGIC; however, a statistically significant improvement in spasticity relative to placebo was demonstrated by the TNmAS for both doses of arbaclofen (p=0.0482 and 0.0118 for 40 mg and 80 mg per day, respectively). Upon review, it appears that CGIC failed to recognize the improvement demonstrated by the TNmAS. However, the CGIC values indicated both treatment groups improved from baseline. Further, it appears that there is a dose-response relationship between the two strengths with the 80 mg exhibiting a stronger signal of efficacy as assessed by the TNmAS scale. Though arbaclofen 80 mg per day had a higher discontinuation rate in the study, the safety and tolerability profile was in line with previously reported results, most notably a somnolence incidence of 9.5% and 14.5% for the 40-mg and 80-mg treatment arms, respectively, compared to 9.6% for the placebo treatment arm. Somnolence is one of the most frequently reported dose-limiting adverse events associated with baclofen treatment today. Based on the efficacy and safety exhibited for arbaclofen, the Company remains encouraged and plans to request a meeting with the FDA in the third quarter of 2019 to discuss its clinical and regulatory strategy to submit an NDA. At this time, however, it is unclear whether or not the Company will be required to conduct an additional clinical trial which may delay our submission past 2019. If we are required to conduct any such additional clinical trials, our development costs may increase, our regulatory approval process could be delayed or denied and we may not be able to commercialize and commence sales of arbaclofen ER in the time frame currently contemplated, if at all.

We acquired the rights to RVL‑1201 in 2017 and have completed a second Phase III clinical trial of RVL‑1201 for the treatment of acquired blepharoptosis, or droopy eyelid. The study was a six week randomized, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-daily treatment of RVL-1201 compared with placebo for the treatment of acquired blepharoptosis. The primary endpoint was a measurement of the mean change from baseline of the number of points seen out of a total of 35 in the top four rows of the Leicester Peripheral Field Test, or LPFT, as measured in two timepoints: hour 6 on day 1 and hour 2 on day 14. Topline results of the second Phase III trial met the primary endpoints. The mean change from baseline on the LPFT on hour 6, day 1 was 6.3 for RVL-1201 versus 2.1 for vehicle (p < 0.0001) and on hour 2, day 14 was 7.7 for RVL-1201 versus 2.4 for vehicle (p < 0.0001). We also completed a 12-week randomized, multicenter, double-masked, placebo controlled safety study to evaluate the safety of RVL-1201 compared with vehicle for the treatment of acquired blepharoptosis. Results of the safety study showed RVL-1201 was well tolerated when administered once daily over a 12-week period where the majority of adverse events were mild and did not require treatment. We intend to submit an NDA in the third quarter of 2019. If approved, RVL‑1201 would be the first non‑surgical treatment option approved by the FDA for droopy eyelid.

We plan to invest selectively in expanding our product portfolio by leveraging both our proprietary Osmodex drug delivery system to develop differentiated products as well as our management team’s operating experience to pursue external business development opportunities.

Financial Operations Overview

Segment Information

We currently operate in one business segment focused on the development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products that target markets with underserved patient populations. We are not organized by market and are managed and operated as one business. We also do not operate any separate lines of business or separate business entities with respect to our products. A single management team reports to our chief operating decision maker who comprehensively manages our entire business. Accordingly, we do not accumulate discrete financial information with respect to separate service lines and do not have separately reportable segments. See Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Table of Contents

Components of Results of Operations

Revenues

Our revenues consist of product sales, royalty revenues and licensing and contract revenue.

Net product sales—Our revenues consist primarily of product sales of our promoted products, principally M-72, Lorzone, Divigel and the OB Complete family of prescription prenatal dietary supplements, and our non‑promoted products, principally methylphenidate ER and VERT. We ship product to a customer pursuant to a purchase order, which in certain cases is pursuant to a master agreement with that customer, and we invoice the customer upon shipment. For these sales we recognize revenue when control has transferred to the customer, which is typically on delivery to the customer. The amount of revenue we recognize is equal to the selling price, adjusted for any variable consideration, which includes estimated chargebacks, commercial rebates, discounts and allowances at the time revenues are recognized.

Royalty revenue—For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).

Licensing and contract revenue—The Company has arrangements with commercial partners that allow for the purchase of product from the Company by the commercial partners for the purpose of sub-distribution. Licensing revenue is recognized when the performance obligation identified in the arrangement is completed. Variable considerations, such as returns on product sales, government program rebates, price adjustments and prompt pay discounts associated with licensing revenue, are generally the responsibility of our commercial partners.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, including salaries and benefits for employees in executive, finance, accounting, business development, legal and human resource functions. General and administrative expenses also include corporate facility costs, including rent, utilities, legal fees related to corporate matters, share based compensation and fees for accounting and other consulting services. We expect to incur additional general and administrative expenses as a public company, including costs associated with the preparation of our SEC filings, increased legal and accounting costs, investor relations costs and, incremental director and officer liability insurance costs, as well as costs related to compliance with the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Research and Development

Costs for research and development are charged as incurred and include employee‑related expenses (including salaries and benefits, share based compensation, travel and expenses incurred under agreements with contract research organizations, or CROs, contract manufacturing organizations and service providers that assist in conducting clinical and preclinical studies), costs associated with preclinical activities and development activities and costs associated with regulatory operations.

Costs for certain development activities, such as clinical studies, are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using data such as patient enrollment, clinical site activations or information provided to us by our vendors on their actual costs incurred. Payments for these activities are based on the terms of the individual arrangements, which may differ from the patterns of costs incurred, and are reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements as prepaid expenses or accrued expenses as applicable.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

Financial Operations Overview

The following table presents revenues and expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			% Change
Net product sales	$	56,215		$	71,986		(22)	%
Royalty revenue		780			(211)		(470)	%
Licensing and contract revenue		537			84		539	%
Total revenues		57,532			71,859		(20)	%
Cost of goods sold (inclusive of amortization of intangibles)		32,644			33,677		(3)	%
Gross profit		24,888			38,182		(35)	%
Gross profit percentage		43	%		53	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		25,511			16,676		53	%
Research and development expenses		5,360			8,867		(40)	%
Impairment of intangibles		125,766			—		-	%
Total operating expenses		156,637			25,543		513	%
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount		4,552			5,241		(13)	%
Other non-operating expense (gain)		15			(309)		NM	%
Total other non-operating expense (gain)		4,567			4,932		(7)	%
Income (loss) before income taxes		(136,316)			7,707		(1,869)	%
Income tax benefit (expense)		11,662			(1,819)		NM	%
Net income (loss)	$	(124,654)			5,888		(2,217)	%

NM-Not meaningful

Revenue

The following table presents total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		% Change
Venlafaxine ER (VERT)	$	18,293	$	19,663	(7)	%
Methylphenidate ER		17,100		39,146	(56)	%
Lorzone		4,063		3,972	2	%
Divigel		6,920		4,983	39	%
OB Complete		2,676		2,750	(3)	%
Other		7,163		1,472	387	%
Net product sales		56,215		71,986	(22)	%
Royalty revenue		780		(211)	NM	%
Licensing and contract revenue		537		84	NM	%
Total revenues	$	57,532	$	71,859	(20)	%

NM-Not meaningful

Total Revenues - Total revenues decreased by $14.3 million to $57.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to $71.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 primarily due to a decrease in net product sales.

Net Product Sales - Net product sales decreased by $15.8 million to $56.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to $72.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Net sales of methylphenidate ER (including M-72 which was launched in the second quarter of 2018) decreased 56% during the quarter due to additional

Table of Contents

competitors entering the market resulting in significantly lower net selling prices. Net sales of VERT decreased 7% during the quarter as volume declines following the launch of a competing product in the largest dosage during the quarter were partially offset by higher realized net selling prices due to lower than estimated product returns. We expect that the additional competition for both methylphenidate ER and VERT from these competitors, as well as additional generic product approvals and launches in the future, if any, will continue to negatively affect our sales of these products during the remainder of 2019 and in future years.

Product sales of Lorzone were relatively flat for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the prior year period, while sales of Divigel increased approximately 39% driven primarily by the launch of a new dosage strength together with targeted promotional activities and strong patient access. Product sales of OB Complete decreased 3% during the quarter due to lower realized net pricing and lower volume of product sold. Other sales increased $5.7 million, or 387%, in the quarter primarily due to higher sales of a non-promoted product.

Royalty Revenue - Royalty revenue increased by $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019, relative to the comparable period in 2018 when price protection adjustments were incurred by one of our license partners, thereby reducing royalty revenue in that period.

Licensing and Contract Revenue - Licensing and contract revenue increased $0.5 million in three months ended June 30, 2019 due to higher product sales by our license partners during the quarter.

Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit Percentage

The following table presents a breakdown of total cost of goods sold for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2019		2018		% Change
Amortization of intangible assets	$	16,868	$	19,302	(13)	%
Depreciation expense		611		671	(9)	%
Royalty expense		2,456		3,696	(34)	%
Other cost of goods sold		12,709		10,008	28	%
Total cost of goods sold	$	32,644	$	33,677	(3)	%

Cost of goods sold decreased $1.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2019 to $32.6 million as compared to $33.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in amortization of intangible assets largely due to lower amortization of methylphenidate ER and lower royalty expenses, partially offset by higher inventory reserves and higher unit production costs during the quarter.

Gross profit percentage decreased to 43% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 53% in the same period in 2018. Excluding amortization and depreciation, our gross profit percentage decreased to 74% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 as compared with 81% for the three months ended June 30, 2018, largely driven by lower realized net selling prices, offset by lower royalty expense.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $8.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019 to $25.5 million as compared to $16.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018. The increase in our selling, general and administrative expenses reflects additions to salesforce headcount and marketing costs associated with the launch of Osmolex ER, together with share compensation expense and higher costs associated with being a public company.

Table of Contents

Research and Development

Research and development expenses decreased by $3.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2019 to $5.4 million as compared to $8.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease reflects the completion of Phase III clinical trials of both arbaclofen ER and RVL-1201 during the first and second quarters of 2019, respectively, partially offset by share compensation expense.

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses incurred for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		% Change
Osmolex ER	$	175	$	532	(67)	%
Arbaclofen ER		1,081		2,787	(61)	%
RVL-1201		1,204		1,005	20	%
Other		2,900		4,543	(36)	%
Total	$	5,360	$	8,867	(40)	%

Impairment of Intangibles Assets

Impairment of intangible assets of $125.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019 relates to the write down to fair value of Venlafaxine due to price and volume decreases resulting from competing generic products, underperformance of Osmolex ER and the decision to discontinue selling a formulation of Corvite. The following table details the impairment charges for such period (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
	Impairment
Asset/Asset Group	Charge		Reason For Impairment
Product Rights
Osmolex ER	$	17,730	Revenue underperforming expectations.
Corvite		190	Discontinued formulation
		17,920
Developed Technology
Venlafaxine ER		57,166	Revenue underperforming expectations due to new generic market entrant.

Distribution Rights
Venlafaxine		50,680	Revenue underperforming expectations due to new generic market entrant.

Total Impairment Charges for three months ended June 30, 2019	$	125,766

Interest Expense and Amortization of Debt Discount

Interest expense and amortization of debt discount decreased by $0.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2019 to $4.5 million as compared to $5.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease reflects lower levels of borrowing following the prepayment of $50.0 million of debt in the fourth quarter of 2018, and lower levels of interest rates generally.

Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized income tax benefit of $11.7 million on $136.3 million of loss before income tax, compared to $1.8 million of income tax expense on $7.7 million of income before income tax during the comparable 2018 period. The tax benefit resulted from an impairment charge on certain assets which required the Company to record a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.

Income taxes for the interim periods have been based on an estimated annualized worldwide effective tax rate. During the three month period ended June 30, 2019, the annualized worldwide effective tax rate was 10% as compared to 15% in the three month period ended June 30, 2018. Income tax (expense) benefit differs from the statutory income tax rate primarily due to the occurrence of orphan drug and research development credits in addition to state and foreign taxes.

The income tax expense was based on the applicable federal, state and foreign tax rates for those periods. For periods with income before provision for income taxes, favorable tax items result in a decrease in the effective tax rate, while unfavorable tax items result in an increase in the effective tax rate. For periods with a loss before benefit from income taxes, favorable tax items result in an increase in the effective tax rate, while unfavorable tax items result in a decrease in the effective tax rate.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

Financial Operations Overview

The following table presents revenues and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			% Change
Net product sales	$	112,615		$	130,820		(14)	%
Royalty revenue		1,501			752		100	%
Licensing and contract revenue		543			88		517	%
Total revenues		114,659			131,660		(13)	%
Cost of goods sold (inclusive of amortization of intangibles)		61,847			67,338		(8)	%
Gross profit		52,812			64,322		(18)	%
Gross profit percentage		46	%		49	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		47,168			33,838		39	%
Research and development expenses		15,125			18,941		(20)	%
Impairment of intangibles		125,766			—		-	%
Total operating expenses		188,059			52,779		256	%
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount		9,052			10,084		(10)	%
Other non-operating expense (gain)		(542)			(446)		22	%
Total other non-operating expense (gain)		8,510			9,638		(12)	%
Income (loss) before income taxes		(143,757)			1,905		(7,646)	%
Income tax benefit (expense)		12,902			(624)		NM	%
Net income (loss)	$	(130,855)		$	1,281		(10,315)	%

NM-Not meaningful

Revenue

The following table presents total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):

Table of Contents


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		% Change
Venlafaxine ER (VERT)	$	39,900	$	34,484	16	%
Methylphenidate ER		37,890		67,326	(44)	%
Lorzone		8,332		8,212	1	%
Divigel		12,417		9,933	25	%
OB Complete		4,606		5,100	(10)	%
Other		9,470		5,765	64	%
Net product sales		112,615		130,820	(14)	%
Royalty revenue		1,501		752	100	%
Licensing and contract revenue		543		88	517	%
Total revenues	$	114,659	$	131,660	(13)	%

Total Revenues - Total revenues decreased by $17.0 million to $114.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to $131.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 primarily due to a decrease in net product sales.

Net Product Sales - Net product sales decreased by $18.2 million to $112.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to $130.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Net sales of methylphenidate ER (including M-72 which was launched in the second quarter of 2018) decreased 44% for the six months ended June 30, 2019 due to additional competitors entering the market, resulting in significantly lower net selling prices, partially offset by higher volumes. Net sales of VERT increased 16% during the six months ended June 30, 2019. During the period a competing dosage strength was launched which negatively affected sales volumes, however volume decreases were more than offset by lower than estimated product returns as well as government rebates resulting in higher realized net selling prices in the period. We expect that the additional competition for both methylphenidate ER and VERT from these competitors, as well as additional generic product approvals and launches in the future, if any, will continue to negatively affect our sales of these products during the remainder of 2019 and in future years.

Product sales of Lorzone were relatively flat for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the prior year period, while sales of Divigel increased approximately 25% driven primarily by the launch of a new dosage strength together with targeted promotional activities and strong patient access. Product sales of OB Complete decreased 10% during the quarter due to lower realized net pricing and volume of products sold. Other sales increased $3.7 million, or 64%, during the period largely due to higher sales of a non-promoted product.

Royalty Revenue - Royalty revenue increased by $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to the prior year period, primarily due to price protection adjustments incurred by one of our license partners thereby reducing royalty revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit Percentage

The following table presents a breakdown of total cost of goods sold for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2019		2018		% Change
Amortization of intangible assets	$	33,736	$	38,675	(13)	%
Depreciation expense		1,243		1,278	(3)	%
Royalty expense		4,283		7,036	(39)	%
Other cost of goods sold		22,585		20,349	11	%
Total cost of goods sold	$	61,847	$	67,338	(8)	%

Table of Contents

Cost of goods sold decreased $5.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2019 to $61.8 million as compared to $67.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in amortization of intangible assets largely due to lower amortization of methylphenidate ER and lower royalty expenses offset by higher unit production costs.

Gross profit percentage decreased to 46% for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 49% in the same period in 2018. Excluding amortization and depreciation, our gross profit percentage decreased to 77% for the six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared with 79% for the six months ended June 30, 2018, largely driven by lower realized net selling prices, offset by lower royalties on licensed products and product mix.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $13.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019 to $47.2 million as compared to $33.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018. The increase in our selling, general and administrative expenses reflects additions to salesforce headcount and marketing costs associated with the launch Osmolex ER, together with share compensation expense and higher costs associated with being a public company.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses decreased by $3.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2019 to $15.1 million as compared to $18.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease largely reflects the completion of Phase III clinical trials of both arbaclofen ER and RVL-1201 during the first and second quarters of 2019, respectively, partially offset by share compensation expense.

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses incurred for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		% Change
Osmolex ER	$	498	$	629	(21)	%
Arbaclofen ER		5,150		7,375	(30)	%
RVL-1201		2,581		1,922	34	%
Other		6,896		9,015	(24)	%
Total	$	15,125	$	18,941	(20)	%

Impairment of Intangibles Assets

Impairment of intangible assets of $125.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019 related to the write-down to fair value of Venlafaxine due to price and volume decreases resulting from competing generic products, underperformance of Osmolex ER and the decision to discontinue selling a formulation of Corvite. The following table details the impairment charges for such period (in thousands):

Table of Contents


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
	Impairment
Asset/Asset Group	Charge		Reason For Impairment
Product Rights
Osmolex ER	$	17,730	Revenue underperforming expectations.
Corvite		190	Discontinued formulation
		17,920
Developed Technology
Venlafaxine ER		57,166	Revenue underperforming expectations due to new generic market entrant.

Distribution Rights
Venlafaxine		50,680	Revenue underperforming expectations due to new generic market entrant.
Total Impairment Charges for six months ended June 30, 2019	$	125,766

Interest Expense and Amortization of Debt Discount

Interest expense and amortization of debt discount decreased by $1.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2019 to $9.1 million as compared to $10.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease reflects lower levels of borrowing following the prepayment of $50.0 million of debt in the fourth quarter of 2018, and lower interest rates generally.

Other Non‑operating (Income) Expenses, net

Other non-operating expense was $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Income Tax Expense

During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized income tax benefit of $12.9 million on $143.8 million of loss before income tax, compared to $0.6 million of income tax expense on $1.9 million of income before income tax during the comparable 2018 period. The tax benefit resulted from an impairment charge on certain assets which required the Company to record a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.

Income taxes for the interim periods have been based on an estimated annualized worldwide effective tax rate. During the six month period ended June 30, 2019, the annualized worldwide effective tax rate was 10% as compared to 15% in the six month period ended June 30, 2018. Income tax (expense) benefit differs from the statutory income tax rate primarily due to the occurrence of orphan drug and research development credits in addition to state and foreign taxes.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations and amounts available to be drawn under our Revolving Credit Facility, or Revolver. Our primary uses of cash are to fund operating expenses, product development costs, capital expenditures, debt service payments, as well as strategic business and product acquisitions.

As of June 30, 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $63.7 million and borrowing availability under the Revolver of $50.0 million. We also had $271.4 million aggregate principal amount borrowed under our term loans and $1.0 million under our note payable for insurance financing. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, we used $4.2 million of cash from operations, and during the six months ended June 30, 2018, we used cash from operations of $0.1 million. We expect to generate positive cash flow from operations in the future through sales of our existing and pipeline products if approved; however, we expect our levels of cash flow generated from our existing product sales to be lower due to price competition on methylphenidate ER and VERT.

As of June 30, 2019, the interest rate was 6.15% and 6.65% for our Term A Loan and Term B Loan, respectively. As of June 30, 2018, the interest rate was 5.84% and 6.34% for our Term A Loan and Term B Loan, respectively.

At June 30, 2019, there were no outstanding borrowings or outstanding letters of credit under the Revolver. Availability under the Revolver as of June 30, 2019 was $50.0 million.

On October 22, 2018, we completed our IPO, in which we issued and allotted 7,647,500 ordinary shares at a public offering price of $7.00 per share. The number of shares issued in the IPO reflected the exercise in full of the underwriters’ option to purchase 997,500 additional ordinary shares. In addition, we issued and allotted 2,014,285 ordinary shares at the public offering price in a private placement to certain existing shareholders. The aggregate net proceeds of the IPO and the private placement were approximately $58.1 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. Shortly after the IPO, we prepaid $50 million of our Term A Loan and Term B Loan.

We believe that our existing cash balances, cash we expect to generate from operations from our existing product portfolio, our near‑term product launches and our product pipeline, as well as funds available under the Revolver, will be sufficient to fund our operations and to meet our existing obligations for at least the next 12 months.

The adequacy of our cash resources depends on many assumptions, including primarily our assumptions with respect to product sales and expenses, drug development and commercialization costs, as well as other factors, such as successful development and launching of new products and strategic product or business acquisitions. Our assumptions may prove to be wrong or other factors may adversely affect our business. We expect our near term levels of cash flow to be negatively affected by price competition on methylphenidate ER and VERT, and increased expenses associated with new product launches. As a result, we could exhaust or significantly decrease our available cash resources, and we may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our debt obligations. This could, among other things, force us to raise additional funds or force us to reduce our expenses, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. The Company plans to realign its operating infrastructure to prepare for the launch of RVL-1201 and implement cost-savings measures to reduce its expenses. In addition, the Company is exploring options to raise additional capital by, for example, out-licensing or partnering the ex-US rights to RVL-1201, strategic business development, and/or conducting one or more public or private debt or equity financings, which could be dilutive to our shareholders.

To continue to grow our business over the longer term, we plan to commit resources to internal product development, which may include clinical trials of product candidates, and expansion of our commercial, manufacturing and other operations. In addition, we have evaluated and expect to continue to evaluate a wide array of strategic transactions as part of our plan to acquire or in‑license and develop additional products and product candidates to augment our internal development pipeline. Strategic transaction opportunities that we pursue could materially affect our liquidity and capital resources and may require us to incur additional indebtedness, seek equity capital or both. In addition, we may pursue development, acquisition or in‑licensing of approved or development products in new or existing therapeutic areas or continue the expansion of our existing operations. Accordingly, we expect to continue to opportunistically seek access to additional capital to license or acquire additional products, product candidates or companies to expand our operations, or

Table of Contents

for general corporate purposes. Strategic transactions may require us to raise additional capital through one or more public or private debt or equity financings or could be structured as a collaboration or partnering arrangement.

To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, our shareholders’ ownership interests will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our shareholders. Additionally, certain financings may require the consent of the lenders under our senior secured credit facilities. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our intellectual property, technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.

Cash Flows

The following table provides information regarding our cash flows for the periods indicated (in thousands):


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2019		2018		Change
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(4,160)	$	(54)	$	(4,106)
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,091)		(2,181)		90
Net cash used in financing activities		(847)		(3,370)		2,523
Effect on cash of changes in exchange rate		—		(730)		730
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(7,098)	$	(6,335)	$	(763)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

Cash flows from operating activities are primarily driven by earnings from operations (excluding the impact of non-cash items), the timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to accounts receivable and accounts payable and the timing of inventory transactions and changes in other working capital amounts. Net cash used by operating activities was $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, and net cash used in operating activities was $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

The increase in cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018, was due to changes in working capital, primarily as a result of higher levels of net accounts receivable and inventories (primarily of methylphenidate ER and VERT), together with lower levels of accounts payable and accrued expenses, offset by lower prepaid expenses.

Net cash used in investing activities

Our uses of cash in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 reflected purchases of property, plant and equipment and were $2.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

Net cash used in financing activities

Net cash used by financing activities of $0.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019 primarily related to repayments of insurance financing loans and leases of real property and office equipment.

Net cash used in financing activities of $3.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 primarily related to debt repayments of borrowings under our term loans, partially offset by the proceeds from our insurance financing loan.

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

There have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of our business in our contractual obligations during the six months ended June 30, 2019 from those as of December 31, 2018 as set forth in our filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, except for the satisfaction of the purchase obligation to buy at least $4.0 million of API during 2019, which obligation was satisfied in the second quarter of 2019.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The significant accounting policies and bases of presentation are described in Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and the related disclosures in the notes thereto. Some of these estimates can be subjective and complex. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, there may be other reasonable estimates or assumptions that differ significantly from ours. Further, our estimates and assumptions are based upon information available at the time they were made. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In order to understand our condensed consolidated financial statements, it is important to understand our critical accounting estimates. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if: (i) the accounting estimate requires us to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made and (ii) changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, or use of different estimates that we reasonably could have used in the current period, would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We believe the following accounting policies and estimates to be critical:

Revenue Recognition

Product Sales—Revenue is recognized at the point in time when our performance obligations with our customers have been satisfied. At contract inception, we determine if the contract is within the scope of ASC Topic 606 and then evaluates the contract using the following five steps: (1) identify the contract with the customer; (2) identify the performance obligations; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (5) recognize revenue at the point in time when the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Revenue is recorded at the transaction price, which is the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring products to a customer. We considered the unit of account for each purchase order that contains more than one product. Because all products in a given purchase order are generally delivered at the same time and the method of revenue recognition is the same for each, there is no need to separate an individual order into separate performance obligations. In the event that we fulfilled an order only partially because a requested item is on backorder, the portion of the purchase order covering the item is generally cancelled, and the customer has the option to submit a new one for the backordered item. We determine the transaction price based on fixed consideration in our contractual agreements, which includes estimates of variable consideration, and the transaction price is allocated entirely to the performance obligation to provide pharmaceutical products. In determining the transaction price, a significant financing component does not exist since the timing from when we deliver product to when the customers pay for the product is less than one year and the customers do not pay for product in advance of the transfer of the product.

We record product sales net of any variable consideration, which includes estimated chargebacks, commercial rebates, discounts and allowances and doubtful accounts. We utilize the expected value method to estimate all elements of variable consideration included in the transaction. The variable consideration is recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time revenues are recognized. We will only recognize revenue to the extent that it is probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur in a future period. These estimates may differ from actual consideration amount received and we will re‑assess these estimates each reporting period to reflect known changes in factors.

Table of Contents

Royalty Revenue—For arrangements that include sales‑based royalties, including milestone payments based on the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, we recognize revenue at the later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).

Licensing and Contract Revenue— We have arrangements with commercial partners that allow for the purchase of product from us by the commercial partner for purposes of sub‑distribution. We recognize revenue from an arrangement when control of such product is transferred to the commercial partner, which is typically upon delivery. In these situations the performance obligation is satisfied when product is delivered to our commercial partner. Licensing revenue is recognized in the period in which the product subject to the sublicensing arrangement is sold. Sales deductions, such as returns on product sales, government program rebates, price adjustments, and prompt pay discounts in regard to licensing revenue is generally the responsibility of our commercial partners and not recorded by us.

Freight—We record amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling as revenue, and record shipping and handling expenses related to product sales as selling, general and administrative expenses. We account for shipping and handling activities related to contracts with customers as costs to fulfill the promise to transfer the associated products. When shipping and handling costs are incurred after a customer obtains control of the products, we also have elected to account for these as costs to fulfill the promise and not as a separate performance obligation.

Sales Deductions

Product sales are recorded net of estimated chargebacks, commercial and governmental rebates, discounts, allowances, copay discounts, advertising and promotions and estimated product returns, or collectively, “sales deductions.”

Provision for estimated chargebacks, commercial rebates, discounts and allowances and doubtful accounts settled in sales credits at the time of sales are analyzed and adjusted, if necessary, monthly and recorded against gross trade accounts receivable. Estimated product returns, commercial and governmental rebates and customer coupons settled in cash are analyzed and adjusted, if necessary, monthly and recorded as a component of accrued expenses.

Calculating certain of these items involves estimates and judgments based on sales or invoice data, contractual terms, historical utilization rates, new information regarding changes in applicable regulations and guidelines that would impact the amount of the actual rebates, our expectations regarding future utilization rates and estimated customer inventory levels. Amounts accrued for sales deductions are adjusted when trends or significant events indicate that adjustment is appropriate and to reflect actual experience. The most significant items deducted from gross product sales where we exercise judgment are chargebacks, commercial and governmental rebates, product returns, discounts and allowances and advertising and promotions.

Where available, we have relied on information received from our wholesaler customers about the quantities of inventory held, including the information received pursuant to days of sales outstanding, which we have not independently verified. For other customers, we have estimated inventory held based on buying patterns. In addition, we have evaluated market conditions for products primarily through the analysis of wholesaler and other third party sell‑through, as well as internally‑generated information, to assess factors that could impact expected product demand at March 31, 2019. We believe that the estimated level of inventory held by our customers is within a reasonable range as compared to both: (i) historical amounts and (ii) expected demand for each respective product at March 31, 2019.

If the assumptions we use to calculate our allowances for sales deductions do not appropriately reflect future activity, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be materially impacted.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the activity and ending balances for our product sales provisions for the six months ended June 30, 2019 (in thousands):


					Government
			Commercial		and Managed Care		Product		Discounts and
	Chargebacks		Rebates		Rebates		Returns		Allowances		Total
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	38,861	$	49,231	$	9,981	$	48,464	$	3,510	$	150,047
Provision		238,036		104,803		10,061		5,177		9,795		367,872
Charges processed		(241,489)		(131,829)		(12,744)		(6,514)		(9,908)		(402,484)
Balance June 30, 2019	$	35,408	$	22,205	$	7,298	$	47,127	$	3,397	$	115,435

Total items deducted from gross product sales were $367.9 million (excluding $2.5 million in provisions for advertising and promotion), or 76.2% as a percentage of gross product sales during the six months ended June 30, 2019.

Chargebacks—We enter into contractual agreements with certain third parties such as retailers, hospitals and group‑purchasing organizations, or GPOs, to sell certain products at predetermined prices. Most of the parties have elected to have these contracts administered through wholesalers that buy the product from us and subsequently sell it to these third parties. When a wholesaler sells products to one of these third parties that are subject to a contractual price agreement, the difference between the price paid to us by the wholesaler and the price under the specific contract is charged back to us by the wholesaler. Utilizing this information, we estimate a chargeback percentage for each product and record an allowance for chargebacks as a reduction to gross sales when we record our sale of the products. We reduce the chargeback allowance when a chargeback request from a wholesaler is processed. Our provision for chargebacks is fully reserved for at the time when sales revenues are recognized.

We obtain product inventory reports from major wholesalers to aid in analyzing the reasonableness of the chargeback allowance and to monitor whether wholesaler inventory levels do not significantly exceed customer demand. We assess the reasonableness of our chargeback allowance by applying a product chargeback percentage that is based on a combination of historical activity and current price and mix expectations to the quantities of inventory on hand at the wholesalers according to wholesaler inventory reports. In addition, we estimate the percentage of gross sales that were generated through direct and indirect sales channels and the percentage of contract compared to non‑contract revenue in the period, as these each affect the estimated reserve calculation. In accordance with our accounting policy, we estimate the percentage amount of wholesaler inventory that will ultimately be sold to third parties that are subject to contractual price agreements based on a trend of such sales through wholesalers. We use this percentage estimate until historical trends indicate that a revision should be made. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our actual chargeback rate experience, and new trends are factored into our estimates each quarter as market conditions change.

Events that could materially alter chargebacks include: changes in product pricing as a result of competitive market dynamics or negotiations with customers changes in demand for specific products due to external factors such as competitor supply position or consumer preferences, and customer shifts in buying patterns from direct to indirect through wholesalers, which could either individually or in aggregate increase or decrease the chargebacks depending on the direction and trend of the change(s).

Chargebacks were $238.0 million, or 49.3% as a percentage of gross product sales for the six months ended June 30, 2019. We expect that chargebacks will continue to significantly impact our reported net product sales.

Commercial Rebates—We maintain an allowance for commercial rebates that we have in place with certain customers. Commercial rebates vary by product and by volume purchased by each eligible customer. We track sales by product number for each eligible customer and then apply the applicable commercial rebate percentage, using both historical trends and actual experience to estimate our commercial rebates. We reduce gross sales and increase the commercial rebates allowance by the estimated rebate amount when we sell our products to eligible customers. We reduce the commercial rebate allowance when we process a customer request for a rebate. At each month end, we analyze the allowance for commercial rebates against actual rebates processed and make necessary adjustments as appropriate. Our provision for commercial rebates is fully reserved for at the time sales revenues are recognized.

Table of Contents

The allowance for commercial rebates takes into consideration price adjustments which are credits issued to reflect increases or decreases in the invoice or contract prices of our products. In the case of a price decrease, a shelf‑stock adjustment credit is given for product remaining in customer’s inventories at the time of the price reduction. Contractual price protection results in a similar credit when the invoice or contract prices of our products increase, effectively allowing customers to purchase products at previous prices for a specified period of time. Amounts recorded for estimated shelf‑stock adjustments and price protections are based upon specified terms with direct customers, estimated changes in market prices, and estimates of inventory held by customers. We regularly monitor these and other factors and evaluate the reserve as additional information becomes available.

We ensure that commercial rebates are reasonable through review of contractual obligations, review of historical trends and evaluation of recent activity. Furthermore, other events that could materially alter commercial rebates include: changes in product pricing as a result of competitive market dynamics or negotiations with customers changes in demand for specific products due to external factors, such as competitor supply position or consumer preferences, and customer shifts in buying patterns from direct to indirect through wholesalers, which could either individually or in aggregate increase or decrease the commercial rebates depending on the direction and velocity of the change(s).

Commercial rebates were $104.8 million, or 21.7% as a percentage of gross product sales for the six months ended June 30, 2019. We expect that commercial rebates will continue to significantly impact our reported net sales.

Government Program Rebates—Federal law requires that a pharmaceutical distributor, as a condition of having federal funds being made available to the states for the manufacturer’s drugs under Medicaid and Medicare Part B, must enter into a rebate agreement to pay rebates to state Medicaid programs for the distributor’s covered outpatient drugs that are dispensed to Medicaid beneficiaries and paid for by a state Medicaid program under a fee‑for‑service arrangement. CMS is responsible for administering the Medicaid rebate agreements between the federal government and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Rebates are also due on the utilization of Medicaid managed care organizations, or MMCOs. We also pay rebates to MCOs for the reimbursement of a portion of the sales price of prescriptions filled that are covered by the respective plans. The liability for Medicaid, Medicare and other government program rebates is settled in cash and is estimated based on historical and current rebate redemption and utilization rates contractually submitted by each state’s program administrator and assumptions regarding future government program utilization for each product sold, and accordingly recorded as a reduction of product sales. Medicaid rebates are typically billed up to 180 days after the product is shipped, but can be as much as 270 days after the quarter in which the product is dispensed to the Medicaid participant. In addition to the estimates mentioned above, our calculation also requires other estimates, such as estimates of sales mix, to determine which sales are subject to rebates and the amount of such rebates. Periodically, we adjust the Medicaid rebate provision based on actual claims paid. Due to the delay in billing, adjustments to actual claims paid may incorporate revisions of this provision for several periods. Because Medicaid pricing programs involve particularly difficult interpretations of complex statutes and regulatory guidance, our estimates could differ from actual experience.

Government and managed care rebates were $10.1 million, or 2.1% as a percentage of gross product sales for the six months ended June 30, 2019.

Product Returns—Certain of our products are sold with the customer having the right to return the product within specified periods. Estimated return accruals are made at the time of sale based upon historical experience. Our return policy generally allows customers to receive credit for expired products within three months prior to expiration and within one year after expiration. Our provision for returns consists of our estimates for future product returns.

Historical factors such as one‑time recall events as well as pending new developments such as comparable product approvals or significant pricing movement that may impact the expected level of returns are taken into account monthly to determine the appropriate accrued expense. As part of the evaluation of the liability required, we consider actual returns to date that are in process, the expected impact of any product recalls and the amount of wholesaler’s inventory to assess the magnitude of unconsumed product that may result in product returns to us in the future. The product returns level can be impacted by factors such as overall market demand and market competition and availability for substitute products which can increase or decrease the pull through for sales of our products and ultimately impact the level of product returns. In determining our estimates for returns and allowances, we are required to make certain assumptions regarding the timing of the introduction of new products. In addition, we make certain assumptions with respect to the

Table of Contents

extent and pattern of decline associated with generic competition. To make these assessments, we utilize market data for similar products as analogs for our estimations. We use our best judgment to formulate these assumptions based on past experience and information available to us at the time. We continually reassess and make the appropriate changes to our estimates and assumptions as new information becomes available to us. Product returns are fully reserved for at the time when sales revenues are recognized.

Our estimate for returns may be impacted by a number of factors, but the principal factor relates to the level of inventory in the distribution channel. When we are aware of an increase in the level of inventory of our products in the distribution channel, we consider the reasons for the increase to determine whether we believe the increase is temporary or other‑than‑temporary. Increases in inventory levels assessed as temporary will not result in an adjustment to our provision for returns. Some of the factors that may be an indication that an increase in inventory levels will be temporary include:

recently implemented or announced price increases for our products; and

new product launches or expanded indications for our existing products.

Conversely, other‑than‑temporary increases in inventory levels may be an indication that future product returns could be higher than originally anticipated and, accordingly, we may need to adjust our provision for returns. Some of the factors that may be an indication that an increase in inventory levels will be other‑than‑temporary include:

declining sales trends based on prescription demand;

recent regulatory approvals to shorten the shelf life of our products, which could result in a period of higher returns;

slow moving or obsolete product still in the distribution channel;

introduction of new product(s) or generic competition;

increasing price competition from generic competitors; and

changes to the National Drug Codes, or NDCs, of our products, which could result in a period of higher returns related to product with the old NDC, as our customers generally permit only one NDC per product for identification and tracking within their inventory systems.

We ensure that product returns are reasonable through inspection of historical trends and evaluation of recent activity. Furthermore, other events that could materially alter product returns include: acquisitions and integration activities that consolidate dissimilar contract terms and could impact the return rate as typically we purchase smaller entities with less contracting power and integrate those product sales to our contracts; and consumer demand shifts by products, which could either increase or decrease the product returns depending on the product or products specifically demanded and ultimately returned.

Product returns were $5.2 million, or 1.1% as a percentage of gross product sales for the six months ended June 30, 2019.

Promotions and Co‑Pay Discount Cards—From time to time we authorize various retailers to run in‑store promotional sales of our products. We accrue an estimate of the dollar amount expected to be owed back to the retailer. Additionally, we provide consumer co‑pay discount cards, administered through outside agents to provide discounted products when redeemed. Upon release of the cards into the market, we record an estimate of the dollar value of co‑pay discounts expected to be utilized taking into consideration historical experience.

Table of Contents

Advertising and promotions were $2.5 million, or 0.5% as a percentage of gross product sales for the six months ended June 30, 2019. Advertising and promotions as a percentage of gross product sales did not change materially during the periods presented.

Discounts and allowances were $9.8 million, or 2.0% as a percentage of gross product sales for the six months ended June 30, 2019. Discounts and allowances as a percentage of gross product sales did not change materially during the periods presented.

Valuation of long‑lived assets

As of June 30, 2019, our combined long‑lived assets balance, including property, plant and equipment and finite‑lived intangible assets, is $298.0 million.

Long‑lived assets, other than goodwill and other indefinite‑lived intangibles, are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future cash flows derived from such assets. Factors that we consider in deciding when to perform an impairment review include significant changes in our forecasted projections for the asset or asset group for reasons including, but not limited to, significant under‑performance of a product in relation to expectations, significant changes or planned changes in our use of the assets, significant negative industry or economic trends, and new or competing products that enter the marketplace. The impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use of the asset group.

Our long‑lived intangible assets, which consist of distribution rights, product rights, tradenames and developed technology, are initially recorded at fair value upon acquisition. To the extent they are deemed to have finite lives, they are then amortized over their estimated useful lives using either the straight‑line method or based on the expected pattern of cash flows. Factors giving rise to our initial estimate of useful lives are subject to change. Significant changes to any of these factors may result in a reduction in the useful life of the asset and an acceleration of related amortization expense, which could cause our operating income, net income and net income per share to decrease.

Recoverability of an asset that will continue to be used in our operations is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the forecasted undiscounted future cash flows related to the asset. In the event the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its undiscounted future cash flows and the carrying amount is not considered recoverable, impairment may exist. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down by the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds the related fair value of the asset with the related impairment charge recognized within the statements of operations.

Goodwill and indefinite‑lived intangible assets

Goodwill and indefinite‑lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment on an annual basis as of October 1st of each year or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.

Goodwill Impairment Assessment—We are organized in one reporting unit and evaluate goodwill for our company as a whole. Under the authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, we have the option to first assess the qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test. If we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the goodwill impairment test is performed. We perform our goodwill impairment tests by comparing the fair value and carrying amount of our reporting unit. Any goodwill impairment charges we recognize for our reporting unit are equal to the lesser of (i) the total goodwill allocated to that reporting unit and (ii) the amount by which that reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value.

The goodwill impairment test requires us to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit and to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying value exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference. If the carrying value recorded is less than the fair value calculated then no impairment loss is

Table of Contents

recognized. The fair value of our reporting unit is determined using an income approach that utilizes a discounted cash flow model or, where appropriate, the market approach, or a combination thereof. The discounted cash flow models are dependent upon our estimates of future cash flows and other factors. Our estimates of future cash flows are based on a comprehensive product by product forecast over a five‑year period and involve assumptions concerning (i) future operating performance, including future sales, long‑term growth rates, operating margins, variations in the amounts, allocation and timing of cash flows and the probability of achieving the estimated cash flows and (ii) future economic conditions, all which may differ from actual future cash flows.

During the three months ended June 30, 2019 we assessed goodwill for impairment and based on this assessment, we did not recognize an impairment charge. During the first two quarters of 2019, the Company's market capitalization decreased significantly. Additional or a sustained decline in our market capitalization, even if due to macroeconomic or industry-wide factors, could put pressure on the carrying value of our goodwill and cause the Company to conduct additional impairment tests. A determination that all or a portion of our goodwill is impaired, although a non-cash charge to operations, could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

Assumptions related to future operating performance are based on management’s annual and ongoing budgeting, forecasting and planning processes and represent our best estimate of the future results of our operations as of a point in time. These estimates are subject to many assumptions, such as the economic environments in which we operate, demand for the products and competitor actions. Estimated future cash flows are discounted to present value using a market participant, weighted average cost of capital. The financial and credit market volatility directly impacts certain inputs and assumptions used to develop the weighted average cost of capital such as the risk‑free interest rate, industry beta, debt interest rate and our market capital structure. These assumptions are based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. The use of different inputs and assumptions could increase or decrease our estimated discounted future cash flows, the resulting estimated fair values and the amounts of related goodwill impairments, if any.

IPR&D Intangible Asset Impairment Assessment—IPR&D, which are indefinite‑lived intangible assets representing the value assigned to acquired Research and Development, or R&D, projects that principally represent rights to develop and sell a product that we have acquired which has not yet been completed or approved. These assets are subject to impairment testing until completion or abandonment of each project. The fair value of our indefinite‑lived intangible assets is determined using an income approach that utilizes a discounted cash flow model and requires the development of significant estimates and assumptions involving the determination of estimated net cash flows for each year for each project or product (including net revenues, cost of sales, R&D costs, selling and marketing costs and other costs which may be allocated), the appropriate discount rate to select in order to measure the risk inherent in each future cash flow stream, the assessment of each asset’s life cycle, the potential regulatory and commercial success risks, and competitive trends impacting each asset and related cash flow stream as well as other factors. The major risks and uncertainties associated with the timely and successful completion of the IPR&D projects include legal risk, market risk and regulatory risk. If applicable, upon abandonment of the IPR&D product, the assets are reduced to zero. Upon approval of the products in development for sale and placement into service, the associated IPR&D intangible assets are transferred to Product Rights amortizing intangible assets. The useful life of an amortizing asset generally is determined by identifying the period in which substantially all of the cash flows are expected to be generated.

If the fair value of the IPR&D is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. Based on results of the impairment assessment performed, we did not recognize impairment charges to IPR&D as of June 30, 2019. Beginning in 2018, we have been evaluating the impairment of IPR&D assets quarterly. Based on the results of this evaluation we did not recognized impairment charges as of June 30, 2019.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are recorded under the asset and liability method of accounting. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and

Table of Contents

liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Deferred income tax assets are reduced, as is necessary, by a valuation allowance when we determine it is more‑likely‑than‑not that some or all of the tax benefits will not be realizable in the future. Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent on a variety of factors, some of which are subjective in nature, including the generation of future taxable income, the amount and timing of which are uncertain. In evaluating the ability to recover the deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including cumulative income in recent fiscal years, the forecast of future taxable income exclusive of certain reversing temporary differences and significant risks and uncertainties related to our business. In determining future taxable income, management is responsible for assumptions utilized including, but not limited to, the amount of U.S. federal, state and international pre‑tax operating income, the reversal of certain temporary differences, carryforward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes, the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies and other relevant factors. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates that we are using to manage the underlying business. We assess the need for a valuation allowance each reporting period, and would record any material changes that may result from such assessment to income tax expense in that period.

We account for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740‑10, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. We assess all material positions taken in any income tax return, including all significant uncertain positions, in all tax years that are still subject to assessment or challenge by relevant taxing authorities. Assessing an uncertain tax position begins with the initial determination of the position’s sustainability and is measured at the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The evaluation of unrecognized tax benefits is based on factors that include, but are not limited to, changes in tax law, the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to audit, new audit activity and changes in facts or circumstances related to a tax position. We evaluate unrecognized tax benefits and adjust the level of the liability to reflect any subsequent changes in the relevant facts surrounding the uncertain positions. The liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits can be relieved only if the contingency becomes legally extinguished through either payment to the taxing authority or the expiration of the statute of limitations, the recognition of the benefits associated with the position meet the more‑likely‑than‑not threshold or the liability becomes effectively settled through the examination process. We consider matters to be effectively settled once the taxing authority has completed all of its required or expected examination procedures, including all appeals and administrative reviews. We also accrue for potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax provision (benefit).

The most significant tax jurisdictions are Ireland, the United States, Argentina and Hungary. Significant estimates are required in determining the provision for income taxes. Some of these estimates are based on management’s interpretations of jurisdiction‑specific tax laws or regulations and the likelihood of settlement related to tax audit issues. Various internal and external factors may have favorable or unfavorable effects on the future effective income tax rate. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in tax laws, regulations and/or rates, changing interpretations of existing tax laws or regulations, changes in estimates of prior years’ items, changes in the international organization, likelihood of settlement, and changes in overall levels of income before taxes.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had a federal net operating loss carryover of $3.3 million and net operating loss carryovers in certain foreign tax jurisdictions of approximately $34.5 million which will begin to expire in 2022. At June 30, 2019, the Company had total tax credit carryovers of approximately $4.6 million, primarily consisting of Federal Orphan Drug Tax Credit carryovers. These credit carryovers are expected to be fully realized prior to their expiration, beginning in 2036.

We make an evaluation at the end of each reporting period as to whether or not some or all of the undistributed earnings of our subsidiaries are indefinitely reinvested. While we have concluded in the past that some of such undistributed earnings are indefinitely reinvested, facts and circumstances may change in the future. Changes in facts and circumstances may include a change in the estimated capital needs of our subsidiaries, or a change in our corporate liquidity requirements. Such changes could result in our management determining that some or all of such undistributed earnings are no longer indefinitely reinvested. In that event, we would be required to adjust our income tax provision in the period we determined that the earnings will no longer be indefinitely reinvested outside the relevant tax jurisdiction.

Table of Contents

Share‑based Compensation

Prior to the consummation of our initial public offering, or IPO our employees were eligible to receive awards from the Osmotica Holdings S.C.Sp. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan. Prior to the completion of our IPO, the board of directors approved a new equity-based incentive compensation plan, which took effect prior to the completion of our initial public offering. Therefore, employees are now eligible to receive awards under our 2018 Equity Incentive Plan.

Our share‑based compensation cost will be measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and will be recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which will generally represent the vesting period. We will use the Black Scholes valuation model for estimating the fair value on the date of grant of stock options. The fair value of stock option awards will be affected by our valuation assumptions, the volatility of equity comparables, the expected term of the options, the risk‑free interest rate, expected dividends and other objective and subjective variables.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, please see Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to various market risks, which may result in potential losses arising from adverse changes in market rates, such as interest rates and foreign exchange rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes and do not believe we are exposed to material market risk with respect to our cash and cash equivalents.

Through the operation of our subsidiaries based in Argentina and Hungary, we are exposed to foreign exchange rate risks. In addition to the operations of our foreign subsidiaries, we also contract with vendors that are located outside the United States, and in some cases make payments denominated in foreign currencies. We are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency rates in connection with these arrangements. We do not currently hedge our foreign currency exchange rate risk. As of June 30, 2019, our liabilities denominated in foreign currencies were not material.

We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates on our senior secured credit facilities. An increase in interest rates could have a material impact on our cash flow. As of June 30, 2019, a 100 basis point increase in assumed interest rates for our variable interest credit facilities would have an annual impact of approximately $2.7 million on interest expense.

As of June 30, 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $63.7 million. We do not engage in any hedging activities against changes in interest rates. Because of the short‑term maturities of our cash and cash equivalents, we do not believe that an immediate 10% increase in interest rates would have a significant impact on the realized value of our investments.

Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor, API and clinical trials. We do not believe that inflation had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations during the three months ended June 30, 2019.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2019. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as

Table of Contents

appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2019, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we are a party to various legal proceedings. In addition, we have in the past been, and may in the future be, subject to investigations by governmental and regulatory authorities, which exposes us to greater risks associated with litigation, regulatory or other proceedings, including significant fines or penalties. The outcome of litigation, regulatory or other proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, and some lawsuits, claims, actions or proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably to us. In addition, intellectual property disputes often have a risk of injunctive relief which, if imposed against us, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

On February 16, 2018, upon receipt of approval for Osmolex ER from the FDA, we filed suit against Adamas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware seeking a declaratory judgment that Osmolex ER does not infringe, directly or indirectly, any valid and enforceable claim of any of the 11 patents enumerated in our complaint. On September 20, 2018, Adamas filed an amended answer with counterclaims alleging infringement of certain patents included in our complaint and requesting that the court grant Adamas damages, injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. The action is ongoing, but was stayed on May 23, 2019 at the parties’ joint request. Adamas commercializes a different amantadine product, an extended-release capsule marketed and sold as Gocovri ®. We intend to vigorously defend our rights to commercialize Osmolex ER free and clear of any of these patents. However, this litigation is at a very early stage. If we do not prevail in this litigation, we could be exposed to injunctive relief, or damages, either of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

On April 30, 2019, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc was served with a complaint in an action entitled Leo Shumacher, et al., v. Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County No. SOM-L-000540-19. On May 10, 2019, a Complaint entitled Jeffrey Tello, et al., v. Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County No. SOM-L-000617-19 was filed in the same court as the Shumacher action. The complaints name Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc, certain of its directors and officers and the underwriters of its initial public offering as defendants in putative class actions alleging violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 related to the disclosures contained in the registration statement and prospectus used for the Company’s initial public offering of ordinary shares. On July 22, 2019, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint consolidating the two actions, reiterating the previously pled allegations and adding an additional individual defendant. The Company disputes the allegations in the complaints and intends to vigorously defend against the action. However, this litigation matter is still in an early stage and there is no assurance that we will be successful in our defense or that insurance will be available or adequate to fund any settlement or judgment or the litigation costs of the action, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. At this time there is no loss that is probable or reasonably estimatable.

In general, we intend to continue to vigorously prosecute and defend these proceedings, as appropriate; however, from time to time, we may settle or otherwise resolve these matters on terms and conditions that we believe are in our best interests. Resolution of any or all claims, investigations and legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, could

Table of Contents

have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows in any given accounting period or on our overall financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 6. Exhibits.


EXHIBIT 10.1+		Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc Amended and Restated 2018 Employee Share Purchase Plan

EXHIBIT 31.1	-	Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a—14 and 15d—14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

EXHIBIT 31.2	-	Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a—14 and 15d—14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

EXHIBIT 32.1	-	Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

EXHIBIT 32.2	-	Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

EXHIBIT 101.INS	-	XBRL Instance Document.

EXHIBIT 101.SCH	-	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

EXHIBIT 101.CAL	-	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

EXHIBIT 101.DEF	-	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

EXHIBIT 101.LAB	-	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

EXHIBIT 101.PRE	-	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

+ Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Osmotica Pharmaceuticals plc

Dated: August 8, 2019	By:	/s/ Brian Markison
		Brian Markison
		Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 8, 2019	By:	/s/ Andrew Einhorn
		Andrew Einhorn
		Chief Financial Officer