Saker Aviation Services, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For The
Quarterly Period Ended March 31,
2010
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from _______________ to ________________
Commission
File Number: 000-52593
SAKER
AVIATION SERVICES, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Nevada
|
87-0617649
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
Incorporation or Organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
101 Hangar Road, Avoca, PA
|
18641
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(570)
457-3400
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former
Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last
Report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes o
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule
12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check One):
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o Smaller
Reporting Company x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
No x
As of May
12, 2010, the registrant had 33,164,453 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par
value, issued and outstanding.
SAKER
AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form
10-Q
March
31, 2010
Index
|
Page
|
||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||
ITEM
1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
||
|
|||
Balance
Sheets as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31,
2009
|
1
|
||
|
|||
Statements
of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
|
2
|
||
Statements
of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
|
3
|
||
Notes
to Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
4
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
8
|
||
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
12
|
||
ITEM
4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
12
|
||
|
|||
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||
|
|||
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
|
13
|
||
ITEM
4. OTHER INFORMATION
|
13
|
||
|
|||
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
|
15
|
||
|
|||
SIGNATURES
|
16
|
i
SAKER
AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31,
2010
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 728,796 | $ | 574,847 | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
808,375 | 809,870 | ||||||
Inventories
|
262,458 | 277,941 | ||||||
Note
receivable – current portion, less discount
|
110,289 | 110,289 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
373,895 | 166,156 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
2,283,813 | 1,939,103 | ||||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
||||||||
of
accumulated depreciation of $518,302 and $518,751
respectively
|
1,295,915 | 1,088,386 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
592,296 | 541,961 | ||||||
Note
receivable, less discount
|
435,931 | 509,431 | ||||||
Intangible
assets – trade names
|
100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
2,368,284 | 2,368,284 | ||||||
Total
other assets
|
3,496,511 | 3,519,676 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 7,076,239 | $ | 6,547,165 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 620,246 | $ | 431,899 | ||||
Customer
deposits
|
105,502 | 67,312 | ||||||
Line
of credit
|
500,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
963,548 | 741,485 | ||||||
Notes
payable – current portion
|
351,075 | 170,922 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
2,540,371 | 2,411,618 | ||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Notes
payable - less current portion
|
1,305,288 | 949,817 | ||||||
Security
deposits
|
150,059 | 100,026 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
3,995,718 | 3,461,461 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Controlling
interest
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock - $.001 par value; authorized 9,999,154;
|
||||||||
none
issued and outstanding
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock - $.001 par value; authorized 100,000,000;
|
||||||||
33,164,453
shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009
|
33,164 | 33,164 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
19,636,224 | 19,632,661 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(17,616,685 | ) | (17,542,930 | ) | ||||
Total
controlling interest
|
2,052,703 | 2,122,895 | ||||||
Non-controlling
interest
|
1,027,818 | 962,809 | ||||||
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
3,080,521 | 3,085,704 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$ | 7,076,239 | $ | 6,547,165 |
1
SAKER
AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
REVENUE
|
$ | 2,280,978 | $ | 1,740,072 | ||||
COST
OF REVENUES
|
1,259,491 | 1,080,805 | ||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
1,021,487 | 659,267 | ||||||
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
1,051,807 | 954,162 | ||||||
OPERATING
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
(30,320 | ) | (294,895 | ) | ||||
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
||||||||
OTHER
|
(2,215 | ) | (4,473 | ) | ||||
INTEREST
INCOME
|
303 | — | ||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE
|
(42,744 | ) | (10,968 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
(44,656 | ) | (15,441 | ) | ||||
NET
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
(74,976 | ) | (310,336 | ) | ||||
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS:
|
||||||||
NET
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
— | (547,468 | ) | |||||
GAIN
FROM DISPOSAL OF SUBSIDIARY
|
— | 469,262 | ||||||
NET
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
— | (78,205 | ) | |||||
NET
LOSS
|
$ | (74,976 | ) | $ | (388,541 | ) | ||
Net
loss per Common Share – Basic and Diluted
|
||||||||
Continuing
operations
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||
Discontinued
operations
|
— | (0.02 | ) | |||||
Disposal
of subsidiary
|
— | 0.02 | ||||||
Sub-total
discontinued operations
|
— | (0.00 | ) | |||||
Total
Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||
Weighted
Average Number of Common Shares
|
||||||||
Outstanding
– Basic and Diluted
|
33,164,453
|
35,674,793 |
2
SAKER
AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (74,976 | ) | $ | (388,541 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
39,144 | 46,943 | ||||||
Gain
on sale of subsidiary
|
— | (469,263 | ) | |||||
Stock
based compensation
|
4,784 | 63,224 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,495 | 177,124 | ||||||
Inventories
|
15,483 | (35,819 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(207,739 | ) | 45,859 | |||||
Deposits
|
(50,335 | ) | — | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
188,347 | (379,685 | ) | |||||
Customer
deposits
|
38,190 | 39,226 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
222,063 | 88,849 | ||||||
Security
deposits
|
50,033 | — | ||||||
TOTAL
ADJUSTMENTS
|
301,465 | (423,542 | ) | |||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
226,489 | (812,083 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Issuance
of notes receivable
|
— | (750,000 | ) | |||||
Repayment
of notes receivable
|
73,500 | — | ||||||
Net
cash of sold subsidiary
|
— | (229,188 | ) | |||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(246,673 | ) | (116,873 | ) | ||||
NET
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(173,173 | ) | (1,096,061 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
35,624 | 750,000 | ||||||
Repayment
of notes payable
|
— | (39,469 | ) | |||||
Increase
in non-controlling interest in subsidiary
|
65,009 | — | ||||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
100,633 | 710,531 | ||||||
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
153,949 | (1,197,613 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS –
Beginning
|
574,847 | 1,472,535 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS – Ending
|
$ | 728,796 | $ | 274,922 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the periods for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 42,744 | $ | 13,637 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 1,965 | $ | 4,473 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Line
of credit restructuring
|
$ | 500,000 | $ | — |
3
SAKER
AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 -
Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America for interim financial statements and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and disclosures required for annual financial statements. These
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the financial statements and related footnotes for Saker Aviation Services, Inc.
and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), which appear in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 and the condensed
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 have been prepared by the Company without audit. In the
opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) necessary to make the Company’s financial position as of
March 31, 2010 and its results of operations and cash flows for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 not misleading have been included. The results
of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for any full year or any other interim
period.
NOTE 2 –
Management’s Liquidity
Plans
As of
March 31, 2010, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $728,796 and a
working capital deficit of $256,559. The Company generated revenue of
approximately $2,280,000 and incurred a net loss from continuing operations of
approximately $75,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, cash flows included net cash provided by operating
activities of $226,489, net cash used in investing activities of $173,173, and
net cash provided by financing activities of $100,633.
The
Company has a revolving line of credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) dated
March 3, 2009 and made jointly and severally by the Company and Airborne, Inc.,
a subsidiary divested by the Company in March of 2009 (“Airborne”), in favor of
Birch Hill Capital, LLC (“Birch Hill”). The Credit Facility provides the Company
with a $500,000 revolving line of credit. The Credit Facility is secured by all
of the Company’s assets as well as the assets of Airborne. The Credit
Facility requires interest payments based on outstanding balances at an interest
rate of prime plus 350 basis points (6.75% as of March 31, 2010) and is payable
upon demand by Birch Hill. Birch Hill retains a first lien
against all of the assets of the Company and Airborne. The Company
and Airborne are joint and several guarantors of borrowings under the Credit
Facility. In the event of a sale of Airborne, Birch Hill is entitled
to receive the first distribution of any related proceeds in the full amount of
any outstanding against the Credit Facility.
The
Company is party to a concession agreement with the City of New York for the
operation of the Downtown Manhattan Heliport (the “Heliport”). Under
this agreement, the Company must pay the greater of 18% of the first $5 million
in program year revenue and 25% of revenue in excess of $5 million or minimum
annual guaranteed payments that begin at $1.2 million in Year 1 and increase to
approximately $1.7 million in Year 10. The Company also agreed,
pursuant to this agreement, to make certain capital improvements and safety code
compliance upgrades to the Heliport in the amount of $1,000,000 within two years
following the receipt of building permits for the capital improvements and
another $1,000,000 by the end of the fifth year of the Agreement. Company
management believes that earnings from the operation of the Heliport will be
sufficient to satisfy the minimum annual guarantee and to fund the capital
improvements as required under the agreement.
The
Company believes that it has sufficient liquidity to sustain its existing
business for at least the next twelve months.
NOTE 3 -
Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies
Principles of
Consolidation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Saker
Aviation Services, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries, FBO Air Wilkes-Barre,
Inc. d/b/a Saker Aviation Services (“FBOWB”), FBO Air Garden City, Inc. d/b/a
Saker Aviation Services (“FBOGC”), FBO Air WB Leasing (“WB Leasing”), and its
majority-owned subsidiary FirstFlight Heliports, LLC d/b/a Saker Aviation
Services (“FFH”). All significant inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
4
SAKER
AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Net Income (Loss) Per Common
Share
Basic net
income per share applicable to common stockholders is computed based on the
weighted average number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding
during the periods presented. Diluted net income per share reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other instruments to issue
common stock were exercised or converted into common
stock. Potentially dilutive securities, consisting of options and
warrants, are excluded from the calculation of the diluted income per share when
their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common
stock during the period.
The
following table sets forth the components used in the computation of basic and
diluted income per share:
For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2010*
|
2009*
|
|||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, basic
|
33,164,453 | 35,674,793 | ||||||
Common
shares upon exercise of options
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
shares upon exercise of warrants
|
— | — | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, diluted
|
33,164,453 | 35,674,793 |
*
Potential common shares of 9,503,587 and 13,725,298 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share as their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
Stock Based
Compensation
Stock-based
compensation expense for all share-based payment awards are based on the
grant-date fair value. The Company recognizes these compensation costs over the
requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting
term. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company incurred
stock based compensation of $4,784 and $63,224, respectively. Such amounts have
been recorded as part of the Company’s selling, general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. As
of March 31, 2010, the unamortized fair value of the options totaled
$6,000.
Option
valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including
the expected life of the option. Because the Company's employee stock options
have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the
fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee
stock options.
Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements
During
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) launched the FASB ASC as
the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. The ASC was effective
for interim and annual periods ending September 15, 2009. The ASC does not
change GAAP. Instead, it takes all individual pronouncements that currently
comprise GAAP and reorganizes them into approximately 90 accounting Topics, and
displays all Topics using a consistent structure. Changes to the ASC subsequent
to June 30, 2009, are referred to as Accounting Standards Updates
(“ASU”).
On June
30, 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-01, “Topic 105 – Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 168 – The FASB Accounting Standard Codification and the Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This ASU amends the
FASB ASC for the issuance of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This ASU includes FASB
SFAS No. 168 in its entirety. ASU 2009-01 was effective for interim
and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of
ASU 2009-01 had no effect on the operating results or financial condition of the
Company.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810, “Non-Controlling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51). ASC
810 established accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling
interest in a subsidiary (previously referred to as minority interests). ASC 810
also requires that a retained non-controlling interest upon the deconsolidation
of a subsidiary be initially measured at its fair value. Upon adoption of ASC
810, the Company was required to report any non-controlling interests as a
separate component of consolidated stockholders’ equity. The Company was also
required to present any net income or loss allocable to non-controlling
interests and net income or loss attributable to the stockholders of the Company
separately in its consolidated statements of operations, if significant. ASC 810
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after January 1, 2009. ASC 810 requires retroactive adoption of
the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests.
All other requirements of ASC 810 are applied prospectively. The Company adopted
ASC 810 and reclassified the non-controlling interest in FFH as a separate
component of consolidated stockholders’ equity on January 1,
2009. The adoption of ASC 810 did not have a material impact on
the Company’s results of operation or financial condition.
5
SAKER
AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 4 -
Inventories
Inventories
consist primarily of maintenance parts and aviation fuel, which the Company
sells to its customers. The Company also maintains fuel inventories
for commercial airlines, to which it charges into-plane fees when servicing
commercial aircraft. A summary of inventories as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 is set forth in the following table:
March 31, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Parts
inventory
|
$ | 98,364 | $ | 95,793 | ||||
Fuel
inventory
|
154,571 | 172,049 | ||||||
Other
inventory
|
9,523 | 10,099 | ||||||
Total
inventory
|
$ | 262,458 | $ | 277,941 |
Included
in inventories are amounts held for third parties of $106,547 and $84,685 as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, with an offsetting liability
included as part of accrued expenses.
NOTE 5 -
Stockholders’
Equity
Stock
Options
Details
of all options outstanding are presented in the table below:
Number of
Options
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2010
|
1,250,000 | $ | 0.64 | |||||
Granted
|
— | — | ||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | ||||||
Forfeited
|
(250,000 | ) | (1.60 | ) | ||||
Balance,
March 31, 2010
|
1,000,000 | $ | 0.41 | |||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2010
|
875,000 | $ | 0.35 |
On March
31, 2010, an option for 250,000 shares expired.
Warrants
Details
of all warrants outstanding are presented in the table below:
Number of
Warrants
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2010
|
13,417,121 | $ | 0.71 | |||||
Granted
|
— | — | ||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | ||||||
Forfeited
|
(4,913,534 | ) | (0.60 | ) | ||||
Balance,
March 31, 2010
|
8,503,587 | $ | 0.77 | |||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2010
|
8,503,587 | $ | 0.77 |
6
SAKER
AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
On March
31, 2010, warrants collectively representing 4,913,534 shares
expired.
NOTE 6 –
Related
Parties
The law
firm of Wachtel & Masyr, LLP provides certain legal services to the Company.
William B. Wachtel, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, is a managing
partner of this firm. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the
Company was billed approximately $48,000 and $136,000, respectively, for legal
services. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has
recorded in accounts payable an obligation for legal fees to such firm of
approximately $52,000 and $136,000, respectively, related to legal services
provided by such firm.
Effective
November 2008, the Company executed a management agreement with a company who
has a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary of the Company. The
owners of this company include the children of a member of the Company’s Board
of Directors. The agreement requires a management fee of 10% of gross
receipts of the subsidiary and a “success fee” of 50% of pre-tax profits as
defined. Total fees in the three months ended March 31, 2010
aggregated approximately $250,000, which was included in accrued expenses at
March 31, 2010. As part of the fee arrangement, certain capital
expenditures for the subsidiary are to be funded by the non-controlling
interest, per the operating agreement between the parties.
NOTE 7 -
Litigation
From time
to time, the Company may be a party to one or more claims or disputes which may
result in litigation. The Company's management does not, however, presently
expect that any such matters will have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 8 –
Subsequent
Events
On May 7,
2010, the Company modified its agreements with two debt holders. The
Birch Hill Credit Facility was modified such that the maximum line of credit was
reduced to $500,000, which is fully extended at March 31, 2010, and the
remaining $500,000 was reclassified into a note with a 36-month term with a
24-month balloon payment of outstanding principal and interest at 7% per
year. The maturity date of the EuroAmerican Note was extended
to March 1, 2012. The financial statements at March 31, 2010 reflect
the above changes as if they were in effect on the report date.
7
Item
2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following discussion should be read
together with the consolidated condensed financial statements and related notes
appearing elsewhere in this report. This Item 2 contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Undue reliance should not be
placed on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of
this report. Actual results may differ materially from those included in such
forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause actual results to differ
materially include those set forth at the end of this Item 2 under the heading
"Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements," as well as those
discussed elsewhere in this report.
OVERVIEW
Saker
Aviation Services, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”) is a Nevada corporation, the common
stock, $0.001 par value (the “common stock”), of which is publicly traded on the
over the counter bulletin board system under the symbol
“SKAS.OB”. Through our subsidiaries, we operate in the fixed base
operation (“FBO”) segment of the general aviation industry. An FBO
provides ground-based services such as fueling and hangaring for general
aviation, commercial, and military aircraft; aircraft maintenance, and other
miscellaneous services. We also provide consulting services for a
non-owned FBO facility and serve as the operator of a heliport.
We were
formed on January 17, 2003 (date of inception) as a proprietorship and were
incorporated in Arizona on January 2, 2004. We became a public
company as a result of a reverse merger transaction on August 20, 2004 with
Shadows Bend Development, Inc., an inactive public Nevada corporation which
changed its name to FBO Air, Inc. On December 13, 2006, we changed
our name to FirstFlight, Inc. On September 2, 2009, we changed
our name to Saker Aviation Services, Inc.
Our business activities are carried out
at the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton (Pennsylvania) International Airport, Garden City
(Kansas) Regional Airport, Downtown Manhattan (New York) Heliport, and at
Niagara Falls (New York) International Airport where we provide consulting
services to the operator.
The FBO
segment of the industry is highly fragmented - populated by, according to the
National Air Transportation Association (“NATA”), over 3,000 operators who serve
customers at one or more of the over 3,000 airport facilities across the country
that have at least one paved 3,000-foot runway. The vast majority of these
companies are single location operators. NATA characterizes companies with
operations at three or more airports as “chains.” An operation with FBOs in at
least two distinctive regions of the country is considered a “national” chain
while multiple locations within a single region are “regional”
chains.
REVENUE
AND OPERATING RESULTS
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Comparison
of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009.
REVENUE
Revenue
increased by 31.1 percent to approximately $2,280,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as compared with corresponding prior-year period revenue of
approximately $1,740,000.
Revenue
associated with the sale of jet fuel, aviation gasoline and related items
increased by 24.1 percent to approximately $1,080,000 in the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in the prior
year. Revenue associated with the operation of the Downtown Manhattan
Heliport (the “Heliport”) increased by 59.3% to approximately $1,066,000 in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months ended March
31, 2009. Revenue associated with maintenance activities decreased by
35.2 percent to approximately $117,000 as compared to the same period in the
prior year. Revenue associated with the leasing of aircraft and
office space along with the management of non-owned FBO facilities decreased by
10.7 percent to approximately $19,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010
as compared to the same period in the prior year.
The
increase in revenue associated with the sale of jet fuel, aviation gasoline and
related items was related to higher fuel costs, which offset a decline in volume
of 8.7%. We generally price our fuel products on a fixed dollar
margin basis. As the cost of fuel increases, the corresponding
customer price increases as well. If volume is constant, this
methodology yields higher revenue but at comparable gross margins.
The
increase in revenue associated with the operation of the Heliport was related to
higher levels of activity in helicopter landings and passenger
counts.
8
The
decrease in maintenance revenue was due to decreases in both charges for labor
services and for parts. The primary reason for the decreases in both
categories was a generally lower level of activity associated with jet aircraft
domiciled at the Pennsylvania facility.
The
decrease in revenue associated with the leasing of aircraft and office space
along with the management of non-owned FBO facilities was directly related to a
planned reduction in fees associated with the management of non-owned FBO
facilities.
GROSS
PROFIT
Total
gross profit increased 54.9 percent to approximately $1,021,000 in the three
months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with the three months ended March 31,
2009. Gross profit as a percent of revenue increased to 44.8 percent
in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to 37.9 percent in the same
period in the prior year. The positive impact of the Heliport was a
major factor in the year-over-year increase in gross profit, contributing
approximately $755,000 and 70.8% of revenue in 2010 as compared to approximately
$369,000 and 55.2% of revenue in the same period in 2009.
OPERATING
EXPENSE
Selling, General and
Administrative – FBO Operations
Selling,
general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses associated with our FBO
operations were approximately $943,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010,
an increase of approximately $142,000 or 15.1 percent as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009. The main factor in this increase was the
Heliport, where operating expenses increased by approximately $168,000 or 26.8%
in order to accommodate the higher levels of activity.
SG&A
associated with our FBO operations, as a percentage of revenue, was 41.4 percent
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared with 46.0 percent in the
corresponding prior year period. Increased revenue in this reporting
period more than offset the higher operating expenses, resulting in lower
SG&A as a percentage of revenue.
Selling, General and
Administrative – Corporate Operations
Corporate
expenses were approximately $109,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
representing a decrease of approximately $45,000 as compared with the
corresponding prior year period. The decrease was largely
driven by a combination of lower professional expenses and lesser stock-based
compensation expenses in the current year period as compared to prior
year. Professional fees were lower in large part due the divestiture
of subsidiary operations that occurred in March 2009 and for which no
corresponding expense was incurred in 2010. Stock-based compensation
expenses were approximately $60,000 less in the three months ended March 31,
2010 than they were in the same period in the three months ended March 31,
2009.
OPERATING
LOSS
Loss from
operations decreased by 89.7 percent to approximately $30,300 in the three
months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to approximately $295,000 in the three
months ended March 31, 2009. Operating losses were offset by a
combination of greater levels of levels of revenue and gross profit, which
counterbalanced higher non-corporate operating expenses, as described
above.
Depreciation and
Amortization
Depreciation
and amortization from continuing operations was approximately $39,000 and
$31,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $42,700 as
compared to approximately $11,000 for the same period in 2009. The
increase is largely attributed to the debt service on the EuroAmerican
Note.
Net Income/Loss Per
Share
Net loss
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was approximately $75,000 for
continuing operations as compared to net loss of approximately $310,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in net loss was as a
result of the items discussed above.
9
Basic and
diluted net loss per share was $0.00 and $0.01 for the three months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of
March 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $728,796 and a working
capital deficit of $256,559. We generated revenue of approximately $2,280,000
and net loss from continuing operations of approximately $75,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. For the three months ended March 31,
2010, cash flows included net cash provided by operating activities of $226,489,
net cash used in investing activities of $173,173, and net cash provided by
financing activities of $100,633.
We have a
revolving line of credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) dated March 3, 2009
and made jointly and severally by the Company and Airborne, Inc., a subsidiary
we divested in March of 2009 (“Airborne”), in favor of Birch Hill Capital, LLC
(“Birch Hill”). The Credit Facility provides us with a $500,000 revolving line
of credit. The Credit Facility is secured by all of our assets as well as the
assets of Airborne. The Credit Facility requires interest payments
based on outstanding balances at an interest rate of prime plus 350 basis points
(6.75% as of March 31, 2010) and is payable upon demand by Birch
Hill. Birch Hill retains a first lien against all of our assets
and the assets of Airborne. We and Airborne are joint and several
guarantors of borrowings under the Credit Facility. In the event of a
sale of Airborne, Birch Hill is entitled to receive the first distribution of
any related proceeds in the full amount of any outstanding against the Credit
Facility.
Under a
concession agreement with the City of New York, we operate of the Downtown
Manhattan Heliport (the “Heliport”). Under this agreement, we must
pay the greater of 18% of the first $5 million in annual Heliport program year
revenue and 25% of revenue in excess of $5 million or minimum annual guaranteed
payments that begin at $1.2 million in Year 1 and increase to approximately $1.7
million in Year 10. We also agreed, pursuant to this agreement, to
make certain capital improvements and safety code compliance upgrades to the
Heliport in the amount of $1,000,000 within two years following the receipt of
building permits for the capital improvements and another $1,000,000 by the end
of the fifth year of the Agreement. We believe that earnings from the operation
of the Heliport will be sufficient to satisfy the minimum annual guarantee and
to fund the capital improvements as required under the agreement.
We
believe that we have sufficient liquidity to sustain our existing business for
at least the next twelve months.
Cash
from Operating Activities
For the three months ended March 31,
2010, net cash provided by operating activities was $226,489. This amount
included a decrease in operating cash related to a net loss of $74,976 and
additions for the following items: (i) depreciation and amortization, $39,144;
(ii) stock-based compensation expense, $4,784; (iii) accrued expenses, $222,063;
(iv) accounts payable, $188,347, (v) inventories, $15,483, (vi) customer
deposits, $38,190; (vii) security deposits, $50,033; (viii) accounts receivable,
$1,495. The increase in cash used in operating activities in 2009 was
offset by the following decreases: (i) prepaid expenses, $207,739, and (ii)
deposits, $50,335. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, net
cash used in operating activities was $812,083. This amount included a decrease
in operating cash related to a net loss of $388,541 and additions for the
following items: (i) depreciation and amortization, $46,943; and (ii)
stock-based compensation expense, $63,224; (iii) accounts receivable, $177,124;
(vi) prepaid expenses, $45,859; (v) customer deposits, $39,226; and (vi) accrued
expenses, $88,849. The increase in cash used in operating activities
in 2009 was offset by the following decreases: (i) gain on sale of
subsidiary, $469,263; (ii) inventories, $35,819; and (iii) accounts payable,
$379,685.
Cash
from Investing Activities
For the three months ended March 31,
2010, net cash used in investing activities was $173,173 and was attributable to
the purchase of property and equipment of $246,673 offset by the repayment of
notes receivable of $73,500. For the three months ended March 31,
2009, net cash used in investing activities was $1,096,061 and was attributable
to the purchase of property and equipment of $116,873, issuance of note
receivable of $750,000, and net cash of discontinued operations of
$229,188.
Cash
from Financing Activities
For the three months ended March 31,
2010, net cash provided by financing activities was $100,633, consisting of
proceeds from notes payable of $35,624 and an increase in non-controlling
interest in subsidiary of $65,009. For the three months ended March
31, 2009, net cash provided by financing activities was $710,531, consisting
primarily of a note payable of $750,000 in connection with the divestiture of
Airborne offset by repayment of notes payable of $39,469.
10
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Stock Based
Compensation
Stock-based
compensation expense for all share-based payment awards are based on the
grant-date fair value. We recognize these compensation costs over the requisite
service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting
term.
Option
valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including
the expected life of the option. Because the Company's employee stock options
have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the
fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee
stock options.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
During
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) launched the FASB ASC as
the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. The ASC was
effective for interim and annual periods ending September 15,
2009. The ASC does not change GAAP. Instead, it takes all
individual pronouncements that currently comprise GAAP and reorganizes them into
approximately 90 accounting Topics, and displays all Topics using a consistent
structure. Changes to the ASC subsequent to June 30, 2009, are
referred to as Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”).
On June
30, 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-01, “Topic 105 – Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 168 – The FASB Accounting Standard Codification and the Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This ASU amends the
FASB ASC for the issuance of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This ASU includes FASB
SFAS No. 168 in its entirety. ASU 2009-01 was effective for interim
and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of
ASU 2009-01 had no effect on our operating results or financial
condition.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810, “Non-Controlling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51). ASC
810 established accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling
interest in a subsidiary (previously referred to as minority interests). ASC 810
also requires that a retained non-controlling interest upon the deconsolidation
of a subsidiary be initially measured at its fair value. Upon adoption of ASC
810, we were required to report any non-controlling interests as a separate
component of consolidated stockholders’ equity. We were also required to present
any net income or loss allocable to non-controlling interests and net income or
loss attributable to our stockholders separately in its consolidated statements
of operations, if significant. ASC 810 is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after January 1,
2009. ASC 810 requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure
requirements for existing minority interests. All other requirements of ASC 810
are applied prospectively. We adopted ASC 810 and reclassified the
non-controlling interest in our Heliport subsidiary as a separate component of
consolidated stockholders’ equity on January 1, 2009. The
adoption of ASC 810 did not have a material impact on our results of operation
or financial condition.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements
contained in this report may contain information that includes or is based upon
"forward-looking statements" relating to our business. These forward-looking
statements represent management's current judgment and assumptions, and can be
identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current
facts. Forward-looking statements are frequently accompanied by the use of such
words as "anticipates," "plans," "believes," "expects," "projects," "intends,"
and similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to,
those relating to:
|
§
|
our ability to secure the
additional debt or equity financing, if required, to execute our business
plan;
|
|
§
|
our ability to identify,
negotiate and complete the acquisition of targeted operators, consistent
with our business plan;
|
|
§
|
existing or new competitors
consolidating operators ahead of
us;
|
|
§
|
our
ability to attract new personnel or retain existing personnel, which would
adversely affect implementation of our overall business
strategy.
|
11
Any one
of these or other risks, uncertainties, other factors, or any inaccurate
assumptions may cause actual results to be materially different from those
described herein or elsewhere by us. Undue reliance should not be replaced on
any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they were
made. Certain of these risks, uncertainties, and other factors are described in
greater detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 under the heading “Risk Factors” and in other filings we make with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Subsequent written and oral forward-looking
statements attributable to us or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth above and
elsewhere in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We
expressly disclaim any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking
statements.
Item
3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not applicable.
Item
4T – Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, including our President
and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive and financial officer)
evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Form
10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our President and Chief Executive
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls were effective as of such
date.
Based upon its evaluation, our
management, with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer,
has concluded there is a significant deficiency with respect to our
internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(e).
Those rules define internal control over financial reporting as a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The
weakness identified by management relates to the lack of sufficient accounting
resources to apply certain U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S.
GAAP”).
We currently lack adequately trained
accounting personnel with appropriate U.S. GAAP expertise for certain complex
transactions. Our management believes this weakness is considered a
significant deficiency but does not rise to the level of a material weakness due
to the compensating supervisory controls as discussed below.
As of the end of the period covered by
this report and to address the identified weakness, we engage consultants or
other resources to assist with the accounting and disclosure for complex
transactions. Our President and Chief Executive Officer operates in a
supervisory capacity to help compensate for the limited accounting
personnel. This added level of supervision helps ensure the financial
statements and disclosures are accurate and complete. This additional
assistance was considered in concluding that our weakness in internal control is
a significant deficiency. This added level of supervision helps
ensure the financial statements and disclosures are accurate and
complete.
In order to correct this deficiency, we
plan to hire additional employees or consultants, as needed, to ensure that
management will have adequate resources in order to attain complete reporting of
financial information on a timely manner and provide a further level of
segregation of financial responsibilities.
A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company
have been detected. Such limitations include the fact that human judgment in
decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur
because of human failures, such as simple errors or mistakes or intentional
circumvention of the established process.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting; Changes in Internal
Controls Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial
reporting. We believe that a control system, no matter how well
designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of
the control system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a
company have been detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to provide a reasonable assurance of achieving their
objectives. Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
based on the framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO) as set forth in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal
Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting was effective at the reasonable assurance level
as of March 31, 2010.
12
During the three months ended March 31,
2010, there were no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting
that materially affected or were reasonably likely to materially affect these
controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
Uncertainty and adverse changes in the
general economic conditions of markets in which we participate may negatively
affect our business.
Current
and future conditions in the economy have an inherent degree of uncertainty. As
a result, it is difficult for us to estimate the level of growth or contraction
for the economy as a whole. It is even more difficult to estimate growth or
contraction in various parts, sectors and regions of the economy, including the
markets in which we participate. Adverse changes may occur as a result of soft
global economic conditions, rising oil prices, wavering consumer confidence,
unemployment, declines in or volatility of stock markets, contraction of credit
availability, declines in real estate values, or other factors affecting
economic conditions in general. Our results of operations are sensitive to
changes in general economic conditions that impact consumer spending, including
discretionary spending for use of private aircraft. The economic turmoil that
has arisen in the credit markets (most recently with respect to the indebtedness
of certain European countries such as Greece and Portugal) and in the housing
markets has had an adverse effect on the U.S. and world economy, which may
suppress discretionary spending and other consumer purchasing habits and, as a
result, adversely affect our results of operations.
Item
4. Other Information
Birch Hill Forbearance
Agreement.
Effective
May 7, 2010, we consummated a Forbearance Agreement with Birch Hill Capital, LLC
(“Birch Hill”).
The
Forbearance Agreement modifies the Loan Agreements (as defined below) acquired
by Birch Hill as of December 29, 2009 from Five Star Bank (“Five Star”) pursuant
to an Allonge and an Assignment of Note and Note Documents (together, the
“Assignment Documents”). Under the Assignment Documents, that certain $1,000,000
Line of Credit Note and related documents and agreements dated March 3, 2009
made jointly and severally by Airborne, Inc. (“Airborne”) and us in favor of
Five Star (collectively, the “Loan Agreements”) were sold, assigned and
transferred by Five Star to Birch Hill.
The
modifications made to the Loan Agreements pursuant to the Forbearance Agreement
include: (i) an agreement by Birch Hill to forbear (with respect to us only and
expressly not with respect to Airborne) on demanding repayment of $500,000 of
the principal amount outstanding under the Loan Agreements until May 5, 2012;
and (ii) an agreement by us to make 24 equal monthly payments of interest and
principal of $15,438.55 each (representing payments made on $500,000 of the
principal amount outstanding under the Loan Agreements pursuant to a 36 month
authorization period using an annual interest rate of 7%). The Forbearance
Agreement also includes a general release made by us in favor of Birch Hill and
its affiliates.
The Loan
Agreements are more particularly described in our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated March 2, 2009 and the Assignment Documents are more particularly described
in our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 29, 2009. The descriptions of
the Assignment Documents and the Loan Agreements are incorporated herein by
reference. Approximately $1,000,000 was outstanding under the Loan Agreements as
of May 12, 2010.
First Amendment to EuroAmerican
Promissory Note.
Also
effective May 7, we consummated a First Amendment to Note in order to extend the
maturity date of that certain Promissory Note made by us in favor of
EuroAmerican Investment Corp. (“EuroAmerican”) from February 27, 2010 to March
1, 2012. The EuroAmerican Promissory Note is more particularly described in our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 2, 2009, which description is
incorporated herein by reference. Approximately $750,000 was outstanding under
the EuroAmerican Promissory Note as of May 12, 2010.
13
General.
The above
summaries of the Forbearance Agreement and the First Amendment to Promissory
Note are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of each such
agreement, which are filed as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
William B. Wachtel, one of our Directors, is also a principal of each of Birch
Hill and EuroAmerican.
14
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive and principal financial officer).
*
|
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification. *
|
|
4.1
|
Birch
Hill Forbearance Agreement. *
|
|
4.2
|
First
Amendment to EuroAmerican Promissory Note.
*
|
* Filed
herewith
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Saker
Aviation Services, Inc.
|
||
Date: May
12, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Ronald J. Ricciardi
|
Ronald
J. Ricciardi,
|
||
President
& Chief Executive
Officer
|
16