Saker Aviation Services, Inc. - Annual Report: 2020 (Form 10-K)

PART I

General

Saker Aviation Services, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”) is a Nevada corporation. Our common stock, $0.03 par value per share (the “common stock”), is quoted on the OTCQB Marketplace (“OTCQB”) under the symbol “SKAS”. Through our subsidiaries, we operate in the aviation services segment of the general aviation industry, in which we serve as the operator of a heliport, a fixed base operation (“FBO”), a provider of aircraft maintenance and repair services (“MRO”), and as a consultant for a seaplane base that we do not own. FBOs provide ground-based services, such as fueling and aircraft storage for general aviation, commercial and military aircraft, and other miscellaneous services.

We were formed on January 17, 2003 as a proprietorship and were incorporated in Arizona on January 2, 2004. We became a public company as a result of a reverse merger transaction on August 20, 2004 with Shadows Bend Development, Inc., an inactive public Nevada corporation, and subsequently changed our name to FBO Air, Inc. On December 12, 2006, we changed our name to FirstFlight, Inc. On September 2, 2009, we changed our name to Saker Aviation Services, Inc.

Our business activities are carried out as the operator of the Downtown Manhattan (New York) Heliport, and as an FBO and MRO at the Garden City (Kansas) Regional Airport.

The Garden City facility became part of our company as a result of our acquisition of the FBO assets of Central Plains Aviation, Inc. in March 2005 and of Aircraft Services, Inc. (“Aircraft Services”) in October 2016.

Our business activities at the Downtown Manhattan (New York) Heliport facility (the “Heliport”) commenced in November 2008 when we were awarded the Concession Agreement by the City of New York to operate the Heliport, which we assigned to our subsidiary, FirstFlight Heliports, LLC d/b/a Saker Aviation Services (“FFH”).

We believe the general aviation market has been historically cyclical, with revenue correlated to general U.S. economic conditions. Although not truly seasonal in nature, the spring and summer months tend to generate higher levels of revenue and our operations generally follow that trend. The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to a decline in travel and tourism related businesses and general economic conditions in the United States and significantly disrupted our business and operations in the year ended December 31, 2020, as well as disrupted business operations in the United States and globally. To the extent local, regional and the federal government impose restrictions on air travel and/or air tourism or consumers cease traveling, our results of operations will continue to be negatively impacted. We cannot predict with certainty the full impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on our business operations, financial condition and results of operations, which will largely depend on the length and severity of the ongoing pandemic and any recovery will depend on consumer willingness to travel by air. Please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors” below.

Suppliers and Raw Materials

Our principal materials are aviation fuel and aircraft parts. We obtain aviation fuel, component parts and other supplies from a variety of sources, generally from more than one supplier. Our suppliers and sources are both domestic and foreign, and we believe that our sources of materials are adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future. We do not believe the loss of any one supplier would have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations. We generally purchase our supplies on the open market, where certain commodities have fluctuated in price significantly in recent years. We have not experienced any significant shortage of our key supplies.

Marketing and Sales

The main goal of our marketing and sales efforts is to increase traffic at our facilities, which would then drive revenue through the incremental sale of our products and services. Our primary marketing tactic in this regard is to focus advertising efforts in the environments (web, periodical and industry publications) where the pilot and aviation-user community might be introduced to our brand name and locations. We intend to continue to invest in improvements to our sales and marketing strategies to drive revenue growth.

Government Approvals

The aviation services that we provide are generally performed on municipal or other government owned real estate properties. Accordingly, at times we will need to obtain certain consents or approvals from governmental entities in conjunction with our operations. These consents and approvals are typically in the form of a lease agreement, as is the case at our Kansas facility, or a concession agreement, as is the case with our New York facility. There can be no assurance that we will obtain further consents or approvals on favorable terms or be able to renew existing consents or approvals on favorable terms, if at all.

Government Regulation

We are subject to a variety of governmental laws and regulations that apply to companies in the aviation industry. These include, among other matters, compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration rules and regulations, and local, regional and national rules and regulations as they relate to environmental matters. We believe we are in compliance with, and intend to continue to comply with, all applicable government regulations. The adoption of new regulations could result in increased costs and have an adverse impact on our results of operations, including, for example, regulations that restricted air travel such as reduced seating capacity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Customers

In 2019, the Company’s accounts receivable was comprised of four key customers at our New York Heliport. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, two of these key customers were unable to sustain their business and ceased operating in 2020. Their receivable balances at December 31, 2020, totaling approximately $208,000, have been deemed uncollectable by the Company. The loss of these two key customers has adversely affected our business and results of operations. The Company’s other two key customers continue to operate, but at substantially reduced levels of operation. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, these remaining two key customers represented approximately $137,000, or 52.4% of the balance of accounts receivable. The Company has a security deposit in place in connection with both of these receivables.

Competition

The FBO segment of the aviation services industry is competitive in both pricing and service because aircraft in transit are able to choose from a number of FBO options within a 300-mile radius. The vast majority of FBO operators are independent, single location operators. We are the sole FBO at our facility in Garden City, KS. As such, we face no direct on-airport competition. However, we face competitive pressure on pricing and services from FBO facilities at other airports, depending on aircraft travel flexibility.

We plan to grow our business through both internal development of existing resources and facilities and through the potential acquisition of other related business. We anticipate that growing our business will provide us with greater buying power from suppliers and, therefore, result in lower costs. Lower costs would allow us to implement a more aggressive pricing policy against some competitors. We believe that the higher level of customer service offered in our facilities will allow us to draw additional aircraft traffic and thus compete successfully against other FBOs of all sizes. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the highly competitive aviation industry.

Costs and Effects of Complying With Environmental Laws

We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those that govern health and safety requirements, the discharge of pollutants into the air or water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the responsibility to investigate and clean up contaminated sites that are or were owned, leased, operated or used by us or our predecessors. Some of these laws and regulations require us to obtain permits, which contain terms and conditions that impose limitations on our ability to emit and discharge hazardous materials into the environment and may be periodically subject to modification, renewal and revocation by issuing authorities. Fines and penalties may be imposed for non-compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and the failure to have or to comply with the terms and conditions of required permits. We intend to comply with these laws and regulations. However, from time to time, our operations may not be in full compliance with the terms and conditions of our permits or licenses. We periodically review our procedures and policies for compliance with environmental laws and requirements. We believe that our operations are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws and requirements and that any potential non-compliance would not be expected to result in us incurring material liability or cost to achieve compliance. Although the cost of achieving and maintaining compliance with environmental laws and requirements has not been material, we can provide no assurance that such cost will not become material in the future.

Employees

As of December 31, 2020, we employed 22 persons, 18 of which were employed on a full-time basis and one of which was an executive officer. All of our personnel are employed in connection with our operations in New York and Kansas.

Available Information

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Therefore, we file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. We maintain a website at www.sakeraviation.com where we make available, free of charge, documents that we file with, or furnish to, the SEC, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, registration statements and any amendments to those reports. Our SEC reports can be found under the “SEC Filings” heading in the “Investor Relations” tab on our website. The information found on our website is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.

Risks related to our business and operations:

We will need additional financing to expand our business.

Certain potential aviation services firms which we may seek to acquire in the future may accept shares of our common stock or other securities as payment by us for the acquisition. However, we believe that most will likely prefer cash payments, whether paid at the closing or in post-closing installment payments. There can be no assurance that our operations will generate sufficient cash flow to meet these acquisition obligations. Accordingly, we anticipate the need to seek additional equity or debt financing to meet any cash requirements for acquisitions. Any such financing will be dependent on general market conditions and the stock market’s evaluation of our performance and potential. Accordingly, we can give no assurance that we will obtain such equity or debt financing and, even if we do, that the terms would be satisfactory to us.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and is expected to continue to have, a material adverse impact on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition, and has resulted in lower demand and reduced activity at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on travel demand, travel behavior, or travel restrictions has had, and is expected to continue to have, a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and operating results. The pandemic has resulted in, at times, increased government restrictions and regulation, including certain interstate and other travel restrictions and quarantines of our personnel, and future regulations may make accessing our facilities overly burdensome or impossible, which would adversely affect our operations.

Throughout 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the global and United States economies. Federal, state, and local governments implemented certain travel restrictions, “stay-at-home” orders, and social distancing initiatives which negatively impacted our operations and those of our customers. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 17, 2020 all sightseeing tour operations the Downtown Manhattan Heliport ceased. On July 20, 2020, New York City started Phase 4 of the city’s reopening. Sightseeing tour operators at the heliport restarted operations under this phase. For the period July 20, 2020 through the date of this report, sightseeing tour operators have experienced low demand and minimal activity. To date, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a less substantial impact on our operations at our Kansas FBO and MRO. Although the Downtown Manhattan Heliport has been able to reopen and our Kansas FBO and MRO is operating, there can be no assurance that these facilities will be able to remain open for the foreseeable future, depending on future developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Additionally, the general economic conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have significantly depressed the market value of certain types of aircraft, which led us to record a $270,000 impairment charge relating to a Falcon 10 aircraft we previously recorded as an asset held for sale.

To-date, we have experienced a significant decrease in revenue during all four fiscal quarters of 2020 compared to prior year periods and expect this trend to continue throughout the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. The full extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operational and financial performance will depend on future developments, including the duration and spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and related travel advisories and restrictions and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall demand for air travel, which we expect to remain low for the duration of the pandemic.

We expect our business, results of operations and financial condition to continue to be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant volatility, uncertainty and economic disruption. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly and adversely affected our business, operations and financial results, and we expect these adverse effects to continue for the duration of the pandemic, and the full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, operations and financial results will depend on numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict. We expect our results for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 to be adversely affected. Factors that will determine the full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact our business include, but are not limited to:

We could be adversely affected by increases in the price, or decreases in the availability, of jet fuel.

Our operations could be significantly affected by the availability and price of jet fuel. A significant increase in the price of jet fuel would most likely have a material impact on our ability to achieve and maintain profitability unless we are able to pass on such costs to our customers. Due to the competitive nature of the industry, our ability to pass on increased fuel prices by increasing our rates is uncertain. Likewise, any potential benefit of lower fuel prices may be offset by increased competition and lower revenue, in general. While we do not currently anticipate a significant reduction in fuel availability, dependency on foreign imports of crude oil and the possibility of changes in government policy on jet fuel production, transportation and marketing make it impossible to predict the future availability of jet fuel. If there are new outbreaks of hostility or other conflicts in oil producing areas or elsewhere, there could be a reduction in the availability of jet fuel or significant increases in costs to our business, as well as to the entire aviation industry, which in turn would adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are susceptible to counterparty risk in our agreements with our customers and have been adversely affected by the loss of certain key customers and the inability of such key customers to pay amounts due to us.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, two of the Company’s key customers at our Ney York Heliport were unable to sustain their business and ceased operating in 2020. Their receivable balances at December 31, 2020, totaling approximately $208,000, have been deemed uncollectable by the Company. The loss of these two key customers has adversely affected our business and results of operation. The Company’s other two key customers at our New York Heliport continue to operate, but at substantially reduced levels of operation. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, these two accounts represented approximately $137,000, or 52.4%, of the balance of accounts receivable at December 31, 2020. The Company has a security deposit in place for both of these receivables. If our remaining key customers experience further reduced operations, they may also cease operating which would materially and adversely impact our business and results of operations.

We could be adversely affected by the loss of or failure to extend our material agreements including our Concession Agreement with the City of New York and our lease of the Garden City, Kansas facilities.

A substantial portion of our business depends on our existing material agreements including our Concession Agreement with the City of New York and our lease of facilities in Garden City, Kansas. If we were to lose these agreements, or if these agreements expired without renewal or extension, we may be unable to operate our business in our current geographic markets. Should we lose or fail to extend these agreements, there is no guarantee that we could enter into new agreements with similar terms or into new agreements at all. If we were to enter into material agreements with less favorable terms or if we were unable to enter into new agreements, our business and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Our agreement (the “Air Tour Agreement”) with the New York City Economic Development Corporation (the “NYCEDC”) may continue to negatively impact our business and financial results as well as those of our management company.

Under the Air Tour Agreement, we cannot allow our tenant operators to conduct tourist flights from the Downtown Manhattan Heliport on Sundays. We were also required to ensure that our tenant operators reduced the total allowable number of tourist flights from 2015 levels by 20 percent beginning June 1, 2016, by 40 percent beginning October 1, 2016 and by 50 percent beginning January 1, 2017. Additionally, since June 1, 2016, we have been required to provide monthly written reports to the NYCEDC and the New York City Council detailing the number of tourist flights conducted out of the Downtown Manhattan Heliport compared to 2015 levels, as well as information on any tour flight that flies over land or strays from agreed upon routes. These provisions of the Air Tour Agreement have, and may continue to, have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The FBO segment of the aviation services industry in which we operate is fiercely competitive.

We compete with national, regional, and local FBO operators. Many of our competitors have been in business longer than we have and have greater financial resources available to them. Having greater financial resources will make it easier for these competitors to absorb an increase in fuel prices and other expenses. In addition, these competitors might seek acquisitions in regions and markets competitive to us, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Accordingly, we can give no assurance that we will be able to successfully compete in our industry.

Our business as an FBO is subject to extensive governmental regulation.

FBOs are subject to extensive regulatory requirements that could result in significant costs. For example, the FAA, from time to time, issues directives and other regulations relating to the management, maintenance and operation of facilities, including the potential of emergency regulations related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we may be subject to government procurement regulations as they relate to obtaining new agreements or renewing or extending existing agreements with governmental entities. Compliance with those requirements may cause us to incur significant expenditures. The proposal and enactment of additional laws and regulations, as well as any charges that we have not complied with any such laws and regulations, could significantly increase the cost of our operations and reduce overall revenue. We cannot provide assurance that compliance with existing laws and regulations or that laws or regulations enacted in the future will not adversely affect our business and results of operations. If any emergency regulations related to the COVID-19 pandemic caused us to temporarily cease operations, our results of operations and financial condition would be adversely impacted.

We must maintain and add key management and other personnel.

Our future success is heavily dependent on the performance of our managers. Our growth and future success depends, in large part, on the continued contributions of management and our ability to retain management. Our success depends to a significant extent upon the continued service of Ron Ricciardi, our President and Chief Executive Officer. On September 1, 2019, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Ricciardi. The initial term runs from September 1, 2019 through September 1, 2023 and does not provide for automatic renewal. Loss of the services of Mr. Ricciardi could significantly harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. The Company maintains key-person insurance on the life of Mr. Ricciardi. Beginning on December 24, 2020 and continuing through the date of this report, Mr. Ricciardi remains on a temporary leave of absence to address health issues unrelated to the COVID-19 pandemic. As previously disclosed, effective March 26, 2021, Samuel Goldstein, one of our directors, has been appointed to serve as our acting principal executive officer.

Our growth and future success also depends on other key individuals, as well as our ability to motivate and retain these personnel or hire other persons. Although we believe we will be able to retain and hire qualified personnel, we can give no assurance that we will be successful in retaining and recruiting such personnel in sufficient numbers to increase revenue, maintain profitability or successfully implement our growth strategy. If we lose the services of management or any of our key personnel or are not able to retain or hire qualified personnel, our business could be adversely affected.

If our employees were to unionize, our operating costs would increase and our business could be adversely affected.

None of our employees are currently represented under a collective bargaining agreement. From time to time, there may be efforts to organize our employees. There is no assurance that our employees will not unionize in the future, particularly if legislation is passed that facilitates unionization. The unionization of our employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations due to the possibility of work stoppage, wage increases, or other developments that may result from the unionization of our employees.

Changes in minimum wage laws outside of our control could affect our profitability.

We have employees who are paid wage rates based on the applicable federal or state minimum wage and increases in the minimum wage may increase our labor costs and reduce profitability. Federal, state, or local minimum wages may be raised in the future and we may be unable or unwilling to increase our prices in order to pass these increased labor costs on to our customers, in which case, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We are subject to environmental laws that could impose significant costs on us and the failure to comply with such laws could subject us to sanctions and material fines and expenses.

We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air or water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the responsibility to investigate and clean-up contaminated sites that are or were owned, leased, operated or used by us or our predecessors. Some of these laws and regulations require us to obtain permits, which contain terms and conditions that impose limitations on our ability to emit and discharge hazardous materials into the environment and may be periodically subject to modification, renewal and revocation by issuing authorities. Fines and penalties may be imposed for non-compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, the failure to have required permits or the failure to comply with the terms and conditions of such permits. We intend to comply with all laws and regulations, however, from time to time, our operations may not be in full compliance with the terms and conditions of our permits. We periodically review our procedures and policies for compliance with environmental laws and requirements. We believe that our operations are in material compliance with applicable environmental laws, requirements and permits and any lapses in compliance are not expected to result in us incurring material liability or cost to achieve compliance. However, there can be no assurance that our operations will remain in material compliance with applicable environmental laws and requirements. Historically, the costs of achieving and maintaining compliance with environmental laws, requirements and permits have not been material; however, the operation of our business entails risks in these areas and a failure by us to comply with applicable environmental laws, regulations or permits could result in civil or criminal fines, penalties, enforcement actions, third party claims for property damage and personal injury, requirements to clean up property or to pay for the costs of cleanup and/or regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring corrective measures. Moreover, if applicable environmental laws and regulations, or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, become more stringent in the future, we could incur capital or operating costs beyond those currently anticipated and our business and results of operations could be harmed.

Risks related to our securities:

There is no active market for our common stock, which makes our common stock less liquid.

To date, trading of our common stock has been sporadic and nominal in volume. In addition, there are only a limited number of broker-dealers trading our common stock. As a result, there is little, if any, liquidity in our common stock. We can provide no assurance that an active trading market will ever develop.

Our common stock is subject to the penny stock rules, which makes our common stock less liquid.

The SEC has adopted a set of rules called the “penny stock rules” that regulate broker-dealers with respect to trading in securities with a bid price of less than $5.00. These rules do not apply to securities registered on certain national securities exchanges (including the Nasdaq Stock Market), provided that current price and volume information regarding transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange. Our stock is not listed on such an exchange and we have no expectation that our common stock will be listed on such an exchange in the future. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer to deliver to the customer a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. Additionally, the broker-dealer must provide the customer with other information. The penny stock rules also require that, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, the broker-dealer must determine in writing that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser. The broker-dealer must also receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock such as ours that is subject to the penny stock rules.

Our common stock may not continue to be traded on the OTCQB.

We cannot provide any assurance that our common stock will continue to be eligible to be quoted on the OTCQB Marketplace (“OTCQB”). Should our common stock cease to be quoted on the OTCQB and fail to qualify for listing on a stock exchange (including the Nasdaq Stock Market), our common stock would only trade in the “pink sheets” which generally provides an even less liquid market than the OTCQB. In such event, stockholders may find it more difficult to trade their shares of our common stock or to obtain accurate and current information concerning market prices for our common stock.

Our management team currently has the ability to influence stockholder votes.

As of March 31, 2021, our executive officers, directors and their family members and associates, collectively, are entitled to vote approximately 402,793 shares, or 30.2% of the 1,028,863 shares of our outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, and because there is no cumulative voting for directors, our executive officers and directors are currently in a position to influence the election of all of our Board of Directors. The management of our company is controlled by our Board of Directors, which is currently comprised of three independent directors, a director who is a managing partner of a law firm which provides legal services to us, and one executive officer/director.

General risk factors:

Potential additional financings, the granting of additional stock options and any anti-dilution provisions in potential future derivative securities could further dilute our existing stockholders.

As of March 31, 2021, there were 1,028,863 shares of our common stock outstanding. If all of our outstanding options were exercised, there would be 1,082,191 shares outstanding, an increase of approximately 5.2%. Any further issuances due to additional equity financings, or the granting of additional options could further dilute our existing stockholders, which could cause the value of our common stock to decline.

Our Board of Directors’ right to issue shares of preferred stock could adversely impact the rights of holders of our common stock.

Our Board of Directors currently has the right to authorize the issuance of up to 333,306 shares of one or more series of our preferred stock with such voting, dividend and other rights as our directors determine. Such action can be taken by our Board of Directors without the approval of our shareholders. Accordingly, the holders of any new series of preferred stock could be granted voting rights that reduce the voting power of the holders of our common stock. For example, the preferred holders could be granted the right to vote on a merger as a separate class even if the merger would not have an adverse effect on their rights. This right, if granted, would give such preferred holders a veto with respect to any merger proposal. Alternatively, such preferred holders could be granted a large number of votes per share while voting as a single class with the holders of our common stock, thereby diluting the voting power of the holders of our common stock. In addition, the holders of any new series of preferred stock could be given the option to redeem their shares for cash in the event of a merger. This would make acquiring us less attractive to a potential buyer. Thus, our Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of shares of the new series of preferred stock in order to defeat a proposal for the acquisition of our company that a majority of the holders of our common stock otherwise favor.

Not applicable.

As of March 31, 2021, we lease office and hangar space at the following locations:

We believe that our space is adequate and suitable for our immediate needs. Additional hangar space may be required for our operations in the future. No definitive plans to lease any additional space have been developed at the time of this report. Should additional hangar space be required, there can be no assurance that such space will be available or available on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

From time to time, we may be a party to one or more claims or disputes which may result in litigation. However, we are currently not a party to, nor is our property subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.

Not applicable.

PART II

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “SKAS”. The OTCQB is a regulated quotation service that displays real-time quotes, last-sale prices and volume information in over-the-counter (“OTC”) equity securities. Our common stock is only traded on a limited or sporadic basis and should not be deemed to constitute an established public trading market. OTC quotations reflect intra-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices for the common stock as reported on the OTCQB for the past two most recent fiscal years.

Holders

As of March 31, 2021, there were approximately 162 holders of record of our common stock. This number does not include beneficial owners of the common stock whose shares are held in the names of various broker-dealers, clearing agencies, banks and other fiduciaries.

Dividends

On September 30, 2019, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had declared a special cash dividend of $0.50 per share (the “Dividend”). The Dividend was paid in equal quarterly installments of $0.125 per share beginning on November 1, 2019, with the final dividend paid on August 13, 2020. The declaration and payment of any future dividend will be at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors.

Not applicable.

Forward-looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects” and similar references to future periods. These statements may include projections of revenue, provisions for doubtful accounts, income or loss, capital expenditures, repayment of debt, other financial items, statements regarding our plans and objectives for future operations, acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions, statements of future economic performance, statements of the assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements and statements other than statements of historical fact.

Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncer‐tainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. We therefore caution you against relying on any of these forward-looking statements because they are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include our services and pricing, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, general economic conditions, our ability to raise additional capital, our ability to obtain the various approvals and permits for the acquisition and operation of FBOs and the other risk factors contained in Item 1A of this report.

Any forward-looking statement made by us in this report speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

Overview

Saker Aviation Services, Inc. is a Nevada corporation. Our common stock, $0.03 par value per share (the “common stock”), is quoted on the OTCQB Marketplace (“OTCQB”) under the symbol “SKAS”. Through our subsidiaries, we operate in the aviation services segment of the general aviation industry, in which we serve as the operator of a heliport, a fixed base operation (“FBO”), and as a provider of aircraft maintenance and repair services (“MRO”). FBOs provide ground-based services, such as fueling and aircraft storage for general aviation, commercial and military aircraft, and other miscellaneous services.

We were formed on January 17, 2003 as a proprietorship and were incorporated in Arizona on January 2, 2004. We became a public company as a result of a reverse merger transaction on August 20, 2004 with Shadows Bend Development, Inc., an inactive public Nevada corporation, and subsequently changed our name to FBO Air, Inc. On December 12, 2006, we changed our name to FirstFlight, Inc. On September 2, 2009, we changed our name to Saker Aviation Services, Inc.

Our business activities are carried out as the operator of the Downtown Manhattan (New York) Heliport and as an FBO and MRO at the Garden City (Kansas) Regional Airport.

The Garden City facility became part of our company as a result of our acquisition of the FBO assets of Central Plains Aviation, Inc. in March 2005 and of Aircraft Services, Inc. in October 2016.

Our business activities at the Downtown Manhattan (New York) Heliport facility (the “Heliport”) commenced in November 2008 when we were awarded the Concession Agreement by the City of New York to operate the Heliport, which we assigned to our subsidiary, FirstFlight Heliports, LLC d/b/a Saker Aviation Services (“FFH”).

Throughout 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the global and United States economies. Federal, state, and local governments implemented certain travel restrictions, “stay-at-home” orders, and social distancing initiatives which negatively impacted our operations and those of our customers. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 17, 2020, all sightseeing tour operations at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport ceased due to a drop in demand. On July 20, 2020, New York City started Phase 4 of the city’s reopening. Sightseeing tour operators at the heliport restarted operations under this phase. For the period July 20, 2020 through the date of this report, sightseeing tour operators have experienced low demand and minimal activity. To date, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a less substantial impact on our operations at our Kansas FBO and MRO.

We experienced a decrease in revenue during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 compared to prior year periods. While we expect the COVID-19 pandemic to continue to adversely impact our business and operations, the full extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operational and financial performance will depend on future developments, including the duration and spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and related travel advisories and restrictions and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall demand for air travel.

Our long-term strategy is to increase our sales through growth within our aviation services operations. To do so, we may expand our geographic reach and product offering through strategic acquisitions and improved market penetration within the markets we serve. We expect that any future acquisitions or product offerings would be to complement and/or augment our current aviation services operations.

If we are able to grow our business as planned, we anticipate that our larger size would provide us with greater buying power from suppliers, resulting in lower costs. We expect that lower costs would allow for a more aggressive pricing policy against some competition. More importantly, we believe that the higher level of customer service offered in our facilities will allow us to draw additional aircraft to our facilities and thus allow us to compete against other FBOs of varying sizes.

Summary Financial Information

The summary financial data set forth below is derived from and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, filed as part of this report.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Comparison of Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

REVENUE

Operating results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has depressed year-over-year activity at our Heliport and, consequently, the results reported below.

Revenue decreased by 69.7 percent to $3,506,628 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 as compared with corresponding prior-year period revenue of $11,567,725.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, revenue associated with services and supply items decreased by 77.4 percent to approximately $1,500,000 as compared to approximately $6,600,000 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, revenue associated with the sale of jet fuel, aviation gasoline and related items decreased by 59.1 percent to approximately $1,950,000 as compared to approximately $4,800,000 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, all other revenue decreased by 68.3 percent to approximately $58,000 as compared to approximately $184,000 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.

GROSS PROFIT

Total gross profit decreased 82.8 percent to $980,928 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 as compared to $5,716,659 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. Gross margin was 28.0 percent for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 as compared to 49.4 percent for the same period in 2019.

OPERATING EXPENSE

Selling, General and Administrative

Total selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) were $2,472,203 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of $2,196,894, or 47.1 percent, as compared to the same period in 2019.

SG&A associated with our FBO operations were approximately $1,865,000 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of approximately $2,290,000, or 55.1 percent, as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. SG&A associated with our FBO operations, as a percentage of revenue, was 53.2 percent for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, as compared with 35.9 percent in the corresponding prior year period.

Corporate SG&A was approximately $608,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, representing an increase of approximately $93,000 as compared with the corresponding prior year period.

OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME

Operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $(1,491,276) as compared to operating income of $1,047,562 in the year ended December 31, 2019.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization was approximately $119,000 and $124,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Interest Income and Expense

Interest income was $18,109 and $27,069 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $24,025, as compared to $7,987 in the same period in 2019. The increase in interest expense is due primarily to interest expense associated with our right of use leases.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangibles

We had $750,000 of goodwill at December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense

Income tax benefit for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 was approximately $(431,000), as compared to income tax expense of $399,000 in the same period in 2019. The income tax benefit is attributable to a net loss in the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 as compared to net income in the same period in 2019.

Net (Loss) Income Per Share

Net loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 was $(1,748,928) as compared to net income of $667,644 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.

Basic net loss per share for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 was ($1.71), as compared to basic and diluted net income per share of $0.66 and $0.65, respectively, in 2019.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2020, we had cash of $1,899,082 and a working capital surplus of $2,827,586. We generated revenue of $3,506,268 and had a net loss of $(1,748,928) for the year ended December 31, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2020, cash flows included net cash used in operating activities of $1,590,447, net cash used in investing activities of $4,913, and net cash used in financing activities of $103,049.

As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 21, 2018 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), on March 15, 2018 the Company entered into a loan agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Key Bank National Association (the “Bank”). The Loan Agreement contains three components: (i) a $2,500,000 acquisition line of credit (the “Key Bank Acquisition Note”); (ii) a $1,000,000 revolving line of credit (the “Key Bank Revolver Note”); and (iii) a $338,481 term loan (the “Key Bank Term Note”). There are currently no amounts outstanding under the Key Bank Term Note.

Proceeds of the Key Bank Acquisition Note were to be disbursed pursuant to a multiple draw demand note dated as of the agreement date, where the Company could, at the discretion of the Bank, borrow up to an aggregate amount of $2,500,000, to be used for the Company’s acquisition of one or more business entities. Until the Change of Terms Agreement, as defined below, the Company was required to make consecutive monthly payments of interest, calculated at a rate per annum equal to one-day LIBOR (adjusted daily) plus 2.75%, on any outstanding principal under the Key Bank Acquisition Note from the date of its issuance through September 15, 2018 (the “Conversion Date”).

At any time through and including the Conversion Date, at the Bank’s discretion, the Company had the opportunity to request that any loan made under the Key Bank Acquisition Note be converted into a term loan to be repaid in full, including accrued interest, by consecutive monthly payments over a 48 month amortization period beginning after the Conversion Date. For any loan that was not converted into a term loan on or before the Conversion Date, the Company would have been required to begin making monthly payments of principal and interest after the Conversion Date, over a 48 month amortization period, after which the remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest would have become due and payable. All loans under the Key Bank Acquisition Note would have, after the Conversion Date, accrued interest at a rate per annum equal to the Bank’s four year cost of funds rate plus 2.5%. As of the Conversion Date, there were no amounts due under the Key Bank Acquisition Note and no amounts had been converted to a term loan.

On October 11, 2018, and as subsequently amended, the Company entered into a new loan agreement with the Bank (as so amended, the “Change of Terms Agreement”) which modified the original terms of the Key Bank Acquisition Note. Under the Change of Terms Agreement, the Company may continue to, at the discretion of the Bank, borrow up to an aggregate amount of $2,500,000 through September 1, 2021 (the “Maturity Date”), to be used for the Company’s acquisition of one or more business entities. The Change of Terms Agreement requires the Company to make consecutive monthly payments of interest on any outstanding principal calculated at a rate per annum equal to 4.25% and would be secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets. The entire principal balance, plus all accrued interest, is due in full on the Maturity Date. As of December 31, 2020, there were no amounts due under the Change of Terms Agreement.

Proceeds from the Key Bank Revolver Note, at the discretion of the Bank, provide for the Company to borrow up to $1,000,000 for working capital and general corporate purposes. This revolving line of credit is a demand note with no stated maturity date. Borrowings under the Key Bank Revolver Note will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to one-day LIBOR (adjusted daily) plus 2.75%. The Company is required to make monthly payments of interest on any outstanding principal under the Key Bank Revolver Note and is required to pay the entire balance, including principal and all accrued and unpaid interest and fees, upon demand by the Bank. Any proceeds from the Key Bank Revolver Note would be secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets. As of December 31, 2020, there were no amounts due under the Key Bank Revolver Note.

On August 14, 2020, the Company was granted a loan from the Bank (“the Loan”) in the amount of $304,833, pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) under Division, Title I of the CARES Act, which was enacted March 27, 2020. The Loan, which was in the form of a Note dated August 14, 2020 (“the “Note”), matures in August 2025 and bears interest at a rate of 1% per annum and is payable in monthly installments commencing on, or before, October 31, 2021. The Note may be prepaid by the Company at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties. The Company did not provide any collateral or guarantees in connection with the PPP loan. Funds from the loan may only be used for payroll costs, costs used to continue group health care benefits, mortgage payments, rent, utilities, and interest on other debt obligations incurred during the covered 24 week period. The loan qualifies for forgiveness provided the proceeds are used for eligible expenses on the covered period and certain employee retention criteria are met. In accordance with FASB ASC 470, Debt, and ASC 405-20, Liabilities – Extinguishment of Liabilities, the Company recorded the cash inflow from the PPP loan as a liability, and cash flows from financing, pending legal release from the obligation by the U.S. Small Business Administration at December 31, 2020. Upon forgiveness and legal release, the liability will be reduced by the amount forgiven and a gain on debt extinguishment will be recorded. The Company has used the proceeds for purposes consistent with the PPP and expects this loan to be forgiven in 2021.

The Company is party to a Concession Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2008, with the City of New York for the operation of the Downtown Manhattan Heliport (the “Concession Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Concession Agreement, the Company must pay the greater of 18% of the first $5,000,000 in any program year based on cash collected (“Gross Receipts”) and 25% of Gross Receipts in excess of $5,000,000, or minimum annual guaranteed payments. During the program year that began on May 1, 2020, the City agreed, in recognition of the pandemic’s impact, that the Company could defer payment of minimum guaranteed payments. In October 2020 City waived the deferred fees through September 30, 2020. Concession fees in this Form 10-K have been accounted for based on the abatement. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we incurred approximately $315,000 and $1,640,000 in concession fees, respectively, which are recorded in the cost of revenue.

As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 5, 2016, the Company and the New York City Economic Development Corporation (the “NYCEDC”) announced new measures to reduce helicopter noise and impacts across New York City (the “Air Tour Agreement”).

Under the Air Tour Agreement, the Company has not been allowed to permit its tenant operators to conduct tourist flights from the Downtown Manhattan Heliport on Sundays since April 1, 2016. The Company was also required to ensure that its tenant operators reduce the total allowable number of tourist flights from 2015 levels by 20 percent beginning June 1, 2016, by 40 percent beginning October 1, 2016 and by 50 percent beginning January 1, 2017. Additionally, beginning on June 1, 2016, the Company was required to provide monthly written reports to the NYCEDC and the New York City Council detailing the number of tourist flights conducted out of the Downtown Manhattan Heliport compared to 2015 levels, as well as information on any tour flight that flies over land and/or strays from agreed upon routes.

The Air Tour Agreement also extended the Concession Agreement for 30 months, resulting in a new expiration date of April 30, 2021. The City of New York has two one-year options to further extend the Concession Agreement. The Air Tour Agreement also provided for the minimum annual guarantee payments the Company is required to pay to the City of New York under the Concession Agreement be reduced by 50%, effective January 1, 2017.

These reductions have negatively impacted the Company’s business and financial results as well as those of its management company at the Heliport, Empire Aviation which, as previously disclosed, is owned by the children of a former officer and director of the Company.  The Company incurred management fees with Empire Aviation of approximately $144,000 and $2,200,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which is recorded in administrative expenses. The Company and Empire Aviation had historically contributed to the Helicopter Tourism and Jobs Council (“HTJC”), an association that lobbies on behalf of the helicopter air tour industry, and which had engaged in discussions with the Mayor’s office.  The Company has suspended its contributions to HTJC in light of the pandemic. The Company’s former officer and director is also an active participant with HTJC, which is managed by the former officer and director’s grandson. One of our Directors and our current acting principal executive officer, Sam Goldstein, serves as deputy director of HTJC.  

On April 20, 2018, the Company’s Kansas subsidiary entered into a purchase lease with Commerce Bank for a refueling truck (the “Truck Lease”). The Truck Lease commenced on May 1, 2018 and continues for 60 months at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 416 basis points. At the end of the Truck Lease, the Company’s subsidiary may purchase the vehicle for $1.00.

On January 15, 2019, the Company was issued an unsecured note by one of its customers at the Heliport. The note schedules payments of approximately $276,000 in receivables payable by such customer, had a maturity date of October 31, 2019, as amended, and carries a 7.5% rate of interest. The note payments were to be made in six monthly installments beginning May 31, 2019. The customer’s payments on the note have not met the installment plan and the Company was working on changes to the note when the customer filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in October 2019. In February 2021, the bankruptcy court allowed the customer to convert from a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy to a Chapter 7 Liquidation. Under the Chapter 7 Liquidation, the note will now be treated as a general unsecured claim as opposed to a prioritized payment under the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy to cure the permit default. This change has substantially diminished the Company’s expectation to collect amounts due under the note. Therefore, the Company has deemed unpaid principal and accrued interest of approximately $205,000 at December 31, 2020 as uncollectable. The $205,000 was written off to bad debt expense in the fourth quarter of 2020.

As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 6, 2015, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement, dated June 30, 2015, by and between the Company and Warren A. Peck, pursuant to which Mr. Peck purchased all of the capital stock of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Phoenix Rising Aviation, Inc. The details of the agreement are described in such Current Report as well as in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, which was filed with the SEC on April 11, 2016. The Company received $100,000 due under this agreement in September 2017 and an additional payment of $100,000 in September 2018. In 2019, the Company accepted the title to a Falcon 10 aircraft owned by Mr. Peck as satisfaction in full of the remainder of the $270,000 stock purchase price. The Company intended to sell the aircraft and classified it as “Held For Sale” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31. 2019. The Company has been unable to find a buyer due to a depressed market as well as a drop in demand for this type of aircraft. Without a market in which to sell the aircraft, the Company recorded an impairment charge in the quarter ended June 30, 2020 for the full carrying amount of the aircraft. The Company does not believe the aircraft has any value and, in December 2020, filed an application with the FAA Aircraft Registry to cancel the aircraft’s registry.

As described throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, on March 17, 2020, all sightseeing tour operations at the Downtown Manhattan Heliport ceased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. On July 20, 2020, New York City began Phase 4 of the city’s reopening. Sightseeing tours resumed under this phase. For the period July 20, 2020, through the date of this report, sightseeing tour operators have experienced low demand and minimal activity. To mitigate this loss of revenue, we may need additional financing to continue operations through the issuance of equity or debt and any such financing will be dependent on general market conditions, which itself is subject to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although we have access to the Key Bank Revolver Note described above, we can make no assurance that that the Key Bank Revolver Note will be sufficient to fund our operations. Additionally, certain restrictions in the Key Bank Revolver Note may prohibit us from obtaining more attractive financing.

Our anticipated capital expenditures in 2021 are approximately $50,000 - $100,000.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, we had a net decrease in cash of $1,698,409. Our sources and uses of funds during this period were as follows:

Cash from Operating Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash used in operating activities was $1,590,447. This amount included a decrease in operating cash related to net loss of $1,748,928 and additions for the following items: (i) depreciation, $119,039; (ii) bad debt, $396,000; (iii) impairment charge, $270,000; (iv) impairment of notes receivable, $205,730; (v) stock-based compensation expense, $74,659; (vi) deferred income taxes, $476,000; (vii) accounts receivable, trade, $19,944; and (viii) inventories, $17,585. The decrease in cash used in operating activities in 2020 was offset by the following items: (i) prepaid expenses and income tax receivable, $935,387; (ii) customer deposits, $49,517; (iii) accounts payable, $335,322; and (iv) accrued expenses, $100,250. For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash provided by operating activities was $1,123,862. This amount included an increase in operating cash related to net income of $667,644 and additions for the following items: (i) depreciation, $124,264; (ii) stock-based compensation expense, $33,997; (iii) prepaid expenses and other current assets, $271,830; (iv) deposits, $3,552; (v) deferred income taxes, $31,000; (vi) accounts payable, $49,052; and (vii) accrued expenses, $59,129. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2019 was offset by the following items: (i) accounts receivable, trade, $106,267; and (ii) inventories, $10,339.

Cash from Investing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash used in investing activities was $4,913. This amount represents purchases of property and equipment. For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in investing activities was $87,382. This amount included payments of note receivable of $87,208 offset by purchases of property and equipment of $174,590.

Cash from Financing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash used in financing activities was $103,049. This amount included additions for the issuance of common stock of $16,196 and the issuance of notes payable of $304,833 offset by $383,909 to the payment of accrued dividends and $40,169 to the repayment of right of use leases. For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in financing activities was $277,638 of which $112,217 was attributable to the repayment of notes payable, $126,630 to the payment of accrued dividends, and $38,891 to the repayment of right of use leases.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities in which we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities or any other obligations under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides us with financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those estimates related to product returns, product and content development expenses, bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on experience and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The critical accounting policies which we believe affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are provided as follows:

Accounts Receivable, Trade

In 2020, the Company’s accounts receivable was comprised of four key customers at our New York Heliport. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, two of these key customers were unable to sustain their business and ceased operating in 2020. Their receivable balances at December 31, 2020, totaling approximately $208,000, have been deemed uncollectable by the Company and have been written off to bad debt expense in the fourth quarter of 2020. The Company’s remaining two key customers at our New York Heliport continue to operate, but at substantially reduced levels of operation. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, these remaining two key customers represented approximately $137,000, or 52.4% of the balance of accounts receivable. No customer represented more than 10% of revenue in 2020. The Company has a security deposit in place in connection with both of these receivables.

At December 31, 2019, the Company had concentrations of credit risk in that 73.0% of the balance of its accounts receivable at December 31, 2019 was made up of its four key customers. At December 31, 2019, accounts receivable from the Company’s four key customers amounted to approximately $241,298 (35.6%), $115,864 (17.1%), $111,149 (16.4%), and $26,523 (3.9%), respectively. In addition, these four key customers represented approximately 54.7% of our revenue in 2019. Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. Accounts receivable are periodically evaluated for collectability and the allowance for doubtful accounts is adjusted accordingly. We determine collectability based on our management experience and knowledge of the customers.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangibles that are deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized but, instead, are to be reviewed at each reporting period for impairment. We assessed potential impairment of goodwill using qualitative factors by considering various factors including macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, a sustained share price or market capitalization decrease and any reporting unit specific events. We performed an analysis of our goodwill and intangible assets at December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between their financial statement carrying amounts and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred tax assets are subject to a valuation allowance because it is more likely than not that certain of the deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. During 2020 we experienced a decrease in demand and minimal activity in our business. The extent of the impact of COVID-19 on our operational and financial performance cannot be predicted and will depend on future developments, including the duration and spread of the outbreak, related travel advisories and restrictions. Accordingly, we have established a valuation allowance on net deferred assets. We file income tax returns in the United States (federal) and in various state and local jurisdictions. In most instances, we are no longer subject to federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2017.

Stock Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards are based on the estimated grant-date fair value. We recognize these compensation costs over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term.

Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the option. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by leased assets and provide additional disclosures. ASU 2016-02 became effective for us on January 1, 2019 and we have adopted the new standard using a modified retrospective approach. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Not applicable.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Saker Aviation Services, Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Saker Aviation Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows, for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Goodwill Impairment Assessment

As described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill was $750,000 as of December 31, 2020. Management reviews goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the asset may be impaired. Management considered the ongoing deterioration in general economic and market conditions due to the Covid-19 pandemic and its impact on the respective reporting unit of the Company. Management performs impairment reviews using a fair value method based on management’s judgement and assumptions. The estimated fair value is then compared to the carrying value of the goodwill. In estimating the fair value, management uses the discounted cash flows method.

The principal consideration for our determination that performing procedures related to the goodwill impairment assessment is a critical audit matter are the significant judgement by management when developing the fair value; this, in turn, led to a high degree of auditor judgement, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions relating to future cash flows and the discount rate.

These procedures included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for developing the fair value estimates, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow methodology and (iii) evaluating the significant assumptions used by management related to the discount rates and future cash flows of the entity.

Impairment of Held for Sale Asset

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded an asset impairment of $270,000 relating to the aircraft that was a held for sale asset. Management evaluated impairment on the held for sale asset during the second quarter. Management considered the ongoing deterioration in general economic and market conditions due to the Covid-19 pandemic and its impact on the asset held for sale. The Company engaged a specialist determine the salability of the aircraft. Based on management’s evaluation and the decrease in demand for the aircraft it resulted in an impairment of the aircraft. The determination of the impairment was a critical audit matter due to the evaluation and judgment required by Company management.

The principal consideration for our determination that performing procedures related to the goodwill impairment assessment is a critical audit matter are the significant judgement by management when developing the fair value; this, in turn, led to a high degree of auditor judgement, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions relating to future cash flows and the discount rate.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We obtained an understanding of the Company’s impairment evaluation process and compared the data that was used.

Uncertain Tax Positions

As noted in footnote 8, the Company recorded uncertain tax position assets as of December 31, 2020. Judgement is required by management in determining the Company’s tax provision and recording the related income tax assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is uncertain. As disclosed by management, a valuation allowance for the best estimate of the probable loss on this tax position has been recorded.

The principal consideration for our determination that performing procedures related to uncertain tax positions is a critical audit matter are significant judgement by management when developing whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be recovered and the high degree of judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions relating to the future recoverability of this asset.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, testing management’s process for developing whether there would be taxable income/losses in future years and the availability, or lack thereof, of taxable income in prior carryback periods.

/s/ Kronick Kalada Berdy & Co. P.C.

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2009.

Kingston, Pennsylvania

March 31, 2021

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

SAKER AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

SAKER AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

SAKER AVIATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial

None.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, including our President (principal financial officer) and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, our President and our Chief Executive Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed and submitted by us under the Exchange Act, is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and our Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed and tested, have inherent limitations, including, among other things, the possibility of human error, circumvention or disregard. Therefore, even those systems of internal control that have been determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and our President (principal financial officer), we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the assessment under this framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020.

None.

Part III

The following table contains certain information related to the directors and executive officers of the Company as of December 31, 2020:

On December 24, 2020, Mr. Ricciardi began a temporary leave of absence to address health issues unrelated to the COVID-19 pandemic. Effective March 26, 2021, Mr. Goldstein began serving as our acting principal executive officer.

Each of our directors is elected at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his successor is duly elected and qualified. Our officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors to serve at the discretion of the Board.

Business History

William B. Wachtel – Director, Chairman of the Board

Mr. Wachtel was elected as a director and our Chairman of the Board on March 31, 2005. Mr. Wachtel served as our Chairman until April 8, 2009, when he resigned from such capacity but remained a member of the Board. On October 27, 2011, Mr. Wachtel was re-elected as our Chairman of the Board.

Mr. Wachtel has been a managing partner of Wachtel Missry LLP (previously Wachtel & Missry, LLP, and before that, its predecessor law firm Gold & Wachtel, LLP), since its founding in August 1984. Such firm has provided certain legal services to the Company in the past. He is a co-founder of the Drum Major Institute, an organization carrying forth the legacy of the late Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr.

Mr. Wachtel’s participation is important to our Board of Directors because of his extensive experience advising companies regarding legal issues, which provides him with a depth and breadth of experience that enhances our ability to navigate legal and strategic issues, and because of his extensive experience working with us.

Ronald J. Ricciardi – Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Ricciardi was designated as Chief Executive Officer on November 29, 2018 and has served as our President since March 2009. From August 2004 until September 2006, Mr. Ricciardi also served as our Acting Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Ricciardi was a director of Saker’s predecessor entity since its inception in 2003 and continues to serve in that capacity for the current entity. From December 2006 until October 2010, Mr. Ricciardi served as Vice Chairman of the Board. Mr. Ricciardi served as Chairman of the Board from April 2009 until October 2011.

Mr. Ricciardi is a senior executive with extensive general management experience in entrepreneurial and large companies. Before joining Arizona FBO Air and from 2000 - 2003, Mr. Ricciardi was President and CEO of P&A Capital Partners, Inc., an entertainment finance company established to fund the distribution of independent films. From 1999 – 2000, Mr. Ricciardi was also co-founder, Chairman and CEO of eTurn, Inc., a high technology service provider, for which he developed a consolidation strategy, negotiated potential merger and acquisition candidates, prepared private placement materials and executed numerous private, institutional and venture capital presentations. After a management career at Pepsi-Cola Company and the Perrier Group of America, Mr. Ricciardi was President and CEO of Clearidge, Inc., a leading regional consumer products company, where he provided strategic and organizational development, and led a consolidation effort that included 14 transactions, which more than tripled the revenue of Clearidge, Inc. over four years.

Mr. Ricciardi’s participation is important to our Board of Directors because of his 16 years of experience working in a variety of roles with us, including his service on our Board of Directors, combined with his knowledge of the aviation industry and his extensive management experience, all of which demonstrate his strong commitment to us and make him a valued member of our Board of Directors.

On December 24, 2020, the Company announced that Mr. Ricciardi was taking a temporary leave of absence to address health issues unrelated to the COVID-19 pandemic. During Mr. Ricciardi’s leave of absence, Mark Raab, the Company’s Corporate Controller, serves as the Company’s acting principal financial officer and acting principal accounting officer until such time as Mr. Ricciardi is able to resume his responsibilities. Effective March 26, 2021, Mr. Goldstein has been appointed to serve as our acting principal executive officer.  The Company does not expect Mr. Ricciardi’s temporary leave of absence to have a negative impact on the Company’s business operations.

Samuel Goldstein – Director

Mr. Goldstein was appointed as a director on September 21, 2018.  Effective March 26, 2021, Mr. Goldstein has been appointed to serve as our acting principal executive officer during Mr. Ricciardi’s temporary leave of absence.

Mr. Goldstein has served since 2014, and continues to serve, as Deputy Director of the Helicopter Tourism and Jobs Council (“HTJC”). During this time, HTJC successfully negotiated a settlement with the City of New York enabling the helicopter air tour industry to continue operations. In early 2019, Mr. Goldstein joined Marino, a leading strategic communications firm with offices in New York and Los Angeles, where he is a director with Marino’s Land Use Public Policy unit. Mr. Goldstein was also a principal at Kivvit Public Affairs from 2017 to 2018 and served previously as the director of government relations for Selfhelp Community Services, one of New York’s largest senior housing and social service organizations, from 2008 to 2013.

Mr. Goldstein’s participation is important to our Board of Directors because his exposure and outreach skills developed in part as Deputy Director of HTJC, and corresponding knowledge of the local helicopter marketplace, enable Mr. Goldstein to advise the Company on potential courses of action.

Marc Chodock – Director

Mr. Chodock was appointed as a director on June 25, 2015. 

Mr. Chodock has been acting as a private investor since February 2013. Previously, he was a consultant in the New York office of McKinsey & Company and a Principal at MatlinPatterson Global Advisors, where he served on the Board of Directors of four companies. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business and a Bachelor of Applied Science in Biomedical Science from the School of Engineering and Applied Science of the University of Pennsylvania.

Mr. Chodock's participation is important to our Board of Directors because of his extensive experience in advising companies by serving on boards as well as his knowledge in depth and breadth of the aviation industry.

Roy P. Moskowitz – Director

Mr. Moskowitz was appointed as a director on June 25, 2015.

Mr. Moskowitz has been the Chief Legal Officer of The New School from 2006 to 2019. From 1988 – 2004, Mr. Moskowitz held senior positions of legal oversight for New York educational institutions, including the New York State Education Department, City University of New York, Community School District #2, and the Regional Superintendent of Region 9.

Mr. Moskowitz’ participation is important to our Board of Directors because his extensive experience analyzing legal issues enables Mr. Moskowitz to advise the Company on potential courses of action, particularly when legal topics are involved.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors and officers.

Other Directorships

None of our directors serves as a director of a company (1) with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, (2) subject to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, or (3) registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Code of Ethics

On May 19, 2006, our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions as well as to all of our other employees and directors. Our Code of Ethics is posted on our website at www.sakeraviation.com under the “Investor Relations” tab, and then under the “Corporate Governance” sub-tab. We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirements pursuant to Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, certain provisions of our Code of Ethics by posting such information on our website under the “Investor Relations” section.

Committees of the Board of Directors

There are three committees of the Board of Directors: the Audit Committee comprised of Marc Chodock, Roy P. Moskowitz and Samuel Goldstein; the Nominating Committee comprised of William B. Wachtel and Ronald J. Ricciardi; and the Compensation Committee comprised of Roy P. Moskowitz, Marc Chodock, and Samuel Goldstein.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Based solely on a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto, furnished to us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and Forms 5 and amendments thereto, furnished to us with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, each director and officer timely reported all of his transactions during that most recent fiscal year as required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, except for Messrs. Wachtel, Ricciardi, Goldstein, Moskowitz, and Chodock, each of whom filed one late Form 4 reporting one transaction.

Corporate Governance

There have been no changes to the procedures by which our security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors since our Board of Directors set forth such policy in our proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on November 6, 2013.

Our Board of Directors has determined that, of its Audit Committee, Marc Chodock qualifies as a financial expert as such term is defined in applicable SEC rules, and Roy P. Moskowitz, Samuel Goldstein and Marc Chodock qualify as “independent” as such term is defined by the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the annual and long-term compensation paid by us during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 for services performed on our behalf with respect to the person who served as our executive officer as of December 31, 2020.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2019

There are no outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2020.

2020 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Employment Agreements 

As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 06, 2019, effective September 1, 2019, the Company and Ronald J. Ricciardi entered into a new Employment Agreement (the “New Agreement”). Pursuant to the New Agreement, Mr. Ricciardi will continue to serve as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Among other things, the New Agreement provides for a four-year term with a base salary of $200,000 with subsequent annual base salary increases at the discretion of the Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. Ricciardi is eligible to receive an annual incentive bonus in an amount equal to 25% of the then-applicable base salary earned in the event that the Company meets or exceeds its annual operating plan for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Mr. Ricciardi also received a stock award upon the execution of the New Agreement. In addition, Mr. Ricciardi is eligible for additional stock awards upon each of the four anniversary dates of this New Agreement. Each of the five stock awards shall be the number of shares equal to the issued and outstanding shares of the Company on the date of each issuance multiplied by one half of one percent. The issuance of such stock awards are to be administered according to the Company’s Equity Compensation Plan, as approved the Company’s stockholders.

Additional Narrative Disclosure

We do not offer a defined benefit retirement or pension plan. The Company maintains a 401K Plan (the “401K Plan”) which covers all employees of the Company. Effective January 1, 2020, the Company switched to a Safe Harbor 401K plan. The Safe Harbor 401K Plan stipulates that, going forward, all employees become vested 100% on day one. Employer contributions prior to the change vest over a five-year period on a 20% per year basis. The Company’s Safe Harbor 401K Plan provides for the Company to match each participant's contribution at 100% up to 4% of the employee’s deferral. The employer match prior to the change was 50% up to 6% of the employee’s deferral. Company contributions to the 401K Plan totaled approximately $42,000 and $31,000 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Beneficial Owners

The following table presents certain information as of March 31, 2021 regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

Unless otherwise indicated below, the address for each of our directors and officers is 20 South Street, Pier 6 East River, New York, New York 10004.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 2020, with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. The only security being so offered is our common stock.

We received stockholder approval on December 12, 2006 for the Saker Aviation Services, Inc. Stock Option Plan of 2005 which relates to 250,000 shares of our common stock. Additionally, we received stockholder approval on December 5, 2019 for the Saker Aviation Services Inc. 2019 Stock Incentive Plan, which made 185,000 shares of our common stock were available for award under the plan.

On February 27, 2019, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the state of Nevada a certificate of amendment to our articles of incorporation. The amendment provided for a reverse stock split (the “Reverse Split”) of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 1-for-30. This amendment further provided for a reduction in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to 3,333,334, as well as for a reduction in the number of authorized shares of preferred stock to 333,306 (the Authorized Share Reduction”). The Company’s intention to effect both the Reverse Split and the Authorized Share Reduction were previously disclosed in a definitive information statement on Schedule 14A filed on July 13, 2017 and in a current report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2017. The amendment had an effective date and time of 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on March 1, 2019 for stockholders of record on February 27, 2019.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Our Board of Directors adopted a Policy and Procedure Governing Related Party Transactions on April 26, 2007, which policy delegates certain functions related to the review and approval of related party transactions to the audit committee and the compensation committee.

Pursuant to a management agreement with Empire Aviation, which is owned by the children of our former Chief Executive Officer and a former director, the Company incurred management fees of approximately $144,000 and $2,200,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which is recorded in administrative expenses.  The Company and Empire Aviation have also contributed to the Helicopter Tourism and Jobs Council (“HTJC”), an association that lobbies on behalf of the helicopter air tour industry, and which had engaged in discussions with the Mayor’s office. Mr. Goldstein, one of our directors, serves as deputy director of HTJC. Our former Chief Executive Officer and former director is also an active participant with HTJC, which is managed by his grandson. 

On February 6, 2018, the Company was issued a note by one of its customers at the Heliport. The note scheduled approximately $750,000 in receivables payable by such customer, had a maturity date of October 31, 2018, and carried a 7.5% rate of interest. As of December 31, 2019, all amounts due under the note have been paid. During the second quarter of 2018, our former Chief Executive Officer and former director acquired controlling interest in this customer.

Director Independence

Our Board of Directors made the determination of director independence in accordance with the definition set forth in the Nasdaq Stock Market rules. Under such definition, Marc Chodock, Roy P. Moskowitz and Samuel Goldstein qualify as independent.

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant were approximately $101,900 and $97,100 by Kronick Kalada Berdy & Co. for 2020 and 2019, respectively, for the audits of our annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q for those fiscal years.

Audit-Related Fees. There were fees billed for $18,000 for professional services categorized as Audit-Related Fees by the principal accountant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. There were no fees billed for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Tax Fees. For both years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the aggregate fees billed by the principal accountant for services categorized as Tax Fees were $15,000.

All Other Fees. There were no fees billed for services categorized as All Other Fees by the principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Audit Committee Policies and Procedures. The audit committee of the Board of Directors must pre-approve all auditing services and permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for us by our independent registered public accountants, subject to the de minimus exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act, which nonetheless must be approved by our audit committee prior to the completion of the audit. Each year the audit committee approves the engagement of our independent registered public accountant to audit our financial statements, including the associated fee, before the filing of the previous year’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. At the beginning of the fiscal year, the audit committee will evaluate other known potential engagements of the independent registered public accountants, including the scope of work proposed to be performed and the proposed fees, and approve or reject each service, taking into account whether the services are permissible under applicable law and the possible impact of each non-audit service on the independent registered public accountant’s independence from management. At each such subsequent meeting, the registered public accountants and management may present subsequent services for approval. Typically, these would be services such as due diligence for an acquisition, that would not have been known at the beginning of the year.

Since December 17, 2009 when our Board of Directors initially authorized the engagement of Kronick Kalada Berdy & Co., pursuant to the SEC rules stating that an auditor is not independent of an audit client if the services it provides to the client are not appropriately approved, each subsequent engagement of Kronick Kalada Berdy & Co, has been approved in advance by the audit committee of the Board of Directors, and none of these engagements made use of the de minimus exception to the pre-approval contained in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act.

Part VI

The consolidated financial statements of Saker Aviation Services, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and for each of the years then ended, and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon, are included herein as shown in the “Table of Contents to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

None.

*Filed herewith

+Management compensation plan or arrangement

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.