-
Annual Statements
-
»
Companies
-
»
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
-
»
Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
ý |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 |
-OR- |
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission File No. 1-33145
SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
36-2257936
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3001 Colorado Boulevard
Denton, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
76210
(Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (940) 898-7500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined under Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. YES o NO ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer ý |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.) YES o NO ý
The aggregate market value of registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price of a share of the registrant's common
stock on March 31, 2011 was approximately $1,333,335,000. At November 11, 2011, there were 184,775,543 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement relating to the registrant's 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
Table of Contents
In
this Annual Report, references to "the Company," "Sally Beauty," "our company," "we," "our," "ours" and "us" refer to Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries unless
otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires.
CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the documents incorporated by reference herein which are not purely
historical facts or which depend upon future events may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act. Words such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "project,"
"target," "can," "could," "may," "should," "will," "would" or similar expressions may also identify such forward-looking statements.
Readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as such statements speak only as of the date they were made. Any forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from the events or results described in the forward-looking statements, including, but not
limited to, risks and uncertainties related to:
-
- the highly competitive nature of, and the increasing consolidation of, the beauty products distribution industry;
-
- anticipating changes in consumer preferences and buying trends and managing our product lines and inventory;
-
- potential fluctuation in our same store sales and quarterly financial performance;
-
- our dependence upon manufacturers who may be unwilling or unable to continue to supply products to us;
-
- the possibility of material interruptions in the supply of products by our manufacturers;
-
- products sold by us being found to be defective in labeling or content;
-
- compliance with laws and regulations or becoming subject to additional or more stringent laws and regulations;
-
- product diversion to mass retailers or other unauthorized resellers;
-
- the operational and financial performance of our Armstrong McCall, L.P. ("Armstrong McCall")
franchise-based business;
-
- the success of our internet-based businesses;
-
- successfully identifying acquisition candidates and successfully completing desirable acquisitions;
-
- integrating businesses acquired in the future;
-
- opening and operating new stores profitably;
-
- the impact of the health of the economy upon our business;
-
- the success of our cost control plans;
-
- protecting our intellectual property rights, particularly our trademarks;
-
- conducting business outside the United States;
-
- disruption in our information technology systems;
-
- severe weather, natural disasters or acts of violence or terrorism;
ii
Table of Contents
-
- the preparedness of our accounting and other management systems to meet financial reporting and other requirements and the
upgrade of our existing financial reporting system;
-
- being a holding company, with no operations of our own, and depending on our subsidiaries for cash;
-
- our substantial indebtedness;
-
- the possibility that we may incur substantial additional debt in the future;
-
- restrictions and limitations in the agreements and instruments governing our debt;
-
- generating the significant amount of cash needed to service all of our debt and refinancing all or a portion of our
indebtedness or obtaining additional financing;
-
- changes in interest rates increasing the cost of servicing our debt or increasing our interest expense due to our interest
rate swap agreements;
-
- the potential impact on us if the financial institutions we deal with become impaired;
-
- the costs and effects of litigation;
-
- the representativeness of our historical consolidated financial information with respect to our future financial position,
results of operations or cash flows;
-
- the share distribution of Alberto-Culver Company ("Alberto-Culver") common stock in our separation
from Alberto-Culver not constituting a tax-free distribution;
-
- actions taken by certain large stockholders adversely affecting the tax-free nature of the share distribution
of Alberto-Culver common stock;
-
- the voting power of our largest stockholder discouraging third party acquisitions of us at a premium; and
-
- the interests of our largest stockholder differing from the interests of other holders of our common stock.
The
events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. As a result, our actual results
may differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.
iii
Table of Contents
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Introduction
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. is an international specialty retailer and distributor of professional beauty supplies with operations primarily
in North America, South America and Europe. We believe the Company is the largest distributor of professional beauty supplies in the U.S. based on store count. We operate primarily through two
business units, Sally Beauty Supply and Beauty Systems Group, or BSG. Through Sally Beauty Supply and BSG we sell and distribute beauty products through 4,128 company-owned stores,
181 franchised stores and 1,116 professional distributor sales consultants. Sally Beauty Supply stores target retail consumers and salon professionals, while BSG exclusively targets salons and
salon professionals. We have store locations in the United States (including Puerto Rico), Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Chile and Mexico. Within BSG, we also
have one of the largest networks of professional distributor sales consultants in North America, with approximately 1,116 professional distributor sales consultants who sell directly to salons and
salon professionals. We provide our customers with a wide variety of leading third-party branded and exclusive-label professional beauty supplies, including hair color products, hair care products,
hair dryers and hair styling appliances, skin and nail care products and other beauty items. Approximately 82%, 82% and 84% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were from customers located in the U.S. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, our consolidated net sales were
$3,269.1 million.
Sally
Beauty Supply began operations with a single store in New Orleans in 1964 and was acquired in 1969 by our former parent company, Alberto-Culver Company, which we refer to as Alberto-Culver. BSG
became a subsidiary of Alberto-Culver in 1995. In November 2006, we separated from Alberto-Culver and became an independent company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. We refer to our separation
from Alberto-Culver and its consumer products-focused business as the Separation Transactions. When we refer to Alberto-Culver, we mean Alberto-Culver Company prior to the Separation Transactions or
the company from which we separated.
In
connection with the Separation Transactions, CDRS Acquisition LLC, or CDRS, and CD&R Parallel Fund VII, L.P., which we refer to as the Parallel Fund and, together with CDRS, the CDR
Investors, invested an aggregate of $575.0 million in cash equity in Sally Beauty. CDRS, which, together with the Parallel Fund, at November 11, 2011, owns approximately 35.5% of the
outstanding shares of our common stock on an undiluted basis, is a Delaware limited liability company organized by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P., a private investment fund
managed by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc. Also in connection with the Separation Transactions, certain of our subsidiaries incurred approximately $1,850.0 million of indebtedness,
as more fully described below. Please see "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our Substantial Indebtedness" in Item 1A below.
Professional Beauty Supply Industry Distribution Channels
The professional beauty supply industry serves end-users through four distribution channels: full-service/exclusive
distribution, open-line distribution, direct and mega-salon stores.
Full-Service/Exclusive
This channel exclusively serves salons and salon professionals and distributes "professional-only" products for use in salons and resale
to consumers in salons. Many brands are distributed through arrangements with suppliers by geographic territory. BSG is a leading full-service distributor in the U.S.
1
Table of Contents
Open-Line
This channel serves retail consumers and salon professionals through retail stores and the internet. This channel is served by a large number of
localized retailers and distributors, with only a few having a regional presence and significant channel share. We believe that Sally Beauty Supply is the only open-line distributor in the
U.S. with a national network of retail stores. In addition, the Company's website (www.sallybeauty.com) and e-commerce platform provides
access to product offerings and information beyond our retail stores.
Direct
This channel focuses on direct sales to salons and salon professionals by large manufacturers. This is the dominant form of distribution in Europe,
but represents a smaller channel in the U.S. due to the highly fragmented nature of the U.S. salon industry, which makes direct distribution cost prohibitive for many manufacturers. In addition, we
recently began to offer our BSG products for sale to salons and salon professionals through the Company's websites (www.cosmoprofbeauty.com and www.ebobdirect.com) and e-commerce platforms.
Mega-Salon Stores
In this channel, large-format salons are supplied directly by manufacturers due to their large scale.
Key Industry and Business Trends
We operate primarily within the large and growing U.S. professional beauty supply industry. Potential growth in the industry is expected to be driven
by increases in consumer demand for hair color, hair loss prevention and hair styling products. We believe the following key industry and business trends and characteristics will influence our
business and our financial results going forward:
-
- High level of marketplace fragmentation. The U.S. salon
channel is highly fragmented with nearly 250,000 salons and barbershops. Given the fragmented and small-scale nature of the salon industry, we believe that salon operators will continue to depend on
full-service/exclusive distributors and open-line channels for a majority of their beauty supply purchases.
-
- Growth in booth renting and frequent stocking needs. Salon
professionals primarily rely on just-in-time inventory due to capital constraints and a lack of warehouse and shelf space at salons. In addition, booth renters, who comprise a
significant percentage of total U.S. salon professionals, are often responsible for purchasing their own supplies. Historically, booth renters have significantly increased as a percentage of total
salon professionals, and we expect this trend to continue. Given their smaller individual purchases and relative lack of financial resources, booth renters are likely to be dependent on frequent trips
to professional beauty supply stores, like BSG and Sally Beauty Supply. We expect that these factors will continue to drive demand for conveniently located professional beauty supply stores.
-
- Increasing use of exclusive-label products. We offer a
broad range of exclusive-label products. As our lines of exclusive-label products have matured and become better known in our retail stores, we have seen an increase in sales of these products.
Generally, our exclusive-label products have higher gross margins for us than the leading third-party branded products and, accordingly, we believe that the growth in sales of these products will
likely enhance our overall gross margins. Please see "Risk FactorsWe depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to provide products of adequate quality or who may be unwilling to
continue to supply products to us."
-
- Favorable demographic and consumer trends. We expect the
aging baby-boomer population to drive future growth in professional beauty supply sales through an increase in the usage of hair color and hair loss products. Additionally, continuously
changing fashion-related trends that drive new hair
2
Table of Contents
styles
are expected to result in continued demand for hair styling products. Changes in consumer tastes and fashion trends can have an impact on our financial performance. Our continued success
depends largely on our ability to anticipate, gauge and react in a timely and effective manner to changes in consumer spending patterns and preferences for beauty products. We continuously adapt our
marketing and merchandising initiatives in an effort to expand our market reach or to respond to changing consumer preferences. If we are unable to anticipate and respond to trends in the marketplace
for beauty products and changing consumer demands, our business could suffer. Please see "Risk FactorsWe may be unable to anticipate changes in consumer preferences and buying trends or
manage our product lines and inventory commensurate with consumer demand."
-
- International growth strategies. A key element of our
growth strategy depends on our ability to capitalize on growth opportunities in the international marketplace and to grow our current level of non-U.S. operations. For example, in December
2009, we acquired Sinelco Group BVBA ("Sinelco"), a wholesale distributor of professional beauty products located in Belgium with sales throughout Europe and, in September 2009, we acquired
Distribuidora Intersalon Limitada ("Intersalon"), a distributor of premier beauty supply products then with 16 stores located in Chile. These acquisitions furthered our expansion plans in Europe and
Latin America, key targets of Sally Beauty Supply's international growth initiative. We intend to continue to identify and evaluate non-U.S. acquisition and/or organic international growth
targets. Our ability to grow our non-U.S. operations, integrate our new non-U.S. acquisitions and successfully pursue additional non-U.S. acquisition and/or
international organic growth targets may be affected by business, legal, regulatory and economic risks. Please see "Risk FactorsWe may not be able to successfully identify acquisition
candidates or successfully complete desirable acquisitions," "If we acquire any businesses in the future, they could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our business or have an adverse effect on our
results of operations" and "Our ability to conduct business in international marketplaces may be affected by legal, regulatory and economic risks."
-
- Continuing consolidation. There is continuing
consolidation among professional beauty product distributors and professional beauty product manufacturers. We plan to continue to examine ways in which we can benefit from this trend, including the
evaluation of opportunities to shift business from competitive distributors to the BSG network as well as seeking opportunistic, value-added acquisitions which complement our long-term
growth strategy. We believe that suppliers are increasingly likely to focus on larger distributors and retailers with a broader scale and retail footprint. We also believe that we are well positioned
to capitalize on this trend as well as participate in the ongoing consolidation at the distributor/retail level. However, changes often occur in our relationships with suppliers that may materially
affect the net sales and operating earnings of our business segments. Consolidation among suppliers could exacerbate the effects of these relationship changes and could increase pricing pressures. For
example, as we announced in the fiscal year 2007, one of our largest suppliers, L'Oreal, moved a material amount of revenue out of our BSG distribution network and into regional
distribution networks that compete with BSG. More recently, L'Oreal acquired distributors that compete with BSG in the Midwest, Southeast and West Coast regions of the U.S. and, as a
result, L'Oreal directly competes with BSG in certain geographic areas. If L'Oreal acquired other distributors or suppliers that conduct significant business with BSG, we
could lose related revenue. There can be no assurance that BSG will not lose further revenue over time due to potential losses of additional products (both from L'Oreal and from other
suppliers) as well as from the increased competition from L'Oreal-affiliated distribution networks. Please see "Risk FactorsThe beauty products distribution industry is
highly competitive and is consolidating" and "We depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to provide products of adequate quality or who may be unwilling to continue to supply products to us."
-
- Relationships with suppliers. Sally Beauty Supply, BSG
and their respective suppliers are dependent on each other for the distribution of beauty products. We do not manufacture the brand name or
3
Table of Contents
exclusive-label
products we sell. We purchase our products from a limited number of manufacturers. As is typical in distribution businesses (particularly in our industry), these relationships are
subject to change from time to time (including the expansion or loss of distribution rights in various geographies and the addition or loss of product lines). Since we purchase products from many
manufacturers on an at-will basis, under contracts which can generally be terminated without cause upon 90 days' notice or less or which expire without express rights of renewal,
such manufacturers could discontinue sales to us at any time or upon the expiration of the distribution period. Some of our contracts with manufacturers may be terminated by such manufacturers if we
fail to meet specified minimum purchase requirements. In such cases, we do not have contractual assurances of continued supply, pricing or access to new products and vendors may change the terms upon
which they sell. Infrequently, a supplier will seek to terminate a distribution relationship through legal action. For example, in 2007 Farouk Systems, Inc. filed an action seeking a
declaratory judgment that it was entitled to terminate a long-term distribution agreement with Armstrong McCall. In 2010 that matter was settled and BSG now sells Farouk products in many
territories. Changes in our relationships with suppliers occur often and could positively or negatively impact our net sales and operating profits. Although we focus on developing new revenue and cost
management initiatives to mitigate the negative effects resulting from unfavorable changes in our supplier relationships, there can be no assurance that our efforts will continue to completely offset
the loss of these or other distribution rights. Please see "Risk FactorsWe depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to provide products of adequate quality or who may be unwilling to
continue to supply products to us."
We
expect to continue to expand our product line offerings and to gain additional distribution rights over time through either further negotiation with suppliers or by acquisitions of existing
distributors. Although we are focused on developing new revenue and cost management initiatives, there can be no assurance that our efforts will partially or completely offset any potential loss of
distribution rights in the future. Please see "Risk FactorsWe depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to provide products of adequate quality or who may be unwilling to continue to
supply products to us."
-
- High level of competition. Sally Beauty Supply competes
with other domestic and international beauty product wholesale and retail outlets, including local and regional open-line beauty supply stores, professional-only beauty supply
stores, salons, mass merchandisers, drug stores and supermarkets, as well as sellers on the internet and salons retailing hair care items. BSG competes with other domestic and international beauty
product wholesale and retail suppliers and manufacturers selling professional beauty products directly to salons and individual salon professionals. We also face competition from authorized and
unauthorized retailers and internet sites offering professional salon-only products. The increasing availability of unauthorized professional salon products in large format retail stores
such as drug stores, grocery stores and others could also have a negative impact on our business. Please see "Risk FactorsThe beauty products distribution industry is highly competitive
and is consolidating."
-
- Economic conditions. We appeal to a wide demographic
consumer profile and offer a broad selection of professional beauty products sold directly to retail consumers, and salons and salon professionals. Historically, these factors have provided us with
reduced exposure to downturns in economic conditions in the countries in which we operate. However, a downturn in the economy, especially for an extended period of time, could adversely impact
consumer demand of discretionary items such as beauty products and salon services, particularly affecting our electrical products category and our full-service sales business. In addition,
higher freight costs resulting from increases in the cost of fuel, especially for an extended period of time, may impact our expenses at levels that we cannot pass through to our customers. These
factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Please see "Risk FactorsThe
4
Table of Contents
health
of the economy in the channels we serve may affect consumer purchases of discretionary items such as beauty products and salon services, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations."
-
- Controlling expenses. Another important aspect of our
business is our ability to control costs, especially in our BSG business segment, by right-sizing the business and maximizing the efficiency of our business structure. For example, we recently
completed implementation of a $22.0 million capital spending program to consolidate warehouses and reduce administrative expenses related to BSG's distribution network which has resulted in
annualized cost savings of at least $14.0 million beginning in the fiscal year 2010. Please see "Risk FactorsWe are not certain that
our ongoing cost control plans will continue to be successful."
-
- Opening new stores. Our future growth strategy depends in
part on our ability to open and profitably operate new stores in existing and additional geographic areas. The capital requirements to open a U.S.-based Sally Beauty Supply or BSG store, excluding
inventory, average approximately $70,000 and $80,000, respectively, with the capital requirements for international stores costing less or substantially more depending upon the marketplace. We may not
be able to open all of the new stores we plan to open and any new stores we open may not be profitable, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or
results of operations. Please see "Risk FactorsIf we are unable to profitably open and operate new stores, our business, financial
condition and results of operations may be adversely affected."
-
- Changes to our information technology systems. As our
operations grow in both size and scope, we will continuously need to improve and upgrade our information systems and infrastructure while maintaining the reliability and integrity of our systems and
infrastructure. The expansion of our systems and infrastructure will require us to commit substantial financial, operational and technical resources in advance of any increase in the volume of our
business, with no assurance that the volume of business will increase. For example, we are in the process of designing and implementing a standardized enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system
internationally, which we anticipate will be completed over the next few years. In addition, we are currently implementing a point-of-sale system upgrade program in a number of
our divisions (primarily in our Sally Beauty Supply operations in the U.S.), which we anticipate will provide significant benefits, including enhanced tracking of customer sales and store inventory
activity. These and any other required upgrades to our information systems and information technology (or new technology), now or in the future, will require that our management and resources be
diverted from our core business to assist in completion of these projects. There can be no assurance that the time and resources our management will need to devote to these upgrades, service outages
or delays due to the installation of any new or upgraded technology (and customer issues therewith), or the impact on the reliability of our data from any new or upgraded technology will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial reporting, business, financial condition or results of operations. Please see "Risk FactorsWe may
be adversely affected by any disruption in our information technology systems."
Business Segments, Geographic Area Information and Seasonality
We operate two business segments: (i) Sally Beauty Supply, an open-line and exclusive-label distributor of professional beauty
supplies offering professional beauty supplies to both retail consumers and salon professionals primarily in North America, Europe, Puerto Rico and South America, and (ii) BSG, including its
franchise-based business Armstrong McCall, a full-service beauty supply distributor offering professional brands directly to salons and salon professionals through our own sales force and
professional-only stores, many in exclusive geographical territories, in North America, Puerto Rico, the United Kingdom and certain other European countries. BSG operates stores under the
CosmoProf service mark. BSG also franchises professional beauty supply outlets in the southwest portion of the U.S. and in Mexico, and supplies sub-distributors in Europe. Sally Beauty
Supply accounted for approximately 62%,
5
Table of Contents
63%
and 64%; and BSG accounted for approximately 38%, 37% and 36% of the Company's consolidated net sales for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Financial
information about business segments and geographic area information is incorporated herein by reference to the "Business Segments and Geographic Area Information," Note 20 of the
"Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in "Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Neither
the sales nor the product assortment for Sally Beauty Supply or BSG are generally seasonal in nature.
Sally Beauty Supply
We believe Sally Beauty Supply is the largest open-line distributor of professional beauty supplies in the U.S. based on store count. As
of September 30, 2011, Sally Beauty Supply operated 3,133 company-operated retail stores, 2,509 of which are located in the U.S., with the remaining 624 company-operated stores located in
Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico, Chile, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium, France, Germany and Spain. Sally Beauty Supply also supplied 25 franchised stores located outside the U.S. Our Sally
Beauty Supply stores carry an extensive selection of professional beauty supplies for both retail customers and salon professionals, with between 5,000 and 8,000 stock keeping units, or SKUs, (in the
U.S. and Canada) of beauty products across product
categories including hair color, hair care, skin and nail care, beauty sundries and electrical appliances. Sally Beauty Supply stores carry leading third-party brands such as Clairol®,
Revlon® and Conair®, as well as an extensive selection of exclusive-label merchandise. Store formats, including average size and product selection, for Sally Beauty Supply
outside the U.S. and Canada vary by marketplace. We believe that Sally Beauty Supply has differentiated itself from its competitors through its customer value proposition, attractive pricing,
extensive selection of leading third-party branded and exclusive-label products, a broad ethnic product selection, knowledgeable sales associates and convenient store locations.
Store Design and Operations
Sally Beauty Supply stores are designed to create an appealing shopping environment that embraces the retail consumer and salon professional and
highlights its extensive product offering. Sally Beauty Supply's U.S. and Canadian stores average approximately 1,700 square feet in size and are located primarily in strip shopping centers.
Generally, Sally Beauty Supply stores in the U.S. and Canada follow a consistent format, allowing customers familiarity between Sally Beauty Supply locations. Store formats for Sally Beauty Supply
outside the U.S. and Canada vary by marketplace.
Sally
Beauty Supply stores are segmented into distinctive areas arranged by product type with signs allowing its customers to easily navigate through its stores. Sally Beauty Supply seeks to stimulate
cross-selling and impulse buying through strategic product placement and use of displays to highlight new products and key promotional items.
Merchandise
Sally Beauty Supply stores carry a broad selection of branded and exclusive-label professional beauty supplies. Sally Beauty Supply manages each
category by product and by SKU and uses centrally developed planoguides to maintain a consistent merchandise presentation across its store base (primarily in the U.S. and Canada). Through its
information systems, Sally Beauty Supply actively monitors each store's performance by category, allowing it to maintain consistently high levels of in-stock merchandise. We believe Sally
Beauty Supply's tailored merchandise strategy enables it to meet local demands and helps drive traffic in its stores. Additionally, its information systems enable it to track and automatically
replenish inventory levels, generally on a weekly basis, primarily in the U.S.
6
Table of Contents
In
addition, Sally Beauty Supply offers a comprehensive ethnic product selection with specific appeal to African-American and Hispanic customers. Its ethnic product offerings are tailored by store
based on market demographics and category performance. For example, sales of products targeted for these customers averaged approximately 9.0% of net sales in Sally Beauty Supply's U.S. stores during
the past three years. We believe the wide selection of ethnic products available in Sally Beauty Supply stores is unique and differentiates its stores from its competition. Sally Beauty Supply also
aims to position itself to be competitive in price, but not a discount leader.
Sally
Beauty Supply's pricing strategy is differentiated by customer segment. Professional salon customers are generally entitled to a price lower than that received by retail customers. However,
Sally Beauty Supply does offer discounts to retail customers through its customer loyalty program (please see Marketing and Advertising below).
Leading Third-Party Branded Products
Sally Beauty Supply offers an extensive selection of hair care products, nail care products, beauty sundries and appliances from leading third-party
brands such as Clairol®, Revlon® and Conair®, as well as an extensive selection of exclusive-label merchandise. We believe that carrying a broad selection of the
latest premier branded merchandise is critical to maintaining long-term relationships with our customers. The merchandise Sally Beauty Supply carries includes products from one or more of
the leading manufacturers in each category. Sally Beauty Supply's objective is not only to carry leading brands, but also to carry a full range of branded and exclusive-label products within each
category. As hair trends continue to evolve, we expect to offer the changing professional beauty product assortment necessary to meet the needs of retail consumers and salon professionals.
Exclusive-Label Products
Sally Beauty Supply offers a broad range of exclusive-label products. We believe exclusive-label products provide customers with an attractive
alternative to higher-priced leading third-party brands. Exclusive-label products accounted for approximately 44% of Sally Beauty Supply's product sales in the U.S. during the 2011 fiscal year.
Generally, the exclusive-label brands have higher
gross margins than the leading third-party branded products, and we believe this area offers continued potential growth. Sally Beauty Supply maintains exclusive-label products in a number of
categories including hair care, small electrical appliances and salon products. Sally Beauty Supply actively promotes its exclusive-label brands through in-store promotions, print
advertising and direct shopping guides. We believe our customers perceive our exclusive-label products to be comparable in quality and name recognition to leading third-party branded products.
The
following table sets forth the approximate percentage of Sally Beauty Supply's sales by merchandise category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Hair color |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
22.7 |
% |
|
22.8 |
% |
Hair care |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
20.7 |
% |
|
19.7 |
% |
Skin and nail care |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
14.2 |
% |
|
13.0 |
% |
Brushes, cutlery and accessories |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
15.1 |
% |
|
15.6 |
% |
Electrical appliances |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
11.8 |
% |
|
11.9 |
% |
Ethnic products |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
8.1 |
% |
|
8.7 |
% |
Other beauty items |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
7.4 |
% |
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Table of Contents
Marketing and Advertising
Sally Beauty Supply's marketing program is designed to promote its extensive selection of brand name products at competitive prices. The program is
currently centered on multi-page, color flyers highlighting promotional products. Separate flyers are created and tailored to Sally Beauty Supply's retail customers and salon
professionals. These flyers, which are available in Sally Beauty Supply stores, are also mailed to loyalty program customers and salon professionals on a monthly basis and are supplemented by
e-mail newsletters.
We
continuously adapt our marketing and merchandising initiatives for Sally Beauty Supply in an effort to expand our market reach or to respond to changing consumer preferences.
Sally
Beauty Supply's customer loyalty and marketing programs, primarily in the U.S. and Canada, allow Sally Beauty Supply to collect point-of-sale customer data and increase
our understanding of customers' needs. The Sally "Beauty Club" is a loyalty program for customers who are not salon professionals. Beauty Club members, after paying a nominal annual fee, are eligible
to receive a special, discounted price on almost every non-sale item.
Members are also eligible to receive special Beauty Club e-mail newsletters and exclusive direct mail flyers that contain additional savings, beauty tips, new product information and
coupons. In addition, the "ProCard" is a marketing program for licensed salon professionals. ProCard members are eligible to receive discounts on all beauty products sold at Sally Beauty Supply
stores. We believe these programs are effective in developing and maintaining customer relationships. Outside the U.S. and Canada, our customer loyalty and marketing programs vary by marketplace.
Store Locations
Sally Beauty Supply selects geographic areas and store sites on the basis of demographic information, the quality and nature of neighboring tenants,
store visibility and location accessibility. Sally Beauty Supply seeks to locate stores primarily in strip malls, which are occupied by other high traffic retailers including grocery stores, mass
merchants and home centers.
Sally
Beauty Supply balances its store expansion between new and existing marketplaces. In its existing marketplaces, Sally Beauty Supply adds stores as necessary to provide additional coverage. In
new marketplaces, Sally Beauty Supply generally seeks to expand in geographically contiguous areas to leverage its experience. We believe that Sally Beauty Supply's knowledge of local marketplaces is
an important part of its success.
The
following table provides a history of Sally Beauty Supply's store count (including franchised stores) during the last five fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Stores open at beginning of period |
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
2,923 |
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
2,511 |
|
Net store openings during period |
|
|
126 |
|
|
108 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
83 |
|
Stores acquired during period |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stores open at end of period |
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
2,923 |
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beauty Systems Group
We believe that BSG is the largest full-service distributor of professional beauty supplies in North America, exclusively targeting
salons and salon professionals. As of September 30, 2011, BSG had 995 company-operated stores, supplied 156 franchised stores and had a sales force of approximately 1,116 professional
distributor sales consultants selling exclusively to salons and salon professionals in all states in the U.S., in portions of Canada, and in Puerto Rico, Mexico and certain European countries. BSG
carries
8
Table of Contents
leading
professional beauty product brands, intended for use in salons and for resale by the salon to consumers. BSG stores provide a comprehensive selection of between 5,000 and 10,000 beauty product
SKUs that include hair color and care, skin and nail care, beauty sundries and electrical appliances. Certain BSG products are sold under exclusive distribution agreements with suppliers, whereby BSG
is designated as the sole distributor for a product line within certain geographic territories. Through its large store base and sales force, BSG is able to access a significant portion of the highly
fragmented U.S. salon channel.
Store Design and Operations
BSG stores are designed to create a professional shopping environment that embraces the salon professional and highlights its extensive product
offering. Company-operated BSG stores, which primarily operate under the CosmoProf banner, average approximately 2,700 square feet and are primarily located in secondary strip shopping centers. BSG
store layouts are designed to provide optimal variety and options to the salon professional. Stores are segmented into distinctive areas arranged by product type with certain areas dedicated to
leading third-party brands; such as Paul Mitchell®, Wella®, Sebastian®, Goldwell®, Joico® and TIGI®. The selection of these and
other brands varies by territory.
Professional Distributor Sales Consultants
BSG has a network of approximately 1,116 professional distributor sales consultants ("DSC" or "DSCs"), which exclusively serve salons and salon
professionals. The following table sets forth the number of consultants in the BSG network during the last five fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Professional distributor sales consultants(a) |
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
984 |
|
|
1,002 |
|
- (a)
- Includes
411, 395, 300, 328 and 317 distributor sales consultants of our Armstrong McCall franchisees at September 30, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
The
increase in the number of DSCs in the fiscal year 2011 reflects approximately 70 distributor sales consultants employed by Aerial Company, Inc. ("Aerial") prior to the Company's acquisition
of Aerial in October 2010. The increase in the number of DSCs in the fiscal year 2009 reflects approximately 90 distributor sales consultants employed by Schoeneman Beauty Supply, Inc.
("Schoeneman") prior to the Company's acquisition of Schoeneman in September 2009.
In
order to provide a knowledgeable sales consultant team, BSG actively recruits individuals with industry knowledge or sales experience, as we believe that new sales consultants with either broad
knowledge about the products or direct sales experience will be more successful.
BSG
provides training to new sales consultants beginning with a two-week training program, followed by a program of continuing media-based training, delivered through audio, video and
web-based e-learning. The program is designed to develop product knowledge as well as techniques on how best to serve salon professionals. In addition to selling professional
beauty products, these sales consultants offer in-salon training for professionals and owners in areas such as new styles, techniques and business practices.
An
important component of sales consultants' compensation is sales commissions. BSG's commission system is designed to drive sales and focus consultants on selling products that are best suited to
individual salons and salon professionals. We believe our emphasis on recruitment, training, and sales-based compensation results in a sales force that distinguishes itself from other
full-service/exclusive-channel distributors.
9
Table of Contents
The
following table sets forth the approximate percentage of BSG sales attributable by distribution channel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Company-operated retail stores |
|
|
62.9 |
% |
|
61.5 |
% |
Professional distributor sales consultants (full-service) |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
27.8 |
% |
Franchise stores |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise
BSG stores carry a broad selection of third-party branded products, ranging between 5,000 and 10,000 SKUs of beauty products, including hair color
and care, skin and nail care, beauty sundries and electrical appliances and other beauty items. Some products are available in bulk packaging for higher volume salon needs. Through BSG's information
systems, each store's product performance is actively monitored, allowing maintenance of an optimal merchandise mix. Additionally, BSG's information systems track and automatically replenish inventory
levels on a weekly basis, enabling BSG to maintain high levels of product in stock. Although BSG positions itself to be competitive on price, its primary focus is to provide a comprehensive selection
of branded products to the salon professional. Certain BSG products are sold under exclusive arrangements with suppliers, whereby BSG is designated the sole distributor for a specific brand name
within certain geographic territories. We believe that carrying a broad selection of branded merchandise is critical to maintaining relationships with our professional customers.
The
following table sets forth the approximate percentage of BSG's sales attributable by merchandise category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Hair care |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
37.1 |
% |
|
38.5 |
% |
Hair color |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
29.6 |
% |
|
28.4 |
% |
Promotional items(a) |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
13.2 |
% |
|
12.5 |
% |
Skin and nail care |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
8.1 |
% |
|
7.7 |
% |
Electrical appliances |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
4.9 |
% |
Other beauty items |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
7.5 |
% |
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- Promotional
items consist of sales from other categories that are sold on a value-priced basis.
Marketing and Advertising
BSG's marketing program is designed primarily to promote its extensive selection of brand name products at competitive prices. BSG distributes at its
stores and mails to its salon and salon professional customers, multi-page color shopping guides that highlight promotional products. In addition, BSG communicates with its customers and
distributes promotional material via e-mail, Facebook and Twitter. Some BSG stores also host monthly manufacturer-sponsored classes for customers. These classes are held at BSG stores and
led by manufacturer-employed educators. Salon professionals, after paying a small fee to attend, are educated on new products and beauty trends. We believe these classes increase brand awareness and
potentially drive sales in BSG stores.
10
Table of Contents
Store Locations
BSG stores are primarily located in secondary strip shopping centers. Although BSG stores are located in visible and convenient locations, salon
professionals are generally less sensitive about store location than Sally Beauty Supply customers.
The
following table provides a history of BSG's store count (including franchised stores) during the last five fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Stores open at beginning of period |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
991 |
|
|
929 |
|
|
874 |
|
|
828 |
|
Net store openings during period |
|
|
39 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
46 |
|
Stores acquired during period(a) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stores open at end of period |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
991 |
|
|
929 |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- Stores
acquired in the fiscal year 2011 include 82 stores owned by Aerial prior to the Company's acquisition of Aerial in October 2010. Stores acquired in
the fiscal year 2009 include 43 stores owned by Schoeneman prior to the Company's acquisition of Schoeneman in September 2009.
Competitive Strengths
We believe the following competitive strengths differentiate us from our competitors and contribute to our success:
The Largest Professional Beauty Supply Distributor in the U.S. with Multi-Channel Platform
We believe that Sally Beauty Supply and BSG together comprise the largest distributor of professional beauty products in the U.S. by store count. Our
leading channel positions and multi-channel platform afford us several advantages, including strong positioning with suppliers, the ability to better service the highly fragmented beauty supply
marketplace, economies of scale and the ability to capitalize on the ongoing consolidation in our sector. Through our multi-channel platform, we are able to generate and grow revenues across broad,
diversified geographies, and customer segments using varying product assortments. In the U.S. and Puerto Rico, we offer up to 8,000 and 10,000 SKUs in Sally Beauty Supply (in our stores and online)
and BSG stores, respectively, to a broad potential customer base that includes retail consumers, salons and barbershops in the U.S.
Differentiated Customer Value Proposition
We believe that our stores have a competitive advantage over those of our competitors due to our stores' convenient location, broad selection of
professional beauty products (including leading third-party branded and exclusive-label merchandise), high levels of in-stock merchandise, knowledgeable salespeople and competitive
pricing. Our merchandise mix includes a comprehensive ethnic product selection, which is tailored by store based on market demographics and category performance. We believe that the wide selection of
these products at our stores further differentiates Sally Beauty Supply from its competitors. In addition, as discussed above, Sally Beauty Supply also offers a customer loyalty program called the
Beauty Club, whereby members receive special, member discounts on products and are eligible for Beauty Club e-mail newsletters and exclusive direct mail flyers with additional promotional
offerings, beauty tips and new product information for a nominal annual membership fee. Our BSG professional distributor sales consultants benefit from their customers having access to the BSG store
systems as customers have the ability to pick up the products they need between sales visits from professional distributor sales
11
Table of Contents
consultants.
We believe that our differentiated customer value proposition and strong brands drive customer loyalty and high repeat traffic, contributing to our consistent historical financial
performance.
Attractive Store Economics
We believe that our stores generate attractive returns on invested capital. The capital requirements to open a U.S.-based Sally Beauty Supply or BSG
store, excluding inventory, average approximately $70,000 and $80,000, respectively, with the capital requirements for international stores costing less or substantially more depending on the local
economic conditions. Sally Beauty Supply stores average approximately 1,700 square feet and BSG stores average approximately 2,700 square feet in size in the U.S. and Canada. In the U.S., our stores
are typically located within strip shopping centers. Strong average sales per square foot combined with minimal staffing requirements, low rent expense and limited initial capital outlay typically
result in positive contribution margins within a few months of opening, and cash payback on investment within approximately two years. Due to such attractive investment returns and relatively high
operating profit contributions per store, during the past five fiscal years Sally Beauty Supply and BSG have opened an aggregate of 487 and 181 net new stores, respectively, excluding the effect of
acquisitions. Outside the U.S. and Canada, our store format, sizes and capital requirements vary by marketplace, but we believe these stores also generate compelling unit economics.
Consistent Financial Performance
We have a proven track record of strong growth and consistent profitability due to superior operating performance, new store openings and strategic
acquisitions. Over the past five fiscal years, our consolidated same store sales growth has been positive in each year and has averaged nearly 4.0%, as set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
Same store sales growth(a)
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
4.1 |
% |
|
2.1 |
% |
|
1.2 |
% |
|
2.7 |
% |
Beauty Systems Group |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
6.2 |
% |
|
1.0 |
% |
|
6.9 |
% |
|
10.1 |
% |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
4.6 |
% |
|
1.8 |
% |
|
2.6 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
- (a)
- Same
stores are defined as company-operated stores that have been open for at least 14 months as of the last day of a month. Our same store sales are
calculated in constant dollars and include internet-based sales (beginning in fiscal year 2009) and store expansions, if applicable, but do not generally include the sales from stores relocated until
at least 14 months after the relocation. The sales from stores acquired are excluded from our same store sales calculation until at least 14 months after the acquisition.
Experienced Management Team with a Proven Track Record
Our senior management team led by our President and Chief Executive Officer Gary Winterhalter, averages 24 years of beauty industry experience
and possesses a unique combination of management skills and experience in the beauty supply market. Our team also has a strong track record of successfully identifying and integrating acquisitions,
which continues to be an important part of our overall strategy.
Our Strategy
We believe there are significant opportunities to increase our sales and profitability through the further implementation of our operating strategy
and by growing our store base in existing and contiguous
12
Table of Contents
marketplaces,
both organically and through strategic acquisitions. Key elements of our growth strategy are to:
Increase Sales Productivity of Our Stores
We intend to grow same store sales by focusing on improving our merchandise mix and introducing new products. In addition, we plan to tailor our
marketing, advertising and promotions to attract new customers and increase sales with existing customers. We plan to continue to enhance our customer loyalty programs, which allow us to collect
point-of-sale customer data and increase our understanding of customers' needs. Our exclusive-label products are competitive with leading third-party branded merchandise, draw
traffic to our stores and increase customer loyalty. In addition, we plan to tailor our marketing, advertising and promotions to attract new customers and increase sales with existing customers.
Expand Our Store Base
During the past five fiscal years, Sally Beauty Supply and BSG have opened an aggregate of 487 and 181 net new stores, respectively, excluding the
effect of acquisitions. Because of the limited initial capital outlay, rapid payback, and attractive return on capital, we intend to continue to expand our store base. In the fiscal year 2011, we
opened 126 and 39 Sally Beauty Supply stores and BSG stores, respectively, excluding the effect of acquisitions. We believe there are growth opportunities for additional stores in North America,
Europe and Central and South America. We expect new store openings in existing and new areas to be an important aspect of our future growth opportunities, and intend to continue our annual organic
store growth between 4% and 5% of our total stores for the foreseeable future.
Grow Internationally
International sales represent 21% of Sally Beauty Supply's net sales and we believe there is a significant opportunity for future growth in certain
international geographic areas. As of September 30, 2011, we operated 679 international company-owned stores and 55 international franchise stores across nine countries outside the United
States: Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Chile and Mexico. We believe our platform provides us with the foundation to continue to expand internationally. In
particular, we are currently focused on growing our business in Europe and Central and South America.
Increase Operating Efficiency and Profitability
We believe there are opportunities to increase the profitability of operations by growing our exclusive-label brands, improving sourcing, shifting
customer mix, continuing our cost-cutting initiatives, particularly at BSG, and by further expanding our internet channel. We continue to develop and promote our higher margin
exclusive-label products and increase exclusive product sales, which increases our gross margins and operating results. Over the past few years, we have undertaken a full review of our merchandise
procurement strategy. This initiative is intended to identify lower-cost alternative sources of supply in certain product categories from countries with lower manufacturing costs. We
continue to focus on changing our customer mix by increasing the percentage of retail customers within our stores at Sally Beauty Supply. At BSG, we have
completed numerous projects, including a re-branding initiative that repositioned the vast majority of our North American company-operated stores under a common name and store identity,
CosmoProf, which we believe has improved brand consistency, saved on advertising and promotional costs and allowed for a more focused marketing strategy. Recently, we completed a $22.0 million
capital spending program to consolidate warehouses and reduce administrative expenses related to BSG's distribution network.
We
also offer between 5,000 and 8,000 SKUs of our Sally Beauty Supply products for sale through our website (www.sallybeauty.com) and have recently
begun to offer between 10,000 and 12,000 SKUs of our
13
Table of Contents
BSG
products for sale principally through our websites (www.cosmoprofbeauty.com and www.ebobdirect.com).
We expect electronic commerce, or e-commerce, will increasingly lead to additional higher margin sales for both business segments as a result of the incremental operating expenses
(including rent and other occupancy expenses, payroll, and shipping and handling expenses) associated with traditional brick-and-mortar stores. Please see "Risk
FactorsOur internet-based business may be unsuccessful or may cause internal channel conflict."
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and New Territories for Organic Growth
We have completed more than 35 acquisitions during the last 10 years. We believe our experience in identifying attractive acquisition targets,
our proven integration process and our highly scalable infrastructure have created a strong platform for potential future acquisitions. Recent acquisitions have included:
-
- In October 2010, we acquired Aerial, an 82-store professional-only distributor of beauty products
operating in 11 states in the midwestern United States.
-
- In March 2010, we acquired certain assets and the business of a former exclusive distributor of John Paul Mitchell Systems
beauty products with sales primarily in south Florida and certain islands in the Caribbean.
-
- In December 2009, we acquired Sinelco, a wholesale distributor of professional beauty products located in Belgium with
sales throughout Europe.
-
- In September 2009, we acquired Schoeneman, a 43-store beauty supply chain located in the central northeast
United States.
-
- In September 2009, we acquired Intersalon, a leading distributor of premier beauty supply products with 16 stores located
in Chile.
-
- In May 2008, we acquired Pro-Duo NV ("Pro-Duo"), a cash and carry retailer of both
professional and retail hair products with 40 stores located primarily in Belgium, France and Spain.
We
intend to continue to identify and evaluate acquisition targets and organic growth targets both domestically and internationally, with a focus on expanding our exclusive BSG territories and
allowing Sally Beauty Supply to enter new geographic areas principally outside the U.S. Please see "Risk FactorsWe may not be able to successfully identify acquisition candidates or
successfully complete desirable acquisitions."
Competition
Although there are a limited number of sizable direct competitors to our business, the beauty industry is highly competitive. In each geographic area
in which we operate, we experience competition from domestic and international businesses often with more resources, including mass merchandisers, drug stores, supermarkets and other chains offering
similar or substitute beauty products at comparable prices. Our business also faces competition from department stores. In addition, our business competes with local and regional open-line
beauty supply stores and full-service distributors selling directly to salons and salon professionals through both professional distributor sales consultants and outlets open only to
salons and salon professionals. Our business also faces increasing competition from certain manufacturers that use their own sales forces to distribute their professional beauty products directly or
align themselves with our competitors. Some of these manufacturers are vertically integrating through the acquisition of distributors and stores. In addition, these manufacturers may acquire
additional brands that we currently distribute and attempt to shift these products to their own distribution channels. Our business also faces competition from authorized and unauthorized retailers
and internet sites offering professional salon-only products.
14
Table of Contents
Please
see "Risk FactorsThe beauty products distribution industry is highly competitive and is consolidating" for additional information about our competition.
Customer Service
We strive to complement our extensive merchandise selection and innovative store design with superior customer service. We actively recruit
individuals with cosmetology experience because we believe that such individuals are more knowledgeable about the products they sell. Additionally, Sally Beauty Supply recruits individuals with retail
experience because we believe their general retail knowledge can be leveraged in the beauty supply industry. We believe that employees' knowledge of the products and ability to demonstrate and explain
the advantages of the products increases sales and that their prompt, knowledgeable service fosters the confidence and loyalty of customers and differentiates our business from other professional
beauty supply distributors.
We
emphasize product knowledge during initial training as well as during ongoing training sessions, with programs intended to provide new associates and managers with significant training. The
training programs encompass operational and product training and are designed to increase employee and store productivity. Store employees are also required to participate in training on an ongoing
basis to keep up-to-date on products and operational practices.
Most
of our stores are staffed with a store manager, and two or three full-time or part-time associates. BSG stores are generally also staffed with an assistant manager. The
operations of each store are supervised by a district manager, who reports to a territory manager. A significant number of our store managers and assistant managers are licensed in the cosmetology
field. Additionally, in certain geographic areas in the U.S., a significant number of our store personnel, including store managers and assistant managers, speak Spanish as a second language. We
believe that these skills enhance our store personnel's ability to serve our customers.
Relationships with Suppliers
We purchase our merchandise directly from manufacturers through supply contracts and by purchase orders. For the fiscal year 2011, our five largest
suppliers, The Procter & Gamble Company, or P&G, the Professional Products Division of L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc., or L'Oreal, Conair Corporation, John Paul
Mitchell Systems and Shiseido Cosmetics (America) Limited, accounted for approximately 42% of our consolidated merchandise purchases. Products are purchased from these and many other manufacturers on
an at-will basis or under contracts which can be terminated without cause upon 90 days notice or less or expire without express rights of renewal. Such manufacturers could
discontinue sales to us at any time or upon short notice. If any of these suppliers discontinued selling or were unable to continue selling to us, there could be a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations.
As
is typical in the distribution businesses, relationships with suppliers are subject to change from time to time (including the expansion or loss of distribution rights in various geographies and
the addition or loss of product lines). Changes in our relationships with suppliers occur often, and could positively or negatively impact our net sales and operating profits. Please see "Risk
FactorsWe depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to provide products of adequate quality or who may be unwilling to continue to supply products to us." However, we believe that we
can be successful in mitigating negative effects resulting from unfavorable changes in the relationships between us and our suppliers through, among other things, the development of new or expanded
supplier relationships.
Distribution
As of September 30, 2011, we operated mainly through 17 distribution centers, eight of which serviced Sally Beauty Supply and nine of which
serviced BSG. We recently completed implementation of a comprehensive optimization program to consolidate warehouses and reduce administrative expenses
15
Table of Contents
related
to BSG's distribution network. Total capital expenditures for this program were approximately $22.0 million and certain related expenses were approximately $5.0 million. This
program has resulted in annualized cost savings of at least $14.0 million beginning in the fiscal year 2010.
Our
purchasing and distribution system is designed to minimize the delivered cost of merchandise and maximize the level of merchandise in-stock in stores. This distribution system also
allows for monitoring of delivery times and maintenance of appropriate inventory levels. Product deliveries are typically made to our stores on a weekly basis. Each distribution center has a quality
control department that monitors products received from suppliers. We utilize proprietary software systems to provide computerized warehouse locator and inventory support. Please see "Risk
FactorsWe are not certain that our ongoing cost control plans will continue to be successful."
Management Information Systems
Our management information systems provide order processing, accounting and management information for the marketing, distribution and store
operations functions of our business. A significant portion of these systems have been developed internally. The information gathered by the management information systems supports automatic
replenishment of in-store inventory and provides support for product purchase decisions. Please see "Risk FactorsWe may be adversely affected by any disruption in our
information technology systems."
Employees
In our domestic and foreign operations, we had approximately 24,615 employees as of September 30, 2011; consisting of approximately 7,040
salaried, 4,935 hourly and 12,640 part-time employees. We had approximately 22,900 employees as of September 30, 2010; consisting of approximately 6,730 salaried,
4,670 hourly and 11,500 part-time employees. Part-time employees are used to supplement schedules, particularly in North America.
Certain
subsidiaries in Mexico have collective bargaining agreements covering warehouse and store personnel which expire at various times over the next several years. We believe that we have good
relationships with our employees worldwide.
Management
For information concerning our directors and executive officers, please see "Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Item 10 of
this Annual Report.
Regulation
We are subject to a wide variety of laws and regulations, which historically have not had a material effect on our business. For example, in the
U.S., most of the products sold and the content and methods of advertising and marketing utilized are regulated by a host of federal agencies, including, in each case, one or more of the following:
the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, and the Consumer Products Safety Commission. The transportation and disposal of many of our products are also subject to
federal regulation. State and local agencies regulate many aspects of our business. In marketplaces outside of the U.S., regulation is also comprehensive and focused upon product labeling and safety
issues.
As
of September 30, 2011, Sally Beauty Supply supplied 25 and BSG supplied 156 franchised stores located in the U.S., Mexico and certain countries in Europe. As a result of these
franchisor-franchisee relationships, we are subject to regulation when offering and selling franchises in the applicable countries. The applicable laws and regulations affect our business practices,
as franchisor, in a number of ways,
16
Table of Contents
including
restrictions placed upon the offering, renewal, termination and disapproval of assignment of franchises. To date, these laws and regulations have not had a material effect upon our
operations.
Trademarks and Other Intellectual Property Rights
Our trademarks, certain of which are material to our business, are registered or legally protected in the U.S., Canada and other countries in which
we operate. Together with our subsidiaries, we own over 280 trademark registrations in the U.S., and over 980 trademark registrations outside the U.S. We also rely upon trade secrets and
know-how to develop and maintain our competitive position. We protect intellectual property rights through a variety of methods, including reliance upon trademark, patent and trade secret
laws and confidentiality agreements with many vendors, employees, consultants and others who have access to our proprietary information. The duration of our trademark registrations is generally 10 or
15 years, depending on the country in which a mark is registered, and generally the registrations can be renewed. The scope and duration of intellectual property protection varies by
jurisdiction and by individual product.
Access to Public Filings
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on
Form 8-K, and amendments to such reports are available, without charge, on our website, www.sallybeautyholdings.com, as soon as
reasonably possible after they are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, under the Exchange Act. We will provide copies of such reports to any person, without
charge, upon written request to our Investor Relations Department at 3001 Colorado Blvd, Denton, TX 76210. The information found on our website shall not be considered to be part of this
or any other report filed with or furnished to the SEC.
In
addition to our website, you may read and copy public reports we file with or furnish to the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains our reports, proxy and information statements, and other information that we file electronically
with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following describes risks that we believe to be material to our business. If any of the following risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our
business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. This report also contains forward-looking statements and the following risks could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.
Risks Relating to Our Business
The beauty products distribution industry is highly competitive and is consolidating.
The beauty products distribution industry is highly fragmented, and there are few significant barriers to entry into the marketplaces for most of the
types of products and services we sell. Sally Beauty Supply competes with other domestic and international beauty product wholesale and retail outlets, including local and regional open line beauty
supply stores, professional-only beauty supply stores, salons, mass merchandisers, drug stores and supermarkets. BSG competes with other domestic and international beauty product wholesale
and retail suppliers and with manufacturers selling professional beauty products directly to salons and individual salon professionals. We also face competition from authorized and unauthorized
retailers as well as e-commerce retailers offering professional salon-only and other products. The availability of diverted professional salon products in unauthorized large
format retail stores such as drug stores, grocery stores and others could have a negative impact on our business. The primary competitive factors in the beauty products distribution industry are the
price at which we purchase branded and
17
Table of Contents
exclusive-label
products from manufacturers, the quality, perceived value, consumer brand name recognition, packaging and mix of the products we sell, customer service, the efficiency of our
distribution network, and the availability of desirable store locations. Competitive conditions may limit our ability to maintain prices or may require us to reduce prices in efforts to retain
business or marketplace share. Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do and are less leveraged than our business, and may therefore be able to spend more
aggressively on advertising and promotional activities and respond more effectively to changing business and economic conditions. We expect existing competitors, business partners and new entrants to
the beauty products distribution industry to constantly revise or improve their business models in response to challenges from competing businesses, including ours. If these competitors introduce
changes or developments that we cannot address in a timely or cost-effective manner, our business may be adversely affected.
In
addition, our industry is consolidating, which may give our competitors increased negotiating leverage with suppliers and greater marketing resources, resulting in a more effective ability to
compete with us. For instance, we may lose customers if those competitors which have broad geographic reach attract additional salons (individual and chain) that are currently BSG customers, or if
professional beauty supply manufacturers align themselves with our competitors. For example, BSG's largest supplier, L'Oreal, has been able to shift a material amount of revenue out of
the BSG nationwide distribution network and into its own competitive regional distribution networks. L'Oreal has also acquired one manufacturer (that does not currently do business with
BSG) and distributors which compete directly with BSG in the southeastern U.S., the midwestern U.S. and the west coast of the U.S. As a result, L'Oreal directly competes with BSG and
there can be no assurance that there will not be further revenue losses over time at BSG, due to potential losses of additional L'Oreal related products as well as from the increased
competition from L'Oreal-affiliated distribution networks. If L'Oreal (or another direct competitor) were to acquire or otherwise merge with another manufacturer which
conducts business with BSG, we could lose that revenue as well. Not only does consolidation in
distribution pose risks from competing distributors, but it may also place more leverage in the hands of those manufacturers to negotiate smaller margins on products sold through our network.
If
we are unable to compete effectively in our marketplace or if competitors divert our customers away from our networks, it would adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We may be unable to anticipate changes in consumer preferences and buying trends or manage our product lines and inventory commensurate with consumer demand.
Our success depends in part on our ability to anticipate, gauge and react in a timely manner to changes in consumer spending patterns and preferences
for specific beauty products. If we do not timely identify and properly respond to evolving trends and consumer demands in the marketplace for beauty products and changing consumer demands our sales
may decline significantly and we may be required to mark down unsold inventory to prices which can be significantly lower than normal prices, which would adversely impact our margins and could
adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we depend on our inventory management and information technology systems in order to replenish inventories
and deliver products to store locations in response to customer demands. Any systems-related problems could result in difficulties satisfying the demands of customers which, in turn, could adversely
affect our sales and profitability.
We
expect the aging baby boomer population to drive future growth in professional beauty supply sales through an increase in the use of hair color and hair loss products. Additionally, we expect
continuously changing fashion-related trends that drive new hair styles to result in continued demand for hair styling products. Changes in consumer tastes and fashion trends can have an impact on our
financial performance. If we are unable to anticipate and respond to trends in the marketplace for beauty products and changing consumer demands, our business could suffer.
18
Table of Contents
Our comparable store sales and quarterly financial performance may fluctuate for a variety of reasons.
Our comparable store sales and quarterly results of operations have fluctuated in the past, and we expect them to continue to fluctuate in the
future. A variety of factors
affect our comparable store sales and quarterly financial performance, including:
-
- changes in our merchandising strategy or mix;
-
- the performance of our new stores;
-
- our ability to increase sales and meet forecasted levels of profitability at our existing stores;
-
- the effectiveness of our inventory management;
-
- the timing and concentration of new store openings, including additional human resource requirements and related
pre-opening and other start-up costs;
-
- levels of pre-opening expenses associated with new stores;
-
- the effect of our integration of acquired businesses and stores over time;
-
- the varying cost and profitability of new stores opened in the U.S. and in foreign countries;
-
- a portion of a typical new store's sales (or sales we make over the internet channel) coming from customers who previously
shopped at other existing stores;
-
- expenditures on our distribution system;
-
- the timing and effectiveness of our marketing activities, particularly our Sally Beauty Club and ProCard promotions;
-
- seasonal fluctuations due to weather conditions;
-
- the level of sales made through our internet channels;
-
- actions by our existing or new competitors;
-
- fluctuations over time in the cost to us of products we sell; and
-
- worldwide economic conditions and, in particular, the retail sales environment in the U.S.
Accordingly,
our results for any one fiscal quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other quarter, and comparable store sales for any particular future period may
not continue to increase at the same rates as we have recently experienced and may even decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to provide products of adequate quality or who may be unwilling to continue to supply products to us.
We do not manufacture any products we sell, and instead purchase our products from recognized brand manufacturers and private label fillers. We
depend on a limited number of manufacturers for a significant percentage of the products we sell. During the fiscal year 2011, our five largest suppliers were Procter & Gamble Co., or
P&G, the Professional Products Division of L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc., or L'Oreal, Conair Corporation, John Paul Mitchell Systems and Shiseido Cosmetics (America)
Limited and accounted for approximately 42% of our consolidated merchandise purchases. In addition, BSG's largest supplier, L'Oreal, represented approximately 16% of BSG's merchandise
purchases during the fiscal year 2011.
Since
we purchase products from many manufacturers and fillers under at-will contracts and contracts which can be terminated without cause upon 90 days notice or less, or which
expire without express rights of renewal, manufacturers and fillers could discontinue sales to us immediately or upon short notice. Some of our contracts with manufacturers may be terminated if we
fail to meet specified minimum purchase
19
Table of Contents
requirements.
If minimum purchase requirements are not met, we do not have contractual assurances of continued supply. In lieu of termination, a manufacturer may also change the terms upon which it
sells, for example, by raising prices or broadening distribution to third parties. Infrequently, a supplier will seek to terminate a distribution relationship through legal action. For these and other
reasons, we may not be able to acquire desired merchandise in sufficient quantities or on acceptable terms in the future.
Changes
in Sally Beauty Supply's and BSG's relationships with suppliers occur often, and could positively or negatively impact the net sales and operating profits of both business segments. Some of
our suppliers may seek to decrease their reliance on distribution intermediaries, including full-service/exclusive and open-line distributors like BSG and Sally Beauty Supply,
by promoting their own distribution channels, as discussed above. These suppliers may offer advantages, such as lower prices, when their products are purchased from distribution channels they control.
If our access to supplier-provided products were to diminish relative to our competitors or we were not able to purchase products at the same prices as our competitors, our business could be
materially and adversely affected. Also, consolidation among suppliers may increase their negotiating leverage, thereby providing them with competitive advantages that may increase our costs and
reduce our revenues, adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As
discussed above, L'Oreal directly competes with BSG, and there can be no assurance that there will not be revenue losses over time at BSG, due to potential losses of additional
L'Oreal related products as well as from the increased competition from L'Oreal-affiliated distribution networks. For example,
L'Oreal could attempt to terminate our contracts to carry certain of their products in BSG stores, which accounted for approximately $108.0 million in U.S. sales for the fiscal
year 2011 and expire in 2012. Therefore, there can be no assurance that the impact of these developments, if they were to occur, will not adversely impact revenue to a greater degree than we currently
expect or that our efforts to mitigate the impact of these developments will be successful. If the impact of these developments is greater than we expect or our efforts to mitigate the impact of these
developments are not successful, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Although
we plan to mitigate the negative effects resulting from potential unfavorable changes in our relationships with suppliers, such as L'Oreal, there can be no assurance that our
efforts will partially or completely offset the loss of these distribution rights.
Any significant interruption in the supply of products by manufacturers and fillers could disrupt our ability to deliver merchandise to our stores and customers in a timely
manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Manufacturers and exclusive-label fillers of beauty supply products are subject to certain risks that could adversely impact their ability to provide
us with their products on a timely basis, including inability to procure ingredients, industrial accidents, environmental events, strikes and other labor disputes, union organizing activity,
disruptions in logistics or information systems, loss or impairment of key manufacturing sites, product quality control, safety, and licensing requirements and other regulatory issues, as well as
natural disasters and other external factors over which neither they nor we have control. In addition, our operating results depend to some extent on the orderly operation of our receiving and
distribution processes, which depend on manufacturers' adherence to shipping schedules and our effective management of our distribution facilities and capacity.
If
a material interruption of supply occurs, or a significant manufacturer or filler ceases to supply us or materially decreases its supply to us, we may not be able to acquire products with similar
quality and consumer brand name recognition as the products we currently sell or to acquire such products in sufficient quantities to meet our customers' demands or on favorable terms to our business,
any of which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
20
Table of Contents
If products sold by us are found to be defective in labeling or content, our credibility and that of the brands we sell may be harmed, marketplace acceptance of our products
may decrease, and we may be exposed to liability in excess of our products liability insurance coverage and manufacturer indemnities.
We do not control the production process for the products we sell. We may not be able to identify a defect in a product we purchase from a
manufacturer or exclusive-label filler before we offer such product for resale. In many cases, we rely on representations of manufacturers and fillers about the products we purchase for resale
regarding whether such products have been manufactured in accordance with applicable governmental regulations. Our sale of certain products exposes us to potential product liability claims, recalls or
other regulatory or enforcement actions initiated by federal, state or foreign regulatory authorities or through private causes of action. Such claims, recalls or actions could be based on allegations
that, among other things, the products sold by us are misbranded, contain contaminants or impermissible ingredients, provide inadequate instructions regarding their use or misuse, or include
inadequate warnings concerning flammability or interactions with other substances. Claims against us could also arise as a result of the misuse by
purchasers of such products or as a result of their use in a manner different than the intended use. We may be required to pay for losses or injuries actually or allegedly caused by the products we
sell and to recall any product we sell that is alleged to be or is found to be defective.
Any
actual defects or allegations of defects in products sold by us could result in adverse publicity and harm our credibility or the credibility of the manufacturer, which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Although we may have indemnification rights against the manufacturers of many of the products we distribute and rights as an "additional
insured" under the manufacturers' insurance policies, it is not certain that any manufacturer or insurer will be financially solvent and capable of making payment to any party suffering loss or injury
caused by products sold by us. Further, some types of actions and penalties, including many actions or penalties imposed by governmental agencies and punitive damages awards, may not be remediable
through reliance on indemnity agreements or insurance. Furthermore, potential product liability claims may exceed the amount of indemnity or insurance coverage or be excluded under the terms of an
indemnity agreement or insurance policy and claims for indemnity or reimbursement by us may require us to expend significant resources and may take years to resolve. If we are forced to expend
significant resources and time to resolve such claims or to pay material amounts to satisfy such claims, it could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We could be adversely affected if we do not comply with laws and regulations or if we become subject to additional or more stringent laws and regulations.
We are subject to a number of federal, state and local laws and regulations in the U.S., as well as applicable laws and regulations in each foreign
marketplace in which we do business. These laws and regulations govern the composition, packaging, labeling and safety of the products we sell, as well as the methods we use to sell and import these
products. Non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations of governmental authorities, including the FDA and similar authorities in other jurisdictions, by us or the manufacturers and
fillers of the products sold by us could result in fines, product recalls and enforcement actions, and otherwise restrict our ability to market certain products, which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. The laws and regulations applicable to us or manufacturers of the products sold by us may become more stringent. Continued legal compliance
could require the review and possible reformulation or relabeling of certain products, as well as the possible removal of some products from the marketplace. Legal compliance could also lead to
considerably higher internal regulatory costs. Manufacturers may try to recover some or all of any increased costs of compliance by increasing the prices at which we purchase products, and we may not
be able to recover some or all of such increased cost in our own prices to our customers. We are also subject to state and local laws and regulations that affect our franchisor-franchisee
relationships. Increased compliance costs and the loss of sales of certain products due to more stringent or new laws and regulations could adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
21
Table of Contents
Laws
and regulations impact our business in many areas that have no direct relation to the products we sell. For example, as a public company, we are subject to a number of laws and regulations
related to the disclosure of financial and other information about us, as well as the issuance and sale of our securities. Another area of intense regulation is that of the relationships we have with
our employees, including compliance with many different wage and hour and nondiscrimination related regulatory schemes. Violation of any of the laws or regulations governing our business or the
assertion of individual or class-wide claims could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Product diversion could have an adverse impact on our revenues.
The majority of the products that BSG sells, including those sold by our Armstrong McCall franchisees, are meant to be used exclusively by salons and
individual salon professionals or are meant to be sold exclusively by the purchasers, such as salons, to their retail consumers. However, despite our efforts to prevent diversion, incidents of product
diversion occur, whereby our products are sold by these purchasers (and possibly by other bulk purchasers such as franchisees) to wholesalers and ultimately to general merchandise retailers, among
others. These retailers, in turn, sell such products to consumers. The diverted product may be old, tainted or damaged and sold through unapproved outlets, all of which could diminish the value of the
particular brand. In addition, such diversion may result in lower net sales for BSG should consumers choose to purchase diverted products from retailers rather than purchasing from our customers, or
choose other products altogether because of the perceived loss of brand prestige.
In
the BSG arena, product diversion is generally prohibited under our manufacturers' contracts, and we are often under a contractual obligation to stop selling to salons, salon professionals and other
bulk purchasers which engage in product diversion. If we fail to comply with our anti-diversion obligations under these manufacturers' contracts, (including any known diversion of products
sold through our Armstrong McCall franchisees), these contracts could be adversely affected or even terminated. In addition, our investigation and enforcement of our anti-diversion
obligations may result in reduced sales to our customer base, thereby decreasing our revenues and profitability.
BSG's financial results are affected by the financial results of BSG's franchised-based business (Armstrong McCall).
BSG receives revenue from products purchased by Armstrong McCall franchisees. Accordingly, a portion of BSG's financial results is to an extent
dependent upon the operational and financial success of these franchisees, including their implementation of BSG's strategic plans. If sales trends or economic conditions worsen for Armstrong McCall's
franchisees, their financial results may worsen. Additionally, the failure of Armstrong McCall franchisees to renew their franchise agreements, any requirement that Armstrong McCall restructure its
franchise agreements in connection with such renewals, or any failure of Armstrong McCall to meet its obligations under its franchise agreements, could result in decreased revenues for BSG or create
legal issues with our franchisees or with manufacturers.
Our internet-based business may be unsuccessful or may cause internal channel conflict.
We offer many of our beauty products for sale through our websites in the U.S. (such as www.sallybeauty.com,
www.cosmoprofbeauty.com and www.ebobdirect.com) and abroad. Therefore, we encounter risks and difficulties frequently
experienced in internet-based businesses, including risks related to our ability to attract and retain customers on a cost-effective basis and our ability to operate, support, expand and
develop our internet operations, websites and software and other related operational systems. In addition, our internet-based business may reduce the financial performance of our Sally Beauty Supply
and other stores. For example, customers may choose to shop online rather than purchasing products from our Sally Beauty Supply stores. Although we believe that our participation in both
e-commerce and physical store sales is a distinct advantage for us due to synergies and the potential for new customers, conflicts between these offerings could create issues that have the
potential to adversely affect our results
22
Table of Contents
of
operations. For example, such conflict could cause some of our current or potential internet customers to consider competing distributors of beauty products. These events could have an adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to successfully identify acquisition candidates or successfully complete desirable acquisitions.
In the past several years, we have completed multiple acquisitions and we intend to pursue additional acquisitions in the future. We actively review
acquisition prospects which
would complement our existing lines of business, increase the size and geographic scope of our operations or otherwise offer growth and operating efficiency opportunities. There can be no assurance
that we will continue to identify suitable acquisition candidates.
If
suitable candidates are identified, sufficient funds may not be available to make such acquisitions. We compete against many other companies, some of which are larger and have greater financial and
other resources than we do. Increased competition for acquisition candidates could result in fewer acquisition opportunities and higher acquisition prices. In addition, we are highly leveraged and the
agreements governing our indebtedness contain limits on our ability to incur additional debt to pay for acquisitions. Additionally, the amount of equity that we can issue to make acquisitions or raise
additional capital is severely limited. We may be unable to finance acquisitions that would increase our growth or improve our financial and competitive position. To the extent that debt financing is
available to finance acquisitions, our net indebtedness could increase as a result of any acquisitions.
If we acquire any businesses in the future, they could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our business or have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Any acquisitions that we do make may be difficult to integrate profitably into our business and may entail numerous risks,
including:
-
- difficulties in assimilating acquired operations, stores or products, including the loss of key employees from acquired
businesses;
-
- difficulties and costs associated with integrating and evaluating the distribution or information systems and/or internal
control systems of acquired businesses;
-
- expenses associated with the amortization of identifiable intangible assets;
-
- problems retaining key technical, operational and administrative personnel;
-
- diversion of management's attention from our core business, including loss of management focus on marketplace
developments;
-
- complying with foreign regulatory requirements, including multi-jurisdictional competition rules and restrictions on
trade/imports;
-
- enforcement of intellectual property rights in foreign countries;
-
- adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, including the potential loss of suppliers
of the acquired businesses;
-
- operating inefficiencies and negative impact on profitability;
-
- entering geographic areas or channels in which we have limited or no prior experience; and
-
- those related to general economic and political conditions, including legal and other barriers to cross-border investment
in general, or by U.S. companies in particular.
In
addition, during the acquisition process, we may fail or be unable to discover some of the liabilities of businesses that we acquire. These liabilities may result from a prior owner's noncompliance
with applicable laws and regulations. Acquired businesses may also not perform as we expect or we may not be able to obtain the expected financial improvements in the acquired businesses.
23
Table of Contents
If we are unable to profitably open and operate new stores, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Our future growth strategy depends in part on our ability to open and profitably operate new stores in existing and additional geographic areas. The
capital requirements to open a U.S.-based Sally Beauty Supply or BSG store, excluding inventory, average approximately $70,000 and $80,000, respectively, with the capital requirements for
international stores costing less or substantially more depending upon the marketplace. Despite these relatively low opening costs, we may not be able to open all of the new stores we plan to open and
any new stores we open may not be profitable, either of which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations. There are several factors that could affect our
ability to open and profitably operate new stores, including:
-
- the inability to identify and acquire suitable sites or to negotiate acceptable leases for such sites;
-
- proximity to existing stores that may reduce the new store's sales or the sales of existing stores;
-
- difficulties in adapting our distribution and other operational and management systems to an expanded network of stores;
-
- the potential inability to obtain adequate financing to fund expansion because of our high leverage and limitations on our
ability to issue equity under our credit agreements, among other things;
-
- increased (and sometimes unanticipated) costs associated with opening stores in international locations;
-
- difficulties in obtaining any governmental and third-party consents, permits and licenses;
-
- limitations on capital expenditures which may be included in financing documents that we enter into; and
-
- difficulties in adapting existing operational and management systems to the requirements of national or regional laws and
local ordinances.
In
addition, as we continue to open new stores, our management, as well as our financial, distribution and information systems, and other resources will be subject to greater demands. If our personnel
and systems are unable to successfully manage this increased burden, our results of operations may be materially affected.
The health of the economy in the channels we serve may affect consumer purchases of discretionary items such as beauty products and salon services, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our results of operations may be materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally, both in the U.S. and
internationally. Concerns over inflation, employment, energy costs, geopolitical issues, terrorism, the availability and cost of credit, the mortgage market, sovereign and private banking systems,
sovereign deficits and increasing debt burdens and the real estate and other financial markets in the U.S. and Europe have contributed to increased volatility and diminished expectations for the U.S.
and certain foreign economies. We appeal to a wide demographic consumer profile and offer a broad selection of beauty products sold directly to retail consumers and salons and salon professionals.
Continued uncertainty in the economy could adversely impact consumer purchases of discretionary items such as beauty products, as well as adversely impact the frequency of salon services performed by
professionals using products purchased from us. Factors that could affect consumers' willingness to make such discretionary purchases include: general business conditions, levels of employment,
interest rates, tax rates, the availability of consumer credit and consumer confidence in future economic conditions. In the event of a prolonged economic downturn or acute recession, consumer
spending habits could be adversely affected and we could experience lower than expected net sales. In addition, a reduction in traffic to, or the closing of, the other destination retailers in the
shopping areas where our stores are located could significantly reduce our sales and leave us with unsold inventory. The
24
Table of Contents
economic
climate could also adversely affect our vendors. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are not certain that our ongoing cost control plans will continue to be successful.
Our business strategy substantially depends on continuing to control or reduce operating expenses. In furtherance of this strategy, we have engaged
in ongoing activities to reduce or control costs, some of which are complicated and require us to expend significant resources to implement. We cannot assure you that our efforts will result in the
increased profitability, cost savings or other benefits that we expect, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, specifically our trademarks and service marks, our ability to compete could be negatively impacted.
The success of our business depends to a certain extent upon the value associated with our intellectual property rights. We own certain trademark and
service mark rights used in connection with our business including, but not limited to, "Sally," "Sally Beauty," "Sally Beauty Supply," "Sally Beauty Club Card," "BSG," "CosmoProf," "Proclub,"
"Armstrong McCall," "ion," "Beyond the Zone" and "Salon Services." We protect our intellectual property rights through a variety of methods, including, but not limited to, applying for and obtaining
trademark protection in the U.S., Canada and other countries throughout the world in which our business operates. We also rely on trade secret laws, in addition to confidentiality agreements with
vendors, employees, consultants and others who have access to our proprietary information. While we intend to vigorously protect our trademarks against infringement, we may not be successful. In
addition, the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. The costs required to protect our intellectual property
rights and trademarks are expected to continue to be substantial.
Our ability to conduct business in international marketplaces may be affected by legal, regulatory and economic risks.
Our ability to capitalize on growth in new international marketplaces and to grow or maintain our current level of operations in our existing
international marketplaces is subject to risks associated with our international operations. These risks include: unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, trade barriers to some international
marketplaces, economic and foreign currency fluctuations, potential difficulties in enforcing contracts, increasing levels of violence or terrorism, an inability to properly protect assets (including
intellectual property), an inability to collect receivables, potential tax liabilities associated with repatriating funds from foreign operations and difficulties and costs of staffing, managing and
accounting for foreign operations.
We may be adversely affected by any disruption in our information technology systems.
Our operations are dependent upon our information technology systems, which encompass all of our major business functions. We rely upon such
information technology systems to manage and replenish inventory, to fill and ship customer orders on a timely basis, to coordinate our sales activities across all of our products and services and to
coordinate our administrative activities. A substantial disruption in our information technology systems for any prolonged time period (arising from, for example, system capacity limits from
unexpected increases in our volume of business, outages or delays in our service) could result in delays in receiving inventory and supplies or filling customer orders and adversely affect our
customer service and relationships. Our systems might be damaged or interrupted by natural or man-made events (caused by us,
by our service providers or others) or by computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions affecting the internet. Such delays, problems or costs may have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
As
our operations grow in both size and scope, we continuously need to improve and upgrade our systems and infrastructure while maintaining their reliability and integrity. The expansion of our
systems and
25
Table of Contents
infrastructure
will require us to commit substantial financial, operational and technical resources before the volume of our business increases, with no assurance that the volume of business will
increase. For example, we are in the process of designing and implementing a standardized ERP system internationally over the next few years. In addition, we are currently implementing new
point-of-sale systems in a number of our divisions, which we anticipate will provide significant benefits, including enhanced tracking of customer sales. These and any other
required upgrades to our systems and information technology, or new technology, now and in the future, will require that our management and resources be diverted from our core business to assist in
meeting implementation objectives. Many of our systems are proprietary, and as a result our options are limited in seeking third-party help with the operation and upgrade of those systems. There can
be no assurance that the time and resources our management will need to devote to operations and upgrades, any delays due to the installation of any upgrade (and customer issues therewith), any
resulting service outages, or the impact on the reliability of our data from any upgrade or any legacy system, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
The occurrence of natural disasters or acts of violence or terrorism could adversely affect our operations and financial performance.
The occurrence of natural disasters or acts of violence or terrorism could result in physical damage to our properties, the temporary closure of
stores or distribution centers, the temporary lack of an adequate work force, the temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products (or a substantial increase in the cost of
those products) from domestic or foreign suppliers, the temporary disruption in the delivery of goods to our distribution centers (or a substantial increase in the cost of those deliveries), the
temporary reduction in the availability of products in our stores, and/or the temporary reduction in visits to stores by customers.
If
one or more natural disasters or acts of violence or terrorism were to impact our business, we could, among other things, incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with
distributing products. Furthermore, insurance costs associated with our business may rise significantly in the event of a large scale natural disaster or act of violence or terrorism.
Our accounting and other management systems, controls and resources may not be adequately prepared to meet the financial reporting and other requirements to which we are
subject.
As a publicly-traded company, we are subject to reporting and other obligations under the Exchange Act and other federal securities regulations, such
as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. These obligations place significant demands on our management, administrative and operational resources, including
accounting resources. As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. We also have significant compliance costs under SEC and New York Stock Exchange rules and
regulations.
In
addition, as a public company we are subject to rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which require us to include in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K our management's report on, and assessment of, the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Furthermore, our independent registered public
accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of such internal controls. If we fail to properly assess and/or achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, there is a
risk that we will not comply with Section 404. Moreover, effective internal controls are necessary to help prevent financial fraud. Any adverse finding could result in a negative reaction in
the financial marketplace due to loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which ultimately could harm our business and could negatively impact the market price of
our securities.
To
comply with these requirements, we are continuously upgrading our systems, including information technology systems, and implementing additional financial and management controls and disclosure
processes, reporting systems and procedures. These and any other modifications to our financial and management controls and disclosure processes, reporting systems, information technology systems and
procedures under the financial reporting requirements and other rules that apply to us, now and in the
26
Table of Contents
future,
will require that our management and resources be diverted from our core business to assist in compliance with the requirements. There can be no assurance that the time and resources our
management will need to devote to the requirements, any delays due to the installation of any upgrade, any resulting service outages, and any impact on the reliability of our data from an upgrade will
not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We are a holding company with no operations of our own, and we depend on our subsidiaries for cash.
We are a holding company and do not have any material assets or operations other than ownership of equity interests of our subsidiaries. Our
operations are conducted almost entirely through our subsidiaries, and our ability to generate cash to meet our obligations or to pay dividends is highly dependent on the earnings of, and receipt of
funds from, our subsidiaries through dividends or intercompany loans. The ability of our subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to allow us and them to make scheduled payments
on our obligations will depend on their future financial performance, which will be affected by a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside of our control. We
cannot assure you that the cash flow and earnings of our operating subsidiaries will be adequate for our subsidiaries to service their debt obligations. If our subsidiaries do not generate sufficient
cash flow from operations to satisfy corporate obligations, we may have to: undertake alternative financing plans (such as refinancing), restructure debt, sell assets, reduce or delay capital
investments, or seek to raise additional capital. We cannot assure you that any such alternative refinancing would be possible, that any assets could be sold, or, if sold, of the timing of the sales
and the amount of proceeds realized from those sales, that additional financing could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all, or that additional financing would be permitted under the terms of our
various debt instruments then in effect. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have an
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore,
we and our subsidiaries may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future that may severely restrict or prohibit our subsidiaries from making distributions, paying dividends or
making loans to us.
Risks Relating to Our Substantial Indebtedness
We have substantial debt and may incur substantial additional debt, which could adversely affect our financial health, our ability to obtain financing in the future and our
ability to react to changes in our business.
In connection with the Separation Transactions, certain of our subsidiaries, including Sally Holdings LLC, which we refer to as Sally
Holdings, incurred approximately $1,850.0 million in debt. As of September 30, 2011, we had an aggregate principal amount of
approximately $1,413.1 million, including capital lease obligations, of outstanding debt, and a total debt to equity ratio of -6.45:1.00.
Our
substantial debt could have important consequences. For example, it could:
-
- make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, resulting in possible defaults on and
acceleration of such indebtedness;
-
- limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service
requirements or general corporate purposes;
-
- require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on
our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of such cash flows to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
-
- restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or otherwise transfer assets to us, which could limit our
ability to conduct repurchases of our own equity securities or pay dividends to our stockholders, thereby limiting our ability to enhance stockholder value through such transactions;
27
Table of Contents
-
- increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, including interest rate fluctuations
(because a portion of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest), including borrowings under our senior secured term loan facilities and our asset-backed senior secured loan facility, which we
refer to collectively as the senior secured credit facilities;
-
- place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with proportionately less debt or comparable debt at
more favorable interest rates and that, as a result, may be better positioned to withstand economic downturns;
-
- limit our ability to refinance indebtedness or cause the associated costs of such refinancing to increase; and
-
- limit our flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions and ability to withstand competitive pressures, or prevent
us from carrying out capital spending that is necessary or important to our growth strategy and efforts to improve operating margins or our business.
Any
of the foregoing impacts of our substantial indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Despite our current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantially more debt, including secured debt, which could further exacerbate the
risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.
We and our subsidiaries may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the instruments governing our indebtedness do not
fully prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so. As of September 30, 2011, our senior credit facilities provided us commitments for additional borrowings of up to approximately
$366.5 million under the asset-backed senior secured loan (or ABL) facility, subject to borrowing base limitations. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we
face would increase, and we may not be able to meet all our debt obligations. In addition, the agreements governing our senior credit facilities as well as the indentures governing our senior notes
and senior subordinated notes, which we refer to collectively as the Notes, do not prevent us from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness.
The agreements and instruments governing our debt contain restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact our ability to operate our business.
The senior secured term loan facilities, which we refer to as the Term Loans, contain covenants that, among other things, restrict Sally Holdings and
its subsidiaries' ability to:
-
- dispose of assets;
-
- incur additional indebtedness (including guarantees of additional indebtedness);
-
- pay dividends, repurchase stock or make other distributions;
-
- make voluntary prepayments on the Notes or make amendments to the terms thereof;
-
- prepay certain other debt or amend specific debt agreements;
-
- create liens on assets;
-
- make investments (including joint ventures);
-
- make acquisitions of all of the business or assets of, or stock representing beneficial ownership of, any person;
-
- engage in mergers, consolidations or sales of all or substantially all of Sally Holdings' assets;
-
- engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and
-
- permit restrictions on Sally Holdings subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends to Sally Holdings.
28
Table of Contents
The
ABL credit facility contains covenants that, among other things, restrict Sally Holdings and its subsidiaries' ability to:
-
- change their line of business;
-
- engage in certain mergers, consolidations and transfers of all or substantially all of their assets;
-
- make certain dividends, stock repurchases and other distributions;
-
- make acquisitions of all of the business or assets of, or stock representing beneficial ownership of, any person;
-
- dispose of certain assets;
-
- make voluntary prepayments on the Notes or make amendments to the terms thereof;
-
- prepay certain other debt or amend specific debt agreements;
-
- change the fiscal year of Sally Holdings or its direct parent; and
-
- create or incur negative pledges.
The
Term Loans contain a requirement that Sally Holdings not exceed a maximum ratio of net senior secured debt to consolidated EBITDA (as those terms are defined in the relevant credit agreement). In
addition, if Sally Holdings fails to maintain a specified minimum level of borrowing capacity under the ABL credit facility, it will then be obligated to maintain a specified fixed-charge coverage
ratio. Our ability to comply with these covenants in future periods will depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance, which in turn will be subject to economic conditions and to
financial, market and competitive factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our ability to comply with these covenants in future periods will also depend substantially on the pricing of our
products, our success at implementing cost reduction initiatives and our ability to successfully implement our overall business strategy.
The
indentures governing the Notes also contain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of Sally Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries
to:
-
- dispose of assets;
-
- incur additional indebtedness (including guarantees of additional indebtedness);
-
- pay dividends, repurchase stock or make other distributions;
-
- prepay subordinated debt;
-
- create liens on assets (which, in the case of the senior subordinated notes, would be limited in applicability to liens
securing pari passu or subordinated indebtedness);
-
- make investments (including joint ventures);
-
- engage in mergers, consolidations or sales of all or substantially all of Sally Holdings' assets;
-
- engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and
-
- permit restrictions on Sally Holdings' subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends.
The
restrictions in the indentures governing our Notes and the terms of our senior credit facilities may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business
and may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. We may also incur future debt obligations that
might subject us to additional restrictive covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility. We cannot assure you that our subsidiaries, which are borrowers under these
agreements, will be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if they are unable to comply with these agreements, or that we will be able to refinance our debt on terms acceptable to us, or at
all.
29
Table of Contents
Our
ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in the senior credit facilities and the indentures for the Notes may be affected by economic, financial and industry conditions
beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants and restrictions could result in a default under either the senior credit facilities or the indentures that would permit the applicable lenders
or note holders, as the case may be, to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. If we are unable to repay debt, lenders having
secured obligations, such as the lenders under the senior credit facilities, could proceed against the collateral securing the debt. In any such case, our subsidiaries may be unable to borrow under
the senior credit facilities and may not be able to repay the amounts due under the Term Loans and the Notes. This could have serious consequences to our financial condition and results of operations
and could cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent.
Our ability to generate the significant amount of cash needed to service all of our debt and our ability to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness or obtain
additional financing depends on many factors beyond our control.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance our obligations under, our debt will depend on our financial and operating performance,
which, in turn, will be subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to the financial and business factors, many of which may be beyond our control, described under
"Risks Relating to Our Business" above.
If
our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek to obtain additional equity
capital or restructure our debt. In the future, our cash flow and capital resources may not be sufficient for payments of interest on and principal of our debt, and such alternative measures may not
be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations.
We
cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing, particularly because of our high levels of debt and the debt incurrence restrictions
imposed by the agreements governing our debt, as well as prevailing market conditions. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be
required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. Our senior credit facilities and the indentures governing the Notes restrict our ability to dispose
of assets and use the proceeds from any such dispositions. We cannot assure you we will be able to consummate those sales, or if we do, what the timing of the sales will be or whether the proceeds
that we realize will be adequate to meet debt service obligations when due.
An increase in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could reduce our profitability.
A significant portion of our outstanding debt, including under our senior credit facilities, bears interest at variable rates. As a result, an
increase in interest rates, whether because of an increase in market interest rates or a decrease in our creditworthiness, would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could materially reduce our
profitability and cash flows. The impact of such an increase would be more significant for us than it would be for some other companies because of our substantial debt.
The impairment of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.
We have exposure to different counterparties with regard to our interest rate swaps. These transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of
default of our counterparty. We also have exposure to financial institutions used as depositories of our corporate cash balances. If our counterparties and financial institutions become impaired or
insolvent, this could have serious consequences to our financial condition and results of operations.
30
Table of Contents
Risks Relating to Our Separation from Alberto-Culver and Relating To Our Largest Stockholder
If the share distribution of Alberto-Culver common stock in the transactions separating us from Alberto-Culver did not constitute a tax-free distribution under
Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, or if we became liable for additional taxes owed by Alberto-Culver, then we may be responsible for payment of
significant U.S. federal income taxes.
The following discussion describes the risk that the share distribution of Alberto-Culver common stock in the Separation Transactions may have
triggered significant tax liabilities for us, which could result in a material adverse effect on us. In connection with the share distribution of Alberto-Culver common stock in the separation, we
received: (i) a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and (ii) an opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, counsel to Alberto-Culver, in each case, to the effect
that the transactions qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code and a distribution eligible for non-recognition under Sections 355(a) and 361(c) of
the Code. The private letter ruling and the opinion of counsel were based, in part, on assumptions and representations as to factual matters made by, among others, Alberto-Culver, us and
representatives of Mrs. Carol L. Bernick, Mr. Leonard H. Lavin and certain of our other stockholders whom we refer to as the Lavin family stockholders, as requested by the IRS or
counsel, which, if incorrect, could jeopardize the conclusions reached by the IRS and counsel. The private letter ruling also did not address certain material legal issues that could affect its
conclusions, and reserved the right of the IRS to raise such issues upon a subsequent audit. Opinions of counsel neither bind the IRS or any court, nor preclude the IRS from adopting a contrary
position.
If
the Alberto-Culver share distribution were not to qualify as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Code, we would recognize taxable gain equal to the excess of the
fair market value of the Alberto-Culver common stock distributed to our stockholders over our tax basis in such Alberto-Culver common stock.
Even
if the Alberto-Culver share distribution otherwise qualified as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Code, it would result in significant U.S. federal income tax
liabilities to us if there was an acquisition of our stock or the stock of Alberto-Culver as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the Alberto-Culver share distribution and
that results in an acquisition of 50% or more of Alberto-Culver's or our outstanding common stock.
In
the event that we recognize a taxable gain in connection with the Alberto-Culver share distribution (either: (i) because the Alberto-Culver share distribution did not qualify as a
tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Code, or (ii) because of an acquisition by CDR Investors of 50%
or more of Alberto-Culver or our outstanding common stock as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the Alberto-Culver share distribution), the taxable gain recognized by us
would result in significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities to us. Under the Code, we would be jointly and severally liable for these taxes for which Alberto-Culver may be required to indemnify us
under the tax allocation agreement, and there can be no assurance that Alberto-Culver would be able to fulfill its obligations under the tax allocation agreement if Alberto-Culver was determined to be
responsible for the taxes thereunder.
The
process for determining whether a prohibited change in control has occurred under the rules is complex, inherently factual and subject to interpretation of the facts and circumstances of a
particular case. If Alberto-Culver did not carefully monitor its, or we did not carefully monitor our, compliance with these rules, this might inadvertently cause or permit a prohibited change in the
ownership of us or of Alberto-Culver to occur, thereby triggering Alberto-Culver's or our respective obligations to indemnify the other pursuant to the tax allocation agreement, which would have a
material adverse effect on us.
If
any of the above events occur, we will be jointly and severally liable for these taxes, and there can be no assurance that Alberto-Culver would be able to fulfill its indemnification obligations to
us under the tax allocation agreement if Alberto-Culver was determined to be responsible for these taxes thereunder. In addition, these mutual indemnity obligations could discourage or prevent a third
party from making a proposal to acquire us.
31
Table of Contents
Actions taken by the Lavin family stockholders or by the CDR investors could adversely affect the tax-free nature of the share distribution of Alberto-Culver
common stock in connection with the transactions separating us from Alberto-Culver.
Sales and/or acquisitions by the Lavin family stockholders of our common stock or Alberto-Culver's common stock may adversely affect the
tax-free nature of the share distribution of Alberto-Culver's common stock in the Separation Transactions. First, with certain exceptions, sales by the Lavin family stockholders of our
common stock or Alberto-Culver's common stock at any time after the Separation Transactions might be considered evidence that the share distribution was used principally as a device for the
distribution of earnings and profits, particularly if the selling stockholder was found to have an intent to effect such sale at the time of the share distribution. If the IRS successfully asserted
that the share distribution was used principally as such a device, the share distribution would not qualify as a tax-free distribution, and thus would be taxable to us. Second, with
certain exceptions, if any of the Lavin family stockholders had sold an amount of our common stock that it received in connection with the Separation Transactions (or acquired additional shares of our
common stock) within the two year period following completion of the Alberto-Culver share distribution, and that amount of stock, if added to the common stock that was acquired by CDR Investors were
to equal or exceed 50% of our outstanding common stock, as
determined under the Code and applicable Treasury regulations, a deemed acquisition of control of us in connection with the Alberto-Culver share distribution would be presumed. If this presumption
were not rebutted, we would be subject to significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities, which, if not reimbursed by Alberto-Culver, would have a material adverse effect on us.
The CDR Investors own a significant percentage of our common stock which may discourage third party acquisitions of us at a premium, and the interests of the CDR Investors
may differ from the interests of other holders of our common stock.
The CDR Investors currently own approximately 35.5%, in the aggregate on an undiluted basis, of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Pursuant
to the stockholders agreement entered into by us, the CDR Investors and certain other stockholders, which we refer to as the Stockholders Agreement, CDRS currently has the right to designate four of
our eleven directors. CDRS' right to nominate a certain number of directors will continue so long as it owns specified percentages of our common stock. So long as the CDR Investors continue to have
influence over the election of our directors or directly or indirectly own a significant percentage of the outstanding shares of our common stock, the CDR Investors will continue to be able to
strongly influence our decisions. The CDR Investors' ownership of our common stock and their ability to influence our decisions may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire control of us and
may preclude holders of our common stock from receiving any premium above market price for their shares that may otherwise be offered in connection with any attempt to acquire control of us.
Furthermore, the interests of the CDR Investors may differ from those of other holders of our common stock in material respects. For example, the CDR Investors may have an interest in pursuing
acquisitions, divestitures, financings, re-financings, stockholder dividends or other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their overall equity portfolio or the
short-term value of their investment in us, even though such transactions might involve substantial risks to other holders of our common stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
32
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Substantially all of our store and warehouse locations are leased and our corporate headquarters and five warehouses/distribution centers are owned.
The average store lease is for a term of five years with customary renewal options. The following table provides the number of stores in the U.S. and globally, as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
Beauty Systems Group |
Location
|
|
Company-Operated |
|
Franchise |
|
Company-Operated |
|
Franchise |
United States (excluding Puerto Rico) |
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
126 |
Puerto Rico |
|
41 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
International: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom |
|
242 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Belgium |
|
32 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
70 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
Chile |
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France |
|
35 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
Other |
|
13 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International |
|
583 |
|
25 |
|
96 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Store Count |
|
3,133 |
|
25 |
|
995 |
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table provides locations for our significant offices and warehouses and corporate headquarters, as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Type of Facility |
|
Sq. Feet |
|
Business Segment |
Company-Owned Properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denton, Texas |
|
Corporate Headquarters |
|
|
N/A |
|
(1)(2) |
|
Reno, Nevada |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
253,000 |
|
(1) |
|
Columbus, Ohio |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
246,000 |
|
(1) |
|
Jacksonville, Florida |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
237,000 |
|
(1) |
|
Denton, Texas |
|
Office, Warehouse |
|
|
114,000 |
|
(1)(2) |
|
Marinette, Wisconsin |
|
Office, Warehouse |
|
|
99,000 |
|
(2) |
Leased Properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenville, Ohio |
|
Office, Warehouse |
|
|
246,000 |
|
(2) |
|
Fresno, California |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
200,000 |
|
(2) |
|
Pottsville, Pennsylvania |
|
Office, Warehouse |
|
|
140,000 |
|
(2) |
|
Clackamas, Oregon |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
104,000 |
|
(2) |
|
Spartanburg, South Carolina |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
100,000 |
|
(2) |
|
Thornliebank, Scotland |
|
Office, Warehouse |
|
|
94,000 |
|
(1) |
|
Ronse, Belgium |
|
Office, Warehouse |
|
|
91,000 |
|
(1) |
|
Gent, Belgium |
|
Office, Warehouse |
|
|
83,000 |
|
(1) |
|
Calgary, Alberta, Canada |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
62,000 |
|
(2) |
|
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada |
|
Office, Warehouse |
|
|
60,000 |
|
(2) |
|
Lincoln, Nebraska |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
54,000 |
|
(2) |
|
Guadalupe, Nuevo Leon, Mexico |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
40,000 |
|
(1)(2) |
- (1)
- Sally
Beauty Supply
- (2)
- BSG
33
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There were no material legal proceedings pending against us or our subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011. We are involved in various claims
and lawsuits incidental to the conduct of our business in the ordinary course. We carry insurance coverage in such amounts in excess of our self-insured retention as we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances and that may or may not cover any or all of our liabilities in respect of claims and lawsuits. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will
have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
We
are subject to a number of U.S., federal, state and local laws and regulations, as well as the laws and regulations applicable in each foreign country or jurisdiction in which we do business. These
laws and regulations govern, among other things, the composition, packaging, labeling and safety of the products we sell, the methods we use to sell these products and the methods we use to import
these products. We believe that we are in material compliance with such laws and regulations, although no assurance can be provided that this will remain true going forward.
ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED
34
Table of Contents
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., or the NYSE, under the symbol "SBH." Prior to the Separation Transactions,
there was no established public trading market for our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock, as reported by the NYSE, during the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Fiscal Year 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
18.62 |
|
$ |
14.88 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
17.80 |
|
$ |
13.16 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
15.31 |
|
$ |
12.49 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
15.09 |
|
$ |
10.85 |
|
Fiscal Year 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
11.72 |
|
$ |
7.99 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
10.77 |
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
9.10 |
|
$ |
7.65 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
7.96 |
|
$ |
6.60 |
|
As
of November 11, 2011, there were 1,301 stockholders of record of our common stock, and the closing price of our common stock as reported by the NYSE was $20.44.
Dividends
We have not declared or paid dividends at any time during the two fiscal years prior to the date of this Annual Report.
We
currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings to support our growth strategy or to repay outstanding debt. We do not anticipate paying regular cash dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future. Any payment of future cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, operations, capital
requirements, our general financial condition, contractual restrictions (including those present in our credit agreements) and general business conditions. We depend on our subsidiaries for cash and
unless we receive dividends, distributions, advances, transfers of funds or other cash payments from our subsidiaries, we will be unable to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the future.
However, none of our subsidiaries are obligated to make funds available to us for payment of dividends. Further, the terms of our subsidiaries' debt agreements significantly restrict the ability of
our subsidiaries to pay dividends or otherwise transfer assets to us. Finally, we and our subsidiaries may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future that may severely restrict or
prohibit our subsidiaries from making distributions, paying dividends or making loans to us. Please see "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our Substantial Indebtedness" and Note 14 of
the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in "Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."
35
Table of Contents
Performance Graph
The following illustrates the comparative total return among Sally Beauty, the Dow Jones U.S. Specialty Retailers Index and the S&P 500 Index
assuming that $100 was invested on November 17, 2006, the date regular-way trading of our common stock commenced and that dividends, if any, were reinvested for the fiscal year
included in the data:
The
Dow Jones U.S. Specialty Retailers Index (NYSE: DJUSRS) is a comprehensive view of entities which are primarily in the retail sector in the U.S. Sally Beauty is one of the issuers included in this
index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/06 |
|
3/07 |
|
9/07 |
|
3/08 |
|
9/08 |
|
3/09 |
|
9/09 |
|
3/10 |
|
9/10 |
|
3/11 |
|
9/11 |
|
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
116.92 |
|
|
107.51 |
|
|
87.79 |
|
|
109.41 |
|
|
72.26 |
|
|
90.46 |
|
|
113.49 |
|
|
142.49 |
|
|
178.24 |
|
|
211.20 |
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
103.99 |
|
|
112.77 |
|
|
98.71 |
|
|
87.98 |
|
|
61.11 |
|
|
81.91 |
|
|
91.53 |
|
|
90.23 |
|
|
105.85 |
|
|
91.26 |
|
Dow Jones US Specialty Retailers TSM |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
102.44 |
|
|
97.61 |
|
|
82.54 |
|
|
75.66 |
|
|
65.48 |
|
|
81.97 |
|
|
94.99 |
|
|
102.72 |
|
|
115.69 |
|
|
106.27 |
|
This data assumes that $100 was invested on November 17, 2006 in the Company's common stock and in each of the indexes shown and that all dividends are
reinvested. The Company did not declare dividends during the period covered by this table. Stockholder returns shown should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns.
36
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Sally Beauty was formed in June of 2006 and became the accounting successor to Sally Holdings, Inc. (which was, until November 2006, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Alberto-Culver) upon completion of the Separation Transactions. On November 17, 2006, the Company commenced regular-way trading on the NYSE as an
independent company under the symbol "SBH." The following table presents selected financial data of Sally Beauty for the each of the years in the five-year period ended
September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Results of operations information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,269,131 |
|
$ |
2,916,090 |
|
$ |
2,636,600 |
|
$ |
2,648,191 |
|
$ |
2,513,772 |
|
Cost of products sold and distribution expenses |
|
|
1,674,526 |
|
|
1,511,716 |
|
|
1,393,283 |
|
|
1,413,597 |
|
|
1,360,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,594,605 |
|
|
1,404,374 |
|
|
1,243,317 |
|
|
1,234,594 |
|
|
1,153,747 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(a) |
|
|
1,086,414 |
|
|
1,012,321 |
|
|
899,415 |
|
|
903,146 |
|
|
857,276 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
59,722 |
|
|
51,123 |
|
|
47,066 |
|
|
48,533 |
|
|
42,605 |
|
Sales-based service fee charged by Alberto-Culver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
Transaction expenses(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
448,469 |
|
|
340,930 |
|
|
296,836 |
|
|
282,915 |
|
|
228,585 |
|
Interest expense(c) |
|
|
112,530 |
|
|
112,982 |
|
|
132,022 |
|
|
159,116 |
|
|
145,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes |
|
|
335,939 |
|
|
227,948 |
|
|
164,814 |
|
|
123,799 |
|
|
82,613 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
122,214 |
|
|
84,120 |
|
|
65,697 |
|
|
46,222 |
|
|
38,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
213,725 |
|
$ |
143,828 |
|
$ |
99,117 |
|
$ |
77,577 |
|
$ |
44,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Weighted average shares, basic |
|
|
183,020 |
|
|
181,985 |
|
|
181,691 |
|
|
181,189 |
|
|
180,392 |
|
Weighted average shares, diluted |
|
|
188,093 |
|
|
184,088 |
|
|
183,306 |
|
|
182,704 |
|
|
182,375 |
|
Operating data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of stores (at end of period): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
2,923 |
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
Beauty Systems Group |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
991 |
|
|
929 |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
4,059 |
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
3,773 |
|
|
3,568 |
|
Professional distributor sales consultants (at end of period) |
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
984 |
|
|
1,002 |
|
Same store sales growth(e): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
4.1 |
% |
|
2.1 |
% |
|
1.2 |
% |
|
2.7 |
% |
|
Beauty Systems Group |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
6.2 |
% |
|
1.0 |
% |
|
6.9 |
% |
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
4.6 |
% |
|
1.8 |
% |
|
2.6 |
% |
|
4.5 |
% |
Financial condition information (at end of period): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
419,142 |
|
$ |
387,123 |
|
$ |
341,733 |
|
$ |
367,198 |
|
$ |
354,185 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments |
|
|
63,481 |
|
|
59,494 |
|
|
54,447 |
|
|
99,788 |
|
|
38,272 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
182,489 |
|
|
168,119 |
|
|
151,252 |
|
|
156,260 |
|
|
154,068 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,728,600 |
|
|
1,589,412 |
|
|
1,490,732 |
|
|
1,527,023 |
|
|
1,404,503 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities(c) |
|
|
1,410,111 |
|
|
1,559,591 |
|
|
1,653,013 |
|
|
1,724,684 |
|
|
1,758,594 |
|
Stockholders' deficit |
|
$ |
(218,982 |
) |
$ |
(461,272 |
) |
$ |
(615,451 |
) |
$ |
(702,960 |
) |
$ |
(767,710 |
) |
- (a)
- Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the fiscal years 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 include share-based compensation expenses of
$15.6 million, $12.8 million, $8.6 million, $10.2 million and $13.1 million, respectively. In the fiscal year 2011, selling, general and administrative expenses
reflect a one-time net favorable
37
Table of Contents
impact
of $21.3 million, including a $27.0 million credit from a litigation settlement and certain non-recurring charges of $5.7 million.
- (b)
- The
fiscal year 2007 includes one-time charges associated with the Separation Transactions. Please see Note 1 of the "Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements" in "Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for additional information about the Separation Transactions.
- (c)
- Long-term
debt primarily represents debt incurred in connection with the Separation Transactions and interest expense is related mainly to such
indebtedness.
- (d)
- Weighted
average shares for the fiscal year 2007 were calculated from November 17, 2006 through September 30, 2007, which represents the
actual number of days that shares of the Company's common stock were publicly traded.
- (e)
- Same
stores are defined as company-operated stores that have been open for at least 14 months as of the last day of a month. Our same store sales are
calculated in constant dollars and include internet-based sales (beginning in fiscal year 2009) and store expansions, if applicable, but do not generally include the sales from stores relocated until
at least 14 months after the relocation. The sales from stores acquired are excluded from our same store sales calculation until at least 14 months after the acquisition.
We have not declared or paid dividends at any time during the last two fiscal years prior to the date of this Annual Report. We do not currently anticipate
paying regular cash dividends on our common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings to support our growth strategy or to repay outstanding debt.
38
Table of Contents
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following section discusses management's view of the financial condition as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the results of operations
and cash flows for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, of Sally Beauty. This section should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of
Sally Beauty and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section contains
forward-looking statements. Please see "Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with
these forward-looking statements that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward-looking statements.
Highlights of the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2011:
-
- Our consolidated sales from company-operated stores that have been open for at least 14 months as of
the last day of a month, which we refer to as same store sales, increased 6.1% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011;
-
- Our consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 increased by $353.0 million, or
12.1%, to $3,269.1 million compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 reflect approximately $23.3 million,
or 0.8%, in net positive impact from changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
-
- Our consolidated gross profit for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 increased by $190.2 million, or
13.5%, to $1,594.6 million compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased to 48.8% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011, compared to 48.2% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010;
-
- Our consolidated operating earnings for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 increased by
$107.5 million, or 31.5%, to $448.5 million compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. As a percentage of net sales, operating earnings increased to 13.7% for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to 11.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010;
-
- For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, unallocated corporate expenses increased by 3.0% to
$81.6 million compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. As a percentage of net sales, unallocated corporate expenses decreased to 2.5% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011, compared to 2.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010;
-
- Sally Beauty Supply and BSG each opened or acquired 127 net new stores during the fiscal year ended September 30,
2011, excluding franchised stores;
-
- Cash provided by operations increased by $74.6 million, or 34.3%, to $291.8 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2011, compared to $217.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010;
-
- In October 2010, we acquired Aerial Company, Inc. ("Aerial"), an 82-store professional-only
distributor of beauty products operating in 11 states in the midwestern United States, for approximately $81.8 million; and
-
- During fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, we made optional prepayments on our senior term loan B facility in the
aggregate amount of $147.0 million.
39
Table of Contents
Overview
Description of Business
We operate primarily through two business units, Sally Beauty Supply and Beauty Systems Group, or BSG. Through Sally Beauty Supply and BSG, we
operated a multi-channel platform of 4,128 company-operated stores and supplied
181 franchised stores, primarily in North America, South America and selected European countries, as of September 30, 2011. We are the largest distributor of professional beauty supplies
in the U.S. based on store count. Within BSG, we also have one of the largest networks of professional distributor sales consultants in North America. We provide our customers with a wide variety of
leading third-party branded and exclusive-label professional beauty supplies, including hair color products, hair care products, styling appliances, skin and nail care products
and other beauty items. Sally Beauty Supply stores target retail consumers and salon professionals, while BSG exclusively targets salons and salon professionals. For the year ended
September 30, 2011, our consolidated net sales and operating earnings were $3,269.1 million and $448.5 million, respectively.
We
believe Sally Beauty Supply is the largest open-line distributor of professional beauty supplies in the U.S. based on store count. As of September 30, 2011, Sally Beauty Supply
operated 3,133 company-operated retail stores, 2,509 of which are located in the U.S., with the remaining 624 company-operated stores located in Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico,
Chile, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium, France, Germany and Spain. Sally Beauty Supply also supplied 25 franchised stores located outside the U.S. In the U.S. and Canada, our Sally Beauty
Supply stores average approximately 1,700 square feet in size and are located primarily in strip shopping centers. Our Sally Beauty Supply stores carry an extensive selection of professional beauty
supplies for both retail customers and salon professionals, with between 5,000 and 8,000 SKUs of beauty products across product categories including hair color, hair care, skin and nail care, beauty
sundries and electrical appliances. Sally Beauty Supply stores carry leading third-party brands such as Clairol®, Revlon® and Conair®, as well as an
extensive selection of exclusive-label merchandise. Store formats, including average size and product selection, for Sally Beauty Supply outside the U.S. and Canada vary by marketplace.
For the year ended September 30, 2011, Sally Beauty Supply's net sales and segment operating profit were $2,012.4 million and $381.0 million, respectively, representing 62% and
70% of our consolidated net sales and consolidated operating profit before unallocated corporate expenses, respectively.
We
believe BSG is the largest full-service distributor of professional beauty supplies in North America, exclusively targeting salons and salon professionals. As of September 30,
2011, BSG had 995 company-operated stores, supplied 156 franchised stores and had a sales force of approximately 1,116 professional distributor sales consultants selling exclusively
to salons and salon professionals in all states in the U.S., in portions of Canada, and in Puerto Rico, Mexico and certain European countries. Company-operated BSG stores, which primarily
operate under the CosmoProf banner, average approximately 2,700 square feet in size and are primarily located in secondary strip shopping centers. BSG stores provide a comprehensive selection of
between 5,000 and 10,000 beauty product SKUs that include hair color and care, skin and nail care, beauty sundries and electrical appliances. Through BSG's large store base and sales force, BSG is
able to access a significant portion of the highly fragmented U.S. salon channel. BSG stores carry leading third-party brands such as Paul Mitchell®, Wella®,
Sebastian®, Goldwell®, Joico® and TIGI®, intended for use in salons and for resale by the salons to consumers. Certain BSG products are sold under
exclusive distribution agreements with suppliers, whereby BSG is designated as the sole distributor for a product line within certain geographic territories. For the year ended September 30,
2011, BSG's net sales and segment operating profit were $1,256.7 million and $164.7 million, respectively, representing 38% and 30% of our consolidated net sales and consolidated
operating profit before unallocated corporate expenses, respectively.
40
Table of Contents
Industry and Business Trends
We operate primarily within the large and growing U.S. professional beauty supply industry. Potential growth in the industry is expected to be driven
by increases in consumer demand for hair color, hair loss prevention and hair styling products. We believe the following key industry and business trends and characteristics will influence our
business and our financial results going forward:
-
- High level of marketplace fragmentation. The U.S. salon
channel is highly fragmented with nearly 250,000 salons and barbershops. Given the fragmented and small-scale nature of the salon industry, we believe that salon operators will continue to
depend on full-service/exclusive distributors and open-line channels for a majority of their beauty supply purchases.
-
- Growth in booth renting and frequent stocking needs. Salon
professionals primarily rely on just-in-time inventory due to capital constraints and a lack of warehouse and shelf space at salons. In addition, booth renters, who comprise a
significant percentage of total U.S. salon professionals, are often responsible for purchasing their own supplies. Historically, booth renters have significantly increased as a percentage of total
salon professionals, and we expect this trend to continue. Given their smaller individual purchases and relative lack of financial resources, booth renters are likely to be dependent on frequent trips
to professional beauty supply stores, like BSG and Sally Beauty Supply. We expect that these factors will continue to drive demand for conveniently located professional beauty supply stores.
-
- Increasing use of exclusive-label products. We
offer a broad range of exclusive-label products. As our lines of exclusive-label products have matured and become better known in our retail stores, we have seen an increase in
sales of these products. Generally, our exclusive-label products have higher gross margins for us than the leading third-party branded products and, accordingly, we believe
that the growth in sales of these products will likely enhance our overall gross margins. Please see "Risk FactorsWe depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to provide products of
adequate quality or who may be unwilling to continue to supply products to us."
-
- Favorable demographic and consumer trends. We expect the
aging baby-boomer population to drive future growth in professional beauty supply sales through an increase in the usage of hair color and hair loss products. Additionally, continuously
changing fashion-related trends that drive new hair styles are expected to result in continued demand for hair styling products. Changes in consumer tastes and fashion trends can have an
impact on our financial performance. Our continued success depends largely on our ability to anticipate, gauge and react in a timely and effective manner to changes in consumer spending patterns and
preferences for beauty products. We continuously adapt our marketing and merchandising initiatives in an effort to expand our market reach or to respond to changing consumer preferences. If we are
unable to anticipate and respond to trends in the marketplace for beauty products and changing consumer demands, our business could suffer. Please see "Risk FactorsWe may be unable to
anticipate changes in consumer preferences and buying trends or manage our product lines and inventory commensurate with consumer demand."
-
- International growth strategies. A key element of our
growth strategy depends on our ability to capitalize on growth opportunities in the international marketplace and to grow our current level of non-U.S. operations. For example, in December
2009, we acquired Sinelco, a wholesale distributor of professional beauty products located in Belgium with sales throughout Europe and, in September 2009, we acquired Intersalon, a distributor of
premier beauty supply products then with 16 stores located in Chile. These acquisitions furthered our expansion plans in Europe and Latin America, key targets of the Company's international growth
initiative. We intend to continue to identify and evaluate non-U.S. acquisition and/or organic international growth targets. Our ability to grow our non-U.S. operations,
integrate our new non-U.S. acquisitions and successfully pursue additional non-U.S. acquisition and/or organic international growth targets may be affected by business, legal,
regulatory and economic risks. Please see "Risk FactorsWe may not be able to successfully
41
Table of Contents
identify
acquisition candidates or successfully complete desirable acquisitions," "If we acquire any businesses in the future, they could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our business or have an
adverse effect on our results of operations" and "Our ability to conduct business in international marketplaces may be affected by legal, regulatory and economic risks."
-
- Continuing consolidation. There is continuing
consolidation among professional beauty product distributors and professional beauty product manufacturers. We plan to continue to examine ways in which we can benefit from this trend, including the
evaluation of opportunities to shift business from competitive distributors to the BSG network as well as seeking opportunistic, value-added acquisitions which complement our
long-term growth strategy. We believe that suppliers are increasingly likely to focus on larger distributors and retailers with a broader scale and retail footprint. We also believe that
we are well positioned to capitalize on this trend as well as participate in the ongoing consolidation at the distributor/retail level. However, changes often occur in our relationships with suppliers
that may materially affect the net sales and operating earnings of our business segments. Consolidation among suppliers could exacerbate the effects of these relationship changes and could increase
pricing pressures. For example, as we announced in the fiscal year 2007, one of our largest suppliers, L'Oreal, moved a material amount of revenue out of our BSG distribution network
and into regional distribution networks that compete with BSG. More recently, L'Oreal acquired distributors that compete with BSG in the Midwest, Southeast and West Coast regions of the
U.S. and, as a result, L'Oreal directly competes with BSG in certain geographic areas. If L'Oreal acquired other distributors or suppliers that conduct significant
business with BSG, we could lose related revenue. There can be no assurance that BSG will not lose further revenue over time (including within its franchise-based business) due to
potential losses of additional products (both from L'Oreal and from other suppliers) as well as from the increased competition from L'Oreal-affiliated
distribution networks. Please see "Risk FactorsThe beauty products distribution industry is highly competitive and is consolidating" and "We depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to
provide products of adequate quality or who may be unwilling to continue to supply products to us."
-
- Relationships with suppliers. Sally Beauty Supply/BSG and
their respective suppliers are dependent on each other for the distribution of beauty products. We do not manufacture the brand name or exclusive-label products we sell. We purchase our
products from a limited number of manufacturers. As is typical in distribution businesses (particularly in our industry), these relationships are subject to change from time to time (including the
expansion or loss of distribution rights in various geographies and the addition or loss of product lines). Since we purchase products from many manufacturers on an at-will basis, under
contracts which can generally be terminated without cause upon 90 days' notice or less or which expire without express rights of renewal, such manufacturers could discontinue sales to us at any
time or upon the expiration of the distribution period. Some of our contracts with manufacturers may be terminated by such manufacturers if we fail to meet specified minimum purchase requirements. In
such cases, we do not have contractual assurances of continued supply, pricing or access to new products and vendors may change the terms upon which they sell. Infrequently, a supplier will seek to
terminate a distribution relationship through legal action. For example, in 2007 Farouk Systems, Inc. filed an action seeking a declaratory judgment that it was entitled to terminate a
long-term distribution agreement with Armstrong McCall. In 2010 that matter was settled and BSG now sells Farouk products in many territories. Changes in our relationships with suppliers
occur often and could positively or negatively impact our net sales and operating profits. Although we focus on developing new revenue and cost management initiatives to mitigate the negative effects
resulting from unfavorable changes in our supplier relationships, there can be no assurance that our efforts will continue to completely offset the loss of these or other distribution rights. Please
see "Risk FactorsWe depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to provide products of adequate quality or who may be unwilling to continue to supply products to us."
42
Table of Contents
We
expect to continue to expand our product line offerings and to gain additional distribution rights over time through either further negotiation with suppliers or by acquisitions of existing
distributors. Although we are focused on developing new revenue and cost management initiatives, there can be no assurance that our efforts will partially or completely offset any potential loss of
distribution rights in the future. Please see "Risk FactorsWe depend upon manufacturers who may be unable to provide products of adequate quality or who may be unwilling to continue to
supply products to us."
-
- High level of competition. Sally Beauty Supply competes
with other domestic and international beauty product wholesale and retail outlets, including local and regional open-line beauty supply stores, professional-only beauty supply
stores, salons, mass merchandisers, drug stores and supermarkets, as well as sellers on the internet and salons retailing hair care items. BSG competes with other domestic and international beauty
product wholesale and retail suppliers and manufacturers selling professional beauty products directly to salons and individual salon professionals. We also face competition from authorized and
unauthorized retailers and internet sites offering professional salon-only products. The increasing availability of unauthorized professional salon products in large format retail stores
such as drug stores, grocery stores and others could also have a negative impact on our business. Please see "Risk FactorsThe beauty products distribution industry is highly competitive
and is consolidating."
-
- Economic conditions. We appeal to a wide demographic
consumer profile and offer a broad selection of professional beauty products sold directly to retail consumers, and salons and salon professionals. Historically, these factors have provided us with
reduced exposure to downturns in economic conditions in the countries in which we operate. However, a downturn in the economy, especially for an extended period of time, could adversely impact
consumer demand of discretionary items such as beauty products and salon services, particularly affecting our electrical products category and our full-service sales business. In addition,
higher freight costs resulting from increases in the cost of fuel, especially for an extended period of time, may impact our expenses at levels that we cannot pass through to our customers. These
factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Please see "Risk FactorsThe health of the economy in the channels we serve may
affect consumer purchases of discretionary items such as beauty products and salon services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations."
-
- Controlling expenses. Another important aspect of our
business is our ability to control costs, especially in our BSG business segment, by right-sizing the business and maximizing the efficiency of our business structure. For example, we
recently completed implementation of a $22.0 million capital spending program to consolidate warehouses and reduce administrative expenses related to BSG's distribution network which has
resulted in annualized cost savings of at least $14.0 million beginning in the fiscal year 2010. Please see "Risk FactorsWe are not certain that our ongoing cost control plans will
continue to be successful."
-
- Opening new stores. Our future growth strategy depends in
part on our ability to open and profitably operate new stores in existing and additional geographic areas. The capital requirements to open a U.S.-based Sally Beauty Supply or BSG store,
excluding inventory, average approximately $70,000 and $80,000, respectively, with the capital requirements for international stores costing less or substantially more depending upon the marketplace.
We may not be able to open all of the new stores we plan to open and any new stores we open may not be profitable, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial
condition or results of operations. Please see "Risk FactorsIf we are unable to profitably open and operate new stores, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be
adversely affected."
-
- Changes to our information technology systems. As our
operations grow in both size and scope, we will continuously need to improve and upgrade our information systems and infrastructure while
43
Table of Contents
maintaining
the reliability and integrity of our systems and infrastructure. The expansion of our systems and infrastructure will require us to commit substantial financial, operational and technical
resources in advance of any increase in the volume of our business, with no assurance that the volume of business will increase. For example, we are in the process of designing and implementing a
standardized enterprise resource planning ("ERP") system internationally, which we anticipate will be completed over the next few years. In addition, we are currently implementing a
point-of-sale system upgrade program in a number of our divisions (primarily in our Sally Beauty Supply operations in the U.S.), which we anticipate will provide significant
benefits, including enhanced tracking of customer sales and store inventory activity. These and any other required upgrades to our information systems and information technology (or new technology),
now or in the future, will require that our management and resources be diverted from our core business to assist in completion of these projects. Many of our systems are proprietary, and as a result
our options are limited in seeking third-party help with the operation and upgrade of those systems. There can be no assurance that the time and resources our management will need to
devote to these upgrades, service outages or delays due to the installation of any new or upgraded technology (and customer issues therewith), or the impact on the reliability of our data from any new
or upgraded technology will not have a material adverse effect on our financial reporting, business, financial condition or results of operations. Please see "Risk FactorsWe may be
adversely affected by any disruption in our information technology systems."
Significant Recent Acquisitions
On November 1, 2011, the Company acquired Kappersservice Floral B.V. and two related companies (the "Floral Group") for approximately
€22.5 million (approximately $30.8 million), subject to certain adjustments. The Floral Group is a
19-store distributor of professional beauty products based in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. The acquisition will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly,
the results of operations of the Floral Group will be included in the Company's consolidated financial statements subsequent to the acquisition date. The acquisition was funded with cash from
operations and with borrowings on our ABL credit facility in the amount of approximately $17.0 million.
On
October 1, 2010, we acquired Aerial, an 82-store professional-only distributor of beauty products operating in 11 states in the midwestern United States, for
approximately $81.8 million. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and the results of operations of Aerial are included in our consolidated financial
statements subsequent to the acquisition date. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including intangible assets subject to amortization of $34.7 million, were recorded at their
respective fair values at the acquisition date and goodwill of $25.3 million (which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes) was recorded as a result of this acquisition. The acquisition
of Aerial was funded with borrowings in the amount of $78.0 million under the prior ABL credit facility (which have since been paid in full) and with cash from operations. In addition, during
the fiscal year 2011, we completed several other individually immaterial acquisitions at an aggregate cost of approximately $5.0 million and recorded additional goodwill in the amount of
$4.3 million (the majority of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes) in connection with such acquisitions. Generally, we funded these acquisitions with cash from operations. The
valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with these acquisitions was based on their fair values at the acquisition date.
During
the fiscal year 2010, we acquired Sinelco, a wholesale distributor of professional beauty products based in Ronse, Belgium, for approximately €25.2 million (approximately
$36.6 million). We also assumed €4.0 million (approximately $5.8 million) of pre-acquisition debt, excluding capital lease obligations, of Sinelco in
connection with the acquisition. Sinelco serves over 1,500 customers through a product catalog and website and has sales throughout Europe. Goodwill of $5.2 million (which is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes) was recorded as a result of this acquisition. In addition, during the fiscal year
44
Table of Contents
2010,
we completed several other individually immaterial acquisitions at an aggregate cost of $9.0 million and recorded additional goodwill in the amount of $5.4 million (the majority of
which is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes) in connection with such acquisitions. The valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with all the acquisitions
completed during the fiscal year 2010 was based on their fair values at the acquisition date. We funded these acquisitions generally with cash from operations as well as borrowings under our ABL
credit facility.
The
purchase prices of certain acquisitions completed during the fiscal year 2009 (including the acquisition of Schoeneman on September 30, 2009) were initially allocated to assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their preliminary estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The final valuations of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were completed during the fiscal
year 2010. Accordingly, in the fiscal year 2010, we recorded intangible assets subject to amortization of $24.9 million and intangible assets with indefinite lives of $0.8 million in
connection with certain of the
acquisitions completed during the fiscal year 2009. These amounts were previously reported in Goodwill pending the valuation of the assets acquired.
During
the fiscal year 2009, we acquired Schoeneman, a 43-store beauty supply chain located in the central northeastern United States, at a cost of approximately $71.0 million,
subject to certain adjustments. We currently expect to realize approximately $10 million in present value of future tax savings as a result of anticipated incremental depreciation and
amortization tax deductions relating to the assets acquired in this transaction. In the fiscal year 2009, goodwill of approximately $61.0 million (which is expected to be deductible for tax
purposes) was initially recorded as a result of this acquisition. In addition, during the fiscal year 2009, we completed several other individually immaterial acquisitions at an aggregate cost of
$11.3 million of which a significant portion was allocated to goodwill (the majority of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes). Generally, we funded these acquisitions with cash
from operations.
Our Separation from Alberto-Culver
Prior to 2006, Sally Holdings, Inc. was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alberto-Culver. In November 2006, Sally
Holdings, Inc. was converted to a Delaware limited liability company, was renamed "Sally Holdings LLC," which we refer to as Sally Holdings, and became an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of Sally Beauty in connection with our separation from Alberto-Culver. We refer to our separation from Alberto-Culver as the Separation
Transactions. Sally Beauty is a Delaware corporation formed in June 2006 and became the accounting successor company to Sally Holdings, Inc. upon the completion of the Separation
Transactions. Sally Beauty is a holding company and does not have any material assets or operations other than its ownership of equity interests of its subsidiaries.
In
connection with the Separation Transactions, the CDR Investors invested an aggregate of $575.0 million in Sally Beauty. Currently, the CDR Investors own an aggregate equity
interest representing approximately 35.5% of the outstanding common stock of the Company on an undiluted basis. Also in connection with the Separation Transactions, the Company, through subsidiaries
Sally Investment Holdings LLC ("Sally Investment") and Sally Holdings incurred approximately $1,850.0 million of indebtedness. Please see Note 14 of the "Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements" in "Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Credit Facilities
Borrowings under the term loan facilities and the ABL credit facility are secured by substantially all of our assets, those of Sally
Investment, those of our domestic subsidiaries and, in the case of the ABL credit facility, those of our Canadian subsidiaries and a pledge of certain intercompany notes. Borrowings under the
term loan A facility were paid in full in the fiscal year 2010. Borrowings under the term loan B facility may be prepaid at our option at any time without premium or penalty and are subject to
mandatory repayment in an amount equal to 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the agreement governing the term
45
Table of Contents
loan
facilities) for any fiscal year unless a specified leverage ratio is met. Amounts paid pursuant to said provision may be applied, at the option of the Company, against minimum loan repayments
otherwise required of us over the twelve-month period following any such payment under the terms of the loan agreement. Additionally, borrowings under the term loan facility are subject to
mandatory repayment in an amount equal to 100% of the proceeds of specified asset sales that are not reinvested in the business or applied to repay borrowings under the ABL credit facility. No
mandatory repayments of any kind were made or required to be made in the fiscal year 2011. Please see "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for additional information about our borrowings under the term
loan facilities and optional prepayments thereof.
Our
Notes are unsecured obligations of Sally Holdings and its co-issuer and are guaranteed on a senior basis (in the case of the senior notes) and on a senior subordinated basis (in the
case of the senior subordinated notes) by each material domestic subsidiary of Sally Holdings (other than the co-issuer). Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually. The
senior notes carry optional redemption features whereby the Company has the option to redeem the notes prior to maturity after November 2010 at par plus a premium declining ratably to par, plus
accrued and unpaid interest. The senior subordinated notes carry optional redemption features whereby the Company, at September 30, 2011, has the option to redeem the notes before
November 15, 2011 at par plus a premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest; and on or after November 15, 2011 at par plus a premium declining ratably to par, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. Please see Note 21 of the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" contained elsewhere in this Annual
Report.
Details
of long-term debt (excluding capitalized leases) as of September 30, 2011 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Maturity Dates |
|
Interest Rates |
ABL facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Nov. 2015 |
|
(i) Prime plus (1.25% to 1.75%) or; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) LIBOR(a) plus (2.25% to 2.75%) |
Term loan B |
|
|
696,856 |
|
|
Nov. 2013 |
|
(i) Prime plus (1.25% to 1.50%) or; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) LIBOR plus (2.25% to 2.50%)(b) |
Other(c) |
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
2012-2015 |
|
4.05% to 7.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
701,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
$ |
430,000 |
|
|
Nov. 2014 |
|
9.25% |
Senior subordinated notes |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
Nov. 2016 |
|
10.50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
705,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- London
Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR").
- (b)
- At
September 30, 2011, the contractual interest rate for the term loan B was 2.49%. The interest rate on $300.0 million of this loan is fixed
by interest rate swaps which expire in May 2012.
- (c)
- Represents
pre-acquisition debt of Pro-Duo NV and Sinelco.
Other Significant Items
Derivative Instruments
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to certain market risks including changes in market interest rates and foreign currency fluctuations.
We may consider a variety of practices in the ordinary course of
46
Table of Contents
business
to manage these market risks, including, when deemed appropriate, the use of derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps and foreign currency options, collars and forwards.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
The Company is exposed to a wide variety of economic risks, including risks arising from changing market interest rates. The Company manages its
exposure to certain economic risks (including liquidity, credit risk and changes in interest rates) primarily (a) by closely managing its cash flows from operating and investing activities and
the amounts and sources of its debt obligations; (b) by assessing periodically the creditworthiness of its business partners; and (c) through the use of interest rate swaps by Sally
Holdings. The Company uses interest rate swaps, as part of its overall economic risk management strategy, to add stability to the interest payments due in connection with its senior term loan
obligations. Interest payments related to our senior term loans are impacted by changes in LIBOR. The Company's interest rate swap agreements involve the periodic receipt by Sally Holdings of amounts
based on a variable rate in exchange for Sally Holdings making payments based on a fixed rate over the term of the interest rate swap agreements, without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
In
November 2006, Sally Holdings entered into certain interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $500 million. These interest rate swap agreements expired on or before
November 2009 and were not designated as effective hedges. Accordingly, the changes in fair value of these interest rate swap agreements (which were adjusted quarterly) were recorded in interest
expense in our consolidated statements of earnings.
Additionally,
in May 2008, Sally Holdings entered into certain interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $300 million. These agreements expire in May 2012 and are
designated and qualify as effective cash flow hedges. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments (which are adjusted quarterly) are recorded, net of income tax, in
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income until the hedged obligation is settled or the swap agreements expire, whichever is earlier. Any hedge ineffectiveness is recognized in interest expense in
the Company's
consolidated statements of earnings. Please see "Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskInterest rate risk" and Note 16 of the "Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Foreign Currency Option, Collar and Forward Contracts
The Company is exposed to potential gains or losses from foreign currency fluctuations affecting its net investments in subsidiaries (including
intercompany notes not permanently invested) and earnings denominated in foreign currencies. The Company's primary exposures are to changes in the exchange rates for the U.S. dollar versus the Euro,
the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the Chilean peso, and the Mexican peso. The Company's foreign currency exposures at times offset each other, providing a natural hedge against its
foreign currency risk. In connection with the remaining foreign currency risk, the Company from time to time uses foreign currency options, collars and forwards to effectively fix the foreign currency
exchange rate applicable to specific anticipated foreign currency-denominated cash flows, thus limiting the potential fluctuations in such cash flows resulting from foreign currency market
movements.
The
Company uses foreign currency options and collars, including, at September 30, 2011, collars with an aggregate notional amount of $12.5 million to manage the exposure to the U.S.
dollar resulting from our Sinelco Group subsidiaries' purchases of merchandise from third-party suppliers. Sinelco's functional currency is the Euro. The foreign currency collar agreements
held by the Company at September 30, 2011 have contractual Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rates between 1.4000 and 1.4612 and expire in varying amounts monthly through September 2012. In
addition, the Company uses foreign currency forwards to mitigate its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates in connection with certain
47
Table of Contents
intercompany
balances not permanently invested. At September 30, 2011, we held a foreign currency forward which enabled us to sell approximately €19.9 million
($26.7 million, at the September 30, 2011 exchange rate) at the contractual exchange rate of 1.3610, a foreign currency forward which enabled us to buy approximately $18.3 million
Canadian dollars ($17.5 million, at the September 30, 2011 exchange rate) at the contractual exchange rate of 1.01855, and a foreign currency forward which enabled us to buy
approximately £5.6 million ($8.7 million, at the September 30, 2011 exchange rate) at the contractual exchange rate of 1.5630. All the foreign currency forwards held
by the Company at September 30, 2011 expired in October 2011.
The
Company's foreign currency option, collar and forward agreements are not designated as hedges and do not currently meet the requirements for hedge accounting. Accordingly, the changes in the fair
value (i.e., marked-to-market adjustments) of these derivative instruments (which are adjusted quarterly) are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in
our
consolidated statements of earnings. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, selling general and administrative expenses included $0.2 million in net gains from all of the
Company's foreign currency option, collar and forward agreements. Please see "Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskForeign currency
exchange rate risk" and Note 16 of the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in Item 8"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" contained elsewhere in this Annual
Report.
Share-Based Compensation Plans
For the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, total share-based compensation cost charged against earnings was $15.6 million,
$12.8 million and $8.6 million, respectively, and resulted in an increase in additional paid-in capital by the same amounts. Share-based compensation for the
fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 included $5.0 million, $2.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of accelerated expense related to certain retirement eligible employees who
are eligible to continue vesting awards upon retirement under the terms of the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan") and certain predecessor plans, such as
the Sally Beauty Holdings 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan. For the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, the total income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings from all
share-based compensation plans in which our employees participate or participated was $6.0 million, $5.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and resulted in the
recognition of deferred tax assets by the same amount. Our consolidated statements of cash flows reflect, for the fiscal years 2011 and 2010, excess tax benefits of $3.7 million and
$0.2 million, respectively, and, for the fiscal year 2009, an excess tax shortfall of $0.2 million, from employee exercises of stock options as financing cash flows. As of
September 30, 2011, we had $11.3 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock option awards that is expected to be charged to expense over the
weighted average period of 2.6 years, and $2.3 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock awards that is expected to be charged to
expense over the weighted average period of 3.1 years.
48
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table shows the condensed results of operations of our business for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,269.1 |
|
$ |
2,916.1 |
|
$ |
2,636.6 |
|
Cost of products sold and distribution expenses |
|
|
1,674.5 |
|
|
1,511.7 |
|
|
1,393.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,594.6 |
|
|
1,404.4 |
|
|
1,243.3 |
|
Total other operating costs and expenses |
|
|
1,146.1 |
|
|
1,063.5 |
|
|
946.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
448.5 |
|
|
340.9 |
|
|
296.8 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
112.6 |
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
132.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes |
|
|
335.9 |
|
|
227.9 |
|
|
164.8 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
122.2 |
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
213.7 |
|
$ |
143.8 |
|
$ |
99.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table shows the condensed results of operations of our business for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, expressed as a percentage of net sales for the
respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of products sold and distribution expenses |
|
|
51.2 |
% |
|
51.8 |
% |
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
48.8 |
% |
|
48.2 |
% |
|
47.2 |
% |
Total other costs and expenses |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
36.5 |
% |
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
11.7 |
% |
|
11.3 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
3.9 |
% |
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
7.8 |
% |
|
6.3 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
2.9 |
% |
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
4.9 |
% |
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Table of Contents
Key Operating Metrics
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information concerning key measures we rely on to gauge our operating performance (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
2,012,407 |
|
$ |
1,834,631 |
|
$ |
1,695,652 |
|
|
BSG |
|
|
1,256,724 |
|
|
1,081,459 |
|
|
940,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,269,131 |
|
$ |
2,916,090 |
|
$ |
2,636,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
1,594,605 |
|
$ |
1,404,374 |
|
$ |
1,243,317 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
48.8 |
% |
|
48.2 |
% |
|
47.2 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
1,086,414 |
|
$ |
1,012,321 |
|
$ |
899,415 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
59,722 |
|
$ |
51,123 |
|
$ |
47,066 |
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
380,963 |
|
$ |
320,456 |
|
$ |
283,872 |
|
|
|
BSG(a) |
|
|
164,660 |
|
|
112,495 |
|
|
91,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit |
|
|
545,623 |
|
|
432,951 |
|
|
375,476 |
|
Unallocated expenses(a)(b) |
|
|
(81,594 |
) |
|
(79,203 |
) |
|
(70,022 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
(15,560 |
) |
|
(12,818 |
) |
|
(8,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
448,469 |
|
|
340,930 |
|
|
296,836 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(112,530 |
) |
|
(112,982 |
) |
|
(132,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
335,939 |
|
$ |
227,948 |
|
$ |
164,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
17.5 |
% |
|
16.7 |
% |
|
BSG |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
10.4 |
% |
|
9.7 |
% |
Consolidated operating profit margin |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
11.7 |
% |
|
11.3 |
% |
Number of stores at end-of-period (including franchises): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
2,923 |
|
|
BSG |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
4,059 |
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store sales growth(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
4.1 |
% |
|
2.1 |
% |
|
BSG |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
6.2 |
% |
|
1.0 |
% |
Consolidated |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
4.6 |
% |
|
1.8 |
% |
- (a)
- For
the fiscal year 2011, consolidated operating earnings reflect a net favorable impact of $21.3 million, including a $27.0 million credit
from a litigation settlement and certain non-recurring charges of $5.7 million. This net benefit of $21.3 million is reflected in the BSG segment and in unallocated expenses
in the amount of $19.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively.
- (b)
- Unallocated
expenses consist of corporate and shared costs.
- (c)
- Same
stores are defined as company-operated stores that have been open for at least 14 months as of the last day of a month. Our same store sales are
calculated in constant dollars and include internet-based sales and the effect of store expansions, if applicable, but do not generally include the sales from stores relocated until at least
14 months after the relocation. The sales from stores
50
Table of Contents
acquired
are excluded from our same store sales calculation until at least 14 months after the acquisition.
Description of Net Sales and Expenses
Net Sales. Our net sales consist primarily of the following:
-
- Sally Beauty Supply. Sally Beauty Supply generates net
sales primarily by selling products through its stores to both retail customers and salon professionals. Sally Beauty Supply sells products for hair color and care, skin and nail care, beauty sundries
and electrical appliances. Because approximately 44% of our Sally Beauty Supply product sales come from exclusive-label brands, most of these same products are generally not available in most other
retail stores or in our BSG business segment. Various factors influence Sally Beauty Supply's net sales including local competition, product assortment and availability, price, hours of operation and
marketing and promotional activity. Sally Beauty Supply's product assortment and sales are generally not seasonal in nature.
-
- Beauty Systems Group. BSG generates net sales by selling
products to salons and salon professionals through company-operated and franchised stores as well as through its network of professional distributor sales consultants. BSG sells products for hair
color and care, skin and nail care, beauty sundries and electrical appliances. These products are not sold directly to the general public and are generally not the same products as those sold in our
Sally Beauty Supply stores. Various factors influence BSG's net sales, including product features and availability, competitive activity, relationships with suppliers, new product introductions and
price. BSG's product assortment and sales are generally not seasonal in nature.
Cost of Products Sold and Distribution Expenses. Cost of products sold and distribution expenses consist of the cost to purchase merchandise from suppliers, less
vendor rebates and allowances, and certain overhead expenses including purchasing costs, freight from distribution centers to stores and merchandise handling costs in the distribution centers. Cost of
products sold and distribution expenses are also affected by store inventory shrinkage, which represents products that are lost, stolen or damaged at the store level.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, commissions paid to professional
distributor sales consultants, benefits, utilities, property maintenance, advertising, rent, insurance, freight and distribution expenses for delivery to customers, administrative costs and costs
associated with our corporate support center.
Interest Expense. Interest expense includes the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and is stated net of interest income. Interest expense is primarily
associated with debt incurred in connection with the Separation Transactions.
51
Table of Contents
The Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2011 compared to the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2010
The table below presents net sales, gross profit and gross profit margin data for each reportable segment (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Increase |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
2,012,407 |
|
$ |
1,834,631 |
|
$ |
177,776 |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
BSG |
|
|
1,256,724 |
|
|
1,081,459 |
|
|
175,265 |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales |
|
$ |
3,269,131 |
|
$ |
2,916,090 |
|
$ |
353,041 |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
1,087,698 |
|
$ |
976,377 |
|
$ |
111,321 |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
BSG |
|
|
506,907 |
|
|
427,997 |
|
|
78,910 |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated gross profit |
|
$ |
1,594,605 |
|
$ |
1,404,374 |
|
$ |
190,231 |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
|
54.0 |
% |
|
53.2 |
% |
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
BSG |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
39.6 |
% |
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated gross profit margin |
|
|
48.8 |
% |
|
48.2 |
% |
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
Net Sales
Consolidated net sales increased by $353.0 million, or 12.1%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010. Company-operated Sally Beauty Supply and BSG stores that have been open for at least 14 months contributed an increase of approximately $252.6 million,
or 8.7%, sales through our BSG distributor sales consultants contributed an increase of approximately $41.7 million, or 1.4%, and our Sally Beauty Supply non-store sales channels
contributed an increase of approximately $43.6 million, or 1.5%. Other sales channels (including sales through our BSG franchise-based businesses and from stores that have been open for less
than 14 months) and sales from businesses acquired in the preceding 12 months, in the aggregate, contributed an increase of $15.1 million, or 0.5%, compared to the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010. Consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, are inclusive of approximately $23.3 million in positive impact from changes in
foreign currency exchange rates.
Sally Beauty Supply. Net sales for Sally Beauty Supply increased by $177.8 million, or 9.7%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared
to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. In the Sally Beauty Supply segment, company-operated stores that have been open for at least 14 months contributed an increase of
approximately $157.3 million, or 8.6%, and our non-store sales channels (which, after December 16, 2010, include the catalog and internet sales of our Sinelco Group
subsidiaries) contributed an increase of approximately $43.6 million, or 2.4%. In addition, sales from businesses acquired in the preceding 12 months contributed approximately
$29.4 million, or 1.6%, less to net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Other sales channels (including sales
from stores that have been open for less than 14 months) experienced a minor increase in sales compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Net sales for Sally Beauty Supply for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, are inclusive of approximately $15.8 million in positive impact from changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Beauty Systems Group. Net sales for BSG increased by $175.3 million, or 16.2%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2010. Company-operated stores that have been open for at least 14 months contributed an increase of approximately $95.3 million, or 8.8%, and sales
through our distributor sales consultants contributed an increase of approximately $41.7 million, or
52
Table of Contents
3.9%.
In addition, sales from businesses acquired in the preceding 12 months contributed approximately $24.5 million, or 2.3%, more to net sales for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Other sales channels (including sales through our Armstrong McCall franchise-based business and sales from
stores that have been open for less than 14 months), in the aggregate, contributed an increase of $13.8 million, or 1.2%, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Net
sales for BSG for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, are inclusive of approximately $7.5 million in positive impact from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily in
connection with our Canadian operations.
Gross Profit
Consolidated gross profit increased by $190.2 million, or 13.5%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2010, principally due to higher sales volume and improved gross margins in both business segments as more fully described below. Consolidated gross profit as a
percentage of net sales, or consolidated gross margin, increased to 48.8% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to 48.2% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
Sally Beauty Supply. Sally Beauty Supply's gross profit increased by $111.3 million, or 11.4%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared
to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, principally as a result of higher sales volume and improved gross margins. Sally Beauty Supply's gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased
to 54.0% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to 53.2% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase was the result of a shift in product and customer mix
(including a year-over-year increase in sales of exclusive-label and other higher-margin products) and continued benefits from low-cost sourcing initiatives. This
increase also reflects a $7.4 million net positive impact from changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Beauty Systems Group. BSG's gross profit increased by $78.9 million, or 18.4%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2010, principally as a result of higher sales volume and improved gross margins. BSG's gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to 40.3% for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2011, compared to 39.6% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase was principally the result of a favorable change in the sales mix across the
business, product cost reduction initiatives and synergies from businesses acquired during the last 12 months. This increase also reflects a $3.4 million net positive impact from changes
in foreign currency exchange rates.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $74.1 million, or 7.3%, to $1,086.4 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase was attributable to incremental expenses (including employee compensation, rent and other
occupancy-related expenses) resulting from stores opened and from businesses acquired in the preceding 12 months (including 254 additional company-operated stores since the fiscal year 2010, a
6.6% increase), as well as higher share-based compensation expense of $2.7 million, higher freight and distribution expenses of $10.9 million, higher advertising expenses in the Sally
Beauty Supply segment of $5.5 million, higher credit card fees of $5.6 million and certain non-recurring charges ($5.7 million) in the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011 that include costs related to the closure of a BSG warehouse. This increase was partially offset by a credit resulting from a litigation settlement ($27.0 million) in
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 33.2% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011,
compared to 34.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. In addition to the impact of the credit from the litigation settlement, this decrease is a result of the growth in consolidated
net sales described above and synergies from recent business acquisitions.
53
Table of Contents
Depreciation and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization increased to $59.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to
$51.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase reflects the incremental depreciation and amortization expenses associated with businesses acquired in the last
12 months and with capital expenditures made in the fiscal year 2011 (mainly in connection with store openings in both operating segments and with ongoing information technology upgrades),
partially offset by the impact of assets that became fully depreciated in the preceding 12 months.
Operating Earnings
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information concerning our operating earnings for each reportable segment (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Increase |
|
Operating Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
380,963 |
|
$ |
320,456 |
|
$ |
60,507 |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
|
BSG |
|
|
164,660 |
|
|
112,495 |
|
|
52,165 |
|
|
46.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit |
|
|
545,623 |
|
|
432,951 |
|
|
112,672 |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
Unallocated expenses |
|
|
(81,594 |
) |
|
(79,203 |
) |
|
2,391 |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
(15,560 |
) |
|
(12,818 |
) |
|
2,742 |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
$ |
448,469 |
|
$ |
340,930 |
|
$ |
107,539 |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
operating earnings increased by $107.5 million, or 31.5%, to $448.5 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010. The increase in consolidated operating earnings was due primarily to an increase in the operating profits of both segments, partially offset by slightly higher unallocated
corporate expenses and higher share-based compensation expense, as more fully discussed below. In addition, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, consolidated operating earnings reflect
a credit resulting from a litigation settlement ($27.0 million), partially offset by certain non-recurring charges ($5.7 million) that include costs related to the closure of
a BSG warehouse. The credit resulting from the litigation settlement is reflected in the BSG segment's results and in unallocated expenses in the amount of $24.7 million and
$2.3 million, respectively. Operating earnings, as a percentage of net sales, increased to 13.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to 11.7% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010. This increase reflects the growth in consolidated gross margin described above, as well as a lower growth rate in consolidated operating expenses compared to the growth rate
in consolidated gross profit.
Sally Beauty Supply. Sally Beauty Supply's segment operating earnings increased by $60.5 million, or 18.9%, to $381.0 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The increase in Sally Beauty Supply's operating earnings was primarily a result of increased sales volume
and improved gross margins, partially offset by higher advertising costs of approximately $5.5 million and the incremental costs related to approximately 127 net additional company-operated
stores (stores opened or acquired during the past 12 months) operating during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. Segment operating earnings, as a percentage of net sales,
increased to 18.9% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to 17.5% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase reflects the growth in the segment's gross
margin described above, as well as a lower growth rate in the segment's operating expenses compared to the growth rate in the segment's gross profit.
54
Table of Contents
Beauty Systems Group. BSG's segment operating earnings increased by $52.2 million, or 46.4%, to $164.7 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The increase in BSG's operating earnings was primarily a result of improved gross
margins, the incremental operating earnings of businesses acquired and stores opened during the past 12 months (BSG had an additional 127 company-operated stores at the end of the fiscal year
2011, including 82 stores resulting from the October 2010 acquisition of Aerial), and to ongoing cost reduction initiatives. In addition, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, BSG's
operating earnings reflect a credit resulting from a litigation settlement (approximately $24.7 million), partially offset by certain non-recurring charges ($5.7 million)
that include costs related to the closure of a warehouse. Segment operating earnings, as a percentage of net sales, increased to 13.1% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to
10.4% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. In addition to the impact of the credit from the litigation settlement, this increase reflects the growth in the segment's gross margin
described above, as well as a lower growth rate in the segment's operating expenses compared to the growth rate in the segment's gross profit.
Unallocated expenses. Unallocated expenses, which represent corporate costs (such as payroll, employee benefits and travel expenses for corporate staff, certain
professional fees and corporate governance expenses) that have not been charged to our operating segments, increased by $2.4 million, or 3.0%, to $81.6 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase was due to higher corporate expenses related primarily to on-going upgrades to our
information technology systems ($2.7 million). During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, $2.3 million of the benefit from a litigation settlement offset corporate expenses
incurred in connection with the litigation.
Share-based Compensation Expense. Total compensation cost charged against income for share-based compensation arrangements increased by $2.7 million to
$15.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase was due to the incremental expenses related to, as
well as the higher fair value at the grant date of, share-based awards during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to share-based awards during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, partially offset by the impact of share-based awards that became fully vested during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased by $0.5 million, to $112.5 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Interest expense is net of interest income of $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributable to lower outstanding principal balances on our senior term loans ($3.0 million) and to lower interest-rate
differential charges incurred in connection with interest rate swaps ($2.3 million), partially offset by unamortized deferred financing costs expensed in the fiscal year 2011
($2.8 million) in connection with: (a) prepayments of long-term debt and (b) our November 2010 termination of our prior ABL credit facility. The decrease also reflects
non-cash income ($2.4 million) in the fiscal
year 2010 of marked-to-market adjustments for certain interest rate swaps which expired in November 2009 with no comparable amount in the fiscal year 2011 (please see
Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" contained elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional
information about the Company's interest rate swaps and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below for additional information about our credit facilities).
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes was $122.2 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to $84.1 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The effective tax rate is 36.4% for fiscal year 2011, compared to 36.9% for fiscal year 2010. The decrease in the annual effective tax rate was primarily
55
Table of Contents
due
to tax benefits resulting from certain intercompany transactions that resulted in the release of valuation allowances during the fiscal year 2011, compared to the fiscal year 2010.
Net Earnings
As a result of the foregoing, consolidated net earnings increased by $69.9 million, or 48.6%, to $213.7 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2011, compared to $143.8 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Net earnings, as a percentage of net sales, were 6.5% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2011, compared to 4.9% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.
The Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2010 compared to the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009
The table below presents net sales, gross profit and gross profit margin data for each reportable segment (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Increase |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
1,834,631 |
|
$ |
1,695,652 |
|
$ |
138,979 |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
BSG |
|
|
1,081,459 |
|
|
940,948 |
|
|
140,511 |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales |
|
$ |
2,916,090 |
|
$ |
2,636,600 |
|
$ |
279,490 |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
976,377 |
|
$ |
878,738 |
|
$ |
97,639 |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
BSG |
|
|
427,997 |
|
|
364,579 |
|
|
63,418 |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated gross profit |
|
$ |
1,404,374 |
|
$ |
1,243,317 |
|
$ |
161,057 |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
|
53.2 |
% |
|
51.8 |
% |
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
BSG |
|
|
39.6 |
% |
|
38.7 |
% |
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated gross profit margin |
|
|
48.2 |
% |
|
47.2 |
% |
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Net Sales
Consolidated net sales increased by $279.5 million, or 10.6%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009. Company-operated stores that have been open for at least 14 months contributed an increase of approximately $179.1 million, or 6.8%, and sales from
businesses acquired in the preceding 12 months contributed approximately $94.1 million, or 3.6%, more to consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010,
compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Other sales channels (including sales through our BSG distributor sales consultants and our BSG franchise-based businesses and from stores
that have been open for less than 14 months), in the aggregate, contributed an increase of $6.3 million, or 0.2%, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
Consolidated net sales
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, are inclusive of approximately $17.2 million in positive impact from changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Sally Beauty Supply. Net sales for Sally Beauty Supply increased by $139.0 million, or 8.2%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared
to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. In the Sally Beauty Supply segment, company-operated stores that have been open for at least 14 months contributed an increase of
approximately $127.3 million, or 7.5%, and sales from businesses acquired in the preceding 12 months contributed approximately $13.2 million, or 0.8%, more to net sales for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Other sales channels (including sales from stores that have been open for less than
14 months and non-store sales), in the aggregate, experienced a minor decline in sales compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Net
56
Table of Contents
sales
for Sally Beauty Supply for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, are inclusive of approximately $4.5 million in positive impact from changes in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Beauty Systems Group. Net sales for BSG increased by $140.5 million, or 14.9%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009. Company-operated stores that have been open for at least 14 months contributed an increase of approximately $51.8 million, or 5.5%, sales from
stores that have been open for less than 14 months contributed an increase of approximately $6.3 million, or 0.7%, and sales from businesses acquired in the preceding 12 months
contributed approximately $80.9 million, or 8.6%, more to net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Other sales
channels (including sales through our distributor sales consultants and our franchise-based businesses), in the aggregate, experienced a minor increase in sales compared to the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009. Net sales for BSG for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, are inclusive of approximately $12.7 million in positive impact from changes in foreign
currency exchange rates, primarily in connection with our Canadian operations.
Gross Profit
Consolidated gross profit increased by $161.1 million, or 13.0%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009, principally due to higher sales volume and improved gross margins in both business segments as more fully described below.
Sally Beauty Supply. Sally Beauty Supply's gross profit increased by $97.6 million, or 11.1%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared
to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, principally as a result of higher sales volume and improved gross margins. Sally Beauty Supply's gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased
to 53.2% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to 51.8% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. This increase was the result of a shift in product and customer mix
(including a year-over-year increase in sales of exclusive-label and other higher-margin products), continued benefits from low-cost sourcing initiatives and
overall margin improvements in certain of our Sally Beauty Supply international businesses. This increase also reflects a $2.7 million positive impact from changes in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Beauty Systems Group. BSG's gross profit increased by $63.4 million, or 17.4%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009, principally as a result of higher sales volume and improved gross margins. BSG's gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to 39.6% for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010, compared to 38.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. This increase was principally the result of a favorable change in the sales and product mix
across the business, previously anticipated savings realized from the recently completed warehouse optimization program and synergies from businesses acquired during the last 12 months. This
increase also reflects a $5.5 million positive impact from changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $112.9 million, or 12.6%, to $1,012.3 million for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2010, compared to $899.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. This increase was attributable to incremental expenses (including employee
compensation, rent and other occupancy-related expenses) resulting from stores opened and from businesses acquired in the preceding 12 months (including an increase of 145 stores, or 3.7%, over
the fiscal year 2009), as well as higher share-based compensation expense of $4.2 million, higher advertising expenses in the Sally Beauty Supply segment of $7.1 million and
acquisition-related expenses of $0.7 million. Please see "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" below for more information about the Company's treatment of acquisition-related expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, were 34.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to 34.1% for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2009.
57
Table of Contents
Depreciation and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization increased to $51.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to
$47.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, due to the incremental expenses associated with businesses acquired in the last 12 months and depreciation related to
capital expenditures mainly in connection with store openings in both operating segments, partially offset by the impact of assets that became fully depreciated in the preceding 12 months.
Operating Earnings
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information concerning our operating earnings for each reportable segment (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Increase |
|
Operating Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
320,456 |
|
$ |
283,872 |
|
$ |
36,584 |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
BSG |
|
|
112,495 |
|
|
91,604 |
|
|
20,891 |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit |
|
|
432,951 |
|
|
375,476 |
|
|
57,475 |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
Unallocated expenses |
|
|
(79,203 |
) |
|
(70,022 |
) |
|
9,181 |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
(12,818 |
) |
|
(8,618 |
) |
|
4,200 |
|
|
48.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
$ |
340,930 |
|
$ |
296,836 |
|
$ |
44,094 |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
operating earnings increased by $44.1 million, or 14.9%, to $340.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009. The increase in consolidated operating earnings was due primarily to an increase in the operating profits of both segments, partially offset by higher unallocated corporate
expenses and share-based compensation expense, as discussed below. Operating earnings, as a percentage of net sales, increased to 11.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to
11.3% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
Sally Beauty Supply. Sally Beauty Supply's segment operating earnings increased by $36.6 million, or 12.9%, to $320.5 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The increase in Sally Beauty Supply's segment operating earnings was primarily a result of increased sales
volume and improved gross margins, partially offset by higher advertising costs of approximately $7.1 million and the incremental costs related to approximately 108 net additional
company-operated stores (stores opened or acquired during the past 12 months) operating during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. Segment operating earnings, as a percentage of
net sales, increased to 17.5% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to 16.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The increase in Sally Beauty Supply's
operating earnings, as a percentage of segment net sales, was primarily a result of gross margin improvements.
Beauty Systems Group. BSG's segment operating earnings increased by $20.9 million, or 22.8%, to $112.5 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Segment operating earnings, as a percentage of net sales, increased to 10.4% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, compared to 9.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The increase in BSG operating earnings was primarily a result of gross margin improvements, the
incremental operating earnings of businesses acquired and stores opened during the past 12 months, and to ongoing cost reduction initiatives (including cost savings realized from the warehouse
optimization program that began in the fiscal year 2007).
58
Table of Contents
Unallocated expenses. Unallocated expenses, which represent corporate costs (such as payroll, employee benefits and travel expenses for corporate staff, certain
professional fees and corporate governance expenses) that have not been charged to our operating segments, increased by $9.2 million, or 13.1%, to $79.2 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. This increase was due primarily to higher employee compensation and compensation-related expenses of
approximately $3.7 million, an unfavorable change in foreign currency transactions of approximately $2.3 million resulting principally from intercompany loans not permanently invested,
other corporate expenses of approximately $2.5 million related primarily to recent upgrades to our information technology and communication systems, and acquisitionrelated expenses
of approximately $0.7 million (representing legal fees and expenses, professional fees and other expenses).
Share-based Compensation Expense. Total compensation cost charged against income for share-based compensation arrangements increased by $4.2 million to
$12.8 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. This increase was due to the higher fair value at the grant date
of stock option awards during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to stock option awards during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, and the incremental annual
expenses resulting from such fiscal year 2010 stock option awards.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased by $19.0 million, to $113.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Interest expense is net of interest income of $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributable to lower outstanding principal balances on our ABL credit facility and senior term loans and to lower prevailing LIBOR
interest rates, partially offset by a $2.9 million net unfavorable change in the fair value of certain interest rate swaps (Please see Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" contained elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional information about the Company's interest rate swap
agreements).
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes was $84.1 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to $65.7 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The effective tax rate is 36.9% for fiscal year 2010, compared to 39.9% for fiscal year 2009. The decrease in
the annual effective tax rate primarily relates to an increase in earnings in certain low tax jurisdictions, the release of certain valuation allowances and a reduction in unfavorable permanent items.
Net Earnings
As a result of the foregoing, consolidated net earnings increased by $44.7 million, or 45.1%, to $143.8 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010, compared to $99.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Net earnings, as a percentage of net sales, were 4.9% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, compared to 3.8% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
Financial Condition
September 30, 2011 Compared to September 30, 2010
Working capital (current assets less current liabilities) increased by $32.0 million to $419.1 million at September 30, 2011,
compared to $387.1 million at September 30, 2010. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 1.91 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011, compared to 1.95 to 1.00 at
September 30, 2010. The increase in working capital reflects an increase of $84.4 million in current assets and an increase of $52.4 million in current liabilities. The increase
in current assets as of September 30, 2011 includes an
59
Table of Contents
increase
of $60.9 million in inventory, an increase of $7.0 million in trade accounts receivable, an increase of $5.6 million in deferred income tax assets, an increase of
$4.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and an increase of $4.0 million in accounts receivable, other. The increase in current liabilities as of September 30, 2011 includes an
increase of $55.2 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and a decrease of $2.8 million in income taxes payable, as further described below.
Cash
and cash equivalents increased by $4.0 million to $63.5 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $59.5 million at September 30, 2010 due primarily to cash
provided by operating activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, partially offset by cash used by investing and financing activities (please see "Liquidity and Capital
Resources" below). Trade accounts receivable increased by $7.0 million to $62.0 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $55.0 million at September 30, 2010 due
primarily to the increase in sales activity and to accounts receivable of businesses acquired. Accounts receivable, other, increased by $4.0 million to $33.5 million at
September 30, 2011, compared to $29.5 million at September 30, 2010 due primarily to vendor rebates accrued. Inventory increased by $60.9 million to $665.2 million
at September 30, 2011, compared to $604.4 million at September 30, 2010 due primarily to the effect of stores opened and to the inventory of businesses acquired in the preceding
12 months, and to the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments of approximately $3.6 million. Deferred income tax assets, net, increased by $5.6 million to
$28.5 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $22.9 million at September 30, 2010 primarily due to the timing of differences between accrued expenses included for tax
purposes versus accrued expenses included in our consolidated statements of earnings.
Accounts
payable increased by $37.2 million to $262.1 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $224.9 million at September 30, 2010 due primarily to the accounts
payable of businesses acquired and the timing of payments to suppliers mainly in connection with recent purchases of merchandise inventory. Accrued liabilities increased by $18.0 million to
$185.5 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $167.5 million at September 30, 2010 due primarily to the interest rate swaps which mature in May 2012
($6.5 million), the timing of payments of employee compensation and compensation-related expenses ($4.4 million), an increase in deferred revenue ($3.9 million), and to accrued
liabilities of businesses acquired. Income taxes payable decreased by $2.8 million to $9.4 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $12.2 million at September 30,
2010 due primarily to estimated income tax payments made in the fiscal year 2011, partially offset by the effect of increased earnings and to income taxes payable of businesses acquired.
Net
property and equipment increased by $14.4 million to $182.5 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $168.1 million at September 30, 2010, primarily due to
capital expenditures, the property and equipment of businesses acquired and the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments, partially offset by the fiscal year 2011 depreciation expense.
Goodwill
increased by $27.6 million to $505.9 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $478.2 million at September 30, 2010, primarily due to goodwill recorded in
connection with businesses acquired during the fiscal year 2011 (including the October 2010 acquisition of Aerial).
Intangible
assets, excluding goodwill, increased by $20.3 million to $129.7 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $109.4 million at September 30, 2010,
primarily due to intangible assets recorded in connection with businesses acquired during the fiscal year 2011 (including the October 2010 acquisition of Aerial) and the effect of foreign currency
translation adjustments, partially offset by the fiscal year 2011 amortization expense.
Long-term
debt, including current portion, decreased by $149.5 million to $1,413.1 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $1,562.6 million at
September 30, 2010 due primarily to optional prepayments of $147.0 million on our senior term loan facilities (please see "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below).
60
Table of Contents
Other
liabilities decreased by $14.5 million to $26.2 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $40.7 million at September 30, 2010, primarily due to the fiscal
year 2011 classification, in accrued liabilities, of the interest rate swaps which mature in May 2012. Prior to the fiscal year 2011, these interest swaps were classified in other liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheets.
Deferred
income tax liabilities, net, increased by $9.5 million to $51.3 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $41.8 million at September 30, 2010 primarily due
to the timing of differences between depreciation and amortization included for tax purposes versus depreciation and amortization included in our consolidated statements of earnings.
Total
stockholders' deficit decreased by $242.3 million to $219.0 million at September 30, 2011 compared to September 30, 2010. This decrease was primarily as a result of
net earnings of $213.7 million and an increase in additional paid-in capital of $30.9 million, partially offset by an increase in cumulative translation adjustments and
deferred losses on interest rate swaps, net of tax, as described below.
Additional
paid-in capital increased by $30.9 million to $681.3 million at September 30, 2011, as a result of share-based compensation expense, the exercise of stock
options and the exercise or cancelation of certain stock options subject to redemption. Accumulated other comprehensive loss increased by $2.4 million, to $22.7 million at
September 30, 2011, due to foreign currency translation adjustments of $8.0 million, partially offset by a reduction in deferred losses on hedged interest rate swaps of
$5.6 million, net of income tax.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We broadly define liquidity as our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities to meet our obligations and commitments. In
addition, liquidity includes the ability to obtain appropriate debt and equity financing and to convert into cash those assets that are no
longer required to meet existing strategic and financial objectives. Therefore, liquidity cannot be considered separately from capital resources that consist of current or potentially available funds
for use in achieving long-range business objectives and meeting debt service commitments.
We
are highly leveraged and a substantial portion of our liquidity needs will arise from debt service on indebtedness incurred primarily in connection with the Separation Transactions and from funding
the costs of operations, working capital and capital expenditures. As a holding company, we depend on our subsidiaries, including Sally Holdings, to distribute funds to us so that we may pay our
obligations and expenses. The ability of our subsidiaries to make such distributions will be subject to their operating results, cash requirements and financial condition and their compliance with
covenants and financial ratios related to their existing or future indebtedness, including covenants restricting Sally Holdings' ability to pay dividends to us. In addition, under Delaware law, the
ability of each of Sally Holdings and its subsidiaries to make distributions to us will be limited to the extent: (i) of its surplus, or if there is no surplus, of its net earnings for the
fiscal year in which the distribution is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year, if such subsidiary is a corporation; or (ii) the fair value of its assets exceeds its liabilities, in the
case of Sally Holdings or such subsidiary that is a limited liability company. If, as a consequence of these limitations, we cannot receive sufficient distributions from our subsidiaries, we may not
be able to meet our obligations to fund general corporate expenses. Please see "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our Business," and "Risks Relating to Our Substantial
Indebtedness."
We
may from time to time repurchase or otherwise retire or refinance our debt (through our subsidiaries or otherwise) and take other steps to reduce or refinance our debt or otherwise improve our
balance sheet. These actions may include open market repurchases of our notes, prepayments of our term loans or other retirements of outstanding debt. The amount of debt that may be repurchased,
refinanced or otherwise retired, if any, would be decided upon at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on market conditions, trading levels of the Company's debt from time to
time, the Company's cash position and other considerations.
61
Table of Contents
Borrowings
under the senior term loan facilities may be prepaid at the option of Sally Holdings at any time without premium or penalty and are subject to mandatory repayment in an amount equal to 50%
of excess cash flow (as defined in the agreement governing the term loan facilities) for any fiscal year unless a specified leverage ratio is met. Amounts paid pursuant to said provision may be
applied, at the option of Sally Holdings, against minimum loan repayments otherwise required of it over the twelve-month period following any such payment under the terms of the loan agreement. The
Company was not required to make and did not make mandatory repayments pursuant to such excess cash flow provision in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.
In
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, the Company made optional prepayments in the aggregate amount of $147.0 million on its senior term loan B facility. In connection with such
optional prepayments, the Company recorded losses on extinguishment of debt in the aggregate amount of $1.2 million, which are included in interest expense in the Company's consolidated
statements of earnings.
Based
upon the current level of operations and anticipated growth, we anticipate that existing cash balances, funds expected to be generated by operations, and funds available under the ABL credit
facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements and to finance anticipated capital expenditures over the next 12 months.
There
can be no assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations, that anticipated net sales and operating improvements will be realized, or that future borrowings will
be available under our ABL credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. In addition, our ability to meet our debt service
obligations and liquidity needs are subject to certain risks, which include, but are not limited to, increases in competitive activity, the loss of key suppliers, rising interest rates, the loss of
key personnel, the ability to execute our business strategy and general economic conditions. Please see "Risk Factors."
We
utilize our ABL credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit, as well as to manage normal fluctuations in our operational cash flow. In that regard, we may from time to time draw funds
under the revolving credit facility for general corporate purposes including funding of capital expenditures, acquisitions and interest payments due on our indebtedness. The funds drawn on individual
occasions during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 have varied in amounts of up to $78.0 million, with total amounts outstanding ranging from zero up to $102.5 million. The
amounts drawn are generally paid down with cash provided by our operating activities. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on our borrowings under
the ABL credit facility was 3.3%.
As
of September 30, 2011, Sally Holdings had $366.5 million available for additional borrowings under our ABL credit facility, subject to borrowing base limitations, as reduced by
outstanding letters of credit. Availability under the ABL credit facility is a function of a customary borrowing base of receivables and inventory levels. The ABL credit facility has a
5-year maturity and pricing levels at market rates.
We
are a holding company and do not have any material assets or operations other than ownership of equity interests of our subsidiaries. The agreements and instruments governing the debt of Sally
Holdings and its subsidiaries contain material limitations on their ability to pay dividends and other restricted payments to us which, in turn, constitute material limitations on our ability to pay
dividends and other payments to our stockholders.
Under
the agreements and indentures governing the term loan facilities and the notes, Sally Holdings may not make certain restricted payments to us if a default then exists under the credit agreement
or
the indentures or if its consolidated interest coverage ratio is less than 2.0 to 1.0 at the time of the making of such restricted payment. As of September 30, 2011, its consolidated interest
coverage ratio exceeded 2.0 to 1.0. Further, the aggregate amount of restricted payments it is able to make is limited pursuant to various baskets as calculated pursuant to the credit agreement and
indentures.
62
Table of Contents
Under
its ABL credit facility, Sally Holdings may pay dividends and make other equity distributions to us if availability under the facility exceeds certain thresholds. For dividends and distributions
up to $30.0 million during each fiscal year, borrowing availability must exceed the lesser of $80.0 million or 20% of the borrowing base for 45 days prior to such dividend and
distribution. For dividends in excess of that amount, Sally Holdings must maintain that same availability and its fixed-charge coverage ratio must exceed 1.10 to 1.00. The fixed-charge coverage ratio
is defined as the ratio of (A) EBITDA (as defined in the agreement underlying the ABL credit facility, or Credit Agreement EBITDA) less unfinanced capital expenditures to (B) fixed
charges (as included in the definition of the fixed-charge coverage ratio in the agreement governing the ABL credit facility). As of September 30, 2011, Sally Holdings met all of these
conditions. As of September 30, 2011, the net assets of our consolidated subsidiaries that were unrestricted from transfer under our credit arrangements totaled $483.2 million, subject
to certain adjustments. The ABL credit facility and the senior term loan facilities, as well as the Company's 9.25% Senior Notes indenture and its 10.5% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture contain
customary cross-default and/or cross-acceleration provisions.
During
the fiscal year 2011, we completed several acquisitions at an aggregate cost of $86.8 million. In general, we funded these acquisitions with cash from operations and borrowings under the
ABL credit facility. For example, on October 1, 2010, we acquired Aerial, an 82-store professional-only distributor of beauty products operating in 11 states in the
midwestern United States, for approximately $81.8 million. In connection with the Aerial acquisition we borrowed $78.0 million under our ABL credit facility (which we have since paid in
full). In addition, during the fiscal year 2010, we completed several acquisitions at an aggregate cost of $45.6 million. In general, we funded these acquisitions with cash from operations and
borrowings under the ABL credit facility. For example, on December 16, 2009, we acquired Sinelco, a wholesale distributor of professional beauty products based in Ronse, Belgium, for
approximately €25.2 million (approximately $36.6 million). We also assumed €4.0 million (approximately $5.8 million) of
pre-acquisition debt of Sinelco in connection with the acquisition.
Historical Cash Flows
For the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, our primary source of cash has been funds provided by operating activities and, when necessary,
short-term borrowings.
The primary uses of cash during the past three years were for repayments of long-term debt, acquisitions and capital expenditures.
The
following table shows our sources and uses of funds for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
291,841 |
|
$ |
217,246 |
|
$ |
74,595 |
|
$ |
217,246 |
|
$ |
223,333 |
|
$ |
(6,087 |
) |
Cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(146,735 |
) |
|
(85,022 |
) |
|
(61,713 |
) |
|
(85,022 |
) |
|
(118,562 |
) |
|
33,540 |
|
Cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(140,049 |
) |
|
(126,511 |
) |
|
(13,538 |
) |
|
(126,511 |
) |
|
(149,262 |
) |
|
22,751 |
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
|
(666 |
) |
|
(404 |
) |
|
(666 |
) |
|
(850 |
) |
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,987 |
|
$ |
5,047 |
|
$ |
(1,060 |
) |
$ |
5,047 |
|
$ |
(45,341 |
) |
$ |
50,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
Table of Contents
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, which excludes cash used for acquisitions completed
during the period, increased by $74.6 million to $291.8 million compared to $217.2 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due
to an improvement in earnings of approximately $69.9 million for the fiscal year 2011 (including proceeds from a litigation settlement of $27.0 million), compared to the fiscal year
2010.
Net
cash provided by operating activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, which excludes cash used for acquisitions completed during the period, decreased by
$6.1 million to $217.2 million compared to $223.3 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to changes in inventory levels of
approximately $80.5 million (resulting from increases in inventory levels in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 and reductions in inventory levels in the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009) and deferred income taxes of $8.8 million, partially offset by changes in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of approximately $19.5 million and income
taxes payable of $18.6 million and by an improvement in earnings of approximately $44.7 million for the fiscal year 2010, compared to the fiscal year 2009.
Cash Used by Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 increased by $61.7 million to
$146.7 million compared to $85.0 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increase of $50.7 million in cash used for
acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and an increase of $11.3 million in capital expenditures, including 21 more store openings during the fiscal year 2011, compared to the fiscal year 2010, and
the incremental capital expenditures of Aerial in the fiscal year 2011.
Net
cash used by investing activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 decreased by $33.5 million to $85.0 million compared to $118.6 million during the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. This decrease was primarily due to $45.0 million less in cash used for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, partially offset by higher capital
expenditures primarily as a result of more store openings during the fiscal year 2010, compared to the fiscal year 2009.
Cash Used by Financing Activities
Net cash used by financing activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 increased by $13.5 million to
$140.0 million compared to $126.5 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to net repayments of debt of $149.3 million
during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, compared to net repayments of debt of $127.6 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. This increase also reflects
debt issuance costs of $5.4 million incurred and paid during the fiscal year 2011 in connection with the new ABL credit facility, and an increase in proceeds from exercises of stock options of
$10.1 million in the fiscal year 2011, compared to the fiscal year 2010.
Net
cash used by financing activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 decreased by $22.8 million to $126.5 million compared to $149.3 million during the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. This decrease was primarily due to net repayments of debt of $127.6 million (including the prepayment in full of our term loan A and including a
mandatory repayment in the amount of $22.3 million on our senior term loan facilities) during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, compared to net repayments of debt of
$148.1 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
Credit Facilities
In November 2006, we, through our subsidiaries: (i) entered into two term loan facilities (term loans A and B) in an aggregate amount
of $1,070.0 million; (ii) issued senior notes in an aggregate amount of
64
Table of Contents
$430.0 million
and senior subordinated notes in an aggregate amount of $280.0 million, which we collectively refer to as the Notes; and (iii) entered into the
$400.0 million ABL credit facility, subject to borrowing base limitations, of which approximately $70.0 million was drawn at closing, which resulted in the incurrence of aggregate
indebtedness in connection with the Separation Transactions of
approximately $1,850.0 million. Please see "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our Substantial Indebtedness."
During
the fiscal year 2010, the Company prepaid in full its borrowings under the term loan A facility. As of September 30, 2011, there were outstanding borrowings of $696.9 million
under the term loan B facility, at a contractual interest rate of 2.49%, and outstanding borrowings of $705.0 million under the Notes, at a weighted average interest rate of 9.75%. As of
September 30, 2011, there were no borrowings outstanding under our ABL credit facility and we had $366.5 million available for borrowing under our ABL credit facility, subject to
borrowing base limitations, as reduced by outstanding letters of credit.
Please
see Note 21 of the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in "Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
The
agreements and instruments governing our debt contain restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact our ability to operate our business. These restrictions and limitations relate
to:
|
|
|
|
|
disposal of assets incurrence of additional indebtedness (including guarantees of additional indebtedness) stock repurchase and distributions certain debt prepayments and modifications liens on assets |
|
making investments (including joint ventures)
mergers, consolidations or sales of subsidiaries' assets
ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends making acquisitions of all of the business or assets of or stock representing beneficial
ownership of, any person |
Borrowings
under the term loan facilities and the ABL credit facility are secured by substantially all of our assets, those of Sally Investment Holdings LLC, those of our domestic subsidiaries
and, in the case of the ABL credit facility, those of our Canadian subsidiaries and a pledge of certain intercompany notes. During the fiscal year 2010, the Company prepaid in full its borrowings
under the Term Loan A facility. Borrowings under the term loan B facility may be prepaid at our option at any time without premium or penalty and is subject to mandatory prepayment in an amount equal
to 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the agreement governing the term loan facilities) for any fiscal year unless a specified leverage ratio is met. Additionally, the term loan B facility is
subject to mandatory prepayment in an amount equal to 100% of the proceeds of specified asset sales that are not reinvested in the business or applied to repay borrowings under the ABL credit
facility. No mandatory repayments of any kind were made or required to be made in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.
The
term loan facilities contain a covenant requiring Sally Holdings and its subsidiaries to meet certain maximum consolidated secured leverage ratio levels, which decline over time. The consolidated
secured leverage ratio is a ratio of (A) net consolidated secured debt to (B) Consolidated EBITDA as defined in the agreement underlying the term loan facilities. Compliance with the
consolidated secured leverage ratio is tested quarterly, with a maximum ratio of 3.50 as of September 30, 2011. Failure to comply with the consolidated secured leverage ratio covenant under the
term loan facilities would result in a default under such facilities.
The
ABL credit facility contains a covenant requiring Sally Holdings and its subsidiaries to maintain a fixed-charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0 to 1.0 in the event that availability under the ABL
credit facility falls below certain thresholds. Sally Holdings must comply with the ratio in the event availability is less than the greater of: (a) the lesser of $60.0 million or 15% of
the then current borrowing base and (b) $40.0 million. The fixed-charge coverage ratio is defined as the ratio of (A) EBITDA (as defined in the
65
Table of Contents
agreement
underlying the ABL credit facility, or Credit Agreement EBITDA) less unfinanced capital expenditures to (B) fixed charges (as included in the definition of the fixed-charge coverage
ratio in the agreement governing the ABL credit facility).
For
purposes of calculating either the consolidated secured leverage ratio or the fixed-charge coverage ratio, Consolidated EBITDA and Credit Agreement EBITDA are measured on a
last-four-quarters basis. Accordingly, the calculation can be disproportionately affected by a particularly strong or weak quarter and may not be comparable to the measure for
any previous or subsequent four-quarter period.
Failure
to comply with the fixed-charge coverage ratio covenant (if and when applicable) under the ABL credit facility would result in a default under such facility. A default could also result in a
default under the other facility or facilities, as the case may be, and the Notes. Absent a waiver or an amendment from our lenders and note holders, such defaults could permit the acceleration of all
indebtedness under the ABL credit facility, the term loan facilities and the Notes, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Consolidated
EBITDA and Credit Agreement EBITDA are not recognized measurements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and should not be considered as
a substitute for financial performance and liquidity measures determined in accordance with GAAP, such as net earnings, operating income or operating cash flow. In addition, because other companies
may calculate EBITDA differently, Consolidated EBITDA and Credit Agreement EBITDA likely will not be comparable to EBITDA or similarly titled measures reported by other companies or reported by us in
our quarterly earnings releases.
We
believe that we are currently in compliance with the agreements and instruments governing our debt, including our financial covenants. Our ability to comply with these covenants in future periods
will depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance, which in turn will be subject to economic conditions and to financial, market and competitive factors, many of which are beyond our
control. Further, our ability to comply with these covenants in future periods will also depend substantially on the pricing of our products, our success at implementing cost reduction initiatives and
our ability to successfully implement our overall business strategy. Please see "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our Substantial Indebtedness."
Capital Requirements
During the fiscal year 2011, we had total capital expenditures of approximately $60.0 million which were primarily to fund the addition of new
stores; the remodel, expansion or relocation of existing stores in the ordinary course of our business; and corporate projects. For the fiscal year 2012, we anticipate capital expenditures in the
range of approximately $65.0 million to $70.0 million, excluding acquisitions. Capital expenditures will be primarily for the addition of new stores; the remodel, expansion or relocation
of existing stores in the ordinary course of our business; and corporate projects.
66
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
The following table is a summary of our contractual cash obligations and commitments outstanding by future payment dates at September 30, 2011
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Less than 1
year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
More than 5
years |
|
Total |
|
Long-term debt obligations, including interest obligations(a) |
|
$ |
89,140 |
|
$ |
857,747 |
|
$ |
494,371 |
|
$ |
281,122 |
|
$ |
1,722,380 |
|
Obligations under operating leases(b) |
|
|
141,422 |
|
|
202,977 |
|
|
101,104 |
|
|
50,199 |
|
|
495,702 |
|
Purchase obligations(c) |
|
|
18,349 |
|
|
29,428 |
|
|
47,893 |
|
|
36,641 |
|
|
132,311 |
|
Other long-term obligations(d)(e) |
|
|
17,134 |
|
|
13,378 |
|
|
4,362 |
|
|
8,414 |
|
|
43,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
266,045 |
|
$ |
1,103,530 |
|
$ |
647,730 |
|
$ |
376,376 |
|
$ |
2,393,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- Long-term
debt includes capital leases and future interest payments on debt facilities, based upon outstanding principal amounts and interest
rates as of September 30, 2011.
- (b)
- In
accordance with GAAP, these obligations are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The amounts reported for operating leases do
not include executory costs.
- (c)
- Purchase
obligations reflect legally binding agreements entered into by us to purchase goods or services, that specify minimum quantities to be purchased
and with fixed or variable price provisions. In accordance with GAAP, these obligations are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amounts shown do not, however, reflect open
purchase orders, mainly for merchandise, to be fulfilled within one year, which are generally cancellable.
- (d)
- Other
long-term obligations principally represent obligations under insurance and self-insurance programs, certain liabilities
related to uncertain income tax benefits and commitments under various acquisition-related agreements including non-compete, consulting and severance agreements and deferred compensation
arrangements. These obligations are included in accrued liabilities and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
- (e)
- The
table above does not include $10.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits due to uncertainty regarding the realization and timing of the related
future cash flows, if any.
The
table above excludes amounts included in current liabilities (other than the current portion of long-term debt) as these items will be paid within one year and long-term
liabilities not requiring cash payments.
Our
assumptions with respect to the interest rates applicable to the term loan facilities and the ABL credit facility are subject to changes that may be material. In addition, other future events
could cause actual payments to differ materially from these amounts. Please see Note 16 of the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" in "Item 8Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data" of this Annual Report and "Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskInterest rate risk" for information about our
interest rate swap agreements.
The
majority of our operating leases are for Sally Beauty Supply and BSG stores, which typically are located in strip shopping centers. The use of operating leases allows us to expand our business to
new locations without making significant up-front cash outlays for the purchase of land and buildings.
67
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements
At September 30, 2011 and 2010, we had no off-balance sheet financing arrangements other than operating leases incurred in the
ordinary course of business, interest rate swaps, as well as outstanding letters of credit related to inventory purchases and self insurance programs, which totaled $16.0 million and
$14.5 million, respectively.
Inflation
Inflation has not had a material effect on our results of operations during each of the last three fiscal years.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe these estimates
and assumptions are reasonable. We consider accounting policies to be critical when they require us to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is
made and when different estimates that our management reasonably could have used have a material effect on the presentation of our financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of
operations.
Our
critical accounting estimates include but are not limited to the valuation of inventory, vendor concessions, retention of risk, income taxes, assessment of long-lived assets and
intangible assets with definite lives for impairment and share-based payments.
Valuation of Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method, or market (net realizable
value). When necessary, the Company adjusts the carrying value of inventory to the lower of cost or market, including disposal costs, and for estimated inventory shrinkage. Estimates of the future
demand for the Company's products, historical turn-over rates, the age and sales history of the inventory, and historic as well as anticipated changes in stock keeping units ("SKUs") are
some of the key factors used by management in assessing the net realizable value of inventory. We estimate inventory shrinkage between physical counts based upon our historical experience. Actual
results differing from these estimates could significantly affect our inventory and cost of products sold and distribution expenses. Inventory shrinkage expense averaged approximately 1.0% of
consolidated net sales in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009. A 10% increase or decrease in our estimate of inventory shrinkage at September 30, 2011, would impact net earnings by approximately
$1.6 million, net of income tax.
Vendor Rebates and Concessions
The Company deems a cash consideration received from a supplier to be a reduction of the cost of products sold unless it is in exchange for an asset
or service or a reimbursement of a specific, incremental, identifiable cost incurred by the Company in selling the vendor's products. The majority of cash consideration received by the Company is
considered to be a reduction of the cost of the related products and is reflected in cost of products sold and distribution expenses in our consolidated statements of earnings as the related products
are sold. Any portion of such cash consideration received that is attributable to inventory on hand is reflected as a reduction of inventory. We consider the facts and circumstances of the various
contractual agreements with vendors in order to determine the appropriate classification of amounts received in the consolidated statements of earnings. We record cash consideration expected to be
received from vendors in other receivables at the amount we believe will be collected. These receivables could be significantly affected if actual results differ from management's expectations. A 10%
increase or decrease in these receivables at September 30, 2011, would impact net earnings by approximately $1.5 million, net of income tax.
68
Table of Contents
Retention of Risk
Employee Health Insurance Liability
We maintain a largely self-funded program for healthcare benefits for employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. We cover the
majority of expenses associated with these benefits, other than payroll deductions and out-of pocket expenses paid by the employees. Payments for healthcare benefits below specified
amounts (currently $350,000 per individual per year) are self-insured by us. We base our estimate of ultimate liability on trends in claim payment history, historical trends in claims
incurred but not yet reported, and other components such as expected increases in medical costs, projected premium costs and the number of plan participants. We review our liability on a regular basis
and adjust our accruals accordingly. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010, we accrued an estimated liability relating to employee health insurance of $6.3 million and $6.0 million,
respectively.
Changes
in facts and circumstances may lead to a change in the estimated liability due to revisions of the estimated ultimate costs of our employee healthcare benefits. Estimates of medical costs and
trends in claims are some of the key factors used by our management in determining our employee health insurance liability. This liability could be significantly affected if actual results differ from
management's expectations. A 10% increase or decrease in our employee health insurance liability at September 30, 2011 would impact net earnings by approximately $0.4 million, net of
income tax.
Workers' Compensation Liability, General Liability and Automobile and Property Liability
We maintain a large deductible insurance plan for workers' compensation liability, general liability and automobile and property liability loss
exposures. We base our estimates of the ultimate liability on an actuarial analysis performed by an independent third-party actuary. We review our liability on a regular basis and adjust our accruals
accordingly. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010, our balance sheet included an estimated liability related to the deductible and retention limits of approximately $26.2 million and
$22.8 million, respectively.
Changes
in facts and circumstances may lead to a change in the estimated liability due to revisions of the estimated ultimate costs that affect our workers' compensation, general liability and
automobile and property liability insurance coverage. Changes in estimates occur over time due to such factors as claims incidence and severity of injury or damages. Our liabilities could be
significantly affected if actual results differ from management's expectations or actuarial analyses. A 10% increase or decrease in our workers' compensation liability, general liability and
automobile and property liability at September 30, 2011 would impact net earnings by approximately $1.7 million, net of income tax.
The
change in the self-insurance liability was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
30,286 |
|
$ |
26,920 |
|
Self-insurance expense |
|
|
64,001 |
|
|
62,440 |
|
Self-insurance liability of businesses acquired |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
|
Payments, net of employee contributions |
|
|
(60,731 |
) |
|
(59,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
34,088 |
|
$ |
30,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
We record income tax provisions in our consolidated financial statements based on an estimation of current income tax liabilities. The development of
these provisions requires judgments about tax issues, potential outcomes and timing. If we prevail in tax matters for which provisions have been established or
69
Table of Contents
are
required to settle matters in excess of established provisions, our effective tax rate for a particular period could be significantly affected.
For
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the effective income tax rates were 36.4%, 36.9% and 39.9%, respectively. The decrease in the fiscal year 2011 annual effective tax
rate was primarily due to tax benefits resulting from certain intercompany transactions that resulted in the release of valuation allowances during the fiscal year 2011, compared to the fiscal year
2010. The decrease in the fiscal year 2010 annual effective tax rate primarily relates to an increase in earnings in certain low tax jurisdictions, the release of certain valuation allowances and a
reduction in unfavorable permanent items. The annual effective tax rate in future years is expected to return to a normalized rate in the range of 37% to 38%.
Deferred
income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which temporary differences are estimated to be recovered or
settled. We believe that it is more likely than not that our results of operations in the future will generate sufficient taxable income to realize our deferred tax assets, net of the valuation
allowance currently recorded. We have recorded a valuation allowance to account for uncertainties regarding the recoverability of certain deferred tax assets, primarily foreign loss carryforwards. In
the future, if we determine that certain deferred tax assets will not be realizable, the related adjustments could significantly affect our effective tax rate at that time. The estimated tax benefit
of an uncertain tax position is recorded in our financial statements only after determining a more-likely-than-not probability that the uncertain tax position will
withstand challenge, if any, from applicable taxing authorities.
Assessment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets for Impairment
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, including store equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. The recoverability of long-lived assets and
intangible assets subject to amortization is assessed by comparing the net carrying amount of each asset to its total estimated undiscounted future cash flows ("estimated fair value") expected to be
generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the
estimated fair value of the asset.
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized;
rather, they are reviewed for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the value of the asset may be impaired. When
assessing goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for potential impairment, management compares the carrying amount of the asset to its fair value. In addition, management considers
whether there has been a permanent impairment to the value of the asset by evaluating if various factors (including current
operating results, anticipated future results and cash flows, and relevant market and economic conditions) indicate a possible impairment. Based on the reviews performed, after taking into account the
economic downturn experienced during the past few years in certain geographic areas in which we operate, there were no material asset impairments recognized in the current or prior fiscal years
presented.
Share-Based Payments
We recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period or to the date a participant becomes eligible for
retirement, if earlier. For fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, total compensation cost charged against income and included in selling, general and administrative expenses for share-based compensation
arrangements was $15.6 million, $12.8 million and $8.6 million, respectively.
70
Table of Contents
The
amount of stock option expense is determined based on the fair value of each stock option grant, which is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following assumptions: expected life, volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The expected life of stock options represents the period of time that the stock options
granted are expected to be outstanding. We estimate the expected life based on historical exercise trends. During each of the past five years, we have estimated expected volatility by using the
average volatility of both the Company and similar companies (based on industry sector) since it has not been practicable to estimate the Company's expected volatility on a stand-alone basis due to a
lack of sufficient trading history. The risk-free interest rate is based on the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury issue at the date of the grant for the expected life of the stock
options. The dividend yield represents our anticipated cash dividend over the expected life of the stock options. The amount of stock option expense recorded is significantly affected by these
estimates. In addition, we record stock option expense based on an estimate of the total number of stock options expected to vest, which requires us to estimate future forfeitures. We use historical
forfeiture experience as a basis for this estimate. Actual forfeitures differing from these estimates could significantly affect the timing of the recognition of stock option expense. We have based
all these estimates on our assumptions as of September 30, 2011. Our estimates for future periods may be based on different assumptions and accordingly may differ.
We
believe that our share-based compensation expense is based on reasonable estimates and assumptions. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimate or assumptions, we may be exposed
to changes in share-based compensation expense that could be material. A 10% change in our share-based compensation expense for the year ended September 30, 2011 would affect earnings by
approximately $1.0 million, net of income tax.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
We have not yet adopted and are currently assessing any potential effect of the following pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements:
In
December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2010-28 which amended Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC")
Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. This amendment modifies the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with a zero or negative carrying
amount, by requiring that Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test be performed for such reporting units if it is more likely than not that an impairment of goodwill exists. For public companies, this
amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early application is not permitted.
In
December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29 which amended ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations ("ASC 805"). This amendment requires that a public company that enters into
business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis disclose certain pro forma information for the current and the immediately preceding fiscal year. This amendment also
expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, non-recurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to such business
combination or business combinations. This amendment is effective prospectively for business combinations consummated on or after the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2010. Early application is permitted.
In
May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 which amended ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820"). When
effective, this amendment will change the title of ASC 820 to "Fair Value Measurement" and will adopt fair value measurement and disclosure guidance that is generally consistent with the corresponding
International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") guidance. More specifically, this amendment will change certain requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair
value measurements or, alternatively, clarify the FASB's intent about the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. For public companies, this
71
Table of Contents
amendment
is effective for interim periods and fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public companies is not permitted.
In
June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05 which amended ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. This amendment, which must be
applied retrospectively, will allow an entity the option to present the components of net income, as well as total comprehensive income and the components of other comprehensive income, either in a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate consecutive statements. This amendment also eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income in the
statement of stockholders' equity but does not change the items that must be reported. For public companies, this amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application is permitted.
In
September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08 which amended ASC Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. This amendment will
allow an entity to first assess relevant qualitative factors in order to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test under ASC 350. In
effect, the amendment eliminates the need to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit in connection with the goodwill impairment test unless the entity determines, based on the qualitative
assessment, that it is more likely than not that the reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying amount. This amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests
performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application is permitted.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to certain market risks including foreign currency fluctuations, interest rates and credit risk. We
may consider a variety of practices in the ordinary course of business to manage these market risks, including, when deemed appropriate, the use of derivative financial instruments.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk
We are exposed to potential gains or losses from foreign currency fluctuations affecting net investments and earnings denominated in foreign
currencies. Our primary exposures are to changes in exchange rates for the U.S. dollar versus the Euro, the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the Chilean peso, and the Mexican peso. Our
various foreign currency exposures at times offset each other, sometimes providing a natural hedge against foreign currency risk. For the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, approximately 18%, 18% and
16%, respectively, of our consolidated net sales were made in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Consolidated net sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, are inclusive of
approximately $23.3 million in positive impact from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other comprehensive income reflects $8.0 million
in foreign currency translation adjustments. For the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, fluctuations in the U.S. dollar exchange rates did not otherwise have a material effect on our consolidated
financial condition and consolidated results of operations.
A
10% increase or decrease in the exchange rates for the U.S. dollar versus the foreign currencies to which we have exposure, would have impacted our consolidated net sales by approximately 1.8% in
the fiscal year 2011, and would have impacted our consolidated net assets by approximately 2.5% at September 30, 2011.
The
Company uses foreign currency options and collars, including, at September 30, 2011, collars with an aggregate notional amount of $12.5 million to manage the exposure to the U.S.
dollar resulting from our Sinelco Group subsidiaries' purchases of merchandise from third-party suppliers. Sinelco's functional currency is the Euro. The foreign currency collar agreements held by the
Company at September 30, 2011 have contractual Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rates between 1.4000 and 1.4612 and expire in varying amounts monthly through September 2012. In addition, the
Company uses foreign currency forwards to mitigate its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates in connection with certain intercompany balances not permanently invested. As such, at
September 30, 2011, we held a foreign currency forward which enabled us to sell approximately €19.9 million ($26.7 million, at the September 30,
72
Table of Contents
2011
exchange rate) at the contractual exchange rate of 1.3610, a foreign currency forward which enabled us to buy approximately $18.3 million Canadian dollars ($17.5 million, at the
September 30, 2011 exchange rate) at the contractual exchange rate of 1.01855 and a foreign currency forward which enabled us to buy approximately £5.6 million
($8.7 million, at the September 30, 2011 exchange rate) at the contractual exchange rate of 1.5630. All the foreign currency forwards held by the Company at September 30, 2011
expired in October 2011.
The
Company's foreign currency option and forward agreements are not designated as hedges and do not currently meet the requirements for hedge accounting. Accordingly, the changes in the fair value
(i.e., marked-to-market adjustments) of these derivative instruments (which are adjusted quarterly) are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in our
consolidated statements of earnings. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, these derivative instruments did not have a material impact in our consolidated results of operations or
consolidated cash flows.
Interest rate risk
As a result of the debt financing incurred in connection with the Separation Transactions, we are subject to interest rate market risk in connection
with our long-term debt. The principal interest rate exposure relates to amounts borrowed under the term loan B and the ABL facilities. Based on the approximately $696.9 million of
borrowings under the term loan B facility and the ABL credit facility as of September 30, 2011, a change in the estimated applicable interest rate up or down by 1/8% will
increase or decrease earnings, before provision for income taxes, by approximately $0.9 million on an annual basis, without considering the effect of any interest rate swap agreements we may
have from time to time.
We
and certain of our subsidiaries are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations. In order to enhance our ability to manage risk relating to cash flow and interest rate exposure, we and/or our other
subsidiaries who are borrowers under the ABL credit facility may from time to time enter into and maintain derivative instruments, such as interest rate swap agreements, for periods consistent with
the related underlying exposures. In addition, pursuant to the agreement underlying our term loan facilities we and/or certain of our other subsidiaries hedge a portion of our floating interest rate
exposure for a specified period as more fully described below. We do not purchase or hold any derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
In
November 2006, Sally Holdings entered into certain interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $500 million. These interest rate swap agreements expired on or before
November 2009 and were not designated as hedges and, accordingly, the changes in fair value of these interest rate swap agreements (which were adjusted quarterly) were recorded in interest expense in
our consolidated statements of earnings.
In
the fiscal year 2008, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $300.0 million. These agreements expire in May 2012 and enable the Company
to convert a portion of its variable-interest rate obligations to fixed-interest rate obligations in connection with the term loan facilities, with interest ranging from 5.818% to 6.090%. Interest
payments related to our term loans are impacted by changes in LIBOR. These agreements are designated as effective cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the changes in the fair value of these derivative
instruments are recorded quarterly, net of income tax, in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income ("OCI") until the hedged obligation is settled or the swap agreements expire, whichever is
earlier. Any hedge ineffectiveness is recognized in interest expense in our consolidated statements of earnings.
Credit risk
We are exposed to credit risk on certain assets, primarily cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable. We believe
that the credit risk associated with cash equivalents and short-term investments, if any, is largely mitigated by our policy of investing in a diversified portfolio of securities with high
credit ratings.
73
Table of Contents
We
provide credit to customers in the ordinary course of business and perform ongoing credit evaluations. We believe that our exposure to concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade
receivables is largely mitigated by our broad customer base. We believe our allowance for doubtful accounts is sufficient to cover customer credit risks.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Please see "Index to Financial Statements" which is located on page 88 of this Annual Report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Background. Attached as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are certifications of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief
Financial Officer ("CFO"), which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. This "Controls and Procedures" section includes information concerning the controls
and controls evaluation referred to in the certifications. Part II, Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
sets forth the attestation report of KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, regarding its audit of our internal control over financial reporting. This section should be
read in conjunction with the certifications and the KPMG attestation report for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications. Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. The controls evaluation was conducted by our Disclosure Committee,
comprised of senior representatives from our finance, accounting, internal audit, and legal departments under the supervision of our CEO and CFO.
Certifications
of our CEO and our CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, are attached as exhibits to this Annual Report. This "Controls and
Procedures" section includes the information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the certifications, and it should be read in conjunction with the certifications for a more complete
understanding of the topics presented.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A system of
controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. Because of the limitations in all
such systems, no evaluation can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Furthermore, the design of any system of
controls and procedures is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under
all potential future conditions, regardless of how unlikely.
Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective system of controls and procedures, misstatements or omissions due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Scope of the Controls Evaluation. The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures included a review of their objectives and design, our implementation of
the controls and procedures and the effect of the controls and procedures on the information generated for use in this Annual Report. In the course of the evaluation, we sought to identify whether we
had any data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, was being undertaken if needed. This type of evaluation is
performed on a quarterly basis so that conclusions concerning the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures can be reported in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and
our Annual Reports on Form 10-K. Many of the components of our disclosure controls
74
Table of Contents
and
procedures are also evaluated by our internal audit department, by our legal department and by personnel in our finance organization. The overall goals of these various evaluation activities are
to monitor our disclosure controls and procedures on an ongoing basis, and to maintain them as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant.
Conclusions regarding Disclosure Controls. Based on the required evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of
September 30, 2011, we maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Management of the Company, including the CEO and CFO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and our Board of Directors
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
All
internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. A system of internal controls may become inadequate over time because of changes in conditions or deterioration in
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation
and presentation.
Management
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission ("COSO") in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of
September 30, 2011 our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles based on such criteria.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Please refer to KPMG's Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting on page 88 of the financial statements, which begin on page 71 of this Annual Report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During our last fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting
identified in connection with the evaluation described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
75
Table of Contents
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by Item 10 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from our Proxy
Statement related to the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the headings "Proposal 1Election of Directors," "Executive Officers of the Registrant," "Information Regarding
Corporate Governance, the Board, and Its Committees," "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" and "Report of the Audit Committee."
The
Board of Directors has adopted: (i) Corporate Governance Guidelines and a (ii) Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to directors, officers and employees. Copies of these
documents and the committee charters are available on our website at www.sallybeautyholdings.com and are available in print to any person, without
charge, upon written request to our Vice President of Investor Relations. We intend to disclose on our website at www.sallybeautyholdings.com any
substantive amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to these individuals or persons performing similar functions.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from our Proxy
Statement related to the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the headings "Information on the Compensation of Directors," "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Compensation Committee Report,"
"Executive Compensation" and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation."
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from our Proxy
Statement related to the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the heading "Ownership of Securities."
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table gives information as of September 30, 2011, about our common stock that may be issued under all of our existing equity
compensation plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights(1)
(a) |
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b) |
|
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))(2)
(c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
14,537,125 |
|
$ |
8.50 |
|
|
13,158,497 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
14,537,125 |
|
$ |
8.50 |
|
|
13,158,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
Table of Contents
- (1)
- Includes
options issued and available for exercise and shares available for issuance in connection with past awards under the Sally Beauty
Holdings, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan ("the 2010 Plan") and predecessor share-based plans. We currently grant awards only under the 2010 Plan.
- (2)
- Represents
shares that are available for issuance pursuant to restricted stock or other full value awards under the 2010 Plan and predecessor
share-based plans.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by Item 13 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from our Proxy
Statement related to the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the headings "Information Regarding Corporate Governance, the Board, and Its Committees," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from our Proxy
Statement related to the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the heading "Proposal 2Ratification of Selection of Auditors."
77
Table of Contents
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Documents filed as part of this Annual Report:
(a) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
Please see "Index to Financial Statements" which is located on page 88 of this Annual Report.
(b) Exhibits Required by Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report or are incorporated herein by reference:
Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description |
2.1 |
|
Investment Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, New Aristotle Company, Sally Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and CDRS Acquisition LLC, which is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-136259) filed on October 10, 2006 |
2.2 |
|
First Amendment to the Investment Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, New Aristotle Company, Sally Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and CDRS
Acquisition LLC, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.2 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-136259) filed on October 10, 2006 |
2.3 |
|
Second Amendment to the Investment Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, New Aristotle Company, Sally Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and CDRS
Acquisition LLC, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.02 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2006 |
2.4 |
|
Separation Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, Sally Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and New Aristotle Holdings, Inc., which is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 2.3 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-136259) filed on October 10, 2006 |
2.5 |
|
First Amendment to the Separation Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, Sally Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and New Aristotle Holdings, Inc., which is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.4 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-136259) filed on October 10, 2006 |
2.6 |
|
Second Amendment to the Separation Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, Sally Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and New Aristotle Holdings, Inc., which is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.01 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2006 |
78
Table of Contents
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Beauty Systems Group LLC, Lady Lynn Enterprises, Inc., Schoeneman Beauty Supply, Inc., the Shareholders and F. Dale Schoeneman, dated September 30, 2009, which
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 19, 2009 |
2.8 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on October 1, 2010 by and among Beauty Systems Group LLC, Aerial Company, Inc. and the stockholders named therein, which is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 2.7 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 3, 2011 |
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., dated November 16, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed on November 20, 2006 |
3.2 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., dated October 23, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on October 23, 2008. |
4.1 |
|
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2006, by and among the Company, CDRS Acquisition LLC, CD&R Parallel Fund VII, L.P. and the other stockholders party thereto, which is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 4.8 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2006 |
4.2 |
|
First Amendment to the Stockholders Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2006, between the Company and CDRS Acquisition LLC and Carol L. Bernick, as representative of the other stockholders, which is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 22, 2006 |
4.3 |
|
Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2006, by and among Sally Holdings LLC and Sally Capital Inc., as Co-Issuers, the Subsidiary Guarantors from time to time parties thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Trustee, governing the 9.25% Senior Notes due 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2006 |
4.4 |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 30, 2007, by and among Sally Holdings LLC and Sally Capital Inc., as co-Issuers, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as trustee, governing the 9.25% Senior Notes due 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.2 from the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-144427) of Sally Holdings LLC and Sally
Capital Inc. filed on July 9, 2007 |
4.5 |
|
Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2006, by and among Sally Holdings LLC and Sally Capital Inc., as Co-Issuers, the Subsidiary Guarantors from time to time parties thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Trustee, governing the 10.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2006 |
4.6 |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 30, 2007, by and among Sally Holdings LLC and Sally Capital Inc., as co-Issuers, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as trustee, governing the 10.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.4 from the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-144427) of Sally Holdings LLC
and Sally Capital Inc. filed on July 9, 2007 |
79
Table of Contents
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2006, by and among Sally Holdings LLC, Sally Capital Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith, Incorporated and the other financial institutions named therein, relating to the 9.25% Senior Notes due 2014, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on November 22, 2006 |
4.8 |
|
Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2006, by and among Sally Holdings LLC, Sally Capital Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors parties thereto, Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith, Incorporated and the other financial institutions named therein, relating to the 10.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2006 |
4.9 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated November 16, 2006, with respect to a Term Loan Facility, by and among Sally Holdings LLC, the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, and Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation,
as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.5.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2006 |
4.10 |
|
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2006, made by Sally Investment Holdings LLC, Sally Holdings LLC and certain subsidiaries of Sally Holdings LLC in favor of Merrill Lynch
Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.5.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2006 |
4.11 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated November 16, 2006, with respect to an Asset-Based Loan Facility, among Sally Holdings LLC, Beauty Systems Group LLC, Sally Beauty Supply LLC, any Canadian Borrower from time
to time party thereto, certain subsidiaries of Sally Holdings LLC, the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, Merrill Lynch Capital, a division of Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc., as Administrative Agent and
Collateral Agent, and Merrill Lynch Capital Canada Inc., as Canadian Agent and Canadian Collateral Agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.6.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
November 22, 2006 |
4.12 |
|
U.S. Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2006, made by Sally Investment Holdings LLC, Sally Holdings LLC and certain subsidiaries of Sally Holdings LLC in favor of Merrill
Lynch Capital, a division of Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.6.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on November 22, 2006 |
4.13 |
|
Canadian Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2006, made by Sally Beauty (Canada) Corporation, Beauty Systems Group (Canada), Inc., Sally Beauty Canada Holdings Inc. and certain
of their respective subsidiaries in favor of Merrill Lynch Capital Canada Inc., as Canadian Agent and Canadian Collateral Agent, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.6.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on November 22, 2006 |
80
Table of Contents
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2006, by and between Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent under the Term Loan Facility, and Merrill Lynch Capital, a
division of Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent under the Asset-Based Loan Facility, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.7 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2006 |
4.15 |
|
Assignment and Acceptance of that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2006, among Sally Holdings LLC, Beauty Systems Group LLC, Sally Beauty Supply LLC, the Canadian Borrowers (as
defined in the Credit Agreement), the several banks and other financial institutions from time to time parties thereto, Merrill Lynch Capital, a division of' Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc., as administrative agent and collateral
agent for the Lenders and Merrill Lynch Capital Canada, Inc., as Canadian agent and Canadian collateral agent for the Lenders, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.15 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on November 19, 2009 |
4.16 |
|
Credit Agreement dated as of November 12, 2010 among Sally Holdings LLC, Beauty Systems Group LLC, Sally Beauty Supply LLC, as domestic borrowers, Beauty Systems Group (Canada), Inc., as
Canadian borrower, SBH Finance B.V., as foreign borrower, the guarantors from time to time party hereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, Bank of America, N.A. (acting through its Canada branch), as
Canadian agent, the other lenders party hereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agent, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as syndication agent, Banc of America Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as joint
lead arrangers and joint book managers, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.13 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 3, 2011 |
4.17 |
|
Security Agreement by Sally Holdings LLC, Beauty Systems Group LLC, Sally Beauty Supply LLC, as the domestic borrowers and the other domestic borrowers and domestic guarantors party hereto from time to
time and Bank of America, N.A. as collateral agent dated as of November 12, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.14 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 3,
2011 |
4.18 |
|
Security Agreement by Beauty Systems Group (Canada), Inc., as the Canadian borrower and Bank of America, N.A., (acting through its Canada branch), as Canadian agent dated as of November 12, 2010, which
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.15 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 3, 2011 |
4.19 |
|
Indenture, dated as of November 8, 2011, by and among Sally Holdings LLC, Sally Capital Inc., the guarantors listed therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (including the form of Note
attached as an exhibit thereto), which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2011 |
4.20 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2011, by and among Sally Holdings LLC, Sally Capital Inc., the guarantors listed therein and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2011 |
81
Table of Contents
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Tax Allocation Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, New Aristotle Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and Sally Holdings, Inc., which is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-136259) filed on October 10, 2006 |
10.2 |
|
First Amendment to the Tax Allocation Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, New Aristotle Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and Sally Holdings, Inc., which is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-136259) filed on October 10, 2006 |
10.3 |
|
Second Amendment to the Tax Allocation Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, New Aristotle Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and Sally Holdings, Inc., which
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.01 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2006 |
10.4 |
|
Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, New Aristotle Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and Sally Holdings, Inc., which is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-136259) filed on October 10, 2006 |
10.5 |
|
First Amendment to the Employee Matters Agreement, dated October 3, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, New Aristotle Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and Sally Holdings, Inc., which is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-136259) filed on October 10, 2006 |
10.6 |
|
Second Amendment to the Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, New Aristotle Holdings, Inc., New Sally Holdings, Inc. and Sally Holdings, Inc.,
which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.02 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2006 |
10.7 |
|
Termination Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2006, among Alberto-Culver Company, Sally Holdings, Inc. and Gary G. Winterhalter, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.9 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Alberto-Culver Company on June 22, 2006 |
10.8 |
|
Form of First Amendment to the Termination Agreement with Gary G. Winterhalter, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 29, 2007 |
10.9 |
|
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. Independent Director Compensation Policy, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 19,
2009 |
10.10 |
|
Alberto-Culver Company 2003 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.17 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-144427) of
Sally Holdings LLC and Sally Capital Inc. filed on July 9, 2007 |
82
Table of Contents
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
Alberto-Culver Company 2003 Restricted Stock Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.18 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-144427) of Sally Holdings LLC and
Sally Capital Inc. filed on July 9, 2007 |
10.12 |
|
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 3,
2007 |
10.13 |
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement for Independent Directors pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2007 |
10.14 |
|
2007 Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employees pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed April 27, 2007 |
10.15 |
|
2007 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Independent Directors pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to
the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2007 |
10.16 |
|
2007 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2007 |
10.17 |
|
2009 Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employees pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on November 20, 2008 |
10.18 |
|
2009 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Independent Directors pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.24 to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 20, 2008 |
10.19 |
|
2009 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 20, 2008 |
10.20 |
|
Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2006, made and entered into by and among Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., Sally Investment Holdings LLC and Sally Holdings LLC, which is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 10.14 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sally Holdings LLC and Sally Capital Inc. filed on August 29, 2007 |
10.21 |
|
Form of Option Exercise Period Extension Agreement for Retired Executives, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 6,
2009 |
10.22 |
|
Amendment and Restated Alberto-Culver Company Employee Stock Option Plan of 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.28 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on
November 19, 2009 |
83
Table of Contents
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
2010 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Independent Directors pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.29 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 19, 2009 |
10.24 |
|
2010 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.30 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 19, 2009 |
10.25 |
|
2010 Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employees pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.31 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on November 19, 2009 |
10.26 |
|
2010 Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employees pursuant to the Alberto-Culver Company Employee Stock Option Plan of 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.32 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on November 19, 2009 |
10.27 |
|
Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement with Directors, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 19,
2009 |
10.28 |
|
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix A to the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on December 11,
2009 |
10.29 |
|
Amended and Restated Letter Agreement between Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC ("CD&R") and the Company with respect to the provision of services by CD&R to the Company's Board of Directors dated as
of February 24, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 4, 2010 |
10.30 |
|
2011 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 18, 2010 |
10.31 |
|
2011 Form of Stock Option Agreement for Employees pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.34 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on November 18, 2010 |
10.32 |
|
2011 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Independent Directors pursuant to the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.35 to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 18, 2010 |
10.33 |
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2011, by and among Sally Holdings LLC, Sally Capital Inc., the guarantors listed therein and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated,
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, which is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2011 |
84
Table of Contents
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
Form of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2012 Annual Incentive Plan* |
21.1 |
|
List of Subsidiaries of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.* |
23.1 |
|
Consent of KPMG* |
31.1 |
|
Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Gary G. Winterhalter* |
31.2 |
|
Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Mark J. Flaherty* |
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Gary G. Winterhalter* |
32.2 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Mark J. Flaherty* |
101 |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language) and furnished electronically herewith: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Earnings; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements. |
- *
- Included
herewith
-
- Certain
schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b) (2) of Regulation S-K. The Registrant
agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit upon request.
85
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 16th day of November, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ GARY G. WINTERHALTER
Gary G. Winterhalter
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ MARK J. FLAHERTY
Mark J. Flaherty
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ JANNA S. MINTON
Janna S. Minton
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller |
86
Table of Contents
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ GARY G. WINTERHALTER
Gary G. Winterhalter |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ MARK J. FLAHERTY
Mark J. Flaherty |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ JANNA S. MINTON
Janna S. Minton |
|
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ JAMES G. BERGES
James G. Berges |
|
Chairman of the Board and Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ KATHLEEN J. AFFELDT
Kathleen J. Affeldt |
|
Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ MARSHALL E. EISENBERG
Marshall E. Eisenberg |
|
Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ KENNETH A. GIURICEO
Kenneth A. Giuriceo |
|
Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ ROBERT R. MCMASTER
Robert R. McMaster |
|
Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ WALTER L. METCALFE JR.
Walter L. Metcalfe Jr. |
|
Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ JOHN A. MILLER
John A. Miller |
|
Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ MARTHA J. MILLER
Martha J. Miller |
|
Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ EDWARD W. RABIN
Edward W. Rabin |
|
Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
/s/ RICHARD J. SCHNALL
Richard J. Schnall |
|
Director |
|
November 16, 2011 |
87
Table of Contents
SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Financial Statements
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
88
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.:
We
have audited Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.'s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on
our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit
also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In
our opinion, Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows and stockholders' equity (deficit) for each of the years in the
three-year period ended
September 30, 2011, and our report dated November 15, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/
KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 15, 2011
F-1
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.:
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (the Company) and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, cash flows, and stockholders' equity (deficit) for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2011. These consolidated financial
statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2011, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated November 15, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
/s/
KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 15, 2011
F-2
Table of Contents
Consolidated Financial Statements
The following consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows,
and stockholders' equity (deficit) for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2011 are those of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
F-3
Table of Contents
SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, 2011 and 2010
(In thousands, except par value data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
63,481 |
|
$ |
59,494 |
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,086 and $2,756 at September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively |
|
|
61,996 |
|
|
54,989 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, other |
|
|
33,530 |
|
|
29,510 |
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
665,246 |
|
|
604,357 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
26,360 |
|
|
23,486 |
|
|
Deferred income tax assets, net |
|
|
28,535 |
|
|
22,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
879,148 |
|
|
794,775 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $317,677 and $291,186 at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
182,489 |
|
|
168,119 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
505,873 |
|
|
478,240 |
|
Intangible assets, excluding goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $45,467 and $33,031 at September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively |
|
|
129,658 |
|
|
109,352 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
31,432 |
|
|
38,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,728,600 |
|
$ |
1,589,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
3,004 |
|
$ |
3,045 |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
262,114 |
|
|
224,931 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
185,509 |
|
|
167,496 |
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
9,379 |
|
|
12,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
460,006 |
|
|
407,652 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,410,111 |
|
|
1,559,591 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
26,154 |
|
|
40,692 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities, net |
|
|
51,311 |
|
|
41,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,947,582 |
|
|
2,049,738 |
|
Stock options subject to redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
946 |
|
Stockholders' deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 500,000 shares; 184,502 and 182,592 shares issued and 184,057 and 182,230 shares outstanding at
September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, Authorized 50,000 shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
681,256 |
|
|
650,315 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(879,305 |
) |
|
(1,093,030 |
) |
|
Treasury stock, 15 shares at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, at cost |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
(103 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(22,671 |
) |
|
(20,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' deficit |
|
|
(218,982 |
) |
|
(461,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit |
|
$ |
1,728,600 |
|
$ |
1,589,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4
Table of Contents
SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Fiscal Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,269,131 |
|
$ |
2,916,090 |
|
$ |
2,636,600 |
|
Cost of products sold and distribution expenses |
|
|
1,674,526 |
|
|
1,511,716 |
|
|
1,393,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,594,605 |
|
|
1,404,374 |
|
|
1,243,317 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,086,414 |
|
|
1,012,321 |
|
|
899,415 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
59,722 |
|
|
51,123 |
|
|
47,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
448,469 |
|
|
340,930 |
|
|
296,836 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
112,530 |
|
|
112,982 |
|
|
132,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes |
|
|
335,939 |
|
|
227,948 |
|
|
164,814 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
122,214 |
|
|
84,120 |
|
|
65,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
213,725 |
|
$ |
143,828 |
|
$ |
99,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
183,020 |
|
|
181,985 |
|
|
181,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
188,093 |
|
|
184,088 |
|
|
183,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5
Table of Contents
SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Fiscal Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
213,725 |
|
$ |
143,828 |
|
$ |
99,117 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
59,722 |
|
|
51,123 |
|
|
47,066 |
|
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
15,560 |
|
|
12,818 |
|
|
8,618 |
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
6,846 |
|
|
7,775 |
|
|
8,319 |
|
|
Excess tax (benefit) shortfall from share-based compensation |
|
|
(3,712 |
) |
|
(248 |
) |
|
194 |
|
|
Net loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
327 |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
(56 |
) |
|
Net loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
985 |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
459 |
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
8,129 |
|
|
Changes in (exclusive of effects of acquisitions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
(4,163 |
) |
|
(17 |
) |
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, other |
|
|
(3,971 |
) |
|
(4,520 |
) |
|
9 |
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
(47,930 |
) |
|
(34,247 |
) |
|
46,208 |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
|
(4,369 |
) |
|
832 |
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
3,565 |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
51,332 |
|
|
37,443 |
|
|
17,946 |
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
7,020 |
|
|
(11,628 |
) |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
957 |
|
|
(3,207 |
) |
|
(6,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
291,841 |
|
|
217,246 |
|
|
223,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(59,955 |
) |
|
(48,702 |
) |
|
(37,320 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
384 |
|
|
143 |
|
|
217 |
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(87,164 |
) |
|
(36,463 |
) |
|
(81,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(146,735 |
) |
|
(85,022 |
) |
|
(118,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book cash overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,633 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
428,605 |
|
|
334,000 |
|
|
95,577 |
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(577,911 |
) |
|
(461,567 |
) |
|
(243,666 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(5,397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercises of stock options |
|
|
10,942 |
|
|
878 |
|
|
687 |
|
Excess tax benefit (shortfall) from share-based compensation |
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
248 |
|
|
(194 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(140,049 |
) |
|
(126,511 |
) |
|
(149,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
|
(666 |
) |
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,987 |
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
(45,341 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
59,494 |
|
|
54,447 |
|
|
99,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
63,481 |
|
$ |
59,494 |
|
$ |
54,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
102,059 |
|
$ |
108,733 |
|
$ |
130,204 |
|
|
Income taxes paid, net |
|
$ |
121,226 |
|
$ |
81,668 |
|
$ |
67,463 |
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-6
Table of Contents
SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Fiscal Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital |
|
Accumulated
Deficit |
|
Treasury
Stock |
|
Total
Stockholders'
Deficit |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
181,516 |
|
$ |
1,815 |
|
$ |
622,511 |
|
$ |
(1,335,975 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
$ |
(702,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,117 |
|
|
Deferred losses on interest rate swaps, net of income taxes of $6,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,196 |
) |
|
(10,196 |
) |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,391 |
) |
|
(14,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,530 |
|
|
Stock options subject to redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
67 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
8,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,618 |
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
Stock issued for stock options |
|
|
275 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
181,858 |
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
635,519 |
|
|
(1,236,858 |
) |
|
(33 |
) |
|
(15,898 |
) |
|
(615,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,828 |
|
|
Deferred losses on interest rate swaps, net of income taxes of $64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
(101 |
) |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,277 |
) |
|
(4,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,450 |
|
|
Stock options subject to redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
88 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,818 |
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
Stock issued for stock options |
|
|
284 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
182,230 |
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
650,315 |
|
|
(1,093,030 |
) |
|
(103 |
) |
|
(20,276 |
) |
|
(461,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,725 |
|
|
Deferred gains on interest rate swaps, net of income taxes of $3,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,557 |
|
|
5,557 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,952 |
) |
|
(7,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,330 |
|
|
Stock options subject to redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
96 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
15,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,560 |
|
|
Stock issued for stock options |
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
14,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
184,057 |
|
$ |
1,841 |
|
$ |
681,256 |
|
$ |
(879,305 |
) |
$ |
(103 |
) |
$ |
(22,671 |
) |
$ |
(218,982 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-7
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Fiscal Years ended September 30,
2011, 2010 and 2009
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Description of Business
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries ("Sally Beauty" or "the Company") sell professional beauty supplies, primarily
through its Sally Beauty Supply retail stores in the U.S., Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico, Chile, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium,
France, Germany and Spain. Additionally, the Company distributes professional beauty products to salons and professional cosmetologists through its Beauty Systems Group ("BSG") store operations and a
commissioned direct sales force that calls on salons primarily in the U.S., Puerto Rico, Canada, the United Kingdom and certain other countries in Europe, and to franchises in the southern and
southwestern regions of the U.S., and in Mexico through the operations of its subsidiary Armstrong McCall, L.P. ("Armstrong McCall"). Certain beauty products sold by BSG and Armstrong McCall
are sold under exclusive territory agreements with the manufacturers of the products.
Sally
Beauty Holdings, Inc. was formed in June of 2006 in connection with our November 2006 separation from the Alberto-Culver Company ("Alberto-Culver"). In these financial statements and
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we refer to the transactions related to our separation from Alberto-Culver as the Separation Transactions. In connection with the
Separation Transactions, CDRS Acquisition LLC ("CDRS"), a limited liability company organized by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P., invested $575.0 million in
exchange for an equity ownership of approximately 48% of the outstanding common stock of the Company on an undiluted basis. At September 30, 2011, CDRS owned approximately 47% of our
outstanding common stock on an undiluted basis. In addition, the Company incurred approximately $1,850.0 million of new long-term debt in connection with the Separation
Transactions.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America ("GAAP"). These consolidated financial statements include the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Certain
amounts for prior fiscal years have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
All
references in these notes to "management" are to the management of Sally Beauty.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to interpret and apply accounting standards and to develop and follow
accounting policies
consistent with such standards. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies used in preparing the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosures of contingent liabilities in the financial statements. Our most significant estimates relate to: the valuation of inventory,
vendor concessions, retention of risk, income taxes, the assessment of long-lived assets and intangible assets for impairment, and share-based payments. The level of uncertainty in
F-8
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
estimates
and assumptions increases with the length of time until the underlying transactions are completed. Actual results may differ from these estimates in amounts that may be material to the
financial statements. Management believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements are reasonable.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments purchased by the Company from time to time which have an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be
cash equivalents. These investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. Also included in cash equivalents are proceeds due from customer credit and debit card transactions, which
generally settle within one to three days, and were $10.3 million and $8.4 million at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of investments in cash equivalents,
accounts receivable and derivative instruments.
The
Company invests from time to time in securities of financial institutions with high credit quality. Accounts receivable are deemed by the Company to be highly diversified due to the high number of
entities comprising the Company's customer base and their dispersion across diverse geographical regions. The counterparties to all our derivative instruments are deemed by the Company to be of
substantial resources and strong creditworthiness. The Company believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to its investments in cash equivalents, its accounts
receivable and its derivative instruments at September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the values invoiced to customers and do not bear interest. Trade accounts receivable are stated net of the
allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts requires management to estimate the future collectability of amounts receivable at the balance sheet date. Management records
allowances for doubtful accounts based on historical collection data and current customer information. Customer account balances are written off against the allowance after all means of collection
have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. In the Company's consolidated statements of earnings, bad debt expense is included in selling, general and administrative
expenses. The Company's exposure to credit risk with respect to trade receivables is mitigated by the Company's broad customer base and their dispersion across diverse geographical regions.
Accounts Receivable, Other
Accounts receivable, other, consist primarily of amounts expected to be received from vendors under various contractual agreements and are recorded
at the amount management estimates will be collected.
Inventory
Inventory consists primarily of beauty supplies and related accessories, and salon equipment for sale in the normal course of our business. Inventory
is stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method, or market (net realizable value). Inventory cost reflects actual product costs, the
cost of transportation to the Company's distribution centers, and certain shipping and handling costs,
F-9
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
such
as freight from the distribution centers to the stores and handling costs incurred at the distribution centers. When necessary, the Company adjusts the carrying value of inventory to the lower of
cost or market, including disposal costs, and for estimated inventory shrinkage. Estimates of the future demand for the Company's products, historical turn-over rates, the age and sales
history of the inventory, and historic as well as anticipated changes in stock keeping units ("SKUs") are some of the key factors used by management in assessing the net realizable value of inventory.
The
Company estimates inventory shrinkage between physical counts based on its historical experience. Physical inventory counts are performed at substantially all stores and significant distribution
centers at least annually, and sooner when management has reason to believe that the risk of inventory shrinkage at a particular location is heightened. Upon completion of physical inventory counts,
the Company's consolidated financial statements are adjusted to reflect actual quantities on hand. The Company has policies and processes in place that are intended to minimize inventory shrinkage.
Inventory shrinkage expense has averaged approximately 1% of our consolidated net sales during each of the past three fiscal years.
Lease Accounting
The Company's lease agreements for office space, retail stores and warehouse/distribution facilities are generally accounted for as operating leases,
consistent with applicable GAAP. Rent expense (including any rent abatements or escalation charges) is recognized on a straight-line basis from the date the Company takes possession of the
property to begin preparation of the site for occupancy, to the end of the lease term, including renewal options determined to be reasonably assured. Certain lease agreements to which the Company is a
party provide for contingent rents that are determined as a percentage of revenues in excess of specified levels. The Company records a contingent rent liability, along with the corresponding rent
expense, when specified levels have been achieved or when management determines that achieving the specified levels during the fiscal year is probable.
Certain
lease agreements to which the Company is a party provide for tenant improvement allowances. Such allowances are recorded as deferred lease credits, included in accrued liabilities and other
liabilities, as appropriate, on our consolidated balance sheets, and amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term (including renewal options determined to be reasonably assured)
as a reduction of rent expense. The amortization period used for deferred lease credits is generally consistent with the amortization period used for the constructed leasehold improvement asset for a
given location.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets with Definite Lives
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, including store equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. The recoverability of long-lived assets and
intangible assets subject to amortization is assessed by comparing the net carrying amount of each asset to its total estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If
the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value
of the asset. There were no significant impairment losses recognized in our financial statements in the current or prior fiscal years presented.
Intangible
assets subject to amortization include customer relationships, certain distribution rights and non-competition agreements, and are amortized, on a straight-line
basis, over periods of one to twelve
F-10
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
years.
Such amortization periods are based on the estimated useful lives of the assets and take into account the terms of any underlying agreements, but do not generally reflect all renewal terms
contractually available to the Company.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination. Intangible assets with
indefinite lives include trade names and certain distribution rights acquired in a business combination. Goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite lives are not amortized; rather, they are reviewed for impairment at least annually, during our second fiscal quarter, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate it is
more likely than not that the value of the asset may be impaired. When assessing goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for potential impairment, management compares the carrying amount
of the asset to its fair value. In addition, management considers whether there has been an impairment to the value of the asset by evaluating if various factors (including current operating results,
anticipated future results and cash flows, and relevant market and economic conditions) indicate a possible impairment. Based on the reviews performed, after taking into account the economic downturn
experienced during the past couple of years in certain geographic areas in which we operate, there was no impairment of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives recognized in our financial
statements in the current or prior fiscal years presented.
Deferred Financing Costs
Certain costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt are capitalized when incurred and are amortized over the estimated term of the related
debt agreements generally using the effective interest method. Such capitalized costs are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed
proportionally when certain debt is prepaid.
Insurance/Self-Insurance Programs
The Company retains a substantial portion of the risk related to certain of its workers' compensation, general and auto liability and property damage
insurable loss exposure. Predetermined loss limits have been arranged with insurance companies to limit the Company's exposure per occurrence and aggregate cash outlay. Certain of our employees and
their dependents are also covered by a self-insurance program for healthcare benefit purposes. Currently these self-insurance costs, less amounts recovered through payroll
deductions and certain out-of-pocket amounts incurred in connection with the employee healthcare program, are funded by the Company. The Company maintains an annual
stop-loss insurance policy for the healthcare benefits plan.
The
Company records an estimated liability for the ultimate cost of claims incurred and unpaid as of the balance sheet date, which includes both claims filed and estimated losses incurred but not yet
reported. The Company estimates the ultimate cost based on an analysis of historical data and actuarial estimates. Workers' compensation, general and auto liability and property damage insurable loss
liabilities are recorded at the estimate of their net present value, while healthcare plan liabilities are not discounted. These estimates are reviewed on a regular basis to ensure that the recorded
liability is adequate. The Company believes the amounts accrued at September 30, 2011 and 2010 are adequate.
F-11
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes sales revenue when a customer consummates a point-of-sale transaction at a store. The cost of sales
incentive programs, including customer and consumer coupons, is recognized as a reduction of revenue at the time of sale. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are
recorded on a net basis and are excluded from revenue. The Company also recognizes revenue on merchandise shipped to customers when title and risk of loss pass to the customer (generally upon
shipment). Appropriate provisions for sales returns and cash discounts are made at the time the sales are recognized. Sales returns and allowances averaged approximately 2.0% of net sales during each
of the past three fiscal years.
Cost of Products Sold and Distribution Expenses
Cost of products sold and distribution expenses include actual product costs, the cost of transportation to the Company's distribution centers, and
certain shipping and handling costs, such as freight from the distribution centers to the stores and handling costs incurred at the distribution centers. All other shipping and handling costs are
included in selling, general and administrative expenses when incurred.
Shipping and Handling
Shipping and handling costs (including freight and distribution expenses) related to delivery to customers are included in selling, general and
administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of earnings when incurred and amounted to $41.2 million, $36.0 million and $30.3 million for the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs relate mainly to print advertisements, digital marketing, trade shows and product education for salon professionals. Advertising
costs incurred in connection with print advertisements are expensed the first time the advertisement is run. Other advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Advertising costs of
$70.9 million, $64.6 million and $55.2 million for the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our
consolidated statements of earnings.
Vendor Rebates and Concessions
The Company deems a cash consideration received from a supplier to be a reduction of the cost of products sold unless it is in exchange for an asset
or service or a reimbursement of a specific, incremental, identifiable cost incurred by the Company in selling the vendor's products. The majority of cash consideration received by the Company is
considered to be a reduction of the cost of the related products and is reflected in cost of products sold and distribution expenses in our consolidated statements of earnings as the related products
are sold. Any portion of such cash consideration received that is attributable to inventory on hand is reflected as a reduction of inventory.
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred income taxes for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
F-12
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
expected
to apply to taxable income in the years in which temporary differences are estimated to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in the
consolidated statements of earnings in the period of enactment. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized unless it
is more-likely-than-not that such assets will be realized in full. The estimated tax benefit of an uncertain tax position is recorded in our financial statements
only
after determining a more-likely-than-not probability that the uncertain tax position will withstand challenge, if any, from applicable taxing authorities.
Foreign Currency
The functional currency of each of the Company's foreign operations is generally the respective local currency. Balance sheet accounts are translated
into U.S. dollars (the Company's reporting currency) at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date, while the results of operations are translated using the average exchange rates
during the period presented. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency
transaction gains or losses are included in our consolidated statements of earnings when incurred and were not significant in any of the periods presented in the accompanying financial statements.
Share-Based Compensation
Prior to November 2006, the Company was a subsidiary of Alberto-Culver and had no share-based compensation plans of its own, however, Alberto-Culver
had granted to Company employees certain stock options with a cash settlement provision contingent upon the occurrence of certain change in control events, pursuant to its stock option plans. As such,
the contingent cash settlement of these stock options as a result of such events would not be solely in the control of the Company. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2010, the Company reported
$0.9 million in "Stock options subject to redemption" outside of accumulated stockholders' equity (deficit) on its consolidated balance sheets and this amount was reclassified back into
additional paid-in capital as the related stock options were exercised or canceled or otherwise terminated.
3. Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income reflects changes in accumulated stockholders' equity (deficit) from sources other than transactions with stockholders and, as
such, includes net earnings and certain other specified components. The Company's only components of comprehensive income, other than net earnings, are foreign currency translation adjustments and
deferred gains (losses) on certain interest rate swap agreements, net of income tax.
F-13
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income at September 30, 2011 and 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments(a) |
|
$ |
(18,724 |
) |
$ |
(10,772 |
) |
Deferred (losses) on interest rate swaps, net of tax(b) |
|
|
(3,947 |
) |
|
(9,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
$ |
(22,671 |
) |
$ |
(20,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- There
were no income tax amounts related to foreign currency translation adjustments at September 30, 2011 and 2010.
- (b)
- Amounts
are net of income tax of $2.5 million and $6.0 million at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Please see Note 16
for more information about the Company's interest rate swaps.
4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
We have not yet adopted and are currently assessing any potential effect of the following recent pronouncements on our consolidated financial
statements:
In
December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2010-28 which amended Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC")
Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. This amendment modifies the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with a zero or negative carrying
amount, by requiring that Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test be performed for such reporting units if it is more likely than not that an impairment of goodwill exists. For public companies, this
amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early application is not permitted.
In
December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29 which amended ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations ("ASC 805"). This amendment
requires that a public company that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis disclose certain pro forma information for the current and the immediately
preceding fiscal year. This amendment also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, non-recurring pro forma adjustments
directly attributable to such business combination or business combinations. This amendment is effective prospectively for business combinations consummated on or after the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early application is permitted.
In
May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 which amended ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820"). When
effective, this amendment will change the title of ASC 820 to "Fair Value Measurement" and will adopt fair value measurement and disclosure guidance that is generally consistent with the corresponding
International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") guidance. More specifically, this amendment will change certain requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair
value measurements or, alternatively, clarify the FASB's intent about the
F-14
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
application
of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. For public companies, this amendment is effective for interim periods and fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2011. Early application by public companies is not permitted.
In
June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05 which amended ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. This amendment, which must be
applied retrospectively, will allow an entity the
option to present the components of net income, as well as total comprehensive income and the components of other comprehensive income, either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income
or in two separate consecutive statements. This amendment also eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income in the statement of stockholders' equity but does not
change the items that must be reported. For public companies, this amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011.
Early application is permitted.
In
September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08 which amended ASC Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. This amendment will
allow an entity to first assess relevant qualitative factors in order to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test under ASC 350. In
effect, the amendment eliminates the need to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit in connection with the goodwill impairment test unless the entity determines, based on the qualitative
assessment, that it is more likely than not that the reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying amount. This amendment is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests
performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application is permitted.
Accounting Changes
The Company made no accounting changes during the fiscal year 2011.
5. Fair Value Measurements
The Company's financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade and other accounts receivable, accounts payable, interest rate swap
agreements, foreign currency option, collar and forward agreements and debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade and other accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate
fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
The
Company measures on a recurring basis and discloses its financial instruments under the provisions of ASC 820, as amended. The Company defines "fair value" as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a three-level hierarchy
for measuring fair value and requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. This valuation hierarchy is based upon
the transparency
of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability on the measurement date. The three levels of that hierarchy are defined as follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or
liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data; and
F-15
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Consistent
with this hierarchy, the Company categorized certain of its financial assets and liabilities as follows at September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forwards(a) |
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency collars(a) |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(b) |
|
$ |
1,420,337 |
|
$ |
725,288 |
|
$ |
695,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged interest rate swaps(a) |
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forwards(a) |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,427,315 |
|
$ |
725,288 |
|
$ |
702,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forwards(a) |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency options(a) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(b) |
|
$ |
1,596,228 |
|
$ |
751,250 |
|
$ |
844,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged interest rate swaps(a) |
|
|
15,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
15,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forwards(a) |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
1,612,086 |
|
$ |
751,250 |
|
$ |
860,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- Foreign
currency options, collars and forwards, and interest rate swaps are valued for purposes of this disclosure using widely accepted valuation
techniques, such as discounted cash flow analyses, and reasonable estimates, such as projected market interest rates and projected foreign currency exchange rates, as appropriate. Please see
Note 16 for more information about the Company's foreign currency options, collars and forwards, and interest rate swaps.
- (b)
- Long-term
debt, which is carried at amortized cost in the Company's consolidated financial statements, is generally valued for purposes of this
disclosure using widely accepted valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analyses, and observable inputs, such as market interest rates, except for the senior and senior subordinated notes.
The senior and senior subordinated notes are valued using unadjusted quoted market prices for such debt securities.
F-16
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
6. Accumulated Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
The Company is authorized to issue up to 500.0 million shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and up to
50.0 million shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. Prior to 2006, the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alberto-Culver. In November 2006, the Company had
approximately 180.1 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding and commenced regular-way trading on the New York Stock Exchange as an independent company under the symbol
"SBH," in connection with the Separation Transactions. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had approximately 184.5 million shares issued and approximately 184.1 million shares
outstanding. There have been no shares of the Company's preferred stock issued. Please see the Note 1 for additional information about the Separation Transactions.
7. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share ("EPS"), is calculated by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during
the period. Diluted EPS is calculated similarly but includes potential dilution from the exercise of all outstanding stock options and stock awards, except when the effect would be
anti-dilutive.
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
213,725 |
|
$ |
143,828 |
|
$ |
99,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares |
|
|
183,020 |
|
|
181,985 |
|
|
181,691 |
|
Adjustments for assumed dilutionstock options and stock awards |
|
|
5,073 |
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares |
|
|
188,093 |
|
|
184,088 |
|
|
183,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2011, all outstanding options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock were dilutive. At September 30, 2010 and 2009, options to purchase 6,286,491 shares and
6,431,741 shares, respectively, of the Company's common stock were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share, since these options were anti-dilutive.
Anti-dilutive options are: (a) out-of-the-money options (options the exercise price of which is greater than the average price per share of the
Company's common stock during the period) and (b) in-the-money options (options the exercise price of which is less than the average price per share of the Company's
common stock during the period) for which the sum of assumed proceeds, including unrecognized compensation expense, exceeds the average price per share for the period.
F-17
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
8. Share-Based Payments
In January 2010, the Company adopted the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"), a stockholder-approved
share-based compensation plan which allows for the issuance of up to 29.8 million shares of the Company's common stock. During the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted to its
employees and consultants approximately 3.0 million, 2.9 million and 2.7 million stock options and approximately 199,000, 118,000 and 123,000 restricted share awards,
respectively, under either the 2010 Plan or a predecessor share-based compensation plan, the Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2007 Plan"). Additionally, during the
fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted 43,015, 66,038 and 93,500 restricted stock units ("RSUs"), respectively, to its non-employee directors under either the 2010 Plan or
the 2007 Plan. After the adoption of the 2010 Plan, the Company's equity awards have been made under the 2010 Plan and all future awards are currently expected to be made under such plan.
The
Company measures the cost of services received from employees, directors and consultants in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant,
and recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period or up to the date a participant becomes eligible for retirement, if earlier. For the fiscal years 2011,
2010 and 2009, total compensation cost charged against income and included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company's consolidated statements of earnings for all share-based
compensation arrangements was $15.6 million, $12.8 million and $8.6 million, respectively, and resulted in an increase in additional paid-in capital by the same
amounts. These amounts included, for the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, $5.0 million, $2.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of accelerated expense related to certain
retirement eligible employees who continue vesting awards upon retirement, under the provisions of the 2010 Plan and certain predecessor share-based plans such as the 2007 Plan. For fiscal years 2011,
2010 and 2009, the total income tax benefit recognized in our consolidated statements of earnings from these plans was $6.0 million, $5.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
Prior
to the Separation Transactions, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alberto-Culver and had no share-based compensation plans of our own; however, certain of our employees had been granted stock
options and restricted stock awards under share-based compensation plans of Alberto-Culver. Upon completion of the Separation Transactions, all outstanding Alberto-Culver stock options held by our
employees became options to purchase shares of our common stock.
Stock Options
Each option entitles the holder to acquire one share of the Company's common stock, has an exercise price that equals 100% of the market price per
share of the Company's common stock on the date of grant and generally has a maximum term of 10 years. Options generally vest ratably over a four year period and are generally subject to
forfeiture until the vesting period is complete, subject to certain retirement provisions contained in the 2010 Plan and certain predecessor share-based compensation plans such as the 2007 Plan.
F-18
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The
following table presents a summary of the activity for the Company's stock option plans for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Outstanding
Options (in
Thousands) |
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in
Years) |
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (in
Thousands) |
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
12,738 |
|
$ |
7.53 |
|
|
7.3 |
|
$ |
46,789 |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
11.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,731 |
) |
|
6.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
8.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
13,778 |
|
$ |
8.50 |
|
|
6.8 |
|
$ |
111,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
6,999 |
|
$ |
8.17 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
$ |
59,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table summarizes information about stock options under the Company's option plans at September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Number
Outstanding at
September 30,
2011 (in
Thousands) |
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in
Years) |
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
|
Number
Exercisable at
September 30,
2011 (in
Thousands) |
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
|
$2.00 - $5.24 |
|
|
2,623 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
$ |
4.70 |
|
|
1,381 |
|
$ |
4.22 |
|
$7.42 - $11.39 |
|
|
11,155 |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
9.40 |
|
|
5,618 |
|
|
9.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
13,778 |
|
|
6.8 |
|
$ |
8.50 |
|
|
6,999 |
|
$ |
8.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the Company's stock options for each stock option award. Using this option pricing model, the fair value of each stock option award is
estimated on the date of grant. The fair value of the Company's stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period (generally four years) of the stock options
or to the date a participant becomes eligible for retirement, if earlier.
The
weighted average assumptions relating to the valuation of the Company's stock options are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Expected lives (in years) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
5.0 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
59.0% |
|
|
64.4% |
|
|
47.9% |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.1% |
|
|
2.4% |
|
|
2.6% |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
0.0% |
|
The
expected life of options represents the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding and is based on historical experience of employees of the Company who have been
granted
F-19
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
stock
options, including grants under stock option plans of Alberto-Culver prior to the Separation Transactions. Expected volatility is derived using the average volatility of both the Company and
similar companies (based on industry sector) since it is not practicable to estimate the Company's expected volatility on a stand-alone basis due to a lack of sufficient trading history. The
risk-free interest rate is based on the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury issue as of the date of the grant. Since the Company does not currently expect to pay dividends, the dividend
yield is 0%.
The
weighted average fair value per option at the date of grant, of the stock options issued to the Company's grantees during the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $5.74, $4.15 and $2.33,
respectively. The total fair value of stock options issued to the Company's grantees that vested during the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $8.5 million, $7.6 million and
$6.2 million, respectively.
The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $15.9 million, $1.8 million and $1.0 million, and the tax benefit realized for the
tax deductions from these option exercises was $6.2 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The total cash received during the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 from
these option exercises was $10.9 million, $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
At
September 30, 2011, approximately $11.3 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock option awards are expected to be recognized over the weighted average
period of 2.6 years.
Stock Awards
Restricted Stock Awards
The Company from time to time grants restricted stock awards to employees and consultants under the 2010 Plan. A restricted stock award is an
award of shares of the Company's common stock (which have full voting and dividend rights but are restricted with regard to sale or transfer) the restrictions over which lapse ratably over a specified
period of time (generally five years). Restricted stock awards are independent of stock option grants and are generally subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to these restrictions
lapsing, subject to certain retirement provisions of the 2010 Plan and certain predecessor share-based compensation plans such as the 2007 Plan.
The
Company expenses the cost of the restricted stock awards, which is determined to equal the fair value of the restricted stock award at the date of grant, on a straight-line basis over
the period (the "vesting period") in which the restrictions on these stock awards lapse ("vesting") or to the date a participant becomes eligible for retirement, if earlier. For these purposes, the
fair value of the restricted stock award is determined based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant.
F-20
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The
following table presents a summary of the activity for the Company's restricted stock awards for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
Number of
Shares (in
Thousands) |
|
Weighted
Average Fair
Value Per Share |
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Vesting Term
(in Years) |
|
Unvested at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
362 |
|
$ |
7.38 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
199 |
|
|
11.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
445 |
|
$ |
9.12 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
September 30, 2011, approximately $2.3 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested restricted stock awards are expected to be recognized over the weighted average
period of 3.1 years.
Restricted Stock Units
The Company from time to time grants RSUs which generally vest within one year from the date of grant pursuant to the 2010 Plan. To date, the
Company has only granted RSU awards to its non-employee directors. RSUs represent an unsecured promise of the Company to issue shares of common stock of the Company. Upon vesting, such
RSUs are generally retained by the Company as deferred stock units that are not distributed until six months after the independent director's service as a director terminates. RSUs are independent of
stock option grants and are generally subject to forfeiture if service terminates prior to the vesting of the units. Participants have no voting rights with respect to unvested RSUs. Under the
2010 Plan, the Company may settle the vested deferred stock units with shares of the Company's common stock or in cash.
The
Company expenses the cost of services received in exchange of RSUs (which is determined to equal the fair value of the RSUs at the date of grant) on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period (generally one year). For these purposes, the fair value of the RSU is determined based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant.
The
following table presents a summary of the activity for the Company's RSUs for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
Number of
Shares (in
Thousands) |
|
Weighted
Average Fair
Value Per Share |
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Vesting Term
(In Years) |
|
Unvested at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
43 |
|
|
11.39 |
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
11.39 |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
During
fiscal year 2011, all RSUs vested. Therefore, there are no remaining unrecognized compensation costs to be expensed as of September 30, 2011.
9. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The change in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
2,756 |
|
$ |
2,266 |
|
$ |
2,702 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
1,859 |
|
Uncollected accounts written off, net of recoveries |
|
|
(2,423 |
) |
|
(1,431 |
) |
|
(2,648 |
) |
Allowance for doubtful accounts of acquired companies |
|
|
122 |
|
|
343 |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
2,086 |
|
$ |
2,756 |
|
$ |
2,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
11,187 |
|
$ |
11,124 |
|
Buildings and building improvements |
|
|
59,248 |
|
|
58,594 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
171,916 |
|
|
155,476 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
257,815 |
|
|
234,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, gross |
|
|
500,166 |
|
|
459,305 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(317,677 |
) |
|
(291,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
182,489 |
|
$ |
168,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
expense for the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $47.3 million, $42.4 million and $40.9 million, respectively. As further described in Note 14, borrowings
under the term loan facilities and the ABL credit facility are secured by substantially all of our assets, those of Sally Investment, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Sally Beauty and the direct parent of Sally Holdings, those of our domestic subsidiaries and, in the case of the ABL credit facility, those of our Canadian subsidiaries and
a pledge of certain intercompany notes.
Depreciation
of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the respective classes of assets and is reflected in depreciation
and amortization expense in our consolidated statements of earnings. Buildings and building improvements are depreciated over periods ranging from five to 40 years. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the term of the related lease, including renewals determined to be reasonably assured. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are
depreciated over periods ranging from three to ten years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred, while expenditures for major renewals and improvements are capitalized.
F-22
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill by operating segment for the fiscal years 2010 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty
Supply |
|
Beauty Systems
Group |
|
Total |
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
73,208 |
|
$ |
420,927 |
|
$ |
494,135 |
|
Acquisitions and purchase price adjustments |
|
|
8,092 |
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
10,660 |
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
(2,780 |
) |
|
(22,920 |
) |
|
(25,700 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(2,221 |
) |
|
1,366 |
|
|
(855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
76,299 |
|
|
401,941 |
|
|
478,240 |
|
Acquisitions and purchase price adjustments |
|
|
333 |
|
|
29,321 |
|
|
29,654 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(1,096 |
) |
|
(925 |
) |
|
(2,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
75,536 |
|
$ |
430,337 |
|
$ |
505,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
described in Note 19, during the fiscal year 2010, $5.2 million of the increase in Sally Beauty Supply's goodwill was attributable to the acquisition of Sinelco Group NV
("Sinelco") in December 2009. The remaining increase in Sally Beauty Supply's goodwill in the amount of $2.9 million and the $2.6 million increase in BSG's goodwill during the fiscal
year 2010 were attributable to other acquisitions which were not individually material and to net purchase price adjustments. During the fiscal year 2010, intangible assets subject to amortization in
the amount of $24.9 million were also recorded in connection with certain 2009 acquisitions, including the September 2009 acquisition of Schoeneman Beauty Supply, Inc. ("Schoeneman"),
and intangible assets with indefinite lives in the amount of $0.8 million were recorded in connection with such 2009 acquisitions. These amounts were previously reported in Goodwill pending
completion of the final valuations of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
As
described in Note 19, during the fiscal year 2011, $25.3 million of the increase in BSG's goodwill was attributable to the acquisition of Aerial Company, Inc. ("Aerial") on
October 1, 2010. The remaining increase in BSG's goodwill in the amount of $4.0 million and the increase in Sally Beauty Supply's goodwill in the amount of $0.3 million during the
fiscal year 2011 was attributable to acquisitions which were not individually material and/or to net purchase price adjustments.
F-23
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The
following table provides the carrying value for intangible assets with indefinite lives, excluding goodwill, and the gross carrying value and accumulated amortization for intangible assets subject
to amortization by operating segment at September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty
Supply |
|
Beauty Systems
Group |
|
Total |
|
Balance at September 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets with indefinite lives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names |
|
$ |
27,344 |
|
$ |
33,722 |
|
$ |
61,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
27,344 |
|
|
33,722 |
|
|
61,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
14,491 |
|
|
99,568 |
|
|
114,059 |
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(6,622 |
) |
|
(38,845 |
) |
|
(45,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net value |
|
|
7,869 |
|
|
60,723 |
|
|
68,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, excluding goodwill, net |
|
$ |
35,213 |
|
$ |
94,445 |
|
$ |
129,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets with indefinite lives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names |
|
$ |
28,046 |
|
$ |
33,752 |
|
$ |
61,798 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
28,046 |
|
|
39,452 |
|
|
67,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
14,399 |
|
|
60,486 |
|
|
74,885 |
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(4,301 |
) |
|
(28,730 |
) |
|
(33,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net value |
|
|
10,098 |
|
|
31,756 |
|
|
41,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, excluding goodwill, net |
|
$ |
38,144 |
|
$ |
71,208 |
|
$ |
109,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
expense totaled $12.4 million, $8.7 million and $6.2 million for the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, future
amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year:
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
$ |
11,325 |
|
2013 |
|
|
9,514 |
|
2014 |
|
|
9,226 |
|
2015 |
|
|
8,791 |
|
2016 |
|
|
7,638 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
22,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
weighted average amortization period for intangible assets subject to amortization is approximately 8 years.
F-24
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
12. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
78,796 |
|
$ |
74,446 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
27,274 |
|
|
26,518 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
16,987 |
|
|
13,099 |
|
Rental obligations |
|
|
12,403 |
|
|
11,531 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
4,764 |
|
|
4,511 |
|
Insurance reserves |
|
|
8,114 |
|
|
8,428 |
|
Interest rate swaps(a) |
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
|
Operating accruals and other |
|
|
30,721 |
|
|
28,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
185,509 |
|
$ |
167,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- Prior
to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, interest rate swaps had a maturity in excess of one year and, accordingly, were classified in
other assets or other liabilities, as appropriate, in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Commitments
The Company's principal leases relate to retail stores and warehousing properties. At September 30, 2011, future minimum payments under
non-cancelable operating leases, net of sublease income, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year:
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
$ |
141,422 |
|
2013 |
|
|
115,781 |
|
2014 |
|
|
87,196 |
|
2015 |
|
|
61,634 |
|
2016 |
|
|
39,470 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
50,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
495,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain
of the Company's leases require the Company to pay a portion of real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance and special assessments assessed by the lessor. Also, certain of the Company's leases
include renewal options and escalation clauses.
Total
rental expense for operating leases amounted to $192.6 million, $178.5 million and $166.3 million for the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of earnings. These amounts include $0.7 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million for contingent rents for
the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
F-25
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
There were no material legal proceedings pending against the Company or its subsidiaries, as of September 30, 2011. The Company is involved in
various claims and lawsuits incidental to the conduct of its business in the ordinary course. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse
impact on its consolidated financial position, statements of earnings or cash flows.
On
June 2, 2011, we disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K that the Company's BSG and Armstrong McCall subsidiaries, certain franchisees of Armstrong McCall, certain other
individual defendants and L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. (along with L'Oreal's subsidiary Maly's West) ("L'Oreal"), executed an agreement (the "Settlement
Agreement") settling the litigation initially brought by L'Oreal on February 21, 2008 against certain Armstrong McCall franchisees alleging breach of contract and other claims
related to the distribution agreement between Armstrong McCall and L'Oreal concerning Matrix branded products. Armstrong McCall and Michael Voticky were added as defendants by
L'Oreal on July 27, 2009.
Pursuant
to the Settlement Agreement, the Company and L'Oreal have agreed a) to terminate their existing agreement to distribute Matrix branded products through Armstrong McCall
and its franchisees; b) to enter into a new five-year agreement to distribute Matrix branded products through Armstrong McCall and its franchisees; and c) to an exchange of
financial and other consideration. In connection with the settlement, the litigation was dismissed with prejudice and the parties entered into a mutual release of all claims asserted in the
litigation.
Other Contingencies
The Company provides healthcare benefits to most of its full-time employees. The Company is largely self-funded for the cost
of the healthcare plan (including healthcare claims), other than certain fees and out-of-pocket amounts paid by the employees. In addition, the Company
retains a substantial portion of the risk related to certain workers' compensation, general liability, and automobile and property insurance. The Company records an estimated liability for the
ultimate cost of claims incurred and unpaid as of the balance sheet date. The estimated liability is included in accrued liabilities (current portion) and other liabilities (long-term
portion) in our consolidated balance sheets. The Company carries insurance coverage in such amounts in excess of its self-insured retention which management believes to be reasonable.
Liabilities
for loss contingencies, arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of the assessment can be reasonably estimated. The Company has no significant liabilities for loss contingencies at September 30, 2011 and 2010.
F-26
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
14. Short-term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt
Details of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2011 |
|
Maturity Dates |
|
Interest Rates |
ABL facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Nov. 2015 |
|
(i) Prime plus (1.25% to 1.75%) or; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) LIBOR(a) plus (2.25% to 2.75%) |
Term loan B |
|
|
696,856 |
|
|
Nov. 2013 |
|
(i) Prime plus (1.25% to 1.50%) or; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) LIBOR(a) plus (2.25% to 2.50%)(b) |
Other(c) |
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
2012-2015 |
|
4.05% to 7.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
701,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
$ |
430,000 |
|
|
Nov. 2014 |
|
9.25% |
Senior subordinated notes |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
Nov. 2016 |
|
10.50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
705,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized lease obligations |
|
$ |
6,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(3,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,410,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- London
Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR").
- (b)
- At
September 30, 2011, the contractual interest rate for the term loan B facility was 2.49%. The interest rate on $300.0 million of principal
outstanding under this loan is fixed by interest rate swaps which expire in May 2012.
- (c)
- Represents
pre-acquisition debt of Pro-Duo NV and Sinelco.
In
connection with the Separation Transactions in November 2006, the Company, through its subsidiaries (Sally Investment Holdings LLC and Sally Holdings) incurred $1,850.0 million of
indebtedness by: (i) drawing on a $400.0 million revolving, asset-based lending ("ABL") facility in the amount of $70.0 million; (ii) entering into two
senior term loan facilities (term loans A and B) in an aggregate amount of $1,070.0 million; and (iii) together (jointly and severally) with another of the Company's indirect
subsidiaries, Sally Capital Inc., issuing senior notes in an aggregate amount of $430.0 million and senior subordinated notes in an aggregate amount of $280.0 million. The Company
incurred approximately $58.5 million in costs related to the issuance of the debt, which were capitalized and are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debt
obligations. Borrowings under the term loan A facility were paid in full in the fiscal year 2010.
In
November 2010, the Company entered into a new $400 million, five-year revolving credit facility (the "new ABL credit facility" or the "ABL credit facility") and replaced its
prior ABL credit facility (the "prior ABL credit facility"). The ABL credit facility provides for senior secured revolving loans up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million,
subject to borrowing base limitations. The availability of funds under the ABL credit facility is subject to a borrowing base calculation, which is based on specified percentages of the value of
eligible inventory and eligible accounts receivables, subject to certain reserves and other adjustments and reduced by certain outstanding letters of credit. At September 30, 2011, the Company
had $366.5 million available for borrowing under the ABL credit facility. The terms of the new ABL credit facility contain a commitment fee of 0.50% on the unused portion of the facility. In
connection
F-27
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
with
the Company's termination of the prior ABL credit facility, the Company expensed approximately $1.6 million in unamortized deferred financing costs, which is included in interest expense
in the Company's consolidated statements of earnings.
Principal
and interest on the senior term loan B facility is payable quarterly. The senior term loan facilities contain a covenant requiring Sally Holdings and its subsidiaries to meet certain maximum
consolidated secured leverage ratio levels, which decline over time. The consolidated secured leverage ratio is a ratio of (A) net consolidated secured debt to (B) consolidated EBITDA as
defined in the agreement underlying the senior term loan facilities. Compliance with the consolidated secured leverage ratio is tested quarterly, with a maximum ratio of 3.50 as of
September 30, 2011. Failure to comply with the consolidated secured leverage ratio covenant under the senior term loan facilities would result in a default under such facilities.
Borrowing
under the senior term loan facilities and the ABL credit facility are secured by substantially all of our assets, those of Sally Investment Holdings LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Sally Beauty and the direct parent of Sally Holdings, those of our domestic subsidiaries and, in the case of the ABL credit facility, those of our Canadian subsidiaries and a pledge of certain
intercompany notes. Borrowings under the senior term loan facilities may be prepaid at the option of Sally Holdings at any time without premium or penalty and are subject to mandatory repayment in an
amount equal to 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the agreement governing the senior term loan facilities) for any fiscal year unless a specified leverage ratio is met. Amounts prepaid pursuant
to said provision may be applied, at the option of Sally Holdings, against minimum loan repayments otherwise required of it over the twelve-month period following any such payment under the terms of
the loan agreements. Additionally, borrowings under the senior term loan facilities would be subject to mandatory repayment in an amount equal to 100% of the proceeds of specified asset sales that are
not reinvested in the business or applied to repay borrowings under the ABL credit facility. No mandatory repayments of any kind were made or required to be made in the fiscal year 2011. We believe
that the Company is currently in compliance with the agreements and instruments governing our debt, including our financial covenants.
During
the fiscal year 2011, the Company made optional prepayments in the aggregate amount of $147.0 million on its senior term loan B facility. In connection with such optional prepayments,
the Company recorded losses on extinguishment of debt in the aggregate amount of $1.2 million, which are included in interest expense in the Company's consolidated statements of earnings.
The
Company uses interest rate swaps, as part of its overall economic risk management strategy, to add stability to the interest payments due in connection with its senior term loan obligations. In
the fiscal year 2008, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $300.0 million. These agreements expire in May 2012 and enable the Company to
convert a portion of its variable-interest rate obligations to fixed-interest rate obligations in connection with the term loan facilities, with interest ranging from 5.818% to 6.090%. Interest
payments related to our term loans are impacted by changes in LIBOR. Please see Note 16 for additional information about the Company's interest rate swap agreements.
The
senior notes and senior subordinated notes are unsecured obligations of the issuers and are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior basis (in the case of the senior notes) and on a senior
subordinated basis (in the case of the senior subordinated notes) by each material domestic subsidiary of the Company. Interest on the senior notes and senior subordinated notes is payable
semi-annually. The senior notes carry optional redemption features whereby the Company has the option to redeem the notes prior to maturity on or after November 15, 2010 at par plus
a premium declining ratably to par, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The senior subordinated notes carry optional redemption features whereby the Company has the
F-28
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
option
to redeem the notes before November 15, 2011 at par plus a premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest; and on or after November 15, 2011 at par plus a premium declining ratably to
par, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Furthermore, the agreements underlying the Company's credit facilities
contain terms which significantly restrict the ability of Sally Beauty's subsidiaries to pay dividends or otherwise transfer assets to Sally Beauty.
Maturities
of the Company's long-term debt are as follows at September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year:
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
$ |
2,240 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
8,652 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
690,638 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
430,100 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,406,630 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
6,485 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(3,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,410,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
We
are a holding company and do not have any material assets or operations other than ownership of equity interests of our subsidiaries. The agreements and instruments governing the
debt of Sally Holdings and its subsidiaries contain material limitations on our subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends and other restricted payments to us which, in turn, constitute material
limitations on our ability to pay dividends and other payments to our stockholders.
Under
the agreements and indentures governing the term loan facilities and the notes, Sally Holdings may not make certain restricted payments to us if a default then exists under the credit agreement
or the indentures or if its consolidated interest coverage ratio is less than 2.0 to 1.0 at the time of the making of such restricted payment. As of September 30, 2011, its consolidated
interest coverage ratio exceeded 2.0 to 1.0. Further, the aggregate amount of restricted payments Sally Holdings is able to make is limited pursuant to various baskets as calculated pursuant to the
credit agreement and indentures. Under the terms of our new ABL credit facility, Sally Holdings may pay dividends and make other equity distributions to us if availability under the ABL credit
facility exceeds certain thresholds. For dividends and distributions up to $30.0 million during each fiscal year, borrowing availability must exceed the lesser of $80.0 million or 20% of
the borrowing base for the 45-day period immediately prior to such dividend and distribution. For dividends in excess of that amount, Sally Holdings must maintain that same availability
and its fixed-charge coverage ratio must exceed 1.10 to 1.00. The fixed-charge coverage ratio is defined as the ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the agreement underlying the ABL credit facility) less
unfinanced capital expenditures to fixed charges (as included in the definition of the fixed-charge coverage ratio in the agreement governing the ABL credit facility). As of September 30, 2011,
Sally Holdings met all of these conditions. In addition, as of September 30, 2011, the net assets of our consolidated subsidiaries that were unrestricted from transfer under our credit
arrangements totaled $483.2 million, subject to certain adjustments. The ABL credit facility and the senior term loan facilities, as well as the Company's 9.25% Senior Notes indenture and its
10.5% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture contain customary cross-default and/or cross-acceleration provisions.
F-29
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had no off-balance sheet financing arrangements other than operating leases incurred in the ordinary course of
business as disclosed in Note 13, and outstanding letters of credit related to inventory purchases and self-insurance programs which totaled $16.0 million and
$14.5 million at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
15. Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. Stand-Alone Financial Information
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. is a holding company and has no material assets or operations other than its ownership interests in its
subsidiaries. The Company's operations are conducted almost entirely through its subsidiaries. As such, Sally Beauty depends on its subsidiaries for cash to meet its obligations or to pay dividends.
F-30
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Sally
Investment Holdings LLC, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sally Beauty and the direct parent of Sally Holdings, does not have any assets or operations of any kind. Summary financial
data for Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. on a stand-alone basis as of and for each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
$ |
1,274 |
|
$ |
1,071 |
|
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due from subsidiaries and other |
|
|
60,483 |
|
|
41,479 |
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
(281,690 |
) |
|
(497,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
(218,254 |
) |
$ |
(455,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
$ |
346 |
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
5,368 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
382 |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
728 |
|
|
5,934 |
|
Stockholders' deficit: |
|
|
(218,982 |
) |
|
(461,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit |
|
$ |
(218,254 |
) |
$ |
(455,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(7,813 |
) |
$ |
(7,662 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(7,813 |
) |
|
(7,691 |
) |
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(2,945 |
) |
|
(2,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,868 |
) |
$ |
(4,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by operating activities |
|
$ |
(10,942 |
) |
$ |
(808 |
) |
Net cash used by investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
10,942 |
|
|
878 |
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
10,942 |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
16. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Risk Management Objectives of Using Derivative Instruments
The Company is exposed to a wide variety of risks, including risks arising from changing economic conditions, including changing interest rates, and
foreign currency risks. The Company manages its exposure to certain economic risks (including liquidity, credit risk, and changes in interest rates and in foreign currency exchange rates) primarily:
(a) by closely managing its cash flows from operating and investing activities and the amounts and sources of its debt obligations; (b) by assessing periodically the creditworthiness of
its business partners; and (c) through the use of derivative instruments (including interest rate swaps, and foreign currency options, collars and forwards) by Sally Holdings.
The
Company uses interest rate swaps, as part of its overall economic risk management strategy, to add stability to the interest payments due in connection with its senior term loan obligations.
Interest payments related to our senior term loans are impacted by changes in LIBOR. The Company's interest rate swap agreements involve the periodic receipt by Sally Holdings of amounts based on a
variable rate in exchange for Sally Holdings making payments based on a fixed rate over the term of the interest rate swap agreements, without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The
Company uses foreign currency options, collars and forwards, as part of its overall economic risk management strategy, to fix the amount of certain foreign assets and obligations relative to its
functional and reporting currency (the U.S. dollar) or to add stability to cash flows resulting from its net investments (including intercompany notes not permanently invested) and earnings
denominated in foreign currencies. Such cash flows may be materially affected (favorably or unfavorably) by changes in the exchange rates for the U.S. dollar versus the Euro, the British pound
sterling, the Canadian dollar, the Chilean peso, and the Mexican peso. The Company's foreign currency exposures at times offset each other, providing a natural hedge against its foreign currency risk.
In connection the remaining foreign currency risk, the Company uses foreign currency options, collars and forwards to effectively fix the foreign currency exchange rate applicable to specific
anticipated foreign currency-denominated cash flows, thus limiting the potential fluctuations in such cash flows resulting from foreign currency market movements.
At
September 30, 2011, the Company did not purchase or hold any derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Designated Cash Flow Hedges
In the fiscal year 2008, Sally Holdings entered into certain interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $300 million.
These agreements expire in May
2012 and are designated and qualify as effective cash flow hedges, in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging ("ASC 815"). Accordingly,
changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments (which are adjusted quarterly) are recorded, net of income tax, in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income ("OCI") until the hedged
obligation is settled or the swap agreements expire, whichever is earlier. Any hedge ineffectiveness, as this term is used in ASC 815, is recognized in interest expense in our consolidated statements
of earnings. No hedge ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges was recognized during each of the last three fiscal years.
Amounts
reported in OCI related to interest rate swaps are reclassified into interest expense, as a yield adjustment, in the same period in which interest on the Company's variable-rate
debt obligations affect earnings. During the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, interest expense resulting from such reclassifications was $10.2 million, $10.1 million and
$7.9 million, respectively. During the twelve-month period ending
F-32
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
September 30,
2012, the entire amount reported in OCI ($6.5 million, before income tax) will be reclassified into interest expense.
Non-designated Cash Flow Hedges
The Company may use from time to time derivative instruments (such as interest rate swaps, and foreign currency options, collars and forwards) not
designated as hedges or that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting, to manage its exposure to interest rate or foreign currency exchange rate movements.
In
November 2006, Sally Holdings entered into certain interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $500 million. These interest rate swap agreements expired on or before
November 2009 and were not designated as hedges and, accordingly, the changes in fair value of these interest rate swap agreements (which were adjusted quarterly) were recorded in interest expense in
our consolidated statements of earnings. In the fiscal year 2009, interest expense, including marked-to-market adjustments, resulting from these interest rate swap agreements
was $7.5 million. In the fiscal year 2010, interest expense, including marked-to-market adjustments, resulting from these interest rate swap agreements was less than
$0.1 million.
The
Company uses foreign currency options and collars, including, at September 30, 2011, collars with an aggregate notional amount of $12.5 million to manage the exposure to the U.S.
dollar resulting from our Sinelco Group subsidiaries' purchases of merchandise from third-party suppliers. Sinelco's functional currency is the Euro. The foreign currency collar agreements held by the
Company at
September 30, 2011 have contractual Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rates between 1.4000 and 1.4612 and expire in varying amounts monthly through September 2012.
In
addition, the Company uses foreign currency forwards to mitigate its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates in connection with certain intercompany balances not permanently
invested. At September 30, 2011, we held a foreign currency forward which enabled us to sell approximately €19.9 million ($26.7 million, at the
September 30, 2011 exchange rate) at the contractual exchange rate of 1.3610, a foreign currency forward which enabled us to buy approximately $18.3 million Canadian dollars
($17.5 million, at the September 30, 2011 exchange rate) at the contractual exchange rate of 1.01855 and a foreign currency forward which enabled us to buy approximately
£5.6 million ($8.7 million, at the September 30, 2011 exchange rate) at the contractual exchange rate of 1.5630. All the foreign currency forwards held by the Company
at September 30, 2011 expired in October 2011.
The
Company's foreign currency option, collar and forward agreements are not designated as hedges and do not currently meet the requirements for hedge accounting. Accordingly, the changes in the fair
value (i.e., marked-to-market adjustments) of these derivative instruments (which are adjusted quarterly) are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in
our consolidated statements of earnings. During each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, selling general and administrative expenses included $0.2 million in net
gains, including marked-to-market adjustments, from all of the Company's foreign currency option, collar and forward agreements.
F-33
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The
tables below present the fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in
thousands):
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
As of September 30, 2011 |
|
Liability Derivatives
As of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance Sheet
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
6,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Collars and Forwards |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
Liability Derivatives
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance Sheet
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
15,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Options and Forwards |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
119 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The
table below presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of earnings for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Earnings
for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2011 |
|
Derivatives in
Cash Flow
Hedging
Relationships
|
|
Amount of
Gain or
(Loss)
Recognized
in OCI on
Derivative
(Effective
Portion),
net of tax |
|
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion) |
|
Amount of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion) |
|
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing) |
|
Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing) |
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
5,557 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(10,174 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated
as Hedging Instruments
|
|
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivative |
|
Amount of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Options, Collars and Forwards |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The table below presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of earnings for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Earnings
for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
Derivatives in
Cash Flow
Hedging
Relationships
|
|
Amount of
Gain or
(Loss)
Recognized
in OCI on
Derivative
(Effective
Portion),
net of tax |
|
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion) |
|
Amount of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion) |
|
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing) |
|
Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing) |
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(10,067 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated
as Hedging Instruments
|
|
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivative |
|
Amount of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Options and Forwards |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The table below presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of earnings for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Earnings
for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
Derivatives in
Cash Flow
Hedging
Relationships
|
|
Amount of
Gain or
(Loss)
Recognized
in OCI on
Derivative
(Effective
Portion),
net of tax |
|
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion) |
|
Amount of
Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
(Effective
Portion) |
|
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing) |
|
Amount of Gain
or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing) |
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
(10,196 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(7,935 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated
as Hedging Instruments
|
|
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivative |
|
Amount of
Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(7,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The agreements governing the Company's interest rate swaps contain provisions pursuant to which the Company could be declared in default on its
interest rate swap obligations in the event the Company defaulted under certain terms of the loan documents governing the Company's ABL credit facility. As of September 30, 2011, the fair value
of our interest rate swaps in a liability position related to these agreements was $6.5 million and the Company was under no obligation to post and had not posted any collateral related to
these agreements. If the Company breached any of these provisions, it would be required to settle its obligations under the swap agreements at their termination value of $6.5 million, as of
September 30, 2011, including accrued interest and other termination costs.
At
September 30, 2011, the aggregate fair value of all foreign currency option, collar and forward agreements held was a net asset of $0.6 million, consisting of derivative instruments
in an asset position of $1.1 million and derivative instruments in a liability position of $0.5 million. The Company was under no obligation to post and had not posted any collateral
related to the agreements in a liability position.
The
counterparties to all our derivative instruments are deemed by the Company to be of substantial resources and strong creditworthiness. However, these transactions result in exposure to credit risk
in the event of default by a counterparty. The financial crisis affecting the world financial markets in recent years has resulted in many well-known financial institutions becoming less
creditworthy or having diminished liquidity, which could expose us to an increased level of counterparty risk. In the event that a counterparty defaults in its obligation under our interest rate swaps
and/or foreign currency derivative instruments, we could incur substantial financial losses. However, at the present time, no such losses are deemed probable.
F-37
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
17. 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan
The Company sponsors the Sally Beauty 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (the "401k Plan"), which is a qualified defined contribution plan. The 401k Plan
covers employees of the Company who meet certain eligibility requirements and who are not members of a collective bargaining unit. Under the terms of the 401k Plan, employees may contribute a
percentage of their annual compensation to the 401k Plan up to certain maximums, as defined by the 401k Plan and by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. The Company currently matches a portion of employee
contributions to the plan. The Company recognized expense of $5.9 million, $4.7 million and $4.0 million in the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to such
employer matching contributions under the plan. These amounts are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
In
addition, pursuant to the 401k Plan, the Company may make profit sharing contributions to the accounts of employees who meet certain eligibility requirements and who are not members of a collective
bargaining unit. The Company's profit sharing contributions to the 401k Plan are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. The Company recognized expense of
$3.1 million, $2.7 million and $2.4 million in the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to such profit sharing contributions under the 401k Plan. These amounts
are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
18. Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and most state jurisdictions as well as in
various foreign jurisdictions.
The
provision for income taxes for the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
97,172 |
|
$ |
69,112 |
|
$ |
48,335 |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
11,081 |
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
4,276 |
|
|
State |
|
|
13,629 |
|
|
11,197 |
|
|
5,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current portion |
|
|
121,882 |
|
|
84,741 |
|
|
58,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
8,204 |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
(2,525 |
) |
|
(2,814 |
) |
|
(1,676 |
) |
|
State |
|
|
242 |
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred portion |
|
|
332 |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income tax |
|
$ |
122,214 |
|
$ |
84,120 |
|
$ |
65,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The
difference between the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate and the effective income tax rate is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Statutory tax rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
35.0 |
% |
|
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
Effect of foreign operations |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
0.8 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
0.2 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
36.9 |
% |
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Deferred tax assets attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
19,683 |
|
$ |
16,471 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
28,711 |
|
|
22,829 |
|
|
Inventory adjustments |
|
|
3,432 |
|
|
3,303 |
|
|
Foreign loss carryforwards |
|
|
18,315 |
|
|
16,675 |
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
651 |
|
|
577 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
2,503 |
|
|
6,026 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
2,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
75,968 |
|
|
68,460 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(17,100 |
) |
|
(16,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
58,868 |
|
|
51,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
81,644 |
|
|
70,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
81,644 |
|
|
70,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
22,776 |
|
$ |
18,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management
believes that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets, net of the valuation allowance.
The Company has recorded a valuation allowance to account for uncertainties regarding recoverability of certain deferred tax assets, primarily foreign loss carryforwards.
Domestic
earnings before provision for income taxes were $300.1 million, $215.9 million and $165.1 million in the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Foreign
operations had earnings (losses) before provision for income taxes of $35.8 million, $12.0 million and $(0.3) million in the fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Tax
reserves are evaluated and adjusted as appropriate, while taking into account the progress of audits by various taxing jurisdictions and other changes in relevant facts and circumstances evident
at each balance
F-39
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
sheet
date. Management does not expect the outcome of tax audits to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
At
September 30, 2011, undistributed earnings of the Company's foreign operations are intended to remain permanently invested to finance anticipated future growth and expansion. Accordingly,
federal and state income taxes have not been provided on accumulated but undistributed earnings of $110.6 million and $76.5 million as of September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, as such earnings have been permanently reinvested in the business. The determination of the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to the undistributed earnings is not
practicable.
At
September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had total operating loss carry-forwards of $62.5 million and $53.3 million, respectively, of which $50.1 million and
$46.1 million, respectively, are subject to a valuation allowance. At September 30, 2011, operating loss carry-forwards of $23.6 million expire between 2013 and 2026 and operating
loss carry-forwards of $38.9 million have no expiration date. At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had tax credit carryforwards of $1.1 million and $0.8 million,
respectively, which have no expiration date and of which $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, are subject to a valuation allowance.
The
transactions separating us from Alberto-Culver were intended to qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") and a
distribution eligible for non-recognition under Sections 355(a) and 361(c) of the Code. In connection with the share distribution of Alberto-Culver common stock in the Separation
Transactions, we received: (i) a private letter ruling from the IRS; and (ii) an opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, counsel to Alberto-Culver, in each case, to the effect that the
transactions qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code and a distribution eligible for non-recognition under Sections 355(a) and 361(c) of the Code.
Certain
internal restructurings also occurred at or immediately prior to the Separation Transactions. As a result of the internal restructurings and Separation Transactions, the Company inherited the
federal tax identification number of the old Alberto-Culver parent for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, as the successor entity to Alberto-Culver after the Separation Transactions, the
Company relies upon the prior year federal income tax returns of Alberto-Culver, and accounting methods established therein, for certain calculations that affect our current U.S. federal income tax
liability.
The
Company and Alberto-Culver entered into a tax allocation agreement as part of the Separation Transactions. The agreement provides generally that the Company is responsible for its
pre-separation income tax liabilities, calculated on a stand-alone basis, and Alberto-Culver is responsible for the remainder. In the event additional U.S federal income tax liability
related to the period prior to the Separation Transactions was determined, the Company will be jointly and severally liable for these taxes, and there can be no assurance that Alberto-Culver would be
able to fulfill its indemnification obligations to the Company under the tax allocation agreement if Alberto-Culver was determined to be responsible for these taxes thereunder.
F-40
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The
changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Balance at beginning of the fiscal year |
|
$ |
13,647 |
|
$ |
14,378 |
|
Increases related to prior year tax positions |
|
|
166 |
|
|
1,895 |
|
Decreases related to prior year tax positions |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
Increases related to current year tax positions |
|
|
208 |
|
|
620 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
(1,131 |
) |
Lapse of statute |
|
|
(3,099 |
) |
|
(2,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of fiscal year |
|
$ |
10,836 |
|
$ |
13,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If
recognized, these positions would affect the Company's effective tax rate.
The
Company classifies and recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The total amount of accrued interest and penalties as of
September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $4.2 million and $4.6 million, respectively.
Because
existing tax positions will continue to generate increased liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months, and the fact that we are routinely under audit by various
taxing authorities, it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change during the next 12 months. An estimate of the amount or range of such change cannot be
made at this time. However, we do not expect the change, if any, to have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations within the next 12 months.
The
IRS is currently conducting an examination of the Company's consolidated federal income tax returns for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 in the ordinary course. The IRS
had previously audited the Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through the tax year ended September 30, 2006, thus our statute remains open from the year ended
September 30, 2007 forward. Our foreign subsidiaries are impacted by various statutes of limitations, which are generally open from 2004 forward. Generally, states' statutes in the United
States are open for tax reviews from 2005 forward.
19. Acquisitions
On October 1, 2010, the Company acquired Aerial, an 82-store professional-only distributor of beauty products
operating in 11 states in the midwestern United States, for approximately $81.8 million. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including intangible assets subject to amortization of
$34.7 million, were recorded at their respective fair values at the acquisition date. In addition, goodwill of $25.3 million (which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes) was
recorded as a result of this acquisition. The acquisition of Aerial was funded with borrowings in the amount of $78.0 million under the prior ABL credit facility (which have since been paid in
full) and with cash from operations. In addition, during the fiscal year 2011, the Company completed several other individually immaterial acquisitions at an aggregate cost of approximately
$5.0 million and recorded additional goodwill in the amount of $4.3 million (the majority of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes) in connection with such acquisitions.
Generally, we funded these acquisitions with cash from operations. The valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with these acquisitions was based on their fair values at
the acquisition date.
F-41
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
In
December 2009, the Company acquired Sinelco, a wholesale distributor of professional beauty products based in Ronse, Belgium, for approximately €25.2 million (approximately
$36.6 million). We also assumed €4.0 million (approximately $5.8 million) of pre-acquisition debt, excluding capital lease obligations, of Sinelco in
connection with the acquisition. Sinelco serves over 1,500 customers through a product catalog and website and has
sales throughout Europe. Goodwill of $5.2 million (which is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes) and other intangible assets of $14.0 million, including intangible assets
subject to amortization of $5.8 million, were recorded as a result of this acquisition. In addition, during the fiscal year 2010, the Company completed several other individually immaterial
acquisitions at an aggregate cost of $9.0 million and recorded additional goodwill in the amount of $5.4 million (the majority of which is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes)
in connection with such acquisitions. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with all acquisitions completed during the fiscal year 2010 were recorded at fair values at the
acquisition date in accordance with ASC 805. We funded these acquisitions with cash from operations and borrowings on our ABL credit facility. In addition, during the fiscal year 2010, the Company
recorded intangible assets subject to amortization in the amount of $24.9 million and intangible assets with indefinite lives in the amount of $0.8 million in connection with certain
2009 acquisitions, including the acquisition of Schoeneman. These amounts were previously reported in Goodwill pending completion of the final valuations of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, as discussed in the following paragraph.
In
September 2009, the Company acquired Schoeneman, a 43-store beauty supply chain located in the central northeast United States, at a cost of approximately $71.0 million, subject
to certain adjustments. The Company currently expects to realize approximately $10 million in present value of future tax savings as a result of anticipated incremental depreciation and
amortization tax deductions relating to the assets acquired in this transaction. In the fiscal year 2009, goodwill of approximately $61.0 million (which is expected to be deductible for tax
purposes) was initially recorded as a result of this acquisition. In addition, during the fiscal year 2009, the Company completed several other individually immaterial acquisitions at an aggregate
cost of $11.3 million of which a significant portion was allocated to goodwill (the majority of which is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes). The purchase prices of certain
acquisitions completed during the fiscal year 2009 (including the acquisition of Schoeneman) were initially allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their preliminary estimated
fair values at the date of acquisition. The final valuations of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were completed during the fiscal year 2010. Generally, we funded these acquisitions with
cash from operations.
These
business combinations have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of operations of the entities acquired have been included in the Company's
consolidated financial statements since their respective dates of acquisition.
20. Business Segments and Geographic Area Information
The Company's business is organized into two separate segments: (i) Sally Beauty Supply, a domestic and international chain of cash and carry
retail stores which offers professional beauty supplies to both salon professionals and retail customers in North America and parts of South America and Europe and (ii) BSG (including its
franchise-based business, Armstrong McCall), a full service beauty supply distributor which offers professional brands of beauty products directly to salons through its own sales force and
professional only stores (including franchise stores) in generally exclusive geographic territories in North America and parts of Europe.
F-42
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
The
accounting policies of both of our business segments are the same as described in the summary of significant accounting policies contained in Note 2. Sales between segments, which were
eliminated in consolidation, were not material for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Business Segments Information
Segment data for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
2,012,407 |
|
$ |
1,834,631 |
|
$ |
1,695,652 |
|
|
BSG |
|
|
1,256,724 |
|
|
1,081,459 |
|
|
940,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,269,131 |
|
$ |
2,916,090 |
|
$ |
2,636,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
380,963 |
|
$ |
320,456 |
|
$ |
283,872 |
|
|
|
BSG(a) |
|
|
164,660 |
|
|
112,495 |
|
|
91,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit |
|
|
545,623 |
|
|
432,951 |
|
|
375,476 |
|
|
Unallocated expenses(a)(b) |
|
|
(81,594 |
) |
|
(79,203 |
) |
|
(70,022 |
) |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
(15,560 |
) |
|
(12,818 |
) |
|
(8,618 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(112,530 |
) |
|
(112,982 |
) |
|
(132,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
335,939 |
|
$ |
227,948 |
|
$ |
164,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
766,896 |
|
$ |
729,380 |
|
$ |
652,184 |
|
|
BSG |
|
|
908,093 |
|
|
808,842 |
|
|
792,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
1,674,989 |
|
|
1,538,222 |
|
|
1,445,063 |
|
|
Shared services |
|
|
53,611 |
|
|
51,190 |
|
|
45,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,728,600 |
|
$ |
1,589,412 |
|
$ |
1,490,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
28,763 |
|
$ |
26,426 |
|
$ |
24,175 |
|
|
BSG |
|
|
25,099 |
|
|
20,081 |
|
|
18,735 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
4,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59,722 |
|
$ |
51,123 |
|
$ |
47,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sally Beauty Supply |
|
$ |
34,946 |
|
$ |
30,366 |
|
$ |
23,203 |
|
|
BSG |
|
|
14,145 |
|
|
11,252 |
|
|
8,470 |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
10,864 |
|
|
7,084 |
|
|
5,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59,955 |
|
$ |
48,702 |
|
$ |
37,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, consolidated operating earnings reflect a net favorable impact of $21.3 million; including a
$27.0 million credit from a litigation settlement and certain non-recurring charges of $5.7 million. This net benefit of $21.3 million is reflected in the BSG segment
and in unallocated expenses in the amount of $19.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively.
- (b)
- Unallocated
expenses consist of corporate and shared costs.
F-43
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Geographic Area Information
Geographic data for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net sales:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
2,688,062 |
|
$ |
2,402,085 |
|
$ |
2,202,218 |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
581,069 |
|
|
514,005 |
|
|
434,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,269,131 |
|
$ |
2,916,090 |
|
$ |
2,636,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
1,240,894 |
|
$ |
1,133,652 |
|
$ |
1,105,026 |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
434,095 |
|
|
404,570 |
|
|
340,037 |
|
|
Shared services |
|
|
53,611 |
|
|
51,190 |
|
|
45,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,728,600 |
|
$ |
1,589,412 |
|
$ |
1,490,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (a)
- Net
sales are attributable to individual countries based on the location of the customer.
21. Subsequent Events
On November 1, 2011, the Company acquired Kappersservice Floral B.V. and two related companies (the "Floral Group") for approximately
€22.5 million (approximately $30.8 million), subject to certain adjustments. The Floral Group is a 19-store distributor of professional beauty products based
in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. The acquisition will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of operations of the Floral Group will be included in the
Company's consolidated financial statements subsequent to the acquisition date. The acquisition was funded with cash from operations and with borrowings on our ABL credit facility in the amount of
approximately $17.0 million.
On
November 3, 2011, Sally Holdings LLC ("Sally Holdings") and Sally Capital, Inc. (together with Sally Holdings, the "Issuers"), both wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company,
the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries entered into a purchase agreement pursuant to which the Issuers sold in a private placement $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of the
Issuers' 6.875% Senior Notes due 2019 (the "Senior Notes"). The Senior Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 6.875%, were issued at 98.5% of par, and are guaranteed by certain of the Company's
domestic subsidiaries who have guaranteed obligations under Sally Holdings LLC's senior credit facilities, existing notes and other indebtedness outstanding prior to this issuance.
The
Company intends to use the net proceeds from the Senior Notes (approximately $737.0 million) to redeem $430.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Issuers' outstanding 9.25%
senior notes due 2014 (the "2014 Notes"), to redeem $275.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Issuers' outstanding 10.50% senior subordinated notes due 2016 (the "2016 Notes"), pursuant
to the terms of the indentures governing the 2014 Notes and the 2016 Notes, as well as to pay accrued and unpaid interest thereof, and fees and expenses incurred in connection with issuance of the
Senior Notes and redemption of the 2014 Notes and the 2016 Notes. The Company expects to complete the redemptions on or about December 5, 2011, subject to certain conditions.
F-44
Table of Contents
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fiscal
Years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
22. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Certain unaudited quarterly consolidated statement of earnings information for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is
summarized below (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
1st
Quarter |
|
2nd
Quarter |
|
3rd
Quarter |
|
4th
Quarter |
|
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
793,564 |
|
$ |
801,805 |
|
$ |
836,576 |
|
$ |
837,186 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
379,391 |
|
$ |
391,814 |
|
$ |
410,532 |
|
$ |
412,868 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
40,949 |
|
$ |
49,278 |
|
$ |
69,143 |
|
$ |
54,355 |
|
|
Earnings per common share(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
704,851 |
|
$ |
720,467 |
|
$ |
742,975 |
|
$ |
747,797 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
333,214 |
|
$ |
344,284 |
|
$ |
360,859 |
|
$ |
366,017 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
26,126 |
|
$ |
34,560 |
|
$ |
41,116 |
|
$ |
42,026 |
|
|
Earnings per common share(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
- (a)
- The
sum of the quarterly earnings per share may not equal the full year amount, as the computations of the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for each quarter and for the full year are performed independently.
F-45