Sanara MedTech Inc. - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☑
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
------------------------------------------------------
Commission
File Number 0-11808
WOUND
MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas
|
|
59-2219994
|
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
16633 Dallas
Parkway, Suite 250, Addison, Texas
75001
|
(Address of
principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Common
Stock $ .001 par value
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☑
No
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes
☑ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. ☑ Yes ☐
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). ☑ Yes ☐
No
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[ ] Yes
☑ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated
filer,” “large accelerated filer” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer
☐
|
|
Accelerated
filer
☐
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
☐
|
|
Smaller
reporting company
☑
|
Indicate
by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No
☑
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2016 based
on the $0.07 closing price as of such date was approximately
$6,062,571.
As of
March 31, 2017, 110,544,476 shares of the Issuer’s
$.001 par value common stock were issued and 110,540,387 were
outstanding.
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Letter from the President
|
(i)
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
BUSINESS
|
1
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1A
|
RISK FACTORS
|
3
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1B
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
14
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2
|
PROPERTIES
|
14
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
14
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
15
|
|
|
|
ITEM 5
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
16
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
17
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
18
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7A
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
20
|
|
|
|
ITEM 8
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
21
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
22
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9A
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
22
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9B
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
22
|
|
|
|
ITEM 10
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
23
|
|
|
|
ITEM 11
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
27
|
|
|
|
ITEM 12
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
29
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
30
|
|
|
|
ITEM 14
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
31
|
|
|
|
ITEM 15
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
33
|
LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT
Dear
Shareholders:
As we
look ahead, we’d like to reflect on our accomplishments of
this past year and to comment about the future. 2016 was the first
year in our new 3 Year Plan and with initiatives for creating
company focus, cash flow stability and strategic growth. I am
pleased to report that we accomplished our 2016 goals; grew annual
revenues by 63%; reduced Notes Payable by $200,000; and increased
working capital by $900,000.
In
concert with our Board of Directors, we have aligned our management
and staff responsibilities with our updated Mission Statement:
“Wound Management develops, markets and sells innovative
medical devices with a focus on high value and enhanced patient
outcomes in surgical settings through a growing commercial
organization and strategic alliances.” Similarly, our Vision
Statement was updated: “To drive shareholder value by
building a strong organization and strategic alliances to develop,
market and sell biotechnology medical devices with a focus on
innovation, high value and enhanced patient
outcomes.”
In
2017, we will continue to enhance our core staff and product
offerings to strengthen our foundation to prepare for 2018 topline
sales growth. This includes creating strategic sales alliances as
well as adding products that complement our sales force’s
call points. We project 2017 revenues to grow 45%, or to
approximately $8 million during this foundation-building year in
which we are on pace to retire all amortized short-term debt by the
end of Q2 2017. To accomplish our growth we will continue to add
facility, hospital and surgical accounts across the country through
our expanding network of Independent Distributor / Representative
Partners. New customers accounted for 30% of 2016’s sales and
we expect this trend to continue in 2017.
Our
management team was enhanced by the December 2016 addition of J.
Michael Carmena as our Chief Financial Officer. His financial
experience coupled with his sales and marketing orientation make
him an ideal Executive Team member. His 15+ years of Life Sciences
experience including the medical device marketplace have added
depth to our planning and implementation activities. In 2017, we
plan to add additional key Executive Team members to further
broaden our ability for strong growth.
In
2016, the majority of our revenues were from our CellerateRX®
Activated Collagen® product line. This patented product has
proved to provide economical solutions for enhanced patient
outcomes in surgical and chronic wound care. Our surgical
salesforce is supported by champion surgeons from a variety of
specialties including trauma, orthopedic, foot and ankle, spine,
neurology, colorectal, vascular, plastic surgery and general
surgery. We added numerous case studies and testimonials in 2016
and updated our corporate and product websites.
In
February 2016, we announced the FDA 501(k) clearance of
HemaQuell® our Resorbable Bone Hemostat based on the patent in
our wholly-owned Resorbable Orthopedic Products subsidiary. This
novel resorbable “bone wax” tamponades bleeding in
bone, then resorbs within 2-7 days following surgery.
HemaQuell® is delivered in a patent-pending applicator that
simplifies its use in the surgical suite. Early market feedback is
showing that surgeons recognize the need and the value for this
novel technology. Ideal customers include orthopedic, spine,
trauma, foot and ankle, and cardiothoracic surgeons. In the fall of
2016 we engaged a Commercialization expert to help us craft our
market rollout strategy and we are currently engaging that
strategy. As of the first quarter of 2017, HemaQuell®is now
being used by a few key surgeons and is being evaluated by several
hospital committees for approval. We anticipate that it will
contribute significantly to our 2017 and 2018 revenue
growth.
Along
with adding key staff at year end 2016, the Company purchased new
applications to assist in order taking, processing, shipping,
invoicing, and customer management. This suite of services is in
the final stages of implementation and will help us better manage
and streamline operations. To accommodate our staff growth, our
corporate offices are moving in Q2 2017 to a larger, more
convenient location in the DFW Metroplex.
In
summary, for the first time in the Company’s history, we are
extremely pleased to report a year of record growth and long
awaited financial stability. As we enter Year 2 of our 3 Year Plan,
we anticipate our momentum will continue forward resulting in
growth in revenues, the addition of more core products, and key
staff members. We will continue to do our best to meet and exceed
shareholder expectations.
|
Deborah
J. Hutchinson
|
|
|
|
President
|
(i)
PART
I
Item 1. BUSINESS
Background
The
terms “we,” “our,” “us,” and
“Company” refer Wound Management Technologies, Inc.,
and its subsidiaries, unless the context suggests
otherwise
Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. was organized on December 14, 2001,
as a Texas corporation under the name eAppliance Innovations, Inc.
In June of 2002, MB Software Corporation, a public corporation
formed under the laws of Colorado, merged with the Company (which
at the time was a wholly owned subsidiary of MB Software
Corporation), and the Company changed its name to MB Software
Corporation as part of the merger. In May of 2008, the Company
changed its name to Wound Management Technologies,
Inc.
Wound
Care Innovations, LLC (“WCI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company was organized as a Nevada limited liability company
on August 21, 2003 WCI is a growing provider of the patented
CellerateRX® Activated Collagen® product in the wound
care and surgical markets. The wound care market is quickly
expanding, particularly with respect to diabetic wound applications
due to an aging global population; an increase in the incidence of
obesity; and an increase in the number of diabetic patients. In
2012, WCI expanded its Activated Collagen product line to include
CellerateRX Surgical products, which is a key factor in the
Company’s growth.
Resorbable
Orthopedic Products, LLC (“ROP”) a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company was organized as a Texas limited
liability company on August 24, 2009, as part of a transaction to
acquire a multi-faceted patent for resorbable bone homostatsis
products. ROP is both licensing technology from this patent and
also developing products itself. In 2014 the Company entered into a
commercial license for a bone void filler and in 2016 ROP received
FDA 510(k) clearance for HemaQuell™ Resorbable Bone Wax.
HemaQuell™ is a mechanical tamponade for bleeding bone that
resorbs within 2-7 days after use. In the first quarter of 2017,
ROP launched HemaQuell® Resorbable Bone Wax via the
Company’s Innovate OR, Inc, subsidiary. Initial sales efforts
are focused on orthopedic, cardiovascular, and spine
surgeries
The Product
CellerateRX
is cleared by the FDA as a medical device for use on all acute and
chronic wounds, except third degree burns, and is offered in both
gel and powder form. CellerateRX is available under a physician’s order and
is reimbursed as part of the overall surgical procedure.
CellerateRX wound care products are available without a
prescription and are currently approved for reimbursement under
Medicare Part B. Applied Nutritionals, LLC (“AN”) manufactures CellerateRX
products and owns the CellerateRX trademark. The Company has
incurred no research and development costs related to CellerateRX
during the last two fiscal years.
Patent, License and Royalty Agreements
Effective
January 3, 2008, WCI entered into separate exclusive license
agreements with both AN and its founder George Petito
(“Petito”),
pursuant to which WCI obtained the exclusive worldwide license to
certain patented technologies and processes related to CellerateRX.
WCI had been marketing and selling CellerateRX during the previous
four years under the terms of a distribution agreement with AN that
was effective on July 28, 2004. The current licenses are limited to
the human health care market, (excluding dental and retail) for
external wound care (including surgical wounds), and include any
new product developments based on the licensed patent and processes
and any continuations. The term of these licenses expires in
2018.
In
consideration for the licenses, WCI agreed to pay AN and Petito,
(in the aggregate), the following royalties, beginning January 3,
2008: (a) an advance royalty of $100,000; (b) a royalty of 15% of
gross sales occurring during the first year of the license; (c) an
additional advance royalty of $400,000 on January 3, 2009; plus (d)
a royalty of 3% of gross sales for all sales occurring after the
payment of the $400,000 advance royalty. In addition, WCI must
maintain a minimum aggregate annual royalty payment of $375,000 for
2009 and thereafter if the royalty percentage payments made do not
meet or exceed that amount. A N and Petito have been paid the
minimum aggregate annual royalty payments each year since 2008,
including both 2016 and 2015.
1
Marketing, Sales and Distribution
We
continue to market our products in the diabetic wound care and long
term care markets, as well as the professional medical markets, due
to the prevalence of diabetic and decubitus, (pressure) ulcers. We
believe that our Activated Collagen products are unique in
composition, applicability and clinical performance, and
demonstrate the ability to reduce costs associated with standard
wound management. In 2012, the Company added the CellerateRX
Activated Collagen Surgical product line to broaden the
Company’s product applications. WCI Surgical Products are
attracting increased business from hospitals and surgery centers
due to their unique collagen benefits, biocompatibility with other
therapies, price point, and product performance. Surgical
specialties where the products are used include trauma, orthopedic,
spine, podiatry, vascular, plastic surgery and general surgery.
CellerateRX wound care products are sold via independent
distributors, distributor organizations, healthcare distributors,
representatives and internal sales activities. The surgical
products are sold through a growing network of surgical product
distributors and Company representatives who are credentialed to
demonstrate the products in surgical settings, and the Company has
increased its presence at wound care, podiatry and surgical trade
shows and meetings throughout the country.
The
Company continues to work with international parties to expand the
distribution of our products outside of the U.S. In 2013, WCI
engaged a new distributor to market CellerateRX in several
countries in the Middle East (MENA region),and we continue to
actively sell in many of the MENA countries. CellerateRX is also
registered in South Africa and in 2014, registration was achieved
in Nigeria and Mexico.
Staffing
As of
March 31, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries have a staff of
16, consisting of 10 full-time employees, 2 part-time employees and
4 contractors.
Competition
The
wound care market is served by a number of large, multi-product
line companies offering a suite of products to the market.
CellerateRX products compete with all primary dressings, some
prescription drug therapies and other medical devices.
Manufacturers and distributors of competitive products include:
Smith & Nephew plc, Acelity L.P. Inc., Medline Industries,
Inc., and Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation. Many of our
competitors are significantly larger than we are and have more
financial and personnel resources than we do. Consequently, we will
be at a competitive disadvantage in marketing and selling our
products in the marketplace. We believe, however, that the patented
molecular form of collagen used in CellerateRX allows our products
to outperform currently available non-active dressings by reducing
the cost of wound management, and by replacing numerous products
with a single primary dressing.
New Products, Markets and Services
In
September 2009. the Company acquired a patent (U.S. Patent No.
7,074,425, the “ROP
Patent”) from Resorbable Orthopedics, LLC,
(“ROP”) for a
resorbable bone wax and delivery system for orthopedic bone void
fillers (See Note 9 “Intangible Assets”). The ROP
Patent offers innovative, safe and effective resorbable orthopedic
products that are complementary to the already-existing CellerateRX
surgical products. Together, the bone wax and delivery system
addresses issues such as bone wax granuloma and the cost-effective
delivery of materials that manage bone wound healing. The
resorbable orthopedic products covered by the ROP Patent are (a) a
resorbable orthopedic hemostat (resorbable bone wax) used to stop
blood flow; (b) a delivery system for osteogenic/osteoinductive
orthopedic products (bone void fillers); and (c) the formula as a
delivery system for bone growth factors. These products have a
complimentary sales call point for surgical representatives that
sell the Company’s CellerateRX Surgical
products.
The
Company received 510k approval for the resorbable orthopedic
hemostat in February of 2016; completed subsequent testing and had
product, (HemaQuell™) available for sale in February 2017.
The Company is also exploring a relationship with an international
distributor to market this product outside of the United States
(the “U.S.”)
and to obtain a Conformité Européene, (European
Conformity) Mark (CE Mark ). CE Marking indicates a product’s
compliance with applicable European Union (EU) regulations and
enables the products to be commercialized in approximately 30
European countries..
2
On
November 8, 2011, ROP executed a development and license agreement
with BioStructures, LLC (The “BioStructures License”). The
BioStructures License licensed certain bone wax rights to
BioStructures, LLC to develop products in the field of bone
remodeling, based on the ROP Patent (See Note 9 “Intangible
Assets”) for use in the human skeletal system. The
BioStructures License excludes the fields of (1) a resorbable
hemostat (resorbable bone wax), (2) a resorbable orthopedic
hemostat (bone wax) and antimicrobial dressing, and (3) veterinary
orthopedic applications. According to the terms of the
BioStructures License, BioStructures, LLC paid an initial fee of
$100,000 for the right to develop royalty-bearing products based on
the ROP Patent for a 24-month period (such products shall
hereinafter be referred to as the “BioStructures Products”). That
right was extended to allow for the additional time needed for
their FDA 510(k) clearance which occurred in 2014. At the time of
their first FDA clearance, BioStructures paid a $50,000 FDA
clearance fee and then entered into a Commercial License with ROP
to market their cleared bone void filler. BioStructures paid
$100,000 for the Commercial License which also included a 3%
royalty on any such product’s sales over the life of the ROP
Patent, which expires in 2023 and annual minimum royalties of
$201,000. In 2015, BioStructures was acquired by BioVentus Global.
In 2016, BioVentus Global and ROP agreed to reduce the royalty fee
to 1.5% with the annual minimum royalty unchanged.
Available Information
The
Company electronically files reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public may read and
copy any materials the Company has filed with the SEC at the
SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site
(www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information
statements, and other information regarding issuers that file
electronically with the SEC. Copies of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current
Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 are also available free of charge through the
Company’s website (http://www.wmgtech.com/), as soon as
reasonably practicable after electronically filing with or
otherwise furnishing such information to the SEC, and are available
in print to any stockholder who requests it.
Item
1A. RISK FACTORS
The
following risk factors should be considered with respect to making
any investment in our securities as such an investment involves a
high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following
risks and the other information set forth elsewhere in this report,
including the financial statements and related notes, before you
decide to purchase shares of our stock. If any of these risks
occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be adversely affected. As a result, the trading price of our
stock could decline, perhaps significantly, and you could lose part
or all of your investment. As used herein, the word
“business” as used in “material adverse effect on
our business”, “adversely affect our business”
and other similar phrases includes any of (or any combination of)
the Company’s present or future: operations, financial
performance, margins, revenues, operating margins, stock value,
competitive position, or other indicators of Company
performance.
RISKS RELATED TO HOW WE OPERATE OUR BUSINESS:
We have a history of losses and may not achieve or maintain
profitability.
We have
incurred net losses since we began our current operations in 2004.
(see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations”). More
specifically, we incurred net losses from continuing operations of
$415,747, $1,340,455, and $2,278,177 in 2016, 2015, and 2014,
respectively, and additional losses in previous years. We plan to
continue making significant investments in our sales and marketing
programs resulting in a substantial increase in our operating
expenses. Consequently, we will need to generate significant
additional revenue to achieve and maintain profitability in the
future. We cannot offer any assurance that we will be able to
generate future earnings. If we fail to maintain profitability, our
stock price may decline and you may lose part or all of your
investment.
3
Our revenues for a particular period are difficult to predict, and
a shortfall in revenues may harm our operating
results.
Because
we are a relatively young company, our revenues and consequently
results of operations are difficult to predict. We plan our
operating expense levels based primarily on forecasted revenue
levels. A shortfall in revenue could lead to operating results
being below expectations as we may not be able to quickly reduce
our fixed expenses in response to these short-term revenue
shortfalls. We have experienced fluctuations in revenue and
operating results from quarter to quarter and anticipate that these
fluctuations will continue until we achieve a critical mass with
our product sales. These fluctuations are due to a variety of
factors, including:
●
the uncertainty
surrounding our ability to attract new customers and retain
existing customers;
●
the length and
variability of our sales cycle, which makes it difficult to
forecast the quarter in which our sales will occur;
●
issues in
manufacturing our products or product candidates;
●
the timing of
operating expense relating to the expansion of our business and
operations;
●
the development of
new wound care products or product enhancements by our
competitors;
●
actual events,
circumstances, outcomes and amounts differing from judgments,
assumptions and estimates used in preparing our operating plan and
how well we execute our strategy and operating plans.
As a
consequence, operating results for a particular future period are
difficult to predict, and, due to our relatively limited history,
prior results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Any
of the foregoing factors, or any other factors discussed elsewhere
herein, could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
If our products do not gain market acceptance, we might not be able
to fund future operations.
A
number of factors may affect the market acceptance of our products
or any other products we develop or acquire, including, but not
limited to:
●
the price of our
products relative to other products for the same
indications;
●
the perception by
patients, physicians and other members of the healthcare community
of the efficacy and safety of our products for their indicated
applications and treatments;
●
changes in practice
guidelines and the standard of care for the targeted indication;
and
●
the effectiveness
of our sales and marketing efforts or our partners’ sales and
marketing efforts.
Our
ability to effectively promote and sell any approved products may
also depend on pricing and cost-effectiveness, including our
ability to produce a product at a competitive price and our ability
to obtain sufficient third-party coverage or reimbursement, if any.
In addition, our efforts to educate the medical community on the
benefits of our product candidates may require significant
resources, may be constrained by FDA rules and policies on product
promotion, and may never be successful. If our products do not gain
market acceptance, we may not be able to fund future operations,
including developing, testing and obtaining regulatory approval for
new product candidates and expanding our sales and marketing
efforts for our approved products, which would cause our business
to suffer.
Disruption of, or changes in, our distribution model or customer
base could harm our sales and margins.
If we
fail to manage the distribution of our products properly, or if the
financial condition or operations of our reseller channels weakens,
there may be a material adverse effect on our business.
Furthermore, a change in the mix of our customers between service
provider and enterprise, or a change in the mix of direct and
indirect sales, could adversely affect our business.
4
Several
factors could also result in disruption of or changes in our
distribution model or customer base, which could harm our sales and
margins, including the following:
●
in some instances,
we compete with some of our resellers through our direct sales,
which may lead these channel partners to use other suppliers that
do not compete; and
●
some of our
resellers may have insufficient financial resources and may not be
able to withstand changes in business conditions.
If we cannot meet our future capital requirements, our business
will suffer.
We have
a history of operating losses and with the exception of 2016,
negative cash flow from operating activities. As such, we have
utilized funds from offerings of our securities to fund our
operations. Future results of operations involve significant risks
and uncertainties. Factors that could affect our future operating
results and cause actual results to vary materially from
expectations include, but are not limited to, potential demand for
our products, risks from competitors, regulatory approval of our
new products, technological change, and dependence on key
personnel. Although we have taken steps to improve our overall
liquidity, if our cash flow is insufficient, we may be forced
either to secure a line of credit or seek additional equity
financing in order to:
●
fund operating
losses;
●
increase marketing
to address the market for wound care, surgical and ROP
products;
●
take advantage of
opportunities, including more rapid expansion or acquisitions of
complementary products or businesses;
●
hire, train and
retain employees;
●
develop new
products; and/or
●
respond to economic
and competitive pressures.
If our
capital needs are met through the issuance of equity or convertible
debt securities, the percentage ownership of our current
stockholders may be reduced. Our future success may be determined
in large part by our ability to obtain additional financing, and
the incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt
service obligations which could result in operating and financing
covenants that would restrict our operations. There can be no
assurance that such financing would be available or, if available,
that such financing could be obtained upon terms acceptable to us.
If adequate funds are not available, or are not available on
acceptable terms, our operating results and financial condition may
suffer.
Failure to retain and recruit key personnel would harm our ability
to meet key objectives.
Our
success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and
retain skilled executive, managerial, sales and marketing
personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be able to find
and attract additional qualified employees or retain any such
executive officers and other key personnel. The inability to hire
qualified personnel; the loss of services of our executive officers
or key personnel; or the loss of services of executive officers or
key personnel who may be hired in the future may have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Failure to manage our planned growth could harm our
business.
Our
ability to successfully market and sell our wound care products and
implement our business plan requires an effective plan for managing
our future growth. We plan to increase the scope of our operations
at a rapid rate. Future expansion efforts will be expensive and may
strain our internal operating resources. To manage future growth
effectively, we must maintain and enhance our financial and
accounting systems and controls, integrate new personnel and manage
expanded operations. If we do not manage growth properly, it could
harm our operating results and financial condition.
5
We operate in a highly competitive industry and face competition
from large, well-established medical device manufacturers as well
as new market entrants.
Competition
from other medical device companies is intense, expected to
increase, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new
product introductions and other market activities of industry
participants. We compete with other companies in acquiring rights
to products or technologies from universities and other research
institutions. Although our products have performed well in customer
evaluations, we are a relatively unknown brand in a market
controlled, in large part, by companies with a large customer base.
We may not, even with strong customer accounts, be able to
establish the credibility necessary to secure large national
customers.
A
number of factors may limit the market acceptance of our products,
including the timing of regulatory approvals and market entry
relative to competitive products, the availability of alternative
products, and the price of our products relative to alternative
products, the availability of third party reimbursement and the
extent of marketing efforts by third party distributors or agents
that we retain. There can be no assurance that our products will
receive market acceptance in a commercially viable period of time,
if at all. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we can
develop products that are more effective or achieve greater market
acceptance than competitive products, or that our competitors will
not succeed in developing or acquiring products and technologies
that are more effective than those being developed by us, that
would render our products and technologies less competitive or
obsolete.
Our
competitors enjoy several competitive advantages over us, including
but not limited to:
●
large and
established distribution networks in the U.S. and/or in
international markets;
●
greater financial,
managerial and other resources for products research and
development, sales and marketing efforts and protecting and
enforcing intellectual property rights;
●
greater name
recognition;
●
larger consumer
base;
●
more expansive
portfolios of intellectual property rights;
●
greater experience
in obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals and/or clearances
from the FDA and other regulatory agencies.
The
presence of competition in our market may lead to pricing pressure
which would make it more difficult to sell our products at a price
that will make us profitable or may prevent us from selling our
products at all. Our failure to compete effectively would have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our
information and expose us to liability, which would cause our
business and reputation to suffer.
In the
ordinary course of our business, we use networks to collect and
store sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary
business information and that of our customers, suppliers and
business partners, personally identifiable information of our
customers and employees. The secure processing, maintenance and
transmission of this information is critical to our operations.
Despite our security measures, our information technology and
infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached
due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such
breach could compromise our networks and the information stored
there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any
such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result
in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect
the privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties.
Further, they may cause disruption of our operations and the
services we provide to customers, damage to our reputation, and
cause a loss of confidence in our products and services, which
could adversely affect our business.
We may not be able to maintain sufficient product liability
insurance to cover claims against
us.
Product
liability insurance for the healthcare industry is generally
expensive to the extent it is available at all. We may not be able
to maintain such insurance on acceptable terms or be able to secure
increased coverage as commercialization of our products progresses,
nor can we be sure that existing or future claims against us will
be covered by our product liability insurance. Moreover, the
existing coverage of our insurance policy or any rights of
indemnification and contribution that we may have may not be
sufficient to offset existing or future claims. A successful claim
against us with respect to uninsured liabilities or in excess of
insurance coverage and not subject to any indemnification or
contribution could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
6
RISKS RELATED TO OUR PRODUCTS:
Competitors could invent products superior to ours and cause our
products and technologies to become obsolete.
The
wound care sector of the medical products industry is characterized
by rapidly evolving technology and intense competition. Our
competitors currently manufacture and distribute a variety of
products that are, in many respects, comparable to our products.
Many suppliers of competing products are considerably larger and
have much greater resources than we do. In addition, many
specialized products companies have formed collaborations with
large, established companies to support research, development and
commercialization of wound care products which may be competitive
with ours. Academic institutions, government agencies and other
public and private research organizations are also conducting
research activities and may commercialize wound care products on
their own or through joint ventures. It is possible that these
competitors may develop technologies and products that are more
effective than any we currently have. If this occurs, any of our
products and technology affected by these developments could become
obsolete.
WCI CellerateRx products are manufactured only by A N which we do
not own or control.
A N
holds the patent to, and is currently the sole source of the
CellerateRx products we offer for sale (the “WCI Products”), which WCI
Products make up a substantial portion of our business. Our growth
and ability to meet customer demands depends in part on our ability
to obtain timely deliveries of the WCI Products from our
manufacturer. We may in the future experience a shortage of the WCI
Products as a result of manufacturing process issues or capacity
problems at our supplier or strong demand for the ingredients
constituting WCI Products.
If
shortages or delays persist, the cost to manufacture the WCI
Products may increase or the WCI Products may not be available at
all. We may also encounter shortages if we do not accurately
anticipate our needs. We may not be able to secure enough WCI
Products at reasonable prices or of acceptable quality to meet our
or our customers’ needs. Accordingly, our revenues could
suffer and our costs could increase until other sources can be
developed. There can be no assurance that we will not encounter
these problems in the future.
The
fact that we do not own the manufacturing rights could have an
adverse impact on the supply of the WCI Products and on our
business. As of the date of this report, AN has represented to the
Company that it has two contract manufacturers approved to compound
and or fill WCI Products, however, in the event that AN is not able
to fulfill orders for WCI Products, we may temporarily be prevented
from marketing and selling the WCI Products until we are able to
locate a substitute manufacturer.
We may have exposure to product liability claims.
Although
we have contractual indemnity from the manufacturer of CellerateRX
for liability claims related to their products, we could face a
product liability claim outside of the scope of the contractual
indemnity. We do not have, and do not anticipate obtaining,
contractual indemnification from parties supplying raw materials or
parties marketing the products we sell. In any event,
indemnification from the manufacturer of CellerateRX or from any
other party is limited by the terms of the indemnity and by the
creditworthiness of the indemnifying party. A successful product
liability claim or series of claims brought against us could result
in judgments, fines, damages and liabilities that could have a
material adverse effect on our business. We may incur significant
expense investigating and defending these claims, even if they do
not result in liability. Moreover, even if no judgments, fines,
damages or liabilities are imposed on us, our reputation could
suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In the event that we do not have adequate insurance or contractual
indemnification, product liability claims relating to defective
products could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
RISKS RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:
The patent on the CellerateRX products expires in 2018.
CellerateRx products currently benefit from the protection of a
patent that will expire in 2018. Upon expiration of the patent,
such products may become subject to increased competition resulting
from the marketing of generic products, and the Company’s
performance may suffer as a result.
7
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights
adequately, we may not be able to compete effectively.
Our success depends in part on our ability to protect the
proprietary rights to the technologies used in our products. We
rely on patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to
establish and maintain proprietary rights in our technology and
products. However, these legal means afford only limited protection
and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or
keep a competitive advantage. Our patents and patent applications
may not be broad enough to prevent competitors from introducing
similar products into the market. Our patents, if challenged or our
attempts to enforce them, may not necessarily be upheld by the
courts. Efforts to enforce any of our proprietary rights could be
time-consuming and expensive, which could adversely affect our
business and prospects and divert management’s
attention. Our exclusive license agreement for our collagen
based CellerateRX products specifically limits our exclusive rights
to the worldwide human healthcare market and specifically excludes
the veterinary, dental, nutritional and injectibles markets. There
can be no assurance that our other proprietary rights will not be
challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights will in
fact provide competitive advantages to us. In addition, patent
protection in foreign countries may be different from patent
protection under U.S. laws and may not be favorable to us. The
outcome of any actions taken in these foreign countries may be
different than if such actions were taken under the laws of the
U.S. If we are unable to protect our worldwide proprietary rights,
we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage to others who
need not incur the substantial expense, time and effort required to
create the innovative products necessary to be
successful.
We may be found to infringe on intellectual property rights of
others.
Third
parties, including customers, may in the future assert claims or
initiate litigation related to exclusive patent, copyright,
trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies
and related standards that are relevant to us. These assertions may
emerge over time as a result of our growth and the general increase
in the pace of patent claim assertions, particularly in the U.S.
Because of the existence of a large number of patents in the
healthcare field, the secrecy of some pending patents and the rapid
rate of issuance of new patents, it is not economically practical
or even possible to determine in advance whether a product or any
of its components infringes or will infringe the patent rights of
others. The asserted claims or initiated litigation can include
claims against us or our manufacturers, suppliers or customers
alleging infringement of their proprietary rights with respect to
our existing or future products or components of those products.
Regardless of the merit of these claims, they can be
time-consuming, result in costly litigation and diversion of
technical and management personnel, or require us to develop a
non-infringing technology or enter into license agreements. Where
claims are made by customers, resistance even to unmeritorious
claims could damage customer relationships. There can be no
assurance that licenses will be available on acceptable terms and
conditions, if at all, or that our indemnification by our suppliers
will be adequate to cover our costs if a claim were brought
directly against us or our customers. Furthermore, because of the
potential for high court awards that are not necessarily
predictable, it is not unusual to find even arguably unmeritorious
claims settled for significant amounts. If any infringement or
other intellectual property claim made against us by any third
party is successful, or if we fail to develop non-infringing
technology or license the proprietary rights on commercially
reasonable terms and conditions, our business could be materially
and adversely affected.
RISKS RELATED TO REGULATIONS:
Our business is affected by numerous regulations.
Government
regulation by the U.S. FDA and similar agencies in other countries
is a significant factor in the development, manufacturing and
marketing of our products and in the acquisition or licensing of
new products. Complying with government regulations is often time
consuming and expensive and may involve delays or actions adversely
impacting the marketing and sale of our current or future
products.
Following
initial regulatory approval of any products that we may develop, we
will be subject to continuing regulatory review, including review
of adverse (drug or device) experiences or reactions and clinical
results that are reported after our products become commercially
available. This would include results from any post-marketing tests
or continued actions required as a condition of approval. The
manufacturing facilities we use (and may use) to make any of our
products may become subject to periodic review and inspection by
the FDA. If a previously unknown problem with a product or a
manufacturing and laboratory facility used by us is discovered, the
FDA may impose restrictions on that product or on the manufacturing
facility, including requiring us to withdraw the product from the
market. Any changes to an approved product, including the way it is
manufactured or promoted, often requires FDA approval before the
product, as modified, can be marketed. In addition, for products we
develop in the future, we and our contract manufacturers may be
subject to ongoing FDA requirements for submission of safety and
other post-market information. If we violate regulatory
requirements at any stage, whether before or after marketing
approval is obtained, we may be fined, be forced to remove a
product from the market or experience other adverse consequences,
which would materially harm our financial results. Additionally, we
may not be able to obtain the labeling claims necessary or
desirable for product promotion.
8
Further,
various healthcare reform proposals have emerged at the federal and
state levels. We cannot predict whether foreign, federal, state or
local healthcare reform legislation or regulation affecting our
business may be proposed or enacted in the future, or what effect
any such legislation or regulation would have on our business. The
implementation of new legislation and regulation may lower
reimbursements for our products, reduce medical procedure volumes
which would likely adversely affect our business. In addition, the
enacted excise tax may materially and adversely affect our
business.
Distribution
of our products outside the U.S. is subject to extensive government
regulation. These regulations, including the requirements for
approvals or clearance to market; the time required for regulatory
review and the sanctions imposed for violations, vary from country
to country. We do not know whether we will obtain regulatory
approvals in such countries or that we will not be required to
incur significant costs in obtaining or maintaining these
regulatory approvals.
If we fail to obtain, or experience significant delays in obtaining
regulatory clearances or approvals to market future medical device
products, we will be unable to commercialize these products until
such clearance or approval is obtained.
The
developing, testing, manufacturing, marketing and selling of
medical devices is subject to extensive regulation by governmental
authorities in the U.S. and other countries. The process of
obtaining regulatory clearance and approval of certain medical
technology products is costly and time consuming. Inherent in the
development of new medical products is the potential for delay
because product testing, including clinical evaluation, is required
before many products can be approved for human use. With respect to
medical devices, such as those that we manufacture and market,
before a new medical device, or a new use of, or claim for, an
existing product can be marketed (unless it is a Class I device),
it must first receive either premarket clearance under Section
510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act or approval of a
premarket approval application, or PMA, from the FDA, unless an
exemption applies. In the 510(k) clearance process, the FDA must
determine that the proposed device is “substantially
equivalent” to a device legally on the market, known as a
“predicate” device, with respect to intended use,
technology and safety and effectiveness to clear the proposed
device for marketing. Clinical data is sometimes required to
support substantial equivalence. The PMA approval pathway requires
an applicant to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the
device for its intended use based, in part, on extensive data
including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical
trial, manufacturing and labeling data. The premarket approval
process is typically required for devices that are deemed to pose
the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or
implantable devices. Both the 510(k) and premarket approval
processes can be expensive and lengthy and entail significant user
fees.
Failure
to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in,
among other things, suspension or withdrawal of approvals or
clearances, seizure or recall of products, injunctions against the
manufacture, holding, distribution, marketing and sale of a product
and civil and criminal sanctions. Furthermore, changes in existing
regulations or the adoption of new regulations could prevent us
from obtaining, or affect the timing of, future regulatory
approvals. Meeting regulatory requirements and evolving government
standards may delay marketing of our new products for a
considerable period of time, impose costly procedures upon our
activities and result in a competitive advantage to larger
companies that compete against us.
We
cannot assure you that the FDA or other regulatory agencies will
approve any products developed by us on a timely basis, if at all,
or, if granted, that approval will not entail limiting the
indicated uses for which we may market the product, which could
limit the potential market for any of these products.
Changes to the FDA approval process or ongoing regulatory
requirements could make it more difficult for us to obtain FDA
approval of new products or comply with ongoing
requirements.
New
government regulations may be enacted and changes in FDA policies
and regulations and, their interpretation and enforcement, could
prevent or delay regulatory clearance or approval of new products.
We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse
government regulation that may arise from future legislation or
administrative action, either in the U.S. or abroad. Therefore, we
do not know whether we will be able to continue to comply with such
regulations or whether the costs of such compliance will have a
material adverse effect on our business. Changes could, among other
things, require different labeling, monitoring of patients,
interaction with physicians, education programs for patients or
physicians, curtailment of necessary supplies, or limitations on
product distribution. These changes, or others required by the FDA
could have an adverse effect on our business, and specifically, on
the sales of these products. The evolving and complex nature of
regulatory science and regulatory requirements, the broad authority
and discretion of the FDA and the generally high level of
regulatory oversight results in a continuing possibility that from
time to time, we will be adversely affected by regulatory actions
despite ongoing efforts and commitment to achieve and maintain full
compliance with all regulatory requirements. If we are not able to
maintain regulatory compliance, we will not be permitted to market
our products and our business would suffer.
9
Modifications to our current products may require new marketing
clearances or approvals or require us to cease marketing or recall
the modified products until such clearances or approvals are
obtained.
Any
modification to a FDA-cleared product that could significantly
affect its safety or efficacy, or that would constitute a major
change or modification in its intended use, requires a new FDA
510(k) clearance or, possibly, a premarket approval (PMA). The FDA
requires every manufacturer to make its own determination as to
whether a modification requires a new 510(k) clearance or PMA, but
the FDA may review and disagree with any decision reached by the
manufacturer. In the future, we may make additional modifications
to our products after they have received FDA clearance or approval
and, in appropriate circumstances, determine that new clearance or
approval is unnecessary. Regulatory authorities may disagree with
our decisions not to seek new clearance or approval and may require
us to obtain clearance or approval for previous modifications to
our products. If that were to occur for a previously cleared or
approved product, we may be required to cease marketing or recall
the modified device until we obtain the necessary clearance or
approval. Under these circumstances, we may also be subject to
significant regulatory fines or other penalties. If any of the
foregoing were to occur, our financial condition and results of
operations could be negatively impacted.
Changes in reimbursement policies and regulations by governmental
or other third-party payers may have an adverse impact on the use
of our products.
A
significant portion of our wound care products are purchased
principally for the Medicare and Medicaid eligible population by
hospital outpatient clinics, wound care clinics, durable medical
equipment (DME) suppliers and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs),
which typically bill various third-party payers, primarily state
and federal healthcare programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid), and
managed care plans, for the products and services provided to their
patients. Although our wound care products are currently eligible
for reimbursement under Medicare Part B, adjustments to our
reimbursement amounts or a change in Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services’ (CMS). reimbursement policies could have
an adverse effect on our market opportunities in this area. The
ability of our customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for
products and services from third-party payers is critical to the
success of our business because reimbursement status affects which
products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay.
In addition, our ability to obtain reimbursement approval in
foreign jurisdictions may affect our ability to expand our product
offerings internationally.
Third-party
payers have adopted, and are continuing to adopt, a number of
policies intended to curb rising healthcare costs. These policies
include the imposition of conditions of payment by foreign, state
and federal healthcare programs as well as private insurance plans,
and the reduction in reimbursement amounts applicable to specific
products and services.
Changes
in healthcare systems in the U.S. or internationally in a manner
that significantly reduces reimbursement for procedures using our
products or denies coverage for these procedures would also have an
adverse impact on the acceptance of our products and the prices
which our customers are willing to pay for them.
We and our sales personnel, whether employed by us or by others,
must comply with various federal and state anti-kickback,
self-referral, false claims and similar laws, any breach of which
could cause a material adverse effect on our business.
Our
relationships with physicians, hospitals and the marketers of our
products are subject to scrutiny under various federal
anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and similar laws, often
referred to collectively as healthcare fraud and abuse laws.
Healthcare fraud and abuse laws are complex, and even minor,
inadvertent violations can give rise to liability, or claims of
alleged violations. Possible sanctions for violation of these fraud
and abuse laws include monetary fines, civil and criminal
penalties, exclusion from federal healthcare programs, including
Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Administration, Department of Defense, Public Health
Service (PHS), and forfeiture of amounts collected in violation of
such prohibitions could occur. Certain states have similar fraud
and abuse laws that also authorize substantial civil and criminal
penalties for violations. Any government investigation or a finding
of a violation of these laws may result in an adverse effect on our
business.
10
The
federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits any knowing and willful
offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration
in return for the referral of an individual or the ordering or
recommending of the use of a product or service for which payment
may be made by any federal healthcare program, including
Medicare.
The
scope and enforcement of the healthcare fraud and abuse laws is
uncertain and is subject to rapid change. There can be no assurance
that federal or state regulatory or enforcement agencies will not
investigate or challenge our current or future activities under
these laws. Any state or federal investigation, regardless of the
outcome, could be costly and time-consuming. Additionally, we
cannot predict the impact of any changes in these laws, whether
these changes are retroactive or will have effect on a
going-forward basis only.
If we
engage additional physicians on a consulting basis, the agreements
with these physicians will be structured to comply with all
applicable laws, including the federal ban on physician
self-referrals (commonly known as the “Stark Law”) the
federal Anti-Kickback Statute, state anti-self-referral and
anti-kickback laws. Even so, it is possible that regulatory or
enforcement agencies or courts may view these agreements as
prohibited arrangements that must be restructured or for which we
would be subject to other significant civil or criminal penalties.
Because our strategy includes the involvement of physicians who
consult with us on the design of our products, we could be
materially impacted if regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts
interpret our financial relationships with our physician advisors
who refer or order our products to be in violation of one or more
health care fraud and abuse laws. Such government action could harm
our reputation and the reputations of our physician advisors. In
addition, the cost of noncompliance with these laws could be
substantial because we could be subject to monetary fines and civil
or criminal penalties, and we could also be excluded from state and
federal healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, for
non-compliance.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS OR OUR COMMON
STOCK:
The trading price of the shares of our common stock is highly
volatile, and purchasers of our common stock could incur
substantial losses.
The
market price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue
to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to
various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including
the following:
●
technological
innovations or new products and services by us or by our
competitors;
●
additions or
departures of key personnel;
●
sales of our common
stock;
●
our ability to
execute our business plan;
●
loss of any
strategic relationship;
●
industry
developments;
●
fluctuations in
stock market prices and trading volumes of similar
companies;
●
economic, political
and other external factors;
●
period-to-period
fluctuations in our financial results;
●
regulatory
developments in the U.S. and foreign countries, both generally or
specific to us and our products; and
●
intellectual
property, product liability or other litigation against
us.
Although publicly
traded securities are subject to price and volume fluctuations, it
is likely that our common stock will experience these fluctuations
to a greater degree than the securities of more established and
better capitalized organizations.
11
Our common stock does not have a vigorous trading market and you
may not be able to sell your securities when desired.
Although
there is a public market for our common stock, trading volume has
been historically low, which could impact the stock price and the
ability to sell shares of our common stock. We can give no
assurance that a more active and liquid public market for the
shares of our common stock will develop in the future.
The potential sale of large amounts of common stock may have a
negative effect upon the market value of our shares.
Sales
of a significant number of shares of our common stock in the public
market could harm the market price of our common stock and make it
more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of
common stock. As additional shares of our common stock become
available for resale in the public market, the supply of our common
stock will increase, which could decrease the price of our common
stock.
In
addition, future sales of large amounts of common stock could
adversely affect or inhibit our ability to raise capital.
Substantially all of the outstanding shares of our common stock are
freely tradable, without restriction or registration under the
Securities Act (other than the sales volume restrictions of Rule
144 applicable to shares held beneficially by persons who may be
deemed to be affiliates). The price of our common stock could also
drop as a result of the exercise of options for common stock or the
perception that such sales or exercise of options could
occur.
We have not paid, and we are unlikely to pay in the near future,
cash dividends on our securities.
We have
not paid and do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common
or preferred stock, which may limit the current return available on
an investment in our stock. Future dividends on our stock, if any,
will depend on our future earnings, capital requirements, financial
condition and such other factors as our management personnel may
consider relevant. Currently, we intend to retain earnings, if any,
to increase our net worth and reserves.
“Penny Stock” Limitations.
Rule
3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 establishes the
definition of a “penny stock.” For purposes relevant to
the Company, a “penny stock” is any equity security
that has a minimum bid price of less than $5.00 per share or with
an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a
limited number of exceptions which are likely not available to us.
It is likely that our shares will be considered to be penny stocks
for the immediate foreseeable future. This classification severely
and adversely affects any market liquidity of our common
stock.
For any
transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock
rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person’s
account for transactions in penny stocks and that the broker or
dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the
transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny
stock to be purchased. In order to approve a person's account for
transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain
financial information and investment experience and objectives of
the person and the broker or dealer must make a special written
determination that the transaction in penny stocks is suitable for
that person and that that person has sufficient knowledge and
experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the
risks of a transaction in penny stocks.
The
broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a
penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to
the penny stock market that, in highlight form, sets forth the
basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability
determination, and that the broker or dealer received a signed,
written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. These
restrictions and regulations limit the appeal of penny stock to
some investors and may limit the liquidity of shares of our
stock.
Disclosure
also has to be made about (a) the risks of investing in penny stock
in both public offerings and in secondary trading; (b) commissions
payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered
representative; (c) current quotations for the securities; and (d)
the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud
in penny stock transactions. Finally, the broker or dealer must
send monthly statements disclosing recent price information for the
penny stock held in the account and information on the limited
market in penny stocks.
12
Because
of these regulations, broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the
above-referenced paperwork and disclosures. In addition, they may
encounter difficulties when attempting to sell shares of our common
stock, which may affect the ability of selling shareholders or
other holders to sell their shares in any secondary market. These
additional sales practices and disclosure requirements may impede
the sale of our securities and the liquidity of our securities may
decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the price. Our shares,
in all probability, will be considered subject to such penny stock
rules for the foreseeable future, and our shareholders may, as a
result, find it difficult to sell their shares.
A few of our existing shareholders own a large percentage of our
voting stock and have a significant influence over matters
requiring stockholder approval and may delay or prevent a change in
control.
Our
officers and directors own or control a large percentage of our
common stock (See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters”). As a result, our management could have the ability
to exert substantial influence over all matters requiring approval
by our stockholders, including the election and removal of
directors and any proposed merger, consolidation or sale of all or
substantially all of our assets as well as other corporate
transactions. This concentration of control could be
disadvantageous to other stockholders with interests different from
those of our officers, directors, and principal stockholders; e.g.,
our officers and principal stockholders could delay or prevent an
acquisition or merger even if the transaction would benefit other
stockholders. This significant concentration of share ownership may
adversely affect the trading price for our common stock because
investors often perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies
with controlling stockholders.
Additionally,
our Series B, Series C, and Series D Preferred Stock vote with the
common stock on an “as converted basis” of 1,000 shares
of common stock to 1 share of preferred stock. This means each
preferred share exercises substantially greater voting power than
each share of common stock.
Our Articles of Incorporation, as amended and Bylaws, as amended
may delay or prevent a potential takeover of the
company.
Our
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws contain provisions that may
have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a potential
takeover of the Company, even if the takeover is in the best
interest of our shareholders. For example, the Bylaws limit when
shareholders may call a special meeting of shareholders, and these
and other provisions may negatively affect the price of our stock.
The Articles also allow our board of directors (the
“Board”) to
fill vacancies, including newly created directorships.
Our Board can authorize the issuance of preferred stock, which
could diminish the rights of holders of our common stock, and make
a change of control of the Company more difficult even if it might
benefit our shareholders.
The
Board is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or
more series and to fix the voting powers, preferences and other
rights and limitations of the preferred stock. Accordingly, we may
issue shares of preferred stock with a preference over our common
stock with respect to dividends or distributions on liquidation or
dissolution, or that may otherwise adversely affect the voting or
other rights of the holders of common stock. Issuances of preferred
stock, depending upon the rights, preferences and designations of
the preferred stock, may have the effect of delaying, deterring or
preventing a change of control, even if that change of control
might benefit our shareholders.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:
When
used in this Form 10-K or other filings by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, in the Company’s press
releases or other public or shareholder communications, or in oral
statements made with the approval of an authorized officer of the
Company’s executive officers, the words or phrases
“would be”, “will allow”, “intends
to”, “will likely result”, “are expected
to”, “will continue”, “is
anticipated”, “estimate”, “project”,
or similar expressions are intended to identify
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The
Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made,
and advises readers that forward-looking statements involve various
risks and uncertainties. Our management believes its assumptions
are based upon reasonable data derived from and known about our
business and operations. No assurances are made that our actual
results of operations or the results of our future activities will
not differ materially from these assumptions. The Company does not
undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation to update any
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated
events or circumstances after the date of such
statement.
13
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
As a
smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this
information.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
The
Company’s corporate office is currently located at 16633
Dallas Parkway, Suite 250, Addison, TX 75001. The lease for the
Company’s corporate office was entered into in November of
2013 and effective December 1, 2013. The lease expires on April 30,
2017 and requires base rent payment of $5,736.79 per month for
months 1-17, $5,865.71 for months 18-29, and $5,994.63 for months
30-41. In March of 2017, the Company executed a new lease for
office space located at 1200 Summit Ave., Suite 414, Fort Worth, TX
76102 and will be relocating our corporate offices there. The lease
is to be effective upon completion of leasehold improvements
(sometime in April 2017) and end on the last day of the fiftieth
(50th) full calendar month following the effective date. Monthly
base rental payments are as follows: months 1-2, $0; months 3-14,
$7,250; months 15-26, $7,401; months 27-38, $7,552; and months
39-50, $7,703.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Ken Link v. Wound Management Technologies, Inc., et al. On
November 14, 2011, Ken Link instituted litigation against Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and Scott A. Haire in the District
Court of Tarrant County Texas, Cause No. 342-256486-11 of the 342nd
Judicial District, alleging default under the terms of a certain
promissory note executed by Wound Management Technologies, Inc. and
guaranteed by Scott A. Haire. Ken Link asserted at that point in
time that the unpaid balance of the note, including accrued
interest as of December 4, 2011 was the sum of $355,292, Mr. Link
asserted that he was entitled to receive 200,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock. Mr. Link is also seeking
attorney’s fees. Mr. Link is also seeking interest at 13% per
annum, plus $1,000 per day. We have disputed the claim, because we
believe the contract is tainted by usury, and therefore, a usury
counterclaim will more than offset the unpaid balance of the
promissory note.
The
note, in the original principal amount of $223,500, required the
payment of interest accrued at 13% per annum, an additional
one-time charge of $20,000 due on maturity, the issuance of 200,000
shares of stock as interest, and a $1,000 per day late fee for each
day the principal and interest is late. It is our contention that
these sums make the contract usurious and the usury claims more
than offset the amount of the unpaid indebtedness. Furthermore, we
have filed an action for recovery of damages for usury under the
Texas Finance Code for a note which was previously executed by the
Company and payable to Ken Link, which was in fact paid to Mr. Link
in full. In addition, Wound Management is seeking recovery of
attorney’s fees pursuant to the usury provisions of the Texas
Finance Code. While the amount of the promissory note remains
unpaid, the counterclaims more than offset the maximum amount that
could be asserted on the promissory note. The case was set for
trial for the week of October 21, 2013, but after three (3) days of
trial before a jury, the judge declared a mistrial. The case was
subsequently reset for trial for the week of December 1, 2014 and
the judge again declared a mistrial. The case is currently set for
trial the week of May 15, 2017. Subsequent to October 21, 2013, Ken
Link amended his pleadings and alleges that Wound Management
Technologies, Inc. never intended to pay the $223,500.00 promissory
note and sought damages for fraud and the loss of the benefit of
the bargain relating to the shares of stock, plus interest as set
forth in the note, exemplary damages, and attorney's fees. On
September 4, 2015, Ken Link again amended his pleadings once again
seeking the sums he says are owed to him that were advanced to him
in the amount of $223,500.00. It is unclear if he is suing on the
note or not, but it appears he is. We are taking steps to
vigorously defend this matter, however, we are unable at this time
to determine the ultimate outcome of this matter or determine the
effect it may have on our business, financial condition or result
of operations.
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. v. Fox Lake Animal Hospital,
PSP Wound Management Technologies, Inc. instituted
litigation in Cause No. 96-263918-13 in the 96th District Court of
Tarrant County, Texas against Fox Lake Animal Hospital, PSP and
Bohdan Rudawksi, Trustee of the Fox Lake Animal Hospital, PSP. The
cause of action asserts that the loan transaction between Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and Fox Lake Animal Hospital PSP
involved the collection of illegal usurious interest for the reason
that while the face amount of the promissory note is $39,000.00,
but the loan actually loaned for a 6-month period was $25,000.00,
resulting in an interest rate in excess of the maximum rate
permitted by the Texas Finance Code. Wound Management Technologies,
Inc. is seeking to recover the penalties authorized by the Texas
Finance Code, together with the attorney’s fees. Fox Lake
Animal Hospital and Bohdan Rudawski, Trustee have filed a
counterclaim where they allege there were misrepresentations by
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. that would be excuse them from
having to pay penalties under the Texas Finance Code for charging
usurious interest. Fox Lake Animal Hospital and Bohdan Rudawski,
Trustee further claim that actions asserted violates the Federal
Securities Exchange Act and alleged fraud and fraud in the
inducement in entering into the promissory note. In the opinion of
counsel, the counterclaim is without merit. Wound Management
Technologies, Inc. will pursue this case to final
judgment.
14
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. v. Bohdan Rudawski Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. instituted litigation in Cause No.
352-263856-13 in the 352nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
against Bohdan Rudawksi. The case has been postponed until
September of 2016. The cause of action asserts that the loan
transaction between Wound Management Technologies, Inc. and Bohdan
Rudawski involved the collection of illegal usurious interest for
the reason that while the face amount of the promissory note is
$156,000.00, but the loan actually loaned for a 6-month period was
$100,000.00, charging an effective interest rate of over 100% which
violates the provisions of the Texas Finance Code. Wound Management
Technologies, Inc. is seeking to recover the penalties authorized
by the Texas Finance Code, together with the attorney’s fees.
Bohdan Rudawski has filed an answer and alleges there was not an
absolute obligation to repay the note, attempting to defeat the
usury claim. Bohdan Rudawski has further asserted that the claims
violate the Federal Securities Exchange Act and allege fraud of
inducement in entering into the promissory note. In the opinion of
counsel, that counter-claim is without merit. Wound Management
Technologies, Inc. will pursue this case to final
judgment.
The
352nd Judicial District Court entered an order in December, 2016
consolidating the Bohdan Rudawski case and the Fox Lake Animal
Hospital case into the 352nd Court case. This case is currently set
for trial for the week of June 19, 2017.
Beeleve, LLC. v. Wound Management Technologies,
Inc. Beeleve,
LLC instituted litigation against the Company on November 19, 2014
in Cause DC-14-13541 of the 95th District Court of Dallas County,
Texas, on one certain promissory note. That matter has been
resolved to the satisfaction of the Company and an Agreed Order of
Dismissal with prejudice has been entered October 14,
2015.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
This
item is not applicable.
15
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The
Company’s common stock is traded on OTCQB under the trading
symbol “WNDM.” OTCQB is one of three tiers established
by OTC Markets Group, Inc., which operates one of the world’s
largest electronic interdealer quotation systems for broker-dealers
to trade securities not listed on a national exchange. The
following table sets forth the high and low sales price information
of the Company’s common stock for the quarterly periods
indicated as reported by NASDAQ.
YEAR
|
QUARTER ENDING
|
HIGH
|
LOW
|
2016
|
March 31,
2016
|
$0.890
|
$0.050
|
|
June 30,
2016
|
$0.080
|
$0.050
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
$0.070
|
$0.040
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
$0.050
|
$0.040
|
2015
|
March 31,
2015
|
$0.060
|
$0.060
|
|
June 30,
2015
|
$0.090
|
$0.090
|
|
September 30,
2015
|
$0.070
|
$0.060
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
$0.090
|
$0.070
|
Record Holders
As of
March 31, 2017, there were 2,140 shareholders of record holding
shares of common stock issued, of which a total of 4,089 shares are
held as treasury stock. As of March 31, 2017, there were
110,544,476 shares of common stock issued and 110,540,387 shares of
common stock outstanding.
The
holders of the common stock are entitled to one vote for each share
held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders.
Holders of the common stock have no preemptive rights and no right
to convert their common stock into any other securities. There are
no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common
stock.
Dividends
We have
never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and
we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We currently expect to retain any future earnings to fund our
operations and the expansion of our business.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Set
forth below is information regarding the issuance and sales of the
Company’s securities without registration for the two-year
period ended December 31, 2016 not previously
disclosed:
On
March 5, 2015, the Company granted 100,000 shares of common stock
which vested immediately valued at $5,970 according to the terms of
a service agreement. Under the award, the nonemployee was also
granted an aggregate of 800,000 additional shares which vest in
tranches of 300,000, 250,000 and 250,000 upon the achievement of
certain revenue targets. No expense was recognized for these
additional shares during the twelve months ended December 31,
2015.
16
On
March 10, 2015, the Company issued 374,264 shares of common stock
in conversion of 357 shares of Series C Preferred stock and $1,036
of related dividends.
On May
19, 2015, the Company granted 100,000 shares of common stock which
vested immediately valued at $10,000 according to the terms of a
service agreement.
On May
19, 2015, the Company awarded 250,000 shares of common stock which
vested immediately valued at $23,000 according to the terms of an
employment agreement.
On June
19, 2015, the Company issued 642,330 shares of common stock in
conversion of 600 shares of Series C Preferred stock and $2,963 of
related Series C dividends.
On July
15, 2015, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock which
vested 60 days after their grant date of May 15, 2015 valued at
$9,800 according to the terms of a service agreement.
During
twelve months ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded an
aggregate reversal of $10,456 of stock-based compensation related
to the amortization of stock awards to employees and nonemployees
net of reversal of the unvested portion of forfeited awards. During
the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued an
aggregate of 333,334 shares of fully vested common stock under
previously granted stock awards.
On
December 29, 2015, the Company issued 594,243 shares of common
stock in conversion of 546 shares of Series C Preferred stock and
$3,377 of related Series C dividends.
On
January 29, 2016, the Company issued 1,098,904 shares of common
stock in conversion of 1,000 shares of Series C Preferred stock and
$6,923.29 of related Series C dividends.
On
February 9, 2016, the Company issued 2,142 shares of Series C
preferred stock in exchange for cash amount of
$150,000.
On
April 5, 2016, the Company issued 4,286 shares of Series C
preferred stock in exchange for cash amount of
$300,000.
On
October 26, 2016, the Company issued 1,150,000 shares of common
stock valued at $57,500 to company employees.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, an aggregate of 166,667 common
shares were issued upon the vesting of previously granted stock
awards and the Company recorded a net reversal of $2,220 of
stock-based compensation related to the amortization of stock
awards to employees and nonemployees net of reversal of the
unvested portion of forfeited awards.
The
issuances described above were made in private transactions or
private placements intending to meet the requirements of one or
more exemptions from registration. In addition to any noted
exemption below, we relied upon Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”). The investors were not
solicited through any form of general solicitation or advertising,
and the sales were conducted in private transactions where the
investor identified an investment intent as to the transaction
without a view to an immediate resale of the securities. The shares
were “restricted securities” in that they were both
legended with reference to Rule 144 as such and the investors
identified that they were sophisticated as to the investment
decision and in most cases we reasonably believed the investors
were “accredited investors” as such term is defined
under Regulation D based upon statements and information supplied
to us in writing and verbally in connection with the transactions.
We have never utilized an underwriter for an offering of our
securities and no sales commissions were paid to any third party in
connection with the above-referenced sales.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
As a
smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this
information.
17
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related footnotes that appear
in this document.
Organizational Overview
Our
primary focus is developing and marketing products for the advanced
wound care market, with a focus on surgical products, as pursued
through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, WCI and ROP, which brings a
unique mix of products, procedures and expertise to the wound care
arena and surgical wounds. CellerateRX’s patented Activated
Collagen fragments (CRa® are a fraction of the size of the
native collagen molecules and particles found in other products,
which delivers the benefits of collagen to the body
immediately.
After
completing evidence-based studies, the Company has identified
opportunities for growth, especially in the following areas: brand
recognition in the medical community, products for surgical wounds,
and international expansion of our business.
In
September of 2009, the Company acquired the ROP Patent, which
offers a solution to the problem of bone wound healing in a cost
effective manner. In February 2016, we received FDA 501(k)
clearance for HemaQuell® our Resorbable Bone Hemostat. In
2011, ROP executed BioStructures License to develop certain
products in the field of bone remodeling. In January of 2014,
BioStructures received 510k clearance for their first Biostructures
Product: an innovative bioactive bone graft putty and bone graft
extender. In February of 2014, ROP granted a Commercial License to
BioStructures according to the terms of the Biostructures License.
In November 2015, BioStructures was sold to BioVentus Global and
the License remains in effect.
Preparing
for the expanding role of our products, the Company is studying the
feasibility of two other medical devices that could be effectively
distributed by the Company’s sales direct and contracted
sales teams.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these
consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities
and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances. The results of these assumptions form the basis
for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Under
different assumptions or conditions, actual results may differ from
these estimates. We believe the footnotes to the consolidated
financial statements provide the description of the significant
accounting policies necessary in fully understanding and evaluating
our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Year ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year ended
December 31, 2015
Revenues. The Company generated revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2016 of $5,507,853 compared to revenues of $3,372,188
for the year ended December 31, 2015, or a 63% increase in
revenues. The increase in revenues is the result of the
Company’s increased sales and marketing efforts. Revenues in
both 2016 and 2015 include $201,000 in annual royalties from the
Biostructures License.
Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold for the year ended
December 31, 2016 were $943,579 compared to cost of goods sold of
$891,970 for the year ended December 31, 2015, or a 6% increase in
cost of goods sold. In 2016, although the Company’s revenue
from product sales increased significantly, the Company did not yet
exceed the sales threshold needed to exceed the minimum annual
royalty of $375,000.
Selling, General and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses. SG&A expenses for the
year ended December 31, 2016 were $4,775,524 compared to SG&A
expenses of $3,385,168 for the year ended December 31, 2015, or a
41% increase in SG&A expenses. In 2016 the Company was
successful in controlling general and administrative costs while
still growing sales. The largest component of this savings was due
to negotiating and terminating the Shipping and Marketing Agreement
with Welldyne in 2015.
18
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $174,493 for the year
ended December 31, 2016, compared to $176,892 for the year
ended December 31, 2015, or a decrease of 1%.
Net loss. We had a net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2016, of $415,747 compared with a net loss of
$1,340,455 for the year ended December 31, 2015, or a decrease
in loss of 69%. The Company was able to reduce net loss in 2016 by
increasing revenue from product sales and gross
profit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our
principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents,
and cash generated from operations. Cash and cash equivalents
consist primarily of cash on deposit with banks. Historically, we
have financed our operations primarily from the sale of debt and
equity securities. Our financing activities generated
approximately $244,927 for the year ended December 31, 2016,
and approximately $867,120 for the year ended December 31,
2015.
We
determined that our existing cash and future cash to be generated
from operations will satisfy our foreseeable working capital, debt
repayment and capital expenditure requirements for at least the
next twelve months. We will monitor our cash flow, assess our
business plan, and make expenditure adjustments accordingly. If
appropriate, we may pursue limited financing including issuing
additional equity. Although we have successfully funded our
operations to date by attracting additional equity investors, there
is no assurance that our capital raising efforts will be able to
attract additional necessary capital for our operations. If we are
unable to obtain additional funding for operations at any time now
or in the future, we may not be able to continue operations as
proposed, requiring us to modify our business plan, curtail various
aspects of our operations or cease operations.
As of
December 31, 2016, we had total current assets of $1,996,013,
including cash of $833,480 and inventories of $348,457. As of
December 31, 2015, we had total current assets of $1,158,670,
including cash of $182,337 and inventories of
$409,778.
As of
December 31, 2016, we had total current liabilities of $1,394,359
including $414,338 of notes payable to unrelated parties. Our
current liabilities also include $276,916 of current year royalties
payable, which were paid in full during January of 2016. As of
December 31, 2015, we had total current liabilities of $1,459,094
including $614,700 of notes payable and convertible notes payable
to unrelated parties. Our current liabilities also included
$276,916 of current year royalties payable.
As of
December 31, 2016, our current liabilities also included derivative
liabilities of $44 compared to derivative liabilities of $310 at
December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2016, our derivative liabilities
consisted of 10,000 outstanding common stock purchase warrants. At
December 31, 2015, our derivative liabilities consisted of 410,000
outstanding common stock purchase warrants and convertible
promissory notes, net of unamortized discounts in the amount of
$10,494.
For the
year ended December 31, 2016, net cash from operating activities
was $409,245 compared to net cash used in operating activities of
$1,202,889 in 2015.
We used
$3,029 in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2016,
compared to $5,334 in the year ended December 31,
2015.
For the
year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by financing
activities was $244,927, compared to $867,120 in 2015.
19
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
Contractual Commitments
Royalty Agreements
Pursuant
to the agreements with AN and Petito, the Company is obligated to
pay royalties to AN and Petito, as described in “Item 1.
Product, Patent, License and Royalty Agreement.” The Company
is current with all such royalty obligations.
On
September 29, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”), by and
among the Company, RSI-ACQ, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company (RSI), Resorbable Orthopedic Products, LLC
(“Resorbable”) and Resorbable’s members, pursuant
to which, RSI acquired substantially all of Resorbable’s
assets, in exchange for (i) 500,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock, and (ii) a royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the
net revenues generated from products sold by the Company or any of
its affiliates, which products are developed from or otherwise
utilize any of the patented technology acquired from Resorbable.
The royalty is paid to Barry Constantine, (a contract employee of
the Company holding the position of Director of R&D) for
distribution to the original patent holders, (including Mr.
Constantine) and/or their heirs.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
As a
smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this
information.
20
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
F-1
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
F-2
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
F-3
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’
Deficit
|
F-4
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-5
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-6
|
21
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Wound
Management Technologies, Inc.
Fort
Worth, Texas
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively,
the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then
ended. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the entity’s management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor
were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for
the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malonebailey.com
Houston,
Texas
April
4, 2017
F-1
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Assets
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
Cash
|
$833,480
|
$182,337
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for bad debt of $21,947 and
$20,388
|
744,044
|
251,546
|
Royalty
receivable
|
50,250
|
201,000
|
Inventory,
net of allowance for obsolescence for $153,023 and
$150,135
|
348,457
|
409,778
|
Prepaid
and other assets
|
19,782
|
114,009
|
Total current assets
|
1,996,013
|
1,158,670
|
|
|
|
Long-term assets:
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $41,328 and
$31,477
|
34,939
|
41,762
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization of $369,974 and
$318,944
|
140,336
|
191,366
|
Total long-term assets
|
175,275
|
233,128
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$2,171,288
|
$1,391,798
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$238,229
|
$222,351
|
Accounts
payable - related parties
|
93,655
|
21,099
|
Accrued
royalties
|
276,916
|
323,062
|
Current
lease obligation
|
3,766
|
4,504
|
Accrued
interest
|
367,411
|
273,068
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
44
|
310
|
Notes
payable
|
414,338
|
444,700
|
Convertible
notes payable
|
-
|
170,000
|
Total current liabilities
|
1,394,359
|
1,459,094
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
Convertible
notes payable - related parties
|
1,200,000
|
1,200,000
|
Capital
lease obligation
|
-
|
3,973
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
1,200,000
|
1,203,973
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
2,594,359
|
2,663,067
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' deficit
|
|
|
Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock, $10 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 85,646 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016
and 80,218 issued and outstanding as of December 31,
2015
|
856,460
|
802,180
|
Common
Stock: $.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 109,690,387
issued and 109,686,298 outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and
107,274,816 issued and 107,270,727 outstanding as of December 31,
2015
|
109,690
|
107,274
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
45,822,570
|
44,615,321
|
Treasury
stock
|
(12,039)
|
(12,039)
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(47,199,752)
|
(46,784,005)
|
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
(423,071)
|
(1,271,269)
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$2,171,288
|
$1,391,798
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-2
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$5,507,853
|
$3,372,188
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
943,579
|
891,970
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
4,564,274
|
2,480,218
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
3,946,124
|
3,378,707
|
Other
administrative expense
|
818,665
|
-
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
60,883
|
60,031
|
Bad
debt expense
|
10,735
|
6,461
|
Total operating expenses
|
4,836,407
|
3,445,199
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
(272,133)
|
(964,981)
|
|
|
|
Other income / (expense)
|
|
|
Debt
forgiveness
|
30,592
|
-
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
266
|
(295)
|
Other
income
|
21
|
20
|
Loss
on issuance of debt for warrants
|
-
|
(198,307)
|
Interest
expense
|
(174,493)
|
(176,892)
|
Total other income / (expense)
|
(143,614)
|
(375,474)
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
(415,747)
|
(1,340,455)
|
|
|
|
Series
C preferred stock dividends
|
(261,716)
|
(268,772)
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders
|
$(677,463)
|
$(1,609,227)
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per share of common stock
|
$(0.01)
|
$(0.02)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, basic and
diluted
|
108,604,489
|
106,695,782
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-3
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’
DEFICIT
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
|
|
Preferred
Stock
Series
C Shares |
$10.00
Par
Value Amount
|
Common
Stock
Shares
|
$0.001
Par
Value Amount
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Treasury
Stock Shares
|
Treasury
Stock Amount
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
Stockholders'
Deficit
|
Balance at December 31,
2014
|
70,411
|
$704,110
|
105,447,320
|
$105,447
|
$43,820,636
|
(4,089)
|
$(12,039)
|
$(45,443,550)
|
$(825,396)
|
Issuance of Common
stock for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Services
|
-
|
-
|
216,734
|
216
|
48,553
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
48,769
|
Conversion
of Series C Preferred Stock
|
(1,503)
|
(15,030)
|
1,503,000
|
1,503
|
13,527
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Series
C Dividend
|
-
|
-
|
107,762
|
108
|
(108)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Issuance of Preferred
stock for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash
|
11,310
|
113,100
|
-
|
-
|
636,900
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
750,000
|
Recognition of vesting
stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(4,187)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(4,187)
|
Fogiveness of related
party convertible debt
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
100,000
|
Net
Loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,340,455)
|
(1,340,455)
|
Balance at December 31,
2015
|
80,218
|
$802,180
|
107,274,816
|
$107,274
|
$44,615,321
|
(4,089)
|
$(12,039)
|
$(46,784,005)
|
$(1,271,269)
|
Issuance of Common
stock for:
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Services
|
-
|
-
|
1,316,667
|
1,317
|
56,183
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
57,500
|
Conversion
of Series C Preferred Stock
|
(1,000)
|
(10,000)
|
1,000,000
|
1,000
|
9,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Series
C Dividend
|
-
|
-
|
98,904
|
99
|
(99)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Issuance of Preferred
stock for:
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Cash
|
6,428
|
64,280
|
-
|
-
|
385,720
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
450,000
|
Recognition of vesting
stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,220)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,220)
|
Warrant
expense
|
|
|
|
|
758,665
|
|
|
|
758,665
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(415,747)
|
(415,747)
|
Balance at December 31,
2016
|
85,646
|
$856,460
|
109,690,387
|
$109,690
|
$45,822,570
|
(4,089)
|
$(12,039)
|
$(47,199,752)
|
$(423,071)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-4
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(415,747)
|
$(1,340,455)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
60,883
|
60,031
|
Forgiveness
of debt
|
30,592
|
-
|
Bad
debt expense
|
10,735
|
6,461
|
Inventory
obsolescence
|
152,547
|
133,747
|
Common
stock issued for services
|
55,280
|
44,582
|
(Gain)
loss on change in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
(266)
|
295
|
Warrant
expense
|
758,665
|
-
|
(Gain)
loss on issuance of debt for warrants
|
-
|
198,307
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
(503,233)
|
20,256
|
(Increase)
decrease in royalities receivable
|
150,750
|
(201,000)
|
(Increase)
decrease in inventory
|
(91,226)
|
(140,995)
|
(Increase)
decrease in prepaids and other assets
|
94,227
|
(107,714)
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued royalties and dividends
|
(46,146)
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
15,877
|
33,183
|
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable related parties
|
72,556
|
-
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued liabilities
|
-
|
(1,224)
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued interest payable
|
63,751
|
91,637
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating
activities
|
409,245
|
(1,202,889)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(3,029)
|
(5,334)
|
Net
cash flows used in investing activities
|
(3,029)
|
(5,334)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
Payments
on capital lease obligation
|
(4,711)
|
(4,660)
|
Borrowings
on debt
|
-
|
96,000
|
Payments
on debt
|
(200,362)
|
(74,220)
|
Borrowings
on convertible debt, to related parties
|
-
|
1,200,000
|
Payments
on convertible debt
|
-
|
(1,100,000)
|
Cash
proceeds from sale of series C preferred stock
|
450,000
|
750,000
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities
|
244,927
|
867,120
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
651,143
|
(341,103)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
182,337
|
523,441
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$833,480
|
$182,338
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
Interest
|
$49,559
|
$85,255
|
Income
taxes
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
Common
stock issued for Series C dividends
|
$99
|
$108
|
Common
stock issued for conversion of Series C Preferred
Stock
|
10,000
|
15,030
|
Issuance
of convertible debt for warrants
|
-
|
200,000
|
Issuance
of vested stock
|
167
|
333
|
Forgiveness
of related party convertible debt
|
-
|
100,000
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-5
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Wound Management
Technologies, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Texas in
December 2001 as MB Software, Inc. In May 2008, MB Software, Inc.
changed its name to Wound Management Technologies, Inc. The Company
distributes collagen-based wound care products to healthcare
providers such as physicians, clinics and hospitals.
NOTE
2 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The terms
“the Company,” “we,” “us” and
“WMT” are used in this report to refer to Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
PRINCIPLES
OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of WMT and
its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Wound Care Innovations, LLC a Nevada
limited liability company (“WCI”); Resorbable
Orthopedic Products, LLC, a Texas limited liability company
(“Resorbable); and Innovate OR, Inc.
(“InnovateOR”) formerly referred to as BioPharma
Management Technologies, Inc., a Texas corporation
(“BioPharma”). All intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
USE
OF ESTIMATES IN FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION
The preparation of
the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. On a regular basis, management evaluates these
estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
CASH,
CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The Company
considers all highly liquid debt investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Marketable securities include investments with maturities greater
than three months but less than one year. For certain of the
Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other
accrued liabilities, and amounts due to related parties, the
carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short
maturities.
LOSS
PER SHARE
The Company
computes loss per share in accordance with Accounting Standards
Codification “ASC” Topic No. 260, “Earnings per
Share,” which requires the Company to present basic and
dilutive loss per share when the effect is dilutive. Basic loss per
share is computed by dividing loss available to common stockholders
by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted
loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except
that the denominator is increased to include the number of
additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the
potential common shares had been issued and if the additional
common shares were dilutive.
F-6
REVENUE
RECOGNITION
In accordance with
the guidance in “ASC” Topic No. 605, “Revenue
Recognition,” the Company recognizes revenue when (a)
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (b) delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered, (c) the fee is fixed or
determinable, and (d) collectability is reasonable assured. Revenue
is recognized upon delivery. Revenue is recorded on the gross
basis, which includes handling and shipping, because the Company
has risks and rewards as a principal in the transaction based on
the following: (a) the Company maintains inventory of the product,
(b) the Company is responsible for order fulfillment, and (c) the
Company establishes the price for the product. The Company
recognizes royalty revenue in the period the royalty bearing
products are sold.
The Company
recognizes revenue based on bill and hold arrangements when the
seller has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and
rewards of ownership of the goods; the seller does not retain
effective control over the goods or continuing managerial
involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership; the
amount of revenue can be measured reliably; it is probable that the
economic benefits of the sale will flow to the seller; any costs
incurred or to be incurred related to the sale can be measured
reliably; it is probable that delivery will be made; the goods are
on hand, identified, and ready for delivery; the buyer specifically
acknowledges the deferred delivery instructions; and the usual
payment terms apply.
ALLOWANCE
FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The Company
establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure accounts
receivable are not overstated due to uncollectibility. Bad debt
reserves are maintained based on a variety of factors, including
the length of time receivables are past due and a detailed review
of certain individual customer accounts. If circumstances related
to customers change, estimates of the recoverability of receivables
would be further adjusted. The Company recorded bad debt expense of
$10,735 and
$6,461 in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The allowance for doubtful
accounts at December 31, 2016 was $21,947 and the amount at
December 31, 2015 was $20,388.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are
stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost
computed on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventories consist of
finished goods, powders, gels and the related packaging supplies.
The Company recorded inventory obsolescence expense of $152,547 in
2016 and $133,747 in 2015. The allowance for obsolete and slow
moving inventory had a balance of $153,023 and $150,135 at December
31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
Property and
equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed utilizing
the straight-line method over the estimated economic life of the
asset, which ranges from five to ten years. As of December 31,
2016, fixed assets consisted of $76,267 including furniture and
fixtures, computer equipment, phone equipment and the Company
websites. As of December 31, 2015, fixed assets consisted of
$73,239 including furniture and fixtures, computer equipment, phone
equipment and the Company websites. The depreciation expense
recorded in 2016 was $9,852 and the depreciation expense recorded
in 2015 was $8,999. The balance of accumulated depreciation was
$41,328 and $31,477 at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015,
respectively.
F-7
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
Intangible assets
as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of a patent acquired in
2009 with a historical cost of $510,310. The intangible asset is
being amortized over its estimated useful life of 10 years using
the straight-line method. Amortization expense recognized was
$51,031 during 2016 and 2015.
IMPAIRMENT
OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Long-lived assets
and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by the
Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. The Company continuously evaluates the
recoverability of its long-lived assets based on estimated future
cash flows and the estimated liquidation value of such long-lived
assets, and provides for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows
are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived
assets. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the
asset down to its fair value, and a loss is recorded as the
difference between the carrying value and fair value. Fair values
are determined based on quoted market values, undiscounted cash
flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable. Assets to
be disposed of are carried at the lower of carrying value or
estimated net realizable value. There was no impairment recorded
during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
As defined in
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic No.
820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date (exit price).
The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including
assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the
valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market
corroborated, or generally unobservable. ASC 820 establishes a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair
value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs (level 3 measurement). This fair value measurement framework
applies at both initial and subsequent measurement.
The three levels of
the fair value hierarchy defined by ASC Topic No. 820 are as
follows:
Level 1 –
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those
in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on
an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial
instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable
securities and listed equities.
Level 2 –
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets
included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly
observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those
financial instruments that are valued using models or other
valuation methodologies. These models are primarily
industry-standard models that consider various assumptions,
including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value,
volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for
the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic
measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in
the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be
derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels
at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
F-8
Instruments in this
category generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as
commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and
collars.
Level 3 –
Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less
observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with
internally developed methodologies that result in
management’s best estimate of fair value.
At December 31,
2016 and 2015, the Company’s financial instruments consist of
the derivative liabilities related to stock purchase warrants which
were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, a level 3
input.
Our intangible
assets have also been valued using the fair value accounting
treatment and a description of the methodology used, including the
valuation category, is described below in Note 6 “Intangible
Assets.”
The following table
sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the
Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were
accounted for at fair value as of December 31, 2016 and
2015.
Recurring Fair Value Measure
|
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
Liabilities as of December 31, 2016
|
$-
|
$-
|
$44
|
$44
|
Derivative
Liabilities as of December 31, 2015
|
$-
|
$-
|
$310
|
$310
|
DERIVATIVES
The Company entered
into derivative financial instruments to manage its funding of
current operations. Derivatives are initially recognized at fair
value at the date a derivative contract is entered into and are
subsequently re-measured to their fair value at the end of each
reporting period. The resulting gain or loss is recognized in
profit or loss immediately.
INCOME
TAXES
Income taxes are
accounted for under the asset and liability method, whereby
deferred income taxes are recorded for temporary differences
between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of
assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect
the tax rates expected to be in effect for the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is
provided if it is more likely than not that some or all, of the
deferred tax asset will not be realized.
F-9
BENEFICIAL
CONVERSION FEATURE OF CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
The convertible
feature of certain notes payable provides for a rate of conversion
that is below the market value of the Company’s common stock.
Such a feature is normally characterized as a "Beneficial
Conversion Feature" ("BCF"). In accordance with ASC Topic No.
470-20-25-4, the intrinsic value of the embedded beneficial
conversion feature present in a convertible instrument shall be
recognized separately at issuance by allocating a portion of the
debt equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to additional
paid in capital. When applicable, the Company records the estimated
fair value of the BCF in the consolidated financial statements as a
discount from the face amount of the notes. Such discounts are
accreted to interest expense over the term of the notes using the
effective interest method.
ADVERTISING
EXPENSE
In accordance with
ASC Topic No. 720-35-25-1, the Company recognizes advertising
expenses the first time the advertising takes place. Such costs are
expensed immediately if such advertising is not expected to
occur.
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
The Company
accounts for stock-based compensation to employees in accordance
with FASB ASC 718. Stock-based compensation to employees is
measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award,
and is recognized as expense over the requisite employee service
period. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to other
than employees in accordance with FASB ASC 505-50. Equity
instruments issued to other than employees are valued at the
earlier of a commitment date or upon completion of the services,
based on the fair value of the equity instruments and is recognized
as expense over the service period. The Company estimates the fair
value of stock-based payments using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model for common stock options and warrants and the
closing price of the Company’s common stock for common share
issuances.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period
presentation.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
There were various
accounting standards and interpretations issued during 2016 and
2015, none of which are expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s financial position, operations or cash
flows.
NOTE
3 - GOING CONCERN
The Company has
continuously incurred losses from operations, however, the
operating loss in 2016 includes a significant nonrecurring expense
in the amount of $818,665, primarily a non-cash loss on the
issuance of warrants for services valued at $758,665. Without this
non-cash expense, operating income was $342,918 for 2016. See NOTE
4 below for a discussion of this expense. On December 31, 2016, the
Company has a working capital balance of $601,654. The Company has
adopted a robust operating plan for 2017 that projects existing
cash and future cash to be generated from operations will satisfy
our foreseeable working capital, debt repayment and capital
expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months.
However, minimal funding may be required at certain times during
the year due to the timing of significant expenditures such as
inventory purchases. The Company believes it will be able to obtain
such funding, if required during 2017. We will also monitor our
cash flow; assess our business plan; and make expenditure
adjustments accordingly.
F-10
Based upon the
Company's current ability to obtain additional financing or equity
capital and to achieve profitable operations, it is not appropriate
at this time to continue using the going concern
basis.
NOTE
4 – OTHER SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS
Evolution
Partners LLC Letter Agreement
On April 26, 2016,
the Company entered into a letter agreement with Evolution Venture
Partners LLC (“EVP”) to serve as a strategic adviser
together with Middlebury Securities, LLC (“Middlebury”)
to serve as the exclusive placement agent to the Company in
connection with the pursuit and execution of a “Financing
Transaction” or “Strategic Transaction”. A
Financing Transaction is defined as a single transaction or a
series of related transactions, a private or public offering or
issuance of equity securities or indebtedness of the Company for
cash, assumption or incurrence of indebtedness, securities or other
consideration with any party. A Strategic Transaction is defined as
any acquisition, business combination, transfer or other
disposition or any other corporate transaction involving the
assets, intellectual property, securities or businesses of the
Company, whether by way of a merger or consolidation, license,
divestiture, reorganization, recapitalization or restructuring,
issuance of indebtedness, tender or exchange offer, negotiated
purchase, leveraged buyout, minority investment or partnership,
joint venture, collaborative venture or otherwise with any party. A
Strategic Transaction does not include any transaction identified
or sourced internally by the Company or the Company’s Board
of Directors and entered into in the Company’s ordinary
course of business.
The initial term of
the agreement is for a period of one (1) year from the execution of
the agreement (the “Term”); provided, however, that
such initial term will be extended for successive six (6) month
periods unless terminated by written notice by either party.
Furthermore, in the event within twelve (12) months following the
expiration of the Term (such period, the “Tail Period”)
the Company closes a Strategic Transaction or Financing Transaction
with a person or entity contacted by EVP on behalf of the Company
during the Term, then the Company shall pay and deliver to EVP all
fees, expenses and warrants as though such transaction were
consummated during the Term.
As compensation for
these services, EVP received a one-time consulting fee of $60,000
plus a warrant to purchase up to 60 million shares of the common
stock of the Company, (which number of shares was approximately 23%
of the Company’s outstanding capital stock, calculated on a
fully diluted basis, on the agreement date). The total amount of
this expense was $818,665, consisting of the cash fee of $60,000
and the fair value of the warrants vested on the agreement dated
recognized of $758,665, and is recognized in 2016 as “Other
administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
The terms and
conditions upon which the Warrant may be exercised, and the Shares
covered thereby may be purchased, are as follows:
The exercise period
of the Warrant is the period beginning on the date that the Warrant
vests as provided below and ending at 5:00 p.m., Dallas, Texas
time, on April 26, 2021, (the “Exercise Period”). EVP
may only purchase shares that have vested (“Vested
Shares”), which shares shall vest as follows:
F-11
20% of the shares
were vested on the agreement date;
20% of the shares
will vest and become exercisable upon the consummation by the
Company of one or more Financing Transactions with gross proceeds
of at least $5,000,000; it being agreed and understood that such
gross proceeds will exclude capital invested or loaned to the
Company by current investors, members of the Board or management of
the Company and/or their respective affiliates (collectively,
“Inside Investors”), but not to the extent third- party
investors do not participate in such Financing Transaction in order
to accommodate participation by the Inside Investors;
20% of the shares
will vest and become exercisable upon the consummation by the
Company of a Strategic Transaction (other than an Acquisition of
the Company and other than a distribution agreement);
20% of the shares
shall vest and become exercisable upon the Company’s
execution of a material distribution agreement which constitutes a
Strategic Transaction, which materiality threshold will be mutually
agreeable to the Company and EVP / Middlebury;
20% of the shares
shall vested and become exercisable upon the Company’s hiring
of an executive officer or other key employee, which executive
officer or key employee was identified by Service Provider or
Service Provider played a meaningful role in such person’s
hire as requested by the Company in writing, and only if, the
Company and EVP / Middlebury mutually agree that such hire will
materially enhance the Company; and
All non-vested
shares will vest and become exercisable upon the consummation of an
acquisition of the Company.
The agreement
further provides that in the event the Company closes a Strategic
Transaction during the Term, or closes a Strategic Transaction
during the Tail Period with a person or entity contacted by EVP on
behalf of the Company during the Term, the Company shall pay to EVP
a cash fee equal to five percent (5%) of the transaction value of
the Strategic Transaction. Furthermore, in the event the Company
closes a Financing Transaction during the Term, or closes a
Financing Transaction during the Tail Period with a person or
entity contacted by EVP on behalf of the Company during the Term,
the Company shall pay to EVP a cash fee equal to: (i) five percent
(5%) of the amount of the gross proceeds from the equity sold in a
Financing Transaction; and (ii) three percent (3%) of the amount of
the gross proceeds from the debt sold in a Financing
Transaction.
As of this date,
there are no Financing Transactions or Strategic Transactions being
considered by the Company and no such transactions have
occurred.
Shipping
and Consulting Agreement
On September 20,
2013, the Company entered into a Shipping and Consulting Agreement
with WellDyne Health, LLC (“WellDyne”). Under the
agreement, WellDyne agreed to provide certain storage, shipping,
and consulting services, and was granted the right to conduct
online resale of certain of the Company’s products to U.S.
consumers. The agreement provided for an initial term of 3
years.
Effective June 1,
2015, the Company and WellDyne entered into an amendment to the
Agreement, pursuant to which the Agreement was amended to, among
other things: (a) eliminate certain administrative services being
performed by WellDyne under the Agreement, (b) revise the terms of
the administrative fee payable to WellDyne under the Agreement, and
(c) provide for termination of the Agreement, effective as of
September 19th of a given year, by written notice by either party
delivered before June 15th of such year.
F-12
On June 4, 2015,
the Company delivered written notice to WellDyne, terminating the
Agreement pursuant to Section Five thereof and the termination was
effective September 19, 2015.
Brookhaven
Medical, Inc. Agreement
On October 11,
2013, the Company, together with certain of its subsidiaries,
entered into a term loan agreement (the “Loan
Agreement”) with Brookhaven Medical, Inc.
(“BMI”), pursuant to which BMI made a loan to the
Company in the amount of $1,000,000 under a Senior Secured
Convertible Promissory Note (the “First BMI Note”). In
connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company and BMI also
entered into a letter of intent contemplating (i) an additional
loan to the Company (the “Additional Loan”) of up to
$2,000,000 by BMI (or an outside lender), and (ii) entrance into an
agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”)
pursuant to which the Company would merge with a subsidiary of BMI,
subject to various conditions precedent.
The First BMI Note
carries an interest rate of 8% per annum, and all unpaid principal
and accrued but unpaid interest under the First BMI Note is due and
payable on the later of (i) October 10, 2014, or (ii) the first
anniversary of the date of the Merger Agreement. The First BMI Note
may be prepaid in whole or in part upon ten days’ written
notice, and all unpaid principal and accrued interest under the
Note may be converted, at the option of BMI, into shares of the
Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series
C Preferred Stock”) at a conversion price of $70.00 per
share. The Company’s obligations under the First BMI Note are
secured by all the assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries.
On October 15,
2013, BMI agreed to make the Additional Loan pursuant to a Secured
Convertible Drawdown Promissory Note (the “Second BMI
Note”), which allows the Company to drawdown, as needed, an
aggregate of $2,000,000, subject to an agreed upon drawdown
schedule or as otherwise approved by BMI. In connection with the
Second BMI Note, the Company, its subsidiaries, and BMI entered
into an additional loan agreement as well as an additional security
agreement.
The Second BMI Note
carries an interest rate of 8% per annum, and (subject to various
default provisions) all unpaid principal and accrued but unpaid
interest under the Second BMI Note is due and payable on the later
of (i) October 15, 2014, or (ii) the first anniversary of the date
of the Merger Agreement. The Second BMI Note may be prepaid in
whole or in part upon ten days’ written notice, and all
unpaid principal and accrued interest under the Second BMI Note may
be converted, at the option of BMI, into shares of the
Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a
conversion price of $70.00 per share at any time prior to the
Maturity Date.
In December of
2013, the Company and Brookhaven Medical, Inc. announced their
mutual decision not to proceed with the proposed merger but to
pursue other business relationships between the two
companies.
On October 15,
2014, the Company and Brookhaven Medical, Inc. executed an
amendment extending the due date of the notes to April 15, 2015.
The Company evaluated the modification under ASC 470 and determined
that it does not qualify as an extinguishment of debt.
F-13
On June 15, 2015,
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”),
together with certain of its subsidiaries, entered into a term loan
agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with The James W.
Stuckert Revocable Trust (“SRT) and The S. Oden Howell
Revocable Trust (“HRT”), pursuant to which SRT made a
loan to the Company in the amount of $600,000 and HRT made a loan
to the Company in the amount of $600,000 under Senior Secured
Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Notes”). Both SRT
and HRT are controlled by affiliates of the Company. The proceeds
of the Notes were used to pay off all outstanding unpaid principal
and accrued but unpaid interest under the Senior Secured
Convertible Promissory Note issued to Brookhaven Medical, Inc.
pursuant to a loan agreement dated October 11, 2013, (as described
in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 16,
2013, the “Brookhaven Note”). The Notes each carry an
interest rate of 10% per annum, and (subject to various default
provisions) all unpaid principal and accrued but unpaid interest
under the Notes is due and payable on June 15, 2018.The Notes may
be prepaid in whole or in part upon ten days’ written notice,
and all unpaid principal and accrued interest under the Notes may
be converted, at the option of SRT and HRT, into shares of the
Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a
conversion price of $70.00 per share at any time prior to
maturity.”).
NOTE
5 – NOTES PAYABLE
CONVERTIBLE
NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTIES
Funds are advanced
to the Company from various related parties. Other shareholders
fund the Company as necessary to meet working capital requirements
and is a summary of outstanding convertible notes due to related
parties, including accrued interest separately recorded, as of
December 31, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Interest
|
|
Related
Party
|
|
Nature
of Relationship
|
|
Term
of the agreement
|
Principal
amount
|
2016
|
2015
|
S. Oden Howell
Revocable Trust ("HRT")
|
|
Mr. S. Oden
Howell, Jr. became a member of the Board of Directors in June of
2015
|
|
The note is
unsecured, bears interest at 10% per annum, matures June 18, 2018,
and is convertible into shares of the Company's Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $70.00 per
share at any time prior to maturity.
|
$600,000
|
$96,164
|
$32,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
James W. Stuckert
Revocable Trust ("SRT")
|
|
Mr. James W.
Stuckert became a member of the Board of Directors in September of
2015
|
|
The note is
unsecured, bears interest at 10% per annum, matures June 18, 2018,
and is convertible into shares of the Company's Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $70.00 per
share at any time prior to maturity.
|
$600,000
|
$96,164
|
$32,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total
|
|
|
|
|
$1,200,000
|
$192,328
|
$65,754
|
F-14
On June 15, 2015,
the Company used proceeds from the above mentioned notes (with The
James W. Stuckert Revocable Trust (“SRT) and The S. Oden
Howell Revocable Trust (“HRT”) to pay off the
negotiated outstanding unpaid principal to $1,100,000, accrued but
unpaid interest and recognized $100,000 forgiveness of related
party convertible debt under the Senior Secured Convertible
Promissory Note issued to Brookhaven Medical, Inc. pursuant to a
loan agreement dated October 11, 2013. The gain was accounted for
as a capital transaction in 2015.
NOTES
PAYABLE
The following is a
summary of amounts due to unrelated parties, including accrued
interest separately recorded, as of December 31, 2016 and
2015:
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
Accrued Interest
|
||
Note Payable
|
|
Terms of the
agreement
|
2016
|
2015
|
2016
|
2015
|
March 4, 2011 Note
Payable
|
|
223,500 note
payable; (i) interest accrues at 13% per annum; (ii) maturity date
of September 4, 2011; (iii) $20,000 fee due at maturity date with a
$1,000 per day fee for each day the principal and interest is late.
This note is currently the subject of litigation (see Note 12
"Legal Proceedings")
|
$223,500
|
$223,500
|
$147,374
|
$117,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter 2012
Secured Subordinated Promissory Notes
|
|
Three
notes in the aggregate principal amount of $110,000; (i) interest
accrues at 5% per annum; (ii) maturity date of October 12, 2012;
(iii) after the maturity date interest shall accrue at 18% per
annum and the company shall pay to the note holders on a pro rata
basis, an amount equal to twenty percent of the sales proceeds
received by the Company and its subsidiary, WCI, from the sale of
surgical powders, until such time as the note amounts have been
paid in full. As of December 31, 2016, all of these notes remain
due.
|
$104,571
|
$110,000
|
$8,200
|
$67,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2012
Promissory Note
|
|
$51,300 note
payable (i) interest accrues at 10% per annum; (ii) original
maturity date of December 31, 2012; (iii) default interest rate of
15% per annum. As of December 31, 2016, $11,300 of this note
remains due.
|
$11,300
|
$11,300
|
$19,510
|
$14,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quest Capital
Investors, LLC
|
|
Furniture purchase
agreement in the original amount of $11,700 with $300 payments due
each month. Secured by fixed assets of the Company.
|
$300
|
$3,900
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 28, 2015
Promissory Note
|
|
$96,000 note
payable (i) interest accrues at 10% per annum; (ii) original
maturity date of May 28, 2016; (iii) amended maturity date of June
30, 2017
|
$74,667
|
$96,000
|
$-
|
$2,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2015
Convertible Promissory Note
|
|
$ 200,000 note
payable which accrued interest at 5% per annum. The note was due
September 26, 2016. The note was convertible, into common shares of
the Company at the option of the Company at a rate equal to 90% of
the volume weighted average price of the company's common stock for
the 5 trading days preceding the date of conversion. As of December
31, 2016, the note is paid in full.
|
$-
|
$170,000
|
$-
|
$4,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$414,338
|
$614,700
|
$175,083
|
$207,315
|
F-15
On June 26, 2015,
the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement with Tonaquint,
Inc., a Utah corporation (“Tonaquint”), under which
Tonaquint was issued a convertible promissory note (the
“Note”) in exchange for the surrender of common stock
warrants originally issued by the Company to Tonaquint pursuant to
a Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 21, 2011. The Note in
the original principal amount of $200,000, carried a 5% rate of
interest, and matured on September 26, 2016. The Note provided for
an initial cash installment payment of $10,000, with subsequent
monthly cash installment payments beginning in December of 2015.
Each such monthly installment payment could have been made, at the
Company's option, in shares of common stock. Subject to certain
conditions, the number of shares issuable in lieu of cash
installment payments was to be determined based on a conversion
price equal to 90% of the five-day volume weighted average trading
price of the Company's common stock. The surrendered warrants were
accounted for as derivatives with a fair value of $1,693 on the
date of the exchange.
This resulted in a
loss on the issuance of debt for warrants of $198,307 during the
year ended December 31, 2015. The Company paid a total of $178,552
in cash under this note during the year ended December 31, 2016. In
September 2016, the Company paid the final $10,000 in principal and
$8,552 in accrued interest.
During each of the
years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company paid a total of
$3,600 to Quest Capital as part of the furniture purchase agreement
in the original amount of $11,700.
During the year
ended December 31, 2015, the Company paid the final $40,620
principal and $14,861 in accrued interest due on the MAH Holding
note. (MAH Holding is controlled by a former major stockholder of
the Company).
During the year
ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid $26,762 principal and
$49,559 in accrued interest for three of the non-related party
notes. In June and July of 2016, two of the parties' notes were
amended and they agreed to forgive a portion of the accrued
interest in the amounts of $22,943 and $7,649 for a total of
$30,592.
NOTE
6 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS
PATENT
On September 29,
2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the
“Agreement”), whereby the Company acquired a patent
from in exchange for 500,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock and the assumption of a legal fee payable in the amount of
$47,595 which is related to the patent. Based on the guidance in
ASC Topic No. 350-30, the patent was recorded as an intangible
asset of $462,715, or approximately $.93 per share plus $47,595 for
the assumed liability. The intangible asset is being amortized over
an estimated ten year useful life.
The activity for
the intangible accounts is summarized below:
|
2016
|
2015
|
Patent
|
$510,310
|
$510,310
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
(369,974)
|
(318,944)
|
Patent,
net of accumulated amortization
|
140,336
|
191,366
|
|
|
|
Total
intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
|
$140,336
|
$191,366
|
The amount
amortized for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $51,030
and $51,031, respectively.
F-16
NOTE
7 – CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS
WCI had two
significant customers which accounted for approximately 18% and 14%
of the Company’s sales in 2016 and had two significant
customers which accounted for approximately 28% and 14% of the
Company’s sales in 2015. The loss of the sales generated by
these customers would have a significant effect on the operations
of the Company.
The Company
purchases all inventory from one vendor. If this vendor became
unable to provide materials in a timely manner and the Company was
unable to find alternative vendors, the Company's business,
operating results and financial condition would be materially
adversely affected.
NOTE
8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
ROYALTY
AGREEMENTS
Effective January
3, 2008, WCI entered into separate exclusive license agreements
with both Applied Nutritionals, LLC (“Applied”) and its
founder George Petito (“Petito”), pursuant to which WCI
obtained the exclusive world-wide license to make products
incorporating intellectual property covered by a patent related to
CellerateRX products. The licenses are limited to the human health
care market, (excluding dental and retail) for external wound care
(including surgical wounds), and include any new product
developments based on the licensed patent and processes and any
continuations. The term of these licenses expires in
2018.
In consideration
for the licenses, WCI agreed to pay Applied and Petito, (in the
aggregate), the following royalties, beginning January 3, 2008: (a)
an advance royalty of $100,000; (b) a royalty of 15% of gross sales
occurring during the first year of the license; (c) an additional
advance royalty of $400,000 on January 3, 2009; plus (d) a royalty
of 3% of gross sales for all sales occurring after the payment of
the $400,000 advance royalty. In addition, WCI must maintain a
minimum aggregate annual royalty payment of $375,000 for 2009 and
thereafter if the royalty percentage payments made do not meet or
exceed that amount. The amounts listed in the two preceding
sentences are the aggregate of amounts paid/owed to Applied and
Petito) and the Company has paid the minimum aggregate annual
royalty payments each year since 2008, including both 2016 and
2015. The total unpaid royalties as of December 31, 2016 and 2015,
is $276,916 and $323,062, respectively.
On September 29,
2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the
“Asset Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company,
RSI-ACQ, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (RSI),
Resorbable Orthopedic Products, LLC (“Resorbable”) and
Resorbable’s members, pursuant to which, RSI acquired
substantially all of Resorbable’s assets, in exchange for (i)
500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) a
royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the net revenues generated
from products sold by the Company or any of its affiliates, which
products are developed from or otherwise utilize any of the
patented technology acquired from Resorbable. The royalty is paid
to Barry Constantine Consultant LLC and one of the principals of
the LLC is Barry Constantine whom is a contract employee of the
Company and holds the position of Director of R&D.
PREPAIDS
FROM INVENTORY CONTRACTS
In October of 2015,
WCI entered into a contract with the manufacturer of the
CellerateRX product to purchase $217,512 of product. Payment in the
amount of $108,014 was made in October of 2015 with the remaining
balance of $109,498 paid in 2016 and before receipt of product.
This amount was recorded as an asset in the “Prepaid and
Other Assets” account at December 31, 2015 based on the
contractual obligation of the parties.
In November of
2016, ROP entered into a contract with the contract manufacturer of
HemaQuell® product to purchase $13,787 of product. This amount
was recorded as an asset in the “Prepaid and Other
Assets” account at December 31, 2016, based on the
contractual obligation of the parties.
F-17
OFFICE
LEASES
The Company’s
corporate office is located at 16633 Dallas Parkway, Suite 250,
Addison, TX 75001. The lease was entered into in November of 2013.
The lease expires on April 30, 2017 and requires base rent payments
of $5,737 per month for months 1-17, $5,866 for months 18-29, and
$5,995 for months 30-41.
In March of 2017,
the Company executed a new office lease for office space located at
1200 Summit Ave., Suite 414, Fort Worth, TX 76102 and will be
relocating our corporate offices there. The lease is to be
effective upon completion of leasehold improvements (sometime in
April 2017) and end on the last day of the fiftieth (50th) full
calendar month following the effective date. Monthly base rental
payments are as follows: months 1-2, $0; months 3-14, $7,250;
months 15-26, $7,401; months 27-38, $7,552; and months 39-50,
$7,703.
PAYABLES
TO RELATED PARTIES
As of December 31,
2016 and 2015, the Company had outstanding payable to related
parties totaling $93,655 and $21,099, respectively. The payables
are unsecured, bear no interest and due on demand
NOTE
9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
PREFERRED
STOCK
There are currently
5,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock authorized, with no
shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued or outstanding as of
December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Effective June 24,
2010, the Company filed a Certificate of Designations, Number,
Voting Power, Preferences and Rights of Series B Convertible
Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Certificate”) with the
Texas Secretary of State, designating 7,500 shares of Series B
Preferred Stock, par value $10.00 per share (the “Series B
Shares”). The Series B Shares rank senior to shares of all
other common and preferred stock with respect to dividends,
distributions, and payments upon dissolution. Each of the Series B
Shares is convertible at the option of the holder into shares of
common stock as provided in the Certificate. There were no Series B
Shares issued or outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and
2015.
On October 11,
2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Designations, Number,
Voting Power, Preferences and Rights of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”),
under which it designated 100,000 shares of Series C Preferred
Stock, par value $10.00. The Series C Preferred Stock is entitled
to accruing dividends (payable, at the Company’s options, in
either cash or stock) of 5% per annum until October 10, 2016, and
3% per annum until October 10, 2018.
The Series C
Preferred Stock is senior to the Company’s common stock and
any other currently issued series of the Company’s preferred
stock upon liquidation, and is entitled to a liquidation preference
per share equal to the original issuance price of such shares of
Series C Preferred Stock together with the amount of all accrued
but unpaid dividends thereon. Each of the Series C Shares is
convertible at the option of the holder into 1,000 shares of common
stock as provided in the Certificate. Additionally, each holder of
Series C Preferred Stock shall be entitled to vote on all matters
submitted for a vote of the holders of Common Stock a number of
votes equal to the number of full shares of Common Stock into which
such holder’s Series C shares could then be converted. As of
December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were 85,646 and
80,218 shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued and outstanding,
respectively.
F-18
On November 13,
2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Designations, Number,
Voting Power, Preferences and Rights of Series D Convertible
Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”),
under which it designated 25,000 shares of Series D Preferred
Stock. Shares of Series D Preferred Stock are not entitled to any
preference with respect to dividend or upon liquidation, and will
automatically convert (at a ratio of 1,000-to-1) into shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 upon approval of the
Company’s stockholders (and filing of) and amendment to the
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation increasing the number
of authorized shares of Common Stock from 100,000,000 to
250,000,000. As of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 there
were 0 shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
On September 3, 2014, the company increased its authorized common
stock to 250,000,000 shares. As a result, all outstanding Series D
preferred shares were converted to common stock.
On May 30, 2014,
the Company filed a Certificate of Designations, Number, Voting
Power, Preferences and Rights of Series E Convertible Preferred
Stock (The “Certificate of Designations”), under which
it designated 5,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock. Shares of
Series E Preferred Stock are not entitled to any preference with
respect to dividends or upon liquidation, and will automatically
convert (at a ratio of 1,000 shares of Common Stock for every one
share of Series E Preferred Stock) into shares of the
Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value upon approval of the
Company’s stockholders (and filing of) and amendment to the
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation increasing the number
of authorized shares of Common Stock from 100,000,000 to
250,000,000. As of December 31, 2016, there were no shares of
Series E Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
During the year
ended December 31, 2015, the company issued 11,310 shares of Series
C preferred stock to Directors of the Company for cash proceeds of
$750,000.
During the year
ended December 31, 2016, the company issued 6,428 shares of Series
C preferred stock to Directors of the Company for cash proceeds of
$450,000.
The Series C
preferred stock earned dividends of $261,716 and $268,772 for the
years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
As of the date of this filing, no Series C preferred stock
dividends have been declared or paid.
During the year
ended December 31, 2013, the Company granted an aggregate of 15,000
shares of Series D preferred stock to employees and nonemployees
for services. 13,000 of the shares were granted to employees and
vest immediately upon grant, 1,000 of the shares were granted to an
employee and vest in equal tranches over three years through
October 1, 2016 and 1,000 of the shares were granted to a
nonemployee and vest in equal tranches over three years through
September 15, 2016. The aggregate fair value of the awards was
determined to be $1,046,669 of which $925,787 was previously
recognized, $79,318 was recognized during the year ended December
31, 2014, $6,628 less net forfeitures of $19,173 was recognized
during the year ended December 31, 2015, $8,109 was recognized
during the year ended December 31, 2016 and all shares have vested,
no further expense to be recognized.
During the year
ended December 31, 2014, the Company granted an aggregate of 1,000
shares of Series D preferred stock to two employees according to
the terms of their employment agreements. The shares vest in equal
annual amounts over three years and the aggregate fair value of the
awards was determined to be $120,000. During the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015, $6,806 and $25,193 was expensed. Net
forfeitures of $17,135 was recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2016. A total of 667 shares are vested and no further
expense is to be recognized.
On September 3,
2014, the Company increased its authorized common stock to
250,000,000 shares. Accordingly, the 16,545 outstanding shares of
Series D preferred stock were automatically converted into
16,545,000 common shares.
The Company
evaluated the Series C and Series D preferred stock under FASB ASC
815 and determined that they do not qualify as derivative
liabilities. The
Company then
evaluated the Series C and Series D preferred stock for beneficial
conversion features under FASB ASC 470-30 and determined that none
existed.
COMMON
STOCK
On September 3,
2014, the Company held its annual meeting of stockholders. The
stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Articles
of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of common stock
of the Company from 100,000,000 to 250,000,000.
On March 5, 2015,
the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock which vested
immediately valued at $5,970 according to the terms of a service
agreement.
F-19
Under the award,
the nonemployee was also granted an aggregate of 800,000 additional
shares which vest in tranches of 300,000, 250,000 and 250,000 upon
the achievement of certain revenue targets. No expense was
recognized for these additional shares during the year ended
December 31, 2016.
On March 10, 2015,
the Company issued 374,264 shares of common stock in conversion of
357 shares of Series C Preferred stock and $1,036 of related
dividends.
On May 19, 2015,
the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock which vested
immediately valued at $10,000 according to the terms of a service
agreement.
On May 19, 2015,
the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock which vested
immediately valued at $23,000 according to the terms of an
employment agreement.
On June 19, 2015,
the Company issued 642,330 shares of common stock in conversion of
600 shares of Series C Preferred stock and $2,963 of related Series
C dividends.
On July 15, 2015,
the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock which vested 60
days after their grant date of May 15, 2015 valued at $9,800
according to the terms of a service agreement.
On December 31,
2015, the Company issued 594,168 shares of common stock in
conversion of 546 shares of Series C Preferred stock and $3,372 of
related Series C dividends.
During the year
ended December 31, 2015, an aggregate of 333,334 common shares were
issued upon the vesting of previously granted stock awards and the
Company recorded a net reversal of $4,187 of stock-based
compensation related to the amortization of stock awards to
employees and nonemployees net of reversal of the unvested portion
of forfeited awards.
During the year
ended December 31, 2015, an aggregate of 666,600 shares of fully
vested common stock under previously issued under stock awards and
was returned and cancelled. The share cancellation was recognized
at par value.
On March 31, 2016
the Company issued 1,098,904 shares of common stock in conversion
of 1,000 shares of Series C Preferred stock and $6,924 of related
dividends.
On October 26,
2016, the Company issued 1,150,000 shares of common stock valued at
$57,500 to employees. During the year ended December 31, 2016, an
aggregate of 499,967 common shares were issued upon the vesting of
previously granted stock awards and the Company recorded a net
reversal of $2,220 of stock-based compensation related to the
amortization of stock awards to employees and nonemployees net of
reversal of the unvested portion of forfeited awards.
On
October 26, 2016, the Company agreed to grant three tranches of
shares of common stock, 250,000, 250,000, and 250,000 to a sales
consultant which are to be earned upon meeting specific performance
measures agreed upon. The measures include achieving three specific
sales targets per month for 3 consecutive months. The first one of
these was earned January 31st, 2017, and 250,000
shares were granted in March 2017.
During the year
ended December 31, 2016, an aggregate of 166,667 shares of fully
vested common stock under previously issued stock awards was
returned and cancelled. The share cancellation was recognized at
par value.
F-20
WARRANTS
At December 31,
2016, there were 67,246,300 warrants outstanding with a weighted
average exercise price of $0.12. At December 31, 2015, there were
9,736,844 warrants outstanding with a weighted average exercise
price of $0.19.
A summary of the
status of the warrants granted at December 31, 2016 and 2015 and
changes during the years then ended is presented
below:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
||
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
9,736,844
|
$0.19
|
Granted
|
60,000,000
|
0.12
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Expired
|
(2,490,544)
|
0.60
|
Outstanding
at end of period
|
$67,246,300
|
$0.23
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
|
||
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
10,936,844
|
$0.37
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
(800,000)
|
0.62
|
Expired
|
(400,000)
|
0.55
|
Outstanding
at end of period
|
9,736,844
|
$0.19
|
F-21
The following table
summarizes the outstanding warrants as of December 31,
2016:
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|||
|
Warrants Outstanding
|
Warrants Exercisable
|
|||
Range of Exercise Prices
|
Number Outstanding
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contract Life
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
|
Number Exercisable
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
$0.06
|
4,500,000
|
2
|
$0.06
|
4,500,000
|
$0.06
|
0.08
|
550,000
|
1
|
0.08
|
550,000
|
0.08
|
0.09
|
625,000
|
1
|
0.09
|
625,000
|
0.09
|
0.12
|
60,000,000
|
4
|
0.12
|
12,000,000
|
0.12
|
0.15
|
1,571,300
|
1
|
0.15
|
1,571,300
|
0.15
|
$0.06 -.15
|
67,246,300
|
4
|
$0.12
|
19,246,300
|
$0.12
|
The following table
summarizes the outstanding warrants as of December 31,
2015:
|
As of December 31, 2015
|
As of December 31, 2015
|
|||
|
Warrants Outstanding
|
Warrants Exercisable
|
|||
Range of Exercise Prices
|
Number Outstanding
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contract Life
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
|
Number Exercisable
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
$0.06
|
4,500,000
|
3
|
$0.06
|
4,500,000
|
$0.06
|
0.08
|
550,000
|
2
|
0.08
|
550,000
|
0.08
|
0.09
|
625,000
|
2
|
0.09
|
625,000
|
0.09
|
0.15
|
1,571,300
|
2
|
0.15
|
1,571,300
|
0.15
|
0.44
|
1,515,544
|
1
|
0.44
|
1,515,544
|
0.44
|
0.60
|
975,000
|
1
|
0.60
|
975,000
|
0.60
|
$0.06 -.60
|
9,736,844
|
2
|
$0.19
|
9,736,844
|
$0.19
|
F-22
STOCK
OPTIONS
A summary of the
status of the stock options granted for the years ended December
31, 2016 and 2015, and changes during the period then ended is
presented below:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
||
|
Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
1,093,500
|
$0.15
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding
at end of period
|
1,093,500
|
$0.23
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
|
||
|
Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
943,500
|
$0.15
|
Granted
|
150,000
|
(a)
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding
at end of period
|
1,093,500
|
$0.15
|
(a) On January 1,
2015, the Company granted three tranches of options, 25,000,
25,000, and 100,000 which vest upon meeting specific performance
measures agreed upon. The measures include achieving three specific
sales targets per month for 3 consecutive months. The exercise
price and expiration date of each tranche will be set upon
achieving the targets. As of the date of this filing the
performance measures have not been met. As a result, the exercise
price is undetermined and these options are excluded from the
calculation of weighted average remaining life.
F-23
The following table
summarizes the outstanding options as of December 31,
2016:
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|||
|
Stock Options Outstanding
|
Stock Options Exercisable
|
|||
Exercise Price
|
Number Outstanding
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contract Life
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
|
Number Exercisable
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
$0.15
|
943,500
|
1.75
|
$0.15
|
943,500
|
$0.15
|
(a)
|
150,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$0.15
|
1,093,500
|
1.63
|
$0.15
|
943,500
|
$0.15
|
The following table
summarizes the outstanding options as of December 31,
2015:
|
As of December 31, 2015
|
As of December 31, 2015
|
|||
|
Stock Options Outstanding
|
Stock Options Exercisable
|
|||
Exercise Price
|
Number Outstanding
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contract Life
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
|
Number Exercisable
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
$0.15
|
943,500
|
1.63
|
$0.15
|
943,500
|
$0.15
|
(a)
|
150,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$0.15
|
1,093,500
|
1.63
|
$0.15
|
943,500
|
$0.15
|
(a) On January 1,
2015, the Company granted three tranches of options, 25,000,
25,000, and 100,000 which vest upon meeting specific performance
measures agreed upon. The measures include achieving three specific
sales targets per month for 3 consecutive months. The exercise
price and expiration date of each tranche will be set upon
achieving the targets. As of the date of this filing the
performance measures have not been met. As a result, the exercise
price is undetermined and these options are excluded from the
calculation of weighted average remaining life.
F-24
NOTE
10 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
During 2016 and
2015, the Company had outstanding common stock warrants that
contained anti-dilution provisions including provisions for the
adjustment of the exercise price if the Company issues common stock
or common stock equivalents at a price less than the exercise
price. In addition, the Company also had outstanding convertible
notes payable to various lenders that were convertible at discounts
ranging from 30% to 50% of the fair market value of the
Company’s common stock.
As of December 31,
2016, the Company did not have a sufficient number of common shares
authorized to fulfill the possible exercise of all outstanding
warrants and the conversion of all outstanding convertible notes
payable. As a result, the Company determined that the warrants and
the embedded beneficial conversion features of the debt instruments
do not qualify for equity classification. Accordingly, the warrants
and conversion options are treated as derivative liabilities and
are carried at fair value. As of December 31, 2016, some of the
outstanding common stock warrants with the anti-dilution provision
remained outstanding.
The Company
estimates the fair value of the derivative warrant liabilities by
using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model and the derivative
liabilities related to the conversion features in the outstanding
convertible notes using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model
assuming maximum value, a Level 3, input, with the following
assumptions used:
Year
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Dividend
yield:
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
146.67 to
110.19%
|
|
133.81
to 167.50%
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
0.00
to 1.07%
|
|
.13%
to 1.07%
|
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
0.00
to 0.56
|
|
0.00
to 1.57
|
|
The following table
sets forth the changes in the fair value of derivative liabilities
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
Balance, December 31, 2014
|
$(1,708)
|
Derivative
warrants exchanged for debt
|
1,693
|
Loss
on change in fair value of derivative
liabilities
|
(325)
|
Balance, December 31, 2015
|
(310)
|
Loss
on change in fair value of derivative
liabilities
|
266
|
Balance, December 31, 2016
|
$(44)
|
The aggregate gain
(loss) on derivative liabilities for the years ended December 31,
2016 and December 31, 2015 was $266 and ($295),
respectively.
F-25
NOTE
11 – INCOME TAXES
The Company
accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic No. 740,
“Income Taxes.” This standard requires the Company to
provide a net deferred tax asset or liability equal to the expected
future tax benefit or expense of temporary reporting differences
between book and tax accounting and any available operating loss or
tax credit carry forwards.
A 100% valuation
allowance has been provided for all deferred tax assets, as the
ability of the Company to generate sufficient taxable income in the
future is uncertain.
The unexpired net
operating loss carry forward at December 31, 2016 is approximately
$34,650,000 with various expiration dates between 2018 and 2036 if
not utilized. All tax years starting with 2013 are open for
examination.
Non-current
deferred tax asset:
|
2016
|
2015
|
34%
of Net operating loss carry forwards
|
$11,781,690
|
$11,776,321
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(11,781,690)
|
(11,776,321)
|
Net
non-current deferred tax asset
|
-
|
-
|
Reconciliations of
the expected federal income tax benefit based on the statutory
income tax rate of 34% to the actual benefit for the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015 are listed below.
|
2016
|
2015
|
Expected
federal income tax benefit
|
$141,354
|
$450,287
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
(5,369)
|
(808,294)
|
Goodwill
amortization
|
142,386
|
142,386
|
Derivative
gain
|
90
|
(67,524)
|
Other
|
(1,720)
|
298,303
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
(276,741)
|
(15,158)
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
$0
|
$0
|
F-26
The Company has no
tax positions at December 31, 2016 and 2015 for which the ultimate
deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty
about the timing of such deductibility.
The Company
recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in
interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. During the
years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized no
interest and penalties.
NOTE
12 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Ken Link v. Wound Management Technologies,
Inc., et al. On November 14, 2011, Ken Link instituted
litigation against Wound Management Technologies, Inc. and Scott A.
Haire in the District Court of Tarrant County Texas, Cause No.
342-256486-11 of the 342nd Judicial District, alleging default
under the terms of a certain promissory note executed by Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and guaranteed by Scott A. Haire. Ken
Link asserted at that point in time that the unpaid balance of the
note, including accrued interest as of December 4, 2011 was the sum
of $355,292, Mr. Link asserted that he was entitled to receive
200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Mr. Link is
also seeking attorney’s fees. Mr. Link is also seeking
interest at 13% per annum, plus $1,000 per day. We have disputed
the claim, because we believe the contract is tainted by usury, and
therefore, a usury counterclaim will more than offset the unpaid
balance of the promissory note.
The note, in the
original principal amount of $223,500, required the payment of
interest accrued at 13% per annum, an additional one-time charge of
$20,000 due on maturity, the issuance of 200,000 shares of stock as
interest, and a $1,000 per day late fee for each day the principal
and interest is late. It is our contention that these sums make the
contract usurious and the usury claims more than offset the amount
of the unpaid indebtedness. Furthermore, we have filed an action
for recovery of damages for usury under the Texas Finance Code for
a note which was previously executed by the Company and payable to
Ken Link, which was in fact paid to Mr. Link in full. In addition,
Wound Management is seeking recovery of attorney’s fees
pursuant to the usury provisions of the Texas Finance Code. While
the amount of the promissory note remains unpaid, the counterclaims
more than offset the maximum amount that could be asserted on the
promissory note. The case was set for trial for the week of October
21, 2013, but after three (3) days of trial before a jury, the
judge declared a mistrial. The case was subsequently reset for
trial for the week of December 1, 2014 and the judge again declared
a mistrial. The case is currently set for trial the week of May 15,
2017. Subsequent to October 21, 2013, Ken Link amended his
pleadings and alleges that Wound Management Technologies, Inc.
never intended to pay the $223,500 promissory note and sought
damages for fraud and the loss of the benefit of the bargain
relating to the shares of stock, plus interest as set forth in the
note, exemplary damages, and attorney's fees. On September 4, 2015,
Ken Link again amended his pleadings once again seeking the sums he
says are owed to him that were advanced to him in the amount of
$223,500. It is unclear if he is suing on the note or not, but it
appears he is. We are taking steps to vigorously defend this
matter, however, we are unable at this time to determine the
ultimate outcome of this matter or determine the effect it may have
on our business, financial condition or result of
operations.
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. v. Fox Lake
Animal Hospital, PSP: Wound Management Technologies, Inc.
instituted litigation in Cause No. 96-263918-13 in the 96th
District Court of Tarrant County, Texas against Fox Lake Animal
Hospital, PSP and Bohdan Rudawksi, Trustee of the Fox Lake Animal
Hospital, PSP. The cause of action asserts that the loan
transaction between Wound Management Technologies, Inc. and Fox
Lake Animal Hospital PSP involved the collection of illegal
usurious interest for the reason that while the face amount of the
promissory note is $39,000, but the loan actually loaned for a
6-month period was $25,000, resulting in an interest rate in excess
of the maximum rate permitted by the Texas Finance Code. Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. is seeking to recover the penalties
authorized by the Texas Finance Code, together with the
attorney’s fees. Fox Lake Animal Hospital and Bohdan
Rudawski, Trustee have filed a counterclaim where they allege there
were misrepresentations by Wound Management Technologies, Inc. that
would be excuse them from having to pay penalties under the Texas
Finance Code for charging usurious interest. Fox Lake Animal
Hospital and Bohdan Rudawski, Trustee further claim that actions
asserted violates the Federal Securities Exchange Act and alleged
fraud and fraud in the inducement in entering into the promissory
note. In the opinion of counsel, the counterclaim is without merit.
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. will pursue this case to final
judgment.
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. v. Bohdan
Rudawski: Wound Management Technologies, Inc. instituted
litigation in Cause No. 352-263856-13 in the 352nd District Court
of Tarrant County, Texas against Bohdan Rudawksi. The case has been
postponed until September of 2016. The cause of action asserts that
the loan transaction between Wound Management Technologies, Inc.
and Bohdan Rudawski involved the collection of illegal usurious
interest for the reason that while the face amount of the
promissory note is $156,000, but the loan actually loaned for a
6-month period was $100,000, charging an effective interest rate of
over 100% which violates the provisions of the Texas Finance Code.
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. is seeking to recover the
penalties authorized by the Texas Finance Code, together with the
attorney’s fees. Bohdan Rudawski has filed an answer and
alleges there was not an absolute obligation to repay the note,
attempting to defeat the usury claim. Bohdan Rudawski has further
asserted that the claims violate the Federal Securities Exchange
Act and allege fraud of inducement in entering into the promissory
note. In the opinion of counsel, that counter-claim is without
merit. Wound Management Technologies, Inc. will pursue this case to
final judgment.
The 352nd Judicial
District Court entered an order in December, 2016 consolidating the
Bohdan Rudawski case and the Fox Lake Animal Hospital case into the
352nd Court case. This case is currently set for trial for the week
of June 19, 2017.
F-27
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. v. Bohdan
Rudawski: Wound Management Technologies, Inc. instituted
litigation in Cause No. 352-263856-13 in the 352nd District Court
of Tarrant County, Texas against Bohdan Rudawksi. The case has been
postponed until September of 2016. The cause of action asserts that
the loan transaction between Wound Management Technologies, Inc.
and Bohdan Rudawski involved the collection of illegal usurious
interest for the reason that while the face amount of the
promissory note is $156,000.00, but the loan actually loaned for a
6 month period was $100,000.00, charging an effective interest rate
of over 100% which violates the provisions of the Texas Finance
Code. Wound Management Technologies, Inc. is seeking to recover the
penalties authorized by the Texas Finance Code, together with the
attorney’s fees. Bohdan Rudawski has filed an answer and
alleges there was not an absolute obligation to repay the note,
attempting to defeat the usury claim. In the opinion of counsel,
that claim is without merit. Wound Management Technologies, Inc.
will pursue this case to final judgment.
NOTE
13 – CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION
In December 2014,
the Company entered into a Capital Lease agreement for the purchase
of a phone system. The agreement required a down payment of $2,105
and 36 monthly payments of $375. The Company recorded an asset of
$13,512 and a capital lease obligation of $13,512. Aggregate
payments under the capital lease were $4,733 and $4,504 during 2016
and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2016, a total lease
liability of $3,766 remained which will be due in full during
2017.
NOTE
14 -- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In accordance with
applicable accounting standards for the disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial
statements are issued, all significant events or transactions that
occurred after December 31, 2017, are outlined below:
On March 9, 2017,
the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock to each of the
Company’s four Board Directors, (a total of 600,000 shares
valued at $42,000).
On March 10, 2017,
the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock valued at $17,500
to a contract consultant upon achievement of specified revenue
targets which occurred January, 31, 2017.
On March 10, 2017,
the Company issued 715 shares of Series C preferred stock in
exchange for cash in the amount of $50,050.
F-28
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In
accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e), we carried out
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements for external
reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate over time.
Management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(“COSO”) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
(2013). Based on its assessment and those criteria, management has
concluded that we maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On
March 10, 2017, WTI and John Siedhoff, the chairman of the
Company’s Board of Directors, entered into an amendment to
the Consulting Agreement, dated April 25, 2016, by and between the
Company and Mr. Siedhoff (the “Amendment”). The
Amendment: (i) changes the name of the consultant under the
Consulting Agreement from John Siedhoff to Twin Oaks Equities, LLC
(an entity controlled by Mr. Siedhoff), and(ii) increases the
monthly compensation payable under the Consulting Agreement from
$15,000 to $20,000, effective as of January 1, 2017.
22
PART III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Board of Directors
The
following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of the
current directors of the Company.
NAME
|
|
AGE
|
|
POSITION
|
|
YEAR FIRST
ELECTED
|
S.
Oden “Denny” Howell Jr.
|
|
77
|
|
Director
|
|
2015
|
Dr.
Philip J. Rubinfeld
|
|
61
|
|
Director
|
|
2010
|
John
Siedhoff
|
|
57
|
|
Director
|
|
2014
|
James
Stuckert
|
|
79
|
|
Director
|
|
2015
|
S. Oden
“Denny” Howell, Jr.
is a long-time investor in pharmaceutical and medical device
companies, as well as a past director of a pharmaceutical company.
Mr. Howell currently serves (and has served since 1972) as
President of Howell & Howell Contractors, Inc., a renovation
contractor, and industrial and commercial painting contractor. He
is also (a) the Secretary/Treasurer of LCM Constructors, Inc., a
general construction company, (b) Secretary/Treasurer of SemperFi
Constructors, LLC, a service-disabled, veteran-owned small
business, (c) Chairman of Keller Manufacturing Company, (d)
Chairman of PDD, LLC, (e) Director of THV Holdings, LLC, and (f)
Trustee of Lindsey Wilson College in Columbia,
Kentucky.
Dr. Philip J.
Rubinfeld has served as the (a) Director of Anesthesiology
and Pain Management at Surgery Center of Northwest Jersey, LLC
since 2001, and (b) Medical Director and Director of Anesthesiology
at Specialty Surgical Center, LLC since 2007. Dr. Rubinfeld has
also worked in private practice specializing in pain management
since 1996.
John Siedhoff earned
a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Iowa
State University, and spent the next 12 years working for Fluor
Corporation and Controls Southeast, Inc. in the design, manufacture
and installation of high temperature, high pressure piping systems
for oil refineries and petrochemical plants. Mr. Siedhoff’s
turnaround and merger and acquisition experience started as Chief
Operating Officer of Enduro Systems, Inc., where he acquired
companies to vertically integrate material handling operations
including the weighing, conveying, and filling of oil refined
products, and the rapid loading of grain.
James W.
Stuckert Since 2004, Mr.
Stuckert has been a Senior Executive of J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L.
Lyons, LLC (“Hilliard
Lyons”), a full service
financial asset management firm located in 13 Midwestern states.
Mr. Stuckert joined Hilliard Lyons in 1962 and served in several
capacities including Chief Executive Officer prior to being named
Chairman in December of 1995. He served as Chairman from December
of 1995 to December of 2003. Mr. Stuckert holds a Bachelor of
Science degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Master of Business
Administration degree from the University of Kentucky. He is a long
term investor in the Company, as well as a former Board Member of
(a) Royal Gold, Inc. (for 24 years), (b) SenBanc Fund (where he
served as Chairman), (c) Board Member of DataBeam, Inc., and (d)
the Securities Industry Association. In the past, he has served as
(a) a member of the Nominating Committee of the New York Stock
Exchange, (b) Chair of the Regional Firms Committee of the Security
Industry Association (SIA), (c) a member of the Board of Trustees
of the University of Kentucky (where he served as Vice Chair and
Chair of the Finance Committee), and (d) Chair of an Investment
Committee for a hospital group with investable assets totaling in
excess of $1.2 Billion.
23
Executive Officers
The
following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of the
executive officers of the Company.
NAME
|
|
AGE
|
|
POSITION
|
Deborah Jenkins
Hutchinson
|
|
58
|
|
President
|
J.
Michael Carmena
|
|
61
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Cathy
Bradshaw
|
|
64
|
|
President of
WCI
|
Deborah Jenkins
Hutchinson has served as the Company’s President since
October 16, 2013. She previously served as the Company’s
President from January 12, 2010 until March 20, 2012. From 2005
until January 12, 2010, she served various entities in various
capacities, including most recently, as President of Virtual
Technology Licensing, LLC (“Virtual Technology”). Prior to
joining Virtual Technology, she was (a) the Managing Member of
Cognitive Communications, LLC, a business consulting company, and
(b) Special Consultant to Health Office India for strategy
development and operations assistance for work with U.S. clients in
medical transcription and coding services. Ms. Hutchinson is
currently on the Board of Directors of Private Access,
Inc.
J. Michael Carmena
has served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since
December 8, 2016. From 2010 until 2013, Mr. Carmena served as
Senior Director, Business & Sales Operations, of Smith and
Nephew plc, formerly known as Healthpoint Biotherapeutics. Mr.
Carmena previously served Healthpoint Biotherapeutics as Senior
Director, Finance & Administration (from 2008 to 2010) and as
Controller (from 1998 to 2008).
Cathy Bradshaw
serves as the President of WCI. Ms. Bradshaw has over 25 years of
healthcare management experience in homecare, pharmacy &
infusion services, long term care, and durable medical equipment
(DME) suppliers, including serving as SE Regional VP at Ivonyx,
Inc. (home infusion) and Sr. VP of Managed Care/Contracting at Flag
Ship Home Health in Florida. Cathy is responsible for the Science
and Technology of CellerateRX®.
Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers
None of
our directors or officers or their respective associates or
affiliates is indebted to us.
Family Relationships
There
are no family relationships among our directors or executive
officers.
24
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange
Act”) requires our
directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of
a registered class of our equity securities to file reports with
the SEC of ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock
and other equity securities of the Company. Based solely on a
review of the copies of the forms sent to us and the
representations made by the reporting persons to us, we believe
that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, our
directors, officers and 10% holders complied with all filing
requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act,
with the
following exceptions: Ms. Hutchinson had a delinquent Form 4 filing
on March 31, 2017 for an issuance of 500,000 shares of Common Stock
that occurred on October 24, 2016; Mr. Stuckert had a delinquent
Form 4 filing on March 10, 2016 for an issuance of 1,071 shares of
Series C Preferred Stock that occurred on February 9, 2016; Mr.
Howell had a delinquent Form 4 filing on March 10, 2016 for an
issuance of 1,071 shares of Series C Preferred Stock that occurred
on February 9, 2016; Mr. Stuckert had a delinquent Form 4 filing on
April 20, 2016 for issuance of 2,143 shares of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock that occurred on March 30, 2016, and the transfer
of 1,500,000 shares of common stock from a trust of which Mr.
Stuckert is the trustee to a trustee of which Mr. Stuckert’s
spouse is the trustee that occurred on April 5, 2016; and Mr.
Howell had a delinquent Form 4 filing on April 20, 2016 for an
issuance of 2,143 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
that occurred on March 30, 2016.
Independent Directors
The
Board consists of non-management directors. Three of our directors
are independent, as defined by Rule 4200(a) (15) of the
NASDAQ’s listing standards. (Mr. Siedhoff may be deemed not
to be independent by virtue of compensation received pursuant to
his consulting agreement with the Company.) Under the
NASDAQ’s listing standards, no director qualifies as
independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that he or
she has no material relationship with the Company. Based upon
information requested from and provided by each director concerning
their background, employment, and affiliations, including
commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, and
familial relationships, the Board has determined that, other than
being a director and/or shareholder of the Company, each of the
independent directors named above has either no relationship with
the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or
officer of an organization that has a relationship with the
Company, or has only immaterial relationships with the Company, and
is independent under the NASDAQ’s listing
standards.
Meetings and Committees of the Board
Our
business is managed under the direction of the Board. The Board
meets on a regular basis—at least quarterly—to review
significant developments affecting the Company and to act on
matters requiring the approval of the Board. In addition to
regularly scheduled meetings, the Board also holds special meetings
when the Company faces a matter requiring attention or action by
the Board. The Board does not currently have a standing audit,
compensation, nominating or governance committee, and the entire
Board performs the functions of each such committees, participating
in all relevant decisions thereof. It is the expectation of the
Company that, upon election of new directors, it will be able to
form standing committees so as to more efficiently perform the
various functions of such committee, and that each such committee
will adopt a charter as appropriate and make such charter available
on the Company’s website. The Company further recognizes that
none of its directors currently qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert. The Board continues to search for qualified
candidates to fill such role.
Nominations
The
existing directors work to identify qualified candidates to serve
as nominees for director. When identifying director nominees, the
Board may consider, among other factors, the potential
nominee’s reputation, integrity, independence from the
Company, skills and business, government or other professional
acumen, bearing in mind the composition of the Board and the
current state of the Company and the industry generally. The Board
may also consider the number of other public companies for which
the person serves as director; and the availability of the
person’s time and commitment to the Company. In the case of
current directors being considered for re-nomination, the Board
will also take into account the director’s tenure as a member
of the Board, the director’s history of attendance at
meetings of the Board and the director’s preparation for and
participation in such meetings.
25
Shareholders
seeking to nominate director candidates may do so by writing the
Corporate Secretary of the Company and giving the recommended
candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications, if
such recommendations are submitted by shareholders in compliance
with the Company’s Bylaws.
Following
identification of the need to replace, add or re-elect a director
to the Board, and consideration of the above criteria and any
shareholder recommendations, the Board will submit its recommended
nominees to the shareholders for election. The Board utilizes this
process, rather than a formal nominations committee, because they
have found that, for the Company, the functions of a nominations
committee are more than adequately fulfilled by this
process.
Board Leadership Structure
There
are currently no lead independent directors serving on the
Board.
Our
Board leadership structure is commonly utilized by other public
companies in the U.S., and we believe that it is effective. This
leadership structure is appropriate for us given the size and scope
of our business, the experience and active involvement of our
independent directors, and our corporate governance practices,
which include regular communication with and interaction between
and among the President, the Chief Financial Officer and the
independent directors. Of the four members of our Board, all are
independent from management.
Risk Management
The
Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s management
and operations. The Board serves in the role of an audit committee,
fulfilling its responsibilities for general oversight of the
integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the
Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence,
the performance of the Company’s internal audit function, and
risk assessment and risk management. We believe that the Board
provides effective oversight of risk management functions. On a
regular basis we perform a risk review wherein the management team
evaluates the risks we expect to face in the upcoming year and over
a longer term horizon. Then, plans are developed to deal with the
risks identified. In addition, members of our management team
periodically present to the Board the strategies, issues and plans
for the areas of our business for which they are responsible. While
the Board oversees risk management, our management team is
responsible for the Company’s day-to-day risk management
processes. Additionally, the Board requires that management raise
exceptional issues to the Board. We believe this division of
responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the
risks we face and that the Board leadership structure supports this
approach.
Meeting Attendance
During
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the
Board held three and four Board meetings, respectively. During 2016
and 2015, each director (once appointed) attended all Board
meetings, (no director attended fewer than 75% of the meetings),
and no director received any compensation in 2015 for service to
the Company as a director. In 2016 one director received
compensation for service. See “Director Compensation”
under “Item 11. Executive Compensation.” The Company
encourages, but does not require, directors to attend the annual
meeting of shareholders; however, such attendance allows for direct
interaction between shareholders and members of the
Board.
Code of Ethics
On
April 2, 2012, the Company adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to
our principal executive, financial and accounting officers. The
Code of Ethics can be found on our website at http://wmgtech.com
under the Investor Relations tab.
26
Shareholder Communications with the Board
Any
Company shareholder or other interested party who wishes to
communicate with the non-management directors as a group may direct
such communications by writing to the:
Corporate
Secretary
Wound
Management Technologies, Inc.
16633
Dallas Parkway, Suite 250
Addison,
TX 75001
The
communication must be clearly addressed to the Board or to a
specific director. If a response is desired, the individual should
also provide contact information such as name, address and
telephone number.
All
such communications will be reviewed initially by the Corporate
Secretary. The Corporate Secretary will forward to the appropriate
director(s) all correspondence, except for items of the following
nature:
●
advertising;
●
promotions of a product or service;
●
patently offensive material; and
●
matters completely unrelated to the Board’s functions,
Company performance, Company policies or that could not reasonably
be expected to affect the Company’s public
perception.
The
Corporate Secretary will prepare a periodic summary report of all
such communications for the Board. Correspondence not forwarded to
the Board will be retained by the Company and will be made
available to any director upon such director’s
request.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
following table and the accompanying notes provide summary
information for each of the last two fiscal years concerning cash
and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to
executive officers (or those acting in a similar
capacity).
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and
Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-equity
incentive compensation ($)
|
Non-qualified
deferred compensation earnings ($)
|
All other
compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Robert Lutz, Jr
(a)
|
2015
|
138,068
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
138,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deborah J.
Hutchinson (b)
|
2015
|
150,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
150,000
|
|
2016
|
200,000
|
-
|
25,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darren Stine
(c)
|
2015
|
118,333
|
-
|
15,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
133,333
|
|
2016
|
120,000
|
-
|
20,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cathy Bradshaw
(d)
|
2015
|
120,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120,000
|
|
2016
|
120,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.
Michael Carmena (e)
|
2016
|
8,636
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8,636
|
27
Notes to Summary Compensation Table
(a) Robert
Lutz Jr. resigned as CEO and Chairman of the Board effective
November 30, 2015.
(b) Deborah
J. Hutchinson was appointed as the Company’s President
effective October 16, 2013.
(c) Darren
Stine resigned from his position as the Company’s Chief
Financial Officer effective December 2, 2016.
(d) J.
Michael Carmena was appointed as the Company’s Chief
Financial Officer effective December 8, 2016.
(e) Cathy
Bradshaw is the President of WCI and, because the Company’
primary focus has been concentrated within this subsidiary, her
compensation is included in this Executive Compensation
disclosure.
Employment Agreements
None of
our executive officers listed above has an employment agreement or
an agreement containing change in control provisions with the
Company or its subsidiaries and there are no verbal agreements with
any of these executives (or other employees) regarding their
employment or compensation. No executive officer listed above is
entitled to payments upon termination or a change in
control.
In
December 2016, Deborah Hutchinson, Mandy Muse, Sheila Schultz and
Jonathan Knickerbocker received a stock grant for 500,000, 250,000,
250,000 and 150,000 shares respectively. All shares vested
immediately.
In
March of 2015, Mr. Darren Stine received a grant of 250,000 shares
of common stock, which were vested immediately.
Director Compensation
2016 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
Name
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-equity
incentive plan compensation ($)
|
Non-qualified
deferred compensation earnings ($)
|
All other
compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
S. Oden
“Denny” Howell Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Philip J.
Rubinfeld
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
Siedhoff
|
|
|
|
|
$290,000
|
$290,000
|
James
Stuckert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
reimburse each director for reasonable travel expenses related to
such director’s attendance at Board and committee meetings.
In the years 2015 and 2016, the Company did not issue any equity
compensation to the members of its Board in respect of their
service thereon. On February 27, 2017, the Company awarded a for
Board members 150,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock,
(600,000 shares total) for services. In the future, the Company
might have to offer additional compensation to attract the caliber
of independent board members the Company is seeking.
The
Company does not sponsor a pension benefits plan, a non-qualified
deferred compensation plan or a non-equity incentive plan for its
directors. In April of 2016, the Company engaged one director as a
consultant and paid monthly fees per contract terms. No other or
additional compensation for services were paid to any of the other
directors during 2015 and 2016.
28
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END
The
following table provides information concerning outstanding equity
awards as of December 31, 2016, for our named executive officers
and directors. We do not currently have an equity incentive plan;
therefore, these columns have been omitted from the following
table.
|
OPTION
AWARDS
|
STOCK
AWARDS
|
||||
Name
|
Number of
Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(Exercisable)
|
Number of
Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(Unexercisable)
|
Option Exercise
Price ($)
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
Number of Shares
of Stock That Have Not Vested
|
Market Value of
Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)
|
Dr.
Philip J. Rubinfeld
|
18,750
|
—
|
0.15
|
9/11/2017
|
—
|
—
|
Deborah
J. Hutchinson
|
18,750
|
—
|
0.15
|
9/11/2017
|
—
|
—
|
Cathy
Bradshaw (1)
|
200,000
|
—
|
0.15
|
8/17/2017
|
—
|
—
|
|
237,500
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
—
|
Footnotes to Outstanding Equity Awards table:
(1)
Ms.
Bradshaw’s 200,000 stock purchase options issued on August
17, 2012, vested over a three-year period beginning on the first
anniversary of issuance. Additionally, Ms. Bradshaw was issued
1,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock pursuant to a restricted
stock agreement on November 13, 2013, and such shares vested over a
three-year period. On September 3, 2014, the outstanding shares of
Series D preferred stock were automatically converted into shares
of the Company’s common stock.
Pension Benefits
The
Company does not sponsor any pension benefit plans and none of the
named executive officers contribute to such a plan.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
The
Company does not sponsor any non-qualified defined compensation
plans or other non-qualified deferred compensation plans and none
of the named executive officers contribute to any such
plans.
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The
following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2017, the number and
percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock owned by:
(a) each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner
of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;
(b) each of our directors; (c) the named executive
officers as defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K; and
(d) all current directors and executive officers, as a group.
As of March 31, 2017, (a) there were 110,540,387 shares of common
stock issued and outstanding, with 4,089 shares held as treasury
stock, (b) 85,646 shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued and
outstanding, and (c) 0 shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued
and outstanding
Beneficial
ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under
the Exchange Act. Under this rule, certain shares may be deemed to
be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example,
persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the
shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by
a person if the person has the right to acquire shares (for
example, upon exercise of an option or warrant) within 60 days of
the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the
percentage ownership of any person, the number of shares is deemed
to include the number of shares beneficially owned by such person
by reason of such acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage
of outstanding shares of any person as shown in the following table
does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual voting power
at any particular date.
29
|
Common
Stock
|
Preferred
Stock
|
||
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
|
Beneficial
Ownership Percentage
|
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
|
Beneficial
Ownership Percentage
|
Applied
Nutritionals, LLC
1890 Bucknell
Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015
|
6,000,000
|
5.43%
|
—
|
—
|
Robert Lutz Jr
(1)
5431 Ursula
Ln Dallas, TX
75229
|
6,250,000
|
5.65%
|
—
|
—
|
(1) Mr. Robert Lutz Jr. may be deemed to beneficially own 250,000
shares of stock held by his wife. Ownership of Preferred Stock
includes 3,257 shares of Series C Preferred Stock. Mr. Lutz
resigned as CEO and Chairman of the Board November, 30,
2015.
|
|
Common Stock
|
Preferred Stock
|
||
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS:
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Beneficial Ownership Percentage
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Beneficial Ownership Percentage
|
James
W Stuckert (2)
|
13,901,755
|
12.58%
|
39,956
|
46.65%
|
S.
Oden “Denny” Howell Jr. (3)
|
400,000
|
0.36%
|
24,137
|
28.18%
|
Dr.
Philip J. Rubinfeld (4)
|
618,750
|
0.56%
|
1,723
|
2.01%
|
Cathy
Bradshaw (5)
|
1,450,000
|
1.31%
|
—
|
—
|
Deborah
J. Hutchinson (6)
|
2,768,750
|
2.50%
|
—
|
—
|
John
Siedhoff
|
7,150,000
|
6.47%
|
—
|
—
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (6
persons)
|
26,289,255
|
23.78%
|
65,816
|
76.85%
|
(2) Mr. James W. Stuckert may be deemed to beneficially own
2,900,000 shares held by Diane V Stuckert Rev TR of which Mr.
Stuckert’s wife is the trustee. Also reflects 270,000 shares
issuable upon the exercise of warrants and/or options.
|
||||||||
(3) Reflects 250,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants
and/or options.shares of Series C Preferred Stock. 18,750 shares
issuable upon the exercise of warrants.
|
||||||||
(4) Reflects 118,750 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants
and/or options. Ownership of Preferred Stock includes 1,723 shares
of Series C Preferred Stock.
|
||||||||
(5) Reflects 200,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants
and/or options.
|
||||||||
(6) Reflects 18,750 shares issuable upon the exercise of
warrants.
|
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
In
addition to the officer and director compensation arrangements
disclosed herein, the Company was involved in the following
transactions with related parties during fiscal years 2015 or 2016.
Funds are advanced to the Company from various related parties,
including shareholders who fund the Company as necessary to meet
working capital requirements and expenses.
30
In
October of 2014, the note payable to MAH Holding, LLC
(“MAH”) in the
principal amount of $40,620 was acquired by an unrelated third
party and settled on October 1, 2015.
In June
of 2015, Mr. S Oden Howell, Jr. was elected to the Board and Mr.
Howell is the holder of a convertible note payable in the principle
amount of $600,000 and accrued interest of $96,164 through year end
December 31, 2016.
In
September of 2015, Mr. James Stuckert was elected to the Board and
Mr. Stuckert is the holder of a convertible note payable in the
principle amount of $600,000 and accrued interest of $96,164
through year end December 31, 2016.
The
following is a summary of amounts due to related parties, including
accrued interest separately recorded, as of December 31,
2016:
Related
Party
|
|
Nature of
Relationship
|
|
Terms of the
Agreement
|
Principal
Amount
|
Accrued
Interest
|
S.
Oden Howell Revocable Trust
|
|
Mr. S. Oden Howell,
Jr. became a member of the Board in June of 2015.
|
|
See “June 15,
2015 Convertible Promissory Note”.
|
600,000
|
96,164
|
|
|
|
|
|||
James
W. Stuckert Revocable Trust
|
|
Mr. James W.
Stuckert became a member of the Board in September of
2015.
|
|
See “June 15,
2015 Convertible Promissory Note”.
|
600,000
|
96,164
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
$1,200,000
|
$192,328
|
Three
of our directors are independent, as defined by Rule 4200(a) (15)
of the NASDAQ’s listing standards. Mr. Siedhoff may be deemed
not to be independent by virtue of compensation received pursuant
to his consulting agreement with the Company.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees. We engaged MaloneBailey, LLP to conduct our audits
for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31,
2015, and our audit fees for services
performed were $51,500 and $51,500,
respectively.
Tax Fees. We engaged Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C. as our
accountants and our tax fees for services performed for the
years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, were $13,238
and $12,532, respectively.
All Other Fees. None.
31
Consideration of Non-audit Services Provided
by the Independent Auditors. The Board has considered
whether the services provided for non-audit services are compatible
with maintaining MaloneBailey, LLP’s independence, and has
concluded that the independence of such firm has been
maintained.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy
The
policy of the Board, in its capacity as the Company’s audit
committee, is to pre-approve all audit, audit-related and non-audit
services provided by the independent registered public accounting
firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related
services, tax services and other services. The Board approved all
of the fees described above. The Board may also pre-approve
particular services on a case-by-case basis. The independent public
accountants are required to periodically report to the Board
regarding the extent of services provided by the independent public
accountants in accordance with such pre-approval. The Board may
also delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members.
Such member(s) must report any decisions to the Board at the next
scheduled Board meeting.
32
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 17, 2009, by
and among BioPharma Management Technologies, Inc., a Texas
corporation, Wound Management Technologies, Inc., a Texas
corporation, BIO Acquisition, Inc., and the undersigned
shareholders (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 21,
2009)
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed
April 11, 2008)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Information Statement
filed with the Commission on May 13, 2008)
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 11,
2008)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Number, Voting Power, Preferences and
Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1(i) to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed November 30, 2007)
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Number, Voting Power, Preferences and
Rights of Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 25, 2010)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Long Term
Incentive Plan dated March 12, 2010 effective subject to
shareholder approval on or before March 11, 2011 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed August 16, 2010)
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Number, Voting Power, Preferences and
Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K/A filed February 6, 2014 amending the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2013)
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Number, Voting Power, Preferences and
Rights of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed November 14, 2013)
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Term Loan Agreement dated June 15, 2015 by and among Wound
Management Technologies, Inc., Wound Care Innovations, LLC,
Resorbable Orthopedic Products, LLC, Biopharma Management
Technologies, Inc., The James W. Stuckert Revocable Trust and The
S. Oden Howell Revocable Trust (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed June 18, 2015)
|
33
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated June 15, 2015 in
Favor of The James W. Stuckert Revocable Trust (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed June 18, 2015)
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated June 15, 2015 in
Favor of The S. Oden Howell Revocable Trust (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed June 18, 2015)
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Exchange Agreement dated June 26, 2015, by and between Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and Tonaquint, Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed
August 17, 2015)
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Convertible Promissory Note dated June 26, 2015 by and between
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. and Tonaquint, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s
Form 10-K filed August 17, 2015)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Letter Agreement dated April 26, 2016 by and between Wound
Management Technologies, Inc., Evolution Venture Partners, LLC and
Middlebury Securities, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 2,
2016)
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated April 25, 2016 by and between Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and John Siedhoff (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed
April 29, 2016)
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries*
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Interactive Data Files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T
|
* Filed
herewith
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
WOUND
MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 4, 2017 |
By:
|
/s/
J.
Michael Carmena
|
|
|
|
J. Michael
Carmena
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Deborah
J. Hutchinson
|
|
President (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
April 4, 2017 |
Deborah
J. Hutchinson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
J.
Michael Carmena
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
April 4, 2017 |
J. Michael Carmena |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Dr.
Philip J. Rubinfeld
|
|
Director |
|
April 4, 2017 |
Dr. Philip J. Rubinfeld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
James
W. Stuckert
|
|
Director |
|
April 4, 2017 |
James W.
Stuckert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Mr.
John Siedhoff
|
|
Director |
|
April 4, 2017 |
Mr. John
Siedhoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Oden
Howell, Jr.
|
|
Director |
|
April 4, 2017 |
Oden Howell,
Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
35