Sanara MedTech Inc. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☑ ANNUAL REPORT UNDER
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
------------------------------------------------------
Commission File Number 0-11808
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas
|
|
59-2219994
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
1200
Summit Ave, Suite 414, Fort Worth, Texas 76102
|
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Common
Stock $ .001 par value
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☑ No
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☑ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. ☑ Yes ☐ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). ☑ Yes ☐ No
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] Yes
☑
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated
filer,” “large accelerated filer” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer
☐
|
|
Accelerated
filer
☐
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
☐
|
|
Smaller reporting
company
☑
|
Emerging growth
company
☑
|
Indicate
by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐
No ☑
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2017 based
on the $0.07 closing price as of such date was approximately
$6,062,571.
As of
March 29, 2018, 236,646,990 shares of the Issuer’s $.001 par
value common stock were issued and 236,642,901 were
outstanding.
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
Page
|
Letter from the CEO
|
(i)
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
BUSINESS
|
1
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1A
|
RISK FACTORS
|
3
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1B
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
14
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2
|
PROPERTIES
|
14
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
14
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
15
|
|
|
|
ITEM 5
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
16
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
17
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
18
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7A
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
20
|
|
|
|
ITEM 8
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
21
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
22
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9A
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
22
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9B
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
22
|
|
|
|
ITEM 10
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
23
|
|
|
|
ITEM 11
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
26
|
|
|
|
ITEM 12
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
28
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
29
|
|
|
|
ITEM 14
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
29
|
|
|
|
ITEM 15
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
31
|
LETTER FROM THE CEO
Dear
Shareholders:
As we
enter the third year of our three-year plan, we’d like to
reflect on the momentum we continued to build in 2017 and give
perspective about our future. The plan for 2017 included
initiatives for building a solid company infrastructure and
maintaining positive cash flow while focusing on strategic growth.
I am pleased to report that we accomplished our 2017 goals by
building a strong sales and marketing leadership team; growing
annual revenues by 14%; realizing net income of $331,000, and
retiring all debt except for our two convertible notes
payable.
The Company was able to report annual net income for the
first time in its history in 2017. Furthermore, 2016 included a
significant nonrecurring expense in the amount of $818,665,
primarily a noncash loss on the issuance of warrants for services
valued at $758,665. Without this noncash expense, operating income
was $343,000 for 2016. These warrants issued in 2016 were cancelled
in 2017. We were able to achieve this two-year period of positive
net cash from operations while still investing resources to
strengthen our operational capabilities, grow our sales force, and
invest in product development.
Continuing
the momentum we enjoyed in 2016, more hospitals and surgeons from a
variety of specialties recognized the benefits to their
patients of our CRXa® Activated Collagen® Product
Line. I am also pleased to report we realized the first
sales of our HemaQuell® Resorbable Bone Hemostat in the fourth
quarter of 2017. This novel product stops bone bleeding on contact
and then resorbs within 2-7 days following surgery to allow for
normal healing. HemaQuell Hemostat is delivered in a patent-pending
applicator that simplifies its use in the surgical suite. Early
adopter surgeons are recognizing the need and the value for this
novel technology.
Beginning
with the May 2017 hiring of Robert (Rob) K. Mart as Vice President,
Marketing, 2017 saw the building of an outstanding sales and
marketing leadership team. Rob is a seasoned leader with forty plus
years of healthcare industry experience including twenty-three
years with Johnson & Johnson. His leadership experience
includes many successes and awards in research & product
development and sales & marketing. We further bolstered our
marketing and product development capabilities with the late summer
hiring of Sherlene Bagley, another healthcare industry veteran with
extensive marketing, product development and operations
experience.
In the
Fall, we brought great sales leadership into the Company with the
addition of Zachary (Zach) B. Fleming as Vice President, Sales and
Jay M. Speelhoffer as Director, Strategic Accounts. Zach is a
dynamic sales leader with twenty years of progressive medical sales
leadership roles, most recently with Smith & Nephew. He has a
history of creating winning teams by attracting and retaining top
sales talent as well as a drive to help clinicians and their
patients achieve superior clinical outcomes. Jay has demonstrated
success for thirty plus years in customer-facing sales and account
management leadership positions with companies such as Johnson
& Johnson, Bristol Myers Squibb, and most recently St. Jude
Medical. His experience and reputation in the industry has already
paid dividends in growing our sales distribution network. In
addition, we just had two offers accepted, one for our new Chief
Financial Officer and one for our Director of Customer Service.
Both individuals are experienced medical device/pharma
professionals who will add great value to our management
team.
Along with adding key staff, the Company implemented a
robust, cloud-based enterprise software system to improve
productivity and facilitate the scale-up of order taking,
processing, shipping, invoicing, and customer management. Also, in
the Spring of 2017 we moved our corporate offices into a larger,
more convenient location in the DFW Metroplex to accommodate our
growing staff.
2018 is
getting off to a great start with several major accomplishments
already under our belts. While we have an aggressive forecast, we
hit the January and February numbers and expect to achieve the
forecast for March and the first quarter as well as our daily sales
rate continues to increase.
I am
also extremely pleased to announce that on Monday, March 26, 2018,
the Company submitted an FDA 510(k) application seeking U.S.
marketing clearance for our new internally sourced hydrolyzed
collagen. With the pending expiration of Applied
Nutritionals’ patent covering the use of hydrolyzed collagen
in wound care on February 27, 2018, part of our three-year
strategic plan was to develop our own source for the hydrolyzed
collagen raw material used to manufacture our surgical and wound
care products. All laboratory and preclinical tests have confirmed
that the internally sourced hydrolyzed collagen is equivalent to
the currently sourced material. Having control of sourcing will
reduce supply risks, control inventory costs, and give us the
ability to develop new, differentiated products that meet the needs
of our customers. We are currently ramping up production and, upon
FDA clearance, we expect to be selling our internally sourced
products by September of this year. In the meantime, we have ample
stock available of
CellerateRX®/CRXa® Branded products to fulfill
customers’ needs through August of this year as provided for
in our current license agreement.
(i)
Other
significant milestones in the First Quarter of 2018
include:
●
The retirement of
all debt – both current and long term.
●
The conversion of
all Series C Preferred Stock and accumulated dividends to Common
Stock so the Company only has one class of stock.
●
The conclusion of
all outstanding litigation.
●
The expansion of
our Company Sales Force.
In
summary, for the first time in the Company’s history, we are
extremely pleased to report a year of positive net income,
sustained growth, and long awaited financial stability. As we enter
the last year of our three-year plan, we anticipate our momentum
will continue forward, resulting in growth of revenues, the
addition of more core products, continued investments in new
products and clinical support of existing products, and expanding
our staff to support our growing business. We will continue to do
our best to meet or exceed customer and shareholder
expectations.
J.
Michael Carmena
Chief
Executive Officer
(ii)
PART
I
Item 1. BUSINESS
Background
The
terms “we,” “our,” “us,” and
“Company” refer Wound Management Technologies, Inc.,
and its subsidiaries, unless the context suggests
otherwise
Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. was organized on December 14, 2001,
as a Texas corporation under the name eAppliance Innovations, Inc.
In June of 2002, MB Software Corporation, a public corporation
formed under the laws of Colorado, merged with the Company (which
at the time was a wholly owned subsidiary of MB Software
Corporation), and the Company changed its name to MB Software
Corporation as part of the merger. In May of 2008, the Company
changed its name to Wound Management Technologies,
Inc.
Wound
Care Innovations, LLC (“WCI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company was organized as a Nevada limited liability company
on August 21, 2003. WCI is a growing provider of
CellerateRX®/CRXɑ® Activated Collagen® Adjuvant
in the general wound care and surgical markets. The general/chronic
wound care market is quickly expanding, particularly with respect
to chronic wound applications due to an aging population and
increases in the incidence of obesity and diabetes. In 2012, WCI
expanded its Activated Collagen® Adjuvant product line to
include surgical products, which resulted in the Company’s
sales growth.
Resorbable
Orthopedic Products, LLC (“ROP”) a whollyowned
subsidiary of the Company, was organized as a Texas limited
liability company on August 24, 2009, as part of a transaction to
acquire a multifaceted patent for resorbable bone hemostasis
products. ROP is both licensing technology from this patent and
also developing products itself. In 2014 the Company entered into a
commercial license for a bone void filler and in 2016 ROP received
FDA 510(k) clearance for ROP Bone Hemostasis Material, (registered
tradename HemaQuell®). HemaQuell® Resorbable Bone
Hemostat is a mechanical tamponade for bleeding bone that resorbs
within 27 days after use. The Company began selling HemaQuell
Hemostat in the fourth quarter of 2017. Initial sales efforts are
focused on orthopedic, cardiovascular, and spine
surgeries.
The Product
CellerateRX®/CRXɑ®
Activated Collagen®/CRXɑ® Adjuvant, (the
“Product”) is cleared by the FDA as a medical device
for use on all acute and chronic wounds, except third degree burns,
and is offered in both powder and gel form. CellerateRX Wound Care
Products are available without a prescription and are currently
approved for reimbursement under Medicare Part B. CellerateRX
Activated Collagen® Surgical Adjuvant Products are
available under a physician’s order. Applied
Nutritionals, LLC (“AN”) manufactures the Products
and owns the CellerateRX registered trademark. The Company has
incurred no research and development costs related to CellerateRX
during the last two fiscal years.
Patent, License and Royalty Agreements
WCI
began marketing and selling CellerateRX Products under the terms of
a distribution agreement with AN that was effective on July 28,
2004. Effective January 3, 2008, WCI entered into separate
exclusive license agreements with both AN and its founder George
Petito (“Petito”), pursuant to which WCI obtained the
exclusive worldwide license to certain patented technologies and
processes related to CellerateRX Products. The licenses are limited
to the human health care market, (excluding dental and retail) for
external wound care (including surgical wounds). Although the term
of these licenses expired on February 27, 2018, the agreements
permit WCI to continue to sell and distribute Product with third
parties for a period not exceeding six (6) months from the
termination date.
In
consideration for the licenses, WCI agreed to pay AN and Petito,
(in the aggregate), the following royalties, beginning January 3,
2008: (a) an advance royalty of $100,000. (b) a royalty of 15% of
gross sales occurring during the first year of the license. (c) an
additional advance royalty of $400,000 on January 3, 2009. plus (d)
a royalty of 3% of gross sales for all sales occurring after the
payment of the $400,000 advance royalty. In addition, WCI must
maintain a minimum aggregate annual royalty payment of $375,000 for
2009 and thereafter if the royalty percentage payments made do not
meet or exceed that amount. AN and Petito have been paid the
minimum aggregate annual royalty payments each year since 2008,
including both 2017 and 2016. Sales of CellerateRX Products
occurring after the termination date are subject to the 3%
royalty.
1
Marketing, Sales and Distribution
We
began marketing our products in the chronic wound care and
long-term care markets, as well as the professional medical
markets, due to the prevalence of diabetic and decubitus,
(pressure) ulcers. We believe that our Activated Collagen®
Products are unique in composition and clinical performance and
demonstrate the ability to reduce costs associated with standard
wound management. In 2012, the Company added the CellerateRX
Surgical Activated Collagen® Adjuvant product line to expand
into the surgical wound market. WCI Surgical Products are
attracting increased business from hospitals and surgery centers
due to the unique benefits of hydrolyzed collagen, including
product efficacy and economic value. The Products are used in
specialty areas including total joint replacement, spine,
orthopedic, trauma, vascular, general, plastic and reconstructive
surgeries and podiatry. Chronic wound care Products are sold via
independent distributors, distributor organizations, healthcare
distributors, representatives and internal sales activities. The
surgical Products are sold through a growing network of surgical
product distributors and Company representatives who are
credentialed to demonstrate the products in surgical
settings.
Staffing
As of
March 31, 2018, the Company has a staff of 18, consisting of 13
full-time employees, and 5 contractors.
Competition
The
general wound care market is served by a number of large,
multi-product line companies offering a suite of products to the
market as well as a large number of small companies. Our Activated
Collagen Products compete with primary dressings, advanced wound
care products, collagen matrices and other biopharmaceutical
products. Manufacturers and distributors of competitive products
include: Smith & Nephew plc, Acelity L.P. Inc., Medline
Industries, Inc., and Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation.
Many of our competitors are significantly larger than we are and
have more financial and personnel resources than we do.
Consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in marketing
and selling our products in the marketplace. We believe, however,
that the unique molecular form of Activated Collagen® Adjuvant
used in our Products outperforms currently available, non-active
dressings by improving efficacy, reducing the cost of patient care,
and replacing numerous products with a single primary
dressing.
New Products, Markets and Services
In
September 2009. the Company acquired a patent (U.S. Patent No.
7,074,425, the “ROP
Patent”) from Resorbable Orthopedics, LLC,
(“ROP”) for a
resorbable bone hemostat and delivery system for orthopedic bone
void fillers (See Note 5 “Intangible Assets”). The ROP
Patent offers innovative, safe and effective resorbable orthopedic
products that are complementary to the already-existing Activated
Collagen® Surgical Products. Together, the bone hemostat and
delivery system addresses issues such as bone wax granuloma and the
cost-effective delivery of materials that manage bone wound
healing. The resorbable orthopedic products covered by the ROP
Patent are (a) a resorbable bone hemostat used to stop blood flow;
(b) a delivery system for osteogenic/osteoinductive orthopedic
products (bone void fillers); and (c) the formula as a delivery
system for bone growth factors. These products have a complimentary
sales call point for surgical representatives that sell the
Company’s Activated Collagen® Surgical
Products.
The
Company received 510(k) clearance for the resorbable orthopedic
hemostat in February of 2016; completed subsequent testing and
launched HemaQuell® Resorbable Bone Hemostat in 2017, with our
first sales realized in the Fourth Quarter. The Company is
currently focusing its sales efforts in the domestic, (United
States) market.
2
On
November 8, 2011, ROP executed a development and license agreement
with BioStructures, LLC, (The “BioStructures License”) which
licensed certain bone hemostat rights to BioStructures, LLC to
develop products in the field of bone remodeling, based on the ROP
Patent, (see Note 5 “Intangible Assets”) for use in the
human skeletal system. The BioStructures License excludes the
fields of (1) a resorbable bone hemostat, (2) a resorbable
orthopedic hemostat and antimicrobial dressing, and (3) veterinary
orthopedic applications. In accordance with the terms of the
BioStructures License, BioStructures, LLC paid an initial fee of
$100,000 for the right to develop royalty-bearing products based on
the ROP Patent for a 24-month period (such products shall
hereinafter be referred to as the “BioStructures Products”). That
right was extended to allow for the additional time needed for
their FDA 510(k) clearance which occurred in 2014. At the time of
their first FDA clearance, BioStructures paid a $50,000 FDA
clearance fee and then entered into a Commercial License with ROP
to market their cleared bone void filler. BioStructures paid
$100,000 for the Commercial License which also included a 3%
royalty on any such product’s sales over the life of the ROP
Patent, which expires in 2023 and annual minimum royalties of
$201,000. In 2015, BioStructures was acquired by BioVentus LLC. In
2016, BioVentus LLC and ROP agreed to reduce the royalty fee to
1.5% with the annual minimum royalty unchanged.
Available Information
The
Company electronically files reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public may read and
copy any materials the Company has filed with the SEC at the
SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site
(www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information
statements, and other information regarding issuers that file
electronically with the SEC. Copies of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current
Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 are also available free of charge through the
Company’s website (http://www.wmgtech.com/), as soon as
reasonably practicable after electronically filing with or
otherwise furnishing such information to the SEC, and are available
in print to any stockholder who requests it.
Item
1A. RISK FACTORS
The
following risk factors should be considered with respect to making
any investment in our securities as such an investment involves a
high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following
risks and the other information set forth elsewhere in this report,
including the financial statements and related notes, before you
decide to purchase shares of our stock. If any of these risks
occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be adversely affected. As a result, the trading price of our
stock could decline, perhaps significantly, and you could lose part
or all of your investment. As used herein, the word
“business” as used in “material adverse effect on
our business”, “adversely affect our business”
and other similar phrases includes any of (or any combination of)
the Company’s present or future: operations, financial
performance, margins, revenues, operating margins, stock value,
competitive position, or other indicators of Company
performance.
RISKS RELATED TO HOW WE OPERATE OUR BUSINESS:
We had a history of losses in prior years and may not maintain
profitability.
Prior
to 2017, the Company continuously incurred net losses since we
began our current operations in 2004. (see “Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations”). Most recently, we incurred net
losses from continuing operations of $415,747, and $1,340,455 in
2016, and 2015, respectively. However, the operating loss in 2016
included a significant nonrecurring expense in the amount of
$818,665, primarily a non-cash loss on the issuance of warrants for
services valued at $758,665. Without this non-cash expense,
operating income was $342,918 for 2016. We plan to continue making
significant investments in our sales and clinical programs
resulting in a substantial increase in our operating expenses.
Consequently, we will need to continue our revenue growth to
maintain profitability in the future. We cannot offer any assurance
that we will be able to generate future sales growth. If we fail to
maintain profitability, our stock price may decline and you may
lose part or all of your investment.
3
Our revenue growth for a particular period is difficult to predict,
and a shortfall in forecast revenues may harm our operating
results.
Because
we are a relatively small company, our revenue growth and
consequently results of operations are difficult to predict. We
plan our operating expense levels based primarily on forecasted
revenue levels. A shortfall in revenue could lead to operating
results being below expectations as we may not be able to quickly
reduce our fixed expenses in response to short-term revenue
shortfalls. We have experienced fluctuations in revenue and
operating results from quarter to quarter and anticipate that these
fluctuations will continue until we achieve a critical mass with
our product sales. These fluctuations are due to a variety of
factors, including:
●
the
uncertainty surrounding our ability to attract new customers and
retain existing customers;
●
the
length and variability of our sales cycle, which makes it difficult
to forecast the quarter in which our sales will occur;
●
issues in
manufacturing our products or product candidates;
●
the
timing of operating expense relating to the expansion of our
business and operations;
●
the
development of new wound care products or product enhancements by
our competitors;
●
actual events,
circumstances, outcomes and amounts differing from assumptions and
estimates used in preparing our operating plan and how well we
execute our strategy and operating plans.
As a
consequence, operating results for a particular future period are
difficult to predict and prior results are not necessarily
indicative of future results. Any of the foregoing factors, or any
other factors discussed elsewhere herein, could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
If our products do not gain market acceptance, we might not be able
to fund future operations.
A
number of factors may affect the market acceptance of our products
or any other products we develop or acquire, including, but not
limited to:
●
the
price of our products relative to other products for the same
indications;
●
the
perception by physicians and other members of the healthcare
community of the efficacy and safety of our products for their
indicated applications and treatments;
●
changes in
practice guidelines and the standard of care for the targeted
indication; and
●
the
effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts or our
partners’ sales and marketing efforts.
Our
ability to effectively promote and sell any approved products may
also depend on pricing and cost-effectiveness, including our
ability to produce a product at a competitive price and our ability
to obtain sufficient third-party coverage or reimbursement, if any.
In addition, our efforts to educate the medical community on the
benefits of our product candidates may require significant
resources, may be constrained by FDA rules and policies on product
promotion, and may never be successful. If our products do not gain
market acceptance, we may not be able to fund future operations,
including developing, testing and obtaining regulatory approval for
new product candidates and expanding our sales and marketing
efforts for our approved products, which would cause our business
to suffer.
Disruption of, or changes in, our distribution model or customer
base could harm our sales and margins.
If we
fail to manage the distribution of our products properly, or if the
financial condition or operations of our reseller channels weakens,
there may be a material adverse effect on our business.
Furthermore, a change in the mix of our customers between service
provider and enterprise, or a change in the mix of direct and
indirect sales, could adversely affect our business.
4
Several
factors could also result in disruption of or changes in our
distribution model or customer base, which could harm our sales and
margins, including the following:
●
in
some instances, we compete with some of our resellers through our
direct sales, which may lead these channel partners to use other
suppliers that do not compete; and
●
some
of our resellers may have insufficient financial resources and may
not be able to withstand changes in business
conditions.
If we cannot meet our future capital requirements, our business
will suffer.
We have
a history of operating losses and with the exception of 2016,
negative cash flow from operating activities. As such, we have
utilized funds from offerings of our securities to fund our
operations. Future results of operations involve significant risks
and uncertainties. Factors that could affect our future operating
results and cause actual results to vary materially from
expectations include, but are not limited to, potential demand for
our products, risks from competitors, regulatory approval of our
new products, technological change, and dependence on key
personnel. Although we have taken steps to improve our overall
liquidity, if our cash flow is insufficient, we may be forced
either to secure a line of credit or seek additional equity
financing in order to:
●
fund
operating losses;
●
increase
marketing to address the market for wound care, surgical and ROP
products;
●
take
advantage of opportunities, including more rapid expansion or
acquisitions of complementary products or businesses;
●
hire, train and
retain employees;
●
develop new
products; and/or
●
respond to
economic and competitive pressures.
If our
capital needs are met through the issuance of equity or convertible
debt securities, the percentage ownership of our current
stockholders may be reduced. Our future success may be determined
in large part by our ability to obtain additional financing, and
the incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt
service obligations which could result in operating and financing
covenants that would restrict our operations. There can be no
assurance that such financing would be available or, if available,
that such financing could be obtained upon terms acceptable to us.
If adequate funds are not available, or are not available on
acceptable terms, our operating results and financial condition may
suffer.
Failure to retain and recruit key personnel would harm our ability
to meet key objectives.
Our
success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and
retain skilled executive, managerial, sales and marketing
personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be able to find
and attract additional qualified employees or retain any such
executive officers and other key personnel. The inability to hire
qualified personnel; the loss of services of our executive officers
or key personnel; or the loss of services of executive officers or
key personnel who may be hired in the future may have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Failure to manage our planned growth could harm our
business.
Our
ability to successfully market and sell our wound care products and
implement our business plan requires an effective plan for managing
our future growth. We plan to increase the scope of our operations
at a rapid rate. Future expansion efforts will be expensive and may
strain our internal operating resources. To manage future growth
effectively, we must maintain and enhance our financial and
accounting systems and controls, integrate new personnel and manage
expanded operations. If we do not manage growth properly, it could
harm our operating results and financial condition.
5
We operate in a highly competitive industry and face competition
from large, well-established medical device manufacturers as well
as new market entrants.
Competition
from other medical device companies is intense, expected to
increase, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new
product introductions and other market activities of industry
participants. We compete with other companies in acquiring rights
to products or technologies from universities and other research
institutions. Although our products have performed well in customer
evaluations, we are a relatively unknown brand in a market
controlled, in large part, by companies with a large customer base.
We may not, even with strong customer accounts, be able to
establish the credibility necessary to secure large national
customers.
A
number of factors may limit the market acceptance of our products,
including the timing of regulatory approvals and market entry
relative to competitive products, the availability of alternative
products, and the price of our products relative to alternative
products, the availability of third party reimbursement and the
extent of marketing efforts by third party distributors or agents
that we retain. There can be no assurance that our products will
receive market acceptance in a commercially viable period of time,
if at all. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we can
develop products that are more effective or achieve greater market
acceptance than competitive products, or that our competitors will
not succeed in developing or acquiring products and technologies
that are more effective than those being developed by us, that
would render our products and technologies less competitive or
obsolete.
Our
competitors enjoy several competitive advantages over us, including
but not limited to:
●
large and
established distribution networks in the U.S. and/or in
international markets;
●
greater
financial, managerial and other resources for products research and
development, sales and marketing efforts and protecting and
enforcing intellectual property rights;
●
greater name
recognition;
●
larger consumer
base;
●
more
expansive portfolios of intellectual property rights;
●
greater
experience in obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals and/or
clearances from the FDA and other regulatory agencies.
The
presence of competition in our market may lead to pricing pressure
which would make it more difficult to sell our products at a price
that will make us profitable or may prevent us from selling our
products at all. Our failure to compete effectively would have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our
information and expose us to liability, which would cause our
business and reputation to suffer.
In the
ordinary course of our business, we use networks to collect and
store sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary
business information and that of our customers, suppliers and
business partners, personally identifiable information of our
customers and employees. The secure processing, maintenance and
transmission of this information is critical to our operations.
Despite our security measures, our information technology and
infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached
due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such
breach could compromise our networks and the information stored
there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any
such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result
in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect
the privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties.
Further, they may cause disruption of our operations and the
services we provide to customers, damage to our reputation, and
cause a loss of confidence in our products and services, which
could adversely affect our business.
We may not be able to maintain sufficient product liability
insurance to cover claims against
us.
Product
liability insurance for the healthcare industry is generally
expensive to the extent it is available at all. We may not be able
to maintain such insurance on acceptable terms or be able to secure
increased coverage as commercialization of our products progresses,
nor can we be sure that existing or future claims against us will
be covered by our product liability insurance. Moreover, the
existing coverage of our insurance policy or any rights of
indemnification and contribution that we may have may not be
sufficient to offset existing or future claims. A successful claim
against us with respect to uninsured liabilities or in excess of
insurance coverage and not subject to any indemnification or
contribution could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
6
RISKS RELATED TO OUR PRODUCTS:
Competitors could invent products superior to ours and cause our
products and technologies to become obsolete.
The
wound care sector of the medical products industry is characterized
by a multitude of technologies and intense competition. Our
competitors currently manufacture and distribute a variety of
products that are, in many respects, comparable to our products.
Many suppliers of competing products are considerably larger and
have much greater resources than we do. In addition, many
specialized products companies have formed collaborations with
large, established companies to support research, development and
commercialization of wound care products which may be competitive
with ours. Academic institutions, government agencies and other
public and private research organizations are also conducting
research activities and may commercialize wound care products on
their own or through joint ventures. It is possible that these
competitors may develop technologies and products that are more
effective than any we currently have. If this occurs, any of our
products and technology affected by these developments could become
obsolete.
We may have exposure to product liability claims.
Although
we have contractual indemnity from the manufacturer of CellerateRX
for liability claims related to their products, we could face a
product liability claim outside of the scope of the contractual
indemnity. We do not have, and do not anticipate obtaining,
contractual indemnification from parties supplying raw materials or
parties marketing the products we sell. In any event,
indemnification from the manufacturer of CellerateRX or from any
other party is limited by the terms of the indemnity and by the
creditworthiness of the indemnifying party. A successful product
liability claim or series of claims brought against us could result
in judgments, fines, damages and liabilities that could have a
material adverse effect on our business. We may incur significant
expense investigating and defending these claims, even if they do
not result in liability. Moreover, even if no judgments, fines,
damages or liabilities are imposed on us, our reputation could
suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In the event that we do not have adequate insurance or contractual
indemnification, product liability claims relating to defective
products could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
RISKS RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:
The patent on the CellerateRX products expired in February
2018.
CellerateRX products no longer benefit from the protection of a
patent that expired in February 2018 and may become subject to
increased competition resulting from the marketing of substantially
equivalent products, and the Company’s performance may suffer
as a result.
7
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights
adequately, we may not be able to compete effectively.
Part of our success depends on our ability to protect proprietary
rights to technologies used in certain of our products. We rely on
patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secret laws to establish
and maintain proprietary rights in our technology and products.
However, these legal means afford only limited protection and may
not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep a
competitive advantage. Our patents and patent applications may not
be broad enough to prevent competitors from introducing similar
products into the market. Our patents, if challenged or our
attempts to enforce them, may not necessarily be upheld by the
courts. Efforts to enforce any of our proprietary rights could be
time-consuming and expensive, which could adversely affect our
business and prospects and divert management’s
attention. There can be no assurance that our proprietary
rights will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that
the rights will in fact provide competitive advantages to
us.
We may be found to infringe on intellectual property rights of
others.
Third
parties, including customers, may in the future assert claims or
initiate litigation related to exclusive patent, copyright,
trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies
and related standards that are relevant to us. These assertions may
emerge over time as a result of our growth and the general increase
in the pace of patent claim assertions, particularly in the U.S.
Because of the existence of a large number of patents in the
healthcare field, the secrecy of some pending patents and the rapid
rate of issuance of new patents, it is not economically practical
or even possible to determine in advance whether a product or any
of its components infringes or will infringe the patent rights of
others. The asserted claims or initiated litigation can include
claims against us or our manufacturers, suppliers or customers
alleging infringement of their proprietary rights with respect to
our existing or future products or components of those products.
Regardless of the merit of these claims, they can be
time-consuming, result in costly litigation and diversion of
technical and management personnel, or require us to develop a
non-infringing technology or enter into license agreements. Where
claims are made by customers, resistance even to unmeritorious
claims could damage customer relationships. There can be no
assurance that licenses will be available on acceptable terms and
conditions, if at all, or that our indemnification by our suppliers
will be adequate to cover our costs if a claim were brought
directly against us or our customers. Furthermore, because of the
potential for high court awards that are not necessarily
predictable, it is not unusual to find even arguably unmeritorious
claims settled for significant amounts. If any infringement or
other intellectual property claim made against us by any third
party is successful, or if we fail to develop non-infringing
technology or license the proprietary rights on commercially
reasonable terms and conditions, our business could be materially
and adversely affected.
RISKS RELATED TO REGULATIONS:
Our business is affected by numerous regulations.
Government
regulation by the U.S. FDA and similar agencies in other countries
is a significant factor in the development, manufacturing and
marketing of our products and in the acquisition or licensing of
new products. Complying with government regulations is often time
consuming and expensive and may involve delays or actions adversely
impacting the marketing and sale of our current or future
products.
Following
initial regulatory approval of any products that we may develop, we
will be subject to continuing regulatory review, including review
of adverse (drug or device) experiences or reactions and clinical
results that are reported after our products become commercially
available. This would include results from any post-marketing tests
or continued actions required as a condition of approval. The
manufacturing facilities we use (and may use) to make any of our
products may become subject to periodic review and inspection by
the FDA. If a previously unknown problem with a product or a
manufacturing and laboratory facility used by us is discovered, the
FDA may impose restrictions on that product or on the manufacturing
facility, including requiring us to withdraw the product from the
market. Any changes to an approved product, including the way it is
manufactured or promoted, often requires FDA approval before the
product, as modified, can be marketed. In addition, for products we
develop in the future, we and our contract manufacturers may be
subject to ongoing FDA requirements for submission of safety and
other post-market information. If we violate regulatory
requirements at any stage, whether before or after marketing
approval is obtained, we may be fined, be forced to remove a
product from the market or experience other adverse consequences,
which would materially harm our financial results. Additionally, we
may not be able to obtain the labeling claims necessary or
desirable for product promotion.
8
Further,
various healthcare reform proposals have emerged at the federal and
state levels. We cannot predict whether foreign, federal, state or
local healthcare reform legislation or regulation affecting our
business may be proposed or enacted in the future, or what effect
any such legislation or regulation would have on our business. The
implementation of new legislation and regulation may lower
reimbursements for our products, reduce medical procedure volumes
which would likely adversely affect our business. In addition, the
enacted excise tax may materially and adversely affect our
business.
Distribution
of our products outside the U.S. is subject to extensive government
regulation. These regulations, including the requirements for
approvals or clearance to market; the time required for regulatory
review and the sanctions imposed for violations, vary from country
to country. We do not know whether we will obtain regulatory
approvals in such countries or that we will not be required to
incur significant costs in obtaining or maintaining these
regulatory approvals.
If we fail to obtain or experience significant delays in obtaining
regulatory clearances or approvals to market future medical device
products, we will be unable to commercialize these products until
such clearance or approval is obtained.
The
developing, testing, manufacturing, marketing and selling of
medical devices is subject to extensive regulation by governmental
authorities in the U.S. and other countries. The process of
obtaining regulatory clearance and approval of certain medical
technology products is costly and time consuming. Inherent in the
development of new medical products is the potential for delay
because product testing, including clinical evaluation, is required
before many products can be approved for human use. With respect to
medical devices, such as those that we manufacture and market,
before a new medical device, or a new use of, or claim for, an
existing product can be marketed (unless it is a Class I device),
it must first receive either premarket clearance under Section
510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act or approval of a
premarket approval application, or PMA, from the FDA, unless an
exemption applies. In the 510(k) clearance process, the FDA must
determine that the proposed device is “substantially
equivalent” to a device legally on the market, known as a
“predicate” device, with respect to intended use,
technology and safety and effectiveness to clear the proposed
device for marketing. Clinical data is sometimes required to
support substantial equivalence. The PMA approval pathway requires
an applicant to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the
device for its intended use based, in part, on extensive data
including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical
trial, manufacturing and labeling data. The premarket approval
process is typically required for devices that are deemed to pose
the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or
implantable devices. Both the 510(k) and premarket approval
processes can be expensive and lengthy and entail significant user
fees.
Failure
to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in,
among other things, suspension or withdrawal of approvals or
clearances, seizure or recall of products, injunctions against the
manufacture, holding, distribution, marketing and sale of a product
and civil and criminal sanctions. Furthermore, changes in existing
regulations or the adoption of new regulations could prevent us
from obtaining, or affect the timing of, future regulatory
approvals. Meeting regulatory requirements and evolving government
standards may delay marketing of our new products for a
considerable period of time, impose costly procedures upon our
activities and result in a competitive advantage to larger
companies that compete against us.
We
cannot assure you that the FDA or other regulatory agencies will
approve any products developed by us on a timely basis, if at all,
or, if granted, that approval will not entail limiting the
indicated uses for which we may market the product, which could
limit the potential market for any of these products.
Changes to the FDA approval process or ongoing regulatory
requirements could make it more difficult for us to obtain FDA
approval of new products or comply with ongoing
requirements.
New
government regulations may be enacted and changes in FDA policies
and regulations and, their interpretation and enforcement, could
prevent or delay regulatory clearance or approval of new products.
We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse
government regulation that may arise from future legislation or
administrative action, either in the U.S. or abroad. Therefore, we
do not know whether we will be able to continue to comply with such
regulations or whether the costs of such compliance will have a
material adverse effect on our business. Changes could, among other
things, require different labeling, monitoring of patients,
interaction with physicians, education programs for patients or
physicians, curtailment of necessary supplies, or limitations on
product distribution. These changes, or others required by the FDA
could have an adverse effect on our business, and specifically, on
the sales of these products. The evolving and complex nature of
regulatory science and regulatory requirements, the broad authority
and discretion of the FDA and the generally high level of
regulatory oversight results in a continuing possibility that from
time to time, we will be adversely affected by regulatory actions
despite ongoing efforts and commitment to achieve and maintain full
compliance with all regulatory requirements. If we are not able to
maintain regulatory compliance, we will not be permitted to market
our products and our business would suffer.
9
Modifications to our current products may require new marketing
clearances or approvals or require us to cease marketing or recall
the modified products until such clearances or approvals are
obtained.
Any
modification to a FDA-cleared product that could significantly
affect its safety or efficacy, or that would constitute a major
change or modification in its intended use, requires a new FDA
510(k) clearance or, possibly, a premarket approval (PMA). The FDA
requires every manufacturer to make its own determination as to
whether a modification requires a new 510(k) clearance or PMA, but
the FDA may review and disagree with any decision reached by the
manufacturer. In the future, we may make additional modifications
to our products after they have received FDA clearance or approval
and, in appropriate circumstances, determine that new clearance or
approval is unnecessary. Regulatory authorities may disagree with
our decisions not to seek new clearance or approval and may require
us to obtain clearance or approval for previous modifications to
our products. If that were to occur for a previously cleared or
approved product, we may be required to cease marketing or recall
the modified device until we obtain the necessary clearance or
approval. Under these circumstances, we may also be subject to
significant regulatory fines or other penalties. If any of the
foregoing were to occur, our financial condition and results of
operations could be negatively impacted.
Changes in reimbursement policies and regulations by governmental
or other third-party payers may have an adverse impact on the use
of our products.
A
significant portion of our wound care products are purchased
principally for the Medicare and Medicaid eligible population by
hospital outpatient clinics, wound care clinics, durable medical
equipment (DME) suppliers and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs),
which typically bill various third-party payers, primarily state
and federal healthcare programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid), and
managed care plans, for the products and services provided to their
patients. Although our wound care products are currently eligible
for reimbursement under Medicare Part B, adjustments to our
reimbursement amounts or a change in Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services’ (CMS). reimbursement policies could have
an adverse effect on our market opportunities in this area. The
ability of our customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for
products and services from third-party payers is critical to the
success of our business because reimbursement status affects which
products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay.
In addition, our ability to obtain reimbursement approval in
foreign jurisdictions may affect our ability to expand our product
offerings internationally.
Third-party
payers have adopted, and are continuing to adopt, a number of
policies intended to curb rising healthcare costs. These policies
include the imposition of conditions of payment by foreign, state
and federal healthcare programs as well as private insurance plans,
and the reduction in reimbursement amounts applicable to specific
products and services.
Changes
in healthcare systems in the U.S. or internationally in a manner
that significantly reduces reimbursement for procedures using our
products or denies coverage for these procedures would also have an
adverse impact on the acceptance of our products and the prices
which our customers are willing to pay for them.
We and our sales personnel, whether employed by us or by others,
must comply with various federal and state anti-kickback,
self-referral, false claims and similar laws, any breach of which
could cause a material adverse effect on our business.
Our
relationships with physicians, hospitals and the marketers of our
products are subject to scrutiny under various federal
anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and similar laws, often
referred to collectively as healthcare fraud and abuse laws.
Healthcare fraud and abuse laws are complex, and even minor,
inadvertent violations can give rise to liability, or claims of
alleged violations. Possible sanctions for violation of these fraud
and abuse laws include monetary fines, civil and criminal
penalties, exclusion from federal healthcare programs, including
Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Administration, Department of
Defense, Public Health Service (PHS), and forfeiture of amounts
collected in violation of such prohibitions could occur. Certain
states have similar fraud and abuse laws that also authorize
substantial civil and criminal penalties for violations. Any
government investigation or a finding of a violation of these laws
may result in an adverse effect on our business.
10
The
federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits any knowing and willful
offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration
in return for the referral of an individual or the ordering or
recommending of the use of a product or service for which payment
may be made by any federal healthcare program, including
Medicare.
The
scope and enforcement of the healthcare fraud and abuse laws is
uncertain and is subject to rapid change. There can be no assurance
that federal or state regulatory or enforcement agencies will not
investigate or challenge our current or future activities under
these laws. Any state or federal investigation, regardless of the
outcome, could be costly and time-consuming. Additionally, we
cannot predict the impact of any changes in these laws, whether
these changes are retroactive or will have effect on a
going-forward basis only.
If we
engage additional physicians on a consulting basis, the agreements
with these physicians will be structured to comply with all
applicable laws, including the federal ban on physician
self-referrals (commonly known as the “Stark Law”) the
federal Anti-Kickback Statute, state anti-self-referral and
anti-kickback laws. Even so, it is possible that regulatory or
enforcement agencies or courts may view these agreements as
prohibited arrangements that must be restructured or for which we
would be subject to other significant civil or criminal penalties.
Because our strategy includes the involvement of physicians who
consult with us on the design of our products, we could be
materially impacted if regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts
interpret our financial relationships with our physician advisors
who refer or order our products to be in violation of one or more
health care fraud and abuse laws. Such government action could harm
our reputation and the reputations of our physician advisors. In
addition, the cost of noncompliance with these laws could be
substantial because we could be subject to monetary fines and civil
or criminal penalties, and we could also be excluded from state and
federal healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, for
non-compliance.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS OR OUR COMMON
STOCK:
The trading price of the shares of our common stock is highly
volatile, and purchasers of our common stock could incur
substantial losses.
The
market price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue
to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to
various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including
the following:
●
technological
innovations or new products and services by us or by our
competitors;
●
additions or
departures of key personnel;
●
sales of our
common stock;
●
our
ability to execute our business plan;
●
loss
of any strategic relationship;
●
industry
developments;
●
fluctuations in
stock market prices and trading volumes of similar
companies;
●
economic,
political and other external factors;
●
period-to-period
fluctuations in our financial results;
●
regulatory
developments in the U.S. and foreign countries, both generally or
specific to us and our products; and
●
intellectual
property, product liability or other litigation against
us.
Although publicly
traded securities are subject to price and volume fluctuations, it
is likely that our common stock will experience these fluctuations
to a greater degree than the securities of more established and
better capitalized organizations.
11
Our common stock does not have a vigorous trading market and you
may not be able to sell your securities when desired.
Although
there is a public market for our common stock, trading volume has
been historically low, which could impact the stock price and the
ability to sell shares of our common stock. We can give no
assurance that a more active and liquid public market for the
shares of our common stock will develop in the future.
The potential sale of large amounts of common stock may have a
negative effect upon the market value of our shares.
Sales
of a significant number of shares of our common stock in the public
market could harm the market price of our common stock and make it
more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of
common stock. As additional shares of our common stock become
available for resale in the public market, the supply of our common
stock will increase, which could decrease the price of our common
stock.
In
addition, future sales of large amounts of common stock could
adversely affect or inhibit our ability to raise capital.
Substantially all of the outstanding shares of our common stock are
freely tradable, without restriction or registration under the
Securities Act (other than the sales volume restrictions of Rule
144 applicable to shares held beneficially by persons who may be
deemed to be affiliates). The price of our common stock could also
drop as a result of the exercise of options for common stock or the
perception that such sales or exercise of options could
occur.
We have not paid, and we are unlikely to pay in the near future,
cash dividends on our securities.
We have
not paid and do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common
or preferred stock, which may limit the current return available on
an investment in our stock. Future dividends on our stock, if any,
will depend on our future earnings, capital requirements, financial
condition and such other factors as our management personnel may
consider relevant. Currently, we intend to retain earnings, if any,
to increase our net worth and reserves.
“Penny Stock” Limitations.
Rule
3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 establishes the
definition of a “penny stock.” For purposes relevant to
the Company, a “penny stock” is any equity security
that has a minimum bid price of less than $5.00 per share or with
an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a
limited number of exceptions which are likely not available to us.
It is likely that our shares will be considered to be penny stocks
for the immediate foreseeable future. This classification severely
and adversely affects any market liquidity of our common
stock.
For any
transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock
rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person’s
account for transactions in penny stocks and that the broker or
dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the
transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny
stock to be purchased. In order to approve a person's account for
transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain
financial information and investment experience and objectives of
the person and the broker or dealer must make a special written
determination that the transaction in penny stocks is suitable for
that person and that that person has sufficient knowledge and
experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the
risks of a transaction in penny stocks.
The
broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a
penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to
the penny stock market that, in highlight form, sets forth the
basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability
determination, and that the broker or dealer received a signed,
written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. These
restrictions and regulations limit the appeal of penny stock to
some investors and may limit the liquidity of shares of our
stock.
Disclosure
also has to be made about (a) the risks of investing in penny stock
in both public offerings and in secondary trading; (b) commissions
payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered
representative; (c) current quotations for the securities; and (d)
the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud
in penny stock transactions. Finally, the broker or dealer must
send monthly statements disclosing recent price information for the
penny stock held in the account and information on the limited
market in penny stocks.
12
Because
of these regulations, broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the
above-referenced paperwork and disclosures. In addition, they may
encounter difficulties when attempting to sell shares of our common
stock, which may affect the ability of selling shareholders or
other holders to sell their shares in any secondary market. These
additional sales practices and disclosure requirements may impede
the sale of our securities and the liquidity of our securities may
decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the price. Our shares,
in all probability, will be considered subject to such penny stock
rules for the foreseeable future, and our shareholders may, as a
result, find it difficult to sell their shares.
A few of our existing shareholders own a large percentage of our
voting stock and have a significant influence over matters
requiring stockholder approval and may delay or prevent a change in
control.
Our
directors own or control a large percentage of our common stock
(See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters”). As a
result, our directors could have the ability to exert substantial
influence over all matters requiring approval by our stockholders,
including the election and removal of directors and any proposed
merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our
assets as well as other corporate transactions. This concentration
of control could be disadvantageous to other stockholders with
interests different from those of our directors, and principal
stockholders; e.g., our principal stockholders could delay or
prevent an acquisition or merger even if the transaction would
benefit other stockholders. This significant concentration of share
ownership may adversely affect the trading price for our common
stock because investors often perceive disadvantages in owning
stock in companies with controlling stockholders.
Our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and Bylaws, as amended,
may delay or prevent a potential takeover of the
Company.
Our
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws contain provisions that may
have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a potential
takeover of the Company, even if the takeover is in the best
interest of our shareholders. For example, the Bylaws limit when
shareholders may call a special meeting of shareholders, and these
and other provisions may negatively affect the price of our stock.
The Articles also allow our board of directors (the
“Board”) to
fill vacancies, including newly created directorships.
Our Board can authorize the issuance of preferred stock, which
could diminish the rights of holders of our common stock and make a
change of control of the Company more difficult even if it might
benefit our shareholders.
The
Board is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or
more series and to fix the voting powers, preferences and other
rights and limitations of the preferred stock. Accordingly, we may
issue shares of preferred stock with a preference over our common
stock with respect to dividends or distributions on liquidation or
dissolution, or that may otherwise adversely affect the voting or
other rights of the holders of common stock. Issuances of preferred
stock, depending upon the rights, preferences and designations of
the preferred stock, may have the effect of delaying, deterring or
preventing a change of control, even if that change of control
might benefit our shareholders.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:
When
used in this Form 10-K or other filings by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, in the Company’s press
releases or other public or shareholder communications, or in oral
statements made with the approval of an authorized officer of the
Company’s executive officers, the words or phrases
“would be”, “will allow”, “intends
to”, “will likely result”, “are expected
to”, “will continue”, “is
anticipated”, “estimate”, “project”,
or similar expressions are intended to identify
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The
Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made,
and advises readers that forward-looking statements involve various
risks and uncertainties. Our management believes its assumptions
are based upon reasonable data derived from and known about our
business and operations. No assurances are made that our actual
results of operations or the results of our future activities will
not differ materially from these assumptions. The Company does not
undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation to update any
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated
events or circumstances after the date of such
statement.
13
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
The
Company’s corporate office is currently located at 1200
Summit Avenue, Suite 414, Fort Worth, TX 76102. The lease for the
Company’s corporate office was entered into in March of 2017
and effective May 1, 2017. The lease expires on the last day of the
fiftieth (50th) full calendar month following the effective date,
(June 30, 2021). Monthly base rental payments are as follows:
months 1-2, $0; months 3-14, $7,250; months 15-26, $7,401; months
27-38, $7,552; and months 39-50, $7,703.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Ken Link v. Wound Management Technologies, Inc., et al. On
November 14, 2011, Ken Link instituted litigation against Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and Scott A. Haire in the District
Court of Tarrant County Texas, Cause No. 342-256486-11 of the 342nd
Judicial District, alleging default under the terms of a certain
promissory note executed by Wound Management Technologies, Inc. and
guaranteed by Scott A. Haire. Ken Link asserted at that point in
time that the unpaid balance of the note, including accrued
interest as of December 4, 2011, was the sum of $355,292. Mr. Link
also asserted that he was entitled to receive 200,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock. Mr. Link was also seeking
attorney’s fees; interest at 13% per annum; plus $1,000 per
day. We disputed the claim, because we believed the contract was
tainted by usury, and therefore, a usury counterclaim would more
than offset the unpaid balance of the promissory note.
The
note, in the original principal amount of $223,500, required the
payment of interest accrued at 13% per annum; an additional
one-time charge of $20,000 due on maturity; the issuance of 200,000
shares of the Company’s common stock as interest; and a
$1,000 per day late fee for each day the principal and interest is
late. It was our contention that these sums made the contract
usurious and the usury claims more than offset the amount of the
unpaid indebtedness. Furthermore, we filed an action for recovery
of damages for usury under the Texas Finance Code for a note which
was previously executed by the Company and payable to Ken Link,
which was in fact paid to Mr. Link in full. In addition, Wound
Management sought recovery of attorney’s fees pursuant to the
usury provisions of the Texas Finance Code. While the amount of the
promissory note remained unpaid, the counterclaims more than offset
the maximum amount that could be asserted on the promissory note.
The case was set for trial the week of October 21, 2013, but after
three (3) days of trial before a jury, the judge declared a
mistrial. Subsequently, Ken Link amended his pleadings and alleged
that Wound Management Technologies, Inc. never intended to pay the
$223,500 promissory note and sought damages for fraud and the loss
of the benefit of the bargain relating to the shares of stock, plus
interest as set forth in the note, exemplary damages, and
attorney's fees. The case was subsequently reset for trial the week
of December 1, 2014, and the judge again declared a mistrial. On
September 4, 2015, Ken Link amended his pleadings once again
seeking the sums he says are owed to him that were related to the
advance by him in the amount of $223,500. The case was set for
trial the week of May 15, 2017, but again, after three (3) days of
trial before a jury, the judge declared a mistrial.
The
case was subsequently reset for trial the week of October 30, 2017,
and during a break in the proceedings, (November 1, 2017), the
Company and Ken Link entered into a binding settlement agreement,
which resulted in dismissal with prejudice of all claims and
counterclaims asserted in Cause No. 342-256486-11, in exchange for
which the Company delivered to Ken Link 1,200,000 shares of Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. common stock in total satisfaction of
all obligations between the parties. As a result of this
settlement, the Note Payable to Mr. Link in the amount of $223,500
is cancelled along with accrued interest in the amount of
$147,373.
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. v. Fox Lake Animal Hospital,
PSP Wound Management Technologies, Inc. instituted
litigation in Cause No. 96-263918-13 in the 96th District Court of
Tarrant County, Texas against Fox Lake Animal Hospital, PSP and
Bohdan Rudawski, Trustee of the Fox Lake Animal Hospital, PSP. The
cause of action asserts that the loan transaction between Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and Fox Lake Animal Hospital PSP
involved the collection of illegal usurious interest for the reason
that while the face amount of the promissory note is $39,000, but
the loan actually loaned for a 6-month period was $25,000,
resulting in an interest rate in excess of the maximum rate
permitted by the Texas Finance Code. Wound Management Technologies,
Inc. is seeking to recover the penalties authorized by the Texas
Finance Code, together with the attorney’s fees. Fox Lake
Animal Hospital and Bohdan Rudawski, Trustee have filed a
counterclaim where they allege there were misrepresentations by
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. that would be excuse them from
having to pay penalties under the Texas Finance Code for charging
usurious interest. Fox Lake Animal Hospital and Bohdan Rudawski,
Trustee further claim that actions asserted violates the Federal
Securities Exchange Act and alleged fraud and fraud in the
inducement in entering into the promissory note.
14
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. v. Bohdan Rudawski Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. instituted litigation in Cause No.
352-263856-13 in the 352nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas
against Bohdan Rudawksi. The case has been postponed until
September of 2016. The cause of action asserts that the loan
transaction between Wound Management Technologies, Inc. and Bohdan
Rudawski involved the collection of illegal usurious interest for
the reason that while the face amount of the promissory note is
$156,000.00, but the loan actually loaned for a 6-month period was
$100,000.00, charging an effective interest rate of over 100% which
violates the provisions of the Texas Finance Code. Wound Management
Technologies, Inc. is seeking to recover the penalties authorized
by the Texas Finance Code, together with the attorney’s fees.
Bohdan Rudawski has filed an answer and alleges there was not an
absolute obligation to repay the note, attempting to defeat the
usury claim. Bohdan Rudawski has further asserted that the claims
violate the Federal Securities Exchange Act and allege fraud of
inducement in entering into the promissory note.
The
352nd Judicial District Court entered an order in December, 2016,
consolidating the Bohdan Rudawski case and the Fox Lake Animal
Hospital case into the 352nd Court case. The case was tried and went to the
jury on March 22, 2018. The jury, in response to the question
concerning the fraud counterclaim, reached a verdict that there was
no fraud, therefore, a Judgment should be entered finding that the
Defendants take nothing by virtue of their fraud
claim.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
This
item is not applicable.
15
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The
Company’s common stock is traded on OTCQB under the trading
symbol “WNDM.” OTCQB is one of three tiers established
by OTC Markets Group, Inc., which operates one of the world’s
largest electronic interdealer quotation systems for broker-dealers
to trade securities not listed on a national exchange. The
following table sets forth the high and low sales price information
of the Company’s common stock for the quarterly periods
indicated as reported by NASDAQ.
YEAR
|
|
QUARTER
ENDING
|
HIGH
|
LOW
|
2017
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
$0.100
|
$0.038
|
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
$0.100
|
$0.058
|
|
|
September 30,
2017
|
$0.078
|
$0.048
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
$0.070
|
$0.046
|
2016
|
|
March 31,
2016
|
$0.890
|
$0.050
|
|
|
June 30,
2016
|
$0.080
|
$0.050
|
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
$0.070
|
$0.040
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
$0.050
|
$0.040
|
Record Holders
As of
March 31, 2018, there were 2,166 shareholders of record holding
shares of common stock issued, of which a total of 4,089 shares are
held as treasury stock. As of March 31, 2018, there were
236,646,990 shares of common stock issued and 236,642,901 shares of
common stock outstanding.
The
holders of the common stock are entitled to one vote for each share
held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders.
Holders of the common stock have no preemptive rights and no right
to convert their common stock into any other securities. There are
no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common
stock.
Dividends
We have
never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and
we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We currently expect to retain any future earnings to fund our
operations and the expansion of our business.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Set
forth below is information regarding the issuance and sales of the
Company’s securities without registration for the year ended
December 31, 2017, not previously disclosed:
On
March 9, 2017, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock to
each of the Company’s directors (four directors at the time,
for a total of 600,000 shares valued at $42,000).
On
March 10, 2017, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock
valued at $18,500 to a contract consultant upon achievement of
specified revenue targets.
On July
31, 2017, the Company issued 937,556 shares of common stock for the
conversion of 800 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
and $9,629 of related Series C dividends.
On
November 22, 2017, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common
stock valued at $84,000 for settlement of debt. (See NOTE 11 below
for a discussion of this settlement).
On
November 22, 2017, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common
stock to a contract consultant upon termination of contract. There
was no incremental increase in the fair value of the modified
stock-based compensation award as of the modification date and
accordingly, no additional compensation cost was recognized. See
NOTE 3 below for discussion of the contract
termination.
16
The
issuances described above were made in private transactions or
private placements intending to meet the requirements of one or
more exemptions from registration. In addition to any noted
exemption below, we relied upon Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”). The investors were not
solicited through any form of general solicitation or advertising,
and the sales were conducted in private transactions where the
investor identified an investment intent as to the transaction
without a view to an immediate resale of the securities. We have
never utilized an underwriter for an offering of our securities and
no sales commissions were paid to any third party in connection
with the above-referenced sales.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
As a
smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this
information.
17
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related footnotes that appear
in this document.
Organizational Overview
Our
primary focus is developing and marketing products for the advanced
wound care market, with a focus on surgical products, as pursued
through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, WCI and ROP, which brings a
unique mix of products, procedures and expertise to the wound care
arena and surgical wounds. CellerateRX/CRXɑ®
Adjuvant’s unique Activated Collagen® fragments
(CRa® are a fraction of the size of the native collagen
molecules and particles found in other products, which delivers the
benefits of collagen to the body immediately.
In
September of 2009, the Company acquired the ROP Patent, which
offers a solution to the problem of bone wound healing in a
cost-effective manner. In February 2016, we received FDA 501(k)
clearance for HemaQuell® our Resorbable Bone Hemostat. In
2011, ROP executed BioStructures License to develop certain
products in the field of bone remodeling. In January of 2014,
BioStructures received 510(k) clearance for their first
Biostructures Product: an innovative bioactive bone graft putty and
bone graft extender. In February of 2014, ROP granted a Commercial
License to BioStructures according to the terms of the
Biostructures License. In November 2015, BioStructures was sold to
BioVentus Global and the License remains in effect.
Preparing
for the expanding role of our products, the Company is studying the
feasibility of two other medical devices that could be effectively
distributed by the Company’s sales direct and contracted
sales teams.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these
consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities
and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances. The results of these assumptions form the basis
for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Under
different assumptions or conditions, actual results may differ from
these estimates. We believe the footnotes to the consolidated
financial statements provide the description of the significant
accounting policies necessary in fully understanding and evaluating
our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Year ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year ended
December 31, 2016
Revenues. The Company generated revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2017 of $6,304,741 compared to revenues of $5,507,853
for the year ended December 31, 2016, or a 14% increase in
revenues. The increase in revenues is the result of the
Company’s increased sales and marketing efforts. Revenues in
both 2017 and 2016 include $201,000 in annual royalties from the
Biostructures License.
Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold for the year ended
December 31, 2017 were $806,038 compared to cost of goods sold of
$943,579 for the year ended December 31, 2016, or a 14% decrease in
cost of goods sold. In 2017, although the Company’s revenue
from product sales increased significantly, the Company did not yet
exceed the sales threshold needed to exceed the minimum annual
royalty of $375,000.
Selling, General and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses. SG&A expenses for the
year ended December 31, 2017 were $5,275,402 compared to SG&A
expenses of $3,946,124 for the year ended December 31, 2016, or a
34% increase in SG&A expenses due to the buildup in our sales
and marketing infrastructure to support future field sales force
expansion. In 2016 the Company was successful in controlling
general and administrative costs while still growing
sales.
18
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $126,825 for the year
ended December 31, 2017, compared to $174,493 for the year
ended December 31, 2016, or a decrease of 27%.
Net Income / loss. We had net income for the year ended
December 31, 2017, of $331,309 compared with a net loss of
$415,747 for the year ended December 31, 2016, or an
improvement of $747,056. This improvement was primarily because
2016 included a significant nonrecurring expense in the amount of
$818,665, mostly a non-cash loss on the issuance of warrants for
services valued at $758,665.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our
principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents,
and cash generated from operations. Cash and cash equivalents
consist primarily of cash on deposit with banks. Historically, we
have financed our operations primarily from the sale of debt and
equity securities. Our financing activities used approximately
$145,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, and generated
approximately $245,000 for the year ended December 31,
2016.
We
determined that our existing cash and future cash to be generated
from operations will satisfy our foreseeable working capital, debt
repayment and capital expenditure requirements for at least the
next twelve months. We will monitor our cash flow, assess our
business plan, and make expenditure adjustments accordingly. If
appropriate, we may pursue limited financing including issuing
additional equity. Although we have successfully funded our
operations to date by attracting additional equity investors, there
is no assurance that our capital raising efforts will be able to
attract additional necessary capital for our operations. If we are
unable to obtain additional funding for operations at any time now
or in the future, we may not be able to continue operations as
proposed, requiring us to modify our business plan, curtail various
aspects of our operations or cease operations.
As of
December 31, 2017, we had total current assets of $2,037,360,
including cash of $463,189 and inventories of $711,397. As of
December 31, 2016, we had total current assets of $1,996,013,
including cash of $833,480 and inventories of
$348,457.
As of
December 31, 2017, we had total current liabilities of $2,115,324
including $1,200,000 of notes payable to related parties. Our
current liabilities also include $244,422 of current year royalties
payable, which were paid in full during February of 2018. As of
December 31, 2016, we had total current liabilities of $1,394,359
including $414,338 of notes payable and convertible notes payable
to unrelated parties. Our current liabilities also included
$276,916 of current year royalties payable.
For the
year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in operating activities
was $139,862 compared to net cash provided by operating activities
of $409,245 in 2016.
We used
$85,875 in investing activities in the year ended December 31,
2017, compared to $3,029 in the year ended December 31,
2016.
For the
year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in financing activities
was $144,554, compared to net cash provided by financing activities
of $244,927 in 2016.
19
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
Contractual Commitments
Royalty Agreements
Pursuant
to the agreements with AN and Petito, the Company is obligated to
pay royalties to AN and Petito, as described in “Item 1.
Product, Patent, License and Royalty Agreement.” The Company
is current with all such royalty obligations.
On
September 29, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”), by and
among the Company, RSI-ACQ, LLC (“RSI”), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company that was subsequently renamed Resorbable
Orthopedic Products, LLC (“Resorbable”) and
Resorbable’s members, pursuant to which, RSI acquired
substantially all of Resorbable’s assets, in exchange for (i)
500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) a
royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the net revenues generated
from products sold by the Company or any of its affiliates, which
products are developed from or otherwise utilize any of the
patented technology acquired from Resorbable. The royalty is paid
to Barry Constantine, LLC for distribution to the original patent
holders, (including Mr. Constantine) and/or their
heirs.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
As a
smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this
information.
20
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
F-1
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
F-2
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
F-3
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Deficit)
|
F-4
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-5
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-6
|
21
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
To the
Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Wound
Management Technologies, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively,
the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years
then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the
“financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then
ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to
perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.
As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
no such opinion.
Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malonebailey.com
We have
served as the Company's auditor since 2014.
Houston,
Texas
March
29, 2018
F-1
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017, AND 2016
|
December
31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Assets
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
Cash
|
$463,189
|
$833,480
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for bad debt of $28,910 and
$21,947
|
786,250
|
744,044
|
Royalty
receivable
|
50,250
|
50,250
|
Inventory,
net of allowance for obsolescence for $144,996 and
$153,023
|
711,397
|
348,457
|
Prepaid
and other assets
|
26,274
|
19,782
|
Total current assets
|
2,037,360
|
1,996,013
|
|
|
|
Long-term assets:
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $56,951 and
$41,328
|
63,211
|
34,939
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization of $434,999 and
$369,974
|
117,291
|
140,336
|
Total long-term assets
|
180,502
|
175,275
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$2,217,862
|
$2,171,288
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$225,462
|
$238,229
|
Accounts
payable - related parties
|
60,000
|
93,655
|
Accrued
royalties
|
244,422
|
276,916
|
Deferred
rent
|
13,920
|
-
|
Accrued
Commission
|
46,534
|
-
|
Current
lease obligation
|
-
|
3,766
|
Accrued
interest
|
324,986
|
367,411
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
-
|
44
|
Notes
payable
|
-
|
414,338
|
Convertible
notes payable – related parties
|
1,200,000
|
-
|
Total current liabilities
|
2,115,324
|
1,394,359
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
Convertible
notes payable - related parties
|
-
|
1,200,000
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
-
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
2,115,324
|
2,594,359
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
|
|
Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock, $10 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 85,561 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017
and 85,646 issued and outstanding as of December 31,
2016
|
855,610
|
856,460
|
Common
Stock: $.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 113,427,943
issued and 113,423,854 outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and
109,690,387 issued and 109,686,298 outstanding as of December 31,
2016
|
113,428
|
109,690
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
46,013,982
|
45,822,570
|
Treasury
stock
|
(12,039)
|
(12,039)
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(46,868,443)
|
(47,199,752)
|
Total
stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
102,538
|
(423,071)
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
$2,217,862
|
$2,171,288
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-2
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
|
Years
Ended
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Revenues
|
$6,304,741
|
$5,507,853
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
806,038
|
943,579
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
5,498,703
|
4,564,274
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
5,275,402
|
3,946,124
|
Other
administrative expense
|
-
|
818,665
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
80,648
|
60,883
|
Bad
debt expense
|
22,207
|
10,735
|
Total operating expenses
|
5,378,257
|
4,836,407
|
|
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
120,444
|
(272,133)
|
|
|
|
Other income / (expense)
|
|
|
Gain
on settlement of debt
|
286,873
|
-
|
Debt
forgiveness
|
50,646
|
30,592
|
Change
in fair value of derivative liability
|
44
|
266
|
Other
income
|
125
|
21
|
Interest
expense
|
(126,825)
|
(174,493)
|
Total other income / (expense)
|
210,863
|
(143,614)
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
331,309
|
(415,747)
|
|
|
|
Series
C preferred stock dividends
|
(139,006)
|
(261,716)
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) available to common stockholders
|
$192,303
|
$(677,463)
|
|
|
|
Basic
net loss per share of common stock
|
$0.00
|
$(0.01)
|
|
|
|
Diluted net loss
per share of common stock
|
$0.00
|
$(0.01)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, basic
|
111,381,832
|
108,604,489
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, diluted
|
208,645,538
|
108,604,489
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-3
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
|
Preferred Stock
Series C Shares
|
$10.00 Par Value Amount
|
Common Stock Shares
|
$0.001 Par Value Amount
|
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
Treasury Stock Shares
|
Treasury Stock Amount
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
|
Balance at
December 31, 2015
|
80,218
|
$802,180
|
107,274,816
|
$107,274
|
$44,615,321
|
(4,089)
|
$(12,039)
|
$(46,784,005)
|
$(1,271,269)
|
Issuance of
Common stock for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
-
|
-
|
1,316,667
|
1,317
|
56,183
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
57,500
|
Conversion
of Series C Preferred Stock
|
(1,000)
|
(10,000)
|
1,000,000
|
1,000
|
9,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Series
C Dividend
|
-
|
-
|
98,904
|
99
|
(99)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Issuance of
Preferred stock for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
6,428
|
64,280
|
-
|
-
|
385,720
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
450,000
|
Recognition
of vesting stock
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,220)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,220)
|
Warrant
expense
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
758,665
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
758,665
|
Net
Loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(415,747)
|
(415,747)
|
Balance at
December 31, 2016
|
85,646
|
$856,460
|
109,690,387
|
$109,690
|
$45,822,570
|
(4,089)
|
$(12,039)
|
$(47,199,752)
|
$(423,071)
|
Issuance of
Common stock for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
-
|
-
|
1,600,000
|
1,600
|
58,650
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
60,250
|
Conversion
of Series C Preferred Stock
|
(800)
|
(8,000)
|
800,000
|
800
|
7,200
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Series
C Dividend
|
-
|
-
|
137,556
|
138
|
(138)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Common
stock issued for settlement of debt
|
-
|
-
|
1,200,000
|
1,200
|
82,800
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
84,000
|
Issuance of
Preferred stock for:
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Cash
|
715
|
7,150
|
-
|
-
|
42,900
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
50,050
|
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
331,309
|
331,309
|
Balance at
December 31, 2017
|
85,561
|
$855,610
|
113,427,943
|
$113,428
|
$46,013,982
|
(4,089)
|
$(12,039)
|
$(46,868,443)
|
$102,538
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-4
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
income/(loss)
|
$331,309
|
$(415,747)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
80,648
|
60,883
|
Forgiveness
of debt
|
(50,646)
|
30,592
|
Gain
on settlement of debt
|
(286,873)
|
-
|
Bad
debt expense
|
22,207
|
10,735
|
Inventory
obsolescence
|
57,483
|
152,547
|
Common
stock issued for services
|
60,250
|
55,280
|
(Gain)
loss on change in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
(44)
|
(266)
|
Warrant
expense
|
-
|
758,665
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
(64,413)
|
(503,233)
|
(Increase)
decrease in royalties receivable
|
-
|
150,750
|
(Increase)
decrease in inventory
|
(420,423)
|
(91,226)
|
(Increase)
decrease in prepaids and other assets
|
(6,492)
|
94,227
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued royalties and dividends
|
(32,494)
|
(46,146)
|
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
26,942
|
15,877
|
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable related parties
|
(33,655)
|
72,556
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued liabilities
|
60,454
|
-
|
Increase
(decrease) in accrued interest payable
|
115,885
|
63,751
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating
activities
|
(139,862)
|
409,245
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(43,895)
|
(3,029)
|
Purchase
of intangible assets
|
(41,980)
|
-
|
Net
cash flows used in investing activities
|
(85,875)
|
(3,029)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
Payments
on capital lease obligation
|
(3,766)
|
(4,711)
|
Payments
on debt
|
(190,838)
|
(200,362)
|
Cash
proceeds from sale of series C preferred stock
|
50,050
|
450,000
|
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing
activities
|
(144,554)
|
244,927
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
(370,291)
|
651,143
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
833,480
|
182,337
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$463,189
|
$833,480
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
Interest
|
$10,937
|
$49,559
|
Income
taxes
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
Common
stock issued for Series C dividends
|
$137
|
$99
|
Common
stock issued for conversion of Series C Preferred
Stock
|
8,000
|
10,000
|
Issuance
of vested stock
|
-
|
167
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-5
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. was incorporated in the State of
Texas in December 2001 as MB Software, Inc. In May 2008, MB
Software, Inc. changed its name to Wound Management Technologies,
Inc. The Company distributes collagen-based wound care products to
healthcare providers such as physicians, clinics and
hospitals.
NOTE 2 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
terms “the Company,” “we,” “us”
and “WMT” are used in this report to refer to Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of WMT and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Wound Care Innovations,
LLC a Nevada limited liability company (“WCI”);
Resorbable Orthopedic Products, LLC, a Texas limited liability
company (“Resorbable); and Innovate OR, Inc.
(“InnovateOR”) formerly referred to as BioPharma
Management Technologies, Inc., a Texas corporation
(“BioPharma”). All intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
USE OF ESTIMATES IN FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION
The
preparation of the financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. On a regular basis, management
evaluates these estimates and assumptions. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The
Company considers all highly liquid debt investments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Marketable securities include investments with
maturities greater than three months but less than one year. For
certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable
and other accrued liabilities, and amounts due to related parties,
the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short
maturities.
INCOME / LOSS PER SHARE
The
Company computes income/loss per share in accordance with
Accounting Standards Codification “ASC” Topic No. 260,
“Earnings per Share,” which requires the Company to
present basic and dilutive income/loss per share when the effect is
dilutive. Basic income/loss per share is computed by dividing
income/loss available to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares available. Diluted income/loss per
share is computed similar to basic income/loss per share except
that the denominator is increased to include the number of
additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the
potential common shares had been issued and if the additional
common shares were dilutive.
F-6
The calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the
years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Basic
net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$331,309
|
$(415,747)
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding
|
111,381,832
|
108,604,489
|
|
|
|
Basic
net income (loss) per share
|
$0.00
|
$(0.01)
|
|
|
|
Diluted
net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$331,309
|
$(415,747)
|
Series
C dividends
|
(139,006)
|
|
Diluted
net income (loss)
|
$192,303
|
$(415,747)
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding
|
111,381,832
|
108,604,489
|
Common
stock warrants
|
694,834
|
-
|
Convertible
debt
|
-
|
-
|
Preferred
shares
|
96,568,871
|
-
|
Weighted
average shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per
share
|
208,645,538
|
108,604,489
|
|
|
|
Diluted
net income (loss) per share
|
$0.00
|
$(0.00)
|
The following table summarizes the potential shares of common stock
that were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per
share for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 as such shares
would have had an anti-dilutive effect:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Preferred
shares
|
-
|
92,915,071
|
Convertible
debt
|
19,890,414
|
18,082,186
|
REVENUE RECOGNITION
In
accordance with the guidance in “ASC” Topic No. 605,
“Revenue Recognition,” the Company recognizes revenue
when (a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (b) delivery
has occurred or services have been rendered, (c) the fee is fixed
or determinable, and (d) collectability is reasonable assured.
Revenue is recognized upon delivery. Revenue is recorded on the
gross basis, which includes handling and shipping, because the
Company has risks and rewards as a principal in the transaction
based on the following: (a) the Company maintains inventory of the
product, (b) the Company is responsible for order fulfillment, and
(c) the Company establishes the price for the product. The Company
recognizes royalty revenue in the period the royalty bearing
products are sold.
The
Company recognizes revenue based on bill and hold arrangements when
the seller has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and
rewards of ownership of the goods; the seller does not retain
effective control over the goods or continuing managerial
involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership; the
amount of revenue can be measured reliably; it is probable that the
economic benefits of the sale will flow to the seller; any costs
incurred or to be incurred related to the sale can be measured
reliably; it is probable that delivery will be made; the goods are
on hand, identified, and ready for delivery; the buyer specifically
acknowledges the deferred delivery instructions; and the usual
payment terms apply.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The
Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts to ensure
accounts receivable are not overstated due to uncollectability. Bad
debt reserves are maintained based on a variety of factors,
including the length of time receivables are past due and a
detailed review of certain individual customer accounts. If
circumstances related to customers change, estimates of the
recoverability of receivables would be further adjusted. The
Company recorded bad debt expense of $22,207 and $10,735 in 2017
and 2016, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts at
December 31, 2017 was $28,910 and the amount at December 31, 2016
was $21,947.
F-7
INVENTORIES
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost
computed on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventories consist of
finished goods, powders, gels and the related packaging supplies.
The Company recorded inventory obsolescence expense of $57,483 in
2017 and $152,547 in 2016. The allowance for obsolete and
slow-moving inventory had a balance of $144,996 and $153,023 at
December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed
utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated economic life
of the assets, which ranges from five to ten years. For assets sold
or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any related gain or
loss is reflected in income for the period. As of December 31,
2017, fixed assets consisted of $120,162 including furniture and
fixtures, computer equipment, phone equipment and the Company
websites. As of December 31, 2016, fixed assets consisted of
$76,267 including furniture and fixtures, computer equipment, phone
equipment and the Company websites. The depreciation expense
recorded in 2017 was $15,623 and the depreciation expense recorded
in 2016 was $9,852. The balance of accumulated depreciation was
$56,951 and $41,328 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
respectively. The Company paid $43,895 to acquire fixed assets
during 2017.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As of
December 31, 2017, and 2016 intangible assets include a patent
acquired in 2009 with a historical cost of $510,310. The patent is
being amortized over its estimated useful life of 10 years using
the straight-line method. Amortization expense recognized was
$65,025 and $51,031 during 2017 and 2016. In 2017, the Company put
into service a business software. The costs to implement this
software which totaled $41,980 are included in intangible assets
and are being amortized over the initial term of the license which
is three years.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Long-lived
assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by
the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. The Company continuously evaluates the
recoverability of its long-lived assets based on estimated future
cash flows and the estimated liquidation value of such long-lived
assets and provides for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows
are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived
assets. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the
asset down to its fair value, and a loss is recorded as the
difference between the carrying value and fair value. Fair values
are determined based on quoted market values, undiscounted cash
flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable. Assets to
be disposed of are carried at the lower of carrying value or
estimated net realizable value. There was no impairment recorded
during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
As
defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
Topic No. 820, fair value is the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date
(exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability,
including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the
inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily
observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. ASC 820
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used
to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement). This fair value
measurement framework applies at both initial and subsequent
measurement.
The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by ASC Topic No.
820 are as follows:
Level 1
– Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are
those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on
an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial
instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable
securities and listed equities.
F-8
Level 2
– Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active
markets included in level 1, which are either directly or
indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes
those financial instruments that are valued using models or other
valuation methodologies. These models are primarily
industry-standard models that consider various assumptions,
including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value,
volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for
the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic
measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in
the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be
derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels
at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Instruments
in this category generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives
such as commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and
collars.
Level 3
– Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are
generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may
be used with internally developed methodologies that result in
management’s best estimate of fair value.
At
December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s financial
instruments consist of the derivative liabilities related to stock
purchase warrants which were valued using the Black-Scholes Option
Pricing Model, a level 3 input.
Our
intangible assets have also been valued using the fair value
accounting treatment and a description of the methodology used,
including the valuation category, is described below in Note 5
“Intangible Assets.”
The
following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy
the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were
accounted for at fair value as of December 31, 2017 and
2016.
Recurring Fair Value Measure
|
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities as of December 31, 2017
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
Derivative Liabilities as of December 31, 2016
|
$-
|
$-
|
$44
|
$44
|
DERIVATIVES
The
Company entered into derivative financial instruments to manage its
funding of current operations. Derivatives are initially recognized
at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into and
are subsequently re-measured to their fair value at the end of each
reporting period. The resulting gain or loss is recognized in
profit or loss immediately.
INCOME TAXES
Income
taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method,
whereby deferred income taxes are recorded for temporary
differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the
tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities reflect the tax rates expected to be in effect for the
years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation
allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some or
all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
F-9
BENEFICIAL CONVERSION FEATURE OF CONVERTIBLE NOTES
PAYABLE
The
convertible feature of certain notes payable provides for a rate of
conversion that is below the market value of the Company’s
common stock. Such a feature is normally characterized as a
"Beneficial Conversion Feature" ("BCF"). In accordance with ASC
Topic No. 470-20-25-4, the intrinsic value of the embedded
beneficial conversion feature present in a convertible instrument
shall be recognized separately at issuance by allocating a portion
of the debt equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to
additional paid in capital. When applicable, the Company records
the estimated fair value of the BCF in the consolidated financial
statements as a discount from the face amount of the notes. Such
discounts are accreted to interest expense over the term of the
notes using the effective interest method.
ADVERTISING EXPENSE
In
accordance with ASC Topic No. 720-35-25-1, the Company recognizes
advertising expenses the first time the advertising takes place.
Such costs are expensed immediately if such advertising is not
expected to occur.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation to employees in
accordance with FASB ASC 718. Stock-based compensation to employees
is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the
award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite employee
service period. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation
to other than employees in accordance with FASB ASC 505-50. Equity
instruments issued to other than employees are valued at the
earlier of a commitment date or upon completion of the services,
based on the fair value of the equity instruments and is recognized
as expense over the service period. The Company estimates the fair
value of stock-based payments using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model for common stock options and warrants and the
closing price of the Company’s common stock for common share
issuances.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current
period presentation.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May
2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, Revenue from Contracts
with Customers which is to be effective for reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has reviewed the
pronouncement and believes it will not have a material impact on
the Company’s financial position, operations or cash
flows.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASC 842 Leases which is to be
effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.
The Company is currently reviewing any impact that it will have on
the Company’s financial position, operations or cash
flows.
F-10
NOTE 3 – OTHER SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS
Evolution Partners LLC Letter Agreement and Termination
Agreement
On
October 10, 2017, Wound Management Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) and Evolution Venture Partners LLC
(“EVP”) entered into a termination agreement (the
“Termination Agreement”) terminating, effective as of
September 29, 2017, that certain letter agreement dated April 26,
2016, (the “Agreement”), by and between the Company,
EVP, and Middlebury Securities, LLC (“Middlebury”).
Middlebury terminated its charter on or about July 27, 2016, and
therefore is not a party to the Termination Agreement. The
Agreement had an initial term of one year (with an automatic
six-month renewal term) and provided for:
●
A
$60,000 consulting fee payable upon execution of the Agreement,
refundable only upon cancellation of the Agreement by EVP during
the initial one-year term.
●
A
success fee in an amount equal to 5% of the transaction value of
any strategic transaction.
●
A
selling fee equal to 3% of the gross proceeds of any debt financing
transaction or 5% of the gross proceeds of any equity financing
transaction.
●
The
issuance to EVP of a warrant (the “Warrant”) for the
purchase of 60,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock,
par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), at an
exercise price of $0.12 per share.
The
total amount of the consulting fee and warrant expense was $818,665
and is recognized in 2016 as “Other administrative
expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
As of
the termination date, there were no Financing Transactions or
Strategic Transactions (as defined in the Agreement) being
considered by the Company and no such transactions
occurred.
Pursuant
to the Termination Agreement, EVP canceled the Warrant in exchange
for the Company’s issuance to EVP of 750,000 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock. There was no incremental increase in
the fair value of the modified stock-based compensation award as of
the modification date and accordingly, no additional compensation
cost was recognized.
F-11
NOTE 4 – NOTES PAYABLE
CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTIES
Funds
are advanced to the Company from various related parties as
necessary to meet working capital requirements. Below is a summary
of outstanding convertible notes due to related parties, including
accrued interest separately recorded, as of December 31, 2017 and
2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Interest
|
|
||||||
Related
Party
|
|
Nature of
Relationship
|
|
Term of the
agreement
|
|
Principal amount
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|||
S. Oden
Howell Revocable Trust ("HRT")
|
|
Mr. S.
Oden Howell, Jr. became a member of the Board of Directors in June
of 2015
|
|
The
note is secured, bears interest at 10% per annum, matures June 15,
2018, and is convertible into shares of the Company's Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $70.00 per
share at any time prior to maturity.
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
|
$
|
162,493
|
|
|
$
|
96,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
James
W. Stuckert Revocable Trust ("SRT")
|
|
Mr.
James W. Stuckert became a member of the Board of Directors in
September of 2015
|
|
The
note is secured, bears interest at 10% per annum, matures June 15,
2018, and is convertible into shares of the Company's Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock at a conversion price of $70.00 per
share at any time prior to maturity.
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
|
$
|
162,493
|
|
|
$
|
96,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
324,986
|
|
|
$
|
192,328
|
|
F-12
On June
15, 2015, the Company entered into term loan agreements with The
James W. Stuckert Revocable Trust (“SRT) and The S. Oden
Howell Revocable Trust (“HRT”), pursuant to which SRT
made a loan to the Company in the amount of $600,000 and HRT made a
loan to the Company in the amount of $600,000 under Senior Secured
Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Notes”). Both SRT
and HRT are controlled by affiliates of the Company. The Notes each
carry an interest rate of 10% per annum, and (subject to various
default provisions) all unpaid principal and accrued but unpaid
interest under the Notes is due and payable on June 15, 2018. The
Notes may be prepaid in whole or in part upon ten days’
written notice, and all unpaid principal and accrued interest under
the Notes may be converted, at the option of SRT and HRT, into
shares of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
at a conversion price of $70.00 per share at any time prior to
maturity.”). The Company’s obligations under the two
notes are secured by all the assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries.
NOTES PAYABLE
The
following is a summary of amounts due to unrelated parties,
including accrued interest separately recorded, as of December 31,
2017 and 2016:
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
Accrued Interest
|
|
||||||||||
Note Payable
|
|
Terms of the agreement
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
||||
March
4, 2011 Note Payable
|
|
223,500
note payable; (i) interest accrues at 13% per annum; (ii) maturity
date of September 4, 2011; (iii) $20,000 fee due at maturity date
with a $1,000 per day fee for each day the principal and interest
is late. This note was settled in full on November 1, 2017 (see
Note 11 "Legal Proceedings")
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
223,500
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
147,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third
Quarter 2012 Secured Subordinated Promissory Notes
|
|
Three notes in the aggregate principal amount of $110,000; (i)
interest accrues at 5% per annum; (ii) maturity date of October 12,
2012; (iii) after the maturity date interest shall accrue at 18%
per annum and the company shall pay to the note holders on a pro
rata basis, an amount equal to twenty percent of the sales proceeds
received by the Company and its subsidiary, WCI, from the sale of
surgical powders, until such time as the note amounts have been
paid in full. As of December 31, 2017, all of these notes have been
repaid in full.
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
104,571
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
8,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
28, 2012 Promissory Note
|
|
$51,300
note payable (i) interest accrues at 10% per annum; (ii) original
maturity date of December 31, 2012; (iii) default interest rate of
15% per annum. As of December 31, 2017, the note is paid in
full.
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
11,300
|
|
|
$
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
19,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quest
Capital Investors, LLC
|
|
Furniture
purchase agreement in the original amount of $11,700 with $300
payments due each month. Secured by fixed assets of the Company. As
of December 31, 2017, the note is paid in full.
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 28,
2015 Promissory Note
|
|
$96,000
note payable (i) interest accrues at 10% per annum; (ii) original
maturity date of May 28, 2016; (iii) amended maturity date of June
30, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, the note is paid in
full.
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
74,667
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
414,338
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
175,083
|
|
F-13
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid $26,762
principal and $49,559 in accrued interest for three of the
non-related party notes. In June and July of 2016, two of the
parties' notes were amended and they agreed to forgive a portion of
the accrued interest in the amounts of $22,943 and $7,649 for a
total of $30,592.
During
2017, the WMTI reached an agreement to settle an outstanding
payable with WellDyne Health, LLC, (“WellDyne”), a
third party that had provided shipping and consulting services on
behalf of the Company effective through September 19, 2015. As part
of that settlement, WellDyne forgave $39,709 of the outstanding
payable.
During
2017, the Company paid a total of $190,838 principal to three
non-related party note holders and reached an agreement with them
to forgive $10,937 in accrued interest. As a result, all three
notes were paid in full. The Company also settled $223,500 note
payable and $147,373 accrued interest in Common Stock, see note
11.
NOTE 5 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Patent
On
September 29, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “Agreement”), whereby the Company
acquired a patent from in exchange for 500,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock and the assumption of a legal fee
payable in the amount of $47,595 which is related to the patent.
Based on the guidance in ASC Topic No. 350-30, the patent was
recorded as an intangible asset of $462,715, or approximately $.93
per share plus $47,595 for the assumed liability. The intangible
asset is being amortized over an estimated ten-year useful
life.
Software Implementation
In
2017, the Company put into service a business software. The costs
to implement this software which totaled $41,980 are included in
intangible assets and are being amortized over the initial term of
the license which is three years.
The
activity for the intangible assets is summarized
below:
Cost
|
Patent
|
Software
|
Total
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
$510,310
|
$-
|
$510,310
|
Implementation
costs
|
|
41,980
|
41,980
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
$510,310
|
$41,980
|
$552,290
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
$369,974
|
$-
|
$369,974
|
Amortization
expense
|
51,032
|
13,993
|
65,025
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
$421,006
|
$13,993
|
$434,999
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
$140,336
|
$-
|
$140,336
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
$89,304
|
$27,987
|
$117,291
|
F-14
NOTE 6 – CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS
The
Company had one significant customer which accounted for
approximately 16% of the Company’s sales in 2017 and had two
significant customers which accounted for approximately 18% and 14%
of the Company’s sales in 2016. The loss of the sales
generated by these customers would have a significant effect on the
operations of the Company.
The
Company purchases all raw materials inventory for its principal
product from one vendor. If this vendor became unable to provide
materials in a timely manner and the Company was unable to find
alternative vendors, the Company's business, operating results and
financial condition would be materially adversely
affected.
NOTE 7 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
ROYALTY AGREEMENTS
Effective
January 3, 2008, WCI entered into separate exclusive license
agreements with both Applied Nutritionals, LLC
(“Applied”) and its founder George Petito
(“Petito”), pursuant to which WCI obtained the
exclusive world-wide license to make products incorporating
intellectual property covered by a patent related to CellerateRX
products. The licenses are limited to the human health care market,
(excluding dental and retail) for external wound care (including
surgical wounds) and include any new product developments based on
the licensed patent and processes and any continuations. Although
the term of these licenses expired on February 27, 2018, the
agreements permit WCI to continue to sell and distribute products
for a period not exceeding six (6) months from the effective
termination date.
In
consideration for the licenses, WCI agreed to pay Applied and
Petito, (in the aggregate), the following royalties, beginning
January 3, 2008: (a) an advance royalty of $100,000; (b) a royalty
of 15% of gross sales occurring during the first year of the
license; (c) an additional advance royalty of $400,000 on January
3, 2009; plus (d) a royalty of 3% of gross sales for all sales
occurring after the payment of the $400,000 advance royalty. In
addition, WCI must maintain a minimum aggregate annual royalty
payment of $375,000 for 2009 and thereafter if the royalty
percentage payments made do not meet or exceed that amount. The
amounts listed in the two preceding sentences are the aggregate of
amounts paid/owed to Applied and Petito) and the Company has paid
the minimum aggregate annual royalty payments each year since 2008,
including both 2017 and 2016. Sales of CellerateRX occurring after
the termination date are subject to the 3% royalty. The total
unpaid royalties as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, is $244,422 and
$276,916, respectively.
On
September 29, 2009, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”), by and
among the Company, RSI-ACQ, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company (RSI), Resorbable Orthopedic Products, LLC
(“Resorbable”) and Resorbable’s members, pursuant
to which, RSI acquired substantially all of Resorbable’s
assets, in exchange for (i) 500,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock, and (ii) a royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the
net revenues generated from products sold by the Company or any of
its affiliates, which products are developed from or otherwise
utilize any of the patented technology acquired from Resorbable.
The royalty is paid to Barry Constantine Consultant LLC for
distribution to the original patent holders, (including Mr.
Constantine) and/or their heirs.
PREPAID FROM INVENTORY CONTRACT
In
November of 2016, ROP entered into a contract with the contract
manufacturer of HemaQuell® product to purchase $13,787 of
product. This amount was recorded as an asset in the “Prepaid
and Other Assets” account at December 31, 2016, based on the
contractual obligation of the parties.
F-15
OFFICE LEASE
The
Company’s corporate office is located at 1200 Summit Avenue,
Suite 414, Fort Worth, TX 76102. The lease was entered into in
March of 2017, with an effective date of May 1, 2017. The lease
expires on the last day of the fiftieth (50th) full calendar month
following the effective date (June 30, 2021). Monthly base rental
payments are as follows: months 1-2, $0; months 3-14, $7,250;
months 15-26, $7,401; months 27-38, $7,552; and months 39-50,
$7,703.
PAYABLES TO RELATED PARTIES
As of
December 31, 2017, and 2016, the Company had outstanding payable to
related parties totaling $60,000 and $93,655, respectively. The
payables are unsecured, bear no interest and due on
demand.
NOTE 8 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
PREFERRED STOCK
There
are currently 5,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock
authorized, with no shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued or
outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Effective
June 24, 2010, the Company filed a Certificate of Designations,
Number, Voting Power, Preferences and Rights of Series B
Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (the
“Certificate”) with the Texas Secretary of State,
designating 7,500 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, par value
$10.00 per share (the “Series B Shares”). The Series B
Shares rank senior to shares of all other common and preferred
stock with respect to dividends, distributions, and payments upon
dissolution. Each of the Series B Shares is convertible at the
option of the holder into shares of common stock as provided in the
Certificate. There were no Series B Shares issued or outstanding as
of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
On
October 11, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Designations,
Number, Voting Power, Preferences and Rights of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of
Designations”), under which it designated 100,000 shares of
Series C Preferred Stock, par value $10.00. The Series C Preferred
Stock is entitled to accruing dividends (payable, at the
Company’s options, in either cash or stock) of 5% per annum
until October 10, 2016, and 3% per annum until October 10,
2018.
The
Series C Preferred Stock is senior to the Company’s common
stock and any other currently issued series of the Company’s
preferred stock upon liquidation and is entitled to a liquidation
preference per share equal to the original issuance price of such
shares of Series C Preferred Stock together with the amount of all
accrued but unpaid dividends thereon. Each of the Series C Shares
is convertible at the option of the holder into 1,000 shares of
common stock as provided in the Certificate. Additionally, each
holder of Series C Preferred Stock shall be entitled to vote on all
matters submitted for a vote of the holders of Common Stock a
number of votes equal to the number of full shares of Common Stock
into which such holder’s Series C shares could then be
converted. As of December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, there
were 85,561 and 85,646 shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued
and outstanding, respectively.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 6,428 shares
of Series C preferred stock to Directors of the Company for cash
proceeds of $450,000.
On
March 10, 2017, the Company issued 715 shares of Series C preferred
stock in exchange for cash in the amount of $50,050.
During
2017, one shareholder converted 800 shares of Series C preferred
stock and dividend of $9,692 to common stock of 937,556
shares.
Series
C preferred stock dividends were $139,006 and $261,716 for the
years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate outstanding accumulated
arrearages of cumulative dividends was $909,557, ($10.63 per
share). As of the date of this filing, $1,060,098 Series C preferred stock dividends
have been converted to 15,144,247 shares of common stock at $0.07 per
share.
F-16
On
November 13, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Designations,
Number, Voting Power, Preferences and Rights of Series D
Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of
Designations”), under which it designated 25,000 shares of
Series D Preferred Stock. Shares of Series D Preferred Stock are
not entitled to any preference with respect to dividend or upon
liquidation and will automatically convert (at a ratio of
1,000-to-1) into shares of the Company’s common stock, par
value $0.001 upon approval of the Company’s stockholders (and
filing of) and amendment to the Company’s Certificate of
Incorporation increasing the number of authorized shares of Common
Stock from 100,000,000 to 250,000,000. On September 3, 2014, the
Company increased its authorized common stock to 250,000,000
shares. As a result, all outstanding Series D preferred shares were
converted to common stock.
In
November of 2013, the Company granted an aggregate of 15,000 shares
of Series D preferred stock to employees and nonemployees for
services. 9,000 of the shares were granted to employees and vested
immediately upon grant; 4,000 shares were granted to a nonemployee
and vested immediately upon grant; 1,000 of the shares were granted
to an employee and vested in equal tranches over three years
through October 1, 2016; and 1,000 of the shares were granted to a
nonemployee and vested in equal tranches over three years through
September 15, 2016. The aggregate fair value of the awards was
determined to be $1,046,669 of which $925,787 was recognized during
the year ended December 31, 2013; $79,318 was recognized during the
year ended December 31, 2014; $6,628, (net forfeitures of $19,173)
was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015; and $8,109
was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016. As of
October 1, 2016, all shares have vested, no further expense is to
be recognized.
During
the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company granted an aggregate
of 1,445 shares of Series D preferred stock to three nonemployees
which vested immediately upon grant. The aggregate fair value of
the awards was determined to be $157,050 which was recognized
during the year ended December 31, 2014 and no further expense is
to be recognized.
On
September 3, 2014, the Company increased its authorized common
stock to 250,000,000 shares. Accordingly, the 16,545 outstanding
shares of Series D preferred stock were automatically converted
into 16,545,000 common shares.
As of
December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016 there were no shares of
Series D Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
On May
30, 2014, the Company filed a Certificate of Designations, Number,
Voting Power, Preferences and Rights of Series E Convertible
Preferred Stock (The “Certificate of Designations”),
under which it designated 5,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock.
Shares of Series E Preferred Stock are not entitled to any
preference with respect to dividends or upon liquidation, and will
automatically convert (at a ratio of 1,000 shares of Common Stock
for every one share of Series E Preferred Stock) into shares of the
Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value upon approval of the
Company’s stockholders (and filing of) and amendment to the
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation increasing the number
of authorized shares of Common Stock from 100,000,000 to
250,000,000. As of December 31, 2017, there were no shares of
Series E Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
The
Company evaluated the Series C preferred stock under FASB ASC 815
and determined that they do not qualify as derivative liabilities.
The Company then evaluated the Series C preferred stock for
beneficial conversion features under FASB ASC 470-30 and determined
that none existed.
COMMON STOCK
On
September 3, 2014, the Company held a stockholders meeting. The
stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Articles
of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of common stock
of the Company from 100,000,000 to 250,000,000.
On
March 31, 2016 the Company issued 1,098,904 shares of common stock
in conversion of 1,000 shares of Series C Preferred stock and
$6,924 of related dividends.
On
October 26, 2016, the Company issued 1,150,000 shares of common
stock valued at $57,500 to employees. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, an aggregate of 499,967 common shares were
issued upon the vesting of previously granted stock awards and the
Company recorded a net reversal of $2,220 of stock-based
compensation related to the amortization of stock awards to
employees and nonemployees net of reversal of the unvested portion
of forfeited awards.
On
October 26, 2016, the Company agreed to grant three tranches of
shares of common stock, 250,000, 250,000, and 250,000 to a sales
consultant which are to be earned upon meeting specific performance
measures agreed upon. The measures include achieving three specific
sales targets per month for 3 consecutive months. The first one of
these was earned January 31st,
2017, and 250,000 shares were granted in March 2017.
F-17
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, an aggregate of 166,667 shares of
fully vested common stock under previously issued stock awards was
returned and cancelled. The share cancellation was recognized at
par value.
On
March 9, 2017, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock to
each of the Company’s then four Board Directors, (a total of
600,000 shares valued at $42,000).
On
March 10, 2017, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock
valued at $18,250 to a contract consultant upon achievement of
specified revenue targets which occurred January 31,
2017.
On July
31, 2017, the Company issued 937,556 shares of common stock for the
conversion of 800 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
and $9,629 of related Series C dividends
On
November 22, 2017, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common
stock valued at $84,000 for settlement of debt (see NOTE 11 below
for a discussion of the settlement).
On
November 22, 2017, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common
stock valued at $0 to a contract consultant upon termination of
contract (see NOTE 3 above for a discussion of the
termination).
WARRANTS
At
December 31, 2017, there were 5,100,000 warrants outstanding with a
weighted average exercise price of $0.06. At December 31, 2016,
there were 67,246,300 warrants outstanding with a weighted average
exercise price of $0.12.
A
summary of the status of the warrants granted at December 31, 2017
and 2016, and changes during the years then ended is presented
below:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
||
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
67,246,300
|
$0.12
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
(60,051,300)
|
0.12
|
Expired
|
(2,095,000)
|
0.13
|
Outstanding
at end of period
|
5,100,000
|
$0.06
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
||
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
9,736,844
|
$0.19
|
Granted
|
60,000,000
|
0.12
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Expired
|
(2,490,544)
|
0.60
|
Outstanding
at end of period
|
67,246,300
|
$0.12
|
F-18
The
following table summarizes the outstanding warrants as of December
31, 2017:
Warrants
Outstanding
|
Warrants
Exercisable
|
||||
Range of Exercise Prices
|
Number Outstanding
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contract Life
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
|
Number Exercisable
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
$0.06
|
4,500,000
|
1
|
$0.06
|
4,500,000
|
$0.06
|
0.08
|
200,000
|
1
|
0.08
|
200,000
|
0.08
|
0.09
|
400,000
|
1
|
0.09
|
400,000
|
0.09
|
$0.06 -0.09
|
5,100,000
|
1
|
$0.06
|
5,100,000
|
$0.06
|
The
following table summarizes the outstanding warrants as of December
31, 2016:
Warrants
Outstanding
|
Warrants
Exercisable
|
||||
Range of Exercise Prices
|
Number Outstanding
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contract Life
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
|
Number Exercisable
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
$0.06
|
4,500,000
|
2
|
$0.06
|
4,500,000
|
$0.06
|
0.08
|
550,000
|
1
|
0.08
|
550,000
|
0.08
|
0.09
|
625,000
|
1
|
0.09
|
625,000
|
0.09
|
0.12
|
60,000,000
|
4
|
0.12
|
12,000,000
|
0.12
|
0.15
|
1,571,300
|
1
|
0.15
|
1,571,300
|
0.15
|
$0.06 -.15
|
67,246,300
|
4
|
$0.12
|
19,246,300
|
$0.12
|
F-19
STOCK OPTIONS
A
summary of the status of the stock options granted for the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and changes during the period
then ended is presented below:
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
||
|
Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
1,093,500
|
$0.15
|
Granted
|
1,150,000
|
0.06
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
(150,000)
|
(a)
|
Expired
|
(943,500)
|
0.15
|
Outstanding
at end of period
|
1,150,000
|
$0.06
|
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
||
|
Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
1,093,500
|
$0.15
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding
at end of period
|
1,093,500
|
$0.15
|
(a) On
January 1, 2015, the Company granted three tranches of options,
25,000, 25,000, and 100,000 which vest upon meeting specific
performance measures. The measures include achieving three specific
sales targets per month for 3 consecutive months. The exercise
price and expiration date of each tranche will be set upon
achieving the targets. As of the date of this filing the
performance measures have not been met. As a result, the exercise
price is undetermined and these options are excluded from the
calculation of weighted average remaining life. As of December 31,
2017, the options were forfeited.
On
December 31, 2017, the Company granted a total of 1,150,000 options
to five employees. The shares vest in equal annual
amounts over three years and the aggregate fair value of the
awards was determined to be $61,322 and no expense was
recognized.
F-20
The
following table summarizes the outstanding options as of December
31, 2017:
As of December 31,
2017
|
As
of December 31, 2017
|
||||
Stock Options
Outstanding
|
Stock Options Exercisable
|
|
|||
Exercise Price
|
Number Outstanding
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contract Life
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
|
Number Exercisable
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
$0.06
|
1,150,000
|
5
|
$0.06
|
-
|
$-
|
The
following table summarizes the outstanding options as of December
31, 2016:
As of December 31,
2016
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
||||
Stock Options
Outstanding
|
Stock Options Exercisable
|
|
|||
Exercise Price
|
Number Outstanding
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contract Life
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
|
Number Exercisable
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
$0.15
|
943,500
|
1.75
|
$0.15
|
943,500
|
$0.15
|
(a)
|
150,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$0.15
|
1,093,500
|
1.63
|
$0.15
|
943,500
|
$0.15
|
(a) On
January 1, 2015, the Company granted three tranches of options,
25,000, 25,000, and 100,000 which vest upon meeting specific
performance measures. The measures include achieving three specific
sales targets per month for 3 consecutive months. The exercise
price and expiration date of each tranche will be set upon
achieving the targets. As of the date of this filing the
performance measures have not been met. As a result, the exercise
price is undetermined and these options are excluded from the
calculation of weighted average remaining life. As of December 31,
2017, the options were forfeited.
F-21
NOTE 9 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
During
2017 and 2016, the Company had outstanding common stock warrants
that contained anti-dilution provisions including provisions for
the adjustment of the exercise price if the Company issues common
stock or common stock equivalents at a price less than the exercise
price. In addition, the Company also had outstanding convertible
notes payable to various lenders that were convertible at discounts
ranging from 30% to 50% of the fair market value of the
Company’s common stock.
As of
December 31, 2017, the Company did not have a sufficient number of
common shares authorized to fulfill the possible exercise of all
outstanding warrants and the conversion of all outstanding
convertible notes payable. As a result, the Company determined that
the warrants and the embedded beneficial conversion features of the
debt instruments do not qualify for equity classification.
Accordingly, the warrants and conversion options are treated as
derivative liabilities and are carried at fair value. As of
December 31, 2017, no outstanding common stock warrants with
anti-dilution provision remained outstanding.
The
Company estimates the fair value of the derivative warrant
liabilities by using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model and the
derivative liabilities related to the conversion features in the
outstanding convertible notes using the Black-Scholes Option
Pricing Model assuming maximum value, a Level 3, input, with the
following assumptions used:
Year
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Dividend yield:
|
|
0%
|
|
0%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
127.73%
to 0%
|
|
146.67
to 110.19%
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
0.00 to 1.07%
|
|
0.00 to 1.07%
|
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
0.00 to 0.00
|
|
0.00 to 0.56
|
|
The
following table sets forth the changes in the fair value of
derivative liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015:
Balance, December 31, 2015
|
$(310)
|
Derivative
warrants exchanged for debt
|
|
Loss
on change in fair value of derivative
liabilities
|
266
|
Balance, December 31, 2016
|
(44)
|
Loss
on change in fair value of derivative
liabilities
|
44
|
Balance, December 31, 2017
|
$-
|
The
aggregate gain (loss) on derivative liabilities for the years ended
December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $44 and $266,
respectively.
F-22
NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic No.
740, “Income Taxes.” This standard requires the Company
to provide a net deferred tax asset or liability equal to the
expected future tax benefit or expense of temporary reporting
differences between book and tax accounting and any available
operating loss or tax credit carry forwards.
A 100%
valuation allowance has been provided for all deferred tax assets,
as the ability of the Company to generate sufficient taxable income
in the future is uncertain.
The
unexpired net operating loss carry forward at December 31, 2017 is
approximately $34,740,000 with various expiration dates between
2019 and 2037 if not utilized. All tax years starting with 2014 are
open for examination.
On
December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax
Act”) significantly revised U.S. corporate income tax law by,
among other things, reducing the corporate income tax rate from 34%
to 21%. As a result of this effective tax rate change the Net
operating loss carry forward as of December 31, 2017, decreased
from $11,928,740 to $7,295,315, a decrease of $4,633,425. Because
the Company recognizes a valuation allowance for the entire
balance, there is no net impact to the Company’s balance
sheet or results of operations.
Non-current
deferred tax asset:
|
2017
|
2016
|
Net
operating loss carry forwards, (21% as of December 31, 2017 and 34%
as of December 31, 2016
|
$7,295,315
|
$11,781,690
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(7,295,315)
|
(11,781,690)
|
Net
non-current deferred tax asset
|
$-
|
$-
|
Reconciliations
of the expected federal income tax benefit based on the statutory
income tax rate of 34% to the actual benefit for the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016 are listed below.
|
2017
|
2016
|
Expected
federal income tax benefit
|
$(112,645)
|
$141,354
|
Goodwill
amortization
|
142,386
|
142,386
|
Gain
on settlement of debt
|
114,757
|
-
|
NOL
carryover reduced by settlement of debt
|
(114,403)
|
-
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
(11,807)
|
(5,369)
|
Expired
capital loss carryover
|
(9,227)
|
-
|
Other
|
(9,061)
|
(1,720)
|
Derivative
gain
|
-
|
90
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
(276,741)
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
$0
|
$0
|
F-23
The
Company has no tax positions at December 31, 2017 and 2016 for
which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which
there is uncertainty about the timing of such
deductibility.
The
Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax
benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company
recognized no interest and penalties.
NOTE 11 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Ken Link v. Wound Management Technologies, Inc., et al. On
November 14, 2011, Ken Link instituted litigation against Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and Scott A. Haire in the District
Court of Tarrant County Texas, Cause No. 342-256486-11 of the 342nd
Judicial District, alleging default under the terms of a certain
promissory note executed by Wound Management Technologies, Inc. and
guaranteed by Scott A. Haire. Ken Link asserted at that point in
time that the unpaid balance of the note, including accrued
interest as of December 4, 2011, was the sum of $355,292, Mr. Link
asserted that he was entitled to receive 200,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock. Mr. Link was also seeking
attorney’s fees and interest at 13% per annum, plus $1,000
per day. We disputed the claim, because we believed the contract
was tainted by usury, and therefore, a usury counterclaim would
more than offset the unpaid balance of the promissory
note.
The
note, in the original principal amount of $223,500, required the
payment of interest accrued at 13% per annum; an additional
one-time charge of $20,000 due on maturity; the issuance of 200,000
shares of stock as interest; and a $1,000 per day late fee for each
day the principal and interest is late. It was our contention that
these sums made the contract usurious and the usury claims more
than offset the amount of the unpaid indebtedness. Furthermore, we
filed an action for recovery of damages for usury under the Texas
Finance Code for a note which was previously executed by the
Company and payable to Ken Link, which was in fact paid to Mr. Link
in full. In addition, Wound Management was seeking recovery of
attorney’s fees pursuant to the usury provisions of the Texas
Finance Code. While the amount of the promissory note remained
unpaid, the counterclaims more than offset the maximum amount that
could be asserted on the promissory note. The case was set for
trial the week of October 21, 2013, but after three (3) days of
trial before a jury, the judge declared a mistrial. Subsequently,
Ken Link amended his pleadings and alleged that Wound Management
Technologies, Inc. never intended to pay the $223,500 promissory
note and sought damages for fraud and the loss of the benefit of
the bargain relating to the shares of stock, plus interest as set
forth in the note, exemplary damages, and attorney's fees. The case
was subsequently reset for trial the week of December 1, 2014, and
the judge again declared a mistrial. On September 4, 2015, Ken Link
again amended his pleadings seeking the sums he says were owed to
him resulting from the advance by him in the amount of $223,500.
The case was set for trial the week of May 15, 2017. but again,
after three (3) days of trial before a jury, the judge declared a
mistrial.
The
case was subsequently reset for trial the week of October 30, 2017,
and during a break in the proceedings, (November 1, 2017), the
Company and Ken Link entered into a binding settlement agreement,
which resulted in dismissal with prejudice of all claims and
counterclaims asserted in Cause No. 342-256486-11, in exchange for
which the Company delivered to Ken Link 1,200,000 shares of Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. common stock in total satisfaction of
all obligations between the parties. As a result of this
settlement, the Note Payable to Mr. Link in the amount of $223,500
was cancelled along with accrued interest in the amount of $147,
253. The fair value of the 1,200,000 shares of common stock
issued was $84,000 based on the stock price when issued, the
Company recognized gain on settlement of debt of
$286,873.
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. v. Fox Lake Animal Hospital,
PSP: Wound Management Technologies, Inc. instituted
litigation in Cause No. 96-263918-13 in the 96th District Court of
Tarrant County, Texas against Fox Lake Animal Hospital, PSP and
Bohdan Rudawksi, Trustee of the Fox Lake Animal Hospital, PSP. The
cause of action asserts that the loan transaction between Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and Fox Lake Animal Hospital PSP
involved the collection of illegal usurious interest for the reason
that while the face amount of the promissory note is $39,000, but
the loan actually loaned for a 6-month period was $25,000,
resulting in an interest rate in excess of the maximum rate
permitted by the Texas Finance Code. Wound Management Technologies,
Inc. is seeking to recover the penalties authorized by the Texas
Finance Code, together with the attorney’s fees. Fox Lake
Animal Hospital and Bohdan Rudawski, Trustee have filed a
counterclaim where they allege there were misrepresentations by
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. that would be excuse them from
having to pay penalties under the Texas Finance Code for charging
usurious interest. Fox Lake Animal Hospital and Bohdan Rudawski,
Trustee further claim that actions asserted violates the Federal
Securities Exchange Act and alleged fraud and fraud in the
inducement in entering into the promissory note.
F-24
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. v. Bohdan Rudawski:
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. instituted litigation in Cause
No. 352-263856-13 in the 352nd District Court of Tarrant County,
Texas against Bohdan Rudawksi. The case has been postponed until
September of 2016. The cause of action asserts that the loan
transaction between Wound Management Technologies, Inc. and Bohdan
Rudawski involved the collection of illegal usurious interest for
the reason that while the face amount of the promissory note is
$156,000, but the loan actually loaned for a 6-month period was
$100,000, charging an effective interest rate of over 100% which
violates the provisions of the Texas Finance Code. Wound Management
Technologies, Inc. is seeking to recover the penalties authorized
by the Texas Finance Code, together with the attorney’s fees.
Bohdan Rudawski has filed an answer and alleges there was not an
absolute obligation to repay the note, attempting to defeat the
usury claim. Bohdan Rudawski has further asserted that the claims
violate the Federal Securities Exchange Act and allege fraud of
inducement in entering into the promissory note.
The
352nd Judicial District Court entered an order in December, 2016
consolidating the Bohdan Rudawski case and the Fox Lake Animal
Hospital case into the 352nd Court case. The case was tried and went to the
jury on March 22, 2018. The jury, in response to the question
concerning the fraud counterclaim, reached a verdict that there was
no fraud, therefore, a Judgment should be entered finding that the
Defendants take nothing by virtue of their fraud
claim.
NOTE 12 – CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION
In
December 2014, the Company entered into a Capital Lease agreement
for the purchase of a phone system. The agreement required a down
payment of $2,105 and 36 monthly payments of $375. The Company
recorded an asset of $13,512 and a capital lease obligation of
$13,512. Aggregate payments under the capital lease were $3,766 and
$4,733 during 2017 and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2017,
the balance was paid in full.
NOTE 13 -- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In
accordance with applicable accounting standards for the disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the
financial statements are issued, all significant events or
transactions that occurred after December 31, 2017, are outlined
below:
On
March 6, 2018 the Company issued 22,651,356 shares of common stock
for the conversion of $1,200,000 in convertible debt.
In
February and March 2018, the company issued 100,567,691 shares of
common stock for conversion of 85,561 shares of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock and $1,050,468 of related Series C
dividends.
As of
the date of this report there are no Series C Convertible Preferred
stock shares outstanding.
In
response to the expiration of Applied Nutritionals’ patent
covering the use of hydrolyzed collagen in wound care on February
27, 2018, the Company submitted an FDA 510(k) application on March
26, 2018, seeking U.S. marketing clearance for our new internally
sourced hydrolyzed collagen.
F-25
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In
accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e), we carried out
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements for external
reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate over time.
Management,
including our Chief Executive Officer / Chief Financial Officer,
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(“COSO”) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
(2013). Based on its assessment and those criteria, management has
concluded that we maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On
March 10, 2017, the Company and John Siedhoff, the chairman of the
Company’s Board of Directors, entered into an amendment to
the Consulting Agreement, dated April 25, 2016, by and between the
Company and Mr. Siedhoff (the “Amendment”). The
Amendment: (i) changes the name of the consultant under the
Consulting Agreement from John Siedhoff to Twin Oaks Equities, LLC
(an entity controlled by Mr. Siedhoff), and (ii) increases the
monthly compensation payable under the Consulting Agreement from
$15,000 to $20,000, effective as of January 1, 2017.
22
PART III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Board of Directors
The
following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of the
current directors of the Company.
NAME
|
|
AGE
|
|
POSITION
|
|
YEAR FIRST
ELECTED
|
S. Oden
“Denny” Howell Jr.
|
|
78
|
|
Director
|
|
2015
|
John C.
Siedhoff
|
|
58
|
|
Director
|
|
2014
|
James
W. Stuckert
|
|
80
|
|
Director
|
|
2015
|
S. Oden
“Denny” Howell, Jr.
is a long-time investor in pharmaceutical and medical device
companies, as well as a past director of a pharmaceutical company.
He has served as President of Howell & Howell Contractors,
Inc., a renovation and industrial/commercial painting contractor
since 1972. He is also the Secretary/Treasurer of LCM Constructors,
Inc., a general construction company; Secretary/Treasurer of
SemperFi Constructors, LLC, a service-disabled, veteran-owned small
business; Chairman of Keller Manufacturing Co., Inc.; Chairman of
PDD, LLC, and a Trustee of Lindsey Wilson College in Columbia,
Kentucky.
John C. Siedhoff has
been a part of acquiring more than twenty companies with a focus
and expertise on turnaround opportunities. His turnaround, merger
and acquisition experience began as Chief Operating Officer of
Enduro Systems, Inc., and as Chief Financial Officer of Deep Down,
Inc., where he completed a reverse merger public transaction. Mr.
Siedhoff is a founding member of Twin Oaks Equity, LLC, a firm
specializing in corporate turnarounds, mergers and acquisitions
located in The Woodlands, Texas. Mr. Siedhoff has served on the
boards of Enduro Holdings, Deep Down, SK Holdings and 40 Days For
Life. He earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical
Engineering from Iowa State University.
James W.
Stuckert began an illustrious
53-year career with J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, LLC
(“Hilliard Lyons”) as an advisor/trader, ultimately
rising to lead the Company as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
in 1995. Hilliard Lyons is a full-service financial asset
management firm Headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. Under his
leadership Hilliard Lyons grew to over 2,200 employees with 85
offices in thirteen Midwestern states, and managed assets in excess
of $35 billion. Mr. Stuckert was an initial investor and served 24
years on the Board of Royal Gold, Inc; He has served as Chairman of
SenBanc Fund; board member of DataBeam, Inc.; and board member of
the Securities Industry Association, (SIA). He has also served as a
past member of the nominating committee of the New York Stock
Exchange and as Chairman of the SIA’s Regional Firms
Committee. Mr. Stuckert has served his alma mater, the University
of Kentucky as a member of the Board of Trustees; Vice Chairman and
Chairman of the Finance Committee; and Chairman of the Presidential
Search Committee. In addition, he was Chairman of a
hospital’s investment committee with investable assets in
excess of $1.2 billion. Mr. Stuckert earned a Bachelor of Science
in Mechanical Engineering, and Master of Business Administration
degrees from the University of Kentucky.
23
Executive Officers
The
following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of the
executive officers of the Company.
NAME
|
|
AGE
|
|
POSITION
|
J.
Michael Carmena
|
|
62
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|
J. Michael Carmena
was appointed Chief Executive Officer effective February 20, 2018
and has served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since
December 8, 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Carmena served
as Senior Director, Business & Sales Operations, of Smith and
Nephew plc, formerly known as Healthpoint Biotherapeutics. Mr.
Carmena previously served Healthpoint Biotherapeutics as Senior
Director, Finance & Administration (from 2008 to 2010) and as
Controller (from 1998 to 2008). Mr. Carmena began his professional
career at Arthur Andersen & Co., after graduating, magna cum
laude, with a BBA in Accounting from Texas Christian University in
1978.
Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers
None of
our directors or officers or their respective associates or
affiliates is indebted to us.
Family Relationships
There
are no family relationships among our directors or executive
officers.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange
Act”) requires our
directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of
a registered class of our equity securities to file reports with
the SEC of ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock
and other equity securities of the Company. Based solely on a
review of the copies of the forms sent to us and the
representations made by the reporting persons to us, we believe
that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, our
directors, officers and 10% holders complied with all filing
requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act,
with the
following exceptions: Though he became the Company’s Chief
Financial Officer on December 8, 2016, Mr. Carmena filed his
initial Form 3 upon being named Chief Executive Officer on February
20, 2018.
Independent Directors
The
Board consists of non-management directors. Two of our directors
are independent, as defined by Rule 4200(a) (15) of the
NASDAQ’s listing standards. (Mr. Siedhoff may be deemed not
to be independent by virtue of compensation received pursuant to
his consulting agreement with the Company.) Under the
NASDAQ’s listing standards, no director qualifies as
independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that he or
she has no material relationship with the Company. Based upon
information requested from and provided by each director concerning
their background, employment, and affiliations, including
commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, and
familial relationships, the Board has determined that, other than
being a director and/or shareholder of the Company, each of the
independent directors named above has either no relationship with
the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or
officer of an organization that has a relationship with the
Company, or has only immaterial relationships with the Company, and
is independent under the NASDAQ’s listing
standards.
Meetings and Committees of the Board
Our
business is managed under the direction of the Board. The Board
meets on a regular basis—at least quarterly—to review
significant developments affecting the Company and to act on
matters requiring the approval of the Board. In addition to
regularly scheduled meetings, the Board also holds special meetings
when the Company faces a matter requiring attention or action by
the Board. The Board does not currently have a standing audit,
compensation, nominating or governance committee, and the entire
Board performs the functions of each such committees, participating
in all relevant decisions thereof. It is the expectation of the
Company that, upon election of new directors, it will be able to
form standing committees so as to more efficiently perform the
various functions of such committee, and that each such committee
will adopt a charter as appropriate and make such charter available
on the Company’s website. The Company further recognizes that
none of its directors currently qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert. The Board continues to search for qualified
candidates to fill such role.
24
Nominations
The
existing directors work to identify qualified candidates to serve
as nominees for director. When identifying director nominees, the
Board may consider, among other factors, the potential
nominee’s reputation, integrity, independence from the
Company, skills and business, government or other professional
acumen, bearing in mind the composition of the Board and the
current state of the Company and the industry generally. The Board
may also consider the number of other public companies for which
the person serves as director; and the availability of the
person’s time and commitment to the Company. In the case of
current directors being considered for re-nomination, the Board
will also take into account the director’s tenure as a member
of the Board, the director’s history of attendance at
meetings of the Board and the director’s preparation for and
participation in such meetings.
Shareholders
seeking to nominate director candidates may do so by writing the
Corporate Secretary of the Company and giving the recommended
candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications, if
such recommendations are submitted by shareholders in compliance
with the Company’s Bylaws.
Following
identification of the need to replace, add or re-elect a director
to the Board, and consideration of the above criteria and any
shareholder recommendations, the Board will submit its recommended
nominees to the shareholders for election. The Board utilizes this
process, rather than a formal nominations committee, because they
have found that, for the Company, the functions of a nominations
committee are more than adequately fulfilled by this
process.
Board Leadership Structure
There
are currently no lead independent directors serving on the
Board.
Our
Board leadership structure is commonly utilized by other public
companies in the U.S., and we believe that it is effective. This
leadership structure is appropriate for us given the size and scope
of our business, the experience and active involvement of our
independent directors, and our corporate governance practices,
which include regular communication with and interaction between
and among the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, the
chairman, and the independent directors. Of the three members of
our Board, two are independent from management.
Risk Management
The
Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s management
and operations. The Board serves in the role of an audit committee,
fulfilling its responsibilities for general oversight of the
integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the
Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence,
the performance of the Company’s internal audit function, and
risk assessment and risk management. We believe that the Board
provides effective oversight of risk management functions. On a
regular basis we perform a risk review wherein the management team
evaluates the risks we expect to face in the upcoming year and over
a longer-term horizon. Then, plans are developed to deal with the
risks identified. In addition, members of our management team
periodically present to the Board the strategies, issues and plans
for the areas of our business for which they are responsible. While
the Board oversees risk management, our management team is
responsible for the Company’s day-to-day risk management
processes. Additionally, the Board requires that management raise
exceptional issues to the Board. We believe this division of
responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the
risks we face and that the Board leadership structure supports this
approach.
Meeting Attendance
During
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the
Board held four and three Board meetings, respectively. During 2017
and 2016, each director (once appointed) attended all Board
meetings, (no director attended fewer than 75% of the meetings).
The Company encourages, but does not require, directors to attend
the annual meeting of shareholders; however, such attendance allows
for direct interaction between shareholders and members of the
Board.
Code of Ethics
On
April 2, 2012, the Company adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to
our principal executive, financial and accounting officers. The
Code of Ethics can be found on our website at http://wmgtech.com
under the Investor Relations tab.
25
Shareholder Communications with the Board
Any
Company shareholder or other interested party who wishes to
communicate with the non-management directors as a group may direct
such communications by writing to the:
Corporate
Secretary
Wound
Management Technologies, Inc.
1200
Summit Avenue, Suite 414
Fort
Worth, TX 76102
The
communication must be clearly addressed to the Board or to a
specific director. If a response is desired, the individual should
also provide contact information such as name, address and
telephone number.
All
such communications will be reviewed initially by the Corporate
Secretary. The Corporate Secretary will forward to the appropriate
director(s) all correspondence, except for items of the following
nature:
●
advertising;
●
promotions of a product or service;
●
patently offensive material; and
●
matters completely unrelated to the Board’s functions,
Company performance, Company policies or that could not reasonably
be expected to affect the Company’s public
perception.
The
Corporate Secretary will prepare a periodic summary report of all
such communications for the Board. Correspondence not forwarded to
the Board will be retained by the Company and will be made
available to any director upon such director’s
request.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
following table and the accompanying notes provide summary
information for each of the last two fiscal years concerning cash
and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to
executive officers (or those acting in a similar
capacity).
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-equity
incentive compensation ($)
|
Non-qualified
deferred compensation earnings ($)
|
All other
compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
J. Michael
Carmena (a)
|
|
2016
|
8,636
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8,636
|
|
|
2017
|
175,000
|
-
|
-
|
30,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deborah J.
Hutchinson (b)
|
|
2016
|
200,000
|
-
|
25,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
225,000
|
|
|
2017
|
170,000
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darren Stine (c)
|
|
2016
|
120,000
|
-
|
20,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
140,000
|
|
|
2017
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
26
Notes to Summary Compensation Table
(a)
J.
Michael Carmena was appointed as the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer effective February 20, 2018 and as Chief
Financial Officer effective December 8, 2016.
(b)
Deborah
J. Hutchinson retired as the Company’s President effective
July 19, 2017.
(c)
Darren
Stine resigned from his position as the Company’s Chief
Financial Officer effective December 2, 2016.
Employment Agreements
None of
our executive officers listed above has an employment agreement or
an agreement containing change in control provisions with the
Company or its subsidiaries and there are no verbal agreements with
any of these executives (or other employees) regarding their
employment or compensation. No executive officer listed above is
entitled to payments upon termination or a change in
control.
In
December 2016, Deborah Hutchinson, Mandy Muse, Sheila Schultz and
Jonathan Knickerbocker received a stock grant for 500,000, 250,000,
250,000 and 150,000 shares respectively. All shares vested
immediately.
Director Compensation
2017 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
Name
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-equity
incentive plan compensation ($)
|
Non-qualified
deferred compensation earnings ($)
|
All other
compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
S. Oden
“Denny” Howell Jr.
|
$10,500
|
|
|
|
|
$10,500
|
Phillip J.
Rubinfeld
|
$10,500
|
|
|
|
|
$10,500
|
John C.
Siedhoff
|
$10,500
|
|
|
|
$280,000
|
$290,500
|
James W.
Stuckert
|
$10,500
|
|
|
|
|
$10,500
|
We
reimburse each director for reasonable travel expenses related to
such director’s attendance at Board and committee meetings.
In 2016 the Company did not issue any equity compensation to the
members of its Board in respect of their service thereon. On
February 27, 2017, the Company awarded each Board members 150,000
shares of the Company’s Common Stock, (600,000 shares total)
for services. In the future, the Company might have to offer
additional compensation to attract the caliber of independent board
members the Company is seeking.
The
Company does not sponsor a pension benefits plan, a non-qualified
deferred compensation plan or a non-equity incentive plan for its
directors. In April of 2016, the Company engaged one director as a
consultant and paid monthly fees per contract terms. No other or
additional compensation for services were paid to any of the other
directors during 2016 and 2017.
27
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END
The
following table provides information concerning outstanding equity
awards as of December 31, 2017, for our named executive officers
and directors. We do not currently have an equity incentive plan;
therefore, these columns have been omitted from the following
table.
|
OPTION
AWARDS
|
STOCK
AWARDS
|
||||
Name
|
Number of
Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(Exercisable)
|
Number of
Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(Unexercisable)
|
Option
Exercise Price ($)
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
Number of
Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested
|
Market Value
of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)
|
J.
Michael Carmena
|
—
|
500,000
|
0.06
|
12/31/2022
|
500,000
|
30,000
|
Robert
K. Mart
|
—
|
300,000
|
0.06
|
12/31/2022
|
300,000
|
18,000
|
Zachary
B. Fleming
|
—
|
200,000
|
0.06
|
12/31/2022
|
200,000
|
12,000
|
Jay
Speelhoffer
|
—
|
100,000
|
0.06
|
12/31/2022
|
100,000
|
6,000
|
Sherlene
Bagley
|
—
|
50,000
|
0.06
|
12/31/2022
|
50,000
|
3,000
|
|
—
|
1,150,000
|
|
|
1,150,000
|
69,000
|
Footnotes to Outstanding Equity Awards table:
Pension Benefits
The
Company does not sponsor any pension benefit plans and none of the
named executive officers contribute to such a plan.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
The
Company does not sponsor any non-qualified defined compensation
plans or other non-qualified deferred compensation plans and none
of the named executive officers contribute to any such
plans.
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The
following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2018, the number and
percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock owned by:
(a) each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner
of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;
(b) each of our directors; (c) the named executive
officers as defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K; and
(d) all current directors and executive officers, as a group.
As of March 31, 2018, (a) there were 236,642,901 shares of common
stock issued and outstanding, with 4,089 shares held as treasury
stock, (b) 0 shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued and
outstanding, and (c) 0 shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued
and outstanding
Beneficial
ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under
the Exchange Act. Under this rule, certain shares may be deemed to
be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example,
persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the
shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by
a person if the person has the right to acquire shares (for
example, upon exercise of an option or warrant) within 60 days of
the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the
percentage ownership of any person, the number of shares is deemed
to include the number of shares beneficially owned by such person
by reason of such acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage
of outstanding shares of any person as shown in the following table
does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual voting power
at any particular date.
28
|
Common Stock
|
Preferred Stock
|
||
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS:
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Beneficial Ownership Percentage
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Beneficial Ownership Percentage
|
James W Stuckert (1)
|
72,795,489
|
32.07%
|
—
|
—
|
S. Oden “Denny” Howell Jr.
|
42,092,429
|
18.54%
|
—
|
—
|
John C. Siedhoff
|
7,150,000
|
3.15%
|
—
|
—
|
J. Michael Carmena (2)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (4
persons)
|
122,037,918
|
53.77%
|
—
|
—%
|
(1)
Mr. James W. Stuckert may be deemed to beneficially own 6,865,400
shares held by Diane V Stuckert Rev TR of which Mr.
Stuckert’s wife is the trustee.
(2)
Though Mr. Carmena holds warrants for the purchase of 500,000
shares of Common Stock, they are subject to a vesting schedule and
will not become partially exercisable until December 31,
2018.
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
In
addition to the officer and director compensation arrangements
disclosed herein, the Company was involved in the following
transactions with related parties during fiscal years 2016 and
2017. Funds are advanced to the Company from various related
parties, including shareholders who fund the Company as necessary
to meet working capital requirements and expenses.
In June
of 2015, Mr. S Oden Howell, Jr. was elected to the Board and Mr.
Howell is the holder of a convertible note payable in the principle
amount of $600,000 and accrued interest of $162,493 through year
end December 31, 2017.
In
September of 2015, Mr. James Stuckert was elected to the Board and
Mr. Stuckert is the holder of a convertible note payable in the
principle amount of $600,000 and accrued interest of $162,493
through year end December 31, 2017.
The
following is a summary of amounts due to related parties, including
accrued interest separately recorded, as of December 31,
2017:
Related
Party
|
|
Nature of
Relationship
|
|
Terms of the
Agreement
|
|
Principal
Amount
|
|
|
Accrued
Interest
|
|
||
S. Oden Howell Revocable Trust
|
|
Mr. S.
Oden Howell, Jr. became a member of the Board in June of
2015.
|
|
See
“June 15, 2015 Convertible Promissory
Note”.
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
162,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
James W. Stuckert Revocable Trust
|
|
Mr.
James W. Stuckert became a member of the Board in September of
2015.
|
|
See
“June 15, 2015 Convertible Promissory
Note”.
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
162,493
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
324,986
|
|
Two of
our directors are independent, as defined by Rule 4200(a) (15) of
the NASDAQ’s listing standards. Mr. Siedhoff may be deemed
not to be independent by virtue of compensation received pursuant
to his consulting agreement with the Company.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees. We engaged MaloneBailey, LLP to conduct our audits
for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31,
2016, and our audit fees for services
performed were $53,500 and $51,500,
respectively.
Tax Fees. We engaged Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C. as our
accountants and our tax fees for services performed for the
years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, were $14,655
and $13,238, respectively.
All Other Fees. None.
29
Consideration of Non-audit Services Provided
by the Independent Auditors. The Board has considered
whether the services provided for non-audit services are compatible
with maintaining MaloneBailey, LLP’s independence, and has
concluded that the independence of such firm has been
maintained.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy
The
policy of the Board, in its capacity as the Company’s audit
committee, is to pre-approve all audit, audit-related and non-audit
services provided by the independent registered public accounting
firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related
services, tax services and other services. The Board approved all
of the fees described above. The Board may also pre-approve
particular services on a case-by-case basis. The independent public
accountants are required to periodically report to the Board
regarding the extent of services provided by the independent public
accountants in accordance with such pre-approval. The Board may
also delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members.
Such member(s) must report any decisions to the Board at the next
scheduled Board meeting.
30
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 17, 2009, by
and among BioPharma Management Technologies, Inc., a Texas
corporation, Wound Management Technologies, Inc., a Texas
corporation, BIO Acquisition, Inc., and the undersigned
shareholders (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 21,
2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed
April 11, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Information Statement
filed with the Commission on May 13, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed April 11,
2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Number, Voting Power, Preferences and
Rights of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1(i) to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed November 30, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Number, Voting Power, Preferences and
Rights of Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 25, 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wound Management Technologies, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Long-Term
Incentive Plan dated March 12, 2010 effective subject to
shareholder approval on or before March 11, 2011 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed August 16, 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Number, Voting Power, Preferences and
Rights of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K/A filed February 6, 2014 amending the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2013)
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Number, Voting Power, Preferences and
Rights of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed November 14, 2013)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter Agreement dated April 26, 2016 by and between Wound
Management Technologies, Inc., Evolution Venture Partners, LLC and
Middlebury Securities, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 2,
2016)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated April 25, 2016 by and between Wound
Management Technologies, Inc. and John Siedhoff (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed
April 29, 2016)
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated March 10, 2017, by and between the Company and John Siedhoff (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 10, 2017) |
|
||
|
Termination Agreement effective September 29, 2017, by and between
the Company and Evolution Venture Partners LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 11,
2017)
|
|
|
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Interactive Data Files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T
|
* Filed
herewith
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
WOUND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
29, 2018
|
By:
|
/s/ J.
Michael Carmena
|
|
|
|
J.
Michael Carmena
|
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.
Michael Carmena
|
|
CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March
29, 2018
|
J. Michael Carmena
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J.
Michael Carmena
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
|
March
29, 2018
|
J.
Michael Carmena
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
W. Stuckert
|
|
Director
|
|
March
29, 2018
|
James
W. Stuckert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mr.
John Siedhoff
|
|
Director
|
|
March
29, 2018
|
Mr.
John Siedhoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Oden
Howell, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March
29, 2018
|
Oden
Howell, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
32