Santa Fe Gold CORP - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[ x ]     QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

[     ]     TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _____to _______

Commission File Number: 001-12974

SANTA FE GOLD CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in its Charter)

1128 Pennsylvania NE, Suite 200, Albuquerque, NM 87110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant's telephone number including area code: (505) 255-4852

N/A
Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ x ]  No [    ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [    ]  No  [ x ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 94,556,912 shares outstanding as of November 9, 2011.

2

PART 1
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

     Santa Fe Gold Corporation (the Company) is a U.S. mining company incorporated in Delaware in August 1991. Its general business strategy is to acquire, explore and develop mineral properties. The Company’s principal assets are the 100% owned Summit silver-gold project in New Mexico, the leased Ortiz gold property in New Mexico, and the 100% owned Black Canyon mica project in Arizona.

     The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q under Article 8.03 of Regulation S-X. These statements do not include all of the information and notes to the financial statements required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three month period ended September 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2012. The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Going Concern

     The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern, it may be unable to realize the carrying value of its assets and to meet its liabilities as they become due.

     The Company had a net income of $702,862 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, has a working capital deficit of $12,403,042 which includes a non-cash financial derivative liability of $6,424,553 and deferred revenue of $3,159,612 and has a total accumulated deficit of $59,043,681 at September 30, 2011. The Company generated revenues of $2,550,724 from the sales of precious metals in the three months ended September 30, 2011. To continue as a going concern, the Company is dependent upon an increased ramp up of production on the Company’s Summit mine site; increased throughput recovery of precious metals through the Banner mill; and continued fund raising for project development and working capital for operational and administrative expenses.

     The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

Principles of Consolidation

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Azco Mica, Inc., a Delaware corporation; The Lordsburg Mining Company, a New Mexico corporation; Minera Sandia, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation and Santa Fe Gold Barbados Corporation, a Barbados corporation. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Estimates

     The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

6

     Significant estimates are used when accounting for the Company’s carrying value of mineral properties, fixed assets, depreciation, accruals, derivative instrument liabilities, taxes and contingencies, which are discussed in the respective notes to the financial statements.

Marketable Securities

     Marketable securities are classified as available for sale and classified as current assets as they are subject to use within one year. The marketable securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, if any, included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity.

Inventory

     Inventory is carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Inventory classifications include stockpiled ore, in-process inventory, siliceous flux material and precious metals concentrate. Currently the stockpiled ore represents ore that is extracted from the mine and is waiting for processing. The ore currently is valued solely at the cost of transportation to the mill site as the Summit mine is still in process of ramping up to full production from the development stage. In-process inventory represents material that is currently being processed through the Banner mill. The in-process inventory is currently valued at stockpile ore costs plus applicable costs to crush the ore into mill feed. The siliceous flux material inventory and the precious metals concentrates awaiting shipment are valued at stockpile ore costs, plus allocated mill processing costs per ton based upon the processing requirements of the final product.

Fair Value Measurements

     The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximated their related fair values as of September 30, 2011, due to the relatively short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s convertible debentures approximates the fair value based on the terms at which the Company could obtain similar financing and the short term nature of these instruments.

Derivative Financial Instruments

     The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks.

     The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt, equity instruments and other financing arrangements to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, including embedded conversion options that are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. Also, in connection with the issuance of financing instruments, the Company may issue freestanding options or warrants that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as equity. The Company may also issue options or warrants to non-employees in connection with consulting or other services.

     Derivative financial instruments are initially measured at their fair value. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. For warrant-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the derivative instruments. To the extent that the initial fair values of the freestanding and/or bifurcated derivative instrument liabilities exceed the total proceeds received, an immediate charge to income is recognized, in order to initially record the derivative instrument liabilities at their fair value.

     The discount from the face value of the convertible debt or equity instruments resulting from allocating some or all of the proceeds to the derivative instruments, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to income, usually using the effective interest method.

     The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. If reclassification is required, the fair value of the derivative instrument, as of the determination date, is reclassified. Any previous charges or credits to income for changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are not reversed. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within twelve months of the balance sheet date.

7

Reclamation Costs

     The Company follows ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations, which requires that an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset be recognized as a liability in the period in which it is incurred and becomes determinable, with an offsetting increase in the carrying amount of the associated asset. The cost of the tangible asset, including the initially recognized ARO, is depleted, such that the cost of the ARO is recognized over the useful life of the asset. The ARO is recorded at fair value, and accretion expense is recognized over time as the discounted liability is accreted to its expected settlement value. The fair value of the ARO is measured using expected future cash flow, discounted at the Company’s credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate. At June 30, 2011, the Company has made a provision for an asset retirement obligation for the Summit mine and Banner mill sites aggregating $149,236. The projected required asset retirement obligation at settlement value is $230,716 and the accretion of the discounted liability will be recognized quarterly through December 2016.

     The Company’s asset retirement obligation through September 30, 2011, is as follows:

Deferred Revenue

     Deferred revenue represents a cash advance made under a definitive gold sale agreement to sell a portion of the life-of-mine gold production only, not silver production, from our Summit silver-gold mine. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received an upfront cash deposit of $4 million, plus it will receive ongoing production payments equal to the lesser of $400 per ounce or the prevailing market price, for each ounce of gold delivered pursuant to the agreement for the life of the mine. The upfront cash advance will be amortized by the difference between the market price and $400 per ounce for those gold deliveries where the prevailing market price exceeds $400 per ounce. The Company will also recognize the on-going production payments as revenue for gold delivered pursuant to the agreement. Deferred revenue on the Company’s balance sheet is categorized as current if the Company expects to recognize such revenue within the following twelve months. Current deferred revenue amounted to $ $3,159,612 at September 30, 2011.

Revenue Recognition

     Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred either physically or through an irrevocable transfer of metals to the buyer’s account, the price is fixed or determinable, no related obligations remain and collectability is probable.

     Sales of all metals products sold directly to the Company’s metals buyers, including by-product metals, are recorded as revenues upon a buyer either taking physical delivery of the metals product in the case of siliceous flux material or upon the buyer receiving all required documentation necessary to take physical delivery of the metals product in the case of concentrate (generally at the time the product is loaded onto a shipping vessel at the originating port and the bill of lading is generated).

     Revenues for metals products are recorded at current market prices at the time of delivery and are subsequently adjusted to the current market prices existing at the end of each reporting period. Due to the period of time existing between delivery and final settlement with the buyer, the Company must estimate the prices at which sales of its metals will be settled. Changes in metals prices between delivery and final settlement will result in adjustments to revenues previously recorded.

8

     Sales of metals products are recorded net of charges from the buyer for treatment, refining, smelting losses, and other negotiated charges. Charges are estimated upon shipment of product based on contractual terms, and actual charges do not vary materially from estimates. Costs charged by smelters include a metals payable fee, fixed treatment and refining costs per ton of product.

     Sales of refined gold related to the definitive gold sale agreement dated September 11, 2009 are recorded as revenues when the buyer takes delivery. The recorded revenues are final at that time. Due to the nature of the definitive gold sale agreement an obligation exists for the delivery of refined gold concurrent with the delivery of other metals products. Consequently the associated costs to purchase refined gold are also recorded at the same time as the delivery of other metals products. The costs to purchase refined gold are recorded using the current market price upon delivery of the refined gold or upon accrual of the obligation if undelivered. If necessary the accrual for any unsettled deliveries of refined gold and the related costs to purchase such are adjusted to the current market price existing at the end of each reporting period until final delivery and adjustment occurs.

Net Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

     The Company calculates net income (loss) per share as required by Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 260-10, Earnings per Share (“ASC 260-10”). Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding. During the periods when they are anti-dilutive, common stock equivalents, if any, are not considered in the computation. Consequently the impact of outstanding stock equivalents has not been included in the current period as they would be anti-dilutive.

Comprehensive Loss

     In addition to net loss, comprehensive loss includes all changes in equity during a period, such as cumulative unrealized changes in the fair value of marketable securities available for sale or other investments.

Stock-Based Compensation

      In connection with terms of employment with the Company’s executives and employees, the Company issues options to acquire its common stock. Employee and non-employee awards are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Such options may be exercisable at varying exercise prices and generally vest over a period of six months to a year.

     The Company accounts for share based payments in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on the grant date fair value of the award. In accordance with ASC 718-10-30-9, Measurement Objective – Fair Value at Grant Date, the Company estimates the fair value of the award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for valuation of the share-based payments. The Company believes this model provides the best estimate of fair value due to its ability to incorporate inputs that change over time, such as volatility and interest rates, and to allow for actual exercise behavior of option holders. The simplified method is used to determine compensation expense since historical option exercise experience is limited relative to the number of options issued. The compensation cost is recognized ratably using the straight-line method over the expected vesting period.

     Stock-based compensation costs recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $312,791 and $362,146, respectively.

Reclassifications

     Certain items in these consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This new guidance is to be applied prospectively. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this standard will not materially expand its consolidated financial statement note disclosures.

9

      In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (ASC Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), which amends current comprehensive income guidance. This accounting update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. Instead, the Company must report comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income which contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 will be effective for public companies during the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as it only requires a change in the format of the current presentation.

     Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC during the current reporting period did not, or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 – CONTEMPLATED ACQUISITION

    On September 6, 2011, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Columbus Silver Corporation (TSXV: CSC) (“Columbus Silver”) pursuant to which the Company has conditionally agreed to acquire all of Columbus Silver’s outstanding common stock for a cash amount of Cdn $0.20 per outstanding share in a transaction currently valued at Cdn $9,977,285. Until closing of the transaction, the Company has agreed to provide bridge financing to Columbus Silver to fund leasehold payments and for working capital, which through the end of December 2011 totals $513,716. At September 30, 2011, the Company has advanced $213,716 under the agreement which is classified in other current assets on the balance sheet.

     The Memorandum of Understanding contemplates a business combination by way of a Plan of Arrangement, which is subject to Canadian court approval. In addition, the proposed transactions are subject to the final approval of the boards of directors of the Company and Columbus Silver, stock exchange and regulatory approvals, Columbus Silver shareholder approval and the Company’s commitment of the required funding. If the Company does not notify Columbus Silver by November 30, 2011 that it has obtained a firm commitment for the required funding, Columbus Silver will have the option to terminate the acquisition. On September 8, 2011, in relation to the transaction with Columbus, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K.

NOTE 4 – INVENTORY

     The following table provides the components of inventory as of:

NOTE 5 – NOTE RECEIVABLE

     On January 27, 2011, the Company advanced $200,000 to Columbus Silver Corporation (“Columbus Silver”) (TSXV: CSC) in exchange for a promissory note bearing interest at 4% per annum. All accrued interest and principal is due and payable on December 31, 2012. The loan was extended for the purpose of providing Columbus Silver with working capital in connection with a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) dated September 23, 2010, in contemplation of a business combination (the “Transaction”). In the event that either party to the MOU informs the other that it will not proceed with the Transaction, either the maker or the holder will have the ability, by providing written notice to the other, to require that the maker apply to the TSX Venture Exchange to have the entire outstanding principal amount and accrued unpaid interest of this note paid in common shares of the maker. As of September 30, 2011, accrued interest receivable on the note receivable was $5,467.

10

NOTE 6 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENT LIABILITIES

     On December 30, 2010, in connection with the registered direct offering to three institutional investors for 1,666,668 shares of the Company’s common stock, the Company issued 833,334 five year warrants giving the holders the right to purchase common stock at $1.50 per share. The warrants are exercisable immediately after issuance and will expire five years from the date of issuance. Using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the fair market value of the warrants under the placement at the time of issuance was determined to be $669,372 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 2.01%, (2) an expected life of 5.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 79.51%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. The private placement was subject to the issuance of 100,000 warrants to the placement agent, exercisable at $1.50 per share and has an exercise period of approximately 3.92 years. The warrants are exercisable immediately after issuance. Using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the fair market value of the placement agent warrants under the placement at the time of issuance was determined to be $62,614 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 1.47%, (2) an expected life of 3.92 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 68.65%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero.

     On August 2, 2011, the Company secured a $5 million senior secured loan with Victory Park Capital Advisors, LLC (“Victory Park”), see NOTE 8. In connection with the loan, the Company issued warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of its common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share, are exercisable immediately after issuance and will expire five years from the date of issuance. Using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the fair market value of the warrants at the time of issuance was determined to be $339,247 with the following assumptions: (1) risk-free rate of interest of 1.23%, (2) an expected life of 5.0 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 86.79%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero.

     The fair market value of the derivative instruments liabilities at September 30, 2011, was determined to be $6,424,553 with the following assumptions: (1) risk free interest rate of 0.14% to 88.0%, (2) remaining contractual life of 0.40 to 4.84 years, (3) expected stock price volatility of 51.52% to 85.86%, and (4) expected dividend yield of zero. Based upon the change in fair value, the Company has recorded a non-cash gain on derivative instruments for the three months ended September 30, 2011, of $2,887,760 and a corresponding decrease in the derivative instruments liability.

     The derivative liability is comprised of the following as of:

11

NOTE 7 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE AND DEBENTURES

Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes

     On October 30, 2007, the Company completed the placement of 10% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes of $450,000. The notes were placed with three accredited investors for $150,000 each. The notes have a term of 60 months, and at such time all remaining principal and interest shall be due. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum. Interest will accrue for 18 months from the date of closing. Interest on the outstanding principal balance will then be payable in quarterly installments commencing on the first day of the 19th month following closing. In connection with the transaction, the Company issued a five year warrant for each $2.50 invested, for a total of 180,000 warrants, each warrant giving the note holder the right to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $1.25 per share. At the option of the holders of the convertible notes, the outstanding principal and interest is convertible at any time into shares of the Company’s common stock at conversion price of $1.25 per share. The notes will be automatically converted into common stock if the weighted average closing sales price of the stock exceeds $2.50 per share for ten consecutive trading days. The shares underlying the notes and warrants will be registered on request of the note holders, provided the weighted average closing price of the stock exceeds $1.50 per share for ten consecutive trading days.

     At September 30, 2011, accrued interest due on the Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes was $10,166.

Senior Secured Convertible Subordinated Debentures

     On December 21, 2007, the Company entered into definitive agreements for the placement with a single investor of a 7% Senior Secured Convertible Debenture in the amount of $13,500,000. Proceeds from the debenture were issued in accordance with a pre-determined funding schedule related to the Summit project’s anticipated construction requirements. The term of the debenture is 60 months, at the end of which time all remaining principal and interest shall be due. The debenture bears interest at the rate of 7% per annum. Interest on the outstanding principal balance is payable in quarterly installments, commencing on July 1, 2009. Interest may be paid in cash or stock at the investor’s election. If paid in stock, the number of shares will be calculated using the average of the daily volume weighted average sales prices of the common stock for the twenty (20) trading days immediately preceding the payment date. The entire amount of principal and any unpaid interest will be due December 31, 2012, subject to the investor’s right to require the Company after 36 and 48 months to apply up to 30% of the Summit project’s positive cash flow toward retirement of the debenture. The debenture is secured by a mortgage on the Summit real property and a security interest in Summit personal property. The investor may at any time convert unpaid principal and interest into shares of our common stock at the rate of $1.00 per share. The debenture will be automatically converted into common stock if the weighted average closing sales price of the stock exceeds $2.50 per share for 10 consecutive trading days. Beginning January 1, 2011, the Company may redeem the entire outstanding amount of the debenture, including principal and outstanding interest, subject to the investor’s right to convert the debenture into shares of common stock. In connection with the transaction, for every $2.00 of the original principal amount of the debenture, the investor will receive a warrant to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $1.00. The warrants are exercisable from July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014. The Company has received the total advances under the agreement of $13,500,000, and the Company has issued an aggregate of 6,750,000 warrants under the debenture advances.

     On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into Amendment 2 on the Senior Secured Convertible Debenture dated December 21, 2007. Pursuant to the amendment, all the accrued interest on the debentures due June 30, 2009, in the collective aggregate amount of $974,360, was automatically converted into 974,360 shares of the Company’s common stock effective as of June 30, 2009. The amendment also provided that the accrued interest for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009 shall be paid in shares of the Company’s common stock, to be valued at $1.00 per share at the time of payment and issuance. Accordingly the Company issued 483,000 shares of its common stock for payment of $483,000 of aggregate accrued interest for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009. Additionally the amendment provided that on March 31, 2010, the note holder shall have the option to make a six-month election, by providing written notice of its election thirty days prior to March 31, 2010, to have the March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 quarterly interest payments paid in shares of the Company’s common stock. The note holder has chosen not to make the election, and consequently the accrued interest relating to the debentures, totaling $475,125 for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 was paid in cash during the year. Commencing September 30, 2010, the note holder shall have the option to make an annual election, by providing 30 days prior written notice of its election, to have the subsequent four quarterly interest payments paid in shares of the Company’s common stock. Valuation of the common stock shall be based upon the Market Price of the stock for the 30 trading days immediately preceding the payment due date.

12

     At September 30, 2011 accrued interest due on the Senior Secured Convertible Subordinated Debentures was $241,500.

     The components of the convertible notes payable and debentures are as follows:

     Aggregate yearly maturities of long term debt based upon payment terms at September 30, 2011, are as follows:

NOTE 8 – NOTES PAYABLE

     On June 5, 2008, the Company agreed to exercise the option to purchase the Planet MIO property, consisting of thirty-one patented mining claims totaling 523 acres in La Paz County, Arizona. The Company originally leased the property in 2000 from New Planet Copper Mining Company under the terms of a Lease with Option to Purchase. The Company agreed to exercise the purchase option in connection with settlement of an action the Company commenced in March 2007 seeking to confirm that the lease remained in good standing. The purchase price was $250,000. The Company signed a promissory note for $200,000 with interest payable at 10% per annum from the date of closing of the transaction. The original provisions of the note called for a $50,000 payment at the signing of the note, which occurred in August 2008, and four subsequent principal payments of $50,000 plus interest due each anniversary date of the agreement. In August 2009, the amortization schedule of the note was amended to reflect four equal annual payments of principal and interest of $63,094. The due date for the first annual payment was extended with the interest rate increased to 20% per annum during the extension period. The Company also agreed to pay an additional $2,000 in legal and miscellaneous fees to document the amendment. All other provisions of the original agreement remain unchanged including the provision for a 5% royalty to be paid on any future production from the property.

     On July 25, 2008, the Company entered into an installment sales contract for $94,613 to purchase certain equipment. The term of the agreement is for 36 months at an interest rate of 6.75%, with the equipment securing the loan.

     On September 30, 2009, the Company entered into an installment sales contract for $16,825 to purchase certain equipment. The term of the agreement is for 36 months at an interest rate of 9.25%, with the equipment securing the loan.

13

     On September 27, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to finance insurance premiums in the amount of $77,306 at an interest rate of 6.99% with equal payments due monthly beginning November 1, 2010 and continuing until September 1, 2011.

     On August 2, 2011, the Company entered into a financing agreement for $5 million senior secured loan for working capital. The loan bears interest at 15% per annum payable in monthly installments in arrears. The loan becomes due in six months from the anniversary date of the loan and the loan may be repaid at any time without penalty. The senior obligations are secured by a first priority lien on the stock of Santa Fe’s subsidiaries and first priority liens covering substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Summit silver-gold project, the Black Canyon mica project and the Planet micaceous iron oxide project. In connection with the loan, the Company issued warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of its common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share and a term of five years.

     On September 30, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to finance insurance premiums in the amount of $105,121 at an interest rate of 4.99% with equal payments due monthly beginning November 1, 2011 and continuing until September 1, 2012.

     The following summarizes notes payable at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011:

     The aggregate maturities of notes payable as of September 30, 2011, is as follows:

14

NOTE 9 – CAPITAL LEASES

     The Company utilizes capital leases for the purchase of equipment. Lease terms and interest rates for the equipment are 60 months at 6.25%, 36 months at 5.34%, and 36 months at 5.78% . The assets and liabilities under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the asset. The assets are amortized or depreciated over the lower of their related lease terms or their estimated productive lives.

     Minimum future lease payments under capital leases, as of September 30, 2011, for each of the following years and in aggregate, are as follows:

NOTE 10 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

      U.S. accounting standards require disclosure of a fair-value hierarchy of inputs the Company uses to value an asset or a liability. In September 2006, the FASB issued new accounting guidance, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company previously partially adopted this guidance for all instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted the remaining provisions of the guidance for all non-financial assets and liabilities that are not re-measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption of these provisions did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

      Fair value standards define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the standards establish a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires that the Company maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair-value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. For the Company, Level 1 inputs include quoted prices on the Company’s securities that are actively traded.

Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that is observable, either directly or indirectly. For the Company, Level 2 inputs include assumptions such as estimated life; risk free rate and volatility estimates used in determining the fair values of the Company’s option and warrant securities issued derivative financial instruments.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little of no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flows methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

     The Company’s financial instruments consist of marketable securities and derivative instruments which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Marketable securities are comprised of 1,000,000 shares of common stock of Columbus Silver Corporation which is traded on the TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV: CSC). The stock was purchased in accordance with a Memorandum of Understanding entered into on September 24, 2010 for the purpose of consummating a business combination. The derivative instruments consist of certain embedded features contained within its debt instruments and certain warrant contracts. The derivatives are measured on their respective origination dates, at the end of each reporting period and at other points in time when necessary, such as modifications, using Level 3 inputs in accordance with GAAP. The Company does not report any financial assets or liabilities that it measures using Level 2 inputs. The fair value measurement of financial instruments and other assets as of September 30, 2011 are as follows:

15

     Idle equipment includes equipment associated with the mica project which the Company ceased operations and are classified as Level 3. The fair value of the idle equipment was determined based upon an independent third party appraisal. The appraised value was established based upon comparable sales of similar assets and certain assumptions regarding market demand for these assets. As this valuation was based upon unobservable inputs, we classified the idle equipment as Level 3. There was no change in the carrying valuation of the idle equipment during the three months ended September 30, 2011.

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS

     On September 11, 2009, the Company entered into a definitive gold sale agreement with Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (TSX-V: SSL) (“Sandstorm”) to sell a portion of the life-of-mine gold production (but not silver production) from our Summit silver-gold mine. Under the agreement we received an upfront cash deposit of $4.0 million, plus we will receive ongoing production payments equal to the lesser of $400 per ounce or the prevailing market price, for each ounce of gold delivered pursuant to the agreement for the life of the mine. Gold production subject to the agreement includes 50% of the first 10,000 ounces of gold produced, and 22% of the gold thereafter. The amount of payable gold can be reduced from 22% to 15% provided that within 36 months the Summit mine reaches certain performance levels in any consecutive 12 month period, in compliance with prefeasibility estimates, including 1) the rate of ore mined and processed must average 400 tons per day or more, and 2) payable gold production must exceed 11,500 ounces during such consecutive 12 month period. Sandstorm made an initial payment of $500,000 and on October 7, 2009 paid the remaining $3,500,000 balance of the upfront cash deposit. The Company will receive credit against the $4,000.000 upfront cash deposit for the difference between the market price and $400 per ounce for those gold deliveries where the prevailing market price exceeds $400 per ounce. These credits will be recognized as revenue, in addition to the ongoing production payments received for gold delivered pursuant to the agreement. In certain circumstances, including failure to meet minimum production rates, interruption in production due to permitting issues and customary events of default, the agreement may be terminated. In such event, the Company may be required to return to Sandstorm the upfront cash deposit of $4.0 million less a credit for gold delivered up to the date of that event, which is determined using the difference between the market price and $400 per ounce for gold deliveries where the prevailing market price exceeded $400 per ounce.

     On March 29, 2011, the Company entered into Amendment 1 for the definitive gold sale agreement dated September 11, 2009. The amendment extended the original completion guarantee date from April 2011 to June 30, 2012. In exchange for the amended completion guarantee date, the Company agreed to deliver an additional 700 ounces of gold at equivalent sales terms over and above what is currently due under the agreement. Under the terms of the amendment the delivery of the additional gold was to be made prior to June 30, 2011.

     On June 28, 2011, the Company entered into Amendment 2 for the definitive gold sale agreement. The amendment extended the delivery date for the additional 700 ounces of gold agreed upon in Amendment 1 from June 30, 2011 until October 15, 2011. In exchange for the deferred delivery date the Company agreed to pay a per diem of 3 ounces of gold for each day the additional 700 ounces of gold under Amendment 1 remain outstanding past June 30, 2011 until the actual date of delivery, no later than October 15, 2011. Based upon the sale terms of the agreement, the Company recorded an accrued liability of $773,850 for 700 ounces of gold based upon the closing gold price on June 30, 2011. On August 9, 2011 the Company satisfied the requirements of Amendment 2 and delivered 817 ounces of gold. The net cost of delivering the gold after receiving payment from Sandstorm of $400 per ounce delivered was $1,075,785. In order to recognize the final cost of delivering the gold, the accrued liability of $773,850 at June 30, 2011 was adjusted by an additional $301,935 and recognized during the quarter as a non-recurring component of costs applicable to sales.

16

NOTE 12 - LITIGATION – LEGAL MATTERS

     On August 31, 2011, the Company filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico against Ortiz Mines, Inc. (“OMI”) in connection with OMI’s purported termination of the Company’s exclusive leasehold rights to explore, develop and mine gold, silver, copper and other minerals on the Ortiz Mine Grant in Santa Fe County, New Mexico and OMI’s demand for significant additional consideration to allow the lease to continue. The Complaint alleges several causes of action, including breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The Complaint seeks both declaratory and injunctive relief. The Company believes OMI’s purported termination of the Lease was wrongful and intends to vigorously prosecute legal claims to enforce its rights under the Lease and recover all applicable damages. On September 2, 2011, in relation to the Complaint, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K.

NOTE 13 - STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY

Issuances of Common Stock

     On July 1, 2011, 50,000 shares of common stock were issued to a consultant for services, valued at $48,000 based on the closing market price on the date of the transaction.

     On July 1, 2011, the Company issued 337,500 shares of previously recorded vested stock grants to employees of the Company.

Issuances of Options

     During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued no new options and 80,000 options were cancelled.

Issuances of Warrants

     During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 750,000 five year warrants at an exercise price of $1.00 and 1,323,581 warrants expired.

     Stock option and warrant activity, both within the 1989 stock Option Plan and the 2007 Equity incentive Plan and outside of these plans, for the three months ended September 30, 2011, are as follows:

     Stock options and warrants exercisable at September 30, 2011, are as follows:

17

     As of September 30, 2011, the aggregate intrinsic value of all stock options and warrants vested and expected to vest was approximately $3,106,300 and the aggregate intrinsic value of currently exercisable stock options and warrants was approximately $3,106,300. The intrinsic value of each option share is the difference between the fair market value of the common stock and the exercise price of such option or warrant share to the extent it is "in-the-money". Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value that would have been received by the holders of in-the-money options had they exercised their options on the last trading day of the quarter and sold the underlying shares at the closing stock price on such day. The intrinsic value calculation is based on the $0.83 closing stock price of the Common Stock on September 30, 2011. The total number of in-the-money options and warrants vested and exercisable as of September 30, 2011, was 4,885,000.

     The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended September, 2011, was $-0-. Intrinsic value of exercised shares is the total value of such shares on the date of exercise less the cash received from the option or warrant holder to exercise the options. The options were exercised on a cashless basis and no cash proceeds were received from the exercise of the stock options.

     The total fair value of options and warrants granted during the three months ended September 30, 2011, was approximately $477,673. The total grant-date fair value of option and warrant shares vested during the three months ended September 30, 2011, was approximately 15,894.

NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

     The Company has evaluated events and transactions that occurred subsequent to September 30, 2011 for possible disclosure or recognition in the consolidated financial statements. The Company has determined that there were no such events or transactions that warrant disclosure or recognition in the consolidated financial statements.

18

ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q may contain certain “forward-looking” statements as such term is defined in the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 and by the securities and exchange commission in its rules, regulations and releases, which represent the Company’s expectations or beliefs, including but not limited to, statements concerning the Company’s operations, economic performance, financial condition, growth and acquisition strategies, investments, and future operational plans. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “intent”, “could”, “estimate”, “might”, “Plan”, “predict” or “continue” or the negative or other variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Company’s control, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of important factors, including uncertainty related to acquisitions, governmental regulation, managing and maintaining growth, the operations of the company and its subsidiaries, volatility of stock price and any other factors discussed in this and other registrant filings with the securities and exchange commission. The company does not intend to undertake to update the information in this Form 10-Q if any forward-looking statement later turns out to be inaccurate.

     The following discussion summarizes the results of our operations for the three month period ended September 30, 2011, and compares those results to the three month period ended September 30, 2010. It also analyzes our financial condition at September 30, 2011. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis, including the audited financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and Notes to the financial statements, in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.

Overview

     Santa Fe Gold Corporation (“the Company”, “our” or “we”) is a U.S. mining company, incorporated in August 1991 in the state of Delaware, with a general business strategy to acquire and develop mining properties amenable to low cost production. We currently are focused on: (1) continuing the ramp up of production at our Summit silver-gold property located in New Mexico during the fourth calendar quarter of 2011, (2) conducting further studies on our Ortiz gold project located in New Mexico and (3) continuing to raise working capital for operating and administrative expenses.

     We commenced processing operations at the Banner Mill in March 2010. Commissioning of the mill proceeded satisfactorily and in July 2010, the mill facilities were placed into service and depreciation started to be recognized on the plant. The Company is in process of the final stages of ramping up full production from the Summit mine and increased throughput at the Banner Mill.

Basis of Presentation and Going Concern

     The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern, it may be unable to realize the carrying value of its assets and to meet its liabilities as they become due.

     The Company has incurred a net income of $702,862 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, and has a total accumulated deficit of $59,043,681and a working capital deficit of $12,403,042 at September 30, 2011, which includes non-cash derivative instrument liabilities aggregating $6,424,553 and deferred revenue of $3,159,612.

      The Company has increased revenue-generating operations during the current quarter as we ramp up to commercial production at our Summit mine site and attain full throughput at our Banner Mill. To continue as a going concern, the Company is dependent on continued fund raising for project development and payment of general and administration expenses until production at the Summit mine site ramps up to full production and profitable operations are achieved. The Company has no commitment from any party to provide additional working capital and there is no assurance that such funding will be available as needed, or if available, that its terms will be favorable or acceptable to the Company.

19

     The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.

Derivative Financial Instruments

     In connection with the issuance of debt or equity instruments, we may issue options or warrants to purchase our common stock. In certain circumstances, these options or warrants may be classified as derivative liabilities, rather than as equity. Additionally, the debt or equity instruments may contain embedded derivative instruments, such as conversion options, which in certain circumstances, may be required to be bifurcated from the associated host instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative instrument liability.

     The identification of, and accounting for, derivative instruments is complex. Our derivative instrument liabilities are revalued at the end of each reporting period, with changes in the fair value of the derivative liability recorded as charges or credits to income, in the period in which the changes occur. For warrants that are accounted for as derivative instrument liability, we determined the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. That model requires assumptions related to the remaining term of the instruments and risk-free rates of return, our current common stock price and expected dividend yield, and the expected volatility of our common stock price over the life of the warrants. The identification of, and accounting for, derivative instruments and the assumptions used to value them can significantly affect our consolidated financial statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

     Sales

     We had revenues of $2,550,724 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $776,822 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $1,773,902 is due to increased production at the Summit mine and related shipments of precious metals concentrate, flux material and the sale of refined gold. Sales for the current quarter consisted of concentrate sales of $894,019, flux material of $739,320 and refined gold of $917,385.

     The definitive gold sale agreement entered into on September 11, 2009 stipulates that we deliver the contractual production quantity in refined gold. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources section within this Item 2 for additional information. The Summit Project is not currently configured or permitted to produce refined gold. To fulfill the contractual terms per the definitive gold sale agreement, refined gold is purchased for delivery. The agreement calls for the sale of gold at the fixed price of $400 per ounce plus the upfront advance, representing deferred revenue, which is to be credited by the difference between the market price and the fixed price of gold for the number of ounces delivered. The revenue component of $917,385 for the delivery of refined gold is comprised of $465,731 representing sales of gold at the fixed price of $400 per ounce, and $451,654 representing the realization of deferred revenue related to the upfront cash advance.

     Operating Costs and Expenses

     Costs applicable to sales aggregate $1,620,490 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $395,087 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $1,225,403 is attributable to the costs associated with the shipments of concentrate and flux material for smelting feedstock totaling $131,993 and the cost of purchasing refined gold of $1,093,410 in order to satisfy the delivery requirements of the definitive gold sale agreement. Of this amount, approximately $301,935 is non-recurring and attributable to the completion guarantee extension as discussed in NOTE 11 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements. The Summit project is in process of completing the development of its initial targets of full production. Costs applicable to sales are higher than normally expected until full production is attained. We anticipate these costs will decrease in relation to sales once as we achieve full production at the mine and corresponding full throughput at the mill site during the fourth calendar quarter of 2011.

     Exploration and mining costs were $528,954 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $390,019 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $138,935. The increase is attributable to expanding production operations at the Summit mine site, increased throughput at the Banner Mill and a corresponding decrease in capitalized payroll burden. The increase in costs is primarily comprised of: $137,778 related royalties; general mine and mill general operating costs of $36,876; repairs and maintenance aggregating $32,152; vehicle operating costs of $46,022 and resource and property taxes of $24,949. These increases were offset by decreases in labor burden classified to cost applicable to sales of $73,890; shop supplies aggregating $17,169; $22,776 related to exploration associated costs and property and casualty insurance of $18,741, which is classified in cost applicable to sales in the current period on measurement.

20

     General and administrative expenses increased to $910,116 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, from $765,084 for the comparative three month period ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $145,032. The increase is mainly attributable to legal fees of $72,712; financing costs of $85,000; consulting fees of $24,497; audit and accounting fees aggregating $37,891; costs associated with options and warrants of $75,357; insurance of $3,608; corporate filing fees of $5,073 and general office expenses of $14,739. These increases were offset by decreased expenses in the following areas: investor relations of $71,615 and corporate labor burden of $102,583. The decrease in labor burden is mainly attributable to a decrease of $100,543 attributable to employee stock grants recognized in the prior period of measurement.

     Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $658,407 for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $572,157 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $86,250. The increase is attributable primarily to additional equipment purchased and put into service during the ramp up to achieve commercial production.

     Other Income and Expenses

     Other income and (expenses) for the three months ended September 30, 2011, were $1,872,232 as compared to $(2,606,181) for the comparable three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in net other income of $4,478,413 is primarily attributable to the increase gain recognized on derivative instruments liability of $5,015,133. The increase was offset by increase in interest expense of $126,197; accretion of discounts on notes payable of $257,482 and a $152,587 loss on disposal of assets.

     The increase in interest expense was due primarily to interest of $125,000 on the five million dollar working capital loan that was placed in August 2011.

     Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments

     We recognized a gain on derivative financial instruments of $2,887,760 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to a (loss) of $2,127,373 for the prior year’s comparable period, resulting in an increased gain of $5,015,133. The non-cash gain arises from adjustments to record the derivative financial instruments at fair values in accordance with current accounting standards. The derivative financial instruments arose in connection with senior secured convertible notes and the issuance of warrants attached to stock subscriptions and warrants issued under our registered direct offerings. Otherwise, we generally do not use derivative financial instruments for other purposes, such as hedging cash flow or fair-value risks. The increase in the derivative gain for the three months ended September 30, 2011, is attributable mainly to adjustments to record the change in fair value for the embedded conversion feature of derivative financial instruments, the warrants previously issued under our registered direct offerings, changes in the market price of our common stock, which is a component of the calculation model, and the issuance of additional warrants resulting in derivative treatment. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of this derivative. Because Black-Scholes uses our stock price, changes in the stock price will result in volatility in the earnings in future periods as we continue to reflect the derivative financial instruments at fair values.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     To continue with the deployment of our business strategies, we will require significant additional working capital. We also will require additional working capital for employment of necessary corporate personnel, and related general and administrative expenses until we reach profitable operations.

     As of September 30, 2011, we have cash and cash equivalents of $1,292,439, accounts receivable for product sales of $2,054,855, a working capital deficit of $12,403,042, which includes a non-cash financial derivative liability of $6,424,553 and deferred revenue of $3,159,612, and an accumulated deficit of $59,043,681.

     We are continuing to pursue a joint venture or sale of the Black Canyon mica project. Management has determined to deploy its resources in the area of precious metals based upon the current and projected market trends in this area.

21

     We continue to seek funding to advance our business plan and strategies. Historically, we have relied upon equity related financing to fund our deployment of our business plan. Currently we have no arrangements to borrow funds for working capital requirements. We will require additional funding to meet our corporate general and administrative commitments, to continue feasibility studies on our mineral properties and to initiate exploration programs. The Summit project is expected to achieve commercial production in the fourth quarter calendar year 2011. Beginning the first calendar quarter our operations for our remaining fiscal year 2012 will be funded mainly from anticipated sales of precious metals, the sale of our equity securities, possibly through the exercise of certain options and warrants and through additional financing facilities. We believe we will be able to finance our continuing future activities, although there are no assurances of success in this regard or in our ability to obtain continued financing through capital markets, joint ventures, or other acceptable arrangements. If our plans are not successful, future operations and liquidity may be adversely impacted. In the event that we are unable to obtain required capital, we may be forced to reduce our exploration and operating expenditures or to cease development operations altogether.

     On September 11, 2009, we entered into a definitive gold sale agreement with Sandstorm Resources Ltd. (TSX-V: SSL) (“Sandstorm”) to sell a portion of the life-of-mine gold production (but not silver production) from our Summit silver-gold mine. Under the agreement we received an upfront cash deposit of $4.0 million, plus we will receive ongoing production payments equal to the lesser of $400 per ounce or the prevailing market price, for each ounce of gold delivered pursuant to the agreement for the life of the mine. Gold production subject to the agreement includes 50% of the first 10,000 ounces of gold produced, and 22% of the gold thereafter. The amount of payable gold can be reduced from 22% to 15% provided that within 36 months the Summit mine reaches certain performance levels in any consecutive 12 month period, in compliance with prefeasibility estimates, including 1) the rate of ore mined and processed must average 400 tons per day or more, and 2) payable gold production must exceed 11,500 ounces during such consecutive 12 month period. We will receive credit against the $4,000,000 upfront cash deposit for the difference between the market price and $400 per ounce for those gold deliveries where the prevailing market price exceeds $400 per ounce. These credits will be recognized as revenue, in addition to the ongoing production payments received for gold delivered pursuant to the agreement. In certain circumstances, including failure to meet minimum production rates, interruption in production due to permitting issues and customary events of default, the agreement may be terminated. In such event, we may be required to return to Sandstorm the upfront cash deposit of $4.0 million less a credit for gold delivered up to the date of that event, which is determined using the difference between the market price and $400 per ounce for gold deliveries where the prevailing market price exceeded $400 per ounce.

     On January 20, 2010, the we entered into definitive security purchase agreements with 23 institutional investors (collectively, “Purchasers") to sell an aggregate of $10.0 million of units, each unit consisting of one Share and one-half of a Warrant to purchase a Share by way of a registered direct offering. Pursuant to the transaction, we sold to the Purchasers an aggregate of 7,692,310 Shares and Warrants to purchase up to 3,846,155 additional Shares. The Warrants are exercisable at an exercise price of $1.70 per share upon issuance and have a term of five years. In connection with the placement we issued 461,539 warrants to Placement Agents, exercisable at $1.625 per share and having a term of approximately 4.9 years. These Placement Agent warrants vested six months from the date of issuance. We received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $9,375,000, after deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses.

     The securities were issued pursuant to the Company's effective S-3 Registration Statement under which the securities are registered. The units, including the Shares and Warrants (including the Placement Agent warrants) and shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants were issued pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated as of January 20, 2010, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in connection with a takedown from the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which became effective on December 29, 2009, and the base prospectus contained in such registration statement.

     On December 29, 2010, we entered into a definitive security purchase agreements with three institutional investors to sell an aggregate of $2 million of units, each unit consisting of one share and one-half warrant per share to purchase a share by way of the placement. Under the agreement, we sold 1,666,668 shares and warrants to purchase 833,334 additional shares of our common stock. The warrants will be exercisable at an exercise price of $1.50 per share immediately upon the issuance of the stock and will expire five years from the date they are first exercisable. In connection with the transaction, we paid the Placement Agent a fee of $136,000 and issued 100,000 warrants exercisable at $1.50 per share which have an exercise period of approximately 3.92 years. The warrants are exercisable immediately after issuance. We received $1,864,001 net cash proceeds from the placement.

     The units, including the shares and warrants (including the Placement Agent warrants) and shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants are issued pursuant to the prospectus supplement dated as of December 29, 2010, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in connection with a takedown from the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-163112), which became effective on December 29, 2009, and the base prospectus contained in such registration statement.

22

     We are utilizing the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including but not limited to, working capital for the Summit silver-gold project; acquisition of additional feed sources for expansion of the Lordsburg mill; advancement of the Ortiz gold project; and pursuit of acquisition opportunities.

     On March 29, 2011, we amended the definitive gold sale agreement dated September 11, 2009. The amendment extended the original completion guarantee date from April 2011 to June 30, 2012. In exchange for the amended completion guarantee date, we agreed to deliver an additional 700 ounces of gold at equivalent sales terms over and above what is currently due under the agreement. Based upon the sale terms of the agreement, the Company recorded an accrued liability of $727,300 based upon the closing gold price on March 31, 2011. Under the terms of the amendment the delivery is to be made prior to June 30, 2011.

     On June 28, 2011, we entered into Amendment 2 for the definitive gold sale agreement. The amendment extended the delivery date for the additional 700 ounces of gold agreed upon in Amendment 1 from June 30, 2011 until October 15, 2011. In exchange for the deferred delivery date we agreed to pay a per diem of 3 ounces of gold for each day the additional 700 ounces of gold under Amendment 1 remain outstanding past June 30, 2011 until the actual date of delivery, no later than October 15, 2011. Based upon the sale terms of the agreement, we recorded an accrued liability of $773,850 for 700 ounces of gold based upon the closing gold price on June 30, 2011. On August 9, 2011 the Company satisfied the requirements of Amendment 2 and delivered 817 ounces of gold. The net cost of delivering the gold after receiving payment from Sandstorm of $400 per ounce delivered was $1,075,785. In order to recognize the final cost of delivering the gold, the accrued liability of $773,850 at June 30, 2011 was adjusted by an additional $301,935 and recognized during the quarter as a non-recurring component of costs applicable to sales.

     On August 2, 2011, we entered into a financing agreement for $5 million senior secured loan for working capital. The loan bears interest at 15% per annum payable in monthly installments in arrears. The loan has a term of six months and may be repaid at any time without penalty. The senior obligations are secured by a first priority lien on the stock of our subsidiaries and on liens covering substantially all of the assets of the Company, including the Summit silver-gold project, the Black Canyon mica project and the Planet micaceous iron oxide project. In connection with the loan, we issued warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $1.00 per share and a term of five years.

     We are actively exploring a number of financing options to procure funding necessary to repay the $5 million senior secured loan, to complete the $10 million Columbus Silver transaction and to provide additional working capital.

Factors Affecting Future Operating Results

     We continue to deploy our plan to place the Company on an improved financial footing. In addition to the significant capital raisings in 2010 and the $5 million working capital facility in 2011, we plan to continue to raise capital as may be required to provide for operations on our various property sites, complete the Columbus Silver Corporation acquisition and repay the $5 million working capital facility. We plan to procure capital with a long term financing arrangements and/or equity placements. If we continue to secure required financing on acceptable terms, we believe we will be in a position to execute our business plan on our property sites.

     We originally entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding on September 24, 2010 with Columbus Silver Corporation (TSXV: CSC) (“Columbus Silver”), pursuant to which the we will acquire all the outstanding shares of common stock of Columbus Silver in exchange for the Company’s common stock. The contemplated exchange ratio is one share of Santa Fe common stock for every 5.82515 shares of Columbus Silver’s common stock. It is contemplated that we would issue a total of 8,787,527 shares in the transaction, the value of which shares will be determined by the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the effective closing date of the contemplated transaction. Following completion of the transaction, it is estimated we would be owned 91.37% by current Company shareholders and 8.63% by Columbus Silver shareholders. In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding, we purchased 1,000,000 shares of Columbus Silver common stock on October 28, 2010 in a private placement valued at $98,058. Proceeds of the issuance were used by Columbus Silver as bridge financing for operational expenses through December 31, 2010. On January 27, 2011, we advanced $200,000 to Columbus Silver in exchange for a promissory note bearing interest at 4% per annum. All accrued interest and principal is due and payable on December 31, 2012. The loan was extended for the purpose of providing Columbus Silver with working capital in connection with a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) dated September 23, 2010, in contemplation of a business combination (the “Transaction”). In the event that either party to the MOU informs the other that it will not proceed with the Transaction, either the maker or the Holder will have the ability, by providing written notice to the other, to require that the Maker apply to the TSX Venture Exchange to have the entire outstanding principal amount and accrued unpaid interest of this Note paid in common shares of the Maker pursuant to Exchange Policy 4.3, Shares for Debt, or its successor policy or instrument. Currently the Company is negotiating a revocation of cease trade orders against the Company issued by the British Columbia and Ontario Securities Commission in 2003 after the Company did not make required regulatory filings. Until the cease trade orders are revoked, steps cannot be taken to consummate the proposed transaction by us.

23

     On September 6, 2011, the we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Columbus Silver Corporation (TSXV: CSC) (“Columbus Silver”) pursuant to which we have conditionally agreed to acquire all of Columbus Silver’s outstanding common stock for a cash amount of Cdn $0.20 per outstanding share in a transaction currently valued at Cdn $9,977,285. Until closing of the transaction, we agreed to provide bridge financing to Columbus Silver to fund leasehold payments and for working capital, which through the end of December 2011 totals $513,716. The Memorandum of Understanding contemplates a business combination by way of a Plan of Arrangement, which is subject to Canadian court approval. In addition, the proposed transactions are subject to the final approval of the boards of directors of the Company and Columbus Silver, stock exchange and regulatory approvals, Columbus Silver shareholder approval and the Company’s commitment of the required funding. If we do not notify Columbus Silver by November 30, 2011 that it has obtained a firm commitment for the required funding, Columbus Silver will have the option to terminate the acquisition.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements defined in Item 303(a) (4) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     There has been no material change in the market risks discussed in Item 7A of Santa Fe Gold’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting management on a timely basis to material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports. Under the supervision of, and the participation of our management, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, has conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2011. This evaluation included certain areas in which we have made, and are continuing to make, changes to improve and enhance controls. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required, and are effective in alerting management on a timely basis to material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports.

     During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

      On August 31, 2011, we filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico against Ortiz Mines, Inc. (“OMI”) in connection with OMI’s purported termination of our exclusive leasehold rights to explore, develop and mine gold, silver, copper and other minerals on the Ortiz Mine Grant in Santa Fe County, New Mexico and OMI’s demand for significant additional consideration to allow the lease to continue. The Complaint alleges several causes of action, including breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The Complaint seeks both declaratory and injunctive relief. We believe OMI’s purported termination of the Lease was wrongful and intend to vigorously prosecute legal claims to enforce our rights under the Lease and recover all applicable damages.

24

     Except for the Complaint filed against Ortiz Mines, Inc., we are not currently subject to any legal proceedings, and to the best of our knowledge, no such proceedings are threatened, the results of which would have a material impact on our properties, results of operation, or financial condition. Nor, to the best of our knowledge, are any of our officers or directors involved in any legal proceedings in which we are an adverse party.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

     Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011, in addition to the other information included in this quarterly report. If any of the risks described actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could fall.

     As of September 30, 2011, there have not been any material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, although we may disclose changes to such risk factors or disclose additional risk factors from time to time in our future filings with the SEC.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

     None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

     None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

     Mine Safety Disclosures

     The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“The Act”) requires the operators of mines, including gold and silver mines, to include in each periodic report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission certain specified disclosures regarding the company’s history of mine safety.

     In evaluating these disclosures, consideration should be given to factors such as: (i) the number of citations and orders may vary depending on the size of the mine, (ii) the number of citations issued will vary from inspector to inspector and mine to mine, and (iii) citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and in that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed.

     Specified disclosures relating to The Act and pertaining to the Summit Mine for the year ended September 30, 2011 are as follows:

25

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

SIGNATURES:

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

26