Santander Holdings USA, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 001-16581
SANTANDER
HOLDINGS USA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
23-2453088
(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |
|
75 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts (Address of principal executive offices) |
02109 (Zip Code) |
(617) 346-7200
Registrants telephone number including area code
Registrants telephone number including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ. No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation ST (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o.
No
o.*
*Registrant is not subject to the requirements of Rule 405 of Regulation S-T at this time.
*Registrant is not subject to the requirements of Rule 405 of Regulation S-T at this time.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act) Yes o. No þ.
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at October 31, 2011 | |
Common Stock (no par value) | 517,107,043 shares |
Table of Contents
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of Santander Holdings USA, Inc. (SHUSA or the Company). SHUSA
may from time to time make forward-looking statements in SHUSAs filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC) (including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Exhibits
hereto), in its reports to shareholders (including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2010) and in other communications by SHUSA, which are made in good faith by
SHUSA, pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Some of the statements made by SHUSA, including any statements preceded by, followed by or
which include the words may, could, should, pro forma, looking forward, will, would,
believe, expect, hope, anticipate, estimate, intend, plan, strive, hopefully,
try, assume or similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to SHUSAs vision, mission,
strategies, goals, beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates, intentions,
financial condition, results of operations, future performance and business of SHUSA and are not
historical facts. Although SHUSA believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking
statements are reasonable, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve
risks and uncertainties which are subject to change based on various important factors (some of
which are beyond SHUSAs control). Among the factors which could cause SHUSAs financial
performance to differ materially from that expressed in the forward-looking statements are:
| the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the regional and local economies in which SHUSA conducts operations, which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs, and provision for credit losses; | ||
| the effects of, or policies determined by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; | ||
| inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations, which may, among other things reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect the ability to originate and distribute financial products in the primary and secondary markets; | ||
| adverse movements and volatility in debt and equity capital markets; | ||
| adverse changes in the securities markets, including those related to the financial condition of significant issuers in the Companys investment portfolio; | ||
| revenue enhancement initiatives may not be successful in the marketplace or may result in unintended costs; | ||
| changing market conditions may force SHUSA to alter the implementation or continuation of cost savings or revenue enhancement strategies; | ||
| SHUSAs timely development of competitive new products and services in a changing environment and the acceptance of such products and services by customers; | ||
| the willingness of customers to substitute competitors products and services and vice versa; | ||
| the ability of SHUSA and its third party vendors to convert and maintain SHUSAs data processing and related systems on a timely and acceptable basis and within projected cost estimates; | ||
| the impact of changes in financial services policies, laws and regulations, including laws, regulations and policies concerning taxes, banking, capital, liquidity, proper accounting treatment, securities and insurance, and the application thereof by regulatory bodies and the impact of changes in and interpretation of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States; | ||
| the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted in July 2010, which is a significant development for the banking industry, the full reach of which will be unknown until the rulemaking processes mandated by the legislation are complete (although the impact will involve higher compliance costs and certain elements, that are likely to negatively affect SHUSAs revenue and earnings); |
1
Table of Contents
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
(continued)
(continued)
| additional legislation and regulations may be enacted or promulgated in the future, and management is unable to predict the form such legislation or regulation may take or to the degree which management needs to modify SHUSAs businesses or operations to comply with such legislation or regulation; | ||
| the cost and other effects of the consent order issued by the Office of Thrift Supervision to Sovereign Bank requiring the Bank to take certain steps to improve its mortgage servicing and foreclosures practices, as is further described in Part I, Item 2; | ||
| technological changes; | ||
| competitors of SHUSA may have greater financial resources and develop products and technology that enable those competitors to compete more successfully than SHUSA; | ||
| changes in consumer spending and savings habits; | ||
| acts of terrorism or domestic or foreign military conflicts and acts of God, including natural disasters; | ||
| regulatory or judicial proceedings; | ||
| changes in asset quality; | ||
| the outcome of ongoing tax audits by federal, state and local income tax authorities may require additional taxes be paid by SHUSA as compared to what has been accrued or paid as of period end; and | ||
| SHUSAs success in managing the risks involved in the foregoing. |
If one or more of the factors affecting SHUSAs forward-looking information and statements
proves incorrect, the actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from
those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking information and statements. Therefore, SHUSA
cautions you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking information and statements. The
effect of these factors is difficult to predict. Factors other than these also could adversely
affect the results, and the reader should not consider these factors to be a complete set of all
potential risks or uncertainties. New factors emerge from time to time and management cannot assess
the impact of any such factor on SHUSAs business or the extent to which any factor, or combination
of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward looking
statement. Any forward looking statements only speak as of the date of this document and SHUSA
undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking information and statements, whether written
or oral, to reflect any change. All forward-looking statements attributable to SHUSA are expressly
qualified by these cautionary statements.
2
INDEX
3
Table of Contents
PART 1- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements |
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited at September 30, 2011, audited at December 31, 2010)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions |
$ | 3,184,550 | $ | 1,705,895 | ||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||
Available-for-sale at fair value |
13,834,050 | 13,371,848 | ||||||
Other investments |
524,899 | 614,241 | ||||||
Loans held for investment (1) |
65,626,619 | 65,017,884 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(2,185,302 | ) | (2,197,450 | ) | ||||
Net loans held for investment |
63,441,317 | 62,820,434 | ||||||
Loans held for sale at fair value |
141,096 | 150,063 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $507,356 and $445,225 at September
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
657,742 | 595,951 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
365,999 | 406,617 | ||||||
Goodwill |
4,124,351 | 4,124,351 | ||||||
Core deposit intangibles and other intangibles |
160,103 | 188,940 | ||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
1,550,216 | 1,519,462 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
487,179 | 583,637 | ||||||
Other assets (2) |
3,331,689 | 3,570,376 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 91,803,191 | $ | 89,651,815 | ||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Deposits and other customer accounts |
$ | 47,363,568 | $ | 42,673,293 | ||||
Borrowings and other debt obligations |
30,191,424 | 33,630,117 | ||||||
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
137,493 | 104,125 | ||||||
Other liabilities (3) |
2,004,066 | 1,983,610 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
79,696,551 | 78,391,145 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Preferred stock (no par value; $25,000 liquidation
preference; 7,500,000 shares authorized; 8,000
shares outstanding at September 30, 2011 and at
December 31, 2010) |
195,445 | 195,445 | ||||||
Common stock (no par value; 800,000,000 shares
authorized; 517,107,043 shares issued at September
30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010) |
11,118,007 | 11,117,328 | ||||||
Warrants |
285,435 | 285,435 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(140,847 | ) | (234,190 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings/(deficit) |
609,966 | (128,984 | ) | |||||
TOTAL SHUSA STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
12,068,006 | 11,235,034 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
38,634 | 25,636 | ||||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
12,106,640 | 11,260,670 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 91,803,191 | $ | 89,651,815 | ||||
(1) | Includes loans held for investment at fair value of $1,614,651 and $2,148,261 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. | |
(2) | Includes mortgage servicing rights at fair value of $95,677 and $146,028 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, derivatives at fair value of $465,073 and $353,370 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively and foreclosed assets at fair value of $123,829 and $114,198 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. | |
(3) | Includes derivatives at fair value of $745,452 and $543,267 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three-Month Period | Nine-Month Period | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on loans |
$ | 1,174,559 | $ | 1,089,668 | $ | 3,576,430 | $ | 3,134,072 | ||||||||
Interest-earning deposits |
1,655 | 732 | 5,051 | 1,492 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
101,904 | 121,117 | 316,528 | 358,391 | ||||||||||||
Other investments |
15 | 244 | 114 | 916 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME |
1,278,133 | 1,211,761 | 3,898,123 | 3,494,871 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits and customer accounts |
65,066 | 51,207 | 187,837 | 174,422 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings and other debt obligations |
258,499 | 282,085 | 823,564 | 874,122 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE |
323,565 | 333,292 | 1,011,401 | 1,048,544 | ||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
954,568 | 878,469 | 2,886,722 | 2,446,327 | ||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
368,713 | 455,639 | 949,629 | 1,305,650 | ||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES |
585,855 | 422,830 | 1,937,093 | 1,140,677 | ||||||||||||
NON-INTEREST INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
Consumer banking fees |
160,368 | 127,609 | 498,181 | 360,390 | ||||||||||||
Commercial banking fees |
43,877 | 47,842 | 130,195 | 139,718 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage banking income/(expense), net |
(25,943 | ) | 2,602 | (13,714 | ) | 27,684 | ||||||||||
Capital markets revenue, net |
6,009 | 3,290 | 18,723 | 11,517 | ||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
15,541 | 13,593 | 42,858 | 40,685 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous income/(expense) |
(3,378 | ) | 1,329 | 595 | 3,798 | |||||||||||
TOTAL FEES AND OTHER INCOME |
196,474 | 196,265 | 676,838 | 583,792 | ||||||||||||
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses |
(4,180 | ) | (4,776 | ) | (38,446 | ) | (52,170 | ) | ||||||||
Portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income before taxes |
4,180 | 3,964 | 38,121 | 48,225 | ||||||||||||
OTTI recognized in earnings |
| (812 | ) | (325 | ) | (3,945 | ) | |||||||||
Net gain on sale of investment securities |
41,943 | 131,925 | 124,192 | 204,279 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on investment securities recognized in earnings |
41,943 | 131,113 | 123,867 | 200,334 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME |
238,417 | 327,378 | 800,705 | 784,126 | ||||||||||||
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits |
203,993 | 185,309 | 599,358 | 510,085 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment expenses |
89,061 | 78,848 | 254,497 | 235,484 | ||||||||||||
Technology expense |
30,194 | 28,432 | 91,938 | 81,996 | ||||||||||||
Outside services |
35,668 | 30,359 | 104,049 | 87,850 | ||||||||||||
Marketing expense |
9,426 | 9,984 | 26,739 | 25,679 | ||||||||||||
Loan expense |
48,182 | 34,998 | 165,951 | 90,146 | ||||||||||||
Other administrative expenses |
38,070 | 30,129 | 117,500 | 98,231 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
454,594 | 398,059 | 1,360,032 | 1,129,471 | ||||||||||||
5
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(continued)
Three-Month Period | Nine-Month Period | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
OTHER EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
$ | 13,138 | $ | 15,282 | $ | 43,041 | $ | 48,728 | ||||||||
Deposit insurance premiums |
18,551 | 23,227 | 66,279 | 70,529 | ||||||||||||
Equity method investments |
3,376 | 6,046 | 9,444 | 20,099 | ||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment |
23,570 | 13 | 29,712 | 3,381 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES |
58,635 | 44,568 | 148,476 | 142,737 | ||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
311,043 | 307,581 | 1,229,290 | 652,595 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
104,707 | 87,419 | 426,840 | 195,229 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME INCLUDING NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
$ | 206,336 | $ | 220,162 | $ | 802,450 | $ | 457,366 | ||||||||
LESS: NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO
NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
13,503 | 7,073 | 52,550 | 20,113 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHUSA |
$ | 192,833 | $ | 213,089 | $ | 749,900 | $ | 437,253 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Accumulated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Other | Retained | Stock- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Preferred | Common | Comprehensive | Earnings | Noncontrolling | holders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Stock | Stock | Warrants | Loss | (Deficit) | Interest | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
511,107 | $ | 195,445 | $ | 10,381,500 | $ | 285,435 | $ | (349,869 | ) | $ | (1,147,373 | ) | $ | 22,397 | $ | 9,387,535 | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect from change in
accounting principle |
| | | | | (3,747 | ) | | (3,747 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
511,107 | $ | 195,445 | $ | 10,381,500 | $ | 285,435 | $ | (349,869 | ) | $ | (1,151,120 | ) | $ | 22,397 | $ | 9,383,788 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 437,253 | 20,113 | 457,366 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain/loss,
net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities
available-for-sale |
| | | | 214,064 | | | 214,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension liabilities |
| | | | 904 | | | 904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
| | | | (48,081 | ) | | | (48,081 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | 166,887 | 437,253 | 20,113 | 624,253 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insurance of common stock to parent |
3,000 | | 750,000 | | | | | 750,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued in connection with
employee benefit and incentive
compensation plans |
| | 744 | | | | | 744 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
| | | | | (10,950 | ) | | (10,950 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2010 |
514,107 | $ | 195,445 | $ | 11,132,244 | $ | 285,435 | $ | (182,982 | ) | $ | (724,817 | ) | $ | 42,510 | $ | 10,747,835 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Other | Retained | Stock- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Preferred | Common | Comprehensive | Earnings | Noncontrolling | holders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Stock | Stock | Warrants | Loss | (Deficit) | Interest | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
517,107 | $ | 195,445 | $ | 11,117,328 | $ | 285,435 | $ | (234,190 | ) | $ | (128,984 | ) | $ | 25,636 | $ | 11,260,670 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 749,900 | 52,550 | 802,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain/loss, net
of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities
available-for-sale |
| | | | 151,749 | | | 151,749 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension liabilities |
| | | | 1,027 | | | 1,027 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
| | | | (59,433 | ) | | | (59,433 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | 93,343 | 749,900 | 52,550 | 895,793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued in connection with
employee benefit and incentive
compensation plans |
| | 679 | | | | | 679 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to noncontrolling interest |
| | | | | | (39,552 | ) | (39,552 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
| | | | | (10,950 | ) | | (10,950 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2011 |
517,107 | $ | 195,445 | $ | 11,118,007 | $ | 285,435 | $ | (140,847 | ) | $ | 609,966 | $ | 38,634 | $ | 12,106,640 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine-Month Period | ||||||||
Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
$ | 802,450 | $ | 457,366 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
949,629 | 1,305,650 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
79,477 | (40,952 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
153,434 | 174,218 | ||||||
Net amortization/accretion of investment securities and loan premiums and discounts |
37,110 | (118,881 | ) | |||||
Net gain on sale of loans |
(13,050 | ) | (21,425 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sale of investment securities |
(124,192 | ) | (204,279 | ) | ||||
OTTI recognized in earnings |
325 | 3,945 | ||||||
Loss on debt extinguishments |
29,712 | 3,381 | ||||||
Net loss on real estate owned and premises and equipment |
8,296 | 12,086 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
2,885 | 1,557 | ||||||
Remittance to Santander for stock-based compensation |
(2,206 | ) | (877 | ) | ||||
Origination of loans held for sale, net of repayments |
(828,333 | ) | (1,313,915 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale |
850,627 | 964,546 | ||||||
Net change in: |
||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
40,618 | 19,720 | ||||||
Other assets and bank owned life insurance |
(214,213 | ) | 401,952 | |||||
Other liabilities |
141,996 | 226,519 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 1,914,565 | $ | 1,870,611 | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net cash used in by investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investment securities |
$ | 4,946,458 | $ | 5,075,900 | ||||
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of available-for-sale investment securities |
2,585,805 | 3,449,231 | ||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale investment securities |
(7,023,632 | ) | (4,890,607 | ) | ||||
Net change in other investments |
89,342 | 28,902 | ||||||
Net change in restricted cash |
96,458 | (8,755 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales of loans held for investment |
651 | 7,373 | ||||||
Purchase of loans held for investment |
(2,657,786 | ) | (7,748,910 | ) | ||||
Net change in loans other than purchases and sales |
419,918 | 147,439 | ||||||
Purchase of other assets from third party |
| (121,715 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned and premises and equipment |
67,477 | 43,786 | ||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment |
(135,888 | ) | (132,168 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
$ | (1,611,197 | ) | $ | (4,149,524 | ) | ||
8
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Continued)
Nine-Month Period | ||||||||
Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net cash provided by financing activities: |
||||||||
Net change in deposits and other customer accounts |
$ | 4,690,275 | $ | (3,163,726 | ) | |||
Net change in borrowings |
(1,798,779 | ) | 1,583,392 | |||||
Net proceeds from senior notes, subordinated notes and credit facility |
9,268,672 | 9,950,047 | ||||||
Repayments of borrowings and other debt obligations |
(10,941,971 | ) | (5,089,651 | ) | ||||
Net change in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
33,368 | 41,385 | ||||||
Cash dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
(10,950 | ) | (10,950 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends paid to noncontrolling interest |
(65,328 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
| 750,000 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
$ | 1,175,287 | $ | 4,060,497 | ||||
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
$ | 1,478,655 | $ | 1,781,584 | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
1,705,895 | 2,323,290 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 3,184,550 | $ | 4,104,874 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE |
||||||||
Net income taxes paid |
$ | 1,265,192 | $ | 264,244 | ||||
Interest paid |
$ | 1,036,357 | $ | 1,050,245 | ||||
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS |
||||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
$ | 87,553 | $ | 133,058 | ||||
Other repossessed assets |
$ | 1,229,160 | $ | 1,011,200 | ||||
Receipt of available for sale mortgage backed securities in exchange for mortgage
loans held for investment |
$ | 649,676 | $ | 1,375,502 | ||||
Consolidation of commercial mortgage backed securitization portfolio |
$ | | $ | (860,486 | ) | |||
Sale of previously consolidated commercial mortgage backed securitization portfolio |
$ | | $860,486 | |||||
Dividends declared |
$ | 8,224 | $ | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
9
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The consolidated financial statements of Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and Subsidiaries (SHUSA or
the Company) include the accounts of Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including
Sovereign Bank (the Bank), Santander Consumer USA, Inc (SCUSA), Independence Community Bank
Corp. (Independence) and Sovereign Delaware Investment Corporation. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. SHUSA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Banco
Santander SA (Santander). Santander is a retail and commercial bank, based in Spain, with a
presence in ten major markets throughout the world. At the end of 2010, Santander was the largest
bank in the euro zone and 10th in the world by market capitalization. Founded in 1857, Santander
had over 95 million customers, 14,082 branches more than any other international bank and
approximately 179,000 employees, at December 2010. It is the largest financial group in Spain and
Latin America. Furthermore, it has relevant positions in the United Kingdom, Portugal, Poland,
Northeastern U.S. and, through its Santander Consumer Finance arm, in Germany.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements, prepared in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP), have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations. Additionally, where applicable, the policies conform to the
accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. However, in the
opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments
of a normal and recurring nature necessary to present fairly the consolidated balance sheets,
statements of operations, statement of stockholders equity and statements of cash flows for the
periods indicated, and contain adequate disclosure to make the information presented not
misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Companys latest annual report on Form 10-K.
In the second quarter of 2011, the Company reclassified amounts presented in the December 31, 2010
consolidated balance sheet of $583.6 million from Other Assets to Restricted Cash. The Company
believes that this presentation provides a more meaningful presentation of cash available for
general operations. This reclassification had no effect on the consolidated statement of
operations.
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Management identified accounting for the allowance for loan losses, derivatives, income taxes and
goodwill as the most critical accounting policies and estimates in that they are important to the
portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results, and require managements most
difficult, subjective or complex judgments as a result of the need to make estimates about the
effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. These accounting policies, including the nature of
the estimates and types of assumptions used, are described throughout this Managements Discussion
and Analysis and the December 31, 2010 Managements Discussion and Analysis filed in the 2010 Form
10-K. The results of operations for any interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the
results which may be expected for the entire year.
The Company evaluated events from September 30, 2011, the date of the consolidated financial
statements, through the issuance of these consolidated financial statements included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
There have been no significant changes to the Companys accounting policies as disclosed in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
10
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(2) RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, an update to Topic 350, Intangibles Goodwill and
Other: When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or
Negative Carrying Amounts. The amendments to Topic 350 modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment
test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an
entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not
that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining this, an entity should consider whether there are
any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. These amendments were
effective for the Company on January 1, 2011. The implementation of this guidance did not have an
impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, an update to ASC 310-40, Receivables Troubled Debt
Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments to Topic 310 were effective on July 1, 2011 for the
Company, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption.
In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, the Company must
separately conclude that the restructuring constitutes a concession as well as the debtor must be
experiencing financial difficulties. The amendments to Topic 310 clarify the guidance on a
creditors evaluation of whether it has granted a concession and the debtor is experiencing
financial difficulties. The implementation of this guidance did not have a significant impact on
the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, an update to ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing to
improve the accounting for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and
obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The
amendments in this update remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion
requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on
substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the
collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments to ASC 860
are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012. The implementation of this guidance is not
expected to have an impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, an update to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement to provide
guidance about how fair value should be determined where it is already required or permitted under
U.S. GAAP. The guidance clarifies how a principal market is determined, addresses the fair value
measurement of instruments with offsetting market or counterparty credit risks and the concept of
valuation premise and highest and best use, extends the prohibition on blockage factors to all
three levels of the fair value hierarchy, and requires additional disclosures. The amendments to
ASC 820 are effective for the first interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2012 for the
Company, and should be applied prospectively. The implementation of this guidance is not expected
to have a significant impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, an update to ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, which
requires comprehensive income to be reported in either a single statement or in two consecutive
statements reporting net income and other comprehensive income. The amendments do not change what
items are reported in other comprehensive income or the requirement to report classification of
items from other comprehensive income to net income. The amendments to ASC 220 are effective for
the first interim and annual period beginning January 1, 2012 for the Company, and should be
applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. The implementation of
this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial position or
results of operations. A proposed deferral for certain aspects of this guidance was issued in
October 2011. If the proposed deferral is adopted unchanged, the deferral period would be begin for
the Company on January 1, 2012 and would remain in effect indefinitely.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, an update to ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and
Other, which requires companies to perform goodwill and indefinite-life intangible asset
impairment testing using a two-step process. The amendments to the ASU permits companies to first
assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a
reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as basis for determining whether it is necessary to
perform the two-step impairment test. The amendments to ASC 350 are effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 for the Company. The implementation of this
guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial position or
results of operations.
11
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(3) INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The following tables present the composition and fair value of investment securities
available-for-sale at the dates indicated:
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Loss | Value | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities |
$ | 43,956 | $ | 24 | $ | | $ | 43,980 | ||||||||
Debentures of FHLB, FNMA, and FHLMC |
19,435 | 565 | | 20,000 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
1,625,010 | 18,666 | 29,241 | 1,614,435 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
2,611,922 | 23,679 | 7,130 | 2,628,471 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
1,775,376 | 66,880 | 10,324 | 1,831,932 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies |
1,459,874 | 51,107 | | 1,510,981 | ||||||||||||
FHLMC and FNMA debt securities |
5,052,670 | 106,229 | 3,369 | 5,155,530 | ||||||||||||
Non-agency securities |
1,133,913 | 3,538 | 108,730 | 1,028,721 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
$ | 13,722,156 | $ | 270,688 | $ | 158,794 | $ | 13,834,050 | ||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Loss | Value | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and government agency securities |
$ | 12,997 | $ | | $ | | $ | 12,997 | ||||||||
Debentures of FHLB, FNMA, and FHLMC |
24,291 | 708 | | 24,999 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
2,148,919 | 66,924 | 13,056 | 2,202,787 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
3,097,959 | 37,849 | 11,205 | 3,124,603 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
2,000,974 | 1,609 | 120,303 | 1,882,280 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies |
364,331 | 75 | 10 | 364,396 | ||||||||||||
FHLMC and FNMA debt securities |
4,254,734 | 51,473 | 7,204 | 4,299,003 | ||||||||||||
Non-agency securities |
1,607,514 | 260 | 146,991 | 1,460,783 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
$ | 13,511,719 | $ | 158,898 | $ | 298,769 | $ | 13,371,848 | ||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale with an estimated fair value of $2.7 billion and $5.7
billion were pledged as collateral for borrowings, standby letters of credit, interest rate
agreements and certain public deposits at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Contractual maturities of the Companys investment securities available-for-sale at September 30,
2011 are as follows:
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 313,515 | $ | 315,278 | ||||
Due after 1 within 5 years |
2,922,350 | 2,942,214 | ||||||
Due after 5 within 10 years |
786,645 | 777,514 | ||||||
Due after 10 years/ no maturity |
9,699,646 | 9,799,044 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 13,722,156 | $ | 13,834,050 | ||||
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities when there is a right to call or prepay
obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
12
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(3) INVESTMENT SECURITIES (continued)
The following tables disclose the aggregate amount of unrealized losses as of September 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010 on securities in the Companys investment portfolio classified according to
the amount of time that those securities have been in a continuous loss position:
At September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
$ | 796,958 | $ | (17,419 | ) | $ | 60,330 | $ | (11,822 | ) | $ | 857,288 | $ | (29,241 | ) | |||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
562,671 | (2,431 | ) | 123,272 | (4,699 | ) | 685,943 | (7,130 | ) | |||||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
64,881 | (1,152 | ) | 306,202 | (9,172 | ) | 371,083 | (10,324 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLMC and FNMA debt securities |
1,010,513 | (3,236 | ) | 7,747 | (133 | ) | 1,018,260 | (3,369 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-agency securities |
53,391 | (3,515 | ) | 839,501 | (105,215 | ) | 892,892 | (108,730 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
$ | 2,488,414 | $ | (27,753 | ) | $ | 1,337,052 | $ | (131,041 | ) | $ | 3,825,466 | $ | (158,794 | ) | |||||||||
At December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt securities |
$ | 535,892 | $ | (12,356 | ) | $ | 9,426 | $ | (700 | ) | $ | 545,318 | $ | (13,056 | ) | |||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
660,683 | (4,498 | ) | 96,005 | (6,707 | ) | 756,688 | (11,205 | ) | |||||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
1,420,899 | (83,641 | ) | 245,067 | (36,662 | ) | 1,665,966 | (120,303 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies |
5,380 | (10 | ) | | | 5,380 | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
FHLMC and FNMA debt securities |
947,311 | (7,078 | ) | 13,537 | (126 | ) | 960,848 | (7,204 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-agency securities |
62,744 | (3,879 | ) | 1,358,715 | (143,112 | ) | 1,421,459 | (146,991 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
$ | 3,632,909 | $ | (111,462 | ) | $ | 1,722,750 | $ | (187,307 | ) | $ | 5,355,659 | $ | (298,769 | ) | |||||||||
The unrealized losses on the Companys state and municipal bond portfolio were $10.3 million at
September 30, 2011 compared to $120.3 million at December 31, 2010. This portfolio consists of
98.8% general obligation bonds of states, cities, counties and school districts. The portfolio has
a weighted average underlying credit risk rating of AA. Approximately 76% of these bonds are
insured with various companies and as such, carry additional credit protection. The largest
geographic concentrations of the state and local municipal bonds are in California, which
represented 22% of the total portfolio. No other state had more than 20% of the total portfolio.
The Company has determined that the unrealized losses on the portfolio are due to an increase in
credit spreads since acquisition, principally for obligors in certain geographic locations.
The unrealized losses on the non-agency securities portfolio were $108.7 million at September 30,
2011 compared with $147.0 million at December 31, 2010. Excluding the securities discussed in the
following paragraph, this portfolio consists primarily of highly rated non-agency mortgage-backed
securities from a diverse group of issuers in the private-label market. The Company has determined
that the unrealized losses on these securities above are due to an increase in credit spreads since
acquisition and liquidity issues in the marketplace. The Company has concluded these unrealized
losses are temporary in nature on the majority of this portfolio since management believes based on
modeled projections, that there is sufficient credit subordination associated with these
securities.
At September 30, 2011, the Company had thirteen investments in certain non-agency mortgage backed
securities with ending book values of $623.8 million which the Company does not expect to collect
the entire scheduled principal. At September 30, 2010, the Company had fourteen investments in
certain non-agency mortgage backed securities with ending book values of $920.7 million which the
Company does not expect to collect the entire scheduled principal. Cumulative credit losses for
these securities recognized in earnings were $142.8 million at September 30, 2011 and $210.1
million at September 30, 2010.
13
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(3) INVESTMENT SECURITIES (continued)
The following table displays changes in credit losses for debt securities recognized in earnings
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and expected to be recognized in
earnings over the remaining life of the securities.
Nine- | Nine- | |||||||
Month | Month | |||||||
Period | Period | |||||||
Ending | Ending | |||||||
September | September | |||||||
30, 2011 | 30, 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Cumulative credit loss recognized on non-agency securities at the beginning of the period |
$ | 210,919 | $ | 206,155 | ||||
Cumulative reduction as of the beginning of the period for accretion into interest income for the expected increase
in cash flow on certain non-agency securities |
(9,631 | ) | | |||||
Current period accretion into interest income for the expected increase in cash flow on certain non-agency securities |
(7,903 | ) | (5,833 | ) | ||||
Additions for amount related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized |
| 3,945 | ||||||
Reductions for securities sold during the period |
(68,442 | ) | | |||||
Additional increases to credit losses for previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges when the
entity does not intend to sell the security |
325 | | ||||||
Net cumulative credit loss recognized on non-agency securities as of the end of the period |
125,268 | 204,267 | ||||||
Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected and recognized over the remaining life of securities |
(28,586 | ) | (66,165 | ) | ||||
Projected ending balance of the amount related to credit losses on debt securities at the end of the period for which
a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income |
$ | 96,682 | $ | 138,102 | ||||
The thirteen and fourteen bonds that the Company has recorded other-than-temporary impairments
on have a weighted average S&P credit rating of CC at September 30, 2011 and CCC at September 30,
2010. Each of these securities contains various levels of credit subordination. The underlying
mortgage loans that comprise these investment securities were primarily originated in the years
2005 through 2007. Approximately 55.9% of these loans were jumbo loans, and approximately 70.1% of
the collateral backing these securities were limited documentation loans. A summary of the key
assumptions utilized to forecast future expected cash flows on the securities determined to have
other-than-temporary-impairment were as follows at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010.
September 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||
Loss severity |
52.86 | % | 49.17 | % | ||||
Expected cumulative loss percentage |
24.35 | % | 23.62 | % | ||||
Cumulative loss percentage to date |
5.79 | % | 4.20 | % | ||||
Weighted average FICO |
711 | 711 | ||||||
Weighted average LTV |
67.7 | % | 68.4 | % |
Based upon the analysis performed above, the Company recognized other-than-temporary impairment
losses of $0 and $0.3 million in earnings during the three-month and nine-month period ended
September 30, 2011, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, the Company recognized
other-than-temporary impairment losses of $0.8 million and $3.9 million during the three-month and
nine-month periods, respectively. Excluding the securities above, management has concluded that
the unrealized losses on the remaining investment securities (which totaled 140 individual
securities) are temporary in nature since (1) they are not related to the underlying credit quality
of the issuers, (2) the principal and interest on these securities are from investment grade
issuers, (3) the Company does not intend to sell these investments, and (4) it is more likely than
not that the Company will not be required to sell the investments before recovery of the amortized
cost basis, which may be maturity.
The Company is evaluating its investment strategies in light of changes in the regulatory
environment that could have an impact on capital and liquidity. Based on this evaluation, it is
reasonably possible the Company may elect to pursue other strategies.
14
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(3) INVESTMENT SECURITIES (continued)
The Company evaluates the fair value of investment securities that are sold to determine realized
gains or losses on the transaction. Proceeds from sales of investment securities and the realized
gross gains and losses from those sales are as follows:
Three-Month Period | Nine-Month Period | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sales of investment securities |
$ | 1,238,856 | $ | 3,078,931 | $ | 4,946,458 | $ | 5,075,900 | ||||||||
Gross realized gains |
$ | 41,958 | $ | 131,928 | $ | 124,345 | $ | 205,239 | ||||||||
Gross realized losses |
(15 | ) | (3 | ) | (153 | ) | (960 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gains |
$ | 41,943 | $ | 131,925 | $ | 124,192 | $ | 204,279 | ||||||||
(4) LOANS
The following table presents the composition of the loans held for investment portfolio by type of
loan and by fixed and variable rates at the dates indicated:
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans held for investment: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans |
$ | 10,560,501 | 16.1 | % | $ | 11,311,167 | 17.4 | % | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial loans |
10,540,775 | 16.1 | 9,931,143 | 15.3 | ||||||||||||
Multi-family loans |
7,010,929 | 10.7 | 6,746,558 | 10.4 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,133,820 | 1.7 | 1,170,044 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
Total commercial loans held for investment |
29,246,025 | 44.6 | 29,158,912 | 44.9 | ||||||||||||
Consumer loans secured by real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages |
11,292,374 | 17.2 | 11,029,650 | 17.0 | ||||||||||||
Home equity loans and lines of credit |
6,902,605 | 10.5 | 7,005,539 | 10.7 | ||||||||||||
Total consumer loans secured by real estate |
18,194,979 | 27.7 | 18,035,189 | 27.7 | ||||||||||||
Consumer loans not secured by real estate |
||||||||||||||||
Auto loans |
15,335,070 | 23.4 | 16,714,124 | 25.7 | ||||||||||||
Other |
2,850,545 | 4.3 | 1,109,659 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
36,380,594 | 55.4 | 35,858,972 | 55.1 | ||||||||||||
Total loans held for investment (1) |
$ | 65,626,619 | 100.0 | % | $ | 65,017,884 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Total loans held for investment: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
$ | 41,079,106 | 62.6 | % | $ | 41,405,419 | 63.7 | % | ||||||||
Variable rate |
24,547,513 | 37.4 | 23,612,465 | 36.3 | ||||||||||||
Total loans held for investment (1) |
$ | 65,626,619 | 100.0 | % | $ | 65,017,884 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Total loans held for investment includes deferred loan origination costs, net of deferred loan fees and unamortized purchase premiums, net of discounts as well as purchase accounting adjustments. These items resulted in a net decrease in loan balances of $720.3 million and $920.7 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The reason for the variance was due primarily to loans acquired by the Bank during the first quarter of 2011. |
15
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
Loans pledged as collateral for borrowings totaled $47.3 billion at September 30, 2011 and $47.7
billion at December 31, 2010.
The entire loans held for sale portfolio at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consists of
fixed rate residential mortgages. The balance at September 30, 2011 was $141.1 million compared to
$150.1 million at December 31, 2010.
On January 5, 2011, the Bank purchased $1.7 billion of marine and recreational vehicle loans. On
June 30, 2011, the Bank purchased a $181.9 million credit card receivable portfolio.
On September 12, 2011, the Bank purchased $393.4 million of marine and recreational vehicle loans.
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the periods
indicated:
Three-Month Period | Nine-Month Period | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period |
$ | 2,226,973 | $ | 2,043,010 | $ | 2,197,450 | $ | 1,818,224 | ||||||||
Allowance established in connection with reconsolidation of
previously unconsolidated securitized assets |
| | | 5,991 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
109,970 | 164,099 | 365,649 | 515,567 | ||||||||||||
Consumer secured by real estate |
142,245 | 35,101 | 210,310 | 100,818 | ||||||||||||
Consumer not secured by real estate |
217,612 | 169,902 | 570,367 | 550,531 | ||||||||||||
Total charge-offs |
469,827 | 369,102 | 1,146,326 | 1,166,916 | ||||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
14,698 | 14,437 | 34,409 | 41,769 | ||||||||||||
Consumer secured by real estate |
2,830 | 1,296 | 5,241 | 2,069 | ||||||||||||
Consumer not secured by real estate |
58,673 | 42,075 | 201,879 | 181,513 | ||||||||||||
Total recoveries |
76,201 | 57,808 | 241,529 | 225,351 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs, net of recoveries |
393,626 | 311,294 | 904,797 | 941,565 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses (1) |
351,955 | 439,149 | 892,649 | 1,288,215 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, end of period |
$ | 2,185,302 | $ | 2,170,865 | $ | 2,185,302 | $ | 2,170,865 | ||||||||
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, beginning of period |
$ | 340,843 | $ | 260,085 | $ | 300,621 | $ | 259,140 | ||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments (1) |
16,758 | 16,490 | 56,980 | 17,435 | ||||||||||||
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, end of period |
$ | 357,601 | $ | 276,575 | $ | 357,601 | $ | 276,575 | ||||||||
Total allowance for credit losses, end of period |
$ | 2,542,903 | $ | 2,447,440 | $ | 2,542,903 | $ | 2,447,440 | ||||||||
(1) | The Company defines the provision for credit losses on the consolidated statement of operations as the sum of the total provision for loan losses and provision for unfunded lending commitments. |
16
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) | LOANS (continued) |
The following table presents the composition of non-performing assets at the dates indicated:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Non-accrual loans: |
||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate |
$ | 455,731 | $ | 653,221 | ||||
Commercial and industrial |
340,277 | 528,333 | ||||||
Multi-family |
136,783 | 224,728 | ||||||
Total commercial loans |
932,791 | 1,406,282 | ||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||
Residential mortgages |
440,433 | 602,027 | ||||||
Consumer loans secured by real estate |
106,631 | 125,310 | ||||||
Consumer not secured by real estate |
554,458 | 592,650 | ||||||
Total consumer loans |
1,101,522 | 1,319,987 | ||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
2,034,313 | 2,726,269 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
173,715 | 143,149 | ||||||
Other repossessed assets |
77,104 | 79,854 | ||||||
Total other real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
250,819 | 223,003 | ||||||
Total non-performing assets |
$ | 2,285,132 | $ | 2,949,272 | ||||
Impaired loans are generally defined as all Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs) plus commercial
non-accrual loans in excess of $1.0 million and, prior to September 30, 2011, residential mortgage
loans with specific reserves. Impaired and past due loans are summarized as follows:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Impaired loans with a related allowance |
$ | 1,363,895 | $ | 1,836,993 | ||||
Impaired loans without a related allowance |
250,756 | 299,501 | ||||||
Total impaired loans |
$ | 1,614,651 | $ | 2,136,494 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses reserved for impaired loans |
$ | 361,733 | $ | 417,873 |
The Company, through the SCUSA subsidiary, acquires certain auto loans at a substantial discount
from par from manufacturer-franchised dealers or other companies engaged in non-prime lending
activities. Part of this discount is attributable to the expectation that not all contractual cash
flows will be received from the borrowers. These loans are accounted for under the Receivable topic
of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Section 310-30) Loans and Debt Securities Acquired
with Deteriorated Credit Quality. The excess of cash flows expected over the estimated fair value
at acquisition is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the
remaining life of the loans using the constant effective yield method. The difference between
contractually required payments and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected at
acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference.
17
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
Changes in the actual or expected cash flows of purchased impaired loans from the date of
acquisition will either impact the accretable yield or result in an impairment charge to the
provision for credit losses in the period in which the changes are deemed probable. Subsequent
decreases to the net present value of expected cash flows will generally result in an impairment
charge to the provision for credit losses, resulting in an increase to the Allowance for Loan
Losses (ALLL), and a reclassification from accretable yield to nonaccretable difference.
Subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a recovery of any
previously recorded provision, to the extent applicable, and a reclassification from nonaccretable
difference to accretable yield, which is recognized prospectively over the remaining lives of the
loans. Prepayments are treated as a reduction of cash flows expected to be collected and a
reduction of projections of contractual cash flows such that the nonaccretable difference is not
affected. Thus, for decreases in cash flows expected to be collected resulting from prepayments,
the effect will be to reduce the yield prospectively.
A rollforward of SCUSAs nonaccretable and accretable yield on loans accounted for under Section
310-30 is shown below for the nine- month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
Contractual | Nonaccretable | Accretable | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Receivable Amount | (Yield)/Premium | Premium/(Yield) | Amount (1) | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
$ | 9,147,004 | $ | (966,463 | ) | $ | 210,459 | $ | 8,391,000 | |||||||
Principal reductions |
(2,824,211 | ) | | | (2,824,211 | ) | ||||||||||
Charge-offs, net |
(252,132 | ) | 252,132 | | | |||||||||||
Accretion of loan discount (premium) |
| | (121,177 | ) | (121,177 | ) | ||||||||||
Transfers between nonaccretable and accretable yield |
| (5,431 | ) | 5,431 | | |||||||||||
Settlement adjustments |
10,288 | (2,279 | ) | (262 | ) | 7,747 | ||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
$ | 6,080,949 | $ | (722,041 | ) | $ | 94,451 | $ | 5,453,359 | |||||||
(1) | Carrying amount includes principal and accrued interest. |
Contractual | Nonaccretable | Accretable | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Receivable Amount | (Yield)/Premium | (Yield)/Premium | Amount | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
$ | 2,042,594 | $ | (225,949 | ) | $ | (35,207 | ) | $ | 1,781,438 | ||||||
Additions (loans acquired during the period) |
8,580,277 | (832,409 | ) | 404,398 | 8,152,266 | |||||||||||
Principal reductions |
(1,095,661 | ) | | | (1,095,661 | ) | ||||||||||
Charge-offs, net |
(185,294 | ) | 185,294 | | | |||||||||||
Accretion of loan discount |
| | (19,441 | ) | (19,441 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 9,341,916 | $ | (873,064 | ) | $ | 349,750 | $ | 8,818,602 | |||||||
U.S. GAAP requires that entities disclose information about the credit quality of its financing
receivables at disaggregated levels, specifically defined as portfolio segments and classes
based on managements systematic methodology for determining its allowance for credit losses. As
such, compared to the financial statement categorization of loans, the Company utilizes an
alternate categorization for purposes of modeling and calculating the allowance for credit losses
and for tracking the credit quality, delinquency and impairment status of the underlying commercial
and consumer loan populations.
In disaggregating its financing receivables portfolio, the Companys methodology begins with the
commercial and consumer segments. The commercial segmentation reflects line of business
distinctions. Corporate banking includes the majority of commercial and industrial loans as well
as related owner-occupied real estate. Middle market commercial real estate represents the
portfolio of specialized lending for investment real estate. Continuing care retirement
communities is the portfolio of financing for continuing care retirement communities. Santander
real estate capital is the real estate portfolio of the specialized lending group in Brooklyn, NY.
Remaining commercial represents principally the commercial equipment and vehicle funding
business.
The consumer segmentation reflects product structure with minor variations from the financial
statement categories. Home mortgages is generally residential mortgages, Self-originated home
equity excludes purchased home equity portfolios, and Indirect auto excludes self-originated
direct auto loans. Indirect purchased represents an acquired portfolio of marine and recreational
vehicle contracts. Direct auto loans and purchased home equity loans make up the majority of
balances in Remaining consumer. Credit cards includes all unsecured consumer credit cards.
18
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
Loans that have been classified as non-accrual generally remain classified as non-accrual until the
loan is able to sustain a period of repayment which is typically defined as six months for a
monthly amortizing loan at which time, accrual of interest resumes.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three-month period and nine-month period
ended September 30, 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
Three-Month Period Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Consumer | Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period |
$ | 846,060 | $ | 1,348,101 | $ | 32,812 | $ | 2,226,973 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
113,486 | 268,902 | (30,433 | ) | 351,955 | |||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(109,970 | ) | (359,857 | ) | | (469,827 | ) | |||||||||
Recoveries |
14,698 | 61,503 | | 76,201 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs, net of recoveries |
(95,272 | ) | (298,354 | ) | | (393,626 | ) | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, end of period |
$ | 864,274 | $ | 1,318,649 | $ | 2,379 | $ | 2,185,302 | ||||||||
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Consumer | Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period |
$ | 905,786 | $ | 1,275,982 | $ | 15,682 | $ | 2,197,450 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
289,728 | 616,224 | (13,303 | ) | 892,649 | |||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(365,649 | ) | (780,677 | ) | | (1,146,326 | ) | |||||||||
Recoveries |
34,409 | 207,120 | | 241,529 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs, net of recoveries |
(331,240 | ) | (573,557 | ) | | 904,797 | ||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, end of period |
$ | 864,274 | $ | 1,318,649 | $ | 2,379 | $ | 2,185,302 | ||||||||
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 303,378 | $ | 58,355 | $ | | $ | 361,733 | ||||||||
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment |
560,896 | 1,090,462 | 2,379 | 1,653,737 | ||||||||||||
Purchased impaired loans |
| 169,832 | | 169,832 | ||||||||||||
Financing receivables: |
||||||||||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 29,246,025 | $ | 36,521,690 | $ | | $ | 65,767,715 | ||||||||
Ending balance, evaluated at fair value |
| 141,096 | | 141,096 | ||||||||||||
Ending balance, individually evaluated for impairment |
933,776 | 680,875 | | 1,614,651 | ||||||||||||
Ending balance, collectively evaluated for impairment |
28,312,249 | 30,300,231 | | 58,612,480 | ||||||||||||
Purchased impaired loans |
| 5,399,488 | | 5,399,488 |
19
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
Non-accrual loans disaggregated by class of financing receivables are summarized as follows:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Non-accrual loans: |
||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||
Corporate banking |
$ | 419,635 | $ | 653,943 | ||||
Middle market commercial real estate |
193,050 | 379,898 | ||||||
Continuing care retirement communities |
172,219 | 126,704 | ||||||
Santander real estate capital |
124,796 | 203,802 | ||||||
Remaining commercial |
23,091 | 41,935 | ||||||
Total commercial loans |
932,791 | 1,406,282 | ||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||
Home mortgages |
440,433 | 602,027 | ||||||
Self-originated home equity |
58,507 | 63,686 | ||||||
Indirect auto |
536,963 | 563,002 | ||||||
Indirect purchased |
11,338 | | ||||||
Remaining consumer |
54,281 | 91,272 | ||||||
Total consumer loans |
1,101,522 | 1,319,987 | ||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
$ | 2,034,313 | $ | 2,726,269 | ||||
Delinquencies disaggregated by class of financing receivables are summarized as follows as of
September 30, 2011:
Recorded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60-89 | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 | Days | Greater | Total | > 90 Days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Days Past | Past | Than 90 | Total | Financing | and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Due | Due | Days | Past Due | Current | Receivables (1) | Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
$ | 57,752 | $ | 18,782 | $ | 317,486 | $ | 394,020 | $ | 14,384,493 | $ | 14,778,513 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Middle market commercial real estate |
4,664 | | 109,774 | 114,438 | 3,660,860 | 3,775,298 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing care retirement
communities |
3,365 | 2,417 | 11,155 | 16,937 | 235,752 | 252,689 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Santander real estate capital |
49,770 | 22,785 | 94,607 | 167,162 | 9,069,809 | 9,236,971 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining commercial |
2,789 | 464 | 96,191 | 99,444 | 1,103,110 | 1,202,554 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home mortgages |
230,847 | 101,173 | 440,432 | 772,452 | 10,659,479 | 11,431,931 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Self-originated home equity |
22,243 | 11,296 | 58,507 | 92,046 | 6,430,207 | 6,522,253 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indirect auto |
1,202,447 | 390,301 | 157,624 | 1,750,372 | 13,379,844 | 15,130,216 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indirect purchased |
25,452 | 10,598 | 4,551 | 40,601 | 2,360,576 | 2,401,177 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Credit cards |
1,853 | 1,430 | 3,794 | 7,077 | 174,194 | 181,271 | 3,794 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining consumer |
23,315 | 11,438 | 54,281 | 89,034 | 765,808 | 854,842 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,624,497 | $ | 570,684 | $ | 1,348,402 | $ | 3,543,583 | $ | 62,224,132 | $ | 65,767,715 | $ | 3,794 | ||||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
Delinquencies disaggregated by class of financing receivables are summarized as follows as of
December 31, 2010:
Recorded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 | 60-89 | Greater | Total | > 90 Days | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Days Past | Days Past | Than 90 | Total | Financing | and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Due | Due | Days | Past Due | Current | Receivables (1) | Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
$ | 83,039 | $ | 51,675 | $ | 425,824 | $ | 560,538 | $ | 14,192,156 | $ | 14,752,694 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Middle market commercial real estate |
37,619 | 24,980 | 187,393 | 249,992 | 3,530,116 | 3,780,108 | 169 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing care retirement
communities |
13,300 | | 107,579 | 120,879 | 460,168 | 581,047 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Santander real estate capital |
119,795 | 27,819 | 161,583 | 309,197 | 8,881,740 | 9,190,937 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining commercial |
5,491 | 32,982 | 8,312 | 46,785 | 807,341 | 854,126 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home mortgages |
238,829 | 106,756 | 602,027 | 947,612 | 10,230,512 | 11,178,124 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Self-originated home equity |
18,540 | 12,774 | 63,686 | 95,000 | 6,461,605 | 6,556,605 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indirect auto |
1,455,595 | 412,774 | 140,238 | 2,008,607 | 14,762,568 | 16,771,175 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining consumer |
52,751 | 26,116 | 71,492 | 150,359 | 1,352,772 | 1,503,131 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,024,959 | $ | 695,876 | $ | 1,768,134 | $ | 4,488,969 | $ | 60,678,978 | $ | 65,167,947 | $ | 169 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Financing Receivables includes loans held for sale. |
21
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
Impaired loans disaggregated by class of financing receivables, excluding purchased impaired loans,
are summarized as follows:
September 30, 2011 | Recorded | Unpaid | Related | Average | ||||||||||||
Investment | Principal | Specific | Recorded | |||||||||||||
Balance | Reserves | Investment | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
$ | 53,029 | $ | 65,231 | $ | | $ | 93,592 | ||||||||
Middle market commercial real estate |
85,850 | 106,963 | | 73,926 | ||||||||||||
Continuing care retirement communities |
35,477 | 51,790 | | 18,230 | ||||||||||||
Santander real estate capital |
22,412 | 23,420 | | 28,509 | ||||||||||||
Remaining commercial |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||
Home mortgages |
| | | 33,879 | ||||||||||||
Self-originated home equity |
34,928 | 35,248 | | 17,464 | ||||||||||||
Remaining consumer |
19,060 | 19,660 | | 9,530 | ||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
294,056 | 345,064 | 179,545 | 319,689 | ||||||||||||
Middle market commercial real estate |
153,578 | 182,376 | 39,781 | 235,478 | ||||||||||||
Continuing care retirement communities |
155,246 | 228,407 | 53,540 | 140,483 | ||||||||||||
Santander real estate capital |
111,256 | 117,140 | 23,797 | 117,419 | ||||||||||||
Remaining commercial |
22,872 | 23,476 | 6,715 | 31,345 | ||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||
Home mortgages |
474,972 | 482,793 | 32,714 | 576,964 | ||||||||||||
Indirect auto |
151,915 | 151,915 | 25,641 | 179,067 | ||||||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 933,776 | $ | 1,143,867 | $ | 303,378 | $ | 1,058,671 | ||||||||
Consumer |
680,875 | 689,616 | 58,355 | 816,904 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,614,651 | $ | 1,833,483 | $ | 361,733 | $ | 1,875,575 | ||||||||
22
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
The Company did not recognize any interest income on impaired loans including TDRs that have not
returned to performing status. The Company recognized interest income on approximately $614.7
million of TDRs that were returned to performing status as of September 30, 2011.
Related | ||||||||||||
Recorded | Unpaid Principal | Specific | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | Investment | Balance | Reserves | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
$ | 134,154 | $ | 134,154 | $ | | ||||||
Middle market commercial real estate |
62,002 | 62,002 | | |||||||||
Continuing care retirement communities |
983 | 983 | | |||||||||
Santander real estate capital |
34,605 | 34,605 | | |||||||||
Remaining commercial |
| | | |||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||
Home mortgages |
67,757 | 67,757 | | |||||||||
With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
187,296 | 345,322 | 158,026 | |||||||||
Middle market commercial real estate |
257,639 | 317,378 | 59,739 | |||||||||
Continuing care retirement communities |
104,084 | 125,720 | 21,636 | |||||||||
Santander real estate capital |
96,583 | 123,581 | 26,998 | |||||||||
Remaining commercial |
25,998 | 39,818 | 13,820 | |||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||
Home mortgages |
545,077 | 678,956 | 133,879 | |||||||||
Indirect auto |
202,443 | 206,218 | 3,775 | |||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 903,344 | $ | 1,183,563 | $ | 280,219 | ||||||
Consumer |
815,277 | 952,931 | 137,654 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,718,621 | $ | 2,136,494 | $ | 417,873 | ||||||
Commercial credit quality disaggregated by class of financing receivables is summarized according
to standard regulatory classifications as follows:
PASS. Asset is well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or
guarantors, if any, or by the fair value, less costs to acquire and sell any underlying collateral
in a timely manner.
SPECIAL MENTION. Asset has potential weaknesses that deserve managements close attention, which,
if left uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for an asset at some
future date. Special Mention assets are not adversely classified.
SUBSTANDARD. Asset is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the
obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. A well-defined weakness or weaknesses exist that
jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. The loans are characterized by distinct possibility that
the Bank will sustain some loss if deficiencies are not corrected.
DOUBTFUL. Exhibits the inherent weaknesses of a substandard credit. Additional characteristics
exist that make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, on the basis
of currently known facts, conditions and values. Possibility of loss is extremely high, but because
of certain important and reasonable specific pending factors which may work to the advantage and
strengthening of the credit, an estimated loss cannot yet be determined.
23
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
LOSS. Credit is considered uncollectible and of such little value that it does not warrant
consideration as an active asset. There may be some recovery or salvage value, but there is doubt
as to whether, how much or when the recovery would occur.
The Company places consumer loans, excluding auto loans and credit card loans, on non-performing
status at 90 days delinquent. For the majority of auto loans, the Company places them on
non-performing status at 60 days delinquent. Credit cards remain performing until they are 180
days delinquent, at which point they are charged-off and all interest is removed from interest
income.
Regulatory classifications by class of financing receivables are summarized as follows:
Middle | Continuing | |||||||||||||||||||||||
market | care | Santander | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | commercial | retirement | real estate | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 | banking | real estate | communities | capital | commercial | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Rating: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
$ | 13,288,419 | $ | 2,421,919 | $ | 200,459 | $ | 8,656,650 | $ | 880,242 | $ | 25,447,689 | ||||||||||||
Special Mention |
560,505 | 691,984 | 31,271 | 297,599 | 40,126 | 1,621,485 | ||||||||||||||||||
Substandard |
778,958 | 545,144 | 9,139 | 267,355 | 109,884 | 1,710,480 | ||||||||||||||||||
Doubtful |
150,631 | 116,251 | 11,820 | 15,367 | 172,302 | 466,371 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
$ | 14,778,513 | $ | 3,775,298 | $ | 252,689 | $ | 9,236,971 | $ | 1,202,554 | $ | 29,246,025 | ||||||||||||
Middle | Continuing | |||||||||||||||||||||||
market | care | Santander | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | commercial | retirement | real estate | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | banking | real estate | communities | capital | commercial | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory Rating: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
$ | 12,709,768 | $ | 2,306,926 | $ | 307,890 | $ | 8,482,219 | $ | 765,493 | $ | 24,572,296 | ||||||||||||
Special Mention |
796,484 | 652,330 | 55,886 | 320,727 | 12,488 | 1,837,915 | ||||||||||||||||||
Substandard |
1,043,379 | 632,901 | 90,567 | 312,130 | 74,629 | 2,153,606 | ||||||||||||||||||
Doubtful |
201,248 | 187,951 | 126,704 | 75,861 | 1,517 | 593,281 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss |
1,814 | | | | | 1,814 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
$ | 14,752,693 | $ | 3,780,108 | $ | 581,047 | $ | 9,190,937 | $ | 854,127 | $ | 29,158,912 | ||||||||||||
Consumer credit quality disaggregated by class of financing receivables is summarized as follows:
Home | Self-originated | Indirect | Indirect | Credit | Remaining | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 | mortgages | home equity | auto | purchased | cards | consumer | Total(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performing |
$ | 10,991,498 | $ | 6,463,746 | $ | 14,593,253 | $ | 2,389,839 | $ | 181,271 | $ | 800,561 | $ | 35,420,168 | ||||||||||||||
Non-performing |
440,433 | 58,507 | 536,963 | 11,338 | | 54,281 | 1,101,522 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
$ | 11,431,931 | $ | 6,522,253 | $ | 15,130,216 | $ | 2,401,177 | $ | 181,271 | $ | 854,842 | $ | 36,521,690 | ||||||||||||||
Home | Self-originated | Indirect | Indirect | Credit | Remaining | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | mortgages | home equity | auto | purchased | cards | consumer | Total(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performing |
$ | 10,576,097 | $ | 6,492,919 | $ | 15,931,345 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,688,687 | $ | 34,689,048 | ||||||||||||||
Non-performing |
602,027 | 63,686 | 563,002 | | | 91,272 | 1,319,987 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
$ | 11,178,124 | $ | 6,556,605 | $ | 16,494,347 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,779,959 | $ | 36,009,035 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Financing Receivables includes loans held for sale. |
24
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) | LOANS (continued) |
TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS
Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) are loans that have been modified whereby the Company has
agreed to make certain concessions to customers to both meet the needs of the customers and to
maximize the ultimate recovery of a loan. TDRs occur when a borrower is experiencing, or is
expected to experience, financial difficulties and the loan is modified using a modification that
would otherwise not be granted to the borrower. The types of concessions granted are generally
interest rate reductions, limitations on the accrued interest charged, term extensions, and
deferment of principal.
The following table summarizes the Companys performing and non-performing TDRs at the dates
indicated:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Performing |
$ | 614,674 | $ | 456,044 | ||||
Non-performing |
185,442 | 245,114 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 800,116 | $ | 701,158 | ||||
Consumer Loan TDRs
The primary modification program for the Companys home mortgage and self-originated home equity
portfolios is a proprietary program designed to keep customers in their homes and when appropriate
prevent them from entering into foreclosure. The program is available to all customers facing a
financial hardship regardless of their delinquency status. The main goal of the modification
program is to review the customers entire financial condition to ensure that the proposed modified
payment solution is affordable according to a specific debt-to-income ratio (DTI) range. The
main modification benefits of the program allow for a limit on accrued interest charged; term
extensions; interest rate reductions; or deferment of principal. The Company will review each
customer on a case-by-case basis to determine which benefit or combination of benefits will be
offered to achieve the target DTI range.
For the Companys other consumer portfolios (indirect auto, indirect purchased, and remaining
consumer) the terms of the modifications include one or a combination of the following; a reduction
of the stated interest rate of the loan at a rate of interest lower than the current market rate
for new debt with similar risk; an extension of the maturity date.
Consumer TDRs are generally placed on non-accrual status until the Company believes repayment under
the revised terms are reasonably assured and a sustained period of repayment performance has been
achieved (typically defined as six months for a monthly amortizing loan). However, any loan that
has remained current for the six months immediately prior to modification will remain on accrual
status after the modification is enacted. The TDR classification will remain on the loan until it
is paid in full or liquidated
25
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
Commercial Loan TDRs
All of the Companys commercial loan modifications are based on the facts of the individual
customer, including their complete relationship with the Company. Loan terms are modified to meet
each borrowers specific circumstances at a point in time. Modifications for commercial loan TDRs
generally, though not always, result in bifurcation of the original loan into A and B notes. The A
note is restructured to allow for upgraded risk rating and return to accrual status after a
sustained period of payment performance has been achieved (typically six months for monthly payment
schedules). Any B note is structured as a deficiency note; the balance is charged off but the debt
is usually not forgiven. As TDRs, they will be subject to analysis for specific reserves by either
calculating the present value of expected future cash flows or, if collateral dependent,
calculating the fair value of the collateral less its estimated cost to sell. The TDR
classification will remain on the loan until it is paid in full or liquidated.
TDR Impact to Allowance for Loan Losses
Allowance for loan losses are established to recognize losses inherent in funded loans intended to
be held-for-investment that are probable and can be reasonable estimated. Prior to a TDR
modification, the Company generally measures its allowance under a loss contingency methodology
whereby consumer loans with similar risk characteristics are pooled and loss experience
information are monitored for credit risk and deterioration with statistical tools considering
factors such as delinquency, loan to values, and credit scores.
Upon TDR modification, the Company generally measures impairment based on a present value of
expected future cash flows methodology considering all available evidence. The amount of the
required valuation allowance is equal to the difference between the loans impaired value and the
recorded investment.
When a consumer TDR subsequently defaults, the Company generally measures impairment based on the
fair value of the collateral less its estimated cost to sell.
Typically, commercial loans whose terms are modified in a TDR will have previously been identified
as impaired prior to modification and accounted for generally using a present value of expected
future cash flows methodology unless the loan is considered collateral dependent. Loans considered
collateral dependent are measured for impairment based on their fair values of collateral less its
estimated cost to sell. Accordingly, upon TDR modification, the allowance methodology remains
unchanged. When a commercial TDR subsequently defaults, the Company generally measures impairment
based on the fair value of the collateral less its estimated cost to sell.
26
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
The following tables detail the activity of TDRs for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2011. Dollars in thousands.
Three-month period ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Pre-Modification | Post-Modification | |||||||||||
Number of | Outstanding Recorded | Outstanding Recorded | ||||||||||
Contracts | Investment (1) | Investment (2) | ||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Middle market commercial real estate |
2 | $ | 7,384 | $ | 7,352 | |||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||
Home mortgages |
118 | 34,377 | 34,189 | |||||||||
Self-originated home equity |
44 | 3,909 | 3,704 | |||||||||
Indirect auto |
1,785 | 24,412 | 23,704 | |||||||||
Total |
1,949 | $ | 70,082 | $ | 68,949 | |||||||
Nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Pre-Modification | Post-Modification | |||||||||||
Outstanding Recorded | Outstanding Recorded | |||||||||||
Number of Contracts | Investment (1) | Investment (2) | ||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||
Middle market commercial real estate |
4 | $ | 30,362 | $ | 30,344 | |||||||
Santander real estate capital |
2 | 587 | 584 | |||||||||
Remaining commercial |
1 | 151 | 150 | |||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||
Home mortgages (3) |
491 | 141,932 | 145,195 | |||||||||
Self-originated home equity |
156 | 14,092 | 14,496 | |||||||||
Indirect auto |
6,527 | 73,250 | 70,043 | |||||||||
Indirect purchased |
1 | 167 | 168 | |||||||||
Remaining consumer |
2 | 118 | 121 | |||||||||
Total |
7,184 | $ | 260,659 | $ | 261,101 | |||||||
(1) | Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment amount is the month-end balance prior to the month the modification occurred. | |
(2) | Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment amount is the month-end balance for the month that the modification occurred. | |
(3) | The post-modification outstanding recorded investment amounts for home mortgages exclude interest reserves. These reserves would reduce the balance noted above to more closely align with the pre-modification balance. |
27
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(4) LOANS (continued)
The following table details TDRs that were modified for during the past twelve-month period and
have subsequently defaulted during the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011.
Dollars in thousands.
Three-month period ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Number of | Recorded | |||||||
Contracts | Investment (1) | |||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||
Home mortgages |
7 | $ | 2,116 | |||||
Indirect auto |
3,630 | 37,139 | ||||||
Total |
3,637 | $ | 39,255 | |||||
Nine-month period ended | ||||||||
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Number of | Recorded | |||||||
Contracts | Investment (1) | |||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||
Home mortgages |
13 | $ | 2,977 | |||||
Indirect auto |
5,933 | 58,177 | ||||||
Total |
5,946 | $ | 61,154 | |||||
(1) | The recorded investment represents the period-end balance as of September 30, 2011 |
28
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(5) GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill totaled $2.3 billion in the Retail banking segment and $1.2 billion in the Corporate
banking segment at September 30, 2011. The SCUSA segment has goodwill of $692.9 million at
September 30, 2011. There were no additions to goodwill in 2011. Goodwill was not impaired at
September 30, 2011, or December 31, 2010, nor was any goodwill written off due to impairment during
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011. No impairment indicators have been noted since the
prior annual review on December 31, 2010 and as such, no impairment test has been performed. The
Company will perform its annual goodwill impairment test at December 31, 2011.
The following table details amounts related to the intangible assets as of September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Net | Net | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amortization | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Core deposit intangibles |
$ | 89,743 | $ | 149,357 | $ | 124,352 | $ | 466,748 | ||||||||
Purchased credit card
relationships (PCCR) |
10,318 | 3,887 | | | ||||||||||||
SCUSA trademarks |
39,082 | 1,565 | 39,669 | 978 | ||||||||||||
SCUSA customer relationships |
8,267 | 4,133 | 9,197 | 3,203 | ||||||||||||
Operating lease agreements |
10,434 | 5,128 | 11,736 | 3,827 | ||||||||||||
Other |
2,259 | 5,235 | 3,986 | 3,508 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 160,103 | $ | 169,305 | $ | 188,940 | $ | 478,264 | ||||||||
Intangible assets decreased as a result of normal amortization offset by the recognition of the
PCCR intangible asset in the amount of $14.2 million related to the credit card portfolio
acquisition in the second quarter of 2011. Accumulated amortization of core deposit intangibles
decreased during the third quarter due to the write-off of certain fully amortized core deposits
intangible asset. Amortization expense on intangible assets for the three-month periods ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $13.1 million and $15.3 million, respectively. Amortization
expense on intangible assets for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $43.0
million and $48.7 million, respectively.
29
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(6) MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company serviced residential real estate loans for
others totaling $14.1 billion and $14.7 billion, respectively. The carrying value of the related
mortgage servicing rights at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $94.8 million and $146.0
million, respectively. For the three-month period and nine-month period ended September 30, 2011,
the Company recorded impairments of $39.7 million and $42.5 million on the mortgage servicing
rights resulting primarily from changes in anticipated loan prepayment rates (CPR) and, to a lesser
extent, changes in the anticipated earnings rate on escrow and similar balances. The following
table presents a summary of activity for the Companys residential mortgage servicing rights.
Nine-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Gross book balance at beginning of period |
$ | 173,549 | $ | 179,643 | ||||
Mortgage servicing assets recognized |
17,926 | 27,404 | ||||||
Amortization and permanent impairment |
(26,659 | ) | (35,498 | ) | ||||
Gross balance at end of period |
$ | 164,816 | $ | 171,549 | ||||
Valuation allowance |
(70,040 | ) | (52,562 | ) | ||||
Book balance at end of period |
$ | 94,776 | $ | 118,987 | ||||
The fair value of the residential mortgage servicing rights is estimated using a discounted cash
flow model. This model estimates the present value of the future net cash flows from mortgage
servicing activities based on various assumptions. These cash flows include servicing and ancillary
revenue offset by the estimated costs of performing servicing activities. Significant assumptions
in the valuation of residential mortgage servicing rights are anticipated loan prepayment rates
(CPR), the anticipated earnings rate on escrow and similar balances held by the Company in the
normal course of mortgage servicing activities and the discount rate reflective of a market
participants required return on investment for similar assets. Increases in prepayment speeds, as
well as discount rate result in lower valuations of mortgage servicing rights. Decreases in the
anticipated earnings rate on escrow and similar balances result in lower valuations of mortgage
servicing rights. For each of these items, the Company makes assumptions based on current market
information and future expectations. All of the assumptions are based on standards that the Company
believes would be utilized by market participants in valuing mortgage servicing rights and are
derived and/or benchmarked against independent public sources. Additionally, an independent
appraisal of the fair value of the Companys residential mortgage servicing rights is obtained
annually and is used by management to evaluate the reasonableness of the assumptions used in the
Companys discounted cash flow model.
Listed below are the most significant assumptions that were utilized by the Company in the
evaluation of residential mortgage servicing rights for the periods presented.
September 30, | ||||||||||||
2011 | December 31, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
CPR |
25.75 | % | 16.82 | % | 24.82 | % | ||||||
Escrow earnings rate |
1.19 | % | 2.41 | % | 2.59 | % | ||||||
Discount Rate |
10.21 | % | 10.21 | % | 10.21 | % |
A valuation allowance is established for the excess of the cost of each residential mortgage
servicing asset stratum over the estimated fair value. Activity in the valuation allowance for
mortgage servicing rights for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 consisted of
the following:
Nine-Month Period Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 27,525 | $ | 52,089 | ||||
Net change in valuation allowance for
mortgage servicing rights |
42,515 | 473 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 70,040 | $ | 52,562 | ||||
30
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(6) MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS (continued)
The Company originates and has previously sold multi-family loans in the secondary market to Fannie
Mae while retaining servicing. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company serviced
$9.9 billion and $11.2 billion of loans for Fannie Mae, respectively, and as a result has recorded
servicing assets of $0.9 million and $3.7 thousand, respectively. The Company recorded servicing
asset amortization related to the multi-family loans sold to Fannie Mae of $0.8 million and $3.8
million for the three-month and nine-period ended September 30, 2011 compared to amortization of
$2.4 million and $7.1 million for the corresponding periods in the prior year. The Company recorded
multi-family servicing (impairments) / recoveries of $(23.1) thousand and $4.7 million for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to net impairments of $1.6
million and $0.5 million for the corresponding periods in the prior year. In September 2009, the
Company elected to stop selling multi-family loans to Fannie Mae and retains all production for the
loan portfolio.
The Company had gains on the sale of residential and multi-family mortgage loans of $6.5 million
and $11.6 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared
with gains on the sale of mortgage loans of $7.3 million and $20.1 million for the corresponding
periods ended September 30, 2010. The Company has recourse reserves of $135.1 million associated
with multi-family loans sold to Fannie Mae, on which the Companys maximum credit exposure is
$169.4 million which includes charge-offs that have been recognized but not yet applied to
respective loan.
(7) DEPOSIT PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
The following table presents the composition of deposits and other customer accounts at the dates
indicated:
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent | Rate | Amount | Percent | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposit accounts |
$ | 7,801,258 | 16.5 | % | | % | $ | 7,141,527 | 16.7 | % | | % | ||||||||||||
NOW accounts |
5,728,165 | 12.1 | 0.13 | 5,689,021 | 13.3 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money market accounts |
16,735,486 | 35.3 | 0.58 | 14,272,645 | 33.5 | 0.66 | ||||||||||||||||||
Savings accounts |
3,490,263 | 7.4 | 0.12 | 3,463,061 | 8.1 | 0.11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
8,625,411 | 18.2 | 1.40 | 7,827,485 | 18.4 | 1.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total retail and commercial deposits |
42,380,583 | 89.5 | 0.54 | 38,393,739 | 90.0 | 0.53 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale NOW accounts |
| | | 87,000 | 0.2 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale money markets |
261,029 | 0.6 | 0.08 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale certificates of deposit |
1,384,048 | 2.9 | 0.42 | 537,217 | 1.3 | 0.71 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total wholesale deposits |
1,645,077 | 3.5 | 0.36 | 624,217 | 1.5 | 0.66 | ||||||||||||||||||
Government deposits |
2,377,228 | 5.0 | 0.39 | 1,889,397 | 4.4 | 0.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Customer repurchase agreements |
960,680 | 2.0 | 0.22 | 1,765,940 | 4.1 | 0.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
$ | 47,363,568 | 100.0 | % | 0.52 | % | $ | 42,673,293 | 100.0 | % | 0.52 | % | ||||||||||||
31
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(8) BORROWINGS AND OTHER DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The following table presents information regarding the Bank borrowings and other debt obligations
at the dates indicated:
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Effective | Effective | |||||||||||||||
Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Sovereign Bank borrowings and other debt obligations: |
||||||||||||||||
Overnight federal funds purchased |
$ | 2,003,000 | 0.05 | % | $ | 954,000 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances, maturing through August 2018 (1) |
9,326,113 | 4.02 | 9,849,041 | 4.10 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
| | 1,389,382 | 0.31 | ||||||||||||
Reit preferred |
148,600 | 14.04 | 147,530 | 14.20 | ||||||||||||
2.75% senior notes, due January 2012 |
1,349,462 | 3.92 | 1,348,111 | 3.92 | ||||||||||||
3.750% subordinated debentures, due March 2014 (2) |
| | 219,530 | 3.75 | ||||||||||||
5.125% subordinated debentures, due March 2013 (2) |
489,762 | 5.23 | 485,276 | 5.28 | ||||||||||||
4.375% subordinated debentures, due August 2013 (2) |
| | 271,945 | 4.38 | ||||||||||||
8.750% subordinated debentures, due May 2018 (2) |
496,457 | 8.81 | 496,170 | 8.82 | ||||||||||||
Total Sovereign Bank borrowings and other debt obligations |
$ | 13,813,394 | 3.76 | % | $ | 15,160,985 | 3.78 | % | ||||||||
(1) | In the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company terminated $330.0 million of FHLB callable advances. As a consequence, the Company incurred costs of $22.8 million through loss on debt extinguishment at September 30, 2011. FHLB Advances include the off-setting effect of the value of terminated fair value hedges. | |
(2) | The Bank has issued various subordinated notes. Prior to December 31, 2010, the Company received approval from the Companys primary regulator to repurchase $271.9 million of 4.375% fixed rate/floating rate subordinated bank notes due August 1, 2013 and $219.5 million of 3.75% fixed rate/floating rate subordinated bank notes due April 1, 2014. These notes were subsequently repurchased during the first quarter of 2011. The 4.375% notes were redeemable in whole or in part as of August 1, 2008 and the 3.75% notes were redeemable in whole or in part as of April 1, 2009. In anticipation of this repurchase, the Company wrote off $5.2 million of unamortized discounts, purchase marks and deferred issuance costs through loss on debt extinguishment at December 31, 2010. |
The following table presents information regarding SCUSA borrowings and other debt obligations
at the dates indicated:
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Effective | Effective | |||||||||||||||
Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
SCUSA borrowings and other debt obligations: |
||||||||||||||||
SCUSA Subordinated revolving credit facility, due December 2011 |
$ | 100,000 | 1.97 | % | $ | 100,000 | 2.01 | % | ||||||||
SCUSA Subordinated revolving credit facility, due December 2011 |
150,000 | 1.97 | 150,000 | 2.05 | ||||||||||||
SCUSA Warehouse lines with Santander and related subsidiaries (1) |
1,879,700 | 1.84 | 4,148,355 | 1.57 | ||||||||||||
SCUSA Warehouse line, due May 2011 (2) |
| | 475,825 | 1.62 | ||||||||||||
SCUSA Warehouse line, due October 2011 (2) |
535,086 | 1.34 | 209,390 | 5.85 | ||||||||||||
SCUSA Warehouse line, due March 2012 (2) |
385,140 | 1.28 | 516,000 | 1.71 | ||||||||||||
SCUSA Warehouse line, due March 2012 (2) |
225,314 | 1.82 | | | ||||||||||||
SCUSA Warehouse line, due May 2012 (2) |
300,000 | 1.04 | 129,600 | 3.40 | ||||||||||||
SCUSA Warehouse line, due May 2012 |
976,500 | 1.07 | | | ||||||||||||
SCUSA Warehouse line, due September 2012 (2) |
251,000 | 1.24 | 23,660 | 3.11 | ||||||||||||
SCUSA Warehouse line, due September 2017 |
760,861 | 1.89 | 1,077,475 | 1.96 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed notes |
8,184,375 | 2.14 | 8,050,022 | 2.35 | ||||||||||||
TALF loan |
111,958 | 2.92 | 196,589 | 2.22 | ||||||||||||
Total SCUSA borrowings and other debt obligations |
$ | 13,859,934 | 1.91 | % | $ | 15,076,916 | 2.11 | % | ||||||||
(1) | During 2011, the Company, through the SCUSA subsidiary, amended warehouse lines with Santander, acting through the New York branch, to release excess collateral and modify the fee structure of the warehouses. In addition, on December 31, 2010, the Company amended a warehouse line with Santander to increase availability to $3.7 billion and extend the maturity date to December 31, 2011. | |
(2) | During 2011, the Company, through the SCUSA subsidiary, amended several warehouse line of credit agreements to extend the maturity dates. |
32
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(8) | BORROWINGS AND OTHER DEBT OBLIGATIONS (continued) |
The following table presents information regarding holding company borrowings and other debt
obligations at the dates indicated:
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Effective | Effective | |||||||||||||||
Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Holding company borrowings and other debt obligations: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
$ | 61,789 | 0.76 | % | $ | 968,355 | 0.98 | % | ||||||||
Subordinated notes, due March 2020 |
752,633 | 5.96 | 751,355 | 5.96 | ||||||||||||
2.50% senior notes, due June 2012 |
249,671 | 3.73 | 249,332 | 3.73 | ||||||||||||
4.625% senior notes, due April 2016 (1) |
496,593 | 4.66 | | | ||||||||||||
Santander senior line of credit, due April 2011 (2) |
| | 250,000 | 0.69 | ||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures due to Capital Trust Entities
(3) |
957,410 | 6.18 | 1,173,174 | 6.50 | ||||||||||||
Total holding company borrowings and other debt obligations |
$ | 2,518,096 | 5.44 | % | $ | 3,392,216 | 4.17 | % | ||||||||
(1) | During April 2011, the Company issued $500.0 million in 5 year fixed rate senior unsecured notes at a rate of 4.625% which mature on April 19, 2016. | |
(2) | The Company has a line of credit agreement with Banco Santander with a total borrowing capacity of up to $1.5 billion maturing in September 2012. At September 30, 2011, there was no outstanding balance on this line. During 2011, the Company terminated a $1.0 billion line with Banco Santander originally maturing in September 2011. The Company is in compliance with all covenants of the credit agreements with Santander. | |
(3) | On June 15, 2011, the Company redeemed Sovereign Capital Trust V at a par value of $175.0 million. As a consequence, the Company wrote off $4.8 million of unamortized deferred issuance costs related to the redemption of the Capital Trust V through loss on debt extinguishment at June 30, 2011. |
(9) DERIVATIVES
The Company uses derivative instruments as part of the interest rate risk management process to
manage risk associated with the financial assets and liabilities, the mortgage banking activities,
and to assist the commercial banking customers with risk management strategies and for certain
other market exposures.
One of the Companys primary market risks is interest rate risk. Management uses derivative
instruments to mitigate the impact of interest rate movements on the value of certain liabilities,
assets and on probable forecasted cash flows. These instruments primarily include interest rate
swaps that have underlying interest rates based on key benchmark indices and forward sale or
purchase commitments. The nature and volume of the derivative instruments used to manage interest
rate risk depend on the level and type of assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and the risk
management strategies for the current and anticipated interest rate environment.
Interest rate swaps are generally used to convert fixed rate assets and liabilities to variable
rate assets and liabilities and vice versa. The Company utilizes interest rate swaps that have a
high degree of correlation to the related financial instrument.
As part of its overall business strategy, the Bank originates fixed rate residential mortgages. It
sells a portion of this production to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), Federal
National Mortgage Association (FNMA), and private investors. The loans are exchanged for cash or
marketable fixed rate mortgage-backed securities which are generally sold. This helps insulate the
Company from the interest rate risk associated with these fixed rate assets. The Company used
forward sales, cash sales and options on mortgage-backed securities as a means of hedging against
changes in interest rate on the mortgages that are originated for sale and on interest rate lock
commitments.
To accommodate customer needs, the Company enters into customer-related financial derivative
transactions primarily consisting of interest rate swaps, caps, floors and foreign exchange
contracts. Risk exposure from customer positions is managed through transactions with other
dealers.
Through the Companys capital markets and mortgage-banking activities, it is subject to trading
risk. The Company employs various tools to measure and manage price risk in its trading portfolios.
In addition, the Board of Directors has established certain limits relative to positions and
activities. The level of price risk exposure at any given point in time depends on the market
environment and expectations of future price and market movements, and will vary from period to
period.
33
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(9) DERIVATIVES (continued)
FAIR VALUE HEDGES
The Company has historically entered into pay-variable, receive-fixed interest rate swaps to hedge
changes in fair values of certain brokered certificate of deposits and certain debt obligations.
The Company had no fair value hedges outstanding at September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. At
September 30, 2011, the Company has $27.8 million of deferred net after tax losses on terminated
derivative instruments that were hedging fair value changes. These losses will continue to be
deferred in other liabilities and will be reclassified into interest expense over the remaining
lives of the hedged assets and liabilities.
CASH FLOW HEDGES
The Company hedges exposures to changes in cash flows associated with forecasted interest payments
on variable-rate liabilities, through the use of pay-fixed, receive variable interest rate swaps.
The last of the hedges is scheduled to expire in January 2016. The Company includes all components
of each derivatives gain or loss in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. For the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, no hedge ineffectiveness was recognized as
income in earnings associated with cash flow hedges. At September 30, 2011, the Company has $9.1
million of deferred losses on terminated derivative instruments that were hedging the future cash
flows on certain borrowings. These losses will continue to be deferred in accumulated other
comprehensive income and will be reclassified into interest expense as the future cash flows occur,
unless it becomes probable that the forecasted interest payments will not occur, in which case, the
losses in accumulated other comprehensive income will be recognized immediately. As of September
30, 2011, the Company expects approximately $5.4 million of the deferred net after-tax loss on
derivative instruments included in accumulated other comprehensive income to be reclassified to
earnings during the next twelve months as the future cash flows occur.
Shown below is a summary of the derivatives designated as accounting hedges at September 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010:
Notional | Receive | Pay | Life | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Asset | Liability | Rate | Rate | (Years) | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay fixed receive floating interest rate swaps |
$ | 9,402,948 | $ | | $ | 281,864 | 0.24 | % | 2.03 | % | 2.9 | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay fixed receive floating interest rate swaps |
$ | 9,892,675 | $ | | $ | 174,362 | 0.22 | % | 2.38 | % | 3.0 |
The following table presents the net gains or losses, excluding tax effect, recorded in the
Consolidated Statements of Income and accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) in the
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity relating to derivative instruments designated as cash
flow hedges. All balances in the table are presented in thousands. See Note 12 for further detail
of the amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
For the three-month period ended September 30: | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Amount of loss recognized in AOCI |
$ | (23,687 | ) | $ | (15,894 | ) | ||
Amount of loss reclassified from AOCI into net interest income |
(44,629 | ) | (53,726 | ) | ||||
Amount of ineffectiveness recognized in other income |
| |
For the nine-month period ended September 30: | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Amount of gain recognized in AOCI |
$ | 34,163 | $ | 108,448 | ||||
Amount of loss reclassified from AOCI into net interest income |
(143,942 | ) | (192,984 | ) | ||||
Amount of ineffectiveness recognized in other income |
| |
34
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(9) DERIVATIVES (continued)
OTHER DERIVATIVE ACTIVITIES
The Companys derivative portfolio also includes mortgage banking interest rate lock commitments
and forward sale commitments used for risk management purposes and derivatives executed with
commercial banking customers, primarily interest rate swaps and foreign currency contracts.
In June 2010, the Company sold the Visa Inc. Class B common shares. In conjunction with the sale of
the Visa, Inc. Class B shares, the Company entered into a total return swap in which the Company
will make or receive payments based on subsequent changes in the conversion rate of the Class B
shares into Class A shares. This total return swap is accounted for as a free standing derivative.
The fair value of the total return swap was calculated using a discounted cash flow model based on
unobservable inputs consisting of managements estimate of the probability of certain litigation
scenarios, timing of litigation settlements and payments related to the swap.
SCUSA has entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge variable rate liabilities associated
with securitization trust agreements.
Additionally, Sovereign and SCUSA had derivative positions with the notional amounts totaling $13.2
billion and $1.0 billion at September 30, 2011 and $13.3 billion and $1.7 billion at December 31,
2010 which were not designated to obtain hedge accounting treatment.
All derivative contracts are valued using either cash flow projection models or observable market
prices. Pricing models used for valuing derivative instruments are regularly validated by testing
through comparison with third parties.
Summary information regarding other derivative activities at September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010 follows:
Asset derivatives | Liability derivatives | |||||||||||||||
Fair value | Fair value | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage banking derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Forward commitments to sell loans |
$ | | $ | 3,488 | $ | 7,913 | $ | | ||||||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
9,908 | 734 | | | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage banking risk management |
9,908 | 4,222 | 7,913 | | ||||||||||||
Customer related derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Swaps receive fixed |
406,885 | 297,637 | 81 | 2,803 | ||||||||||||
Swaps pay fixed |
182 | 4,750 | 396,336 | 300,485 | ||||||||||||
Other |
4,571 | 4,905 | 4,475 | 4,841 | ||||||||||||
Total customer related derivatives |
411,638 | 307,292 | 400,892 | 308,129 | ||||||||||||
Other derivative activities |
||||||||||||||||
VISA total return swap |
| | 2,917 | 4,081 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
20,372 | 20,707 | 16,999 | 13,349 | ||||||||||||
Trading |
23,155 | 21,149 | 34,867 | 43,345 | ||||||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments |
$ | 465,073 | $ | 353,370 | $ | 463,588 | $ | 368,904 | ||||||||
35
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(9) | DERIVATIVES (continued) |
The following financial statement line items were impacted by the Companys derivative activity as
of and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
Income Statement Effect For the Three-Month Period Ended | ||||
Derivative Activity | September 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | ||
Cash flow hedges: |
||||
Pay fixed-receive variable interest rate swaps |
Decrease in net interest income of $44.3 million. | Decrease in net interest income of $66.9 million. | ||
Other derivative activities: |
||||
Forward commitments to sell loans
|
Decrease in mortgage banking revenues of $7.9 million. | Decrease in mortgage banking revenues of $0.6 million. | ||
Interest rate lock commitments
|
Increase in mortgage banking revenues of $8.4 million. | Decrease in mortgage banking revenues of $1.0 million. | ||
Customer related derivatives
|
Increase in capital markets revenue of $4.5 million. | Decrease in capital markets revenue of $0.2 million. | ||
Total return swap associated with sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares
|
Increase in other non-interest income of $0.1 million | Decrease in other non-interest income of $0.6 million | ||
Foreign exchange
|
Decrease in commercial banking fees of $5.8 million. | Increase in commercial banking fees of $0.7 million. | ||
Trading
|
Increase to net interest income of $3.6 million. | Decrease to net interest income of $1.1 million. |
Income Statement Effect For the Nine-Month Period Ended | ||||
Derivative Activity | September 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | ||
Cash flow hedges: |
||||
Pay fixed-receive variable interest rate swaps |
Decrease in net interest income of $143.9 million. | Decrease in net interest income of $227.5 million. | ||
Other derivative activities: |
||||
Forward commitments to sell loans
|
Decrease in mortgage banking revenues of $11.4 million. | Decrease in mortgage banking revenues of $7.4 million. | ||
Interest rate lock commitments
|
Increase in mortgage banking revenues of $9.2 million. | Increase in mortgage banking revenues of $3.7 million. | ||
Customer related derivatives
|
Increase in capital markets revenue of $11.6 million. | Increase in capital markets revenue of $3.5 million. | ||
Total return swap associated with sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares
|
Increase in other non-interest income of $1.2 million | Decrease in other non-interest income of $5.9 million. | ||
Foreign exchange
|
Decrease in commercial banking fees of $4.0 million. | Increase in commercial banking fees of $29 thousand. | ||
Trading
|
Increase to net interest income of $10.5 million. | Decrease to net interest income of $10.9 million. |
36
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(10) INCOME TAXES
SHUSA has a valuation allowance of $106.6 million at September 30, 2011 as compared to $99.3
million at December 31, 2010 related to deferred tax assets subject to carry forward periods.
Management has determined more likely than not these deferred tax assets will remain unused after
the carry forward periods have expired. The $7.3 million increase is due to additional deferred tax
assets that were created during the three-month period ended September 30, 2011 and will remain
unused after the carry forward periods have expired.
At September 30, 2011, the Company had net unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax
positions of $113.7 million. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized
tax benefits is as follows:
Federal | Accrued | Unrecognized | ||||||||||
State and | Interest and | Income Tax | ||||||||||
Local Tax | Penalties | Benefits | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 110,363 | $ | 26,588 | $ | 136,951 | ||||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
1,554 | | 1,554 | |||||||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
1,476 | 5,337 | 6,813 | |||||||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
| (9,169 | ) | (9,169 | ) | |||||||
Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a
lapse of the applicable statute of limitations |
139 | (219 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||
Settlements |
(7,361 | ) | (307 | ) | (7,668 | ) | ||||||
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2011 |
$ | 106,171 | $ | 22,230 | 128,401 | |||||||
Less: Federal, state and local income tax benefits |
(14,745 | ) | ||||||||||
Net unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would
impact the effective tax rate at September 30, 2011 |
$ | 113,656 | ||||||||||
The Company recognizes penalties and interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits
within income tax expense on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized an increase of approximately
$0.3 million and a decrease of $4.4 million in interest and penalties compared to an increase of
$0.7 million and $1.8 million for the corresponding periods in the prior year.
Actual income taxes paid may vary from estimates depending upon changes in income tax laws, actual
results of operations, and the final audit of tax returns by taxing authorities. Tax assessments
may arise several years after tax returns have been filed. The Company reviews the tax balances
quarterly and as new information becomes available, the balances are adjusted, as appropriate. The
Company is subject to ongoing tax examinations and assessments in various jurisdictions. On June
17, 2009, the Company filed a lawsuit against the United States in Federal District Court seeking a
refund of assessed taxes paid for tax years 2003-2005 related to two separate financing
transactions with an international bank totaling $1.2 billion. As a result of these two financing
transactions, the Company was subject to foreign taxes of $154.0 million during the years 2003
through 2005 and claimed a corresponding foreign tax credit for foreign taxes paid during those
years, which the IRS disallowed. The IRS also disallowed the Companys deductions for interest
expense and transaction costs, totaling $24.9 million in tax liability, and assessed interest and
penalties totaling approximately $69.6 million. In 2006 and 2007, the Company was subject to an
additional $87.6 million and $22.5 million of foreign taxes, respectively, as a result of the two
financing transactions, and the Companys entitlement to foreign tax credits in these amounts will
be determined by the outcome of the 2003-2005 litigation. In addition, the outcome of the
litigation will determine whether the Company is subject to additional tax liability of $49.8
million related to interest expense and transaction cost deductions, and whether the Company will
be subject to $12.1 million in interest and $12.5 million in penalties for 2006 and 2007. The
Company continues to believe that it is entitled to claim these foreign tax credits taken with
respect to the transactions and also continues to believe the Company is entitled to tax deductions
for the related issuance costs and interest deductions based on tax law. The Company maintains a
tax reserve of $96.9 million as of September 30, 2011. The Company believes this reserve amount
adequately provides for potential exposure to the IRS related to these items. However, as the
Company continues to go through the litigation process, management will continue to evaluate the
appropriate tax reserve levels for this position and any changes made to the tax reserves may
materially affect the Companys income tax provision, net income and regulatory capital in future
periods.
37
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(10) INCOME TAXES (continued)
The IRS recently concluded the exam of the Companys 2006 and 2007 tax returns. In addition to the
adjustments for items related to the two financing transactions discussed above, the IRS has
proposed to recharacterize ordinary losses related to the sale of certain assets to capital losses.
The Company has paid the tax assessment resulting from the recharacterization from capital to
ordinary losses, and will contest the adjustment through the administrative appeals process. The
Company is confident that its position related to its ordinary tax treatment of the losses will
ultimately be upheld. If the Company is not successful in defending its position, the maximum
potential tax liability resulting from this IRS adjustment would be approximately $95.0 million.
Additionally, with respect to the 2006-2007 tax periods, the Company faces potential interest and
penalties resulting from the recharacterization adjustment and other unrelated adjustments of
approximately $11.1 million in interest and $14.5 million in penalties.
(11) TRANSACTION RELATED AND INTEGRATION CHARGES AND OTHER RESTRUCTURING COSTS, NET
The Company recorded charges against its earnings during 2009 for transaction related and
integration charges and other restructuring costs. A rollforward of the nine-month periods ending
September 30, 2011 and 2010 of the transaction related and integration charges and other
restructuring cost accruals are summarized below:
Contract | ||||||||||||
Termination | Severance | Total | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Reserve
balance at December
31, 2010 |
$ | 17,239 | $ | 15,205 | $ | 32,444 | ||||||
Payments |
(3,642 | ) | (8,399 | ) | (12,041 | ) | ||||||
Reserve balance at
September 30, 2011 |
$ | 13,597 | $ | 6,806 | $ | 20,403 | ||||||
Contract | ||||||||||||
Termination | Severance | Total | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Reserve
balance at December
31, 2009 |
$ | 27,805 | $ | 46,900 | $ | 74,705 | ||||||
Payments |
(9,395 | ) | (26,244 | ) | (35,639 | ) | ||||||
Reserve balance at
September 30, 2010 |
$ | 18,410 | $ | 20,656 | $ | 39,066 | ||||||
(12) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME / (LOSS)
The following table presents the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of related
tax, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. All dollars are
presented in thousands.
Total Other | Total Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income | Other Comprehensive Loss | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three-Month Period | September | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax | Tax | Beginning | Net | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||
Activity | Effect | Net Activity | Balance | Activity | Balance | |||||||||||||||||||
Change in accumulated gains/(losses) on cash flow hedge derivative
financial instruments |
$ | (62,333 | ) | $ | 24,268 | $ | (38,065 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivative
financial instruments |
(2,628 | ) | 1,033 | (1,595 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivative financial instruments |
(64,961 | ) | 25,301 | (39,660 | ) | $ | (144,713 | ) | $ | (39,660 | ) | $ | (184,373 | ) | ||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities
available-for-sale |
126,130 | (50,319 | ) | 75,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income |
41,943 | (16,484 | ) | 25,459 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities available-for-sale |
168,073 | (66,803 | ) | 101,270 | (42,296 | ) | 101,270 | 58,974 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of defined benefit plans |
520 | (204 | ) | 316 | (15,764 | ) | 316 | (15,448 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total, September 30, 2011 |
$ | 103,632 | $ | (41,706 | ) | $ | 61,926 | $ | (202,773 | ) | $ | 61,926 | $ | (140,847 | ) | |||||||||
38
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(12) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME / (LOSS) (continued)
Total Other | Total Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income | Other Comprehensive Loss | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine-Month Period | December 31, | September | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, 2011 | 2010 | 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax | Tax | Net | Beginning | Net | Ending | |||||||||||||||||||
Activity | Effect | Activity | Balance | Activity | Balance | |||||||||||||||||||
Change in accumulated gains/(losses) on cash flow hedge derivative
financial instruments |
$ | (86,861 | ) | $ | 33,970 | $ | (52,891 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivative
financial instruments |
(10,238 | ) | 3,696 | (6,542 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivative financial instruments |
(97,099 | ) | 37,666 | (59,433 | ) | $ | (124,940 | ) | $ | (59,433 | ) | $ | (184,373 | ) | ||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities
available-for-sale |
128,483 | (51,263 | ) | 77,220 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income |
123,867 | (49,338 | ) | 74,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities available-for-sale |
252,350 | (100,601 | ) | 151,749 | (92,775 | ) | 151,749 | 58,974 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of defined benefit plans |
1,686 | (659 | ) | 1,027 | (16,475 | ) | 1,027 | (15,448 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total, September 30, 2011 |
$ | 156,937 | $ | (63,594 | ) | $ | 93,343 | $ | (234,190 | ) | $ | 93,343 | $ | (140,847 | ) | |||||||||
Total Other | Total Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income | Other Comprehensive Loss | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three-Month Period Ended | September | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax | Tax | Net | Beginning | Net | Ending | |||||||||||||||||||
Activity | Effect | Activity | Balance | Activity | Balance | |||||||||||||||||||
Change in accumulated gains/(losses) on cash flow hedge derivative
financial instruments |
$ | (64,528 | ) | $ | 19,994 | $ | (44,534 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivative
financial instruments |
(3,803 | ) | 1,384 | (2,419 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivative financial instruments |
(68,331 | ) | 21,378 | (46,953 | ) | $ | (158,704 | ) | $ | (46,953 | ) | $ | (205,657 | ) | ||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities
available-for-sale |
(54,924 | ) | 19,874 | (35,050 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income |
131,113 | (47,725 | ) | 83,388 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities available-for-sale |
76,189 | (27,851 | ) | 48,338 | (10,673 | ) | 48,338 | 37,665 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of defined benefit plans |
473 | (172 | ) | 301 | (15,291 | ) | 301 | (14,990 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total, September 30, 2010 |
$ | 8,331 | $ | (6,645 | ) | $ | 1,686 | $ | (184,668 | ) | $ | 1,686 | $ | (182,982 | ) | |||||||||
Total Other | Total Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income | Other Comprehensive Loss | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine-Month Period | December 31, | September | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, 2010 | 2009 | 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax | Tax | Beginning | Net | Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||
Activity | Effect | Net Activity | Balance | Activity | Balance | |||||||||||||||||||
Change in accumulated gains/(losses) on cash flow hedge derivative
financial instruments |
$ | (59,468 | ) | $ | 18,587 | $ | (40,881 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivative
financial instruments |
(11,158 | ) | 3,958 | (7,200 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivative financial instruments |
(70,626 | ) | 22,545 | (48,081 | ) | $ | (157,576 | ) | $ | (48,081 | ) | $ | (205,657 | ) | ||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities
available-for-sale |
136,368 | (49,719 | ) | 86,649 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income |
200,334 | (72,919 | ) | 127,415 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities available-for-sale |
336,702 | (122,638 | ) | 214,064 | (176,399 | ) | 214,064 | 37,665 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of defined benefit plans |
1,420 | (516 | ) | 904 | (15,894 | ) | 904 | (14,990 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total, September 30, 2010 |
$ | 267,496 | $ | (100,609 | ) | $ | 166,887 | $ | (349,869 | ) | $ | 166,887 | $ | (182,982 | ) | |||||||||
39
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(13) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are routinely defendants in or
parties to pending and threatened legal actions and proceedings, including actions brought on
behalf of various classes of claimants. These actions and proceedings are generally based on
alleged violations of consumer protection, securities, environmental, banking, employment and other
laws. In some of these actions and proceedings, claims for substantial monetary damages are
asserted against the Company and its subsidiaries. In the ordinary course of business, the Company
and its subsidiaries are also subject to regulatory examinations, information gathering requests,
inquiries and investigations.
In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such litigation and regulatory
matters, particularly where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages or where the
matters present novel legal theories or involve a large number of parties, the Company generally
cannot predict what the eventual outcome of the pending matters will be, what the timing of the
ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual loss, fines or penalties related
to each pending matter may be.
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company establishes an accrued liability for
litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both
probable and estimable. In such cases, there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts
accrued. When a loss contingency is not both probable and estimable, the Company does not establish
an accrued liability. As a litigation or regulatory matter develops, the Company, in conjunction
with any outside counsel handling the matter, evaluates on an ongoing basis whether such matter
presents a loss contingency that is probable and estimable at which time an accrued liability is
established with respect to such loss contingency. The Company continues to monitor the matter for
further developments that could affect the amount of the accrued liability that has been previously
established. For certain legal matters in which the Company is involved, the Company is able to
estimate a range of reasonably possible losses. For other matters for which a loss is probable or
reasonably possible, such an estimate is not possible. Excluding the matters discussed below,
management currently estimates that it is reasonably possible that the Company could incur losses
in an aggregate amount up to approximately $60.0 million in excess of the accrued liability, if
any, with it also being reasonably possible that the Company could incur no such losses at all in
these matters. This estimated range of reasonably possible losses represents the estimate of
possible losses over the life of such legal matters, which may span an indeterminable number of
years, and is based on information available as of September 30, 2011.
Complaint from Trustee for the Trust PIERS
On December 17, 2010, the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association (the
Trustee) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the
Court) solely as the Trustee for the Trust PIERS under an Indenture dated September 1, 1999, as
amended, against the Company. The complaint asserts that the acquisition by Santander of the
Company on January 31, 2009, constituted a change of control under the Trust PIERS.
If the acquisition constituted a change of control under the definitions applicable to the Trust
PIERS, the Company would be required to pay a significantly higher rate of interest on subordinated
debentures of SHUSA held in trust for the holders of Trust PIERS and the principal amount of the
debentures would accrete to $50 per debenture as of the effective date of the change of control.
The reset rate in the event of a change of control is defined in the Indenture as the greater of
7.41% per annum and the rate determined by a reference agent utilizing a process set forth in the
Indenture. There is no change in control under the Trust PIERS, among other reasons, if the
consideration in the acquisition consisted of shares of common stock traded on a national
securities exchange. Santander issued American Depositary Shares in connection with the acquisition
which were and are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
The complaint asks the Court to declare that the acquisition of the Company was a change of
control under the Indenture and seeks damages equal to the interest that the complaint alleges
should have been paid by the Company for the benefit of holders of Trust PIERS. If the Trustee
prevails in the lawsuit, and using the 7.41% reset rate in the Indenture, the impact attributable
to the Indenture on the Company as of September 30, 2011 would be a reduction of pre-tax income up
to approximately $339.0 million, of which approximately $275.0 million relates to the difference in
the current carrying amount of the subordinated debentures and the principal amount due at
maturity. The trustee has argued that the reset rate should be 12.77% or higher, which if accepted
by the Court, would increase the impact of an unfavorable outcome noted above.
The Company believes the acquisition by Santander was not a change of control and that the
Trustees damages are overstated in the event the Court concludes that the acquisition of the
Company was a change of control. The Company intends to vigorously defend its position against
any claims by the Trustee or any holder of Trust PIERS.
40
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(13) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)
Fabrikant & Sons Bankruptcy Adversary Proceeding
In October 2007, the official committee of unsecured creditors of the debtors, M. Fabrikant & Sons
(MFS) and a related company, Fabrikant-Leer International, Ltd. (FLI), filed an adversary
proceeding against Sovereign Precious Metals, LLC (SPM), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank,
and the Bank in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. The
proceeding seeks to avoid $22.0 million in obligations otherwise due to the Bank (and formerly SPM)
with respect to gold previously consigned to debtor by the Bank. In addition, the adversary
proceeding seeks to recover over $9.8 million in payments made to the Bank by an affiliate of the
debtors. Several other financial institutions were named as defendants based upon other alleged
fraudulent transfers. Defendants motions to dismiss were denied in part and allowed in part.
Claims remain against the Bank for approximately $33.0 million.
The plaintiff has appealed the courts dismissal of its claims, including those claims based on
actual fraud. The appeal has been fully briefed. Discovery has been stayed in the case pending a
ruling on the appeal. The disposition of the appeal will not affect the Banks exposure in the
case.
Overdraft Litigation
The putative class action litigation filed against the Bank by Diane Lewis, on behalf of herself
and others similarly situated, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland has
been transferred to and consolidated for pre-trial proceedings in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida (the MDL Court) under the caption In re Checking Account
Overdraft Litigation. The complaint alleges violations of law in connection with the Banks
overdraft/transaction ordering and fees practices.
Other
Reference should be made to Note 10 for disclosure regarding the lawsuit filed by the Company
against the Internal Revenue Service/United States. In addition to the proceedings described above
and the litigation described in Note 10 above, the Company, in the normal course of business is
subject to various other pending and threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary
damages and other relief are asserted. The Company does not anticipate, at the present time, that
the ultimate aggregate liability, if any, arising out of such other legal proceedings will have a
material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or liquidity. However, management
cannot determine whether or not any claims asserted against the Company, whether in the proceedings
specifically described above, the matter described in Note 10 above, or otherwise, will have a
material effect on the results of operations or cash flows in any future reporting period, which
will depend on, among other things, the amount of any loss resulting from the claim and the amount
of income otherwise reported for the reporting period.
Foreclosure Matters
On April 13, 2011, the Bank consented to the issuance of a Consent Order (the Order) by the
Banks previous primary federal banking regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), as
part of an interagency horizontal review of foreclosure practices at 14 mortgage servicers. The
Order requires the Bank to take a number of actions, including designating a Board committee to
monitor and coordinate the Banks compliance with the provisions of the Order, developing and
implementing plans to improve the Banks mortgage servicing and foreclosure practices and taking
certain other remedial actions. The Bank has retained an independent consultant to conduct a review
of certain foreclosure actions or proceedings for loans serviced by the Bank.
The Company estimates the one-time costs that it and the Bank will incur relating to compliance
with the Order will be approximately $24.0 million in 2011. Recurring legal and operational
expenses to comply with the Order are estimated to be approximately $7.0 million annually. The
Company and the Bank may incur further expenses related to compliance with the Order.
The Order will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency (OCC), successor to the OTS. Any material failure to comply with the provisions of
the Order could result in enforcement actions by the OCC. While the Bank intends to take such
actions as may be necessary to enable the Bank to comply fully with the provisions of the Order,
and management is not aware of any impediments that may prevent the Bank from achieving full
compliance with the Order, there can be no assurance that the Bank will be able to comply fully
with the provisions of the Order, or to do so within the timeframes required, or that compliance
with the Order will not be more time consuming, more expensive, or require more managerial time
than anticipated. The Bank may also be subject to remediation costs and civil money penalties,
however, management is unable to determine the likelihood or amount of such costs or penalties at
this time, and accordingly, no accrual has been recorded.
41
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(14) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has various debt agreements with Santander. See Note 8 for a listing of these debt
agreements.
In March 2010, the Company issued 3.0 million shares of common stock to Santander which raised
proceeds of $750.0 million.
In December 2010, the Company issued 3.0 million shares of common stock to Santander which raised
proceeds of $750.0 million and declared a $750.0 million dividend to Santander. This was a non-cash
transaction.
The Company has $2.1 billion of public securities that consists of trust preferred security
obligations and preferred stock issuances. Santander owns approximately 34.8% of these securities
as of September 30, 2011.
The Company has entered into derivative agreements with Santander with a notional value of $10.3
billion and consists primarily of interest rate swap agreements to hedge interest rate risk on
floating rate tranches of its securitizations and FHLB advances.
Santander has provided guarantees on the covenants, agreements and obligations of SCUSA under the
governing documents where SCUSA is a party for the securitizations. This includes, but is not
limited to, the obligations of SCUSA as servicer and transferor to repurchase certain receivables.
In 2006, Santander extended a total of $425.0 million in unsecured lines of credit to the Bank for
federal funds and Eurodollar borrowings and for the confirmation of standby letters of credit
issued by the Bank. This line is at a market rate and in the ordinary course of business and can be
cancelled by either the Bank or Santander at any time and can be replaced by the Bank at any time.
In the first quarter of 2009, this line was increased to $2.5 billion. In September 2011, this line
was decreased to $1.5 billion. During both the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and
2010, the average unfunded balance outstanding under these commitments was $1.2 billion. The Bank
paid approximately $2.5 million and $8.9 million in fees to Santander in the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 in connection with these commitments compared to $3.1
million and $9.4 million in fees in the corresponding periods in the prior year. Santander also
extended a line of credit to SHUSA in the amount of $1.5 billion, which matures in September 2012.
There was no outstanding balance on this line at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The Company and its affiliates have entered into various service agreements with Santander and its
affiliates. Each of the agreements was done in the ordinary course of business and on market terms.
The agreements are as follows:
| Nw Services Co., a Santander affiliate doing business as Aquanima, is under contract with the Bank to provide procurement services, with fees paid in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 in the amounts of $0.9 million and $2.6 million compared to $0.7 million and $1.7 million for the same periods in 2010. |
| Geoban, S.A., a Santander affiliate, is under contract with the Bank to provide services in the form of debit card disputes and claims support, and consumer and mortgage loan set-up and review, with fees paid in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 in the amounts of $6.5 million and $7.3 million. There were no fees paid in 2010 with respect to this agreement. |
| Ingenieria De Software Bancario S.L., a Santander affiliate, is under contract with the Bank to provide information technology development, support and administration, with fees paid in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 in the amounts of $25.8 million and $82.7 million compared to $46.2 million and $80.9 million for the same periods in 2010. |
| Produban Servicios Informaticos Generales S.L., a Santander affiliate, is under contract with the Bank to provide professional services, and administration and support of information technology production systems, telecommunications and internal/external applications, with fees paid in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 in the amounts of $23.2 million and $62.7 million compared to $22.2 million and $35.4 million for the same periods in 2010. |
| Santander Back-Offices Globales Mayoristas S.A., a Santander affiliate, is under contract with Sovereign Bank to provide logistical support for Sovereign Banks derivative and hedging transactions and programs. In the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, fees in the amount of $0.1 million and $0.3 million were paid to Santander Back-Offices Globales Mayoristas S.A. with respect to this agreement compared to $0.1 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2010. There were no fees paid with respect to this agreement in the first or second quarters of 2010. |
42
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(14) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
| Santander Global Facilities (SGF), a Santander affiliate, is under contract with the Bank to provide administration and management of employee benefits and payroll functions for the Bank and other affiliates including employee benefits and payroll processing services provided by third party vendors through sponsorship by SGF. In the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, fees in the amounts of $1.4 million and $4.0 million were paid to SGF with respect to this agreement compared to $1.2 million and $4.0 million for the same periods in 2010. |
| SGF is under contract with the Bank to provide property management services. In the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, fees in the amounts of $1.4 million and $4.0 million were paid to SGF with respect to this agreement compared to $1.3 million and $3.5 million for the same periods ended September 30, 2010. |
In 2010, the Company extended a $10.0 million unsecured loan to Servicios de Cobranza, Recuperacion
y Seguimiento, S.A. DE C.V. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the principal balance was
$2.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively.
(15) FAIR VALUE
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, no changes were made to the Companys
valuation models that had, or were expected to have, a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheets or results of operations. For a further discussion of the Companys
valuation methodologies for assets, liabilities and lending-related commitments measured at fair
value and the fair value hierarchy, see Note 19 and Note 20 on pages 84-87 on Form 10-K for 2010.
The following tables present the assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis by major product category and fair value hierarchy.
Quoted Prices in Active | Significant Other | Significant | Balance at | |||||||||||||
Markets for Identical | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | September 30, | |||||||||||||
Assets (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
US Treasury and government agency securities |
$ | | $ | 43,980 | $ | | $ | 43,980 | ||||||||
Debentures of FHLB, FNMA and FHLMC |
| 20,000 | | 20,000 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
| 1,614,435 | | 1,614,435 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
| 2,576,174 | 52,297 | 2,628,471 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
| 1,831,932 | | 1,831,932 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
| 6,666,511 | 1,028,721 | 7,695,232 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
| 12,753,032 | 1,081,018 | 13,834,050 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
| 141,096 | | 141,096 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage banking |
| | 9,908 | 9,908 | ||||||||||||
Customer related |
| 411,638 | | 411,638 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange |
| 20,372 | | 20,372 | ||||||||||||
Trading |
| 23,155 | | 23,155 | ||||||||||||
Total financial assets |
$ | | $ | 13,349,293 | $ | 1,090,926 | $ | 14,440,219 | ||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow |
$ | | $ | 281,864 | $ | | $ | 281,864 | ||||||||
Mortgage banking |
| 7,913 | | 7,913 | ||||||||||||
Customer related |
| 400,892 | | 400,892 | ||||||||||||
Total return swap |
| | 2,917 | 2,917 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange |
| 16,999 | | 16,999 | ||||||||||||
Trading |
| 34,867 | | 34,867 | ||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
$ | | $ | 742,535 | $ | 2,917 | $ | 745,452 | ||||||||
43
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(15) FAIR VALUE (continued)
Quoted Prices in Active | Significant Other | Significant | Balance at | |||||||||||||
Markets for Identical | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | December 31, | |||||||||||||
Assets (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
US Treasury and government agency securities |
$ | | $ | 12,997 | $ | | $ | 12,997 | ||||||||
Debentures of FHLB, FNMA and FHLMC |
| 24,999 | | 24,999 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
| 2,202,787 | | 2,202,787 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
| 3,073,194 | 51,409 | 3,124,603 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
| 1,882,280 | | 1,882,280 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
| 4,663,744 | 1,460,438 | 6,124,182 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
| 11,860,001 | 1,511,847 | 13,371,848 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
| 150,063 | | 150,063 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage banking |
| 3,488 | 734 | 4,222 | ||||||||||||
Customer related |
| 307,292 | | 307,292 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange |
| 20,707 | | 20,707 | ||||||||||||
Trading |
| 21,149 | | 21,149 | ||||||||||||
Total financial assets |
$ | | $ | 12,362,700 | $ | 1,512,581 | $ | 13,875,281 | ||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow |
$ | | $ | 169,758 | $ | 4,604 | $ | 174,362 | ||||||||
Customer related |
| 308,130 | | 308,130 | ||||||||||||
Total return swap |
| | 4,081 | 4,081 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange |
| 13,349 | | 13,349 | ||||||||||||
Trading |
| 43,345 | | 43,345 | ||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
$ | | $ | 534,582 | $ | 8,685 | $ | 543,267 | ||||||||
There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy
during the three-months and nine-months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
The Companys Level 3 assets are primarily comprised of certain non-agency mortgage backed
securities. These investments are thinly traded and the Company determined the estimated fair
values for these securities by evaluating pricing information from a combination of sources such as
third party pricing services, third party broker quotes for certain securities and from other
independent third party valuation sources. These quotes are benchmarked against similar securities
that are more actively traded in order to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair values.
The fair market value estimates assigned to these securities assume liquidation in an orderly
fashion and not under distressed circumstances. Due to the continued illiquidity and credit risk of
certain securities, the market value of these securities is highly sensitive to assumption changes
and market volatility.
Gains and losses on investments and mortgage servicing rights are recognized on the Statements of
Operations through the Net gain on sale of investment securities and Mortgage banking income,
net, respectively. Gains and losses related derivatives affect various line items on the
Statements of Operations. See Note 9 for the discussion of derivatives activity on the Statements
of Operations.
44
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(15) FAIR VALUE (continued)
The tables below presents the changes in the Level 3 balances for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. All balances are presented in thousands.
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2011:
Investments | Mortgage | |||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | Servicing Rights | Derivatives | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
$ | 1,117,472 | $ | 140,597 | $ | (1,558 | ) | $ | 1,256,511 | |||||||
Gains/(losses) in other comprehensive income |
36,677 | | | 36,677 | ||||||||||||
Gains/(losses) in earnings |
| (39,687 | ) | 8,549 | (31,138 | ) | ||||||||||
Purchases |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Issuances |
| 4,443 | | 4,443 | ||||||||||||
Sales |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Settlements(1) |
(73,131 | ) | | | (73,131 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization |
| (9,676 | ) | | (9,676 | ) | ||||||||||
Transfers into/out of level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
$ | 1,081,018 | $ | 95,677 | $ | 6,991 | $ | 1,183,686 | ||||||||
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011:
Investments | Mortgage | |||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | Servicing Rights | Derivatives | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 1,511,847 | $ | 146,028 | $ | (7,951 | ) | $ | 1,649,924 | |||||||
Gains/(losses) in other comprehensive income |
33,702 | | (216 | ) | 33,486 | |||||||||||
Gains/(losses) in earnings |
9,843 | (37,789 | ) | 11,454 | (16,492 | ) | ||||||||||
Purchases |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Issuances |
| 17,926 | | 17,926 | ||||||||||||
Sales |
(180,611 | ) | | | (180,611 | ) | ||||||||||
Settlements(1) |
(293,763 | ) | | 3,704 | (290,059 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization |
| (30,488 | ) | | (30,488 | ) | ||||||||||
Transfers into/out of level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
$ | 1,081,018 | $ | 95,677 | $ | 6,991 | $ | 1,183,686 | ||||||||
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2010:
Investments | Mortgage | |||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | Servicing Rights | Derivatives | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ | 1,816,001 | $ | 136,855 | $ | (14,422 | ) | $ | 1,938,434 | |||||||
Gains/(losses) in other comprehensive income |
53,283 | | (4,306 | ) | 48,977 | |||||||||||
Gains/(losses) in earnings |
(811 | ) | (12,911 | ) | (922 | ) | (14,644 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Issuances |
| 10,758 | | 10,758 | ||||||||||||
Sales |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Settlements(1) |
(242,321 | ) | | 7,094 | (235,227 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization |
| (13,957 | ) | | (13,957 | ) | ||||||||||
Transfers into/out of level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 1,626,152 | $ | 120,745 | $ | (12,556 | ) | $ | 1,734,341 | |||||||
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010:
Investments | Mortgage | |||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | Servicing Rights | Derivatives | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 1,938,576 | $ | 136,874 | $ | (24,585 | ) | $ | 2,050,865 | |||||||
Gains/(losses) in other comprehensive income |
166,901 | | (5,488 | ) | 161,413 | |||||||||||
Gains/(losses) in earnings |
(5,805 | ) | (973 | ) | 2,048 | (4,730 | ) | |||||||||
Purchases |
| | (5,240 | ) | (5,240 | ) | ||||||||||
Issuances |
| 27,404 | | 27,404 | ||||||||||||
Sales |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Settlements(1) |
(473,520 | ) | | 20,709 | (452,811 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization |
| (42,560 | ) | | (42,560 | ) | ||||||||||
Transfers into/out of level 3 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 1,626,152 | $ | 120,745 | $ | (12,556 | ) | $ | 1,734,341 | |||||||
(1) | Settlements include prepayments. paydowns and maturities. |
45
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(15) FAIR VALUE (continued)
As of September 30, 2011, approximately $14.4 billion of the Companys total assets consisted of
financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial instruments
for which the Company elected the fair value option. Approximately $13.3 billion of these financial
instruments, net of counterparty and cash collateral balances, were measured using valuation
methodologies involving market-based or market-derived information. Approximately $1.1 billion of
these financial instruments were measured using model-based techniques, or using Level 3 inputs,
and represented approximately 7.6% of the total assets measured at fair value and approximately
1.2% of the total consolidated assets.
The Company adopted the fair value option on residential mortgage loans classified as held for sale
which allows the Company to record the mortgage loan held for sale portfolio at fair market value
versus the lower of cost or market. The Company economically hedges its residential held for sale
portfolio with forward sale agreements which are reported at fair value. A lower of cost or market
accounting treatment would not allow the Company to record the excess of the fair market value over
book value but would require the Company to record the corresponding reduction in value on the
hedges. Both the loans and related hedges are carried at fair value which reduces earnings
volatility as the amounts more closely offset, particularly in environments when interest rates are
declining.
The Companys residential loan held for sale portfolio had an aggregate fair value of $141.1
million at September 30, 2011. The contractual principal amount of these loans totaled $134.4
million at September 30, 2011. The difference in fair value compared to principal balance of $6.7
million was recorded in mortgage banking revenues during the nine-month period ended September 30,
2011. Substantially all of these loans are current and none are in non-accrual status. Interest
income on these loans is credited to interest income as earned. The fair value of these loans is
estimated based upon the anticipated exit price for these loans in the secondary market to agency
buyers such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The majority of the residential loan held for sale
portfolio is sold to these two agencies.
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result
from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. For
assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still held in the balance sheet at
quarter end, the following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each
adjustment and the carrying value of the related individual assets or portfolios at quarter end.
Quoted Prices in Active | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Markets for | Observable Inputs | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets (Level 1) | (Level 2) | Inputs (Level 3) | Total | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Loans (1) |
$ | | $ | $1,614,651 | $ | | $ | $1,614,651 | ||||||||
Foreclosed assets (2) |
| 123,829 | | 123,829 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights (3) |
| | 95,677 | 95,677 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Loans (1) |
$ | | $ | 2,148,261 | $ | | $ | 2,148,261 | ||||||||
Foreclosed assets (2) |
| 114,198 | | 114,198 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights (3) |
| | 146,028 | 146,028 |
(1) | These balances are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis using the fair value of the underlying collateral. | |
(2) | Assets taken in foreclosure of defaulted loans are primarily comprised of commercial and residential real property and are generally measured at the lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. The fair value of the real property is generally determined using appraisals or other indications of value based on recent comparable sales of similar properties or assumptions generally observable in the marketplace, and the related nonrecurring fair value measurement adjustments have generally been classified as Level 2. | |
(3) | These balances are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Mortgage servicing rights are stratified for purposes of the impairment testing. |
46
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(15) | FAIR VALUE (continued) |
The following table presents the increases and decrease in value of certain assets that are
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for which a fair value adjustment has been included
in the income statement, relating to assets held at period end. All balances are presented in
thousands.
Income Statement | Three-Month Period Ended | Nine-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||||||
Location | September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Loans |
Provision for credit losses | $ | 79,413 | $ | 28,584 | $ | 56,140 | $ | (63,290 | ) | ||||||||
Foreclosed assets |
Other administrative expense | (7,203 | ) | (4,189 | ) | (13,205 | ) | (7,221 | ) | |||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
Mortgage banking income | (39,687 | ) | (12,910 | ) | (37,789 | ) | (972 | ) | |||||||||
$ | 32,523 | $ | 11,485 | $ | 5,146 | $ | (71,483 | ) | ||||||||||
The following table presents disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments. These
fair values for certain instruments are presented based upon subjective estimates of relevant
market conditions at a specific point in time and information about each financial instrument. In
cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using
present value or other valuation techniques. These techniques involve uncertainties resulting in
variability in estimates affected by changes in assumptions and risks of the financial instruments
at a certain point in time. Therefore, the derived fair value estimates presented below for certain
instruments cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets. In addition, the fair
values do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time
an entitys entire holdings of a particular financial instrument nor does it reflect potential
taxes and the expenses that would be incurred in an actual sale or settlement. Accordingly, the
aggregate fair value amounts presented below do not represent the underlying value to the Company:
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Value | Fair Value | Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions |
$ | 3,184,550 | $ | 3,184,550 | $ | 1,705,895 | $ | 1,705,895 | ||||||||
Available-for-sale investment securities |
13,834,050 | 13,834,050 | 13,371,848 | 13,371,848 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for investment, net |
63,441,317 | 63,148,007 | 62,820,434 | 61,453,371 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
141,096 | 141,096 | 150,063 | 150,063 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
95,677 | 117,576 | 146,028 | 148,746 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage banking |
9,908 | 9,908 | 4,222 | 4,222 | ||||||||||||
Customer related |
411,638 | 411,638 | 307,292 | 307,292 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange |
20,372 | 20,372 | 20,707 | 20,707 | ||||||||||||
Trading |
23,155 | 23,155 | 21,149 | 21,149 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
47,363,568 | 46,530,609 | 42,673,293 | 42,592,642 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings and other debt obligations |
30,191,424 | 31,581,723 | 33,630,117 | 34,764,709 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow |
281,864 | 281,864 | 174,362 | 174,362 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage banking |
7,913 | 7,913 | | | ||||||||||||
Customer related |
400,892 | 400,892 | 308,130 | 308,130 | ||||||||||||
Total return swap |
2,917 | 2,917 | 4,081 | 4,081 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange |
16,999 | 16,999 | 13,349 | 13,349 | ||||||||||||
Trading |
34,867 | 34,867 | 43,345 | 43,345 | ||||||||||||
Unrecognized financial instruments:(1) |
||||||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
117,500 | 117,406 | 110,705 | 110,617 |
(1) | The amounts shown under carrying value represent accruals or deferred income arising from those unrecognized financial instruments. |
47
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(15) FAIR VALUE (continued)
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had $487.2 million of restricted cash primarily related to
SCUSA securitization transactions and lockbox collections and cash restricted for investment
purposes. Excess cash flows generated by the securitization trusts are added to restricted cash,
creating additional over-collateralization until the contractual securitization requirement has
been reached. Once the targeted reserve requirement is satisfied, additional excess cash flows
generated by the Trusts are released to SCUSA as distributions from the trusts. Lockbox collections
are added to restricted cash and released when transferred to the appropriate warehouse line of
credit or trust. Certain cash is restricted for investment only and is not available for normal
operational purposes.
(16) BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys segments are focused principally around the customers that the Bank and SCUSA serve.
The Retail banking segment is primarily comprised of the branch locations and the residential
mortgage business. The branches offer a wide range of products and services to customers and each
attracts deposits by offering a variety of deposit instruments including demand and NOW accounts,
money market and savings accounts, certificates of deposits and retirement savings products. The
branches also offer consumer loans such as home equity loans and line of credits. The Retail
banking segment also includes business banking loans and small business loans to individuals. The
Specialized Business segment is primarily comprised of non-strategic lending groups which include
indirect automobile, aviation and continuing care retirement communities. The Corporate banking
segment provides the majority of the Companys commercial lending platforms such as commercial real
estate loans, multi-family loans, commercial and industrial loans and the Companys related
commercial deposits. The Global Banking segment includes businesses with large corporate domestic
and foreign clients. The Other category includes investment portfolio activity, intangibles and
certain unallocated corporate income and expenses.
SCUSA is a specialized consumer finance company engaged in the purchase, securitization and
servicing of retail installment contracts originated by automobile dealers and direct origination
of retail installment contracts over the internet.
For segment reporting purposes, SCUSA continues to be managed as a separate business unit. With the
exception of this segment, the Companys segment results are derived from the Companys business
unit profitability reporting system by specifically attributing managed balance sheet assets,
deposits and other liabilities and their related interest income or expense to each of the
segments. Funds transfer pricing methodologies are utilized to allocate a cost for funds used or a
credit for funds provided to business line deposits, loans and selected other assets using a
matched funding concept.
The provision for credit losses recorded by each segment is based on the net charge-offs of each
line of business and changes in specific reserve levels for loans in the segment (except for
changes in Specific Valuation Allowances see (4) in the following table) and the difference
between the provision for credit losses recognized by the Company on a consolidated basis and the
provision recorded by the business line is recorded in the Other category. Other income and
expenses directly managed by each business line, including fees, service charges, salaries and
benefits, and other direct expenses as well as certain allocated corporate expenses are accounted
for within each segments financial results. Accounting policies for the lines of business are the
same as those used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements with respect to
activities specifically attributable to each business line. However, the preparation of business
line results requires management to establish methodologies to allocate funding costs and benefits,
expenses and other financial elements to each line of business. Where practical, the results are
adjusted to present consistent methodologies for the segments.
During 2011, the multi-family and large corporate commercial specialty groups were merged into the
Corporate banking segment from the Specialized Business segment, which, for the three-month period
ended September 30, 2010, resulted in approximately $9.0 billion of average assets and $11.5
million of pretax income allocated to the Corporate banking segment that had previously been
allocated to the Specialized Business segment. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010,
approximately $8.8 billion of average assets and $2.4 million of pretax income were allocated to
the Corporate banking segment that had previously been allocated to the Specialized Business
segment. Since the Specialized Business segment had no goodwill allocated to it, this reporting
structure change had no impact on the amount of goodwill assigned to other segments. Prior period
results were recast to conform to current methodologies for the segments.
48
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(16) BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)
The following tables present certain information regarding the Companys segments. All balances are
presented in thousands.
SHUSA excluding SCUSA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three-Month Period Ended | Specialized | Global | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 | Retail (1) | Business | Corporate | Banking | Other (3) | SCUSA | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 182,955 | $ | 16,800 | $ | 121,304 | $ | 14,898 | $ | 77,436 | $ | 541,175 | $ | 954,568 | ||||||||||||||
Other income |
79,153 | 4,017 | 18,930 | 5,793 | 8,513 | 80,068 | 196,474 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses (4) |
54,254 | 64,416 | 64,267 | 1,823 | (54,560 | ) | 238,513 | 368,713 | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
286,739 | 10,150 | 34,719 | 4,177 | (12,757 | ) | 131,566 | 454,594 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income/(loss) before income taxes(1) |
(94,747 | ) | (53,801 | ) | 38,738 | 14,518 | 156,206 | 250,129 | 311,043 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment revenue/(expense) (2) |
(49,875 | ) | (20,326 | ) | (96,114 | ) | (1,224 | ) | 167,539 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total average assets |
$ | 24,644,857 | $ | 3,575,657 | $ | 20,118,286 | $ | 3,185,442 | $ | 24,598,989 | $ | 15,329,488 | $ | 91,452,719 |
SHUSA excluding SCUSA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Three-Month Period Ended | Specialized | Global | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | Retail (1) | Business | Corporate | Banking | Other (3) | SCUSA | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 168,807 | $ | 27,545 | $ | 114,706 | $ | 8,433 | $ | 102,168 | $ | 456,810 | $ | 878,469 | ||||||||||||||
Other income |
100,085 | 11,437 | 13,013 | 4,993 | 5,273 | 61,464 | 196,265 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
55,140 | 49,298 | 28,274 | 2,364 | 36,424 | 284,139 | 455,639 | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
260,799 | 9,398 | 34,780 | 3,734 | (10,792 | ) | 100,140 | 398,059 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income/(loss) before income taxes(1) |
(66,280 | ) | (19,788 | ) | 61,512 | 7,292 | 191,997 | 132,848 | 307,581 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment revenue/(expense) (2) |
(61,355 | ) | (36,389 | ) | (107,940 | ) | (2,083 | ) | 207,767 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total average assets |
$ | 23,176,867 | $ | 5,084,270 | $ | 19,809,044 | $ | 2,296,656 | $ | 22,046,883 | $ | 12,497,860 | $ | 84,911,580 |
SHUSA excluding SCUSA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine-Month Period Ended | Specialized | Global | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011 | Retail (1) | Business | Corporate | Banking | Other (3) | SCUSA | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 584,317 | $ | 59,960 | $ | 364,608 | $ | 41,948 | $ | 212,603 | $ | 1,623,286 | $ | 2,886,722 | ||||||||||||||
Other income |
282,162 | 13,130 | 59,458 | 20,236 | 28,735 | 273,117 | 676,838 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses (4) |
185,549 | 181,609 | 164,848 | 9,917 | (100,810 | ) | 508,516 | 949,629 | ||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
832,574 | 29,529 | 103,732 | 10,766 | (32,159 | ) | 415,590 | 1,360,032 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income/(loss) before income taxes(1) |
(175,936 | ) | (138,219 | ) | 146,269 | 41,238 | 386,885 | 969,053 | 1,229,290 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment revenue/(expense) (2) |
(112,486 | ) | (70,346 | ) | (298,893 | ) | (3,264 | ) | 484,989 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total average assets |
$ | 24,425,476 | $ | 3,885,189 | $ | 20,192,131 | $ | 2,936,186 | $ | 24,656,571 | $ | 15,829,825 | $ | 91,925,378 |
SHUSA excluding SCUSA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Nine-Month Period Ended | Specialized | Global | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | Retail (1) | Business | Corporate | Banking | Other (3) | SCUSA | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 551,226 | $ | 89,226 | $ | 342,832 | $ | 16,106 | $ | 229,586 | $ | 1,217,351 | $ | 2,446,327 | ||||||||||||||
Other income |
330,446 | 24,415 | 53,646 | 9,064 | 21,085 | 145,136 | 583,792 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
203,468 | 188,870 | 163,265 | 4,560 | 14,237 | 731,250 | 1,305,650 | |||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
769,499 | 29,323 | 103,011 | 10,937 | (38,060 | ) | 254,761 | 1,129,471 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income/(loss) before income taxes(1) |
(135,060 | ) | (104,764 | ) | 121,690 | 9,632 | 388,445 | 372,652 | 652,595 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment revenue/(expense) (2) |
(123,533 | ) | (124,761 | ) | (316,795 | ) | (3,034 | ) | 568,123 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total average assets |
$ | 22,847,083 | $ | 5,523,329 | $ | 19,837,218 | $ | 1,522,295 | $ | 23,281,101 | $ | 10,433,348 | $ | 83,444,374 |
(1) | The Retail segment fees and other income includes residential servicing rights impairments of $39.7 million and $42.5 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to impairments of $11.3 million and $0.5 million in the corresponding periods in the prior year. See Note 6 for further discussion on these items. | |
(2) | Intersegment revenue/(expense) represent charges or credits for funds used or provided by each of the segments and are included in net interest income. | |
(3) | The Other category includes earnings from the investment portfolio (excluding any investments purchased by SCUSA), interest expense on the Banks borrowings and other debt obligations (excluding any borrowings held by SCUSA), amortization of intangible assets and certain unallocated corporate income and expenses. | |
(4) | In certain circumstances Specific Valuation Allowances (SVAs) were permitted to be used instead of partial charge-offs by the OTS, the Companys former regulator. The OCC does not permit the establishment of SVAs. Accordingly, the Bank charged-off $103.7 million of mortgage loans during the third quarter 2011. These charge-offs did not have an impact on the results of operations for the segment or in consolidation. |
49
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(17) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Investment Agreements
On October 20, 2011, Santander Holdings USA, Inc. (SHUSA) and Santander Consumer USA Inc.
(SCUSA), a majority-owned subsidiary of SHUSA, entered into an investment agreement (the New
Investor Investment Agreement) with Sponsor Auto Finance Holdings Series LP, a Delaware limited
partnership (Auto Finance Holdings), jointly owned by investment funds affiliated with Warburg
Pincus LLC, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. and Centerbridge Partners L.P. (collectively, the
New Investors). Pursuant to the terms of the New Investor Investment Agreement, Auto Finance
Holdings has agreed to purchase, and SCUSA has agreed to issue to Auto Finance Holdings, an
aggregate number of shares of SCUSA common stock representing 25.0% of the total number of issued
and outstanding shares of SCUSA common stock as of the closing of the transaction (the New
Investor Investment), for an aggregate purchase price of $1 billion.
Also on October 20, 2011, SCUSA entered into an investment agreement (the Dundon Investment
Agreement and together with the New Investor Investment Agreement, the Investment Agreements)
with Dundon DFS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Dundon DFS) affiliated with Thomas G.
Dundon, the Chief Executive Officer of SCUSA. Pursuant to the terms of the Dundon Investment
Agreement, Dundon DFS has agreed to purchase, and SCUSA has agreed to issue to Dundon DFS, an
aggregate number of additional shares of SCUSA common stock so that Dundon DFS will hold 10% of the
total number of issued and outstanding shares of SCUSA common stock as of the closing of the
transaction for aggregate consideration of approximately $150.0 million (the Dundon Investment
and, together with the New Investor Investment, the Investments).
Upon the consummation of the Investments, SHUSA, the New Investors (KKR, Warburg Pincus and
Centerbridge Partners indirectly through Auto Finance Holdings) and Mr. Dundon (indirectly through
Dundon DFS) will own 65%, 25% and 10% of the common stock of SCUSA, respectively. SHUSA and Dundon
DFS currently own 91.5% and 8.5% of the common stock of SCUSA, respectively.
The consummation of the Investments is subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt
of Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act clearance and receipt of various state approvals
and permits. Subject to the satisfaction of these conditions, the parties expect the Investments
to be consummated by the end of the fourth quarter of 2011. Following the consummation of the
Investments, in the event that SCUSA did not have tangible common equity, after giving effect to
the Investments and other adjustments, of at least $1.99 billion at October 31, 2011, SHUSA will be
required to make a cash capital contribution to SCUSA such that at October 31, 2011 SCUSAs actual
tangible common equity, after giving effect to the Investments and other adjustments, would have
been $1.99 billion. We do not expect the contribution to have a material effect on SHUSAs
financial position.
Shareholders Agreement
Upon the consummation of the Investments, SHUSA, SCUSA, Auto Financing Holdings, Dundon DFS, Thomas
G. Dundon and Banco Santander, S.A. will enter into a shareholders agreement (the Shareholders
Agreement), the terms and conditions of which have already been agreed. The Shareholders
Agreement will provide each of SHUSA, Dundon DFS and Auto Finance Holdings with certain board
representation, governance, registration and other rights with respect to their ownership interests
in SCUSA.
Pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement, depending on SCUSAs performance during 2014 and 2015, if
SCUSA exceeds certain performance targets, SCUSA may be required to make a payment of up to $595
million in favor of SHUSA. If SCUSA does not meet such performance targets during 2014 and 2015,
SCUSA may be required to make a payment to Auto Finance Holdings of up to the same amount.
The Shareholders Agreement also provides that each of Auto Finance Holdings and Dundon DFS will
have the right to sell, and SHUSA will be required to purchase, their respective shares of SCUSA
common stock, at its then fair market value, and Auto Finance Holdings and Dundon DFS, if
applicable, will receive the payment referred to above at that time (i) at the fourth, fifth and
seventh anniversaries of the closing of the Investments, unless an initial public offering of SCUSA
common stock has been previously consummated or (ii) in the event there is a deadlock with respect
to certain specified matters which require the approval of the board of directors or shareholders
of SCUSA.
50
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Santander Holdings USA, Inc.(SHUSA or the Company), headquartered in Boston, MA, provides
customers with a broad range of financial products and services through two primary subsidiaries,
Sovereign Bank (the Bank) and Santander Consumer USA (SCUSA).
The Bank, with a home office in Wilmington, DE, is a $75.9 billion financial institution as of
September 30, 2011 with community banking offices, operations and team members located principally
in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island,
Maryland, and Delaware. The Bank gathers substantially all of the deposit accounts in these market
areas. The Bank uses the deposits, as well as other financing sources, to fund the loan and
investment portfolios. The Bank earns interest income on the loans and investments. In addition,
the Bank generates other income from a number of sources including deposit and loan services, sales
of loans and investment securities, capital markets products and bank-owned life insurance. The
Banks principal other expenses include employee compensation and benefits, occupancy and
facility-related costs, technology and other administrative expenses. The Banks volumes, and
accordingly, the financial results, are affected by the economic environment, including interest
rates, consumer and business confidence and spending, as well as the competitive conditions within
the Banks geographic footprint.
SCUSA, headquartered in Dallas, TX, is a specialized consumer finance company engaged in the
purchase, securitization, and servicing of retail installment contracts originated by automobile
dealers. SCUSA acquires retail installment contracts from manufacturer franchised dealers in
connection with their sale of used and new automobiles and trucks primarily to nonprime customers
with limited credit histories or past credit problems. SCUSA also purchases retail installment
contracts from other companies.
On January 30, 2009, the Company was acquired by Santander. In July 2009, Santander contributed
SCUSA, a majority owned subsidiary, into the Company.
The customers select the Bank and SCUSA for banking and other financial services based on the
ability to assist customers by understanding and anticipating the individual financial needs of
each customer and providing customized solutions. Following the acquisition by Santander, the
Company began to change its strategy substantially. During 2009 and much of 2010, the Companys
primary emphasis was stabilization and turning around the operating results of the Company by
realigning various elements of the Santander business model into the Companys reporting structure.
The second phase, transformation, has already begun and focuses on creating a sound, sustainable,
and competitive franchise.
Successful stabilization efforts included improving risk management and collections, improving the
Companys margins and efficiency, and reorganizing to align to Santander business models.
Noteworthy accomplishments include a return to positive operating cash flows and profitability in
2010, establishment of a centralized and independent risk management function, implementation of
certain pricing and fee assessment changes to the deposit portfolio, implementation of a new sales
process across the network while introducing several new products in connection with the Better
Banking campaigns, and completion of a significant reduction in workforce, in large part, from
consolidating certain back office functions and eliminating certain middle to senior management
positions.
Moving forward into the transformation phase, the Company is focused on longer-term initiatives to
continue to build a solid banking franchise.
Growing Corporate Banking is a key priority for the Bank. Management plans to take a measured and
gradual approach to building a strong franchise. Significant Corporate Banking initiatives include
strengthening the Large Corporate unit as a competitive provider for large corporate customers,
balancing penetration of different Corporate Banking units within the Banks footprint in New
England, Metro New York, and the Mid-Atlantic, increasing participation in syndicated and club
loans to in-footprint companies, upgrading the technology platform and operational capabilities,
and taking advantage of Santanders global presence by seeking U.S. Transaction Banking business
from non-U.S. Santander clients.
Managements priority in Global Banking and Markets (GBM) is to grow the business in the existing
Santander US client base through a sector specific approach with a differentiated product offering.
This will include different types of financing, hedging and transactional services with the
objective of improving the existing cross-selling and increasing revenue per client. GBM also
expects to grow as a product provider to the Large Corporate and Middle Market client segments
served by the Bank.
51
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Retail Banking efforts are focused on increasing market share in the existing primary service area,
cross-selling to existing and new customers, and reducing dependence on third-party service
providers. Significant initiatives in Retail Banking include migrating to Santanders retail
banking platform and subsequent implementation of more robust product applications and MIS,
enhancing the online, ATM, and call center platforms, introducing mobile banking and enhanced
functionality in the existing electronic banking platform, and developing the capability to issue
and service credit cards directly.
CURRENT REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), which is a significant development for the industry. The
elements of the act addressing financial stability are largely focused on issues related to
systemic risks and capital markets-related activities. The act includes a number of specific
provisions designed to promote enhanced supervision and regulation of financial firms and financial
markets, protect consumers and investors from financial abuse and provide the government with tools
to manage a financial crisis and raise international regulatory standards. The act also introduces
a substantial number of reforms that reshape the structure of the regulation of the financial
services industry, requiring more than 60 studies to be conducted and more than 200 regulations to
be written over the next two years.
The true impact of this legislation to the Company and the industry will be unknown until these
reforms are complete, although they will involve higher compliance costs. Certain elements, such as
the debit interchange legislation, will negatively affect the Companys revenue and earnings; while
certain other elements, such as the Collins Amendment, will phase in the heightened capital
standards by eliminating trust preferred securities as tier 1 regulatory capital for certain
financial institutions. Other impacts include increases to the levels of deposit insurance
assessments on large insured depository institutions, impacts to the nature and levels of fees
charged to consumers, changes to the types of derivative activities that the Bank and other insured
depository institutions may conduct, and other increases to capital, leverage and liquidity
requirements for banks and bank holding companies. Financial institutions deemed to be systemically
important (generally defined as financial institutions, similar to the Company, with greater than
$50.0 billion in total assets) will be subject to additional supervision and requirements to
develop resolution plans for potential economic and market events that could have a significant
negative impact on their business. These changes could impact the future profitability and growth
of the Company.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) announced
regulatory changes to debit card and ATM overdraft practices that were effective July 1, 2010.
These changes prohibit financial institutions from charging consumers fees for paying overdrafts on
automated teller machine (ATM) and one-time debit card transactions, unless a consumer consents, or
opts in, to the overdraft service for those types of transactions. These changes will continue to
have an impact that could be material to the consumer banking fee revenue. The actual impact could
vary due to a variety of factors, including changes in customer behavior.
On December 16, 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision issued Basel III: A global
regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems (Basel III). Basel III is a
comprehensive set of reform measures designed to strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk
management of the banking sector. The Basel III rules do not apply to U.S. banks or holding
companies automatically. If implemented by U.S. regulators as proposed, Basel III would
significantly increase the capital required to be held by the Company and narrow the types of
instruments which would qualify as providing appropriate capital.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN BANK REGULATION
In May 2011, the Bank applied to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to become a
national bank organized under the National Bank Act. In connection with this application, the
Company submitted an application to the FRB to become a bank holding company, upon the conversion
of the bank to a national bank, under the Bank Holding Company Act of
1956, as amended. On November 8, 2011 the OCC approved the
application by Sovereign Bank. On October 14, 2011, the FRB approved
the Companys application.
52
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Upon
conversion to a national bank, the Bank will no longer be subject to
federal thrift regulations and instead will be subject to the OCCs regulations under the National
Bank Act. The various laws and regulations administered by the OCC for national banks affect
corporate practices and impose certain restrictions on activities and investments, but the Company
does not believe that the Banks current or currently proposed business will be limited materially,
if at all, by these restrictions. In addition, as a national bank, the Bank will no longer be
subject to the qualified thrift lender requirement, which requires thrifts to maintain a certain
percentage of their portfolio assets in certain qualified thrift investments, such as
residential housing related loans, certain consumer and small business loans and residential
mortgage-backed securities. The Bank will also no longer be subject to the restrictions in the
Home Owners Loan Act limiting the amount of commercial loans that the Bank may make.
Upon becoming a bank holding company, the Company will be subject to the comprehensive,
consolidated supervision and regulation of the FRB. The Company will be subject to risk-based and
leverage capital requirements and information reporting requirements. The Company believes that it
will be well capitalized under the FRBs capital standards.
Additionally, because the Company has more than $50.0 billion in total consolidated assets, as a
bank holding company it will become subject to the heightened prudential and other requirements for
large bank holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act imposes heightened prudential requirements on
bank holding companies with at least $50.0 billion in total consolidated assets and requires the
FRB to establish prudential standards for such large bank holding companies that are more stringent
than those applicable to other bank holding companies, including standards for risk-based capital
requirements and leverage limits, liquidity, risk-management requirements, resolution plans
(referred to as living wills) and credit exposure reporting and concentration limits. As part of
the Dodd-Frank enhanced supervision framework, the Company will be subject to annual stress tests
by the FRB, and the Company and the Bank will be required to conduct semi-annual and annual stress
tests, respectively, reporting results to the FRB and the OCC. The FRB also has discretionary
authority to establish additional prudential standards, on its own or at the Financial Stability
Oversight Councils recommendation, regarding contingent capital, enhanced public disclosures,
short-term debt limits, and otherwise as it deems appropriate.
Additionally, federal laws restrict the types of activities in which bank holding companies may
engage, and subject them to a range of supervisory requirements, including regulatory enforcement
actions for violations of laws and policies. Bank holding companies may engage in the business of
banking and managing and controlling banks, as well as closely related activities. The Company does
not expect the limitations described above will adversely affect the current operations or
materially prohibit the Company from engaging in activities that are currently contemplated by its
business strategies.
On June 29, 2011, the FRB issued the final rule implementing the debit card interchange fee and
routing regulation rules pursuant to the Durbin amendment. The final rule establishes standards
for assessing whether debit card interchange fees received by debit card issuers are reasonable
and proportional to the costs incurred by issuers for electronic debit transactions. In addition,
the final rule prohibits network exclusivity arrangements on debit cards to ensure merchants have
choices in how debit card transactions are routed The effective date for the provision regarding
debit card interchange fees and the network exclusivity prohibition is October 1, 2011 and April 1,
2012, respectively.
The negative impact of the Durbin amendment on revenue is expected to be approximately $50.0 to
$60.0 million annually based on the current debit card transaction volume. The actual impact could
vary due to a variety of factors.
On July 21, 2011, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the OCC assumed responsibility from the Office
of Thrift Supervision (OTS) for the ongoing examination, supervision, and regulation of federal
savings associations and rulemaking for all savings associations, state and federal. Accordingly,
as a federal savings bank, the Bank is subject to supervision, enforcement, and rulemaking
authority by the OCC.
53
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
FORECLOSURE MATTERS
On October 2010, the Bank began a comprehensive review of the foreclosure processes. Based on the
results of the review, the Bank took corrective action to address deficiencies in the mortgage
foreclosure practices and is in the process of implementing additional measures to address the
issues raised in the Order. As of September 30, 2011, the Bank services approximately 155,000
residential mortgage loans including approximately 3,200 which are in the process of foreclosure.
These loans are comprised of loans owned by the Bank and loans serviced for third parties.
The Bank also owns loans serviced by third parties including approximately 300 that are in the
process of foreclosure. The average number of residential mortgage and home equity foreclosures
initiated monthly for loans serviced by the Bank and owned-loans serviced by third parties is
approximately 240 and 340, as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
On April 13, 2011, the Bank consented to the issuance of a Consent Order (the Order) by the
Banks previous primary federal banking regulator, the OTS, as part of an interagency horizontal
review of foreclosure practices at 14 mortgage servicers. The Order requires the Bank to take a
number of actions, including designating a Board committee to monitor and coordinate the Banks
compliance with the provisions of the Order, developing and implementing plans to improve the
Banks mortgage servicing and foreclosure practices and taking certain other remedial actions. The
Bank has retained an independent consultant to conduct a review of certain foreclosure actions or
proceedings for loans serviced by the Bank.
The Company estimates the one-time costs that it and the Bank will incur relating to compliance
with the Order will be approximately $24 million in 2011. Recurring legal and operational expenses
to comply with the Order are estimated to be approximately $7.0 million annually. The Company and
the Bank may incur further expenses related to compliance with the Order.
The Order will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the OCC, successor to the OTS. Any
material failure to comply with the provisions of the Order could result in enforcement actions by
the OCC. While the Bank intends to take such actions as may be necessary to enable the Bank to
comply fully with the provisions of the Order, and the Bank is not aware of any impediments that
may prevent the Bank from achieving full compliance with the Order, there can be no assurance that
the Bank will be able to comply fully with the provisions of the Order, or to do so within the
timeframes required, or that compliance with the Order will not be more time consuming, more
expensive, or require more managerial time than anticipated. The Bank may also be subject to
remediation costs and civil money penalties, however, the Bank is unable to determine the
likelihood or amount of such costs or penalties at this time, and accordingly, no accrual has been
recorded.
CREDIT RISK ENVIRONMENT
Unemployment in the United States continues to remain near historically high levels, and conditions
are expected to remain challenging for financial institutions into 2012. Conditions in the housing
market have been difficult over the past few years and declining real estate values and financial
stress on borrowers have resulted in elevated levels of delinquencies and charge-offs.
Accordingly, consumers and financial institutions remain cautious as weak housing markets, high
unemployment, and volatile global credit and market environments remain a concern.
Conditions in the housing market have significantly impacted areas
of the Companys business. Certain segments of the Banks
consumer and commercial loan portfolios have exposure to the housing
market. Total residential real estate loans including held for sale
increased to $11.4 billion at September 30, 2011 from
$12.2 billion at December 31, 2010, while Alt-A residential
real estate loans (also known as limited documentation) decreased to
$1.6 billion from $1.9 billion over the same respective
period. Charge-offs on the Alt-A residential real estate loans have
increased year-over-year and totaled $70.2 million and
$87.3 million during the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2011 compared to $13.8 million and
$38.2 million for the corresponding periods in the prior year.
The increase in charge-offs in our Alt-A residential real estate loan
portfolio during the third quarter 2011 was due to a one-time
write-off of $46.8 million of Specific Valuation Reserves (SVAs)
in this portfolio. In certain circumstances, SVAs were permitted to
be used instead of partial charge-offs by the OTS, the Companys
former regulator. The OCC does not permit the establishment of SVAs.
Accordingly, the Bank charged-off $103.7 million of mortgage
loans during the third quarter 2011. These charge-offs did not have
an impact of the results of operations. Future performance of the
residential real estate market, unemployment and general economic
conditions. Future performance of the residential loan portfolio will
continue to be significantly influenced by home prices in the
residential real estate market, unemployment and general economic
conditions.
54
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The homebuilder industry also has been impacted by difficult new home sales volumes and values of
residential real estate which has impacted the profitability and liquidity of these companies.
Declines in real estate prices have been the most pronounced in certain states where previous
increases were the largest, such as California, Florida and Nevada. Additionally, heightened
foreclosure volumes have continued in various other areas due to the generally challenging economic
environment and levels of unemployment. The Company provided financing to various homebuilder
companies which is included in the commercial loan portfolio. The
Company has been working on reducing its loss exposure to this loan portfolio which has resulted in
the decline to $108.0 million at September 30, 2011 compared to $248.3 million at September 30,
2010. At September 30, 2011, the entire homebuilder loan portfolio lies in the Companys geographic
footprint which generally has had more stable economic conditions on a relative basis compared to
the national economy. Management will continue to monitor the credit quality of this portfolio in
future periods given the recent market conditions and determine the impact, if any, on the
allowance for loan losses related to these homebuilder loans.
Concerns regarding Greeces ability to meet its debt obligations have continued to heighten. In
addition, recent market sentiment has raised serious doubt about the credit quality of certain
other European jurisdictions including Portugal, Ireland, Italy and Spain. The Company does not
have any sovereign debt with any country within the European Union. Other than transactions with
the parent company, Santander, as further described in Notes 8 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, the Companys exposure to Portugal, Spain and Italy includes approximately $226.0
million in multi-national corporations domiciled in these countries including covered bonds with
high investment grade ratings and operating diversification outside of their home countries as well
as approximately $76.0 million of Spanish government institution bonds. The Company has no exposure
to Ireland or Greece.
On August 5, 2011, Standard & Poors (S&P), one of three major credit rating agencies which also
include Moodys Investors Service and Fitch, lowered its long-term credit rating on the United
States sovereign debt from AAA to AA+. Moodys and Fitch each maintained the highest rating on U.S.
sovereign debt, but have assigned a negative outlook to its ratings. The implications of these
actions by the ratings agencies could include negative effects on U.S. Treasury securities as well
as instruments issued, guaranteed or insured by government agencies or government-sponsored
institutions. These types of instruments are significant assets for the Company. In addition, the
potential impact could exacerbate the other risks to which the Company is subject to including, but
not limited to, the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of the Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
On October 11, 2011, Fitch Ratings downgraded six Spanish banks, indicating that this was due to
the downgrade of the Kingdom of Spain to AA-, as well as to the fact that banks worldwide and
particularly in Europe, face challenges in fundamentals and in the markets. Fitch ratings for
Santander are AA- with negative outlook. Also on October 11, 2011, Standard & Poors downgraded
Spanish banks because it believes the sluggish growth prospects, the still depressed real estate
market and increased turbulence in capital markets will impact financial entities in the coming
months. Santanders long-term debt ratings are AA- with negative outlook. On October 14, 2011
Standard & Poors said that its ratings on SHUSA are not affected by the recent downgrade of
Santander. Standard & Poors ratings remain at A/A-1 with a stable outlook for SHUSA and the Bank.
On October 19, 2011, Moodys also downgraded Spanish entities as a result of downgrading Spains
sovereign debt to A1. The long-term debt ratings of Banco Santander were downgraded from Aa2 to
Aa3, maintaining a negative outlook.
CURRENT INTEREST RATE ENVIRONMENT
Net interest income represents a significant portion of the Companys revenues. Accordingly, the
interest rate environment has a substantial impact on the Companys earnings. Currently, the
Company is in an asset sensitive interest rate risk position. During the first nine months of 2011,
the net interest margin increased to 4.85% from 4.60% in the nine-month period ended September 30,
2010. This increase in margin is primarily attributable to the changing interest rate environment
combined with a mix shift from higher cost wholesale deposits to lower cost retail deposits. Net
interest margin in future periods will be impacted by several factors such as but not limited to,
the Companys ability to grow and retain core deposits, the future interest rate environment, loan
and investment prepayment rates, and changes in non-accrual loans. See the discussion of Asset and
Liability Management practices in a later section of this Report, including the estimated impact
of changes in interest rates on the Companys net interest income.
55
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
RECENT INDUSTRY CONSOLIDATION
The Companys acquisition by Santander has strengthened the Companys financial position and
enabled the Company to execute its strategy of focusing on GBM and its core retail and commercial
customers in the Companys geographic footprint. The banking industry has experienced significant
consolidation in recent years, which is likely to continue in future periods. Consolidation may
affect the markets in which the Company operates as new or restructured competitors integrate
acquired businesses, adopt new business practices or change product pricing as they attempt to
maintain or grow market share. Recent merger activity involving national, regional and community
banks and specialty finance companies in the Northeastern United States, has affected the
competitive landscape in the markets the Company serves. Management continually monitors the
environment in which it operates to assess the impact of the industry consolidation on the Company,
as well as the practices and strategies of the Companys competitors, including loan and deposit
pricing, customer expectations and the capital markets.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
The Company reported pre-tax income of $311.0 million and $1.2 billion for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $307.6 million and $652.6 million for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010. Results for the three-month period
ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2010 were favorably
impacted by $84.9 million increase on interest income on loans and $86.9 million decrease in the
provision for credit losses offset by the decrease in non-interest income of $89.0 million and
increases in general and administrative expenses of $56.5 million .
Results for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2010 were favorably impacted by $442.4 million increase on interest income on loans
and $356.0 million decrease in the provision for credit losses offset by an increase in general and
administrative expenses of $230.6 million. The increase on interest on loans was due to $8.0
billion of loans acquired by SCUSA during the latter half of 2010 and $1.7 billion of loans
acquired by the Bank during the first quarter of 2011. Increases in general and administrative
expense were the result of higher outside consulting fees, the reinstatement of the Company
contribution to the employee 401(k) retirement plan in July 2010, increased loan servicing expenses
at SCUSA, and increase in premise and equipment depreciation.
56
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET / TAX EQUIVALENT NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS
THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010
THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax | Tax | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Equivalent | Yield/ | Average | Equivalent | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
EARNING ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENTS |
$ | 16,788,635 | $ | 112,481 | 2.68 | % | $ | 15,124,044 | $ | 132,936 | 3.51 | % | ||||||||||||
LOANS(3): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
21,988,017 | 214,849 | 3.88 | % | 23,075,998 | 251,257 | 4.33 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Multi-family |
6,987,085 | 89,075 | 5.07 | % | 5,561,602 | 73,667 | 5.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages |
11,524,543 | 128,533 | 4.46 | % | 10,922,640 | 131,315 | 4.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Home equity loans and lines of credit |
6,910,035 | 67,081 | 3.85 | % | 7,023,292 | 69,973 | 3.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans secured by real estate |
18,434,578 | 195,614 | 4.23 | % | 17,945,932 | 201,288 | 4.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Auto loans |
15,541,333 | 622,373 | 15.89 | % | 13,825,566 | 562,022 | 16.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
2,597,994 | 55,212 | 8.43 | % | 256,823 | 4,414 | 6.82 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total consumer |
36,573,905 | 873,199 | 9.48 | % | 32,028,321 | 767,724 | 9.52 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
65,549,007 | 1,177,123 | 7.13 | % | 60,665,921 | 1,092,648 | 7.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(2,257,567 | ) | | | (2,096,387 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
NET LOANS |
63,291,440 | 1,177,123 | 7.39 | % | 58,569,534 | 1,092,648 | 7.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS |
80,080,075 | 1,289,604 | 6.40 | % | 73,693,578 | 1,225,584 | 6.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
11,372,644 | | | 11,218,002 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 91,452,719 | $ | 1,289,604 | 5.61 | % | $ | 84,911,580 | $ | 1,225,584 | 5.74 | % | ||||||||||||
FUNDING LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits and other customer related
accounts: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail and commercial deposits |
$ | 34,275,547 | $ | 59,663 | 0.69 | % | $ | 29,583,464 | $ | 45,250 | 0.61 | % | ||||||||||||
Wholesale deposits |
2,058,805 | 2,329 | 0.45 | % | 781,395 | 3,188 | 1.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Government deposits |
2,364,553 | 2,313 | 0.39 | % | 2,210,886 | 1,791 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Customer repurchase agreements |
1,020,064 | 763 | 0.30 | % | 1,643,309 | 978 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL DEPOSITS |
39,718,969 | 65,068 | 0.65 | % | 34,219,054 | 51,207 | 0.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||
BORROWED FUNDS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
9,512,703 | 101,653 | 4.25 | % | 11,327,425 | 119,623 | 4.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds and repurchase agreements |
1,257,397 | 551 | 0.17 | % | 2,786,550 | 2,583 | 0.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
18,933,471 | 156,295 | 3.28 | % | 16,693,782 | 159,879 | 3.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL BORROWED FUNDS |
29,703,571 | 258,499 | 3.46 | % | 30,807,757 | 282,085 | 3.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL FUNDING LIABILITIES |
69,422,540 | 323,567 | 1.85 | % | 65,026,811 | 333,292 | 2.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Demand deposit accounts |
7,743,408 | | | 7,069,164 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
2,265,465 | | | 2,124,809 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
79,431,413 | 323,567 | 1.62 | % | 74,220,784 | 333,292 | 1.79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
12,021,306 | | | 10,690,796 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY |
$ | 91,452,719 | 323,567 | 1.41 | % | $ | 84,911,580 | 333,292 | 1.56 | % | ||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
$ | 966,037 | $ | 892,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST SPREAD (1) |
4.55 | % | 4.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST MARGIN (2) |
4.79 | % | 4.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents the difference between the yield on total earning assets and the cost of total funding liabilities. | |
(2) | Represents annualized, taxable equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. | |
(3) | Interest on loans includes amortization of premiums and discounts on purchased loans and amortization of deferred loan fees, net of origination costs. Average loan balances includes non-accrual loans and loans held for sale. |
57
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET / TAX EQUIVALENT NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax | Tax | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Equivalent | Yield/ | Average | Equivalent | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
EARNING ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENTS |
$ | 16,621,823 | $ | 348,747 | 2.80 | % | $ | 15,283,324 | $ | 393,640 | 3.43 | % | ||||||||||||
LOANS(3): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
22,134,069 | 671,249 | 4.05 | % | 24,430,426 | 904,782 | 4.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Multi-family |
6,916,730 | 264,644 | 5.11 | % | 5,293,269 | 212,893 | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages |
11,524,692 | 391,959 | 4.53 | % | 10,987,407 | 405,960 | 4.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Home equity loans and lines of credit |
6,939,197 | 201,374 | 3.88 | % | 7,030,666 | 214,175 | 4.07 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans secured by real estate |
18,463,889 | 593,333 | 4.29 | % | 18,018,073 | 620,135 | 4.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Auto loans |
16,289,524 | 1,897,248 | 15.57 | % | 10,932,005 | 1,392,609 | 17.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
2,310,747 | 157,988 | 9.14 | % | 258,813 | 13,297 | 6.87 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total consumer |
37,064,160 | 2,648,569 | 9.55 | % | 29,208,891 | 2,026,041 | 9.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
66,114,959 | 3,584,462 | 7.25 | % | 58,932,586 | 3,143,716 | 7.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(2,230,302 | ) | | | (1,974,585 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
NET LOANS |
63,884,657 | 3,584,462 | 7.50 | % | 56,958,001 | 3,143,716 | 7.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS |
80,506,480 | 3,933,209 | 6.53 | % | 72,241,325 | 3,537,356 | 6.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
11,418,898 | | | 11,203,049 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 91,925,378 | $ | 3,933,209 | 5.72 | % | $ | 83,444,374 | $ | 3,537,356 | 5.66 | % | ||||||||||||
FUNDING LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits and other customer related
accounts: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail and commercial deposits |
$ | 33,103,305 | $ | 170,410 | 0.69 | % | $ | 29,951,997 | $ | 152,418 | 0.68 | % | ||||||||||||
Wholesale deposits |
2,303,180 | 7,939 | 0.46 | % | 1,168,981 | 13,861 | 1.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Government deposits |
2,160,134 | 6,092 | 0.38 | % | 2,187,846 | 5,257 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Customer repurchase agreements |
1,418,188 | 3,396 | 0.32 | % | 1,675,811 | 2,886 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL DEPOSITS |
38,984,807 | 187,837 | 0.64 | % | 34,984,635 | 174,422 | 0.67 | % | ||||||||||||||||
BORROWED FUNDS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
9,973,027 | 322,621 | 4.32 | % | 11,505,096 | 393,632 | 4.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds and repurchase agreements |
2,021,096 | 5,498 | 0.36 | % | 2,152,626 | 4,583 | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
19,045,975 | 495,445 | 3.48 | % | 15,389,297 | 475,907 | 4.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL BORROWED FUNDS |
31,040,098 | 823,564 | 3.54 | % | 29,047,019 | 874,122 | 4.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL FUNDING LIABILITIES |
70,024,905 | 1,011,401 | 1.93 | % | 64,031,654 | 1,048,544 | 2.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Demand deposit accounts |
7,506,397 | | | 7,039,474 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
2,638,985 | | | 2,058,439 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
80,170,287 | 1,011,401 | 1.69 | % | 73,129,567 | 1,048,544 | 1.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
11,755,091 | | | 10,314,807 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY |
$ | 91,925,378 | 1,011,401 | 1.47 | % | $ | 83,444,374 | 1,048,544 | 1.68 | % | ||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
$ | 2,921,808 | $ | 2,488,812 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST SPREAD (1) |
4.60 | % | 4.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST MARGIN (2) |
4.85 | % | 4.60 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents the difference between the yield on total earning assets and the cost of total funding liabilities. | |
(2) | Represents annualized, taxable equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. | |
(3) | Interest on loans includes amortization of premiums and discounts on purchased loans and amortization of deferred loan fees, net of origination costs. Average loan balances includes non-accrual loans and loans held for sale. |
58
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 was $954.6
million and $2.9 billion compared to $878.5 million and $2.4 billion for the same periods in 2010.
SCUSA generated net interest income of $541.2 million and $1.6 billion for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 compared to $456.8 million and $1.2 billion for the
same periods in the corresponding year, due primarily to growth in average earning assets at SCUSA.
Excluding SCUSA, net interest income was $413.4 million and $1.3 billion for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $421.7 million and $1.2 billion for the
corresponding periods in the prior year.
Interest on investment securities and interest-earning deposits was $103.6 million and $321.7
million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $122.1
million and $360.8 million for the same periods in 2010. The average balance of investment
securities and interest-earning deposits was $16.8 billion with an average tax equivalent yield of
2.68% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to an average balance of $15.1
billion with an average yield of 3.51% for the same period in 2010. The increase in the three-month
average balance resulted in an increase in interest income of $310.8 million, while the decrease in
the three-month average tax equivalent yield resulted in a decrease in interest income of $331.2
million. The average balance of investment securities and interest-earning deposits was $16.6
billion with an average tax equivalent yield of 2.80% for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2011 compared to an average balance of $15.3 billion with an average yield of 3.43% for the same
period in 2010. The increase in the nine-month average balance resulted in an increase in interest
income of $69.1 million while the decrease in the nine-month average tax equivalent resulted in a
decrease in interest income of $114.0 million.
Interest on loans was $1.2 billion and $3.6 billion for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2011, compared to $1.1 billion and $3.1 billion for the three-month and
nine-month periods in 2010. Average total loan balances for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2011 increased $4.9 billion and $7.2 billion from the same periods in the
corresponding year and average yields decreased 0.03% for the three-month period and increased
0.12% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to the corresponding period in
the prior year. These increases are driven by $8.0 billion of loans acquired by SCUSA during the
latter half of 2010, $1.7 billion of loans acquired by the Bank during the first quarter of 2011,
and $181.9 million of credit card loans acquired by the Bank during the second quarter of 2011.
Interest on deposits and related customer accounts was $65.1 million and $187.8 million for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $51.2 million and $174.4
million for the same periods in 2010. The average balance of deposits was $39.7 billion with an
average cost of 0.65% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to an average
balance of $34.2 billion with an average cost of 0.59% for the same period in 2010. The increase in
the three-month average balance resulted in an increase in interest expense of $8.7 million, while
the increase in the three-month average cost resulted in an increase in interest expense of $5.1
million. The average balance of deposits was $39.0 billion with an average cost of 0.64% for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to an average balance of $35.0 billion with an
average cost of 0.67% for the same period in 2010. The increase in the nine-month average balance
resulted in an increase in interest expense of $26.6 million while the decrease in the nine-month
average cost resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $13.1 million.
Interest on borrowed funds was $258.5 million and $823.6 million for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $282.1 million and $874.1 million for the same
periods in 2010. The average balance of borrowings was $29.7 billion with an average cost of 3.46%
for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to an average balance of $30.8 billion
with an average cost of 3.64% for the same period in 2010. The decrease in the three-month average
balance resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $9.9 million, while the decrease in the
three-month average cost resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $13.7 million. The average
balance of borrowings was $31.0 billion with an average cost of 3.54% for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2011 compared to an average balance of $29.0 billion with an average cost of
4.02% for the same period in 2010. The increase in the nine-month average balance resulted in an
increase in interest expense of $117.0 million while the decrease in the nine-month average cost
resulted in a decrease in interest of $167.5 million. The increase in borrowing levels is due to
SCUSA asset earning growth which has been funded with increased borrowings.
59
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The provision for credit losses is based upon credit loss experience, growth or contraction of
specific segments of the loan portfolio, and the estimate of losses inherent in the current loan
portfolio. The provision for credit losses for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2011 was $368.7 million and $949.6 million, compared to $455.6 million and $1.3
billion for the same periods in 2010. Credit losses, while showing signs of stabilizing, remain
elevated given the current challenging economy and high unemployment levels which has negatively
impacted the credit quality of the loan portfolios.
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the periods
indicated:
Three-Month Period | Nine-Month Period | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period |
$ | 2,226,973 | $ | 2,043,010 | $ | 2,197,450 | $ | 1,818,224 | ||||||||
Allowance established in connection with reconsolidation of
previously unconsolidated securitized assets |
| | | 5,991 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
109,970 | 164,099 | 365,649 | 515,567 | ||||||||||||
Consumer secured by real estate |
142,245 | 35,101 | 210,310 | 100,818 | ||||||||||||
Consumer not secured by real estate |
217,612 | 169,902 | 570,367 | 550,531 | ||||||||||||
Total charge-offs |
469,827 | 369,102 | 1,146,326 | 1,166,916 | ||||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
14,698 | 14,437 | 34,409 | 41,769 | ||||||||||||
Consumer secured by real estate |
2,830 | 1,296 | 5,241 | 2,069 | ||||||||||||
Consumer not secured by real estate |
58,673 | 42,075 | 201,879 | 181,513 | ||||||||||||
Total recoveries |
76,201 | 57,808 | 241,529 | 225,351 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs, net of recoveries |
393,626 | 311,294 | 904,797 | 941,565 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses (1) |
351,955 | 439,149 | 892,649 | 1,288,215 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, end of period |
$ | 2,185,302 | $ | 2,170,865 | $ | 2,185,302 | $ | 2,170,865 | ||||||||
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, beginning of period |
$ | 340,843 | $ | 260,085 | $ | 300,621 | $ | 259,140 | ||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments (1) |
16,758 | 16,490 | 56,980 | 17,435 | ||||||||||||
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments, end of period |
$ | 357,601 | $ | 276,575 | $ | 357,601 | $ | 276,575 | ||||||||
Total allowance for credit losses, end of period |
$ | 2,542,903 | $ | 2,447,440 | $ | 2,542,903 | $ | 2,447,440 | ||||||||
(1) | The provision for credit losses on the consolidated statement of operations is the sum of the total provision for loan losses and provision for unfunded lending commitments. |
The credit quality of the loan portfolio has a significant impact on the Companys operating
results. The Company continues to experience overall credit quality improvement including signs of
improvement in the commercial and consumer portfolios beginning in 2010 and continuing into 2011.
The net charge-offs were $393.6 million and $904.8 million during the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011 compared to $311.3 million and $941.6 million during the
corresponding periods in the prior year. Net charge-offs related to SCUSA for three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 were $138.6 million and $315.4 million compared to
$113.0 million and $315.3 million for the corresponding periods ended September 30, 2010.
Sovereign chargeoffs increased for the three-months ended September 30, 2011 due to the charge-off
of certain mortgage loans with Specific Valuation Allowances (SVAs). In certain circumstances, SVAs
were permitted to be used instead of partial charge-offs by the OTS, the Companys former
regulator. The OCC does not permit the establishment of SVAs. Accordingly, the Bank charged-off
$103.7 million of mortgage loans during the third quarter 2011. These charge-offs did not have an
impact on the results of operations.
60
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Total non-interest income was $238.4 million and $800.7 million for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $327.4 million and $784.1 million for the same
periods in 2010.
Consumer banking fees were $160.4 million and $498.2 million for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $127.6 million and $360.4 million for the same
periods in 2010, representing increases of 25.7% and 38.2%, respectively. The increase for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 is due to growth in consumer loan fees
which increased $24.4 million and $139.0 million due to growth in the SCUSA loan portfolio.
Conversely, consumer banking fees for the three-month and nine-month period ended September 30,
2011 also reflect the impact of reduced overdraft fee revenues due to regulatory changes that took
effect on August 15, 2010.
Commercial banking fees were $43.9 million and $130.2 million for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $47.8 million and $139.7 million for the same periods
in 2010, representing decreases of 8.2% and 6.8%, respectively. The Company has been able to
maintain the commercial fee levels in spite of declining commercial loan balances due to pricing
changes on the commercial deposit and loan portfolios.
Net mortgage banking income/ (expense), net was composed of the following components:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Sales of mortgage loans and related securities |
$ | 6,955 | $ | 13,187 | $ | 13,029 | $ | 26,945 | ||||||||
Net gains on hedging activities |
3,808 | 8,433 | 4,042 | 10,243 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing fees |
13,137 | 13,704 | 38,894 | 40,900 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights |
(9,677 | ) | (13,957 | ) | (30,488 | ) | (42,560 | ) | ||||||||
Residential mortgage servicing rights (impairments)/recoveries |
(39,664 | ) | (11,333 | ) | (42,515 | ) | (473 | ) | ||||||||
Sales and changes to recourse reserves of multi-family loans |
(479 | ) | (5,855 | ) | (1,402 | ) | (6,871 | ) | ||||||||
Multi-family mortgage servicing rights (impairments)/recoveries |
(23 | ) | (1,577 | ) | 4,726 | (500 | ) | |||||||||
Total mortgage banking income/(expense), net |
$ | (25,943 | ) | $ | 2,602 | $ | (13,714 | ) | $ | 27,684 | ||||||
Mortgage banking income/(expense) consists of fees associated with servicing loans not held by the
Company, as well as amortization and changes in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights and
recourse reserves. Mortgage banking income results also include gains or losses on the sales of
mortgage, home equity loans and lines of credit and multi-family loans and mortgage-backed
securities that were related to loans originated or purchased and held by the Company, as well as
gains or losses on mortgage banking derivative and hedging transactions. Mortgage banking
derivative instruments include principally interest rate lock commitments and forward sale
commitments.
Sales of mortgage loans have decreased for the three-month period and increased for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2011 compared to September 30, 2010. For the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011, the Company sold $319.8 million and $840.1 million of loans at
gains of $7.0 million and $13.0 million, compared to $469.9 million and $952.7 million of loans at
gains of $13.2 million and $26.9 million in the corresponding periods in the prior year.
61
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company serviced residential real estate loans for
the benefit of others totaling $14.1 billion and $14.7 billion, respectively. The carrying value of
the related mortgage servicing rights at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $94.8 million
and $146.0 million, respectively. For the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2011, the Company recorded impairments of $39.7 million and $42.5 million on the mortgage servicing
rights, resulting primarily from changes in anticipated loan prepayment rates (CPR) and, to a
lesser extent, changes in the anticipated earnings rate on escrow and similar balances. Significant
assumptions in the valuation of mortgage servicing rights are anticipated loan prepayment rates
(CPR) and the anticipated earnings rate on escrow and similar balances held by the Company in the
normal course of mortgage servicing activities. Increases in prepayment speeds (which are generally
driven by lower long term interest rates) result in lower valuations of mortgage servicing rights,
while lower prepayment speeds result in higher valuations. The escrow related credit spread is the
estimated reinvestment yield earned on the serviced loan escrow deposits. Decreases in the
anticipated earnings rate on escrow and similar balances result in lower valuations of mortgage
servicing rights while increased spreads result in higher valuations. For each of these items, the
Company must make market assumptions based on future expectations. All of the assumptions are based
on standards that management believes would be utilized by market participants in valuing mortgage
servicing rights and are derived and/or benchmarked against independent public sources.
Additionally, an independent appraisal of the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights is
obtained annually and is used by management to evaluate the reasonableness of the discounted cash
flow model. Future changes to prepayment speeds may cause significant future charges or recoveries
of previous impairments in future periods.
The Company will periodically sell qualifying mortgage loans to FHLMC, Government National Mortgage
Association (GNMA) and FNMA in return for mortgage-backed securities issued by those agencies.
The Company reclassifies the net book balance of the loans sold to such agencies from loans to
investment securities available for sale. For those loans sold to the agencies in which the Company
retains the servicing rights, the Company allocates the net book balance transferred between
servicing rights and investment securities based on the relative fair values.
The Company previously sold multi-family loans in the secondary market to Fannie Mae while
retaining servicing. In September 2009, the Bank elected to stop selling multi-family loans to
Fannie Mae and since that time has retained all production for the loan portfolio. Under the terms
of the multi-family sales program with Fannie Mae, the Company retained a portion of the credit
risk associated with such loans. As a result of this agreement with Fannie Mae, the Company retains
a 100% first loss position on each multi-family loan sold to Fannie Mae under such program until
the earlier to occur of (i) the aggregate approved losses on the multi-family loans sold to Fannie
Mae reaching the maximum loss exposure for the portfolio as a whole or (ii) until all of the loans
sold to Fannie Mae under this program are fully paid off.
The Company has established a liability related to the fair value of the retained credit exposure
for multi-family loans sold to Fannie Mae. This liability represents the amount that the Company
estimates that it would have to pay a third party to assume the retained recourse obligation. The
estimated liability represents the present value of the estimated losses that the portfolio is
projected to incur based upon internal specific information and an industry-based default curve
with a range of estimated losses. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had a
$135.1 million and $171.7 million liability related to the fair value of the retained credit
exposure for loans sold to Fannie Mae under this sales program.
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company serviced $9.9 billion and $11.2 billion,
respectively, of multi-family loans for Fannie Mae that had been sold to Fannie Mae pursuant to
this program with a maximum potential loss exposure of $169.4 million and $217.9 million,
respectively. As a result of this retained servicing on multi-family loans sold to Fannie Mae, the
Company had loan servicing assets of $0.9 million and $3.7 thousand at September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. During the three-month and nine-month period ended September 30,
2011, the Company recorded servicing asset amortization of $0.8 million and $3.8 million,
respectively, compared to $2.4 million and $7.1 million for the comparable periods in the prior
year. Additionally, during the three-month and nine-month periods of 2011, the Company recorded a
net servicing impairment of $23.1 thousand and net recoveries of $4.7 million, compared to net
impairments of $1.6 million and $0.5 million in the corresponding periods in the prior year.
Capital markets revenues were $6.0 million and $18.7 million for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $3.3 million and $11.5 million for the same periods
in 2010. Revenues increased during the current year for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended due to increased sales volume as well as an increase to average size of each sales
transaction.
62
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income represents fluctuations in the cash surrender value of life
insurance policies for certain employees where the Bank is the beneficiary of the policies, as well
as the receipt of insurance proceeds. The BOLI income was $15.5 million and $42.9 million for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $13.6 million and $40.7
million for the comparable periods in the prior year is due primarily to increased death benefits
offset by lower returns on certain polices.
Net gains on investment securities were $41.9 million and $123.9 million for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to net gains of $131.1 million and $200.3
million for the same periods in 2010. The nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 results
included other-than-temporary impairment charges in earnings of $325.2 thousand. There were no
other-than-temporary impairment charges in earnings recognized in the three-month period ended
September 30, 2011. The three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 included
other-than-temporary impairment charges in earnings of $0.8 million and $3.9 million on certain
non-agency mortgage backed securities. Additionally, during the nine-month period ended September
30, 2010, net gains included $14.0 million on the sale of Visa Inc. Class B common shares.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2011 were $454.6 million and $1.4 billion, compared to $398.1 million and $1.1 billion for the same
periods in 2010. This increase was due primarily to increased compensation and benefit expenses and
increased loan servicing expenses at SCUSA due to additional employee count and additional
servicing fees. Additional increases relate to additional employee count and the reinstatement of
personnel benefits at the Bank. From June 2009 to June 2010, the Company ceased matching employee
contributions. In July 2010, the Company resumed matching 100.0% of employee contributions up to
3.0% of their compensation and 50.0% of employee contributions between 3.0% and 5.0%.
OTHER EXPENSES
Other expenses consist primarily of amortization of intangibles, deposit insurance expense, merger
related and integration charges, equity method investment expense and other restructuring and proxy
and related professional fees. Other expenses were $58.6 million and $148.5 million for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $44.6 million and $142.7
million for the same periods in 2010.
The Company recorded intangible amortization expense of $13.1 million and $43.0 million for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $15.3 million and $48.7
million for the corresponding periods in the prior year. The decrease in the current year period is
due primarily to decreased core deposit intangible amortization expense on previous acquisitions
and assets that become fully amortized in 2011.
INCOME TAX PROVISION/ (BENEFIT)
An income tax provision of $104.7 million and $426.8 million was recorded for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $87.4 million and $195.2 million for the
same periods in 2010 resulting in an effective tax rate of 33.7% and 34.7% for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 compared to 28.4% and 29.9% for the comparable periods
in 2010. The statutory tax rate for 2011 and 2010 was 35.0%.
63
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
LINE OF BUSINESS RESULTS
The Retail banking segment net interest income increased $14.1 million and $33.1 million to $183.0
million and $584.3 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011
compared to the corresponding periods in the preceding year, due to increased earnings resulting
from the $1.7 billion of loans acquired during the first quarter of 2011 and the $181.9 million of
credit card loans acquired in the second quarter of 2011. The net spread on a match funded basis
for this segment was 1.19% and 1.30% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2011 compared to 1.16% and 1.29% for the same periods in the prior year. The average balance of
loans was $24.2 billion for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to an average
balance of $22.4 billion for the corresponding period in the preceding year. The average balance of
deposits was $36.1 billion for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, compared to $34.4
billion for the same period a year ago. The provision for credit losses decreased $0.9 million to
$54.3 million and $17.9 million to $185.5 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2011. General and administrative expenses totaled $286.7 million and $832.6 million
for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $260.8 million and
$769.5 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010. The increase in
general and administrative expenses is due to increased compensation and benefit expense within the
Retail banking segment resulting from a higher headcount and the reinstatement of personnel
benefits at the Bank during July 2010.
The Specialized Business segment net interest income decreased $10.7 million and $29.3 million to
$16.8 million and $60.0 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011
compared to the corresponding periods in the preceding year. The net spread on a match funded basis
for this segment was 2.54% and 2.67% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2011 compared to 2.50% and 2.43% for the same periods in the prior year. The average balance of
loans for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 was $2.9 billion compared with $4.8
billion for the corresponding period in the prior year. The provision for credit losses increased
$15.1 million to $64.4 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011 and decreased
$7.3 million to $181.6 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011. General and
administrative expenses totaled $10.2 million and $29.5 million for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $9.4 million and $29.3 million for the three-month
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010.
The Corporate banking segment net interest income increased $6.6 million and $21.8 million to
$121.3 million and $364.6 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2011 compared to the corresponding periods in the preceding year. The net spread on a match funded
basis for this segment was 1.61% and 1.70% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2011 compared to 1.69% and 1.69% for the same periods in the prior year. The average
balance of loans for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 was $21.2 billion compared with
$20.9 billion for the corresponding period in the prior year. The provision for credit losses
increased $36.0 million and $1.6 million to $64.3 million and $164.8 million for the three-month
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011. General and administrative expenses, including
allocated corporate and direct support costs, were $34.7 million and $103.7 million for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 compared with $34.8 million and $103.0
million for the corresponding periods in the prior year.
The Global banking segment net interest income increased $6.5 million and $25.8 million to $14.9
million and $41.9 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011
compared to the corresponding periods in the preceding year. The net spread on a match funded basis
for this segment was 1.60% and 1.66% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2011 compared to 1.74% and 1.86% for the same period in the prior year. The decrease in net spread
was offset by the increase in the average loan balances. The average balance of loans for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 was $2.5 billion compared with $850.0 million for the
corresponding period in the prior year. General and administrative expenses, including allocated
corporate and direct support costs, were $4.2 million and $10.8 million for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 compared with $3.7 million and $10.9 million for the
corresponding periods in the prior year.
Income before income taxes for Other increased $35.8 million and $1.6 million to $156.2 million and
$386.9 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 compared to the
corresponding periods in the preceding year. Net interest income decreased $24.7 million and $17.0
million to $77.4 million and $212.6 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2011 compared to the corresponding periods in the preceding year due to investment
yields decreasing 86 basis points for the three-month period ended September 30, 2011 and 67 basis
points for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011. Average investments for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $16.4 billion and $14.8 billion, respectively, with
an average cost of 2.75% and 3.42%.
64
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The SCUSA segment net interest income increased $84.4 million and $405.9 million to $541.2 million
and $1.6 billion for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30 2011, compared to
the corresponding periods in the preceding year, due to increased earnings resulting from the 2010
acquisitions. The average balance of loans for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 was
$15.3 billion compared to $9.7 billion for the corresponding period in the prior year. The average
yield on the loan portfolio for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 was 16.49% compared
to 19.70% for the corresponding period in the prior year. Average borrowings for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2011 were $14.1 billion with an average cost of 2.60%, compared to $9.2
billion with an average cost of 3.23% in the preceding year. The provision for credit losses was
$238.5 million and $508.5 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2011 compared to $284.1 million and $731.3 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2010. General and administrative expenses totaled $131.6 million and $415.6 million
for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011, compared to $100.1 million and
$254.8 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010. SCUSA continues
to remain profitable due to aggressive pricing on its loan portfolio, favorable financing costs and
adequate sources of liquidity which is attributable to its relationship with Santander.
Additionally, SCUSAs successful servicing and collection practices have enabled it to maximize the
cash collections on its portfolio. Future profitability levels will depend on controlling credit
losses and continuing to be able to effectively price its portfolio. SCUSAs business has also been
favorably impacted by the fact that certain competitors have exited the subprime auto market.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
LOAN PORTFOLIO
At September 30, 2011, commercial loans (excluding multi-family loans) totaled $22.2 billion
representing 33.9% of the Companys loan portfolio, compared to $22.4 billion, or 34.4% of the loan
portfolio at December 31, 2010 and $27.7 billion, or 42.9% of the loan portfolio at September 30,
2010. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, only 16% and 13%, respectively, of the total
commercial portfolio was unsecured. The ability for the Company to originate commercial loans to
credit worthy customers in recent quarters has been limited due to challenging economic conditions
which has resulted in reduced loan demand.
At September 30, 2011, multi-family loans totaled $7.0 billion representing 10.7% of the Companys
loan portfolio, compared to $6.7 billion, or 10.4% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2010 and
$5.8 billion or 9.0% of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2010. The increase in multi-family
loans is due to the Companys decision not to sell any multi-family loan production during 2010 in
order to increase the percentage of the Companys assets in this lower risk asset class.
The consumer loan portfolio (including held for sale) secured by real estate, consisting of home
equity loans and lines of credit and residential loans, totaled $18.3 billion at September 30,
2011, representing 27.9% of the Companys loan portfolio, compared to $18.2 billion, or 27.9%, of
the loan portfolio at December 31, 2010 and $18.0 billion or 27.8% of the loan portfolio at
September 30, 2010. The Company entered into a credit default swap in 2006 on a portion of the
residential real estate loan portfolio through a synthetic securitization structure. Under the
terms of the credit default swap, the Company fulfilled the first loss exposure of $5.2 million as
the Protected Party to the transaction. The Company will be reimbursed for losses up to $42.1
million on the loans within the portion of the loan portfolio, which totaled $1.5 billion at
September 30, 2011. Any losses sustained after the $42.1 million is reimbursed are the
responsibility of the Company. This credit default swap term is equal to the term of the loan
portfolio.
The consumer loan portfolio not secured by real estate, consisting of automobile loans and other
consumer loans, totaled $18.2 billion at September 30, 2011, representing 27.7% of the Companys
loan portfolio, compared to $17.8 billion, or 27.4%, of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2010 and
$13.1 billion or 20.3% of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2010. Excluding SCUSA, auto loans
have declined to $1.2 billion at September 30, 2011 compared to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2010
and $2.2 billion at September 30, 2010 due to run-off in the Banks indirect auto loan portfolio.
The Bank ceased originating all indirect auto loans as of January 2009.
65
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
Non-performing assets were $2.3 billion or 2.49% of total assets at September 30, 2011, compared to
$2.9 billion or 3.29% of total assets at December 31, 2010 and $3.0 billion or 3.39% of total
assets at September 30, 2010. The decreases from the December 31, 2010 period were primarily driven
by the commercial and residential mortgage loan portfolios. The decreases from the September 30,
2010 period were primarily driven by the commercial loan portfolios. Future changes to delinquency
and non-performing assets levels will have a significant impact on the financial results.
The Company places all commercial and residential mortgage loans on non-performing status at 90
days delinquent or sooner if management believes the loan has become impaired unless return to
current status is expected imminently. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current
information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan. An insignificant delay (e.g. less than 90 days) or
insignificant shortfall in amount of payments does not necessarily result in the loan being
identified as impaired.
For the majority of auto loans, the accrual of interest is discontinued and reversed once an
account becomes past due 60 days or more. All other consumer loans, excluding credit cards,
continue to accrue interest until they are 90 days delinquent, at which point they are either
charged-off or placed on non-accrual status and anticipated losses are reserved. Credit cards
remain accruing interest until they are 180 days delinquent, at which point they are charged-off
and all interest is removed from interest income. At 180 days delinquent, anticipated losses on
residential real estate loans are fully reserved for or charged off.
Loans that have been classified as non-accrual remain classified as non-accrual until the loan is
able to sustain a period of repayment which is typically defined as six months for a monthly
amortizing loan at which time, accrual of interest resumes
The following table presents the composition of non-performing assets at the dates indicated:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Non-accrual loans: |
||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate |
$ | 455,731 | $ | 653,221 | ||||
Commercial and industrial |
340,277 | 528,333 | ||||||
Multi-family |
136,783 | 224,728 | ||||||
Total commercial loans |
932,791 | 1,406,282 | ||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||
Residential mortgages |
440,433 | 602,027 | ||||||
Consumer
loans secured by real estate |
106,631 | 125,310 | ||||||
Consumer not secured by real estate |
554,458 | 592,650 | ||||||
Total consumer loans |
1,101,522 | 1,319,987 | ||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
2,034,313 | 2,726,269 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
173,715 | 143,149 | ||||||
Other repossessed assets |
77,104 | 79,854 | ||||||
Total other real estate owned and other repossessed assets |
250,819 | 223,003 | ||||||
Total non-performing assets |
$ | 2,285,132 | $ | 2,949,272 | ||||
Past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal and accruing interest |
$ | 3,794 | $ | 169 | ||||
Annualized net loan charge-offs to average loans (2) |
1.82 | % | 2.01 | % | ||||
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets |
2.49 | % | 3.29 | % | ||||
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans |
3.09 | % | 4.18 | % | ||||
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans, real estate owned and repossessed assets |
3.46 | % | 4.51 | % | ||||
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total non-performing assets (1) |
111.2 | % | 84.7 | % | ||||
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total non-performing loans (1) |
124.9 | % | 91.6 | % |
(1) | Allowance for credit losses is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded commitments, which is included in other liabilities. | |
(2) | Annualized net loan charge-offs to average loans is calculated as annualized net loan charge-off as of nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 divided the nine-month average loan balance. |
66
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The Companys allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans has increased to
3.87% at September 30, 2011 compared to 3.83% at December 31, 2010 and 3.79% at September 30, 2010.
Although non-performing assets remain at elevated levels, the Company has seen improvements from
December 31, 2010 levels in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011. The increase in the
allowance as a percentage of total loans increased at September 30, 2011 compared to December 31,
2010 due to the increase in the reserve for unfunded lending commitments of $57.0 million. The
allowance for loan losses decreased $12.1 million when comparing September 30, 2011 to December 31,
2010. Excluding loans that are classified as non-accrual, loans past due have declined from $2.2
billion at year end to $1.8 billion at September 30, 2011. The increase was attributed to allowance
increases at SCUSA.
Loans ninety (90) days or more past due and still accruing interest increased $3.6 million from
December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011, primarily due to the purchase of the credit card portfolio
during the second quarter of 2011. Potential problem loans (commercial loans delinquent more than
30 days but less than 90 days, although not currently classified as non-performing loans) amounted
to approximately $128.5 million and $268.4 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
In response to higher levels of other real estate owned, the Company has updated and enhanced
existing policies and governance, and streamlined and enhanced procedures to manage reporting and
sales.
TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS
Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) are loans that have been modified whereby the Company has
agreed to make certain concessions to the customer (reduction of interest rate, extension of term
or forgiveness of a portion of the loan) to maximize the ultimate recovery of a loan. TDRs remain
in non-accrual status until the Company believes repayment under the revised terms are reasonably
assured and a sustained period of repayment performance was achieved (typically defined as six
months for a monthly amortizing loan). Loan restructurings generally occur when a borrower is
experiencing, or is expected to experience, financial difficulties in the near-term. Consequently,
a modification that would otherwise not be considered is granted to the borrower.
The following table summarizes TDRs at the dates indicated:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Performing: |
||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 85,903 | $ | 35,629 | ||||
Residential mortgages |
361,005 | 220,382 | ||||||
Consumer |
167,766 | 200,033 | ||||||
Subtotal performing |
$ | 614,674 | $ | 456,044 | ||||
Non-performing: |
||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 33,781 | $ | 68,517 | ||||
Residential mortgages |
113,575 | 131,807 | ||||||
Consumer |
38,086 | 44,790 | ||||||
Subtotal non-performing |
$ | 185,442 | $ | 245,114 | ||||
Total |
$ | 800,116 | $ | 701,158 | ||||
67
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses and the percentage of
each loan type to total loans at the dates indicated:
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||
Loans to | Loans to | |||||||||||||||
Total | Total | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Loans | Amount | Loans | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Allocated allowance: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
$ | 864,274 | 45 | % | $ | 905,786 | 45 | % | ||||||||
Consumer loans |
1,318,649 | 55 | 1,275,982 | 55 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated allowance |
2,379 | n/a | 15,682 | n/a | ||||||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses |
$ | 2,185,302 | 100 | % | $ | 2,197,450 | 100 | % | ||||||||
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments |
357,601 | 300,621 | ||||||||||||||
Total allowance for credit losses |
$ | 2,542,903 | $ | 2,498,071 | ||||||||||||
The allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments are maintained at levels
that management considers adequate to provide for losses based upon an evaluation of known and
inherent risks in the loan portfolio. Managements evaluation takes into consideration the risks
inherent in the loan portfolio, past loan loss experience, specific loans with loss potential,
geographic and industry concentrations, delinquency trends, economic conditions, the level of
originations and other relevant factors. While management uses the best information available to
make such evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance for credit losses may be necessary if
conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations.
The allowance for loan losses consists of two elements: (i) an allocated allowance, which is
comprised of allowances established on specific loans, and allowances for each loan category based
on historical loan loss experience adjusted for current trends and adjusted for both general
economic conditions and other risk factors in the Companys loan portfolios, and (ii) an
unallocated allowance to account for a level of imprecision in managements estimation process.
Management regularly monitors the condition of the portfolio, considering factors such as
historical loss experience, trends in delinquency and non-performing loans, changes in risk
composition and underwriting standards, experience and ability of staff and regional and national
economic conditions and trends.
For the commercial loan portfolios excluding small business loans (businesses with sales of up to
$3.0 million), the Company has specialized credit officers, a monitoring unit and workout units
that identify and manage potential problem loans. Changes in management factors, financial and
operating performance, company behavior, industry factors and external events and circumstances are
evaluated on an ongoing basis to determine whether potential impairment is evident and additional
analysis is needed. For the commercial loan portfolios, risk ratings are assigned to each
individual loan to differentiate risk within the portfolio and are reviewed on an ongoing basis by
credit risk management and revised, if needed, to reflect the borrowers current risk profiles and
the related collateral positions. The risk ratings consider factors such as financial condition,
debt capacity and coverage ratios, market presence and quality of management. Workout officers
reassess the most adversely rated borrowers on a quarterly basis, and credit officers review all
other borrowers on a regular basis no less than once per year. The Companys Internal Asset Review
group regularly performs loan reviews and assesses the appropriateness of assigned risk ratings.
Risk rating actions are generally reviewed formally by one or more Credit Committees depending on
the size of the loan and the type of risk rating action being taken. When a credits risk rating
is downgraded to a certain level, the relationship must be reviewed more frequently and detailed
reports completed that document risk management strategies for the credit going forward. When
credits are downgraded beyond a certain level, the Companys workout department becomes responsible
for managing the credit risk.
When problem loans are identified that are secured with collateral, management examines the loan
files to evaluate the nature and type of collateral supporting the loans. Management documents the
collateral type, date of the most recent valuation, and whether any liens exist, to determine the
value to compare against the committed loan amount.
68
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
If a loan is identified as impaired and is collateral dependent, an initial appraisal is obtained
to provide a baseline in determining the propertys fair market value. The frequency of appraisals
depends on the type of collateral being appraised. If the collateral value is subject to
significant volatility (due to location of asset, obsolescence, etc.) an appraisal is obtained more
frequently. At a minimum, updated appraisals are obtained within a 12 month period, if the loan
remains outstanding for that period of time.
When management determines that the value of an impaired loan is less than its carrying amount, the
Company recognizes impairment through a provision estimate or a charge-off to the allowance.
Management performs these assessments on at least a quarterly basis. For commercial loans, a
charge-off is recorded when management determines the Bank will not collect 100% of a loan based on
the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell the property, or the net present value of
expected future cash flows. Charge-offs are recorded on a monthly basis and partial charged-off
loans continue to be evaluated on a quarterly basis and additional charge-offs or loan loss
provisions may be taken on the remaining loan balance utilizing the same criteria.
The portion of the allowance for loan losses related to the commercial portfolio decreased from
$905.8 million at December 31, 2010 (3.11% of commercial loans) to $864.3 million at September 30,
2011 (2.96% of commercial loans).
The consumer loan and small business loan portfolios are monitored for credit risk and
deterioration with statistical tools considering factors such as delinquency, loan to value, and
credit scores. Management evaluates the consumer portfolios throughout their life cycle on a
portfolio basis.
Consumer loans and any portion of a consumer loan secured by real estate and mortgage loans not
adequately secured are generally charged-off when deemed to be uncollectible or delinquent 180 days
or more (120 days for closed-end consumer loans not secured by real estate), whichever comes first,
unless it can be clearly demonstrated that repayment will occur regardless of the delinquency
status. Examples that would demonstrate repayment include; a loan that is secured by adequate
collateral and is in the process of collection; a loan supported by a valid guarantee or insurance;
or a loan supported by a valid claim against a solvent estate.
For both residential and home equity loans, loss severity assumptions are incorporated into the
loan loss reserve models to estimate the loan balances that will ultimately charge-off. These
assumptions are based on recent loss experience for six loan-to-value bands within the portfolios.
Current loan-to-value ratios are updated based on movements in the state level Federal Housing
Finance Agency House Pricing Indexes. For non-performing loans, current loan-to-value ratios are
generated by obtaining broker price opinions which are refreshed every six months. Values obtained
are used to estimate ultimate losses.
As of September 30, 2011, approximately 11.3% and 12.5% of the residential mortgage loan portfolio
and home equity loan portfolio had loan-to-value ratios above 100% compared with approximately 19%
and 18%, respectively, at December 31, 2010. No loans were originated with LTVs in excess of 100%.
For home equity lines of credit (HELOC), if the value of the property decreases more than 50.0% of
the homes equity from the time the HELOC was issued, the Bank will review the line of credit and
the borrowers full relationship with the Bank to determine if it is appropriate to close the line
to mitigate the risk associated with further collateral devaluation.
For auto loans, the Company charges off accounts in repossession when the automobile is repossessed
and legally available for disposition. Auto loans are charged off through the allowance for loan
loss when the loan becomes 121 days delinquent and the Company has not repossessed the related
vehicle.
The allowance for the consumer loans was $1.3 billion at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The allowance as a percentage of consumer loans was 3.62% at September 30, 2011 and 3.54% at
December 31, 2010. This increase is due primarily to SCUSA loan acquisitions during 2010.
Additionally, the Company reserves for certain inherent, but undetected, losses that are probable
within the loan portfolio. This is due to several factors, such as, but not limited to, inherent
delays in obtaining information regarding a customers financial condition or changes in their
unique business conditions and the interpretation of economic trends. While this analysis is
conducted at least quarterly, the Company has the ability to revise the allowance factors whenever
necessary in order to address improving or deteriorating credit quality trends or specific risks
associated with a given loan pool classification.
69
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Regardless of the extent of the Companys analysis of customer performance, portfolio evaluations,
trends or risk management processes established, a level of imprecision will always exist due to
the judgmental nature of loan portfolio and/or individual loan evaluations. The Company maintains
an unallocated allowance to recognize the existence of these exposures. The unallocated allowance
for loan losses was $2.4 million at September 30, 2011 and $15.7 million at December 31, 2010.
Management continuously evaluates its allowance methodology; however the unallocated allowance is
subject to changes each reporting period due to certain inherent but undetected losses; which are
probable of being realized within the loan portfolio.
In addition to the allowance for loan losses, the Bank also estimates probable losses related to
unfunded lending commitments. Unfunded lending commitments are subject to individual reviews, and
are analyzed and segregated by risk according to the Companys internal risk rating scale. These
risk classifications, in conjunction with an analysis of historical loss experience, current
economic conditions and performance trends within specific portfolio segments, and any other
pertinent information result in the estimation of the reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
Additions to the reserve for unfunded lending commitments are made by charges to the provision for
credit losses.
The reserve for unfunded lending commitments has increased to $357.6 million at September 31, 2011
from $300.6 million at December 31, 2010 due to increased volumes to large customers in the
commercial portfolio as well as increased volumes in global banking and international trade
The risk factors of the allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments are
continuously reviewed and revised by management where conditions indicate that the estimates
initially applied are different from actual results. The Company also performs a comprehensive
analysis of the allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments on a
quarterly basis. In addition, a review of allowance levels based on nationally published statistics
is conducted quarterly.
The factors supporting the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending
commitments do not diminish the fact that the entire allowance for loan losses and the reserve for
unfunded lending commitments are available to absorb losses in the loan portfolio and related
commitment portfolio, respectively. The Companys principal focus is to ensure the adequacy of the
total allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments.
The allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments are subject to
review by banking regulators. The Companys primary bank regulators regularly conduct examinations
of the allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments and make assessments
regarding their adequacy and the methodology employed in their determination.
As mentioned previously, the Company, through its SCUSA subsidiary, acquires loans at a substantial
discount from certain companies. Part of this discount is attributable in part to future expected
credit losses. Upon acquisition of a portfolio of loans, SCUSA will project future credit losses on
the pool and will amortize this discount to interest income in accordance with Accounting Standard
Codification 310-30. The amount of nonaccretable loan discount at September 30, 2011 totaled $722.0
million compared to $966.5 million at December 31, 2010. The reason for the decrease is due
primarily to charge-offs during the ninemonth period ended September 30, 2011.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment securities consist primarily of mortgage-backed securities, tax-free municipal
securities, U.S. Treasury and government agency securities, corporate debt securities, asset backed
securities and stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB). Mortgage-backed
securities consist of pass-through and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by federal
agencies or private label issuers. The Companys mortgage-backed securities are either guaranteed
as to principal and interest by the issuer or have ratings of AAA by Standard and Poors and
Moodys at the date of issuance. The Company purchases classes which are senior positions backed by
subordinate classes. The subordinate classes absorb the losses and must be completely eliminated
before any losses flow through the senior positions. The average life of the available-for-sale
investment portfolio at September 30, 2011 was 4.36 years compared to 6.06 years at December 31,
2010.
Total investment securities available-for-sale increased to $13.8 billion at September 30, 2011,
compared to $13.4 billion at December 31, 2010. For additional information with respect to the
Companys investment securities, see Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other investments, which consists of FHLB stock and repurchase agreements, decreased from $0.6
billion at December 31, 2010 to $0.5 billion at September 30, 2011.
70
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill was $4.1 billion at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Other intangibles, net of
accumulated amortization, was $160.1 million at September 30, 2011 and $188.9 million at December
31, 2010. The decrease of $28.8 million is due to year-to-date amortization expense of $43.0
million, partially offset by the PCCR intangible asset acquired during the second quarter of 2011
as part of the credit card acquisition in the amount of 14.2 million.
Goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets are not amortized on a recurring basis, but
are subject to periodic impairment testing. This testing is required annually, or more frequently
if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Impairment testing is performed at the
reporting unit level and not on an individual acquisition basis and is a two-step process. The
first step is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value (including its
allocated goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is in excess of its carrying value,
there is no impairment charge recorded. If the carrying value of a reporting unit is in excess of
its fair value, a second step needs to be performed. The second step entails calculating the
implied fair value of goodwill as if a reporting unit is purchased at its step 1 fair value. This
is determined in the same manner as goodwill in a business combination. If the implied fair value
of goodwill is in excess of the reporting units allocated goodwill amount, no impairment charge is
required. Management evaluated the goodwill at December 31, 2010 and determined that it was not
impaired. No impairment indicators have been noted since December 31, 2010 and as such, no
impairment test has been performed. The Company will perform its annual goodwill impairment test at
December 31, 2011.
DEPOSITS AND OTHER CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS
The Bank attracts deposits within its primary market area with an offering of deposit instruments
including demand accounts, NOW accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts, certificates of
deposit and retirement savings plans. Total deposits and other customer accounts at September 30,
2011 were $47.4 billion compared to $42.7 billion at December 31, 2010. The growth in deposits was
mainly due to money market accounts and wholesale certificates of deposits, which increased $2.4
billion and $846.8 million from December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
BORROWINGS AND OTHER DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The Company utilizes borrowings and other debt obligations as a source of funds for its asset
growth and its asset/liability management. Collateralized advances are available from the FHLB
provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Funding is also available
from the Federal Reserve discount window through the pledging of certain assets. The Company also
utilizes reverse repurchase agreements, which are short-term obligations collateralized by
securities fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the U.S. Government or an agency
thereof, and federal funds lines with other financial institutions. The Company, through its SCUSA
subsidiary, has warehouse lines of credit agreements with Santander, as well as other financial
institutions. SCUSA also securitizes some of its retail automotive installment contracts which are
structured as secured financings. These transactions are paid using the cash flows from the
underlying retail automotive installment contracts which serve as collateral. During 2010, the
Company has initiated a holding company level commercial paper issuance program, which is backed by
committed lines from Santander, to take advantage of attractive yields given the market appetite
for top tier issuers of money market solutions. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had $61.8
million of outstanding commercial paper with an effective rate of 0.76%. Total borrowings at
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $30.2 billion and $33.6 billion, respectively. See
Note 8 for further discussion and details on the Companys borrowings and other debt obligations.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Securitization transactions contribute to the Companys overall funding and regulatory capital
management. These transactions involve periodic transfers of loans or other financial assets to
special purpose entities (SPEs). The vast majority of the Companys SPEs are consolidated on
the Companys balance sheet at September 30, 2011. The balance of loans in unconsolidated SPEs
totaled $56.9 million at September 30, 2011.
71
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The Company enters into partnerships, which are variable interest entities, with real estate
developers for the construction and development of low-income housing. The partnerships are
structured with the real estate developer as the general partner and the Company as the limited
partner. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of these variable interest entities as the
Company is not involved in direct management of the activities of these entities. The Companys
risk of loss is limited to its investment in the partnerships, which totaled $101.0 million at
September 30, 2011 and any future cash obligations that the Company has committed to the
partnerships. Future cash obligations related to these partnerships totaled $0.5 million at
September 30, 2011. The Companys investments in these partnerships are accounted for under the
equity method.
BANK REGULATORY CAPITAL
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) requires institutions
regulated by the Banks primary regulator to have a minimum tangible capital ratio equal to 1.5% of
tangible assets, and a minimum core or leverage ratio equal to 4.0% of tangible assets, and a
risk-based capital ratio equal to 8.0% as defined. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act (FDICIA) requires regulated institutions to have minimum tangible capital equal
to 2.0% of total tangible assets.
The FDICIA established five capital tiers: well-capitalized, adequately-capitalized,
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. A depository
institutions capital tier depends upon its capital levels in relation to various relevant capital
measures, which include leverage and risk-based capital measures and certain other factors.
Depository institutions that are not classified as well-capitalized or adequately-capitalized are
subject to various restrictions regarding capital distributions, payment of management fees,
acceptance of brokered deposits and other operating activities. At September 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, the Bank had met all quantitative thresholds necessary to be classified as
well-capitalized under regulatory guidelines.
Federal banking laws, regulations and policies also limit the Banks ability to pay dividends and
make other distributions to the Company. The Bank is required to give prior notice to its primary
regulator before paying any dividend. In addition, the Bank must obtain prior regulatory approval
to declare a dividend or make any other capital distribution if, after such dividend or
distribution, the Banks total distributions to the Company within that calendar year would exceed
100% of its net income during the year plus retained net income for the prior two years, or if the
Bank is not adequately capitalized at the time. In addition, prior approval would be required if
the Banks examination or CRA ratings fall below certain levels or the Bank is notified by its
regulator that it is a problem association or an association in troubled condition. During the
three years following the period-ended September 30, 2010, the Bank must obtain the written
non-objection of the primary regulator to declare a dividend or make any other capital
distribution.
The following schedule summarizes the actual capital balances of the Bank at September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010:
TIER 1 | TIER 1 | TOTAL | ||||||||||
LEVERAGE | RISK-BASED | RISK-BASED | ||||||||||
CAPITAL | CAPITAL | CAPITAL | ||||||||||
REGULATORY CAPITAL | RATIO | RATIO | RATIO | |||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Sovereign Bank at September 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||
Regulatory capital |
$ | 8,300,343 | $ | 8,228,617 | $ | 9,540,408 | ||||||
Minimum capital requirement (1) |
2,867,770 | 2,283,889 | 4,567,778 | |||||||||
Excess |
$ | 5,432,573 | $ | 5,944,728 | $ | 4,972,630 | ||||||
Sovereign Bank capital ratio |
11.58 | % | 14.41 | % | 16.71 | % | ||||||
Sovereign Bank at December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||
Regulatory capital |
$ | 7,736,164 | $ | 7,680,472 | $ | 9,092,918 | ||||||
Minimum capital requirement (1) |
2,707,475 | 2,283,372 | 4,566,745 | |||||||||
Excess |
$ | 5,028,689 | $ | 5,397,100 | $ | 4,526,173 | ||||||
Sovereign Bank capital ratio |
11.43 | % | 13.45 | % | 15.93 | % |
(1) | Minimum capital requirement as defined by the primary regulator |
72
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity represents the ability of the Company to obtain cost effective funding to meet the needs
of customers, as well as the Companys financial obligations. Factors that impact the liquidity
position of the Company include loan origination volumes, loan prepayment rates, maturity structure
of existing loans, core deposit growth levels, certificate of deposit maturity structure and
retention, the Companys credit ratings, investment portfolio cash flows, maturity structure of
wholesale funding, etc. These risks are monitored and centrally managed. This process includes
reviewing all available wholesale liquidity sources. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had
$28.0 billion in unused available overnight liquidity in the form of unused federal funds purchased
lines, unused FHLB borrowing capacity, unused borrowing lines with the Federal Reserve Bank and
unencumbered investment portfolio securities. The Company also forecasts future liquidity needs and
develops strategies to ensure adequate liquidity is available at all times.
The Bank has several sources of funding to meet its liquidity requirements, including the liquid
investment securities portfolio, the core deposit base, the ability to acquire large deposits, FHLB
borrowings, Federal Reserve borrowings, wholesale deposit purchases, federal funds purchased and
reverse repurchase agreements.
The Company has the following major sources of funding to meet its liquidity requirements:
dividends and returns of investment from its subsidiaries, short-term investments held by nonbank
affiliates and access to the capital markets. Additionally, the Company has the ability to raise
funds through Santander and certain subsidiaries of Santander.
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had over $22.8 billion in committed liquidity from the FHLB
and the Federal Reserve Bank. Of this amount, $13.5 billion is unused and can be used to provide
additional borrowing capacity and liquidity for the Company. At September 30, 2011, liquid assets
(defined as cash and cash equivalents, loans held for sale, and securities available for sale
exclusive of securities pledged as collateral) totaled approximately $14.4 billion or 30.5% of
total deposits. This compares to $9.5 billion, or 22.2%, of total deposits, at December 31, 2010.
The Company also has available liquidity from unencumbered securities and other market sources of
$13.0 billion, as well as cash deposits at September 30, 2011 of $3.2 billion. Management believes
that the Company has ample liquidity to fund its operations.
The investment portfolio contains certain non-agency mortgage backed securities which are not
actively traded. In certain instances, the Company is the sole investor of the issued security. The
Company evaluates prices from a third party pricing service, third party broker quotes for certain
securities and from another independent third party valuation source to determine their estimated
fair value. The fair value estimates assume liquidation in an orderly market and not under
distressed circumstances. If the Company was required to sell these securities, actual proceeds
received could potentially be significantly less than the estimated fair values.
On July 15, 2010, the Company entered into a commercial paper program under which the Company may
issue unsecured commercial paper notes on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate
amount outstanding at any time of $2.0 billion. The proceeds of the commercial paper issuances are
used for general corporate purposes. Amounts available under the program may be re-borrowed. At
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance of unsecured commercial paper
notes was $61.8 million and $968.4 million, respectively.
73
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business as a source of
funds for its asset growth and its asset/liability management, to fund acquisitions, and to meet
required capital needs. These obligations require the Company to make cash payments over time as
detailed in the table below.
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | Over 1 yr | Over 3 yrs | Over | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year | to 3 yrs | to 5 yrs | 5 yrs | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances (1) |
$ | 11,088,127 | $ | 1,358,364 | $ | 2,540,084 | $ | 5,676,964 | $ | 1,512,715 | ||||||||||
Federal funds purchased (1) |
2,003,007 | 2,003,007 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
61,830 | 61,830 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other debt obligations (1) (2) |
18,666,112 | 7,198,517 | 3,644,370 | 3,868,093 | 3,955,132 | |||||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures due to capital trust entities (1) (2) |
2,144,451 | 211,485 | 112,110 | 364,670 | 1,456,186 | |||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit (1) |
10,277,089 | 5,998,812 | 2,673,138 | 1,595,155 | 9,984 | |||||||||||||||
Investment partnership commitments (3) |
451 | 358 | 26 | 26 | 41 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
704,628 | 108,704 | 187,391 | 145,185 | 263,348 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 44,945,695 | $ | 16,941,077 | $ | 9,157,119 | $ | 11,650,093 | $ | 7,197,406 | ||||||||||
(1) | Includes interest on both fixed and variable rate obligations. The interest associated with variable rate obligations is based upon interest rates in effect at September 30, 2011. The contractual amounts to be paid on variable rate obligations are affected by changes in market interest rates. Future changes in market interest rates could materially affect the contractual amounts to be paid. | |
(2) | Includes all carrying value adjustments, such as unamortized premiums or discounts and hedge basis adjustments. | |
(3) | The commitments to fund investment partnerships represent future cash outlays for the construction and development of properties for low-income housing, and historic tax credit projects. The timing and amounts of these commitments are projected based upon the financing arrangements provided in each projects partnership or operating agreement, and could change due to variances in the construction schedule, project revisions, or the cancellation of the project. |
Excluded from the above table are deposits of $37.4 billion that are due on demand by
customers. Additionally, $113.7 million of tax liabilities associated with unrecognized tax
benefits have been excluded due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future
cash outflows associated with such obligations.
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to manage its exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters
of credit, loans sold with recourse, forward contracts and interest rate swaps, caps and floors.
These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk
in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. The contract or notional
amounts of these financial instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in
particular classes of financial instruments. Commitments to extend credit, including standby
letters of credit, do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that these commitments
often expire without being drawn upon.
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and loans sold
with recourse is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the
same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance
sheet instruments. For interest rate swaps, caps and floors and forward contracts, the contract or
notional amounts do not represent exposure to credit loss. The Company controls the credit risk of
its interest rate swaps, caps and floors and forward contracts through credit approvals, limits and
monitoring procedures.
74
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period:
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts | Less than | Over 1 yr | Over 3 yrs | |||||||||||||||||
Other Commitments | Committed | 1 year | to 3 yrs | to 5 yrs | Over 5 yrs | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 17,149,580 | $ | 5,223,936 | $ | 2,962,416 | $ | 3,731,169 | $ | 5,232,059 | ||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
2,797,527 | 1,451,473 | 979,955 | 216,200 | 149,899 | |||||||||||||||
Loans sold with recourse |
245,399 | 10,436 | 69,326 | 48,233 | 117,404 | |||||||||||||||
Forward buy commitments |
522,769 | 506,989 | 15,780 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total commitments |
$ | 20,715,275 | $ | 7,192,834 | $ | 4,027,477 | $ | 3,995,602 | $ | 5,499,362 | ||||||||||
The Companys standby letters of credit meet the definition of a guarantee under the guarantees
topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. These transactions are conditional commitments
issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The guarantees are
primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The weighted average term of
these commitments is 1.5 years. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. In the event of a
draw by the beneficiary that complies with the terms of the letter of credit, the Company would be
required to honor the commitment. The Company has various forms of collateral, such as real estate
assets and customer business assets. The maximum undiscounted exposure related to these commitments
at September 30, 2011 was $2.8 billion, and the approximate value of the underlying collateral upon
liquidation that would be expected to cover this maximum potential exposure was $2.1 billion. The
fees related to standby letters of credit are deferred and amortized over the life of the
commitment. These fees are immaterial to the Companys financial statements at September 30, 2011.
Management believes that the utilization rate of these standby letters of credit will continue to
be substantially less than the amount of these commitments, as has been the Companys experience to
date.
ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Interest rate risk arises primarily through the Companys traditional business activities of
extending loans and accepting deposits. Many factors, including economic and financial conditions,
movements in market interest rates and consumer preferences, affect the spread between interest
earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities. Interest rate risk is managed centrally by the
Companys risk management group with oversight by the Asset and Liability Committee. In managing
the interest rate risk, the Company seeks to minimize the variability of net interest income across
various likely scenarios while at the same time maximizing the net interest income and net interest
margin. To achieve these objectives, the Treasury Group works closely with each business line in
the Company and guides new business. The Treasury Group also uses various other tools to manage
interest rate risk including wholesale funding maturity targeting, investment portfolio purchase
strategies, asset securitization/sale and financial derivatives.
Interest rate risk focuses on managing four elements of risk associated with interest rates: basis
risk, repricing risk, yield curve risk and option risk. Basis risk stems from rate index timing
differences with rate changes, such as differences in the extent of changes in fed funds compared
with three-month LIBOR. Repricing risk stems from the different timing of contractual repricing
such as, one-month versus three-month reset dates. Yield curve risk stems from the impact on
earnings and market value due to different shapes and levels of yield curves. Optionality risk
stems from prepayment or early withdrawal risk embedded in various products. These four elements of
risk are analyzed through a combination of net interest income simulations, shocks to the net
interest income simulations, scenarios and market value analysis and the subsequent results are
reviewed by management. Numerous assumptions are made to produce these analyses including, but not
limited to, assumptions on new business volumes, loan and investment prepayment rates, deposit
flows, interest rate curves, economic conditions and competitor pricing.
The Company simulates the impact of changing interest rates on the expected future interest income
and interest expense (net interest income sensitivity). This simulation is run monthly and it
includes various scenarios that help management understand the potential risks in net interest
income sensitivity. These scenarios include both parallel and non-parallel rate shocks as well as
other scenarios that are consistent with quantifying the four elements of risk. This information is
used to develop proactive strategies to ensure that the Companys risk position remains close to
neutral so that future earnings are not significantly adversely affected by future interest rates.
75
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The table below discloses the estimated sensitivity to the Companys net interest income based on
interest rate changes:
The following estimated percentage | ||||
If interest rates changed in parallel by the | increase/(decrease) to | |||
amounts below at September 30, 2011 | net interest income would result | |||
Up 100 basis points |
2.28 | % | ||
Up 200 basis points |
4.44 | % | ||
Down 100 basis points |
(3.12 | )% |
Because the assumptions used are inherently uncertain, the Company cannot precisely predict
the effect of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ
from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, the
difference between actual experience and the assumed volume and characteristics of new business and
behavior of existing positions, and changes in market conditions and management strategies, among
other factors.
The Company also focuses on calculating the market value of equity (MVE). This analysis is very
useful as it measures the present value of all estimated future interest income and interest
expense cash flows of the Company over the estimated remaining life of the balance sheet. MVE is
calculated as the difference between the market value of assets and liabilities. The MVE
calculation utilizes only the current balance sheet and therefore does not factor in any future
changes in balance sheet size, balance sheet mix, yield curve relationships and product spreads
which may mitigate the impact of any interest rate changes.
Management looks at the effect of interest rate changes on MVE. The sensitivity of MVE to changes
in interest rates is a measure of longer-term interest rate risk and also highlights the potential
capital at risk due to adverse changes in market interest rates. The following table discloses the
estimated sensitivity to the Companys MVE at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. All dollar
balances are in thousands:
The following estimated percentage | ||||||||
If interest rates | increase/(decrease) to MVE would result | |||||||
changed in parallel by | September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||
Base |
$ | 8,644,839 | $ | 6,910,151 | ||||
Up 200 basis points |
(4.61) | % | (8.43 | )% | ||||
Up 100 basis points |
(1.12) | % | (3.86 | )% |
Neither the net interest income sensitivity analysis nor the MVE analysis contemplates changes
in credit risk of the loan and investment portfolio from changes in interest rates. The amounts
above are the estimated impact due solely to a parallel change in interest rates.
Pursuant to its interest rate risk management strategy, the Company enters into derivative
relationships such as interest rate exchange agreements (swaps, caps, and floors) and forward sale
or purchase commitments. The Companys objective in managing the interest rate risk is to provide
sustainable levels of net interest income while limiting the impact that changes in interest rates
have on net interest income.
Interest rate swaps are generally used to convert fixed rate assets and liabilities to variable
rate assets and liabilities and vice versa. The Company utilizes interest rate swaps that have a
high degree of correlation to the related financial instrument.
As part of the overall business strategy, the Company, through the Bank, originates fixed rate
residential mortgages. It sells a portion of this production to FHLMC, FNMA, and private investors.
The loans are exchanged for cash or marketable fixed rate mortgage-backed securities which are
generally sold. This helps insulate the Company from the interest rate risk associated with these
fixed rate assets. The Company uses forward sales, cash sales and options on mortgage-backed
securities as a means of hedging against changes in interest rate on the mortgages that are
originated for sale and on interest rate lock commitments.
To accommodate customer needs, the Company enters into customer-related financial derivative
transactions, primarily consisting of interest rate swaps, caps, floors and foreign exchange
contracts. Risk exposure from customer positions is managed through transactions with other
dealers.
Through the Companys capital markets and mortgage-banking activities, it is subject to trading
risk. The Company employs various tools to measure and manage price risk in its trading portfolios.
In addition, the Board of Directors has established certain limits relative to positions and
activities. The level of price risk exposure at any given point in time depends on the market
environment and expectations of future price and market movements, and will vary from period to
period.
76
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Incorporated by reference from Part I, Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition Asset and Liability Management hereof.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of September 30, 2011. Based on this evaluation, the Companys
principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2011 to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by the Company in reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is
(i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including the Companys principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the second quarter of 2011, the Company implemented a new General Ledger system which will
provide a flexible architecture to interface with Santanders global systems. The implementation of
this new system was determined to have a material impact to the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Other than the changes mentioned above, no other changes in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting occurred during 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
77
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 | Legal Proceedings |
Reference should be made to Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosure
regarding the lawsuit filed by SHUSA against the Internal Revenue Service and Note 13 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for SHUSAs litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 1A | Risk Factors |
There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors, in
the Corporations 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than modifications to the Reputational
and Compliance Risk Exists Related to the Companys Foreclosure Activities risk factor as
described in Foreclosure Matters in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the
risk factor related to the ratings downgrade of United States sovereign debt on August 5, 2011
described in Credit Risk Environment in Part 1, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
the risk factor related to compromises of the Companys data security described below.
Compromises of the Companys data security could materially harm the Companys reputation and
business.
The Company is subject to data security breaches. In the ordinary course of business, the Companys
activities include the collection, storage and transmission of certain personal and financial
information from individuals, such as customers and employees. Security breaches could expose the
Company to a risk of loss of this information, litigation, and potential liability. The Companys
cyber security measures may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, or
otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to the Companys or customers
information. Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, users, or
customers to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to the Companys or customers
information. Any such breach or unauthorized access could result in significant legal and financial
exposure, damage to the Companys reputation, and a loss of confidence that could potentially have
an adverse effect on future business with current and potential customers. Because the techniques
used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change
frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, the Company may be unable
to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or
perceived breach of the Companys security occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of
the Companys cyber security measures could be harmed and the Company could lose potential future
business.
Item 2 | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
No shares of the Companys common stock were repurchased during the three-month or nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2011.
78
Table of Contents
Item 6 | Exhibits |
(a) Exhibits
(3.1 | ) | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Santander
Holdings USA, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Santander Holdings USA, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
January 30, 2009). |
||
(3.2 | ) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Santander
Holdings USA, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Santander Holdings USA, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
February 5, 2010). |
||
(3.3 | ) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Santander
Holdings USA, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
Santander Holdings USA, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
June 21, 2011). |
||
(3.4 | ) | Certificate of Designations for the Series D Preferred Stock
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Santander Holdings
USA, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2009). |
||
(3.5 | ) | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Santander Holdings USA, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Santander Holdings
USA, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 21, 2011). |
||
(4.1 | ) | In accordance with Regulation S-K Item No. 601(b)(4)(iii),
Santander Holdings USA, Inc. is not filing copies of instruments
defining the rights of holders of long-term debt because none of
those instruments authorizes debt in excess of 10% of the total
assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis. Santander Holdings USA, Inc. agrees to furnish a copy of any
such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request. |
||
(31.1 | ) | Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
(31.2 | ) | Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
(32.1 | ) | Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
||
(32.2 | ) | Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
79
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. (Registrant) |
||||
Date: November 11, 2011 | /s/ Jorge Morán | |||
Jorge Morán | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Authorized Officer) |
||||
Date: November 11, 2011 | /s/ Guillermo Sabater | |||
Guillermo Sabater | ||||
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President (Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
80
Table of Contents
SANTANDER HOLDINGS USA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBITS INDEX
(3.1 | ) | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Santander
Holdings USA, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Santander Holdings USA, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed
January 30, 2009). |
||
(3.2 | ) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Santander
Holdings USA, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Santander Holdings USA, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed
February 5, 2010). |
||
(3.3 | ) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Santander
Holdings USA, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
Santander Holdings USA, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
June 21, 2011). |
||
(3.4 | ) | Certificate of Designations for the Series D Preferred Stock
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Santander Holdings
USA, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2009). |
||
(3.5 | ) | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Santander Holdings USA, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Santander Holdings
USA, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 21, 2011). |
||
(4.1 | ) | In accordance with Regulation S-K Item No. 601(b)(4)(iii),
Santander Holdings USA, Inc. is not filing copies of instruments
defining the rights of holders of long-term debt because none of
those instruments authorizes debt in excess of 10% of the total
assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis. Santander Holdings USA, Inc. agrees to furnish a copy of any
such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request. |
||
(31.1 | ) | Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
(31.2 | ) | Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
(32.1 | ) | Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
||
(32.2 | ) | Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
81