SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP. - Quarter Report: 2010 May (Form 10-Q)

Unassociated Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

R	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 001-33376

GSC Investment Corp.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	20-8700615
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)

500 Campus Drive, Suite 220

Florham Park, New Jersey 07932

(Address of principal executive offices)

(973)-437-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: YES R NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer R	Smaller reporting company ¨
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨ NO R

The number of outstanding common shares of the registrant as of July 7, 2010 was 16,940,109.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
•	Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of May 31, 2010 (unaudited) and February 28, 2010	3
•	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	4
•	Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of May 31, 2010 (unaudited) and February 28, 2010	5
•	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	10
•	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	11
•	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of May 31, 2010 (unaudited)	12

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	39

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	41

	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	42

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	42

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	42

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	42

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	42

Item 5.	Other Information	42

Item 6.	Exhibits	42

SIGNATURES		43

GSC Investment Corp.

Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities

	As of
	May 31, 2010			February 28, 2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS

Investments at fair value
Non-control/non-affiliate investments (amortized cost of $113,009,708 and $117,678,275, respectively)	$	71,719,742		$	72,674,847
Control investments (cost of $29,233,097 and $29,233,097, respectively)		18,208,657			16,698,303
Total investments at fair value (amortized cost of $142,242,805 and $146,911,372, respectively)		89,928,399			89,373,150
Cash and cash equivalents		2,928,017			3,352,434
Cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts		378,728			225,424
Outstanding interest rate cap at fair value (cost of $131,000 and $131,000, respectively)		22,278			42,147
Interest receivable, net of reserve of $3,269,723 and $2,120,309, respectively		2,589,212			3,473,961
Management fee receivable		231,300			327,928
Other assets		401,636			140,272

Total assets	$	96,479,570		$	96,935,316

LIABILITIES
Revolving credit facility	$	33,807,431		$	36,992,222
Management and incentive fees payable		3,482,482			3,071,093
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		779,972			1,111,081
Interest and credit facility fees payable		270,246			267,166
Due to manager		6,549			15,602
Total liabilities	$	38,346,680		$	41,457,164

NET ASSETS
Common stock, par value $.0001 per share, 100,000,000 common shares
authorized, 16,940,109 common shares issued and outstanding	$	1,694		$	1,694
Capital in excess of par value		128,339,497			128,339,497
Accumulated undistributed net investment loss		(2,843,933	)		(2,846,135	)
Accumulated net realized loss from investments and derivatives		(14,941,240	)		(12,389,830	)
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and derivatives		(52,423,128	)		(57,627,074	)
Total Net Assets		58,132,890			55,478,152

Total liabilities and Net Assets	$	96,479,570		$	96,935,316

NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE	$	3.43		$	3.27

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GSC Investment Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	For the three months ended May 31, 2010			For the three months ended May 31, 2009
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
INVESTMENT INCOME
Interest from investments
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments	$	1,617,267		$	3,318,840
Control investments		652,720			868,229
Total interest income		2,269,987			4,187,069
Interest from cash and cash equivalents		319			13,191
Management fee income		506,785			520,992
Other income		33,559			43,134
Total investment income		2,810,650			4,764,386

EXPENSES
Interest and credit facility financing expenses		831,121			642,893
Base management fees		411,389			547,744
Professional fees		1,142,537			339,780
Administrator expenses		155,137			171,861
Incentive management fees		-			322,183
Insurance		194,654			206,017
Directors fees and expenses		164,611			82,000
General & administrative		64,136			59,780
Expenses before expense waiver and reimbursement		2,963,585			2,372,258
Expense reimbursement		(155,137	)		(171,861	)
Total expenses net of expense waiver and reimbursement		2,808,448			2,200,397

NET INVESTMENT INCOME		2,202			2,563,989

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS:
Net realized loss from investments		(2,551,410	)		(5,152	)
Net unrealized appreciation on investments		5,223,815			2,769,292
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on derivatives		(19,869	)		35,687
Net gain on investments		2,652,536			2,799,827

NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS	$	2,654,738		$	5,363,816

WEIGHTED AVERAGE - BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE	$	0.16		$	0.65

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED		16,940,109			8,291,384

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GSC Investment Corp.

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

May 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

Company (a, c)	Industry	Investment Interest Rate/Maturity	Principal/ Number of Shares		Cost		Fair Value		% of Net Assets

Non-control/Non-affiliated investments - 123.4% (b)

GFSI Inc (d)	Apparel	Senior Secured Notes 10.50%, 6/1/2011	$	7,082,000	$	7,082,000	$	7,082,000		12.2	%

Legacy Cabinets Holdings (d, i)	Building Products	Common Voting A-1		2,535		220,900		220,900		0.4	%

Legacy Cabinets Holdings (d, i)	Building Products	Common Voting B-1		1,600		139,424		139,424		0.2	%

Legacy Cabinets, Inc. (d, i)	Building Products	First Lien Term Loan 7.25%, 5/3/2014		281,644		281,644		192,926		0.3	%

		Total Building Products		285,779		641,968		553,250		0.9	%

Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation (d)	Consumer Products	Second Lien Term Loan 7.61%, 1/26/2012		3,250,000		3,248,218		3,120,000		5.4	%

Targus Group International, Inc. (d)	Consumer Products	First Lien Term Loan 10.25%, 11/22/2012		3,128,814		2,969,724		2,753,356		4.7	%

Targus Holdings, Inc. (d)	Consumer Products	Unsecured Notes 10.00%, 12/14/2015		1,538,235		1,538,235		799,882		1.4	%

Targus Holdings, Inc. (d, i)	Consumer Products	Common		62,413		566,765		686,543		1.2	%

		Total Consumer Products		7,979,462		8,322,942		7,359,781		12.7	%

CFF Acquisition LLC (d)	Consumer Services	First Lien Term Loan 7.50%, 7/31/2013		305,973		305,973		264,667		0.5	%

M/C Communications, LLC (d)	Education	First Lien Term Loan 6.75%, 12/31/2012		834,131		834,131		554,697		1.0	%

M/C Communications, LLC (d, i)	Education	Class A Common Stock		166,327		30,241		13,306		0.0	%

		Total Education		1,000,458		864,372		568,003		1.0	%

Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc. (d)	Electronics	Second Lien Term Loan 6.28%, 6/1/2014		2,000,000		1,825,912		1,630,000		2.8	%

Group Dekko (d)	Electronics	Second Lien Term Loan 10.50%, 1/20/2012		6,983,429		6,983,429		5,097,903		8.8	%

		Total Electronics		8,983,429		8,809,341		6,727,903		11.6	%

USS Parent Holding Corp. (d, i)	Environmental	Non Voting Common Stock		765		133,002		99,141		0.2	%

USS Parent Holding Corp. (d, i)	Environmental	Voting Common Stock		17,396		3,025,798		2,255,450		3.9	%

		Total Environmental		18,161		3,158,800		2,354,591		4.1	%

Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc. (d)	Financial Services	Second Lien Term Loan 6.60%, 7/31/2013		4,825,000		4,803,746		1,206,250		2.1	%

Big Train, Inc. (d)	Food and Beverage	First Lien Term Loan 7.75%, 3/31/2012		1,876,873		1,442,978		1,717,339		3.0	%

IDI Acquisition Corp. (d)	Healthcare Services	Senior Secured Notes 10.75%, 12/15/2011		3,800,000		3,695,657		3,724,000		6.4	%

PRACS Institute, LTD (d)	Healthcare Services	Second Lien Term Loan 10.00%, 4/17/2013		4,093,750		4,061,460		3,622,969		6.2	%

		Total Healthcare Services		7,893,750		7,757,117		7,346,969		12.6	%

McMillin Companies LLC (d)	Homebuilding	Senior Secured Notes 9.53%, 10/31/2013		7,700,000		7,356,428		4,466,000		7.7	%

Worldwide Express Operations, LLC (d)	Logistics	First Lien Term Loan 10.00%, 6/30/2013		2,835,072		2,831,452		2,069,603		3.6	%

Jason Incorporated (d, i)	Manufacturing	Unsecured Notes 13.00%, 11/1/2010		12,000,000		12,000,000		960,000		1.7	%

Jason Incorporated (d, i)	Manufacturing	Unsecured Notes 13.00%, 11/1/2010		1,700,000		1,700,000		136,000		0.2	%

Specialized Technology Resources, Inc. (d)	Manufacturing	Second Lien Term Loan 7.35%, 12/15/2014		5,000,000		4,807,843		4,900,000		8.4	%

		Total Manufacturing		18,700,000		18,507,843		5,996,000		10.3	%

Elyria Foundry Company, LLC (d)	Metals	Senior Secured Notes 13.00%, 3/1/2013		5,000,000		4,888,653		4,550,000		7.8	%

Elyria Foundry Company, LLC (d, i)	Metals	Warrants		3,000		-		-		0.0	%

		Total Metals		5,003,000		4,888,653		4,550,000		7.8	%

Company (a, c)	Industry	Investment Interest Rate/Maturity	Principal/ Number of Shares		Cost		Fair Value		% of Net Assets

Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada (d, e)	Natural Resources	First Lien Term Loan 11.00%, 3/30/2009	$	2,948,640	$	2,948,640	$	2,828,925		4.9	%

Grant U.S. Holdings LLP (d, e, i)	Natural Resources	Second Lien Term Loan 10.75%, 9/20/2013		6,349,512		6,349,348		592,409		1.0	%

		Total Natural Resources		9,298,152		9,297,988		3,421,334		5.9	%

Energy Alloys, LLC (d)	Oil and Gas	Second Lien Term Loan 3.00%, 6/30/2015		6,285,070		6,285,070		609,652		1.0	%

Energy Alloys, LLC (d, i)	Oil and Gas	Warrants		3		-		-		0.0	%

		Total Oil and Gas		6,285,073		6,285,070		609,652		1.0	%

Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e, i)	Packaging	Senior Secured Notes 12.50%, 6/15/2010		4,850,000		4,850,000		4,437,750		7.6	%

Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e, i)	Packaging	Senior Secured Notes 12.50%, 6/15/2010		5,087,250		5,087,250		4,654,834		8.0	%

Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e, i)	Packaging	Senior Secured Notes 11.92%, 6/15/2010		500,000		500,000		457,500		0.8	%

		Total Packaging		10,437,250		10,437,250		9,550,084		16.4	%

Brown Publishing Company (d, i)	Publishing	Second Lien Term Loan 8.76%, 9/19/2014		1,203,226		1,198,390		15,040		0.0	%

Network Communications, Inc. (d, i)	Publishing	Unsecured Notes 10.75%, 12/1/2013		5,000,000		5,065,452		2,412,500		4.1	%

Penton Media, Inc. (d)	Publishing	First Lien Term Loan 5.00%, 8/1/2014		4,840,388		3,951,945		3,448,776		5.9	%

		Total Publishing		11,043,614		10,215,787		5,876,316		10.0	%

Sub Total Non-control/Non-affiliated investments						113,009,708		71,719,742		123.4	%

Control investments - 31.3% (b)

GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP (h, i)	Financial Services	100% General Partnership Interest		-		-		-		0.0	%

GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007 LTD. (f, h)	Structured Finance Securities	Other/Structured Finance Securities 9.73%, 1/21/2020		30,000,000		29,233,097		18,208,657		31.3	%

Sub Total Control investments						29,233,097		18,208,657		31.3	%

Affiliate investments - 0.0% (b)

GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP (g, i)	Financial Services	6.24% Limited Partnership Interest		-		-		-		0.0	%
Sub Total Affiliate investments						-		-		0.0	%

TOTAL INVESTMENT ASSETS - 154.7% (b)					$	142,242,805	$	89,928,399		154.7	%

Outstanding interest rate cap	Interest rate			Maturity	Notional		Cost		Fair Value		% of Net Assets

Interest rate cap		8.0	%	2/9/2014	$	36,734,694	$	87,000	$	15,812		0.0	%
Interest rate cap		8.0	%	11/30/2013		26,433,408		44,000		6,466		0.0	%

Sub Total Outstanding interest rate cap							$	131,000	$	22,278		0.0	%

(a) All of the Fund’s equity and debt investments are issued by eligible portfolio companies, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, except Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada, Grant U.S. Holdings LLP, GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007 Ltd., Terphane Holdings Corp., and GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP.

(b) Percentages are based on net assets of $58,132,890 as of May 31, 2010.

(d) All or a portion of the securities are pledged as collateral under a revolving securitized credit facility (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements).

(e) Non-U.S. company. The principal place of business for Terphane Holdings Corp is Brazil, and for Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada and Grant U.S. Holdings LLP is Canada.

(f) 9.73% represents the modeled effective interest rate that is expected to be earned over the life of the investment.

(g) As defined in the Investment Company Act, we are an "Affiliate" of this portfolio company because we own 5% or more of the portfolio company's outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the period in which the issuer was an Affiliate are as follows:

Interest

Management

Net Realized

Net unrealized

Company

Purchases

Redemptions

Sales (cost)

Income

fee income

gains/(losses)

GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP

(h) As defined in the Investment Company Act, we are an "Affiliate" of this portfolio company because we own 5% or more of the portfolio company's outstanding voting securities. In addition, as defined in the Investment Company Act, we "Control" this portfolio company because we own more than 25% of the portfolio company's outstanding voting securities. Transactions during the period in which the issuer was both an Affiliate and a portfolio company that we Control are as follows:

							Interest		Management		Net Realized		Net unrealized
Company	Purchases		Redemptions		Sales (cost)		Income		fee income		gains/(losses)		gains/(losses)
GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007 LTD.	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	652,720	$	506,785	$	-	$	1,510,354
GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

(i) Non-income producing at May 31, 2010.

GSC Investment Corp.

Consolidated Schedule of Investments

February 28, 2010

Company (a, c)	Industry	Investment Interest Rate/Maturity	Principal/ Number of Shares		Cost		Fair Value		% of Net Assets

Non-control/Non-affiliated investments - 131.0% (b)

GFSI Inc (d)	Apparel	Senior Secured Notes 10.50%, 6/1/2011	$	7,082,000	$	7,082,000	$	6,909,907		11.9	%

Legacy Cabinets, Inc. (d, i)	Building Products	First Lien Term Loan 6.58%, 8/18/2012		1,479,842		1,463,159		444,841		0.8	%

Legacy Cabinets, Inc. (d, i)	Building Products	Second Lien Term Loan 12.50%, 8/18/2013		1,862,420		1,828,197		85,113		0.1	%

		Total Building Products		3,342,262		3,291,356		529,954		0.9	%

Hopkins Manufacturing Corporation (d)	Consumer Products	Second Lien Term Loan 7.50%, 1/26/2012		3,250,000		3,247,947		3,003,650		5.2	%

Targus Group International, Inc. (d)	Consumer Products	First Lien Term Loan 10.25%, 11/22/2012		3,109,712		2,936,092		2,738,101		4.7	%

Targus Holdings, Inc. (d)	Consumer Products	Unsecured Notes 10.00%, 12/14/2015		1,538,235		1,538,235		1,529,467		2.6	%

Targus Holdings, Inc. (d, i)	Consumer Products	Common		62,413		566,765		237,169		0.4	%

		Total Consumer Products		7,960,360		8,289,039		7,508,387		12.9	%

CFF Acquisition LLC (d)	Consumer Services	First Lien Term Loan 7.50%, 7/31/2013		306,855		306,855		255,242		0.4	%

M/C Communications, LLC (d)	Education	First Lien Term Loan 6.75%, 12/31/2012		831,174		831,174		616,897		1.1	%

M/C Communications, LLC (d, i)	Education	Class A Common Stock		166,327		30,241		16,633		0.0	%

		Total Education		997,501		861,415		633,530		1.1	%

Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc. (d)	Electronics	Second Lien Term Loan 6.23%, 6/1/2014		2,000,000		1,814,950		1,764,600		3.0	%

Group Dekko (d)	Electronics	Second Lien Term Loan 10.50%, 1/20/2012		6,913,293		6,913,293		4,852,440		8.3	%

		Total Electronics		8,913,293		8,728,243		6,617,040		11.4	%

USS Parent Holding Corp. (d, i)	Environmental	Non Voting Common Stock		765		133,002		86,745		0.1	%

USS Parent Holding Corp. (d, i)	Environmental	Voting Common Stock		17,396		3,025,798		1,973,453		3.3	%

		Total Environmental		18,161		3,158,800		2,060,198		3.5	%

Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc. (d)	Financial Services	Second Lien Term Loan 6.48%, 7/31/2013		4,837,500		4,814,623		983,464		1.7	%

Big Train, Inc. (d)	Food and Beverage	First Lien Term Loan 7.75%, 3/31/2012		1,931,121		1,451,316		1,696,876		2.9	%

IDI Acquisition Corp. (d)	Healthcare Services	Senior Secured Notes 10.75%, 12/15/2011		3,800,000		3,679,489		3,620,640		6.2	%

PRACS Institute, LTD (d)	Healthcare Services	Second Lien Term Loan 8.26%, 4/17/2013		4,093,750		4,058,633		3,568,931		6.2	%

		Total Healthcare Services		7,893,750		7,738,122		7,189,571		12.4	%

McMillin Companies LLC (d)	Homebuilding	Senior Secured Notes 9.53%, 10/31/2013		7,700,000		7,334,121		3,634,400		6.3	%

Worldwide Express Operations, LLC (d)	Logistics	First Lien Term Loan 10.00%, 6/30/2013		2,820,467		2,816,547		2,230,143		3.9	%

Jason Incorporated (d, i)	Manufacturing	Unsecured Notes 13.00%, 11/1/2010		12,000,000		12,000,000		1,478,400		2.5	%

Jason Incorporated (d, i)	Manufacturing	Unsecured Notes 13.00%, 11/1/2010		1,700,000		1,700,000		209,440		0.4	%

Specialized Technology Resources, Inc. (d)	Manufacturing	Second Lien Term Loan 7.23%, 12/15/2014		5,000,000		4,799,666		4,711,000		8.0	%

		Total Manufacturing		18,700,000		18,499,666		6,398,840		11.0	%

Elyria Foundry Company, LLC (d)	Metals	Senior Secured Notes 13.00%, 3/1/2013		5,000,000		4,883,382		3,785,500		6.5	%

Elyria Foundry Company, LLC (d, i)	Metals	Warrants		3,000		-		8,610		0.0	%

		Total Metals		5,003,000		4,883,382		3,794,110		6.5	%

Company (a, c)	Industry	Investment Interest Rate/Maturity	Principal/ Number of Shares		Cost		Fair Value		% of Net Assets

Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada (d, e)	Natural Resources	First Lien Term Loan 11.00%, 3/30/2009	$	2,948,639	$	2,948,639	$	2,830,694		4.9	%

Grant U.S. Holdings LLP (d, e, i)	Natural Resources	Second Lien Term Loan 10.75%, 9/20/2013		6,349,512		6,349,348		158,738		0.3	%

		Total Natural Resources		9,298,151		9,297,987		2,989,432		5.1	%

Energy Alloys, LLC (d)	Oil and Gas	Second Lien Term Loan 3.00%, 6/30/2015		6,239,318		6,239,318		1,128,693		1.9	%

Energy Alloys, LLC (d, i)	Oil and Gas	Warrants		3		-		-		0.0	%

		Total Oil and Gas		6,239,321		6,239,318		1,128,693		1.9	%

Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e)	Packaging	Senior Secured Notes 12.50%, 6/15/2010		4,850,000		4,850,000		4,549,785		7.8	%

Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e)	Packaging	Senior Secured Notes 12.50%, 6/15/2010		5,087,250		5,087,250		4,772,349		8.2	%

Terphane Holdings Corp. (d, e)	Packaging	Senior Secured Notes 10.92%, 6/15/2010		500,000		500,000		469,050		0.8	%

		Total Packaging		10,437,250		10,437,250		9,791,184		16.8	%

Custom Direct, Inc. (d)	Printing	First Lien Term Loan 3.06%, 12/31/2013		1,832,053		1,527,103		1,614,222		2.7	%

Affinity Group, Inc. (d)	Publishing	First Lien Term Loan 12.75%, 3/31/2010		361,020		360,554		361,020		0.6	%

Affinity Group, Inc. (d)	Publishing	First Lien Term Loan 12.75%, 3/31/2010		386,625		386,129		386,626		0.7	%

Brown Publishing Company (d, i)	Publishing	Second Lien Term Loan 8.76%, 9/19/2014		1,203,226		1,198,390		10,709		0.0	%

Network Communications, Inc. (d)	Publishing	Unsecured Notes 10.75%, 12/1/2013		5,000,000		5,067,619		2,473,000		4.3	%

Penton Media, Inc. (d)	Publishing	First Lien Term Loan 2.50%, 2/1/2013		4,847,802		3,908,440		3,478,299		5.9	%

		Total Publishing		11,798,673		10,921,132		6,709,654		11.5	%

Sub Total Non-control/Non-affiliated investments						117,678,275		72,674,847		125.0	%

Control investments - 30.1% (b)

GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP (h, i)	Financial Services	100% General Partnership Interest		-		-		-		0.0	%

GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007 LTD. (f, h)	Structured Finance Securities	Other/Structured Finance Securities 8.27%, 1/21/2020		30,000,000		29,233,097		16,698,303		28.7	%

Sub Total Control investments						29,233,097		16,698,303		28.7	%

Company (a, c)	Industry	Investment Interest Rate/Maturity	Principal/ Number of Shares		Cost		Fair Value		% of Net Assets

Affiliate investments - 0.0% (b)

GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP (g, i)	Financial Services	6.24% Limited Partnership Interest		-		-		-		0.0	%
Sub Total Affiliate investments						-		-		0.0	%

TOTAL INVESTMENT ASSETS - 161.1% (b)					$	146,911,372	$	89,373,150		153.7	%

Outstanding interest rate cap	Interest rate			Maturity	Notional		Cost		Fair Value		% of Net Assets

Interest rate cap		8.0	%	2/9/2014	$	39,183,673	$	87,000	$	30,097		0.1	%
Interest rate cap		8.0	%	11/30/2013		26,433,408		44,000		12,050		0.0	%

Sub Total Outstanding interest rate cap							$	131,000	$	42,147		0.1	%

(b) Percentages are based on net assets of $55,478,152 as of February 28, 2010.

(d) All or a portion of the securities are pledged as collateral under a revolving securitized credit facility (see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements).

(e) Non-U.S. company. The principal place of business for Terphane Holdings Corp is Brazil, and for Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada and Grant U.S. Holdings LLP is Canada.

(f) 8.27% represents the modeled effective interest rate that is expected to be earned over the life of the investment.

							Interest		Management		Net Realized		Net unrealized
Company	Purchases		Redemptions		Sales (cost)		Income		fee income		gains/(losses)		gains/(losses)
GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	(10,527	)

							Interest		Management		Net Realized		Net unrealized
Company	Purchases		Redemptions		Sales (cost)		Income		fee income		gains/(losses)		gains/(losses)
GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007 LTD.	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	2,397,514	$	2,057,397	$	-	$	(4,970,217	)
GSC Partners CDO GP III, LP	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	(98,412	)

(i) Non-income producing at February 28, 2010.

GSC Investment Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets

	For the three months ended May 31, 2010			For the three months ended May 31, 2009
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
INCREASE FROM OPERATIONS:
Net investment income	$	2,202		$	2,563,989
Net realized loss from investments		(2,551,410	)		(5,152	)
Net unrealized appreciation on investments		5,223,815			2,769,292
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on derivatives		(19,869	)		35,687
Net increase in net assets from operations		2,654,738			5,363,816

Total increase in net assets		2,654,738			5,363,816
Net assets at beginning of period		55,478,152			68,013,777
Net assets at end of period	$	58,132,890		$	73,377,593

Net asset value per common share	$	3.43		$	8.85
Common shares outstanding at end of period		16,940,109			8,291,384

Accumulated undistributed net investment income (loss)	$	(2,843,933	)	$	8,686,481

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GSC Investment Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	For the three months ended May 31, 2010			For the three months ended May 31, 2009
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Operating activities
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS	$	2,654,738		$	5,363,816
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Paid-in-kind interest income		(377,030	)		(193,771	)
Net accretion of discount on investments		(182,648	)		(274,406	)
Amortization of deferred credit facility financing costs		-			71,320
Net realized loss from investments		2,551,410			5,152
Net unrealized appreciation on investments		(5,223,815	)		(2,769,292	)
Unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on derivatives		19,869			(35,687	)
Proceeds from sale and redemption of investments		2,676,834			921,553
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
Cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts		(153,304	)		(850,750	)
Interest receivable		884,749			19,713
Management fee receivable		96,628			64
Other assets		(261,364	)		180,268
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Management and incentive fees payable		411,389			869,927
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(331,109	)		(9,891	)
Interest and credit facility fees payable		3,080			154,175
Due to manager		(9,053	)		-
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		2,760,374			3,452,191

Financing activities
Paydowns on debt		(3,184,791	)		(1,239,416	)
Credit facility financing cost		-			(25,000	)
NET CASH USED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(3,184,791	)		(1,264,416	)

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(424,417	)		2,187,775
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		3,352,434			6,356,225
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	2,928,017		$	8,544,000

Supplemental Information:
Interest paid during the period	$	828,040		$	417,398

Supplemental non-cash information
Paid-in-kind interest income	$	377,030		$	193,771
Net accretion of discount on investments	$	182,648		$	274,406
Amortization of deferred credit facility financing costs	$	-		$	71,320

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GSC INVESTMENT CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

May 31, 2010

(unaudited)

Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

GSC Investment Corp. (the “Company”, “we” and “us”) is a non-diversified closed end management investment company incorporated in Maryland that has elected to be treated and is regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). We commenced operations on March 23, 2007 and completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) on March 28, 2007. We have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code (the “code”). We expect to continue to qualify and to elect to be treated for tax purposes as a RIC. Our investment objectives are to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments by primarily investing in private middle market companies and select high yield bonds.

GSC Investment, LLC (the “LLC”) was organized in May 2006 as a Maryland limited liability company. As of February 28, 2007, the LLC had not yet commenced its operations and investment activities.

On March 21, 2007, the Company was incorporated and concurrently, the LLC was merged with and into the Company in accordance with the procedure for such merger in the LLC’s limited liability company agreement and Maryland law. In connection with such merger, each outstanding common share of the LLC was converted into an equivalent number of shares of common stock of the Company and the Company is the surviving entity.

We are externally managed and advised by our investment adviser, GSCP (NJ), L.P. (individually and collectively with its affiliates, “GSC Group” or the “Manager”), pursuant to an investment advisory and management agreement.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and its special purpose financing subsidiary, GSC Investment Funding, LLC. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All references made to the “Company,” “we,” and “us” in the financial statements encompassing of these consolidated subsidiaries, except as stated otherwise.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the period reported. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include short-term, liquid investments in a money market fund. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value.

Cash and cash equivalents, Securitization Accounts

Cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts include amounts held in designated bank accounts in the form of cash and short-term liquid investments in money market funds representing payments received on securitized investments or other reserved amounts associated with the Company’s securitization facilities. The Company is required to use a portion of these amounts to pay interest expense, reduce borrowings, or pay other amounts in accordance with the related securitization agreements. Cash held in such accounts may not be available for the general use of the Company.

Investment Classification

The Company classifies its investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, “Control Investments” are defined as investments in companies in which we own more than 25% of the voting securities or maintain greater than 50% of the board representation. Under the 1940 Act, “Affiliated Investments” are defined as those non-control investments in companies in which we own between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, “Non-affiliated Investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments or Affiliated Investments.

Investment Valuation

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities which qualify as financial instruments under ASC 825 approximates the carrying amounts presented in the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities.

Investments for which market quotations are readily available are fair valued at such market quotations obtained from independent third party pricing services and market makers subject to any decision by our board of directors to make a fair value determination to reflect significant events affecting the value of these investments. We value investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair value as determined, in good faith, by our board of directors based on input from our Manager, our audit committee and, if our board or audit committee so request, a third party independent valuation firm. Determinations of fair value may involve subjective judgments and estimates. The types of factors that may be considered in a fair value pricing include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, market yield trend analysis, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors.

We undertake a multi-step valuation process each quarter when valuing investments for which market quotations are not readily available, as described below:

•

Each investment is initially valued by the responsible investment professionals and preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with our senior management; and

•

An independent valuation firm engaged by our board of directors reviews at least one quarter of these preliminary valuations each quarter so that the valuation of each investment for which market quotes are not readily available is reviewed by the independent valuation firm at least annually.

In addition, all our investments are subject to the following valuation process.

•

The audit committee of our board of directors reviews each preliminary valuation and our investment adviser and independent valuation firm (if applicable) will supplement the preliminary valuation to reflect any comments provided by the audit committee; and

•

Our board of directors discuss the valuations and determine the fair value of each investment, in good faith, based on the input of our investment adviser, independent valuation firm (if applicable) and audit committee.

Our equity investment in GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd. (“GSCIC CLO”) is carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions based on historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for similar CLO equity, when available, as determined by our investment advisor and recommended to our board of directors.

Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The determination of fair value by our board of directors may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed. Our net asset value could be materially affected if the determinations regarding the fair value of our investments were materially higher or lower than the values that we ultimately realize upon the disposal of such investments.

We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC 815. ASC 815 requires recognizing all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company values derivative contracts at the closing fair value provided by the counterparty. Changes in the values of derivative contracts are included in the consolidated statement of operations.

Investment Transactions and Income Recognition

Purchases and sales of investments and the related realized gains or losses are recorded on a trade-date basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company stops accruing interest on its investments when it is determined that interest is no longer collectible. If any cash is received after it is determined that interest is no longer collectible, we treat the cash as payment on the principal balance until the entire principal balance has been repaid, before any interest income is recognized. Discounts and premiums on investments purchased are accreted/amortized over the life of the respective investment using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortizations of premium on investments.

Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected. Accrued interest is generally reserved when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as a reduction in principal depending upon management’s judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in management’s judgment, are likely to remain current. The Company may make exceptions to this if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection.

Interest income on our investment in GSCIC CLO is recorded using the effective interest method in accordance with the provision of ASC 325, based on the anticipated yield and the estimated cash flows over the projected life of the investment. Yields are revised when there are changes in actual or estimated cash flows due to changes in prepayments and/or re-investments, credit losses or asset pricing. Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an adjustment to the estimated yield over the remaining life of the investment from the date the estimated yield was changed.

Paid-in-Kind Interest

The Company includes in income certain amounts that it has not yet received in cash, such as contractual paid-in-kind interest (“PIK”), which represents contractually deferred interest added to the investment balance that is generally due at maturity. We stop accruing PIK if we do not expect the issuer to be able to pay all principal and interest when due.

Deferred Credit Facility Financing Costs

Financing costs incurred in connection with each respective credit facility have been deferred and are being amortized using the straight line method over the life of each respective facility.

Indemnifications

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may enter into contracts or agreements that contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of these provisions against the Company. Based on its history and experience, management feels that the likelihood of such an event is remote.

Income Taxes

The Company has filed an election to be treated for tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, among other things, intends to make the requisite distributions to its stockholders which will relieve the Company from federal income taxes. Therefore, no provision has been recorded for federal income taxes.

In order to qualify as a RIC, among other requirements, the Company is required to timely distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each fiscal tax year. The Company will be subject to a nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax of 4% on undistributed income if we do not distribute at least 98% of our ordinary income in any calendar year and 98% of our capital gain net income for each one-year period ending on October 31.

Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned.

We adopted ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) on February 28, 2008. ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold that an uncertain tax position is required to meet before tax benefits associated with such uncertain tax position are recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Our adoption of ASC 740 did not require a cumulative effect adjustment to the February 28, 2008 undistributed net realized earnings. We classify interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of provision for income taxes.

Dividends

Dividends to common stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the board of directors. Net realized capital gains, if any, are generally distributed at least annually, although we may decide to retain such capital gains for reinvestment.

The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of our dividend distributions on behalf of our stockholders unless a stockholder elects to receive cash. As a result, if our board of directors authorizes, and we declare, a cash dividend, then our stockholders who have not ‘‘opted out’’ of our dividend reinvestment plan will have their cash dividends automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, rather than receiving the cash dividends. If the Company’s common stock is trading below net asset value at the time of valuation, the plan administrator will receive the dividend or distribution in cash and will purchase common stock in the open market, on the New York Stock Exchange or elsewhere, for the account of each Participant.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”, (“SFAS No. 166”) which amends the derecognition guidance in SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”, eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” (“QSPE”) and requires more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions as well as a company’s continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 is now codified in ASC 860. The amended requirements are effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009 and early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of ASC 860 by the Company did not have material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASU 2010-06” ), which amends ASC 820 and requires additional disclosure related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurement in respect of transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The update also clarifies existing disclosure about inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures related to activity in Level 3 fair value measurements which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within that fiscal year. The adoption of ASU 2010–06 by the Company did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Risk Management

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company manages a variety of risks, including market risk and credit risk. Market risk is the risk of potential adverse changes to the value of investments because of changes in market conditions such as interest rate movements and volatility in investment prices.

Credit risk is the risk of default or non-performance by portfolio companies equivalent to the investment’s carrying amount.

The Company is also exposed to credit risk related to maintaining all of its cash and cash equivalents including those in securitization accounts at a major financial institution and credit risk related to the derivative counterparty.

The Company has investments in lower rated and comparable quality unrated high yield bonds and bank loans. Investments in high yield investments are accompanied by a greater degree of credit risk. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer is significantly greater for holders of high yield securities, because such investments are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.

Note 3. Going Concern

As of May 31, 2010, the Company remained in default on its Revolving Facility (see Note 7) and as a result of the default, our lender has the right to accelerate repayment of the outstanding indebtedness and to foreclose and liquidate the collateral pledged thereunder. Acceleration of the outstanding indebtedness and/or liquidation of the collateral would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and operations. The deleveraging of the Company may significantly impair the Company’s ability to effectively operate. There is no assurance that we will have sufficient funds available to pay in full the total amount of obligations that would become due as a result of such acceleration or that we will be able to obtain additional or alternative financing to pay or refinance any such accelerated obligations. However, we continue to believe that we will have adequate liquidity to continue to fund our operations and the interest payments on our outstanding debt, including any default interest.

On April 14, 2010, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC (“Saratoga”) and CLO Partners LLC (“CLO Partners”) and announced a $55 million recapitalization plan to cure the debt default. The recapitalization plan includes Saratoga and CLO Partners purchasing approximately 9.8 million shares of common stock of GSC Investment Corp. for $1.52 per share pursuant to a definitive stock purchase agreement and a commitment from Madison Capital Funding LLC to provide the Company with a $40 million senior secured revolving credit facility. Upon the closing of the transaction, the Company will immediately borrow funds under the new credit facility that, when added to the $15 million equity investment, will be sufficient to repay the full amount of the Company's existing debt and to provide the Company with working capital thereafter. The plan is subject to shareholder approval.

A fundamental principle of the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP is the assumption that an entity will continue in existence as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations and the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities occurring in the ordinary course of business. This principle is applicable to all entities except for entities in liquidation or entities for which liquidation appears imminent. In accordance with this requirement, our policy is to prepare our consolidated financial statements on a going concern basis unless we intend to liquidate or have no other alternative but to liquidate. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and do not reflect any adjustments that might specifically result from the outcome of this uncertainty or our debt restructuring activities.

Note 4. Investments

The Company values all investments in accordance with ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value. As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

ASC 820 provides guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased when compared with normal market activity for the asset or liability, and identifying transactions that are not orderly. In those circumstances, further analysis and/or significant adjustment to the transaction or quoted prices may be required at the measurement date under current market conditions.

ASC 820 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability of inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques the Company is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the inputs used to determine fair values. Investments carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

•

Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

•

Level 2 – Valuations based on inputs other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable.

•

Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The inputs into the determination of fair value may require significant management judgment or estimation. Such information may be the result of consensus pricing information or broker quotes which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by disclaimer would result in classification as Level 3 information, assuming no additional corroborating evidence.

In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, we continue to employ the valuation policy approved by our board of directors that is consistent with ASC 820 (see Note 2). Consistent with our valuation policy, we evaluate the source of inputs, including any markets in which our investments are trading, in determining fair value.

The following table presents fair value measurements of investments as of May 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurments Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
First lien term loans	$	–	$	–	$	13,830	$	13,830
Second lien term loans		–		–		20,794		20,794
Senior secured notes		–		–		29,372		29,372
Unsecured notes		–		–		4,308		4,308
Structured finance securities		–		–		18,209		18,209
Common stock/equities		–		–		3,415		3,415
Limited partnership interest		–		–		–		–
Total	$	–	$	–	$	89,928	$	89,928

The following table presents fair value measurements of investments as of February 28, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurments Using
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
First lien term loans	$	–	$	–	$	16,653	$	16,653
Second lien term loans		–		–		20,267		20,267
Senior secured notes		–		–		27,742		27,742
Unsecured notes		–		–		5,690		5,690
Structured finance securities		–		–		16,698		16,698
Common stock/equities		–		–		2,323		2,323
Limited partnership interest		–		–		–		–
Total	$	–	$	–	$	89,373	$	89,373

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the quarter ended May 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

	First lien term loans			Second lien term loans			Senior secured notes		Unsecured notes			Structured finance securities		Common stock/equities		Total
Balance as of February 28, 2010	$	16,653		$	20,267		$	27,742	$	5,690		$	16,698	$	2,323	$	89,373
Net unrealized gains (losses)		547			2,228			1,586		(1,380	)		1,511		732		5,224
Purchases and other adjustments to cost		308			210			44		(2	)		-		-		560
Sales and redemptions		(2,664	)		(13	)		-		-			-		-		(2,677	)
Net realized loss from investments		(689	)		(1,863	)		-		-			-		-		(2,552	)
Transfers in/out		(325	)		(35	)		-		-			-		360		-
Balance as of May 31, 2010	$	13,830		$	20,794		$	29,372	$	4,308		$	18,209	$	3,415	$	89,928

Purchases and other adjustments to cost include purchases of new investments at cost, effects of refinancing/restructuring, accretion/amortization of income from discount/premium on debt securities, and PIK.

Sale and redemptions represent net proceeds received from investments sold during the period.

Net transfers in and/or out represent existing investments that were either previously categorized as another level and the inputs to the model became unobservable or investments that were previously classified as the lowest significant input became observable during the period. These investments transfers are recorded at their end of period fair values.

The composition of our investments as of May 31, 2010, at amortized cost and fair value were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Investments at Amortized Cost		Investments at Fair Value		Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio
First lien term loans	$	15,567	$	13,830		15.4	%
Second lien term loans		39,563		20,794		23.1
Senior secured notes		33,460		29,372		32.7
Unsecured notes		20,304		4,308		4.8
Structured finance securities		29,233		18,209		20.2
Common stock/equities		4,116		3,415		3.8
Limited partnership interest		–		–		–
Total	$	142,243	$	89,928		100.0	%

The composition of our investments as of February 28, 2010, at amortized cost and fair value were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Investments at Amortized Cost		Investments at Fair Value		Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio
First lien term loans	$	18,936	$	16,653		18.6	%
Second lien term loans		41,264		20,267		22.7
Senior secured notes		33,416		27,742		31.0
Unsecured notes		20,306		5,690		6.4
Structured finance securities		29,233		16,698		18.7
Common stock/equities		3,756		2,323		2.6
Limited partnership interest		–		–		–
Total	$	146,911	$	89,373		100.0	%

Note 5. Investment in GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd.

On January 22, 2008, we invested $30 million in all of the outstanding subordinated notes of GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd., a $400 million CLO managed by us that invests primarily in senior secured loans. Additionally, we entered into a collateral management agreement with GSCIC CLO pursuant to which we will act as collateral manager to it. In return for our collateral management services, we are entitled to a senior collateral management fee of 0.10% and a subordinate collateral management fee of 0.40% of the outstanding principal amount of GSCIC CLO’s assets, to be paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee equal to 20% of excess cash flow to the extent the GSCIC CLO subordinated notes receive an internal rate of return equal to or greater than 12%. For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009 we accrued $0.5 and $0.5 million in management fee income, respectively and $0.7 and $0.9 million in interest income, respectively, from GSCIC CLO. We did not accrue any amounts related to the incentive management fee as the 12% hurdle rate has not yet been achieved.

Note 6. Agreements

On March 21, 2007, the Company entered into an investment advisory and management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with GSC Group, our investment advisor. The initial term of the Management Agreement is two years, with automatic, one-year renewals at the end of each year subject to certain approvals by our board of directors and/or our stockholders. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, our investment adviser implements our business strategy on a day-to-day basis and performs certain services for us, subject to oversight by our board of directors. Our investment adviser is responsible for, among other duties, determining investment criteria, sourcing, analyzing and executing investments transactions, asset sales, financings and performing asset management duties. Under the Management Agreement, we have agreed to pay our investment adviser a management fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of a base management fee and an incentive fee.

The base management fee of 1.75% is calculated based on the average value of our total assets (other than cash or cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) at the end of the two most recently completed fiscal quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the applicable fiscal quarter.

The incentive fee consists of the following two parts:

The first, payable quarterly in arrears, equals 20% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income (not including excise taxes), expressed as a rate of return on the value of the net assets at the end of the immediately preceding quarter, that exceeds a 1.875% quarterly (7.5% annualized) hurdle rate measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. Under this provision, in any fiscal quarter, our investment adviser receives no incentive fee unless our pre-incentive fee net investment income, as defined above, exceeds the hurdle rate of 1.875%. Amounts received as a return of capital are not included in calculating this portion of the incentive fee. Since the hurdle rate is based on net assets, a return of less than the hurdle rate on total assets may still result in an incentive fee.

The second, payable at the end of each fiscal year equals 20% of our net realized capital gains, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation, in each case on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of such incentive fees paid to the investment adviser through such date.

For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009 we incurred $0.4 and $0.5 million in base management fees. For the three months May 31, 2009 we incurred $0.3 million in incentive fees related to pre-incentive fee net investment income. For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, we incurred no incentive management fees related to net realized capital gains. As of May 31, 2010 $0.9 million of base management fees and $2.6 million of incentive fees were unpaid and included in management and incentive fees payable in the accompanying consolidated statement of assets and liabilities.

As of May 31, 2010, the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, the sum of our aggregate distributions to our stockholders and our change in net assets (defined as total assets less liabilities) (before taking into account any incentive fees payable during that period) was less than 7.5% of our net assets at the beginning of the first fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2010. Accordingly, the payment of the incentive fee for the quarter ended May 31, 2010 has been deferred along with all previously deferred incentive fees. The total deferred incentive fee payable at May 31, 2010 was $2.6 million.

On March 21, 2007, the Company entered into a separate administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with GSC Group, pursuant to which GSC Group, as our administrator, has agreed to furnish us with the facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations and provide managerial assistance on our behalf to those portfolio companies to which we are required to provide such assistance. Our allocable portion is based on the proportion that our total assets bears to the total assets or a subset of total assets administered by our administrator.

For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009 we expensed $0.2 and $0.2 million of administrator expenses, respectively, pertaining to bookkeeping, record keeping and other administrative services provided to the Company in addition to our allocable portion of rent and other overhead related expenses. GSC Group has agreed not to be reimbursed by the Company for any expenses incurred in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement until the Company’s total assets exceeds $500 million. Additionally, the Company’s requirement to reimburse GSC Group is capped such that the amounts payable, together with the Company’s other operating expenses, will not exceed an amount equal to 1.5% per annum of the Company’s net assets attributable to the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, we have recorded $0.2 and $0.2 million in expense waiver and reimbursement, respectively, under the Administration Agreement in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

On March 23, 2007, the Manager provided the Company with a Notification of Fee Reimbursement (the “Expense Reimbursement Agreement”). The Expense Reimbursement Agreement provides for the Manager to reimburse the Company for operating expenses to the extent that our total annual operating expenses (other than investment advisory and management fees, interest and credit facility expenses, and organizational expense) exceed an amount equal to 1.55% of our net assets attributable to common stock. The Manager is not entitled to recover any reimbursements under this agreement in future periods. The term of the Expense Reimbursement Agreement is for a period of 12 months beginning March 23, 2007 and for each twelve months period thereafter unless otherwise agreed by the Manager and the Company. On April 15, 2008, the Manager and the Company agreed not to extend the agreement for an additional twelve month period and terminated the Expense Reimbursement Agreement as of March 23, 2008. For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, we recorded $0.2 and $0.2 million in expense waiver and reimbursement, respectively under the Expense Reimbursement Agreement in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

Note 7. Borrowings

As a BDC, we are only allowed to employ leverage to the extent that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after giving effect to such leverage. The amount of leverage that we employ at any time depends on our assessment of the market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing.

On April 11, 2007, we formed GSC Investment Funding LLC (“GSC Funding”), a wholly owned consolidated subsidiary of the Company, through which we entered into a revolving securitized credit facility (the “Revolving Facility”) with Deutsche Bank AG, as administrative agent, under which we may borrow up to $100 million. A significant percentage of our total assets have been pledged under the Revolving Facility to secure our obligations thereunder. Under the Revolving Facility, funds were borrowed from or through certain lenders and interest is payable monthly at the greater of the commercial paper rate and our lender’s prime rate plus 4.00% plus a default rate of 2.00% or, if the commercial paper market is unavailable, the greater of the prevailing LIBOR rates and our lender’s prime rate plus 6.00% plus a default rate of 3.00%.

In March 2009 we amended the Revolving Credit Facility to increase the portion of the portfolio that can be invested in "CCC" rated investments in return for an increased interest rate and expedited amortization. As a result of these transactions, we expected to have additional cushion under our Borrowing Base (as defined below) that would allow us to better manage our capital in times of declining asset prices and market dislocation. If we are not able to obtain new sources of financing, however, we expect our portfolio will gradually de-lever as principal payments are received, which may negatively impact our net investment income and ability to pay dividends.

On July 30, 2009 we exceeded the permissible borrowing limit for 30 consecutive days, resulting in an event of default under our Revolving Facility that is continuing. As a result of this event of default, our lender has the right to accelerate repayment of the outstanding indebtedness under and Revolving Facility and to foreclose and liquidate the collateral pledged thereunder. Acceleration of the outstanding indebtedness and/or liquidation of the collateral would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and operations. As a result of the continuing default, the Company may be forced to sell its investments to raise funds to repay outstanding amounts. Such forced sales may result in values that could be less than carrying values reported in these financial statements. The deleveraging of the Company may significantly impair the Company’s ability to effectively operate. Please see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors—An event of default under the Revolving Facility may lead to a forced liquidation of the pledged assets that may yield less than the fair value of the assets” in our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010 for more information. Our lender has elected not to accelerate the obligation to date, but has reserved the right to do so.

At May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010 we had $33.8 million and $37.0 million in borrowings under the Revolving Facility, respectively. The actual amount that may be outstanding at any given time (the “Borrowing Base”) is dependent upon the amount and quality of the collateral securing the Revolving Facility. Our Borrowing Base was $6.1 million at May 31, 2010 versus $1.7 million at February 28, 2010. The increase in our Borrowing Base during the quarter is mainly attributable to the change in classification of certain defaulted assets that resulted in a higher collateral value per the Borrowing Base calculation.

For purposes of determining the Borrowing Base, most assets are assigned the values set forth in our most recent quarterly report filed with the SEC. Accordingly, the May 31, 2010 Borrowing Base relies upon the valuations set forth in the annual report for the year ended February 28, 2010. The valuations presented in this quarterly report will not be incorporated into the Borrowing Base until after this report is filed with the SEC.

During the continuance of an event of default, the interest rate on the Revolving Facility is increased from the commercial paper rate plus 4.00% to the greater of the commercial paper rate and our lender’s prime rate plus 4.00% plus a default rate of 2.00% or, if the commercial paper market is unavailable, the greater of the prevailing LIBOR rates and our lender’s prime rate plus 6.00% plus a default rate of 3.00%. For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, we recorded $0.8 and $0.6 million of interest expense. For the three months ended May 31, 2009, we recorded $71,320 of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Revolving Facility. For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, the interest rates on the outstanding borrowings were 9.25% and a range of 4.52% to 4.73%, respectively.

Note 8. Interest Rate Cap Agreements

In April and May 2007, pursuant to the requirements of the Facilities, GSC Funding and GSC Funding II entered into interest rate cap agreements with Deutsche Bank AG with notional amounts of $34 million and $60.9 million at costs of $75,000, and $44,000, respectively. In May 2007 GSC Funding increased the notional under its agreement from $34 million to $40 million for an additional cost of $12,000. The agreements expire in February 2014 and November 2013 respectively. These interest rate caps are treated as free-standing derivatives under ASC 815 and are presented at their fair value on the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities and the changes in their fair value are included on the consolidated statement of operations.

The agreements provide for a payment to the Company in the event LIBOR exceeds 8%, mitigating our exposure to increases in LIBOR. With respect to calculating the payments under these agreements, the notional amount is determined based on a pre-determined schedule set forth in the respective agreements which provides for a reduction in the notional at specified dates until the maturity of the agreements. As of May 31, 2010 we did not receive any such payments as the LIBOR has not exceeded 8%. At May 31, 2010, the total notional outstanding for the interest rate caps was $63.2 million with an aggregate fair value of $22,278, which is recorded in outstanding interest cap at fair value on the Company’s consolidated statement of assets and liabilities. For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, the Company recorded $19,869 of unrealized depreciation and $35,687 of unrealized appreciation respectively, on derivatives in the consolidated statement of operations related to the change in the fair value of the interest rate cap agreements.

The table below summarizes our interest rate cap agreements as of May 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

Instrument	Type	Notional		Interest Rate			Maturity	Fair Value
Interest Rate Cap	Free Standing Derivative	$	36,735		8.0	%	Feb 2014	$	16
Interest Rate Cap	Free Standing Derivative		26,433		8.0		Nov 2013		6
	Net fair value							$	22

The table below summarizes our interest rate cap agreements as of February 28, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

Instrument	Type	Notional		Interest Rate			Maturity	Fair Value
Interest Rate Cap	Free Standing Derivative	$	39,184		8.0	%	Feb 2014	$	30
Interest Rate Cap	Free Standing Derivative		26,433		8.0		Nov 2013		12
	Net fair value							$	42

Note 9. Directors Fees

The independent directors receive an annual fee of $40,000. They also receive $2,500 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting and receive $1,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each committee meeting. In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $5,000 and the chairman of each other committee receives an annual fee of $2,000 for their additional services in these capacities. In addition, we have purchased directors’ and officers’ liability insurance on behalf of our directors and officers. Independent directors have the option to receive their directors’ fees in the form of our common stock issued at a price per share equal to the greater of net asset value or the market price at the time of payment. No compensation is paid to directors who are “interested persons.” For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, we accrued $0.1 and $0.1 million for directors’ fees expense, respectively. As of May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2009, $110,500 and $54,000 in directors’ fees expense were unpaid and included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. As of May 31, 2010, we had not issued any common stock to our directors as compensation for their services.

Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity

On May 16, 2006, GSC Group capitalized the LLC, by contributing $1,000 in exchange for 67 shares, constituting all of the issued and outstanding shares of the LLC.

On March 20, 2007, the Company issued 959,955 and 81,362 shares of common stock, priced at $15.00 per share, to GSC Group and certain individual employees of GSC Group, respectively, in exchange for the general partnership interest and a limited partnership interest in GSC Partners CDO III GP, LP, collectively valued at $15.6 million. At this time, the 67 shares owned by GSC Group in the LLC were exchanged for 67 shares of GSC Investment Corp.

On March 28, 2007, the Company completed its IPO of 7,250,000 shares of common stock, priced at $15.00 per share, before underwriting discounts and commissions. Total proceeds received from the IPO, net of $7.1 million in underwriter’s discount and commissions, and $1.0 million in offering costs, were $100.7 million.

On November 13, 2009, we declared a dividend of $1.825 per share payable on December 31, 2009. Shareholders had the option to receive payment of the dividend in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, provided that the aggregate cash payable to all shareholders was limited to $2.1 million or $0.25 per share. Based on shareholder elections, the dividend consisted of $2.1 million in cash and 8,648,725 of newly issued shares of common stock.

Note 11. Earnings Per Share

In accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 260, “Earnings per Share” (“ASC 260”), basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive common shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis.

The following information sets forth the computation of the weighted average basic and diluted net decrease in net assets per share from operations for the quarters ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands except per share amounts):

Basic and diluted	May 31, 2010		May 31, 2009
Net increase in net assets from operations	$	2,655	$	5,364
Weighted average common shares outstanding		16,940,109		8,291,384
Earnings per common share-basic and diluted	$	0.16	$	0.65

Note 12. Dividend

The Company did not declare any dividend payments during the quarters ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009.

Note 13. Financial Highlights

The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009:

Per share data:	May 31, 2010			May 31, 2009

Net asset value at beginning of period	$	3.27		$	8.20

Net investment income (1) (5)		0.00			0.31
Net realized losses on investments and derivatives		(0.15	)		-
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and derivatives		0.31			0.34
Net increase in stockholders’ equity		0.16			0.65

Net asset value at end of period	$	3.43		$	8.85
Net assets at end of period	$	58,132,890		$	73,377,593
Shares outstanding at end of period		16,940,109			8,291,384

Per share market value at end of period	$	1.71		$	2.90
Total return based on market value (2)		(10.94	)%		45.73	%
Total return based on net asset value (3)		4.79	%		7.93	%

Ratio/Supplemental data: (6)
Ratio of net investment income net of expense waiver and reimbursement to average net assets (4)		0.01	%		12.83	%
Ratio of operating expenses net of expense waiver and reimbursement to average net assets (4)		13.34	%		6.18	%
Ratio of incentive management fees to average net assets		0.00	%		1.61	%
Ratio of credit facility related expenses to average net assets		5.61	%		3.22	%
Ratio of total expenses net of expense waiver and reimbursement to average net assets (4)		18.95	%		11.01	%

(1)	Net investment (loss) income excluding expense waiver and reimbursement equals ($0.01) and $0.29 per share for the quarters ended May 31, 2010 and May 31, 2009, respectively.

(2)	Total annual return is historical and assumes changes in share price, reinvestments of all dividends and distributions, and no sales change for the year.

(3)	Total annual return is historical and assumes changes in net assets value, reinvestments of all dividends and distributions, and no sales change for the year.

(4)

For the quarter ended May 31, 2010, excluding the expense waiver and reimbursement arrangement, the ratio of net investment income, operating expenses, total expenses to average net assets is (1.03%), 14.39% and 19.99%, respectively. For the quarter ended May 31, 2009, excluding the expense waiver and reimbursement arrangement, the ratio of net investment income, operating expenses, total expenses to average net assets is 11.97%, 7.04% and 11.87%, respectively.

(5)	Amount is less than $0.005 for the quarter end May 31, 2010.

(6)	Ratios are annualized.

Note 14. Related Party Transaction

On March 20, 2007, the Company issued 959,955 and 81,362 shares of common stock, priced at $15.00 per share, to GSC Group and certain individual employees of GSC Group, respectively, in exchange for the general partnership interest and a limited partnership interest in GSC Partners CDO III GP, LP, collectively valued at $15.6 million. As of May 31, 2010, the fair value of the general partnership interest and limited partnership interest was zero.

On January 10, 2008, GSC Group notified our Dividend Reinvestment Plan Administrator that it was electing to receive dividends and other distributions in cash (rather than in additional shares of common stock) with respect to all shares of stock held by it and the investment funds under its control. For the quarter ended February 29, 2008, GSC Group received 35,911 of additional shares under the dividend reinvestment plan. As of May 31, 2010, GSC Group and its affiliates own approximately 11.4% of the outstanding common shares of the Company.

On January 22, 2008, we entered into a collateral management agreement with GSCIC CLO pursuant to which we will act as collateral manager to it. In return for our collateral management services, we are entitled to a senior collateral management fee of 0.10% and a subordinate collateral management fee of 0.40% of the outstanding principal amount of GSCIC CLO’s assets, to be paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee equal to 20% of excess cash flow to the extent the GSCIC CLO subordinated notes receive an internal rate of return equal to or greater than 12%. We do not expect to enter into additional collateral management agreements in the near future.

In April 2009, our investment adviser withheld a scheduled principal amortization payment under its credit facility, resulting in a default thereunder. Since then, our investment adviser and its secured lenders have been in negotiations regarding a consensual restructuring of its obligations under such credit facility. While we are not directly affected by our investment adviser’s default, if it is unable to restructure its credit facility, or an acceleration of the outstanding principal balance by the lenders occurs, the ability of the investment adviser to retain key individuals and perform its investment advisory duties for us could be significantly impaired.

Note 15. Subsequent Events

On June 7, 2010, the Company repaid $0.1 million of the outstanding borrowings related to the credit facility.

On June 25, 2010, the Company filed a definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A related to the proposed Saratoga transaction.

On July 9, 2010, the Company repaid $0.8 million of the outstanding borrowings related to the credit facility.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this quarterly report contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking information due to the factors discussed in Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 and Part II, Item 1A in this quarterly report.

The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us or are within our control. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

•	our future operating results;

•	our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies;

•	the impact of investments that we expect to make;

•	our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

•	the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest;

•	the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;

•	our expected financings and investments;

•	our regulatory structure and tax treatment, including our ability to operate as a business development company and a regulated investment company;

•	the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;

•	the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies;

•	the ability of our investment adviser to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and effectively administer our investments; and

•	continued access to our Revolving Facility.

You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made in this quarterly report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this quarterly report.

Overview

GSC Investment Corp. is a Maryland corporation that has elected to be treated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). The Company is the successor by merger to GSC Investment, LLC (the “LLC”), a Maryland limited liability company that had elected to be regulated as a BDC, which was merged into the Company concurrently with the Company’s incorporation on March 21, 2007. As a result of the merger, each outstanding common share of the LLC was converted into an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s common stock.

Our investment objectives are to generate current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments by primarily investing in middle market companies and select high yield bonds. We have elected and qualified to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). We commenced operations on March 23, 2007 and completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) on March 28, 2007. We are externally managed and advised by our investment adviser, GSCP (NJ), L.P. (together with certain of its affiliates, “GSC Group”).

We used the net proceeds of our IPO to purchase approximately $100.7 million in aggregate principal amount of debt investments from GSC Partners CDO Fund III, Limited (“CDO Fund III”), a collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) fund managed by our investment adviser. We used borrowings under our Facilities (as defined below) to purchase approximately $115.1 million in aggregate principal amount of debt investments in April and May 2007 from CDO Fund III and GSC Partners CDO Fund Limited (“CDO Fund I”), a collateralized debt obligation fund managed by our investment adviser.

Our portfolio is comprised primarily of investments in leveraged loans (comprised of both first and second lien term loans) issued by middle market companies and high yield bonds. We seek to create a diversified portfolio by investing up to 5% of our total assets in each investment, although the investment sizes may be more or less than the targeted range. These investments are sourced in both the primary and secondary markets through a network of relationships with commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies and financial sponsors. Due to constraints imposed by our Revolving Facility, we have had limited investment activity in both the primary and secondary markets. The leveraged loans and high yield bonds that we purchase are generally used to finance buyouts, acquisitions, growth, recapitalizations and other types of transactions. Leveraged loans are generally senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated debt of the portfolio company. Leveraged loans also have the benefit of security interests on the assets of the portfolio company, which may rank ahead of, or be junior to, other security interests. High yield bonds are typically subordinated to leveraged loans and generally unsecured, though a substantial amount of the high yield bonds that we currently own are secured. Substantially all of the debt investments held in our portfolio hold a non-investment grade rating by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and/or Standard & Poor’s or, if not rated, would be rated below investment grade if rated. High yield bonds rated below investment grade are commonly referred to as “junk bonds.” As part of our long-term strategy, we also anticipate purchasing mezzanine debt and making equity investments in middle market companies. Mezzanine debt is typically unsecured and subordinated to senior debt of the portfolio company. For purposes of this quarterly report, we generally use the term “middle market” to refer to companies with annual EBITDA of between $5 million and $50 million. EBITDA represents earnings before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Investments in middle market companies are generally less liquid than equivalent investments in companies with larger capitalizations.

While our primary focus is to generate current income and capital appreciation through investments in debt and equity securities of middle market companies and high yield bonds, we intend to invest up to 30% of our assets in opportunistic investments. Opportunistic investments may include investments in distressed debt, debt and equity securities of public companies, credit default swaps, emerging market debt, and structured finance vehicles, including CLOs. As part of this 30%, we may also invest in debt of middle market companies located outside the United States. Given our primary investment focus on first and second lien term loans issued by middle market companies and high yield bonds, we believe our opportunistic investments will allow us to supplement our core investments with other investments that are within our investment adviser’s expertise that we believe offer attractive yields and/or the potential for capital appreciation. As of May 31, 2010, our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO, a CLO we manage, constituted 20.2% of our total investments. We do not expect to manage and purchase all of the equity in another CLO transaction in the near future. We may, however, invest in CLO securities issued by other investment managers.

As of May 31, 2010, our portfolio consisted of $89.9 million in investments. We seek to create a diversified portfolio that includes leveraged loans, mezzanine debt and high yield bonds by investing up to 5% of our total investments in each portfolio company, although the investment sizes may be more or less than the targeted range. As of May 31, 2010, we invested in excess of 5% of our total investments in 6 of the 27 portfolio companies and the GSCIC CLO, but in each case less than 20.2% of our total investments, and our five largest portfolio company exposures represented approximately 49.9% of our total investments.

As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in “qualifying assets,” including securities of U.S. operating companies whose securities are not listed on a national securities exchange (i.e., New York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange and The NASDAQ Global Market), U.S. operating companies with listed securities that have market capitalizations of less than $250 million, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. In addition, we are only allowed to borrow money such that our asset coverage, which, as defined in the 1940 Act, measures the ratio of total assets less total liabilities (excluding borrowings) to total borrowings, equals at least 200% after such borrowing, with certain limited exceptions.

Significant Developments in Our Business

Since the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 (November 30, 2008), due to constraints imposed by our Revolving Facility (as defined below), we have had limited investment activity in both the primary and secondary markets. On July 30, 2009, we exceeded permissible borrowing limits for 30 consecutive days, resulting in an event of default under our credit facility that is continuing as of May 31, 2010. As a result of this event of default, our lender has the right to accelerate repayment of the outstanding indebtedness under our credit facility and to foreclose and liquidate the collateral pledged thereunder. Acceleration of the outstanding indebtedness and/or liquidation of the collateral would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and operations. As of the date of this quarterly report, our lender has not accelerated the debt, but has reserved the right to do so. There is no assurance that we will have sufficient funds available to pay in full the total amount of obligations that would become due as a result of such acceleration or that we will be able to obtain additional or alternative financing to pay or refinance any such accelerated obligations.

Substantially all of our assets other than our investment in the subordinated notes of GSC Investment Corp. CLO 2007, Ltd. ("GSCIC CLO") are held in a special purpose subsidiary and pledged under our Revolving Facility. We commenced the two year amortization period under the Revolving Facility in January 2009, during which time all principal proceeds from the pledged assets are used to repay the Revolving Facility. In addition, during the continuance of an event of default, all interest proceeds from the pledged assets are also used to repay the Revolving Facility. As a result, the Company is required to fund its operating expenses and dividends solely from cash on hand, management fees earned from, and the proceeds of the subordinated notes of, GSCIC CLO. The deleveraging of the Company may significantly impair the Company’s ability to effectively operate.

On April 14, 2010, the Company announced that it entered into a definitive agreement with Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC (“Saratoga”) to execute a $55 million recapitalization plan that would cure the existing bank default. Please see “Proposed Saratoga Transaction” below for more information.

In a report dated May 27, 2010, our independent registered public accountants have determined that there is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of our remaining in default of our Revolving Facility. Please see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Risks related to our liquidity and financial condition” in our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010 for more information.

Proposed Saratoga Transaction

On April 14, 2010, we entered into a stock purchase agreement (“the Stock Purchase Agreement”) with Saratoga and CLO Partners LLC (together with Saratoga, the “Investors”) and an assignment, assumption and novation agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) with Saratoga, pursuant to which we assumed certain rights and obligations of Saratoga under the debt commitment letter (the “Madison Commitment Letter”) Saratoga received from Madison Capital Funding LLC (“Madison”), indicating Madison’s willingness to provide the Company with a $40 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Replacement Facility”), subject to the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions. We refer to the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement collectively as the “Saratoga Transaction.”

If the conditions to closing under the Stock Purchase Agreement are satisfied, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, we will issue and sell to the Investors 9,868,422 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $15,000,000 at a price of $1.52 per share, in a private transaction that is exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Regulation D thereunder. Concurrently with the closing of the Saratoga Transaction and pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, we will (i) enter into the Replacement Facility with Madison; (ii) enter into a registration rights agreement with the Investors; (iii) enter into a trademark license agreement with Saratoga or one of its affiliates; and (iv) replace GSCP (NJ), L.P. as the Company’s investment adviser with Saratoga Investment Advisors, LLC, by executing the Investment Advisory and Management Agreement, subject to stockholder approval, and as the Company’s administrator with an affiliate of Saratoga by executing an Administration Agreement. The Company and its current investment adviser, GSCP (NJ), L.P., have entered into a Termination and Release Agreement, to be effective as of the closing, pursuant to which GSCP (NJ), L.P., among other things, has agreed to waive any and all accrued and unpaid deferred incentive management fees up to and as of the closing of the Saratoga Transaction but will continue to receive the base management fees earned through the date of the closing.

In addition, as a condition to closing of the Saratoga Transaction and in each case to be effective as of the closing, the Company is required to procure the resignations of Robert F. Cummings, Jr. and Richard M. Hayden, both of whom are affiliates of GSCP (NJ) L.P., as members of the Board and to elect Christian L. Oberbeck and Richard A. Petrocelli, both of whom are affiliates of Saratoga, as members of the Board (the “Saratoga Directors”). The Saratoga Directors will be elected by the Board to fill the vacancies created by the resignations described above and the Saratoga Directors will be appointed to the class of directors as determined by the Board in accordance with the Company’s organizational documents. The Company’s stockholders will have the opportunity to vote for each of the Saratoga Directors when his class of directors is up for reelection. In addition, all officers of the Company will resign at closing and the Board will appoint Mr. Oberbeck as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Petrocelli as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer.

Promptly after closing of the Saratoga Transaction, the Company will change its name from “GSC Investment Corp.” to “Saratoga Investment Corp.” and the Company intends to undertake a one-for-ten reverse stock split, pursuant to which each stockholder will receive one share of our common stock in exchange for every ten shares owned at that time. After giving effect to the shares of common stock issued in connection with the Saratoga Transaction and the one-for-ten reverse stock split, the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding will be approximately 2.7 million.

The Company will use the net proceeds from the Saratoga Transaction and a portion of the funds available to it under the Replacement Facility to pay the full amount of principal and accrued interest, including default interest, outstanding under our Revolving Facility due and payable as of the date of closing.

Following completion of the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Investors and certain individuals affiliated with Saratoga and Saratoga Partners, including Messrs. Oberbeck and Petrocelli, will hold approximately 36.8% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. Pursuant to the provisions of the 1940 Act, the Company will be deemed to be controlled by Mr. Oberbeck following consummation of the Saratoga Transaction. Mr. Oberbeck is the Managing Partner of Saratoga Partners, an affiliate of Saratoga, and has been a member of its investment committee for 15 years. Mr. Oberbeck is the primary investor in Saratoga, and CLO Partners LLC is an entity wholly-owned by Mr. Oberbeck. Saratoga Partners has also provided Saratoga with an equity commitment letter, pursuant to which Saratoga Partners has agreed to fulfill and satisfy solely the payment obligations of Saratoga and CLO Partners under the Stock Purchase Agreement, subject to the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions, including the closing conditions described herein.

For more information about Saratoga, see our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on June 25, 2010.

Revenues

We generate revenue in the form of interest income and capital gains on the debt investments that we hold and capital gains, if any, on equity interests that we may acquire. We expect our debt investments, whether in the form of first and second lien term loans, mezzanine debt or high yield bonds, to have terms of up to ten years, and to bear interest at either a fixed or floating rate. Interest on debt will be payable generally either quarterly or semi-annually. In some cases our debt investments may provide for a portion of the interest to be paid-in-kind (“PIK”). To the extent interest is paid-in-kind, it will be payable through the increase of the principal amount of the obligation by the amount of interest due on the then-outstanding aggregate principal amount of such obligation. The principal amount of the debt and any accrued but unpaid interest will generally become due at the maturity date. In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, structuring or diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance or investment management services and possibly consulting fees. Any such fees will be generated in connection with our investments and recognized as earned. We may also invest in preferred equity securities that pay dividends on a current basis.

On January 22, 2008 we entered into a collateral management agreement with GSCIC CLO pursuant to which we will act as its collateral manager and receive a senior collateral management fee of 0.10% and a subordinate collateral management fee of 0.40% of the outstanding principal amount of GSCIC CLO’s assets, paid quarterly to the extent of available proceeds. We are also entitled to an incentive management fee equal to 20% of excess cash flow to the extent the GSCIC CLO subordinated notes receive an internal rate of return equal to or greater than 12%.

We recognize interest income on our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO using the effective interest method, based on the anticipated yield and the estimated cash flows over the projected life of the investment. Yields are revised when there are changes in actual or estimated cash flows due to changes in prepayments and/or re-investments, credit losses or asset pricing. Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an adjustment to the estimated yield over the remaining life of the investment from the date the estimated yield was changed.

Expenses

Our primary operating expenses include the payment of investment advisory and management fees, professional fees, directors and officers insurance, fees paid to independent directors and administrator expenses, including our allocable portion of our administrator’s overhead. Our allocable portion is based on the ratio of our total assets to the total assets administered by our administrator. Our investment advisory and management fees compensate our investment adviser for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing and monitoring our investments. We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, including those relating to:

•

organization;

•

calculating our net asset value (including the cost and expenses of any independent valuation firm);

•

expenses incurred by our investment adviser payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or other advisers, in monitoring our financial and legal affairs and in monitoring our investments and performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio companies;

•

interest payable on debt, if any, incurred to finance our investments;

•

offerings of our common stock and other securities;

•

investment advisory and management fees;

•

administration fees;

•

fees payable to third parties, including agents, consultants or other advisers, relating to, or associated with, evaluating and making investments;

•

transfer agent and custodial fees;

•

registration fees;

•

listing fees;

•

taxes;

•

independent directors’ fees and expenses;

•

costs of preparing and filing reports or other documents of the SEC;

•

the costs of any reports;

•

proxy statements or other notices to stockholders, including printing costs;

•

to the extent we are covered by any joint insurance policies, our allocable portion of the insurance premiums for such joint policies;

•

direct costs and expenses of administration, including auditor and legal costs; and

•

all other expenses incurred by us or our administrator in connection with administering our business.

The amount payable to GSC Group as administrator under the administration agreement is capped to the effect that such amount, together with our other operating expenses, does not exceed an amount equal to 1.5% per annum of our net assets attributable to common stock. In addition, since inception and including the current one-year term of the administration agreement (expiring March 21, 2011), GSC Group has waived our reimbursement obligation under the administration agreement until our total assets exceed $500 million.

Pursuant to the investment advisory and management agreement, we pay GSC Group as investment adviser a quarterly base management fee of 1.75% of the average value of our total assets (other than cash or cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) at the end of the two most recently completed fiscal quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the applicable fiscal quarter, and an incentive fee.

The incentive fee has two parts:

•

A fee, payable quarterly in arrears, equal to 20% of our pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the net assets at the end of the immediately preceding quarter, that exceeds a 1.875% quarterly (7.5% annualized) hurdle rate measured as of the end of each fiscal quarter. Under this provision, in any fiscal quarter, our investment adviser receives no incentive fee unless our pre-incentive fee net investment income exceeds the hurdle rate of 1.875%. Amounts received as a return of capital are not included in calculating this portion of the incentive fee. Since the hurdle rate is based on net assets, a return of less than the hurdle rate on total assets may still result in an incentive fee.

•

A fee, payable at the end of each fiscal year, equal to 20% of our net realized capital gains, if any, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation, in each case on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of capital gains incentive fees paid to the investment adviser through such date.

We will defer cash payment of any incentive fee otherwise earned by our investment adviser if, during the most recent four full fiscal quarter period ending on or prior to the date such payment is to be made, the sum of (a) our aggregate distributions to our stockholders and (b) our change in net assets (defined as total assets less liabilities) (before taking into account any incentive fees payable during that period) is less than 7.5% of our net assets at the beginning of such period. These calculations will be appropriately pro rated for the first three fiscal quarters of operation and adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the applicable period. Such incentive fee will become payable on the next date on which such test has been satisfied for the most recent four full fiscal quarters or upon certain terminations of the investment advisory and management agreement. We commenced deferring cash payment of incentive fees during the quarterly period ended August 31, 2007, and have continued to defer such payments through the current quarterly period. As of May 31, 2010, $2.6 million of incentive fees have been deferred and remained unpaid and will be waived if the Saratoga Transaction is consummated. GSCP will no longer provide services to us if the Saratoga Transaction is consummated.

To the extent that any of our leveraged loans are denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars, we may enter into currency hedging contracts to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. We may also enter into interest rate hedging agreements. Such hedging activities, which will be subject to compliance with applicable legal requirements, may include the use of interest rate caps, futures, options and forward contracts. Costs incurred in entering into or settling such contracts will be borne by us.

From the commencement of operations until March 23, 2008, GSC Group reimbursed us for operating expenses to the extent that our total annual operating expenses (other than investment advisory and management fees and interest and credit facility expenses) exceeded an amount equal to 1.55% of our net assets attributable to common stock. GSC Group has not reimbursed us since that date and we do not expect to be reimbursed in the future.

Portfolio and investment activity

Corporate Debt Portfolio Overview(1)

	At May 31, 2010			At February 28, 2010
	($ in millions)
Number of investments		36			38
Number of portfolio companies		25			27
Average investment size	$	2.0		$	1.9
Weighted average maturity	2.3 years			2.5 years
Number of industries		18			19
Average investment per portfolio company	$	2.9		$	2.7
Non-Performing or delinquent investments	$	14.3		$	18.5
Fixed rate debt (% of interest bearing portfolio)	$	33.2 (48.6	)%	$	33.0 (46.9	)%
Weighted average current coupon		11.6	%		11.6	%
Floating rate debt (% of interest bearing portfolio)	$	35.1 (51.4	)%	$	37.4 (53.1	)%
Weighted average current spread over LIBOR		7.8	%		7.6	%

(1)	Excludes our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO and investments in common stocks and limited partnership interests.

During the three months ended May 31, 2010, we made no investments in new or existing portfolio companies and had $2.7 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments resulting in net repayments of $2.7 million for the period.

During the three months ended May 31, 2009, we made no investments in new or existing portfolio companies and had $0.3 million in aggregate amount of exits and repayments resulting in net repayments of $0.3 million for the period.

Our portfolio composition at May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010 was as follows:

Portfolio composition

	At May 31, 2010						At February 28, 2010
	Percentage of Total Portfolio			Weighted Average Current Yield			Percentage of Total Portfolio			Weighted Average Current Yield
First lien term loans		15.4	%		9.7	%		18.6	%		8.6	%
Second lien term loans		23.1			8.1			22.7			8.1
Senior secured notes		32.7			11.6			31.0			11.6
Unsecured notes		4.8			12.2			6.4			12.2
GSCIC CLO subordinated notes		20.2			9.7			18.7			8.3
Equity interests		3.8			N/A			2.6			N/A
Limited partnership interests		—			N/A			—			N/A
Total		100.0	%		9.8	%		100.0	%		9.3	%

Our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO represents a first loss position in a portfolio that, at May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010, was composed of $406.0 and $387.1 million, respectively, in aggregate principal amount of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans. This investment is subject to unique risks. Please see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks related to our investments—Our investment in GSCIC CLO constitutes a leveraged investment in a portfolio of predominantly senior secured first lien term loans and is subject to additional risks and volatility”, of our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010 for more information. We do not consolidate the GSCIC CLO portfolio in our financial statements. Accordingly, the metrics below do not include the underlying GSCIC CLO portfolio investments. However, at May 31, 2010, three GSCIC CLO portfolio investments were in default and over 91.8% of the GSCIC CLO portfolio investments had a CMR (as defined below) color rating of green or yellow.

GSC Group normally grades all of our investments using an internally developed credit and monitoring rating system (“CMR”). The CMR consists of a single component: a color rating. The color rating is based on several criteria, including financial and operating strength, probability of default, and restructuring risk. The color ratings are characterized as follows: (Green) - strong credit; (Yellow) - satisfactory credit; (Red) - payment default risk, in payment default and/or significant restructuring activity.

The CMR distribution of our investments at May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010 was as follows:

Portfolio CMR distribution

	At May 31, 2010					At February 28, 2010
	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
	($ in thousands)
Green	$	9,650		10.7	%	$	9,479		10.6	%
Yellow		23,714		26.4			27,763		31.1
Red		34,941		38.9			33,222		37.2
N/A(1)		21,623		24.0			18,909		21.1
Total	$	89,928		100.0	%	$	89,373		100.0	%

(1)	Comprised of our investments in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO, equity interests, and limited partnership interests.

The following table shows the portfolio composition by industry grouping at fair value at May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010.

Portfolio composition by industry grouping at fair value

	At May 31, 2010					At February 28, 2010
	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
	($ in thousands)
Structured Finance Securities (1)	$	18,209		20.2	%	$	16,698		18.7	%
Packaging		9,550		10.6			9,791		11.0
Consumer Products		7,360		8.2			7,508		8.4
Healthcare Services		7,347		8.2			7,190		8.0
Apparel		7,082		7.9			6,910		7.7
Electronics		6,728		7.5			6,617		7.4
Manufacturing		5,996		6.7			6,399		7.2
Publishing		5,876		6.5			6,710		7.5
Metals		4,550		5.1			3,794		4.3
Homebuilding		4,466		5.0			3,634		4.1
Natural Resources		3,421		3.8			2,989		3.3
Environmental		2,354		2.6			2,060		2.3
Logistics		2,070		2.3			2,230		2.5
Food and Beverage		1,717		1.9			1,697		1.9
Financial Services		1,206		1.3			984		1.1
Oil and Gas		610		0.7			1,129		1.2
Education		568		0.6			634		0.7
Building Products		553		0.6			530		0.6
Consumer Services		265		0.3			255		0.3
Printing		—		—			1,614		1.8
Total	$	89,928		100.0	%	$	89,373		100.0	%

(1)	Comprised of our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO.

The following table shows the portfolio composition by geographic location at fair value at May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010. The geographic composition is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company.

Portfolio composition by geographic location at fair value

	At May 31, 2010					At February 28, 2010
	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
	($ in thousands)
Midwest	$	22,591		25.1	%	$	23,637		26.5	%
Other(1)		18,209		20.2			16,698		18.7
West		15,618		17.4			14,695		16.4
International		12,971		14.4			12,781		14.3
Northeast		11,271		12.6			11,631		13.0
Southeast		9,268		10.3			9,931		11.1
Total	$	89,928		100.0	%	$	89,373		100.0	%

(1)	Comprised of our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO.

Results of Operations

For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009

Operating results for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows;

	For the three months ended
	May 31, 2010			May 31, 2009
	($ in thousands)
Total investment income	$	2,811		$	4,764
Total expenses before waiver and reimbursement		2,964			2,372
Total expense waiver and reimbursement		(155	)		(172	)
Total expenses net of expense waiver and reimbursement		2,808			2,200
Net investment income		2			2,564
Net realized losses		(2,551	)		(5	)
Net unrealized gains		5,204			2,805
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	2,655		$	5,364

Investment income

The composition of our investment income for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:

Investment Income

	For the three months ended
	May 31, 2010		May 31, 2009
	($ in thousands)
Interest from investments	$	2,270	$	4,187
Management of GSCIC CLO		507		521
Interest from cash and cash equivalents and other income		34		56
Total	$	2,811	$	4,764

For the three months ended May 31, 2010, total investment income decreased $2.0 million, or 41.0% compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. The decrease is predominantly attributable to an increase in the allowance for impaired loans and bonds, a decrease in the effective interest rate earned on our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO, and a smaller total average portfolio. The allowance for impaired loans and bonds increased to $1.1 million, for the three months ended May 31, 2010 from $0.3 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009. Interest income from our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO decreased $0.2 million, or 24.8%, to $0.7 million for the three months ended May 31, 2010 from $0.9 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009.

For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, total PIK income was $0.4 million, and $0.2 million, respectively.

Operating Expenses

The composition of our operating expenses for the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:

Operating Expenses

	For the three months ended
	May 31, 2010		May 31, 2009
	($ in thousand)
Interest and credit facility expense	$	831	$	643
Base management fees		411		548
Professional fees		1,143		340
Incentive management fees		—		322
Administrator expenses		155		172
Insurance expenses		195		206
Directors fees		165		82
General and administrative expenses		64		59
Total operating expenses before manager waiver and reimbursement	$	2,964	$	2,372

For the three months ended May 31, 2010, total operating expenses before manager expense waiver and reimbursement increased $0.6 million, or 24.9% compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009.

For the three months ended May 31, 2010, the increase in interest and credit facility expense is primarily attributable to an increase in the interest rate on our credit facility from the commercial paper rate plus 70 basis points to the greater of the commercial paper rate and our lender’s prime rate plus 4.00% plus a default rate of 2.00%, as a result of our July 30, 2009 event of default (please see “—Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for more information). For the three months ended May 31, 2010, the weighted average interest rate on the Revolving Facility was 9.25% compared to 3.85% for the three months ended May 31, 2009.

For the three months ended May 31, 2010, base management fees decreased $0.1 million, or 24.9% compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. The reduction in base management fees results from the decrease in the average value of our total net assets and the continued reduction in the total portfolio size.

For the three months ended May 31, 2010, professional fees increased $0.8 million, or 236.3% compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. The increase in professional fees is attributable to additional legal and professional fees associated with the evaluation of strategic transaction opportunities including the proposed Saratoga Transaction.

For the three months ended May 31, 2010, incentive management fees decreased $0.3 million, or 100.0% compared to the three months ended May 31, 2009. The decrease in incentive management fees is primarily attributable to the decrease in investment income and the increase in operating expenses which resulted in a failure to meet the quarterly hurdle rate of 1.875% for the quarter ended May 31, 2010 resulting in no incentive management fees for the quarter.

Net Realized Gains/Losses from Investments

For the three months ended May 31, 2010, the Company had $2.7 million of sales, repayments, exits or restructurings resulting in $2.6 million of net realized losses. The most significant realized gains and losses during the three months ended May 31, 2010 were as follows:

Three months ended May 31, 2010

Issuer	Asset Type	Gross Proceeds		Cost			Net Realized Gain/(Loss)
		($ in thousands)
Custom Direct, Inc.	First Lien Term Loan	$	1,832	$	(1,535	)	$	297
Legacy Cabinets, Inc.	Second Lien Term Loan		139		(2,002	)		(1,863	)
Legacy Cabinets, Inc.	First Lien Term Loan		502		(1,496	)		(994	)

For the three months ended May 31, 2009, the Company had $0.3 million of sales, repayments or exits resulting in $5,152 of net realized losses. The most significant realized gains and losses during the three months ended May 31, 2009 were as follows:

Three months ended May 31, 2009

Issuer	Asset Type	Gross Proceeds		Cost			Net Realized Loss
		($ in thousands)
IPC Systems, Inc.	First Lien Term Loan	$	14	$	(19	)	$	(5	)

Net Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on Investments

For the three months ended May 31, 2010, the Company had net unrealized appreciation of $5.2 million, which was comprised of $5.3 million in unrealized appreciation, $3.2 million in unrealized depreciation and $3.1 million related to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation recorded upon the exit of an investment. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation for the three months ended May 31, 2010 are as follows:

Three months ended May 31, 2010

Issuer	Asset Type	Cost		Fair Value		Total Unrealized Depreciation			Quarterly Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation)
		($ in thousands)
GSCIC CLO	Other/Structured Finance Securities	$	29,233	$	18,209	$	(11,024	)	$	1,510
McMillin Companies, LLC	Senior Secured Notes		7,356		4,466		(2,890	)		809
Elyria Foundry Company, LLC	Senior Secured Notes		4,889		4,550		(339	)		751
Grant U.S. Holdings, LLP	Second Lien Term Loan		6,349		592		(5,757	)		434
USS Mergerco, Inc.	Common stock		3,159		2,355		(804	)		294
Jason Incorporated	Unsecured Notes		13,700		1,096		(12,604	)		(592	)
Energy Alloys, LLC	Second Lien Term Loan		6,285		610		(5,675	)		(565	)
Penton Media, Inc.	First Lien Term Loan		3,952		3,449		(503	)		(503	)

The $1.5 million decrease in net unrealized depreciation in our investment in the GSCIC subordinated notes was due to changes in various assumptions, such as portfolio default rate, recovery rate on defaults and portfolio prepayment rate, used in our discounted cash flow model. These changes were made in accordance with current market practice for CLO equity investments and not as a result of any change in the underlying GSCIC portfolio. The decrease in unrealized depreciation in our investments in McMillin Companies, LLC and Elyria Foundry Company, LLC, were due to an improvement in the outlook for these companies. The increase in unrealized depreciation in our investments in Jason Incorporated and Energy Alloy were due to declining prospects for each of the companies. The change in the fair values of our investments in Grant U.S. Holdings and Penton Media, Inc were due to fluctuations in the market quotations obtained for these investments compared to the prior period.

For the three months ended May 31, 2009, the Company had net unrealized appreciation of $2.8 million, which was comprised of $8.0 million in unrealized appreciation and $5.2 million in unrealized depreciation The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation for the three months ended May 31, 2009 are as follows:

Three months ended May 31, 2009
Issuer	Asset Type	Cost		Fair Value		Total Unrealized Depreciation			Quarterly Change in Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation)
		($ in thousands)
Terphane Holdings Corp.	Senior Secured Notes	$	10,435	$	8,568	$	(1,867	)	$	870
Penton Media, Inc.	First Lien Term Loan		3,770		2,915		(855	)		861
IDI Acquisition Corp.	Senior Secured Notes		3,638		3,207		(431	)		764
USS Mergerco, Inc.	Second Lien Term Loan		5,852		4,328		(1,524	)		731
GSCIC CLO	Other/Structured Finance Securities		29,233		19,208		(10,025	)		(2,461	)
Grant U.S. Holdings LLP	Second Lien Term Loan		6,189		795		(5,394	)		(1,643	)
Targus Holdings Corp	Second Lien Term Loan		4,786		2,573		(2,213	)		(563	)

Net Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on Derivatives

For the three months ended May 31, 2010, changes in the value of the interest rate caps resulted in an unrealized depreciation of $19,869 versus an unrealized appreciation of $35,687 for the three months ended May 31, 2009.

Changes in Net Asset Value from Operations

For the three months ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, we recorded a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of $2.7 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Based on 16,940,109 weighted average common shares outstanding as of May 31, 2010, our per share net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $0.16 for the three months ended May 31, 2010. This compares to a per share increase in net assets resulting from operations of $0.65 for the three months ended May 31, 2009 based on 8,291,384 weighted average common shares outstanding as of May 31, 2009.

Financial condition, liquidity and capital resources

The Company’s liquidity and capital resources have been generated primarily from the net proceeds of its IPO, advances from the Revolving Facility and the Term Facility, as well as cash flows from operations. On March 28, 2007, we completed our IPO and issued 7,250,000 common shares and received net proceeds of $100.7 million.

On April 11, 2007, we entered into a $100.0 million revolving securitized credit facility (the “Revolving Facility”). On May 1, 2007, we entered into a $25.7 million term securitized credit facility (the “Term Facility” and, together with the Revolving Facility, the “Facilities”), which was fully drawn at closing. In December 2007, we consolidated the Facilities by using a draw under the Revolving Facility to repay the Term Facility. In response to the market wide decline in financial asset prices, which has negatively affect the value of our portfolio, we terminated the revolving period of the Revolving Facility effective January 14, 2009 and commenced a two-year amortization period during which all principal proceeds from the collateral will be used to repay outstanding borrowings. In March 2009 we amended the Revolving Credit Facility to decrease the minimum required collateralization and increase the portion of the portfolio that can be invested in “CCC” rated investments in return for an increased interest rate and expedited amortization.

A Borrowing Base violation will occur if our outstanding borrowings exceed the Borrowing Base at any time. We can cure a Borrowing Base violation by reducing our borrowing below the Borrowing Base (by, e.g., selling collateral and repaying borrowings) or pledging additional collateral to increase the Borrowing Base. If we fail to cure a Borrowing Base violation within the specified time, a default under the Revolving Facility shall occur. On July 30, 2009 an unremedied Borrowing Base violation became an event of default, which is currently continuing. As a result of this event of default, our lender has the right to accelerate repayment of the outstanding indebtedness under the Revolving Facility and to foreclose and liquidate the collateral pledged thereunder. Acceleration of the outstanding indebtedness and/or liquidation of the collateral would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and operations. As a result of the continuing default, the Company may be forced to sell its investments to raise funds to repay outstanding amounts. Such forced sales may result in values that could be less than carrying values reported in these financial statements. The deleveraging of the Company may significantly impair the Company’s ability to effectively operate. To date, our lender has not accelerated the debt with respect to this event of default, but has reserved the right to do so. Please see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Risks related to our liquidity and financial condition” of our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010 for more information.

At May 31, 2010, we had $33.8 million in borrowings under the Revolving Facility versus $37.0 million in borrowings at February 28, 2010. The actual amount that we are permitted to borrow under the Revolving Facility at any given time (the “Borrowing Base”) is dependent upon the amount and quality of the collateral securing the Revolving Facility. Our Borrowing Base was $6.1 million at May 31, 2010 versus $1.7 million at February 28, 2010. The increase in our Borrowing Base during the quarter is mainly attributable to the repayment and reinstatement of certain defaulted assets that resulted in a higher collateral value per the Borrowing Base calculation.

Substantially all of our assets other than our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO are held in a special purpose subsidiary and pledged under our Revolving Facility. We commenced the two year amortization period under the Revolving Facility in January 2009, during which time all principal proceeds from the pledged assets are used to repay the Revolving Facility. In addition, during the continuance of an event of default, all interest proceeds from the pledged assets are also used to repay the Revolving Facility. As a result, the Company is required to fund is operating expenses and dividends solely from cash on hand, management fees earned from, and the proceeds of the subordinated notes of, GSCIC CLO. Please see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks related to our liquidity and financial condition” in our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010 for more information.

In April 2009, our investment adviser withheld a scheduled principal amortization payment under its credit facility, resulting in a default thereunder. Since then, our investment adviser and its secured lenders have been in negotiations regarding a consensual restructuring of its obligations under such credit facility. While we are not directly affected by our investment adviser’s default, a material adverse change in the business, condition (financial or otherwise), operations or performance of our investment adviser could constitute a default under our Revolving Facility. Please see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors-Risks related to our Investment Advisor” in our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010 for more information.

Our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act, was 272%, and 250% as of May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010, respectively.

At May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010, the fair value of investments, cash and cash equivalents and cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts were as follows:

	At May 31, 2010					At February 28, 2010
	Fair Value		Percent of Total			Fair Value		Percent of Total
	($ in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,928		3.2	%	$	3,352		3.6	%
Cash and cash equivalents, securitization accounts		379		0.4			225		0.2
First lien term loans		13,830		14.8			16,653		17.9
Second lien term loans		20,794		22.3			20,267		21.8
Senior secured notes		29,372		31.5			27,742		29.9
Unsecured notes		4,308		4.6			5,690		6.1
Structured finance securities		18,209		19.5			16,698		18.0
Common stock		3,415		3.7			2,323		2.5
Other/limited partnership interests		–		-			-		-
Total	$	93,235		100.0	%	$	92,950		100.0	%

During the quarter ended May 31, 2010, the Company did not make any dividend declarations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At May 31, 2010 and February 28, 2010, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our business activities contain elements of market risk. We consider our principal market risks to be fluctuations in interest rates and the inherent difficulty of determining the fair value of our investments that do not have a readily available market value. Managing these risks is essential to our business. Accordingly, we have systems and procedures designed to identify and analyze our risks, to establish appropriate policies and thresholds and to continually monitor these risks and thresholds by means of administrative and information technology systems and other policies and processes.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is defined as the sensitivity of our current and future earnings to interest rate volatility, including relative changes in different interest rates, variability of spread relationships, the difference in re-pricing intervals between our assets and liabilities and the effect that interest rates may have on our cash flows. Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on interest earning assets and our interest expense incurred in connection with our interest bearing debt and liabilities. Changes in interest rates can also affect, among other things, our ability to acquire leveraged loans, high yield bonds and other debt investments and the value of our investment portfolio.

Our investment income is affected by fluctuations in various interest rates, including LIBOR and the prime rate. A large portion of our portfolio is, and we expect will continue to be, comprised of floating rate investments that utilize LIBOR. Our interest expense is affected by fluctuations in our lender’s prime rate. At May 31, 2010, we had $33.8 million of borrowings outstanding at a floating rate tied to the prevailing prime rate plus a margin of 6.00%.

In April and May 2007, pursuant to the Revolving Facility, the Company entered into two interest rate cap agreements with notional amounts of $34.0 million (increased to $40.0 million in May 2007) and $60.9 million. These agreements provide for a payment to the Company in the event LIBOR exceeds 8%, mitigating our exposure to increases in LIBOR. At May 31, 2010, the aggregate interest rate cap agreement notional amount was $63.2 million.

We have analyzed the potential impact of changes in interest rates on interest income from investments. Assuming that our investments as of May 31, 2010 were to remain constant for a full fiscal year and no actions were taken to alter the existing interest rate terms, a hypothetical change of 1% in interest rates would cause a corresponding change of approximately $0.2 million to our interest income from investments.

Although management believes that this measure is indicative of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for potential changes in credit quality, size and composition of the assets on the statement of assets and liabilities and other business developments that could magnify or diminish our sensitivity to interest rate changes, nor does it account for divergences in LIBOR and the commercial paper rate, which have historically moved in tandem but, in times of unusual credit dislocations, have experienced periods of divergence. Accordingly no assurances can be given that actual results would not materially differ from the potential outcome simulated by this estimate.

Portfolio Valuation

We carry our investments at fair value, as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors. Investments for which market quotations are readily available are fair valued at such market quotations. We value investments for which market quotations are not readily available at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board under our valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process. For investments that are thinly traded, we review the depth and quality of the available quotations to determine if market quotations are readily available. If the available quotations are indicative only, we may determine that market quotations are not readily available. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments, and the differences could be material. In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuations that are assigned.

The types of factors that we may take into account in fair value pricing of our investments include, as relevant, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, third party valuations, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, market yield trend analysis, comparison to publicly-traded securities, recent sales of or offers to buy comparable companies, and other relevant factors. The fair value of our investment in the subordinated notes of GSCIC CLO is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes prepayment, re-investment and loss assumptions which are adjusted to reflect changes in historical experience and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for similar CLO subordinated notes or equity, when available

The table below describes the primary considerations made by our Board of Directors in determining the fair value of our investments at May 31, 2010:

	Fair Value		Percent of Total Investments
	($ in thousands)
Third party independent valuation firm	$	63,220		70.3	%
Discounted cash flow model		18,208		20.2
Readily available market maker, broker quotes		8,500		9.5
Total fair valued investments	$	89,928		100.0	%

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our CEO and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, are any material legal proceedings threatened against us or our subsidiaries.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business is subject to certain risks and events that, if they occur, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our common stock. For a discussion of these risks, please refer to Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Sales of unregistered securities

We did not sell any securities during the period covered by this report that were not registered under the Securities Act.

Issuer purchases of equity securities

We did not purchase any shares of our equity securities during the period covered by this report.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Description
31.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	GSC Investment CORP.

Date: July 15, 2010	By	/s/ Seth M. Katzenstein
		Seth M. Katzenstein
		Chief Executive Officer and President, GSC
		Investment Corp.

	By	/s/ richard t. allorto, jr.
		Richard T. Allorto, Jr.
		Chief Financial Officer, GSC Investment Corp.