SB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT of 1934
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
OR
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For
the transition period from ___________ to
____________
|
Commission
File Number 0-13507
|
RURBAN
FINANCIAL CORP.
|
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
Ohio
|
34-1395608
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
401
Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio
|
43512
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code:
|
(419)
783-8950
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
Title
of each class
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common
Shares, Without Par Value
|
The
NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
|
Not
Applicable
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
o
No
x
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
o
No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large Accelerate Filer
o Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated
Filer o Smaller Reporting Company x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No
x
The
aggregate market value of the common shares of the registrant held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common shares
were last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently
completed second fiscal quarter was $59,158,736.
The
number of common shares of the registrant outstanding at March 12, 2008 was
4,941,933.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on April 17, 2008 are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RURBAN
FINANCIAL CORP.
2007
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Item
1.
|
Business
|
4
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
24
|
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
27
|
Item
2.
|
Properties
|
27
|
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
29
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
29
|
Supplemental
Item: Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
30
|
|
PART
II
|
||
Item
5.
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
32
|
Item
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
35
|
Item
7.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
36
|
Item
7A.
|
Qualitative
and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
53
|
Item
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
53
|
Item
9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
53
|
Item
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
53
|
Item
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
53
|
54
|
||
PART
III
|
||
Item
10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers of the Registrant and Corporate
Governance
|
54
|
Item
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
55
|
Item
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
55
|
Item
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
55
|
Item
14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
55
|
|
||
PART
IV
|
||
Item
15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
56
|
Signatures
and Certifications
|
57
|
3.
PART
I
Item
1. Business.
General
Rurban
Financial Corp., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”), is a bank holding company
registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and is
subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(the “Federal Reserve Board”). The Company was organized in 1983. The executive
offices of the Company are located at 401 Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio
43512.
Through
its direct and indirect subsidiaries, The State Bank and Trust Company (“State
Bank”), RFCBC, Inc. (“RFCBC”), Rurbanc Data Services, Inc. (“RDSI”), Diverse
Computer Marketers, Inc. (“DCM”), Reliance Financial Services (“RFS”), Rurban
Mortgage Company (“RMC”), Rurban Statutory Trust I (“RST I”), and Rurban
Statutory Trust II (“RST II”), the Company is engaged in a variety of
activities, including commercial banking, data and item processing, and trust
and financial services, as explained in more detail below.
General
Description of Holding Company Group
State
Bank
State
Bank is an Ohio state-chartered bank. State Bank presently operates six branch
offices in Defiance County, Ohio (five in the city of Defiance and one in Ney),
two branch offices in adjacent Paulding County, Ohio (one each in Paulding
and
Oakwood), three branch offices in Fulton County, Ohio (one each in Delta, Lyons
and Wauseon), two branch offices in Allen County, Ohio (two in the city of
Lima), three branch offices in Wood County, Ohio (one each in Luckey, Walbridge
and Perrysburg) and one office in adjacent Lucas County, Ohio, a Loan Production
Office in Franklin County, and one branch office in Allen County, Indiana.
At
December 31, 2007, State Bank had 162 full-time equivalent
employees.
State
Bank offers a full range of commercial banking services, including checking
accounts, passbook savings, money market accounts and time certificates of
deposit; automatic teller machines; commercial, consumer, agricultural and
residential mortgage loans (including “Home Value Equity” line of credit loans);
personal and corporate trust services; commercial leasing; bank credit card
services; safe deposit box rentals; Internet and telephone banking and other
personalized banking services.
RFS
is a
trust and financial services company and was merged into State Bank during
2007.
RFS offers various trust and financial services, including asset management
services for individuals and corporate employee benefit plans, as well as
brokerage services through Raymond James Financial, Inc.
RMC
RMC
is an
Ohio corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of State Bank. RMC is a mortgage
company; however, it ceased originating mortgage loans in the second quarter
of
2000 and is presently inactive.
At
December 31, 2007, RMC had no employees.
RFCBC
RFCBC
is
an Ohio corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that was
incorporated in August 2004. RFCBC operates as a loan subsidiary in servicing
and working out problem loans. At December 31, 2007, RFCBC had no
employees.
4.
RDSI
RDSI
has
been in operation since 1964 and became an Ohio corporation in June 1976. RDSI
has two operating locations: one in Defiance, Ohio, and one in Holland,
Michigan. At December 31, 2007, RDSI had 70 full-time equivalent
employees.
RDSI
delivers software systems to the banking industry which provide a broad range
of
data processing and item processing services in an outsourced environment
utilizing Information Technology Inc. (ITI) software.
DCM
DCM
was
acquired in September of 2006. DCM is a Michigan corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of RDSI. DCM has one operating location: Lansing, Michigan. At
December 31, 2007, DCM had 29 full-time equivalent employees.
DCM
delivers item processing services to the banking industry in an outsourced
environment utilizing BankWare software.
DCM
was
merged into RDSI effective December 31, 2007 and now operates as a division
of
RDSI doing business as “DCM”.
RST
I
RST
I is
a trust that was organized in August 2000. In September 2000, RST I closed
a
pooled private offering of 10,000 Capital Securities with liquidation amount
of
$1,000 per security. The proceeds of the offering were loaned to the Company
in
exchange for junior subordinated debentures with terms similar to the Capital
Securities. The sole assets of RST I are the junior subordinated debentures
and
the back-up obligations, which in the aggregate, constitute a full and
unconditional guarantee by the Company of the obligations of RST I under the
Capital Securities.
RST
II
RST
II is
a trust that was organized in August 2005. In September 2005, RST II closed
a
pooled private offering of 10,000 Capital Securities with a liquidation amount
of $1,000 per security. The proceeds of the offering were loaned to the Company
in exchange for junior subordinated debentures with terms similar to the Capital
Securities. The sole assets of RST II are the junior subordinated debentures
and
the back-up obligations, which in the aggregate, constitute a full and
unconditional guarantee by the Company of the obligations of RST II under the
Capital Securities.
Recent
Developments
During
the first quarter of 2007, Rurban merged Reliance Financial Services, N.A.,
its
trust and investment subsidiary, and The Exchange Bank, its recently acquired
community bank, into The State Bank and Trust Company. This action has allowed
efficiencies leading to continuing core profit improvement at The State Bank
and
Trust Company.
State
Bank continues to expand its reach to higher-growth markets. In January 2007,
the Fort Wayne, Indiana Loan Production Office was converted to a full-service
branch. State Bank continued its entrance to growth markets by opening a Loan
Production Office in Columbus, Ohio in December, 2007.
RDSI
and
DCM, Rurban’s data and item processing subsidiaries, reported another record
year. The total number of banks being processed increased by 5 to 117. Revenue
increased to $20.6 million, a $4.3 million, or 27% increase, over the previous
year’s results. Net income was a record $2.5 million for the
year.
5.
On
April
12, 2007, Rurban initiated a stock repurchase program, authorizing the
repurchase of up to 250,000 shares, or approximately 5%, of the Company’s
outstanding shares. As of the end of the fourth quarter, Rurban repurchased
48,500 shares at an average cost of $12.58 per share.
Rurban
increased its dividend to shareholders from $0.21 per share during 2006 to
$0.26
per share in 2007.
Competition
State
Bank experiences significant competition in attracting depositors and borrowers.
Competition in lending activities comes principally from other commercial banks
in the lending areas of State Bank, and, to a lesser extent, from savings
associations, insurance companies, governmental agencies, credit unions,
securities brokerage firms and pension funds. The primary factors in competing
for loans are interest rates charged and overall banking services.
State
Bank’s competition for deposits comes from other commercial banks, savings
associations, money market funds and credit unions as well as from insurance
companies and securities brokerage firms. The primary factors in competing
for
deposits are interest rates paid on deposits, account liquidity and convenience
of office location.
RDSI
and
DCM also operate in a highly competitive field. RDSI and DCM compete primarily
on the basis of the value and quality of their data processing and item
processing services and service and convenience to their customers.
RFS
operates in the highly competitive trust services field and its competition
consists primarily of other Ohio bank trust departments.
Supervision
and Regulation
The
following is a summary of certain statutes and regulations affecting the Company
and its subsidiaries. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference
to
such statutes and regulations.
Regulation
of Bank Holding Companies and Their Subsidiaries in General
The
Company is a bank holding company and, as such, is subject to regulation under
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “Bank Holding Company
Act”). The Bank Holding Company Act requires the prior approval of the Federal
Reserve Board before a bank holding company may acquire direct or indirect
ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank (unless
the bank is already majority owned by the bank holding company), acquire all
or
substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company, or
merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company. Subject to certain
exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act also prohibits a bank holding company
from acquiring 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank and
from engaging in any business other than banking or managing or controlling
banks. The primary exception to this prohibition allows a bank holding company
to own shares in any company the activities of which the Federal Reserve Board
had determined, as of November 19, 1999, to be so closely related to banking
as
to be a proper incident thereto.
The
Company is subject to the reporting requirements of, and examination and
regulation by, the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board has
extensive enforcement authority over bank holding companies, including, without
limitation, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist
or removal orders, and require that a bank holding company divest subsidiaries,
including its subsidiary banks. In general, the Federal Reserve Board may
initiate enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe
or unsound practices. A bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited
from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with extensions of
credit and/or the provision of other property or services to a customer by
the
bank holding company or its subsidiaries.
6.
State
Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System, so its primary federal regulator
is the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board issues regulations
governing the operations of State Bank and examines State Bank. The Federal
Reserve Board may initiate enforcement action against insured depository
institutions and affiliated persons for violations of laws and regulations
and
for engaging in unsafe or unsound practices. The deposits of State Bank are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and are subject to
the applicable provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
As
a
state-chartered bank incorporated under Ohio law, State Bank is also subject
to
regulation, supervision and examination by the Ohio Division of Financial
Institutions (the “Division”). The Division may initiate supervisory measures or
formal enforcement actions against Ohio state-chartered banks and, if the
grounds provided by law exist, the Division may place an Ohio bank in
conservatorship or receivership. Whenever the Superintendent of Financial
Institutions considers it necessary or appropriate, the Superintendent may
also
examine the affairs of any holding company or any affiliate or subsidiary of
an
Ohio bank.
Various
requirements and restrictions under the laws of the United States and the State
of Ohio affect the operations of State Bank, including requirements to maintain
reserves against deposits, restrictions on the nature and amount of loans which
may be made and the interest that may be charged thereon, restrictions relating
to investments and other activities, limitations on credit exposure to
correspondent banks, limitations on activities based on capital and surplus,
limitations on payment of dividends, and limitations on branching. Various
consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of State
Bank.
The
Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLBs”) provide credit to their members in the form of
advances. As a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati, State Bank must maintain
certain minimum investments in the capital stock of the FHLB of Cincinnati.
State Bank was in compliance with these requirements at December 31,
2007.
Dividends
The
ability of the Company to obtain funds for the payment of dividends and for
other cash requirements is largely dependent on the amount of dividends that
may
be declared by its subsidiaries. State Bank may not pay dividends to the Company
if, after paying such dividends, it would fail to meet the required minimum
levels under the risk-based capital guidelines and the minimum leverage ratio
requirements. State Bank must obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board
and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions if a dividend in any year would
cause the total dividends for that year to exceed the sum of the current year’s
net profits and the retained net profits for the preceding two years, less
required transfers to surplus. Payment of dividends by State Bank may be
restricted at any time at the discretion of the regulatory authorities, if
they
deem such dividends to constitute an unsafe and/or unsound banking practice.
These provisions could have the effect of limiting the Company’s ability to pay
dividends on its outstanding common shares. Moreover, the Federal Reserve Board
expects the Company to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks,
which may require it to retain capital for further investment in the subsidiary,
rather than for dividends to shareholders of the Company.
Transactions
with Affiliates, Directors, Executive Officers and Shareholders
Sections
23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Federal Reserve Board
Regulation W restrict transactions by banks and their subsidiaries with
their affiliates. Any company or entity that controls, is controlled by or
is
under common control with a bank is generally considered to be an affiliate
of
the bank.
7.
In
general, Sections 23A and 23B and Regulation W:
·
|
limit
the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered
transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of the
bank’s capital stock and surplus (i.e., tangible
capital);
|
·
|
limit
the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered
transactions” with all affiliates to 20% of the bank’s capital stock and
surplus; and
|
·
|
require
that all covered transactions be on terms substantially the same,
or at
least as favorable to the bank or subsidiary, as those provided to
non-affiliates.
|
The
term
“covered transaction” includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance
of a guarantee and similar types of transactions.
A
bank’s
authority to extend credit to executive officers, directors and greater than
10%
shareholders, as well as entities such persons control, is subject to Sections
22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O promulgated
thereunder by the Federal Reserve Board. Among other things, these loans must
be
made on terms substantially the same as those offered to unaffiliated
individuals (or be made under a benefit or compensation program and on terms
widely available to employees) and must not involve a greater than normal risk
of repayment. In addition, the amount of loans a bank may make to these persons
is based, in part, on the bank’s capital position, and specified approval
procedures must be followed in making loans which exceed specified
amounts.
Regulatory
Capital
The
Federal Reserve Board has adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding
companies and for state member banks, such as State Bank. The risk-based capital
guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating
risk weighted assets by assigning assets and off-balance-sheet items to broad
risk categories. The minimum ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets
(including certain off-balance-sheet items, such as standby letters of credit)
is 8%. Of that 8%, 4% is to be comprised of common shareholders’ equity
(including retained earnings but excluding treasury stock), non-cumulative
perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred
stock, and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries,
less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (“Tier 1 capital”). The
remainder (“Tier 2 capital”) may consist, among other things, of certain amounts
of mandatory convertible debt securities, subordinated debt, preferred stock
not
qualifying as Tier 1 capital, an allowance for loan and lease losses and net
unrealized gains, after applicable taxes, on available-for-sale equity
securities with readily determinable fair values, all subject to limitations
established by the guidelines. The Federal Reserve Board also imposes a minimum
leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to total assets) of 3% for bank holding companies
and state member banks that meet certain specified conditions, including no
operational, financial or supervisory deficiencies, and including having the
highest regulatory rating. The minimum leverage ratio is 1%-2% higher for other
bank holding companies and state member banks based on their particular
circumstances and risk profiles and those experiencing or anticipating
significant growth. Failure to meet applicable capital guidelines could subject
a banking institution to a variety of enforcement remedies available to federal
and state regulatory authorities, including the termination of deposit insurance
by the FDIC.
The
federal banking regulators have established regulations governing prompt
corrective action to resolve capital deficient banks. The regulations establish
five capital level categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized,
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically
undercapitalized. Under these regulations, institutions which become
undercapitalized can become subject to mandatory regulatory scrutiny and
limitations, which increase as capital decreases. Such institutions may also
be
required to file capital plans with their primary federal regulator, and their
holding companies may be required guarantee the capital shortfall up to 5%
of
the assets of the capital deficient institution at the time it becomes
undercapitalized.
8.
The
Company and State Bank, at year end 2007, were categorized as “well
capitalized”.
Deposit
Insurance Assessments
In
February of 2006, President Bush signed into law the Deposit Insurance Reform
Act of 2005 and its companion bill, the Deposit Insurance Reform Conforming
Amendments Act of 2005 (collectively, the “Deposit Insurance Reform Acts”),
which provide for the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings Association
Insurance Fund (SAIF) to be merged into a new Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF).
The
Deposit Insurance Reform Acts provide for several additional changes to the
deposit insurance system, including the following:
·
|
Increasing
the deposit insurance limit for retirement accounts from $100,000
to
$250,000;
|
·
|
Adjusting
the deposit insurance limits (currently $100,000 for most accounts)
every
five years based on an inflation index, with the first adjustment
to be
effective on January 1, 2011;
|
·
|
Providing
pass-through deposit insurance for the deposits of employee benefit
plans
(but prohibiting undercapitalized depository institutions from accepting
employee benefit plan deposits);
|
·
|
Allocating
an aggregate of $4.7 billion of one-time credits to offset the premiums
of
depository institutions based on their assessment bases at the end
of
1996;
|
·
|
Establishing
rules for awarding cash dividends to depository institutions, based
on
their relative contributions to the DIF and its predecessor funds,
when
the DIF reserve ratio reaches certain levels;
and
|
·
|
Revising
the rules and procedures for risk-based premium
assessments.
|
On
January 1, 2007, final rules under the Deposit Insurance Reform Acts became
effective. The final rules set a base assessment schedule for 2007 for DIF
premiums. For banks with less than $10 billion in assets, the premium assessment
rates are based on a combination of financial ratios and CAMELS component
ratings. The final rules also provide a one-time credit to institutions to
offset amounts owed for deposit insurance.
The
Company does not expect that the Deposit Insurance Reform Acts will have a
significant impact on the Company or its subsidiary banks in fiscal year
2007.
Monetary
Policy and Economic Conditions
The
commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions,
but also by the policies of various governmental regulatory authorities,
including the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board regulates money
and credit conditions and interest rates in order to influence general economic
conditions primarily through open market operations in U.S. Government
securities, changes in the discount rate on bank borrowings and changes in
reserve requirements against bank deposits. These policies and regulations
significantly affect the overall growth and distribution of bank loans,
investments and deposits, and the interest rates charged on loans as well as
the
interest rates paid on deposits and accounts.
Holding
Company Activities
In
November 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was enacted, permitting bank holding
companies to become financial holding companies and thereby affiliate with
securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities that
are
financial in nature. A bank holding company may become a financial holding
company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized under the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation Act of 1991 prompt corrective action provisions,
is well managed, and has at least a satisfactory rating under the Community
Reinvestment Act by filing a declaration that the bank holding company wishes
to
become a financial holding company. No regulatory approval is required for
a
financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings
association, engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental
to
activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve
Board.
9.
The
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act defines “financial in nature” to include: (i) securities
underwriting, dealing and market making; (ii) sponsoring mutual funds and
investment companies; (iii) insurance underwriting and agency; (iv) merchant
banking activities; and (v) activities that the Federal Reserve Board has
determined to be closely related to banking.
The
Company has not elected to become a financial holding company. The Company
intends to continue to analyze the proposed advantages and disadvantages of
becoming a financial holding company on a periodic basis.
SEC
Regulation
The
Company is subject to the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”) and certain state securities authorities relating to the offering
and sale of its securities. The Company is subject to the registration,
reporting and other regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933,
as
amended, and the Exchange Act and the rules adopted by the SEC under those
acts.
The Company’s common shares are listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol “RBNF”, and the Company is subject to the NASDAQ rules and regulations
applicable to listed companies.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and Related Rules Affecting Corporate Governance
As
mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC has adopted rules and
regulations governing, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing and
accounting and executive compensation, and enhanced the timely disclosure of
corporate information. The SEC has also approved corporate governance rules
promulgated by The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (“NASDAQ”). The Board of Directors
of the Company has taken a series of actions to comply with the new NASDAQ
and
SEC rules and to further strengthen its corporate governance practices. The
Company has adopted and implemented a Code of Conduct and Ethics and a copy
of
that policy can be found on the Company’s website at www.rurbanfinancial.net
by first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Code of Conduct”. The
Company has also adopted charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation
Committee and the Executive Governance and Nominating Committee, which charters
are available on the Company’s website at www.rurbanfinancial.net by
first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Supplementary
Info”.
Effect
of Environmental Regulation
Compliance
with federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of materials
into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the
environment, has not had a material effect upon the capital expenditures,
earnings or competitive position of the Company and its subsidiaries. The
Company believes that the nature of the operations of its subsidiaries has
little, if any, environmental impact. The Company, therefore, anticipates no
material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities for its
current fiscal year or for the foreseeable future. The Company’s subsidiaries
may be required to make capital expenditures for environmental control
facilities related to properties which they may acquire through foreclosure
proceedings in the future; however, the amount of such capital expenditures,
if
any, is not currently determinable.
10.
Available
Information
The
Company will provide, without charge, to each shareholder, upon written request
to Rurban Financial Corp., P.O. Box 467, Defiance, Ohio 43512, Attention: Valda
Colbart, Investor Relations Department, a copy of the Company's Annual Report
on
Form 10-K, including the Financial Statements and Schedules thereto required
to
be filed with the SEC, for the Company's most recent fiscal year.
Statistical
Financial Information Regarding the Company
The
following schedules and tables analyze certain elements of the consolidated
balance sheets and statements of income of the Company and its subsidiaries,
as
required under Exchange Act Industry Guide 3 promulgated by the SEC, and should
be read in conjunction with the narrative analysis presented in Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
and the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and its subsidiaries included
at pages F-1 through F-53 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
11.
I. |
DISTRIBUTION
OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY; INTEREST
RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
|
The
following are the condensed average balance sheets for the years ending December
31 and the interest earned or paid on such amounts and the average interest
rate
thereon:
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($in
thousands)
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
|||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable
|
$ |
84,389
|
$ |
4,284
|
5.08
|
%
|
$
|
119,394
|
$ |
5,212
|
4.37
|
%
|
$ |
108,306
|
$ |
4,337
|
4.00
|
%
|
||||||||||
Non-taxable
(1)
|
16,405
|
978
|
5.96
|
%
|
14,497
|
848
|
5.85
|
%
|
7,248
|
403
|
5.56
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
5,072
|
225
|
4.44
|
%
|
2,259
|
177
|
7.84
|
%
|
4,881
|
160
|
3.28
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans,
net (2)(3)
|
381,449
|
27,893
|
7.31
|
%
|
354,400
|
25,055
|
7.07
|
%
|
268,158
|
16,659
|
6.21
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
earning assets
|
487,315
|
33,380
|
6.85
|
%
|
490,550
|
31,292
|
6.38
|
%
|
388,593
|
21,559
|
5.55
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
11,605
|
11,827
|
9,653
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(3,843
|
)
|
(4,495
|
)
|
(4,885
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment
|
19,788
|
19,387
|
15,570
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
41,707
|
36,825
|
24,435
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
556,572
|
$
|
554,094
|
$ |
433,366
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings
and interest-bearing demand deposits
|
$
|
138,314
|
$ |
2,714
|
1.96
|
%
|
$
|
127,179
|
$ |
1,656
|
1.30
|
%
|
$ |
102,453
|
$ |
716
|
0.70
|
%
|
||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
231,605
|
10,882
|
4.70
|
%
|
228,193
|
9,366
|
4.10
|
%
|
167,140
|
4,935
|
2.95
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
36,588
|
1,653
|
4.52
|
%
|
21,965
|
946
|
4.30
|
%
|
6,854
|
165
|
2.41
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Advances
from FHLB
|
19,329
|
1,037
|
5.36
|
%
|
41,353
|
2,106
|
5.09
|
%
|
46,376
|
2,040
|
4.40
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
20,620
|
1,809
|
8.77
|
%
|
20,620
|
1,787
|
8.67
|
%
|
14,434
|
1,275
|
8.83
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
borrowed funds
|
1,641
|
127
|
7.74
|
%
|
939
|
75
|
7.98
|
%
|
2,247
|
237
|
10.55
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
448,097
|
18,222
|
4.07
|
%
|
440,249
|
15,936
|
3.62
|
%
|
339,504
|
9,368
|
2.76
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Demand
deposits
|
42,848
|
47,176
|
36,675
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
7,682
|
12,168
|
6,105
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
498,627
|
499,593
|
382,284
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
57,945
|
54,501
|
51,083
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
556,572
|
$
|
554,094
|
$ |
433,367
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income (tax equivalent basis)
|
$ |
15,158
|
$
|
15,356
|
$ |
12,191
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income as a percent of
average interest-earning assets
|
3.11
|
%
|
3.13
|
%
|
3.14
|
%
|
(1) |
Interest
is computed on a tax equivalent basis using a 34% statutory tax
rate. The
tax equivalent adjustment was $333, $288 and $137 in 2007, 2006
and
2005, respectively.
|
(2) |
Nonaccruing
loans and loans held for sale are included in the average
balances.
|
(3) |
Interest
is computed on a tax equivalent basis using a 34% statutory tax
rate. The
tax equivalent adjustment was $38 and $33 in 2007 and 2006
respectively.
|
12.
I.
|
DISTRIBUTION
OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY;
|
INTEREST
RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
(Continued)
|
The
following tables set forth the effect of volume and rate changes on interest
income and expense for the periods indicated. For purposes of these tables,
changes in interest due to volume and rate were determined as
follows:
Volume
Variance - change in volume multiplied by the previous year's rate.
Rate
Variance - change in rate multiplied by the previous year's volume.
Rate/Volume
Variance - change in volume multiplied by the change in rate. This variance
was
allocated to volume variance and rate variance in proportion to the relationship
of the absolute dollar amount of the change in each.
Interest
on non-taxable securities has been adjusted to a fully tax equivalent basis
using a statutory tax rate of 34% in 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Variance
|
|
Variance
Attributable To
|
|
|||||
|
|
2007/2006
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
||||
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
||||||||||
Securities
|
||||||||||
Taxable
|
$
|
(928
|
)
|
$
|
(1,688
|
)
|
$
|
760
|
||
Non-taxable
|
130
|
113
|
17
|
|||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
48
|
149
|
(101
|
)
|
||||||
Loans,
net of unearned income and deferred loan fees
|
2,838
|
1,958
|
880
|
|||||||
|
2,088
|
532
|
1,556
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
||||||||||
Deposits
|
||||||||||
Savings
and interest-bearing demand deposits
|
1,058
|
156
|
902
|
|||||||
Time
deposits
|
1,516
|
142
|
1,374
|
|||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
707
|
659
|
48
|
|||||||
Advances
from FHLB
|
(1,069
|
)
|
(1,176
|
)
|
107
|
|||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
22
|
-
|
22
|
|||||||
Other
borrowed funds
|
52
|
54
|
(2
|
)
|
||||||
2,286
|
(165
|
)
|
2,451
|
|||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
(198
|
)
|
$
|
697
|
$
|
(895
|
)
|
13.
I.
|
DISTRIBUTION
OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY;
|
INTEREST
RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
(Continued)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Variance
|
|
Variance Attributable To
|
|
|||||
|
|
2006/2005
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
|||
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
||||||||||
Securities
|
||||||||||
Taxable
|
$
|
875
|
$
|
465
|
$
|
410
|
||||
Non-taxable
|
445
|
423
|
22
|
|||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
17
|
(119
|
)
|
136
|
||||||
Loans,
net of unearned income and deferred loan fees
|
8,396
|
5,875
|
2,521
|
|||||||
|
9,733
|
6,644
|
3,089
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
||||||||||
Deposits
|
||||||||||
Savings
and interest-bearing demand deposits
|
940
|
205
|
735
|
|||||||
Time
deposits
|
4,431
|
2,143
|
2,288
|
|||||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
781
|
575
|
206
|
|||||||
Advances
from FHLB
|
66
|
(235
|
)
|
301
|
||||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
512
|
537
|
(25
|
)
|
||||||
Other
borrowed funds
|
(162
|
)
|
(114
|
)
|
(48
|
)
|
||||
$
|
6,568
|
$
|
3,111
|
$
|
3,457
|
|||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
3,165
|
$
|
3,533
|
$
|
(368
|
)
|
14.
II.
|
INVESTMENT
PORTFOLIO
|
A.
|
The
book value of securities available for sale as of December 31 in each
of the following years are summarized as
follows:
|
Book
Value of Securities
|
||||||||||
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||
U.S.
Treaury and government agencies
|
$
|
40,189
|
$
|
58,123
|
$
|
89,671
|
||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
16,019
|
15,465
|
12,694
|
|||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
36,380
|
28,770
|
35,660
|
|||||||
Other
securities
|
50
|
81
|
1,305
|
|||||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
23
|
23
|
23
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
92,661
|
$
|
102,462
|
$
|
139,353
|
B. |
The
maturity distribution and weighted average interest rates of securities
available for sale at December 31, 2007 are set forth in the table
below.
The weighted average interest rates are based on coupon rates for
securities purchased at par value and on effective interest rates
considering amortization or accretion if the securities were purchased
at
a premium or discount.:
|
|
|
Maturing
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
After One Year
|
|
After Five Years
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Within
|
|
but within
|
|
but within
|
|
After
|
|
||||
|
|
One Year
|
|
Five Years
|
|
Ten Years
|
|
Ten Years
|
|
||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
Treaury and government agencies
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,153
|
$
|
39,036
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
554
|
603
|
2,150
|
12,712
|
|||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
176
|
3,178
|
3,229
|
29,797
|
|||||||||
Other
securities
|
-
|
50
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
730
|
$
|
4,984
|
$
|
44,415
|
$
|
42,509
|
|||||
Marketable
equity securities with no maturity
|
$
|
23
|
|||||||||||
Weighted
average yield (1)
|
2.61
|
%
|
4.68
|
%
|
4.90
|
%
|
5.13
|
%
|
(1) |
Yields
are not presented on a tax-equivalent
basis.
|
C. |
Excluding
those holdings of the investment portfolio in U.S. Treasury securities
and
other agencies of the U.S. Government, there were no other securities
of
any one issuer which exceeded 10% of the shareholders' equity of
the
Company at December 31,
2007.
|
15.
III.
|
LOAN
PORTFOLIO
|
A.
|
Types
of Loans - Total loans on the balance sheet are comprised of the
following
classifications at December 31 for the years
indicated:
|
Types
of Loans
|
||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
|||||||||||
Commercial
and Agricultural
|
$
|
253,202
|
$
|
225,827
|
$
|
187,667
|
$
|
188,532
|
$
|
188,532
|
||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
84,621
|
94,389
|
89,086
|
63,828
|
46,718
|
|||||||||||
Consumer
loans to individuals
|
51,358
|
49,314
|
48,877
|
31,949
|
37,310
|
|||||||||||
Leases
|
330
|
857
|
1,661
|
5,128
|
11,775
|
|||||||||||
Total
loans
|
$
|
389,511
|
$
|
370,387
|
$
|
327,291
|
$
|
264,750
|
$
|
284,335
|
||||||
Real
estate mortgage loans held for resale
|
$
|
1,650
|
$
|
390
|
$
|
224
|
$
|
113
|
$
|
219
|
Concentrations
of Credit Risk:
The
Company grants commercial, real estate and installment loans to customers mainly
in northwest Ohio. Commercial loans include loans collateralized by commercial
real estate, business assets and, in the case of agricultural loans, crops
and
farm equipment. As of December 31, 2007, commercial and agricultural loans
made up approximately 65% of the loan portfolio and the loans are expected
to be
repaid from cash flow from operations of businesses. As of December 31,
2007, residential first mortgage loans made up approximately 21.7% of the loan
portfolio and are collateralized by first mortgages on residential real estate.
As of December 31, 2007, consumer loans to individuals made up
approximately 13.3% of the loan portfolio and are primarily collateralized
by
consumer assets.
B.
|
Maturities
and Sensitivities of Loans to Changes in Interest Rates - The following
table shows the amounts of commercial and agricultural loans outstanding
as of December 31, 2007 which, based on remaining scheduled
repayments of principal, are due in the periods indicated. Also,
the
amounts have been classified according to sensitivity to changes
in
interest rates for commercial and agricultural loans due after one
year.
(Variable-rate loans are those loans with floating or adjustable
interest
rates.)
|
Maturing
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Commercial and
Agricultural
|
|||
Within
one year
|
$
|
63,266
|
||
After
one year but within five years
|
75,597
|
|||
After
five years
|
114,339
|
|||
Total
commercial and agricultural loans
|
$
|
253,202
|
16.
III. LOAN PORTFOLIO
(Continued)
Commercial
And Agricultural
|
||||||||||
Interest
Sensitivity
|
||||||||||
Fixed
|
Variable
|
|||||||||
Rate
|
Rate
|
Total
|
||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Due
after one year but within five years
|
$
|
22,681
|
$
|
52,916
|
$
|
75,597
|
||||
Due
after five years
|
11,086
|
103,253
|
114,339
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
33,767
|
$
|
156,169
|
$
|
189,936
|
C.
|
Risk
Elements
|
1.
|
Non-accrual,
Past Due, Restructured and Impaired Loans – The following schedule
summarizes non-accrual, past due, restructured and impaired loans
at
December 31 in each of the following
years.
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
(a)
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis
|
$
|
5,990
|
$
|
3,828
|
$
|
6,270
|
$
|
13,384
|
$
|
18,352
|
||||||
(b)
Accuring loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more
as to
interest or principal payments
|
-
|
-
|
5
|
11
|
-
|
|||||||||||
(c)
Loans not included in (a) which are "Troubled Debt Restructurings"
as
defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
15
|
159
|
166
|
825
|
1,570
|
5,058
|
|||||||||||
Total
non-performing loans
|
$
|
6,149
|
$
|
3,994
|
$
|
7,100
|
$
|
14,965
|
$
|
23,410
|
||||||
(d)
Other loans defined as impaired
|
$
|
593
|
$
|
82
|
$
|
3,283
|
$
|
4,671
|
$
|
9,099
|
2007
|
||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||
Cash
basis interest income recognized on impaired loans outstanding at
December 31, 2007
|
$
|
75
|
||
Interest
income actually recorded on impaired loans and included in net income
for
the period
|
63
|
|||
2007
unrecorded interest income on non-accrual loans
|
351
|
17.
III.
|
LOAN PORTFOLIO
(Continued)
|
Management
believes the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2007 is adequate to
absorb any losses on non-performing loans, as the allowance balance is
maintained by management at a level considered adequate to cover losses that
are
probable based on past loss experience, general economic conditions, information
about specific borrower situations, including their financial position and
collateral values, and other factors and estimates which are subject to change
over time.
1.
|
Discussion
of the Non-accrual Policy
|
The
accrual of interest income is discontinued when the collection of
a loan
or interest, in whole or in part, is doubtful. When interest accruals
are
discontinued, interest income accrued in the current period is reversed.
While loans which are past due 90 days or more as to interest or
principal
payments are considered for non-accrual status, management may elect
to
continue the accrual of interest when the estimated net realizable
value
of collateral, in management’s judgment, is sufficient to cover the
principal balance and accrued interest. These policies apply to both
commercial and consumer loans.
|
2.
|
Potential
Problem Loans
|
As
of December 31, 2007, in addition to the $6,149,000 of loans reported
under Item III.C.1. above (which amount includes all loans classified
by
management as doubtful or loss), there were approximately $1,416,000
in
other outstanding loans where known information about possible credit
problems of the borrowers caused management to have concerns as to
the
ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment
terms
(loans classified as substandard by management) and which may result
in
disclosure of such loans pursuant to Item III.C.1. at some future
date. In
regard to loans classified as substandard, management believes that
such
potential problem loans have been adequately evaluated in the allowance
of
loan losses.
|
18.
III.
|
LOAN PORTFOLIO
(Continued)
|
3.
|
Foreign
Outstandings
|
None
|
4.
|
Loan
Concentrations
|
At
December 31, 2007, loans outstanding related to agricultural
operations or collateralized by agricultural real estate aggregated
approximately $43,369,000, or 11.1 % of total
loans.
|
D.
|
Other
Interest-Bearing Assets
|
There
were no other interest-bearing assets as of December 31, 2007 which
would be required to be disclosed under Item III.C.1 or Item III.C.2.
if
such assets were loans.
|
19.
IV. |
SUMMARY
OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
|
A.
|
The
following schedule presents an analysis of the allowance for loan
losses,
average loan data and related ratios for the years ended
December 31:
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans
outstanding at end of period
|
$
|
389,269
|
$
|
370,102
|
$
|
327,048
|
$
|
264,481
|
$
|
284,104
|
||||||
Average
loans outstanding during period
|
$
|
381,453
|
$
|
354,726
|
$
|
268,158
|
$
|
271,503
|
$
|
385,153
|
||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$
|
3,717
|
$
|
4,700
|
$
|
4,899
|
$
|
10,181
|
$
|
17,694
|
||||||
Balance,
Exchange
|
910
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance,
Oakwood
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans
charged-off
|
||||||||||||||||
Commercial
and agricultural loans
|
(104
|
)
|
(1,277
|
)
|
(2,760
|
)
|
(6,599
|
)
|
(10,089
|
)
|
||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
(81
|
)
|
(100
|
)
|
(133
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
(195
|
)
|
||||||
Leases
|
-
|
-
|
(208
|
)
|
(70
|
)
|
(225
|
)
|
||||||||
Consumer
loans to individuals
|
(247
|
)
|
(440
|
)
|
(308
|
)
|
(308
|
)
|
(1,345
|
)
|
||||||
(432
|
)
|
(1,817
|
)
|
(3,409
|
)
|
(6,989
|
)
|
(11,854
|
)
|
|||||||
Recoveries
of loans previously charged-off
|
||||||||||||||||
Commercial
and agricultural loans
|
85
|
419
|
1,566
|
1,835
|
2,497
|
|||||||||||
Real
estate mortgage
|
4
|
75
|
2
|
52
|
86
|
|||||||||||
Leases
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
31
|
109
|
|||||||||||
Consumer
loans to individuals
|
95
|
162
|
145
|
188
|
447
|
|||||||||||
184
|
656
|
1,717
|
2,106
|
3,139
|
||||||||||||
Net
loans charged-off
|
(248
|
)
|
(1,160
|
)
|
(1,692
|
)
|
(4,883
|
)
|
(8,715
|
)
|
||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
521
|
178
|
583
|
(399
|
)
|
1,202
|
||||||||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$
|
3,990
|
$
|
3,717
|
$
|
4,700
|
$
|
4,899
|
$
|
10,181
|
||||||
Ratio
of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding
during
the period
|
0.07
|
%
|
0.33
|
%
|
0.63
|
%
|
1.80
|
%
|
2.26
|
%
|
The
allowance for loan losses balance and the provision for loan losses are
determined by management based upon periodic reviews of the loan portfolio.
In
addition, management considered the level of charge-offs on loans as well as
the
fluctuations of charge-offs and recoveries on loans in the factors which caused
these changes. Estimating the risk of loss and the amount of loss is necessarily
subjective. Accordingly, the allowance is maintained by management at a level
considered adequate to cover losses that are currently anticipated based on
past
loss experience, economic conditions, information about specific borrower
situations including their financial position and collateral values and other
factors and estimates which are subject to change over time.
20.
IV. |
SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
(Continued)
|
B. |
The
following schedule provides a breakdown of the allowance for loan
losses
allocated by type of loan and related
ratios.
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Allocation
of the Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
of Loans In
|
|
|
|
of Loans In
|
|
|
|
of Loans In
|
|
|
|
of Loans In
|
|
|
|
of Loans In
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Each
|
|
|
|
Each
|
|
|
|
Each
|
|
|
|
Each
|
|
|
|
Each
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Total
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Total
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Total
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Total
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Total
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Amount
|
|
Loans
|
|
Amount
|
|
Loans
|
|
Amount
|
|
Loans
|
|
Amount
|
|
Loans
|
|
Amount
|
|
Loans
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
and agricultural
|
$
|
2,945
|
73.8
|
%
|
$
|
2,945
|
79.2
|
%
|
$
|
3,728
|
57.3
|
%
|
$
|
4,502
|
61.9
|
%
|
$
|
9,649
|
66.3
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Residential
first mortgage
|
590
|
14.8
|
%
|
317
|
8.5
|
%
|
291
|
27.2
|
%
|
141
|
24.1
|
%
|
75
|
16.4
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
Consumer
loans to individuals
|
455
|
11.4
|
%
|
455
|
12.3
|
%
|
681
|
15.5
|
%
|
256
|
14.0
|
%
|
457
|
17.3
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||
$
|
3,990
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
3,717
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
4,700
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
4,899
|
100.0
|
%
|
$
|
10,181
|
100.0
|
%
|
While
management's periodic analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses
may allocate portions of the allowance for specific problem loan situations,
the
entire allowance is available for any loan charge-offs that
occur.
21.
V. |
DEPOSITS
|
The
average amount of deposits and average rates paid are summarized
as
follows for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
||||||
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rate
|
|
||||||
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Savings
and interest-bearing demand deposits
|
$
|
138,314
|
1.96
|
%
|
$
|
127,179
|
1.30
|
%
|
$
|
102,453
|
0.70
|
%
|
|||||||
Time
deposits
|
231,604
|
4.70
|
%
|
228,193
|
4.10
|
%
|
167,140
|
2.95
|
%
|
||||||||||
Demand
deposits (non-interest-bearing)
|
42,849
|
—
|
47,176
|
—
|
36,675
|
—
|
|||||||||||||
$
|
412,767
|
$
|
402,548
|
$
|
306,268
|
Maturities
of time certificates of deposit and other time deposits of $100,000
or
more outstanding at December 31, 2007 are summarized as
follows:
|
Amount
|
||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
||||
Three
months or less
|
$
|
11,594
|
||
Over
three months and through six months
|
17,216
|
|||
Over
six months and through twelve months
|
20,310
|
|||
Over
twelve months
|
8,231
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
57,351
|
22.
VI. |
RETURN
ON EQUITY AND ASSETS
|
The
ratio of net income to average shareholders' equity and average total
assets and certain other ratios are as follows for periods ended
December
31:
|
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Average
total assets
|
$
|
556,572
|
$
|
554,094
|
$
|
433,367
|
||||
Average
shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
57,945
|
$
|
54,501
|
$
|
51,083
|
||||
Net
income
|
$
|
3,257
|
$
|
2,760
|
$
|
673
|
||||
Cash
dividends declared
|
$
|
1,303
|
$
|
1,056
|
$
|
914
|
||||
Return
on average total assets
|
0.59
|
%
|
0.50
|
%
|
0.16
|
%
|
||||
Return
on average shareholders' equity
|
5.62
|
%
|
5.06
|
%
|
1.32
|
%
|
||||
Dividend
payout ratio (1)
|
40.01
|
38.25
|
133.33
|
|||||||
Average
shareholders' equity to average total assets
|
10.41
|
%
|
9.84
|
%
|
11.79
|
%
|
(1) Cash
dividends declared divided by net income.
VII. |
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS
|
The
Company did have short-term borrowings during 2005 but the average
ending
balance for the period did not exceed 30% or more of shareholders’ equity.
|
The
following information is reported for short-term borrowings for 2007
and
2006:
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||
Amount
outstanding at end of year
|
$
|
43,006
|
$
|
32,271
|
|||
Weighted
average interest rate at end of year
|
4.38
|
%
|
4.43
|
%
|
|||
Maximum
amount outstanding at any month end
|
$
|
46,966
|
$
|
32,584
|
|||
Average
amount outstanding during the year
|
$
|
36,588
|
$
|
21,965
|
|||
Weighted
average interest rate during the year
|
4.51
|
%
|
4.30
|
%
|
23.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Certain
statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in other statements
that we make from time to time in filings by the Company with the SEC, in press
releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of
the
Company which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking
statements with in the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act
of 1995. These
forward-looking statements include statements preceded by or that include the
words or phases “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “intends,” “expects,”
“projects,” “estimates,” “should,” “may,” “would be,” “will allow,” “will likely
result,” “will continue,” “will remain,” or similar expressions.
The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for
forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective
information so long as those statements are identified as forward-looking and
are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
discussed in the forward-looking statements. We desire to take advantage of
the
“safe harbor” provisions of the Act.
Forward-looking
statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially
from those predicted by the forward-looking statements because of various
factors and possible events, including those factors identified below. There
is
also the risk that the Company’s management or Board of Directors incorrectly
analyzes these risks and forces, or that the strategies the Company develops
to
address them are unsuccessful.
Forward-looking
statements speak only as of that date on which they are made. Except as may
be
required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date
on
which the statement is made to reflect unanticipated events.
All
forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or any person acting
on
our behalf are qualified in their entirety by the following cautionary
statements.
Adverse
Economic Conditions could adversely affect our financial condition results
of
operations.
Our
success depends significantly upon the general economic conditions in the local
markets in which we operate, as well as the strength of the U.S. economy in
general. Conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, money supply
and
other factors outside our control may adversely affect our asset quality,
deposit levels and loan demand and, therefore, our financial condition and
results of operations. Decreases in real estate values could adversely affect
the value of property used as collateral for our real estate loans. In addition,
adverse changes in the economy could adversely affect the ability of our
borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, which could have an adverse
impact on our financial condition and results of operations. The substantial
majority of our loans are to individuals and businesses in Northwestern Ohio.
As
a result, adverse economic in this market area, including the loss of certain
significant employers, could reduce our growth and generally affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
Changes
in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Our
earnings depend substantially on our interest spread, which is the difference
between the rates we earn on loans, securities and other earning assets and
the
interest rates we pay on deposits and other borrowings. These rates will depend
on many factors that are partly or entirely outside of our control, including
general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and
regulatory authorities. While we have taken measures intended to manage the
risks of operating in a changing rate environment, there can be no assurance
that such measures will be effective in avoiding undue interest rate risk.
As
market interest rates rise, we will have competitive pressures to increase
the
rates we pay on deposits, which will result in a decrease in net interest income
and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
24.
We
operate in an extremely competitive market, and our business will suffer if
we
are unable to compete effectively.
In
our
market area, we encounter significant competition from other commercial banks,
savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, consumer
finance companies and other financial institutions. The increasingly competitive
environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, changes in
technology and product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of
consolidation among financial service providers. If we fail to adequately
address each of the competitive pressures in the banking industry, our financial
condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
If
our actual loan losses exceed our allowance for loan losses, our net income
will
decrease.
Our
loan
customers may not repay their loans according to their terms, and the collateral
securing the payment of these loans may be insufficient to pay any remaining
loan balance. We may experience significant loan losses, which could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results. In accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, we maintain an allowance
for
loan losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance, which when
combined, we refer to as the allowance for loan losses. Our allowance for loan
losses may not be adequate to cover actual credit losses, and future provisions
for credit losses could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Our allowance for loan losses is based on prior experience, as well as an
evaluation of the risks in the current portfolio. The amount of future losses
is
susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including
changes in interest rates that may be beyond our control, and these losses
may
exceed current estimates. Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part
of
their examination process, review our loans and allowance for loan losses.
We
cannot assure you that we will not further increase the allowance for loan
losses or that regulators will not require us to increase this allowance. Either
of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Our
earnings are significantly affected by federal regulation and the monetary
policies of the federal government and its agencies.
Any
changes to state and federal banking laws and regulations may negatively impact
our ability to expand our services and to increase the value of our business.
We
are subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision, and
legislation that govern almost all aspects of our operations. These laws may
change from time to time and are mainly intended for the protection of
consumers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds. In addition, our earnings
are affected by the monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve. These policies, which include regulating the national supply of bank
reserves and bank credit, can have a major effect upon the source and cost
of
funds and the rates of return earned on loans and investments. The Federal
Reserve influences the size and distribution of bank reserves through its open
market operations and changes in cash reserve requirements against member bank
deposits. Future changes in laws or regulations or their interpretation or
enforcement could be materially adverse to our business and
shareholders.
Our
business strategy includes significant growth plans. Our financial condition
and
results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail
to
manage our growth effectively.
We
intend
to continue pursuing a profitable growth strategy. Our prospects must be
considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties encountered by
companies in significant growth stages of development. We cannot assure you
that
we will be able to expand our market presence in our existing markets or
successfully enter new markets or that any such expansion will not adversely
affect our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of
operations or adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our
business strategy. Also, if we grow more slowly than anticipated, our operating
results could be materially affected.
25.
Our
ability to grow successfully will depend on a variety of factors including
the
continued availability of desirable business opportunities, the competitive
responses from other financial institutions in our market areas and our ability
to manage our growth. While we believe we have the management resources and
internal systems in place to successfully manage our future growth, there can
be
no assurance growth opportunities will be available or growth will be
successfully managed.
Our
success depends upon our ability to attract and retain key personnel.
Our
success depends upon the continued service of our senior management team and
upon our ability to attract and retain qualified financial services personnel.
Competition for qualified employees is intense. We can not assure you that
we
will be able to retain our existing key personnel or attract additional
qualified personnel. If we lose the services of our key personnel, or are unable
to attract additional qualified personnel, our business, financial condition
and
results of operations could be adversely affected.
We
depend upon the accuracy and completeness of information about customers.
In
deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with
customers, we may rely on information provided to us by customers, including
financial statements and other financial information. We may also rely on
representations of customers as to the accuracy and completeness of that
information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent
auditors. For example, in deciding whether to extend credit to a business,
we
may assume that the customer’s audited financial statements conform with
generally accepted accounting principles and present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the
customer, and we may also rely on the audit report covering those financial
statements. Our financial condition and results of operations could be
negatively impacted to the extent we rely on financial statements that do not
comply with generally accepted accounting principles or that are materially
misleading.
Our
ability to pay cash dividends is limited, and we may be unable to pay cash
dividends in the future even if we elect to do so.
We
are
dependent primarily upon the earnings of our operating subsidiaries for funds
to
pay dividends on our common shares. The payment of dividends by us is also
subject to regulatory restrictions. As a result, any payment of dividends in
the
future will be dependent, in large part, on our ability to satisfy these
regulatory restrictions and our subsidiaries’ earnings, capital requirements,
financial condition and other factors. Although our financial earnings and
financial condition have allowed us to declare and pay periodic cash dividends
to our shareholders, there can be no assurance that our dividend policy or
size
of dividend distribution will continue in the future. Our failure to pay
dividends on our common shares could have a material adverse effect on the
market price of our common shares.
RDSI
relies on the continued functioning of its data center and the integrity of
the
data it processes.
RDSI’s
data center is an integral part of its business. Damage to RDSI’s data center
due to acts of terrorism, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure and
other
disasters could have a material adverse effect on RDSI’s business, operating
results and financial condition. In addition, RDSI relies on the integrity
of
the data it processes. If this data is incorrect or somewhat tainted, client
relations and confidence in RDSI’s services could be impaired, which would harm
RDSI’s business.
26.
A
limited trading market exists for our common shares which could lead to price
volatility.
Your
ability to sell or purchase our common shares depends upon the existence of
an
active trading market for our common shares. While our stock is quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Market, it trades infrequently. As a result, you may be unable
to
sell or purchase our common shares at the volume, price and time you desire.
The
limited trading market for our common shares may cause fluctuations in the
market value of our common shares to be exaggerated, leading to price volatility
in excess of that which would occur in a more active trading
market.
The
preparation of our financial statements requires the use of estimates that
may
vary from actual results.
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make
significant estimates that affect the financial statements. Two of our most
critical estimates are the level of the allowance for loan losses and the
accounting for goodwill and other intangibles. Because of the inherent nature
of
these estimates, we cannot provide complete assurance that we will not be
required to charge earnings for significant unexpected loan losses, nor that
we
will not recognize a material provision for impairment of our goodwill. For
additional information regarding these critical estimates, see Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
beginning on page 36 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes
in accounting standards could impact our results of
operations.
The
accounting standard setters, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board,
the SEC and other regulatory bodies, periodically change the financial
accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements. These changes can be difficult to predict
and
can materially affect how we record and report our financial condition and
results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or
revised standard retroactively, which would result in the restatement of our
financial statements for prior periods.
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not
Applicable
Item
2. Properties.
The
Company’s principal executive offices are located at 401 Clinton Street,
Defiance, Ohio. This facility is owned by State Bank, and a portion of the
facility is leased to the Company.
The
following is a listing and brief description of the properties owned or leased
by State Bank and used in its business:
1.
|
State
Bank’s main office is owned and located at 401 Clinton Street, Defiance,
Ohio. State Bank leases portions of this facility to the Company
and the
RFS division of State Bank. (Banking and
Other)
|
2.
|
State
Bank owns a drive-thru branch office located at 510 Third Street,
Defiance, Ohio. (Banking)
|
3.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 150 West Main Street,
Ney, Ohio. (Banking)
|
4.
|
State
Bank leases a parcel of land for a full service branch office (Owned)
located at 1600 North Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio, pursuant to
a
15-year lease. (Banking)
|
27.
5.
|
State
Bank owns a drive-thru branch office located at 1856 East Second
Street,
Defiance, Ohio. (Banking)
|
6.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 220 North Main
Street,
Paulding, Ohio. (Banking)
|
7.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 312 Main Street,
Delta, Ohio. (Banking)
|
8.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 133 E. Morenci
Street, Lyons, Ohio. (Banking)
|
9.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 515 Parkview,
Wauseon, Ohio. (Banking)
|
10.
|
State
Bank leases a full service branch office located in the Chief Market
Square supermarket at 705 Deatrick Street, Defiance, Ohio, pursuant
to a
15-year lease. (Banking)
|
11.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 218 North First
Street,
Oakwood, Ohio. (Banking)
|
12.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 930 West Market
Street,
Lima, Ohio. (Banking)
|
13.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 2903 Elida Road,
Lima,
Ohio. (Banking)
|
14.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 12832 Coldwater
Road,
Fort Wayne, Indiana. (Banking)
|
15.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 235 Main Street,
Luckey,
Ohio. (Banking)
|
16.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 311 Main Street,
Walbridge, Ohio. (Banking)
|
17.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 610 East South
Boundary,
Perrysburg, Ohio. (Banking)
|
18.
|
State
Bank owns a full service branch office located at 6401 Monroe Street,
Sylvania, Ohio. (Banking)
|
19.
|
State
Bank leases a loan production office located at 75 South High Street,
#8,
Dublin, Ohio. (Banking)
|
RDSI
leases office space located at 7622 St Rt. 66, Defiance, Ohio, office space
located at 2010 S. Jefferson Ave., Defiance, Ohio, office space located at
11952
James Street, Holland, Michigan and office space located at 105 East Holland
Street, Archbold, Ohio.
DCM
leases office space located at 3101 Technology Blvd., Suite B, Lansing,
Michigan.
28.
Item
3. Legal
Proceedings.
There
are
no pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries
is
a party or to which any of their property is subject, except routine legal
proceedings incidental to their business. None of such proceedings are
considered by the Company to be material.
Item
4.
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not
applicable.
29.
Supplemental
Item: Executive
Officers of the Registrant.
The
following table lists the names and ages of the executive officers of the
Company as of March 21, 2008, the positions presently held by each executive
officer and the business experience of each executive officer during the past
five years. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has held his principal
occupation(s) for more than five years.
Name
|
Age
|
Position(s)
Held with the Company and
its
Subsidiaries and Principal Occupation(s)
|
||
Kenneth
A. Joyce
|
59
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 2002; Chairman,
Chief
Executive Officer and a Director of Rurbanc Data Services, Inc. (“RDSI”)
since 1997; Director of State Bank since 2002; Director of RFCBC
since
2004; Chairman and Former Director of Reliance Financial Services
(now a
division of State Bank) (“RFS”) since 2005; Member of RFS Investment
Committee since March 2007; Director of The Exchange Bank (“Exchange
Bank”) from 2006 to March 2007; Chairman, CEO and Director of Rurban
Operations Corp. (“ROC”) from 2006 to March 2007; Member of RFS Investment
Committee since March 2007; Chairman and Director of Diverse Computer
Marketers, Inc. (“DCM”) from 2006 to December 2007; Director of
Promedica-Defiance Regional Medical Center and Promedica Physicians
Group;
Chairman of Promedica-Defiance Regional Medical Center Finance Committee;
Chairman and Director of United Way (non-profit); Director of Kettenring
Country Club.
|
||
Henry
R. Thiemann
|
61
|
President
of RDSI since September, 2007; President & Chief Executive Officer of
RFCBC; Former President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of
The
Exchange Bank from 2006 to March 2007; Chief Operating Officer of
the
Company from May 2005 to December 2005; Executive Vice President
and Chief
Operating Officer of State Bank from 2002 to May 2005; President
and Chief
Executive Officer of RFCBC since 2004; Senior Vice President and
Operations Manager of the Company from 1998 to 2001; Director of
RFCBC
since 2004; President and Director of RMC since August 1999; Former
Director of ROC; Former Director of RFS.
|
||
Duane
L. Sinn
|
37
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since December
2005; Senior Vice President and Financial Analysis Manager of State
Bank
from 2004 to December 2005; Senior Vice President and Controller
of the
Company from 2000 to 2004; Former Director of ROC; Former Director
of
RFS.
|
30.
Name
|
Age
|
Position(s)
Held with the Company and
its Subsidiaries and Principal Occupation(s)
|
|||||
Mark
A. Klein
|
53
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer of State Bank since January 2006; Senior
Vice
President Private Banking of Sky Bank, Toledo, Ohio from 2004 to
January
2006; Vice President and Team Leader of Sky Bank, Toledo, Ohio from
2000
to 2004; Director of State Bank since 2006; Member of RFS Investment
Committee since March 2007; Former Director of ROC; Former Director
of
RFS.
|
31.
PART
II
Item
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market
Information
The
common shares of the Company are traded on The NASDAQ Global Market (symbol
“RBNF”). The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices and the cash
dividends declared with respect to the common shares of the Company for the
indicated periods. The high and low prices reflect actual prices for purchases
and sales of the Company's common shares as reported by NASDAQ and not
inter-dealer prices.
Per
Share
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Sales
Prices
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|||||
2007
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Declared
|
|
|||
First
Quarter
|
$
|
11.92
|
$
|
10.66
|
$
|
.060
|
||||
Second
Quarter
|
12.82
|
11.71
|
.060
|
|||||||
Third
Quarter
|
12.90
|
12.46
|
.070
|
|||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
13.25
|
10.25
|
.070
|
|||||||
2006
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Declared
|
|||
First
Quarter
|
$
|
13.00
|
$
|
11.16
|
$
|
.050
|
||||
Second
Quarter
|
12.44
|
10.90
|
.050
|
|||||||
Third
Quarter
|
12.00
|
10.82
|
.050
|
|||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
11.79
|
10.50
|
.060
|
The
Company plans to continue to pay regular quarterly cash dividends. However,
there can be no assurance as to the amount of dividends which will be declared
with respect to the common shares of the Company in the future, since such
dividends are subject to the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors,
cash needs, general business conditions, dividends from the subsidiaries and
applicable governmental regulations and policies. For a discussion of the
regulatory limitations on our ability to pay dividends, see “Supervision and
Regulation - Dividends” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
During
the Fourth Quarter 2007, there were no sales of unregistered
securities.
The
approximate number of holders of the outstanding common shares of the Company,
as of February 21, 2008, was 2,415.
32.
Repurchases
of Common Shares
The
following table provides information regarding repurchases of the Company’s
common shares during the three months ended December 31, 2007:
Period
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares Purchased
(1)
|
|
Average Price
Paid
per Share
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or
Programs
|
|
Maximum
Number
(or
Approximate
Dollar
Value) of
Shares
that May
Yet
Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
(2)
|
|
||||
October
1 through October 31, 2007
|
5,731
|
$
|
12.80
|
5,500
|
216,500
|
||||||||
November
1 through November 30, 2007
|
12,642
|
$
|
12.72
|
11,000
|
205,500
|
||||||||
December
1 through December 31, 2007
|
4,995
|
$
|
12.45
|
4,000
|
201,500
|
(1) |
All
of the repurchased shares, other than the shares repurchased as part
of
the publicly announced plan, were purchased in the open market by
Reliance
Financial Services, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, in its
capacity
as the administrator of the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership and Savings
Plan.
|
(2) |
On
April 12, 2007 the Company announced that its Board of Directors
had
authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the Company
may
purchase up to 250,000 common shares over the ensuing 15-month
period.
|
Share
Performance
The
following graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting
material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor
shall such information be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any future
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
each
as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
it
by reference into such filing.
Provided
below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the Company’s
cumulative total shareholder return on its common shares with an index for
the
NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. Companies) comprised of all domestic common shares
traded on the NASDAQ Global Market System and the NASDAQ Small-Cap Market and
an
index for NASDAQ Bank Stocks comprised of all depository institutions (SIC
Code
#602) and holding and other investment companies (SIC Code #671) that are traded
on the NASDAQ Global Market System and the NASDAQ Small-Cap Market (“NASDAQ Bank
Stocks”) for the five-year period ended December 31, 2007.
33.
Period
Ending
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
|
12/31/02
|
|
12/31/03
|
|
12/31/04
|
|
12/31/05
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
||||||
Rurban
Financial Corp.
|
100.00
|
149.25
|
149.78
|
128.84
|
119.88
|
142.00
|
|||||||||||||
NASDAQ
Composite
|
100.00
|
150.01
|
162.89
|
165.13
|
180.85
|
198.60
|
|||||||||||||
NASDAQ
Bank
|
100.00
|
129.93
|
144.21
|
137.97
|
153.15
|
119.35
|
Source
: SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA
|
(434)
977-1600
|
©
2007
|
www.snl.com
|
34.
Item
6. Selected
Financial Data.
SUMMARY
OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FINANCIAL
HIGHLIGHTS
(Dollars
in thousands except per share data)
Year
Ended December 31
|
||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
||||||||||||
EARNINGS
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$
|
33,010
|
$
|
30,971
|
$
|
21,422
|
$
|
20,028
|
$
|
27,774
|
||||||
Interest
expense
|
18,222
|
15,936
|
9,368
|
7,951
|
13,972
|
|||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
14,788
|
15,035
|
12,054
|
12,077
|
13,802
|
|||||||||||
Provision
(credit) for loan losses
|
521
|
178
|
583
|
(399
|
)
|
1,202
|
||||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
26,861
|
23,755
|
18,338
|
17,376
|
35,169
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
36,637
|
34,904
|
29,054
|
26,009
|
29,160
|
|||||||||||
Provision
(credit) for
income taxes
|
1,234
|
948
|
81
|
1,109
|
6,303
|
|||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
3,257
|
2,760
|
673
|
2,734
|
12,305
|
|||||||||||
PER
SHARE DATA
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings
|
$
|
0.65
|
$
|
0.55
|
$
|
0.15
|
$
|
0.60
|
$
|
2.71
|
||||||
Diluted
earnings
|
0.65
|
0.55
|
0.15
|
0.60
|
2.70
|
|||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared
|
0.26
|
0.21
|
0.20
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||
AVERAGE
BALANCES
|
||||||||||||||||
Average
shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
57,945
|
$
|
54,501
|
$
|
51,083
|
$
|
49,279
|
$
|
44,599
|
||||||
Average
total assets
|
556,572
|
554,095
|
433,366
|
417,801
|
549,371
|
|||||||||||
RATIOS
|
||||||||||||||||
Return
on average shareholders'
equity
|
5.62
|
%
|
5.06
|
%
|
1.32
|
%
|
5.55
|
%
|
27.59
|
%
|
||||||
Return
on average total assets
|
0.59
|
0.50
|
0.16
|
0.65
|
2.24
|
|||||||||||
Cash
dividend payout ratio
(cash dividends divided by net income)
|
40.01
|
38.25
|
133.33
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||
Average
shareholders'
equity to average total assets
|
10.41
|
9.84
|
11.79
|
11.79
|
8.12
|
|||||||||||
PERIOD
END TOTALS
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
561,214
|
$
|
556,007
|
$
|
530,542
|
$
|
415,349
|
$
|
435,312
|
||||||
Total
investments and fed
funds sold
|
94,661
|
111,562
|
139,353
|
108,720
|
117,699
|
|||||||||||
Total
loans and leases
|
389,269
|
370,102
|
327,048
|
264,481
|
284,104
|
|||||||||||
Loans
held for sale
|
1,650
|
390
|
224
|
113
|
219
|
|||||||||||
Total
deposits
|
406,031
|
414,555
|
384,838
|
279,624
|
317,475
|
|||||||||||
Notes
Payable
|
922
|
2,589
|
939
|
3,080
|
10,328
|
|||||||||||
Advances
from FHLB
|
24,000
|
21,000
|
45,500
|
56,000
|
39,000
|
|||||||||||
Trust
Preferred Securities
|
20,620
|
20,620
|
20,620
|
10,310
|
10,000
|
|||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
59,325
|
56,955
|
54,451
|
50,306
|
48,383
|
|||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity per
share
|
$
|
11.92
|
$
|
11.33
|
$
|
10.83
|
$
|
11.01
|
$
|
10.60
|
35.
Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Rurban
Financial Corp. (“Rurban”), is a bank holding company registered with the
Federal Reserve Board under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.
Through its direct and indirect subsidiaries, Rurban is engaged in commercial
banking, computerized data and item processing, and trust and financial
services.
The
following discussion is intended to provide a review of the consolidated
financial condition and results of operations of Rurban and its subsidiaries
(collectively, the “Company”). This discussion should be read in conjunction
with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related footnotes for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and conform to
general practices within the banking industry. The Company’s significant
accounting policies are described in detail in the notes to the Company’s
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions.
The
Company’s financial position and results of operations can be affected by these
estimates and assumptions and are integral to the understanding of reported
results. Critical accounting policies are those policies that management
believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial
condition and results, and they require management to make estimates that are
difficult, subjective or complex.
Allowance
for Loan Losses - The
allowance for loan losses provides coverage for probable losses inherent in
the
Company’s loan portfolio. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses each quarter based on changes, if any, in underwriting activities,
loan portfolio composition (including product mix and geographic, industry
or
customer-specific concentrations), trends in loan performance, regulatory
guidance and economic factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as
it
requires the use of significant management estimates. Many factors can affect
management’s estimates of specific and expected losses, including volatility of
default probabilities, rating migrations, loss severity and economic and
political conditions. The allowance is increased through provisions charged
to
operating earnings and reduced by net charge-offs.
The
Company determines the amount of the allowance based on relative risk
characteristics of the loan portfolio. The allowance recorded for commercial
loans is based on reviews of individual credit relationships and an analysis
of
the migration of commercial loans and actual loss experience. The allowance
recorded for homogeneous consumer loans is based on an analysis of loan mix,
risk characteristics of the portfolio, fraud loss and bankruptcy experiences,
and historical losses, adjusted for current trends, for each homogeneous
category or group of loans. The allowance for credit losses relating to impaired
loans is based on each impaired loan’s observable market price, the collateral
for certain collateral-dependent loans, or the discounted cash flows using
the
loan’s effective interest rate.
Regardless
of the extent of the Company’s analysis of customer performance, portfolio
trends or risk management processes, certain inherent but undetected losses
are
probable within the loan portfolio. This is due to several factors including
inherent delays in obtaining information regarding a customer’s financial
condition or changes in their unique business conditions, the subjective nature
of individual loan evaluations, collateral assessments and the interpretation
of
economic trends. Volatility of economic or customer-specific conditions
affecting the identification and estimation of losses for larger non-homogeneous
credits and the sensitivity of assumptions utilized to establish allowances
for
homogenous groups of loans are also factors. The Company estimates a range
of
inherent losses related to the existence of these exposures. The estimates
are
based upon the Company’s evaluation of imprecise risk associated with the
commercial and consumer allowance levels and the estimated impact of the current
economic environment.
36.
Goodwill
and Other Intangibles -
The
Company records all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions,
including goodwill and other intangibles, at fair value as required by SFAS
141.
Goodwill is subject, at a minimum, to annual tests for impairment. Other
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using
straight-line and accelerated methods, and are subject to impairment if events
or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount.
The initial goodwill and other intangibles recorded and subsequent impairment
analysis requires management to make subjective judgments concerning estimates
of how the acquired asset will perform in the future. Events and factors that
may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, customer
attrition, changes in revenue growth trends, specific industry conditions and
changes in competition.
Impact
of Accounting Changes
In
March 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 156, Accounting
for Servicing of Financial Assets: an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140
(FAS
140
and FAS 156). FAS 140 establishes, among other things, the accounting for all
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This Statement
amends FAS 140 to require that all separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable.
This
Statement permits, but does not require, the subsequent measurement of
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value.
Under this Statement, an entity can elect subsequent fair value measurement
to
account for its separately recognized servicing assets and servicing
liabilities. Adoption of this Statement is required as of the beginning of
the
first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. On January 1, 2007,
the Company adopted SFAS No. 156. The adoption of SFAS No. 156 did not have
a
material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the
Company.
The
Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
and multiple-state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state and local examinations by tax authorities for
years before 2004.
The
Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation 48 (FIN 48), [Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109],
on
January 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in
interim periods, disclosure and transition. As a result of the implementation
of
FIN 48, the Company did not become aware of any liability for uncertain tax
positions that it believes should be recognized in the financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, [The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - including
an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159)].
SFAS
No. 159 permits the Company to choose to measure certain financial assets and
liabilities at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at
fair
value (i.e. the Fair Value Option). Election of the Fair Value Option is made
on
an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. At the adoption date,
unrealized gains and losses on financial assets and liabilities for which the
Fair Value Option has been elected would be reported as a cumulative adjustment
to beginning retained earnings. If we elect the Fair Value Option for certain
financial assets and liabilities, we will report unrealized gains and losses
due
to changes in their fair value in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.
SFAS No. 159 is effective as of January 1, 2008. Management has evaluated the
potential impact of adopting SFAS No. 159 on the Company consolidated financial
statements and does not expect it will have any material impact to the financial
position and results of operations of the Company.
37.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, [Fair
Value Measurements (FAS 157)].
FAS
157 enhances existing guidance for measuring assets and liabilities using fair
value. Prior to the issuance of FAS 157, guidance for applying fair value was
incorporated in several accounting pronouncements. FAS 157 provides a single
definition of fair value, together with a framework for measuring it, and
requires additional disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets
and
liabilities. FAS 157 also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based
measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and sets out a fair value
hierarchy with the highest priority being quoted prices in active markets.
Under
FAS 157, fair value measurements are disclosed by level within that hierarchy.
While FAS 157 does not add any new fair value measurements, it does change
current practice. Changes to practice include: (1) a requirement for an
entity to include its own credit standing in the measurement of its liabilities;
(2) a modification of the transaction price presumption; (3) a
prohibition on the use of block discounts when valuing large blocks of
securities for broker-dealers and investment companies; and (4) a
requirement to adjust the value of restricted stock for the effect of the
restriction even if the restriction lapses within one year. FAS 157 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years.
At
its
September 2006 meeting, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final
consensus on Issue No. 06-4, [Accounting
for Deferred
Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar
Life
Insurance Arrangements].
The
consensus stipulates that an agreement by an employer to share a portion of
the
proceeds of a life insurance policy with an employee during the postretirement
period is a postretirement benefit arrangement required to be accounted for
under Statement No. 106 (“SFAS No. 106”) or Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 12, Omnibus Opinion-1967. The consensus concludes that the purchase
of a split-dollar life insurance policy does not constitute a settlement under
SFAS No. 106 and, therefore, a liability for the postretirement obligation
must
be recognized under SFAS No. 106 if the benefit is offered under an arrangement
that constitutes a plan or under APB No. 12 if it is not part of a plan. Issue
06-04 is effective for annual or interim reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2007. The Company has endorsement split-dollar life insurance
policies. A liability is expected to be recorded in the first quarter of 2008,
however; there will be no material impact to the financial position and results
of operations as a result of the implementation of EITF 06-04.
In
September 2006, the FASB ratified a consensus opinion by the EITF on EITF Issue
06-5, [Accounting
for Purchases of Life Insurance-Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized
in
Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4 (Accounting for Purchases
of
Life Insurance)].
EITF
Issue 06-5 requires policy holders to consider other amounts included in the
contractual terms of an insurance policy, in addition to cash surrender value,
for purposes of determining the amount that could be realized under the terms
of
the insurance contract. If it is probable that contractual terms would limit
the
amount that could be realized under the insurance contract, those contractual
limitations should be considered when determining the realizable amounts. The
amount that could be realized under the insurance contract should be determined
on an individual policy (or certificate) level and should include any amount
realized on the assumed surrender of the last individual policy or certificate
in a group policy.
The
Company holds several life insurance policies; however, the policies do not
contain any provisions that would restrict or reduce the cash surrender value
of
the policies. The consensus in EITF Issue 06-5 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The application of this guidance did not
have
a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results
of
operations.
38.
Acquisitions
Diverse
Computer Marketers
On
September 2, 2006, Rurbanc Data Services, Inc (“RDSI”), the bank data processing
subsidiary of Rurban Financial Corp. (“Rurban”), completed its acquisition of
Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc., a Michigan corporation, and a related Indiana
corporation, DCM Indiana, Inc. Rurban subsequently merged DCM Indiana, Inc.
into
Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc. (“DCM”). DCM now operates as a separate
subsidiary of RDSI. As a result of this acquisition, the Company will have
an
opportunity to grow its item processing business.
Under
the
terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, RDSI acquired all of the outstanding
stock of the DCM Companies from their shareholders for an aggregate purchase
price of $5.0 million. An additional $250,000 was payable to the
shareholders contingent upon the continuation of profitable growth over the
first year of combined operations. The final payment of $266,559 was made in
2007. The entire purchase price was paid in cash. The results of DCM’s
operations have been included in Rurban’s consolidated statement of income from
the date of acquisition.
The
following tables summarize the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired
and the computation of the purchase price and goodwill related to the
acquisitions.
Cash
|
$
|
118,137
|
||
Accounts
receivable
|
419,151
|
|||
Premises
and equipment
|
207,644
|
|||
Goodwill
|
4,795,144
|
|||
Other
intangibles
|
2,652,000
|
|||
Other
assets
|
158,241
|
|||
Total
Assets
|
8,350,317
|
|||
Liabilities:
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
1,188,289
|
|||
Borrowings
|
1,284,427
|
|||
Other
liabilities
|
886,510
|
|||
Total
Liabilities
|
3,359,226
|
|||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
4,991,091
|
The
signficant intangible assets acquired include the customer related intangible
of
$2,389,000, the Trademark of $180,000 and the non-compete agreements of $83,000,
which have useful lives of 180, 36 and 36 months, respectively, and will be
amortized using the straight-line method. The $4.8 million of goodwill was
assigned entirely to the data processing unit and is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes. This analysis is based upon an initial third party
opinion and is subject to change for up to twelve months.
Under
terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, and immediately prior to the closing,
the
disaster recovery services portion of the DCM business was spun-off. As DCM
records did not include separate financial information for the disaster recovery
services, historical financial information for the purchased portion of the
business is not available. Therefore, pro forma information that discloses
the
results of operations as though the business combination had been completed
at
the beginning of the period is not included.
39.
EARNINGS
SUMMARY
Net
income for 2007 was $3.3 million, or $0.65 per diluted share, compared with
net
income of $2.8 million, or $0.55 per diluted share, and net income of $673,000,
or $0.15 per diluted share, reported for 2006 and 2005, respectively. Cash
dividends per share were $0.26 in 2007, $0.21 in 2006 and $0.20 in 2005.
Rurban
continued to make significant progress in 2007, as the Company continued its
path of improving profitability. Rurban achieved four consecutive quarters
of
core earnings improvement. Revenue continued to grow and the company executed
significant non-interest expense reductions within the Banking Group. The
earnings improvement was driven by both the banking and data and item processing
segments of Rurban. Many of the non-interest expense reductions were due to
the
company merging four separate charters into the lead bank, The State Bank and
Trust Company. It also represents a new beginning for Rurban, where the Company
can focus its energies on growth, efficiency and profitability. In the fourth
quarter of 2006, the Company announced additional steps to complete its
restructuring. The Company completed initiatives in 2007 to bring these final
steps to closure, streamlining Rurban into a holding company with a
single-chartered community bank and a dynamic data processing company. Net
income for 2006 was impacted by asset quality combined with continued
improvement in the revenue stream of RDSI. Also negatively impacting earnings
in
2006 was the RFCBC loan sale and acquisition costs relating to the acquisitions
that were necessary for the growth strategy to pave the way for future earnings.
CHANGES
IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
Balance
sheet growth over the past twelve months has been achieved exclusively
through
organic
growth. Total loans increased 5.2%, or $19.2 million, over the course of 2007,
funded largely by cash and the liquidation of investment securities. As a result
of this restructure, assets grew only 1% year-over-year to $561.2
million.
40.
Significant
Events of 2007
During
the first quarter of 2007, Rurban merged Reliance Financial Services, N.A.,
its
trust and investment subsidiary, and The Exchange Bank, its recently acquired
community bank, into The State Bank and Trust Company. This action has allowed
efficiencies leading to continuing core profit improvement at The State Bank
and
Trust Company.
State
Bank continues to expand its reach to higher-growth markets. In January 2007,
the Fort Wayne, Indiana Loan Production Office was converted to a full-service
branch. State Bank continued its entrance to growth markets by opening a Loan
Production Office in Columbus, Ohio in December, 2007.
RDSI
and
DCM, Rurban’s data and item processing subsidiaries, reported another record
year. The total number of banks being processed increased by 5 to 117. Revenue
increased to $20.6 million, a $4.3 million, or 27% increase, over the previous
year’s results. Net income was a record $2.5 million for the year.
On
April
12, 2007, Rurban initiated a stock repurchase program, authorizing the
repurchase of up to 250,000 shares, or approximately 5%, of the Company’s
outstanding shares. As of the end of the fourth quarter, Rurban repurchased
48,500 shares at an average cost of $12.58.
Rurban
increased its dividend to shareholders from $0.21 per share during 2006 to
$0.26
per share in 2007.
Significant
Events of 2006
During
the fourth quarter of 2006, Rurban increased its quarterly dividend by 20%,
to
$0.06 per share.
Fourth
quarter 2006 results include actions that resulted in after-tax charges/income
of $474,000 for balance sheet restructuring, merger-related expenses of
$187,000, recovery of WorldCom bond losses totaling $587,000, and a gain
associated with the sale of the credit card portfolio of $488,000.
Rurban
received regulatory approval to open a full-service banking center in Fort
Wayne, Indiana, where it previously had a Loan Production Office. This full
service branch opened on January 2, 2007.
Rurban
announced the planned merger of Reliance Financial Services, N.A., Rurban’s
trust and investment subsidiary, and The Exchange Bank, its recently acquired
community bank, into its lead bank, The State Bank and Trust Company, subject
to
regulatory approval. An after-tax charge of $187,000 for this merger was
recorded during the fourth quarter as stated earlier.
On
September 2, 2006, Rurbanc Data Services, Inc. (“RDSI”), the bank data
processing subsidiary of Rurban Financial Corp. (“Rurban”), completed its
acquisition of Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc.
41.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
%
Change
|
2006
|
2005
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands except per share data)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
561,214
|
$
|
556,007
|
+1
|
%
|
$
|
556,007
|
$
|
530,542
|
+5
|
%
|
|||||||
Total
Securities
|
92,661
|
102,462
|
-10
|
%
|
102,462
|
139,353
|
-27
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Loans
Held for Sale
|
1,650
|
390
|
N/A
|
390
|
224
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
Loans
(Net)
|
385,278
|
366,384
|
+5
|
%
|
366,384
|
322,348
|
+14
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Allowance
for Loan Losses
|
3,990
|
3,717
|
+7
|
%
|
3,717
|
4,700
|
-21
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
Deposits
|
$
|
406,031
|
$
|
414,555
|
-2
|
%
|
$
|
414,555
|
$
|
384,838
|
+8
|
%
|
|||||||
Total
Revenues
|
$
|
41,648
|
$
|
38,790
|
+7
|
%
|
$
|
38,790
|
$
|
30,392
|
+28
|
%
|
|||||||
Net
Interest Income
|
14,787
|
15,034
|
-2
|
%
|
15,034
|
12,054
|
+25
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Loan
Loss Provision (credit)
|
521
|
178
|
N/A
|
178
|
583
|
-70
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Noninterest
Income
|
26,861
|
23,755
|
+13
|
%
|
23,755
|
18,338
|
+13
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Non-interest
Expense
|
36,637
|
34,904
|
+5
|
%
|
34,904
|
29,054
|
+20
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Net
Income
|
3,257
|
2,760
|
+18
|
%
|
2,760
|
673
|
+310
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Basic
Earnings per Share
|
$
|
0.65
|
$
|
0.55
|
N/A
|
$
|
0.55
|
$
|
0.15
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
Diluted
Earnings per Share
|
$
|
0.65
|
$
|
0.55
|
N/A
|
$
|
0.55
|
$
|
0.15
|
N/A
|
Net
Interest Income
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
%
Change
|
2006
|
2005
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
Interest Income
|
$
|
14,787
|
$
|
15,034
|
-2
|
%
|
$
|
15,034
|
$
|
12,054
|
+25
|
%
|
Net
interest income
was
$14.8 million for 2007 compared to $15.0 million for 2006, a decrease of 1.6%,
which primarily resulted from margin compression. Average earning assets also
decreased to $488.3 million in 2007 compared to $490.6 million in 2006 as a
result of repositioning the balance sheet to improve the net interest margin.
Over the past 12 months, the company was successful in converting lower yielding
investments into a funding source for loan growth and converted higher cost
deposits to core deposits and increased wholesale funding due to favorable
rates.
Net
interest income was
$15.0
million for 2006, an increase of 24.7% above the prior year, which resulted
from
a 26.2% growth in average earning assets offset by a one basis point decline
in
the annual net interest margin to 3.13%. The growth in earning assets was
attributable to the acquisition of Exchange Bank. The decrease in the net
interest margin was largely due to the flat to sometimes invested yield curve,
the high mix of investments to earning assets and the increase in funding cost
throughout 2006.
42.
Loan
Loss Provision
The
Provision for Loan Losses of
$521,000
was taken in 2007 compared to $178,000 taken for 2006; the $343,000 increase
reflects a more normal accrual in 2007. 2006 includes a release of $140,000
reserve associated with the credit card portfolio, which has been sold with
partial recourse to the bank.
The
Provision for Loan Losses of
$178,000
was taken in 2006 compared to $583,000 taken for 2005; the $405,000 decrease
reflects the lower level of risk in the loan portfolio, in addition to the
release of the $140,000 reserve associated with the credit card portfolio,
which
has been sold with partial recourse to the bank. The fourth quarter loan loss
provision of $(159,000) represents a $772,000 decrease from the prior-year
fourth quarter, and reflects the same factors as above. The fourth quarter
of
2005 was impacted by a problem loan sale.
Non-interest
Income
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
%
Change
|
2006
|
2005
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
Non-interest Income
|
$
|
26,861
|
$
|
23,755
|
+13
|
%
|
$
|
23,755
|
$
|
18,338
|
+30
|
%
|
|||||||
-
Data Service Fees
|
$
|
19,382
|
$
|
15,011
|
+29
|
%
|
$
|
15,011
|
$
|
12,708
|
+18
|
%
|
|||||||
-
Trust Fees
|
$
|
3,385
|
$
|
3,192
|
+6
|
%
|
$
|
3,192
|
$
|
3,134
|
+2
|
%
|
|||||||
-
Deposit Service Fees
|
$
|
2,244
|
$
|
2,161
|
+4
|
%
|
$
|
2,161
|
$
|
1,860
|
+16
|
%
|
|||||||
-
Gains on Sale of Loans
|
$
|
574
|
$
|
1,249
|
N/A
|
$
|
1,249
|
$
|
(437
|
)
|
N/A
|
||||||||
-
Investment Securities
Recoveries
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
889
|
N/A
|
$
|
889
|
$
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||||||
-
Gains (losses) on Sale of Securities
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
N/A
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
$
|
25
|
N/A
|
|||||||
-
Other
|
$
|
1,274
|
$
|
1,748
|
-27
|
%
|
$
|
1,748
|
$
|
1,048
|
+67
|
%
|
Total
non-interest income
was
$26.9 million for 2007 compared to $23.8 million for 2006, representing a $3.1
million, or 13.1% increase year-over-year. Non-interest income in 2006 was
increased a net $1.1 million from the one-time impact of a $495,000 charge
taken
to restructure the bond portfolio, an $889,000 recovery of losses previously
recorded on WorldCom bonds, and a gain associated with the sale of the credit
card portfolio of $740,000. Excluding these 2006 one-time items, non-interest
income increased $4.2 million, or 18.7%, year-over-year. This increase was
driven by a $4.4 million, or 29%, increase in data service fees, which were
primarily attributable to the DCM acquisition.
Total
non-interest income
was
$23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, accounting for 61.2% of
total 2006 revenue compared with 60.3% for the year earlier period. Excluding
the one-time impact of a $495,000 charge taken to restructure the bond
portfolio, an $889,000 recovery of WorldCom bond losses and a gain associated
with the sale of the credit card portfolio of $740,000, 2006 total non-interest
income was $22.6 million, up $4.2 million or 23.3% above the $18.3 million
reported for the prior year. Over 63% of 2006 fee income was derived from RDSI,
the data processing subsidiary, with smaller growth contributions from the
Banking Group and Reliance. The increase in Deposit Service fees was due to
the
acquisition of Exchange Bank in 2006.
43.
Rurbanc
Data Services, Inc. (“RDSI”)
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
%
Change
|
2006
|
2005
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Data
Service Fees
|
$
|
19,382
|
$
|
15,011
|
+29
|
%
|
$
|
15,011
|
$
|
12,708
|
+18
|
%
|
Data
service fees
increased $4.4 million or 29% to $19.4 million in 2007 from $15.0 million in
2006, and increased $2.3 million, or 18% from 2005 to 2006. Data processing
fees
contributed 72.2% of Rurban’s recurring non-interest income for 2007. The
majority of the increase was due to RDSI core growth, as well as a full year
of
fee income from DCM, which was acquired on September 2, 2006. RDSI now services
over 117 community banks.
Earnings
for the 2007 fiscal year were $2.5 million compared to $2.1 million for 2006,
up
$390,000, or 18.7%. The Company continues to see a solid pipeline of potential
customers for both the data processing and item processing business lines
entering 2008 as six additional banks are scheduled to be converted by June
of
2008.
RDSI
and DCM provide
data
processing and item processing services for 117 community banks in
Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada,
Ohio
and Wisconsin.
RDSI and
DCM differentiate themselves from their competition through the quality of
their
products and the excellence of their customer service. The applications utilized
by RDSI are driven by world-class software. Customer service encompasses on-time
delivery every morning and a discipline of responding to and resolving customer
questions and issues within one hour. RDSI provides turnkey solutions for its
clients through its partnerships with vendors experienced in a full array of
banking products.
Non-interest
Expense
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
Year
Ended
December
31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
%
Change
|
2006
|
2005
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
Non-interest Expense
|
$
|
36,637
|
$
|
34,904
|
+5
|
%
|
$
|
34,904
|
$
|
29,054
|
+20
|
%
|
|||||||
-
Salaries & Employee Benefits
|
$
|
17,007
|
$
|
16,584
|
+3
|
%
|
$
|
16,584
|
$
|
13,519
|
+23
|
%
|
|||||||
-
Professional Fees
|
$
|
2,227
|
$
|
2,396
|
-7
|
%
|
$
|
2,396
|
$
|
2,730
|
-12
|
%
|
|||||||
- All
Other
|
$
|
17,403
|
$
|
15,924
|
+9
|
%
|
$
|
15,924
|
$
|
12,805
|
+24
|
%
|
Non-interest
expense
increased $1.7 million, or 4.9%, primarily from the additional expenses incurred
within the Data Processing Group relating to the incorporation of full-year
expenses from the DCM acquisition, which occurred in September of 2006. Data
Processing Group expenses were $16.9 million in 2007 compared to $13.1 million
in 2006. This $3.7 million increase in RDSI was partially offset by a $1.9
million improvement within our Banking Group. This non-interest expense
reduction was primarily the result of reductions in professional fees associated
with loan workouts and the reduction of 42 full-time positions within the
company, of which 23 were part of the Banking Group. This significantly reduced
compensation and employee benefits expense. This reduction was also aided by
approximately $500,000 of one-time expenses taken in the fourth quarter of
2006
as detailed below.
44.
Non-interest
expense
increased $5.8 million, or 20.0%, primarily from the additional expenses of
$4.9
million and $1.2 million, respectively, contributed by The Exchange Bank and
DCM, which were acquired on December 31, 2005 and September 2, 2006,
respectively. Excluding one-time 2006 charges including $215,000 associated
with
the prepayment of approximately $9.0 million of higher-cost FHLB advances and
merger-related charges of approximately $283,000, including a fourth quarter
charge to merge the two community banks, 2006 recurring non-interest expense
was
$34.4 million, up 18.4% from $29.1 million reported for 2005.
Salaries
and benefits accounted for $3.1 million, or 52.4%, of the $5.8 million
year-over-year increase in non-interest expenses with the addition of 36 FTE
employees, bringing the total to 317. Improvements in State Bank’s operating
expenses since the acquisition of the Lima branches in the second quarter of
2005 partially offset higher spending levels in other categories.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Investments
The
Company evaluates its securities portfolio for impairment throughout the year.
An impairment is recorded against individual equity securities if their cost
significantly exceeds their fair value for a substantial amount of time. An
impairment is also recorded for investments in debt securities, unless the
decrease in fair value is attributable to interest rates and management has
the
intent and ability to retain the investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
Management
believes that it has the ability and intent to retain the investments with
a
loss evidenced by the Company’s liquidity position discussed later in the
Liquidity section, and over the past three years, the Company has had net gains
on the sale of securities and any losses were minimal.
Loans
Period
Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/07
|
%
of
Total
|
12/31/06
|
%
of
Total
|
%
Inc/(Dec)
|
12/31/05
|
%
of
Total
|
%
Inc/(Dec)
|
||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$
|
83,049
|
21
|
%
|
$
|
71,641
|
19
|
%
|
16
|
%
|
$
|
79,359
|
24
|
%
|
(10
|
)%
|
|||||||||
Commercial
R.E.
|
126,785
|
33
|
%
|
109,503
|
30
|
%
|
16
|
%
|
68,072
|
21
|
%
|
61
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Agricultural
|
43,369
|
11
|
%
|
44,683
|
12
|
%
|
(3
|
)%
|
40,236
|
12
|
%
|
11
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Residential
|
84,621
|
22
|
%
|
94,389
|
25
|
%
|
(10
|
)%
|
89,086
|
27
|
%
|
6
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Consumer
|
51,357
|
13
|
%
|
49,314
|
13
|
%
|
4
|
%
|
48,877
|
15
|
%
|
1
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Leases
|
330
|
0
|
%
|
857
|
1
|
%
|
(61
|
)%
|
1,661
|
1
|
%
|
(48
|
)%
|
||||||||||||
Loans
|
$
|
389,511
|
$
|
370,387
|
5
|
%
|
$
|
327,291
|
13
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
Loans
held for sale
|
1,650
|
390
|
224
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
391,161
|
$
|
370,777
|
$
|
327,515
|
Loans
increased $19.2 million to $390 million at December 31, 2007. This growth was
due to commercial loans increases as Residential and Consumer loan balances
decreased slightly during 2007.
In
2006,
loans increased $43 million to $370 million at December 31, 2006. This growth
is
all organic in nature since the Exchange Bank acquisition balances were included
as of December 31, 2005.
45.
Asset
Quality
Period
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
12/31/07
|
12/31/06
|
Change in
Dollars/
Percentages
|
12/31/05
|
Change in
Dollars/
percentages
|
||||||||||||
Non-performing
loans
|
$
|
6.0
|
$
|
3.8
|
$
|
2.2
|
$
|
6.3
|
$
|
-2.5
|
||||||
Non-performing
assets
|
$
|
6.2
|
$
|
3.9
|
$
|
2.3
|
$
|
8.9
|
$
|
-5.0
|
||||||
Non-performing
assets/total Assets
|
1.10
|
%
|
0.70
|
%
|
40
|
%
|
1.67
|
%
|
-0.97
|
%
|
||||||
Net
charge-offs
|
$
|
0.2
|
$
|
1.2
|
$
|
-1.0
|
$
|
1.7
|
$
|
-0.5
|
||||||
Net
charge-offs/total loans
|
0.07
|
%
|
0.31
|
%
|
-0.24
|
%
|
0.52
|
%
|
-0.21
|
%
|
||||||
Loan
loss provision (credit)
|
$
|
.5
|
$
|
.2
|
$
|
0.3
|
$
|
.6
|
$
|
-0.4
|
||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
$
|
3.9
|
$
|
3.7
|
$
|
0.2
|
$
|
4.7
|
$
|
-1.0
|
||||||
Allowance/loans
|
1.03
|
%
|
1.00
|
%
|
.03
|
%
|
1.44
|
%
|
-0.44
|
%
|
||||||
Allowance/non-performing
Loans
|
65
|
%
|
97
|
%
|
-32
|
%
|
75
|
%
|
+22
|
%
|
||||||
Allowance/non-performing
Assets
|
65
|
%
|
95
|
%
|
-30
|
%
|
53
|
%
|
+42
|
%
|
A
Provision for Loan Losses of
$521,000
was taken in 2007 compared to $178,000 taken for 2006. The 2006 provision was
reduced by the release of $140,000 provision associated with the credit card
portfolio sold at the end of 2006. The fourth quarter loan loss provision of
$142,000 represents a normal accrual for the company given our loan growth
and
net charge-offs of $89,000, or .09%, of average loans.
Non-performing
assets
(loans +
OREO + OAO) were $6.2 million, or 1.10 %, of total assets at December 31, 2007,
an increase of $2.3 million from a year-ago. This increase, which originated
in
the second quarter of 2007, is due to three commercial loan relationships that
are being worked out with minimal, if any, expected loss.
CAPITAL
RESOURCES
Stockholders’
equity
at
December 31, 2007, was $59.3 million, equivalent to 10.6% of total assets.
On a
tangible basis, the ratio was 7.1%. The total risk-based capital ratio was
16.0%
at December 31, 2007, well in excess of the “well-capitalized” regulatory
threshold of 10%.
Total
consolidated regulatory (risk-based) capital
was
$64.2 million at December 31, 2007, and $62.0 million at December 31, 2006.
As
of December 31, 2007, $19.7 million of the $20 million of trust preferred
securities qualified as Tier 1 capital.
Planned
Purchases of Premises and Equipment
Management
plans to purchase
additional premises and equipment to meet the current and future needs of the
Company’s customers. These purchases, including buildings and improvements and
furniture and equipment (which includes computer hardware, software, office
furniture and license agreements), are currently expected to total approximately
$4.4 million over the next year. These purchases are expected to be funded
by
cash on hand and from cash generated from current operations.
46.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity
relates primarily
to the
Company’s ability to fund loan demand, meet deposit customers’ withdrawal
requirements and provide for operating expenses. Assets used to satisfy these
needs consist of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, interest earning
deposits in other financial institutions, securities available for sale and
loans held for sale. These assets are commonly referred to as liquid assets.
Liquid assets were $111.5 million at December 31, 2007 compared to $125.5
million at December 31, 2006. During 2007, the company continued to liquidate
investments and use the funding to grow the loan portfolio. Rurban
restructured its balance sheet during the fourth quarter of 2006 to improve
its
net interest margin going forward, by selling $17.5 million of investment
securities, or approximately 13% of its investment portfolio, with an average
yield of 3.89%. Approximately $12 million of the proceeds were used to repay
higher-cost, non-core funding, namely, long-term advances from the Federal
Home
Loan Bank and other borrowings that had a cost in excess of 5.25%. The remaining
proceeds of approximately $5.5 million were used to fund the bank’s growing
commercial loan portfolio.
The
Company views this level of liquidity as appropriate.
The
Company’s commercial real estate and residential first mortgage
portfolio
of
$211.4 million at December 31, 2007, and residential first mortgage portfolio
of
$94.4 million at December 31, 2006, which can and has been readily used to
collateralize borrowings, is an additional source of liquidity. Management
believes the Company’s current liquidity level, without these borrowings, is
sufficient to meet its liquidity needs. At December 31, 2007, all eligible
commercial real estate and first mortgage loans were pledged under an FHLB
blanket lien.
The
cash flow statements
for the
periods presented provide an indication of the Company’s sources and uses of
cash as well as an indication of the ability of the Company to maintain an
adequate level of liquidity. A discussion of the cash flow statements for 2007,
2006 and 2005 follows.
The
Company experienced
positive
cash flows from operating activities in 2007, 2006 and 2005. Net cash from
operating activities was $5.9 million, $4.7 million and $4.2 million for the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Cash
flow from investing activities
was a
use of cash of $12.8 million and $21.0 million for December 31, 2007 and 2006
respectively, and net funds provided of $28.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005. The changes in net cash from investing activities for 2007
include the purchase of bank owned life insurance of $1.0 million and purchases
of premises and equipment of $3.7 million. The changes in net cash from
investing activities for 2006 include the cash paid to the shareholders of
Exchange Bank that totaled $6.5 million and cash paid to the shareholders of
DCM
that totaled $4.9 million. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company received $3.5
million, $33.3 million and $5.2 million, respectively, from sales of securities
available for sale, while proceeds from repayments, maturities and calls of
securities were $37.2 million, $19.5 million and $17.1 million in 2007, 2006
and
2005, respectively.
Net
cash flow from financing activities
was $1.6
million, $26.1 million, and $(31.1) million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The net cash increase was
primarily due to an increase in securities sold under agreement to repurchase
of
$10.7 million $26.2 million and $2.0 for December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
respectively. Other significant changes for 2007, 2006 and 2005 include $3.0
million, $(24.5) million and $(14.0) million in net borrowings from the FHLB.
Additionally $(8.5) million, $29.7 million and $(23.1) million of the change
is
attributable to the change in deposits. Also, in 2005, the Company received
proceeds of $10.3 million from the trust preferred issuance.
47.
Off-Balance-Sheet
Borrowing Arrangements:
Significant
additional off-balance-sheet liquidity is available in the form of FHLB
advances, unused federal funds lines from correspondent banks, and the national
certificate of deposit market. Management expects the risk of changes in
off-balance-sheet arrangements to be immaterial to earnings.
Approximately
$139.8 million commercial real estate and residential first mortgage loans
of
the Company’s $211.4 million portfolio qualify to collateralize FHLB borrowings
and have been pledged to meet FHLB collateralization requirements as of December
31, 2007. Based on the current collateralization requirements of the FHLB,
approximately $21.4 million of additional borrowing capacity existed at December
31, 2007.
At
December 31, 2007, the Company had $20.9 million in federal funds lines. As
of
December 31, 2006, the Company had $21.8 million in federal funds lines. There
were no Federal funds borrowed at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The Company also
had $9.8 million in unpledged securities that may be used to pledge for
additional borrowings.
TABULAR
DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Payment
due by period
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than 1
year
|
1 – 3
years
|
3 – 5
Years
|
More
than 5
years
|
|||||||||||
Long-Term
Debt Obligations
|
$
|
24,000,000
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
$
|
16,500,000
|
$
|
5,500,000
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Other
Debt Obligations
|
21,542,457
|
340,288
|
582,169
|
-
|
20,620,000
|
|||||||||||
Capital
Lease Obligations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Operating
Lease Obligations
|
2,433,393
|
411,551
|
675,147
|
513,283
|
833,412
|
|||||||||||
Purchase
Obligations
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other
Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Registrant’s Balance Sheet under
GAAP
|
223,480,842
|
183,913,727
|
34,587,157
|
4,363,903
|
616,055
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
271,456,692
|
$
|
186,665,566
|
$
|
52,344,473
|
$
|
10,377,186
|
$
|
22,069,467
|
The
Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007 were comprised of
long-term debt obligations, other debt obligations, operating lease obligations
and other long-term liabilities. Long-term debt obligations are comprised of
FHLB Advances of $24.0 million. Other debt obligations are comprised of Trust
Preferred securities of $20.6 million and Notes Payable of $922,000. The
operating lease obligation is a lease on the RDSI-South building, of $99,600
per
year, the RDSI-North building of $162,000 a year and the DCM-Lansing facility
of
$89,400 per year. Other long-term liabilities include time deposits of $223.5
million.
48.
ASSET
LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Asset
liability management
involves
developing and monitoring strategies to maintain sufficient liquidity, maximize
net interest income and minimize the impact that significant fluctuations in
market interest rates would have on earnings. The business of the Company and
the composition of its balance sheet consist of investments in interest-earning
assets (primarily loans, mortgage-backed securities, and securities available
for sale) which are primarily funded by interest-bearing liabilities (deposits
and borrowings). With the exception of specific loans which are originated
and
held for sale, all of the financial instruments of the Company are for other
than trading purposes. All of the Company’s transactions are denominated in U.S.
dollars with no specific foreign exchange exposure. In addition, the Company
has
limited exposure to commodity prices related to agricultural loans. The impact
of changes in foreign exchange rates and commodity prices on interest rates
are
assumed to be insignificant. The Company’s financial instruments have varying
levels of sensitivity to changes in market interest rates resulting in market
risk. Interest rate risk is the Company’s primary market risk exposure; to a
lesser extent, liquidity risk also impacts market risk exposure.
Interest
rate risk
is the
exposure of a banking institution’s financial condition to adverse movements in
interest rates. Accepting this risk can be an important source of profitability
and shareholder value; however, excessive levels of interest rate risk could
pose a significant threat to the Company’s earnings and capital base.
Accordingly, effective risk management that maintains interest rate risks at
prudent levels is essential to the Company’s safety and soundness.
Evaluating
a financial institution’s exposure
to
changes in interest rates includes assessing both the adequacy of the management
process used to control interest rate risk and the organization’s quantitative
level of exposure. When assessing the interest rate risk management process,
the
Company seeks to ensure that appropriate policies, procedures, management
information systems, and internal controls are in place to maintain interest
rate risks at prudent levels of consistency and continuity. Evaluating the
quantitative level of interest rate risk exposure requires the Company to assess
the existing and potential future effects of changes in interest rates on its
consolidated financial condition, including capital adequacy, earnings,
liquidity, and asset quality (when appropriate).
The
Federal Reserve Board
together
with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Company, adopted a Joint Agency Policy Statement on interest rate
risk
effective June 26, 1996. The policy statement provides guidance to examiners
and
bankers on sound practices for managing interest rate risk, which will form
the
basis for ongoing evaluation of the adequacy of interest rate risk management
at
supervised institutions. The policy statement also outlines fundamental elements
of sound management that have been identified in prior Federal Reserve guidance
and discusses the importance of these elements in the context of managing
interest rate risk. Specifically, the guidance emphasizes the need for active
board of director and senior management oversight and a comprehensive risk
management process that effectively identifies, measures, and controls interest
rate risk.
Financial
institutions
derive
their income primarily from the excess of interest collected over interest
paid.
The rates of interest an institution earns on its assets and owes on its
liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Since
market interest rates change over time, an institution is exposed to lower
profit margins (or losses) if it cannot adapt to interest rate changes. For
example, assume that an institution’s assets carry intermediate or long term
fixed rates and that those assets are funded with short-term liabilities. If
market interest rates rise by the time the short-term liabilities must be
refinanced, the increase in the institution’s interest expense on its
liabilities may not be sufficiently offset if assets continue to earn at the
long-term fixed rates. Accordingly, an institution’s profits could decrease on
existing assets because the institution will either have lower net interest
income or possibly, net interest expense. Similar risks exist when assets are
subject to contractual interest rate ceilings, or rate sensitive assets are
funded by longer-term, fixed-rate liabilities in a declining rate
environment.
49.
There
are several ways
an
institution can manage interest rate risk including: 1) matching repricing
periods for new assets and liabilities, for example, by shortening terms of
new
loans or investments; 2) selling existing assets or repaying certain
liabilities; and 3) hedging existing assets, liabilities, or anticipated
transactions. An institution might also invest in more complex financial
instruments intended to hedge or otherwise change interest rate risk. Interest
rate swaps, futures contacts, options on futures contracts, and other such
derivative financial instruments can be used for this purpose. Because these
instruments are sensitive to interest rate changes, they require management’s
expertise to be effective. The Company has not purchased derivative financial
instruments in the past but may purchase such instruments in the future if
market conditions are favorable.
Quantitative
Market Risk Disclosure.
The
following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments
used for purposes other than trading that are sensitive to changes in interest
rates as of December 31, 2007. It does not present when these items may actually
reprice. For loans receivable, securities, and liabilities with contractual
maturities, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average
interest rates by contractual maturities as well as the historical impact of
interest rate fluctuations on the prepayment of loans and mortgage backed
securities. For core deposits (demand deposits, interest-bearing checking,
savings, and money market deposits) that have no contractual maturity, the
table
presents principal cash flows and applicable related weighted-average interest
rates based upon the Company’s historical experience, management’s judgment and
statistical analysis, as applicable, concerning their most likely withdrawal
behaviors. The current historical interest rates for core deposits have been
assumed to apply for future periods in this table as the actual interest rates
that will need to be paid to maintain these deposits are not currently known.
Weighted average variable rates are based upon contractual rates existing at
the
reporting date.
50.
Principal/Notional
Amount Maturing or Assumed to be Withdrawn In:
(Dollars
in thousands)
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
|||||||||
Rate-sensitive
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable
rate loans
|
$
|
56,126
|
$
|
8,708
|
$
|
3,386
|
$
|
1,804
|
$
|
1,100
|
$
|
1,661
|
$
|
72,785
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
7.78
|
%
|
7.46
|
%
|
7.46
|
%
|
7.39
|
%
|
7.35
|
%
|
7.41
|
%
|
7.70
|
%
|
||||||||
Adjustable
rate loans
|
$
|
28,267
|
$
|
26,477
|
$
|
21,171
|
$
|
17,274
|
$
|
14,117
|
$
|
70,909
|
$
|
178,215
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
7.00
|
%
|
6.94
|
%
|
6.94
|
%
|
6.89
|
%
|
7.00
|
%
|
7.04
|
%
|
6.99
|
%
|
||||||||
Fixed
rate loans
|
$
|
44,051
|
$
|
25,687
|
$
|
17,053
|
$
|
14,858
|
$
|
9,799
|
$
|
28,470
|
$
|
139,918
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
6.81
|
%
|
6.68
|
%
|
6.56
|
%
|
6.59
|
%
|
6.27
|
%
|
5.24
|
%
|
6.38
|
%
|
||||||||
Total
loans
|
$
|
128,444
|
$
|
60,872
|
$
|
41,610
|
$
|
33,936
|
$
|
25,016
|
$
|
101,040
|
$
|
390,918
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
7.28
|
%
|
6.91
|
%
|
6.83
|
%
|
6.78
|
%
|
6.73
|
%
|
6.54
|
%
|
6.90
|
%
|
||||||||
Fixed
rate investment securities
|
$
|
44,124
|
$
|
7,674
|
$
|
3,800
|
$
|
3,242
|
$
|
1,764
|
$
|
29,654
|
$
|
90,258
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
5.24
|
%
|
4.62
|
%
|
5.03
|
%
|
5.18
|
%
|
5.61
|
%
|
4.81
|
%
|
5.04
|
%
|
||||||||
Variable
rate investment securities
|
$
|
2,339
|
$
|
1,026
|
$
|
262
|
$
|
169
|
$
|
132
|
$
|
2,497
|
$
|
6,425
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
5.60
|
%
|
5.32
|
%
|
5.59
|
%
|
5.58
|
%
|
5.25
|
%
|
4.88
|
%
|
5.26
|
%
|
||||||||
Federal
Funds Sold & Other
|
$
|
2,000
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
2,000
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
2.99
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
2.99
|
%
|
||||||||
Total
rate sensitive assets
|
$
|
176,907
|
$
|
69,572
|
$
|
45,672
|
$
|
37,347
|
$
|
26,912
|
$
|
133,191
|
$
|
489,601
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
6.70
|
%
|
6.63
|
%
|
6.67
|
%
|
6.64
|
%
|
6.65
|
%
|
6.12
|
%
|
6.52
|
%
|
||||||||
Rate
sensitive liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand
- non interest-bearing
|
$
|
8,313
|
$
|
8,314
|
$
|
8,314
|
$
|
8,314
|
$
|
8,286
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
41,541
|
||||||||
Demand
- interest bearing
|
$
|
10,884
|
$
|
10,884
|
$
|
10,884
|
$
|
10,884
|
$
|
10,771
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
54,307
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
1.13
|
%
|
1.13
|
%
|
1.13
|
%
|
1.13
|
%
|
1.13
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
1.13
|
%
|
||||||||
Money
market accounts
|
$
|
12,300
|
$
|
12,300
|
$
|
12,300
|
$
|
12,300
|
$
|
12,180
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
61,380
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
2.81
|
%
|
2.81
|
%
|
2.81
|
%
|
2.81
|
%
|
2.81
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
2.81
|
%
|
||||||||
Savings
|
$
|
5,075
|
$
|
4,968
|
$
|
4,968
|
$
|
4,968
|
$
|
5,341
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
25,320
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
0.27
|
%
|
0.27
|
%
|
0.27
|
%
|
0.27
|
%
|
0.27
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.27
|
%
|
||||||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
$
|
185,011
|
$
|
26,248
|
$
|
6,864
|
$
|
1,977
|
$
|
2,391
|
$
|
992
|
$
|
223,483
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
4.23
|
%
|
4.20
|
%
|
3.48
|
%
|
5.02
|
%
|
4.15
|
%
|
2.65
|
%
|
4.20
|
%
|
||||||||
Fixed
rate FHLB advances
|
$
|
2,000
|
$
|
5,500
|
$
|
11,000
|
$
|
5,500
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
24,000
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
5.22
|
%
|
4.48
|
%
|
5.38
|
%
|
5.11
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
5.10
|
%
|
||||||||
Fixed
rate Notes Payable
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
10,310
|
$
|
10,310
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
10.60
|
%
|
10.60
|
%
|
||||||||
Variable
rate Notes Payable
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
922
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
10,310
|
$
|
11,232
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
7.75
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
6.49
|
%
|
6.59
|
%
|
||||||||
Fed
Funds Purchased & Repos
|
$
|
8,006
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
15,000
|
$
|
20,000
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
43,006
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
2.86
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
4.77
|
%
|
4.74
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
4.40
|
%
|
||||||||
Total
rate sensitive liabilities
|
$
|
231,589
|
$
|
68,214
|
$
|
54,330
|
$
|
59,865
|
$
|
58,969
|
$
|
21,612
|
$
|
494,579
|
||||||||
Average
interest rate
|
3.73
|
%
|
2.68
|
%
|
2.41
|
%
|
2.75
|
%
|
2.59
|
%
|
8.27
|
%
|
3.38
|
%
|
51.
Principal/Notional
Amount Maturing or Assumed to be Withdrawn In:
(Dollars
in Thousands)
Comparison
of 2007 to 2006:
|
First
|
Years
|
|||||||||||
|
Year
|
2 –
5
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Total
rate-sensitive assets:
|
|||||||||||||
At
December 31, 2007
|
$
|
176,907
|
$
|
179,502
|
$
|
133,191
|
$
|
489,601
|
|||||
At
December 31, 2006
|
195,015
|
170,804
|
120,379
|
486,198
|
|||||||||
Increase
(decrease)
|
$
|
(18,108
|
)
|
$
|
8,698
|
$
|
12,812
|
$
|
3,403
|
||||
Total
rate-sensitive liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||
At
December 31, 2007
|
$
|
231,589
|
$
|
241,378
|
$
|
21,612
|
$
|
494,579
|
|||||
At
December 31, 2006
|
232,446
|
237,240
|
21,349
|
491,035
|
|||||||||
Increase
(decrease)
|
$
|
(857
|
)
|
$
|
4,138
|
$
|
263
|
$
|
3,544
|
The
above table
reflects
expected maturities, not expected repricing. The contractual maturities adjusted
for anticipated prepayments and anticipated renewals at current interest rates,
as shown in the preceding table, are only part of the Company’s interest rate
risk profile. Other important factors include the ratio of rate-sensitive assets
to rate sensitive liabilities (which takes into consideration loan repricing
frequency but not when deposits may be repriced) and the general level and
direction of market interest rates. For core deposits, the repricing frequency
is assumed to be longer than when such deposits actually reprice. For some
rate
sensitive liabilities, their repricing frequency is the same as their
contractual maturity. For variable rate loans receivable, repricing frequency
can be daily or monthly. For adjustable rate loans receivable, repricing can
be
as frequent as annually for loans whose contractual maturities range from one
to
thirty years. In 2006, the Company’s liquidation of a portion of the investment
securities and its ability to obtain below market funding through repurchase
agreements helped balance deposit expenses in the midst of four interest rate
increases. The Company continued to reposition its balance sheet in 2007 by
liquidating investments and reducing high cost certificates of deposit which
had
a positive impact on the margin and helped balance the gap
position.
The
Company manages
its
interest rate risk by the employment of strategies to assure that desired levels
of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities mature or
reprice with similar time frames. Such strategies include: 1) loans receivable
which are renewed (and repriced) annually, 2) variable rate loans, 3)
certificates of deposit with terms from one month to six years, 4) securities
available for sale which mature at various times primarily from one through
ten
years, 5) federal funds borrowings with terms of one day to 90 days, and 6)
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings with terms of one day to ten years.
Impact
of Inflation and Changing Prices
The
majority of assets and liabilities
of the
Company are monetary in nature and therefore the Company differs greatly from
most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments
in
fixed assets or inventories. However, inflation does have an important impact
on
the growth of total assets in the banking industry and the resulting need to
increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an
appropriate equity to assets ratio. Inflation significantly affects noninterest
expense, which tends to rise during periods of general inflation.
Management
believes
the most
significant impact on financial results is the Company’s ability to react to
changes in interest rates. Management seeks to maintain an essentially balanced
position between interest sensitive assets and liabilities and actively manages
the amount of securities available for sale in order to protect against the
effects of wide interest rate fluctuations on net income and shareholders’
equity.
52.
Item
7A. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The
disclosures required by this item appear under the caption “Asset Liability
Management” in Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
beginning on page 36 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item
8.
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
The
Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company and its subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the related Consolidated
Statements of Income, Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Cash Flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, the
related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm, appear on pages F-1 through F-53 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item
9. Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.
Not
Applicable.
Item
9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
With
the
participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer (the principal
executive officer) and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(the principal financial officer) of the Company, the Company’s management has
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s President and Chief
Executive Officer and the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that:
·
|
information
required to be disclosed by the Company in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the other reports that the Company files or submits under the
Exchange
Act would be accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including its principal executive officer and principal financial
officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure;
|
·
|
information
required to be disclosed by the Company in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the other reports that the Company files or submits under the
Exchange
Act would be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms;
and
|
·
|
the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end
of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
|
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The
“Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” is provided
on page F-0 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
53.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
No
changes were made in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the
Company’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007, that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
Item
9B. Other Information
PART
III
Item
10. Directors
and Executive Officers of the Registrant and Corporate
Governance.
Directors
and Executive Officers
The
information required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K concerning
the directors of the Company is incorporated herein by reference from the
disclosure included in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 17, 2008 (the “2008
Proxy Statement”), under the caption “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”. The information
concerning the executive officers of the Company required by Item 401 of
SEC Regulation S-K is set forth in the portion of Part I of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K entitled “Supplemental Item: Executive Officers of
the Registrant.”
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
The
information required by Item 405 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated
herein by reference from the disclosure included in the Company’s 2008 Proxy
Statement under the caption “SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE.”
Committee
Charters and Code of Conduct and Ethics
The
Company’s Board of Directors has adopted charters for each of the Audit
Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Executive Governance and
Nominating Committee. A copy of these charters is available on the Company’s
Internet website at www.rurbanfinancial.net by first clicking “Corporate
Governance” and then “Supplementary Info”. The Company has adopted a Code of
Conduct and Ethics that applies to the Company’s directors, officers and
employees. A copy of the Code of Conduct and Ethics is available on the
Company’s Internet website at www.rurbanfinancial.net under the
“Corporate Governance” tab. Interested persons may also obtain copies of the
Code of Conduct and Ethics, the Audit Committee charter, the Compensation
Committee charter and the Executive Governance and Nominating Committee charter,
without charge, by writing to Rurban Financial Corp., Attn: Investor Relations,
401 Clinton Street, Defiance, OH 43512.
54.
Director
Nominating Procedures
The
information required by Item 407(c)(3) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated
herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the caption
“CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – Nominating Procedures” in the Company’s 2008 Proxy
Statement.
Audit
Committee
The
information required by Items 407(d)(4) and 407(d)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K
is
incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure to be included under the
caption “MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD - Committees of the Board – Audit
Committee” in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement.
Item
11. Executive
Compensation.
The
information required by Item 402 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein
by
reference to the information contained in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement
under the captions “COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS” and “DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION”.
Item
12. Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters.
The
information required by Item 403 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein
by
reference from the disclosure included in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement
under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT”.
The
information required by Item 201(d) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein
by reference to the information contained in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement
under the caption “Proposal No. 2–Approval of Rurban Financial Corp. 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan – Equity Compensation Plan Information.”
Item
13. Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
The
information required by Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein
by
reference to the information contained in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement
under the caption “TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS”.
The
information required by Item 407(a) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein
by reference to the information contained in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement
under the caption “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – Director Independence”.
Item
14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The
information required to be disclosed in this Item 14 is incorporated herein
by
reference to the information contained in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement
under the caption “AUDIT COMMITTEE DISCLOSURE” – Pre-Approval of Services
Performed by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “AUDIT COMMITTEE
DISCLOSURE” – Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the
2007 Fiscal Year”.
55.
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) |
Financial
Statements.
|
A
list of
all financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is included
under “INDEX
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS”
on
page
59 herein.
(a) (2) |
Financial
Statement Schedules.
|
All
schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related
instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.
(a) (3) |
Exhibits.
|
The
exhibits listed on the “INDEX TO EXHIBITS” beginning on page 113 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or
incorporated herein by reference.
56.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf
by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
RURBAN FINANCIAL CORP.
|
||
/s/
Duane L. Sinn
|
||
By:
|
Duane L. Sinn, Executive Vice President and
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Power
of Attorney
KNOW
ALL
MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each undersigned officer and/or director of Rurban
Financial Corp., an Ohio corporation (the “Corporation”), which is about to file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report
of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007,
hereby constitutes and appoints Kenneth A. Joyce and Duane L. Sinn, and each
of
them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power
of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead,
in
any and all capacities, to sign both the Annual Report on Form 10-K and any
and
all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any
and
all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and the NASDAQ Stock Market, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all things that each of said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them or his or their substitute
or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has
been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
|
Date
|
Capacity
|
||
/s/
Kenneth A, Joyce
|
March
21, 2008
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, and
|
||
Kenneth
A. Joyce
|
Director
|
|||
/s/
Duane L. Sinn
|
March
21, 2008
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief
|
||
Duane
L. Sinn
|
Financial
Officer
|
|||
/s/
Thomas A. Buis
|
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
Thomas
A. Buis
|
57.
/s/ Thomas M. Callan |
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
Thomas
M. Callan
|
||||
/s/
John R. Compo
|
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
John
R. Compo
|
||||
/s/
John Fahl
|
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
John
Fahl
|
||||
/s/
Robert A. Fawcett, Jr.
|
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
Robert
A. Fawcett, Jr.
|
||||
/s/
Richard L. Hardgrove
|
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
Richard
L. Hardgrove
|
||||
/s/
Rita A. Kissner
|
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
Rita
A. Kissner
|
||||
/s/
Thomas L. Sauer
|
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
Thomas
L. Sauer
|
||||
/s/
Steven D. VanDemark
|
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
Steven
D. VanDemark
|
||||
/s/
J. Michael Walz, D.D.S.
|
March
21, 2008
|
Director
|
||
J.
Michael Walz, D.D.S
|
||||
Date:
March 21, 2008
|
58.
Rurban
Financial Corp.
December
31, 2006 and 2005
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
F-
0
|
|||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-1
|
|||
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
||||
Balance
Sheets
|
F-2 to F-3
|
|||
Statements
of Income
|
F-4 to F-5
|
|||
Statements
of Stockholders’ Equity
|
F-6
|
|||
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
F-7 to F-8
|
|||
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
F-9 to F-52
|
59.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The
management of Rurban Financial Corp. (the “Corporation”) is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934. The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in conformity
with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The Corporation’s
internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that:
a)
|
Pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the
Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries;
|
b)
|
Provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit
preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries
are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the Corporation; and
|
c)
|
Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the assets of the
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries that could have a material
effect on the financial statements.
|
With
the
supervision and participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer,
and
our Chief Financial Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of the
Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,
based on the criteria set forth for effective internal control over financial
reporting by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission in “Internal Control Integrated Framework.” Based on our assessment
and those criteria, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, the
Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is
effective.
This
Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Corporation’s
registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the
Corporation’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Corporation to provide
only management’s report in this Annual Report.
RURBAN
FINANCIAL CORP.
Kenneth A. Joyce | Duane L. Sinn |
President and Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer |
February
14, 2008
F-0.
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit
Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Defiance,
Ohio
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rurban Financial Corp.
as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007. The Company's management is
responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express
an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing auditing procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits also included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Rurban Financial Corp.
as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of
America.
Cincinnati,
Ohio
February
14, 2008
F1
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
December
31
Assets
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
15,183,627
|
$
|
13,381,791
|
|||
Federal
funds sold
|
2,000,000
|
9,100,000
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
17,183,627
|
22,481,791
|
|||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
-
|
150,000
|
|||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
92,661,386
|
102,462,075
|
|||||
Loans
held for sale
|
1,649,758
|
390,100
|
|||||
Loans,
net of unearned income
|
389,268,744
|
370,101,809
|
|||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(3,990,455
|
)
|
(3,717,377
|
)
|
|||
Premises
and equipment
|
15,128,754
|
15,449,774
|
|||||
Federal
Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
4,021,200
|
3,993,450
|
|||||
Foreclosed
assets held for sale, net
|
124,131
|
82,397
|
|||||
Interest
receivable
|
3,008,968
|
3,129,774
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
13,940,618
|
13,674,058
|
|||||
Core
deposits and other intangibles
|
5,135,228
|
5,858,982
|
|||||
Purchased
software
|
4,282,563
|
4,618,691
|
|||||
Cash
value of life insurance
|
12,160,581
|
10,771,843
|
|||||
Other
|
6,638,895
|
6,559,886
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
561,213,998
|
$
|
556,007,253
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F2
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
December
31
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Liabilities
|
|||||||
Deposits
|
|||||||
Demand
|
$
|
41,541,297
|
$
|
46,565,554
|
|||
Savings,
interest checking and money market
|
141,009,043
|
130,267,333
|
|||||
Time
|
223,480,842
|
237,722,558
|
|||||
Total
deposits
|
406,031,182
|
414,555,445
|
|||||
Short-term
borrowings
|
43,006,438
|
32,270,900
|
|||||
Notes
payable
|
922,457
|
2,589,207
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank advances
|
24,000,000
|
21,000,000
|
|||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
20,620,000
|
20,620,000
|
|||||
Interest
payable
|
2,532,914
|
2,224,413
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,310,602
|
1,610,462
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
3,465,171
|
4,181,673
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
501,888,764
|
499,052,100
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingent Liabilities
|
|||||||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $2.50 stated value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; 5,027,433
shares
outstanding
|
12,568,583
|
12,568,583
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
14,923,571
|
14,859,165
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
32,361,106
|
30,407,298
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
82,235
|
(879,893
|
)
|
||||
Treasury
Stock, at cost Common; 2007 - 48,500 shares, 2006 - 0
shares
|
(610,260
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
59,325,235
|
56,955,153
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
561,213,998
|
$
|
556,007,253
|
F3
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Years
Ended December 31
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Interest
Income
|
||||||||||
Loans
|
||||||||||
Taxable
|
$
|
27,782,068
|
$
|
24,958,988
|
$
|
16,593,703
|
||||
Tax-exempt
|
73,451
|
63,356
|
64,609
|
|||||||
Securities
|
||||||||||
Taxable
|
4,283,508
|
5,211,672
|
4,337,477
|
|||||||
Tax-exempt
|
645,451
|
559,518
|
265,959
|
|||||||
Other
|
225,151
|
176,884
|
160,240
|
|||||||
Total
interest income
|
33,009,629
|
30,970,418
|
21,421,988
|
|||||||
Interest
Expense
|
||||||||||
Deposits
|
13,595,896
|
11,022,161
|
5,651,372
|
|||||||
Notes
payable
|
126,812
|
74,904
|
334,713
|
|||||||
Repurchase
Agreements
|
1,615,016
|
848,277
|
-
|
|||||||
Federal
funds purchased
|
39,047
|
97,226
|
67,300
|
|||||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank advances
|
1,037,026
|
2,106,385
|
2,039,851
|
|||||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
1,808,520
|
1,787,023
|
1,275,168
|
|||||||
Total
interest expense
|
18,222,317
|
15,935,976
|
9,368,404
|
|||||||
Net
Interest Income
|
14,787,312
|
15,034,442
|
12,053,584
|
|||||||
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
521,306
|
177,838
|
583,402
|
|||||||
Net
Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses
|
14,266,006
|
14,856,604
|
11,470,182
|
|||||||
Non-interest
Income
|
||||||||||
Data
service fees
|
19,382,115
|
15,011,143
|
12,708,407
|
|||||||
Trust
fees
|
3,385,320
|
3,192,025
|
3,133,550
|
|||||||
Customer
service fees
|
2,243,745
|
2,161,153
|
1,859,547
|
|||||||
Net
gains (losses) on loan sales
|
574,000
|
1,310,536
|
(436,971
|
)
|
||||||
Net
realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities
|
1,998
|
(494,885
|
)
|
25,300
|
||||||
Investment
securities recoveries
|
-
|
889,454
|
-
|
|||||||
Loan
servicing fees
|
227,017
|
358,321
|
306,929
|
|||||||
Gain
on sale of assets
|
29,477
|
94,198
|
-
|
|||||||
Other
|
1,017,727
|
1,233,376
|
741,340
|
|||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
$
|
26,861,399
|
$
|
23,755,321
|
$
|
18,338,102
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F4
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Years
Ended December 31
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Non-interest
Expense
|
||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
$
|
17,007,314
|
$
|
16,584,146
|
$
|
13,518,749
|
||||
Net
occupancy expense
|
1,994,299
|
1,840,864
|
1,214,169
|
|||||||
Equipment
expense
|
6,586,623
|
5,850,281
|
5,148,458
|
|||||||
Data
processing fees
|
469,808
|
562,265
|
411,465
|
|||||||
Professional
fees
|
2,226,577
|
2,395,863
|
2,730,337
|
|||||||
Marketing
expense
|
820,528
|
669,764
|
445,656
|
|||||||
Printing
and office supplies
|
661,760
|
619,100
|
524,473
|
|||||||
Telephone
and communications
|
1,781,277
|
1,705,261
|
1,549,449
|
|||||||
Postage
and delivery expense
|
1,545,340
|
735,210
|
313,379
|
|||||||
Insurance
expense
|
140,651
|
171,363
|
218,484
|
|||||||
Employee
expense
|
1,083,056
|
978,832
|
994,735
|
|||||||
State,
local and other taxes
|
584,031
|
674,280
|
572,456
|
|||||||
FHLB
prepayment penalties
|
-
|
214,886
|
-
|
|||||||
Other
|
1,735,346
|
1,901,452
|
1,412,030
|
|||||||
Total
non-interest expense
|
36,636,610
|
34,903,567
|
29,053,840
|
|||||||
Income
Before Income Tax
|
4,490,795
|
3,708,358
|
754,444
|
|||||||
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
1,234,160
|
948,116
|
81,353
|
|||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
3,256,635
|
$
|
2,760,242
|
$
|
673,091
|
||||
Basic
Earnings Per Share
|
$
|
0.65
|
$
|
0.55
|
$
|
0.15
|
||||
Diluted
Earnings Per Share
|
$
|
0.65
|
$
|
0.55
|
$
|
0.15
|
F5
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Years
Ended December 31
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2005
|
$
|
11,439,255
|
$
|
11,003,642
|
$
|
28,943,736
|
$
|
(803,189
|
)
|
$
|
(277,649
|
)
|
$
|
50,305,795
|
|||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
673,091
|
673,091
|
|||||||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net
of
reclassification adjustment and tax effect
|
(852,673
|
)
|
(852,673
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
(179,582
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Dividends
on common stock, $0.20 per share
|
(914,010
|
)
|
(914,010
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock
options exercised (2,929 treasury shares)
|
(4,158
|
)
|
40,753
|
36,595
|
|||||||||||||||
Treasure
stock retired (4,358 treasury shares)
|
(10,962
|
)
|
(225,934
|
)
|
236,896
|
-
|
|||||||||||||
Exchange
acquisition
|
1,140,290
|
4,061,560
|
5,201,850
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
12,568,583
|
14,835,110
|
28,702,817
|
(1,655,862
|
)
|
-
|
54,450,648
|
||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
2,760,242
|
2,760,242
|
|||||||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net
of
reclassification adjustment and tax effect
|
775,969
|
775,969
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
3,536,211
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
on common stock, $0.21 per share
|
(1,055,761
|
)
|
(1,055,761
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Expense
of stock option plan
|
24,055
|
24,055
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
12,568,583
|
14,859,165
|
30,407,298
|
(879,893
|
)
|
-
|
56,955,153
|
||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
3,256,635
|
3,256,635
|
|||||||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net
of
reclassification adjustment and tax effect
|
962,128
|
962,128
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
4,218,763
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
on common stock, $0.26 per share
|
(1,302,827
|
)
|
(1,302,827
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Expense
of stock option plan
|
64,406
|
64,406
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
repurchased under stock repurchase plan
|
(610,260
|
)
|
(610,260
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
$
|
12,568,583
|
$
|
14,923,571
|
$
|
32,361,106
|
$
|
82,235
|
$
|
(610,260
|
)
|
$
|
59,325,235
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F6
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Years
Ended December 31
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Operating
Activities
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
3,256,635
|
$
|
2,760,242
|
$
|
673,091
|
||||
Items
not requiring (providing) cash
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,969,922
|
3,544,965
|
3,108,693
|
|||||||
Provision
(credit) for loan losses
|
521,306
|
177,838
|
583,402
|
|||||||
Expense
of stock option plan
|
64,406
|
24,055
|
-
|
|||||||
Amortization
of premiums and discounts on securities
|
48,799
|
206,096
|
218,221
|
|||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
723,754
|
535,351
|
131,826
|
|||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(795,035
|
)
|
(460,305
|
)
|
384,337
|
|||||
FHLB
Stock Dividends
|
(47,250
|
)
|
(385,950
|
)
|
(116,800
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of loans held for sale
|
18,032,822
|
11,328,770
|
5,481,329
|
|||||||
Originations
of loans held for sale
|
(18,718,482
|
)
|
(11,326,566
|
)
|
(6,029,400
|
)
|
||||
(Gain)
loss from sale of loans
|
(574,000
|
)
|
(1,249,148
|
)
|
436,971
|
|||||
(Gain)
loss on sale of foreclosed assets
|
-
|
(113,729
|
)
|
214,642
|
||||||
(Gain)
loss on sales of fixed assets
|
(29,396
|
)
|
19,530
|
18,817
|
||||||
Net
realized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
|
-
|
494,885
|
(25,300
|
)
|
||||||
Changes
in
|
||||||||||
Interest
receivable
|
120,806
|
(119,419
|
)
|
(513,229
|
)
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
(254,227
|
)
|
296,344
|
(1,241,089
|
)
|
|||||
Interest
payable and other liabilities
|
(408,466
|
)
|
(1,081,796
|
)
|
899,500
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
5,911,594
|
4,651,163
|
4,225,011
|
|||||||
Investing
Activities
|
||||||||||
Net
change in interest-bearing deposits
|
150,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Purchases
of available-for-sale securities
|
(29,501,721
|
)
|
(15,375,196
|
)
|
(38,373,878
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
37,247,138
|
19,506,403
|
17,107,354
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
3,464,242
|
33,263,994
|
5,154,173
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sale of credit card portfolio and non-performing
loans
|
-
|
5,760,603
|
-
|
|||||||
Net
change in loans
|
(19,653,367
|
)
|
(49,367,497
|
)
|
(4,562,982
|
)
|
||||
Purchase
of premises and equipment
|
(3,701,669
|
)
|
(9,042,264
|
)
|
(2,975,180
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sales of premises and equipment
|
401,241
|
2,880,497
|
93,216
|
|||||||
Purchase
bank owned life insurance
|
(1,000,000
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Proceeds
from sale of foreclosed assets
|
-
|
2,811,928
|
1,565,223
|
|||||||
Cash
paid to shareholders of Exchange Bank Acquisition
|
-
|
(6,526,646
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Cash
paid to shareholders of Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc.
Acquisition
|
(266,560
|
)
|
(4,872,961
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of Federal Reserve stock
|
19,500
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from assumption of net liabilities in business acquisition
|
-
|
-
|
50,928,950
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(12,841,196
|
)
|
(20,961,139
|
)
|
28,936,876
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F7
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Years
Ended December 31
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Financing
Activities
|
||||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in demand deposits, money market, interest checking
and savings accounts
|
$
|
5,717,453
|
$
|
553,021
|
$
|
(6,940,715
|
)
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in certificates of deposit
|
(14,241,716
|
)
|
29,164,512
|
(16,360,869
|
)
|
|||||
Net
increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
10,735,538
|
26,190,480
|
2,021,269
|
|||||||
Net
decrease in federal funds purchased
|
—
|
(4,600,000
|
)
|
(2,900,000
|
)
|
|||||
Proceeds
from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
14,000,000
|
47,900,000
|
20,500,000
|
|||||||
Repayment
of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
(11,000,000
|
)
|
(72,400,000
|
)
|
(34,500,000
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
—
|
2,700,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from trust preferred
|
—
|
—
|
10,310,000
|
|||||||
Repayment
of notes payable
|
(1,666,750
|
)
|
(2,311,326
|
)
|
(2,381,084
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from stock options exercised
|
—
|
—
|
36,595
|
|||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(610,260
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(1,302,827
|
)
|
(1,055,759
|
)
|
(914,010
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
1,631,438
|
26,140,928
|
(31,128,814
|
)
|
||||||
Increase
(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
(5,298,164
|
)
|
9,830,952
|
2,033,073
|
||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year
|
22,481,791
|
12,650,839
|
10,617,766
|
|||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, End of Year
|
$
|
17,183,627
|
$
|
22,481,791
|
$
|
12,650,839
|
||||
Supplemental
Cash Flows Information
|
||||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
17,913,818
|
$
|
15,084,607
|
$
|
8,989,474
|
||||
Income
taxes paid - net of refunds
|
$
|
(2,430,000
|
)
|
$
|
(948,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,021,302
|
)
|
|
Common
stock and payable issued for net assets
in Acquisition
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
11,826,130
|
||||
Transfer
of loans to foreclosed assets
|
$
|
320,600
|
$
|
556,677
|
$
|
3,247,539
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F8
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
1:
|
Nature
of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Nature
of Operations
Rurban
Financial Corp. (“Company”) is a bank holding company whose principal activity
is the ownership and management of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The State
Bank
and Trust Company (“State Bank”), RFCBC, Inc. (“RFCBC”), Rurbanc Data Services,
Inc. (“RDSI”), Rurban Statutory Trust I (“RST I”), and Rurban Statutory Trust II
(“RST II”). State Bank owns all of the outstanding stock of Reliance Financial
Services (“RFS”), and Rurban Mortgage Company (“RMC”). State Bank is primarily
engaged in providing a full range of banking and financial services to
individual and corporate customers in northwest Ohio and Northeast Indiana.
State Bank is subject to competition from other financial institutions. State
Bank is regulated by certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic
examinations by those regulatory authorities. RFCBC operates as a loan
subsidiary that continues to administer a classified loan. RDSI owns all the
outstanding shares of Diverse Computer Marketing (“DCM”), and provides data and
item processing services to community banks in Arkansas, Florida, Illinois,
Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio and Wisconsin. RFS offers
a
diversified array of trust and financial services to customers nationwide.
RST I
and RST II are trusts which were organized in 2000 and 2005, respectively,
to
manage the Company’s trust preferred securities.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, State
Bank, RFCBC, RDSI and RMC. Exchange Bank’s balance sheet was consolidated at
December 31, 2005, but not the income statement as a result of closing this
acquisition at the close of business December 31, 2005. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
F9
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Material
estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to
the
determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate
acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans. In
connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management
obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.
Cash
Equivalents
The
Company considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three
months or less to be cash equivalents except for short-term U.S. Treasury
securities which are classified as available-for-sale securities.
Securities
Available-for-sale
securities, which include any security for which the Company has no immediate
plan to sell but which may be sold in the future, are carried at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses are recorded, net of related income tax effects,
in
other comprehensive income.
Held-to-maturity
securities, which include any security for which the Company has the positive
intent and ability to hold until maturity, are carried at historical cost
adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
Amortization
of premiums and accretion of discounts are recorded as interest income from
securities. Realized gains and losses are recorded as net security gains
(losses). Gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the
specific-identification method.
The
Company evaluates its securities portfolio for impairment throughout the year.
An impairment is recorded against individual equity securities if their cost
significantly exceeds their fair value for a substantial amount of time. An
impairment is also recorded for investments in debt securities, unless the
decrease in fair value is attributable to interest rates and management has
the
intent and ability to retain the investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
Mortgage
Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage
loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried
at
the lower of cost or fair value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if
any,
are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income.
Loans
Loans
that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future
or
until maturity or payoffs are reported at their outstanding principal balances
adjusted for any charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, any deferred fees
or costs on originated loans and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased
loans. Interest income is reported on the interest method and includes
amortization of net deferred loan fees and costs over the loan term. Generally,
loans are placed on non-accrual status not later than 90 days past due, unless
the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection.
F10
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Allowance
for Loan Losses
The
allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have
occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to income. Loan losses
are
charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility
of a
loan balance is probable. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
allowance.
The
allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and
is
based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in
light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio,
adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated
value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This
evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are
susceptible to significant revision as new information becomes
available.
A
loan is
considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is
probable that State Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of
principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include
payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled
principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant
payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.
Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls
on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration each of the circumstances
surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the
reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the
shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured
on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial, agricultural, and construction loans
by
either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s
effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of
the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Large
groups of smaller balance homogenous loans are collectively evaluated for
impairment. Accordingly, State Bank does not separately identify individual
consumer and residential loans for impairment measurements.
Premises
and Equipment
Depreciable
assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is charged
to expense using the straight-line method for buildings and the declining
balance method for equipment over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Leasehold improvements are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line
method over the terms of the respective leases.
F11
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Federal
Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
Federal
Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock are required investments for
institutions that are members of the Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan
Bank
systems. The required investment in the common stock is based on a predetermined
formula.
Foreclosed
Assets Held for Sale
Assets
acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are
initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure, establishing a
new
cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed
by
management and the assets are carried at the lower of the carrying amount or
the
fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations related
to
foreclosed assets and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net
income or expense from foreclosed assets.
Goodwill
Goodwill
is tested for impairment annually. If the implied fair value of goodwill is
lower than its carrying amount, goodwill impairment is indicated and goodwill
is
written down to its implied fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value,
if any, are not recognized in the financial statements.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over weighted-average
periods ranging from one to fifteen years. Such assets are periodically
evaluated as to the recoverability of their carrying value. Purchased software
is being amortized using the straight-line method over periods ranging from
one
to three years.
Stock
Options
At
December 31, 2007, the Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan,
which is described more fully in Note 18. Prior to 2006, the Company accounted
for this plan under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,
and
related Interpretations. Accordingly, in 2005 and 2004, no stock-based employee
compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under
this
plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common
stock at the grant date.
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions
of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment.
The
Company selected the modified prospective application. Accordingly, after
January 1, 2006, the Company began expensing the fair value of stock options
granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled. In accordance with Statement No.
123 and related interpretations, no compensation expense was
recognized.
F12
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
The
following table illustrates the effect on 2005 net income and earnings per
share
if the Company had applied the fair value provisions of FASB Statement No.
123,
Accounting
for Stock-based Compensation,
to
stock-based employee compensation. In April 2005, the Company accelerated
certain stock options to be immediately vested. In accordance with Statement
No.
123 and related interpretations, no compensation expense was recognized.
2005
|
||||
Net
income, as reported
|
$
|
673,091
|
||
Less:
Total stock-based employee compensation cost determined under the
fair
value based method, net of income taxes
|
(655,615
|
)
|
||
Pro
forma net income
|
$
|
17,476
|
||
Earnings
per share:
|
||||
Basic
– as reported
|
$
|
0.15
|
||
Basic –
pro forma
|
$
|
0.00
|
||
Diluted –
as reported
|
$
|
0.15
|
||
Diluted –
pro forma
|
$
|
0.00
|
Income
Taxes
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax effects of differences
between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities. A
valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if it is more
likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company
files consolidated income tax returns for its subsidiaries.
Treasury
Shares
Treasury
stock is stated at cost. Cost is determined by first-in, first-out method.
On
April 12, 2007, Rurban initiated a stock repurchase program, authorizing the
repurchase of up to 250,000 shares or approximately five percent of the
Company’s outstanding shares. As of year end the company repurchased 48,500
shares at an average cost of $12.58.
Earnings
Per Share
Earnings
per share have been computed based upon the weighted-average common shares
outstanding during each year. Unearned ESOP shares which have not vested have
been excluded from the computation of average shares outstanding.
F13
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the 2005 and 2006 financial statements
to
conform to the 2007 financial statement presentation. These reclassifications
had no effect on net income.
Note
2:
|
Restriction
on Cash and Due From Banks
|
State
Bank is required to maintain reserve funds in cash and/or on deposit with the
Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve required at December 31, 2007, was
$1,344,000.
F14
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
3:
|
Securities
|
The
amortized cost and approximate fair values of securities were as
follows:
Amortized Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Approximate
Fair Value
|
||||||||||
Available-for-Sale
Securities:
|
|||||||||||||
December
31, 2007:
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government Agencies
|
$
|
40,133,111
|
$
|
76,292
|
$
|
(20,040
|
)
|
$
|
40,189,363
|
||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
36,339,539
|
370,134
|
(330,074
|
)
|
36,379,599
|
||||||||
State
and political subdivision
|
15,991,138
|
91,752
|
(64,211
|
)
|
16,018,679
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
23,000
|
-
|
-
|
23,000
|
|||||||||
Other
securities
|
50,000
|
745
|
-
|
50,745
|
|||||||||
$
|
92,536,788
|
$
|
538,923
|
$
|
(414,325
|
)
|
$
|
92,661,386
|
|||||
December
31, 2006:
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government Agencies
|
$
|
59,021,221
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(898,591
|
)
|
$
|
58,122,630
|
||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
29,169,513
|
48,022
|
(447,351
|
)
|
28,770,184
|
||||||||
State
and political subdivision
|
15,500,312
|
47,316
|
(82,680
|
)
|
15,464,948
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
23,000
|
-
|
-
|
23,000
|
|||||||||
Other
securities
|
81,200
|
113
|
-
|
81,313
|
|||||||||
$
|
103,795,246
|
$
|
95,451
|
$
|
(1,428,622
|
)
|
$
|
102,462,075
|
F15
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
The
amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale at
December 31, 2007, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected
maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have
the
right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
Available
for Sale
|
|||||||
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||
Within
one year
|
$
|
557,490
|
$
|
554,396
|
|||
Due
after one year through five years
|
1,791,007
|
1,806,566
|
|||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
41,137,626
|
41,185,753
|
|||||
Due
after ten years
|
12,688,126
|
12,712,072
|
|||||
56,174,249
|
56,258,787
|
||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities and equity securities
|
36,362,539
|
36,402,599
|
|||||
Totals
|
$
|
92,536,788
|
$
|
92,661,386
|
The
carrying value of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits
and for other purposes, was $44,634,646 at December 31, 2007, and $61,186,085
at
December 31, 2006. The securities delivered for repurchase agreements were
$38,184,453 at December 31, 2007, and $27,437,603 for 2006.
Gross
gains of $1,998, $7,928, and $34,050 and gross losses of $0, $502,813, and
$8,750 resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities were realized
for
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The tax expense for net security gains
(losses) for 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $679, $(168,000), and $9,000,
respectively.
Certain
investments in debt securities are reported in the financial statements at
an
amount less than their historical cost. Total fair value of these investments
at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, was $20,200,650 and $92,111,343 which is
approximately 22% and 90% of the Company’s available-for-sale investment
portfolio respectively.
Based
on
evaluation of available evidence, including recent changes in market interest
rates, credit rating information and information obtained from regulatory
filings, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities
are
temporary.
Should
the impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the
cost
basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in
net
income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment is
identified.
In
2002
the Company took an after-tax loss of $1.1 million on an investment in WorldCom
bonds. In 2006 $889,454 of this loss was recovered, which resulted in a $587,000
after-tax gain.
F16
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Securities
with unrealized losses at December 31, 2007, are as follows:
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or Longer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale
Securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government agencies
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
$
|
3,979,960
|
$
|
(20,040
|
)
|
$
|
3,979,960
|
$
|
(20,040
|
)
|
|||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
1,508,150
|
(7,235
|
)
|
9,203,980
|
(322,839
|
)
|
10,712,130
|
(330,074
|
)
|
||||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
1,728,883
|
(10,378
|
)
|
3,779,677
|
(53,833
|
)
|
5,508,560
|
(64,211
|
)
|
||||||||||
$
|
3,237,033
|
$
|
(17,613
|
)
|
$
|
16,963,617
|
$
|
(396,712
|
)
|
$
|
20,200,650
|
$
|
(414,325
|
)
|
Securities
with unrealized losses at December 31, 2006, are as follows:
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or Longer
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale
Securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and government agencies
|
$
|
6,482,190
|
$
|
(16,767
|
)
|
$
|
51,240,439
|
$
|
(881,824
|
)
|
$
|
57,722,629
|
$
|
(898,591
|
)
|
||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
5,689,252
|
(56,739
|
)
|
18,064,045
|
(390,612
|
)
|
23,753,297
|
(447,351
|
)
|
||||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
6,975,811
|
(27,974
|
)
|
3,659,606
|
(54,706
|
)
|
10,635,417
|
(82,680
|
)
|
||||||||||
$
|
19,147,253
|
$
|
(101,480
|
)
|
$
|
72,964,090
|
$
|
(1,327,142
|
)
|
$
|
92,111,343
|
$
|
(1,428,622
|
)
|
F17
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
4: Loans
and Allowance for Loan Losses
Categories
of loans at December 31 include:
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Commercial
|
$
|
83,048,522
|
$
|
71,640,907
|
|||
Commercial
real estate
|
126,784,483
|
109,503,312
|
|||||
Agricultural
|
43,369,266
|
44,682,699
|
|||||
Residential
real estate
|
84,620,992
|
94,389,118
|
|||||
Consumer
|
51,357,419
|
49,314,080
|
|||||
Leasing
|
330,000
|
856,808
|
|||||
Total
loans
|
389,510,682
|
370,386,924
|
|||||
Less
|
|||||||
Net
deferred loan fees, premiums and discounts
|
(241,938
|
)
|
(285,115
|
)
|
|||
Loans,
net of unearned income
|
$
|
389,268,744
|
$
|
370,101,809
|
|||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
$
|
(3,990,455
|
)
|
$
|
(3,717,377
|
)
|
Activity
in the allowance for loan losses was as follows:
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Balance,
beginning of year
|
$
|
3,717,377
|
$
|
4,699,827
|
$
|
4,899,063
|
||||
Balance,
Exchange Bank
|
-
|
-
|
910,004
|
|||||||
Provision
charged to expense
|
521,306
|
177,838
|
583,402
|
|||||||
Recoveries
|
183,987
|
656,963
|
1,716,815
|
|||||||
Losses
charged off
|
(432,215
|
)
|
(1,817,251
|
)
|
(3,409,457
|
)
|
||||
Balance,
end of year
|
$
|
3,990,455
|
$
|
3,717,377
|
$
|
4,699,827
|
F18
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Individual
loans determined to be impaired were as follows:
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Year-end
impaired loans with no allowance for loan losses allocated
|
$
|
1,786,931
|
$
|
607,469
|
$
|
1,676,128
|
||||
Year-end
loans with allowance for loan losses allocated
|
$
|
1,897,903
|
$
|
1,514,169
|
$
|
4,460,129
|
||||
Total
impaired loans
|
$
|
3,684,834
|
$
|
2,121,638
|
$
|
6,136,257
|
||||
Amount
of allowance allocated
|
$
|
332,805
|
$
|
224,630
|
$
|
1,992,807
|
||||
Average
of impaired loans during the year
|
$
|
2,805,689
|
$
|
4,177,213
|
$
|
10,036,150
|
||||
Interest
income recognized during impairment
|
$
|
63,425
|
$
|
46,917
|
$
|
223,782
|
||||
Cash-basis
interest income recognized
|
$
|
74,940
|
$
|
50,779
|
$
|
232,008
|
At
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more
totaled $0, $0, and $5,200 respectively. Non-accruing loans at December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005 were $5,990,000, $3,828,000, and $6,270,000
respectively.
Note
5: Premises
and Equipment
Major
classifications of premises and equipment stated at cost, were as follows at
December 31:
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Land
|
$
|
1,720,883
|
$
|
1,544,883
|
|||
Buildings
and improvements
|
12,327,515
|
9,925,293
|
|||||
Equipment
|
11,878,202
|
11,259,960
|
|||||
Construction
in progress
|
447,295
|
2,567,079
|
|||||
26,373,895
|
25,297,215
|
||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(11,245,141
|
)
|
(9,847,441
|
)
|
|||
Net
premises and equipment
|
$
|
15,128,754
|
$
|
15,449,774
|
F19
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
6: Goodwill
The
changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005 were:
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Balance
as of January 1
|
$
|
13,674,058
|
$
|
8,917,373
|
$
|
2,144,304
|
||||
Adjustment
(2007) and goodwill acquired during the year (2006) – Data
Processing
|
266,559
|
4,795,149
|
-
|
|||||||
Adjustment
(2006) and goodwill acquired during the year (2005)–
Banking
|
-
|
(38,464
|
)
|
6,773,069
|
||||||
Balance
as of December 31
|
$
|
13,940,618
|
$
|
13,674,058
|
$
|
8,917,373
|
F20
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
7: Other
Intangible Assets
The
carrying basis and accumulated amortization of recognized intangible assets
at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 were:
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
||||
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|||||
Core
deposit intangible
|
$
|
4,039,615
|
(1,340,276
|
)
|
$
|
4,039,615
|
$
|
(888,544
|
)
|
||||
Customer
relationship intangible
|
200,627
|
(87,493
|
)
|
200,627
|
(76,405
|
)
|
|||||||
Banking
intangibles
|
4,240,242
|
(1,427,769
|
)
|
4,240,242
|
(964,949
|
)
|
|||||||
Customer
relationship intangible
|
2,389,000
|
(212,356
|
)
|
2,389,000
|
(53,089
|
)
|
|||||||
Trademark
intangible
|
180,000
|
(80,000
|
)
|
180,000
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|||||||
Non-compete
intangible
|
83,000
|
(36,889
|
)
|
83,000
|
(9,222
|
)
|
|||||||
Data
Processing intangibles
|
2,652,000
|
(329,245
|
)
|
2,652,000
|
(68,311
|
)
|
|||||||
Purchased
software - Banking
|
645,778
|
(447,930
|
)
|
217,940
|
(166,435
|
)
|
|||||||
Purchased
software – Data Processing
|
9,928,769
|
(6,010,019
|
)
|
9,073,965
|
(4,679,663
|
)
|
|||||||
Purchased
software - Other
|
350,010
|
(184,045
|
)
|
379,422
|
(206,538
|
)
|
|||||||
Purchased
software
|
10,924,557
|
(6,641,994
|
)
|
9,671,327
|
(5,052,636
|
)
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
17,816,799
|
(8,399,008
|
)
|
$
|
16,563,569
|
$
|
(6,085,896
|
)
|
Amortization
expense for core deposits and other for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006
and 2005, was $723,754, $535,351 and $131,825, respectively. Amortization
expense for purchased software for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and
2005 was $1,339,276, $1,329,580 and $1,234,279, respectively Estimated
amortization expense for each of the following five years is:
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
||||||||||||
Core
deposit intangible
|
$
|
397,436
|
$
|
397,436
|
$
|
397,436
|
$
|
397,436
|
$
|
397,436
|
||||||
Customer
relationship intangible
|
49,930
|
42,337
|
36,884
|
31,069
|
26,758
|
|||||||||||
Banking
intangibles
|
447,366
|
439,773
|
434,320
|
428,505
|
424,194
|
|||||||||||
Customer
Relationship intangible
|
159,267
|
159,267
|
159,267
|
159,267
|
159,267
|
|||||||||||
Trademark
intangible
|
60,000
|
40,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Non-compete
intangible
|
27,667
|
40,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Data
Processing intangibles
|
246,934
|
239,267
|
159,267
|
159,267
|
159,267
|
|||||||||||
Purchased
software – Banking
|
82,665
|
69,033
|
39,915
|
159
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Purchased
Software – Data Processing
|
1,164,433
|
1,015,682
|
870,160
|
228,996
|
153,561
|
|||||||||||
Purchased
Software – Other
|
80,127
|
43,519
|
29,609
|
3,851
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Purchased
Software
|
1,327,225
|
1,128,234
|
939,684
|
233,006
|
153,561
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
2,021,525
|
$
|
1,807,274
|
$
|
1,533,271
|
$
|
820,778
|
$
|
737,022
|
F21
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
8: Interest-Bearing
Time Deposits
Interest-bearing
time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more were $57,351,000 on December
31, 2007, and $75,847,000 on December 31, 2006. Certificates of deposit obtained
from brokers totaled approximately $3,975,000 and $14,992,000 at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
At
December 31, 2007, the scheduled maturities of time deposits were as
follows:
2008
|
$
|
183,913,727
|
||
2009
|
28,303,638
|
|||
2010
|
6,283,519
|
|||
2011
|
1,977,491
|
|||
2012
|
2,386,412
|
|||
Thereafter
|
616,055
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
223,480,842
|
Of
the
$3,975,000 in brokered deposits held at December 31, 2007, $2,670,000 mature
within the next year.
Note
9: Short-Term
Borrowings
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Securities
sold under repurchase agreements - retail
|
$
|
8,006,438
|
$
|
7,270,900
|
|||
Securities
sold under repurchase agreements - broker
|
35,000,000
|
25,000,000
|
|||||
Total
short-term borrowings
|
$
|
43,006,438
|
$
|
32,270,900
|
At
December 31, 2007, The Bank had $20.9 million in federal funds lines, of which
none were drawn upon. At December 31, 2006, The Bank had $21.8 million in
federal funds lines, of which none was drawn on.
F22
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
The
Bank
has retail repurchase agreements to facilitate cash management transactions
with
commercial customers. These obligations are secured by agency securities
and
such collateral is held by the Federal Home Loan Bank. At December 31, 2007,
retail repurchase agreements totaled $8,006,438.
The maximum amount of outstanding agreements at any month end during 2007
and
2006 totaled $8,941,000 and $7,400,000, respectively, and the monthly average
of
such agreements totaled $7,268,000 and $6,471,000, respectively. The agreements
at December 31, 2007 and 2006 mature within one month.
The
Bank
also has repurchase agreements with brokerage firms who are in possession of
the
underlying securities. The securities are returned to The Bank on the repurchase
date. The maximum amount of outstanding agreements at any month end during
2007
and 2006 totaled $35,000,000 and $25,000,000, respectively, and the monthly
average of such agreements totaled $28,452,000 and $14,064,000, respectively.
These repurchase agreements mature between 2011 and 2012 and at December 31,
2007, totaled $35,000,000 with a weighted average interest rate at year-end
of
4.75%.
F23
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
10: Notes
Payable
Notes
payable at December 31, include:
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Revolving
Demand Note payable in the amount of $500,000, secured by all business
assets of RDSI, monthly payments of interest at prime plus
.5%
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
200,000
|
|||
Note
payable in the amount of $2,500,000, secured by all inventory, equipment
and receivables of RDSI, monthly payments of $41,042 together with
interest at a variable rate equal to the 5 Year Treasury Index plus
2.85%,
maturing August 23, 2011
|
$
|
922,457
|
2,389,207
|
||||
$
|
922,457
|
$
|
2,589,207
|
F24
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Aggregate
annual maturities of notes payable at December 31, 2007, are:
Debt
|
||||
2008
|
$
|
340,288
|
||
2009
|
368,475
|
|||
2010
|
213,694
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
922,457
|
Note
11: Federal
Home Loan Bank Advances
The
Federal Home Loan Bank advances were secured by mortgage loans and commercial
real estate loans totaling $139,808,148 at December 31, 2007. Advances, at
interest rates from 3.84 to 6.25 percent, are subject to restrictions or
penalties in the event of prepayment.
Aggregate
annual maturities of Federal Home Loan Bank advances at December 31, 2007,
are:
Debt
|
||||
2008
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
||
2009
|
5,500,000
|
|||
2010
|
11,000,000
|
|||
2011
|
5,500,000
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
24,000,000
|
F25
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
12: Trust
Preferred Securities
On
September 15, 2005, RST II, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, closed
a
pooled private offering of 10,000 Capital Securities with a liquidation amount
of $1,000 per security. The proceeds of the offering were loaned to the Company
in exchange for junior subordinated debentures with terms similar to the Capital
Securities. The sole assets of RST II are the junior subordinated debentures
of
the Company and payments thereunder. The junior subordinated debentures and
the
back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional
guarantee by the Company of the obligations of RST
II
under the Capital Securities. Distributions on the Capital Securities are
payable quarterly at an interest rate that changes quarterly and is based on
the
3-month LIBOR and are included in interest expense in the consolidated financial
statements. These securities are considered Tier 1 capital (with certain
limitations applicable) under current regulatory guidelines. As of December
31,
2007 and 2006, the outstanding principal balance of the Capital Securities
was
$10,000,000.
On
September 7, 2000, RST I, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, closed
a
pooled private offering of 10,000 Capital Securities with a liquidation amount
of $1,000 per security. The proceeds of the offering were loaned to the Company
in exchange for junior subordinated debentures with terms similar to the Capital
Securities. The sole assets of RST I are the junior subordinated debentures
of
the Company and payments thereunder. The junior subordinated debentures and
the
back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional
guarantee by the Company of the obligations of RST I under the Capital
Securities. Distributions on the Capital Securities are payable semi-annually
at
the annual rate of 10.6% and are included in interest expense in the
consolidated financial statements. These securities are considered Tier 1
capital (with certain limitations applicable) under current regulatory
guidelines. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the outstanding principal balance
of the Capital Securities was $10,000,000.
The
junior subordinated debentures are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole
or
in part, upon repayment of the Capital Securities at maturity or their earlier
redemption at the liquidation amount. Subject to the Company having received
prior approval of the Federal Reserve, if then required, the Capital Securities
are redeemable prior to the maturity date of September 7, 2030, at the option
of
the Company; on or after September 7, 2020 at par; or on or after September
7,
2010 at a premium; or upon occurrence of specific events defined within the
trust indenture.
F26
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
13: Income
Taxes
The
provision for income taxes includes these components:
For
The Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2007
|
2007
|
2007
|
||||||||
Taxes
currently payable (refundable)
|
$
|
2,029,195
|
$
|
1,408,421
|
$
|
(302,984
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(795,035
|
)
|
(460,305
|
)
|
384,337
|
|||||
Income
tax expense
|
$
|
1,234,160
|
$
|
948,116
|
$
|
81,353
|
A
reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to the Company’s
actual income tax expense is shown below:
For
The Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2007
|
2007
|
2007
|
||||||||
Computed
at the statutory rate (34%)
|
$
|
1,526,870
|
$
|
1,260,842
|
$
|
256,511
|
||||
Increase
(decrease) resulting from
|
||||||||||
Tax
exempt interest
|
(211,646
|
)
|
(184,640
|
)
|
(103,015
|
)
|
||||
Other
|
(81,064
|
)
|
(128,086
|
)
|
(72,143
|
)
|
||||
Actual
tax expense
|
$
|
1,234,160
|
$
|
948,116
|
$
|
81,353
|
F27
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
The
tax
effects of temporary differences related to deferred taxes shown on the balance
sheets are:
At
December 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
|
||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
$
|
1,244,891
|
$
|
1,121,589
|
|||
Accrued
compensation and benefits
|
318,748
|
279,153
|
|||||
Net
deferred loan fees
|
100,670
|
100,932
|
|||||
Unrealized
losses on available-for-sale securities
|
-
|
452,812
|
|||||
Mark
to market adjustments
|
42,363
|
-
|
|||||
Purchase
accounting adjustments
|
164,796
|
188,644
|
|||||
NOL
carry over
|
751,000
|
751,000
|
|||||
Other
|
48,997
|
3,166
|
|||||
2,671,465
|
2,897,296
|
||||||
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
|||||||
Depreciation
|
(973,163
|
)
|
(974,157
|
)
|
|||
Mortgage
servicing rights
|
(135,319
|
)
|
(71,078
|
)
|
|||
Unrealized
gains on available-for-sale securities
|
(42,363
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Mark
to market adjustment
|
-
|
(452,812
|
)
|
||||
Purchase
accounting adjustments
|
(2,226,793
|
)
|
(2,350,013
|
)
|
|||
Prepaids
|
(182,115
|
)
|
(185,760
|
)
|
|||
FHLB
stock dividends
|
(422,314
|
)
|
(422,314
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
-
|
(51,624
|
)
|
||||
(3,982,067
|
)
|
(4,507,758
|
)
|
||||
Net
deferred tax liability
|
$
|
(1,310,602
|
)
|
$
|
(1,610,462
|
)
|
The
NOL
carry over begins to expire in 2024.
Note
14: Other
Comprehensive Loss
Other
comprehensive income (loss) components and related taxes are as
follows:
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Unrealized
gains (losses) on securities available for sale
|
$
|
1,459,768
|
$
|
680,825
|
$
|
(1,266,627
|
)
|
|||
Reclassification
for realized amount included in income
|
(1,998
|
)
|
494,885
|
(25,300
|
)
|
|||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss), before tax effect
|
1,457,770
|
1,175,710
|
(1,291,927
|
)
|
||||||
Tax
expense (benefit)
|
495,642
|
399,741
|
(439,254
|
)
|
||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
962,128
|
$
|
775,969
|
$
|
(852,673
|
)
|
F28
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
15: Regulatory
Matters
The
Company and State Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements
administered by the federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum
capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional
discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Company and State Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet
items
as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and
classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators
about
components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the
Company and State Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in
the
table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to
risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average
assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2007, that the
Company and State Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they
are
subject.
As
of
December 31, 2007, the most recent notification to the regulators categorized
the State Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, State Bank must
maintain capital ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions
or
events since that notification that management believes have changed State
Bank’s status as well-capitalized.
The
Company’s consolidated, and State Bank’s actual, capital amounts (in millions)
and ratios, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, are also presented in the
following table. On March 24, 2007, Exchange Bank was merged with and into
the
lead bank, State Bank.
F29
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
The
Company and State Bank’s actual capital amounts (in millions) and ratios are
also presented in the following table.
Actual
|
For
Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
To
Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
||||||||||||||
As
of December 31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
64.2
|
15.9
|
%
|
$
|
32.2
|
8.0
|
%
|
$
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
State
Bank
|
49.5
|
12.7
|
31.3
|
8.0
|
39.1
|
10.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
59.9
|
14.9
|
16.1
|
4.0
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
State
Bank
|
45.5
|
11.6
|
15.6
|
4.0
|
23.5
|
6.0
|
|||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to Average Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
59.9
|
11.0
|
21.9
|
4.0
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
State
Bank
|
45.5
|
8.4
|
21.8
|
4.0
|
27.3
|
5.0
|
|||||||||||||
As
of December 31, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
62.0
|
16.0
|
%
|
$
|
30.9
|
8.0
|
%
|
$
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
State
Bank
|
46.8
|
12.4
|
30.2
|
8.0
|
37.8
|
10.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
57.6
|
14.9
|
15.5
|
4.0
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
State
Bank
|
43.0
|
11.4
|
15.1
|
4.0
|
22.7
|
6.0
|
|||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to Average Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
57.6
|
10.5
|
22.0
|
4.0
|
-
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
State
Bank
|
43.0
|
7.8
|
22.0
|
4.0
|
27.5
|
5.0
|
Dividends
paid by Rurban are mainly provided for by dividends from its subsidiaries.
However, certain restrictions exist regarding the ability of State Bank to
transfer funds to Rurban in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.
Regulatory approval is required in order to pay dividends in excess of State
Bank’s earnings retained for the current year plus retained net profits since
January 1, 2005.
F30
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
As
of
December 31, 2007, approximately $5.1 million was available for distribution
to
Rurban as dividends without prior regulatory approval. The 2006 table was
consolidated for The State Bank and Trust Company and The Exchange
Bank.
Note
16: Related
Party Transactions
Certain
directors, executive officers and principal shareholders of the Company,
including associates of such persons, are loan customers. A summary of the
related party loan activity, for loans aggregating $60,000 or more to any one
related party, follows for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006:
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Balance,
January 1
|
$
|
3,454,000
|
$
|
2,394,000
|
|||
New
Loans
|
3,751,000
|
5,936,000
|
|||||
Repayments
|
(3,009,000
|
)
|
(4,997,000
|
)
|
|||
Other
changes
|
1,805,000
|
121,000
|
|||||
Balance,
December 31
|
$
|
6,001,000
|
$
|
3,454,000
|
In
management’s opinion, such loans and other extensions of credit and deposits
were made in the ordinary course of business and were made on substantially
the
same terms (including interest rates and collateral) as those prevailing at
the
time for comparable transactions with other persons. Further, in management’s
opinion, these loans did not involve more than normal risk of collectibility
or
present other unfavorable features.
Deposits
from related parties held at December 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled $977,000
and $1,840,000, respectively.
Note
17: Employee
Benefits
The
Company has retirement savings 401(k) plans covering substantially all
employees. Employees contributing up to 6% of their compensation receive a
Company match of 50% of the employee’s contribution. Employee contributions are
vested immediately and the Company’s matching contributions are fully vested
after three years of employment. Employer contributions charged to expense
for
2007, 2006 and 2005 were $272,750, $307,000, and $257,600
respectively.
F31
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Also,
the
Company has deferred compensation agreements with certain active and retired
officers. The agreements provide monthly payments for up to 15 years that equal
15% to 25% of average compensation prior to retirement or death. The charge
to
expense for the current agreements was $166,000, $199,000, and $240,000 for
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In 2006 and 2005, previously accrued benefits
under the agreements in the amount of $166,000 and $346,000, respectively,
were
reversed and credited to expense as a result of termination or resignation
of
certain officers. Such charges reflect the straight-line accrual over the period
until full eligibility of the present value of benefits due each participant
on
the full eligibility date, using a 6% discount factor.
Life
insurance plans are provided for certain executive officers on a split-dollar
basis. The Company is the owner of the split-dollar policies. The officers
are
entitled to a sum equal to two times either the employee’s annual salary at
death, if actively employed, or final annual salary, if retired, less $50,000,
not to exceed the employee’s portion of the death benefit. The Company is
entitled to the portion of the death proceeds which equates to the cash
surrender value less any loans on the policy and unpaid interest or cash
withdrawals previously incurred by the Company. The employees have the right
to
designate a beneficiary(s) to receive their share of the proceeds payable upon
death. The cash surrender value of these life insurance policies and life
insurance policies related to the Company’s supplemental retirement plan totaled
approximately $2,011,589 at December 31, 2007, and $1,955,902 at December 31,
2006.
Additional
life insurance is provided to certain officers through a bank-owned life
insurance policy (“BOLI”). By way of a separate split-dollar agreement, the
policy interests are divided between the bank and the insured’s beneficiary. The
bank owns the policy cash value and a portion of the policy net death benefit,
over and above the cash value assigned to the insured’s beneficiary. During 2007
the bank elected to add $1 million in additional BOLI on two key executive
officers. The cash surrender value of all life insurance policies totaled
approximately $10,148,992 at December 31, 2007, and $8,815,940 at December
31,
2006.
The
Company has a noncontributory employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) covering
substantially all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. Voluntary
contributions are made by the Company to the plan. Each eligible employee is
vested based upon years of service, including prior years of service. The
Company’s contributions to the account of each employee become fully vested
after three years of service.
Compensation
expense is recorded equal to the fair market value of the stock when
contributions, which are determined annually by the Board of Directors of the
Company, are made to the ESOP. Allocated shares in the ESOP for each of the
three years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, were 462,850, 497,955,
and
556,607, respectively.
Dividends
on allocated shares are recorded as dividends and charged to retained earnings.
Compensation expense is recorded equal to the fair market value of the stock
when contributions, which are determined annually by the Board of Directors
of
the Company, are made to the ESOP.
ESOP
expense for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $565,644,
$531,000, and $445,000, respectively.
F32
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
18: Stock
Option Plan
In
March,
2007, the Company’s single share-based compensation plan expired. The
compensation cost that has been charged against income for that plan was
$64,406, $24,055, and $0 for 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The total
income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share-based
compensation arrangements was $21,898, $8,179, and $0 for 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The
Company’s Stock Option Plan (the Plan), which is shareholder approved, permits
the grant of share options to its employees for up to 441,000 shares of common
stock. The Plan expired in March, 2007. The Company believes that such awards
better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders.
Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market
price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant; those option awards generally
vest based on 5 years of continuous service and have 10-year contractual terms.
The
fair
value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a binomial
option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table.
Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock and
other factors. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise
and
employee termination within the valuation model; separate groups of employees
that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for
valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted is derived from the
output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time that
options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods
within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve in effect at the time of grant.
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
27.0
|
%
|
18.5
|
%
|
23.7-27.7
|
%
|
||||
Weighted-average
volatility
|
27.01
|
%
|
18.5
|
%
|
26.7
|
%
|
||||
Expected
dividends
|
2.0
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
0-1.5
|
%
|
||||
Expected
term (in years)
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|||||||
Risk-free
rate
|
4.72
|
%
|
2.3
|
%
|
4.5-4.5
|
%
|
F33
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
A
summary
of option activity under the Plan as of December 31, 2007 and changes during
the
year then ended, is presented below:
2007
|
|||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
beginning of year
|
325,274
|
$
|
13.41
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
114,640
|
11.48
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
|
26,861
|
13.53
|
|||||||||||
Expired
|
71,074
|
12.87
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding,
end of year
|
341,979
|
$
|
12.86
|
6.63
|
$
|
179,217
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Exercisable,
end of year
|
212,089
|
$
|
13.67
|
5.18
|
$
|
51,325
|
The
weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years
2007,
2006 and 2005 was $3.02, $2.34 and $4.32, respectively. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005, was $0, $0 and $2,017, respectively.
As
of
December 31, 2007, there was $323,425 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the
plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of
2.08 years
F34
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
19: Earnings
Per Share
Earnings
per share (EPS) is computed as follows:
Year
Ended December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||
Income
|
Weighted-
Average
Shares
|
Per
Share
Amount
|
||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
||||||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
3,256,635
|
5,010,987
|
$
|
0.65
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
4,324
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders and assumed conversions
|
$
|
3,256,635
|
5,015,311
|
$
|
0.65
|
Options
to purchase 176,278 common shares at $13.30 to $16.78 per share were outstanding
at December 31, 2007, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS
because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of
the common shares.
Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
||||||||||
Income
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Shares
|
|
Per
Share
Amount
|
||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
||||||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
2,760,242
|
5,027,433
|
$
|
0.55
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
1,442
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders and assumed conversions
|
$
|
2,760,242
|
5,028,875
|
$
|
0.55
|
F35
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Options
to purchase 285,838 common shares at $11.72 to $16.78 per share were outstanding
at December 31, 2006, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS
because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of
the common shares.
Year
Ended December 31, 2005
|
||||||||||
Income
|
Weighted-
Average
Shares
|
Per
Share
Amount
|
||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
||||||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
673,091
|
4,571,348
|
$
|
0.15
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
13,058
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
||||||||||
Income
available to common shareholders and assumed conversions
|
$
|
673,091
|
4,584,406
|
$
|
0.15
|
Options
to purchase 215,066 common shares at $13.30 to $16.78 per share were outstanding
at December 31, 2005, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS
because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of
the common shares.
F36
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
20: Leases
The
Company’s subsidiaries, The State Bank and Trust Company, RDSI, and DCM, have
several noncancellable operating leases for business use that expire over the
next ten years. These leases generally contain renewal options for periods
of
five years and require the lessee to pay all executory costs such as taxes,
maintenance and insurance. Aggregate rental expense for these leases was
$535,361, $307,393, and $249,504 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and
2005, respectively.
Future
minimum lease payments under operating leases are:
2008
|
$
|
411,551
|
||
2009
|
367,947
|
|||
2010
|
307,200
|
|||
2011
|
303,083
|
|||
2012
|
210,200
|
|||
Thereafter
|
833,412
|
|||
Total
minimum lease payments
|
$
|
2,433,393
|
F37
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
21: Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The
following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s financial
instruments. The fair values of certain of these instruments were calculated
by
discounting expected cash flows, which involves significant judgments by
management and uncertainties. Fair value is the estimated amount at which
financial assets or liabilities could be exchanged in a current transaction
between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Because
no
market exists for certain of these financial instruments and because management
does not intend to sell these financial instruments, the Company does not know
whether the fair values shown below represent values at which the respective
financial instruments could be sold individually or in the
aggregate
December
31, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
||||||||||||
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||
Financial
assets
|
|||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
17,183,627
|
$
|
17,184,000
|
$
|
22,481,791
|
$
|
22,482,000
|
|||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
-
|
-
|
150,000
|
150,000
|
|||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
92,661,386
|
92,661,000
|
102,462,075
|
102,462,000
|
|||||||||
Loans
including loans held for sale, net
|
386,928,047
|
388,253,000
|
366,774,532
|
364,490,000
|
|||||||||
Stock
in FRB and FHLB
|
4,021,200
|
4,021,000
|
3,993,450
|
3,993,000
|
|||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
3,008,968
|
3,009,000
|
3,129,774
|
3,130,000
|
|||||||||
Financial
liabilities
|
|||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$
|
406,031,182
|
$
|
406,240,000
|
$
|
414,555,445
|
$
|
413,990,000
|
|||||
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
|
43,006,438
|
43,110,000
|
32,270,900
|
31,674,000
|
|||||||||
Note
payable
|
922,457
|
922,000
|
2,589,207
|
2,589,000
|
|||||||||
FHLB
advances
|
24,000,000
|
24,823,000
|
21,000,000
|
20,982,000
|
|||||||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
20,620,000
|
20,503,000
|
20,620,000
|
21,257,000
|
|||||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
2,532,914
|
2,533,000
|
2,224,413
|
2,224,000
|
For
purposes of the above disclosures of estimated fair value, the following
assumptions were used as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. The estimated fair
value for cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing deposits, FRB and FHLB
stock, accrued interest receivable, demand deposits, savings accounts, interest
checking accounts, certain money market deposits, short-term borrowings and
interest payable is considered to approximate cost. The estimated fair value
for
securities is based on quoted market values for the individual securities or
for
equivalent securities. The estimated fair value for loans receivable, including
loans held for sale, net, is based on estimates of the rate State Bank would
charge for similar loans at December 31, 2007 and 2006 applied for the time
period until the loans are assumed to re-price or be paid.
F38
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
The
estimated fair value for fixed-maturity time deposits as well as borrowings
is
based on estimates of the rate State Bank paid on such liabilities at December
31, 2007 and 2006, applied for the time period until maturity. The fair value
of
commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar
agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the
present creditworthiness of the counterparties. The estimated fair value for
other financial instruments and off-balance sheet loan commitments approximate
cost at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and are not considered significant to this
presentation.
F39
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
22: Commitments
and Credit Risk
State
Bank grants commercial, agribusiness, consumer and residential loans to
customers. Although State Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, agricultural
loans comprised approximately 11% and 12% of the portfolio as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Commitments
to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment
of a fee. Since a portion of the commitments may expire without being drawn
upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on
management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies, but may
include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment,
commercial real estate and residential real estate.
Letters
of credit are conditional commitments issued by State Bank to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily
issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including
commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions. The credit risk
involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved
in extending loans to customers.
Lines
of
credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of
any condition established in the contract. Lines of credit generally have fixed
expiration dates. Since a portion of the line may expire without being drawn
upon, the total unused lines do not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on
management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may
include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment,
commercial real estate and residential real estate. Management uses the same
credit policies in granting lines of credit as it does for on-balance-sheet
instruments..
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Loan
commitments and unused lines of credit
|
$
|
76,445,000
|
$
|
71,545,000
|
|||
Standby
letters of credit
|
-
|
582,000
|
|||||
Commercial
letters of credit
|
377,000
|
-
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
76,822,000
|
$
|
72,127,000
|
And
from
time to time certain due from bank accounts are in excess of federally insured
limits
F40
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
There
are
various contingent liabilities that are not reflected in the consolidated
financial statements, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal
counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have
a
material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
Salary
continuation agreements with certain executive officers contain provisions
regarding certain events leading to separation from the Company, before the
executive officer’s normal retirement date, which could result in cash payments
in excess of amounts accrued.
Note
23: Future
Change in Accounting Principle
In
March 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 156, Accounting
for Servicing of Financial Assets: an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140
(FAS
140
and FAS 156). FAS 140 establishes, among other things, the accounting for all
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This Statement
amends FAS 140 to require that all separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable.
This
Statement permits, but does not require, the subsequent measurement of
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value.
Under this Statement, an entity can elect subsequent fair value measurement
to
account for its separately recognized servicing assets and servicing
liabilities. Adoption of this Statement is required as of the beginning of
the
first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. On January 1, 2007
the Company adopted SFAS No. 156. The adoption of SFAS No. 156 did not have
a
material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the
Company.
The
Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
and multiple-state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state and local examinations by tax authorities for
years before 2004.
The
Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No.48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on January 1, 2007. FIN
48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. As a result of the implementation of FIN
48,
the Company did not become aware of any liability for uncertain tax positions
that it believes should be recognized in the financial statements.
In
February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits us to choose to measure certain
financial assets and liabilities at fair value that are not currently required
to be measured at fair value (i.e. the Fair Value Option). Election of the
Fair
Value Option is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable.
At
the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on financial assets and
liabilities for which the Fair Value Option has been elected would be reported
as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings. If we elect the
Fair
Value Option for certain financial assets and liabilities, we will report
unrealized gains and losses due to changes in their fair value in earnings
at
each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of January 1,
2008.
Management has evaluated the potential impact of adopting SFAS No. 159 on our
consolidated financial statements and found it will have no material impact
to
the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
F41
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157 enhances existing
guidance for measuring assets and liabilities using fair value. Prior to the
issuance of FAS 157, guidance for applying fair value was incorporated in
several accounting pronouncements. FAS 157 provides a single definition of
fair
value, together with a framework for measuring it, and requires additional
disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities. FAS
157 also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an
entity-specific measurement, and sets out a fair value hierarchy with the
highest priority being quoted prices in active markets. Under FAS 157, fair
value measurements are disclosed by level within that hierarchy. While FAS
157
does not add any new fair value measurements, it does change current practice.
Changes to practice include: (1) a requirement for an entity to include its
own credit standing in the measurement of its liabilities; (2) a
modification of the transaction price presumption; (3) a prohibition on the
use of block discounts when valuing large blocks of securities for
broker-dealers and investment companies; and (4) a requirement to adjust
the value of restricted stock for the effect of the restriction even if the
restriction lapses within one year. FAS 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and
interim periods within those fiscal years.
At
its
September 2006 meeting, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final
consensus on Issue No. 06-4, Accounting
for Deferred
Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar
Life
Insurance Arrangements.
The
consensus stipulates that an agreement by an employer to share a portion of
the
proceeds of a life insurance policy with an employee during the postretirement
period is a postretirement benefit arrangement required to be accounted for
under Statement No. 106 (“SFAS No. 106”) or Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 12, Omnibus Opinion-1967. The consensus concludes that the purchase
of a split-dollar life insurance policy does not constitute a settlement under
SFAS No. 106 and, therefore, a liability for the postretirement obligation
must
be recognized under SFAS No. 106 if the benefit is offered under an arrangement
that constitutes a plan or under APB No. 12 if it is not part of a plan. Issue
06-04 is effective for annual or interim reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2007. The Company has endorsement split-dollar life insurance
policies. A liability is expected to be recorded in the first quarter of 2008,
however; there will be no material impact to the financial position and results
of operations as a result of the implementation of EITF 06-04.
In
September 2006, the FASB ratified a consensus opinion by the EITF on EITF Issue
06-5, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance-Determining the Amount That
Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4
(Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance). The issue requires policy holders
to consider other amounts included in the contractual terms of an insurance
policy, in addition to cash surrender value, for purposes of determining the
amount that could be realized under the terms of the insurance contract. If
it
is probable that contractual terms would limit the amount that could be realized
under the insurance contract, those contractual limitations should be considered
when determining the realizable amounts. The amount that could be realized
under
the insurance contract should be determined on an individual policy (or
certificate) level and should include any amount realized on the assumed
surrender of the last individual policy or certificate in a group policy.
F42
The
Company holds several life insurance policies, however, the policies do not
contain any provisions that would restrict or reduce the cash surrender value
of
the policies. The consensus in EITF Issue 06-5 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The application of this guidance did not
have
a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of
operations.
At
its
March 2007 meeting, the EITF reached a final consensus on Issue No. 06-10,
Accounting
for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements.
A
consensus was reached that an employer should recognize a liability for the
postretirement benefit related to a collateral assignment split-dollar life
insurance arrangement in accordance with either FASB Statement No. 106 or APB
Opinion No. 12, as appropriate, if the employer has agreed to maintain a life
insurance policy during the employee’s retirement or provide the employee with a
death benefit based on the substantive agreement with the employee. A consensus
also was reached that an employer should recognize and measure an asset based
on
the nature and substance of the collateral assignment split-dollar life
insurance arrangement. The consensuses are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2007, including interim periods within those fiscal years,
with early application permitted. The Company has endorsement split-dollar
life
insurance policies. The implementation of EITF 06-10 will not have a material
impact on the financial position and results of operations of the
Company.
F43
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note
24: Condensed
Financial Information (Parent Company Only)
Presented
below is condensed financial information as to financial position, results
of
operations and cash flows of the Company:
Condensed
Balance Sheets
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
5,089,342
|
$
|
7,102,859
|
|||
Investment
in common stock of banking subsidiaries
|
58,521,717
|
56,448,620
|
|||||
Investment
in nonbanking subsidiaries
|
16,004,390
|
13,846,560
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
1,972,079
|
2,103,164
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
81,587,528
|
$
|
79,501,203
|
|||
Liabilities
|
|||||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
$
|
20,000,000
|
$
|
20,000,000
|
|||
Borrowings
from non-banking subsidiaries
|
620,000
|
620,000
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
1,642,294
|
1,926,050
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
22,262,294
|
22,546,050
|
|||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
59,325,234
|
56,955,153
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
81,587,528
|
$
|
79,501,203
|
F44
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Condensed
Statements of Income
2007
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||
Income
|
||||||||||
Interest
Income
|
$
|
4,324
|
$
|
3,099
|
$
|
2,126
|
||||
Dividends
from subsidiaries
|
||||||||||
Banking
Subsidiaries
|
1,200,000
|
6,400,000
|
7,153,134
|
|||||||
Nonbanking
subsidiaries
|
300,000
|
-
|
1,513,000
|
|||||||
Total
|
1,500,000
|
6,400,000
|
8,666,134
|
|||||||
Other
income
|
1,353,760
|
1,491,158
|
1,091,721
|
|||||||
Total
income
|
2,858,084
|
7,894,257
|
9,759,981
|
|||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
1,808,520
|
1,787,023
|
1,364,168
|
|||||||
Other
expense
|
2,831,749
|
2,683,109
|
2,514,712
|
|||||||
Total
expenses
|
4,640,269
|
4,470,132
|
3,878,880
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||
Income
before income tax and equity in undistributed income of
subsidiaries
|
(1,782,185
|
)
|
3,424,125
|
5,881,101
|
||||||
Income
tax
|
(1,115,943
|
)
|
(1,011,797
|
)
|
(946,911
|
)
|
||||
|
||||||||||
Income
before equity in undistributed income of
subsidiaries
|
(666,242
|
)
|
4,435,922
|
6,828,012
|
||||||
|
||||||||||
Equity
in undistributed (excess distributed) income
of subsidiaries
|
||||||||||
Banking
subsidiaries
|
1,710,405
|
(3,797,432
|
)
|
(6,383,468
|
)
|
|||||
Nonbanking
subsidiaries
|
2,212,472
|
2,121,752
|
228,547
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||
Total
|
3,922,877
|
(1,675,680
|
)
|
(6,154,921
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
3,256,635
|
$
|
2,760,242
|
$
|
673,091
|
F45
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|||||
Operating
Activities
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
3,256,635
|
$
|
2,760,242
|
$
|
673,091
|
||||
Items
not requiring (providing) cash
|
||||||||||
Equity
in (undistributed) excess distributed net income of
subsidiaries
|
(3,268,799
|
)
|
2,204,917
|
6,192,398
|
||||||
Expense
of stock option plan
|
64,406
|
24,055
|
-
|
|||||||
Other
assets
|
131,085
|
(49,256
|
)
|
(15,230
|
)
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
(283,757
|
)
|
(6,032,292
|
)
|
629,444
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(100,430
|
)
|
(1,092,334
|
)
|
7,479,703
|
|||||
Investing
Activities
|
||||||||||
Investment
in RST II
|
-
|
-
|
(310,000
|
)
|
||||||
Investment
in RDSI
|
-
|
(5,500,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Investment
in ROC
|
-
|
(600,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Repayment
of policy loan
|
-
|
-
|
(1,014,523
|
)
|
||||||
Proceeds
from liabilities assumed in business acquisition
|
-
|
-
|
3,029
|
|||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
-
|
(6,100,000
|
)
|
(1,321,494
|
)
|
|||||
Financing
Activities
|
||||||||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(1,302,827
|
)
|
(1,055,761
|
)
|
(914,010
|
)
|
||||
Payment
of registration costs and other acquisition costs
|
-
|
-
|
(326,615
|
)
|
||||||
Repayment
of note payable
|
-
|
(240,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Proceeds
from subordinated debenture
|
-
|
-
|
10,310,000
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
-
|
-
|
36,595
|
|||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(610,260
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(1,913,087
|
)
|
(1,295,761
|
)
|
9,105,970
|
|||||
Net
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
(2,013,517
|
)
|
(8,488,095
|
)
|
15,264,179
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year
|
7,102,859
|
15,590,954
|
326,775
|
|||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at End of Year
|
$
|
5,089,342
|
$
|
7,102,859
|
$
|
15,590,954
|
||||
Supplemental
cash flow information
|
||||||||||
Common
stock and payable issued for net assets in acquisition
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
11,826,130
|
F46
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
Note 25: |
Segment
Information
|
The
reportable segments are determined by the products and services offered,
primarily distinguished between banking and data processing operations. Loans,
investments, deposits and financial services provide the revenues in the
banking
segment and include the accounts of State Bank, RFCBC and RFS, which provides
trust and financial services to customers nationwide.
Service
fees provide the revenues in the data processing operation and include the
accounts of RDSI and DCM. Other segments include the accounts of the Company,
Rurban Financial Corp., which provides management services to its subsidiaries.
The
accounting policies used are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies. Segment performance is evaluated using net
interest income, other revenue, operating expense and net income. Goodwill
is
allocated. Income taxes and indirect expenses are allocated on revenue.
Transactions among segments are made at fair value. The Company allocates
certain expenses to other segments. Information reported internally for
performance assessment follows. Reclassifications have been made to the 2005
and
2006 tables to conform to the 2007 table, which include the consolidation
of The
State Bank and Trust Company, RFCBC and RFS into Banking, RDSI and DCM into
Data
Processing, and Rurban Financial Corp. into Other.
2007
|
Banking
|
Data
Processing |
Other
|
Total
Segments |
Intersegment
Elimination |
Consolidated
Totals |
|||||||||||||
Income
Statement Information:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income (expense)
|
$
|
16,859,523
|
$
|
(268,014
|
)
|
$
|
(1,804,197
|
)
|
$
|
14,787,312
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
14,787,312
|
|||||
Other
revenue-external customers
|
7,434,979
|
19,347,947
|
78,473
|
26,861,399
|
—
|
26,861,399
|
|||||||||||||
Other
revenue-other segments
|
551,681
|
1,539,854
|
1,314,861
|
3,406,396
|
(3,406,396
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Net
interest income and other revenue
|
24,846,183
|
20,619,787
|
(410,863
|
)
|
45,055,107
|
(3,406,396
|
)
|
41,648,711
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
20,338,289
|
16,872,968
|
2,831,749
|
40,043,006
|
(3,406,396
|
)
|
36,636,610
|
||||||||||||
Significant
noncash items:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
999,594
|
2,837,758
|
132,570
|
3,969,922
|
—
|
3,969,922
|
|||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
521,306
|
—
|
—
|
521,306
|
—
|
521,306
|
|||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
1,076,183
|
1,273,919
|
(1,115,942
|
)
|
1,234,160
|
—
|
1,234,160
|
||||||||||||
Segment
profit
|
$
|
2,910,405
|
$
|
2,472,900
|
$
|
(2,126,670
|
)
|
$
|
3,256,635
|
—
|
$
|
3,256,635
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
sheet information:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
541,717,871
|
$
|
20,419,865
|
$
|
81,439,870
|
$
|
643,577,606
|
$
|
(82,363,608
|
)
|
$
|
561,213,998
|
||||||
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
11,691,382
|
7,384,464
|
—
|
19,075,846
|
—
|
19,075,846
|
|||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment expenditures
|
$
|
3,599,534
|
$
|
2,303,330
|
$
|
137,071
|
$
|
6,039,935
|
—
|
$
|
6,039,935
|
F47
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
2006
|
Banking
|
Data
Processing |
Other
|
Total
Segments |
Intersegment
Elimination |
Consolidated
Totals |
|||||||||||||
Income
Statement Information:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income (expense)
|
$
|
17,082,702
|
$
|
(264,336
|
)
|
$
|
(1,783,924
|
)
|
$
|
15,034,442
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
15,034,442
|
|||||
Other
revenue-external customers
|
8,211,356
|
15,011,143
|
532,822
|
23,755,321
|
—
|
23,755,321
|
|||||||||||||
Other
revenue-other segments
|
3,316,764
|
1,551,655
|
997,260
|
5,865,679
|
(5,865,679
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Net
interest income and other revenue
|
28,610,822
|
16,298,462
|
(253,842
|
)
|
44,655,442
|
(5,865,679
|
)
|
38,789,763
|
|||||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
24,943,476
|
13,142,661
|
2,683,109
|
40,769,246
|
(5,865,679
|
)
|
34,903,567
|
||||||||||||
Significant
noncash items:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
933,518
|
2,505,065
|
106,382
|
3,544,965
|
—
|
3,544,965
|
|||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
177,838
|
—
|
—
|
177,838
|
—
|
177,838
|
|||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
886,940
|
1,072,973
|
(1,011,797
|
)
|
948,116
|
—
|
948,116
|
||||||||||||
Segment
profit
|
$
|
2,602,568
|
$
|
2,082,828
|
$
|
(1,925,154
|
)
|
$
|
2,760,242
|
—
|
$
|
2,760,242
|
|||||||
Balance
sheet information:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
539,310,887
|
$
|
20,306,144
|
$
|
79,188,059
|
$
|
638,805,090
|
$
|
(82,797,837
|
)
|
$
|
556,007,253
|
||||||
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
12,154,202
|
7,378,838
|
—
|
19,533,040
|
—
|
19,533,040
|
|||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment expenditures
|
$
|
3,079,231
|
$
|
5,820,264
|
$
|
142,769
|
$
|
9,042,264
|
—
|
$
|
9,042,264
|
||||||||
2005
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
Data
Processing |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
Segments |
|
|
Intersegment
Elimination |
|
|
Consolidated
Totals |
|
Income
Statement Information:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income (expense)
|
$
|
13,650,366
|
$
|
(234,741
|
)
|
$
|
(1,362,041
|
)
|
$
|
12,053,584
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
12,053,584
|
|||||
Other
revenue-external customers
|
5,556,794
|
12,708,407
|
72,901
|
18,338,102
|
—
|
18,338,102
|
|||||||||||||
Other
revenue-other segments
|
910,827
|
1,354,001
|
870,005
|
3,134,833
|
(3,134,833
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Net
interest income and other revenue
|
20,117,987
|
13,827,667
|
(419,135
|
)
|
33,526,519
|
(3,134,833
|
)
|
30,391,686
|
|||||||||||
Non-interest
expense
|
18,682,524
|
11,164,340
|
2,341,809
|
32,188,673
|
(3,134,833
|
)
|
29,053,840
|
||||||||||||
Significant
noncash items:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
731,976
|
2,315,621
|
61,096
|
3,108,693
|
—
|
3,108,693
|
|||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
583,402
|
—
|
—
|
583,402
|
—
|
583,402
|
|||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
82,395
|
945,869
|
(946,911
|
)
|
81,353
|
—
|
81,353
|
||||||||||||
Segment
profit
|
$
|
769,666
|
$
|
1,717,458
|
$
|
(1,814,033
|
)
|
$
|
673,091
|
—
|
$
|
673,091
|
|||||||
Balance
sheet information:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
521,117,797
|
$
|
10,204,699
|
$
|
82,155,101
|
$
|
613,477,597
|
$
|
(82,935,321
|
)
|
$
|
530,542,276
|
||||||
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
12,659,706
|
—
|
—
|
12,659,706
|
—
|
12,659,706
|
|||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment expenditures
|
$
|
688,124
|
$
|
2,252,592
|
$
|
157,818
|
$
|
3,098,534
|
—
|
$
|
3,098,534
|
F48
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 26: |
Quarterly
Financial Information
(Unaudited)
|
The
following tables summarize selected quarterly results of operations for 2007
and
2006.
December
31, 2007
|
March
|
|
June
|
|
September
|
|
December
|
||||||
Interest
income
|
$
|
8,016,828
|
$
|
8,234,039
|
$
|
8,350,340
|
$
|
8,408,422
|
|||||
Interest
expense
|
4,423,552
|
4,483,901
|
4,689,389
|
4,625,477
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
3,593,276
|
3,750,158
|
3,660,591
|
3,783,287
|
|||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
92,640
|
145,594
|
140,409
|
142,663
|
|||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
6,738,742
|
6,507,700
|
6,782,842
|
6,832,115
|
|||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
9,300,253
|
9,065,370
|
9,106,400
|
9,164,587
|
|||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
236,672
|
261,829
|
333,384
|
402,275
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
702,453
|
785,045
|
863,601
|
905,536
|
|||||||||
Earnings
per share
|
|||||||||||||
Basis
|
0.14
|
0.16
|
0.17
|
0.18
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
0.14
|
0.16
|
0.17
|
0.18
|
|||||||||
Dividends
per share
|
0.06
|
0.06
|
0.07
|
0.07
|
|||||||||
December
31, 2006
|
March
|
|
|
June
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
December
|
|||
Interest
income
|
$
|
7,047,089
|
$
|
7,542,688
|
$
|
8,157,473
|
$
|
8,223,168
|
|||||
Interest
expense
|
3,183,033
|
3,712,225
|
4,401,939
|
4,638,779
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
3,864,056
|
3,830,463
|
3,755,534
|
3,584,389
|
|||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
246,000
|
56,321
|
35,000
|
(159,483
|
)
|
||||||||
Noninterest
income
|
5,008,299
|
5,268,252
|
5,902,756
|
7,576,014
|
|||||||||
Noninterest
expense
|
7,950,031
|
8,079,875
|
8,514,656
|
10,359,005
|
|||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
153,779
|
248,996
|
294,893
|
250,448
|
|||||||||
Net
income
|
522,545
|
713,523
|
813,741
|
710,433
|
|||||||||
Earnings
per share
|
|||||||||||||
Basis
|
0.10
|
0.14
|
0.16
|
0.14
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
0.10
|
0.14
|
0.16
|
0.14
|
|||||||||
Dividends
per share
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
0.06
|
F49
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
During
the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company restructured its balance sheet and
recorded losses of $718,000, recorded losses of $283,000 associated with
the
merger, recorded income of $890,000 on the recovery of bond losses and sold
the
credit card portfolio for a gain of $740,000. The merger charges relate to
the
Company’s plan at the time to merge its Banking Group, consisting of The State
Bank and Trust Company, The Exchange Bank, Rurban Operations Company and
Reliance Financials Services, N.A., into The State Bank and Trust Company
charter. The Company completed the merger on March 24, 2007.
F50
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 27: |
BUSINESS
ACQUISITIONS
|
Diverse
Computer Marketers
On
September 2, 2006, Rurbanc Data Services, Inc (“RDSI”), the bank data processing
subsidiary of Rurban Financial Corp. (“Rurban”), completed its acquisition of
Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc., a Michigan corporation, and a related Indiana
corporation, DCM Indiana, Inc. Rurban subsequently merged DCM Indiana, Inc.
into
Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc. (“DCM”). DCM now operates as a separate
subsidiary of RDSI. As a result of this acquisition, the Company will have
an
opportunity to grow its item processing business.
Under
the
terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, RDSI acquired all of the outstanding
stock of the DCM Companies from their shareholders for an aggregate purchase
price of $5.0 million. An additional $250,000 was payable to the
shareholders contingent upon the continuation of profitable growth over the
first year of combined operations. The final payment of $266,559 was made
in
2007. The entire purchase price was paid in cash. The results of DCM’s
operations have been included in Rurban’s consolidated statement of income from
the date of acquisition.
The
following tables summarize the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired
and the computation of the purchase price and goodwill related to the
acquisitions.
Cash
|
$
|
118,137
|
||
Accounts
receivable
|
419,151
|
|||
Premises
and equipment
|
207,644
|
|||
Goodwill
|
4,795,144
|
|||
Other
intangibles
|
2,652,000
|
|||
Other
assets
|
158,241
|
|||
Total
Assets
|
8,350,317
|
|||
Liabilities:
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
1,188,289
|
|||
Borrowings
|
1,284,427
|
|||
Other
liabilities
|
886,510
|
|||
Total
Liabilities
|
3,359,226
|
|||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
4,991,091
|
F51
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2007 and 2006
The
signficant intangible assets acquired include the customer related intangible
of
$2,389,000, the Trademark of $180,000 and the non-compete agreements of $83,000,
which have useful lives of 180, 36 and 36 months, respectively, and will
be
amortized using the straight-line method. The $4.8 million of goodwill was
assigned entirely to the data processing unit and is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes. This analysis is based upon an initial third
party
opinion and is subject to change for up to twelve months.
Under
terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, and immediately prior to the closing,
the
disaster recovery services portion of the DCM business was spun-off. As DCM
records did not include separate financial information for the disaster recovery
services, historical financial information for the purchased portion of the
business is not available. Therefore, pro forma information that discloses
the
results of operations as though the business combination had been completed
at
the beginning of the period is not included.
F52
RURBAN
FINANCIAL CORP.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
INDEX
TO
EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Location
|
||
2.1
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2006, by and among Rurbanc
Data
Services, Inc., Lance Thompson and Robert Church
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed May 24, 2006 (File No. 0-13507).
|
||
3.1
|
Amended
Articles of Registrant, as amended
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a)(i) to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1989 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
3.2
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Amended Articles of Rurban Financial
Corp.
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
3.3
|
Certificate
of Amendment to the Amended Articles of Rurban Financial
Corp.
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
3.4
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Rurban Financial Corp. [Note:
filed for purposes of SEC reporting compliance only - this document
has
not been filed with the Ohio Secretary of State.]
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3(d) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
3.5
|
Amended
and Restated Regulations of Rurban Financial Corp.
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
4.1
|
Indenture,
dated as of September 15, 2005, by and between Rurban Financial
Corp. and
Wilmington Trust Company, as Debenture Trustee, relating to Floating
Rate
Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (File
No.
0-13507).
|
||
4.2
|
Amended
and Restated Declaration of Trust of Rurban Statutory Trust II,
dated as
of September 15, 2005
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (File
No.
0-13507).
|
60.
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Location
|
||
4.3
|
Guarantee
Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2005, by and between Rurban
Financial
Corp. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Guarantee Trustee
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (File
No.
0-13507).
|
||
4.4
|
Agreement
to furnish instruments and agreements defining rights of holders
of
long-term debt
|
Filed
herewith.
|
||
10.1*
|
Rurban
Financial Corp. Stock Option Plan
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(u) to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 (File
No. 0-13507).
|
||
10.2*
|
Rurban
Financial Corp. Plan to Allow Directors to Elect to Defer
Compensation
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(v) to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 (File
No. 0-13507).
|
||
10.3*
|
Form
of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with Five-Year Vesting
under
Rurban Financial Corp. Stock Option Plan
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.4*
|
Form
of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with Vesting After One
Year of
Employment under Rurban Financial Corp. Stock Option Plan
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed March 21, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).
|
||
10.5*
|
Form
of Incentive Stock Option Agreement with Five-Year Vesting under
Rurban
Financial Corp. Stock Option Plan
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(x) to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.6*
|
Form
of Incentive Stock Option Agreement with Vesting After One Year
of
Employment under Rurban Financial Corp. Stock Option Plan
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed March 21, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).
|
||
10.7*
|
Form
of Stock Appreciation Rights under Rurban Financial Corp. Stock
Option
Plan
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed March 21, 2005 (File No.
0-13507).
|
61.
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Location
|
||
10.8*
|
Employees’
Stock Ownership and Savings Plan of Rurban Financial Corp.
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(y) to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.9*
|
Rurban
Financial Corp. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(z) to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File
No. 0-13507).
|
||
10.10*
|
Employment
Agreement, executed March 6, 2006 and effective as of March 1,
2006, by
and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Kenneth A. Joyce
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.11*
|
First
Amendment to Employment Agreement, executed May 19, 2006 and effective
as
of March 1, 2006, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Kenneth
A.
Joyce
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.12*
|
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan Agreement, executed March 13, 2006 and
effective
as of March 1, 2006, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and
Kenneth A.
Joyce
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.13*
|
Schedule
identifying other substantially identical Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan Agreements with executive officers of Rurban Financial
Corp. and its subsidiaries
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.14*
|
First
Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement,
executed
May 16, 2006 and effective as of March 1, 2006, by and between
Rurban
Financial Corp. and Kenneth A. Joyce
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.15*
|
Schedule
identifying other substantially identical First Amendments to Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan Agreements with executive officers of
Rurban
Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (File No.
0-13507).
|
62.
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Location
|
||
10.16*
|
Change
in Control Agreement, executed March 9, 2006 and effective as of
March 1,
2006, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Duane L.
Sinn
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.17*
|
Schedule
identifying other substantially identical Change in Control Agreements
with executive officers of Rurban Financial Corp. and its
subsidiaries
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.18*
|
First
Amendment to Change in Control Agreement, executed May 17, 2006
and
effective as of March 1, 2006, by and between Rurban Financial
Corp. and
Duane L. Sinn
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.19*
|
Schedule
identifying other substantially identical First Amendments to Change
in
Control Agreements with executive officers of Rurban Financial
Corp. and
its subsidiaries
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (File No.
0-13507).
|
||
10.20*
|
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of January 1, 2007
|
Incorprated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (File No.
0-13507)
|
||
11
|
Statement
re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
|
Included
in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of
Registrant in the financial statements portion of this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
|
||
21
|
Subsidiaries
of Registrant
|
Filed
herewith.
|
||
23
|
Consent
of BKD, LLP
|
Filed
herewith.
|
||
24
|
Power
of Attorney of Directors and Executive Officers
|
Included
on signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
||
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification - Principal Executive
Officer
|
Filed
herewith.
|
||
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification - Principal Financial
Officer
|
Filed
herewith.
|
||
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification - Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial
Officer
|
Filed
herewith.
|
*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
63.