SB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x QUARTERLY
REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended March
31, 2008
OR
o TRANSITION
REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
transition period from
_________________to___________________________
Commission
file number 0-13507
RURBAN
FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio
|
34-1395608
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
401
Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio 43512
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(Zip
Code)
(419)
783-8950
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large Accelerate
Filer o Accelerated
Filer o Non-Accelerated
Filer o Smaller
Reporting Company x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common
Shares, without par value
|
4,941,933
|
(class)
|
(Outstanding
at May 13, 2008)
|
RURBAN
FINANCIAL CORP.
FORM
10-Q
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
3
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
20
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
28
|
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
29
|
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
30
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
30
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
30
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
30
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
30
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
31
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
32
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
32
|
|
||
Signatures
|
33
|
2
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
The
interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Rurban Financial Corp.
(“Rurban” or the “Company”) are unaudited; however, the information contained
herein reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of financial condition and results of
operations for the interim periods presented. All adjustments reflected in
these
financial statements are of a normal recurring nature in accordance with Rule
10-01 of Regulation S-X. Results of operations for the three months ended March
31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of results for the complete year.
3
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
March
31,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
15,758,593
|
$
|
15,183,627
|
|||
Federal
funds sold
|
6,400,000
|
2,000,000
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
22,158,593
|
17,183,627
|
|||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
94,378,377
|
92,661,386
|
|||||
Loans
held for sale
|
2,464,643
|
1,649,758
|
|||||
Loans,
net of unearned income
|
391,962,691
|
389,268,744
|
|||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(4,016,230
|
)
|
(3,990,455
|
)
|
|||
Premises
and equipment
|
15,180,760
|
15,128,754
|
|||||
Purchased
software
|
4,149,202
|
4,282,563
|
|||||
Federal
Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
4,062,100
|
4,021,200
|
|||||
Foreclosed
assets held for sale, net
|
1,572,644
|
124,131
|
|||||
Interest
receivable
|
2,752,252
|
3,008,968
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
13,940,618
|
13,940,618
|
|||||
Core
deposits and other intangibles
|
4,961,846
|
5,135,228
|
|||||
Cash
value of life insurance
|
12,276,003
|
12,160,581
|
|||||
Other
|
5,889,849
|
6,638,895
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
571,733,348
|
$
|
561,213,998
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
Note: |
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements at that
date.
|
4
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
March
31,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
||||||
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|||||||
Liabilities
|
|||||||
Deposits
|
|||||||
Demand
|
$
|
41,748,793
|
$
|
41,541,297
|
|||
Savings,
interest checking and money market
|
156,513,960
|
141,009,043
|
|||||
Time
|
218,449,515
|
223,480,842
|
|||||
Total
deposits
|
416,712,268
|
406,031,182
|
|||||
Notes
payable
|
817,584
|
922,457
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank advances
|
23,000,000
|
24,000,000
|
|||||
Retail
repurchase agreements
|
43,536,570
|
43,006,438
|
|||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
20,620,000
|
20,620,000
|
|||||
Interest
payable
|
2,481,629
|
2,532,914
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
4,694,986
|
4,775,773
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
511,863,037
|
501,888,764
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingent Liabilities
|
|||||||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $2.50 stated value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued
5,027,433
shares; outstanding March 2008 – 4,941,933 shares, December
2007 – 4,978,933 shares
|
12,568,583
|
12,568,583
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
14,944,315
|
14,923,571
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
32,956,244
|
32,361,106
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
432,429
|
82,235
|
|||||
Treasury
Stock, at cost
|
|||||||
Common;
March 2008 – 85,500 shares, December 2007 – 48,500
shares
|
(1,031,260
|
)
|
(610,260
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
59,870,311
|
59,325,235
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
571,733,348
|
$
|
561,213,998
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
Note: |
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from
the audited
consolidated financial statements at that
date.
|
5
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
2008
|
|
March
31,
2007
|
|||||
Interest
Income
|
|||||||
Loans
|
|||||||
Taxable
|
$
|
6,808,196
|
$
|
6,676,813
|
|||
Tax-exempt
|
21,350
|
17,293
|
|||||
Securities
|
|||||||
Taxable
|
1,039,894
|
1,091,197
|
|||||
Tax-exempt
|
158,367
|
153,057
|
|||||
Other
|
97,409
|
78,468
|
|||||
Total
interest income
|
8,125,216
|
8,016,828
|
|||||
Interest
Expense
|
|||||||
Deposits
|
3,091,902
|
3,333,730
|
|||||
Other
borrowings
|
17,506
|
51,072
|
|||||
Retail
repurchase agreements
|
460,552
|
343,849
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank advances
|
302,336
|
249,587
|
|||||
Trust
preferred securities
|
435,704
|
445,314
|
|||||
Total
interest expense
|
4,308,000
|
4,423,552
|
|||||
Net
Interest Income
|
3,817,216
|
3,593,276
|
|||||
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
192,218
|
92,640
|
|||||
Net
Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses
|
3,624,998
|
3,500,636
|
|||||
Non-interest
Income
|
|||||||
Data
service fees
|
5,264,565
|
4,834,136
|
|||||
Trust
fees
|
855,107
|
826,382
|
|||||
Customer
service fees
|
586,207
|
528,424
|
|||||
Net
gains on loan sales
|
274,603
|
54,279
|
|||||
Net
proceeds from liquidation of equity securities
|
132,106
|
0
|
|||||
Investment
securities recoveries
|
197,487
|
0
|
|||||
Loan
servicing fees
|
62,940
|
108,706
|
|||||
Gain
(loss) on sale of assets
|
(71,032
|
)
|
35,967
|
||||
Other
|
213,530
|
350,848
|
|||||
Total
non-interest income
|
7,515,513
|
6,738,742
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
6
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) (continued)
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
2008
|
|
March
31,
2007
|
|||||
Non-interest
Expense
|
|||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
$
|
4,438,764
|
$
|
4,396,787
|
|||
Net
occupancy expense
|
566,016
|
527,133
|
|||||
Equipment
expense
|
1,567,637
|
1,605,873
|
|||||
Data
processing fees
|
96,567
|
156,181
|
|||||
Professional
fees
|
570,687
|
677,391
|
|||||
Marketing
expense
|
181,747
|
155,685
|
|||||
Printing
and office supplies
|
186,052
|
198,092
|
|||||
Telephone
and communications
|
421,929
|
445,204
|
|||||
Postage
and delivery expense
|
602,634
|
392,261
|
|||||
State,
local and other taxes
|
180,768
|
199,741
|
|||||
Employee
expense
|
230,611
|
255,069
|
|||||
Other
|
557,948
|
290,836
|
|||||
Total
non-interest expense
|
9,601,360
|
9,300,253
|
|||||
Income
Before Income Tax
|
1,539,151
|
939,125
|
|||||
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
429,795
|
236,672
|
|||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
1,109,356
|
$
|
702,453
|
|||
Basic
Earnings Per Share
|
$
|
0.22
|
$
|
0.14
|
|||
Diluted
Earnings Per Share
|
$
|
0.22
|
$
|
0.14
|
|||
Dividends
Declared Per Share
|
$
|
0.08
|
$
|
0.06
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
7
RURBAN
FINANCIAL CORP.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended
|
|
||||||
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$
|
59,325,235
|
$
|
56,955,153
|
|||
Cumulative
effect adjustment for split-dollar BOLI
|
(116,303
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Beginning
balance as adjusted
|
59,208,932
|
56,955,153
|
|||||
Net
Income
|
1,109,356
|
702,453
|
|||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|||||||
Net
change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for
sale,
net
|
350,193
|
342,085
|
|||||
Total
comprehensive income (loss)
|
1,459,549
|
1,044,538
|
|||||
Cash
dividend
|
(397,914
|
)
|
(301,646
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of Treasury Shares
|
(421,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Stock
option expense
|
20,744
|
13,259
|
|||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$
|
59,870,311
|
$
|
57,711,304
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
8
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
March
31, 2008
|
|
March
31, 2007
|
|||||
Operating
Activities
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1,109,356
|
$
|
702,453
|
|||
Items
not requiring (providing) cash
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
976,290
|
968,860
|
|||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
192,218
|
92,640
|
|||||
Expense
of stock option plan
|
20,744
|
13,259
|
|||||
Amortization
of premiums and discounts on securities
|
15,842
|
25,649
|
|||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
173,382
|
175,384
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(180,403
|
)
|
(157,478
|
)
|
|||
FHLB
Stock Dividends
|
(40,900
|
)
|
(47,250
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of loans held for sale
|
15,208,863
|
4,808,032
|
|||||
Originations
of loans held for sale
|
(15,749,144
|
)
|
(4,474,350
|
)
|
|||
Gain
from sale of loans
|
(274,603
|
)
|
(54,279
|
)
|
|||
(Gain)
loss on sale of foreclosed assets
|
(3,180
|
)
|
(9,040
|
)
|
|||
(Gain)
loss on sales of fixed assets
|
71,032
|
(26,927
|
)
|
||||
Changes
in
|
|||||||
Interest
receivable
|
256,716
|
308,859
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
656,421
|
(853,117
|
)
|
||||
Interest
payable and other liabilities
|
(248,376
|
)
|
(917,091
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
2,184,258
|
555,604
|
|||||
Investing
Activities
|
|||||||
Purchases
of available-for-sale securities
|
(36,191,291
|
)
|
(5,722,790
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
34,989,055
|
11,529,117
|
|||||
Net
change in loans
|
(4,461,937
|
)
|
(3,326,187
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of premises and equipment and software
|
(1,196,249
|
)
|
(1,502,472
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sales of premises and equipment
|
301,314
|
234,397
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of foreclosed assets
|
62,385
|
175,016
|
|||||
Cash
paid for Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc. acquisition
|
-
|
(16,034
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(6,496,723
|
)
|
1,371,047
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
9
Rurban
Financial Corp.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(continued)
Three
Months Ended
March 31, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|||||
Financing
Activities
|
|||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in demand deposits, money market, interest checking
and savings accounts
|
$
|
15,712,413
|
$
|
3,681,627
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in certificates of deposit
|
(5,031,327
|
)
|
(5,644,131
|
)
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
530,132
|
(1,443,705
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
1,000,000
|
—
|
|||||
Repayment
of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
(2,000,000
|
)
|
(3,500,000
|
)
|
|||
Repayment
of notes payable
|
(104,873
|
)
|
(73,296
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(421,000
|
)
|
|||||
Dividends
paid
|
(397,914
|
)
|
(301,646
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
9,287,431
|
(7,281,151
|
)
|
||||
Increase
(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
4,974,966
|
(5,354,500
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year
|
17,183,627
|
22,481,791
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
|
$
|
22,158,593
|
$
|
17,127,291
|
|||
Supplemental
Cash Flows Information
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
4,359,285
|
$
|
4,414,340
|
|||
Transfer
of loans to foreclosed assets
|
$
|
1,507,718
|
$
|
28,244
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
10
RURBAN
FINANCIAL CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE
A—BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q. Accordingly,
they
do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The financial
statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management,
necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company. Those adjustments consist only of normal recurring
adjustments. Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008
are
not necessarily indicative of results for the complete year.
The
condensed consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2007
has
been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as
of
that date.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
NOTE
B—EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings
per share (EPS) have been computed based on the weighted average number of
shares outstanding during the periods presented. For the periods ended March
31,
2008 and 2007, stock options totaling 329,640 and 319,913 common shares,
respectively, were not considered in computing EPS as they were anti-dilutive.
The number of shares used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings
per
share was:
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
March
31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
4,962,428
|
5,027,433
|
|||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
4,962,511
|
5,027,613
|
NOTE
C – LOANS, RISK ELEMENTS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN
LOSSES
Total
loans on the balance sheet are comprised of the following classifications
at:
March,
31
2008
|
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||||
Commercial
|
$
|
82,268,776
|
$
|
83,048,522
|
|||
Commercial
real estate
|
129,703,596
|
126,784,483
|
|||||
Agricultural
|
47,508,611
|
43,369,266
|
|||||
Residential
real estate
|
82,998,903
|
84,620,992
|
|||||
Consumer
|
49,389,534
|
51,357,419
|
|||||
Lease
financing
|
330,000
|
330,000
|
|||||
Total
loans
|
392,199,420
|
389,510,682
|
|||||
Less
|
|||||||
Net
deferred loan fees, premiums and discounts
|
(236,792
|
)
|
(241,938
|
)
|
|||
Loans,
net of unearned income
|
$
|
391,962,691
|
$
|
389,268,744
|
|||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
$
|
(4,016,230
|
)
|
$
|
(3,990,455
|
)
|
11
The
following is a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses account
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
3,990,455
|
$
|
3,717,377
|
|||
Provision
charged to expense
|
192,218
|
92,640
|
|||||
Recoveries
|
30,848
|
54,044
|
|||||
Loans
charged off
|
(197,291
|
)
|
(95,247
|
)
|
|||
Balance,
end of period
|
$
|
4,016,230
|
$
|
3,768,814
|
The
following schedule summarizes nonaccrual, past due and impaired loans
at:
March
31,
2008
|
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||||
Non-accrual
loans
|
$
|
5,304,652
|
$
|
5,990,483
|
|||
Accruing
loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest
or
principal
payments
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Total
non-performing loans
|
$
|
5,304,652
|
$
|
5,990,483
|
Individual
loans determined to be impaired were as follows:
March
31,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
||||||
Loans
with no allowance for loan losses allocated
|
$
|
1,742,000
|
$
|
1,787,000
|
|||
Loans
with allowance for loan losses allocated
|
1,744,000
|
1,898,000
|
|||||
Total
impaired loans
|
$
|
3,486,000
|
$
|
3,685,000
|
|||
Amount
of allowance allocated
|
$
|
358,000
|
$
|
333,000
|
NOTE
D – REGULATORY MATTERS
The
Company and The State Bank and Trust Company (“State Bank”) are subject to
various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state
banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate
certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators.
If undertaken, these actions could have a direct material adverse effect on
the
Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and State Bank
must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of
assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under
regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are
also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings and other factors.
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the
Company and State Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in
the
table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to
risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), and of Tier I capital
to
average assets (as defined in the regulations). As of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, the Company and State Bank exceeded all “well-capitalized”
requirements to which they were subject.
12
As
of
December 31, 2007, the most recent notification to the regulators categorized
State Bank as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, State Bank must
maintain capital ratios as set forth in the following table. There are no
conditions or events since that notification that management believes have
changed State Bank’s categorization as well-capitalized.
The
Company’s consolidated, and State Bank’s actual, capital amounts (in millions)
and ratios, as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, are also presented
in
the following table.
|
|
Actual
|
|
Minimum
Required
For
Capital Adequacy
Purposes
|
|
To
Be Well
Capitalized
Under
Prompt
Corrective
Action
Provisions
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
||||||
As
of March 31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
64.5
|
15.8
|
%
|
$
|
32.7
|
8.0
|
%
|
$
|
—
|
N/A
|
||||||||
State
Bank
|
50.1
|
12.6
|
31.8
|
8.0
|
39.7
|
10.0
|
|||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
60.3
|
14.7
|
16.4
|
4.0
|
—
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
State
Bank
|
46.1
|
11.6
|
15.9
|
4.0
|
23.8
|
6.0
|
|||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to Average Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
60.3
|
11.0
|
21.9
|
4.0
|
—
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
State
Bank
|
46.1
|
8.4
|
21.8
|
4.0
|
27.3
|
5.0
|
|||||||||||||
As
of December 31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
64.2
|
15.9
|
%
|
$
|
32.2
|
8.0
|
%
|
$
|
—
|
N/A
|
||||||||
State
Bank
|
49.5
|
12.7
|
31.3
|
8.0
|
39.1
|
10.0
|
|||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
59.9
|
14.9
|
16.1
|
4.0
|
—
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
State
Bank
|
45.5
|
11.6
|
15.6
|
4.0
|
23.5
|
6.0
|
|||||||||||||
Tier
I Capital
(to Average Assets) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
59.9
|
11.0
|
21.9
|
4.0
|
—
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||
State
Bank
|
45.5
|
8.4
|
21.8
|
4.0
|
27.3
|
5.0
|
13
NOTE
E – CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
There
are
various contingent liabilities that are not reflected in the consolidated
financial statements, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal
counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have
a
material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
NOTE
F - NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
On
December 4, 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51.”
SFAS
No.
160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish new accounting and reporting standards for
the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a
subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest
in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions.
The statement also requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income
when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December
15, 2008. Early application is prohibited. SFAS No. 160 is effective for the
Company’s fiscal year that begins on January 1, 2009 and will be applied to
future acquisitions.
On
December 4, 2007, the FASB amended SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations.” SFAS
No.
141R, establishes requirements and principles for how an acquirer recognizes
and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. SFAS
No.
141R will apply to business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or
after the beginning of the first reporting period for fiscal year beginning
on
or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Accordingly, a
calendar year-end company is required to record and disclose business
combinations following existing GAAP until January 1, 2009. Management is
currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, to the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
The
Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
and Ohio jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject
to
U.S. federal, state and local examinations by tax authorities for years before
2005.
The
Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on January 1, 2007. FIN
48
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be
taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the
Company did not become aware of any liability for uncertain tax positions that
it believes should be recognized in the financial statements.
In
February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities - including an amendment of FASB Statement
No.
115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits the Company to choose to measure
certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value (i.e. the Fair Value Option). Election
of
the Fair Value Option is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is
irrevocable. At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on financial
assets and liabilities for which the Fair Value Option has been elected would
be
reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings. If the
Company elects the Fair Value Option for certain financial assets and
liabilities, the Company will report unrealized gains and losses due to changes
in their fair value in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No.
159
is effective as of January 1, 2008. The Company has not elected the Fair Value
Option for any financial assets or liabilities at March 31,
2008.
14
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements
(FAS
157). FAS 157 enhances existing guidance for measuring assets and liabilities
using fair value. Prior to the issuance of FAS 157, guidance for applying fair
value was incorporated in several accounting pronouncements. FAS 157 provides
a
single definition of fair value, together with a framework for measuring it,
and
requires additional disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets
and
liabilities. FAS 157 also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based
measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and sets out a fair value
hierarchy with the highest priority being quoted prices in active markets.
Under
FAS 157, fair value measurements are disclosed by level within that hierarchy.
While FAS 157 does not add any new fair value measurements, it does change
current practice. Changes to practice include: (1) a requirement for an
entity to include its own credit standing in the measurement of its liabilities;
(2) a modification of the transaction price presumption; (3) a
prohibition on the use of block discounts when valuing large blocks of
securities for broker-dealers and investment companies; and (4) a
requirement to adjust the value of restricted stock for the effect of the
restriction even if the restriction lapses within one year. FAS 157 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We have
adopted FAS 157 effective for the first quarter of 2008.
At
its
September 2006 meeting, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final
consensus on Issue No. 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements. The consensus stipulates that an agreement by an employer to
share
a portion of the proceeds of a life insurance policy with an employee during
the
postretirement period is a postretirement benefit arrangement required to be
accounted for under Statement No. 106 (“SFAS No. 106”) or Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 12, Omnibus Opinion-1967. The consensus concludes that
the purchase of a split-dollar life insurance policy does not constitute a
settlement under SFAS No. 106 and, therefore, a liability for the postretirement
obligation must be recognized under SFAS No. 106 if the benefit is offered
under
an arrangement that constitutes a plan or under APB No. 12 if it is not part
of
a plan. Issue 06-04 is effective for annual or interim reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company has endorsement split-dollar
life
insurance policies. A liability has been recorded through a cumulative-effect
adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2008 in the amount of $116,303.
There was no material impact to the financial position and results of operations
as a result of the implementation of EITF 06-04.
At
its
March 2007 meeting, the EITF reached a final consensus on Issue No. 06-10,
Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.
A
consensus was reached that an employer should recognize a liability for the
postretirement benefit related to a collateral assignment split-dollar life
insurance arrangement in accordance with either FASB Statement No. 106 or APB
Opinion No. 12, as appropriate, if the employer has agreed to maintain a life
insurance policy during the employee’s retirement or provide the employee with a
death benefit based on the substantive agreement with the employee. A consensus
also was reached that an employer should recognize and measure an asset based
on
the nature and substance of the collateral assignment split-dollar life
insurance arrangement. The consensuses are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2007, including interim periods within those fiscal years,
with early application permitted. The Company has endorsement split-dollar
life
insurance policies. The implementation of EITF 06-10 will not have a material
impact on the financial position and results of operations of the
Company.
NOTE
G – COMMITMENTS AND CREDIT RISK
As
of
March 31, 2008, loan commitments and unused lines of credit totaled $68,135,000,
standby letters of credit totaled $287,000 and no commercial letters of credit
were outstanding.
NOTE
H – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
reportable segments are determined by the products and services offered,
primarily distinguished between banking and data processing operations. “Other”
segment information includes the accounts of the holding company, Rurban, which
combined provides management and operational services to its subsidiaries.
Information reported internally for performance assessment follows.
15
NOTE
H — SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
|
||||||
As
of and for the three months ended March 31, 2008
|
Data
|
Total
|
Intersegment
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
statement information:
|
Banking
|
Processing
|
Other
|
Segments
|
Elimination
|
Totals
|
|||||||||||||
Net
interest income (expense)
|
$
|
4,295,351
|
$
|
(43,240
|
)
|
$
|
(434,895
|
)
|
$
|
3,817,216
|
$
|
3,817,216
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
income - external customers
|
2,159,188
|
5,259,566
|
96,759
|
7,515,513
|
7,515,513
|
||||||||||||||
Non-interest
income - other segments
|
9,366
|
389,403
|
309,998
|
708,767
|
(708,767
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
6,463,905
|
5,605,729
|
(28,138
|
)
|
12,041,496
|
(708,767
|
)
|
11,332,729
|
|||||||||||
Non-interest
expense
|
5,017,887
|
4,393,142
|
899,098
|
10,310,127
|
(708,767
|
)
|
9,601,360
|
||||||||||||
Significant
non-cash items:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
269,370
|
667,162
|
39,758
|
976,290
|
-
|
976,290
|
|||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
192,218
|
-
|
-
|
192,218
|
-
|
192,218
|
|||||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
336,347
|
412,280
|
(318,832
|
)
|
429,795
|
-
|
429,795
|
||||||||||||
Segment
profit (loss)
|
$
|
917,453
|
$
|
800,307
|
$
|
(608,404
|
)
|
$
|
1,109,356
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,109,356
|
||||||
Balance
sheet information:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
552,918,637
|
$
|
20,353,899
|
$
|
6,588,372
|
$
|
579,860,908
|
$
|
(8,127,560
|
)
|
$
|
571,733,348
|
||||||
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
11,579,734
|
7,322,730
|
-
|
18,902,464
|
-
|
18,902,464
|
|||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment expenditures
|
57,314
|
1,046,388
|
92,547
|
1,196,249
|
-
|
1,196,249
|
16
NOTE
H — SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)
|
||||||
As
of and for the three months ended March 31, 2007
|
Data
|
Total
|
Intersegment
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
statement information:
|
Banking
|
Processing
|
Other
|
Segments
|
Elimination
|
Totals
|
|||||||||||||
Net
interest income (expense)
|
$
|
4,131,429
|
$
|
(93,658
|
)
|
$
|
(444,495
|
)
|
$
|
3,593,276
|
$
|
3,593,276
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest
income - external customers
|
1,889,737
|
4,834,136
|
14,869
|
6,738,742
|
6,738,742
|
||||||||||||||
Non-interest
income - other segments
|
526,124
|
415,225
|
313,046
|
1,254,395
|
(1,254,395
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
6,547,290
|
5,155,703
|
(116,580
|
)
|
11,586,413
|
(1,254,395
|
)
|
10,332,018
|
|||||||||||
Non-interest
expense
|
5,710,203
|
4,108,766
|
735,679
|
10,554,648
|
(1,254,395
|
)
|
9,300,253
|
||||||||||||
Significant
non-cash items:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
239,567
|
699,637
|
29,656
|
968,860
|
-
|
968,860
|
|||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
92,640
|
-
|
-
|
92,640
|
-
|
92,640
|
|||||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
173,944
|
355,973
|
(293,245
|
)
|
236,672
|
-
|
236,672
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Segment
profit (loss)
|
$
|
570,503
|
$
|
690,964
|
$
|
(559,014
|
)
|
$
|
702,453
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
702,453
|
||||||
Balance
sheet information:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
530,459,372
|
$
|
21,097,318
|
$
|
8,460,028
|
$
|
560,016,718
|
$
|
(11,131,164
|
)
|
$
|
548,885,554
|
||||||
Goodwill
and intangibles
|
12,040,233
|
7,333,457
|
-
|
19,373,690
|
-
|
19,373,690
|
|||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment expenditures
|
730,435
|
772,037
|
-
|
1,502,472
|
-
|
1,502,472
|
17
NOTE
I – FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures
about
fair value measurements. FAS 157 has been applied prospectively as of the
beginning of the period.
FAS
157
defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at
the measurement date. FAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize
the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes
three
levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 2 |
Observable
inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar
assets
or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market
data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities
|
Level 3 |
Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are
significant to the fair value of the assets or
liabilities
|
Available-for-Sale
Securities
The
fair
value of available-for-sale securities are determined by various valuation
methodologies. Level 2 securities include U.S. government agencies,
mortgage-backed securities, and obligations of political and state
subdivisions.
The
following table presents the fair value measurements of assets measured at
fair
value on a recurring basis and the level within FAS 157 fair value hierarchy
in
which the fair value measurements fall at March 31, 2008:
Fair
Value Measurements Using:
|
|||||||||||||
Description
|
Fair Values at 3/31/2008
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets (Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|||||||||
Available-for-Sale Securities
|
94,378,377
|
-
|
94,378,377
|
-
|
Impaired
Loans
Loans
for
which it is probable the Company will not collect all principal and interest
due
according to contractual terms are measured for impairment in accordance
with
the provisions of Financial Accounting Standard No. 114, “Accounting
by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.”
Allowable methods for estimating fair value include using the fair value
of the
collateral for collateral dependent loans, or where a loan is determined
no to
be collateral dependent, using the discounted cash flow method. If the impaired
loan is collateral dependent, then the fair value method of measuring the
amount
of impairment is utilized. This method requires obtaining an independent
appraisal of the collateral and applying a discount factor to the value based
on
the Company’s loan review policy.
18
The
following table presents the fair value measurements of assets measured at
fair
value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the FAS 157 fair value
hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at March 31,
2008:
Fair
Value Measurements Using:
|
|||||||||||||
Description
|
Fair Values
at 3/31/2008
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets (Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs (Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
403,000
|
-
|
-
|
403,000
|
19
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contains forward-looking statements that are provided to assist in the
understanding of anticipated future financial performance. Forward-looking
statements provide current expectations or forecasts of future events and are
not guarantees of future performance. Examples of forward-looking statements
include: (a) projections of income or expense, earnings per share, the payments
or non-payments of dividends, capital structure and other financial items;
(b)
statements of plans and objectives of the Company or our management or Board
of
Directors, including those relating to products or services; (c) statements
of
future economic performance; and (d) statements of assumptions underlying such
statements. Words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,”
“targets,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive
means
of identifying those statements. Forward-looking statements are based on
management’s expectations and are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties. Although management believes that the expectations reflected
in
such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ
materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially include,
without limitation, changes in interest rates, changes in the competitive
environment, and changes in banking regulations or other regulatory or
legislative requirements affecting bank holding companies. Additional detailed
information concerning a number of important factors which could cause actual
results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained
in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations is available in the Company’s filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including the
disclosure under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007. Undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date hereof. Except as may be required by law, the
Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to
reflect unanticipated events or circumstances after the date on which the
statement is made.
Overview
of Rurban
Rurban
is
a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve Board. Rurban’s
wholly-owned subsidiary, The State Bank and Trust Company (“State Bank”), is
engaged in commercial banking. Rurban’s subsidiary, Rurbanc Data Services, Inc.
(“RDSI”), provides computerized data processing services to community banks and
businesses. On March 24, 2007, The Exchange Bank and Reliance Financial
Services, N.A. (“Reliance”) were merged with and into the lead bank, State Bank.
Reliance’s trust and investment operations are now conducted through a division
of State Bank, doing business under the name Reliance Financial Services. On
December 31, 2007 Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc. (DCM) was merged with and
into RDSI. DCM continues to operate as a division of RDSI, continuing to doing
business under the name Diverse Computer Marketers.
Rurban
Statutory Trust I (“RST”) was established in August 2000. In
September 2000, RST completed a pooled private offering of 10,000 Capital
Securities with a liquidation amount of $1,000 per security. The proceeds of
the
offering were loaned to the Company in exchange for junior subordinated
debentures of the Company with terms substantially similar to the Capital
Securities. The sole assets of RST are the junior subordinated debentures,
and
the back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional
guarantee by the Company of the obligations of RST under the Capital
Securities.
Rurban
Statutory Trust II (“RST II”) was established in August 2005. In September 2005,
RST II completed a pooled private offering of 10,000 Capital Securities with
a
liquidation amount of $1,000 per security. The proceeds of the offering were
loaned to the Company in exchange for junior subordinated debentures of the
Company with terms substantially similar to the Capital Securities. The sole
assets of RST II are the junior subordinated debentures, and the back-up
obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee
by
the Company of the obligations of RST II under the Capital Securities.
20
RFCBC,
Inc., (“RFCBC”) is an Ohio corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company that was incorporated in August 2004. RFCBC operates as a loan
subsidiary in servicing and working out problem loans.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Note
1 to
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 describes
the significant accounting policies used in the development and presentation
of
the Company’s financial statements. The accounting and reporting policies of the
Company are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the
United States and conform to general practices within the banking industry.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions.
The
Company’s financial position and results of operations can be affected by these
estimates and assumptions and are integral to the understanding of reported
results. Critical accounting policies are those policies that management
believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial
condition and results, and they require management to make estimates that are
difficult, subjective, or complex.
Allowance
for Loan Losses - The
allowance for loan losses provides coverage for probable losses inherent in
the
Company’s loan portfolio. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses each quarter based on changes, if any, in underwriting activities,
loan portfolio composition (including product mix and geographic, industry
or
customer-specific concentrations), trends in loan performance, regulatory
guidance and economic factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as
it
requires the use of significant management estimates. Many factors can affect
management’s estimates of specific and expected losses, including volatility of
default probabilities, rating migrations, loss severity and economic and
political conditions. The allowance is increased through provisions charged
to
operating earnings and reduced by net charge-offs.
The
Company determines the amount of the allowance based on relative risk
characteristics of the loan portfolio. The allowance recorded for commercial
loans is based on reviews of individual credit relationships and an analysis
of
the migration of commercial loans and actual loss experience. The allowance
recorded for homogeneous consumer loans is based on an analysis of loan mix,
risk characteristics of the portfolio, fraud loss and bankruptcy experiences,
and historical losses, adjusted for current trends, for each homogeneous
category or group of loans. The allowance for credit losses relating to impaired
loans is based on the loan’s observable market price, the collateral for certain
collateral-dependent loans, or the discounted cash flows using the loan’s
effective interest rate.
Regardless
of the extent of the Company’s analysis of customer performance, portfolio
trends or risk management processes, certain inherent but undetected losses
are
probable within the loan portfolio. This is due to several factors, including
inherent delays in obtaining information regarding a customer’s financial
condition or changes in their unique business conditions, the subjective nature
of individual loan evaluations, collateral assessments and the interpretation
of
economic trends. Volatility of economic or customer-specific conditions
affecting the identification and estimation of losses for larger non-homogeneous
credits and the sensitivity of assumptions utilized to establish allowances
for
homogenous groups of loans are also factors. The Company estimates a range
of
inherent losses related to the existence of these exposures. The estimates
are
based upon the Company’s evaluation of imprecise risk associated with the
commercial and consumer allowance levels and the estimated impact of the current
economic environment. To the extent that actual results differ from management’s
estimates, additional loan loss provisions may be required that could adversely
impact earnings for future periods.
21
Goodwill
and Other Intangibles -
The
Company records all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions,
including goodwill and other intangibles, at fair value as required by SFAS
141.
Goodwill is subject, at a minimum, to annual tests for impairment. Other
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using
straight-line or accelerated methods, and are subject to impairment if events
or
circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount.
The
initial goodwill and other intangibles recorded and subsequent impairment
analysis requires management to make subjective judgments concerning estimates
of how the acquired asset will perform in the future. Events and factors that
may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, customer
attrition, changes in revenue growth trends, specific industry conditions and
changes in competition. A decrease in earnings resulting from these or other
factors could lead to an impairment of goodwill that could adversely impact
earnings of future periods.
Impact
of Accounting Changes
On
December 4, 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51.”
SFAS
No.
160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish new accounting and reporting standards for
the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a
subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest
in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions.
The statement also requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income
when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December
15, 2008. Early application is prohibited. SFAS No. 160 is effective for the
Company’s fiscal year that begins on January 1, 2009 and will be applied to
future acquisitions.
On
December 4, 2007, the FASB amended SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations.” SFAS
No.
141R, establishes requirements and principles for how an acquirer recognizes
and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. SFAS
No.
141R will apply to business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or
after the beginning of the first reporting period for fiscal year beginning
on
or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. Accordingly, a
calendar year-end company is required to record and disclose business
combinations following existing GAAP until January 1, 2009. Management is
currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, to the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
The
Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal
and Ohio jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject
to
U.S. federal, state and local examinations by tax authorities for years before
2005.
The
Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on January 1, 2007. FIN
48
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be
taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the
Company did not become aware of any liability for uncertain tax positions that
it believes should be recognized in the financial statements.
In
February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities - including an amendment of FASB Statement
No.
115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits the Company to choose to measure
certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value (i.e. the Fair Value Option). Election
of
the Fair Value Option is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is
irrevocable. At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on financial
assets and liabilities for which the Fair Value Option has been elected would
be
reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings. If the
Company elects the Fair Value Option for certain financial assets and
liabilities, the Company will report unrealized gains and losses due to changes
in their fair value in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No.
159
is effective as of January 1, 2008. The Company has not elected the Fair Value
Option for any financial assets or liabilities at March 31, 2008.
22
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements
(FAS
157). FAS 157 enhances existing guidance for measuring assets and liabilities
using fair value. Prior to the issuance of FAS 157, guidance for applying fair
value was incorporated in several accounting pronouncements. FAS 157 provides
a
single definition of fair value, together with a framework for measuring it,
and
requires additional disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets
and
liabilities. FAS 157 also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based
measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and sets out a fair value
hierarchy with the highest priority being quoted prices in active markets.
Under
FAS 157, fair value measurements are disclosed by level within that hierarchy.
While FAS 157 does not add any new fair value measurements, it does change
current practice. Changes to practice include: (1) a requirement for an
entity to include its own credit standing in the measurement of its liabilities;
(2) a modification of the transaction price presumption; (3) a
prohibition on the use of block discounts when valuing large blocks of
securities for broker-dealers and investment companies; and (4) a
requirement to adjust the value of restricted stock for the effect of the
restriction even if the restriction lapses within one year. FAS 157 is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We have
adopted FAS 157 effective for the first quarter of 2008.
At
its
September 2006 meeting, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final
consensus on Issue No. 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements. The consensus stipulates that an agreement by an employer to
share
a portion of the proceeds of a life insurance policy with an employee during
the
postretirement period is a postretirement benefit arrangement required to be
accounted for under Statement No. 106 (“SFAS No. 106”) or Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 12, Omnibus Opinion-1967. The consensus concludes that
the purchase of a split-dollar life insurance policy does not constitute a
settlement under SFAS No. 106 and, therefore, a liability for the postretirement
obligation must be recognized under SFAS No. 106 if the benefit is offered
under
an arrangement that constitutes a plan or under APB No. 12 if it is not part
of
a plan. Issue 06-04 is effective for annual or interim reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2007. The Company has endorsement split-dollar
life
insurance policies. A liability has been recorded through a cumulative-effect
adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2008 in the amount of $116,303.
At
its
March 2007 meeting, the EITF reached a final consensus on Issue No. 06-10,
Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.
A
consensus was reached that an employer should recognize a liability for the
postretirement benefit related to a collateral assignment split-dollar life
insurance arrangement in accordance with either FASB Statement No. 106 or APB
Opinion No. 12, as appropriate, if the employer has agreed to maintain a life
insurance policy during the employee’s retirement or provide the employee with a
death benefit based on the substantive agreement with the employee. A consensus
also was reached that an employer should recognize and measure an asset based
on
the nature and substance of the collateral assignment split-dollar life
insurance arrangement. The consensuses are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2007, including interim periods within those fiscal years,
with early application permitted. The Company has endorsement split-dollar
life
insurance policies. The implementation of EITF 06-10 will not have a material
impact on the financial position and results of operations of the
Company.
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2008 compared to Three Months Ended March 31,
2007
Net
Income:
Net
income for the first quarter of 2008 was $1,109,000 or $0.22 per diluted share,
compared to $702,000, or $0.14 per diluted share, for the first quarter of
2007.
This quarterly increase in net income was driven by a $777,000 increase in
non-interest income and a $224,000 increase in net interest income partially
offset by an increase in provision expense of $100,000 and a $301,000 increase
in non-interest expense.
23
Net
Interest Income:
Net
interest income was $3.8 million, an increase of $224,000 or 6.2 percent, from
the 2007 first quarter. Average earning assets increased $14.6 million or 3.0
percent over the 12-month period, all of which was organic growth. Loan growth
over the past twelve months was $18.7 million, or 5.0 percent, reaching $392.0
million at March 31, 2008; this growth was entirely organic. Commercial loans
now account for nearly 66 percent of State Bank’s loan portfolio, and the
majority of the Bank’s loan growth was derived from this sector. Loan growth
during the first quarter remained steady. As of March 31, 2008, loans were
$2.7
million higher than year-end, with agricultural loans, up $4.1 million and
commercial real estate loans, up $2.9 million. Growth for both periods was
primarily offset by slight declines in residential and consumer loans.
Year-over-year, the net interest margin increased 22 basis points from 3.04%
for
the first quarter 2007 to 3.26% for the first quarter 2008. The 3.26% represents
a 14 basis point increase from the linked quarter of 3.12%. This increase is
a
result of an aggressive asset liability management program that the Company
continues to execute.
Provision
for Loan Losses:
The
provision for loan losses was $192,000 in the first quarter of 2008 compared
to
a $93,000 in the first quarter of 2007. The increase in provision was due in
part to the Company's growing loan portfolio and more than offset the Company’s
net charge-offs, which totaled $166,000 for the first quarter of 2008. Net
charge-offs during the first quarter of 2007 were $41,000. Total allowance
for
loan losses to total loans was 1.02% and consistent with the previous quarter
levels. For the first quarter ended March 31, 2008, net charge-offs as a
percentage of average loans was 0.17% annualized. At quarter end, consolidated
non-performing assets, including those of RFCBC (the loan workout subsidiary),
were $7.0 million or 1.22% of total assets compared with $4.1 million or 0.75%
of total assets for the prior year first quarter.
($in
Thousands)
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|||
Non-performing
Assets
|
$
|
6,967
|
$
|
6,162
|
$
|
4,112
|
||||
Allowance
for loan losses / Total loans
|
1.02
|
%
|
1.03
|
%
|
1.01
|
%
|
||||
Allowance
for loan losses/Non-performing loans
|
57.6
|
%
|
64.8
|
%
|
91.6
|
%
|
Non-interest
Income: Non-interest
income was $7.5 million for the first quarter of 2008 compared with $6.7 million
for the first quarter of 2007, an increase of $777,000 or 11.5%. The increase
was primarily driven by data processing fees as they increased $430,000. First
quarter non-interest income was also positively impacted by the one-time
recovery of $197,000 and $132,000, respectively, from the partial recovery
of
previously written off WorldCom securities and proceeds from the sale of equity
securities derived from VISA Inc.’s Initial Public Offering. Non-interest income
accounts for approximately 66% of Rurban’s total revenue.
Non-interest
Expense:
Non-interest expense was $9.6 million for the first quarter of 2008, up $301,000
or 3.2% from the year-earlier quarter. RDSI took billing for postage in-house
during the quarter resulting in additional postage expense of $230,000 being
recorded. This is offset by increases in revenue. Additionally, one-time
expenses of $176,000 were recorded in the quarter related to the wind-down
of
RFCBC, Rurban’s loan workout subsidiary.
Changes
in Financial Condition
March
31, 2008 vs. December 31, 2007
At
March
31, 2008, total assets were $571.7 million, representing an increase of $10.5
million or 1.9% from December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable
to an increase of $4.4 million or 220% in fed funds, a $1.7 million or 1.9%
increase in available-for-sale securities, and a $2.7 million or 0.7% increase
in loans net of unearned income.
24
Year
over
year, average assets increased $12.5 million, or 2.3%. Loan growth over the
past
twelve months was approximately $18.7 million, or 5.0%, reaching $392.0 million
at March 31, 2008; this growth was entirely organic. Virtually all of the growth
in the Bank’s loan portfolio over this period was derived from the commercial
sector. Loan growth during the first quarter remained steady. As of March 31,
2008, loans were $2.7 million higher than year-end, with agricultural loans,
up
$4.1 million and commercial real estate loans, up $2.9 million. Growth for
both
periods was primarily offset by slight declines in residential and consumer
loans.
At
March
31, 2008, liabilities totaled $511.9 million, an increase of $10.0 million
since
December 31, 2007. Of this increase, virtually all was derived from an increase
in total deposits, which increased $10.7 million or 2.6%. Of the $10.7 million
increase in total deposits, money market accounts increased $11.3 million and
interest bearing NOW accounts increased $5.2 million. Time deposits decreased
$5.0 million during the period, while savings deposits decreased $1.0 million.
The decrease in time deposits reflects the execution of run-off of municipal
deposits as part of the planned balance sheet restructuring.
From
December 31, 2007 to March 31, 2008, total shareholders’ equity increased
$545,000 or 1.0% to $59.9 million. Of this increase, retained earnings increased
$595,000 which is the result of $1.1 million in net income less $398,000 in
cash
dividends to shareholders. Also, accumulated other comprehensive loss increased
$350,000 as the result of an increase in market value of the available-for-sale
securities portfolio, and additional paid in-capital increased $21,000 as the
result of stock option expense incurred during the quarter. The stock repurchase
plan reduced capital by $421,000 during the period as 37,000 shares were
repurchased during the quarter.
Capital
Resources
At
March
31, 2008, actual capital levels (in millions) and minimum required levels were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
Required
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
To Be Well Capitalized
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Actual
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
Action Regulations
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
||||||
Total
capital (to risk weighted assets)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
64.5
|
15.8
|
%
|
$
|
32.7
|
8.0
|
%
|
$
|
-
|
N/A
|
||||||||
State
Bank
|
50.1
|
12.6
|
31.8
|
8.0
|
39.7
|
10.0
|
Both
the
Company and State Bank were categorized as well-capitalized at March 31, 2008.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity
relates primarily to the Company’s ability to fund loan demand, meet deposit
customers’ withdrawal requirements and provide for operating expenses. Assets
used to satisfy these needs consist of cash and due from banks, federal funds
sold, interest earning deposits in other financial institutions, securities
available for sale and loans held for sale. These assets are commonly referred
to as liquid assets. Liquid assets were $119.0 million at March 31, 2008
compared to $111.5 million at December 31, 2007.
25
The
Company’s commercial real estate and residential first mortgage portfolio of
$212.7 million at March 31, 2008, and $211.4 million at December 31, 2007,
which
can and has been readily used to collateralize borrowings, is an additional
source of liquidity. Management believes the Company’s current liquidity level,
without these borrowings, is sufficient to meet its liquidity needs. At March
31, 2008, all eligible commercial real estate and first mortgage loans were
pledged under an FHLB blanket lien.
The
cash
flow statements for the periods presented provide an indication of the Company’s
sources and uses of cash, as well as an indication of the ability of the Company
to maintain an adequate level of liquidity. A discussion of the cash flow
statements for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
follows.
The
Company experienced positive cash flows from operating activities for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. Net cash from operating activities was
$2.2 million and $556,000, respectively, for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007.
Cash
flow
from investing activities was a use of cash of $6.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and net funds provided of $1.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007. The changes in net cash from investing activities for
the
three months ended March 31, 2008 include the purchase of available-for-sale
securities of $36.2 million, partially offset by the proceeds from maturities
or
calls of available-for-sale securities of $35.0 million, the net change in
loans
of $4.5 million, and the purchases of premises and equipment of $1.2 million.
The changes in net cash from investing activities for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 include the proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale
securities $11.5 million, offset by the purchase of available-for-sale
securities $5.7 million, the net change in loans of $3.3 million and the
purchase of premises and equipment of $1.5 million.
Net
cash
flow from financing activities was $9.3 million, for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and $(7.3) million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The
2008 net cash increase was primarily due to a net increase in deposits of $10.7
million, partially offset by net proceeds from FHLB advances of $1.0 million.
The three months ended March 31, 2007 net cash decrease was due primarily to
a
net decrease in deposits of $2.0 million, proceeds from FHLB advances of $3.5
million and the net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
of $1.4 million.
Off-Balance-Sheet
Borrowing Arrangements:
Significant
additional off-balance-sheet liquidity is available in the form of FHLB
advances, unused federal funds lines from correspondent banks, and the national
certificate of deposit market. Management expects the risk of changes in
off-balance-sheet arrangements to be immaterial to earnings.
Approximately
$134.4 million of the Company’s $212.7 million commercial real estate and
residential first mortgage loans qualify to collateralize FHLB borrowings and
have been pledged to meet FHLB collateralization requirements as of March 31,
2008. Based on the current collateralization requirements of the FHLB,
approximately $27.3 million of additional borrowing capacity existed at March
31, 2008.
At
March
31, 2008, the Company had $20.9 million in federal funds lines. As of December
31, 2007, the Company had $20.9 million in federal funds lines. There were
no
Federal funds borrowed at March 31, 2008 and 2007. The Company also had $10.3
million in unpledged securities of which $1.4 million may be used to pledge
for
additional borrowings.
The
Company’s contractual obligations as of March 31, 2008 were comprised of
long-term debt obligations, other debt obligations, operating lease obligations
and other long-term liabilities. Long-term debt obligations are comprised of
FHLB Advances of $23.0 million. Other debt obligations are comprised of Trust
Preferred securities of $20.6 million and Notes Payable of $818,000. The
operating lease obligation is a lease on the State Bank operations building
of
$99,600 per year, the RDSI-North building of $162,000 per year, the Northtowne
branch of State Bank of $60,000 per year and the DCM Lansing facility which
total $108,000 per year. Other long-term liabilities include time deposits
of
$218.4 million.
26
ASSET
LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Asset
liability management involves developing and monitoring strategies to maintain
sufficient liquidity, maximize net interest income and minimize the impact
that
significant fluctuations in market interest rates would have on earnings. The
business of the Company and the composition of its balance sheet consist of
investments in interest-earning assets (primarily loans, mortgage-backed
securities, and securities available for sale) which are primarily funded by
interest-bearing liabilities (deposits and borrowings). With the exception
of
specific loans which are originated and held for sale, all of the financial
instruments of the Company are for other than trading purposes. All of the
Company’s transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars with no specific foreign
exchange exposure. In addition, the Company has limited exposure to commodity
prices related to agricultural loans. The impact of changes in foreign exchange
rates and commodity prices on interest rates are assumed to be insignificant.
The Company’s financial instruments have varying levels of sensitivity to
changes in market interest rates resulting in market risk. Interest rate risk
is
the Company’s primary market risk exposure; to a lesser extent, liquidity risk
also impacts market risk exposure.
Interest
rate risk is the exposure of a banking institution’s financial condition to
adverse movements in interest rates. Accepting this risk can be an important
source of profitability and shareholder value; however, excessive levels of
interest rate risk could pose a significant threat to the Company’s earnings and
capital base. Accordingly, effective risk management that maintains interest
rate risks at prudent levels is essential to the Company’s safety and
soundness.
Evaluating
a financial institution’s exposure to changes in interest rates includes
assessing both the adequacy of the management process used to control interest
rate risk and the organization’s quantitative level of exposure. When assessing
the interest rate risk management process, the Company seeks to ensure that
appropriate policies, procedures, management information systems, and internal
controls are in place to maintain interest rate risks at prudent levels of
consistency and continuity. Evaluating the quantitative level of interest rate
risk exposure requires the Company to assess the existing and potential future
effects of changes in interest rates on its consolidated financial condition,
including capital adequacy, earnings, liquidity, and asset quality (when
appropriate).
The
Federal Reserve Board together with the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Company, adopted a Joint Agency
Policy Statement on interest rate risk effective June 26, 1996. The policy
statement provides guidance to examiners and bankers on sound practices for
managing interest rate risk, which will form the basis for ongoing evaluation
of
the adequacy of interest rate risk management at supervised institutions. The
policy statement also outlines fundamental elements of sound management that
have been identified in prior Federal Reserve guidance and discusses the
importance of these elements in the context of managing interest rate risk.
Specifically, the guidance emphasizes the need for active board of director
and
senior management oversight and a comprehensive risk management process that
effectively identifies, measures, and controls interest rate risk.
Financial
institutions derive their income primarily from the excess of interest collected
over interest paid. The rates of interest an institution earns on its assets
and
owes on its liabilities generally are established contractually for a period
of
time. Since market interest rates change over time, an institution is exposed
to
lower profit margins (or losses) if it cannot adapt to interest rate changes.
For example, assume that an institution’s assets carry intermediate or long term
fixed rates and that those assets are funded with short-term liabilities. If
market interest rates rise by the time the short-term liabilities must be
refinanced, the increase in the institution’s interest expense on its
liabilities may not be sufficiently offset if assets continue to earn at the
long-term fixed rates. Accordingly, an institution’s profits could decrease on
existing assets because the institution will either have lower net interest
income or possibly, net interest expense. Similar risks exist when assets are
subject to contractual interest rate ceilings, or rate sensitive assets are
funded by longer-term, fixed-rate liabilities in a declining rate
environment.
27
There
are
several ways an institution can manage interest rate risk including: 1) matching
repricing periods for new assets and liabilities, for example, by shortening
terms of new loans or investments; 2) selling existing assets or repaying
certain liabilities; and 3) hedging existing assets, liabilities, or anticipated
transactions. An institution might also invest in more complex financial
instruments intended to hedge or otherwise change interest rate risk. Interest
rate swaps, futures contacts, options on futures contracts, and other such
derivative financial instruments can be used for this purpose. Because these
instruments are sensitive to interest rate changes, they require management’s
expertise to be effective. The Company has not purchased derivative financial
instruments in the past but may purchase such instruments in the future if
market conditions are favorable.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
The
following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments
used for purposes other than trading that are sensitive to changes in interest
rates as of March 31, 2008. It does not present when these items may actually
reprice. For loans receivable, securities, and liabilities with contractual
maturities, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average
interest rates by contractual maturities as well as the historical impact of
interest rate fluctuations on the prepayment of loans and mortgage backed
securities. For core deposits (demand deposits, interest-bearing checking,
savings, and money market deposits) that have no contractual maturity, the
table
presents principal cash flows and applicable related weighted-average interest
rates based upon the Company’s historical experience, management’s judgment and
statistical analysis, as applicable, concerning their most likely withdrawal
behaviors. The current historical interest rates for core deposits have been
assumed to apply for future periods in this table as the actual interest rates
that will need to be paid to maintain these deposits are not currently known.
Weighted average variable rates are based upon contractual rates existing at
the
reporting date.
Principal/Notional
Amount Maturing or Assumed to Withdraw In:
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
First
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comparison
of 2008 to 2007:
|
|
Year
|
|
2 –
5
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|||||
Total
rate-sensitive assets:
|
|||||||||||||
At
March 31, 2008
|
$
|
174,377
|
$
|
187,940
|
$
|
136,951
|
$
|
499,268
|
|||||
At
December 31, 2007
|
176,907
|
179,502
|
133,191
|
489,601
|
|||||||||
Increase
(decrease)
|
$
|
(2,530
|
)
|
$
|
8,438
|
$
|
3,760
|
$
|
9,667
|
||||
|
|||||||||||||
Total
rate-sensitive liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||
At
March 31, 2008
|
$
|
229,440
|
$
|
252,956
|
$
|
22,291
|
$
|
504,687
|
|||||
At
December 31, 2007
|
231,589
|
241,378
|
21,612
|
494,579
|
|||||||||
Increase
(decrease)
|
$
|
(2,149
|
)
|
$
|
11,578
|
$
|
679
|
$
|
10,108
|
The
above
table reflects expected maturities, not expected repricing. The contractual
maturities adjusted for anticipated prepayments and anticipated renewals at
current interest rates, as shown in the preceding table, are only part of the
Company’s interest rate risk profile. Other important factors include the ratio
of rate-sensitive assets to rate-sensitive liabilities (which takes into
consideration loan repricing frequency, but not when deposits may be repriced)
and the general level and direction of market interest rates. For core deposits,
the repricing frequency is assumed to be longer than when such deposits actually
reprice. For some rate sensitive liabilities, their repricing frequency is
the
same as their contractual maturity. For variable rate loans receivable,
repricing frequency can be daily or monthly. For adjustable rate loans
receivable, repricing can be as frequent as annually for loans whose contractual
maturities range from one to thirty years. Recent Fed actions, economic
conditions and increasingly aggressive local market competition have pushed
loan
rates lower, necessitating the Company’s ability to generate and reprice core
deposits downward which has enabled the Company to reduce overall funding
costs.
28
The
Company manages its interest rate risk by the employment of strategies to assure
that desired levels of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities mature or reprice with similar time frames. Such strategies include:
1) loans receivable which are renewed (and repriced) annually, 2) variable
rate
loans, 3) certificates of deposit with terms from one month to six years, 4)
securities available for sale which mature at various times primarily from
one
through ten years, 5) federal funds borrowings with terms of one day to 90
days,
and 6) FHLB borrowings with terms of one day to ten years.
Item
4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
With
the
participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer (the principal
executive officer) and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(the principal financial officer) of the Company, the Company’s management has
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the quarterly period covered by
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s
President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that:
· |
information
required to be disclosed by the Company in this Quarterly Report
on Form
10-Q and other reports which the Company files or submits under the
Exchange Act would be accumulated and communicated to the Company’s
management, including its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure;
|
· |
information
required to be disclosed by the Company in this Quarterly Report
on Form
10-Q and other reports which the Company files or submits under the
Exchange Act would be recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms;
and
|
· |
the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end
of the quarterly period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
|
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the
Company’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
29
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
There
are
no material pending legal proceedings against the Company or any of its
subsidiaries other than ordinary, routine litigation incidental to their
respective businesses. In the opinion of management, this litigation should
not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
An
investment in our common shares involves certain risks, including those
identified and described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as
well
as in the Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information contained
on page 18 of this Form 10-Q. These risk factors could materially affect the
Company’s business, financial condition or future results. There have been no
material change in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
a. |
Not
applicable
|
b. |
Not
applicable
|
c. |
The
following table provides information regarding repurchases of the
Company’s common shares during the three months ended March 31,
2008:
|
Period
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased (1) |
Average Price
Paid per Share |
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum
Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
|||||||||
January
1 through January 31, 2008
|
902
|
$
|
11.49
|
—
|
201,500
|
||||||||
February
1 through February 29, 2008
|
25,661
|
$
|
11.47
|
22,000
|
179,500
|
||||||||
March
1 through March 31, 2008
|
15,517
|
$
|
10.86
|
15,000
|
164,500
|
(1) |
In
February and March 2008, 3,661 and 517 of the repurchased shares
respectively, were purchased in the open market by Reliance Financial
Services, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, in its capacity
as the
administrator of the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership and Savings Plan.
The balance of shares repurchased were part of the publicly announced
plan.
|
(2) |
On
April 12, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors
had
authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the Company
may
purchase up to 250,000 common shares over the ensuing 15-month
period.
|
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not
applicable
30
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The
2008
Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Rurban Financial Corp. was held on April
17,
2008, in Defiance, Ohio. Mark A. Klein, serving as Chairman of the Annual
Meeting, presided.
At
the
close of business on the February 19, 2008 record date for the Annual Meeting,
a
total of 4,966,537 common shares of the Company were outstanding and entitled
to
vote. A total of 4,208,188, or 84.7% of the outstanding common shares entitled
to vote, were represented by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting.
Therefore, a quorum was present. The proposal to adopt an amendment to Section
2.01 of the Company’s Amended and Restated Regulations, which would have removed
the 70-year age limit with respect to a person’s election or re-election as a
director of the Company, was not approved. The eligible candidates for election
as Directors, pending the outcome of Proposal One listed in the proxy statement,
were elected to serve three-year terms expiring at the Annual Shareholder
Meeting in 2011. The Rurban Financial Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan was
approved.
Summary
of Matters Voted Upon by Shareholders
1.
|
To
adopt the proposed amendment to Section 2.01 of the Company’s Amended and
Restated Regulations, which would remove the 70-year age limit with
respect to a person’s election or re-election as a director of the
Company:
|
Number
of Shares
|
|||||||
Votes
For
|
Votes
Against
|
Abstain
|
|||||
2,381,560
|
944,480
|
882,148
|
2. |
Election
of Directors:
|
Nominee
|
Votes
For
|
Votes
Withheld
|
|||||
John
R. Compo
|
3,669,831
|
538,357
|
|||||
Robert
A. Fawcett, Jr.
|
3,679,800
|
528,388
|
|||||
Rita
A. Kissner
|
3,679,172
|
529,016
|
3. |
To
approve the Rurban Financial Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive
Plan:
|
Votes
For
|
Votes
Against
|
Abstain
|
|||||
2,615,419
|
640,377
|
952,393
|
Directors
whose term of office continued after the Annual Meeting:
Thomas
A.
Buis
Thomas
M.
Callan
Richard
L. Hardgrove
Kenneth
A. Joyce
Thomas
L.
Sauer
Steven
D.
VanDemark
J.
Michael Walz
John
Fahl, who has been a Board Member since 1996 and helped guide your Company
through its challenging times, did not continue as a director following the
Annual Meeting due to the failure of the proposed amendment to Section 2.01
of
the Company’s Amended and Restated Regulations to receive the necessary approval
of shareholders. The amendment required the affirmative vote of at least a
majority of the total common shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting. Although Mr. Fahl received over 80% of the votes cast for his
reelection at the Annual Meeting, he was ineligible for reelection due to the
70-year age limit.
31
Item
5. Other Information
Not
applicable
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibits
31.1
–
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Principal Executive
Officer)
31.2
–
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Principal Financial
Officer)
32.1
–
Section 1350 Certification (Principal Executive Officer)
32.2
–
Section 1350 Certification (Principal Financial Officer)
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
authorized.
RURBAN
FINANCIAL CORP.
|
||
Date:
May
13, 2008
|
By
|
/s/
Kenneth A. Joyce
|
|
Kenneth
A. Joyce
|
|
|
President
& Chief Executive Officer
|
|
By
|
/s/
Duane L. Sinn
|
|
|
Duane
L. Sinn
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President &
|
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
33