SB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)

Unassociated Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
	SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
	OR
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
	SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from ___________ to ____________

Commission File Number 0-13507

RURBAN FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio		34-1395608
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

401 Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio		43512
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(419) 783-8950

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Shares, Without Par Value		The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Not Applicable

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large Accelerate Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the common shares of the registrant held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common shares were last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $34,820,386.

The number of common shares of the registrant outstanding at March 17, 2010 was 4,861,779.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 22, 2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RURBAN FINANCIAL CORP.

2009 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1.	Business	3

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	25
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	32
Item 2.	Properties	32
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	34
Item 4.	Reserved	34
Supplemental Item: Executive Officers of the Registrant		35

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	36
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	39
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	40
Item 7A.	Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk	60
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	60
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	60
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	60
Item 9B.	Other Information	61

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	61
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	62
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	62
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	63
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	63

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	64

Signatures and Certifications		68

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” under Item 1A. Risk Factors on page 25 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

General

Rurban Financial Corp., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”), is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”). The Company was organized in 1983. The executive offices of the Company are located at 401 Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio 43512.

Through its direct and indirect subsidiaries, The State Bank and Trust Company (“State Bank”), RFCBC, Inc. (“RFCBC”), RDSI Banking Systems (“RDSI”), Rurban Mortgage Company (“RMC”), Rurban Investments, Inc. (“RII”), Rurban Statutory Trust I (“RST I”), and Rurban Statutory Trust II (“RST II”), the Company is engaged in a variety of activities, including commercial banking, data and item processing, and trust and financial services, as explained in more detail below. State Bank owns all of the outstanding stock of Rurban Mortgage Company (“RMC”) and Rurban Investments Inc. (“RII”).

General Description of Holding Company Group

State Bank

State Bank is an Ohio state-chartered bank. State Bank presently operates five branch offices in Defiance County, Ohio (four in the city of Defiance), two branch offices in adjacent Paulding County, Ohio (one each in Paulding and Oakwood), three branch offices in Fulton County, Ohio (one each in Delta, Lyons and Wauseon), one branch offices in Allen County, Ohio, three branch offices in Wood County, Ohio (one each in Luckey, Walbridge and Perrysburg), four branch offices in Williams County, Ohio (one each in Montpelier, Bryan, Pioneer, and West Unity), one branch office in Lucas County, Ohio (Sylvania), a Commercial and Mortgage Loan Production Office in Franklin County, Ohio, a Mortgage Loan Production Office in Steuben County, Indiana and one branch office in Allen County, Indiana. At December 31, 2009, State Bank had 190 full-time equivalent employees.

State Bank offers a full range of commercial banking services, including checking accounts, passbook savings, money market accounts and time certificates of deposit; automatic teller machines; commercial, consumer, agricultural and residential mortgage loans (including “Home Value Equity” line of credit loans); personal and corporate trust services; commercial leasing; bank credit card services; safe deposit box rentals; Internet and telephone banking; and other personalized banking services.

Reliance Financial Services (“RFS”) is the trust and financial services division of State Bank. RFS offers various trust and financial services, including asset management services for individuals and corporate employee benefit plans, as well as brokerage services through Raymond James Financial, Inc.

RMC

RMC is an Ohio corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of State Bank. RMC is a mortgage company; however, it ceased originating mortgage loans in the second quarter of 2000 and is presently inactive. At December 31, 2009, RMC had no employees.

RFCBC

RFCBC is an Ohio corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that was incorporated in August 2004. RFCBC operates as a loan subsidiary in servicing and working out problem loans. At December 31, 2009, RFCBC had no employees.

RDSI

RDSI has been in operation since 1964 and became an Ohio corporation in June 1976. RDSI has one operating location in Defiance, Ohio. In September 2006, RDSI acquired Diverse Computer Marketers, Inc. (“DCM”) which was merged into RDSI effective December 31, 2007 and now operates as a division of RDSI doing business as “DCM”. DCM has one operating location in Lansing, Michigan.

RDSI delivers software systems to the banking industry which provide a broad range of data processing and item processing services in an outsourced environment utilizing Information Technology Inc. (ITI) software. At December 31, 2009, RDSI had 109 full-time equivalent employees.

RST I

RST I is a trust that was organized in August 2000. In September 2000, RST I closed a pooled private offering of 10,000 Capital Securities with a liquidation amount of $1,000 per security. The proceeds of the offering were loaned to the Company in exchange for junior subordinated debentures with terms similar to the Capital Securities. The sole assets of RST I are the junior subordinated debentures and the back-up obligations, which in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the obligations of RST I under the Capital Securities.

RST II

RST II is a trust that was organized in August 2005. In September 2005, RST II closed a pooled private offering of 10,000 Capital Securities with a liquidation amount of $1,000 per security. The proceeds of the offering were loaned to the Company in exchange for junior subordinated debentures with terms similar to the Capital Securities. The sole assets of RST II are the junior subordinated debentures and the back-up obligations, which in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the obligations of RST II under the Capital Securities.

Recent Developments

State Bank

At State Bank, asset quality issues increased throughout the year, with non-performing assets increasing to 3.02 percent of total assets as of December 31, 2009, from 1.00 percent of total assets at year end 2008. Net charge-offs increased to 0.84 percent of total loans for 2009 compared to 0.19 percent of loans for 2008.

As part of its continuing program to reduce operating expenses, State Bank closed two banking centers in 2009, one in Ney, Ohio and one in Montpelier, Ohio. In early 2010 State Bank closed a banking center in Lima, Ohio

Rurban increased its dividend to shareholders from $0.34 per share during 2008 to $0.36 per share in 2009. However, due to an increase in problem assets in the fourth quarter of 2009, the dividend for the first quarter of 2010 was suspended and on-going dividend payouts will be evaluated quarterly

The mortgage banking business line continues to grow, with residential real estate loan production of $238 million for the year, driven by the refinancing boom, compared to $38 million for 2008.

Included within the $5.7 million provision for loan losses, was a provision for a $1.15 million loss recorded due to mortgage fraud by an external title insurance broker. State Bank plans to pursue litigation filed against the principal involved, the local title company, and a title insurance company for recovery of the fraud loss.

RDSI

On April 27, 2009, RDSI announced a strategic partnership with New Core Holdings, Inc. d/b/a New Core Banking Systems, headquartered in Birmingham, AL (“New Core”). As part of this partnership, RDSI and New Core entered into a Reseller Software License and Support Agreement pursuant to which RDSI was granted rights as the exclusive provider of New Core’s Single Source™ software.

RDSI and New Core also entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which New Core would be merged with a newly-created subsidiary of RDSI and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of RDSI. A prerequisite of this merger would be the spin-off of RDSI from Rurban, resulting in RDSI becoming a separate independent public company. This would be followed immediately by the merger of RDSI and New Core. In the merger, the New Core shareholders would receive between 15.5 percent and 26.8 percent of the aggregate common shares of RDSI outstanding immediately following the merger. On October 22, 2009, Rurban announced that its board of directors had approved proceeding with the appropriate filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in connection with the contemplated spin-off of RDSI. RDSI anticipates that the spin-off would be completed in the second quarter of 2010, subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions including final approval by Rurban’s Board of Directors of the spin-off and its terms.

Following RDSI’s April 2009 announcement of its proposed merger and strategic partnership with New Core, RDSI received notice from Information Technology, Inc. and Fiserv Solutions, Inc. (“Fiserv”) stating Fiserv’s intention to terminate a series of license agreements between RDSI and Fiserv (the “License Agreements”). Pursuant to the License Agreements, RDSI licensed Fiserv’s Premier and other software products which it used to provide data processing services to many of its financial institution customers.

On May 22, 2009, RDSI received a complaint in a lawsuit filed against it by Fiserv in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska. In the lawsuit, Fiserv sought declaratory and injunctive relief relating to the License Agreements and asserted claims for breach of contract.

On July 28, 2009, RDSI reached an agreement with Fiserv to wind down their licensing relationship. Pursuant to this agreement, after December 31, 2010, Fiserv will no longer license its Premier suite of products to RDSI and RDSI will exclusively market New Core’s Single Source™ software system. RDSI customers which presently rely on the Premier platform have the option to continue their processing with RDSI and convert to Single Source™, or to move their processing to Fiserv and continue to use Premier. As of the date of the agreement with Fiserv (July 28, 2009), RDSI had 74 data processing customers using Fiserv’s Premier software. RDSI also provides item processing services to customers through its DCM division using software licensed from Bankware.

Since entering into the agreement with Fiserv, RDSI has begun its marketing efforts to offer New Core’s Single Source™ software to its current data processing customers. As of March 17, 2010, 31 of RDSI’s 74 customers had notified RDSI of their intentions to move their processing away from RDSI. As of March 17, 2010, RDSI had 8 executed contracts from current RDSI customers to convert to the Single Source™ software and remain with RDSI. The conversion of the first of these customers – the Company’s subsidiary, State Bank – is expected to be completed during March 2010. As of March 17, 2010, 35 of RDSI’s current customers had not yet notified RDSI as to their final decision as to whether they will continue their processing with RDSI and convert to Single Source™ or move their processing away from RDSI. Because the decisions by these customers may be made throughout 2010, RDSI is currently unable to determine the number of additional customers that may choose to move their processing away from RDSI, or the amount of additional revenue that RDSI may lose as a result.

RDSI expects to ultimately offset the loss of current customers and associated revenues through the customers gained by the planned merger with New Core and through the addition of new banking customers that execute contracts to move their processing to RDSI and convert to Single Source™. As of March 17, 2010, New Core had one banking site using the Single Source™ software and 4 executed contracts with non-RDSI customers. However, the amount and timing of RDSI’s receipt of revenues from new customers is currently uncertain, and there can be no assurances that RDSI will be able to fully replace the revenues it loses from current customers that elect to move their processing away from RDSI. The sales process of offering the Single Source™ software is a complex effort involving software presentations, viewing of test software, and the prospective customer’s due diligence, concluding with approval by the prospective customer’s board of directors and execution of a contract.

In view of the foregoing, it is anticipated that RDSI will experience a significant decrease in revenues in 2010 and that annual revenues will not recover to 2009 levels until after 2010, if at all. Although RDSI has some ability, if necessary, to reduce staffing levels and certain variable expenses to partially offset the impact of decreases in revenues over time, RDSI does not anticipate a reduction in overall expenses in 2010. Rather, RDSI expects to continue to incur increased expenses over the next 12 months in connection with its increased sales, marketing and conversion efforts with respect to the Single Source™ software, as well as continued accelerated depreciation of RDSI’s Fiserv-related assets. In addition, RDSI is likely to incur increased expenses following the planned spin-off and merger with New Core in connection with the management and operation of RDSI as an independent public company and the increased research and development expenses associated with the continued development and enhancement of Single Source™. These expenses will be partially or fully offset by the elimination of software leasing fees currently paid to Fiserv. Finally, it is anticipated that the loss of bank clients by RDSI may cause the current portion of goodwill reflected on RDSI’s balance sheet to become impaired, which would require RDSI to record a non-cash loss through its income statement as early as the first quarter of 2010.

As a result of the anticipated decrease in revenues resulting from the loss of current RDSI customers, the uncertainty regarding if and when the lost revenues will be replaced through the addition of new customers, and the anticipated increased expenses that will be incurred by RDSI in 2010, RDSI is expected to experience a net loss in 2010 and possibly beyond. Because of the uncertainties described above, the extent of the net loss in 2010 cannot be determined at this time. No assurances can be given that the net loss for 2010 will not be significant or that the net loss by RDSI will not extend beyond 2010.

We believe that RDSI’s current capital level is adequate and do not expect that RDSI will need to raise additional capital to support its business operations in 2010 or 2011. However, in the event that the amount of net losses by RDSI are greater than currently anticipated, there is a risk that RDSI may be required to raise additional capital. RDSI’s ability to raise additional capital, if and when needed, will depend upon conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, many of which are outside RDSI’s control, and on RDSI’s financial performance and condition. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that RDSI will be able to raise additional capital if and when needed or on terms acceptable to RDSI. If RDSI cannot raise additional capital if and when needed, it may have a material adverse effect on RDSI’s financial condition and results of operations.

Competition

State Bank experiences significant competition in attracting depositors and borrowers. Competition in lending activities comes principally from other commercial banks in the lending areas of State Bank, and, to a lesser extent, from savings associations, insurance companies, governmental agencies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms and pension funds. The primary factors in competing for loans are interest rates charged and overall banking services.

State Bank’s competition for deposits comes from other commercial banks, savings associations, money market funds and credit unions as well as from insurance companies and securities brokerage firms. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates paid on deposits, account liquidity and convenience of office location.

RDSI and DCM also operate in a highly competitive field. RDSI and DCM compete primarily on the basis of the value and quality of their data processing and item processing services and convenience to their customers.

RFS operates in the highly competitive trust services field and its competition consists primarily of other bank trust departments.

Supervision and Regulation

The following is a description of the significant statutes and regulations applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries. The description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the statutes, regulations and policies that are described. Also, such statutes, regulations and policies are continually under review by the U.S. Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or its subsidiaries could have a material effect on our business.

Regulation of Bank Holding Companies and Their Subsidiaries in General

The Company is a bank holding company and, as such, is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “Bank Holding Company Act”). The Bank Holding Company Act requires the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before a bank holding company may acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank (unless the bank is already majority owned by the bank holding company), acquire all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company, or merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company. Subject to certain exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act also prohibits a bank holding company from acquiring 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank and from engaging in any business other than banking or managing or controlling banks. The primary exception to this prohibition allows a bank holding company to own shares in any company the activities of which the Federal Reserve Board had determined, as of November 19, 1999, to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto.

The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of, and examination and regulation by, the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board has extensive enforcement authority over bank holding companies, including, without limitation, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist or removal orders, and require that a bank holding company divest subsidiaries, including its subsidiary banks. In general, the Federal Reserve Board may initiate enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. A bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with extensions of credit and/or the provision of other property or services to a customer by the bank holding company or its subsidiaries.

Under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support its subsidiary bank. Pursuant to this policy, the Federal Reserve Board may require a bank holding company to contribute additional capital to an undercapitalized subsidiary bank.

State Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System, so its primary federal regulator is the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board issues regulations governing the operations of State Bank and examines State Bank. The Federal Reserve Board may initiate enforcement action against insured depository institutions and affiliated persons for violations of laws and regulations and for engaging in unsafe or unsound practices. The deposits of State Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and are subject to the applicable provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

As a state-chartered bank incorporated under Ohio law, State Bank is also subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions (the “Division”). The Division may initiate supervisory measures or formal enforcement actions against Ohio state-chartered banks and, if the grounds provided by law exist, the Division may place an Ohio bank in conservatorship or receivership. Whenever the Division considers it necessary or appropriate, the Division may also examine the affairs of any holding company or any affiliate or subsidiary of an Ohio bank.

Various requirements and restrictions under the laws of the United States and the State of Ohio affect the operations of State Bank, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the nature and amount of loans which may be made and the interest that may be charged thereon, restrictions relating to investments and other activities, limitations on credit exposure to correspondent banks, limitations on activities based on capital and surplus, limitations on payment of dividends, and limitations on branching. Various consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of State Bank.

The Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLBs”) provide credit to their members in the form of advances. As a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati, State Bank must maintain certain minimum investments in the capital stock of the FHLB of Cincinnati. State Bank was in compliance with these requirements at December 31, 2009.

Dividends

The ability of the Company to obtain funds for the payment of dividends and for other cash requirements is largely dependent on the amount of dividends that may be declared by its subsidiaries. State Bank may not pay dividends to the Company if, after paying such dividends, it would fail to meet the required minimum levels under the risk-based capital guidelines and the minimum leverage ratio requirements. State Bank must obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board and the Division if a dividend in any year would cause the total dividends for that year to exceed the sum of the current year’s net profits and the retained net profits for the preceding two years, less required transfers to surplus. Payment of dividends by State Bank may be restricted at any time at the discretion of the regulatory authorities, if they deem such dividends to constitute an unsafe and/or unsound banking practice. These provisions could have the effect of limiting the Company’s ability to pay dividends on its outstanding common shares. Moreover, the Federal Reserve Board expects the Company to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks, which may require it to retain capital for further investment in the subsidiary, rather than for dividends to shareholders of the Company.

On January 27, 2010, the Company announced that it has elected to suspend payment of quarterly cash dividends at this time and will evaluate future dividend payouts on a quarterly basis. There can be no assurance as to the amount of dividends which may be declared in future periods with respect to the common shares of the Company, since such dividends are subject to the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, cash needs, general business conditions, dividends from the subsidiaries and applicable governmental regulations and policies.

Transactions with Affiliates, Directors, Executive Officers and Shareholders

Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Federal Reserve Board Regulation W restrict transactions by banks and their subsidiaries with their affiliates. Any company or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with a bank is generally considered to be an affiliate of the bank.

In general, Sections 23A and 23B and Regulation W:

limit the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus (i.e., tangible capital);

limit the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with all affiliates to 20% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus; and

require that all covered transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the bank or subsidiary, as those provided to non-affiliates.

The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee and similar types of transactions.

A bank’s authority to extend credit to executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders, as well as entities such persons control, is subject to Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O promulgated there under by the Federal Reserve Board. Among other things, these loans must be made on terms substantially the same as those offered to unaffiliated individuals (or be made under a benefit or compensation program and on terms widely available to employees) and must not involve a greater than normal risk of repayment. In addition, the amount of loans a bank may make to these persons is based, in part, on the bank’s capital position, and specified approval procedures must be followed in making loans which exceed specified amounts.

Regulatory Capital

The Federal Reserve Board has adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies and for state member banks, such as State Bank. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk weighted assets by assigning assets and off-balance-sheet items to broad risk categories. The minimum ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets (including certain off-balance-sheet items, such as standby letters of credit) is 8%. Of that 8%, 4% is to be comprised of common shareholders’ equity (including retained earnings but excluding treasury stock), non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock, and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (“Tier 1 capital”). The remainder of total risk-based capital (“Tier 2 capital”) may consist, among other things, of certain amounts of mandatory convertible debt securities, subordinated debt, preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 capital, an allowance for loan and lease losses and net unrealized gains, after applicable taxes, on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, all subject to limitations established by the guidelines. The Federal Reserve Board also imposes a minimum leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to total assets) of 3% for bank holding companies and state member banks that meet certain specified conditions, including no operational, financial or supervisory deficiencies, and including having the highest regulatory rating. The minimum leverage ratio is 1%-2% higher for other bank holding companies and state member banks based on their particular circumstances and risk profiles and those experiencing or anticipating significant growth. Failure to meet applicable capital guidelines could subject a banking institution to a variety of enforcement remedies available to federal and state regulatory authorities, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC.

The federal banking regulators have established regulations governing prompt corrective action to resolve capital deficient banks. The regulations establish five capital level categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Under these regulations, institutions which become undercapitalized can become subject to mandatory regulatory scrutiny and limitations, which increase as capital decreases. Such institutions may also be required to file capital plans with their primary federal regulator, and their holding companies may be required to guarantee the capital shortfall up to 5% of the assets of the capital deficient institution at the time it becomes undercapitalized.

The Company’s management believes that the Company and State Bank, at year end 2009, satisfied all requirements to be deemed “well capitalized”.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”)

The FDIC is an independent federal agency which insures the deposits of federally-insured banks and savings associations up to certain prescribed limits and safeguards the safety and soundness of financial institutions. State Bank’s deposits are subject to the deposit insurance assessments of the FDIC. Under the FDIC’s deposit insurance assessment system, the assessment rate for any insured institution may vary according to regulatory capital levels of the institution and other factors such as supervisory evaluations.

The FDIC is authorized to prohibit any insured institution from engaging in any activity that poses a serious threat to the insurance fund and may initiate enforcement actions against a bank, after first giving the institution’s primary regulatory authority an opportunity to take such action. The FDIC may also terminate the deposit insurance of any institution that has engaged in or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.

Monetary Policy and Economic Conditions

The commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the policies of various governmental regulatory authorities, including the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board regulates money and credit conditions and interest rates in order to influence general economic conditions primarily through open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in the discount rate on bank borrowings and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These policies and regulations significantly affect the overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, and the interest rates charged on loans as well as the interest rates paid on deposits and accounts.

Holding Company Activities

In November 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was enacted, permitting bank holding companies to become financial holding companies and thereby affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities that are financial in nature. A bank holding company may become a financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Act of 1991 prompt corrective action provisions, is well managed, and has at least a satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act by filing a declaration that the bank holding company wishes to become a financial holding company. No regulatory approval is required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act defines “financial in nature” to include: (i) securities underwriting, dealing and market making; (ii) sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; (iii) insurance underwriting and agency; (iv) merchant banking activities; and (v) activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be closely related to banking.

The Company has not elected to become a financial holding company. The Company intends to continue to analyze the proposed advantages and disadvantages of becoming a financial holding company on a periodic basis.

10.

SEC and NASDAQ Regulation

The Company is subject to the jurisdiction of the SEC and certain state securities authorities relating to the offering and sale of its securities. The Company is subject to the registration, reporting and other regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the rules adopted by the SEC under those acts. The Company’s common shares are listed on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “RBNF”, and the Company is subject to the rules and regulations of The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (“NASDAQ”) applicable to listed companies.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Related Rules Affecting Corporate Governance

As mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), the SEC has adopted rules and regulations governing, among other matters, corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced the timely disclosure of corporate information. The SEC has also approved corporate governance rules promulgated by NASDAQ. The Board of Directors of the Company has taken a series of actions to comply with the NASDAQ and SEC rules and to further strengthen its corporate governance practices. The Company has adopted and implemented a Code of Conduct and Ethics and a copy of that policy can be found on the Company’s website at www.rurbanfinancial.net by first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Code of Conduct”. The Company has also adopted charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee, which charters are available on the Company’s website at www.rurbanfinancial.net by first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Supplementary Info”.

Patriot Act

The Uniting and Strengthening of America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”) gives the United States Government greater powers over financial institutions to combat money laundering and terrorist access to the financial system in our country. The Patriot Act requires regulated financial institutions to establish programs for obtaining identifying information from customers seeking to open new accounts and establish enhanced due diligence policies, procedures and controls designed to detect and report suspicious activity.

Effect of Environmental Regulation

Compliance with federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has not had a material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company believes that the nature of the operations of its subsidiaries has little, if any, environmental impact. The Company, therefore, anticipates no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities for its current fiscal year or for the foreseeable future. The Company’s subsidiaries may be required to make capital expenditures for environmental control facilities related to properties which they may acquire through foreclosure proceedings in the future; however, the amount of such capital expenditures, if any, is not currently determinable.

Available Information

The Company will provide, without charge, to each shareholder, upon written request to Rurban Financial Corp., P.O. Box 467, Defiance, Ohio 43512, Attention: Linda Sickmiller, Investor Relations Department, a copy of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the Financial Statements and Schedules thereto required to be filed with the SEC, for the Company's most recent fiscal year.

11.

The Company maintains an Internet website at www.rurbanfinancial.net (this uniform resource locator, or URL, is an inactive textual reference only and is not intended to incorporate the Company’s website into this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The Company makes available free of charge on or through its Internet website the Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as well as the Company’s definitive proxy statements filed pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes such material to, the SEC.

Statistical Financial Information Regarding the Company

The following schedules and tables analyze certain elements of the consolidated balance sheets and statements of income of the Company and its subsidiaries, as required under Exchange Act Industry Guide 3 promulgated by the SEC, and should be read in conjunction with the narrative analysis presented in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and its subsidiaries included at pages F-1 through F-57 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

12.

I.	DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL

The following are the condensed average balance sheets for the years ending December 31 and the interest earned or paid on such amounts and the average interest rate thereon:

	2009								2008								2007
($in thousands)	Average					Average			Average					Average			Average					Average
	Balance			Interest		Rate			Balance			Interest		Rate			Balance			Interest		Rate
Assets:
Securities
Taxable	$	89,092		$	4,083		4.58	%	$	84,301		$	4,293		5.09	%	$	84,389		$	4,284		5.08	%
Non-taxable (1)		27,114			1,611		5.94	%		17,193			1,040		6.05	%		16,405			978		5.96	%
Federal funds sold		77			0		0.17	%		4,985			134		2.68	%		5,072			225		4.44	%
Loans, net (2)(3)		453,787			27,492		6.06	%		401,770			27,601		6.87	%		381,449			27,893		7.31	%
Total earning assets		570,070			33,186		5.82	%		508,250			33,067		6.51	%		487,315			33,380		6.85	%
Cash and due from banks		27,573								9,570								11,605
Allowance for loan losses		(5,650	)							(4,182	)							(3,843	)
Premises and equipment		23,993								21,145								19,788
Other assets		51,485								40,708								41,707

Total assets	$	667,470							$	575,491							$	556,572

Liabilities
Deposits
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits	$	209,394		$	780		0.37	%	$	158,765		$	1,748		1.10	%	$	138,314		$	2,714		1.96	%
Time deposits		226,275		$	5,747		2.54	%		213,891			8,319		3.89	%		231,605			10,882		4.70	%
Short-term borrowings		46,930			1,869		3.98	%		44,891			1,874		4.18	%		36,588			1,653		4.52	%
Advances from FHLB		38,571			1,625		4.21	%		33,377			1,508		4.52	%		19,329			1,037		5.36	%
Junior subordinated debentures		20,620			1,573		7.63	%		20,620			1,692		8.20	%		20,620			1,809		8.77	%
Other borrowed funds		-			-		N/A			-			-		N/A			1,641			127		7.74	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		541,790			11,594		2.14	%		471,544			15,141		3.21	%		448,097			18,222		4.07	%

Demand deposits		53,857								35,386								42,848
Other liabilities		8,246								8,597								7,682
Total liabilities		603,894								515,527								498,627
Shareholders' equity		63,576								59,964								57,945

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	667,470							$	575,491							$	556,572

Net interest income (tax equivalent basis)				$	21,592							$	17,926							$	15,158

Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets							3.79	%							3.53	%							3.11	%

(1)	Security interest is computed on a tax equivalent basis using a 34% statutory tax rate. The tax equivalent adjustment was $548,000, $354,000 and $333,000 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

(2)	Nonaccruing loans and loans held for sale are included in the average balances.

(3)	Loan interest is computed on a tax equivalent basis using a 34% statutory tax rate. The tax equivalent adjustment was $47,000, $44,000 and $38,000 in 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively.

13.

I.	DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL (Continued)

The following tables set forth the effect of volume and rate changes on interest income and expense for the periods indicated. For purposes of these tables, changes in interest due to volume and rate were determined as follows:

Volume Variance - change in volume multiplied by the previous year's rate.

Rate Variance - change in rate multiplied by the previous year's volume.

Rate/Volume Variance - change in volume multiplied by the change in rate. This variance was allocated to volume variance and rate variance in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of the change in each.

Interest on non-taxable securities has been adjusted to a fully tax equivalent basis using a statutory tax rate of 34% in 2009, 2008 and 2007.

	Total
	Variance			Variance Attributable To
	2009/2008			Volume			Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest income
Securities
Taxable	$	(210	)	$	235		$	(445	)
Non-taxable		571			590			(19	)
Federal funds sold		(134	)		(134	)		-
Loans, net of unearned income and deferred loan fees		(108	)		3,353			(3,461	)
		119			4,044			(3,925	)

Interest expense
Deposits
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits		(968	)		437			(1,405	)
Time deposits		(2,572	)		458			(3,030	)
Short-term borrowings		(5	)		83			(88	)
Advances from FHLB		117			224			(107	)
Trust preferred securities		(119	)		-			(119	)
Other borrowed funds		-			-			-
	$	(3,547	)	$	1,202		$	(4,749	)

Net interest income	$	3,666		$	2,842		$	824

14.

I.	DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY; INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL (Continued)

	Total
	Variance			Variance Attributable To
	2008/2007			Volume			Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest income
Securities
Taxable	$	11		$	(4	)	$	15
Non-taxable		62			48			14
Federal funds sold		(94	)		(4	)		(90	)
Loans, net of unearned income and deferred loan fees		(292	)		1,444			(1,736	)
		(313	)		1,484			(1,797	)

Interest expense
Deposits
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits		(966	)		357			(1,323	)
Time deposits		(2,563	)		(788	)		(1,775	)
Short-term borrowings		221			354			(133	)
Advances from FHLB		471			656			(185	)
Trust preferred securities		(117	)		-			(117	)
Other borrowed funds		(127	)		(127	)		-
	$	(3,081	)	$	452		$	(3,533	)

Net interest income	$	2,768		$	1,032		$	1,736

15.

II.	INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

The book value of securities available for sale as of December 31 in each of the following years are summarized as follows:

Book Value of Securities

	2009		2008		2007
	(dollars in thousands)
U.S. Treaury and government agencies	$	12,944	$	15,184	$	40,189
State and political subdivisions		31,537		22,801		16,019
Mortgage-backed securities		52,246		64,546		36,380
Money Market Mutual Fund		8,333		-		-
Other securities		-		52		50
Marketable equity securities		23		23		23

Total	$	105,083	$	102,606	$	92,661

The maturity distribution and weighted average interest rates of securities available for sale at December 31, 2009 are set forth in the table below. The weighted average interest rates are based on coupon rates for securities purchased at par value and on effective interest rates considering amortization or accretion if the securities were purchased at a premium or discount:

	Maturing
				After One Year			After Five Years
	Within			but within			but within			After
	One Year			Five Years			Ten Years			Ten Years
	(dollars in thousands)
U.S. Treaury and government agencies	$	-		$	107		$	4,489		$	8,348
State and political subdivisions		1,045			3,781			5,518			21,193
Mortgage-backed securities		527			2,417			-			49,302

Total Securities with maturity	$	1,572		$	6,305		$	10,007		$	78,843

Weighted average yield by maturity (1)		3.63	%		4.03	%		3.06	%		4.75	%

Money Market Mutual Fund with no maturity	$	8,333			-			-			-
Marketable equity securities with no maturity		23			-			-			-

Total Securities with no stated maturity	$	8,356		$	-		$	-		$	-

Weighted average yield no maturity (1)	< 0.01		%		-			-			-

(1)

Yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Money market funds represent the payments received on mortgage-backed securities or funds received from the maturity or calls of U.S Treasury, government agency and municipal securities. These funds are then reinvested back into these securities

16.

Excluding those holdings of the investment portfolio in U.S. Treasury securities and other agencies of the U.S. Government, there were no other securities of any one issuer which exceeded 10% of the shareholders' equity of the Company at December 31, 2009.

III.	LOAN PORTFOLIO

Types of Loans - Total loans on the balance sheet are comprised of the following classifications at December 31 for the years indicated:

Types of Loans

(dollars in thousands)	2009		2008		2007		2006		2005

Commercial business and agricultural	$	126,128	$	127,287	$	126,418	$	116,324	$	123,559
Commercial real estate		179,909		161,566		126,784		109,503		64,108
Real estate mortgage		92,972		107,905		84,621		94,389		89,086
Consumer loans to individuals		53,655		53,339		51,358		49,314		48,877
Leases		221		266		330		857		1,661

Total loans	$	452,885	$	450,363	$	389,511	$	370,387	$	327,291

Real estate mortgage loans held for resale	$	16,858	$	3,824	$	1,650	$	390	$	224

Concentrations of Credit Risk: The Company grants commercial, real estate and installment loans to customers mainly in Northwest Ohio. Commercial loans include loans collateralized by commercial real estate, business assets and, in the case of agricultural loans, crops and farm equipment and the loans are expected to be repaid from cash flow from operations of businesses. As of December 31, 2009, commercial business and agricultural loans made up approximately 27.8 percent of the loan portfolio while commercial real estate loans accounted for approximately 39.7 percent of the loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2009, residential first mortgage loans made up approximately 20.5 percent of the loan portfolio and are secured by first mortgages on residential real estate. As of December 31, 2009, consumer loans to individuals made up approximately 11.9% of the loan portfolio and are primarily secured by consumer assets.

Maturities and Sensitivities of Loans to Changes in Interest Rates - The following table shows the amounts of commercial and agricultural loans outstanding as of December 31, 2009 which, based on remaining scheduled repayments of principal, are due in the periods indicated. Also, the amounts have been classified according to sensitivity to changes in interest rates for commercial and agricultural loans due after one year. (Variable-rate loans are those loans with floating or adjustable interest rates.)

Maturing	Commercial Business		Commercial
(dollars in thousands)	and Agricultural		Real Estate		Total
Within one year	$	21,280	$	13,673	$	34,953
After one year but within five years		40,771		47,890		88,661
After five years		64,077		118,346		182,423

Total commercial business, commercial real estate and agricultural loans	$	126,128	$	179,909	$	306,037

17.

III.	LOAN PORTFOLIO (Continued)

	Interest Sensitivity
	Fixed		Variable
	Rate		Rate		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial Business and Agricultural

Due after one year but within five years	$	17,416	$	23,355	$	40,771
Due after five years		4,548		59,529		64,077

Total	$	21,964	$	82,884	$	104,848

Commercial Real Estate

Due after one year but within five years		14,082		33,808		47,890
Due after five years		19,527		98,819		118,346

Total	$	33,609	$	132,627	$	166,236

Commercial Business, Commercial
Real Estate and Agricultural

Due after one year but within five years		31,498		57,163		88,661
Due after five years		24,075		158,348		182,423

Total	$	55,573	$	215,511	$	271,084

Risk Elements

Non-accrual, Past Due, Restructured and Impaired Loans – The following schedule summarizes non-accrual, past due, restructured and impaired loans at December 31 in each of the following years.

	2009		2008		2007		2006		2005
	(dollars in thousands)
(a) Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis	$	18,543	$	5,178	$	5,990	$	3,828	$	6,270
(b) Accruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments		-		-		-		-		5
(c) Loans not included in (a) which are "Troubled Debt Restructurings" as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15		1,364		151		159		166		825
Total non-performing loans	$	19,907	$	5,329	$	6,149	$	3,994	$	7,100

(d) Other loans defined as impaired	$	3,597	$	1,868	$	593	$	82	$	3,283

	2009
	($ In thousands)
Cash basis interest income recognized on impaired loans outstanding at December 31, 2009	$	597

Interest income actually recorded on impaired loans and included in net income for the period		565

2009 unrecorded interest income on non-accrual loans		402

18.

III.	LOAN PORTFOLIO (Continued)

Management believes the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2009 was adequate to absorb any losses on non-performing loans, as the allowance balance is maintained by management at a level considered adequate to cover losses that are probable based on past loss experience, general economic conditions, information about specific borrower situations, including their financial position and collateral values, and other factors and estimates which are subject to change over time.

Discussion of the Non-accrual Policy

The accrual of interest income is discontinued when the collection of a loan or interest, in whole or in part, is doubtful. When interest accruals are discontinued, interest income accrued in the current period is reversed. While loans which are past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments are considered for non-accrual status, management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when the estimated net realizable value of collateral, in management’s judgment, is sufficient to cover the principal balance and accrued interest. These policies apply to both commercial and consumer loans.

Potential Problem Loans

As of December 31, 2009, in addition to the $19,907,000 of non-performing loans reported under Item III.C.1. above (which amount includes all loans classified by management as doubtful or loss), there were approximately $11,723,000 in other outstanding loans where known information about possible credit problems of the borrowers caused management to have concerns as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms (loans classified as substandard by management) and which may result in disclosure of such loans pursuant to Item III.C.1. at some future date. In regard to loans classified as substandard, management believes that such potential problem loans have been adequately evaluated in the allowance of loan losses.

19.

III.	LOAN PORTFOLIO (Continued)

Foreign Outstandings

None

Loan Concentrations

At December 31, 2009, loans outstanding related to agricultural operations or collateralized by agricultural real estate and equipment aggregated approximately $41,485,000, or 9.2 % of total loans.

Other Interest-Bearing Assets

There were no other interest-bearing assets as of December 31, 2009 which would be required to be disclosed under Item III.C.1 or Item III.C.2. if such assets were loans.

20.

IV. SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE

The following schedule presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses, average loan data and related ratios for the years ended December 31:

Summary of Loan Loss Experience

	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
	(dollars in thousands)
Loans
Loans outstanding at end of period	$	452,558		$	450,112		$	389,269		$	370,102		$	327,048

Average loans outstanding during period	$	453,787		$	401,770		$	381,453		$	354,726		$	268,158

Allowance for loan losses
Balance at beginning of period	$	5,020		$	3,990		$	3,717		$	4,700		$	4,899
Balance, of ALLL acquired in Exchange acquisition														910
Balance, of ALLL acquired in Montpelier acquisition					1,104
Loans charged-off:
Commercial business and agricultural loans		(1,248	)		(277	)		(86	)		(1,047	)		(2,249	)
Commercial real estate		(918	)		(212	)		(18	)		(230	)		(511	)
Real estate mortgage		(1,218	)		(172	)		(81	)		(100	)		(133	)
Leases		-			-			-			-			(208	)
Consumer loans to individuals		(491	)		(261	)		(247	)		(440	)		(308	)
		(3,875	)		(922	)		(432	)		(1,817	)		(3,409	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
Commercial business and agricultural loans		50			67			72			405			1,548
Commercial real estate		14			24			13			14			18
Real estate mortgage		54			4			4			75			2
Leases		-			-			-			-			4
Consumer loans to individuals		29			63			95			162			145
		147			158			184			656			1,717

Net loans charged-off		(3,728	)		(764	)		(248	)		(1,160	)		(1,692	)

Provision for loan losses		5,738			690			521			178			583

Balance at end of period	$	7,030		$	5,020		$	3,990		$	3,717		$	4,700

Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period		0.84	%		0.19	%		0.07	%		0.33	%		0.63	%

The allowance for loan losses balance and the provision for loan losses are determined by management based upon periodic reviews of the loan portfolio. In addition, management considered the level of charge-offs on loans as well as the fluctuations of charge-offs and recoveries on loans in the factors which caused these changes. Estimating the risk of loss and the amount of loss is necessarily subjective. Accordingly, the allowance is maintained by management at a level considered adequate to cover losses that are currently anticipated based on past loss experience, economic conditions, information about specific borrower situations including their financial position and collateral values and other factors and estimates which are subject to change over time.

21.

IV. SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE (Continued)

The following schedule provides a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses allocated by type of loan and related ratios.

	Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
			Percentage					Percentage					Percentage					Percentage					Percentage
			of Loans In					of Loans In					of Loans In					of Loans In					of Loans In
			Each					Each					Each					Each					Each
			Category to					Category to					Category to					Category to					Category to
	Allowance		Total			Allowance		Total			Allowance		Total			Allowance		Total			Allowance		Total
	Amount		Loans			Amount		Loans			Amount		Loans			Amount		Loans			Amount		Loans
	December 31, 2009					December 31, 2008					December 31, 2007					December 31, 2006					December 31, 2005
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial and agricultural	$	2,685		38.2	%	$	2,304		45.9	%	$	2,398		60.1	%	$	2,748		73.9	%	$	2,453		52.2	%
Commercial real estate		2,804		39.9	%		1,255		25.0	%		547		13.7	%		197		5.3	%		240		5.1	%
Residential first mortgage		717		10.2	%		884		17.6	%		590		14.8	%		317		8.5	%		1,278		27.2	%
Consumer loans to individuals		824		11.7	%		577		11.5	%		455		11.4	%		455		12.3	%		729		15.5	%
	$	7,030		100.0	%	$	5,020		100.0	%	$	3,990		100.0	%	$	3,717		100.0	%	$	4,700		100.0	%

While management's periodic analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses may allocate portions of the allowance for specific problem loan situations, the entire allowance is available for any loan charge-offs that occur.

22.

V. DEPOSITS

The average amount of deposits and average rates paid are summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:

	2009					2008					2007
	Average		Average			Average		Average			Average		Average
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits	$	209,394		0.37	%	$	158,765		1.10	%	$	138,314		1.96	%
Time deposits		226,275		2.54	%		213,891		3.89	%		231,604		4.70	%
Demand deposits (non-interest-bearing)		53,857		—			35,386		—			42,849		—
	$	489,526				$	408,042				$	412,767

Maturities of time certificates of deposit and other time deposits of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows:

	Amount
	(dollars in thousands)

Three months or less	$	10,293
Over three months and through six months		20,053
Over six months and through twelve months		20,635
Over twelve months		23,963

Total	$	74,944

23.

VI. RETURN ON EQUITY AND ASSETS

The ratio of net income to average shareholders' equity and average total assets and certain other ratios are as follows for periods ended December 31:

Return on Equity and Assets

	2009			2008			2007
	(dollars in thousands)
Average total assets	$	667,470		$	575,491		$	556,572

Average shareholders’ equity	$	63,576		$	59,964		$	57,945

Net income	$	382		$	5,217		$	3,257

Cash dividends declared	$	1,752		$	1,677		$	1,303

Return on average total assets		0.06	%		0.91	%		0.59	%

Return on average shareholders' equity		0.60	%		8.70	%		5.62	%

Dividend payout ratio (1)		458.64			32.14			40.01

Average shareholders' equity to average total assets		9.52	%		10.42	%		10.41	%

(1) Cash dividends declared divided by net income.

VII. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

The following information is reported for short-term borrowings for 2009, 2008 and 2007:

	2009			2008			2007
	(dollars in thousands)
Amount outstanding at end of year	$	52,043		$	43,426		$	43,006

Weighted average interest rate at end of year		3.28	%		3.91	%		4.38	%

Maximum amount outstanding at any month end	$	52,704		$	49,554		$	46,966

Average amount outstanding during the year	$	45,553		$	44,891		$	36,588

Weighted average interest rate during the year		3.81	%		4.10	%		4.51	%

24.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in other statements that we make from time to time in filings by the Company with the SEC, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of the Company which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include: (a) projections of income or expense, earnings per share, the payment or non-payment of dividends, capital structure and other financial items; (b) statements of plans and objectives of the Company or our Board of Directors or management, including those relating to products and services and those relating to the planned spin-off of RDSI and merger of RDSI with New Core; (c) statements of future economic performance; (d) statements of future customer attraction or retention; and (d) statements of assumptions underlying these statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements preceded by or that include the words or phrases “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “intends,” “expects,” “projects,” “estimates,” “should,” “may,” “would be,” “will allow,” “will likely result,” “will continue,” “will remain,” or similar expressions.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information so long as those statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Act.

Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those predicted by the forward-looking statements because of various factors and possible events, including those factors identified below. There is also the risk that the Company’s management or Board of Directors incorrectly analyzes these risks and forces, or that the strategies the Company develops to address them are unsuccessful.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of that date on which they are made. Except as may be required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made to reflect unanticipated events.

All forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or any person acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by the following cautionary statements.

Adverse economic conditions in our markets could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

As a consequence of the current U.S. recession, businesses across a wide range of industries face serious difficulties due to the lack of consumer spending and the lack of liquidity in the global credit markets. Unemployment has also increased significantly. A sustained weakness or weakening in business and economic conditions generally or specifically in the markets in which we do business could adversely affect our businesses by, among other things, decreasing the demand for loans and other products and services that we offer, causing impairment of certain intangible assets, such as goodwill, and increasing the number of borrowers who become delinquent, file for protection under bankruptcy laws or default on their loans or other obligations to us.

25.

Current levels of market volatility are unprecedented and may adversely affect our businesses, financial condition and results of operations.

The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption for more than a year and have reached unprecedented levels in recent months. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on our businesses, financial condition and results of operations.

Recent developments in the residential mortgage and related markets and the economy may adversely affect our business.

The residential mortgage market in the United States, including Ohio, has been negatively impacted recently by increasing rates and payments on adjustable-rate mortgages, decreasing housing values, increased credit standards for borrowers and other economic factors. As a result, delinquencies, foreclosures and losses with respect to residential construction and mortgage loans have increased and may continue to increase. Additionally, the lower housing prices and appraisal values may result in additional delinquencies and loan losses. While the residential real estate loans held in our portfolio are typically originated using conservative underwriting standards and do not include sub-prime loans, we do originate and hold fixed- and adjustable-rate loans and residential construction loans. If the residential loan market continues to deteriorate, especially in our local markets, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Federal and state governments may adopt laws responsive to the current credit conditions that would adversely affect our ability to collect on loans.

Federal or state governments might adopt legislation or regulations reducing the amount that our customers are required to pay under existing loan contracts or limiting our ability to foreclose on collateral. Additionally, legislation has been proposed to give judges the ability to adjust the principal and interest payments on mortgages to allow homeowners to avoid foreclosure. Such adjustments could adversely affect our profitability and financial condition.

Changes in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our earnings depend substantially on our interest spread, which is the difference between the rates we earn on loans, securities and other earning assets and the interest rates we pay on deposits and other borrowings. These rates will depend on many factors that are partly or entirely outside of our control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory authorities. While we have taken measures intended to manage the risks of operating in a changing rate environment, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective in avoiding undue interest rate risk. As market interest rates rise, we will have competitive pressures to increase the rates we pay on deposits, which will result in a decrease in net interest income and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to complete the planned spin-off of RDSI and the merger of RDSI with New Core could adversely impact the market price of our common shares as well as the business and operating results of the Company and RDSI.

If the planned spin-off of RDSI and the merger of RDSI with New Core are not completed for any reason, the price of Rurban common shares may decline to the extent that the market price of the Company’s common shares reflects positive market assumptions that the spin-off and the merger will be completed and the related benefits will be realized. The Company and Rurban may also be subject to additional risks if the spin-off and the merger are not completed, including:

26.

substantial costs related to the spin-off and the merger, including fees for financial advisors, attorneys and auditors, printing costs and costs associated with the agreements related to the transactions; and

potential disruption to the respective businesses of the Company and RDSI and the distraction of their respective workforce and management teams.

RDSI will lose a significant number of existing customers and associated revenue in connection with its transition from licensing Fiserv’s Premier software to exclusively marketing and licensing Single Source™ software, and this loss of customers and revenues is expected to result in a net loss by RDSI in 2010 and possibly beyond.

On July 28, 2009, RDSI reached an agreement with Fiserv to wind down their licensing relationship. Pursuant to this agreement, after December 31, 2010, Fiserv will no longer license its Premier suite of products to RDSI and RDSI will exclusively market New Core’s Single Source™ software system. RDSI customers which presently rely on the Premier platform have the option to continue their processing with RDSI and convert to Single Source™, or to move their processing to Fiserv and continue to use Premier. As of the date of the agreement with Fiserv (July 28, 2009), RDSI had [74] data processing customers using Fiserv’s Premier software. RDSI also provides item processing services directly to customers and through its DCM division using software licensed from Bankware.

27.

RDSI has and will continue to incur increased expenses associated with the conversion of customers to New Core’s Single Source™ software.

Currently, only one banking site is using Single Source™. The conversion of a second bank (the Company’s banking subsidiary, State Bank) is expected to be completed during March 2010. RDSI expects to convert a significant number of new and existing RDSI customers to Single Source™. Following the execution of the agreement with Fiserv on July 28, 2009, RDSI has devoted its sales, marketing and conversion efforts on the RDSI client bank base focusing on providing the Single Source™ software as a processing option. For example, RDSI has expanded its staff by approximately 13% since entering into the Fiserv agreement in anticipation of preparing for the data processing conversion of existing client banks and new client banks to the Single SourceTM core processing system. RDSI has and will continue to incur additional expenses associated with these sales, marketing and conversion efforts. Because RDSI has agreed to waive its standard conversion fees for existing client banks that convert to Single Source™, RDSI will not be able to recoup or offset through conversion fees the conversion expenses attributable to these banks.We operate in an extremely competitive market, and our business will suffer if we are unable to compete effectively.

In our market area, we encounter significant competition from other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies and other financial institutions. The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. If we fail to adequately address each of the competitive pressures in the banking industry, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

28.

If our actual loan losses exceed our allowance for loan losses, our net income will decrease.

Our loan customers may not repay their loans according to their terms, and the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be insufficient to pay any remaining loan balance. We may experience significant loan losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we maintain an allowance for loan losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance, which when combined, we refer to as the allowance for loan losses. Our allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual credit losses, and future provisions for credit losses could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our allowance for loan losses is based on prior experience, as well as an evaluation of the risks in the current portfolio. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates that may be beyond our control, and these losses may exceed current estimates. Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, review our loans and allowance for loan losses. We cannot assure you that we will not further increase the allowance for loan losses or that regulators will not require us to increase this allowance. Either of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our earnings are significantly affected by federal regulation and the monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies.

Any changes to state and federal banking laws and regulations may negatively impact our ability to expand our services and to increase the value of our business. We are subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision, and legislation that govern almost all aspects of our operations. These laws may change from time to time and are mainly intended for the protection of consumers, depositors and the deposit insurance funds. In addition, our earnings are affected by the monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. These policies, which include regulating the national supply of bank reserves and bank credit, can have a major effect upon the source and cost of funds and the rates of return earned on loans and investments. The Federal Reserve influences the size and distribution of bank reserves through its open market operations and changes in cash reserve requirements against member bank deposits. Future changes in laws or regulations or their interpretation or enforcement could be materially adverse to our business and shareholders.

Further increases in FDIC insurance premiums could negatively affect our profitability.

The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions, including State Bank. The FDIC charges the insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund at a certain level. During 2008 and 2009, there were higher levels of bank failures which dramatically increased resolution costs of the FDIC and depleted the deposit insurance fund. In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios of the deposit insurance fund, the FDIC voted on December 16, 2008 to increase assessment rates of insured depository institutions uniformly by 7 basis points (7 cents for every $100 of deposits), beginning with the first quarter of 2009. Additional changes, beginning April 1, 2009, were to require riskier institutions to pay a larger share of premiums by factoring in rate adjustments based on secured liabilities and unsecured debt levels.

On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule that imposed a special assessment for the second quarter of 2009 of 5 basis points on each insured depositary institution’s assets minus its Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, which was collected on September 30, 2009. The special assessment for the Company was $296,619.

On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule requiring insured depository institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The prepaid assessments for these periods were collected on December 30, 2009, along with the regular quarterly risk-based deposit insurance assessment for the third quarter of 2009. For the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, the prepaid assessment rate was based on each institution’s total base assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009, modified to assume that the assessment rate in effect for the institution on September 30, 2009, was in effect for the entire third quarter of 2009. On September 29, 2009, the FDIC increased annual assessment rates uniformly by 3 basis points beginning in 2011. As a result, an institution’s total base assessment rate for purposes of estimating an institution’s assessment for 2011 and 2012 was increased by 3 basis points. Each institution’s prepaid assessment base was calculated using its third quarter 2009 assessment base, adjusted quarterly for an estimated five percent annual growth rate in the assessment base through the end of 2012. The Company paid $2,678,000 for the three-year prepayment in December 2009, which will be expensed over three years.

29.

We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance. If there are additional financial institution failures, we may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently increased levels. Further increases in FDIC insurance premiums may materially adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to pay dividends on our common shares.

Legislative or regulatory changes could adversely impact our businesses.

The financial services industry is extensively regulated. We are subject to state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern almost all aspects of our operations. Laws and regulations may change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers, depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, and not to benefit our shareholders. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact us. In light of current conditions in the global financial markets and the global economy, regulators have increased their focus on the regulation of the financial services industry. Most recently, government has intervened on an unprecedented scale in responding to the stresses experienced in the global financial markets. Some of the measures subject us and other financial institutions to additional restrictions, oversight or costs that may have an impact on our business, results of operations or the price of our common shares.

Our success depends upon our ability to attract and retain key personnel.

Our success depends upon the continued service of our senior management team and upon our ability to attract and retain qualified financial services personnel. Competition for qualified employees is intense. We can not assure you that we will be able to retain our existing key personnel or attract additional qualified personnel. If we lose the services of our key personnel, or are unable to attract additional qualified personnel, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We depend upon the accuracy and completeness of information about customers.

In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with customers, we may rely on information provided to us by customers, including financial statements and other financial information. We may also rely on representations of customers as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. For example, in deciding whether to extend credit to a business, we may assume that the customer’s audited financial statements conform with generally accepted accounting principles and present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer, and we may also rely on the audit report covering those financial statements. Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted to the extent we rely on financial statements that do not comply with generally accepted accounting principles or that are materially misleading.

Our ability to pay cash dividends is limited, and we may be unable to pay cash dividends in the future even if we elect to do so.

We are dependent primarily upon the earnings of our operating subsidiaries for funds to pay dividends on our common shares. The payment of dividends by us is also subject to regulatory restrictions. As a result, any payment of dividends in the future will be dependent, in large part, on our ability to satisfy these regulatory restrictions and our subsidiaries’ earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors. Although our financial earnings and financial condition have allowed us to declare and pay periodic cash dividends to our shareholders, there can be no assurance that our dividend policy or size of dividend distribution will continue in the future. Our failure to pay dividends on our common shares could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common shares.

30.

RDSI relies on the continued functioning of its data center and the integrity of the data it processes.

RDSI’s data center is an integral part of its business. Damage to RDSI’s data center due to acts of terrorism, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure and other disasters could have a material adverse effect on RDSI’s business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, RDSI relies on the integrity of the data it processes. If this data is incorrect or somewhat tainted, client relations and confidence in RDSI’s services could be impaired, which would harm RDSI’s business.

A limited trading market exists for our common shares which could lead to price volatility.

Your ability to sell or purchase our common shares depends upon the existence of an active trading market for our common shares. While our stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market, it trades infrequently. As a result, you may be unable to sell or purchase our common shares at the volume, price and time you desire. The limited trading market for our common shares may cause fluctuations in the market value of our common shares to be exaggerated, leading to price volatility in excess of that which would occur in a more active trading market.

The preparation of our financial statements requires the use of estimates that may vary from actual results.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. Two of our most critical estimates are the level of the allowance for loan losses and the accounting for goodwill and other intangibles. Because of the inherent nature of these estimates, we cannot provide complete assurance that we will not be required to charge earnings for significant unexpected loan losses, nor that we will not recognize a material provision for impairment of our goodwill. For additional information regarding these critical estimates, see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations beginning on page 25 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

31.

Changes in accounting standards could impact our results of operations.

The accounting standard setters, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC and other regulatory bodies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. These changes can be difficult to predict and can materially affect how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, which would result in the restatement of our financial statements for prior periods.

Our information systems may experience an interruption or security breach.

We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the possible failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failure, interruption or security breach will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability.

We may elect or be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but capital may not be available when it is needed.

We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. In addition, we may elect to raise additional capital to support our business or to finance acquisitions, if any, or we may otherwise elect to raise additional capital. In that regard, a number of financial institutions have recently raised considerable amounts of capital as a result of deterioration in their results of operations and financial condition arising from the turmoil in the mortgage loan market, deteriorating economic conditions, declines in real estate values and other factors, which may diminish our ability to raise additional capital. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, many of which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot be assured of our ability to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital if and when needed, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

Item 2. Properties.

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 401 Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio. This facility is owned by State Bank, and a portion of the facility is leased to the Company.

The following is a listing and brief description of the properties owned or leased by State Bank and used in its business:

State Bank’s main office is owned and located at 401 Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio. State Bank leases portions of this facility to the Company and the RFS division of State Bank. (Banking and Other)

32.

State Bank owns a drive-thru branch office located at 510 Third Street, Defiance, Ohio. (Banking)

State Bank leases a parcel of land for a full service branch office (Owned) located at 1600 North Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio, pursuant to a 9-year lease. (Banking)

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 220 North Main Street, Paulding, Ohio. (Banking)

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 312 Main Street, Delta, Ohio. (Banking)

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 133 E. Morenci Street, Lyons, Ohio. (Banking)

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 515 Parkview, Wauseon, Ohio. (Banking)

State Bank leases a full service branch office located in the Chief Market Square supermarket at 705 Deatrick Street, Defiance, Ohio, pursuant to a 15-year lease. (Banking)

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 218 North First Street, Oakwood, Ohio. (Banking)

10.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 930 West Market Street, Lima, Ohio. (Banking)

11.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 12832 Coldwater Road, Fort Wayne, Indiana. (Banking)

12.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 235 Main Street, Luckey, Ohio. (Banking)

13.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 311 Main Street, Walbridge, Ohio. (Banking)

14.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 610 East South Boundary, Perrysburg, Ohio. (Banking)

15.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 6401 Monroe Street, Sylvania, Ohio. (Banking)

16.

State Bank owns a loan production office located at 109 South High Street, #8, Dublin, Ohio. (Banking)

17.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 1201 East Main Street, Montpelier, Ohio. (Banking)

18.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 119 South State Street, Pioneer, Ohio. (Banking)

19.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 112 East Jackson Street, West Unity, Ohio. (Banking)

33.

20.

State Bank owns a full service branch office located at 1419 West High Street, Bryan, Ohio. (Banking)

21.

State Bank leases a loan production office in Steuben County, Indiana. (Banking)

RDSI leases office space located at 7622 St Rt. 66, Defiance, Ohio, office space located at 801 Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio, office space located at 2010 S. Jefferson Ave., Defiance, Ohio, office space located at 104 Depot Street, Archbold, Ohio and office space located at 105 East Holland Street, Archbold, Ohio.

RDSI (DCM) leases office space located at 3101 Technology Blvd., Suite B, Lansing, Michigan.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

In the ordinary course of our business, we are party to various legal actions, which we believe are incidental to the operation of our business. Although the ultimate outcome and amount of liability, if any, with respect to these legal actions to which we are currently a party cannot presently be ascertained with certainty, in the opinion of management, based upon information currently available to us, any resulting liability is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Reserved.

34.

Supplemental Item: Executive Officers of the Registrant.

The following table lists the names and ages of the executive officers of the Company as of March 17, 2010, the positions presently held by each executive officer and the business experience of each executive officer during the past five years. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has held his principal occupation(s) for more than five years.

Name	Age	Position(s) Held with the Company and its Subsidiaries and Principal Occupation(s)

Kenneth A. Joyce	61	Executive Vice Chairman of the Company since January 2010; President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 2002 to 2010; Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of RDSI since 1997; Director of State Bank since 2002; Director of RFCBC since 2004; Member of Investment Committee of Reliance Financial Services (now a division of State Bank) since March 2007; Director of Promedica-Defiance Regional Medical Center and Promedica Physicians Group; Chairman of Promedica-Defiance Regional Medical Center Finance Committee; Director of United Way (non-profit).

Duane L. Sinn	39	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since December 2005; Senior Vice President and Financial Analysis Manager of State Bank from 2004 to December 2005; Senior Vice President and Controller of the Company from 2000 to 2004.

Mark A. Klein	55	President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 2010; Director of the Company since February 2010, President and Chief Executive Officer of State Bank since January 2006; Director of State Bank since 2006; Member of RFS Investment Committee since March 2007. Senior Vice President Private Banking of Sky Bank, Toledo, Ohio from 2004 to January 2006; Vice President and Team Leader of Sky Bank, Toledo, Ohio from 2000 to 2004; Executive Vice President and Senior Lender of $450 million Sky Bank affiliate from 1994 to 1999; 12 year Member of Defiance City School Board of Education; Member of Defiance Area Foundation Board (non-profit); Member of Promedica-Defiance Regional Medical Center Foundation Board.

Anthony V. Cosentino	48	Executive Vice President of the Company and State Bank since March 2010. Vice President for Financial Planning and Analysis at AmTrust Financial Corporation from June 2006 to December 2009. Chief Financial Officer of Fifth Third Bank of Northeastern Ohio, a subsidiary of Fifth Third Bancorp, from August 1994 to May 2006.

35.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

The common shares of the Company are traded on The NASDAQ Global Market (symbol “RBNF”). The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices and the cash dividends declared with respect to the common shares of the Company for the indicated periods. The high and low prices reflect actual prices for purchases and sales of the Company's common shares as reported by NASDAQ and not inter-dealer prices.

	Per Share				Per Share
	Sales Prices				Dividends
2009	High		Low		Declared

First Quarter	$	8.61	$	7.34	$	.09
Second Quarter		8.75		7.52		.09
Third Quarter		8.10		7.00		.09
Fourth Quarter		8.94		6.38		.09

2008	High		Low		Declared

First Quarter	$	12.60	$	9.79	$	.08
Second Quarter		10.96		9.52		.08
Third Quarter		10.24		7.72		.09
Fourth Quarter		9.50		7.54		.09

During the Fourth Quarter 2009, there were no sales of unregistered securities by the Company.

The approximate number of holders of the outstanding common shares of the Company, as of February 26, 2010, was 2,400.

36.

Repurchases of Common Shares

The following table provides information regarding repurchases of the Company’s common shares during the three months ended December 31, 2009:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
October 1 through October 31, 2009		1,461	$	7.50		-		84,346
November 1 through November 30, 2009		-	$	-		-		84,346
December 1 through December 31, 2009		6,486	$	6.88		-		84,346

(1)

All of the repurchased shares, other than the shares repurchased as part of the publicly announced plan, were purchased in the open market by Reliance Financial Services, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, in its capacity as the administrator of the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership and Savings Plan.

(2)

On July 22, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized an extension to the stock repurchase program for an additional twelve months. The original stock repurchase program was announced in April, 2007 for fifteen months authorizing the purchase of 250,000 common shares. On July 15, 2009, the Company announced an extension of the repurchase plan for an additional fifteen months. As of year-end, the Company had repurchased a total of 165,654 shares at an average cost of $10.68 per share.

Share Performance

The following graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

Provided below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return on its common shares with an index for the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. Companies) comprised of all domestic common shares traded on the NASDAQ Global Market System and the NASDAQ Small-Cap Market and an index for NASDAQ Bank Stocks comprised of all depository institutions (SIC Code #602) and holding and other investment companies (SIC Code #671) that are traded on the NASDAQ Global Market System and the NASDAQ Small-Cap Market (“NASDAQ Bank Stocks”) for the five-year period ended December 31, 2009.

37.

Rurban Financial Corp.

	Period Ending
Index	12/31/04		12/31/05		12/31/06		12/31/07		12/31/08		12/31/09
Rurban Financial Corp.		100.00		86.02		80.04		94.81		59.79		56.33
NASDAQ Composite		100.00		101.37		111.03		121.92		72.49		104.31
NASDAQ Bank		100.00		95.67		106.20		82.76		62.96		51.31

Source : SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA	(434) 977-1600
© 2010	www.snl.com

38.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

	Year Ended December 31
	2009			2008			2007			2006			2005

EARNINGS
Interest income	$	32,591		$	32,669		$	33,010		$	30,971		$	21,422
Interest expense		11,592			15,141			18,222			15,936			9,368
Net interest income		20,999			17,528			14,788			15,035			12,054
Provision for loan losses		5,738			690			521			178			583
Noninterest income		29,595			28,061			26,861			23,755			18,338
Noninterest expense		45,134			37,557			36,637			34,904			29,054
Provision (credit)
for income taxes		(660	)		2,125			1,234			948			81
Net income (loss)		382			5,217			3,257			2,760			673

PER SHARE DATA
Basic earnings	$	0.07		$	1.06		$	0.65		$	0.55		$	0.15
Diluted earnings		0.07			1.06			0.65			0.55			0.15
Cash dividends declared		0.36			0.34			0.26			0.21			0.20

AVERAGE BALANCES
Average shareholders’ equity	$	63,576		$	59,964		$	57,945		$	54,501		$	51,083
Average total assets		667,470			575,491			556,572			554,095			433,366

RATIOS
Return on average
shareholders' equity		0.60	%		8.70	%		5.62	%		5.06	%		1.32	%
Return on average total assets		0.06			0.91			0.59			0.50			0.16
Cash dividend payout
ratio (cash dividends
divided by net income)		458.18			32.14			40.01			38.25			133.33
Average shareholders'
equity to average total
assets		9.52			10.42			10.41			9.84			11.79

PERIOD END TOTALS
Total assets	$	673,049		$	657,619		$	561,214		$	556,007		$	530,542
Total investments and
fed funds sold		105,083			112,606			94,661			111,562			139,353
Total loans and leases		452,558			450,112			389,269			370,102			327,048
Loans held for sale		16,858			3,824			1,650			390			224
Total deposits		491,242			484,221			406,031			414,555			384,838
Notes Payable		2,147			1,000			922			2,589			939
Advances from FHLB		35,267			36,647			24,000			21,000			45,500
Trust Preferred Securities		20,620			20,620			20,620			20,620			20,620
Shareholders' equity		61,708			61,662			59,325			56,955			54,451
Shareholders' equity
per share	$	12.69		$	12.63		$	11.92		$	11.33		$	10.83

39.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Rurban Financial Corp. is a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve Board under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. Through its direct and indirect subsidiaries, Rurban is engaged in commercial banking, computerized data and item processing, and trust and financial services.

The following discussion is intended to provide a review of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Rurban and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in detail in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The Company’s financial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions and are integral to the understanding of reported results. Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and they require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex.

Allowance for Loan Losses - The allowance for loan losses provides coverage for probable losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses each quarter based on changes, if any, in the nature and amount of problem assets and associated collateral, underwriting activities, loan portfolio composition (including product mix and geographic, industry or customer-specific concentrations), trends in loan performance, regulatory guidance and economic factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires the use of significant management estimates. Many factors can affect management’s estimates of specific and expected losses, including volatility of default probabilities, rating migrations, loss severity and economic and political conditions. The allowance is increased through provisions charged to operating earnings and reduced by net charge-offs.

The Company determines the amount of the allowance based on relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. The allowance recorded for commercial loans is based on reviews of individual credit relationships and an analysis of the migration of commercial loans and actual loss experience. The allowance recorded for homogeneous consumer loans is based on an analysis of loan mix, risk characteristics of the portfolio, fraud loss and bankruptcy experiences, and historical losses, adjusted for current trends, for each homogeneous category or group of loans. The allowance for credit losses relating to impaired loans is based on each impaired loan’s observable market price, the collateral for certain collateral-dependent loans, or the discounted cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate.

40.

Regardless of the extent of the Company’s analysis of customer performance, portfolio trends or risk management processes, certain inherent, but undetected, losses are probable within the loan portfolio. This is due to several factors including inherent delays in obtaining information regarding a customer’s financial condition or changes in their unique business conditions, the subjective nature of individual loan valuations, collateral assessments and the interpretation of economic trends. Volatility of economic or customer-specific conditions affecting the identification and estimation of losses for larger non-homogeneous credits and the sensitivity of assumptions utilized to establish allowances for homogenous groups of loans are also factors. The Company estimates a range of inherent losses related to the existence of these exposures. The estimates are based upon the Company’s evaluation of imprecise risk associated with the commercial and consumer allowance levels and the estimated impact of the current economic environment.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles - The Company records all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill and other intangibles, at fair value as required. Goodwill is subject, at a minimum, to annual tests for impairment. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using straight-line and accelerated methods, and are subject to impairment if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount. The initial goodwill and other intangibles recorded and subsequent impairment analysis requires management to make subjective judgments concerning estimates of how the acquired asset will perform in the future. Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, customer attrition, changes in revenue growth trends, specific industry conditions and changes in competition.

Impact of Accounting Changes

FASB ASC 860-10 concerning accounting for transfers of financial assets was issued in June 2009 and changes the de-recognition guidance for transferors of financial assets, including entities that sponsor securitizations, to align that guidance with the original intent of previous guidance. FASB ASC 860-10 also eliminates the exemption from consolidation for qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs). As a result, all existing QSPEs need to be evaluated to determine whether the QSPE should be consolidated in accordance with FASB ASC 860-10.

FASB ASC 860-10 is effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010, as to the Company), for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The recognition and measurement provisions of FASB ASC 860-10 must be applied to transfers that occur on or after the effective date. Early application is prohibited. FASB ASC 860-10 also requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets that occur both before and after the effective date. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FASB ASC 860-10 will have a significant effect on its consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASC 810-10 also improves how enterprises account for and disclose their involvement with variable interest entities (VIE’s), which are special-purpose entities, and other entities whose equity at risk is insufficient or lack certain characteristics. Among other things, FASB ASC 810-10 changes how an entity determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) and whether that VIE should be consolidated. FASB ASC 810-10 requires an entity to provide significantly more disclosures about its involvement with VIEs. As a result, the Company must comprehensively review its involvements with VIEs and potential VIEs, including entities previously considered to be qualifying special purpose entities, to determine the effect on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. FASB ASC 810-10 is effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009 (January 1, 2010, as to the Company), and for interim periods within the first annual reporting period. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FASB ASC 810-10 will have a significant effect on its consolidated financial statements.

41.

Acquisitions

On December 1, 2008, the Company acquired NBM Bancorp, Incorporated (“NBM Bancorp”) and its subsidiary, National Bank of Montpelier (“NBM”), headquartered in Montpelier, Ohio through the merger of NBM Bancorp into the Company and the merger of NBM into The State Bank and Trust Company. As a result of this acquisition, management expects that the Company will have an opportunity to increase its loan and deposit base and reduce transaction costs. The Company also expects to reduce costs through economies of scale.

As a result of the merger and in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 22, 2008, each of the 219,334 shares of common stock of NBM Bancorp outstanding at the time of the merger were converted into the right to receive $113.98 in cash, which will result in the payment by the Company in aggregate of approximately $24 million in cash to NBM Bancorp shareholders. Approximately $1 million was recorded as a payable on the Company’s books as of December 31, 2008.

At the time of the merger, NBM had five banking centers in Williams County, two located in Montpelier and one each in Pioneer, West Unity and Bryan, Ohio. Upon the completion of the merger, these banking centers became banking centers of The State Bank and Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Rurban.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired and the computation of the purchase price and goodwill related to the acquisition:

Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,226,000
Investments		48,774,000
Loans		43,655,000
Core deposits		1,411,000
Goodwill		7,474,000
Premises and equipment		1,678,000
Other assets		1,223,000
Total assets acquired	$	113,441,000

Deposits	$	86,794,000
Other liabilities		1,417,000
Total liabilities assumed		88,211,000
Net assets acquired	$	25,230,000

42.

The only significant intangible asset acquired was the core deposit base, which has a useful life of seven years and will be amortized using the straight-line method. The $7.5 million of goodwill was assigned entirely to the banking segment of the business and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The following proforma disclosures, including the effect of the purchase accounting, depict the results of operations as though the acquisition of NBM had taken place at the beginning of each period.

	Year Ended December 31,
($ 000's) (except per share data)	2008		2007		2006
Net interest income	$	21,174	$	18,753	$	19,121
Net income	$	6,313	$	4,325	$	3,902
Per share - combined:
Basic net income	$	1.25	$	0.86	$	0.78
Diluted net income	$	1.25	$	0.86	$	0.78

Strategic Partnership

On April 27, 2009, the Company announced a strategic partnership between its data processing subsidiary, RDSI and New Core Holdings, Inc. d/b/a New Core Banking Systems, headquartered in Birmingham, AL (“New Core”). As part of this partnership, RDSI and New Core Banking Systems entered into a Reseller Software License and Support Agreement pursuant to which RDSI was granted rights as the exclusive provider of New Core’s Single Source™ software. RDSI and New Core also entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which New Core would be merged with a newly-created subsidiary of RDSI and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of RDSI. A prerequisite of this merger would be the spin-off of RDSI from Rurban, resulting in RDSI becoming a separate independent public company. This would be followed immediately by the merger of New Core with and into RDSI. In the merger, the New Core shareholders would receive between 15.5 percent and 26.8 percent of the aggregate common shares of the Company outstanding immediately following the merger. On October 22, 2009, Rurban announced that its Board of Directors had approved proceeding with the appropriate filings with the SEC in connection with the contemplated spin-off of RDSI. The Company anticipates that the spin-off would be completed in the second quarter of 2010, subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions including final approval by Rurban’s Board of Directors of the spin-off and its terms. For the year ending December 31, 2009, approximately $2,772,000 of expenses were realized in preparation for the spin-off and merger.

On July 28, 2009, RDSI reached an agreement with Information Technology, Inc. and Fiserv Solutions, Inc. (collectively, “Fiserv”) to wind down their licensing relationship. After December 31, 2010, Fiserv will no longer license its Premier suite of products to RDSI and RDSI will exclusively market New Core Banking Systems’ Single SourceTM. RDSI’s customers which presently rely on the Premier platform have the opportunity to continue their processing with RDSI and convert to Single SourceTM, or to move their processing to another third party processor. RDSI and Fiserv have agreed to cooperate in transitioning RDSI clients to their choice of core software prior to December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, RDSI had 68 customers. RDSI has increased its marketing efforts to offer New Core’s Single Source™ software to its current data processing customers. However, RDSI anticipates the loss of some banking clients who elect to move their processing away from RDSI. Because individual bank decisions may be made during 2010, RDSI is currently unable to determine the number of banks that will ultimately choose to leave RDSI. The loss of a significant number of existing bank clients could have a material adverse effect on RDSI’s results of operations and financial condition.

43.

In addition, the loss of bank clients could cause the current portion of goodwill reflected on RDSI’s balance sheet to become impaired, which would require RDSI to record a loss through its income statement.

The planned result of the spin-off and merger is creation of an independent data processing company offering as its core product the Single Source™ software. This software will be RDSI’s sole core banking product going forward. The Single Source™ software is state of the art software utilizing real time processing and an embedded systems approach that RDSI believes offers a competitive advantage to both RDSI and its’ client bank users.

44.

EARNINGS SUMMARY

Net income for 2009 was $382,491, or $0.07 per diluted share, compared with net income of $5.2 million, or $1.06 per diluted share, and net income of $3.3 million, or $0.65 per diluted share, reported for 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash dividends per share were $0.36 in 2009, $0.34 in 2008 and $0.26 in 2007.

The 2009 earnings reflect the impact of the economic downturn as problem assets increased and the costs associated with the RDSI spin-off preparation. The primary factors contributing to this change in earnings were the loan loss reserves ($5.1 million more than the prior-year), an increase in FDIC insurance expense of $1.1 million over 2008, a $1.2 million mortgage fraud loss and the extraordinary expenses incurred due to the planned spin-off of RDSI ($2.8 million).

Positive results for 2009 include continued commercial real estate loan growth of $18.3 million, and organic core deposit growth of $32.7 million. Core deposits now represent 55.9 percent of total deposits compared to 49.9 percent at year-end 2008. Both of these factors helped to produce a stable net interest margin of 4 percent at State Bank. The mortgage banking business line continues to grow, with residential real estate loan production of $238 million for the year, compared to $38 million for 2008. To improve the future profit of State Bank, an expense reduction program was begun in the fourth quarter of 2009 which targets $1.2 million in annual, pre-tax savings.

RDSI reported 2009 fiscal year net income at $875 thousand, compared to $2.82 million reported for the 2008 fiscal year. Significantly affecting the 2009 results were the extraordinary expenses ($2.8 million) incurred due to the planned spin-off of RDSI and merger of RDSI with New Core Banking Systems.

CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets at December 31, 2009 were $673.0 million, compared to $657.6 million at December 31, 2008. Loans (excluding loans held for sale) were $452.6 million at December 31, 2009, compared to $450.1 million at December 31, 2008. Total deposits were $491.2 million at year-end 2009, compared to $484.2 million at December 31, 2008. Non-interest bearing deposits at December 31, 2009 were $57.2 million, compared to $52.2 million at December 31, 2008. Total shareholders’ equity was $61.7 million at year-end 2009, virtually unchanged from the prior year-end.

45.

Significant Events of 2009

During 2009 State Bank closed two banking centers as part of its continuing program to reduce operating expenses.

On April 27, 2009, RDSI announced a strategic partnership with New Core Holdings, Inc. d/b/a New Core Banking Systems, headquartered in Birmingham, AL (“New Core”). As part of this partnership, RDSI and New Core Banking Systems entered into a Reseller Software License and Support Agreement pursuant to which RDSI was granted rights as the exclusive provider of New Core’s Single Source™ software.

RDSI and New Core also entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which New Core would be merged with a newly-created subsidiary of RDSI and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of RDSI. A prerequisite of this merger would be the spin-off of RDSI from Rurban, resulting in RDSI becoming a separate independent public company. This would be followed immediately by the merger of RDSI and New Core. In the merger, the New Core shareholders would receive between 15.5 percent and 26.8 percent of the aggregate common shares of RDSI outstanding immediately following the merger. On October 22, 2009, Rurban announced that its Board of Directors had approved proceeding with the appropriate filings with the SEC in connection with the contemplated spin-off of RDSI. RDSI anticipates that the spin-off would be completed in the second quarter of 2010, subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions including final approval by Rurban’s Board of Directors of the spin-off and its terms.

The mortgage banking business line continues to grow, with residential real estate loan production of $238 million for the year, driven by the refinancing boom, compared to $38 million for 2008.

Significant Events of 2008

The State Bank and Trust Company (“State Bank”), Rurban’s banking subsidiary, completed the acquisition of NBM, with five branches located in Williams County, on December 1, 2008. The acquisition was valued at $25.0 million. This acquisition increased State Bank’s banking center locations from 17 to 22. The acquisition was immediately accretive to earnings.

The turmoil in the banking industry during the majority of the year, and especially the fourth quarter, had many institutions electing to participate in the Government’s TARP/Capital Purchase Program. After thorough consideration of the program’s advantages and disadvantages, Rurban and its Board of Directors elected not to participate in the program due to Rurban’s strong capital position and the TARP program’s uncertainties relative to the Government’s intervention and expectation relative to the funds’ usage.

During 2008, State Bank expanded its reach into Columbus, Ohio’s high volume mortgage market by adding a Mortgage Origination Group to the Columbus Loan Production Office.

46.

Asset quality essentially remained stable during 2008, with non-performing assets declining slightly to 1.00 percent of total assets. Net charge-offs remained moderate and significantly below peers at 0.19 percent of total loans for 2008.

RDSI, Rurban’s data and item processing subsidiary, reported another record year. Revenue increased to $21.6 million, a $946,000, or 4.6% increase, over the previous year’s results. Net income increased $346,000, or 14.0%, to $2.8 million for the year, representing another record result.

Rurban increased its dividend to shareholders from $0.26 per share during 2007 to $0.34 per share in 2008.

On July 22, 2008 the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized an extension to the stock repurchase program for an additional twelve months. The original stock repurchase program was announced in April, 2007 for fifteen months authorizing the purchase of 250,000 common shares.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

	Year Ended December 31,							Year Ended December 31,
	2009		2008		% Change			2008		2007		% Change
	(dollars in thousands except per share data)

Total Assets	$	673,049	$	657,619		2	%	$	657,619	$	561,214		17	%
Total Securities		105,083		102,606		2	%		102,606		92,661		11	%
Loans Held for Sale		16,858		3,824		341	%		3,824		1,650		132	%
Loans (Net)		445,527		445,091		0	%		445,091		385,278		16	%
Allowance for Loan Losses		7,030		5,020		40	%		5,020		3,990		26	%
Total Deposits	$	491,242	$	484,221		1	%	$	484,221	$	406,031		19	%

Total Revenues	$	50,594	$	45,589		11	%	$	45,589	$	41,648		9	%
Net Interest Income		20,999		17,528		20	%		17,528		14,787		19	%
Loan Loss Provision		5,738		690		732	%		690		521		32	%
Non-interest Income		29,595		28,061		5	%		28,061		26,861		4	%
Non-interest Expense		45,133		37,557		20	%		37,557		36,637		3	%
Net Income		382		5,217		-93	%		5,217		3,257		60	%
Basic Earnings per Share	$	0.07	$	1.06		-93	%	$	1.06	$	0.65		63	%
Diluted Earnings per Share	$	0.07	$	1.06		-93	%	$	1.06	$	0.65		63	%

Net Interest Income

	Year Ended							Year Ended
	December 31,							December 31,
	2009		2008		% Change			2008		2007		% Change
	(dollars in thousands)

Net Interest Income	$	20,999	$	17,528		20	%	$	17,528	$	14,787		19	%

Net interest income was $21.0 million for 2009 compared to $17.5 million for 2008, an increase of 19.8 percent, which resulted from the Banking segment being in a liability-sensitive position and the full-year impact of the NBM acquisition. Average earning assets also increased to $570.1 million in 2009 compared to $508.3 million in 2008, again as a result of the full-year impact of the NBM acquisition. The consolidated 2009, or full-year net interest margin improved 26 basis points to 3.79 percent, compared to 3.53 percent for 2008.

47.

Net interest income was $17.5 million for 2008 compared to $14.8 million for 2007, an increase of 18.5 percent, which resulted from the Banking segment being in a liability-sensitive position and core loan growth during the year of $16.6 million. Average earning assets increased to $508.3 million in 2008 compared to $488.3 million in 2007 as a result of loan growth. The consolidated 2008, or full-year net interest margin improved 43 basis point to 3.53 percent for 2008, compared to 3.10 percent for 2007.

Loan Loss Provision

A Provision for Loan Losses of $5.74 million was taken in 2009 compared to $690 thousand taken for 2008. The $5.05 million increase was due to the increase in problem assets primarily driven by the continual weakening of the economy. For 2009, net charge-offs totaled $3.73 million, or 0.84 percent of average loans. Consistent with external economic conditions, State Bank has witnessed an increase in delinquencies within all segments of its loan portfolio. Management continues to proactively identify problem loans and is developing strategies for removing these loans from non-performing status. State Bank anticipates that 2010 will continue to be difficult, as it is not insulated from the economic factors facing the industry.

A Provision for Loan Losses of $690 thousand was taken in 2008 compared to $521 thousand taken for 2007; the $169 thousand increase was primarily due to the additional loan growth in 2008. For 2008, net charge-offs totaled $764 thousand, or 0.19 percent of average loans.

Non-interest Income

	Year Ended							Year Ended
	December 31,							December 31,
	2009		2008		% Change			2008		2007		% Change
	(dollars in thousands)

Total Non-interest Income	$	29,595	$	28,061		5	%	$	28,061	$	26,861		4	%

Data Service Fees	$	18,860	$	20,165		-6	%	$	20,165	$	19,382		4	%
Trust Fees	$	2,509	$	3,082		-19	%	$	3,082	$	3,385		-9	%
Deposit Service Fees	$	2,608	$	2,416		8	%	$	2,416	$	2,244		8	%
Gains on Sale of Loans	$	3,355	$	741		353	%	$	741	$	574		29	%
Investment Securities Recoveries	$	-	$	197		N/A		$	197	$	-		N/A
Net Proceeds from VISA IPO	$	-	$	132		N/A		$	132	$	-		N/A
Gains (losses) on Sale of Securities	$	960	$	-		N/A		$	-	$	2		N/A
Other	$	1,304	$	1,328		-2	%	$	1,328	$	1,274		4	%

Total non-interest income was $29.6 million for 2009 compared to $28.1 million for 2008, representing a $1.53 million, or 5.4 percent increase year-over-year. This increase was driven by a $2.61 million increase in net gain on sale of loans. Increases in net realized gain on sales of securities of $960 thousand and loan servicing fees of $208 thousand, or 88.6 percent, were offset by decreases in Data Processing fees of $1.31 million, or 6.48 percent, and Trust Fees of $573 thousand, or 18.6 percent. The loss of RDSI’s largest customer in July of 2009, coupled with the de-conversion of six client banks in the fourth quarter of 2009, caused the majority of the decline in data processing income. The equity markets throughout 2009 negatively impacted trust fees, which are generally calculated on invested balances. The increase in gain on sale of loans and loan servicing fees was driven by mortgage banking. In 2009, $213 million of saleable loans were generated compared to just $38 million in 2008. The sales of these loans also allowed for the sold and serviced loan portfolio to grow from $71 million in 2008 to over $208 million at December 31, 2009. This portfolio provides a servicing fee annuity, which will provide servicing revenue for the foreseeable future.

48.

Total non-interest income was $28.1 million for 2008 compared to $26.9 million for 2007, representing a $1.2 million, or 4.5 percent increase year-over-year. This increase was driven by a $783 thousand, or 4.04 percent, increase in data service fees. Increases in Customer Service Fees of $172 thousand, or 7.68 percent, and gains on sale of loans of $167 thousand, or 29.1 percent, were offset by decreases in Trust Fees of $303 thousand, or 8.96 percent. The continued decline in the equity markets negatively impacted trust fees, which are generally calculated on invested balances. The improved Customer Service Fees and gain on sale of loans resulted from State Bank’s efforts focused on its High Performance Checking program, well-developed referral program, and improving cross-selling of additional products.

Income taxes amounted to a benefit of $660 thousand in 2009 compared to expense of $2.1 million in 2008. The effective tax rate for 2009 was impacted by the pretax loss and the benefit of tax exempt assets including Municipal Securities and Bank Owned Life Insurance. The effective tax rate was 28.9 percent in 2008.

49.

RDSI Banking Systems (“RDSI”)

	Year Ended							Year Ended
	December 31,							December 31,
	2009		2008		% Change			2008		2007		% Change
	(dollars in thousands)

Data Service Fees	$	18,860	$	20,165		-6	%	$	20,165	$	19,382		4	%

Data service fees decreased $1.31 million, or 6.5 percent, to $18.9 million in 2009 from $20.2 million in 2008, and increased $783 thousand, or 4 percent, from 2007 to 2008. Data processing fees contributed 63.7 percent of Rurban’s recurring non-interest income for 2009. The majority of the decrease from 2008 to 2009 was due to the loss of RDSI’s largest customer in July of 2009, as well as six client banks de-converting in the fourth quarter of 2009.

RDSI reported 2009 fiscal year net income of $875 thousand, compared to $2.82 million reported for the 2008 fiscal year. Significantly affecting our 2009 results were the extraordinary expenses incurred due to the planned spin-off of RDSI and RDSI’s planned merger with New Core Banking Systems, which we believe will position RDSI to offer its own intellectual property in the form of the Single Source™ software. It can be expected that 2010 will be a very challenging year for RDSI from an earnings perspective. The potential loss of client banks and the write-off of the current software are the primary issues that will cause the earnings to be a challenge. The one-year anniversary of the first Single Source™ software installation has passed, and the banking site utilizing this software remains confident in its use, feeling its present needs are being met by this new processing package.

Data service fees increased $783 thousand, or 4 percent, to $20.2 million in 2008 from $19.4 million in 2007. Data processing fees contributed 71.9 percent of Rurban’s recurring non-interest income for 2008. The majority of the increase for 2008 was due to RDSI billing clients directly for postage use, and this increase to revenue was offset by an increase in postage expense.

Non-interest Expense

	Year Ended							Year Ended
	December 31,							December 31,
	2009		2008		% Change			2008		2007		% Change
	(dollars in thousands)

Total Non-interest Expense	$	45,133	$	37,557		20	%	$	37,557	$	36,637		3	%

Salaries & Employee Benefits	$	21,035	$	17,318		21	%	$	17,318	$	17,007		2	%
Professional Fees	$	2,891	$	1,859		56	%	$	1,859	$	2,227		-17	%
All Other	$	21,207	$	18,380		15	%	$	18,380	$	17,403		6	%

Non-interest expense for 2009 increased $7.58 million, or 20.2 percent over 2008. The full-year expenses of the National Bank of Montpelier acquisition contributed $1.70 million of this increase, while mortgage banking expenses increased $2.43 million over 2008. Professional fees increased $1.03 million from 2008 due mainly to fees incurred in connection with the planned spin-off of RDSI and RDSI’s planned merger with New Core Banking Systems. Insurance expense increased $1.07 million year-over-year due mainly to increased FDIC insurance premiums. Finally, equipment expense increased $1.15 million over 2008 due mainly to accelerated software amortization and additional equipment purchases by RDSI.

50.

Non-interest expense increased for 2008 by $920 thousand, or 2.51 percent. The acquisition of National Bank of Montpelier contributed approximately $250 thousand of this increase, primarily from the December operating expenses and the one-time acquisition cost. During 2008, RDSI switched from outsourcing their preparation and mailing activities to managing these mailings in-house. This increased postage expense by $760 thousand during 2008 and this pass-through was offset by increases in revenue. RDSI also experienced an increase in non-federal taxes as it expanded into newer markets and sales tax expense in these new markets increased. Rurban controlled compensation and benefits with a mere 1.83 percent increase year-over-year. These increases were offset by expense reductions in equipment expenses (RDSI) and professional fees associated with loan workouts (State Bank). Data/Item Processing segment expenses were $17.3 million in 2008 compared to $16.9 million in 2007. This $400 thousand increase in RDSI was partially due to the in-house processing of postage. Banking segment expenses were $20.1 million in 2008 compared with $20.3 million in 2007.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Investments

Effective April 1, 2009 the Company adopted new accounting guidance related to recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairment (ASC 320-10). The Company does not intend to sell a debt security, and it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis; it recognizes the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. For held-to-maturity debt securities, the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income for the noncredit portion of a previous other-than-temporary impairment is amortized prospectively over the remaining life of the security on the basis of the timing of future estimated cash flows of the security.

Loans

			% of					% of			%					% of			%
	12/31/2009		Total			12/31/2008		Total			Inc/(Dec)			12/31/2007		Total			Inc/(Dec)
	(dollars in thousands)

Commercial	$	84,643		19	%	$	83,645		19	%		1	%	$	83,049		21	%		1	%
Commercial R.E.		179,909		39	%		161,566		35	%		11	%		126,785		33	%		27	%
Agricultural		41,485		9	%		43,641		10	%		-5	%		43,369		11	%		1	%
Residential		92,972		21	%		107,905		24	%		-14	%		84,621		22	%		28	%
Consumer		53,655		12	%		53,339		12	%		1	%		51,357		13	%		4	%
Leases		221		0	%		266		0	%		-17	%		330		0	%		-19	%
Loans	$	452,885				$	450,362					1	%	$	389,511					16	%

Loans held for sale		16,858					3,824								1,650
Total	$	469,743				$	454,186							$	391,161

Loans increased $2.5 million to $452.9 million at December 31, 2009. This growth was due to commercial real estate growth of $18.3 million and commercial growth of $997 thousand. Residential real estate and agriculture loan balances decreased $14.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively in 2009. The reduction in balances in residential real estate was due to the refinancing boom. The majority of this balance reduction was included in salable mortgages into the secondary market.

In 2008, loans increased $60.8 million to $450.1 million at December 31, 2008. This growth was due to the acquisition of $44.2 million of loans in the National Bank of Montpelier transaction and $16.6 million of core loan growth in all categories.

51.

Asset Quality

	Period Ended December 31,
	(dollars in millions)
							Change in						Change in
							Dollars /						Dollars /
	12/31/2009			12/31/2008			Percentages			12/31/2007			Percentages

Non-performing loans	$	18.5		$	5.2		$	13.3		$	6.0		$	(0.8	)
Non-performing assets	$	20.3		$	6.6		$	13.7		$	6.2		$	0.4
Non-performing assets/total assets		3.02	%		1.00	%		2.02	%		1.10	%		-0.10	%
Net charge-offs	$	3.8		$	0.8		$	3.0		$	0.2		$	0.6
Net charge-offs/total loans		0.84	%		0.19	%		0.65	%		0.07	%		0.12	%
Loan loss provision	$	5.7		$	0.7		$	5.0		$	0.5		$	0.2
Allowance for loan losses	$	7.0		$	5.0		$	2.0		$	4.0		$	1.0
Allowance/loans		1.55	%		1.12	%		0.43	%		1.03	%		0.09	%
Allowance/non-performing loans		38	%		97	%		-59	%		67	%		30	%
Allowance/non-performing assets		35	%		76	%		-42	%		65	%		11	%

Non-performing assets (loans + OREO + OAO) were $20.3 million, or 3.02 percent, of total assets at December 31, 2009, an increase of $13.7 million from 2008. Total restructured loan balances, loans having their key loan terms changed primarily due to borrower stress declined to $1.4 million for year-end 2009 compared to $151 thousand for year-end 2008.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2009, was $61.7 million, equivalent to 9.2 percent of total assets. On a tangible basis, the ratio was 5.2 percent. The total risk-based capital ratio was 12.6 percent at December 31, 2009, well in excess of the “well-capitalized” regulatory threshold of 10 percent.

Total consolidated regulatory (risk-based) capital was $59.8 million at December 31, 2009, and $59.5 million at December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2009, all of the Company’s $20 million of trust preferred securities qualified as Tier 1 capital.

At year-end RDSI had total equity of $13.4 million and total goodwill and intangibles of $6.9 million. The impact of the RDSI spin-off to the Company’s Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2009 if it had occurred at December 31, 2009, would be a reduction of $6.5 million. The Company would remain well above the “Well-Capitalized” level as defined by Regulatory requirements. There is no impact to State Bank’s capital position due to the planned spin-off of RDSI.

Goodwill and Intangibles

Goodwill is related to both our banking and data processing segments. We evaluate the fair value of our banking and data processing segments versus their carrying value as of each fiscal year end or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may exceed the fair value. The discount factors used in present value calculations are updated annually. We also use available market value information to evaluate fair value.

The methodology of calculating fair value for the Banking segment typically includes three different approaches. The income approach calculates a discounted cash flow analysis based on earnings capacity. The projections for the cash flow analysis are based on the Bank’s 2010 budget and assume modest increases in total assets and net income through 2014. A cost savings of 15 percent of the Bank’s overhead has also been factored into this equation.

52.

The asset approach is based on the estimated market difference between the value of assets and liabilities. This approach was not used in calculating fair value for year end 2009 because it does not render a “control level” indication of value.

The final approach is the market approach. This analysis is based on guideline transactions, including price-to-earnings multiples and price-to-book value ratios for selected bank sale transactions.

The methodology for calculating fair value for the data processing segment also utilizes a three step approach. The first approach is the capitalized net value approach. This approach assumes a value based on normalized cash flow capitalized assuming a discount rate of 14.65 percent and long-term growth rate of 3 percent. The data processing segment’s financial performance reflects the implementation of Rurban’s cost savings synergies; therefore no additional cost savings were assumed in this valuation method.

The net asset value approach estimates the market value of assets less the market value of liabilities. This approach was not utilized in determining the fair value of the data processing segment due to RDSI being a service oriented company. The value of the business is not based on the production of a tangible asset, and a minimal amount of tangible capital has been allocated to RDSI. Therefore, a valuation based on net asset value would not be meaningful.

The final approach utilized in determining the fair value of the data processing segment was the market comparables approach. This analysis is based on a review of guideline transactions including multiple of earnings, multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and multiple of revenue for selected financial technology companies. Indications of value are determined using publicly traded guidelines comparable multiples.

Significant changes in the estimates and assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the segments and the recoverability of goodwill or differences between estimates and actual results could result in impairment charges in the future.

Planned Purchases of Premises and Equipment

Management plans to purchase additional premises and equipment to meet the current and future needs of the Company’s customers. These purchases, including buildings and improvements and furniture and equipment (which includes computer hardware, software, office furniture and license agreements), are currently expected to total approximately $1.2 million for State Bank and $1.5 million for RDSI, over the next year. These purchases are expected to be funded by cash on hand and from cash generated from current operations.

53.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity relates primarily to the Company’s ability to fund loan demand, meet deposit customers’ withdrawal requirements and provide for operating expenses. Sources used to satisfy these needs consist of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, interest earning deposits in other financial institutions, securities available for sale, loans held for sale, and borrowings from various sources. The assets, excluding the borrowings, are commonly referred to as liquid assets. Liquid assets were $146.8 million at December 31, 2009 compared to $134.5 million at December 31, 2008. During 2009, the Company continued to utilize strategies that would move the balance sheet to a more asset-sensitive position.

The Company’s commercial real estate, residential first and multi-family mortgage portfolio of $272.9 million at December 31, 2009, which can and has been readily used to collateralize borrowings, is an additional source of liquidity. Management believes the Company’s current liquidity level, without these borrowings, is sufficient to meet its liquidity needs. At December 31, 2009, all eligible commercial real estate, residential first, and multi-family mortgage loans were pledged under an FHLB blanket lien.

During 2009 RDSI paid $1.9 million in dividends to the Company. Management expects sufficient cash-flow from State Bank operations to fund necessary Company liquidity needs.

The cash flow statements for the periods presented provide an indication of the Company’s sources and uses of cash as well as an indication of the ability of the Company to maintain an adequate level of liquidity. A discussion of the cash flow statements for 2009, 2008 and 2007 follows.

The Company experienced negative cash flows from operating activities in 2009, and positive cash flows from operating activities in 2008 and 2007. Net cash from operating activities was $(7.2) million, $9.7 million and $5.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Cash flow from investing activities was a use of cash of $9.5 million, $647 thousand, and $12.8 million for December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The changes in net cash from investing activities for 2009 include the purchase of available-for-sale securities of $67.9 million, net change in loans of $7.7 million and the purchase of premises and equipment of $3.4 million. 2008 changes in net cash from investing activities include the purchase of National Bank of Montpelier of $14.8 million, and purchases of premises and equipment of $8.0 million. The changes in net cash from investing activities for 2007 include the purchase of bank owned life insurance of $1.0 million and purchases of premises and equipment of $3.7 million. In 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company received $27.1 million, $36.5 million and $3.5 million, respectively, from sales of securities available for sale, while proceeds from repayments, maturities and calls of securities were $40.8 million, $48.1 million and $37.2 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Net cash flow provided from financing activities was $13.5 million, $1.9 million, and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The net cash flow increase was primarily due to an increase in federal funds purchased of $5.0 million for December 31, 2009. Additionally, net borrowings from the FHLB were $(1.38) million, $12.6 million and $3.0 million for December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Finally, $7.0 million, $(8.6) million and $(8.5) million of the change is attributable to the change in deposits for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Off-Balance-Sheet Borrowing Arrangements:

Significant additional off-balance-sheet liquidity is available in the form of FHLB advances, unused federal funds lines from correspondent banks, lines of credit from correspondent banks and the national certificate of deposit market. Management expects the risk of changes in off-balance-sheet arrangements to be immaterial to earnings.

54.

Approximately $146.5 million of commercial real estate and residential first mortgage loans of the Company’s $300.0 million portfolio qualify to collateralize FHLB borrowings and have been pledged to meet FHLB collateralization requirements as of December 31, 2009. Based on the current collateralization requirements of the FHLB, approximately $13.7 million of additional borrowing capacity existed at December 31, 2009.

At December 31, 2009, the Company had $20.5 million in federal funds lines. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had $25.5 million in federal funds lines. Federal funds borrowed at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $5.0 million and $0, respectively. The Company also had $17.1 million in unpledged securities that may be used to pledge for additional borrowings.

TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

	Payment due by period
			Less than 1						More than 5
Contractual Obligations	Total		year		1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years		years

Long-Term Debt Obligations	$	36,646,854	$	9,082,228	$	25,925,752	$	1,638,874	$	-
Other Debt Obligations		21,620,000		1,000,000		-		-		20,620,000
Operating Lease Obligations		2,143,078		447,183		652,283		423,200		620,412
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Reflected on the Registrant's
Balance Sheet under GAAP		242,516,203		158,844,618		69,090,559		12,155,618		2,425,408
Total	$	302,926,135	$	169,374,029	$	95,668,594	$	14,217,692	$	23,665,820

The Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009 were comprised of long-term debt obligations, other debt obligations, operating lease obligations and other long-term liabilities. Long-term debt obligations are comprised of FHLB Advances of $35.3 million. Other debt obligations are comprised of Trust Preferred securities of $20.6 million and Notes Payable of $2.1 million. The operating lease obligation is a lease on the RDSI-South building of $99,600 per year, the RDSI-North building of $162 thousand per year and the DCM-Lansing facility of $58,700 per year. Other long-term liabilities include time deposits of $216.6 million.

55.

ASSET LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

Asset liability management involves developing, executing and monitoring strategies to maintain appropriate liquidity, maximize net interest income and minimize the impact that significant fluctuations in market interest rates would have on current and future earnings. The business of the Company and the composition of its balance sheet consist of investments in interest-earning assets (primarily loans, mortgage-backed securities, and securities available for sale) which are primarily funded by interest-bearing liabilities (deposits and borrowings). With the exception of specific loans which are originated and held for sale, all of the financial instruments of the Company are for other than trading purposes. All of the Company’s transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars with no specific foreign exchange exposure. In addition, the Company has limited exposure to commodity prices related to agricultural loans. The impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and commodity prices on interest rates are assumed to be insignificant. The Company’s financial instruments have varying levels of sensitivity to changes in market interest rates resulting in market risk. Interest rate risk is the Company’s primary market risk exposure; to a lesser extent, liquidity risk also impacts market risk exposure.

Interest rate risk is the exposure of a banking institution’s financial condition to adverse movements in interest rates. Accepting this risk can be an important source of profitability and shareholder value; however, excessive levels of interest rate risk could pose a significant threat to the Company’s earnings and capital base. Accordingly, effective risk management that maintains interest rate risks at prudent levels is essential to the Company’s safety and soundness.

Evaluating a financial institution’s exposure to changes in interest rates includes assessing both the adequacy of the management process used to control interest rate risk and the organization’s quantitative level of exposure. When assessing the interest rate risk management process, the Company seeks to ensure that appropriate policies, procedures, management information systems and internal controls are in place to maintain interest rate risks at prudent levels of consistency and continuity. Evaluating the quantitative level of interest rate risk exposure requires the Company to assess the existing and potential future effects of changes in interest rates on its consolidated financial condition, including capital adequacy, earnings, liquidity and asset quality (when appropriate).

The Federal Reserve Board together with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Company adopted a Joint Agency Policy Statement on interest rate risk effective June 26, 1996. The policy statement provides guidance to examiners and bankers on sound practices for managing interest rate risk, which will form the basis for ongoing evaluation of the adequacy of interest rate risk management at supervised institutions. The policy statement also outlines fundamental elements of sound management that have been identified in prior Federal Reserve guidance and discusses the importance of these elements in the context of managing interest rate risk. Specifically, the guidance emphasizes the need for active board of director and senior management oversight and a comprehensive risk management process that effectively identifies, measures and controls interest rate risk.

Financial institutions derive their income primarily from the excess of interest collected over interest paid. The rates of interest an institution earns on its assets and owes on its liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Since market interest rates change over time, an institution is exposed to lower profit margins (or losses) if it cannot adapt to interest rate changes. For example, assume that an institution’s assets carry intermediate or long-term fixed rates and that those assets are funded with short-term liabilities. If market interest rates rise by the time the short-term liabilities must be refinanced, the increase in the institution’s interest expense on its liabilities may not be sufficiently offset if assets continue to earn at the long-term fixed rates. Accordingly, an institution’s profits could decrease on existing assets because the institution will either have lower net interest income or possibly, net interest expense. Similar risks exist when assets are subject to contractual interest rate ceilings, or rate-sensitive assets are funded by longer-term, fixed-rate liabilities in a declining rate environment.

56.

There are several ways an institution can manage interest rate risk including: 1) matching repricing periods for new assets and liabilities, for example, by shortening or lengthening terms of new loans, investments, or liabilities; 2) selling existing assets or repaying certain liabilities; and 3) hedging existing assets, liabilities, or anticipated transactions. An institution might also invest in more complex financial instruments intended to hedge or otherwise change interest rate risk. Interest rate swaps, futures contracts, options on futures contracts, and other such derivative financial instruments can be used for this purpose. Because these instruments are sensitive to interest rate changes, they require management’s expertise to be effective. The Company has not purchased derivative financial instruments in the past but may purchase such instruments in the future if market conditions are favorable.

Quantitative Market Risk Disclosure. The following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments used for purposes other than trading that are sensitive to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2009. The table does not present when these items may actually reprice. For loans receivable, securities, and liabilities with contractual maturities, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by contractual maturities as well as the historical impact of interest rate fluctuations on the prepayment of loans and mortgage backed securities. For core deposits (demand deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposits) that have no contractual maturity, the table presents principal cash flows and applicable related weighted-average interest rates based upon the Company’s historical experience, management’s judgment and statistical analysis, as applicable, concerning their most likely withdrawal behaviors. The current historical interest rates for core deposits have been assumed to apply for future periods in this table as the actual interest rates that will need to be paid to maintain these deposits are not currently known. Weighted average variable rates are based upon contractual rates existing at the reporting date.

57.

Principal/Notional Amount Maturing or Assumed to be Withdrawn In:

(Dollars in thousands)

	2010			2011			2012			2013			2014			Thereafter			Total
Rate Sensitive Assets
Variable Rate Loans	$	42,100		$	16,581		$	9,237		$	5,774		$	4,477		$	8,046		$	86,215
Average interest rate		4.51	%		4.13	%		4.06	%		4.05	%		4.15	%		3.80	%		4.28	%
Adjustable Rate Loans	$	41,768		$	34,173		$	25,010		$	20,662		$	19,345		$	72,132		$	213,090
Average interest rate		5.83	%		5.91	%		5.97	%		5.99	%		5.67	%		5.92	%		5.89	%
Fixed Rate Loans	$	65,063		$	36,623		$	22,371		$	12,122		$	9,950		$	23,983		$	170,111
Average interest rate		5.85	%		6.35	%		5.98	%		6.01	%		5.92	%		3.52	%		5.66	%
Total Loans	$	148,931		$	87,377		$	56,618		$	38,558		$	33,772		$	104,161		$	469,416
Average interest rate		5.46	%		5.76	%		5.66	%		5.71	%		5.54	%		5.20	%		5.51	%
Fixed rate investment securities	$	29,984		$	16,468		$	8,766		$	3,928		$	2,194		$	30,383		$	91,723
Average interest rate		5.31	%		5.58	%		5.65	%		5.25	%		4.34	%		4.38	%		5.06	%
Variable rate investment securities	$	9,197		$	160		$	168		$	136		$	132		$	7,315		$	17,108
Average interest rate		0.52	%		3.97	%		3.98	%		3.84	%		3.79	%		4.78	%		2.46	%
Fed Funds Sold & Other	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Average interest rate		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Total Rate Sensitive Assets	$	188,112		$	104,005		$	65,552		$	42,622		$	36,098		$	141,859		$	578,247
Average interest rate		5.20	%		5.73	%		5.66	%		5.66	%		5.46	%		5.00	%		5.35	%

Rate Sensitive Liabilities
Demand - Non Interest Bearing	$	11,463		$	11,463		$	11,463		$	11,463		$	11,378		$	-		$	57,230
Demand - Interest Bearing	$	17,532		$	17,532		$	17,532		$	17,532		$	17,384		$	-		$	87,512
Average interest rate		0.16	%		0.16	%		0.16	%		0.16	%		0.16	%		0.00	%		0.16	%
Money Market Accounts	$	17,364		$	17,364		$	17,364		$	17,364		$	17,166		$	-		$	86,622
Average interest rate		0.45	%		0.45	%		0.45	%		0.45	%		0.45	%		0.00	%		0.45	%
Savings	$	8,673		$	8,496		$	8,496		$	8,496		$	9,160		$	-		$	43,321
Average interest rate		0.26	%		0.26	%		0.26	%		0.26	%		0.26	%		0.00	%		0.26	%
Certificates of Deposit	$	136,074		$	41,363		$	28,922		$	3,699		$	4,284		$	2,215		$	216,557
Average interest rate		2.00	%		2.41	%		3.04	%		3.68	%		2.09	%		3.40	%		2.26	%
Fixed rate FHLB Advances	$	11,000		$	11,709		$	1,549		$	5,008		$	6,000		$	-		$	35,266
Average interest rate		5.38	%		4.24	%		3.26	%		3.25	%		2.92	%		0.00	%		4.18	%
Variable rate FHLB Advances	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Average interest rate		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Fixed rate Notes Payable	$	996		$	996		$	155		$	-		$	-		$	10,310		$	12,457
Average interest rate		6.50	%		6.50	%		6.50	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		10.60	%		9.89	%
Variable rate Notes Payable	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	10,310		$	10,310
Average interest rate		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		4.12	%		4.12	%
Fed Funds Purchased, Repos & Other	$	17,043		$	15,000		$	20,000		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	52,043
Average interest rate		0.40	%		4.77	%		4.74	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		3.33	%
Total Rate Sensitive Liabilities	$	220,145		$	123,923		$	105,481		$	63,562		$	65,372		$	22,835		$	601,318
Average interest rate		1.62	%		1.94	%		1.91	%		0.67	%		0.60	%		6.98	%		1.73	%

58.

Principal/Notional Amount Maturing or Assumed to be Withdrawn In:

(Dollars in thousands)

	First			Years
Comparison of 2009 to 2008	Year			2 - 5		Thereafter			Total
Total Rate Sensitive Assets:
At December 31, 2009	$	188,112		$	248,276	$	141,859		$	578,247
At December 31, 2008		182,795			227,333		160,659			570,787
Increase (decrease)	$	5,317		$	20,943	$	(18,800	)	$	7,460

Total Rate Sensitive Liabilities:
At December 31, 2009	$	220,145		$	358,338	$	22,835		$	601,318
At December 31, 2008		220,481			338,260		27,173			585,914
Increase (decrease)	$	(336	)	$	20,078	$	(4,338	)	$	15,404

The above table reflects expected maturities, not expected repricing. The contractual maturities adjusted for anticipated prepayments and anticipated renewals at current interest rates, as shown in the preceding table, are only part of the Company’s interest rate risk profile. Other important factors include the ratio of rate-sensitive assets to rate-sensitive liabilities (which takes into consideration loan repricing frequency but not when deposits may be repriced) and the general level and direction of market interest rates. For core deposits, the repricing frequency is assumed to be longer than when such deposits actually reprice. For some rate-sensitive liabilities, their repricing frequency is the same as their contractual maturity. For variable rate loans receivable, repricing frequency can be daily or monthly. For adjustable rate loans receivable, repricing can be as frequent as annually for loans whose contractual maturities range from one to thirty years. The Company continued to reposition its balance sheet over the past two years liquidating investments and reducing high cost certificates of deposit which had a positive impact on the margin and helped balance the gap position.

The Company manages its interest rate risk by the employment of strategies to assure that desired levels of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice with similar time frames. Such strategies include: 1) loans receivable which are renewed (and repriced) annually, 2) variable rate loans, 3) certificates of deposit with terms from one month to six years, 4) securities available for sale which mature at various times primarily from one through ten years, 5) federal funds borrowings with terms of one day to 90 days, and 6) Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings with terms of one day to ten years.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The majority of assets and liabilities of the Company are monetary in nature and therefore, the Company differs greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets or inventories. However, inflation does have an important impact on the growth of total assets in the banking industry and the resulting need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio. Inflation significantly affects non-interest expense, which tends to rise during periods of general inflation.

Management believes the most significant impact on financial results is the Company’s ability to react to changes in interest rates. Management seeks to maintain an essentially balanced position between interest sensitive assets and liabilities and actively manages loan, security, and liability maturities in order to protect against the effects of wide interest rate fluctuations on net income and shareholders’ equity.

59.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The disclosures required by this item appear under the caption “Asset Liability Management” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations beginning on page 39 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the related Consolidated Statements of Income, Stockholders’ Equity and Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, the related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, appear on pages F-1 through F-57 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not Applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

With the participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer) and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer) of the Company, the Company’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that:

information required to be disclosed by the Company in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act would be accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure;

information required to be disclosed by the Company in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act would be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and

the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” is provided on page F-0 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

60.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

No changes were made in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

Not Applicable.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors and Executive Officers

The information required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K concerning the directors of the Company and the nominees for re-election as directors of the Company at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 22, 2010 (the “2010 Annual Meeting”), is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure included in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 2010 Annual Meeting (the “2010 Proxy Statement”), under the caption “PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”. The information concerning the executive officers of the Company required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K is set forth in the portion of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K entitled “Supplemental Item: Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

The information required by Item 405 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure included in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE.”

Committee Charters and Code of Conduct and Ethics

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted charters for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee. Copies of these charters are available on the Company’s Internet website at www.rurbanfinancial.net by first clicking “Corporate Governance” and then “Supplementary Info”. The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that applies to the Company’s directors, officers and employees. A copy of the Code of Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company’s Internet website at www.rurbanfinancial.net under the “Corporate Governance” tab. Interested persons may also obtain copies of the Code of Conduct and Ethics, the Audit Committee charter, the Compensation Committee charter and the Executive Governance and Nominating Committee charter, without charge, by writing to Rurban Financial Corp., Attn: Linda Sickmiller, Investor Relations, 401 Clinton Street, Defiance, OH 43512.

Director Nominating Procedures

Information regarding the procedures by which shareholders of the Company may recommend and/or nominate individuals for election as directors of the Company is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure included under the caption “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – Nominating Procedures” in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement. These procedures have not materially changed from those described in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 16, 2009.

61.

Audit Committee

The information required by Items 407(d)(4) and 407(d)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure included under the caption “MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD – Committees of the Board – Audit Committee” in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The executive compensation information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the Company’s 2009 Proxy Statement under the captions “COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS” and “DIRECTOR COMPENSATION”.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by Item 403 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure included in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT”.

62.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The Rurban Financial Corp. Stock Option Plan (the “1997 Plan”) was approved by the shareholders of the Company at the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 1997 Plan expired in accordance with its terms on March 12, 2007, and no additional stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARS”) or other awards may be granted under the 1997 Plan. At the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders of the Company approved the Rurban Financial Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”).

The following table shows, as of December 31, 2009 the number of common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, he weighted-average exercise price of those stock option, and the number of common shares remaining for future issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans (excluding common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options):

Number of securities

remaining available for

to be issued upon

Weighted-average

future issuance under equity

exercise of

exercise price of

compensation plans

outstanding options,

(excluding securities

Plan category

warrants and rights

reflected in column (a)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

311,213

(1)

12.58

238,500

(2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

N/A

(1)	Does not include "tandem" SARs awards under the 1997 Plan in connection with the grant of the same number of nonqualified stock options. A total of 28,000 "tandem" SARs, with a weighted-average price of $13.68, were outstanding as of December 31, 2009.

(2)

Represents common shares of the Company remaining available for future issuance under the 2008 Plan (subject to certain adjustments). The 1997 Plan expired in accordance with its terms on March 12, 2007, and no additional stock options, stock appreciation rights or other awards my be granted under the 1997 Plan.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS”.

The information required by Item 407(a) of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – Director Independence”.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required to be disclosed in this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the Company’s 2010 Proxy Statement under the caption “AUDIT COMMITTEE DISCLOSURE” – Pre-Approval of Services Performed by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “AUDIT COMMITTEE DISCLOSURE” – Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the 2009 Fiscal Year”.

63.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) (1)

Financial Statements.

A list of all financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is included under “INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS” on page 63 herein.

(a) (2)

Financial Statement Schedules.

All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

(a) (3) Exhibits.

Exhibit No.	Description	Location

2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 22, 2008, by and among Rurban Financial Corp., Rurban Merger Corp, and NBM Bancorp, Incorporated	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 23, 2008 (File No. 0-13507).

2.2	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 25, 2009, by and among Rurbanc Data Services, Inc., NC Merger Corp. and New Core Holdings, Inc.	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 29, 2009 (File No. 0-13507).

2.3	First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 29, 2009, by and among Rurbanc Data Services, Inc., NC Merger Corp. and New Core Holdings, Inc.	Filed herewith.

3.1	Amended Articles of Registrant, as amended	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a)(i) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1989 (File No. 0-13507).

3.2	Certificate of Amendment to the Amended Articles of Rurban Financial Corp.	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 (File No. 0-13507).

3.3	Certificate of Amendment to the Amended Articles of Rurban Financial Corp.	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 0-13507).

3.4	Amended and Restated Articles of Rurban Financial Corp. [Note: filed for purposes of SEC reporting compliance only – this document has not been filed with the Ohio Secretary of State.]	Filed herewith.

64.

Exhibit No.	Description	Location

3.5	Amended and Restated Regulations of Rurban Financial Corp.	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).

3.6	Certificate Regarding Adoption of Amendment to Section 2.01 of the Amended and Restated Regulations of Rurban Financial Corp. by the Shareholders on April 16, 2009	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 22, 2009 (File No. 0-13507).

4.1	Indenture, dated as of September 15, 2005, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Debenture Trustee, relating to Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).

4.2	Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Rurban Statutory Trust II, dated as of September 15, 2005	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).

4.3	Guarantee Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2005, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Guarantee Trustee	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).

4.4	Agreement to furnish instruments and agreements defining rights of holders of long-term debt	Filed herewith.

10.1*	Rurban Financial Corp. Plan to Allow Directors to Elect to Defer Compensation	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(v) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 (File No. 0-13507).

10.2*	Rurban Financial Corp. 1997 Stock Option Plan	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(v) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 (File No. 0-13507).

10.3*	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with Five-Year Vesting under Rurban Financial Corp. 1997 Stock Option Plan	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 0-13507).

10.4*	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with Vesting After One Year of Employment under Rurban Financial Corp. 1997 Stock Option Plan	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 21, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).

10.5*	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement with Five-Year Vesting under Rurban Financial Corp. 1997 Stock Option Plan	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(x) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 0-13507).

65.

Exhibit No.	Description	Location

10.6*	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement with Vesting After One Year of Employment under Rurban Financial Corp. 1997 Stock Option Plan	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 21, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).

10.7*	Form of Stock Appreciation Rights under Rurban Financial Corp. 1997 Stock Option Plan	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 21, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).

10.8*	Rurban Financial Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 22, 2008 (File No. 0-13507).

10.9*	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (For Employees) under Rurban Financial Corp. 2008 Stock Option Plan	In Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 22, 2008 (File No. 0-13507).

10.10*	Employees’ Stock Ownership and Savings Plan of Rurban Financial Corp.	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(y) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 0-13507).

10.11*	Rurban Financial Corp. Employee Stock Purchase Plan	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(z) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 0-13507).

10.12*	Employment Agreement, executed March 6, 2006 and effective as of March 1, 2006, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Kenneth A. Joyce	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 0-13507).

10.13*	First Amendment to Employment Agreement, executed May 19, 2006 and effective as of March 1, 2006, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Kenneth A. Joyce	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (File No. 0-13507).

10.14*	Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of December 31, 2008, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Kenneth A. Joyce	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-13507).

10.15*	Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement, effective as of December 31, 2008, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Kenneth A. Joyce	Filed herewith.

10.16*	Schedule dated December 31, 2008 identifying other substantially identical Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreements with executive officers of Rurban Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-13507).

66.

Exhibit No.	Description	Location

10.17*	First Amendment to Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement, dated as April 20, 2009, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Mark A. Klein	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 22, 2009 (File No. 0-13507).

10.18*	Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement, effective as of December 31, 2008, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Duane L. Sinn	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-13507).

10.19*	Schedule dated December 31, 2008 identifying other substantially identical Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreements with executive officers of Rurban Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-13507).

10.20	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement with Five-Year Vesting under Rurban Financial Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan	Filed herewith.

10.21	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with Five-Year Vesting under Rurban Financial Corp. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan	Filed herewith.

10.22*	Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of January 1, 2007	Incorprated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-13507)

10.23	Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2009, by and between Rurban Financial Corp. and Rurbanc Data Services, Inc.	Filed herewith.

11	Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings	Included in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Registrant in the financial statements portion of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

21	Subsidiaries of Registrant	Filed herewith.

23	Consent of BKD, LLP	Filed herewith.

24	Power of Attorney of Directors and Executive Officers	Included on signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification – Principal Executive Officer	Filed herewith.

31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification – Principal Financial Officer	Filed herewith.

32.1	Section 1350 Certification – Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer	Filed herewith.

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

67.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	RURBAN FINANCIAL CORP.

	By:	/s/ Duane L. Sinn
Date: March 17, 2010		Duane L. Sinn, Executive Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer

Power of Attorney

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each undersigned officer and/or director of Rurban Financial Corp., an Ohio corporation (the “Corporation”), which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Annual Report of the Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, hereby constitutes and appoints Kenneth A. Joyce and Duane L. Sinn, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign both the Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments and documents related thereto, and to file the same, and any and all exhibits, financial statements and schedules related thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ Stock Market, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and substitute or substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all things that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them or his or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Date	Capacity

/s/ Kenneth A, Joyce	March 17, 2010	Executive Vice Chairman, and Director
Kenneth A. Joyce

/s/ Duane L. Sinn	March 17, 2010	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Duane L. Sinn

/s/ Thomas A. Buis	March 17, 2010	Director
Thomas A. Buis

/s/ Thomas M. Callan	March 17, 2010	Director
Thomas M. Callan

68.

/s/ John R. Compo	March 17, 2010	Director
John R. Compo

/s/ Robert A. Fawcett, Jr.	March 17, 2010	Director
Robert A. Fawcett, Jr.

/s/ Richard L. Hardgrove	March 17, 2010	Director
Richard L. Hardgrove

/s/ Rita A. Kissner	March 17, 2010	Director
Rita A. Kissner

/s/ Thomas L. Sauer	March 17, 2010	Director
Thomas L. Sauer

/s/ Steven D. VanDemark	March 17, 2010	Director
Steven D. VanDemark

/s/ J. Michael Walz, D.D.S.	March 17, 2010	Director
J. Michael Walz, D.D.S

/s/ Mark A. Klein	March 17, 2010	Director
Mark A. Klein

/s/Gaylyn J. Finn	March 17, 2010	Director
Gaylyn J. Finn

Date: March 17, 2010

69.

Rurban Financial Corp.

December 31, 2009 and 2008

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	F- 0

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1

Consolidated Financial Statements
Balance Sheets	F-2 to F-3
Statements of Income	F-4 to F-5
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	F-6
Statements of Cash Flows	F-7 to F-8
Notes to Financial Statements	F-9 to F-57

70.

Management’s Report on Internal Control

Over Financial Reporting

The management of Rurban Financial Corp. (the “Corporation”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

a)	Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Corporation; and

c)	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the assets of the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

With the supervision and participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria set forth for effective internal control over financial reporting by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control Integrated Framework”. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Corporation’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Corporation’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Corporation to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

RURBAN FINANCIAL CORP.


Kenneth A. Joyce	Duane L. Sinn
Executive Vice Chairman	Chief Financial Officer

February 26, 2010

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders

Rurban Financial Corp.

Defiance, Ohio

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rurban Financial Corp. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009. The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits also included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rurban Financial Corp. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Cincinnati, Ohio

February 26, 2010

Rurban Financial Corp.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31

Assets

	2009			2008

Cash and due from banks	$	24,824,785		$	18,059,532
Federal funds sold		-			10,000,000
Cash and cash equivalents		24,824,785			28,059,532
Available-for-sale securities		105,083,112			102,606,475
Loans held for sale		16,857,648			3,824,499
Loans, net of unearned income		452,557,581			450,111,653
Allowance for loan losses		(7,030,178	)		(5,020,197	)
Premises and equipment, net		16,993,640			17,621,262
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at cost		3,748,250			4,244,100
Foreclosed assets held for sale, net		1,767,953			1,384,335
Interest receivable		2,324,868			2,964,663
Goodwill		21,414,790			21,414,790
Core deposits and other intangibles		4,977,513			5,835,936
Purchased software		5,338,319			5,867,395
Cash value of life insurance		12,792,045			12,625,015
Other assets		11,398,776			6,079,451

Total assets	$	673,049,102		$	657,618,909

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Rurban Financial Corp.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

	2009			2008

Liabilities
Deposits
Non interest bearing demand	$	57,229,795		$	52,242,626
Interest bearing NOW		87,511,973			73,123,095
Savings		43,321,364			34,563,566
Money Market		86,621,953			82,025,074
Time Deposits		216,557,067			242,266,223
Total deposits		491,242,152			484,220,584
Short-term borrowings		52,042,820			43,425,978
Notes payable		2,146,776			1,000,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		35,266,510			36,646,854
Trust preferred securities		20,620,000			20,620,000
Interest payable		1,507,521			1,965,842
Deferred income taxes		2,715,716			2,987,770
Other liabilities		5,799,952			5,089,877
Total liabilities		611,341,447			595,956,905

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, $2.50 stated value; authorized
10,000,000 shares; 5,027,433 shares issued		12,568,583			12,568,583
Additional paid-in capital		15,186,042			15,042,781
Retained earnings		34,415,316			35,785,317
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		1,307,025			(121,657	)
Treasury stock, at cost
Common; 2009 - 165,654 shares, 2008 -145,981 shares		(1,769,311	)		(1,613,020	)
Total stockholders' equity		61,707,655			61,662,004
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	673,049,102		$	657,618,909

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Rurban Financial Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Income

Years Ended December 31

	2009			2008		2007

Interest Income
Loans
Taxable	$	27,272,465		$	27,473,302	$	27,782,068
Tax-exempt		91,294			84,878		73,451
Securities
Taxable		4,082,639			4,289,728		4,283,508
Tax-exempt		1,063,190			686,458		645,451
Other		81,562			134,079		225,151
Total interest income		32,591,150			32,668,445		33,009,629

Interest Expense
Deposits		6,525,942			10,066,325		13,595,896
Notes payable		132,116			34,576		126,812
Repurchase Agreements		1,733,668			1,821,330		1,615,016
Federal funds purchased		2,827			18,432		39,047
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		1,624,700			1,508,115		1,037,026
Trust preferred securities		1,573,293			1,691,792		1,808,520
Total interest expense		11,592,546			15,140,570		18,222,317

Net Interest Income		20,998,604			17,527,875		14,787,312

Provision for Loan Losses		5,738,098			689,567		521,306

Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses		15,260,506			16,838,308		14,266,006

Non-interest Income
Data service fees		18,859,701			20,165,451		19,382,115
Trust fees		2,508,723			3,081,898		3,385,320
Customer service fees		2,607,985			2,416,093		2,243,745
Net gains on loan sales		3,354,654			740,985		574,000

Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities		960,320			-		1,998
Net proceeds from VISA IPO		-			132,106		-
Investment securities recoveries		-			197,487		-
Loan servicing fees		443,309			235,095		227,017
Gain (losses) on sale of assets		(134,732	)		247,517		29,477
Other		995,126			844,105		1,017,727
Total non-interest income	$	29,595,086		$	28,060,737	$	26,861,399

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Rurban Financial Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Income

Years Ended December 31

	2009			2008		2007

Non-interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits	$	21,034,671		$	17,318,103	$	17,007,314
Net occupancy expense		2,227,452			2,015,946		1,994,299
Equipment expense		7,463,352			6,308,564		6,586,623
Data processing fees		609,876			427,251		469,808
Professional fees		2,891,607			1,859,447		2,226,577
Marketing expense		857,727			831,727		820,528
Printing and office supplies		601,626			554,267		661,760
Telephone and communications		1,622,077			1,686,834		1,781,277
Postage and delivery expense		2,079,463			2,165,098		1,545,340
Insurance expense		1,222,636			154,670		140,651
Employee expense		1,151,438			1,084,028		1,083,056
State, local and other taxes		724,546			985,503		584,031
Other		2,647,018			2,165,175		1,735,346
Total non-interest expense		45,133,489			37,556,613		36,636,610

Income Before Income Tax		(277,897	)		7,342,432		4,490,795

Provision for Income Taxes		(660,388	)		2,125,193		1,234,160

Net Income	$	382,491		$	5,217,239	$	3,256,635

Basic Earnings Per Share	$	0.07		$	1.06	$	0.65

Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.07		$	1.06	$	0.65

								Accumulated
								Other
	Common		Additional		Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury
	Stock		Paid-In Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Stock			Total

Balance, January 1, 2007	$	12,568,583	$	14,859,165	$	30,407,298		$	(879,893	)	$	-		$	56,955,153
Comprehensive Income

Net Income						3,256,635									3,256,635

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment and tax effect									962,128						962,128

Total comprehensive income															4,218,763

Dividends on common stock, $0.26 per share						(1,302,827	)								(1,302,827	)

Expense of stock option plan				64,406											64,406

Shares repurchased under stock repurchase plan												(610,260	)		(610,260	)

Balance, December 31, 2007		12,568,583		14,923,571		32,361,106			82,235			(610,260	)		59,325,235
Comprehensive Income

Net Income						5,217,239									5,217,239

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment and tax effect									(203,892	)					(203,892	)

Total comprehensive income															5,013,347

Dividends on common stock, $0.34 per share						(1,676,723	)								(1,676,723	)

Expense of stock option plan				119,210											119,210

Cumulative effect adjustment for split dollar BOLI						(116,305	)								(116,305	)

Shares repurchased under stock repurchase plan												(1,002,760	)		(1,002,760	)

Balance, December 31, 2008		12,568,583		15,042,781		35,785,317			(121,657	)		(1,613,020	)		61,662,004
Comprehensive Income

Net Income						382,491									382,491

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment and tax effect									1,428,682						1,428,682

Total comprehensive income															1,811,173

Dividends on common stock, $0.36 per share						(1,752,492	)								(1,752,492	)

Expense of stock option plan				143,261											143,261

Shares repurchased under stock repurchase plan												(156,291	)		(156,291	)

Balance, December 31, 2009	$	12,568,583	$	15,186,042	$	34,415,316		$	1,307,025		$	(1,769,311	)	$	61,707,655

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Approximate
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-Sale Securities:
December 31, 2009:
U.S. Treasury and
Government agencies	$	13,215,086	$	5,359	$	(276,796	)	$	12,943,649
Mortgage-backed securities		50,877,903		1,792,894		(424,519	)		52,246,278
State and political subdivisions		30,653,604		984,833		(101,431	)		31,537,006
Money Market Mutual Fund		8,333,179		-		-			8,333,179
Equity securities		23,000		-		-			23,000

	$	103,102,772	$	2,783,086	$	(802,746	)	$	105,083,112

December 31, 2008:
U.S. Treasury and
Government agencies	$	15,146,301	$	65,978	$	(28,396	)	$	15,183,883
Mortgage-backed securities		64,329,865		1,014,453		(797,893	)		64,546,425
State and political subdivisions		23,241,636		22,010		(462,215	)		22,801,431
Equity securities		23,000		-		-			23,000
Other securities		50,000		1,736		-			51,736

	$	102,790,802	$	1,104,177	$	(1,288,504	)	$	102,606,475

	Available for Sale
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value

Within one year	$	1,027,913	$	1,044,796
Due after one year through five years		3,736,916		3,887,231
Due after five years through ten years		9,837,771		10,006,344
Due after ten years		29,266,090		29,542,284
		43,868,690		44,480,655

Mortgage-backed securities & Equity Securities		59,234,082		60,602,457

Totals	$	103,102,772	$	105,083,112

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value		Losses
Available-for-Sale Securities:
U.S. Treasury and Government agencies	$	12,837,085	$	(276,796	)	$	-	$	-		$	12,837,085	$	(276,796	)
Mortgage-backed securities		1,263,285		(15,539	)		2,255,050		(408,980	)		3,518,335		(424,519	)
State and political subdivisions		2,792,842		(56,693	)		991,950		(44,737	)		3,784,792		(101,431	)

	$	16,893,212	$	(349,028	)	$	3,247,000	$	(453,717	)	$	20,140,212	$	(802,746	)

	At December 31,
	2009		2008		2007
Year-end impaired loans with no allowance for loan losses allocated	$	1,099,912	$	1,706,246	$	1,786,931

Year-end loans with allowance for loan losses allocated	$	14,912,035	$	865,710	$	1,897,903

Total impaired loans	$	16,011,947	$	2,571,956	$	3,684,834

Amount of allowance allocated	$	3,041,967	$	322,190	$	332,805

Average of impaired loans during the year	$	16,111,693	$	2,158,106	$	2,805,689

Interest income recognized during impairment	$	564,931	$	11,970	$	63,425

Cash-basis interest income recognized	$	596,565	$	14,807	$	74,940

	2009			2008

Land	$	2,027,383		$	2,071,883
Buildings and improvements		14,871,520			14,781,372
Equipment		11,663,865			10,205,378
Construction in progress		508,500			1,064,890
		29,071,268			28,123,523

Less accumulated depreciation		(12,077,628	)		(10,502,261	)

Net premises and equipment	$	16,993,640		$	17,621,262

	2009					2008
	Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Gross Carrying		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amortization
Core deposits intangible	$	5,450,647	$	(2,427,111	)	$	5,450,647	$	(1,794,702	)
Customer relationship intangible		200,627		(104,761	)		200,627		(96,458	)
Banking intangibles		5,651,274		(2,531,872	)		5,651,274		(1,891,160	)

Customer relationship intangible		2,389,000		(530,889	)		2,389,000		(371,623	)
Trademark intangible		180,000		(180,000	)		180,000		(140,000	)
Non-compete intangible		83,000		(83,000	)		83,000		(64,555	)
Data processing intangibles		2,652,000		(793,889	)		2,652,000		(576,178	)

Purchased software - banking		556,031		(320,092	)		469,515		(199,364	)
Purchased software - data processing		12,699,410		(7,646,988	)		11,172,252		(5,662,679	)
Purchased software - other		187,214		(137,256	)		351,660		(263,989	)
Purchased software		13,442,655		(8,104,336	)		11,993,427		(6,126,032	)
Total	$	21,745,929	$	(11,430,097	)	$	20,296,701	$	(8,593,370	)

2010	$	136,078,650
2011		41,581,487
2012		28,906,245
2013		3,675,211
2014		4,296,269
Thereafter		2,019,205

	$	216,557,067

	2009		2008
Note payable in the amount of $2,700,000, secured by all equipment and recievables of RDSI, monthly payments of $82,871 together with interest at a fixed rate of 6.50%, maturing April 21, 2012, that is due upon demand.	$	2,146,776	$	-

Revolving Demand Note payable in the amount of $3,000,000, secured by all inventory, equipment and receivables of RDSI, monthly payments of interest at prime plus .5% (paid off in April 2009)	$	-	$	1,000,000

	$	2,146,776	$	1,000,000

	Debt

2010	$	13,667,728
2011		12,459,908
2012		1,278,328
2013		1,860,546
2014		6,000,000
Total	$	35,266,510

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2009			2008		2007
Taxes currently payable	$	347,655		$	642,990	$	2,029,195
Deferred provision (benefit)		(1,008,043	)		1,482,203		(795,035	)

Income tax expense	$	(660,388	)	$	2,125,193	$	1,234,160

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well-Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2009
Total Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated	$	59.8		12.6	%	$	37.8		8.0	%	$	-		N/A
State Bank		50.9		11.1	%		36.7		8.0	%		45.8		10.0	%

Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated		53.9		11.4	%		18.9		4.0	%		-		N/A
State Bank		45.2		9.9	%		18.3		4.0	%		27.5		6.0	%

Tier 1 Capital
(to Average Assets)
Consolidated		53.9		8.2	%		26.1		4.0	%		-		N/A
State Bank		45.2		7.1	%		25.6		4.0	%		32.0		5.0	%

As of December 31, 2008
Total Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated	$	59.5		13.0	%	$	36.5		8.0	%	$	-		N/A
State Bank		50.0		11.3	%		35.4		8.0	%		44.3		10.0	%

Tier 1 Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Consolidated		54.5		11.9	%		18.3		4.0	%		-		N/A
State Bank		45.0		10.2	%		17.7		4.0	%		26.6		6.0	%

Tier 1 Capital
(to Average Assets)
Consolidated		54.5		9.5	%		23.1		4.0	%		-		N/A
State Bank		45.0		7.7	%		23.5		4.0	%		29.3		5.0	%

	2009			2008

Balance, January 1	$	5,465,000		$	6,001,000
New Loans		525,000			3,243,000
Repayments		(3,370,000	)		(3,815,000	)
Other changes		-			36,000

Balance, December 31	$	2,620,000		$	5,465,000

	2009			2007

Expected volatility		25.8	%		27.0	%
Weighted-average volatility		25.77	%		27.01	%
Expected dividends		5.0	%		2.0	%
Expected term (in years)		10			10
Risk-free rate		1.60	%		4.72	%

	2009
					Weighted-
			Weighted-		Average
			Average		Remaining	Aggregate
			Exercise		Contractual	Intrinsic
	Shares		Price		Term	Value

Outstanding, beginning of year		315,763	$	12.60
Granted		1,500		7.55
Forfeited		6,050		12.59
Outstanding, end of year		311,213	$	12.58	5.07	$	-

Exercisable, end of year		240,624	$	12.92	4.48	$	-

	Year Ended December 31, 2009
			Weighted-
			Average		Per Share
	Income		Shares		Amount

Basic earnings per share
Net income available to common
shareholders	$	382,491		4,867,030	$	0.07
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options & restricted stock		-		3,373
Diluted earnings per share

Net income available to common
shareholders and assumed
conversions	$	382,491		4,870,403	$	0.07

	Year Ended December 31, 2008
			Weighted-
			Average		Per Share
	Income		Shares		Amount

Basic earnings per share
Net income available to common
shareholders	$	5,217,239		4,925,694	$	1.06
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options & restricted stock		-		-
Diluted earnings per share

Net income available to common
shareholders and assumed
conversions	$	5,217,239		4,925,694	$	1.06

	Year Ended December 31, 2007
			Weighted-
			Average		Per Share
	Income		Shares		Amount

Basic earnings per share
Net income available to common
shareholders	$	3,256,635		5,010,987	$	0.65
Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options		-		4,324
Diluted earnings per share

Net income available to common
shareholders and assumed
conversions	$	3,256,635		5,015,311	$	0.65

2010	$	402,055
2011		379,775
2012		268,892
2013		252,128
2014		200,000
Thereafter		420,412

Total minimum lease payments	$	1,923,262

Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Fair Values at
Description	12/31/2009		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Available-for-Sale Securities:
U.S. Treasury and Government
Agencies	$	12,943,649		-	$	12,943,649		-
Mortgage-backed securities		52,246,278		-		52,246,278		-
State and political subdivisions		31,537,006		-		31,537,006		-
Money Market Mutual Fund		8,333,179		8,333,179		-		-
Equity securities		23,000		-		23,000		-

	December 31, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value		Amount		Value

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	24,824,785	$	24,825,000	$	28,059,532	$	28,060,000
Available-for-sale securities	$	105,083,112	$	105,083,000	$	102,606,475	$	102,606,000
Loans held for sale	$	16,857,648	$	17,070,000	$	3,824,499	$	3,824,000
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	$	445,527,403	$	446,266,000	$	445,091,456	$	451,805,000
Federal Reserve and FHLB Bank stock	$	3,748,250	$	3,748,000	$	4,244,100	$	4,244,000
Interest receivable	$	2,324,868	$	2,325,000	$	2,964,663	$	2,965,000

Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	491,242,152	$	494,536,000	$	484,220,584	$	486,787,000
Short-term borrowings	$	52,042,820	$	53,670,000	$	43,425,978	$	45,976,000
Notes payable	$	2,146,776	$	2,128,000	$	1,000,000	$	1,000,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	35,266,510	$	36,476,000	$	36,646,854	$	38,196,000
Trust preferred securities	$	20,620,000	$	20,571,000	$	20,620,000	$	19,996,000

	2009		2008
Loan commitments and unused lines of credit	$	82,832,000	$	67,785,000
Standby letters of credit		279,000		5,436,000
Total	$	83,111,000	$	73,221,000

			Data						Total			Intersegment			Consolidated
2009	Banking		Processing			Other			Segments			Elimination			Totals

Income Statement information:

Net interest income (expense)	$	22,753,280	$	(182,136	)	$	(1,572,540	)	$	20,998,604		$	-		$	20,998,604
Other revenue - external customers		10,677,391		18,836,667			81,028			29,595,086			-			29,595,086
Other revenue - other segments		92,493		1,599,589			1,497,767			3,189,849			(3,189,849	)		-
Net interest income and other revenue		33,523,164		20,254,120			6,255			53,783,539			(3,189,849	)		50,593,690
Non-interest expense		25,529,882		18,928,782			3,864,674			48,323,338			(3,189,849	)		45,133,489
Significant noncash items:
Depreciation and amortization		1,039,284		3,334,636			99,447			4,473,367			-			4,473,367
Provision for loan losses		5,738,098		-			-			5,738,098			-			5,738,098
Income tax expense		210,330		450,615			(1,321,333	)		(660,388	)		-			(660,388	)
Segment profit	$	2,044,854	$	874,723		$	(2,537,086	)	$	382,491		$	-		$	382,491

Balance sheet information:

Total assets	$	652,166,943	$	22,774,098		$	83,110,060		$	758,051,101		$	(85,001,999	)	$	673,049,102
Goodwill and intangibles		19,472,484		6,919,819			-			26,392,303			-			26,392,303
Premises and equipment expenditures	$	548,824	$	2,805,922		$	51,510		$	3,406,256		$	-		$	3,406,256

December 31, 2009	March		June		September			December
Interest income	$	8,147,603	$	8,289,666	$	8,186,375		$	7,967,506
Interest expense		3,131,740		2,928,277		2,849,660			2,682,869
Net interest income		5,015,863		5,361,389		5,336,715			5,284,637
Provision for loan losses		495,142		798,850		898,050			3,546,056
Non-interest income		7,447,505		7,897,791		7,075,711			7,174,079
Non-interest expense		10,475,024		11,108,057		11,454,115			12,096,293
Income tax expense		389,649		348,687		(99,421	)		(1,299,303	)
Net income		1,103,553		1,003,586		159,682			(1,884,330	)

Earnings per share
Basis		0.23		0.20		0.03			(0.39	)
Diluted		0.23		0.20		0.03			(0.39	)

Dividends per share		0.09		0.09		0.09			0.09