SCI Engineered Materials, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

or

For the transition period from ____________ to _______________

Commission file number: 0-31641

SCI ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2839 Charter Street, Columbus, Ohio 43228

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(614) 486-0261

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

3,814,898 shares of Common Stock, without par value, were outstanding at July 31, 2012.

FORM 10-Q

SCI ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

Table of Contents

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.    

SCI ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SCI Engineered Materials, Inc. (“SCI”, or the “Company”), formerly Superconductive Components, Inc., an Ohio corporation, was incorporated in 1987. The Company operates in the Physical Vapor Deposition (“PVD”) industry in which it develops, commercializes technologies, and manufactures ceramics and metals for advanced applications in: Photonics, Solar, Thin Film Battery, and, to a lesser extent High Temperature Superconductor (“HTS”) materials.

Stock Based Compensation - Compensation cost for all stock-based awards is based on the grant date fair value and recognized over the required service (vesting) period. Non cash stock based compensation expense was $35,781 and $29,928 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Non cash stock based compensation expense was $70,878 and $61,293 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense was $556,498 as of June 30, 2012 and will be recognized through 2017. There was no tax benefit recorded for this compensation cost as the expense primarily relates to incentive stock options that do not qualify for a tax deduction until, and only if, a qualifying disposition occurs.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the four non-employee board members each received compensation of 3,000 shares of common stock of the Company.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, a total of 3,000 stock options were exercised at a price of $1.55. The total cash proceeds were $4,650.

SCI ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The cumulative status of options granted and outstanding at June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, as well as options which became exercisable in connection with the Stock Option Plans is summarized as follows:

Employee Stock Options

Non-Employee Director Stock Options

Exercise prices for options ranged from $1.00 to $6.00 at June 30, 2012. The weighted average option price for all options outstanding was $4.64 with a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.3 years.

SCI ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On February 28, 2012 the Board of Directors voted not to authorize the payment of a cash dividend on convertible preferred stock, Series B, to shareholders of record as of December 31, 2011. Dividends on the Series B preferred stock accrue at 10% annually on the outstanding shares. Accrued Dividends on the Series B preferred stock were $6,038 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and $12,076 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The Company had accrued dividends on Series B preferred stock of $156,988 and $132,836 at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These amounts are included in Convertible preferred stock, Series B on the balance sheet.

SCI ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On January 6, 2011, the Company issued a Promissory Note (the “Promissory Note”) in the amount of not more than $840,000 to The Huntington National Bank, as Lender. This Promissory Note is collateralized by the Company’s inventories, equipment and accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2012 there was a balance of $213,000 on the Promissory Note.

Among other items, the Promissory Note provides for the following:

• Interest is subject to change from time to time based on changes in LIBOR. The index at the inception of the Promissory Note was 0.261% per annum. The interest rate applied to the unpaid principal balance is at a rate of 2.75 percentage points over LIBOR. Under no circumstance will the interest rate be less than 4.00% per annum or more than the maximum rate allowed by applicable law. The interest rate was 4.00% at June 30, 2012.

• Accrued interest is payable monthly. The outstanding principal and accrued interest matures on December 31, 2012.

During 2010, the Company applied and was approved for a 166 Direct Loan to borrow up to $744,250 with the Ohio Department of Development (ODOD). This loan was finalized in February of 2011. The term of the loan is 84 months at a fixed interest rate of 3%. There is also a 0.25% annual servicing fee charged monthly on the outstanding principal balance. Payments of approximately $10,100, including interest, are payable monthly through November 2018. The loan is collateralized by the related project equipment. On April 6, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment with ODOD which consented to the first Ohio Air Quality Development Authority (OAQDA) amendment, referenced below, and agreed that the OAQDA amendment did not constitute a default under the ODOD agreement. The ODOD amendment also stated that the original loan amount of $744,250 remained available and can be used for up to 70.5% of the purchase price and installation costs of certain equipment. As of June 30, 2012 there was a balance of $700,950 on this loan. Disbursements may be made through October 31, 2012.

During 2010, the Company also applied and was approved for a 166 Direct Loan through the Advanced Energy Program with the OAQDA to borrow up to approximately $1.4 million (this maximum commitment by the OAQDA was subsequently reduced to $368,906 on March 20, 2012). The original loan was finalized in February of 2011. The interest rate was 3% at December 31, 2011 and increased to 10% effective with the first amendment dated March 20, 2012. A second amendment dated June 12, 2012 returned the interest rate to 3% effective April 10, 2012. There is also an annual servicing fee of $1,600 charged quarterly. The loan is being amortized over 84 months through March 2018. Payments were interest only through March 2012. Thereafter, principal payments of approximately $14,000 plus interest are due and payable quarterly. The loan is collateralized by the related project equipment. As of June 30, 2012 there was an outstanding balance of $354,820 on this loan.

An Intercreditor Agreement exists as part of the above mentioned loans with agencies of the State of Ohio. The OAQDA and ODOD agree to shared lien and security interest through mutual covenants. These covenants include, but are not limited to, the creation of an agreed upon number of jobs, filing of quarterly and annual reports and various financial covenants.

SCI ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On March 20, 2012, the Company and OAQDA entered into The First Amendment to Loan Documents which waived the debt service coverage requirement for all quarters through and including December 31, 2012 in order to cure a prior violation. The Company is required to maintain a certain debt to tangible net worth ratio during 2012. The Company expects to maintain compliance with this covenant and all other OAQDA and ODOD covenants through June 30, 2013.

During 2006, the Company was approved for a 166 Direct Loan from the Ohio Department of Development in the amount of $400,000. These funds were received in July of 2008 and were used for the purchase of production equipment and to reduce the Company’s capital lease obligations on certain equipment. The term of the loan is 84 months at a fixed interest rate of 3%. There is also a 0.25% annual servicing fee to be charged monthly on the outstanding principal balance. The Company is making monthly servicing fee, interest and principal payments of approximately $6,000. The loan principal balance will be fully amortized at the end of the term in August 2015. The loan is collateralized by the related project equipment. As of June 30, 2012 the loan had a balance of $220,051. This loan is also subject to certain covenants, including job creation or retention.

On April 11, 2011, the Company issued a Revolving Note (the “Note”) to The Huntington National Bank, as Lender. This Note matured on April 13, 2012. The Note was collateralized by the Company’s inventories, equipment and accounts receivable. There was no outstanding balance on the Note at maturity.

Following is the income tax benefit (expense) for the three and six months ended June 30:

Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from temporary differences in the recognition of income and expense for tax and financial reporting purposes. A full valuation allowance has been recorded against the realizability of the net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.   The Company has net operating loss carryforwards available for federal and state tax purposes of approximately $4,100,000 which expire in varying amounts through 2030.

SCI ENGINEERED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Management has forecasted the Company’s operating and investing plans and financing needs to determine its liquidity to meet cash flow requirements and believes it will have sufficient liquidity at least through June 30, 2013. This forecast was based on current cash levels, projected operating cash flows, currently available financing sources and debt obligations. The Company’s ability to maintain current operations is dependent upon its ability to achieve these forecasted results, which management believes will occur. The Company’s revolving line of credit arrangement with its senior lender expired on April 13, 2012.  There was no balance outstanding under this arrangement at maturity. The Company did not have the need to draw on the revolving line of credit since the original commitment date of January 13, 2009.  The Company does not anticipate the need for a similar credit facility in 2012; although management may pursue revolving credit arrangements as working capital requirements increase.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes contained herein and with those in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. Those statements include, but may not be limited to, all statements regarding our intent, belief, and expectations, such as statements concerning our future profitability and operating and growth strategy. Words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “likely” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in other statements we make involve risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, the factors set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, and other factors detailed from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. One or more of these factors have affected, and in the future could affect our business and financial condition and could cause actual results to differ materially from plans and projections. Although we believe the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, there can be no assurance that any of the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statements are made or reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, unless necessary to prevent such statements from becoming misleading. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Overview

SCI Engineered Materials, Inc. (“SCI”, “we” or the “Company”), formerly Superconductive Components, Inc., an Ohio corporation, was incorporated in 1987. We operate in the physical vapor deposition industry in which we develop, commercialize technologies, and manufacture ceramics and metals for advanced applications in: Photonics, Solar, Thin Film Battery, and, to a lesser extent High Temperature Superconductor (“HTS”) materials. Photonics currently represents the largest market for our targets. We have been gaining traction in the solar industry and we expect adoption of our products by current and new customers. Thin Film Battery is a developing market where manufacturers of batteries use our products to produce very small power supplies with small quantities of stored energy. We have added staff to our Technology group for the development of innovative products.

Executive Summary

During 2011 and the first six months of 2012 we invested approximately $1.8 million in new equipment. We continued to develop transparent conductive oxide systems for the solar industry and added domestic and international customers for solar products. Despite short term uncertainties the solar industry is projected to have strong growth for the next few decades. In addition, the Thin Film Solar (TFS) market, which we serve, is expected to gain market share during that period. Given current market opportunities, we continue to invest in expanding production, research & development, marketing, and sales. These investments have resulted in ongoing production orders with periodic releases and intermittent repeat orders for several customers, as well as trial and qualification orders that were shipped to customers in the solar industry throughout 2011 and 2012. During the second quarter of 2012 we had bookings of over $2.0 million (including continued strong bookings from our core customers) and ended the quarter with a backlog of $2.2 million. We also shipped a new product to a current solar customer in 2012. In addition, we received an initial order from a new international customer that shipped during the second quarter of 2012. During the second quarter of 2012, we received repeat orders from both domestic and international solar customers. Early in July of 2012 we received increased orders for solar products that are scheduled to ship during the third quarter of 2012. We continue to work closely with all of our customers and are positioned to meet their current and future product requirements.

During the period from 2007 through June 2012, we invested over $4.1 million in new equipment to increase our manufacturing capacity and advanced test equipment to position the Company to become a meaningful supplier of Zinc Oxide based Transparent Conductive Oxides (TCO) to the TFS industry.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we had total revenue of $2,703,728. This was an increase of $426,160, or 18.7%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. Product revenue increased $517,484, or 24.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from the same period in 2011. Product revenue increased due to volume, which included a new product to an existing core customer. Contract revenue was lower by approximately $91,000 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same time period in 2011 as two grants drew to a close in 2011.

Gross profit was $523,032 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $416,829 for the same three months in 2011. This was an increase of $106,203, or 25.5%. The increase in gross profit was attributed to higher product revenue from increased volume. Gross margin was 19.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 18.3% for the same period in 2011. The increase in gross margin can be attributed to the higher gross profit mentioned above and product mix.

Operating expenses were $508,259 and $592,803 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. This was a decrease of $84,544, or 14.3%. We continue to invest in developing new products for the solar industry including transparent conductive oxide systems. These efforts include accelerating time to market for those products and involve research & development expense beyond the scope of specific government grants and awards.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we had net income of $10,606 compared to a net loss of $198,450 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. We had income applicable to common shares of $4,568 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a net loss of $204,488 for the same period in 2011. This improvement was attributed to the increase in gross profit and reduction in operating expenses.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three and six months ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited) compared to three and six months ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited):

Revenue

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we had total revenue of $2,703,728. This was an increase of $426,160, or 18.7%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. Product revenue increased $517,484, or 24.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from the same period in 2011. Product revenue increased due to customer demand which included a new product to an existing core customer. Contract revenue was lower by approximately $91,000 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same time period in 2011 as two grants drew to a close in 2011.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we had total revenue of $4,586,760. This was a decrease of $208,442, or 4.3%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. Product revenue remained constant despite the loss of a large customer which closed its manufacturing facility during the first quarter of 2011. We shipped approximately $450,000 to this customer during the first half of 2011. The loss of this customer’s revenue was offset by increased demand from new and existing customers. Contract revenue was lower by approximately $228,000 in the first six months of 2012 compared to the first six months of 2011 as two grants drew to a close in 2011. We do not rely on contract revenue as a main part of our business and do not believe that this reduction will have an adverse effect on our business.

Revenue from product sales is recognized upon shipment to customers. Provisions for discounts and rework costs for returns are established when products are shipped based on historical experience. Customer deposits represent cash received in advance of revenue earned.

Revenue from contract research provided for third parties is recognized on the percentage of completion method. Contract research revenue is recognized during the period qualifying expenses are incurred for the research that is performed as set forth under the terms of the grant award agreements.

Gross Profit/Margin

Gross profit was $523,032 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $416,829 for the same three months in 2011. This was an increase of $106,203, or 25.5%. The increase in gross profit was attributed to higher product revenue from increased volume. Gross margin was 19.3% for the second quarter of 2012 compared to 18.3% for the same period in 2011. The increase in gross margin was due to the higher gross profit from increased product revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Gross profit was $838,177 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $964,367 for the same six months in 2011. This was a decrease of $126,190 or 13.1%. The decrease in gross profit was attributed to the expected reduction in contract revenue, the loss of the large customer in early 2011 mentioned above, a change in product mix and higher depreciation expense related to the addition of new capital equipment. Gross margin was 18.3% for the first six months of 2012 compared to 20.1% for the same period in 2011. The decrease in gross margin can be attributed to the lower gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same six months in 2011.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased to $290,556 from $275,340 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, or 5.5%. The second quarter of 2012 included higher professional accounting fees of approximately $11,000, which related to the extension of our year end 2011 audit and Form 10-K filing, and also higher non-cash stock based compensation of approximately $14,000 compared to the second quarter of 2011.  These increases offset savings of approximately $12,000 in other areas that included compensation expense and office expenses.      

General and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased to $571,469 from $551,234 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, or 3.7%. The first six months of 2012 included higher professional accounting fees of approximately $24,000, which related to the extension of our year end 2011 audit and Form 10-K filing, and also higher non-cash stock based compensation of approximately $25,000 compared to the first half of 2011.  These increases offset savings of approximately $32,000 in other areas that included compensation expense, other professional fees and office expenses. We continue to monitor all expenses.     

Professional Fees

Included in general and administrative expense was $71,697 and $60,608 for professional fees for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase was due to higher accounting fees mentioned above.

Included in general and administrative expense was $130,723 and $121,174 for professional fees for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in accounting fees mentioned above was offset by lower professional fees in other areas. These continued expenses are related to SEC compliance costs for legal, accounting and stockholder relations fees.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $70,567 compared to $197,548 for the same period in 2011, a decrease of 64.3%. The second quarter of 2011 included higher costs related to developing innovative transparent conductive oxide systems to further align our activities with customer needs.  Expense related to this area was lower by approximately $51,000 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same time period in 2011. Additional savings in the second quarter of 2012 of approximately $42,000 included other research areas and compensation. These research and development endeavors have moved us beyond the scope of our current federal and state grants and awards. The second quarter of 2011 also included a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $39,000.

Research and development expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $167,389 compared to $362,187 for the same period in 2011, a decrease of 53.8%. Expense related to developing innovative transparent conductive oxide systems was lower by approximately $102,000 in the first half of 2012 compared to the same time period in 2011. Additional savings in the first half of 2012 of approximately $68,000 included other research areas and compensation. The first half of 2011 also included the non-cash impairment charge of approximately $39,000 previously mentioned.

Marketing and Sales Expense

Marketing and sales expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased 22.7% to $147,136 from $119,915 for the same period in 2011. The second quarter of 2012 included an international trade show expense of approximately $21,000. This same international trade show took place during the first quarter of 2011. Commissions to our outside manufacturing sales representatives and compensation expense was slightly higher in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 by approximately $9,000 due to the increase in product revenue and improved gross margin.

Marketing and sales expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased 5.9% to $259,804 from $275,972 for the same period in 2011. This decrease was related to lower commissions to our outside manufacturing sales representatives, compensation and travel.

Stock Compensation Expense

Included in operating expenses were non cash stock based compensation costs of $35,526 and $28,787 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $69,855 and $58,824 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Compensation cost for all stock-based awards is based on the grant date fair value and recognized over the required service (vesting) period. Unrecognized non cash stock based compensation expense related to operating expense was $556,498 as of June 30, 2012 and will be recognized through 2017.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $25,073 and $19,100 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively and $45,184 and $37,666 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase was due to the addition of loan proceeds received from agencies of the State of Ohio and a Promissory Note from our bank.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

Income tax benefit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $20,704 and $25,889, respectively. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $4,237 and $8,475, respectively. We had deferred taxes of $0 and $156,000 at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the third quarter of 2011, we determined a full valuation allowance against our remaining deferred tax assets was necessary. As a result, we recorded a non-cash charge related to continuing operations of $156,000 during the third quarter of 2011. The valuation allowance does not impact our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards to offset taxable earnings in the future.

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability approach in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes ("ASC 740"). Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the impact of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities and their tax basis and are stated at tax rates expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered.

Income/Loss Applicable to Common Shares

Income applicable to common shares was $4,568 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a loss of $204,488 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Loss applicable to common shares was $191,233 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to a loss of $281,232 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This improvement was attributed to the increase in revenue and gross profit in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 and less operating expenses during the first six months of 2012 compared to the same time period in 2011.

Common Shares

The following schedule represents our outstanding common shares during the period of 2012 through 2019 assuming all outstanding stock options are exercised during the year of expiration. If each shareholder exercises his or her options, it would increase our common shares as of June 30, 2012 by 892,250 to 4,707,148 by December 31, 2019. Assuming all such options are exercised in the year of expiration, the effect on shares outstanding is illustrated as follows:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Working Capital

As of June 30, 2012 cash on hand was $529,049. Cash on-hand was $798,069 at December 31, 2011.

At June 30, 2012 working capital was $726,671 compared to $812,398 at December 31, 2011, a decrease of $85,727 or 10.6%. As discussed below cash decreased approximately $269,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2012. Accounts receivable increased approximately $52,000. Inventories increased approximately $202,000 due to increased orders received during the first half of 2012. Prepaid expenses increased approximately $45,000. Accounts payable increased approximately $208,000 due to inventory needs for increased production. Customer deposits and other accrued expenses decreased approximately $26,000. Current capital lease obligations decreased by approximately $75,000 while current notes payable increased by approximately $6,000.

Cash from Operations

Net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $75,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and $519,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. In addition to the changes in various current assets and liabilities mentioned above, non cash expenses for depreciation, accretion and amortization increased to approximately $290,000 during the first half of 2012 from $259,000 during the first half of 2011, an increase of 11.6%. This increase was related to the purchase of additional machinery and equipment. Included in expenses were non cash stock based compensation costs of approximately $71,000 and $61,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Cash from Investing Activities

Cash of approximately $549,000 and $820,000 was used for investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The amounts invested were used to purchase machinery and equipment for increased production capacity and new product lines. Proceeds on sale of equipment totaled $0 and $425 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Cash from Financing Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2012 cash of approximately $205,000 was provided by financing activities. Principal payments to third parties for capital lease obligations and notes payable approximated $706,000. Proceeds from notes payable were approximately $912,000 of which $462,000 was received from the Ohio Department of Development and used to pay towards the Promissory Note from The Huntington National Bank.

Cash of approximately $50,000 was provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Principal payments to third parties for capital lease obligations and notes payable approximated $231,000. Proceeds received from the exercise of common stock options were $4,650. Proceeds from notes payable were $300,000 and a payment of cumulative dividends on preferred stock was approximately $24,000. We incurred a capital lease obligation of $185,000 for new production equipment during the first half of 2011.

Debt Facilities

We have the ability to draw on a Promissory Note from The Huntington National Bank. The maximum principal amount of this Note is $840,000. As of June 30, 2012 there was a balance of $213,000 on the Promissory Note. The Promissory Note matures on December 31, 2012.

Closing documents were signed in February 2011 for a 166 Direct Loan to borrow up to $744,250 with the Ohio Department of Development (ODOD). As of June 30, 2012 there was a balance of $700,950 on this Loan. We have drawn a total of $714,387 against this loan and $29,863 remains available. Also, in February 2011, ODOD recommended that the Ohio Tax Credit Authority approve a tax credit equal to 45 percent of employee income tax withholdings resulting from the project for five years. This credit has an estimated value of $86,000 during the entire term and we expect to take advantage of this Tax Credit. ODOD also provided funding from the Rapid Outreach Grant in the amount of $25,000 for costs associated with the acquisition and installation of machinery and equipment.

Debt Outstanding

Total debt outstanding increased during the first six months of 2012 from approximately $1,775,000 to approximately $1,980,000, or 11.6%. We paid cash of approximately $706,000 towards principal amounts of capital lease obligations and notes payable during the first half of 2012.

Liquidity

We have forecasted our operating and investing plans and financing needs to determine our liquidity to meet cash flow requirements and believe we will have sufficient liquidity at least through June 30, 2013. This forecast was based on current cash levels, projected operating cash flows, currently available financing sources and debt obligations. Our ability to maintain current operations is dependent upon our ability to achieve these forecasted results which we believe will occur. Our revolving line of credit arrangement with our senior lender expired on April 13, 2012.  There was no balance outstanding at maturity. We did not have the need to draw on the revolving line of credit since the original commitment date of January 13, 2009.  We do not anticipate the need for a similar credit facility in 2012; although we may pursue revolving credit arrangements as working capital requirements increase. As previously mentioned, a Promissory Note from The Huntington National Bank has a balance of $213,000 at June 30, 2012. The Promissory Note matures on December 31, 2012 and we expect to pay this with operating cash.

Government Grants and Contracts

During the fourth quarter of 2009 we were notified we had been awarded a grant in the amount of $775,400 by the Ohio Department of Development’s Third Frontier Photovoltaic Program (TFPVP) to commercialize advanced technology for high power density rotatable ceramic sputtering targets. These targets are used in the manufacture of thin film photovoltaics. This technology will enable manufacturers to operate rotatable sputtering targets at higher power densities than current technology. The approval of the grant was received during January 2010 and the work on the contract commenced in the first quarter of 2010. Revenue totaled $115,892 during the first six months of 2012 compared to $107,807 during the first six months of 2011. Total expenditures for the project through June 30, 2012 were $581,425. The work on the contract is expected to continue at least through the fourth quarter of 2012.

During the third quarter of 2009 we received notification from the Department of Energy (DOE) of an Assistance Agreement in the amount of approximately $650,000. This grant provides support for Phase II of a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) award entitled “Homogenous BSCCO-2212 Round Wires for Very High Field Magnet Applications.” Revenue was $2,278 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $193,430 for the same period in 2011. Total expenditures of the project through June 30, 2012 were $643,869. The work on the contract concluded, with the exception of final reporting, late in 2011. The final reporting is expected to be completed during the third quarter of 2012.

During the third quarter of 2008 we received notification from the Department of Energy of a Notice of Financial Assistance Award in the amount of approximately $750,000. This grant provides support for Phase II of a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) award entitled “Flux Pinning Additions to Increase Jc Performance in BSCCO-2212 Round Wire for Very High Field Magnets.” Revenue was $6,831 during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and $51,934 during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The work on the contract began during the third quarter of 2008 and was completed, with the exception of final reporting, during 2011. The final reporting was completed during the second quarter of 2012.

We anticipate that contract research revenue will be less in 2012 due to the two grants that were completed in 2011. We do not rely on contract revenue as a main part of our business and do not believe that this reduction will have an adverse effect on our business.

The granting agency may suspend or terminate the award in whole or in part if we fail to materially comply with the terms and conditions. We expect to complete each award while complying with the terms and conditions.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off balance sheet arrangements including special purpose entities.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Note 2 to the Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Financial Statements. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, accounting for the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory allowances, property and equipment depreciable lives, patents and licenses useful lives, revenue recognition, tax valuation, stock based compensation and assessing changes in which impairment of certain long-lived assets may occur. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the Financial Statements. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on our assessment of the collectability of specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts receivable. If there is a deterioration of a major customer’s credit worthiness or actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due us could be adversely affected. Inventory purchases and commitments are based upon future demand forecasts. If there is a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products or there is a higher risk of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements, we may be required to increase our inventory allowances and our gross margin could be adversely affected. Depreciable and useful lives estimated for property and equipment, licenses and patents are based on initial expectations of the period of time these assets and intangibles will benefit us. Changes in circumstances related to a change in our business, change in technology or other factors could result in these assets becoming impaired, which could adversely affect the value of these assets.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Due to a segregation of duties material weakness described below, and based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of June 30, 2012, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, at the reasonable assurance level, in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosure. Until we are able to hire additional employees, we will continue to report to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors at least monthly (and more often as necessary). We believe this will continue to mitigate this weakness. This reporting includes balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of cash flows, and other detail supporting these statements. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operation, changes in shareholder’s equity and cash flows for all periods presented.

Inherent Limitations over Internal Controls

Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls in future periods is subject to the risk that those internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in business conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management previously disclosed a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting in its annual report on Form 10-K, filed on April 13, 2012 for the year ended December 31, 2011, relating to insufficient segregation of duties consistent with control objectives. Management is aware of the risks associated with the lack of segregation of duties due to the small number of employees currently working with general administrative and financial matters. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions shall be performed by separate individuals. In order to remediate this weakness, we will need to hire additional employees. Although we will periodically reevaluate this situation, at this point we consider that the risks associated with such lack of segregation of duties and the potential benefits of adding employees to segregate such duties are not cost justified. Until we are able to hire additional employees, we will continue to report to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors at least monthly (and more often as necessary). We believe this will continue to mitigate this weakness. This reporting includes balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of cash flows, and other detail supporting these statements.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting for the six months ended June 30, 2012 that materially affected or were reasonably likely to materially affect our disclosure controls and procedures. Additionally, there were no changes in our internal controls that could materially affect our disclosure controls and procedures subsequent to the date of their evaluation. As a result, no corrective actions were required or undertaken.

Part II. Other Information

* Filed with this report

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.