SCORES HOLDING CO INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
Or
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from ____________ to ________________
Commission
file number 000-16665
Scores
Holding Company, Inc.
|
||
(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its
charter)
|
||
Utah
|
87-0426358
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification
No.)
|
|
533-535
West 27th
Street, New York, NY 10001
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
||
(212)
868-4900
|
||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months,
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
One):
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company þ
|
|||
(Do not check if a smaller
Reporting company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2). Yes ¨ No
x
|
As
of November 13, 2009 there were 165,186,124 shares of the issuer’s common
stock, par value $0.001, issued and
outstanding.
|
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PAGE
|
||
Special
Note Regarding Forward Looking Information
|
3
|
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
4
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
17
|
Item4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
21
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
22
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
2
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except
for historical information, this report contains forward-looking
statements. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, including, among other things, statements regarding our business
strategy, future revenues and anticipated costs and expenses. Such
forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements including the
words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” and similar
language. Our actual results may differ significantly from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause
or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those
discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”. You should
carefully review the risks described in the documents we file from time to time
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any
revisions to the forward-looking statements or reflect events or circumstances
after the date of this document.
3
PART
1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and nine months
|
|
Ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
6
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months
|
|
Ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
7
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
8
|
4
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 39,458 | $ | 173 | ||||
Licensee
receivable – net
|
26,400 | 13,845 | ||||||
Total
current Assets
|
65,858 | 14,018 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
238,804 | 333,332 | ||||||
$ | 304,662 | $ | 347,350 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 72,927 | $ | 98,826 | ||||
Related
party payable
|
125,555 | 36,000 | ||||||
Bank
overdraft
|
— | 20,982 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
45,000 | — | ||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
243,482 | 155,808 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, -0- issued and
outstanding
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 165,186,124 and
165,186,124 issued and outstanding, respectively
|
165,186 | 165,186 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
5,998,117 | 5,998,117 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(6,102,123 | ) | (5,971,761 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
61,180 | 191,542 | ||||||
$ | 304,662 | $ | 347,350 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements
5
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Nine months ended September 30,
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||
REVENUES:
|
||||||||||||||||
Royalty
|
$ | 241,236 | $ | 157,116 | $ | 123,618 | $ | 33,660 | ||||||||
Merchandise
|
— | 3,428 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total
|
241,236 | 160,544 | 123,618 | 33,660 | ||||||||||||
COST
OF MERCHANDISE SOLD
|
— | 21,791 | — | 20,701 | ||||||||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
241,236 | 138,753 | 123,618 | 12,959 | ||||||||||||
BAD
DEBT EXPENSE
|
30,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
347,598 | 264,301 | 116,804 | 89,553 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
|
(136,362 | ) | (125,548 | ) | 6,814 | (76,594 | ) | |||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Debt
forgiveness
|
6,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
(130,362 | ) | (125,548 | ) | 6,814 | (76,594 | ) | |||||||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES
|
— | 3,625 | — | — | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME (LOSS)
|
$ | (130,362 | ) | $ | (129,173 | ) | 6,814 | (76,594 | ) | |||||||
NET
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE -
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
and Diluted
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.00 | ) | |||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - Basic and diluted
|
165,186,124 | 165,186,124 | 165,186,124 | 165,186,124 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements
6
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine
months ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
(LOSS)
|
$ | (130,362 | ) | $ | (129,173 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Amortization
|
94,528 | 44,790 | ||||||
Bad
Debt expense
|
30,000 | — | ||||||
Debt
forgiveness
|
(6,000 | ) | — | |||||
Changes
in Assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Royalty
receivable
|
(42,555 | ) | 3,620 | |||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
— | 1,123 | ||||||
Inventory
|
— | 20,700 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
45,000 | — | ||||||
Due
to EMS
|
— | 78,987 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(25,899 | ) | (15,047 | ) | ||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED) IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
(35,288 | ) | 5,000 | |||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Bank
overdraft
|
(20,982 | ) | — | |||||
Related
party payable
|
95,555 | 15,000 | ||||||
Repayments
of notes payable
|
— | (20,000 | ) | |||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED) IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
74,573 | (5,000 | ) | |||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH
|
39,285 | — | ||||||
CASH,
beginning of the period
|
173 | 173 | ||||||
CASH,
end of the period
|
$ | 39,458 | $ | 173 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for interest
|
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ | — | $ | 3,625 | ||||
Non
cash financing activities:
|
||||||||
None
|
See Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1-
Basis for presentation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Scores Holding
Company Inc., formerly Internet Advisory Corporation and (the Company”) have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Regulation S-K. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered
necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring accruals) have
been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Operating
results expected for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2009. For further information, refer to the financial statements
and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on
Form
10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Certain
reclassification has been made to the prior period to conform to presentation of
the current period.
Going
Concern
Scores
Holding Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries (“SCRH”) has incurred losses totaling
$(6,102,123) through September 30, 2009 and has a working capital deficit of
$(177,624) at September 30, 2009. Because of these conditions, SCRH
will require additional working capital to develop business operations. SCRH
intends to raise additional working capital through the continued licensing of
the brand with its current and new operators and to take on operations in larger
cities with greater demand for our product through
acquisitions. There are no assurances that SCRH will be able to
achieve the level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from
operations to support SCRHs’ working capital requirements. To the extent that
funds generated from any future use of licensing, are insufficient, SCRH will
have to raise additional working capital. No assurance can be given that
additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on terms
acceptable to SCRH. If adequate working capital is not
available SCRH may not increase its operations.
These
conditions raise substantial doubt about SCRHs’ ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and
classification of liabilities that might be necessary should SCRHs’ be unable to
continue as a going concern.
8
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 2 -
Summary of Significant Accounting Principles
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying amounts reported on the balance sheets for cash, accounts payable,
accrued expenses, deferred revenue and licensee receivable approximate fair
value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
We earned
royalty revenue from four licensees (Chicago, New Orleans, Baltimore and AYA)
that are not related (unaffiliated) to management of the
Company. During the nine month 2009 period, royalties earned from
these unrelated licensees amounted to $161,236 of which $26,400 remain due and
outstanding. Our Baltimore licensee account for approximately 29% and
26% and our Chicago licensee account for approximately 25% and 25% of our total
royalty revenue in 2009 and 2008 respectively. Our former Las Vegas
licensee was sold and ceased operations in May 2008 accounted for 34% of our
total royalty revenue in 2008. Our AYA licensee, who operates and manages
the Scoreslive.com website, has been in development since
2007. During the 2009 and 2008 periods, AYA accounts for a minimal
amount of our total royalty revenue.
During
the year, the Company received cash prepayments from its New York affiliate in
the amount of $125,000 for royalties. As of September 30, 2009, the
Company recognized $80,000 of such prepayments as revenue and will apply the
$45,000 outstanding balance to revenue when earned in future
periods.
During
the 2009 period, the Company had past due royalties of $18,000 and $14,000 from
its Baltimore and New Orleans licensees. The Company elected to
forego the $18,000 owed from its Baltimore licensee and is negotiating a
settlement with its New Orleans licensee for the $14,000 owed. These
past due balances were the result of the chains of events during the 2008 period
with our former Scores East and West affiliates which may have adversely
effected business operations with our Baltimore and New Orleans licensees. The
reserve for past due royalties was $14,000 and $2,000 as of September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 respectively.
9
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In August
2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair
Value (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 provides additional guidance
clarifying the measurement of liabilities at fair value and becomes effective
for us in fourth quarter 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact ASU 2009-05 will have on its financial statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued FAS 168, the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“Codification”), which launched on July 1, 2009,
and is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting
periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification combines all
authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online
database. After the Codification launch, only one level of authoritative
GAAP exists, other than guidance issued by the SEC. All other accounting
literature excluded from the Codification will be considered
non-authoritative. The Codification does not change or alter existing GAAP
and there is no expected impact on our consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855 (formerly FAS 165, Subsequent Events). ASC 855
establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued.
This statement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The Company adopted ASC 855 for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, and adoption did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2008, the FASB issued additional guidance, which resides under the
Compensation—Retirement Benefits Topic of the FASB ASC 715, on an employer’s
disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other
postretirement plan. This guidance requires disclosure of investment allocation
methodologies and information that enables users of financial statements to
assess the inputs and valuation techniques used to develop fair value
measurements of plan assets in order to provide users with an understanding of
significant concentrations of risk in plan assets. This guidance is effective
for years ending after December 15, 2009 and since it requires additional
disclosure only it will not impact our consolidated results of operations or
financial position.
We do not
believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting or
reporting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on our
financial statements.
Note 3 -
Related party transactions
On
January 27, 2009, the Company and Entertainment Management Services, Inc.
(“EMS”) completed the closing (the “Closing”) of the transfer from EMS to the
Company of all licensing and royalty rights granted to EMS by the Company under
that certain Amended and Restated Master License Agreement by and between EMS
and the Company (the “MLA”). Under the MLA, the Company had granted
EMS the exclusive worldwide license for twenty years plus six five-year renewals
at the option of EMS to sublicense the Company’s trademarks and related
properties (the “Licensing Rights”). Additionally, under the MLA, EMS
was entitled to receive 50% of the licensing fees paid by various non-affiliated
nightclubs (the Existing licensees”) to EMS (the “EMS Royalty
Rights”).
10
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
EMS is
owned by 333 East 60th Street
Inc. (“333”) and 333 is owned by the Share Sellers Richard Goldring and Elliot
Osher.
At the
Closing and pursuant to the terms of the transfer agreement by and between the
Company and EMS dated December 9, 2008, EMS assigned to the Company the
Licensing Rights and the EMS Royalty Rights relating to the Existing licensees,
free and clear of any charges, liens or other encumbrances. In consideration of
these assignments, the Company credited 333 with a $600,000 payment against a
$1,220,475 debt owed by 333 to the Company (the “Debt”) and provided 333 with an
acknowledgement that the Debt was satisfied to the extent of the $600,000
payment. Additionally, at the Closing, EMS and the Company executed a
cancellation and mutual release agreement canceling the MLA and terminating all
of the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder.
WestSide
Realty of New York, Inc.
During
the 2008 period, we subleased on a month-to-month basis, approximately 700
square feet of office space from Go West Entertainment, Inc (GW), which is
located at 533-535 West 27th Street, New York, NY. On July 1, 2008 we
cancelled our month-to-month sublease with GW and leased approximately 350
square feet of office space with Westside Realty of New York (WSR) on a month-to
month basis. The lease requires us to pay a monthly rent of $2,500
which includes overhead cost. A portion of related party payable consists
primarily of $60,000 owed to WSR in accrued rent as of September 30, 2009
respectively. WSR is part owned and operated by Robert M.
Gans.
IM
Operating, LLC
I.M.
Operating LLC (“IMO”), which is partially owned by Robert M. Gans who is also
our majority shareholder, has signed a licensing agreement with us and commenced
operations of a new club in New York, New York (the “New York Club”) under the
Scores name in May 2009. Throughout this report, we refer to the New
York Club as our affiliate, because of the common ownership by Mr.
Gans. Related party payable also consist of cash payments made
by IMO in the amount of $65,555 for insurance,
accounting, business development and legal expenses paid on behalf of the
Company.
11
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 4 -
Licensees
The
agreement between us and EMS dated January 27, 2009, terminated the MLA and
hence, we have begun to retain 100% of the royalty payments received from each
of our existing and future licensees’ rather than the 50% which was previously
retained by EMS under the MLA.
In 2003,
EMS licensed the use of the "Scores Chicago" name to Stone Park Entertainment,
Inc. for its club in Chicago, Illinois. Royalties payable to the Company were
the greater of $2,500 per week or 4.99% of the gross revenues (less $25,000 per
week) earned at that location. Chicago accounts for 25% and 25% of our total
royalty revenues during the first nine month of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. During the nine months 2009 period, the Company
collected $60,038 in cash royalties and is owed $10,000 in accrued
royalties.
In 2004,
EMS licensed the use of "Scores Baltimore" to Club 2000 Eastern Avenue, Inc. for
its nightclub in Baltimore, Maryland. Royalties payable to EMS were the greater
of $1,000 per week or 4.99% of gross revenues. This club accounts for 29% and
26% of our total royalty revenues during the first nine months in 2009 and 2008,
respectively. For the nine months 2009 period, the Company collected
$44,293 in cash royalties and is owed $8,000 in accrued royalties.
In April
2007, EMS licensed the use of the Scores brand name to Silver Bourbon, Inc. for
a night club in New Orleans, Louisiana. Royalties payable under this license are
capped at the greater of $8,000 per month or 4.99% of gross revenues. This club
commenced operations in April 2007 and accounted for 11% and 11% of our total
royalty revenues during first nine months of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The Company is owed $19,000 of which there is a reserve
of $14,000. During the three month ended September 2009 period, the
Company recorded $15,000 in royalties, collected $10,000 and is owed $5,000 net
of allowance.
On
January 27, 2009, we entered into a licensing agreement with I.M. Operating LLC
(“IMO”) for the use of the Scores brand name which our majority shareholder
(Robert M. Gans) and Secretary and Board Director (Howard Rosenbluth) are
members. IMOs’ operations will be at the location of the former
Scores West nightclub, 533-535 West 27th Street, New York, NY (the “West 27th Street
Building”)., which is also owned by Westside Realty of New York, of which the
majority owner is Robert M. Gans. Royalties payable to the Company
under this license agreement are 3% of gross revenues. IMO has a liquor
license, renovated the club and commenced operations at the West 28th street
location in May 2009. During the 2009 period, the Company recorded
deferred revenue in the amount of $125,000 for royalty prepayments from IMO and
recognized $80,000 of such prepayments as revenue; the $45,000 balance will be
applied to revenue when earned in future periods.
12
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 5 –
Commitments and Contingencies
In early
March 2008, we received notice that DIF&B, owner of the Las Vegas club,
would be canceling its sublicense with EMS effective on or before May 6, 2008.
We were notified that DIF&B would be making final royalty payments to EMS
totaling $60,000 at the rate of $10,000 per week starting the first week of
March 2008. The Las Vegas club ceased operating and, as of December 31, 2008,
EMS had received only one such $10,000 payment from DIF&B. EMS commenced an
action against DIF&B and filed a complaint and affidavit of service with the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “SCNY”), on July
23, 2008. DIF&B was required to file an answer by August 23, 2008, but did
not do so. As a result, EMS filed an application for a default judgment and the
SCNY appointed a referee to determine damages. The referee determined that
damages in the amount of $216,000, with interest, should be paid to EMS and a
default judgment totaling $230,557 was entered by the Clerk of
SCNY. We will attempt to collect on this judgment. We will
be entitled to all monies so collected, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement
with EMS and 333.
On
December 11, 2007, Francis Vargas, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West
located in New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us and Go West
Entertainment, Inc. ("Go West") in the Supreme Court of the State of New
York, County of New York, alleging violations of the New York State Human Rights
Law, New York Executive Law, New York City Human Rights Law, and the New York
City Administrative Code, based upon allegations of sexual discrimination and
sexual harassment. The lawsuit further alleges that at all material times both
we and Go West were employers of Ms. Vargas, the plaintiff. The law suit seeks
unspecified compensatory damages for plaintiffs’ alleged loss of past and future
earnings and benefits, emotional distress, humiliation and loss of reputation.
We dispute that we were an employer of the plaintiff and categorically deny all
allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. We filed our
verified answer in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on February 12,
2008 to contest and defend against these accusations and we are currently
engaged in discovery. On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed
for bankruptcy and the case is currently stayed.
On
October 9, 2007, former Go West bartender Siri Diaz filed a purported class
action and collective action on behalf of all tipped employees against us and
other defendants alleging violations of federal and state wage/hour laws (Siri Diaz
et al. v. Scores Holding Company, Inc.; Go West Entertainment, Inc. a/k/a Scores
West Side; and Scores Entertainment, Inc., a/k/a Scores East Side, Case
No. 07 Civ. 8718 (Southern District of New York (the “Court”), Judge Richard M.
Berman)). On November 6, 2007, plaintiffs served an amended purported class
action and collective action complaint, naming dancers and servers as additional
plaintiffs and alleging the same violations of federal and state wage/hour laws.
On or about February 21, 2008, plaintiffs served a second amended complaint
adding two additional party defendants, but limiting the action to persons
employed in the New York Scores’ clubs. The amended complaint alleges that we
and the other defendants are “an integrated enterprise” and that we jointly
employ the plaintiffs, subjecting all of the defendants to liability for the
alleged wage/hour violations. On or about September 5, 2009, plaintiffs served
their third amended complaint adding in two individual defendants who are
alleged to be employers under the state and federal wage claims. We
dispute that we are a proper defendant in this action and we dispute that
we violated the federal and state labor laws, and further dispute that the
dancers are “employees” subject to the federal and state wage and hour laws. We
intend to vigorously contest the claimed liability as well as the violations
alleged.
13
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
On April
18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for bankruptcy.
On behalf
of ourselves and the other defendants we filed a motion to dismiss that portion
of the Complaint as asserted State law class action allegations; we also moved
to dismiss the claims of two of the named plaintiffs for failure to appear for
depositions. At the same time plaintiffs moved for conditional certification
under the federal law for a class of the servers, bartenders and dancers; we
opposed that motion. On May 9, 2008, the Court issued its decision, denying the
motion to dismiss and granting conditional certification for a class of servers,
cocktail waitresses, bartenders and dancers who have worked at Scores East since
October 2004. The case is stayed as against Go West pursuant to the bankruptcy
law. The Court directed that notice be sent to all potential class members. On
May 29, 2008, we filed an answer to plaintiffs’ second amended
complaint. Discovery into both the procedural and substantive issues
is ongoing, as are settlement negotiations.
In
February 2007, the City of New York (the “City”) sought to close Scores West
claiming that it presented a public nuisance. The City alleged that this
nightclub was used for purposes of prostitution; the case was dismissed by the
City of New York and no charges were sought against Scores West or us. In
February, 2007, the New York State Liquor Authority (the “NYSLA”) began a review
of the license held by Scores West and issued an Emergency Summary Order of
Suspension of the Scores West liquor license on February 21, 2007. Go West, the
owner of Scores West, filed a pleading with the NYSLA on behalf of Scores West.
After a temporary adjournment and a series of hearings in front of an
administrative law judge, on February 4, 2008, this judge sustained all charges
against Scores West. A NYSLA hearing was held on March 6, 2008 and the NYSLA
revoked the Scores West Liquor license. On March 18, 2008, the New York State
Appellate Division, First Department (the “Appellate Court”) granted an interim
stay of the liquor license revocation pending a review by the full bench of the
Appellate Court. On April 15, 2008 the Appellate Court decided to deny a further
stay of the March 2008 revocation by the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor
license. Go West filed with the Appellate Court for a reconsideration of its
decision, which was denied. As a result of this outcome, Scores West has closed.
The Appellate Court decided to hear this case on the merits and, on October 3,
2008, found in favor of the NYSLA, upholding the NYSLA’s revocation of the
Scores West Liquor License. Go West subsequently filed a motion for
re-argument before the Appellate Court and/or leave to appeal to the New York
Court of Appeals. This further motion was withdrawn by Go
West.
On April
18, 2008, Go West filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This filing followed the April 15, 2008
Appellate Court decision to deny a further stay of the March 2008 revocation by
the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor license. The United States Trustee in this
case filed a motion seeking the dismissal or conversion of Go West’s Chapter 11
case as Go West is no longer operating. That motion was granted by the
Bankruptcy Court and an order was entered on July 23, 2009 following Go West’s
completion of its stipulations with the Internal Revenue Service (regarding the
payment of unpaid federal taxes) and the New York State Department of Taxation
(regarding a payment plan for state taxes due).
14
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Scores
West has permanently lost its liquor license and has closed its
business. As a result, we are no longer able to receive royalty
revenues from Go West, owner of that club. In 2006, royalty revenues
from Scores West amounted to 31% of our royalties. We did not receive
any revenue from Scores West since 2006. Because Scores West has
closed, the ability of Go West to make payments under the Note has been severely
impaired. As of January 1, 2009, the note has been fully written
off.
On May 2,
2008, the NYSLA gave notice of its pleading to 333, the owner of Scores East, in
connection with its proceeding to cancel or revoke the liquor license of Scores
East, based on its revocation of the Scores West liquor license. (Scores West
and Scores East were related by common ownership.) On July 2, 2008, the NYSLA
gave 333 a notice of hearing set for August 19, 2008. Based on the filing with
the NYSLA of a conditional no-contest plea, this hearing was
adjourned. 333 have since surrendered its liquor license for Scores
East and that club has permanently closed. Because of these
developments, we are no longer able to receive royalty revenues from Scores
East, which in 2006, amounted to 28% of our royalties. We did not
receive any revenue from Scores East since 2006.
On March
30, 2007, we, along with several of our affiliates, were named in a suit in
connection with an alleged assault by an employee of an affiliate and one of our
stockholders and former officer and director. We have answered a third amended
complaint and participated in a Preliminary Conference to establish the
discovery schedule. Examinations before trial of the parties have been completed
and non-party depositions are now being taken. The plaintiff has not yet
undergone the required physical examination. We will vigorously defend ourselves
in this litigation and do not expect that the outcome will be
material.
On
December 11, 2006, SMG, our former affiliate and owner of the club in North
Miami, Florida, filed for bankruptcy with the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York. In connection therewith, it terminated its
license agreement with EMS whereby it was authorized to use our intellectual
property. At the time of its filing, SMG owed us $16,661 for unpaid merchandise,
which we subsequently reserved as bad debt. SMG emerged from bankruptcy in
September 2008 under a plan of reorganization pursuant to which all general,
unsecured debt was discharged, including the $16,661 owed to us.
15
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
On March
31, 2006, Richard K. Goldring, our former president, chief executive officer and
principal shareholder pled guilty to one count of offering a False Instrument
for Filing in the First Degree pursuant to a plea agreement with the District
Attorney of the County of New York (the "DA"). In the event that within one year
of the date of the entry of the guilty plea, Mr. Goldring resigns from all
"control management positions" that he holds in publicly traded companies,
including ours, and divests himself of all "control ownership positions" in
publicly traded companies, including ours, and satisfies certain other
conditions, the DA will recommend a sentence of probation. In this context, a
“control management position” is a role, official or unofficial, by which he
substantially directs the decisions of a company, and a “control ownership
position” is a position in which he controls, directly or indirectly more than
9% of the voting stock or other securities of a company, or stock or securities
that have the capability of being converted into voting stock or other
securities of a company. The plea agreement resolves the DA's investigation
against Mr. Goldring and us. No charges were brought against us.
To comply
with the plea agreement between Richard Goldring and the District Attorney of
the County of New York, on September 4, 2008, Mr. Goldring transferred his
76,080,958 shares of our common stock (the “Goldring Shares”) to Ira Altchek as
trustee (the “Trustee”). According to the terms of the Voting Trust Agreement by
and between Mr. Goldring and the Trustee dated September 4, 2008, the Trustee
had the right to exercise all rights and powers of a shareholder of the Company
with respect to the Goldring Shares, including, without limitation, the sole and
exclusive right to vote the Goldring Shares, while Mr. Goldring maintained the
right to sell the Goldring Shares at any time. The Goldring Shares represented
approximately forty six percent (46%) of the outstanding capital stock of the
Company as of the December 31, 2008. On January 27, 2009, Mr.
Goldring sold all of the Goldring Shares in a private transaction with Buyer, as
further discussed above.
16
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Overview
Scores
Holding Company, Inc. (‘Scores,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) was
incorporated in Utah on September 21, 1981 under the name Adonis Energy, Inc.
Since 2003, we have been in the business of licensing the “Scores” trademarks
and other intellectual property to fine gentlemen’s nightclubs with adult
entertainment in the United States. There are four such clubs
currently operating under the Scores name, in New York, Baltimore, Chicago, and
New Orleans.
On
January 27, 2009, Entertainment Management Services, Inc. ("EMS"), an entity
owned by two of our former directors and employees, transferred to us of all the
Scores licensing and royalty rights originally granted to EMS in 20031. As a result
of this transfer, our intellectual property is now licensed directly by us and
we are now entitled to 100% of the royalty payments made by our licensed clubs
rather than the 50% we were entitled to under the agreement with
EMS.
Additionally
on January 27, 2009, Mitchell’s East LLC, wholly owned by Robert M. Gans,
acquired a majority interest in our outstanding capital stock1. I.M.
Operating LLC (“IMO”), which is partially owned by Robert M. Gans who is also
our majority shareholder, has signed a licensing agreement with us and commenced
operations in New York of a new Club (the “New York Club”) under the Scores name
in May 2009. Throughout this report, we refer to the New York
Club as our affiliate, because of the common ownership by Mr. Gans. All other
clubs are referred to as non-affiliated clubs or as licensees, a term that may
include the New York Club when the context requires.
Results
of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
(“the 2009 period”) Compared to Three Months Ended September 30,
2008 (“the 2008 period”).
Revenues:
Revenues
increased to $123,618 for the 2009 period from $33,660 for the 2008
period. The increase in revenue was due primarily as a result of the
cancellation of the Master License Agreement with EMS (the “MLA”) in December
2008. Pursuant to the MLA, EMS retained fifty percent of our royalties due from
non affiliates. As a result of the cancellation, revenues from our
Chicago nightclub increased one hundred thirty six percent (136%) to $27,579 for
the 2009 period from $11,690 from the 2008 period, while revenues from our
Baltimore club increased one hundred twenty two percent (122%) to $31,039 for
the 2009 period from $13,970 for the 2008 period and revenues from our New
Orleans club increased one hundred fifty (150%) to $15,000 for the 2009 period
from $6,000 in the 2008 period.
1. As
more fully described in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2008.
17
Revenues
from the New York Club, which commenced operations in May 2009, increased to
$50,000 in the 2009 period from $0 in the 2008 period. The New York
Club paid us $25,000 in advance. The Company will apply these
payments to revenue in future periods when earned.
General
and Administrative Expenses:
General
and administrative expenses increased during the 2009 period to $116,804 from
$89,553 during the 2008 period. During the 2009 period, the Company
recognized approximately $43,000 of prior period cost related to business
development and insurance. Amortization expense on our trademark
brand increased $12,196 to $27,126 in the 2009 period from $14,930 in the 2008
period. Costs for rent, legal and trade shows decreased approximately
$44,000 during the 2009 period compared to the 2008 period. Our
efforts to expand into new markets with the Scores brand increased salaries and
business development cost during the 2009 period.
Provision
for Income Taxes:
The
provision for state income taxes relates primarily to the greater of average
assets and capital taxable income. The average assets and capital are not
impacted by net operating losses.
Net
income (loss):
Our net
income was $6,814 or $0.00 per share for the 2009 period compared to a net
(loss) of $(76,594) or $(0.00) per share for the 2008 period. The
increase in net income for the 2009 period was a result of a two hundred sixty
seven percent (267%) increase in royalties earned from our licensees during the
2009 period over the 2008 period. Our costs were significantly
increased, including amortization and insurance which together increased by
approximately $61,000. This increase was offset by reductions
in rent, legal and trade show expenses of approximately $44,000 during the 2009
period over the 2008 period.
Net
income/(loss) per share data for both the 2009 period and the 2008 period is
based on net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted
average of the number of common shares outstanding.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Compared to Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2008
Revenues:
Revenues
increased fifty percent (50%) to $241,236 for the nine month 2009 period from
$160,544 for the nine month 2008 period. Royalty revenues from our Chicago
licensee increased fifty three (53%) percent to $60,943 for the nine month 2009
period from $39,740 for the nine month 2008 period, while revenues from our
Baltimore licensee increased seventy three percent (73%) to $70,293 for the nine
month 2009 period from $40,444 for the nine month 2008 period. Revenues from our
Las Vegas licensee (which terminated our license in May 2008) decreased one
hundred percent (100%) to $0 for the nine month 2009 period from $54,000 for the
nine month 2008 period. The Las Vegas licensee had accounted for
approximately thirty four (34%) percent of our revenue in 2008.
18
During
the second quarter of 2009, the New York Club commenced
operations. We received approximately $125,000 in advances against
future cash royalty payments from our New York affiliate and applied $80,000 of
such advance payments to revenue during the nine month 2009
period. The $45,000 balance will be applied towards future
royalties. During the nine month 2009 period, the Company
reserved approximately $12,000 from our New Orleans licensee and $18,000 from
our Baltimore licensee against past due royalties. See (Bad Debt Expense
below).
General
and Administrative Expenses:
General
and administrative expenses increased during the nine month 2009 period to
$347,598 from $264,301 during the nine month 2008 period. This
difference was primarily due to an increase of $49,000 in amortization expense
related to our trademark brand, increases in business development cost and prior
sales taxes of $37,500 and $19,000, respectively, during the 2009 period over
the 2008 period. These increases were offset by significant reductions in public
relations, salaries, legal, rent, and advertising expenditures. Our
efforts to expand our brand presence in new markets were impacted negatively by
our short falls in our anticipated revenue during the 2009 and 2008 nine month
periods.
Provision
for Income Taxes:
The
provision for state income taxes relates primarily to the greater of average
assets and capital taxable income. The average assets and capital are not
impacted by net operating losses.
Net
(Loss):
Our net
(loss) was $(130,362) or $(0.00) per share for the nine month 2009 period
compared to a net (loss) of $(129,713) or $(0.00) per share for the nine month
2008 period. Losses during the nine month 2009 period were not
significant as compared to the nine month 2008 period. The Company
had significant increases in revenues primarily due to the cancelled MLA with
EMS. The fifty percent revenue that EMS had retained under the MLA
ceased with the MLA’s cancellation. On the other hand, the Company
had significant ad hoc increases in cost for business development, amortization,
bad debts and prior year sales taxes increased during in the 2009 period over
the 2008 period.
Net
(loss) per share data for both the nine month 2009 period and the nine month
2008 period is based on net income available to common shareholders divided by
the weighted average of the number of common shares outstanding.
Bad
Debt Expense
As of
September 30, 2009, our Baltimore and New Orleans licensees owed us $18,000 and
$12,000, respectively, in accrued and unpaid royalties. During the
2009 nine month period, management agreed to write off the $18,000 balance owed
from our Baltimore licensee and continue to reserve the amount owed by our New
Orleans licensee. The determination to write off certain receivables
was made in connection with reductions in revenues from our licensees as a
result of the various prior legal matters relating to our former officers and
New York affiliates. We settled with our Baltimore licensee and we
are currently negotiating with our New Orleans licensee regarding past due
royalties. For the three month 2009 period, the Company recorded
approximately $15,000 in current royalties of which $10,000 was received and
$5,000 remains outstanding for its New Orleans licensee.
19
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash:
At
September 30, 2009, we had $39,458 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $173
in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2008.
Contractual
Commitments:
On
February 28, 2007, our then President, Chief Executive Officer and Director,
Richard Goldring resigned from each of those positions, and terminated his
employment with us under an employment agreement, dated April 16, 2003. The
terms of such agreement provided that if Mr. Goldring terminated his employment
without cause (which he did), we would become obligated to pay him $1 million
(the “Termination Fee”). Given our lack of available cash since Mr. Goldring’s
employment termination, we did not pay Mr. Goldring the Termination
Fee. In May 2009, Mr. Goldring assigned his right, title and interest
in and to the Termination Fee to Robert M. Gans. It is our
understanding that Mr. Gans does not intend to collect from us the Termination
Fee.
Operating
Activities:
Net cash
(used) in and provided by operating activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 was $(35,288) and $5,000,
respectively. The decrease in cash reflect reductions in amounts due to related
parties and inventory write downs offset by increases in royalties
receivable, bad debt and amortization expenses during the 2009 versus the 2008
periods. During the nine month 2009 period, debt in the amount of
$6,000 was forgiven from one of our former related parties. This
forgiveness was the result of our purchase of the Master License Agreement from
EMS.
Financing
Activities:
During
the 2009 period our bank overdraft decreased by $21,000 as a result of our
receiving the $125,000 cash advance against future royalties, from our New York
affiliate licensee. We accrued approximately $60,000 in expenses for rent due to
our Westside Realty affiliate and approximately $65,555 of expenses for
insurance, business development and accounting paid in cash by our New York
affiliate on behalf of the Company.
20
Future
Capital Requirements:
We have
incurred losses since the inception of our business. Since our inception, we
have been dependent on acquisitions and funding from private lenders and
investors to conduct operations. As of September 30, 2009 we had an accumulated
deficit of $(6,102,123), with total current assets of $65,858 and total current
liabilities of $243,482 or negative working capital of $(177,624). As of
December 31, 2008, we had total current assets of $14,018 and total current
liabilities of $155,808 or negative working capital of $(141,790). The decrease
in negative working capital was primarily attributable to the increase in our
cash and accounts receivable, which did not exceed our payables during the 2009
three and nine month periods. The Company received $125,000 in
advance cash payments from our New York affiliate of which $30,000 was applied
towards May and June 2009 royalties and $50,000 was accrued and applied toward
the three months ended September 2009. The remaining $45,000 will be
applied towards future period revenues.
We will
continue to evaluate possible acquisitions of or investments in businesses,
products and technologies that are complimentary to ours. These may require the
use of cash, which would require us to seek financing. We may sell equity or
debt securities or seek credit facilities to fund acquisition-related or other
business costs. Sales of equity or convertible debt securities would result in
additional dilution to our stockholders. We may also need to raise additional
funds in order to support more rapid expansion, develop new or enhanced services
or products, respond to competitive pressures, or take advantage of
unanticipated opportunities. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will
depend upon numerous factors, including the success of our adult entertainment
trademark licensing business.
ITEM
4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures. We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such
term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In
designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management
recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived
and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in
designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure
controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions.
Our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Treasurer who serves
as our principal financial and accounting officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, and as discussed in
greater detail below, our Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer has concluded
that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective:
·
|
to
give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by
us in reports that we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms,
and
|
21
·
|
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we
file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our CEO and our Treasurer,
to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
|
During
the analysis of our internal controls at September 30, 2009, we identified a
number of controls, the adoption of which are material to our internal control
environment and critical to providing reasonable assurance that any potential
errors could be detected. Our analysis identified control deficiencies related
to our recording of inventory, accounts payable, notes payable/debentures,
prepaid expenses and unique or one time or first time transactions. While we
have taken certain remedial steps during the nine months ended September 30,
2009 to correct these control deficiencies, we do not have a sufficient number
of personnel with the requisite expertise in generally accepted accounting
principles to ensure the proper application of the appropriate controls. Due to
the nature of these material weaknesses, there is more than a remote likelihood
that misstatements which could be material to our financial statements could
occur that would not be prevented or detected.
Changes in Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting during the 2009 period that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting
PART
II
ITEM
1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In early
March 2008, we received notice that DIF&B, owner of the Las Vegas club,
would be canceling its sublicense with EMS effective on or before May 6, 2008.
We were notified that DIF&B would be making final royalty payments to EMS
totaling $60,000 at the rate of $10,000 per week starting the first week of
March 2008. The Las Vegas club ceased operating and, as of December 31, 2008,
EMS had received only one such $10,000 payment from DIF&B. EMS commenced an
action against DIF&B and filed a complaint and affidavit of service with the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “SCNY”), on July
23, 2008. DIF&B was required to file an answer by August 23, 2008, but did
not do so. As a result, EMS filed an application for a default judgment and the
SCNY appointed a referee to determine damages. The referee determined that
damages in the amount of $216,000, with interest, should be paid to EMS and a
default judgment totaling $230,557 was entered by the Clerk of the
SCNY. We will attempt to collect on this judgment. We will
be entitled to all monies so collected, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement
with EMS and 333.
On
December 11, 2007, Francis Vargas, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West
located in New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us and Go West in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, alleging violations
of the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law, New York City
Human Rights Law, and the New York City Administrative Code, based upon
allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. The lawsuit further
alleges that at all material times both we and Go West were employers of Ms.
Vargas, the plaintiff. The law suit seeks unspecified compensatory damages for
plaintiffs’ alleged loss of past and future earnings and benefits, emotional
distress, humiliation and loss of reputation. We dispute that we were an
employer of the plaintiff and categorically deny all allegations of sexual
discrimination and sexual harassment. We filed our verified answer in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York on February 12, 2008 to contest and
defend against these accusations and we are currently engaged in
discovery. On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for
bankruptcy and the case is currently stayed.
22
On
October 9, 2007, former Go West bartender Siri Diaz filed a purported class
action and collective action on behalf of all tipped employees against us and
other defendants alleging violations of federal and state wage/hour laws (Siri Diaz
et al. v. Scores Holding Company, Inc.; Go West Entertainment, Inc. a/k/a Scores
West Side; and Scores Entertainment, Inc., a/k/a Scores East Side, Case
No. 07 Civ. 8718 (Southern District of New York (the “Court”), Judge Richard M.
Berman)). On November 6, 2007, plaintiffs served an amended purported class
action and collective action complaint, naming dancers and servers as additional
plaintiffs and alleging the same violations of federal and state wage/hour laws.
On or about February 21, 2008, plaintiffs served a second amended complaint
adding two additional party defendants, but limiting the action to persons
employed in the New York Scores’ clubs. The amended complaint alleges that we
and the other defendants are “an integrated enterprise” and that we jointly
employ the plaintiffs, subjecting all of the defendants to liability for the
alleged wage/hour violations. On or about September 5, 2009, plaintiffs served
their third amended complaint adding in two individual defendants who are
alleged to be employers under the state and federal wage claims. We
dispute that we are a proper defendant in this action and we dispute that
we violated the federal and state labor laws, and further dispute that the
dancers are “employees” subject to the federal and state wage and hour laws. We
intend to vigorously contest the claimed liability as well as the violations
alleged.
On April
18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for bankruptcy.
On behalf
of ourselves and the other defendants we filed a motion to dismiss that portion
of the Complaint as asserted State law class action allegations; we also moved
to dismiss the claims of two of the named plaintiffs for failure to appear for
depositions. At the same time plaintiffs moved for conditional certification
under the federal law for a class of the servers, bartenders and dancers; we
opposed that motion. On May 9, 2008, the Court issued its decision, denying the
motion to dismiss and granting conditional certification for a class of servers,
cocktail waitresses, bartenders and dancers who have worked at Scores East since
October 2004. The case is stayed as against Go West pursuant to the bankruptcy
law. The Court directed that notice be sent to all potential class members. On
May 29, 2008, we filed an answer to plaintiffs’ second amended
complaint. Discovery into both the procedural and substantive issues
is ongoing, as are settlement negotiations.
In
February 2007, the City of New York (the “City”) sought to close Scores West
claiming that it presented a public nuisance. The City alleged that this
nightclub was used for purposes of prostitution; the case was dismissed by the
City of New York and no charges were sought against Scores West or us. In
February, 2007, the New York State Liquor Authority (the “NYSLA”) began a review
of the license held by Scores West and issued an Emergency Summary Order of
Suspension of the Scores West liquor license on February 21, 2007. Go West, the
owner of Scores West, filed a pleading with the NYSLA on behalf of Scores West.
After a temporary adjournment and a series of hearings in front of an
administrative law judge, on February 4, 2008, this judge sustained all charges
against Scores West. A NYSLA hearing was held on March 6, 2008 and the NYSLA
revoked the Scores West Liquor license. On March 18, 2008, the New York State
Appellate Division, First Department (the “Appellate Court”) granted an interim
stay of the liquor license revocation pending a review by the full bench of the
Appellate Court. On April 15, 2008 the Appellate Court decided to deny a further
stay of the March 2008 revocation by the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor
license. Go West filed with the Appellate Court for a reconsideration of its
decision, which was denied. As a result of this outcome, Scores West has closed.
The Appellate Court decided to hear this case on the merits and, on October 3,
2008, found in favor of the NYSLA, upholding the NYSLA’s revocation of the
Scores West Liquor License. Go West subsequently filed a motion for
re-argument before the Appellate Court and/or leave to appeal to the New York
Court of Appeals. This further motion was withdrawn by Go
West.
23
On April
18, 2008, Go West filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This filing followed the April 15, 2008
Appellate Court decision to deny a further stay of the March 2008 revocation by
the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor license. The United States Trustee in this
case filed a motion seeking the dismissal or conversion of Go West’s Chapter 11
case as Go West is no longer operating. That motion was granted by the
Bankruptcy Court and an order was entered on July 23, 2009 following Go West’s
completion of its stipulations with the Internal Revenue Service (regarding the
payment of unpaid federal taxes) and the New York State Department of Taxation
(regarding a payment plan for state taxes due).
Scores
West has permanently lost its liquor license and has closed its
business. As a result, we are no longer able to receive royalty
revenues from Go West, owner of that club. In 2006, royalty revenues
from Scores West amounted to 31% of our royalties. We did not receive
any revenue from Scores West in 2008 or in 2007. Because Scores West
has closed, the ability of Go West to make payments under the Note (defined
below) has been severely impaired. The Note is currently in default. See Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations — Bad Debt Expense.
On May 2,
2008, the NYSLA gave notice of its pleading to 333, the owner of Scores East, in
connection with its proceeding to cancel or revoke the liquor license of Scores
East, based on its revocation of the Scores West liquor license. (Scores West
and Scores East were related by common ownership.) On July 2, 2008, the NYSLA
gave 333 a notice of hearing set for August 19, 2008. Based on the filing with
the NYSLA of a conditional no-contest plea, this hearing was
adjourned. 333 has since surrendered its liquor license for Scores
East and that club has permanently closed. Because of these
developments, we are no longer able to receive royalty revenues from Scores
East, which in 2006, amounted to 28% of our royalties. We did not
receive any revenue from Scores East in 2008 or in 2007.
On March
30, 2007, we, along with several of our affiliates, were named in a suit in
connection with an alleged assault by an employee of an affiliate and one of our
stockholders and former officer and director. We have answered a third amended
complaint and participated in a Preliminary Conference to establish the
discovery schedule. Examinations before trial of the parties have been completed
and non-party depositions are now being taken. The plaintiff has not yet
undergone the required physical examination. We will vigorously defend ourselves
in this litigation and do not expect that the outcome will be
material.
24
On
December 11, 2006, SMG, our former affiliate and owner of the club in North
Miami, Florida, filed for bankruptcy with the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York. In connection therewith, it terminated its
license agreement with EMS whereby it was authorized to use our intellectual
property. At the time of its filing, SMG owed us $16,661 for unpaid merchandise,
which we subsequently reserved as bad debt. SMG emerged from bankruptcy in
September 2008, under a plan of reorganization pursuant to which all general,
unsecured debt was discharged, including the $16,661 owed to us.
On March
31, 2006, Richard K. Goldring, our former president, chief executive officer and
principal shareholder pled guilty to one count of offering a False Instrument
for Filing in the First Degree pursuant to a plea agreement with the District
Attorney of the County of New York (the "DA"). In the event that within one year
of the date of the entry of the guilty plea, Mr. Goldring resigns from all
"control management positions" that he holds in publicly traded companies,
including ours, and divests himself of all "control ownership positions" in
publicly traded companies, including ours, and satisfies certain other
conditions, the DA will recommend a sentence of probation. In this context, a
“control management position” is a role, official or unofficial, by which he
substantially directs the decisions of a company, and a “control ownership
position” is a position in which he controls, directly or indirectly more than
9% of the voting stock or other securities of a company, or stock or securities
that have the capability of being converted into voting stock or other
securities of a company. The plea agreement resolves the DA's investigation
against Mr. Goldring and us. No charges were brought against us.
To comply
with the plea agreement between Richard Goldring and the District Attorney of
the County of New York, on September 4, 2008, Mr. Goldring transferred his
76,080,958 shares of our common stock (the “Goldring Shares”) to Ira Altchek as
trustee (the “Trustee”). According to the terms of the Voting Trust Agreement by
and between Mr. Goldring and the Trustee dated September 4, 2008, the Trustee
had the right to exercise all rights and powers of a shareholder of the Company
with respect to the Goldring Shares, including, without limitation, the sole and
exclusive right to vote the Goldring Shares, while Mr. Goldring maintained the
right to sell the Goldring Shares at any time. The Goldring Shares represented
approximately forty six percent (46%) of the outstanding capital stock of the
Company as of the December 31, 2008. On January 27, 2009, Mr.
Goldring sold all of the Goldring Shares in a private transaction with Buyer, as
further discussed above.
In June
2005, we, together with several of our affiliates, commenced litigation
regarding title to certain of our intellectual property. In February 2006,
counterclaims were asserted and other persons brought third party complaints. In
September 2006, we and our affiliates reached a settlement resolving all claims
against us for a payment of $175,000 made in monthly installments. In return,
the other parties in the litigation disclaimed any right to our intellectual
property.
There are
no other material legal proceedings pending to which we or any of our property
are subject, nor to our knowledge are any such proceedings
threatened.
25
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
31.1/31.2
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant
to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1/32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
* This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC
for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except
to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference.
26
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
|
|||
Dated: November
16, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Curtis Smith
|
|
Curtis
Smith
|
|||
Acting
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal
Financial Officer
|
27