SCORES HOLDING CO INC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
Or
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from ____________ to ________________
Commission
file number 000-16665
Scores
Holding Company, Inc.
|
(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its
charter)
|
Utah
|
87-0426358
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification
No.)
|
533-535
West 27th
Street, New York, NY 10001
|
(Address
of principal executive
offices)
|
(212)
868-4900
|
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months,
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
One):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company þ
|
|||
(Do
not check if a smaller
Reporting
company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2). Yes ¨ No
x
As of
August 10, 2009 there were 165,186,124
shares of the issuer’s common stock, par value $0.001, issued and
outstanding.
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
JUNE
30, 2009 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PAGE
|
||||
Special
Note Regarding Forward Looking Information
|
3
|
|||
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
4
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
17
|
||
Item4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
21
|
||
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
22
|
||
Item
6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
26
|
2
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except
for historical information, this report contains forward-looking
statements. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, including, among other things, statements regarding our business
strategy, future revenues and anticipated costs and expenses. Such
forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements including the
words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” and similar
language. Our actual results may differ significantly from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause
or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those
discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”. You should
carefully review the risks described in the documents we file from time to time
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any
revisions to the forward-looking statements or reflect events or circumstances
after the date of this document.
3
PART
1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31,
2008
|
5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and six months Ended June 30, 2009
and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
6
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
|
7
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
8
|
4
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 14,594 | $ | 173 | ||||
Licensee
receivable – net
|
24,702 | 13,845 | ||||||
Total
current Assets
|
39,296 | 14,018 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
272,180 | 333,332 | ||||||
$ | 311,477 | $ | 347,350 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 187,110 | $ | 128,826 | ||||
Related
party payable
|
— | 6,000 | ||||||
Bank
overdraft
|
— | 20,982 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
70,000 | — | ||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
257,110 | 155,808 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, -0- issued and
outstanding
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 165,186,124 and
165,186,124 issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
165,186 | 165,186 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
5,998,117 | 5,998,117 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(6,108,937 | ) | (5,971,761 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholder's equity
|
54,366 | 191,542 | ||||||
$ | 311,477 | $ | 347,350 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements
5
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six
months ended June 30,
|
Three
months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Royalty
|
$ | 117,618 | $ | 123,456 | $ | 57,835 | $ | 35,079 | ||||||||
Merchandise
|
— | 3,428 | — | 482 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
117,618 | 126,884 | 57,835 | 35,561 | ||||||||||||
COST
OF MERCHANDISE SOLD
|
— | 1,090 | — | 373 | ||||||||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
117,618 | 125,794 | 57,835 | 35,188 | ||||||||||||
BAD
DEBT EXPENSE
|
30,000 | — | 30,000 | — | ||||||||||||
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
230,794 | 174,748 | 138,227 | 108,944 | ||||||||||||
NET
(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
|
(143,176 | ) | (48,954 | ) | (110,392 | ) | (73,756 | ) | ||||||||
OTHER
INCOME DEBT FORGIVENESS
|
6,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
NET
(LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
(137,176 | ) | (48,954 | ) | (110,392 | ) | (73,756 | ) | ||||||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES
|
— | 3,625 | — | 3,625 | ||||||||||||
NET
(LOSS)
|
$ | (137,176 | ) | $ | (52,579 | ) | $ | (110,392 | ) | $ | (77,380 | ) | ||||
NET
(LOSS) PER SHARE -
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
and Diluted
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | ||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE OF COMMON SHARES
|
||||||||||||||||
OUTSTANDING
- Basic and diluted
|
165,186,124 | 165,186,124 | 165,186,124 | 165,186,124 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements
6
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six months ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
(LOSS)
|
$ | (137,176 | ) | $ | (52,579 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Amortization
|
61,152 | 29,860 | ||||||
Bad
Debt expense
|
30,000 | — | ||||||
Debt
forgiveness
|
(6,000 | ) | — | |||||
Changes
in Assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Royalty
receivable
|
(40,857 | ) | 8,605 | |||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
— | 1,123 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
70,000 | — | ||||||
Due
to EMS
|
— | 52,313 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
58,284 | (19,322 | ) | |||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED) IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
35,403 | 20,000 | ||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Bank
overdraft
|
(20,982 | ) | — | |||||
Repayments
of notes payable
|
— | (20,000 | ) | |||||
NET
CASH (USED) IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
(20,982 | ) | (20,000 | ) | ||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH
|
14,421 | — | ||||||
CASH,
beginning of the period
|
173 | 173 | ||||||
CASH,
end of the period
|
$ | 14,594 | $ | 173 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for interest
|
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
— | 3,625 | ||||||
Non
cash financing activities:
|
||||||||
None
|
See Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Scores Holding
Company Inc., formerly Internet Advisory Corporation and (the Company”) have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Regulation S-K. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered
necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring accruals) have
been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Operating
results expected for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31,
2009. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes
thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Going
Concern
Scores
Holding Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries (“SCRH”) has incurred losses totaling
$(6,108,937) through June 30, 2009 and has a working capital deficit of
$(217,814) at June 30, 2009. Because of these conditions, SCRH will
require additional working capital to develop business operations. SCRH intends
to raise additional working capital through the continued licensing of the brand
with its current and new operators and to take on operations in larger cities
with greater demand for our product through acquisitions. There
are no assurances that SCRH will be able to achieve the level of revenues
adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to support SCRHs’
working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from any future
use of licensing, are insufficient, SCRH will have to raise additional working
capital. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available,
or if available, will be on terms acceptable to SCRH. If
adequate working capital is not available SCRH may not increase its
operations.
These
conditions raise substantial doubt about SCRHs’ ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and
classification of liabilities that might be necessary should SCRHs’ be unable to
continue as a going concern.
8
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 2:
Summary of Significant Accounting Principles
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying amounts reported on the balance sheets for cash, accounts payable,
accrued expenses, deferred revenue and licensee receivable approximate fair
value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments
Concentration
of Credit Risk
The
Company earned royalties revenues from four licensees (Chicago, New Orleans,
Baltimore and AYA) who are unrelated from management of the Company. During the
six month ended June 30, 2009 period, royalties earned from unrelated licensees
amounted to $87,618 and there is $24,702 due and outstanding as of June 30,
2009. Our Baltimore and Chicago licensee account for the majority of
our revenues; in 2009 Baltimore and Chicago accounted for 33% and 28% and in
2008 they accounted for 21% and 23%, respectively. Our Las Vegas club was
sold and ceased operations in May 2008, accounted for 44% of our revenues in
2008. Our AYA, Scoreslive.com licensee website is still in the development
stage since 2007, it has accounted for a minimal amount of our total royalty
revenues to date for the 2009 and 2008 periods.
We
received $100,000 in advance cash royalty payments from our affiliated licensee
in New York during the six month period 2009. The Company applied
approximately $30,000 of these advance payments towards the 2009 May and June
royalties due. The $70,000 advance payment balance will be applied
towards future royalties.
At June
30, 2009, Baltimore and New Orleans owed the Company $18,000 and $12,000 in
unpaid accrued royalties. Due to the unstable chain of events with
our former Scores East and West affiliates in December 2008 which may have
adversely effected business operations in Baltimore and New Orleans, a reserve
for the entire amounts due from Baltimore and New Orleans were
provided. During the current period 2009, the Company settled
with Baltimore on the outstanding royalty due and continues to settle all
outstanding balances with New Orleans. For reporting purposes, the
Company did not report any revenues from New Orleans during the three months
ended June 30, 2009.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
On
May 28, 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“FAS
165”). Under FAS 165, companies are required to evaluate events and transactions
that occur after the balance sheet date but before the date the financial
statements are issued, or available to be issued in the case of non-public
entities. FAS 165 requires entities to recognize in the financial statements the
effect of all events or transactions that provide additional evidence of
conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, including the estimates
inherent in the financial preparation process. Entities shall not recognize the
impact of events or transactions that provide evidence about conditions that did
not exist at the balance sheet date but arose after that date. FAS 165 also
requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated. FAS 165 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted the provisions of FAS 165 for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, as required, and adoption did not have a material
impact on the Corporation’s financial statements taken as a
whole.
9
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In
June 2009, the FASB approved the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (the “Codification”), and issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a
replacement of FASB Statement No.162” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 replaces
SFAS 162 to establish the Codification as the source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in
preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles in the United States. SFAS 168 is effective for interim
and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We do not expect the
adoption of SFAS168 to have an impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
We do not
believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting or
reporting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on our
financial statements.
Note 3 -
Related party receivable
On
January 27, 2009, the Company and Entertainment Management Services, Inc.
(“EMS”) completed the closing (the “Closing”) of the transfer from EMS to the
Company of all licensing and royalty rights granted to EMS by the Company under
that certain Amended and Restated Master License Agreement by and between EMS
and the Company (the “MLA”). Under the MLA, the Company had granted
EMS the exclusive worldwide license for twenty years plus six five-year renewals
at the option of EMS to sublicense the Company’s trademarks and related
properties (the “Licensing Rights”). Additionally, under the MLA, EMS
was entitled to receive 50% of the licensing fees paid by various non-affiliated
nightclubs (the Existing licensees”) to EMS (the “EMS Royalty
Rights”).
EMS is
owned by 333 East 60th Street
Inc. (“333”) and 333 is owned by the Share Sellers Richard Goldring and Elliot
Osher
At the
Closing and pursuant to the terms of the transfer agreement by and between the
Company and EMS dated December 9, 2008, EMS assigned to the Company the
Licensing Rights and the EMS Royalty Rights relating to the Existing licensees,
free and clear of any charges, liens or other encumbrances. In consideration of
these assignments, the Company credited 333 with a $600,000 payment against a
$1,220,475 debt owed by 333 to the Company (the “Debt”) and provided 333 with an
acknowledgement that the Debt was satisfied to the extent of the $600,000
payment. Additionally, at the Closing, EMS and the Company executed a
cancellation and mutual release agreement canceling the MLA and terminating all
of the rights and obligations of the parties thereunder.
10
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
WestSide
Realty of New York, Inc.
In 2008,
we occupied approximately 700 square feet of office space from Go West, on
a temporary, month-to-month basis located at 533-535 West 27th Street, New York,
NY. On July 1, 2008 we cancelled our occupancy with Go West and
currently pay $5,000 per month, including overhead costs, for this office space
with Westside Realty of New York which is owned and operated by Robert M.
Gans.
11
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 4 -
Licensees
The
agreement between us and EMS dated January 27, 2009, terminated the MLA and
hence, we have begun to retain 100% of the royalty payments received from each
of these clubs rather than the 50% which was previously retained by EMS under
the MLA.
In 2003,
EMS licensed the use of the "Scores Chicago" name to Stone Park Entertainment,
Inc. for its club in Chicago, Illinois. Royalties payable to the Company were
the greater of $2,500 per week or 4.99% of the gross revenues (less $25,000 per
week) earned at that location. This licensee accounted for 28% and 23% of our
total royalty revenues during the first six month of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. During the six months ended June 2009, the Company
collected $29,535 in cash royalties and is owed $12,924 in outstanding royalties
respectively.
In 2004,
EMS licensed the use of "Scores Baltimore" to Club 2000 Eastern Avenue, Inc. for
its nightclub in Baltimore, Maryland. Royalties payable to EMS were the greater
of $1,000 per week or 4.99% of gross revenues. This club accounted for 33% and
21% of our total royalty revenues during the first six months in 2009 and 2008,
respectively. During the six months ended June 2009, the Company
collected approximately $12,876 in cash royalties and is owed $8,378 in
outstanding royalties respectively.
In April
2007, EMS licensed the use of the Scores brand name to Silver Bourbon, Inc. for
a night club in New Orleans, Louisiana. Royalties payable under this license are
capped at the greater of $8,000 per month or 4.99% of gross revenues. This club
commenced operations in April 2007 and accounted for 10% and 10% of our total
royalty revenues during first six months of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. During the first six months ended June 2009, the
Company did not receive any royalty payments and is owed approximately $14,000
in outstanding royalties. A reserve for the entire $14,000 was
provided for at June 30, 2009 respectively. During the second quarter
0f 2009 , the Company, for reporting purposes did not report revenues
from our New Orleans licensee.
On
January 27, 2009, we entered into a licensing agreement with I.M. Operating LLC
(“IMO”) for the use of the Scores brand name which our majority shareholder
(Robert M. Gans) and Secretary and Board Director (Howard Rosenbluth) are
members. IMOs’ operations will be at the location of the former
Scores West nightclub, 533-535 West 27th Street, New York, NY (the “West 27th Street
Building”)., which is also owned by Westside Realty of New York, of which the
majority owner is Robert M. Gans. Royalties payable to the Company
under this license agreement are 3% of gross revenues. IMO has a liquor
license, renovated the club and commenced operations at the west 28th street
location in May 2009. The Company received a $100,000 advance cash
royalty payment from IMO during the 2009 period of which $30,000 was applied to
May and June 2009 royalties. The balance of $70,000 will be applied
towards future royalties.
12
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 5 –
Commitments and Contingencies
In early
March 2008, we received notice that DIF&B, owner of the Las Vegas club,
would be canceling its sublicense with EMS effective on or before May 6, 2008.
We were notified that DIF&B would be making final royalty payments to EMS
totaling $60,000 at the rate of $10,000 per week starting the first week of
March 2008. The Las Vegas club ceased operating and, as of December 31, 2008,
EMS had received only one such $10,000 payment from DIF&B. EMS commenced an
action against DIF&B and filed a complaint and affidavit of service with the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “SCNY”), on July
23, 2008. DIF&B was required to file an answer by August 23, 2008, but did
not do so. As a result, EMS filed an application for a default judgment and the
SCNY appointed a referee to determine damages. The referee determined that
damages in the amount of $216,000, with interest, should be paid to
EMS. This amount must be confirmed by the SCNY in a final
judgment. If such a judgment is rendered by the SCNY, we will attempt
to collect on the judgment. We will be entitled to all monies so
collected, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement with EMS and 333.
On
December 11, 2007, Francis Vargas, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West
located in New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us and Go West in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, alleging violations
of the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law, New York City
Human Rights Law, and the New York City Administrative Code, based upon
allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. The lawsuit further
alleges that at all material times both we and Go West were employers of Ms.
Vargas, the plaintiff. The law suit seeks unspecified compensatory damages for
plaintiff’s alleged loss of past and future earnings and benefits, emotional
distress, humiliation and loss of reputation. We dispute that we were an
employer of the plaintiff and categorically deny all allegations of sexual
discrimination and sexual harassment. We filed our verified answer in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York on February 12, 2008 to contest and
defend against these accusations and we are currently engaged in
discovery. On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for
bankruptcy and the case is currently stayed.
On
October 9, 2007, former Go West bartender Siri Diaz filed a purported class
action and collective action on behalf of all tipped employees against us and
other defendants alleging violations of federal and state wage/hour laws (Siri Diaz
et al. v. Scores Holding Company, Inc.; Go West Entertainment, Inc. a/k/a Scores
West Side; and Scores Entertainment, Inc., a/k/a Scores East Side, Case
No. 07 Civ. 8718 (Southern District of New York (the “Court”), Judge Richard M.
Berman)). On November 6, 2007, plaintiffs served an amended purported class
action and collective action complaint, naming dancers and servers as additional
plaintiffs and alleging the same violations of federal and state wage/hour laws.
On or about February 21, 2008, plaintiffs served a second amended complaint
adding two additional party defendants, but limiting the action to persons
employed in the New York Scores’ clubs. The amended complaint alleges that we
and the other defendants are “an integrated enterprise” and that we jointly
employ the plaintiffs, subjecting all of the defendants to liability for the
alleged wage/hour violations. We dispute that we violated the federal and state
labor laws, and further dispute that the dancers are “employees” subject to the
federal and state wage and hour laws. We intend to vigorously contest the
claimed liability as well as the violations alleged.
13
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
On April
18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for bankruptcy.
On behalf
of ourselves and the other defendants we filed a motion to dismiss that portion
of the Complaint as asserted State law class action allegations; we also moved
to dismiss the claims of two of the named plaintiffs for failure to appear for
depositions. At the same time plaintiffs moved for conditional certification
under the federal law for a class of the servers, bartenders and dancers; we
opposed that motion. On May 9, 2008, the Court issued its decision, denying the
motion to dismiss and granting conditional certification for a class of servers,
cocktail waitresses, bartenders and dancers who have worked at Scores East since
October 2004. The case is stayed as against Go West pursuant to the bankruptcy
law. The Court directed that notice be sent to all potential class members. On
May 29, 2008, we filed an answer to plaintiffs’ second amended
complaint. Discovery into both the procedural and substantive issues
is ongoing, as are settlement negotiations.
In
February 2007, the City of New York (the “City”) sought to close Scores West
claiming that it presented a public nuisance. The City alleged that this
nightclub was used for purposes of prostitution; the case was dismissed by the
City of New York and no charges were sought against Scores West or us. In
February, 2007, the New York State Liquor Authority (the “NYSLA”) began a review
of the license held by Scores West and issued an Emergency Summary Order of
Suspension of the Scores West liquor license on February 21, 2007. Go West, the
owner of Scores West, filed a pleading with the NYSLA on behalf of Scores West.
After a temporary adjournment and a series of hearings in front of an
administrative law judge, on February 4, 2008, this judge sustained all charges
against Scores West. A NYSLA hearing was held on March 6, 2008 and the NYSLA
revoked the Scores West Liquor license. On March 18, 2008, the New York State
Appellate Division, First Department (the “Appellate Court”) granted an interim
stay of the liquor license revocation pending a review by the full bench of the
Appellate Court. On April 15, 2008 the Appellate Court decided to deny a further
stay of the March 2008 revocation by the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor
license. Go West filed with the Appellate Court for a reconsideration of its
decision, which was denied. As a result of this outcome, Scores West has closed.
The Appellate Court decided to hear this case on the merits and, on October 3,
2008, found in favor of the NYSLA, upholding the NYSLA’s revocation of the
Scores West Liquor License. Go West subsequently filed a motion for
re-argument before the Appellate Court and/or leave to appeal to the New York
Court of Appeals. This further motion was withdrawn by Go
West.
14
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
On April
18, 2008, Go West filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This filing followed the April 15, 2008
Appellate Court decision to deny a further stay of the March 2008 revocation by
the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor license. As of the date hereof, an Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors has not been formed nor has a Trustee or
Examiner been appointed in this case. Go West’s bankruptcy case is pending in
the Bankruptcy Court, Case No. 08-11420. The United States Trustee in this case
filed a motion seeking the dismissal or conversion of Go West’s Chapter 11 case
as Go West is no longer operating. That motion was granted by the Bankruptcy
Court and an order will be entered once Go West completes its stipulations with
the Internal Revenue Service (regarding the payment of unpaid federal taxes) and
the New York State Department of Taxation (regarding a payment plan for state
taxes due).
Scores
West has permanently lost its liquor license and has closed its
business. As a result, we are no longer able to receive royalty
revenues from Go West, owner of that club. In 2006, royalty revenues
from Scores West amounted to 31% of our royalties. We did not receive
any revenue from Scores West since 2006. Because Scores West has
closed, the ability of Go West to make payments under the Note has been severely
impaired. .As of January 1, 2009, the note has been fully written
off.
On May 2,
2008, the NYSLA gave notice of its pleading to 333, the owner of Scores East, in
connection with its proceeding to cancel or revoke the liquor license of Scores
East, based on its revocation of the Scores West liquor license. (Scores West
and Scores East were related by common ownership.) On July 2, 2008, the NYSLA
gave 333 a notice of hearing set for August 19, 2008. Based on the filing with
the NYSLA of a conditional no-contest plea, this hearing was
adjourned. 333 has since surrendered its liquor license for Scores
East and that club has permanently closed. Because of these
developments, we are no longer able to receive royalty revenues from Scores
East, which in 2006, amounted to 28% of our royalties. We did not
receive any revenue from Scores East since 2006.
On March
30, 2007, we, along with several of our affiliates, were named in a suit in
connection with an alleged assault by an employee of an affiliate and one of our
stockholders and former officer and director. We have recently answered a third
amended complaint and participated in a Preliminary Conference to establish the
discovery schedule. Examinations before trial of the parties have been completed
and non-party depositions are now being taken. The plaintiff has not yet
undergone the required physical examination. We will vigorously defend ourselves
in this litigation and do not expect that the outcome will be
material.
On
December 11, 2006, SMG, our former affiliate and owner of the club in North
Miami, Florida, filed for bankruptcy with the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York. In connection therewith, it terminated its
license agreement with EMS whereby it was authorized to use our intellectual
property. At the time of its filing, SMG owed us $16,661 for unpaid merchandise,
which we subsequently reserved as bad debt. SMG emerged from bankruptcy in
September 2008 under a plan of reorganization pursuant to which all general,
unsecured debt was discharged, including the $16,661 owed to
us.
15
Scores
Holding Company Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
On March
31, 2006, Richard K. Goldring, our former president, chief executive officer and
principal shareholder pled guilty to one count of offering a False Instrument
for Filing in the First Degree pursuant to a plea agreement with the District
Attorney of the County of New York (the "DA"). In the event that within one year
of the date of the entry of the guilty plea, Mr. Goldring resigns from all
"control management positions" that he holds in publicly traded companies,
including ours, and divests himself of all "control ownership positions" in
publicly traded companies, including ours, and satisfies certain other
conditions, the DA will recommend a sentence of probation. In this context, a
“control management position” is a role, official or unofficial, by which he
substantially directs the decisions of a company, and a “control ownership
position” is a position in which he controls, directly or indirectly more than
9% of the voting stock or other securities of a company, or stock or securities
that have the capability of being converted into voting stock or other
securities of a company. The plea agreement resolves the DA's investigation
against Mr. Goldring and us. No charges were brought against us.
To comply
with the plea agreement between Richard Goldring and the District Attorney of
the County of New York, on September 4, 2008, Mr. Goldring transferred his
76,080,958 shares of our common stock (the “Goldring Shares”) to Ira Altchek as
trustee (the “Trustee”). According to the terms of the Voting Trust Agreement by
and between Mr. Goldring and the Trustee dated September 4, 2008, the Trustee
had the right to exercise all rights and powers of a shareholder of the Company
with respect to the Goldring Shares, including, without limitation, the sole and
exclusive right to vote the Goldring Shares, while Mr. Goldring maintained the
right to sell the Goldring Shares at any time. The Goldring Shares represented
approximately forty six percent (46%) of the outstanding capital stock of the
Company as of the December 31, 2008. On January 27, 2009, Mr.
Goldring sold all of the Goldring Shares in a private transaction with Buyer, as
further discussed above.
16
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Overview
Scores
Holding Company, Inc. (‘Scores,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) was
incorporated in Utah on September 21, 1981 under the name Adonis Energy, Inc.
Since 2003, we have been in the business of licensing the “Scores” trademarks
and other intellectual property to fine gentlemen’s nightclubs with adult
entertainment in the United States. There are three such clubs
currently operating under the Scores name, in Baltimore, Chicago, and New
Orleans.
On
January 27, 2009, Entertainment Management Services, Inc. ("EMS"), an entity
owned by two of our former directors and employees, transferred to us of all the
Scores licensing and royalty rights originally granted to EMS in 20031. As
a result of this transfer, our intellectual property is now licensed directly by
us and we are now entitled to 100% of the royalty payments made by our licensed
clubs rather than the 50% we were entitled to under the agreement with
EMS.
Additionally
on January 27, 2009, Mitchell’s East LLC, wholly owned by Robert M. Gans,
acquired a majority interest in our outstanding capital stock1. I.M.
Operating LLC (“IMO”), which is partially owned by Robert M. Gans who is also
our majority shareholder, has signed a licensing agreement with us and commenced
operations in New York of a new Club (the “New York Club”) under the Scores name
in May 2009. Throughout this report, we refer to the New York
Club as our affiliate, because of the common ownership by Mr. Gans. All other
clubs are referred to as non-affiliated clubs or as licensees, a term that may
include the New York Club when the context requires.
Results
of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
(“the 2009 period”) Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
(“the 2008 period”).
Revenues:
Revenues
increased Sixty three (63%) percent to $57,835 for the 2009 period from $35,561
for the 2008 period. Revenues from our Chicago nightclub increased
three (3%) to $15,581 for the 2009 period from $15,108 from the 2008 period,
from our Baltimore club decreased (7%) to $12,254 for the 2009 period from
$13,172 for the 2008 period and from our New Orleans club, decreased one hundred
(100%) to $0 for the 2009 period from $6,000 in the 2008 period. (See Bad Debt
Expense below). In May 2009 the New York Club commenced
operations. We received approximately $50,000 in advance cash royalty
payments from the New York Club, which we applied $30,000 towards the
May and June 2009 royalties due. The balance of $20,000 will be applied towards
future royalties due.
1. As
more fully described in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2008.
17
General
and Administrative Expenses:
General
and administrative expenses decreased during the 2009 period to $138,227 from
$108,944 during the 2008 period. The
difference reflects a $25,000 payout of prior quarter salaries during the June
30, 2009 three month period. Our efforts to expand into and capitalize on
new markets with the Scores brand decreased significantly in the 2009 period due
to the short falls in our anticipated revenue during the 2009 and 2008
periods.
Provision
for Income Taxes:
The
provision for state income taxes relates primarily to the greater of average
assets and capital taxable income. The average assets and capital are not
impacted by net operating losses.
Net
(Loss):
Our net
(loss) was $(110,392) or $(0.00) per share for the 2009 period compared to a net
(loss) of $(77,380) or $(0.00) per share for the 2008 period. The
increase in net (loss) for the 2009 period was a result of bad debt reserves of
approximately $30,000 incurred in connection with our Baltimore and New Orleans
licensees.
Net
(loss) per share data for both the 2009 period and the 2008 period is based on
net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average of
the number of common shares outstanding.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Compared to Six Months
Ended June 30, 2008
Revenues:
Revenues
decreased seven (7%) percent to $117,618 for the 2009 six month period from
$126,884 for the 2008 six month period. Revenues from the Las Vegas club
declined one hundred percent (100%) to $0 for the 2009 six month period from
$54,000 for the 2008 six month period. This decline was due to the
sale of the Las Vegas club which terminated its license agreement in August of
2008. Royalty revenues increased from our Chicago licensee seven
(20%) percent to $33,364 for the 2009 six month period from $28,049 for the 2008
six month period, from the Baltimore licensee, forty eight (48%) percent to
$39,254 for the 2009 six month period from $26,474 for the 2008 six month
period. During the 2009 period the New York Club commenced
operations. We received approximately $100,000 in advance cash
royalty payments from the New York Club and applied $30,000 of such advance
payments to revenue for the 2009 period. The $70,000 balance
will be applied towards future royalties. During the 2009 six
month period, the Company reserved approximately $30,000 in past due royalties
from our Baltimore and New Orleans licensees (see Bad Debt Expense
below).
18
General
and Administrative Expenses:
General
and administrative expenses increased during the 2009 six month period to
$230,794 from $174,748 during the 2008 six month period. The $56,000
difference represents a 2009 increase in operating expenses related to
amortization of $30,000, prior year sales taxes on capital improvements of
$19,000 and salaries of $25,000 and reductions in insurance, public
relations, business development and advertising of approximately
$18,000. Our efforts to expand our brand presence in new markets
decreased significantly due to the short falls in our anticipated revenue during
the 2009 and 2008 six month periods.
Provision
for Income Taxes:
The
provision for state income taxes relates primarily to the greater of average
assets and capital taxable income. The average assets and capital are not
impacted by net operating losses.
Net
(Loss):
Our net
(loss) was $(137,176) or $(0.00) per share for the 2009 six month period
compared to a net (loss) of $(52,579) or $(0.00) per share for the 2008 six
month period. This increase in our losses for the 2009 six
month period was a result of a decrease in our revenues due to the sale of the
Las Vegas club in May 2008 and the resultant discontinuance of that club as a
licensee. We reserved approximately $30,000 in bad debt relating to
our Baltimore and New Orleans licensees. We experienced significant
increases in our operating costs of approximately $56,000 in the 2009 six month
period from the 2008 six month period. The Company incurred
significant increases in amortization expense of $30,000, sales and
use taxes on prior years’ capitalized improvements of $19,000 and management
salaries of $25,000 during the 2009 six month period. Our
efforts to reduce spending on expansion during the 2009 six month period
resulted to a $18,000 reductions in public relations, advertising,
insurance and business development.
Net
(loss) per share data for both the 2009 six month period and the 2008 six month
period is based on net income available to common shareholders divided by the
weighted average of the number of common shares outstanding.
Bad
Debt Expense
As of
June 30, 2009, our Baltimore and New Orleans licensees owed us $18,000 and
$12,000 in accrued and unpaid royalties, respectively. During the
2009 six month period, management agreed to write off the balance owed from our
Baltimore licensee and reserve the amount owed by our New Orleans
licensee. This determination to write off certain receivables
resulted from decreases in licensee club revenues which may have dropped as a
result of various prior legal matters connected with our former officers and New
York affiliates. We settled with our Baltimore licensee and we are
currently negotiating with the New Orleans licensee regarding its past due
royalties. During the 2009 period, we did not report revenues from
our New Orleans licensee.
19
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash:
At June
30, 2009, we had $14,594 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $173 in cash
and cash equivalents at December 31, 2008.
Contractual
Commitments:
On
February 28, 2007, our then President, Chief Executive Officer and Director,
Richard Goldring resigned from each of those positions, and terminated his
employment with us under an employment agreement, dated April 16, 2003. The
terms of such agreement provided that if Mr. Goldring terminated his employment
without cause (which he did), we would become obligated to pay him $1 million
(the “Termination Fee”). Given our lack of available cash since Mr. Goldring’s
employment termination, we did not pay Mr. Goldring the Termination
Fee. In May 2009, Mr. Goldring assigned his right, title and interest
in and to the Termination Fee to Robert M. Gans. It is our
understanding that Mr. Gans does not intend to collect from us the Termination
Fee.
Operating
Activities:
Net cash
provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and June
30, 2008 was $35,403 and $20,000, respectively. The increase in cash reflects
the $100,000 advance cash royalty payments made during the 2009 period from our
New York affiliate licensee, which helped reduce a significant portion of our
outstanding debt. Net royalty receivables for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 increased $11,000 over the amount for the six months ended June
30, 2008. During the 2009 six month period, debt in the amount of
$6,000 was forgiven from our former related parties. This forgiveness
was the result of our purchase of the Master License Agreement from
EMS.
Overall
revenue declined in the 2009 six month period from the 2008 six month
period. This, in part, was a result of the loss of our main licensee
in Las Vegas, which accounted for approximately fifty nine percent (44%) of our
royalty revenue in 2008, and to shortfalls in revenue from our Baltimore and New
Orleans licensees in 2009, where club revenues may have dropped as a result of
various prior legal matters connected with our former officers and New York
affiliates. These matters may have adversely impacted operations of
our licensees’ clubs in Baltimore and New Orleans in 2009.
20
Financing
Activities:
During
the 2009 period our bank overdraft decreased by $21,000. This decrease resulted
from the $100,000 advance cash payments of future royalties received from our
New York affiliate licensee.
Future
Capital Requirements:
We have
incurred losses since the inception of our business. Since our inception, we
have been dependent on acquisitions and funding from private lenders and
investors to conduct operations. As of June 30, 2009 we had an accumulated
deficit of $(6,108,937), with total current assets of $39,296 and total current
liabilities of $257,110, or negative working capital of $(217,814). As of
December 31, 2008, we had total current assets of $14,018 and total current
liabilities of $155,808 or negative working capital of $(141,790). The increase
in negative working capital was primarily attributable to the increase in our
cash and accounts receivable, which did not exceed our payables during the 2009
three and six month periods. The Company received $100,000 in advance
cash payments from our affiliate New York licensee of which $30,000 was applied
towards May and June 2009 royalties and the remaining $70,000 will be applied
towards future period revenues.
We will
continue to evaluate possible acquisitions of or investments in businesses,
products and technologies that are complimentary to ours. These may require the
use of cash, which would require us to seek financing. We may sell equity or
debt securities or seek credit facilities to fund acquisition-related or other
business costs. Sales of equity or convertible debt securities would result in
additional dilution to our stockholders. We may also need to raise additional
funds in order to support more rapid expansion, develop new or enhanced services
or products, respond to competitive pressures, or take advantage of
unanticipated opportunities. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will
depend upon numerous factors, including the success of our adult entertainment
trademark licensing business.
ITEM
4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures. We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such
term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In
designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management
recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived
and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in
designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure
controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions.
Our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Treasurer who serves
as our principal financial and accounting officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, and as discussed in
greater detail below, our Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer has concluded
that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective:
21
·
|
to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed
by us in reports that we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms,
and
|
·
|
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we
file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our CEO and our Treasurer,
to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
|
During
the analysis of our internal controls at June 30, 2009, we identified a number
of controls, the adoption of which are material to our internal control
environment and critical to providing reasonable assurance that any potential
errors could be detected. Our analysis identified control deficiencies related
to our recording of inventory, accounts payable, notes payable/debentures,
prepaid expenses and unique or one time or first time transactions. While we
have taken certain remedial steps during the six months ended June 30, 2009 to
correct these control deficiencies, we do not have a sufficient number of
personnel with the requisite expertise in generally accepted accounting
principles to ensure the proper application of the appropriate controls. Due to
the nature of these material weaknesses, there is more than a remote likelihood
that misstatements which could be material to our financial statements could
occur that would not be prevented or detected.
Changes in Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting during the 2009 period that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting
PART
II
ITEM
1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In early
March 2008, we received notice that DIF&B, owner of the Las Vegas club,
would be canceling its sublicense with EMS effective on or before May 6, 2008.
We were notified that DIF&B would be making final royalty payments to EMS
totaling $60,000 at the rate of $10,000 per week starting the first week of
March 2008. The Las Vegas club ceased operating and, as of December 31, 2008,
EMS had received only one such $10,000 payment from DIF&B. EMS commenced an
action against DIF&B and filed a complaint and affidavit of service with the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “SCNY”), on July
23, 2008. DIF&B was required to file an answer by August 23, 2008, but did
not do so. As a result, EMS filed an application for a default judgment and the
SCNY appointed a referee to determine damages. The referee determined that
damages in the amount of $216,000, with interest, should be paid to
EMS. This amount must be confirmed by the SCNY in a final
judgment. If such a judgment is rendered by the SCNY, we will attempt
to collect on the judgment. We will be entitled to all monies so
collected, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement with EMS and
333.
22
On
December 11, 2007, Francis Vargas, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West
located in New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us and Go West in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, alleging violations
of the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law, New York City
Human Rights Law, and the New York City Administrative Code, based upon
allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. The lawsuit further
alleges that at all material times both we and Go West were employers of Ms.
Vargas, the plaintiff. The law suit seeks unspecified compensatory damages for
plaintiff’s alleged loss of past and future earnings and benefits, emotional
distress, humiliation and loss of reputation. We dispute that we were an
employer of the plaintiff and categorically deny all allegations of sexual
discrimination and sexual harassment. We filed our verified answer in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York on February 12, 2008 to contest and
defend against these accusations and we are currently engaged in
discovery. On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for
bankruptcy and the case is currently stayed.
On
October 9, 2007, former Go West bartender Siri Diaz filed a purported class
action and collective action on behalf of all tipped employees against us and
other defendants alleging violations of federal and state wage/hour laws (Siri Diaz
et al. v. Scores Holding Company, Inc.; Go West Entertainment, Inc. a/k/a Scores
West Side; and Scores Entertainment, Inc., a/k/a Scores East Side, Case
No. 07 Civ. 8718 (Southern District of New York (the “Court”), Judge Richard M.
Berman)). On November 6, 2007, plaintiffs served an amended purported class
action and collective action complaint, naming dancers and servers as additional
plaintiffs and alleging the same violations of federal and state wage/hour laws.
On or about February 21, 2008, plaintiffs served a second amended complaint
adding two additional party defendants, but limiting the action to persons
employed in the New York Scores’ clubs. The amended complaint alleges that we
and the other defendants are “an integrated enterprise” and that we jointly
employ the plaintiffs, subjecting all of the defendants to liability for the
alleged wage/hour violations. We dispute that we violated the federal and state
labor laws, and further dispute that the dancers are “employees” subject to the
federal and state wage and hour laws. We intend to vigorously contest the
claimed liability as well as the violations alleged.
On April
18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for bankruptcy.
On behalf
of ourselves and the other defendants we filed a motion to dismiss that portion
of the Complaint as asserted State law class action allegations; we also moved
to dismiss the claims of two of the named plaintiffs for failure to appear for
depositions. At the same time plaintiffs moved for conditional certification
under the federal law for a class of the servers, bartenders and dancers; we
opposed that motion. On May 9, 2008, the Court issued its decision, denying the
motion to dismiss and granting conditional certification for a class of servers,
cocktail waitresses, bartenders and dancers who have worked at Scores East since
October 2004. The case is stayed as against Go West pursuant to the bankruptcy
law. The Court directed that notice be sent to all potential class members. On
May 29, 2008, we filed an answer to plaintiffs’ second amended
complaint. Discovery into both the procedural and substantive issues
is ongoing, as are settlement negotiations.
23
In
February 2007, the City of New York (the “City”) sought to close Scores West
claiming that it presented a public nuisance. The City alleged that this
nightclub was used for purposes of prostitution; the case was dismissed by the
City of New York and no charges were sought against Scores West or us. In
February, 2007, the New York State Liquor Authority (the “NYSLA”) began a review
of the license held by Scores West and issued an Emergency Summary Order of
Suspension of the Scores West liquor license on February 21, 2007. Go West, the
owner of Scores West, filed a pleading with the NYSLA on behalf of Scores West.
After a temporary adjournment and a series of hearings in front of an
administrative law judge, on February 4, 2008, this judge sustained all charges
against Scores West. A NYSLA hearing was held on March 6, 2008 and the NYSLA
revoked the Scores West Liquor license. On March 18, 2008, the New York State
Appellate Division, First Department (the “Appellate Court”) granted an interim
stay of the liquor license revocation pending a review by the full bench of the
Appellate Court. On April 15, 2008 the Appellate Court decided to deny a further
stay of the March 2008 revocation by the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor
license. Go West filed with the Appellate Court for a reconsideration of its
decision, which was denied. As a result of this outcome, Scores West has closed.
The Appellate Court decided to hear this case on the merits and, on October 3,
2008, found in favor of the NYSLA, upholding the NYSLA’s revocation of the
Scores West Liquor License. Go West subsequently filed a motion for
re-argument before the Appellate Court and/or leave to appeal to the New York
Court of Appeals. This further motion was withdrawn by Go
West.
On April
18, 2008, Go West filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This filing followed the April 15, 2008
Appellate Court decision to deny a further stay of the March 2008 revocation by
the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor license. As of the date hereof, an Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors has not been formed nor has a Trustee or
Examiner been appointed in this case. Go West’s bankruptcy case is pending in
the Bankruptcy Court, Case No. 08-11420. The United States Trustee in this case
filed a motion seeking the dismissal or conversion of Go West’s Chapter 11 case
as Go West is no longer operating. That motion was granted by the Bankruptcy
Court and an order will be entered once Go West completes its stipulations with
the Internal Revenue Service (regarding the payment of unpaid federal taxes) and
the New York State Department of Taxation (regarding a payment plan for state
taxes due).
Scores
West has permanently lost its liquor license and has closed its
business. As a result, we are no longer able to receive royalty
revenues from Go West, owner of that club. In 2006, royalty revenues
from Scores West amounted to 31% of our royalties. We did not receive
any revenue from Scores West in 2008 or in 2007. Because Scores West
has closed, the ability of Go West to make payments under the Note (defined
below) has been severely impaired. The Note is currently in default. See Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations — Bad Debt Expense.
On May 2,
2008, the NYSLA gave notice of its pleading to 333, the owner of Scores East, in
connection with its proceeding to cancel or revoke the liquor license of Scores
East, based on its revocation of the Scores West liquor license. (Scores West
and Scores East were related by common ownership.) On July 2, 2008, the NYSLA
gave 333 a notice of hearing set for August 19, 2008. Based on the filing with
the NYSLA of a conditional no-contest plea, this hearing was
adjourned. 333 has since surrendered its liquor license for Scores
East and that club has permanently closed. Because of these
developments, we are no longer able to receive royalty revenues from Scores
East, which in 2006, amounted to 28% of our royalties. We did not
receive any revenue from Scores East in 2008 or in 2007.
24
On March
30, 2007, we, along with several of our affiliates, were named in a suit in
connection with an alleged assault by an employee of an affiliate and one of our
stockholders and former officer and director. We have recently answered a third
amended complaint and participated in a Preliminary Conference to establish the
discovery schedule. Examinations before trial of the parties have been completed
and non-party depositions are now being taken. The plaintiff has not yet
undergone the required physical examination. We will vigorously defend ourselves
in this litigation and do not expect that the outcome will be
material.
On
December 11, 2006, SMG, our former affiliate and owner of the club in North
Miami, Florida, filed for bankruptcy with the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York. In connection therewith, it terminated its
license agreement with EMS whereby it was authorized to use our intellectual
property. At the time of its filing, SMG owed us $16,661 for unpaid merchandise,
which we subsequently reserved as bad debt. SMG emerged from bankruptcy in
September 2008 under a plan or reorganization pursuant to which all general,
unsecured debt was discharged, including the $16,661 owed to us.
On March
31, 2006, Richard K. Goldring, our former president, chief executive officer and
principal shareholder pled guilty to one count of offering a False Instrument
for Filing in the First Degree pursuant to a plea agreement with the District
Attorney of the County of New York (the "DA"). In the event that within one year
of the date of the entry of the guilty plea, Mr. Goldring resigns from all
"control management positions" that he holds in publicly traded companies,
including ours, and divests himself of all "control ownership positions" in
publicly traded companies, including ours, and satisfies certain other
conditions, the DA will recommend a sentence of probation. In this context, a
“control management position” is a role, official or unofficial, by which he
substantially directs the decisions of a company, and a “control ownership
position” is a position in which he controls, directly or indirectly more than
9% of the voting stock or other securities of a company, or stock or securities
that have the capability of being converted into voting stock or other
securities of a company. The plea agreement resolves the DA's investigation
against Mr. Goldring and us. No charges were brought against us.
To comply
with the plea agreement between Richard Goldring and the District Attorney of
the County of New York, on September 4, 2008, Mr. Goldring transferred his
76,080,958 shares of our common stock (the “Goldring Shares”) to Ira Altchek as
trustee (the “Trustee”). According to the terms of the Voting Trust Agreement by
and between Mr. Goldring and the Trustee dated September 4, 2008, the Trustee
had the right to exercise all rights and powers of a shareholder of the Company
with respect to the Goldring Shares, including, without limitation, the sole and
exclusive right to vote the Goldring Shares, while Mr. Goldring maintained the
right to sell the Goldring Shares at any time. The Goldring Shares represented
approximately forty six percent (46%) of the outstanding capital stock of the
Company as of the December 31, 2008. On January 27, 2009, Mr.
Goldring sold all of the Goldring Shares in a private transaction with Buyer, as
further discussed above.
In June
2005, we, together with several of our affiliates, commenced litigation
regarding title to certain of our intellectual property. In February 2006,
counterclaims were asserted and other persons brought third party complaints. In
September 2006, we and our affiliates reached a settlement resolving all claims
against us for a payment of $175,000 made in monthly installments. In return,
the other parties in the litigation disclaimed any right to our intellectual
property.
25
There are
no other material legal proceedings pending to which we or any of our property
are subject, nor to our knowledge are any such proceedings
threatened.
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
31.1/31.2
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant
to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1/32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
____________________
* This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC
for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except
to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference.
26
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
|
||
Dated: August
13, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Curtis Smith
|
Curtis
Smith
|
||
Acting
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer
|
27