SCORES HOLDING CO INC - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
Or
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from ____________ to ________________
Commission
file number 000-16665
Scores
Holding Company, Inc.
|
||
(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its
charter)
|
||
Utah
|
87-0426358
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification
No.)
|
|
533-535
West 27th
Street, New York, NY 10001
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
||
(212)
868-4900
|
||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months,
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
One):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company þ
|
|||
(Do
not check if a smaller
Reporting
company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2). Yes ¨ No
x
As of
August 23, 2010 there were 165,186,124 shares of the issuer’s common stock, par
value $0.001, issued and outstanding.
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
JUNE
30, 2010 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PAGE
|
||||
Special
Note Regarding Forward Looking Information
|
3
|
|||
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
4
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
15
|
||
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
18
|
||
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
20
|
||
Item
6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
23
|
2
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except
for historical information, this report contains forward-looking
statements. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, including, among other things, statements regarding our business
strategy, future revenues and anticipated costs and expenses. Such
forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements including the
words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” and similar
language. Our actual results may differ significantly from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause
or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those
discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”. You should
carefully review the risks described in the documents we file from time to time
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any
revisions to the forward-looking statements or reflect events or circumstances
after the date of this document.
3
PART
1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and
|
||
December
31, 2009 (Audited)
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and six months
|
||
Ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
|
6
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
|
||
Ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
|
7
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
8
|
4
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 14,638 | $ | 31,694 | ||||
Licensee
Receivable – including affiliates - net
|
93,176 | 26,732 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
24,397 | 0 | ||||||
Total
current Assets
|
132,211 | 58,426 | ||||||
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS, NET
|
141,476 | 205,428 | ||||||
$ | 273,687 | $ | 263,854 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 51,354 | $ | 22,091 | ||||
Related
party payable
|
237,366 | 208,583 | ||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
288,720 | 230,674 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
|
||||||||
authorized,
-0- issued and outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized,
|
||||||||
165,186,124
and 165,186,124 issued and outstanding,
|
||||||||
respectively
|
165,186 | 165,186 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
5,998,117 | 5,998,117 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(6,178,336 | ) | (6,130,123 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholder's equity (deficit)
|
(15,033 | ) | 33,180 | |||||
$ | 273,687 | $ | 263,854 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements
5
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six
months ended June 30,
|
Three
months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||
REVENUES:
|
||||||||||||||||
Royalty
revenue
|
$ | 238,352 | $ | 117,618 | $ | 130,901 | 57,835 | |||||||||
Total
|
238,352 | 117,618 | 130,901 | 57,835 | ||||||||||||
EXPENSES:
|
||||||||||||||||
BAD
DEBT EXPENSE
|
— | 30,000 | — | 30,000 | ||||||||||||
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
286,565 | 230,794 | 144,463 | 138,227 | ||||||||||||
NET(
LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
|
(48,213 | ) | (143,176 | ) | (13,562 | ) | (110,392 | ) | ||||||||
OTHER
INCOME DEBT FORGIVENESS
|
— | 6,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||
NET
(LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
(48,213 | ) | (137,176 | ) | (13,562 | ) | (110,392 | ) | ||||||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
NET
LOSS
|
$ | (48,213 | ) | $ | (137,176 | ) | (13,562 | ) | (110,392 | ) | ||||||
NET
LOSS PER SHARE
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | |||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE OF COMMON SHARES
|
||||||||||||||||
OUTSTANDING
- Basic and Diluted
|
165,186,124 | 165,186,124 | 165,186,124 | 165,186,124 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements
6
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six
months ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net(
loss)
|
$ | (48,213 | ) | $ | (137,176 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
|
||||||||
by
operating activities:
|
||||||||
Amortization
|
63,952 | 61,152 | ||||||
Bad
debt expense
|
- | 30,000 | ||||||
Debt
forgiveness
|
- | (6,000 | ) | |||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Licensee
receivable
|
(66,444 | ) | (40,857 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
Expenses
|
(24,397 | ) | - | |||||
Deferred
revenue
|
- | 70,000 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
29,263 | 58,284 | ||||||
NET
CASH (USED IN ) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
(45,839 | ) | 35,403 | |||||
CASH
PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Related
party payable
|
28,783 | - | ||||||
Bank
overdraft
|
- | (20,982 | ) | |||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED) IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
28,783 | (20,982 | ) | |||||
NET
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH
|
(17,056 | ) | 14,421 | |||||
CASH,
beginning of the period
|
31,694 | 173 | ||||||
CASH,
end of the period
|
$ | 14,638 | $ | 14,594 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
- | - |
See Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
7
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALSTATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
1. Organization
Basis for
presentation
Scores
Holding Company, Inc. (along with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) is a Utah
corporation, formed in September 1981 and is located in New York, NY. Formerly,
Internet Advisory Corporation, the Company is a licensing company that exploits
the “Scores” name and trademark for franchising and other licensing
options.
The
consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of
Scores Licensing Corp.
The
Company’s consolidated financial statements include the Company’s accounts, as
well as those of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Certain prior period
amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation. The Company’s accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnote disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial
statements. The consolidated financial statements reflect all
adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated
results of operations and financial position for the interim periods
presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements
and notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the
Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. The results of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
for any other interim period or for the year ending December 31,
2010.
Note
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Principles
Going
Concern
The
Company has incurred cumulative losses totaling $(6,178,336), a working capital
deficit of $(156,509) and a net operating loss of $(48,213) at June 30,
2010. Because of these conditions, the Company will require
additional working capital to develop business operations. The Company intends
to raise additional working capital through the continued licensing of the brand
with its current and new operators and to take on operations in larger cities
with greater demand for our product through acquisitions. There
are no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve the level of revenues
adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to support the
Company’s working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from
any future use of licensing, are insufficient, the Company will have to raise
additional working capital. No assurance can be given that additional financing
will be available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable to the
Company. If adequate working capital is not available, the
Company may not increase its operations.
8
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALSTATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating
to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount
and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be
unable to continue as a going concern.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
The
Company earned royalties and merchandise revenues from four licensees who are
unrelated to management of the Company. During the six months ended June 30,
2010, revenues earned from royalties from these unrelated licensees amounted to
$162,681 and there was $28,758 due and outstanding as of June 30,
2010. The Company’s New York affiliate commenced operations in May
2009 and revenue amounted to $75,671 during the six month 2010 period; there was
$64,418 due and outstanding as of June 30, 2010.
During
the six month 2010 and 2009 period the Company’s Baltimore licensees accounted
for 27% and 33% and the Company’s Chicago licensee accounted for 23% and 28% of
the Company’s total revenues, respectively. The Company’s New
Orleans licensee accounted for 13% and 10% of the Company’s total revenues for
the six months period ended 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
Company’s AYA, Scoreslive.com licensee website, in the development stage since
2007, has accounted for a minimal amount of the Company’s total royalty revenues
to date.
Loss Per
Share
Net loss
per share data for both the 2010 period and the 2009 period is based on net loss
available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average of the number
of common shares outstanding. Outstanding stock options are not part
of this basis as they are anti-dilutive.
The
Company follows the provisions of ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements which
defines fair values, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company’s financial
instruments include cash, licensee receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts
payable, accrued expenses and related party payable. Due to the short term
maturity of these financial instruments, the fair values were not materially
different from their carrying values.
9
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALSTATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
New
Accounting Pronouncements
All newly
issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements have been deemed to
either be irrelevant or immaterial to the operations and reporting disclosures
of the Company.
Note
3. Related-Party Transactions
Transactions
with Common ownership affiliates
On
January 27, 2009, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with its
affiliate through common ownership, I.M. Operating LLC (“IMO”), for the use of
the Scores brand name “Scores New York”. IMO is owned by Robert M.
Gans, the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and a
director. Mr. Gans also owns Mitchell’s East, LLC, the Company’s
majority shareholder. IMO paid $174,866 in administrative cost
related to accounting, business development, insurance and legal services for
the Company as of June 30, 2010. The Company also leases office space
directly from Westside Realty of New York (WSR), the owner of the West 27th Street
Building. The majority owner of WSR is Robert M.
Gans. Between January 1, and March 31, 2009, the monthly rent,
including overhead, was $5,000. As of April 1, 2009, the monthly rent
was reduced to $2,500 per month, including overhead costs. The
Company owed WSR approximately $62,500 in unpaid rent as of June 30,
2010. The combined total of related party debts amounted to $237,366
and is recorded as related party payable.
Note
4. Intangible Assets
Trademark
In
connection with the acquisition of HEIR (also known as, Scores Licensing
Company) in 2002, the Company acquired the trademark to the name “SCORES”. This
trademark had a net recorded value at June 30, 2010 of $141,476. This trademark
has been registered in the United States, Canada, Japan, Mexico and the European
Community. The trademark is being amortized by straight line method over an
estimated useful life of ten years. The Company’s trademark having an infinite
useful life by its definition is being amortized over ten years due to the
difficult New York legal environment for which the related showcase adult club
is operating. The Company recorded $63,952 and $61,152 of
amortization expense, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010 period, the Company believed that the
carrying amount of the “Scores” trademark was equal to its fair or net present
value and as a result, did not recognize any impairment loss.
10
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALSTATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
5. - Licensees
In 2003,
the Company licensed the use of the "Scores Chicago" name to Stone Park
Entertainment, Inc. for its club in Chicago, Illinois. Royalties payable to the
Company are the greater of $2,500 per week or 4.99% of the gross revenues (less
$25,000 per week) earned at that location. Chicago accounted for 23% and 28% of
the Company’s total royalty revenues during the 2010 and 2009 six month periods,
respectively. During the 2010 six month period, the Company collected
$53,911 in royalties and was owed $8,912 in unpaid royalties at the end of the
period.
In 2004,
the Company licensed the use of name "Scores Baltimore" to Club 2000 Eastern
Avenue, Inc. for its nightclub in Baltimore, Maryland. Royalties payable to the
Company are the greater of $1,000 per week or 4.99% of gross revenues. This club
accounted for 27% and 33% of our total royalty revenues during the first six
months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the 2010 six month period,
the Company collected $61,998 in royalties and was owed $11,446 in unpaid
royalties at the end of the period.
In April
2007, the Company licensed the use of the Scores brand name to Silver Bourbon,
Inc. for a night club in New Orleans, Louisiana. Royalties payable to the
Company under this license are capped at the greater of $8,000 per month or
4.99% of gross revenues. This club commenced operations in April 2007 and
accounted for 13% and 10% of the Company’s total royalty revenues during first
six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the
Company was owed $19,000 in unpaid royalties offset by a $14,000 reserve.
For the first six months of the 2010 period, the Company collected
$25,000 in royalties and was owed $5,000 net of the reserve at the end of the
period. The Company subsequently collected the $5,000
receivable.
On
January 27, 2009, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with IMO for
the use of the Scores brand name. IMO is owned by Robert M. Gans, the Company’s
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director. Mr. Gans also owns
Mitchell’s East, LLC, the Company’s majority shareholder. IMOs’
operations are located at the site of the former Scores West nightclub, 533-535
West 27th Street, New York, New York, which is also owned by Westside Realty of
New York, of which the majority owner is Robert M. Gans. Royalties
payable to the Company under this license agreement are 3% of gross
revenues. IMO acquired a liquor license, renovated the club and commenced
operations at the West 28th street location in May
2009. For the 2010 six month period, the Company collected $16,000 in
royalties and was owed $64,418 in unpaid royalties at the end of the
period.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company received a $15,000
non-refundable payment in connection with a proposed licensing agreement with a
potential licensee in Phoenix Arizona. The agreement was not
consummated.
11
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALSTATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
6. Commitments and Contingencies
On March
22, 2010, Russell Whelchel, who performed work as a hair and makeup stylist at
the Scores West nightclub located at 536 West 28th Street,
New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against the Company in the Federal District
Court for the Southern District of New York (the
“S.D.N.Y.”). The plaintiff subsequently amended the complaint
on July 30, 2010. The plaintiff is seeking to recover under federal
and New York labor laws minimum wages, unlawful deductions, misappropriated
gratuities and other wages for the period of his “employment” with Scores West
between May 2009 and February 13, 2010. Additionally, the plaintiff
is seeking pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, liquidated damages and
injunctive relief. The Company disputes that it was an employer of
the plaintiff, it contends that the plaintiff was not an “employee” but rather
an independent contractor of Scores West and it denies all allegations seeking
damages under federal and state wage and hour laws. The Company intends to
vigorously defend against all claims in the plaintiff’s
complaint. The parties are currently engaged in the exchange of
preliminary discovery.
In mid
March 2010, we were named by Nichole Hughes in a complaint filed with the
Supreme Court of the State of New York (the “SCNY”). Ms Hughes is
suing us for an unspecified amount of damages in connection with an alleged
unauthorized use of her image in our advertising materials. On June
20, 2010, we filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. We will vigorously defend
ourselves in this litigation and do not expect that the outcome will be
material.
On
January 14, 2010, the Company was named in a complaint filed with the SCNY in
connection with an alleged assault on the plaintiff by an agent of the Company’s
New York affiliated club. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss this
complaint and will vigorously defend itself in this litigation. The
Company does not expect that the outcome will be material.
.
On June
23, 2009, the Company filed a complaint with the SCNY against Silver Bourbon,
Inc., its licensee in New Orleans and operator of Scores New Orleans, for breach
of contract. At the time of the filing, Silber Bourbon, Inc. owed the
Company $70,000 in unpaid royalties. The Company settled this matter
with Silver Bourbon, Inc. and the court action has been
discontinued.
On
September 5, 2008, Ruth Fowler, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West, one
of the Company’s formerly affiliated New York clubs which is no longer in
business, filed a civil lawsuit against the Company in the
S.D.N.Y. The plaintiff is seeking to recover damages for alleged
illegal deductions taken from her salary and monies due her and for sexual
harassment under the New York City and New York State Human Rights
Laws. On May 7, 2009, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the
action against it but that motion was denied by the S.D.N.Y. with possible leave
to renew the motion at a future date after the completion of discovery
proceedings. In the meanwhile, counsel for plaintiff filed an amended
complaint on February 26, 2010 to add as additional parties to the action our
former affiliates Go West Entertainment, Inc. (“Go West”) and Entertainment
Management Services, Inc. ("EMS").
On March
1, 2010, the Company filed affirmative defenses and an amended response
asserting cross-claims for judgment against both Go West and EMS. The case has
been placed in the hands of a magistrate judge, the Company has served various
discovery demands which have been responded to by counsel for the plaintiff and
related discovery examinations are in progress. Although the outcome
of this action is uncertain, the Company believes that any outcome will not have
a material effect on it, since the plaintiff was only employed by Scores West
for less than four months.
12
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALSTATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In early
March 2008, the Company received notice that DIF&B, owner of the Las Vegas
club, would be canceling its sublicense with EMS (the former Scores Master
license holder) effective on or before May 6, 2008. We were notified that
DIF&B would be making final royalty payments to EMS totaling $60,000 at the
rate of $10,000 per week starting the first week of March 2008. The Las Vegas
club ceased operating and, as of December 31, 2008, EMS had received only one
such $10,000 payment from DIF&B. EMS commenced an action against DIF&B
and filed a complaint and affidavit of service with the SCNY, on July 23, 2008.
DIF&B was required to file an answer by August 23, 2008, but did not do so.
As a result, EMS filed an application for a default judgment and the SCNY
appointed a referee to determine damages. The referee determined that damages in
the amount of $216,000, with interest, should be paid to EMS and a default
judgment totaling $230,557 was entered by the Clerk of the SCNY. The
Company will attempt to collect on the judgment and will be entitled to all
monies so collected, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement with EMS and
333.
On
December 11, 2007, Francis Vargas, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West
located in New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us and Go West in the
SCNY, alleging violations of the New York State Human Rights Law, New York
Executive Law, New York City Human Rights Law, and the New York City
Administrative Code, based upon allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual
harassment. The lawsuit further alleges that at all material times both we and
Go West were employers of Ms. Vargas, the plaintiff. The law suit seeks
unspecified compensatory damages for plaintiff’s alleged loss of past and future
earnings and benefits, emotional distress, humiliation and loss of reputation.
We dispute that we were an employer of the plaintiff and categorically deny all
allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. We filed our
verified answer in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on February 12,
2008 to contest and defend against these accusations and we are currently
engaged in discovery. On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for
bankruptcy and the case was stayed. On July 23, 2009, the bankruptcy
petition was dismissed and, as a result, the automatic stay has been
lifted. The Company recently filed an amended response asserting
cross-claims for judgment against both Go West and EMS.
On
October 9, 2007, former Go West bartender Siri Diaz filed a purported class
action and collective action on behalf of all tipped employees against us and
other defendants alleging violations of federal and state wage/hour laws (Siri Diaz
et al. v. Scores Holding Company, Inc.; Go West Entertainment, Inc. a/k/a Scores
West Side; and Scores Entertainment, Inc., a/k/a Scores East Side, Case
No. 07 Civ. 8718 (Southern District of New York (the “Court”), Judge Richard M.
Berman)). On November 6, 2007, plaintiffs served an amended purported class
action and collective action complaint, naming dancers and servers as additional
plaintiffs and alleging the same violations of federal and state wage/hour laws.
On or about February 21, 2008, plaintiffs served a second amended complaint
adding two additional party defendants, but limiting the action to persons
employed in the New York Scores’ clubs. The amended complaint alleged that we
and the other defendants are “an integrated enterprise” and that we jointly
employ the plaintiffs, subjecting all of the defendants to liability for the
alleged wage/hour violations. On behalf of the Company and the other defendants
the Company filed a motion to dismiss that portion of the Complaint that
asserted State law class action allegations; the Company also moved to dismiss
the claims of two of the named plaintiffs for failure to appear for depositions.
At the same time plaintiffs moved for conditional certification under the
federal law for a class of the servers, bartenders and dancers; the Company
opposed that motion. On May 9, 2008, the Court issued its decision, denying the
motion to dismiss and granting conditional certification for a class of servers,
cocktail waitresses, bartenders and dancers who have worked at Scores East since
October 2004. On May 29, 2008, the Company filed an answer to
plaintiff's’ second amended complaint. On or about September 5, 2009,
plaintiffs served their third amended complaint adding in two individual
defendants who are alleged to be employers under the state and federal wage
claims. The Company disputes that it is a proper defendant in this action
and it disputes that it violated the federal and state labor laws, and further
disputes that the dancers are “employees” subject to the federal and state wage
and hour laws. The Company intends to vigorously contest the claimed liability
as well as the violations alleged.
13
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALSTATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
There are
no other material legal proceedings pending to which we or any of our property
are subject, nor to our knowledge are any such proceedings
threatened.
Note
7. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On August
5, 2010, the Company entered into a license agreement with Burhill LLC
(“Burhill”) pursuant to which Burhill will license the Scores trademarks and
create, distribute, advertise and promote programming content in all forms of
media using the Scores trademarks and conducting business under the name
“Scores.” Burhill has agreed to pay the Company a non-refundable
royalty equal to five percent (5%) of the revenues of Burhill earned in
connection with Burhill’s use of the Scores trademarks, net of actual local
sales taxes paid and including any and all licensing fees charged to third
parties for the use of the programming content owned and/or distributed by
Burhill. Burhill is wholly owned by Robert M. Gans, the President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and owner of Mitchell’s East LLC, the
Company’s majority stockholder.
On August
6, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the Scores Holding
Company, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010
Plan provides for the issuance of both non-statutory and incentive stock options
and other awards to acquire up to 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock. On August 6, 2010, the Company’s majority stockholder, Mitchell’s East
LLC, owning 53.8% of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock executed
a written consent in lieu of a meeting and approved the 2010
Plan. Robert M. Gans, the Company’s President and Chief Executive
Officer and a director, is the sole owner of Mitchell’s East
LLC.
14
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Scores
Holding Company, Inc. (‘Scores,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) was
incorporated in Utah on September 21, 1981 under the name Adonis Energy, Inc.
Since 2003, we have been in the business of licensing the “Scores” trademarks
and other intellectual property to fine gentlemen’s nightclubs with adult
entertainment in the United States. There are four such clubs
currently operating under the Scores name, in New York, Baltimore, Chicago, and
New Orleans.
On
January 27, 2009, Mitchell’s East LLC, wholly owned by Robert M. Gans, acquired
a majority interest in our outstanding capital stock. I.M. Operating
LLC (“IMO”), which is partially owned by Robert M. Gans who is also our majority
shareholder, has signed a licensing agreement with us and commenced operations
in New York of a new club (the “New York Club”) under the Scores name in May
2009. Throughout this report, we refer to the New York Club as
our affiliate, because of the common ownership by Mr. Gans. All other clubs are
referred to as non-affiliated clubs or as licensees, a term that may include the
New York Club when the context requires.
On August
6, 2010, we appointed Robert M. Gans as our President and Chief Executive
Officer and as a member of our Board. Robert Gans and Martin Gans,
one of our existing Board members, are brothers. Also on August 6,
2010, we appointed Howard Rosenbluth as our Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer.
Results
of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(“the 2010 three month period”) Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
(“the 2009 three month period”).
Revenues:
Revenues
increased to $130,901 for the 2010 three month period from $57,835 for the 2009
three month period. The increase was due to the additional revenues
of $10,997 from Chicago, $22,992 from Baltimore, $15,000 from New Orleans,
$9,077 from New York and a non-refundable fee from Arizona in the amount of
$15,000 for a potential club. At this time that club has not
commenced operations.
Revenues
from the New York Club amounted to $39,077 and $30,000 for the 2010 and 2009
three month periods, respectively. Revenues from our Chicago nightclub increased
Seventy One percent (71%) to $26,578 for the 2010 three month period from
$15,581 from the 2009 three month period, while revenues from our Baltimore club
increased One Hundred Eighty Eight percent (188%) to $35,246 for the 2010 three
month period from $12,254 for the 2009 three month period and revenues from our
New Orleans club increased One Hundred percent (100%) to $15,000 for
the 2010 three month period from $0 in the 2009 three month
period.
15
General
and Administrative Expenses:
General
and administrative expenses increased during the 2010 three month period to
$144,463 from $138,227 during the 2009 three month period. Cost
related to administrative expenses increased approximately by $6,200 from 2009
to 2010.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
provision for state income taxes relates primarily to the greater of average
assets and capital taxable income. The average assets and capital are not
impacted by net operating losses.
Net
loss:
Our net
(loss) was $(13,562) or $(0.00) per share for the 2010 three month period
compared to a net (loss) of $(110,392) or $(0.00) per share for the 2009 three
month period. The decrease in operating loss for the 2010 three month
period was a result of (i) an increase in royalty revenues of $73,066, (ii) a
small increase in operating cost and (iii) the absence of any bad debt expense
during the period.
Net loss
per share data for both the 2010 three month period and the 2009 three month
period is based on net income available to common shareholders divided by the
weighted average of the number of common shares outstanding.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (“the
2010 six month period”) Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(“the 2009 six month period”).
Revenues:
Revenues
increased to $238,352 for the 2010 six month period from $117,618 for the 2009
six month period. The increase was due to increased revenues from the
various clubs. Revenues from our New York Club amounted to $75,671
and $30,000 for the 2010 and 2009 six month periods, respectively.
Revenues
from our Chicago nightclub increased Sixty Two percent (62%) to $53,823 for the
2010 six month period from $33,364 from the 2009 six month period, while
revenues from our Baltimore club increased Sixty Three percent (63%) to $63,858
for the 2010 six month period from $39,254 for the 2009 six month period and
revenues from our New Orleans club increased One Hundred Fifty percent (150%) to
$30,000 for the 2010 six month period from $12,000 for the 2009 six month
period. The Company, as previously disclosed, has received a non refundable fee
in the amount of $15,000 for a potential royalty fee structure that has not at
this time materialized.
16
General
and Administrative Expenses:
General
and administrative expenses increased during the 2010 six month period to
$286,565 from $260,794 including bad debt expense amounting to $30,000 in the
prior six month period. Cost related to salaries, business
development, legal, web hosting and insurance increased approximately to $53,500
and cost for rent, bad debt expense and regulatory cost decreased approximately
to $37,500 during the 2010 six month period compared to the 2009 six month
period.
Provision
for Income Taxes:
The
provision for state income taxes relates primarily to the greater of average
assets and capital taxable income. The average assets and capital are not
impacted by net operating losses.
Net
loss:
Our net
(loss) was $(48,213) or $(0.00) per share for the 2010 six month period compared
to a net (loss) of $(137,176) or $(0.00) per share for the 2009 six month
period. The decrease in operating loss for the 2010 six
month period was a result of an increase in royalty revenues of $120,734 offset
by an increase in operating cost related business development salaries and web
development that amounted to $27,267 and a $3,500 reduction in non operating
cost related taxes and regulatory filings over the 2009 six month
period.
Net loss
per share data for both the 2010 six month period and the 2009 six month period
is based on net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted
average of the number of common shares outstanding.
Bad
Debt Expense
As of
June 30, 2010, our New Orleans licensees owed us $14,000 in accrued and unpaid
royalties. During the 2010 three month period, management agreed to
continue to reserve the amount owed by our New Orleans licensee. For
the 2010 three and six month periods, we recorded approximately $15,000 and
$30,000 in current royalties, respectively, of which $25,000 was
received.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash:
At June
30, 2010, we had $14,638 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $31,694 in
cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2009.
Operating
Activities:
Net cash
(used in) provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30,
2010 and June 30, 2009 was $(45,839) and $35,403 respectively. The
decreases in cash are related to increases in prepaid expenses, increases in
licensee receivables and an increase in accounts payable between the 2010 and
2009 periods.
17
Financing
Activities:
During
the 2010 and 2009 six month periods, our New York affiliate paid approximately
$28,783 and $0, respectively, in cash for web development, insurance premiums
and consulting services for the Company. As of June 30, 2010, we owed
$62,500 in rent to our Westside Realty affiliate and $174,866 to our New York
affiliate.
Future
Capital Requirements:
We have
incurred losses since the inception of our business. Since our inception, we
have been dependent on acquisitions and funding from private lenders and
investors to conduct operations. As of June 30, 2010 we had an accumulated
deficit of $(6,178,336), with total current assets of $132,211 and total current
liabilities of $288,720 or negative working capital of $(156,509). As of
December 31, 2009, we had total current assets of $58,426 and total current
liabilities of $230,674 or negative working capital of
$(172,248). Our accounts receivable and
payables increased during the 2010 six month periods; the
effect had no significant impact on our negative working capital.
We will
continue to evaluate possible acquisitions of or investments in businesses,
products and technologies that are complimentary to ours. These may require the
use of cash, which would require us to seek financing. We may sell equity or
debt securities or seek credit facilities to fund acquisition-related or other
business costs. Sales of equity or convertible debt securities would result in
additional dilution to our stockholders. We may also need to raise additional
funds in order to support more rapid expansion, develop new or enhanced services
or products, respond to competitive pressures, or take advantage of
unanticipated opportunities. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will
depend upon numerous factors, including the success of our adult entertainment
trademark licensing business.
ITEM
4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures. We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such
term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In
designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management
recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived
and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in
designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure
controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions.
18
Our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer (who serves as our principal financial and accounting officer), has
evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, and as
discussed in greater detail below, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by
this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective:
·
|
to
give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by
us in reports that we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms,
and
|
·
|
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we
file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our interim CEO and our
Treasurer, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
|
The matters involving internal
controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses
under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1)
lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent
members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors,
resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of
required internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties
consistent with control objectives; and (3) ineffective controls over period end
financial disclosure and reporting processes primarily due to limited financial
accounting staff resources. The aforementioned material weaknesses were
identified by our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer in connection with their review of our financial
statements as of June 30, 2010.
Management believes that the material
weaknesses set forth above did not have an effect on our financial results.
However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and
the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in
ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal
controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our
financial statements in future periods.
Changes in Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
19
PART
II
ITEM
1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
On March
22, 2010, Russell Whelchel, who performed work as a hair and makeup stylist at
the Scores West nightclub located at 536 West 28th Street,
New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us in the
S.D.N.Y. The plaintiff subsequently amended the complaint on
July 30, 2010. The plaintiff is seeking to recover under federal and
New York labor laws minimum wages, unlawful deductions, misappropriated
gratuities and other wages for the period of his “employment” with Scores West
between May 2009 and February 13, 2010. Additionally, the plaintiff
is seeking pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, liquidated damages and
injunctive relief. We dispute that we were an employer of the
plaintiff, we contend that the plaintiff was not an “employee” but rather an
independent contractor of Scores West and we deny all allegations seeking
damages under federal and state wage and hour laws. We intend to vigorously
defend against all claims in the plaintiff’s complaint. We are
currently engaged with the plaintiff in the exchange of preliminary
discovery.
In mid
March 2010, we were named by Nichole Hughes in a complaint filed with the
SCNY. Ms Hughes is suing us for an unspecified amount of damages in
connection with an alleged unauthorized use of her image in our advertising
materials. On June 20, 2010, we filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint. We will vigorously defend ourselves in this litigation and do not
expect that the outcome will be material.
On
January 14, 2010, we were named in a complaint filed with the SCNY in connection
with an alleged assault on the plaintiff by an agent of our New York affiliated
club. We have filed a motion to dismiss this complaint and will vigorously
defend ourselves in this litigation. We do not expect that the
outcome will be material.
On June
23, 2009, we filed a complaint with the SCNY against Silver Bourbon, Inc., our
licensee in New Orleans and operator of Scores New Orleans, for breach of
contract. At the time of the filing, Silber Bourbon, Inc. owed us
$70,000 in unpaid royalties. We have settled this matter with Silver
Bourbon, Inc. and the court action has been discontinued.
On
September 5, 2008, Ruth Fowler, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West, filed
a civil lawsuit against us in the S.D.N.Y. The plaintiff is seeking
to recover damages for alleged illegal deductions taken from her salary and
monies due her and for sexual harassment under the New York City and New York
State Human Rights Laws. On May 7, 2009, we filed a motion to dismiss
the action against us but that motion was denied by the S.D.N.Y. with possible
leave to renew the motion at a future date after the completion of discovery
proceedings. In the meanwhile, counsel for plaintiff filed an amended
complaint on February 26, 2010 to add as additional parties to the action Go
West and EMS. On March 1, 2010, we filed affirmative defenses and an
amended response asserting cross-claims for judgment against both Go West and
EMS. The case has been placed in the hands of a magistrate judge, we have served
various discovery demands which have been responded to by counsel for the
plaintiff and related discovery examinations are in
progress. Although the outcome of this action is uncertain, we
believe that any outcome will not have a material effect on us, since the
plaintiff was only employed by Scores West for less than four
months.
20
In early
March 2008, we received notice that DIF&B, owner of the Las Vegas club,
would be canceling its sublicense with EMS effective on or before May 6, 2008.
We were notified that DIF&B would be making final royalty payments to EMS
totaling $60,000 at the rate of $10,000 per week starting the first week of
March 2008. The Las Vegas club ceased operating and, as of December 31, 2008,
EMS had received only one such $10,000 payment from DIF&B. EMS commenced an
action against DIF&B and filed a complaint and affidavit of service with the
SCNY, on July 23, 2008. DIF&B was required to file an answer by August 23,
2008, but did not do so. As a result, EMS filed an application for a default
judgment and the SCNY appointed a referee to determine damages. The referee
determined that damages in the amount of $216,000, with interest, should be paid
to EMS and a default judgment totaling $230,557 was entered by the Clerk of the
SCNY. We will attempt to collect on this judgment. We will
be entitled to all monies so collected, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement
with EMS and 333.
On
December 11, 2007, Francis Vargas, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West
located in New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us and Go West in the
SCNY, alleging violations of the New York State Human Rights Law, New York
Executive Law, New York City Human Rights Law, and the New York City
Administrative Code, based upon allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual
harassment. The lawsuit further alleges that at all material times both we and
Go West were employers of Ms. Vargas, the plaintiff. The law suit seeks
unspecified compensatory damages for plaintiff’s alleged loss of past and future
earnings and benefits, emotional distress, humiliation and loss of reputation.
We dispute that we were an employer of the plaintiff and categorically deny all
allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. We filed our
verified answer in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on February 12,
2008 to contest and defend against these accusations and we are currently
engaged in discovery. On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for
bankruptcy and the case was stayed. On July 23, 2009, the bankruptcy
petition was dismissed and, as a result, the automatic stay has been
lifted. We recently filed an amended response asserting cross-claims
for judgment against both Go West and EMS.
On
October 9, 2007, former Go West bartender Siri Diaz filed a purported class
action and collective action on behalf of all tipped employees against us and
other defendants alleging violations of federal and state wage/hour laws (Siri Diaz
et al. v. Scores Holding Company, Inc.; Go West Entertainment, Inc. a/k/a Scores
West Side; and Scores Entertainment, Inc., a/k/a Scores East Side, Case
No. 07 Civ. 8718 (Southern District of New York (the “Court”), Judge Richard M.
Berman)). On November 6, 2007, plaintiffs served an amended purported class
action and collective action complaint, naming dancers and servers as additional
plaintiffs and alleging the same violations of federal and state wage/hour laws.
On or about February 21, 2008, plaintiffs served a second amended complaint
adding two additional party defendants, but limiting the action to persons
employed in the New York Scores’ clubs. The amended complaint alleged that we
and the other defendants are “an integrated enterprise” and that we jointly
employ the plaintiffs, subjecting all of the defendants to liability for the
alleged wage/hour violations. On behalf of ourselves and the other
defendants we filed a motion to dismiss that portion of the Complaint that
asserted State law class action allegations; we also moved to dismiss the claims
of two of the named plaintiffs for failure to appear for depositions. At the
same time plaintiffs moved for conditional certification under the federal law
for a class of the servers, bartenders and dancers; we opposed that motion. On
May 9, 2008, the Court issued its decision, denying the motion to dismiss and
granting conditional certification for a class of servers, cocktail waitresses,
bartenders and dancers who have worked at Scores East since October
2004. On May 29, 2008, we filed an answer to plaintiff's’ second
amended complaint. On or about September 5, 2009, plaintiffs served
their third amended complaint adding in two individual defendants who are
alleged to be employers under the state and federal wage claims. We
dispute that we are a proper defendant in this action and we dispute that
we violated the federal and state labor laws, and further dispute that the
dancers are “employees” subject to the federal and state wage and hour laws. We
intend to vigorously contest the claimed liability as well as the violations
alleged.
21
On March
30, 2007, we, along with several of our affiliates, were named in a suit in
connection with an alleged assault by an employee of an affiliate and one of our
stockholders and former officer and director. We have answered a third amended
complaint and participated in a Preliminary Conference to establish the
discovery schedule. Examinations before trial of the parties have been completed
and non-party depositions are now being taken. The plaintiff has not yet
undergone the required physical examination. We will vigorously defend ourselves
in this litigation and do not expect that the outcome will be
material.
On March
31, 2006, Richard K. Goldring, our former president, chief executive officer and
principal shareholder pled guilty to one count of offering a False Instrument
for Filing in the First Degree pursuant to a plea agreement with the District
Attorney of the County of New York (the "DA"). In the event that within one year
of the date of the entry of the guilty plea, Mr. Goldring resigns from all
"control management positions" that he holds in publicly traded companies,
including ours, and divests himself of all "control ownership positions" in
publicly traded companies, including ours, and satisfies certain other
conditions, the DA will recommend a sentence of probation. In this context, a
“control management position” is a role, official or unofficial, by which he
substantially directs the decisions of a company, and a “control ownership
position” is a position in which he controls, directly or indirectly more than
9% of the voting stock or other securities of a company, or stock or securities
that have the capability of being converted into voting stock or other
securities of a company. The plea agreement resolved the DA's investigation
against Mr. Goldring and us. No charges were brought against us.
To comply
with the plea agreement between Richard Goldring and the District Attorney of
the County of New York, on September 4, 2008, Mr. Goldring transferred his
76,080,958 shares of our common stock (the “Goldring Shares”) to Ira Altchek as
trustee (the “Trustee”). According to the terms of the Voting Trust Agreement by
and between Mr. Goldring and the Trustee dated September 4, 2008, the Trustee
had the right to exercise all rights and powers of a shareholder of the Company
with respect to the Goldring Shares, including, without limitation, the sole and
exclusive right to vote the Goldring Shares, while Mr. Goldring maintained the
right to sell the Goldring Shares at any time. The Goldring Shares represented
approximately forty six percent (46%) of the outstanding capital stock of the
Company as of the December 31, 2008. On January 27, 2009, Mr.
Goldring sold all of the Goldring Shares in a private transaction with Buyer, as
further discussed above.
22
There are
no other material legal proceedings pending to which we or any of our property
are subject, nor to our knowledge are any such proceedings
threatened.
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
(a)
|
Exhibits.
|
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant
to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant
to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), adopted pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002*
|
* This
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC
for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except
to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference.
23
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SCORES
HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
|
||
Dated: August
23, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/Robert M. Gans
|
Robert
M. Gans
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
By:
|
/s/Howard Rosenbluth
|
|
Howard
Rosenbluth
|
||
Principal
Financial
Officer
|
24