SECURITY FEDERAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10 – Q
(Mark one)
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
(_) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD:
FROM:
|
TO:
|
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-16120
SECURITY FEDERAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
South Carolina
|
57-0858504
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
|
238 RICHLAND AVENUE WEST, AIKEN, SOUTH CAROLINA
|
29801
|
(Address of Principal Executive Office)
|
(Zip code)
|
(803) 641-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES
|
X
|
NO
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filed | [ ] | Accelerated filer | [ ] |
Non-accelerated filer | [ ] | Smaller reporting company | [X] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
|
NO
|
X
|
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.
CLASS:
|
OUTSTANDING SHARES AT:
|
SHARES:
|
|||
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
August 12, 2011
|
2,944,001 |
INDEX
PART I.
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
|
PAGE NO.
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements (Unaudited):
|
||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011
|
1
|
||
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
2
|
||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income at June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
3
|
||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
4
|
||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
||
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
24
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
35
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
35
|
|
PART II.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
36
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
36
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
36
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
36
|
|
Item 4.
|
[Removed and Reserved]
|
36
|
|
Item 5
|
Other Information
|
36
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
37
|
|
Signatures
|
39
|
||
SCHEDULES OMITTED
All schedules other than those indicated above are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the information is included in the consolidated financial statements and related notes.
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2011
|
March 31, 2011
|
|||||||
Assets:
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
||||||
Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
$ | 9,704,508 | $ | 7,835,638 | ||||
Certificates Of Deposits With Other Banks
|
100,872 | 100,432 | ||||||
Investment And Mortgage-Backed Securities:
|
||||||||
Available For Sale: (Amortized cost of $329,681,078 at June 30, 2011 and $333,387,779
at March 31, 2011)
|
339,910,502 | 339,252,790 | ||||||
Held To Maturity: (Fair value of $43,815,708 at June 30, 2011 and $34,122,925 at
March 31, 2011)
|
42,454,290 | 33,165,125 | ||||||
Total Investment And Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
382,364,792 | 372,417,915 | ||||||
Loans Receivable, Net:
|
||||||||
Held For Sale
|
4,052,268 | 5,166,234 | ||||||
Held For Investment: (Net of allowance of $13,502,573 at June 30, 2011 and $12,501,800
at March 31, 2011)
|
463,762,373 | 479,304,382 | ||||||
Total Loans Receivable, Net
|
467,814,641 | 484,470,616 | ||||||
Accrued Interest Receivable:
|
||||||||
Loans
|
1,624,280 | 1,742,281 | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
942,086 | 944,667 | ||||||
Investments
|
1,108,644 | 889,297 | ||||||
Premises And Equipment, Net
|
19,459,222 | 19,800,616 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock (“FHLB”), At Cost
|
10,054,200 | 11,267,485 | ||||||
Bank Owned Life Insurance
|
10,521,305 | 10,416,305 | ||||||
Repossessed Assets Acquired In Settlement Of Loans
|
13,653,896 | 14,433,853 | ||||||
Intangible Assets, Net
|
136,980 | 159,500 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
1,199,754 | 1,199,754 | ||||||
Prepaid Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) Premium
|
2,538,541 | 2,815,328 | ||||||
Other Assets
|
3,849,476 | 5,050,362 | ||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 925,073,197 | $ | 933,544,049 | ||||
Liabilities And Shareholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Deposit Accounts
|
$ | 684,192,963 | $ | 690,357,114 | ||||
Advances From FHLB
|
133,382,235 | 138,136,338 | ||||||
Other Borrowed Money
|
10,714,798 | 11,195,474 | ||||||
Advance Payments By Borrowers For Taxes And Insurance
|
510,224 | 381,488 | ||||||
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instrument
|
- | 1,467,312 | ||||||
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
5,155,000 | 5,155,000 | ||||||
Senior Convertible Debentures
|
6,084,000 | 6,084,000 | ||||||
Other Liabilities
|
4,773,151 | 4,755,118 | ||||||
Total Liabilities
|
$ | 844,812,371 | $ | 857,531,844 | ||||
Shareholders' Equity:
|
||||||||
Serial Preferred Stock, $.01 Par Value; Authorized Shares 200,000; Issued And
Outstanding Shares, 22,000 At June 30, 2011 And At March 31, 2011
|
$ | 22,000,000 | $ | 22,000,000 | ||||
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value; Authorized Shares – 5,000,000; Issued -
3,144,934 And Outstanding Shares – 2,944,001 At June 30, 2011 And
3,144,934 And 2,944,001 At March 31, 2011
|
31,449 | 30,884 | ||||||
Warrant Issued In Conjunction With Serial Preferred Stock
|
400,000 | 400,000 | ||||||
Additional Paid-In Capital
|
11,593,122 | 10,176,375 | ||||||
Treasury Stock, (At Cost, 200,933 Shares At June 30, 2011 And March 31,
2011, Respectively)
|
(4,330,712 | ) | (4,330,712 | ) | ||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
6,345,176 | 3,637,675 | ||||||
Retained Earnings, Substantially Restricted
|
44,221,791 | 44,097,983 | ||||||
Total Shareholders' Equity
|
$ | 80,260,826 | $ | 76,012,205 | ||||
Total Liabilities And Shareholders' Equity
|
$ | 925,073,197 | $ | 933,544,049 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||
Interest Income:
|
||||
Loans
|
$
|
7,340,697
|
$
|
8,368,838
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
2,117,531
|
2,300,418
|
||
Investment Securities
|
771,454
|
681,245
|
||
Other
|
469
|
174
|
||
Total Interest Income
|
10,230,151
|
11,350,675
|
||
Interest Expense:
|
||||
NOW And Money Market Accounts
|
446,880
|
578,185
|
||
Statement Savings Accounts
|
12,674
|
17,507
|
||
Certificate Accounts
|
1,440,603
|
2,088,953
|
||
Advances And Other Borrowed Money
|
1,269,056
|
1,562,443
|
||
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
57,847
|
57,897
|
||
Senior Convertible Debentures
|
121,680
|
121,680
|
||
Total Interest Expense
|
3,348,740
|
4,426,665
|
||
Net Interest Income
|
6,881,411
|
6,924,010
|
||
Provision For Loan Losses
|
2,300,000
|
1,900,000
|
||
Net Interest Income After Provision For Loan Losses
|
4,581,411
|
5,024,010
|
||
Non-Interest Income:
|
||||
Gain On Sale Of Investments
|
171,224
|
199,511
|
||
Gain On Sale Of Loans
|
107,270
|
268,677
|
||
Service Fees On Deposit Accounts
|
270,693
|
293,885
|
||
Income From Cash Value Of Life Insurance
|
105,000
|
95,000
|
||
Commissions On Insurance
|
92,102
|
90,827
|
||
Trust Income
|
114,000
|
109,500
|
||
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instrument Valuation
|
50,000
|
(40,000)
|
||
Check Card Fee Income
|
202,392
|
165,865
|
||
Other
|
158,613
|
208,777
|
||
Total Non-Interest Income
|
1,271,294
|
1,392,042
|
||
General And Administrative Expenses:
|
||||
Salaries And Employee Benefits
|
2,842,978
|
3,006,484
|
||
Occupancy
|
478,752
|
514,192
|
||
Advertising
|
85,680
|
120,794
|
||
Depreciation And Maintenance Of Equipment
|
412,625
|
456,035
|
||
FDIC Insurance Premiums
|
292,205
|
312,048
|
||
Amortization of Intangibles
|
22,520
|
22,500
|
||
Net cost of operation of other real estate owned
|
36,610
|
174,071
|
||
Other
|
989,154
|
946,604
|
||
Total General And Administrative Expenses
|
5,160,524
|
5,552,728
|
||
Income Before Income Taxes
|
692,181
|
863,324
|
||
Provision For Income Taxes
|
231,134
|
322,745
|
||
Net Income
|
461,047
|
540,579
|
||
Preferred Stock Dividends
|
110,000
|
225,000
|
||
Accretion Of Preferred Stock To Redemption Value
|
-
|
18,816
|
||
Net Income Available To Common Shareholders
|
$
|
351,047
|
$
|
296,763
|
Basic Net Income Per Common Share
|
$
|
0.12
|
$
|
0.12
|
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share
|
$
|
0.12
|
$
|
0.12
|
Cash Dividend Per Share On Common Stock
|
$
|
0.08
|
$
|
0.08
|
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
2,944,001
|
2,461,095
|
||
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
2,944,001
|
2,559,475
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
Preferred
Stock
|
Warrants
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid – In
Capital
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
Retained Earnings
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance At March 31, 2010
|
$ | 17,692,609 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 26,055 | $ | 5,352,144 | $ | (4,330,712 | ) | $ | 4,608,080 | $ | 44,112,443 | $ | 67,860,619 | |||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 540,579 | 540,579 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income,
Net Of Tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized Holding Gains
On Securities Available
For Sale, Net Of Taxes
|
- | - | - | - | - | 1,579,337 | - | 1,579,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification Adjustment
For Gains Included In Net
Income, Net Of Taxes
|
- | - | - | - | - | (123,697 | ) | - | (123,697 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,996,219 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion Of Preferred Stock To
Redemption Value
|
18,816 | - | - | - | - | - | (18,816 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Compensation Expense
|
- | - | - | 8,281 | - | - | - | 8,281 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Dividends On Preferred
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (225,000 | ) | (225,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Dividends On Common
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (196,888 | ) | (196,888 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance At June 30, 2010
|
$ | 17,711,425 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 26,055 | $ | 5,360,425 | $ | (4,330,712 | ) | $ | 6,063,720 | $ | 44,212,318 | $ | 69,443,231 |
Preferred
Stock
|
Warrants
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid – In
Capital
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
Retained Earnings
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance At March 31, 2011
|
$ | 22,000,000 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 30,884 | $ | 10,176,375 | $ | (4,330,712 | ) | $ | 3,637,675 | $ | 44,097,983 | $ | 76,012,205 | |||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 461,047 | 461,047 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income,
Net Of Tax:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized Holding Gains
On Securities Available
For Sale, Net Of Taxes
|
- | - | - | - | - | 2,813,659 | - | 2,813,659 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification Adjustment
For Gains Included In Net
Income, Net Of Taxes
|
- | - | - | - | - | (106,158 | ) | - | (106,158 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3,168,548 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption Of Mandatorily
Redeemable Financial
Instrument
|
- | - | 565 | 1,416,747 | - | - | - | 1,417,312 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Compensation Expense
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 8,281 | 8,281 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Dividends On Preferred
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (110,000 | ) | (110,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Dividends On Common
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (235,520 | ) | (235,520 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance At June 30, 2011
|
$ | 22,000,000 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 31,449 | $ | 11,593,122 | $ | (4,330,712 | ) | $ | 6,345,176 | $ | 44,221,791 | $ | 80,260,826 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net Income
|
$ | 461,047 | $ | 540,579 | ||||
Adjustments To Reconcile Net Income To Net Cash Provided (Used) By
Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation And Amortization Expense
|
368,806 | 395,646 | ||||||
Amortization Of Intangible Assets
|
22,520 | 22,500 | ||||||
Stock Option Compensation Expense
|
8,281 | 8,281 | ||||||
Discount Accretion And Premium Amortization
|
1,065,030 | 617,026 | ||||||
Provisions For Losses On Loans And Real Estate
|
2,300,000 | 1,900,000 | ||||||
Gain On Sale of Investments Available For Sale
|
(102,865 | ) | (64,593 | ) | ||||
Gain On Sale of Mortgage-Backed Securities Available For Sale
|
(68,359 | ) | (134,918 | ) | ||||
Gain On Sale Of Loans
|
(107,270 | ) | (268,677 | ) | ||||
Loss (Gain) On Sale Of Real Estate
|
(62,222 | ) | 53,745 | |||||
Amortization Of Deferred Fees On Loans
|
(6,406 | ) | (28,582 | ) | ||||
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instrument Valuation
|
(50,000 | ) | 40,000 | |||||
Income From Bank Owned Life Insurance
|
(105,000 | ) | (95,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds From Sale Of Loans Held For Sale
|
11,132,175 | 20,685,452 | ||||||
Origination Of Loans For Sale
|
(9,910,939 | ) | (26,730,557 | ) | ||||
(Increase) Decrease In Accrued Interest Receivable:
|
||||||||
Loans
|
118,001 | (85,238 | ) | |||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
2,581 | 27,559 | ||||||
Investments
|
(219,347 | ) | (102,280 | ) | ||||
Increase In Advance Payments By Borrowers
|
128,736 | 147,726 | ||||||
Other, Net
|
(161,204 | ) | (628,745 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided (Used) By Operating Activities
|
4,813,565 | (3,700,076 | ) | |||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
Principal Repayments On Mortgage-Backed Securities Available For Sale
|
11,555,205 | 15,994,983 | ||||||
Principal Repayments On Mortgage-Backed Securities Held To Maturity
|
375,243 | 1,260,067 | ||||||
Purchase Of Investment Securities Available For Sale
|
(11,597,706 | ) | (20,823,676 | ) | ||||
Purchase Of Mortgage-Backed Securities Available For Sale
|
(8,913,028 | ) | (21,271,011 | ) | ||||
Purchase Of Investment Securities Held To Maturity
|
(1,990,350 | ) | - | |||||
Purchase Of Mortgage-Backed Securities Held To Maturiy
|
(8,704,676 | ) | - | |||||
Maturities Of Investment Securities Available For Sale
|
3,547,649 | 5,551,684 | ||||||
Maturities of Investment Securities Held To Maturity
|
1,000,000 | - | ||||||
Proceeds From Sale of Investment Securities Available For Sale
|
4,658,750 | 4,273,540 | ||||||
Proceeds From Sale of Mortgage-Backed Securities Available For Sale
|
3,592,201 | 8,838,798 | ||||||
Purchase Of FHLB Stock
|
(34,343 | ) | - | |||||
Redemption Of FHLB Stock
|
1,247,628 | - | ||||||
Decrease In Loans To Customers
|
11,350,642 | 3,698,101 | ||||||
Proceeds From Sale Of Repossessed Assets
|
2,739,952 | 3,203,745 | ||||||
Purchase And Improvement Of Premises And Equipment
|
(27,412 | ) | (441,108 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities
|
8,799,755 | 285,123 | ||||||
(Continued)
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)- Continued
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Increase (Decrease) In Deposit Accounts
|
$ | (6,164,151 | ) | $ | 10,853,630 | |||
Proceeds From FHLB Advances
|
34,400,000 | 46,150,000 | ||||||
Repayment Of FHLB Advances
|
(39,154,103 | ) | (53,309,022 | ) | ||||
Net Proceeds (Repayments) Of Other Borrowings
|
(480,676 | ) | 192,812 | |||||
Dividends To Preferred Shareholders
|
(110,000 | ) | (225,000 | ) | ||||
Dividends To Common Shareholders
|
(235,520 | ) | (196,888 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided (Used) By Financing Activities
|
(11,744,450 | ) | 3,465,532 | |||||
Increase In Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
1,868,870 | 50,579 | ||||||
Cash And Cash Equivalents At Beginning Of Period
|
7,835,638 | 8,804,645 | ||||||
Cash And Cash Equivalents At End Of Period
|
$ | 9,704,508 | $ | 8,855,224 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure Of Cash Flows Information:
|
||||||||
Cash Paid During The Period For Interest
|
$ | 3,476,818 | $ | 4,347,280 | ||||
Cash Paid During The Period For Income Taxes
|
$ | 456,321 | $ | 15,432 | ||||
Additions To Repossessed Acquired Through Foreclosure
|
$ | 1,897,773 | $ | 3,206,049 | ||||
Change In Unrealized Gain or Loss On Securities Available For Sale,
Net Of Taxes
|
$ | 2,707,501 | $ | 1,455,640 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1.
|
Basis of Presentation
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore, they do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Such statements are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of results for the selected interim periods. Users of financial information produced for interim periods are encouraged to refer to the footnotes contained in the audited financial statements appearing in Security Federal Corporation’s 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders which was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 (“2011 10-K”) when reviewing interim financial statements. The results of operations for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year.
2.
|
Principles of Consolidation
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Security Federal Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Security Federal Bank (the “Bank”) and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Security Federal Insurance, Inc. (“SFINS”) and Security Financial Services Corporation (“SFSC”). SFINS was formed during fiscal 2002 and began operating during the December 2001 quarter and is an insurance agency offering auto, business, health, and home insurance. SFINS has a wholly owned subsidiary, Collier Jennings Financial Corporation which has as subsidiaries Collier Jennings Inc., The Auto Insurance Store Inc., and Security Federal Premium Pay Plans Inc. (the “Collier Jennings Companies”). Security Federal Premium Pay Plans Inc. has one wholly owned premium finance subsidiary and also has an ownership interest in four other premium finance subsidiaries.
SFSC was formed in 1975 and was inactive for several years. During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, it was reactivated and utilized to hold and operate a repossessed hotel located in Hardeeville, South Carolina.
The Company has a wholly owned subsidiary, Security Federal Statutory Trust (the “Trust”), which issued and sold fixed and floating rate capital securities of the Trust. However, under current accounting guidance, the Trust is not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements. The Bank is primarily engaged in the business of accepting savings and demand deposits and originating mortgage loans and other loans to individuals and small businesses for various personal and commercial purposes.
3. Critical Accounting Policies
The Company has adopted various accounting policies, which govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the footnotes to the audited consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2011 included in our 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.. We consider these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions we make, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates which could have a material impact on our carrying values of assets and liabilities and our results of operations.
The Company believes the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The impact of a sudden large loss could deplete the allowance and potentially require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings. The Company provides for loan losses using the allowance method. Accordingly, all loan losses are charged to the related allowance and all recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Additions to the allowance for loan losses are provided by charges to operations based on various factors, which, in management’s judgment, deserve current recognition in estimating possible losses. Such factors considered by management include the fair value of the underlying collateral, stated guarantees by the borrower (if applicable), the borrower’s ability to repay from other economic resources, growth and composition of the loan portfolio, the relationship of the allowance for loan losses to the outstanding loans, loss experience, delinquency trends, and general economic conditions. Management evaluates the carrying value of the loans periodically and the allowance is adjusted accordingly.
6
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
3.
|
Critical Accounting Policies, Continued
|
While management uses the best information available to make evaluations, future adjustments may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making these evaluations. The allowance for loan losses is subject to periodic evaluations by various authorities and may be subject to adjustments based upon the information that is available at the time of their examination. For additional information see Item 1A-Risk Factors: “Our provision for loan losses have remained at elevated levels and we may be required to make further increases in our provision for loan losses and to charge-off additional loans in the future, which could adversely affect our results of operations,” in our 2011 Form 10-K. The Company values impaired loans at the loan’s fair value if it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the terms of the loan agreement at the present value of expected cash flows, the market price of the loan, if available, or the value of the underlying collateral. Expected cash flows are required to be discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. When the ultimate collectibility of an impaired loan’s principal is in doubt, wholly or partially, all cash receipts are applied to principal. When this doubt does not exist, cash receipts are applied under the contractual terms of the loan agreement first to interest and then to principal. Once the recorded principal balance has been reduced to zero, future cash receipts are applied to interest income to the extent that any interest has been foregone. Further cash receipts are recorded as recoveries of any amounts previously charged off.
The Company uses assumptions and estimates in determining income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, deferred income tax liabilities and assets for events recognized differently in its financial statements and income tax returns, and income tax expense. Determining these amounts requires analysis of certain transactions and interpretation of tax laws and regulations. The Company exercises considerable judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments and estimates are reevaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. No assurance can be given that either the tax returns submitted by us or the income tax reported on the Consolidated Financial Statements will not be adjusted by either adverse rulings by the United States Tax Court, changes in the tax code, or assessments made by the Internal Revenue Service.
4.
|
Earnings Per Common Share
|
Accounting guidance specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share (“EPS”) for entities with publicly held common stock or potential common stock such as options, warrants, convertible securities or contingent stock agreements if those securities trade in a public market. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive common shares had been issued. The dilutive effect of options outstanding under the Company’s stock option plan is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. The reverse treasury stock method was used to determine the dilutive effect of the mandatorily redeemable shares outstanding, which were issued by the Company in conjunction with the acquisition of the Collier-Jennings Companies.
Net income available to common shareholders represents consolidated net income adjusted for preferred dividends declared, accretions of discounts and amortization of premiums on preferred stock issuances and cumulative dividends related to the current dividend period that have not been declared as of period end. The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to net income available to common shareholders for the periods presented:
For the Quarter Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Earnings Available to Common Shareholders:
|
||||||||
Net Income
|
$ | 461,047 | $ | 540,579 | ||||
Preferred Stock Dividends
|
110,000 | 225,000 | ||||||
Deemed Dividends On Preferred Stock From Net
Accretion of Preferred Stock
|
- | 18,816 | ||||||
Net Income Available To Common Shareholders
|
$ | 351,047 | $ | 296,763 |
7
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
4. Earnings Per Common Share, Continued
The following table shows the effect of dilutive options and warrants on the Company’s earnings per common share for the periods indicated:
For the Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||
Income (Numerator) Amount
|
Shares
(Denominator)
|
Per Share
|
||||||||||
Basic EPS
|
$ | 351,047 | 2,944,001 | $ | 0.12 | |||||||
Effect of Diluted Securities:
|
||||||||||||
Stock Options & Warrants
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Diluted EPS
|
$ | 351,047 | 2,944,001 | $ | 0.12 |
For the Quarter Ended
|
||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||
Income (Numerator) Amount
|
Shares
(Denominator)
|
Per Share
|
||||||||||
Basic EPS
|
$ | 296,763 | 2,461,095 | $ | 0.12 | |||||||
Effect of Diluted Securities:
|
||||||||||||
Stock Options & Warrants
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Mandatorily Redeemable
Shares
|
- | 98,380 | - | |||||||||
Diluted EPS
|
$ | 296,763 | 2,559,475 | $ | 0.12 |
5. Stock-Based Compensation
Certain officers and directors of the Company participate in an incentive and non-qualified stock option plan. Options are granted at exercise prices not less than the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. The following is a summary of the activity under the Company’s stock option plans for the periods presented:
For the Quarter Ended
|
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||
Balance, Beginning of Period
|
81,400 | $ | 22.51 | 90,900 | $ | 22.57 | ||||||||||
Options granted
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Options exercised
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Options forfeited
|
7,000 | 21.72 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Balance, End of Period
|
74,400 | $ | 22.59 | 90,900 | $ | 22.57 | ||||||||||
Options Exercisable
|
49,900 | $ | 21.91 | 50,400 | $ | 21.93 | ||||||||||
Options Available For Grant
|
50,000 | 50,000 |
8
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
5. Stock-Based Compensation, Continued
At June 30, 2011, the Company had the following options outstanding:
Grant Date
|
Outstanding Options
|
Option Price
|
Expiration Date
|
||||
09/01/03
|
2,400 | $24.00 |
08/31/13
|
||||
12/01/03
|
3,000 | $23.65 |
11/30/13
|
||||
01/01/04
|
5,000 | $24.22 |
12/31/13
|
||||
03/08/04
|
7,000 | $21.43 |
03/08/14
|
||||
06/07/04
|
2,000 | $24.00 |
06/07/14
|
||||
01/01/05
|
20,500 | $20.55 |
12/31/14
|
||||
01/01/06
|
4,000 | $23.91 |
01/01/16
|
||||
08/24/06
|
5,000 | $23.03 |
08/24/16
|
||||
05/24/07
|
2,000 | $24.34 |
05/24/17
|
||||
07/09/07
|
1,000 | $24.61 |
07/09/17
|
||||
10/01/07
|
2,000 | $24.28 |
10/01/17
|
||||
01/01/08
|
16,000 | $23.49 |
01/01/18
|
||||
05/19/08
|
2,500 | $22.91 |
05/19/18
|
||||
07/01/08
|
2,000 | $22.91 |
07/01/18
|
None of the options outstanding at June 30, 2011 or 2010 had an exercise price below the average market price during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 or 2010, respectively. Therefore these options were not deemed to be dilutive to earnings per share in those periods.
6. Stock Warrants
In conjunction with its participation in the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program, the Company sold a warrant to the U.S. Treasury to purchase 137,966 shares of the Company’s common stock at $19.57 per share. The warrant has a 10-year term and was immediately exercisable upon issuance. At June 30, 2011 and 2010, the warrant was not deemed to be dilutive. There were no changes in the Company’s stock warrants during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
7. Carrying Amounts and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Effective April 1, 2008, the Company adopted accounting guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. This guidance applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances.
Accounting guidance emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
9
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
7. Carrying Amounts and Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Continued
Level 1
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as U.S. Treasuries and money market funds.
|
Level 2
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments, mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds, corporate debt securities and derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain derivative contracts and impaired loans.
|
Level 3
|
Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
|
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.
Investment Securities Available for Sale
Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. At June 30, 2011, the Company’s investment portfolio was comprised of government and agency bonds, mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies or government sponsored enterprises, municipal securities and one equity investment. The portfolio did not contain any private label mortgage-backed securities. Fair value measurement is based upon prices obtained from third party pricing services who use independent pricing models which rely on a variety of factors including reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, benchmark yields, economic and industry events and other relevant market information. As such, these securities are classified as Level 2.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
The Company originates fixed rate residential loans on a servicing released basis in the secondary market. Loans closed but not yet settled with Freddie Mac or other investors, are carried in the Company’s loans held for sale portfolio. These loans are fixed rate residential loans that have been originated in the Company’s name and have closed. Virtually all of these loans have commitments to be purchased by investors and the majority of these loans were locked in by price with the investors on the same day or shortly thereafter that the loan was locked in with the Company’s customers.
Therefore, these loans present very little market risk for the Company. The Company usually delivers to, and receives funding from, the investor within 30 days. Commitments to sell these loans to the investor are considered derivative contracts and are sold to investors on a “best efforts" basis. The Company is not obligated to deliver a loan or pay a penalty if a loan is not delivered to the investor. As a result of the short-term nature of these derivative contracts, the fair value of the mortgage loans held for sale in most cases is the same as the value of the loan amount at its origination. These loans are classified as Level 2.
Impaired Loans
The Company does not record loans held for investment at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established as necessary. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired management measures impairment.
10
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
7. Carrying Amounts and Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Continued
Fair value is estimated using one of the following methods: fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell, discounted cash flows, or market value of the loan based on similar debt. The fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell is the most frequently used method. Typically, the Company reviews the most recent appraisal and if it is over 24 months old will request a new third party appraisal. Depending on the particular circumstances surrounding the loan, including the location of the collateral, the date of the most recent appraisal and the value of the collateral relative to the recorded investment in the loan, management may order an independent appraisal immediately or, in some instances, may elect to perform an internal analysis. Specifically as an example, in situations where the collateral on a nonperforming commercial real estate loan is out of the Company’s primary market area, management would typically order an independent appraisal immediately, at the earlier of the date the loan becomes nonperforming or immediately following the determination that the loan is impaired. However, as a second example, on a nonperforming commercial real estate loan where management is familiar with the property and surrounding areas and where the original appraisal value far exceeds the recorded investment in the loan, management may perform an internal analysis whereby the previous appraisal value would be reviewed and adjusted for current conditions including recent sales of similar properties in the area and any other relevant economic trends. These valuations are reviewed at a minimum on a quarterly basis.
Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At June 30, 2011, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. The Company records impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3.
As of June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the recorded investment in impaired loans was $32.5 million and $33.3 million, respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $32.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and $37.2 million for the year ended March 31, 2011.
Foreclosed Assets
Foreclosed assets are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 2.
When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the asset as nonrecurring Level 3.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and identified intangible assets are subject to impairment testing. The Company’s approach to testing for impairment is to compare the business unit’s carrying value to the implied fair value based on a multiple of revenue approach. Impairment testing is performed annually as of September 30th or when events or circumstances occur indicating that goodwill of the reporting unit might be impaired. In the event the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model. As such, goodwill and other intangible assets subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments are classified as Level 3.
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instrument
The fair value is determined, in accordance with the underlying agreement at the instrument’s redemption value, as the number of shares issuable pursuant to the agreement at a price per share determined as the greater of a) $26 per share or b) 1.5 times the book value per share of the Company. This instrument is classified as Level 2. The mandatorily redeemable financial instrument was redeemed during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
11
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
7. Carrying Amounts and Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Continued
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows as of June 30, 2011:
Assets:
|
Quoted Market
Price In Active
Markets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||
FHLB Securities
|
$ | - | $ | 14,284,512 | $ | - | ||||||
Federal Farm Credit Securities
|
- | 2,028,270 | - | |||||||||
Federal National Mortgage
Association (“FNMA”) and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (“FHLMC”) Bonds
|
- | 10,967,660 | - | |||||||||
Small Business Administration
(“SBA”) Bonds
|
- | 68,040,829 | - | |||||||||
Tax Exempt Municipal Securities
|
- | 8,442,124 | - | |||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
- | 236,072,857 | - | |||||||||
Equity Securities
|
- | 74,250 | - | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | 339,910,502 | $ | - |
There were no liabilites measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows as of March 31, 2011:
Assets:
|
Quoted Market
Price In Active
Markets
(Level 1)
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||
FHLB Securities
|
$ | - | $ | 14,209,332 | $ | - | ||||||
Federal Farm Credit Securities
|
- | 2,006,600 | - | |||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC Bonds
|
- | 11,660,990 | - | |||||||||
SBA Bonds
|
- | 64,709,832 | - | |||||||||
Taxable Municipal Securities
|
- | 4,471,650 | - | |||||||||
Tax Exempt Municipal Securities
|
- | 2,034,943 | - | |||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
- | 240,080,693 | - | |||||||||
Equity Securities
|
- | 78,750 | - | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | 339,252,790 | $ | - | ||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial
Instrument
|
$ | - | $ | 1,467,312 | $ | - | ||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | 1,467,312 | $ | - |
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. The tables below present assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall. Other intangible assets are measured on a non-recurring basis at least annually. Specifically, the valuation of goodwill is performed each year at September 30.
Assets:
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Balance At
June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,199,754 | $ | 1,199,754 | ||||||||
Mortgage Loans Held For Sale
|
- | 4,052,268 | - | 4,052,268 | ||||||||||||
Impaired Loans (1)
|
- | - | 31,268,978 | 31,268,978 | ||||||||||||
Foreclosed Assets
|
- | 13,653,896 | - | 13,653,896 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | 17,706,164 | $ | 32,468,732 | $ | 50,174,896 | ||||||||
(1) Impaired loans are reported net of specific reserves of $1.2 million. |
12
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
7. Carrying Amounts and Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Continued
Assets:
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Balance At
March 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,199,754 | $ | 1,199,754 | ||||||||
Mortgage Loans Held For Sale
|
- | 5,166,234 | - | 5,166,234 | ||||||||||||
Impaired Loans (1)
|
- | 31,995,829 | 529,363 | 32,525,192 | ||||||||||||
Foreclosed Assets
|
- | 14,433,853 | - | 14,433,853 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | - | $ | 51,595,916 | $ | 1,729,117 | $ | 53,325,033 | ||||||||
(1) Impaired loans are reported net of specific reserves of $772,476. |
There were no liabilites measured at fair value on a non- recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 or March 31, 2011.
For assets and liabilities that are not presented on the balance sheet at fair value, the following methods are used to determine the fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents—The carrying amount of these financial instruments approximates fair value. All mature within 90 days and do not present unanticipated credit concerns.
Certificates of deposits with other banks—Fair value is based on market prices for similar assets.
Investment securities held to maturity—Securities held to maturity are valued at quoted market prices or dealer quotes.
Loans—The fair value of loans are estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. As discount rates are based on current loan rates as well as management estimates, the fair values presented may not be indicative of the value negotiated in an actual sale.
FHLB Stock—The fair value approximates the carrying value.
Deposits—The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances—Fair value is estimated based on discounted cash flows using current market rates for borrowings with similar terms.
Other Borrowed Money—The carrying value of these short term borrowings approximates fair value.
Senior Convertible Debentures—The fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar debenture offerings with similar terms and maturities would be issued by similar institutions. As discount rates are based on current debenture rates as well as management estimates, the fair values presented may not be indicative of the value negotiated in an actual sale.
Junior Subordinated Debentures—The carrying value of junior subordinated debentures approximates fair value.
13
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
7. Carrying Amounts and Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Continued
The following table is a summary of the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011 presented in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.
June 30, 2011
|
March 31, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
Amount
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
(In Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
$ | 9,705 | $ | 9,705 | $ | 7,836 | $ | 7,836 | ||||||||
Certificates of Deposits With Other Banks
|
101 | 101 | 100 | 101 | ||||||||||||
Investment And Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
382,365 | 383,726 | 372,418 | 373,376 | ||||||||||||
Loans Receivable, Net
|
467,815 | 459,973 | 484,471 | 482,834 | ||||||||||||
FHLB Stock
|
10,054 | 10,054 | 11,267 | 11,267 | ||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||||||||||
Checking, Savings, And Money Market Accounts
|
$ | 339,650 | $ | 339,650 | $ | 332,220 | $ | 332,220 | ||||||||
Certificate Accounts
|
344,543 | 345,867 | 358,137 | 361,110 | ||||||||||||
Advances From FHLB
|
133,382 | 143,562 | 138,136 | 147,207 | ||||||||||||
Other Borrowed Money
|
10,715 | 10,715 | 11,195 | 11,195 | ||||||||||||
Senior Convertible Debentures
|
6,084 | 6,084 | 6,084 | 6,084 | ||||||||||||
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
5,155 | 5,155 | 5,155 | 5,155 |
At June 30, 2011, the Bank had $36.5 million of off-balance sheet financial commitments. These commitments are to originate loans and unused consumer lines of credit and credit card lines. Because these obligations are based on current market rates, if funded, the original principal is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Fair value estimates are made on a specific date, based on relevant market data and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale the Bank’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no active market exists for a significant portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, current interest rates and prepayment trends, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in any of these assumptions used in calculating fair value would also significantly affect the estimates. Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. For example, the Bank has significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities including deposit franchise values, loan servicing portfolios, deferred tax liabilities, and premises and equipment.
In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of these estimates. The Company has used management’s best estimate of fair value on the above assumptions. Thus, the fair values presented may not be the amounts, which could be realized, in an immediate sale or settlement of the instrument. In addition, any income taxes or other expenses that would be incurred in an actual sale or settlement are not taken into consideration in the fair value.
14
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
8. Accounting and Reporting Changes
The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements that could impact the accounting, reporting, and/or disclosure of financial information by the Company.
In July 2010, the Receivables topic of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) was amended by Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-20 to require expanded disclosures related to a company’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The amendments require the allowance disclosures to be provided on a disaggregated basis. The Company is required to include these disclosures in its interim and annual financial statements. See Note 10.
Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) required by ASU 2010-20 were deferred by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in ASU 2011-01 issued in January 2011. In April 2011 the FASB issued ASU 2011-02 to assist creditors with their determination of when a restructuring is a TDR. The determination is based on whether the restructuring constitutes a concession and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties as both events must be present. Disclosures related to TDRs under ASU 2010-20 became effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2011.
In December 2010, the Intangibles topic of the ASC was amended to modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings upon adoption. Impairments occurring subsequent to adoption should be included in earnings. The amendment is effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted.
In April 2011, the criteria used to determine effective control of transferred assets in the Transfers and Servicing topic of the ASC was amended by ASU 2011-03. The requirement for the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms and the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion were removed from the assessment of effective control. The other criteria to assess effective control were not changed. The amendments are effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2012 but are not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
ASU 2011-04 was issued in May 2011 to amend the Fair Value Measurement topic of the ASC by clarifying the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and by changing particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012 but are not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
The Comprehensive Income topic of the ASC was amended in June 2011 by ASU 2011-05. The amendment eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income as a part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendment requires consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income and requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements. The amendments will be applicable to the Company on January 1, 2012 and will be applied retrospectively.
Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
15
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
9. Securities
Investment And Mortgage-Backed Securities, Available For Sale
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair values of investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale are as follows:
June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
Fair value
|
|||||||||||||
FHLB Securities
|
$ | 14,221,978 | $ | 146,465 | $ | 83,931 | $ | 14,284,512 | ||||||||
Federal Farm Credit Securities
|
1,997,280 | 30,990 | - | 2,028,270 | ||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC Bonds
|
10,962,118 | 39,570 | 34,028 | 10,967,660 | ||||||||||||
SBA Bonds
|
66,944,405 | 1,240,191 | 143,767 | 68,040,829 | ||||||||||||
Tax Exempt Municipal Bonds
|
8,370,825 | 76,505 | 5,206 | 8,442,124 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
227,081,534 | 9,007,977 | 16,654 | 236,072,857 | ||||||||||||
Equity Securities
|
102,938 | - | 28,688 | 74,250 | ||||||||||||
$ | 329,681,078 | $ | 10,541,698 | $ | 312,274 | $ | 339,910,502 | |||||||||
March 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
Fair value
|
|||||||||||||
FHLB Securities
|
$ | 14,428,778 | $ | 125,259 | $ | 344,705 | $ | 14,209,332 | ||||||||
Federal Farm Credit Securities
|
1,997,097 | 9,503 | - | 2,006,600 | ||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC Bonds
|
11,959,119 | - | 298,129 | 11,660,990 | ||||||||||||
SBA Bonds
|
64,382,588 | 599,679 | 272,435 | 64,709,832 | ||||||||||||
Taxable Municipal Bond
|
4,556,812 | 12,039 | 97,201 | 4,471,650 | ||||||||||||
Tax Exempt Municipal Bonds
|
2,027,172 | 7,771 | - | 2,034,943 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
233,933,275 | 6,681,694 | 534,276 | 240,080,693 | ||||||||||||
Equity Securities
|
102,938 | - | 24,188 | 78,750 | ||||||||||||
$ | 333,387,779 | $ | 7,435,945 | $ | 1,570,934 | $ | 339,252,790 |
FHLB securities, Federal Farm Credit securities, FNMA and FHLMC bonds, and FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed securities are issued by government-sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”). GSEs are not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. SBA bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. Included in the tables above in mortgage-backed securities are GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are also backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. At June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Company held an amortized cost and fair value of $140.2 million and $145.5 million, respectively and $145.1 million and $148.5 million, respectively, in GNMA mortgage-backed securities included in mortgage-backed securities listed above. All mortgage-backed securities in the Company’s portfolio are either GSEs or GNMA mortgage-backed securities. The balance does not include any private label mortgage-backed securities.
The Bank received approximately $8.3 million and $13.1 million, respectively, in proceeds from sales of available for sale securities during the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and recognized $171,000 and $200,000 in gross gains during the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.
16
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
9. Securities, Continued
The amortized cost and fair value of investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale at June 30, 2011 are shown below by contractual maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities are presented as a separate line item since paydowns are expected to occur before the contractual maturity dates.
Amortized Cost
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||
Less Than One Year
|
$ | 1,085,112 | $ | 1,117,774 | ||||
One – Five Years
|
8,073,665 | 8,226,356 | ||||||
Over Five – Ten Years
|
42,832,404 | 43,205,115 | ||||||
After Ten Years
|
50,608,363 | 51,288,400 | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
227,081,534 | 236,072,857 | ||||||
$ | 329,681,078 | $ | 339,910,502 |
The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category, and length of time that individual available for sale securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2011.
Less than 12 Months
|
12 Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
FHLB Securities
|
$ | 5,814,028 | $ | 83,931 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 5,814,028 | $ | 83,931 | ||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC Bonds
|
2,962,600 | 34,028 | - | - | 2,962,600 | 34,028 | ||||||||||||||||||
SBA Bonds
|
14,440,326 | 143,767 | - | - | 14,440,326 | 143,767 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax Exempt Municipals
|
3,994,602 | 5,206 | - | - | 3,994,602 | 5,206 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
23,478,306 | 16,654 | - | - | 23,478,306 | 16,654 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity Securities
|
- | - | 74,250 | 28,688 | 74,250 | 28,688 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 50,689,862 | $ | 283,586 | $ | 74,250 | $ | 28,688 | $ | 50,764,112 | $ | 312,274 |
The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category, and length of time that individual available for sale securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2011.
Less than 12 Months
|
12 Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
FHLB Securities
|
$ | 11,316,397 | $ | 344,705 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 11,316,397 | $ | 344,705 | ||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC Bonds
|
11,660,990 | 298,129 | - | - | 11,660,990 | 298,129 | ||||||||||||||||||
SBA Bonds
|
22,878,098 | 272,435 | - | - | 22,878,098 | 272,435 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taxable Municipal Bond
|
2,452,620 | 97,201 | 2,452,620 | 97,201 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
49,991,656 | 534,276 | - | - | 49,991,656 | 534,276 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity Securities
|
- | - | 78,750 | 24,188 | 78,750 | 24,188 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 98,299,761 | $ | 1,546,746 | $ | 78,750 | $ | 24,188 | $ | 98,378,511 | $ | 1,570,934 |
Securities classified as available for sale are recorded at fair market value. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until such time as the value recovers or the securities mature. The Company believes, based on industry analyst reports and credit ratings, that the deterioration in value was attributable to changes in market interest rates and is not in the credit quality of the issuer and therefore, these losses are not considered other-than-temporary. The Company reviews its investment securities portfolio at least quarterly and more frequently when economic conditions warrant, assessing whether there is any indication of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). Factors considered in the review include estimated future cash flows, length of time and extent to which market value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and our intent and ability to retain the security to allow for an anticipated recovery in market value.
If the review determines that there is OTTI, then an impairment loss is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment is made, or a portion may be recognized in other comprehensive income. The fair value of investments on which OTTI is recognized then becomes the new cost basis of the investment.
17
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
9. Securities, Continued
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities, Held to Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair values of investment and mortgage-backed securities held to maturity are as follows:
June 30, 2011
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
FHLB Securities
|
$ | 9,032,115 | $ | 354,205 | $ | - | $ | 9,386,320 | ||||||||
Federal Farm Credit Securities
|
991,431 | 9,029 | - | 1,000,460 | ||||||||||||
FNMA Bonds
|
999,000 | - | - | 999,000 | ||||||||||||
SBA Bonds
|
3,857,085 | 308,800 | - | 4,165,885 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
27,419,659 | 714,043 | 24,659 | 28,109,043 | ||||||||||||
Equity Securities
|
155,000 | - | - | 155,000 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 42,454,290 | $ | 1,386,077 | $ | 24,659 | $ | 43,815,708 |
March 31, 2011
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
FHLB Securities
|
$ | 10,040,055 | $ | 297,670 | $ | 694 | $ | 10,337,031 | ||||||||
SBA Bonds
|
3,856,483 | 242,167 | - | 4,098,650 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
19,113,587 | 418,657 | - | 19,532,244 | ||||||||||||
Equity Securities
|
155,000 | - | - | 155,000 | ||||||||||||
$ | 33,165,125 | $ | 958,494 | $ | 694 | $ | 34,122,925 |
Included in the tables above in mortgage-backed securities are GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are also backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. At June 30, 2011, the Company held an amortized cost and fair value of $25.1 million and $25.7 million, respectively, in GNMA mortgage-backed securities included in mortgage-backed securities listed above. At March 31, 2011, the Company held an amortized cost and fair value of $16.5 million and $16.8 million, respectively, in GNMA mortgage-backed securities included in mortgage-backed securities listed above. All mortgage-backed securities in the Company’s portfolio above are either GSEs or GNMA mortgage-backed securities. The balance does not include any private label mortgage-backed securities.
The amortized cost and fair value of investment and mortgage-backed securities held to maturity at June 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities resulting from call features on certain investments. Mortgage-backed securities are presented as a separate line item since paydowns are expected to occur before the contractual maturity dates.
Amortized Cost
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||
Less Than One Year
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
One – Five Years
|
5,980,225 | 6,315,119 | ||||||
Over Five – Ten Years
|
5,029,323 | 5,058,000 | ||||||
More Than Ten Years
|
4,025,083 | 4,333,546 | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
27,419,659 | 28,109,043 | ||||||
$ | 42,454,290 | $ | 43,815,708 |
The Company had two held to maturity mortgage-backed securities with a market value totaling $4.4 million in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011. These securities had been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months. The Company had only one held to maturity security that was in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2011. The fair value of this FHLB security was $1.0 million and the unrealized loss was $1,000. The security had been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months. The Company’s held to maturity portfolio is recorded at amortized cost. The Company has the ability and intends to hold these securities to maturity. There were no sales of securities held to maturity during the quarters ended June 30, 2011 or 2010, or during the year ended March 31, 2011.
18
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
10. Loans Receivable, Net
Loans receivable, net, at June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011 consisted of the following:
June 30, 2011
|
March 31, 2011
|
|||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$ | 107,105,407 | $ | 111,028,021 | ||||
Consumer
|
62,907,429 | 64,862,668 | ||||||
Commercial Business
|
11,816,035 | 13,529,957 | ||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
299,130,772 | 306,955,623 | ||||||
Total Loans Held For Investment
|
480,959,643 | 496,376,269 | ||||||
Loans Held For Sale
|
4,052,268 | 5,166,234 | ||||||
Total Loans Receivable, Gross
|
485,011,911 | 501,542,503 | ||||||
Less:
|
||||||||
Allowance For Possible Loan Loss
|
13,502,573 | 12,501,800 | ||||||
Loans In Process
|
3,705,371 | 4,580,059 | ||||||
Deferred Loan Fees
|
(10,674 | ) | (9,972 | ) | ||||
17,197,270 | 17,071,887 | |||||||
Total Loans Receivable, Net
|
$ | 467,814,641 | $ | 484,470,616 |
The Company uses a risk based approach based on the following credit quality measures when analyzing the loan portfolio: pass, watch, special mention, and substandard. These indicators are used to rate the credit quality of loans for the purposes of determining the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Pass loans are loans that are performing and are deemed adequately protected by the net worth of the borrower or the underlying collateral value. These loans are considered the least risky in terms of determining the allowance for loan losses. Substandard loans are considered the most risky category. These loans typically have an identified weakness or weaknesses and are inadequately protected by the net worth of the borrower or collateral value. All loans 60 days or more past due are automatically classified in this category. The other two categories fall in between these two grades. The following tables list the loan grades used by the Company as credit quality indicators and the balance in each category, excluding loans held for sale for the periods indicated.
Credit Quality Measures
|
||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011
|
Pass
|
Watch
|
Special
Mention
|
Substandard
|
Total Loans
|
|||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$ | 99,274,271 | $ | - | $ | 401,128 | $ | 7,430,008 | $ | 107,105,407 | ||||||||||
Consumer
|
59,457,693 | 148,015 | 8,291 | 3,293,430 | 62,907,429 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Business
|
10,229,767 | - | - | 1,586,268 | 11,816,035 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
224,149,486 | 11,632,084 | 28,284,748 | 35,064,454 | 299,130,772 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 393,111,217 | $ | 11,780,099 | $ | 28,694,167 | $ | 47,374,160 | $ | 480,959,643 |
Credit Quality Measures
|
||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011
|
Pass
|
Watch
|
Special
Mention
|
Substandard
|
Total Loans
|
|||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$ | 104,826,411 | $ | 433,710 | $ | 379,036 | $ | 5,388,864 | $ | 111,028,021 | ||||||||||
Consumer
|
61,425,853 | 97,706 | 9,180 | 3,329,929 | 64,862,668 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Business
|
12,059,761 | 6,285 | - | 1,463,911 | 13,529,957 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
230,031,130 | 10,786,846 | 30,462,062 | 35,675,585 | 306,955,623 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 408,343,155 | $ | 11,324,547 | $ | 30,850,278 | $ | 45,858,289 | $ | 496,376,269 |
19
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
10. Loans Receivable, Net, Continued
The following tables present an age analysis of past due balances by category at the periods indicated.
June 30, 2011
|
30-59 Days
Past Due
|
60-89 Days
Past Due
|
90 Day or
More Past
Due
|
Total Past
Due
|
Current
|
Total Loans Receivable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Residential
Real Estate
|
$ | - | $ | 1,935,656 | $ | 2,070,803 | $ | 4,006,459 | $ | 103,098,948 | $ | 107,105,407 | ||||||||||||
Consumer
|
817,420 | 411,437 | 1,362,643 | 2,591,500 | 60,315,929 | 62,907,429 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Business
|
311,832 | 83,485 | 101,988 | 497,305 | 11,318,730 | 11,816,035 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Real Estate
|
6,989,728 | 2,319,786 | 8,440,108 | 17,749,622 | 281,381,150 | 299,130,772 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 8,118,980 | $ | 4,750,364 | $ | 11,975,542 | $ | 24,844,886 | $ | 456,114,757 | $ | 480,959,643 |
March 31, 2011
|
30-59 Days
Past Due
|
60-89 Days
Past Due
|
90 Day or
More Past
Due
|
Total Past
Due
|
Current
|
Total Loans Receivable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Residential
Real Estate
|
$ | 1,799,800 | $ | - | $ | 1,809,881 | $ | 3,609,681 | $ | 107,418,340 | $ | 111,028,021 | ||||||||||||
Consumer
|
2,673,973 | 196,958 | 1,194,171 | 4,065,102 | 60,797,566 | 64,862,668 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Business
|
93,579 | 133,399 | 171,901 | 398,879 | 13,131,078 | 13,529,957 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
Real Estate
|
19,441,992 | 2,708,373 | 9,337,385 | 31,487,750 | 275,467,873 | 306,955,623 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 24,009,344 | $ | 3,038,730 | $ | 12,513,338 | $ | 39,561,412 | $ | 456,814,857 | $ | 496,376,269 |
At June 30, 2011, the Company did not have any loans that were 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest. Our strategy is to work with our borrowers to reach acceptable payment plans while protecting our interests in the existing collateral. In the event an acceptable arrangement cannot be reached, we may have to acquire these properties through foreclosure or other means and subsequently sell, develop, or liquidate them. The following table shows non-accrual loans by category at June 30, 2011 compared to March 31, 2011.
At June 30, 2011
|
At March 31, 2011
|
$ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Percent (1)
|
Amount
|
Percent (1)
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate
|
$ | 2,070,803 | 0.4 | % | $ | 1,809,881 | 0.4 | % | $ | 260,922 | 14.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Commercial business
|
101,988 | - | 171,901 | - | (69,913 | ) | (40.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate
|
8,440,108 | 1.8 | 9,337,385 | 1.9 | (897,277 | ) | (9.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
1,362,643 | 0.3 | 1,194,171 | 0.2 | 168,472 | 14.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total non-accural loans
|
$ | 11,975,542 | 2.5 | % | $ | 12,513,338 | 2.5 | % | $ | (537,796 | ) | (4.3 | )% | |||||||||||
(1) Percent of gross loans receivable, net of deferred fees and loans in process and loans held for sale
20
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
10. Loans Receivable, Net, Continued
The following tables show the activity in the allowance for loan losses by category for the periods indicated.
June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance For
Loan Losses
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Commercial
Business
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance
|
$ | 1,702,864 | $ | 1,122,055 | $ | 924,149 | 8,752,732 | $ | 12,501,800 | |||||||||||
Provision
|
231,632 | 24,893 | (211,990 | ) | 2,255,465 | 2,300,000 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-Offs
|
(171,039 | ) | (54,738 | ) | (72,811 | ) | (1,023,274 | ) | (1,321,862 | ) | ||||||||||
Recoveries
|
- | 10,557 | 12,078 | - | 22,635 | |||||||||||||||
Ending Balance
|
$ | 1,763,457 | $ | 1,102,767 | $ | 651,426 | $ | 9,984,923 | $ | 13,502,573 |
March 31, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance For
Loan Losses
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
Consumer
|
Commercial
Business
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance
|
$ | 1,944,257 | $ | 988,634 | $ | 678,728 | 8,695,775 | $ | 12,307,394 | |||||||||||
Provision
|
644,032 | 649,542 | 539,264 | 5,967,162 | 7,800,000 | |||||||||||||||
Charge-Offs
|
(1,009,937 | ) | (584,600 | ) | (320,960 | ) | (6,201,170 | ) | (8,116,667 | ) | ||||||||||
Recoveries
|
124,512 | 68,479 | 27,117 | 290,965 | 511,073 | |||||||||||||||
Ending Balance
|
$ | 1,702,864 | $ | 1,122,055 | $ | 924,149 | 8,752,732 | $ | 12,501,800 |
The following tables present information related to impaired loans evaluated individually for impairment and collectively evaluated for impairment in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.
Allowance For Loan Losses
|
||||||||||||
June 30, 2011
|
Individually Evaluated For Impairment
|
Collectively Evaluated For Impairment
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$ | - | $ | 1,763,457 | $ | 1,763,457 | ||||||
Consumer
|
41,100 | 1,061,667 | 1,102,767 | |||||||||
Commercial Business
|
289,404 | 362,022 | 651,426 | |||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
915,617 | 9,069,306 | 9,984,923 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,246,121 | $ | 12,256,452 | $ | 13,502,573 |
Allowance For Loan Losses
|
||||||||||||
March 31, 2011
|
Individually Evaluated For Impairment
|
Collectively Evaluated For Impairment
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$ | - | $ | 1,702,864 | $ | 1,702,864 | ||||||
Consumer
|
41,100 | 1,080,955 | 1,122,055 | |||||||||
Commercial Business
|
240,648 | 683,501 | 924,149 | |||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
490,728 | 8,262,004 | 8,752,732 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 772,476 | $ | 11,729,324 | $ | 12,501,800 |
21
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
10. Loans Receivable, Net, Continued
The following tables present information related to impaired loans evaluated individually for impairment and collectively evaluated for impairment in loans receivable for the periods indicated.
Loans Receivable
|
||||||||||||
June 30, 2011
|
Individually Evaluated For Impairment
|
Collectively Evaluated For Impairment
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$ | 2,062,745 | $ | 105,042,662 | $ | 107,105,407 | ||||||
Consumer
|
2,395,244 | 60,512,185 | 62,907,429 | |||||||||
Commercial Business
|
865,540 | 10,950,495 | 11,816,035 | |||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
27,191,570 | 271,939,202 | 299,130,772 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 32,515,099 | $ | 448,444,544 | $ | 480,959,643 |
Loans Receivable
|
||||||||||||
March 31, 2011
|
Individually Evaluated For Impairment
|
Collectively Evaluated For Impairment
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$ | 2,278,966 | $ | 108,749,055 | $ | 111,028,021 | ||||||
Consumer
|
1,436,829 | 63,425,839 | 64,862,668 | |||||||||
Commercial Business
|
770,011 | 12,759,946 | 13,529,957 | |||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
28,811,862 | 278,143,761 | 306,955,623 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 33,297,668 | $ | 463,078,601 | $ | 496,376,269 |
Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired management measures impairment and records the loan at fair value. Fair value is estimated using one of the following methods: fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sale, discounted cash flows, or market value of the loan based on similar debt. The fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell is the most frequently used method. Typically, the Company reviews the most recent appraisal and if it is over 24 months old will request a new third party appraisal. Depending on the particular circumstances surrounding the loan, including the location of the collateral, the date of the most recent appraisal and the value of the collateral relative to the recorded investment in the loan, management may order an independent appraisal immediately or, in some instances, may elect to perform an internal analysis.
The following table is a summary of information related to impaired loans as of June 30, 2011.
Impaired Loans
|
Recorded
Investment
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
Related
Allowance
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|||||||||||||||
With no related allowance
recorded:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$ | 2,062,745 | $ | 2,624,745 | $ | - | $ | 2,170,856 | $ | 10,577 | ||||||||||
Consumer Loans
|
2,334,576 | 2,519,576 | - | 1,855,369 | 32,768 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Business
|
546,225 | 546,225 | - | 522,853 | 6,945 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
22,689,953 | 24,634,653 | - | 24,538,560 | 222,374 | |||||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Consumer Loans
|
60,668 | 60,668 | 41,100 | 60,668 | - | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Business
|
319,315 | 319,315 | 289,404 | 294,923 | 2,172 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
4,501,617 | 4,821,617 | 915,617 | 3,463,156 | 35,892 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
2,062,745 | 2,624,745 | - | 2,170,856 | 10,577 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer Loans
|
2,395,244 | 2,580,244 | 41,100 | 1,916,037 | 32,768 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Business
|
865,540 | 865,540 | 289,404 | 817,776 | 9,117 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
27,191,570 | 29,456,270 | 915,617 | 28,001,716 | 258,266 |
22
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued
10. Loans Receivable, Net, Continued
The following table is a summary of information related to impaired loans as of March 31, 2011.
Impaired Loans
|
Recorded
Investment
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
Related
Allowance
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|||||||||||||||
With no related allowance
recorded:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
$ | 2,278,966 | $ | 2,683,966 | $ | - | $ | 1,458,882 | $ | 51,267 | ||||||||||
Consumer Loans
|
1,376,161 | 1,583,160 | - | 729,889 | 56,764 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Business
|
499,481 | 499,481 | - | 327,785 | 14,790 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
26,387,167 | 27,948,568 | - | 30,244,873 | 1,361,177 | |||||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
- | - | - | 41,879 | - | |||||||||||||||
Consumer Loans
|
60,668 | 60,668 | 41,100 | 124,089 | - | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Business
|
270,530 | 270,530 | 240,648 | 207,073 | 4,833 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
2,424,695 | 2,614,695 | 490,728 | 4,018,967 | 44,337 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate
|
2,278,966 | 2,683,966 | - | 1,500,761 | 51,267 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer Loans
|
1,436,829 | 1,643,828 | 41,100 | 853,978 | 56,764 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Business
|
770,011 | 770,011 | 240,648 | 534,858 | 19,623 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate
|
28,811,862 | 30,563,263 | 490,728 | 34,263,840 | 1,405,514 |
TDRs included in impaired loans at June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011 were $11.9 million and $12.2 million, respectively. Interest earned during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and fiscal 2011 on these loans amounted to $100,997 and $649,348, respectively.
At June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Bank did not have any loans 90 days delinquent and still accruing interest.
11. Subsequent Events
Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. Recognized subsequent events are events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. Nonrecognized subsequent events are events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date. Management has reviewed events occurring through the date the financial statements were available to be issued and no subsequent events occurred requiring accrual or disclosure.
23
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements and “Safe Harbor” statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This report may contain forward-looking statements about the Company and its subsidiaries which we believe are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements often can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about future performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated, including, but not limited to:
·
|
statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;
|
·
|
statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and
|
·
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.
|
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the following factors:
·
|
the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in our allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses that may be affected by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets;
|
·
|
changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas;
|
·
|
changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources;
|
·
|
fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas;
|
·
|
secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market;
|
·
|
results of examinations of our bank subsidiary, Security Federal Bankby the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (‘OCC”) and of the Company by the Federal Reserve Board,(as successors to the Office of Thrift Supervision) or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, require us to increase our reserve for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings;
|
·
|
legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules;
|
·
|
our ability to attract and retain deposits;
|
·
|
further increases in premiums for deposit insurance;
|
·
|
our ability to control operating costs and expenses;
|
·
|
the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation;
|
·
|
difficulties in reducing risks associated with the loans on our balance sheet;
|
·
|
staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our workforce and potential associated charges;
|
·
|
computer systems on which we depend could fail or experience a security breach;
|
·
|
our ability to retain key members of our senior management team;
|
·
|
costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments;
|
·
|
our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we may in the future acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related thereto;
|
·
|
increased competitive pressures among financial services companies;
|
·
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
|
·
|
the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the implementing regulations;
|
·
|
the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions;
|
·
|
our ability to pay dividends on our common stock;
|
·
|
adverse changes in the securities markets;
|
·
|
inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us;
|
24
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
·
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods;
|
·
|
future legislative changes in and our ability to comply with the requirements of the U.S. Treasury’s Community Development Capital Initiative (“CDCI”); and
|
·
|
other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services and the other risks described elsewhere in this report.
|
Some of these and other factors are discussed in the 2011 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors” Such developments could have an adverse impact on our financial position and our results of operations.
Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this quarterly report and in other public statements we make may turn out to be inaccurate as a result of our beliefs and assumptions we make in connection with the factors set forth above or because of other unidentified and unpredictable factors. Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements and you should not rely on such statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances after the date hereof. These risks could cause our actual results for fiscal year 2012 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by or on behalf of us, and could negatively affect the Company’s financial condition, liquidity and operating and stock price performance.
Comparison of Financial Condition At June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011
General – Total assets decreased $8.5 million or 0.9% to $925.1 million at June 30, 2011 from $933.5 million at March 31, 2011. The primary reason for the decrease in total assets was a decrease in loans receivable, net, offset slightly by an increase in investment and mortgage-backed securities.
Assets – The increases and decreases in total assets were primarily concentrated in the following asset categories:
Increase (Decrease)
|
||||||||||||||||
June 30,
2011
|
March 31, 2011
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Cash And Cash Equivalents
|
$ | 9,704,508 | $ | 7,835,638 | $ | 1,868,870 | 23.9 | % | ||||||||
Investment And Mortgage-
Backed Securities –
Available For Sale
|
339,910,502 | 339,252,790 | 657,712 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Investment And Mortgage-
Backed Securities – Held
To Maturity
|
42,454,290 | 33,165,125 | 9,289,165 | 28.0 | ||||||||||||
Loans Receivable, Net
|
467,814,641 | 484,470,616 | (16,655,975 | ) | (3.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Repossessed Assets
Acquired In
Settlement of Loans
|
13,653,896 | 14,433,853 | (779,957 | ) | (5.4 | ) | ||||||||||
FHLB Stock
|
10,054,200 | 11,267,485 | (1,213,285 | ) | (10.8 | ) | ||||||||||
Prepaid FDIC Premium
|
2,538,541 | 2,815,328 | (276,787 | ) | (9.8 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents increased $1.9 million to $9.7 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $7.8 million at March 31, 2011.
Investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale increased $658,000 or 0.2% to $339.9 million at June 30, 2011 from $339.3 million at March 31, 2011. This increase was the result of investment purchases offset slightly by principal repayments and maturities on securities coupled with the sale of seven securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Investment and mortgage-backed securities held to maturity increased $9.3 million or 28.0% to $42.5 million at June 30, 2011 as a result of purchases during the period offset slightly by calls and maturities of securities as well as principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities.
25
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
Loans receivable, net decreased $16.7 million or 3.4% to $467.8 million at June 30, 2011 from $484.5 million at March 31, 2011. This decrease was a result of Company’s efforts to tighten underwriting standards and increase offering rates combined with overall lower loan demand from credit-worthy borrowers. Residential real estate loans decreased $3.9 million to $107.1 million at June 30, 2011 from $111.0 million at March 31, 2011. Consumer loans decreased $2.0 million to $62.9 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $64.9 million at March 31, 2011. Commercial real estate loans and commercial business loans decreased $7.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively, to $299.1 million and $11.8 million, respectively, at June 30, 2011 when compared to the balance at March 31, 2011. Loans held for sale decreased $1.1 million to $4.1 million at June 30, 2011 from $5.2 million at March 31, 2011.
Repossessed assets acquired in settlement of loans decreased $780,000 to $13.7 million at June 30, 2011 from $14.4 million at March 31, 2011. The Company sold 10 real estate properties and repossessed 10 additional properties during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 for a net decrease during the quarter. At June 30, 2011, the balance of repossessed assets consisted of the following 40 real estate properties: 15 single-family residences and 12 lots within residential subdivisions located throughout our market area in South Carolina and Georgia; three parcels of land in South Carolina; one mobile home including small acreage in Lexington County, South Carolina; five commercial buildings in the Midlands area of South Carolina and one commercial building in Augusta, Georgia; a 55 lot subdivision development and adjacent 17 acres of land in Columbia, South Carolina; a 229.24 acre subdivision in Blythewood, South Carolina; and 34.8 acres of land in Blufton, South Carolina also originally acquired as a participation loan from another financial institution In addition to the properties listed above, the balance also included $27,000 in various other repossessed assets that were not real estate.
FHLB stock decreased $1.2 million or 10.8% to $10.1 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $11.3 million at March 31, 2011. The Bank, as a member of the FHLB of Atlanta, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB of Atlanta in an amount equal to a membership component, which is 0.15% of total assets plus a transaction component which equals 4.5% of outstanding advances (borrowings) from the FHLB of Atlanta. As total assets and total advances have decreased, so has the Bank’s required investment in FHLB stock.
Prepaid FDIC premium decreased $277,000 or 9.8% to $2.5 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $2.8 million at March 31, 2011. This decrease was the result of the payment of the quarterly assessment amount due during the quarter.
Liabilities
Deposit Accounts – The increases and decreases in deposit accounts were as follows:
Balance
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011
|
March 31, 2011
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
|
Weighted
Rate
|
Balance
|
Weighted
Rate
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Demand Accounts:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Checking
|
$ | 114,831,868 | 0.11 | % | $ | 117,077,343 | 0.09 | % | $ | (2,245,475 | ) | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||
Money Market
|
203,836,792 | 0.85 | 194,560,099 | 0.85 | 9,276,693 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Statement Savings
Accounts
|
20,981,344 | 0.25 | 20,582,505 | 0.24 | 398,839 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
339,650,004 | 0.56 | 332,219,947 | 0.54 | 7,430,057 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificate
Accounts
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
0.00 – 1.99% | 250,925,458 | 239,078,153 | 11,847,305 | 5.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2.00 – 2.99% | 82,203,045 | 107,386,573 | (25,183,528 | ) | (23.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
3.00 – 3.99% | 3,278,575 | 3,307,422 | (28,847 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
4.00 – 4.99% | 5,081,697 | 5,272,507 | (190,810 | ) | (3.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
5.00 – 5.99% | 3,054,184 | 3,092,512 | (38,328 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
344,542,959 | 1.59 | 358,137,167 | 1.71 | (13,594,208 | ) | (3.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Deposits
|
$ | 684,192,963 | 1.08 | % | $ | 690,357,114 | 1.15 | % | $ | (6,164,151 | ) | (0.9 | )% |
Included in the certificates above were $39.7 million and $39.7 million in brokered deposits at June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.02% and 2.18%, respectively.
26
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
Advances From FHLB – FHLB advances are summarized by contractual year of maturity and weighted average interest rate in the table below:
Balance
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011
|
March 31, 2011
|
Decrease
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year Due:
|
Balance
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Percent
|
||||||||||||||||||
2012
|
$ | 20,200,000 | 2.65 | % | $ | 24,950,000 | 2.22 | % | $ | (4,750,000 | ) | 19.0 | % | |||||||||||
2013
|
10,000,000 | 4.76 | % | 10,000,000 | 4.76 | % | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
2014
|
30,000,000 | 3.45 | % | 30,000,000 | 3.45 | % | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
2015
|
20,282,235 | 3.01 | % | 20,286,338 | 3.01 | % | (4,103 | ) | (0.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||
2016
|
20,000,000 | 4.12 | % | 20,000,000 | 4.12 | % | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Thereafter
|
32,900,000 | 4.36 | % | 32,900,000 | 4.36 | % | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Total Advances
|
$ | 133,382,235 | 3.69 | % | $ | 138,136,338 | 3.57 | % | $ | (4,754,103 | ) | (3.4 | )% |
These advances are secured by a blanket collateral agreement with the FHLB by pledging the Bank’s portfolio of residential first mortgage loans and investment securities with an amortized cost and fair value of $164.3 million and $156.1 million at June 30, 2011 and $168.2 million and $172.9 million at March 31, 2011, respectively. Advances are subject to prepayment penalties.
The following table shows callable FHLB advances as of the dates indicated. These advances are also included in the above table. All callable advances are callable at the option of the FHLB. If an advance is called, the Bank has the option to payoff the advance without penalty, re-borrow funds on different terms, or convert the advance to a three-month floating rate advance tied to LIBOR.
As of June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||
Borrow Date
|
Maturity Date
|
Amount
|
Int. Rate
|
Type
|
Call Dates
|
|||||
11/23/05
|
11/23/15
|
5,000,000
|
3.933%
|
Multi-Call
|
05/25/08 and quarterly thereafter
|
|||||
07/11/06
|
07/11/16
|
5,000,000
|
4.800%
|
Multi-Call
|
07/11/08 and quarterly thereafter
|
|||||
11/29/06
|
11/29/16
|
5,000,000
|
4.025%
|
Multi-Call
|
05/29/08 and quarterly thereafter
|
|||||
01/19/07
|
07/21/14
|
5,000,000
|
|
4.885%
|
1 Time Call
|
07/21/11
|
||||
03/09/07
|
03/09/12
|
4,700,000
|
4.286%
|
Multi-Call
|
06/09/10 and quarterly thereafter
|
|||||
05/24/07
|
05/24/17
|
7,900,000
|
4.375%
|
Multi-Call
|
05/27/08 and quarterly thereafter
|
|||||
07/25/07
|
07/25/17
|
5,000,000
|
4.396%
|
Multi-Call
|
07/25/08 and quarterly thereafter
|
|||||
11/16/07
|
11/16/11
|
5,000,000
|
3.745%
|
Multi-Call
|
11/17/08 and quarterly thereafter
|
|||||
08/28/08
|
08/28/13
|
5,000,000
|
3.113%
|
Multi-Call
|
08/30/10 and quarterly thereafter
|
|||||
08/28/08
|
08/28/18
|
5,000,000
|
3.385%
|
1 Time Call
|
08/29/11
|
Other Borrowings – The Bank had $10.7 million and $11.2 million in other borrowings (non-FHLB advances) at June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. These borrowings consist of short-term repurchase agreements with certain commercial demand deposit customers for sweep accounts. The repurchase agreements typically mature within one to three days and the interest rate paid on these borrowings floats monthly with money market type rates. At June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the interest rate paid on the repurchase agreements was 0.40%. The Bank had pledged as collateral for these repurchase agreements investment and mortgage-backed securities with amortized costs and fair values of $21.2 million and $22.3 million at June 30, 2011 and $22.7 million and $23.7 million at March 31, 2011, respectively.
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instrument – On June 30, 2006, the Company recorded a $1.4 million mandatorily redeemable financial instrument as a result of the acquisition of the Collier-Jennings Companies. The shareholder of the Collier-Jennings Companies received cash and was issued stock in the Company to settle the acquisition. The Company released the shares to the shareholder of the Collier-Jennings Companies over a three-year period. The stock was mandatorily redeemable by the shareholder of the Collier-Jennings Companies in cumulative increments of 20% per year for a five-year period at the greater of $26 per share or one and one-half times the book value of the Company’s stock.
27
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
On April 11, 2011, the Company eliminated the mandatorily redeemable shares of the Company’s common stock as a result of an investor’s purchase of these shares in a private transaction. In connection with the purchase of these shares, the redemption feature was eliminated. As a result, the Company no longer has the liability related to these shares on its balance sheet. As a result of this transaction, the Company’s capital was increased by $1.5 million.
Junior Subordinated Debentures – On September 21, 2006, the Trust (Security Federal Statutory Trust), issued and sold fixed and floating rate capital securities of the Trust (the “Capital Securities”). The Trust used the net proceeds from the sale of the Capital Securities to purchase a like amount of junior subordinated debentures (the “Debentures”) of the Companywhich are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as junior subordinated debentures, generating proceeds of $5.0 million. The Company used the proceeds for general corporate purposes, primarily to provide capital to the Bank. The debentures qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. The Debentures are the sole assets of the Trust. The Company’s obligations under the Debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the obligations of the Trust.
The Capital Securities accrue and pay distributions quarterly at a rate per annum equal to a blended rate of 4.41% at June 30, 2011. One-half of the Capital Securities issued in the transaction has a fixed rate of 6.88% and the remaining half has a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 170 basis points, which was 1.95% at June 30, 2011. The distribution rate payable on the Capital Securities is cumulative and payable quarterly in arrears.
The Company has the right, subject to events of default, to defer payments of interest on the Capital Securities for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarterly periods, provided that no extension period may extend beyond the maturity date of December 15, 2036. The Company has no current intention to exercise its right to defer payments of interest on the Capital Securities.
The Capital Securities mature or are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity on December 15, 2036, and or upon earlier optional redemption as provided in the amended and restated trust agreeement. The Company has the right to redeem the Capital Securities in whole or in part, on or after September 15, 2011. The Company may also redeem the capital securities prior to such dates upon occurrence of specified conditions and the payment of a redemption premium.
Senior Convertible Debentures –Effective December 1, 2009, the Company issued $6.1 million in convertible senior debentures. The debentures will mature on December 1, 2029 and accrue interest at the rate of 8.0% per annum until maturity or earlier redemption or repayment. Interest on the debentures is payable on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing June 1, 2010. The debentures are convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $20 per share at the option of the holder at any time prior to maturity.
The debentures are redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of the Company at any time on or after December 1, 2019, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debentures to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption. The debentures are unsecured general obligations of the Company ranking equal in right of payment to all of our present and future unsecured indebtedness that is not expressly subordinated.
Equity – Shareholders’ equity increased $4.2 million or 5.6% to $80.3 million at June 30, 2011 from $76.0 million at March 31, 2011. Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax increased $2.7 million to $6.3 million at June 30, 2011. The Company’s net income available for common shareholders was $351,000 for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, after preferred stock dividends of $110,000.
On April 11, 2011, the Company eliminated the mandatorily redeemable shares of the Company’s common stock as a result of an investor’s purchase of these shares in a private transaction. In connection with the purchase of these shares, the redemption feature was eliminated. As a result, the Company no longer has the liability related to these shares on its balance sheet. This transaction resulted in an increase to capital of $1.5 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
The Board of Directors of the Company declared the 82nd consecutive quarterly common stock dividend, which was $0.08 per share, in May 2011, and totaled $236,000. Book value per common share was $19.65 at June 30, 2011 and $18.21 at March 31, 2011.
28
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders - Net income available to common shareholders increased $54,000 or 18.3% to $351,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $297,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in net income was primarily the result of a decrease in preferred stock dividends as a result of participation in the CDCI program and the repayment of the funds owed under the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program.
Net Interest Income -The net interest margin increased 12 basis points to 3.25% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 from 3.13% for the comparable quarter in the previous year. Despite the increase in net interest margin, net interest income decreased $43,000 or 0.62% to $6.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as a result of a decrease in interest expense offset slightly by a decrease in interest income. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, average interest earning assets decreased $23.6 million to $860.8 million while average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $35.1 million to $800.9 million. The interest rate spread increased 11 basis points to 3.13% during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.
Interest Income - Total interest income decreased $1.1 million or 9.9% to $10.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $11.4 million for the same period in 2010. This decrease is the result of the decrease in interest earning assets and the decrease in the yield. Total interest income on loans receivable, net decreased $1.0 million or 12.3% to $7.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as a result of the average loan portfolio balance decreasing $87.4 million, offset slightly by the yield on the loan portfolio increasing 22 basis points. Interest income from mortgage-backed securities decreased $183,000 or 8.0% to $2.1 million as a result of a $21.2 million increase in the average balance of the portfolio combined with a 61 basis point decrease in yield. Interest income from investment securities increased $90,000 or 13.2% to $771,000 as a result of an increase of $41.1 million in the average balance of the investment securities portfolio offset by a 44 basis point decrease in the yield.
The following table compares detailed average balances, associated yields, and the resulting changes in interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Average
Balance
|
Yield(1)
|
Average
Balance
|
Yield(1)
|
Increase
(Decrease) In
Interest And
Dividend Income
From 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans Receivable, Net
|
$ | 478,684,580 | 6.13 | % | $ | 566,097,269 | 5.91 | % | $ | (1,028,141 | ) | |||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
255,019,833 | 3.32 | 233,855,497 | 3.93 | (182,887 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Investment Securities (2)
|
125,443,555 | 2.79 | 84,313,685 | 3.23 | 90,209 | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
1,678,564 | 0.11 | 200,000 | 0.35 | 295 | |||||||||||||||
Total Interest-Earning Assets
|
$ | 860,826,532 | 4.80 | % | $ | 884,466,451 | 5.14 | % | $ | (1,120,524 | ) |
(1)- Annualized
(2)- Tax equivalent basis is calculated using an effective tax rate of 34% and amounted to $102,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011
Interest Expense - Total interest expense decreased $1.1 million or 24.4% to $3.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $4.4 million for the same period one-year earlier. The decrease in total interest expense was attributable to a 45 basis point decrease in interest rates paid during the quarter and a decrease in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities outstanding of $35.1 million when compared to the prior year.
Interest expense on deposits decreased $784,000 or 29.2% to $1.9 million during the period as a result of a 46 basis point decrease in the cost of deposits from 1.64% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 to 1.18% for the same quarter in 2011. The decrease in the cost of deposits was combined with a decrease in the average balance during the quarter. Average interest bearing deposits decreased $12.0 million to $643.4 million compared to $655.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
29
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
Interest expense on advances and other borrowings decreased $293,000 or 18.8% during the 2011 period compared to the comparable period in 2010 as a result of a $23.1 million decrease in the average total borrowings outstanding combined with a 17 basis point decrease in the average cost of debt outstanding. Interest expense on junior subordinated debentures remained unchanged at $58,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 while the average balance remained constant at $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest expense on senior convertible debentures was $122,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The senior convertible debentures were issued on December 1, 2009 and have a fixed interest rate of 8.00%.
The following table compares detailed average balances, cost of funds, and the resulting changes in interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Average
Balance
|
Yield(1)
|
Average
Balance
|
Yield(1)
|
Decrease
In Interest
Expense From
2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Now And Money Market
Accounts
|
$ | 272,301,916 | 0.66 | % | $ | 241,216,944 | 0.96 | % | $ | (131,305 | ) | |||||||||
Statement Savings Accounts
|
20,674,668 | 0.25 | 18,999,975 | 0.37 | (4,833 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Certificate Accounts
|
350,442,766 | 1.64 | 395,176,116 | 2.11 | (648,350 | ) | ||||||||||||||
FHLB Advances And Other
Borrowed Money
|
146,271,812 | 3.47 | 169,358,617 | 3.64 | (293,387 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Junior Subordinated
Debentures
|
5,155,000 | 4.49 | 5,155,000 | 4.49 | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Senior Convertible Debentures
|
6,084,000 | 8.00 | 6,084,000 | 8.00 | - | |||||||||||||||
Total Interest-Bearing
Liabilities
|
$ | 800,930,162 | 1.67 | % | $ | 835,990,652 | 2.12 | % | $ | (1,077,925 | ) |
(1) Annualized
Provision for Loan Losses - The amount of the provision is determined by management’s on-going monthly analysis of the loan portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The Company has policies and procedures in place for evaluating and monitoring the overall credit quality of the loan portfolio and for timely identification of potential problem loans including internal and external loan reviews. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is reviewed monthly by the Asset Classification Committee and quarterly by the Board of Directors.
Management’s monthly review of the adequacy of the allowance includes three main components. The first component is an analysis of loss potential in various homogenous segments of the portfolio based on historical trends and the risk inherent in each category. Previously, management applied a five year historical loss ratio to each loan category to estimate the inherent loss in these pooled loans. However as a result of the decline in economic conditions and the unprecedented increases in delinquencies and charge offs experienced by the industry in recent periods, the Company no longer considers five year historical losses relevant indicators of future losses. Management began applying 12 to 24 month historical loss ratios to each loan category in recent quarters to more accurately project future losses.
The second component of management’s monthly analysis is the specific review and evaluation of significant problem credits identified through the Company’s internal monitoring system. These loans are evaluated for impairment and recorded in accordance with accounting guidance. For each loan deemed impaired, management calculates a specific reserve for the amount in which the recorded investment in the loan exceeds the fair value. This estimate is based on a thorough analysis of the most probable source of repayment, which is typically liquidation of the collateral.
The third component is an analysis of changes in qualitative factors that may affect the portfolio, including but not limited to: relevant economic trends that could impact borrowers’ ability to repay, industry trends, changes in the volume and composition of the portfolio, credit concentrations, or lending policies and the experience and ability of the staff and Board of Directors. Management also reviews and incorporates certain ratios such as percentage of classified loans, average historical loan losses by loan category, delinquency percentages, and the assignment of percentage targets of reserves in each loan category when evaluating the allowance.
30
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
Once the analysis is completed, the three components are combined and compared to the allowance amount. Based on this, charges are made to the provision as needed.
The provision for loan losses was $2.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1.9 million for the same quarter in the prior year.
The following table details selected activity associated with the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
June 30, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Beginning Balance
|
$ | 12,501,800 | $ | 12,307,394 | ||||
Provision
|
2,300,000 | 1,900,000 | ||||||
Charge-offs
|
(1,321,862 | ) | (2,752,625 | ) | ||||
Recoveries
|
22,635 | 30,416 | ||||||
Ending Balance
|
$ | 13,502,573 | $ | 11,485,185 | ||||
Allowance For Loan Losses As A Percentage Of Gross Loans Receivable
Held For Investment At The End Of The Period
|
2.83 | % | 2.02 | % | ||||
Allowance For Loan Losses As A Percentage Of Impaired Loans At The
End Of The Period
|
41.53 | % | 26.66 | % | ||||
Nonaccrual Loans And 90 Days Or More Past Due Loans As A
Percentage Of Gross Loans Receivable Held For Investment At The
End Of The Period
|
2.51 | % | 4.98 | % | ||||
Loans Receivable, Net
|
$ | 467,814,641 | $ | 565,937,049 |
The cumulative interest not accrued during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 relating to all non-performing loans totaled $158,000. At June 30, 2011, the Company did not have any loans that were 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest. Our strategy is to work with our borrowers to reach acceptable payment plans while protecting our interests in the existing collateral. In the event an acceptable arrangement cannot be reached, we may have to acquire these properties through foreclosure or other means and subsequently sell, develop, or liquidate them.
Non-Interest Income - Non-interest income decreased slightly to $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of non-interest income:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Amounts
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Gain On Sale Of Investments
|
$ | 171,224 | $ | 199,511 | $ | (28,287 | ) | (14.2 | )% | |||||||
Gain On Sale Of Loans
|
107,270 | 268,677 | (161,407 | ) | (60.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Service Fees On Deposit Accounts
|
270,693 | 293,885 | (23,192 | ) | (7.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Income From Cash Value Of
Life Insurance
|
105,000 | 95,000 | 10,000 | 10.5 | ||||||||||||
Commissions On Insurance
|
92,102 | 90,827 | 1,275 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Trust Income
|
114,000 | 109,500 | 4,500 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial
Instrument Valuation
|
50,000 | (40,000 | ) | 90,000 | 225.0 | |||||||||||
Check Card Fee Income
|
202,392 | 165,865 | 36,527 | 22.0 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
158,613 | 208,777 | (50,164 | ) | 24.0 | |||||||||||
Total Non-Interest Income
|
$ | 1,271,294 | $ | 1,392,042 | $ | (120,748 | ) | (8.7 | )% |
Gain on sale of investments was $171,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $200,000 in the same period one year earlier. The gain resulted from the sale of seven investments during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the sale of ten securities during the same quarter of the previous year. Gain on sale of loans decreased $161,000 to $107,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $269,000 for the same period one year ago as a result of a decrease in the volume of fixed rate residential mortgage loans originated and sold. Service fees on deposit accounts decreased $23,000 to $271,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $294,000 for the same quarter in 2010.
31
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
Commissions on insurance remained relatively unchanged at $92,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $91,000 for the same quarter in 2010. Trust income was $114,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $110,000 for the comparable quarter in the previous year.
The Company recorded $50,000 in valuation income related to the mandatorily redeemable financial instrument during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $40,000 in valuation expense during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The mandatorily redeemable financial instrument is reported at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with any resulting valuation adjustments included in earnings. On April 11, 2011, the Company eliminated the mandatorily redeemable shares of the Company’s common stock as a result of an investor’s purchase of these shares in a private transaction. In connection with the purchase of these shares, the redemption feature was eliminated. As a result, the Company no longer has the liability related to these shares on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Other miscellaneous income including credit life insurance commissions, safe deposit rental income, annuity and stock brokerage commissions, and other miscellaneous fees, decreased $50,000 to $159,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $209,000 for the same period one year ago.
General And Administrative Expenses – General and administrative expenses decreased $392,000 or 7.1% to $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $5.6 million for the same period one year ago. The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of general and administrative expenses:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
Amounts
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||
Salaries And Employee Benefits
|
$ | 2,842,978 | $ | 3,006,484 | $ | (163,506 | ) | (5.4 | )% | |||||||
Occupancy
|
478,752 | 514,192 | (35,440 | ) | (6.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Advertising
|
85,680 | 120,794 | (35,114 | ) | (29.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Depreciation And Maintenance
Of Equipment
|
412,625 | 456,035 | (43,410 | ) | (9.5 | ) | ||||||||||
FDIC Insurance Premiums
|
292,205 | 312,048 | (19,843 | ) | (6.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Cost Of Operation Of Real Estate
Owned
|
36,610 | 174,071 | (137,461 | ) | (79.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of Intangibles
|
22,520 | 22,500 | 20 | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Other
|
989,154 | 946,604 | 42,550 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||
Total General And Administrative
Expenses
|
$ | 5,160,524 | $ | 5,552,728 | $ | (392,204 | ) | (7.1 | )% |
Salary and employee benefits decreased $164,000 or 5.4% to $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $3.0 million for the same period one year ago. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in the number of employees employed by the Company. At June 30, 2011, the Company had 218 full time equivalent employees compared to 229 full time equivalents at June 30, 2010.
Occupancy decreased $35,000 or 6.9% to $479,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $514,000 for the same period one year ago. In connection with the decrease in occupancy expenses, depreciation and maintenance of equipment expenses decreased $43,000 or 9.5% to $413,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $456,000 for the same period one year ago. Advertising expense decreased $35,000 or 29.1% to $86,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $121,000 for the same period one year ago. These decreases can be attributed to the Company’s effort to reduce expenses during the quarter.
Net cost of operation of real estate owned decreased $137,000 or 79.0% to $37,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $174,000 for the same period in 2010. Real estate owned decreased $780,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as the Company continues to work through these properties.
32
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
Other expenses increased $43,000 to $989,000 for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, an increase of 4.5% when compared to the same period in the prior year. Other expenses include legal fees, consultant fees, and expenses associated with loan collection and workout efforts.
Provision For Income Taxes – Provision for income taxes decreased $92,000 or 28.4% to $231,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $323,000 for the same period one year ago. Income before income taxes was $692,000 and $863,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company’s combined federal and state effective income tax rate for the current quarter was 33.4% compared to 37.3% for the same quarter one year ago.The decrease in the effective income tax rate is the result of an increase in non-taxable income resulting from the mandatorily redeemable financial instrument’s valuation income during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
33
Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Continued
Liquidity Commitments, Capital Resources, and Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
Liquidity – The Company actively analyzes and manages the Bank’s liquidity with the objective of maintaining an adequate level of liquidity and to ensure the availability of sufficient cash flows to support loan growth, fund deposit withdrawals, fund operations, and satisfy other financial commitments. See the “Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows” contained in Item 1 – Financial Statements, herein.
The primary sources of funds are customer deposits, loan repayments, loan sales, maturing investment securities, and advances from the FHLB. The sources of funds, together with retained earnings and equity, are used to make loans, acquire investment securities and other assets, and fund continuing operations. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage repayments are greatly influenced by the level of interest rates, economic conditions, and competition. Management believes that the Company’s current liquidity position and its forecasted operating results are sufficient to fund all of its existing commitments.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011 loan repayments exceeded loan disbursements resulting in a $16.7 million or 3.4% decrease in total net loans receivable. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, deposits decreased $6.2 million and FHLB advances decreased $4.8 million. The Bank had $146.1 million in additional borrowing capacity at the FHLB at June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, the Bank had $241.0 million of certificates of deposit maturing within one year. Based on previous experience, the Bank anticipates a significant portion of these certificates will be renewed.
At June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized” the Bank must maintain minimum total risk based, Tier 1 risk based and Tier 1 leverage ratios of 10%, 6% and 5%, respectively. There are no current conditions or events that management believes would change the Company’s or the Bank’s category.
Off-Balance Sheet Commitments – The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments generally include commitments to originate mortgage, commercial and consumer loans, and involve to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the borrower is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Since some commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Collateral is not required to support commitments.
The following table sets forth the length of time until maturity for unused commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit at June 30, 2011.
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Within
One
Month
|
After One
Through
Three
Months
|
After
Three
Through
Twelve
Months
|
Within
One Year
|
Greater
Than
One
Year
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Unused lines of credit
|
$ | 768 | $ | 1,798 | $ | 4,118 | $ | 6,684 | $ | 28,212 | $ | 34,896 | ||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit
|
62 | 208 | 1,292 | 1,562 | 6 | 1,568 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 830 | $ | 2,006 | $ | 5,410 | $ | 8,246 | $ | 28,218 | $ | 36,464 |
34
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The Company’s market risk arises principally from interest rate risk inherent in its lending, investment, deposit and borrowing activities. Management actively monitors and manages its interest rate risk exposure. Although the Company manages other risks such as credit quality and liquidity risk in the normal course of business, management considers interest rate risk to be its most significant market risk that could potentially have the largest material effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Other types of market risks such as foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity price do not arise in the normal course of the Company’s business activities.
The Company’s profitability is affected by fluctuations in the market interest rate. Management’s goal is to maintain a reasonable balance between exposure to interest rate fluctuations and earnings. A sudden and substantial increase or decrease in interest rates may adversely impact the Company’s earnings to the extent that the interest rates on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities do not change at the same rate, to the same extent or on the same basis. The Company monitors the impact of changes in interest rates on its net interest income using a test that measures the impact on net interest income and net portfolio value of an immediate change in interest rates in 100 basis point increments and by measuring the Bank’s interest sensitivity gap (“Gap”). Net portfolio value is defined as the net present value of assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet contracts. Gap is the amount of interest sensitive assets repricing or maturing over the next twelve months compared to the amount of interest sensitive liabilities maturing or repricing in the same time period.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Bank's interest rate spread, defined as the average yield on interest bearing assets less the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities was 3.13%. For the year ended March 31, 2011, the interest rate spread was 3.06%.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a - 15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Company’s senior management as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that at June 30, 2011 the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to affect our internal controls over financial reporting
The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and or fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
35
Part II: Other Information
Item 1 |
Legal Proceedings
|
The Company is not engaged in any legal proceedings of a material nature at the present time. From time to time, the Company is a party to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business wherein it enforces its security interest in mortgage loans it has made.
|
|
Item 1A | Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011. | |
Item 2 | Unregistered sales of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds |
None | |
Item 3 | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None | |
Item 4 | [Removed and Reserved] |
Item 5 | Other Information |
None |
36
Part II: Other Information, Continued
Item 6 Exhibits
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation, as amended (1) | |
3.2 |
Articles of Amendment, including Certificate of Designation relating to the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock Series A (2)
|
|
3.3 |
Articles of Amendment, including Certificate of Designation relating to the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock Series B (3)
|
|
3.4 | Bylaws (4) | |
4.1 | Form of Stock Certificate of the Company and other instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures (5) | |
4.2 |
Form of Stock Certificate for the Series A Preferred Shares (2)
|
|
4.3 |
Form of Stock Certificate for the Series B Preferred Shares (3)
|
|
4.4 |
Warrant to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock dated December 19, 2008 (2)
|
|
4.5 |
Letter Agreement (including Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms, attached as Exhibit A) dated December 19, 2008 between the Company and the United States Department of the Treasury (2)
|
|
4.6 |
Form of Indenture with respect to the Company’s 8.0% Convertible Senior Debentures Due 2029 (6)
|
|
4.7 |
Specimen Convertible Senior Debenture Due 2029 (6)
|
|
4.8 |
Letter Agreement dated September 29, 2010 between Security Federal Corporation and the United States Department of the Treasury, including the Exchange Agreement – Standard Terms, with respect to the exchange of the Series A Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock for the Series B Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (3)
|
|
4.9 |
Letter Agreement dated September 29, 2010 between Security Federal Corporation and the United States Department of the Treasury, including the Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms, with respect to the purchase of the Series B Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (3)
|
|
10.1 | 1993 Salary Continuation Agreements (7) | |
10.2 | Amendment One to 1993 Salary Continuation Agreements (8) | |
10.3 |
Form of 2006 Salary Continuation Agreement (9)
|
|
10.4 | 1999 Stock Option Plan (4) | |
10.5 | 2002 Stock Option Plan (10) | |
10.6 | 2006 Stock Option Plan (11) | |
10.7 |
2008 Equity Incentive Plan (12)
|
|
10.8 |
Form of incentive stock option agreement and non-qualified stock option agreement pursuant to the 2006 Stock Option Plan (11)
|
|
10.9 | 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (13) | |
10.10 | Incentive Compensation Plan (7) | |
10.11 | Form of Security Federal Bank Salary Continuation Agreement (14) | |
10.12 | Form of Security Federal Split Dollar Agreement (14) | |
10.13 | Form of Compensation Modification Agreement (2) | |
13 |
Annual Report to Stockholders
|
|
14 |
Code of Ethics (15)
|
|
21 | Subsidiaries of Registrant | |
23 | Consent of Elliott Davis, LLC | |
31.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
31.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
32 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
101 | The following materials from Security Federal Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (a) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (b) Consolidated Statements of Income; (c) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’Equity and Comprehensive Income; (d) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (e) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (16) |
(1)
|
Filed on June 26, 1998, as an exhibit to the Company’s Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(2) | Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on December 23, 2008. | |
(3) |
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 30, 2010.
|
|
(4) |
Filed on March 2, 2000, as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(5) |
Filed on August 12, 1987, as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(6) |
Filed on July 13, 2009 as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160553) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(7)
|
Filed on June 28, 1993, as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and incorporated herein by reference.
|
37
|
(8)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(9)
|
Filed on May 24, 2006 as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(10)
|
Filed on June 19, 2002, as an exhibit to the Company’s Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(11)
|
Filed on August 22, 2006, as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Statement No. 333-136813) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(12)
|
Filed on June 20, 2008, as an exhibit to the Company’s Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(13)
|
Filed on June 18, 2004, as an exhibit to the Company’s Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(14)
|
Filed on May 24, 2006 as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(15)
|
Filed on June 27, 2007, as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(16)
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
|
38
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SECURITY FEDERAL CORPORATION
|
||||
Date:
|
August 15, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Timothy W. Simmons | |
Timothy W. Simmons
|
||||
President
|
||||
Duly Authorized Representative
|
Date:
|
August 15, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/ Roy G. Lindburg | ||
Roy G. Lindburg
|
|||||
CFO
|
|||||
Duly Authorized Representative
|
39
EXHIBIT INDEX
31.1 |
Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
31.2 |
Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
32 |
Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
101 | The following materials from Security Federal Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (a) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (b) Consolidated Statements of Income; (c) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’Equity and Comprehensive Income; (d) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (e) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |