SENTIENT BRANDS HOLDINGS INC. - Annual Report: 2012 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission File Number: 333-133327
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
(Exact name of small Business Issuer as specified in its charter)
California | 20-0956471 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
organization) | |
450 National Ave | |
Mountain View, CA | 94043 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (650) 279-9954
n/a
Former address if changed since last report
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer o | Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller Reporting Company þ |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨ Yes x
No
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2012)—No sale or bid data was available as of that date.
State the number of shares outstanding of the registrant's $.001 par value common stock as of the close of business on the latest practicable date (April 11, 2013): 5,889,533
Documents incorporated by reference: None.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I | ||
3 | ||
ITEM 1. | BUSINESS | 4 |
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS | 4 |
ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS | 4 |
ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES | 4 |
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 4 |
ITEM 4. | [REMOVED AND RESERVED] | 4 |
PART II | ||
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES | 4 |
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA | 5 |
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION | 5 |
ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 8 |
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA | 8 |
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | 20 |
ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 20 |
ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION | 21 |
PART III | ||
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 21 |
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 22 |
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS | 23 |
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE | 24 |
ITEM 14 | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES | 25 |
PART IV | ||
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES | 27 |
SIGNATURES | 28 |
2 |
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”), including ”Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events and the future results of Intelligent Buying, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”) that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions about the Company’s business. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “sees,” “estimates” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 and elsewhere in this Report as well as those discussed from time to time in the Company’s other Securities and Exchange Commission filings and reports. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report. If we update or correct one or more forward-looking statements, investors and others should not conclude that we will make additional updates or corrections with respect to other forward-looking statements.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Background
Intelligent Buying, Inc. was incorporated in the State of California on March 22, 2004. On March 22, 2004, the Company issued 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (an aggregate of 20,000 shares) to its founders, Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky for a cash consideration of $200. On March 22, 2006, the Company issued 1,250,000 shares of its Preferred Stock to each of Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky (2,500,000 Preferred Shares in the aggregate) in exchange for the 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock which had been previously issued. Both prior to the exchange and at the time of the exchange, Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky owned 100% of the stock of the Company. The decision to exchange their common shares for preferred shares was intended to enable them to maintain a particular percentage holding of the Company and enable them to maintain voting control over the Company. On September 16, 2010, all 2,500,00 shares of preferred stock were converted into 5,000,000 shares of common stock. Thereafter, no shares of preferred stock remained issued and outstanding.
Our Business Generally
The Company has been engaged since 2004 in the business of asset management and sales of high-end computerized networking equipment to emerging high technology companies. Commencing in 2011, the Company began providing advertising services to promote products and services of third parties (primarily a related company, Anchorfree Wireless, Inc.) to the Company’s customer base. Under this business model, third parties pay the Company a fee to disseminate their advertising to the Company’s customer base. This has now become the principal service product provided by the Company. While the Company has not abandoned its previous business plan, it is not being actively pursued at this time.
Employees
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had three employees.
3 |
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Not required as the Company is a “smaller reporting company”.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
None.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As of December 31, 2012, the Company was not a party to any pending or threatened legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY; RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Price
In 2010, our common stock was approved by FINRA to trade on the OTCBB under the symbol “INTB” on an unpriced basis. There has never been a quotation for the stock and it has yet to actively trade. Even if the common stock were quoted, there may never be substantial activity in such market, if there is substantial activity, such activity may not be maintained, and no prediction can be made as to what prices may prevail in such market.
Holders
As of March 25, 2013, we have issued an aggregate of 5,889,533 shares of our common stock to approximately 39 stockholders of record. The issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in accordance with the exemptions from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. 389,533 shares of the Company’s common stock were registered under a registration statement on Form SB-2 which was declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on January 15, 2008.
Options and Warrants
None of the shares of our common stock are subject to outstanding options or warrants.
Status of Outstanding Common Stock
As of December 31, 2012, 5,753,333 of our 5,889,533 issued and outstanding common shares are held by “affiliates” of the Company and the remaining shares are either registered or may be transferred subject to the requirements of Rule 144. We have not agreed to register any additional outstanding shares of our common stock under the Securities Act.
Dividends
We have not paid any dividends to date, and have no plans to do so in the immediate future.
4 |
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company has never purchased nor does it own any equity securities of any other issuer.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Year Ended | 12/31/12 | 12/31/11 | 12/31/10 | |||||||||
Revenues | $ | 27,870 | $ | 42,966 | $ | 41,063 | ||||||
Net Loss | $ | (2,059 | ) | $ | (1,611 | ) | $ | (2,015 | ) | |||
Net Loss Per Share, Basic and Diluted | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | 0.00 | ) | |||
Weighted Average No. Shares, Basic and Diluted | 5,889,533 | 5,889,533 | 2,355,286 | |||||||||
Stockholders’ Deficit | $ | (685,775 | ) | $ | (683,716 | ) | $ | (682,105 | ) | |||
Total Assets | $ | 4,095 | $ | 451 | $ | 926 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | $ | 13,324 | $ | 14,317 | $ | 13,181 |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Overview
The Company has been engaged since 2004 in the business of asset management and sales of high-end computerized networking equipment to emerging high technology companies. Commencing in 2011, the Company began providing advertising services to promote products and services of third parties (primarily a related company, Anchorfree Wireless, Inc.) to the Company’s customer base. Under this business model, third parties pay the Company a fee to disseminate their advertising to the Company’s customer base. This has now become the principal service product provided by the Company. While the Company has not abandoned its previous business plan, it is not being actively pursued at this time.
Plan of Operations
a. General
The extent of our operations over the next twelve (12) months will be determined by our ability to generate advertising business and, to the extent possible, access and purchase new inventory which can be resold to third parties consistent with our historic business plan. Our business may require a continuing access to additional capital, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to access such capital on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. While we cannot predict exactly what our level of activity will be over the next 12 months, past experience leads us to believe that available capital resources will not be adequate to fund working capital requirements for the 12-month period which commenced January 1, 2013.
5 |
We will attempt to not incur any cash obligations that we cannot satisfy with known resources, which are currently very limited.
The Company does not believe that period-to-period comparisons of its operating results are necessarily meaningful nor should they be relied upon as reliable indicators of future performance, thus making it difficult to accurately forecast quarterly and annual revenues and results of operations. In addition, our operating results are likely to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and year-to-year, as a result of several factors, many of which are outside our control, and any of which could materially harm our business.
Our revenues for the foreseeable future will remain primarily dependent on our ability to generate additional advertising revenues and/or acquire inventory on a continuing basis. As aforesaid, future revenues are difficult to forecast. The Company may be unable to adjust spending quickly enough to offset any unexpected increase in demand or a reduction in revenues in a particular quarter or year, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
b. Current and Anticipated Expenses
The Company is a publicly-reporting and, as a consequence thereof, has incurred and will continue to incur additional significant expenses for legal, accounting and related services. In order to fulfill its reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, there will be ongoing expenses associated with the ongoing professional fees for accounting, legal and a host of other expenses for annual reports and proxy statements as well as ongoing costs of operations. Current monthly expenses to run the Company average approximately $5,000. Payment of future monthly expenses will be largely dependent on available cash.
d. Officers’ Compensation and Loans
Neither Mr. Malobrodsky nor Mr. Gorodyansky has received or accrued any compensation to date and has no written contract or any commitment to receive annual compensation. Messrs. Malobrodsky and Gorodyansky have agreed to forego any salary until such time as the Company has sufficient revenues therefore and/or receives sufficient outside financing.
In the past, our founders have advanced funds to the Company as required. If, and when necessary, our founders may, at their sole option, advance funds to cover additional working capital as deemed necessary. If further funds are advanced, they will be evidenced by notes and will be treated as loans to be repaid, if and when we have the financial resources to do so.
While we cannot predict exactly what our level of activity will be over the next 12 months, past experience leads us to believe that available capital resources will not be adequate to fund working capital requirements for the 12-month period which commenced January 1, 2013. We will therefore need to access additional capital through the issuance of additional equity and debt securities and other forms of outside funding, including additional loans from officers, directors and shareholders of the Company. There is no assurance can be accomplished to the necessary extent, if at all. (See "Liquidity").
Liquidity
As of December 31, 2012, we had $3,934 in cash and $161 in accounts receivable and a negative net working capital of $9,229.
From its inception, the Company has been engaged since 2004 in the business of asset management and sales of high-end computerized networking equipment to emerging high technology companies. Commencing in 2011, the Company began providing advertising services to promote products and services of third parties (primarily a related company, Anchorfree Wireless, Inc.) to the Company’s customer base. Under this business model, third parties pay the Company a fee to disseminate their advertising to the Company’s customer base. This has now become the principal service product provided by the Company. While the Company has not abandoned its previous business plan, it is not being actively pursued at this time.
6 |
The potential exists that our available capital resources may not be adequate to fund our working capital requirements based upon our present level of operations for the 12-month period subsequent to January 1, 2013. A shortage of capital would affect our ability to fund our working capital requirements. If we require additional capital, funds may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, if we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could dilute existing shareholders. If funds are not available, this could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Historically, we have depended on loans from our principal shareholders and their families and acquaintances to provide us with working capital as required. We do not have any credit facilities or other commitments for debt or equity financing. No assurance can be given that financing, when needed, will be available. To date, we have had discussions with potential sources of additional funding, however, the Company does not currently have any firm commitment with respect thereto. None of our shareholders is obligated to make any loans or advances to us and there can be no assurance that any of our shareholders will continue making loans or advances to us in the future.
To meet commitments that are greater than 12 months in the future, we will have to operate our business in such a manner as produce positive cash flow and enhance our exposure in the market. There does not currently appear to be any other viable source of long-term financing except that management may consider various sources of debt and/or equity financing if same can be obtained on terms deemed reasonable to management.
Going Concern. Our independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph to their audit issued in connection with the financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2012, relative to our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s total liabilities exceeded its total assets by $9,229. We had an accumulated deficit of $685,775 incurred through such date and recorded a loss of $2,059 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. Because our auditors have issued a going concern opinion, there is substantial uncertainty we will continue operations in which case you could lose your investment. Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an ongoing business for the next 12 months. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the uncertainty about our ability to continue our business.
Results of Operations for Comparative Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
The following table summarizes the results of operations during the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
Line Item | 12/31/12 (audited) | 12/31/11 (audited) | Increase (Decrease) | Percentage Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 27,870 | $ | 42,966 | $ | 15,096 | (35.13 | )% | ||||||||
Net loss | (2,059 | ) | (1,611 | ) | (448 | ) | (27.80 | )% | ||||||||
Expenses | 29,929 | 44,577 | 14,648 | (32.86 | )% | |||||||||||
Earnings loss per share of common stock | (0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | 0.00 | (n/a | ) |
Comparisons between Cost of Sales Selling, Administrative and General Expenses for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012 and for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2011 are as follows:
7 |
12 Months. Ended 12/31/2012 | 12 Months. Ended 12/31/2011 | |||||||
Cost of Sales | $ | 0 | $ | 22,300 | ||||
Ratio of Cost of Sales to Sales | 0 | % | 51.9 | % | ||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses | $ | 29,929 | $ | 22,277 |
We had a net loss of $2,059 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 as compared with a net loss of $1,611 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. This improvement was largely due to an increase in revenues and a small decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.
The Company’s revenues in any given period is significantly affected the demand for the advertising and other services provided by the Company and by the working capital the Company has available to it
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to an investor in our securities.
Seasonality
Our operating results are not affected by seasonality.
Inflation
Our business and operating results are not affected in any material way by inflation.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Securities and Exchange Commission issued Financial Reporting Release No. 60, "Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies" suggesting that companies provide additional disclosure and commentary on their most critical accounting policies. In Financial Reporting Release No. 60, the Securities and Exchange Commission has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of a company's financial condition and operating results, and require management to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. The nature of our business generally does not call for the preparation or use of estimates. Due to the fact that the Company does not have any operating business, we do not believe that we do not have any such critical accounting policies.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Set forth below are the audited financial statements for the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the reports thereon of Paritz & Co.
8 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX
Page Number | ||
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT | F-1 | |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: | ||
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 | F-2 | |
Statement of Operations and Accumulated Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 | F-3 | |
Statement of Stockholders' Deficiency for period the from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2012 | F-4 | |
Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 | F-5 | |
Notes to Financial Statements for period ended December 31, 2012 | F-6 to F-11 |
9 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Intelligent Buying, Inc
Mountain View, CA
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Intelligent Buying, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of operations and accumulated deficit, changes in stockholders’ (deficiency) and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Intelligent Buying, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations, its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Intelligent Buying, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred operating losses since inception and has a net capital deficit at December 31, 2012, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan in regards to these matters is also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
Paritz & Company, P.A.
Paritz & Company, P.A.
Hackensack, New Jersey
April 13, 2013
10 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 3,934 | $ | 451 | ||||
Accounts receivable | 161 | |||||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 4,095 | 451 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 4,095 | $ | 451 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 13,324 | $ | 7,359 | ||||
Due to related party | - | 6,958 | ||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 13,324 | 14,317 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Authorized – 25,000,000 shares | ||||||||
Issued and outstanding – no shares | ||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value, | ||||||||
Authorized – 50,000,000 shares | ||||||||
Issued and outstanding – 5,889,533 shares | 5,889 | 5,889 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 670,657 | 663,961 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (685,775 | ) | (683,716 | ) | ||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIENCY) | (9,229 | ) | (13,866 | ) | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY | $ | 4,095 | $ | 451 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT
YEAR THEN ENDED DECEMBER 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
REVENUES: | ||||||||
Related Party | $ | - | $ | 18,400 | ||||
Other | 27,870 | 24,566 | ||||||
TOTAL REVENUES | 27,870 | 42,966 | ||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: | ||||||||
Cost of sales | - | 22,300 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 29,929 | 22,277 | ||||||
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES | 29,929 | 44,577 | ||||||
LOSS BEFORE TAXES | (2,059 | ) | (1,611 | ) | ||||
INCOME TAXES | - | - | ||||||
NET LOSS | (2,059 | ) | (1,611 | ) | ||||
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT- BEGINNING OF PERIOD | (683,716 | ) | (682,105 | ) | ||||
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT- END OF PERIOD | $ | (685,775 | ) | $ | (683,716 | ) | ||
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | ||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING | 5,889,533 | 5,889,533 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIENCY)
Common Stock | Preferred Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | $.001 Par Value | Shares | $.001 Par Value | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2009 | 889,533 | $ | 889 | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,500 | $ | 666,461 | $ | (680,090 | ) | $ | (10,240 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Conversion of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | 5,000,000 | 5,000 | (2,500,000 | ) | (2,500 | ) | (2,500 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | (2,015 | ) | (2,015 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2010 | 5,889,533 | $ | 5,889 | — | $ | — | $ | 663,961 | $ | (682,105 | ) | $ | (12,255 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income | (1,611 | ) | (1,611 | )) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2011 | 5,889,533 | $ | 5,889 | — | $ | — | $ | 663,961 | $ | (683,716 | ) | $ | (13,866 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income | (2,059 | ) | (2,059 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholder loan contributed to capital | 6,696 | 6,696 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2012 | 5,889,533 | $ | 5,889 | — | $ | — | $ | 670,657 | $ | (685,775 | ) | $ | (9,229 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (2,059 | ) | $ | (1,611 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net | ||||||||
cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (161 | ) | - | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 5,965 | 1,136 | ||||||
Due to related party | (6,958 | ) | - | |||||
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES | (3,213 | ) | (475 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Stockholder loan contributed to capital | 6,696 | |||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES | 6,696 | - | ||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH | 3,483 | (475 | ) | |||||
CASH – BEGINNING OF PERIOD | 451 | 926 | ||||||
CASH – END OF PERIOD | $ | 3,934 | $ | 451 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012
(AUDITED)
1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Business description
The financial statements presented are those of Intelligent Buying, Inc. (the “Company”). The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of California on March 22, 2004 and is in the business of acquiring high-end computer and networking equipment from resellers and end-users and then reselling this equipment at discounted prices.
Uses of estimates in the preparation of financial statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses during each reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue on a gross basis when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been shipped or the services have been provided to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company reduces revenue for estimated customer returns, rotations and rebates when such amounts are estimable. When not estimable, The Company defers revenue until the product is sold to the end customer. The Company does not provide support on products sold unless a separate agreement for installation and setup has been entered into. The revenue from such an agreement would be reported separately as fee income if and when such services are performed, completed and accepted by the customer. Advertising revenues are recorded monthly.
Comprehensive income
SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income," establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. SFAS No. 130 requires that all items required to be recognized under accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement with the same prominence as other financial statements. Comprehensive income consists of net earnings, the net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale marketable securities, foreign currency translation adjustments, minimum pension liability adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting and is presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity in accordance with SFAS No. 130.During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company did not have any components of comprehensive income (loss) to report.
15 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012
(AUDITED)
Net loss per share
Authoritative guidance on Earnings per Share requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings or loss per share (“EPS”) for all entities with complex capital structures and requires a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation. Basic EPS excludes dilution; diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity.
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities and other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company, unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase earnings per share.
Stock-based compensation
The Company has adopted the FASB standard on Share-Based Payment, which addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The standard eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using old standards, and generally requires instead that such transactions be accounted and recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair value. The standard is effective for public companies that file as small business issuers as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. Depending upon the number of and terms for options that may be granted in future periods, the implementation of this standard could have a significant non-cash impact on results of operations in future periods
During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no stock options granted or outstanding.
Fair value of financial instruments. We value our financial assets and liabilities on a recurring basis using the fair value hierarchy established in Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, as follows:
Level 1 input, which include quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 inputs, which include observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
16 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012
(AUDITED)
Level 3 inputs, which include unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the underlying asset or liability. Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation techniques, as well as significant management judgment or estimation.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement, which amends the fair value guidance in ASC 820, thereby completing the joint project to achieve substantially converged fair value measurement and disclosure requirements for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). The new guidance changes some fair value measurement principles (such as extending the Level 1 prohibition of blockage discounts to Levels 2 and 3 in the fair value hierarchy) and expands disclosure requirements, primarily for Level 3 measurements. This update will be effective for us the first quarter of 2012, applied prospectively with no early adoption permitted. We do not anticipate the requirements of the update will have any significant impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This ASU prohibits equity statement presentation of other comprehensive income, requiring instead either a single continuous operating statement or two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income. The new guidance does not change which components of comprehensive income are recognized in net income or other comprehensive income, or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. Also, the earnings-per-share computation based on net income does not change.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, in order to redeliberate the portion of the earlier ASU relating to presentation of reclassifications from other comprehensive income. Both updates are required for us the first quarter of 2012, applied retrospectively.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, giving entities the option to determine qualitatively whether they can bypass the two-step goodwill impairment test in ASC 350-20, Intangibles, Goodwill and Other. Under the new guidance, if an entity chooses to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that it is more likely than not (more than 50% likelihood) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it would then perform Step 1 of the annual goodwill impairment test and, if necessary, proceed to Step 2. Otherwise, no further evaluation would be necessary. Each reporting period, the entity may choose which reporting units, if any, will use the qualitative assessment for goodwill impairment testing. This update will be effective for us for any 2012 goodwill impairment tests, with early adoption permitted. We do not anticipate the requirements of the update will have any significant impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows, as we currently apply the existing Step 1 test for our single-reporting unit business.
17 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012
(AUDITED)
2. INCOME TAXES
The Company recognizes deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
The Company recorded no income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2012 due to the use of available net operating loss carryforwards. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred a net loss and no tax provision was required.
Net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $686,000 at December 31, 2012 are available to offset future taxable income, if any, and expire in 2027. This results in a net deferred tax asset, assuming an effective tax rate of 34% of approximately $233,000 at December 31, 2012. A valuation allowance in the same amount has been provided to reduce the deferred tax asset, as realization of the asset is not assured.
3. STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIENCY)
Preferred stock
At December 31, 2012, the Company had no shares of its preferred stock issued and outstanding. Previously issued preferred shares were converted according to their terms into 5,000,000 shares of common stock on September 16, 2010.
Common stock
At December 31, 2012, the Company had 5,889,533 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding. These shares comprised 273,333 shares issued on March 22, 2006 in exchange for certain Notes Payable (see Note 2, above), 500,000 shares issued on April 1, 2006 in consideration for certain financial advisory services and 116,200 shares issued on March 31, 2006 in connection with a private placement of common shares. Dividends may be paid on outstanding shares of common stock as declared by the Board of Directors. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote.
18 |
INTELLIGENT BUYING, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2012
(AUDITED)
4. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:
DECEMBER 31 | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
American Express | $ | 5,412 | $ | 5,372 | ||||
Other payables | 7,912 | 1,987 | ||||||
$ | 13,324 | $ | 7,359 |
5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company sells to Anchorfree Wireless, Inc, and AFNCA, Inc., companies which are controlled by the principal shareholders of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2011, approximately 43% of revenues were generated from Anchorfree Wireless, Inc, and AFNCA. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the company had 94% of revenues generated from Anchorfree. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, Anchorfree Wireless, Inc and AFNCA, Inc was not indebted to the Company for revenues generated in the ordinary course of business.
6. GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principle, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, The Company has a negative net working capital of $9,229 as of December 31, 2012 and net loss of $2,059 and $1,611 for years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company currently has limited liquidity, and has not completed its efforts to establish a stabilized source of revenues sufficient to cover operating costs over an extended period of time.
Management anticipates that the Company will be dependent, for the near future, on additional investment capital to fund operating expenses. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in this or any of its endeavors or become financially viable and continue as a going concern.
19 |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our principal executive and principal financial officers have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. They have concluded that, based on such evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2012.
(b) Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Overview
Internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company.
Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
Management has utilized the framework set forth in the report entitled "Internal Control — Integrated Framework" published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ("COSO") of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and utilized the additional guidance contained in the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companies. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Management's Assessment
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
20 |
For the year ended December 31, 2012, our management has reassessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the lack of segregation of duties to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Exchange Act and accumulated and communicated to the Company's Management, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Remediation Plan
Given the Company’s limited financial resources and limited business activities, Company Management has determined that there is nothing that the Company can do at this time to remedy the lack of segregation of duties identified above without adding increased staff and overhead. Management is sensitive to this issue and intends to take appropriate action when the Company’s financial resources permit. In addition, Management will continue to review and make necessary changes to the overall design of our internal control environment.
(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal period to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees
The following table sets forth information with respect to our directors and executive officers. Other than these persons, there are no significant employees.
Name | Age | Position | ||
Eugene Malobrodsky | 31 | Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Director | ||
David Gorodyansky | 31 | President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Director |
David Gorodyansky. Founded Intelligent Buying Inc. in 2004. From August 2001 through May 2002, he served as a Sr. Strategy Manager with Fulcrum Management. In May 2002, he commenced the business which was the predecessor of Intelligent Buying, Inc. as a partnership with Eugene Malobrodsky. This business became Intelligent Buying, Inc. in March 2004 and he has continued as Director and President of Intelligent Buying through the present date. David is a member of the Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals and an advisor on the Technology Expert Council to Gavin Newsom, the mayor of San Francisco. He was also is the Co-Founder and currently serves as President of AnchorFree Wireless Inc., which operates Wi-Fi networks in San Francisco and Palo Alto, California.
Eugene Malobrodsky, Founded Intelligent Buying Inc. in 2004 and was active in initially funding and growth of the company. From September 2000 through August 2001, he served as Information Technology Director of Web Ever, Inc. From September 2001 through June 2002, he served as Sales Manager for Unix Surplus. In May 2002, he commenced the business which was the predecessor of Intelligent Buying, Inc. as a partnership with David Gorodyansky. This business became Intelligent Buying, Inc. in March 2004 and he has continued as Director, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Intelligent Buying through the present date. He is currently in charge of technical operations and strategy planning. He also currently serves as a Senior Vive President of AnchorFree Wireless, Inc., which operates Wi-Fi networks in San Francisco and Palo Alto, California.
21 |
Messrs. Gorodyansky and Malobrodsky currently each devote approximately five to ten hours per week to the business of Intelligent Buying, Inc.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our directors or officers.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert
We do not currently have an audit committee financial expert, nor do we have an audit committee. Our entire board of directors, which currently consists of Messrs Malobrodsky and Gordyansky, handle the functions that would otherwise be handled by an audit committee. We do not currently have the capital resources to pay director fees to a qualified independent expert who would be willing to serve on our board and who would be willing to act as an audit committee financial expert. As our business expands and as we appoint others to our board of directors we expect that we will seek a qualified independent expert to become a member of our board of directors. Before retaining any such expert our board would make a determination as to whether such person is independent.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934 requires the Company's officers and directors, and greater than 10% stockholders, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of its securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of the reports are required by SEC regulation to be furnished to the Company. Based on management's review of these reports during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, all reports required to be filed were filed on a timely basis.
Code of Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted a code of ethics that our officers, directors and any person who may perform similar functions is subject to. Currently, Messrs Malobrodsky and Gordyansky are our only officers and directors, therefore, they are the only persons subject to the Code of Ethics. If we retain additional officers in the future to act as our principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller or persons serving similar functions, they would become subject to the Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics does not indicate the consequences of a breach of the code. If there is a breach, the board of directors would review the facts and circumstances surrounding the breach and take action that it deems appropriate, which action may include dismissal of the employee who breached the code. Currently, since Messrs Malobrodsky and Gordyansky serve as the only directors and officers, they are responsible for reviewing their own conduct under the Code of Ethics and determining what action to take in the event of his own breach of the Code of Ethics.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The following table sets forth information concerning all cash and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our officers for services during the last three fiscal years in all capacities to us, our subsidiaries and predecessors. No executive officer received compensation of $100,000 or more in any of the last three fiscal years.
22 |
Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Option Awards ($) | Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Earnings ($) | Non- qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eugene Malobrodsky | 2010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEO, Secretary | 2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
And Director | 2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David Gorodyansky President, COO, CFO and | 2010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Director | 2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
None of our executive officers received any equity awards, including, options, restricted stock or other equity incentives, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
Additional Narrative Disclosures
All of our employees, including our executive officers, are employed at will and none of our employees has entered into an employment agreement with us. We do not have any bonus, deferred compensation or retirement plan.
Director Compensation
We have no standard arrangements in place to compensate our directors for their service as directors or as members of any committee of directors. In the future, if we retain non-employee directors, we may decide to compensate them for their service to us as directors and members of committees.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 26, 2013 (i) by each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of our common stock; (ii) by each of our officers and directors; and (iii) by all of our officers and directors as a group:
Title of Class | Name & Address of Beneficial Owner | Office, If Any | Amount & Nature of Beneficial Ownership1 | Percent of Class(2) | ||||||||
Common Stock $0.001 par value | Altitude Group, LLC (1) 2264 82nd Street Brooklyn, NY 11214 | 5% holder | 500,000 | 8.49 | % | |||||||
Common Stock $0.001 par value | Eugene Malobrodsky 450 National Ave Mountain View, CA 94043 | CEO, Secretary And Director | 2,500,000 | 42.45 | % | |||||||
Common Stock $0.001 par value | David Gorodyansky 450 National Ave Mountain View, CA 94043 | President, COO, CFO and Director | 2,500,000 | 42.45 | % | |||||||
Common Stock $0.001 par value | All officers and directors as a group (2 persons named above) | 5,000,000 | 84.90 | % |
23 |
(1) | Altitude Group, LLC is controlled by Michael Kreizman, M.D. |
(2) | Based on 5,889,533 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of March 26, 2013. |
Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Each of the beneficial owners listed above has direct ownership of and sole voting power and investment power with respect to the shares of our common stock. For each Beneficial Owner above, any options exercisable within 60 days have been included in the denominator.
Changes in Control
We do not currently have any arrangements which if consummated may result in a change of control of our Company.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Certain Relationships and Transactions with Related Persons
Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky, the sole officers and directors of the Company, are Senior Vice President and President, respectively, of AnchorFree Wireless, Inc., a related company. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, AnchorFree Wireless, Inc. accounted for approximately 43% and 94% of the Company’s revenues, respectively. Sophia Malobrodsky, a shareholder of the company holding approximately 4% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock is the mother of Eugene Malobrodsky, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Royce Diener, an owner of 4,000 shares of common stock of the Company is the father of the Company’s counsel, Robert L. B. Diener.
As of December 31, 2012, the Company owes approximately $6,958 to AnchorFree Wireless, Inc., a company controlled by the principal shareholders and officers of the Company. These amounts represent short-term advances in the ordinary course of business and fluctuate significantly. This amount will be used to offset future purchases by AnchorFree Wireless, Inc.
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
1. On March 22, 2004, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock to each of the Company’s founders, Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky for a cash consideration of $200. At the time, the founders became the sole shareholders of the Company.
2. During fiscal year 2004, Sophia Malobrodsky made a non-interest-bearing loan advance to the Company, payable on demand, in the amount of $38,000. On January 2, 2006. the Company agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of $38,000 for 253,333 shares of the Company’s common stock ($0.15 per share). While the Company was committed to issue these shares at January 2, 2006, these shares were not physically issued until March 22, 2006 because the Company needed to increase its authorized capital and engage a transfer agent in order to facilitate the physical issuance of the shares.
During fiscal year 2005, Ilya Perlov made a non-interest-bearing loan advance to the Company, payable on demand, in the amount of $3,000. Mr. Perlov is an employee of the Company. On January 2, 2006. the Company agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of $3,000 for 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock ($0.15 per share). While the Company was committed to issue these shares at January 2, 2006, these shares were not physically issued until March 22, 2006 because the Company needed to increase its authorized capital and engage a transfer agent in order to facilitate the physical issuance of the shares.
24 |
On January 2, 2006, Ms. Malobrodsky and Mr. Perlov made demand for repayment of these obligations. At the time, the Company did not have the funds available for such repayment and the obligations were deemed to be in default. At that time, the Company had not completed its private placement and there was no guarantee that it would be completed on a timely basis, if at all. As a result, Ms. Malobrodsky agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of the outstanding loan advance ($38,000) owed by the Company to her for 253,333 shares of common stock and Mr. Perlov agreed to exchange the outstanding balance of the outstanding loan advance ($3,000) owed by the Company to him for 20,000 shares of common stock, both at an exchange rate of one share for each $0.15 of debt. The $0.15 per share conversion price was negotiated at that time on an arms-length basis between Ms. Malobrodsky, Mr. Perlov and the Company which took into account a number of factors, including but not limited to (a) the conversion of obligations which had priority over common equity to a common equity position which is pari-passu with all other equity holders; (b) the illiquidity of the Company at the time (as of December 31, 2005, the Company only had $2,197 cash); (c) the Company believed that the obligations to Ms. Malobrodsky and Mr. Perlov needed to be eliminated in order to complete any private placement of common equity and (d) the Company knew that the prospective investors in the private placement would not permit any of the proceeds of such offering to be utilized for payments to the noteholders. While the Company was committed to issue these shares at January 2, 2006, these shares were not physically issued until March 22, 2006 because the Company needed to increase its authorized capital and engage a transfer agent in order to facilitate the physical issuance of the shares. The shares issued to Ms. Malobrodsky and Mr. Perlov were valued at $.75 per share and the accounting treatment of the exchange was to debit Notes Payable and credit Common Stock par value and Additional Paid-In Capital.
3. On April 1, 2006, the company issued 500,000 shares of common stock to Altitude Group, LLC pursuant to the terms of a Financial Services Agreement entered into by the Company on said date. The term of the Agreement is for a period commencing March 22, 2006 and ending on March 21, 2008 and may only be extended upon the mutual written agreement of the Parties. In consideration for Altitude providing the services set forth in the Agreement, the Company was obligated to issue to Altitude 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock of the Company. The Company has valued the services provided and to be provided by Altitude as $375,000 which was recorded as an expense in the Company’s quarter ended June 30, 2006. This valuation was determined in accordance with FASB 123—Accounting for Stock-based Compensation.
4. On March 22, 2006, the Company exchanged 1,250,000 shares of its preferred stock for the 10,000 shares of common stock held by each of the Company’s founders, Eugene Malobrodsky and David Gorodyansky. The 20,000 common shares exchanged by the founders were originally purchased for $200 cash.
5. On September 16, 2010, all 2,500,00 shares of preferred stock were converted into 5,000,000 shares of common stock. Thereafter, no shares of preferred stock remained issued and outstanding
Director Independence
The Board of Directors is currently composed of 2 members, Mr. Malobrodsky and Mr. Gorodyansky. None of our directors are “independent” directors, as that term is defined under the Nasdaq listing standards.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
AUDIT FEES
The aggregate fees billed by our auditors, Paritz & Co., for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and review our interim financial statements for the first, second and third quarters of 2012 will be approximately $4,500. The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 were approximately $4,500.
25 |
AUDIT-RELATED FEES
During the last two fiscal years, no fees were billed or incurred for assurance or related services by our auditors that were reasonably related to the audit or review of financial statements reported above.
TAX FEES
There were no tax preparation fees billed for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011.
ALL OTHER FEES
During the last two fiscal years, no other fees were billed or incurred for services by our auditors other than the fees noted above. Our board, acting as an audit committee, deemed the fees charged to be compatible with maintenance of the independence of our auditors.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES
We do not have a separate audit committee. Our full board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee. Before an independent auditor is engaged by us to render audit or non-audit services, our board of directors pre-approves the engagement. Board of directors pre-approval of audit and non-audit services will not be required if the engagement for the services is entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by our board of directors regarding our engagement of the independent auditor, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, our board of directors is informed of each service provided, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of our board of directors' responsibilities under the Exchange Act to our management. Our board of directors may delegate to one or more designated members of our board of directors the authority to grant pre-approvals, provided such approvals are presented to the board of directors at a subsequent meeting. If our board of directors elects to establish pre-approval policies and procedures regarding non-audit services, the board of directors must be informed of each non-audit service provided by the independent auditor. Board of directors pre-approval of non-audit services, other than review and attest services, also will not be required if such services fall within available exceptions established by the SEC. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, 100% of audit-related services, tax services and other services performed by our independent auditors were pre-approved by our board of directors.
Our board has considered whether the services described above under the caption "All Other Fees", which are currently none, is compatible with maintaining the auditor's independence.
The board approved all fees described above.
26 |
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as part of this 10-K:
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following documents are filed in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K:
· | Report of Paritz & Co., Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm |
· | Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 |
· | Statements of Operations and Accumulated Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 |
· | Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency for the period from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2012 |
· | Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 |
· | Notes to Financial Statements |
2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
All financial statement schedules have been omitted as they are not required, not applicable, or the required information is otherwise included.
3. EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed below are filed as part of or incorporated by reference in this report.
Exhibit No. Identification of Exhibit
31.1. Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2. Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
27 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Intelligent Buying, Inc. | ||
(Registrant) | ||
By | ||
/s/ Eugene Malobrodsky | ||
Eugene Malobrodsky | ||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date | ||
April 13, 2013 | ||
By | ||
/s/ Eugene Malobrodsky | ||
David Gorodyansky | ||
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer | ||
Date | ||
April 13, 2013 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the date indicated.
By | ||
/s/ Eugene Malobrodsky | ||
Eugene Malobrodsky | ||
Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||
Date | ||
April 13, 2013 | ||
By | ||
/s/ David Gorodyansky | ||
David Gorodyansky | ||
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director | ||
Date | ||
April 13, 2013 |
28 |